All Episodes
Previous Next
May 31, 2023 - Viva & Barnes
01:32:35
Blue Jays Player Apologizes; Tara Reade Goes to Russia; AOC Goes Nuts! And More! Viva Frei Live!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Look in the eyes.
Look in the eyes.
We have one planet, Mr. Speaker.
It is my home.
It is yours.
I will not stand idly by and watch it burn.
Can you imagine...
Let me toss this.
The eyes.
First of all, he looks like the brother from Step Brothers, not Will Ferrell's brother.
He looks like John C. Reilly's brother from Step Brothers.
That's a compliment, actually.
You know what?
Before I even go on, let me just make sure audio is good.
I'm in a very, very temporary studio that I don't like, but I might be here all summer.
Is the audio good?
Before I go on with my rant people.
Before I even go on, I'm going to make sure that we're good on Locals, good on Rumble.
Oh, son of a bee sting.
What the heck is going on here?
Refresh this.
Okay, we're live on Rumble.
That's good.
Go to Locals.
We're good on Locals.
All right.
I forgot to warn you about gag reflexes.
I was going to start with Justin Trudeau today, but I said, no, forget it.
I'm going to start with what's going on in Nova Scotia because in as politically outrageous as it is and politically atrocious as it is, it's a very, very serious thing.
I got a buddy, an internet buddy who I've met who's been on the channel, Chet Chisholm.
Who's out in Nova Scotia, sensitizing me to how serious what's going on is, in fact, in Nova Scotia, although anybody paying attention probably already knows this.
If you don't know, forest fires, out of control, a number of them in Nova Scotia, the worst in decades.
This is Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, Sean Fraser, Liberal MP.
Never let a good crisis go to waste, people.
And we're going to get into it in a second.
He's coming to Parliament from Nova Scotia.
And this is what he has to say about it.
where our communities are literally on fire.
They are?
Thousands upon thousands of families have been displaced from their homes.
They have?
Hundreds are watching as their homes maybe turn into ashes.
Hurricane Fiona.
Hurricane Fiona.
Displacing not just homes, but sweeping people out to sea.
Damaging communities beyond measure, and people had to fundraise for money to...
Recoup, rebuild from that, while Canada fires unvaccinated firefighters, healthcare workers, and others, ships billions of dollars out to fund foreign conflict.
And yeah, and when we have a crisis here, our government is barely able to deal with it.
In some instances.
Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives are peddling policies that they know will increase the level of pollution that is causing these severe weather events.
The level of pollution.
That will increase these severe weather events.
Can you imagine the audacity, the intellectual ignorance and naivety it takes to say, there was a hurricane last year, it was a bad one.
Humans did that.
The amazing thing is, I was listening to a podcast as I drove back to Canada from Florida, Long Bloody Drive, The Fall of the Roman Empire by Nick Holmes.
I'm going to get into it in a bit.
One of the amazing hypotheses that Nick Holmes explored In one of the chapters to account for the fall of the Roman Empire was climate change, or at least shifting climates in 300 AD, before the Industrial Revolution.
You know, there might have been natural factors at play that accounted for more or less rainfall in certain parts of the world, which might have accounted for hardships, flooding, droughts back 300 AD.
You know, try to loosely tie it to deforestation, but quite clearly, you know.
Not easily attributable events back, you know, 300 AD to man-caused climate change.
This guy here is now talking about climate change causing the hurricane.
Climate change causing the forest fires.
I had to pull it up because I wasn't sure.
Let me get the graph because someone had tweeted something very interesting.
It was in response to a tweet talking about...
You know what?
I'll just go here.
I'll bring up my Twitter feed.
It was in response to what's causing these wildfires.
Someone says...
Someone posted a graph.
Look at this.
In response to this very same speech, Mr. Surveillance, what a disgrace that politicians who give themselves the power to censor misinformation are the ones dishing it out.
Sean Fraser's own government data shows Canadian wildfires have both decreased in numbers and intensity over the past half century.
Details, Mr. Surveillance.
I don't know if this graph is true, accurate, and I'm reluctant to trust screen grabs from the interwebs.
But look at 2020.
How...
The 2020 wildfires are virtually nil.
It's a very interesting observation.
Someone else astutely pointed out, why was 2020 such a low outlier?
Oh yeah, people were in lockdowns, which got me looking.
What typically are the causes of most wildfires?
Well, in the States, and I suspect it's roughly the same in Canada.
Nearly 85% of wildland fires in the United States are caused by humans.
Now, this is a very inconvenient fact that people are going to have to work their way around or intellectualize their way out of.
And I can steal, man, how they're going to do that.
Sure, we've always had problems in wildfires.
85% of them are caused by humans.
But now they're so much worse when humans cause them because of climate change.
That's going to be the argument.
How are you going to disprove that?
Well, you might have to show graphs showing that wildfires have decreased both in number and intensity over the last little while.
You might.
Or there might simply be no way of doing it.
There might simply be no way of walking out of the foregone conclusion that CO2 emissions, carbon emissions, are leading to hurricanes in Nova Scotia and Florida, wildfires in California and Nova Scotia.
You know what might also have something to do with it?
I'm still waiting for an answer from Fraser, but I doubt I'll get it.
Did Nova Scotia fire any unvaccinated firefighters?
I am wondering.
I don't know that it's a cause or an exacerbating factor to all of this, but are they having a shortage of firefighters?
I know British Columbia fired unvaccinated firefighters.
I know British Columbia did it.
I suspect it was the same in Nova Scotia because they went hog wild on terminating unvaccinated federal employees as well.
It's an amazing thing.
It's an amazing thing how...
It's called fractal wrongness.
Everything that someone does at every step of the way is the wrong thing.
To combat a virus, lockdowns, maritime bubbles, restrictions on interprovincial travel among citizens, as though that's how you can combat a virus.
Curfews, even though there's no science to support curfews to combat a virus.
Then you fire the unvaccinated healthcare workers.
And then you say, holy crap, we've got a big problem now.
We don't have enough healthcare workers.
We better curfew lockdown more because our hospitals are overrun because we fired all of the unvaccinated healthcare workers in the face of a jibby jab that we now know does not prevent contracting, transmitting the virus, has a 3 in 10,000 risk of adverse events by the Canadians' own statistics.
Nova Scotia.
Actually, it was an article out of Nova Scotia.
Article out of Nova Scotia when they said...
Have an adverse reaction from the jab?
Don't worry, people.
We got your ambulance fee covered.
Let me just get my camera.
You have to be rushed to the hospital because you have an adverse reaction.
Don't worry.
We'll cover your ambulance fee.
That's how generous we are.
Fire unvaccinated healthcare workers, fire unvaccinated firefighters.
By the way, these fires that are burning out of control in Nova Scotia, a number of them have, in fact, already been attributed to arson or man-made firefighting, fire starting.
Whether or not it's arson, we'll find out in due time.
Oh, yeah, by the way, that guy that's, you know, immediately attributing the hurricane of last year, the forest fires, now climate change.
Everybody know who Sean Fraser is?
Oh no, you don't.
Do the exercise, people.
Do the exercise.
Google the name and WEF and see what comes up.
Now, full disclosure, everybody, we've talked about this a number of times.
It's not because someone has a bio on the landing page of the WEF that it shows any affiliation with the WEF.
Some landing pages are just the picture and the name.
Others, like Chrystia Freeland, show how she is on the board of trustees of the WEF.
This is...
Sean Fraser's bio on the WEF.
Take it for what it's worth.
Maybe he doesn't want this up there.
He has nothing to do with the WEF.
He's fighting tooth and nail to make them take down his very, very well-drafted bio.
Sean Simon Andrew Fraser is Canada's Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, and has served as the Member of Parliament for Central Nova Scotia since 2015.
As Canada's Minister of Immigration, he is currently leading Canada's efforts to boost immigration levels, to help drive the post-pandemic economic recovery, and he is responsible for the federal government's initiatives that offer safe haven to displaced persons fleeing Afghanistan and Ukraine.
His previous work as the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister included contributions to the Government of Canada's economic response to COVID-19, during which time he served as a primary spokesperson for the federal government in Parliament on fiscal and economic matters.
He also helped inform the federal government's environmental policy during his term as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change.
All right.
Simon Fraser has a very, very wonderful, eloquent bio on the WEF.
Getting up in Parliament of Canada, immediately attributing the wildfires in Nova Scotia to climate change, the hurricane from last year to climate change, while they are now implementing some sort of lockdown in Nova Scotia where, I don't know if you know this, let me see if I can pull up an article.
People are no longer allowed going out into the woods.
They're not allowed fishing.
They're not allowed camping outside.
They're not allowed going on the hiking trails.
All of Nova Scotia's natural resources.
Are now shut down to the public.
I brought this up.
It's a CBC article.
Cripe almighty, I didn't bring it up.
Well, you'll just have to take my word for it.
No, don't take my word for it.
Let's pull it up.
Nova Scotia has now implemented basically a ban on going outside to enjoy the wildlife.
Nova Scotia wildfires, CBC prohibition.
Hold on.
There we go.
I'm a little on the fence about this, but we've talked about climate lockdowns.
Nova Scotia implements province-wide ban on travel activity in woods due to wildfires.
Growing Shelburne County fires prompted evacuation of more than 1,000 homes.
The Nova Scotia government has implemented a province-wide ban on all activity and travel within the province's woods as crews continue to battle multiple fires.
I'm on the fence about this because I do appreciate that it's a natural disaster right now that requires coordination and emergency responses to various areas.
I'm also on the fence about this because we talked about the incoming climate change lockdowns, climate crisis bans on travel, and we're seeing it now in real time.
The only question is going to be whether or not a province-wide ban on any travel into the woodlands is justified given the current wildfires.
And we're seeing it in real time, in real life.
Everything the government has done has contributed to this.
Everything they've done along the way has been a contributing factor to exacerbating this problem.
And now what are they doing?
Lockdowns.
Can't go out into the woods.
And I appreciate you have to have firefighters who have to be able to get to the fires.
You have planes coming, dumping stuff, picking up water from lakes.
I'm not sure under this circumstance that I've taken a hard position one way or the other.
But the warnings were there three years ago, and the reality is occurring now.
This is basically a climate change, climate crisis lockdown.
It might be a state of emergency lockdown, which there have been and will continue to be, and nobody can really complain about those or deny the necessity.
It might also just be a political scoring points opportunity.
It might just be the time to say, hey, look, people, this is what we can do now.
And so if we say that there's a...
Smog, crisis, lockdown, don't go out of your houses.
It might be purely punitive.
Don't go along with our climate change.
We have the ability to lock you down.
One thing is for certain, however, the forest fires that are burning out of control.
There are rumorings, and there are a little bit more than rumorings, that some of them are arson-related, or at the very least, man-caused, human-caused.
The WEF man, who may or may not have anything to do with the WEF, despite his very eloquent bio on the website.
Immediately jumping on this, politicizing it, using it to rail against the conservatives for not implementing policy change that's going to stop these forest fires, stop these hurricanes.
And yes, people, I appreciate the potential accusation of hashtag confession to projection, that I am now taking their politicization and politicizing it to criticize the liberals.
Here's the difference.
There's a difference between politicizing a natural event or a crisis and politicizing the politicizing to that natural event or that crisis.
That's the difference.
If I want to justify my own behavior to myself.
Okay, people, that's what's going on in Canada, at least for now.
I'm going to get into a few more things as we get along here.
Just make sure that everything is going along smooth here.
I feel naked.
I feel out of place.
I feel out of my beautiful studio office.
I'm like going old school.
Who remembers The Amazing Lucas back in the olden days when The Amazing Lucas used to be up against a white backdrop?
The only thing I don't like about this is that there's a sharp headlight coming down that's highlighting the bulbousness and the shininess of my forehead and my nose, if we're being honest here.
Okay.
Good morning.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon, Canada.
Good morning, West Coast.
Good evening.
England.
Before I get into, we got so much.
First of all, I am going to give, whether he wanted it or not, I'm going to give Nick Holtz, the author of the podcast series, I listened to about eight hours of this yesterday, The Fall of the Roman Empire, because I was trying to genuinely and truly appreciate the similarities between what has historically been described as, sorry, what has historically been described as the similarities between What we're seeing in the West now and how the Roman Empire came to an end.
And I had to understand it.
And lucky me, I had a 24-hour drive from Florida to Montreal.
Not so lucky for my kid who's sitting in the back.
He's smarter, whether or not he appreciates it.
He was listening to it in his sleep.
I listened to it.
I'm going to talk about that in a second.
Before that, you may have noticed this stream had a nice little box in the corner.
It says, this video contains a paid promotion.
Because it does.
Now, actually, before I even get into the paid promotion, let's just see.
This is going to be public consensus.
I have been using this product on my face not because I care about my physical appearance, period.
I do not care about my physical appearance.
I care about what my body looks like, but that's not because I like looking good without a shirt.
It's because I like being healthy, and a surefire way to have a good indication that you're healthy is to have muscles, is to be fit, etc., etc.
I don't care about what my face looks like.
I care about my hair, but that's a different story.
Now, I'm asking you this because I've been using the product.
And remember at one point I said, do you see bags under my eyes?
Do the bags under my eyes look better, worse, or the same?
That's the question.
And while you all hypothesize on the answer, I'm going to bring up today's sponsor.
I don't care what I look like, but I know that some people do.
I mean, makeup and skincare product industry is a big industry for a reason.
People like looking good.
People like looking young.
I don't care.
You know, the wrinkle in my forehead is a wrinkle, a grimace of reality, as I like to say it.
But people care about what they look like.
Some people actually have facial work done.
They do things to their faces.
They travel to far-off countries to have work done.
They inject toxins into their face to smooth out the wrinkles.
I wouldn't do it.
I won't do it.
I don't judge the people who do it, but I don't understand that level of vanity, I guess.
But some people like looking young, smooth-faced, just as long as you don't end up looking like the Hollywood actresses and actors who have mangled their faces irreparably.
Simon Cowell, Madonna, just to name some where they've done the work and it doesn't look right at the end of the day.
And then, you know, it's not a...
Okay, whatever.
Genucel, by the way, this is...
So I've been using that retinol stuff under the skin.
Dr. Drew recommends it, sponsors it as well.
And when he did, it's like, okay, I'm going to use it.
I'll see what happens.
If my face looks better, now you know why.
If it doesn't, now you know why.
I think it does, though.
What I love about this company is I spent some time on the phone again with the company before agreeing to sponsor it and before allowing them to sponsor the channel.
The story of the company is amazing.
An Egyptian pharmacist comes to America, I think it was New Jersey, opens up his pharmacy, makes his own skin products, his own proprietary blend, however it works, and then gives it out to a few clients.
And then a few clients say, this is amazing stuff.
They turn into more clients.
And lo and behold, a business is born out of a product that works so well, people literally came to him and said, we need more of this.
Give us your proprietary blend of skin smoothing products.
I'll read a real review because they've asked me to read a real review.
I absolutely love Janice.
My skin feels so good.
Tighter.
Younger with a more even tone.
And I only used it for a week.
My advice for everyone?
Take a picture before.
Well, my face is on the internet.
The product is amazing.
It's an American product.
Made in America.
They sponsor the New Jersey Devils.
And people love it.
People vouch for it.
I've put it on not because I care to see the results.
But I'm curious to see the results.
If you go to Genyacel.com, promo code Viva, you'll get 70% off the most popular package, which is the one you're looking at right there.
And it's good stuff.
That is all.
Genyacel.com, promo code Viva.
Look at my face.
Little Florida sun also does wonders.
Looking tight, Viva.
I do the push-ups.
A, so that I can defend myself, and B, so that I can run real fast, which is a form of defense, and C, if I don't exercise, I go crazy.
Okay, so that's it.
We're going to go to Rumble in a few minutes.
Jen, yourself, thank you.
Let me put out the Rumble link right here, and then we're going to get into a couple of subjects.
We're going to talk about the fall of the Roman Empire.
I am not a professor.
I have no expertise.
I say that I have a kindergarten-level understanding.
I say that...
After having listened to eight and a half hours of podcasts about the fall of the Roman Empire, episode by episode.
Now, full disclosure.
When I started this podcast, I thought there was only one.
And I listened to it.
I'm not really paying much attention to what I'm looking at.
I play the podcast and I'm driving.
I was like, oh, great.
And it ends.
I was like, what the heck?
And then I look.
Oh, oh, hold on.
Ten more episodes.
No, there's not 17 episodes.
There are 62 episodes.
Nick Holmes doesn't just break down the fall of the Roman Empire.
He dissects it down to the plank level.
If anybody doesn't know what the plank level is, plank is the smallest size material on earth.
He breaks it down to a level of detail that I did not need to know and that if I retain 10% of it, I will consider myself lucky.
I'm driving from Florida to Canada.
For the summer.
See my family.
See my mother-in-law.
My parents.
They also look good.
They look good because they look younger than they did the last time I saw them.
Despite being too old.
You can't.
They're too old.
So I'm listening to The Fall of the Roman Empire.
And my bottom line takeaways from it are this.
First of all, everybody should listen to it if you...
It's a masterclass in the history of the Roman Empire.
Excuse me.
I think some elements of it might be controversial.
In as much as there can be controversial takes on The Fall of the Roman Empire.
What's amazing about the fall of the Roman Empire?
Observations from Nick Holmes is that we refer to or generally perceive the Roman Republic to have been a republic.
And one of Nick Holmes' hypotheses is that the Roman Republic was never really a true republic.
In that, you know, the senators, people would vote on their senators, but they would be basically handpicked.
The amount of people who could vote...
Back in the day, it amounts to a small percentage of the population.
So you have a small percentage of the population voting on people who are handpicked by the oligarchy of sorts.
So you're voting on the handpicked candidates.
It looks like democracy.
It looks like a republic, but it might have been more of an oligarchy.
It was very interesting because I saw a similarity there.
What ended up being the fall of the Roman Empire?
Internal fighting.
Expanding too far.
They're conquering too much.
And in the age of the conquest, when they were going out conquering the entire world, the revenues were magnificent.
They would go conquer land and plunder it, pillage it, you know, take all the gold, take all the resources.
So they had amazing income for the longest period of time.
And then at some point in time, once you've conquered the world, the income decreases and you have to start taxing a lot.
And some people don't like taxes.
And some people don't want to pay taxes to a centralized, far-off government.
Then you expand too much.
You have no new income coming in from conquering new lands, conquest, but you have to pay a military.
And if you don't pay the military, the military doesn't act quite as loyal.
You don't necessarily have the forces to protect what you've already conquered.
There was more.
When the training of the military becomes secondary.
When other issues become more important than performance of the military, well, then you start losing battles to people that you shouldn't be losing battles to, to nations that you shouldn't be losing battles to.
Expand too much, revenue not coming in, taxing too much, untrained military or poorly trained military.
Then you start hiring mercenaries.
And there's very, very, very stark similarities between the rise and fall of the Roman Empire and what we see going on.
In the West right now.
I didn't really sense as much of the ideological stuff as I was looking for in Nick's breakdown.
But it was fascinating to listen to.
Hopefully I can get...
Did I have my camera moving again?
It's not.
Hopefully I can get Nick on so that I can flesh out some of my basic understandings of the similarities, but fascinating.
Oh yeah, and crossing the Rubicon.
Does everybody understand the origins of that expression?
Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon River.
It was to conquer some, I don't know, I forget who it was exactly, but to conquer or to fight with that with which, oh, I'm going to be so ignorant because I forgot who they were fighting or who he was going to conquer, was never supposed to cross the Rubicon.
It said you will all be basically damned to hell if you cross the Rubicon.
So the Rubicon, crossing the Rubicon River became known for crossing a step that you can never come back on, performing an irreversible action.
What did I find was crossing the Rubicon in modern times?
The two bullshit impeachments of Donald Trump.
The Russiagate hoax was another Rubicon that was crossed.
Once you cross that Rubicon, I don't know that there's a coming back from that.
I dare say the January 6th Fed Surrection is another Rubicon river that has been crossed.
Once you understand crossing the Rubicon, the origins of the expression, I'll never look at a Jeep Rubicon again the same way, but things make a lot more sense.
Okay.
25 minutes in, I haven't even gotten to the stories yet.
So, Nova Scotia is burning.
Liberal politicians exploiting it.
And most wildfires, 85% caused by humans.
Whether or not they're exacerbated by climate change, that argument will be made.
Whether or not they're exacerbated by human activity, not proper deforesting.
Not clearing up after hurricanes of last year might be an interesting...
With the hurricane of Nova Scotia of last year, there might have been a lot of dead wood that had fallen on the ground that might exacerbate this fire that might have been started by humans.
Yeah, that's it.
Okay, do we want to start...
Do we want to start...
We'll do one story here before we move on over to Rumble, and then before we move on over to Locals Exclusively.
I wanted to bring up this article here.
This article is going to blow your mind.
This is a controversial topic, people.
Because the media has already said that this idea of the Great Reset is a racist, white nationalist, far-right extremist notion that has been invoked by people to carry out egregious acts of violence.
The Buffalo shooter apparently in his manifesto talked about this thing called the Great Replacement.
The idea, as the media depicts it, of the Great Replacement is a political move to replace white America, white Westerners, with non-white Westerners.
And so it has led, allegedly, some people to commit horrendous acts of violence in protest.
It's in their manifestos.
And the media says this theory is a conspiracy theory.
That's how the media demonizes it so that no discussion can be had about what is not a conspiracy theory, but what is actual policy, at least in Canada.
And the caveat to it is that it's not based in race.
That much I agree with.
The idea of the media depicting it as a racist theory is the straw man sort of red herring to demonize people, Out of talking about it.
It isn't a racist theory.
It's a political theory.
And I'll go one step further and say it's not a political theory.
It's a political strategy.
And in case you had any doubts, I stumbled across this today on Twitter.
Twitter.
It's a two-day-old article.
This is from the Globe and Mail.
We're going to read this, and then we're going to understand what it says and the true consequences of what is being put forward in this article.
The Globe and Mail.
Canada on track for 100 million population, but public support can't be taken for granted.
Century Initiative CEO.
What do we have here?
In the title, you have persuasion that the majority of Canadians are already on board with, happy with, support the idea of the country more than doubling in population in what period of time?
By the turn of the century.
Canada right now has 35, 36 million people living in it.
This article is putting forward the policy through which Canada's population will more than double in 77 years.
We're going to reach, apparently, more than 100 million in Canada by the year 2100.
How?
Not through childbirth.
Not through natural growth.
And you're going to see why in a second.
But just understand that the header of this article is persuading people into believing that the majority of Canadians are okay with the idea of the population of the country more than doubling by the turn of the century.
And when you find out how this population is going to more than double, they still want you to believe Canadians are okay with it so that you are lulled into supporting it because, after all, most Canadians support it.
The chief executive...
I have to look this company up after we do this.
What population, what nation historically took in large amounts of people and subsequently fell?
I forgot to mention that part of the fall of the Roman Empire was allowing, I think they called them Goths, Vandals, allowing Goths and Vandals, it might have been more the Goths, to join the Roman Empire but not pledge a sort of allegiance to it.
Come in and live in the country without actually being Roman.
And then what happened?
The sacking of Rome.
Not twice, I think, but three times?
At least twice.
More than double the population within 75 years.
But Lisa Lalonde warned that existing high levels of public support for increasing immigration cannot be taken for granted.
That's a loaded observation right there.
Warned that the existing high levels of public support?
If public opinion shifts on immigration, policy will shift, and ultimately that will be detrimental to the future of the country.
Oh, okay.
The Century Initiative, a non-profit lobby group.
Wants to see Canada's population grow from 39.5 million to 100 million by 2100.
Ms. Lalonde says the investment is needed to address problems such as...
Ms. Lalonde says more investment is needed to address problems such as housing shortages so Canada grows well and can accommodate more people.
Canada is currently euthanizing record numbers of Canadians because they can't accommodate the population they already have.
Where do you think this money comes from?
Canada can barely take care of Nova Scotia as it currently stands.
It can barely take care of the hurricane from last year.
It can barely take care of its existing healthcare system.
You know what would be really good for the healthcare system?
Double the population in 75 years.
Current levels of high immigration and government policy decisions, such as making it easier for foreign students to get permanent residence, are putting Canada on track for the first time to meet or even surpass its target.
Okay.
Listen to this.
This statistic is going to blow your mind.
Canada has...
Canada had record population growth of 700,000 people in 2021 to 2022, with immigration accounting for 94%.
Do you remember when the statistics were coming out and saying immigration out of Canada was at the 25-year high?
That was 2022, 2021, 2022.
And yet Justin Trudeau and the Liberals were saying Canada is flourishing.
Canada is doing so well, record numbers of people are emigrating, moving to Canada.
Population growth is skyrocketing.
I'm going to bring down the article.
There's a way where both of those statements can be true at the same time.
It's just that one happens to result in the destruction of Canada as it currently stands.
Immigration out of Canada is at a quarter of a century high if it hasn't gotten worse in the last year.
How does the population continue to grow then?
Well, the population grew nearly a million.
Let's just say 750,000.
94% of that is immigration.
So while Canada, for whatever the reason, Has decided to be a parasite of sorts off political discourse in the USA as it relates to Dobbs and abortion and all that stuff.
While Canada has decided to import that debate which doesn't exist in Canada.
Make abortion a political litmus test.
Even though Canada is the only nation in the world with absolutely no criminal prohibitions on abortion.
Apparently, despite having no criminal prohibitions on abortion in Canada, it's still not accessible enough.
Justin Trudeau and his liberals have to import the abortion debate from the United States and make it a Canadian political issue.
So while they promote abortion, while they massively increase euthanasia of Canadians, expand it to the mentally ill, want to expand it to minors, expand it to people who are not critically ill, while polls show that Canadians support euthanasia, if homelessness and poverty are the motivating factors, why isn't the population growing?
Jeez, it's a conundrum wrapped in an enigma, wrapped in a paradox.
Why isn't the population growing when all that our government does is promote policies of death?
And whether or not you believe in abortion as a policy for a certain window of period of time, it's important to understand what it is.
People call it reproductive rights.
Even if you support the idea of abortion, even if you're not morally in support of it, but you believe it's like one of those ugly evils that you have to tolerate, but only for a limited window.
Opportunity period of time.
Call it what it is.
Promoting abortion.
Promoting euthanasia.
And the population doesn't grow.
What's the best way to counter that?
Massive immigration.
So much that 94% of the record growth comes from immigration.
Do you know what happens if a population doubles within 75 years due to immigration?
You don't have a country anymore.
And it's not a question of...
Anti-immigration.
Immigration has always been, for the West, the traditional method of growth.
The West has always been a place for immigrants to come seeking a better life.
At some point, however, just to go back to the analogy, if Justin Trudeau wants to be the bon père de famille, the good father, if you can't take care of your existing children, it's reckless to have more.
For people who say that the great replacement theory is a racist theory, okay, take out the word great.
It's not about replacing white Westerners.
It's just a question of politically replacing them.
What better way to survive terrible policy?
What better way to get re-elected through policy that current citizens don't support because it's not in their best interest because you're not actually looking after them.
You're looking after a potential future generation.
What better way...
To get the population to swallow the unswallowable than by just replacing their vote, diluting their vote, importing political support.
I agree.
The replacement theory could be racist if one were to think it was racially targeted.
The only thing is, it's racist to even think that.
Because there are white, black, Chinese, Asian, Native Canadians.
There are white, black, Chinese...
Americans.
There are Americans of all races, crees, religions, gender, sexual orientations, whatever.
Importing and doubling a population to dilute the citizens' vote currently affects everybody, not just one race.
But to say that the replacement theory is a conspiracy theory, that article is detailing it as policy.
It's not conspiracy theory.
It is political strategy.
It's political strategy, and they're telling it to you to your face.
94% of the record growth for 2021-2022 is immigration.
That just means you've opened up your borders to offset the fact that the tax-paying citizens of the country are leaving in droves.
And it's a way to fabricate success out of failure.
I just, I found it shocking.
And then when I was, you know, I was looking up articles on The Great Replacement, which people said was conspiracy theory, and all the articles that I do see, ADL, was it the ACLU, Wikipedia, referring to the Buffalo shooter, The Great Replacement as a racist conspiracy theory, alt-right, far-right, white nationalist conspiracy theory.
Yeah, if you decide to view what this policy entails as racially motivated, I can see how someone would think it's racially motivated, but it's not.
It's politically motivated.
Because if you can't earn your votes locally, import your support through immigration.
All righty, let's see here.
Ned Toons Rock says, Blue Jays can't win a game with balls.
How are they going to...
All right.
That's the intro, people.
Let's go over to Rumble.
And we're going to talk about the...
I love Big Brother.
Just got an article.
Not an article.
I just got an email.
I have to shut down my email because I get emails while I'm streaming and they distract me.
Okay, everybody, head on over to Rumble.
Have I forgotten it?
We're going to take this party.
Over to Rumble.
Over to Locals.
Locals looks good.
Good.
Okay.
So that's it, by the way.
Don't call it the Great Replacement.
It's just political replacement.
Although it is quite ironic you have the Great Reset.
The Great Replacement.
The Great Reset conspiracy theory doesn't exist.
Oh, wait a minute.
I'm sorry.
There's a website.
They have a PowerPoint presentation at the World Economic Forum.
I mean, once upon a time, the World Economic Forum was conspiracy theory.
You got your Great Replacements.
You got your Great Reset.
And they're racist conspiracy theories.
Except, yeah, you got that 2030 agenda at the WEF.
Yeah, you got it.
Except they want to double the population of Canada through immigration within 75 years.
Can you imagine that?
60 million new arrivals.
Not natural population growth.
What can that do to the fabric of a society?
I guess we'll see.
All right.
Ending on YouTube.
And we're going to go over to Rumble.
Viva la Rumble.
What am I doing?
Don't open the window.
Close the window.
Okay.
Ending on YouTube now.
Three, two, one.
Peace out, Pete.
See you on YouTube.
On Rumble.
Okay.
Oh, I should have read the...
Sorry, I should have read the Super Chat.
So I didn't give my standard disclaimer.
Super Chats.
The King 1300.
Blue Jays more concerned about LGBT rights than fielding a good team.
They've been trashed this year.
Politics ruins everything.
Sports, music, science, arts.
Thank you for the Super Chat.
The King 1300.
Seize the day.
Viva, you on who list of misinformation journalists?
Hold on.
Let's go see this in real time, Seize the Day.
And Summer...
Oh, that's not Summer.
Sniper Sight 00. Caesar did nothing wrong.
Proved me wrong.
All right.
Thank you for those super chats.
Let me see if I have any rumble rants.
There's one.
I'm going to get to it in a second.
YouTube takes 30% of those things.
Sorry, I forgot to mention them and read them earlier.
No medical advice.
No election fornication advice.
Certainly no legal advice.
Because I am not a practicing attorney anymore.
And we got this.
Finboy Slick.
Nice to see, again, your handsomeness makes up for the blandness of the Studio Viva.
The only improvement would be a mullet.
God, I've been listening to Samson, the rapper, and his mullet.
I'm thinking, I'll put up, someone actually sent me, like, what are those things called?
A flag, and it's beautiful.
But I think, I'll try it.
I had to set up real quick because I got in late last night.
I had to find an adequate room with adequate lighting.
I'm going to get floodlights, but I had to set myself up in front of a window so I could get decent daylighting.
And thank you for the kind words.
I do not care about what I look like.
I say that, but maybe, I don't know.
Okay, all right, all right.
Now, speaking of the Blue Jays, people, speaking of the Blue Jays, I think when we tell this story, we have to go in an order that highlights the absurdity of it.
So what we're going to have to do, I think we're going to have to read...
We're going to have to read the article just to get the context.
Because it's amazing, actually.
This is where we're from.
Theathletic.com.
Blue Jays' Anthony Bass, or Anthony Bass, I don't know which it is.
I'll go with Bass because I like fishing.
Apologizes for sharing anti-LGBTQ plus social media.
First of all, I'm going to say this.
We're going to play by the rules here.
The Atlantic should be cancelled.
All right?
The Atlantic should be canceled because according to Justin Trudeau, it is now the 2SLGBTQIA+.
And it is wildly intolerant, insensitive, and discriminatory for TheAthletic.com to not include and give the proper acronym 2SLGBTQIA+.
2SLGBTQIA+.
Shame on them.
Hashtag cancel The Atlantic.
I'm joking, but am I?
Blue Jays' Anthony Bass apologizes for sharing anti-LGBTQ + social media posts.
Okay.
It's a foregone conclusion that what he shared was an anti-LGBTQ + social media post.
It sounds like he shared...
Ah, whatever.
Okay.
It's a foregone conclusion.
Whatever it was, it was anti-LGBTQ.
He's publicly apologized a day after sharing an anti-LGBTQ+.
No, no, no.
On Monday, Bass shared a post from Ryan Miller.
Okay?
Ryan Miller doesn't go anywhere.
So already, if you try to find the original post, good luck.
What the heck?
From Ryan Miller, who runs the account DudeWithGoodNews on Instagram that cited biblical verses as a reason to boycott Target and Bud Light for their recent support of LGBTQ plus initiatives.
Hmm.
So it was anti-LGBTQ because he shared a post from someone who cited biblical verses to support a boycott of two companies.
Because of their recent support.
Okay.
Oh, I am absolutely not.
Goodbye.
That's all we needed.
That's the story.
All right.
That's the story.
Then, we've got to go watch his groveling, pathetic, Winston-esque, I love Big Brother apology.
Because I think, I remember he was defiant the day before.
I remember seeing this story when he was defiant, I think.
But maybe I'm making things up.
Or making up memories.
This is his groveling, sniveling, weasley, and I'm going to say this, coerced apology.
There is nothing sincere, nothing authentic about this apology.
Listen to it.
I recognize yesterday.
Say the words.
Say the words.
Say what you said.
Say it.
You met with somebody.
They threatened you.
You want to get cut from the team?
You got a very nice salary there.
It would be a shame if something happens to it.
We might not be able to drop you from your contract, but we can make your life miserable.
You embarrass the team.
It's Pride Month.
Say the words.
I recognized yesterday I made a post that was helpful to the Pride community, which includes friends of mine, close family members of mine, and I am truly sorry for that.
I'm truly sorry for that.
I shared a post that I believed in.
I deliberately shared a post that I believe in, that I think is morally correct, even if you don't agree with it.
I did it on purpose.
I meant it when I did it.
And I'm apologizing for it.
That's not how apologies work.
I just spoke with my teammates.
Oh, I spoke with my teammates.
You get out there, Anthony Bass, and you fucking apologize, okay?
This is going to be bad for all of us.
We don't want the team coming under fire for your selfish religious posts on Instagram.
We don't want the franchise taking a hit for this.
You get out there and you apologize.
I just spoke with my teammates and shared with them my actions yesterday.
I apologized with them.
And as of right now, I'm using the Blue Jays' resources to better educate myself.
I'm using the Blue Jays' resources to better educate myself.
Sir Winston Bass, you have put yourself into re-education camp.
Let's make better decisions moving forward.
The ballpark is for everybody.
We include all fans at the ballpark and we want to welcome everybody.
We want to welcome everybody.
That's all I'm going to say.
Thank you.
I mean, can you believe it?
Can you believe it?
So I saw that apology.
I still hadn't seen the post.
So I'm thinking maybe he really did share something really anti-LGBTQ 2SLGBTQIA+.
Maybe he really did share something That said, LGBTQ2IA +, you're not welcome in the stadium.
Maybe he did say something like that.
And now as I speak out loud, it all makes sense.
What did he share?
What was the video that he shared that was so bloody offensive and so bloody controversial that Winston had to come out and publicly say, two plus two equals five.
There are four lights.
I love Big Brother.
This was the post.
Here's the reason, biblically, why I believe Christians ought to be boycotting Target and Bud Light and any other corporation that's pushing the things they're pushing.
I think a lot of people make this into a political issue, or they say, oh, what's the big deal?
Is it really going to make that big of a difference if I'm shopping there or not shopping there?
Here's what the Bible says.
It tells us what to do as Christians in Ephesians chapter 5. It says this, take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.
For it is shameful to even talk of the things that they do in secret.
So what does that mean to take no part?
Well, what's Target do?
It's a business.
They make money.
They sell things.
And to take part in that is to take part in that God of Mammon that they're serving and to take part in the darkness that they're purveying and getting out to the world and shoving into children's faces.
And to take part in that is to give them your money.
And I believe the Bible gives us radical precedent to say no.
We are running from that.
And to instead expose those things.
To shout it to all the people that have ears to hear that this is evil.
This is demonic.
We won't stand for it.
We're not going to go to the stores anymore and we're not going to give them our money.
We're going to let our voice be heard so that people can see the light and so that people can be pulled out of the darkness.
So first of all, he looks like Luke Wilson.
If we're on celebrity lookalikes today, he kind of looks like Luke Wilson.
So what was the...
Sorry, let's get comfortable back here.
What was the radical offensive thing that was said there?
Here's somebody who's interpreting a biblical verse and applying it to a current event.
It seems that people do this all the time, that the Bible agree with it or disagree with it.
Believe in it or not believe in it.
Take it literally.
Take it...
Spiritually, take it metaphorically, take it as a self-help guide, or disregard it entirely and live a life, I don't know, of spirituality derived elsewhere.
This is an individual, Luke Wilson's twin brother, who says, there's a biblical verse that talks about this, and I think we should be boycotting the companies that are pushing this on children.
I don't think that's not the radical part, and that's not when people want to demonize Anthony Bass.
That's not the part they go to.
It's when he says, it's wicked and it's evil.
Is that the base part?
Hold on a second.
Is that the right?
Oh, let me get this guy back up here.
It's the evil and wicked.
He said, it's evil and it's wicked.
Expose those things.
To shout it to all the people that have ears to hear that this is evil, this is demonic.
This is evil, this is demonic.
Here's going to be a little comprehension test for most people out there.
When he says this is evil and this is demonic, what is the this to which he's referring?
This is a serious question.
This is evil, this is demonic.
What is the this to which he's referring?
Is it companies promoting this on children?
Or is it being LGBTQ2A plus?
Which one is it?
The intellectually honest person who has critical thinking skills and understands the English language in the way that it was intended to be understood would say, this is evil, this is demonic.
Companies pushing this ideology on children, the intellectually dishonest and the ideological terrorists, as Gad Saad would put them, would call them, they're going to say, he's saying that being LGBTQ2IA plus is demonic and evil.
When most people on this earth Could not care less about what a grown adult does, wants to do behind closed doors, considers themselves to be.
More power to you.
The irony is that the libertarians, the live and let live, have no problem with any full-grown adult who's consciously able to make his own decisions doing whatever he or she wants with his or her body.
Nobody cares about that.
And that's not what this guy was saying, and that sure as hell was not what Anthony Bass was suggesting when he retweeted the interpretation of the biblical verse as relates to companies promoting this ideology and pushing it on children for corporate financial gain.
And so that was the post that Anthony Bass shared.
He has been spoken to, and he'd like to apologize for that.
And it is the most disingenuous, coerced, Orwellian, re-education, thought, crime police you can imagine.
I recognized yesterday, I made a post that was hurtful to the Pride community, which includes friends of mine and close family members of mine.
Oh, you made a post that was hurtful to the Pride community?
And I'm truly sorry for that.
How about if it comes to the point where if you don't make a post, it's going to be hurtful to the community, Anthony Bates?
Oh, you made a post that disingenuous people who are ideologically driven are going to deliberately misinterpret to purport that you are demonizing their way of life as opposed to the corporate hijacking and promotion of their way of life on children.
How about when those people say to you, it's Pride Month, if you don't post?
Something every day.
Or you don't make at least one post this month.
We'll take offense to that.
You're going to post something, Anthony?
Are they going to coerce a post out of you?
I don't even think we're far off.
I think we're there.
So congratulations.
It's not just going to be posting legitimate religious beliefs that's going to offend people.
We're going to get to the point where not posting is going to offend people.
And then, Anthony Bass, congratulations with your apology.
You set the precedent.
You're going to have to proactively make posts now in order not to hurt people's feelings.
The basic thing is, I'd like to know what other religions, what other spiritual leaders think about this and why they...
This seems to be a one-way criticism, but maybe that's my blinders potentially acting up.
So that's Anthony Bass.
Ideological...
I'll call him a coward because he did something that he believed in and now he is...
Bearing false witness to himself by apologizing for something he did on purpose, that he believed in, but that he is being browbeaded into apologizing for, that is cowardly.
That's not brave.
And by the way, that apology, it's not going to quell the mob either.
So congratulations.
You've just burnt the bridges from both supporters and haters because the supporters would have supported you if you stood true to what you believed in.
The haters are going to hate you for betraying what you believed in.
Anthony?
That's all I have to say about that.
All right.
What else do we got in the back burner now?
Okay, so there's that.
What is this?
Okay, let me just close the window down.
We've got to get that out of there.
And I say this, by the way, the targeting of children is where I have problems with this.
I could not care less about anyone's religion, whatever they consider their gender to be, whatever their sexual orientation.
I don't care about Any of that.
Live and let live.
It's none of my business.
When it becomes my business is when biological males say, you have to tolerate me competing with biological females.
When it becomes my business is when someone says, this is how you must refer to me when speaking of me to other people.
When someone else's freedom becomes my compelled pronoun, then I have to take issue with it.
When someone else's freedom becomes an oppression of rights of other people, that's where I have to take issue with it.
You want to do whatever you want to do?
My goodness.
Not only can I not care less, it might even be an interesting topic of conversation.
It's nice to understand people.
It's nice to know what their interests are.
When those interests involve indoctrinating, targeting children for what they believe in, well, then we've got a problem because I don't think people should be politically targeting children, let alone ideologically targeting children.
And these filthy companies...
Profiting off hijacking movements, everyone should be offended by this.
I don't want TD celebrating Jewish History Month.
I don't want TD making money off other causes because they think it's in their financial best interest to purport to give a rat's ass about other causes that they historically don't care about and in a year's time will not care about if it does not yield them financial benefit.
Something becomes...
Organic, it becomes grassroots, it becomes corporatized, and then it becomes corrupted.
And we are well beyond the stage of Pride Month having become totally corrupted, totally appropriated, totally politically and corporately hijacked to the point where they don't care.
And they're feigning of caring about other people's rights so they can line their own pockets because they think it's good for their brand and the only time that they realize it isn't is when they...
Tank the value of their stock.
There's someone in here.
Oh, no, I'm totally blocked.
I've got a...
I blocked the door so nobody could even get in.
All right, so there's that.
Okay, now what else do we have on the background here?
Blue Jays.
There's more, there's more, there's more.
Oh!
We have to do the lighthearted one before we do the not lighthearted one.
The not lighthearted one is Tara Reid.
And the hashtag MeToo movement.
Remember the hashtag MeToo movement?
Who's now not only no longer hashtag MeToo.
It went from exposing your genitals without consent to a woman was a bannable offense.
Ask Jeffrey Rush.
Allegedly.
I don't know if he did it.
It went from hashtag MeToo.
Men exposing their genitals to women is sexual assault that leads to permanent cancellation to women shut up and sit down and shower in the locker room with the biological male showing you his...
It went from hashtag believe all women to hashtag demonize the woman who said that your political leader did something bad to them.
We'll get to that not funny story in a second.
The funny story in the meantime.
Oh, it's so good.
It's like AOC has not heard of the Streisand effect.
All that I know is that I've just followed.
The top three best impersonating, not impersonating, sorry, that's the wrong way to say it.
The top three parody accounts, which some might accuse of impersonating.
You got Justin Trudeau's ego, Jagmeet Singh's ego, and now you got, I think it's called AOC press release.
AOC threatens to leave Twitter.
She will never leave Twitter because she needs that attention.
And that's not confession through projection, people.
I'm not seeing in her what I feel true about myself.
She will never leave Twitter because it's a politically useful tool.
When it stops being a politically useful tool, then she'll abandon it out of principle.
AOC threatens to leave Twitter after Elon Musk promotes disgusting account.
Oh, it's disgusting.
It made a joke about Elon Musk.
It's disgusting.
People use that word disgusting.
It's disgusting the way they use it in an inappropriate sense.
The New York Congresswoman said that she was, quote, assessing what to do after billionaire interacted with parody accounts.
Oh, she's assessing.
Keep assessing.
Think hard.
Think long.
Think like in poker.
Think long, think wrong.
I might sue Elon Musk.
I might leave Twitter.
I'm going to do nothing.
What she's going to do is piss and moan and milk it for whatever attention she can get and stay on the account because Twitter is just too damn lucrative.
It's too damn politically lucrative for her.
AOC has threatened to quit Twitter after Elon Musk promoted a sick account impersonating the Democratic politician.
The New York Congresswoman said that she was assessing what to do after the billionaire He interacted with the fake account.
FYI, there's a fake account on here impersonating me and going viral.
The Twitter CEO has engaged in it, boosting visibility.
Hey, you know what, by the way?
I didn't notice that Elon Musk engaged with it.
You know who did bring it to my attention, Elon?
Not Elon.
AOC?
You.
You and A.T. Rupert.
What's his name?
Oh, geez.
Aaron.
Aaron Rupert.
That's who brought it to my attention, and thank you for doing it because it's flipping glorious.
It is releasing false policies and gaining spread.
I am assessing with my team how to move forward.
In the meantime, be careful what you see.
Be careful of what you see.
She reacted after Musk, with whom she had a series of public spats on Twitter, responded with flame emoji to the fake AOC account, tweeting, this might be the wine talking, but I got a crush on Elon Musk.
Let me see if we can get the tweet.
Oh, son of a...
What do you put these fucking links in here for if they don't work?
Okay.
There we go.
Oh, here we go.
Okay, now we can get them.
Here, let's go here.
We can see this.
Oh, it's so good.
It's so good.
Because I read it.
I was like, this might be the wine talking, but I got a crush on Elon Musk.
And do you know why Aaron Rupert is the scum of the fake news earth?
I'll show you in one second.
Disgusting.
It's disgusting.
So the tweet says, this might be the wine talk.
This might be the wine talking, but I got a crush on Elon Musk.
And Elon Musk replies, flame emojis.
One million flame emojis.
Okay, anybody who gets that listens to too much Tom McDonald.
So that's it.
That's the tweet.
Now, look at how Aaron T. Rupert...
It portrays this.
This is disgusting, even for Elon.
First of all, what's disgusting about it?
It's a pretty damn funny joke because I don't think many people believed it to be true.
And if you did, you might hate AOC a little too much or you might love her a little too much.
In case it's not clear, the verified account is not actually AOC.
Oh, well, that's very funny.
It isn't clear.
Do you know why it's not clear?
Because Aaron T. Rupar, the fake news propagandist that he is, didn't include the tweet, which would have allowed you to click on the link and see that it clearly says parody in it.
He only included a screen grab, which does not give you that functionality.
Instead of retweeting the tweet so that you could go and just double check, is this a real tweet?
Because I saw Aaron T. Rupar's tweet before I saw the original tweet, and I'm like...
I'm like, Aaron, was it as parody at the time of the tweet?
And to the extent that it was, although I didn't say this, why would you not have shared the actual link so that people could one-click link and see that it was parody?
Here it is.
That's not it.
That's the damn screen grab again.
Aaron T. Rupar, by the way, for anybody who doesn't know, Is beyond a propagandist.
And you can see how subtly the disinformation is spread.
He shows the screen grab, which doesn't allow you to go click on the profile and immediately see that it's parody.
Suggests, in case it's not clear, it's...
Well, it would have been clear, Aaron, if he had shown the actual tweet so that people could have gone and seen that the AOC press release is a parody account.
But look at this.
Aaron Rupar...
Urban Dictionary.
If anybody doesn't know this.
Rupar...
The degree to which he misleads has earned him an entry in the Wikipedia of Urban Dictionary.
The Urban Dictionary, not Wikipedia.
Rupar, a lying sack of shit who deceives people for a living in the name of his political ideology.
Every word that comes out of his mouth is a lie.
Goebbels was a real Rupar.
He shameless lied.
Come on, man.
Get your language here.
And smeared any opposing hill.
Okay, so I don't like that description.
I like this one.
Rupar, to lie with impunity, a brazen statement with a focus on misleading, usually with intention of a predetermined outcome.
The presidential candidate Rupard before stealing the election.
Now the few citizens that actually favored him suffer extreme voter remorse.
Rupar, to purposely mislead, to intentionally and grossly mischaracterize the statement and or video.
Looks like Rupar pulled a Rupar on the AOC.
Clearly a parody account.
Clearly indicated as one.
Hilarious.
And thanks to Rupar, thanks to Rupar pulling a Rupar, that account is now going to get Streisand-ed.
Streisand-ed-ed-ed-ed?
Let me just go and get the actual tweet for everybody who wants to go follow this.
I think it's called AOC Press Release?
No, it's AOC Press.
And I spelled it wrong.
Looks like I pulled Aviva.
AOC Press.
Here we go.
Look at...
By the way, just to show you, like...
Hold on, this is funny.
Oh, I love discovering things in real time.
Okay, here.
So this is...
You go AOC Press, and it comes up AOC Parity.
And you got AOC Press.
I won.
She got blocked by the real AOC.
Classic.
Yeah, so Rupar definitely pulled a Rupar.
Oh, yeah.
Okay, what else?
Let me go into the rumbles over here and see what's going on.
Oh, Ginger Ninja in the house.
Oh, Ginger.
I was supposed to tell you that I was taking a different detour up to Canada.
Hold on a second.
Okay, let me go here.
Let me bring these up.
Ginger Ninja 1776, bring in a population with no understanding of the Charter so they can be easily propagandized and won't push back when their rights, which they don't understand, are trampled on.
Or how about, you know, they come from countries with so few rights to have slightly fewer, to have slightly more rights, although albeit significantly less than your God-given rights in the Charter, still seems like a good deal.
Ginger Ninja 1776, thank you very much.
What's the plus for?
What's the plus for?
Who knows what the plus is for?
So let me see if I can get...
Okay, while we're on the subject, I wasn't going to play this because I'm not making fun of anybody.
And there's no...
No, sorry, let me back that up.
Now I can hear something in the background.
Okay, sorry, hold on.
I just started a video and I hear it in the background.
I'm going to make fun of Justin Trudeau.
Can I find the video?
I was pulling up the video.
Now I close it.
It was Justin Trudeau trying to say or robotically, magically saying 2SLGBTQIA+.
Let me see what it currently is in Canada.
In Canada, it's 2SLGBTQIA+.
What does the plus stand for in all of that?
Two-spirit.
I'm just going to try to guess it based on the 2SLGBTQIA+.
Two-spirit.
That's the native indigenous two-spirit.
Lesbian.
Gay.
Bi.
Trans.
Queer.
I. Intersex.
A. I'm going to go see what it says here.
Okay.
Former acronym used by the Government of Canada.
To refer to the Canadian community.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, two spirits.
Oh my good God, people.
I'm bringing this up.
This is off the Government of Canada website.
This is off the Government of Canada website.
Our tax dollars have paid for this.
2SLGBTQI plus terminology.
Glossary and common acronyms.
Terminology is continuously evolving.
As a result, it is important to note that this list is not exhaustive, and these definitions are a starting point to understanding 2SLGBTQI+.
They don't have the A in here for some reason.
Identities and issues.
Different 2SLGBTQI plus individuals and communities may have broader and more specific understanding of these terms.
It is the acronym used by the Government of Canada to refer to the Canadian community.
2S at the front.
Two spirits.
Oh, they don't even have the A at this one, so I'm not going to get it.
I, let's just go to the I, is intersex.
And what does the A stand for?
What does the A mean?
Asexual.
All right.
Glad to see our tax dollars are really focusing on the important stuff like healthcare.
Okay, well, that was actually, this was supposed to be the lighthearted distraction from the upcoming story, but this is actually depressing.
And again, someone's asexual, good for you.
I hope you're happy in life, and I sincerely mean that.
Queer, trans, intersex, I don't care.
I don't care.
It would never even come up in conversation unless, you know, the question of dating came up, in which case it wouldn't.
And it wouldn't be because of any of those reasons.
It would be because I'm happily married, and you keep your schnuckling your pants.
My goodness, the government is dedicating to understand.
The government is making a mockery of these people by politically exploiting them and allowing them to be exploited politically, financially, in all respects.
The government does not care about this group of people except to the extent they can squeeze political goodwill out of it.
That's it.
Corporations do not care about you, except to the extent that they can squeeze financial goodwill out of it.
They do not care about you.
And when they're done caring about you, they're going to throw you under the bus the same way they threw other groups under the bus, the same way they're throwing women under the bus after having, you know, fought politically hard for the woman vote.
Now, women, shut up and take it.
We're done with you.
Now the political goodwill that we want comes from the 2SLGBT2QIA+.
And you know what I love, by the way?
And I'm going to say this out loud.
I've now run into enough fans on the street.
I don't say fans.
Supporters.
People who are ideologically aligned.
You know what I love?
Is running into gay and lesbian people on the street.
Trans people on the street who come up and say, this is madness.
And it happens sometimes live on camera for you to see like it happened at the Ottawa protest.
And it happens oftentimes.
In my day-to-day life.
Because gays, lesbians, people who just want to live their life without their identities being used for political warfare have had enough of this crap.
All right.
Well, that was the light topic.
Now let's get to the not-so-light topic.
It was the news of the day yesterday.
Oh, no.
You know, before we get there, I actually have a video right here.
Listen to this.
Listen to Justin Trudeau.
Patronize!
I mean, literally, he's turning a citizen into a patron of his politics.
Cultural respect.
Sorry, I should have given you the gag warning.
Listen to this.
It's a little bit long.
...thing to be able to speak a language.
It goes to the core of identity.
I'm a Quebecer.
I understand how language is core to identity.
I thought Canadians didn't have a national identity, Justin.
Oh, I can't listen to him.
Hello, I'm Bianca.
I'm in my third year in the University of Winnipeg.
I'm Bianca.
And I'm a two-spirited trans woman that finds it very difficult in Winnipeg to be me.
So I have a question.
I'm horrified by what is going on down south with the erasure of...
Erasure.
Who we are and the constant...
The chances of this not being a political plant?
I don't know that it is.
The chances of it being a political plant?
Very likely.
The erasure.
Just drop every frickin' buzzword coming out of fake Canadian news as to what's going on down south.
Every single buzzword.
Drop it.
Say the line.
Nagging on...
Certain aspects of our lives...
Hold on, I have to hear that again.
...spirited trans woman that...
Erasure.
...finds it very difficult in Winnipeg to...
Find it very difficult in Winnipeg to be myself.
To be me.
Why?
Because of what I see going on in the States.
I have a question.
I'm horrified...
Horrified.
...by what is going on down South with the erasure...
Erasure.
Who we are and the constant nagging on certain aspects of our lives.
Nagging?
I don't know what that means even.
Pretty much demonizing and making us feel that we're irrelevant in this world.
It's a very funny thing.
Nobody is doing any such thing.
Live and let live.
Now, making me feel as if I'm irrelevant in this world.
Is that to say that if someone says, in order for me not to feel irrelevant, I need constant positive affirmation, so affirm me every day of the week?
If that's what someone needs in order to not feel irrelevant, well, then that's creating a positive obligation on others to positively do something so that this person does not feel ignored.
Okay.
I'm 45 years old, and I've been around the block.
I'm watching in Canada and I want to know how is your government going to protect people and our youth who are...
Youth?
Oh, there you go.
It just went from you want to live to let's put this on the kids.
Watching this all unfold down south and watching some of the cabinet ministers within our own country come after certain people of...
Of the two-spirit community.
Who's come after anybody?
I don't know of anybody who's gone after anybody.
Unless, of course, sharing biblical verses as to why you should not support a company that targets children with gender ideology offends people.
If that's what they mean by coming after, well then, you know, alas, words have no meaning anymore.
Just scary, and I just want to clarify that you have a plan that is going to protect all Canadians.
Without leaving some of them out.
Including women from biological males competing in female sports?
Including them or no?
Bianca, who I suspect is a biological male based on...
I don't even know what it means.
It's become like a math equation.
I'm a two-spirit trans male.
I think the person sounds like the biological male, but I don't know.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Listen to this.
Thank you, Bianca, for your question, for standing up and asking it today.
By the way, I haven't watched this entire thing.
I saw a portion of it.
Is Justin going to find a way to use a gender pronoun to show how truly tolerant he is?
It's scary.
It's scary to see what's happening.
In the United States.
Look at this raging psychopath.
Channel it!
It's scary to see a country that was founded centuries ago.
Look at those eyes.
You know, a while back I posted a side-by-side of Jacin Ardem, the New Zealand...
And I said, you know, like, selling your soul has its consequences.
And it wasn't to say that someone got physically unattractive as they got older.
There is a look when you sell your soul and you adopt lies as policy.
It sucks out your soul.
The eyes are the window to the soul.
And if you look at those eyes compared to his bright-eyed youth, when he actually said things that he believed in, and you tell me there's not a material difference, and I would dare say that there's a material difference because his actual...
Pride in himself has been sucked out of his body through his own actions.
As with the ideals of freedom and democracy in its almost most utopic forms, despite the real challenges of who got to be a voting citizen and slave ownership.
It's amazing.
Go back to slave ownership and don't go back to freeing of the slaves, Justin.
Go back to the rights of the United States as though those rights were only used to enslave and not actually to free the slaves.
Just victimhood, never forget, always be angry, always divide and conquer.
As if the history of Canada is much better.
Oh, talk about the CN rails and who built the railways and how they built them.
At the origins of the United States.
Look at this.
Psychotic eyes.
That everyone was created equal.
That eventually was hard won through the latter half of the 20th century in many senses.
Start to turn its back on that.
Everyone was created equal under the law, Justin.
Which is a far different statement than everyone being created equal because I'm not six feet tall.
Oh, look at that pause.
Whether it's 2SLGBTQI plus rights that are constantly being attacked.
Constantly being attacked.
When has any rights of the 2SLGBTQI plus been attacked in Canada?
Because he can't have drag shows in front of kids?
Who has attacked any of the rights?
It's quite the contrary, in fact.
Compelling people to speak a certain way and having them cancelled if they don't could arguably be determined to be the attack on rights.
Whether it's women's rights.
Women's rights.
To compete in sports without biological males dominating them?
Seeing the clock turned back.
Generations of women marched on the U.S. Capitol.
Yeah, for Title IX.
To fight for rights?
That are now being denied from them.
In other words, they're kind of being oppressed by the current rights of the people who are saying they're being oppressed.
Isn't that a bitch as to how that happens?
That are now slipping.
He's actually arched for women's rights, culminating in, at least part of which resulted in Title IX, protection of women's sports.
And he is now saying, in response to a question of someone who's saying their rights are being oppressed, trumped, violated, that these biological women have their rights violated because of people who are now claiming that.
I mean, it's so convoluted, it's almost impossible to formulate into a sentence.
Something's happening.
Yeah.
Oh yeah.
And Canada is not immune to that.
We're a little more resilient to it for now.
Demonize.
Divide and conquer.
But what's happening in the United States is bleeding into political discourse in Canada.
bleeding in because the liberals import problems from the states, import political discussion from the states, so they can use it to divide and conquer among conservatives.
I had never heard anybody talk...
Canada had not talked about abortion in a long time.
Only country without any criminal prohibition on abortion.
Justin Trudeau is importing that debate from the Dobbs decision in the United States.
Politicizing it in Canada.
Importing this entire movement as well into Canada.
Divide and conquer.
Whether it's the attacks we're seeing on...
Drag readings in libraries, for example.
Attacks on drag readings in libraries.
Oh, how about the attacks on children by having drag reading in libraries, Justin?
Holy crap.
It's carriage in front of the horse.
It's an upside-down world.
An attack.
The attacks on drag readings in libraries.
When the hell...
Did we become a society of perversion where we say, let's take a sexual activity and stick it in the library, and when people complain about it, they're the abusers?
That we saw just a few months ago.
Oh, and the attack that he's talking about?
People protesting it.
Exercising your charter rights to protest are now attacks on what many might feel to be some form of moral perversion.
Whether it's the horrific attacks.
On 2SLGBTQI plus rights that we're seeing in, you know, we saw it recently here in Manitoba in Brandon.
And I would love to tell you that no Canadian government would ever let that happen.
But they will!
And I'm your hero.
I am your savior.
My gosh, this is...
But I can't.
I can tell you, my government...
We'll never let it happen.
My government will always stand up unequivocally for women's rights, for 2SLGBTQI plus rights.
Psychotic eyes.
For the freedoms guaranteed.
In the Charter?
In the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
You goddamned liar.
Holy cow.
I'm sorry you all have to put up with that.
Oh!
Okay.
That was...
I mean, it's...
It's going to stand up for women's rights.
Justin Trudeau is a transphobe.
Justin Trudeau is a TERF.
I mean, that is.
He's a TERF.
If Justin Trudeau is standing up for women's rights, he is a TERF.
Trans-exclusionary radical feminist.
Those are the rules.
I didn't make them up.
All right.
The not-so-funny story of the day at all.
You all remember Tara Reade.
Tara Reade is the woman who claimed...
That Joe Biden assaulted her in the 90s, mid-90s, I think 96, when she was working on his campaign.
They were not just plausible accusations, and I'll show you why in a second.
They were basically confirmed accusations.
People who knew confirmed that they knew.
They confirmed that it was happening.
They just called it, you know, Joe Biden being handsy.
Oh, you know what?
Hold on a second.
No, no, we'll get to that afterwards.
This is the news, by the way.
She has now, Tara Reid has now...
Fled, left, gone to Russia, and is now asking for citizenship in Russia.
And my goodness, are the people who abused her, you know, physically and psychologically, and then politically, they're loving it.
Woman who accused Biden of assault says she moved to Russia, asked for citizenship.
Times of Israel.
I don't know why I pulled this one up.
I think I'm pulling up articles deliberately to not go through Fox News.
Tara Reid, although maybe the same company owns this, who the hell knows anyone?
Tara Reid sitting alongside Russian lawmaker and alleged spy, Maria Butina.
Says she hopes to hold on to her U.S. citizenship.
Biden has denied her allegations.
So it's nice Biden denied her allegations.
Someone else admitted them.
We'll get there.
Washington.
A woman who accused Joe Biden during 2020 U.S. presidential election of sexual assault appeared Tuesday in Moscow where she said she was asking President Vladimir Putin for Russian citizenship.
Tara Reid worked in his congressional office for a short period in 1993, said she wanted to stay in Russia after a Republican told her she was in physical danger.
Well, I don't want to pull up any memes about, you know, the Clinton-Arkenside and kill lists and whatnot.
I don't think that's an irrational thought that she might actually be in physical danger, although, you know, why now might be the explanation.
Why now might be the retort.
Reid59 said in a streamed interview with the Sputnik Media Group that she had arrived in Russia as a vacationer.
However, she said, when I got off the plane in Moscow for the first time in a very long time, I felt safe and I felt heard and I felt respected.
She made headlines in 2020 claiming that then-Senator Biden sexually assaulted her in a Capitol Hill corridor in 1993, when she was 29. Her accusation came just as Biden was ramping up his campaign against incumbent President Donald Trump, who himself has faced accusations.
Of course, you've got to bring it in.
Biden categorically denied the claim.
It's not true.
I'm saying it unequivocally.
It never happened.
Yada, yada, yada.
Reid said she filed a complaint after the alleged incident, but no record of it has been found.
A 1996 court document records her ex-husband mentioning that she had complained of sexual harassment while working in Biden's office.
It's not clear if her allegations have ever been formally investigated.
Reid, who called herself a geopolitical analyst, said in the Sputnik interview that after making her allegations public in 2020, she was threatened with prison, her life was threatened, and she was called a Russian agent.
Simply alongside Butina, a Russian lawmaker who was arrested in prison in 2018 is alleged.
Read told the interviewer she has, quote, always loved Russia.
I do not see Russia as an enemy, nor do many of my fellow Americans, she said.
Okay.
She had one large request.
I'd like to keep my American citizenship.
I do promise to be a good citizen, she said, claiming she wants to hold on to her Canadian American citizenship.
Now, out.
Kara Read, Lisa Bloom tweets.
Does everyone remember this?
But I say that it was, you know, Joe Biden denied it.
Other people who are in the know basically confirmed it.
Here we go.
Let me see.
Are we looking at the same thing here?
I know we've seen this before, but it bears repeating.
Lisa Bloom, who is the daughter of Gloria Allred, trial lawyer fighting for victims of discrimination.
Can you believe this?
Do we see that?
Do we see this when I bring it up?
Oh, we do.
Good.
Try a lawyer fighting for victims of discrimination, harassment, and abuse.
Probable target for Twitter takedown.
Every fear hides a wish, Lisa.
Lisa Bloom, Esquire, TikTok.
How does she describe herself here?
Fighting for victims of discrimination, harassment, and abuse.
What was her tweet to Tara Reid?
I believe you, Tara Reid.
You have people who remember you told them about this.
Decades ago.
Let me just, I need to highlight the absolute insanity.
Try a lawyer fighting for victims of abuse, discrimination, and harassment says, I believe you, Tara Reid.
You have people who remember you told them about this decades ago.
We know he is handsy.
We know he is handsy.
This is a lawyer taking to Twitter to publicly affirm, I believe Tara Reid and her allegations, and we know that Joe Biden is handsy.
You're not asking for money.
You've obviously struggled mightily with this.
But fuck you.
I'm sorry.
Piss off.
We have to get Trump out.
So I gotta defend your sexual aggressor.
Whom everyone knows is handsy.
Seemingly with the old and the young.
Piss off.
I'm fighting for abuse victims, but not you and not today.
I still have to fight Trump, so I will still support Joe.
But I believe you, and I'm sorry.
Wow.
That's about, that's slightly more disgusting than the other apology that we saw earlier today.
That's Lisa Bloom, lawyer.
Believes her, knows that it's true.
What do the other people in the media do?
Left-wingers who also love Joe Biden?
Well, you know, it went from believe all women to demonize the victim.
And you got...
George Takei, the man who admitted on Howard Stern to sexually assaulting young men by grabbing them by the COCK against their will when they were skittish.
Sometimes when they're skittish.
Oh my god.
George Takei, misogynist, sexual assault denier.
Victim blamer has to say to Tara Reid, wait, so the woman who falsely accused Biden of sexual assault just defected to Russia?
Oh.
See, I don't think I'm going to see my...
...in there?
No.
It's too far down.
That's how George Takei decided to deal with it.
Mock the victim of sexual abuse.
Hashtag MeToo to hashtag FU.
That's how it went.
Oh, here we go.
There's another one.
Rupert!
Rupert's making a twofer.
Rupert.
Aaron Rupert.
Tara Reade's allegations against Joe Biden never checked out, and the episode has mostly been forgotten about three years later.
She's now defected to Russia.
I just hope the media personalities who amplified her and then quietly moved on are at least doing some introspection.
What was, oh yeah, to Paul Rupert, a lying sack of shit who doesn't stop lying for political purposes.
Someone who will deliberately mislead and misrepresent every video and every tweet for political motivation.
Looks like Rupert just pulled another Rupert, because in case you forgot, in case you forgot, Rupert.
The media that propped her up and then moved on and largely undocumented, no one believed her.
I believe you, Tower Reid.
You have people who remember you told them about this decades ago.
We know Joe Biden is handsy, meaning he cannot keep his hands off other women's bodies.
Lord knows what he does with his schmeckle.
That was Rupar pulling another Rupar.
Shameless and disgusting.
Genucel.
Skin products.
Oh, the link.
The link is in...
I hope the link...
Yeah, the link is in the pinned comment.
People, I think that's it.
Hold on one second.
Let me see.
That's it.
We've done it.
Another day.
Another digesting of the universe.
Hold on one second.
I'm just going to make sure before we do this, and then I got to...
Okay, so we got Canada on track for that.
We got that.
Foreign President Donald Trump.
Okay, we got...
What was that?
Oh, that's just a video.
I love Big Brother.
Nova Scotia implements travel-wide ban.
Fine.
Nationwide ban on travel in the woods.
Yeah.
Unprecedented Nova Scotia wildfires.
And the Blue Jays.
People, we've done it, but I'm going to end by reading a couple of the crumble rants, and then we're going to move over to locals.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
If you want to get some merch, VivaFry.com.
Have I brought it up?
Yes, we have.
Ginger Ninja, gag warning.
Ginger Ninja, pulling up video.
Viva, I forgot to give you the gag order.
It's a little long.
Oh, boy.
And then Finboy Slick.
That was from the comments on that Trudeau video you made us suffer through.
P. Moyer says, Viva, your analysis about this Winnipegger is most probably spot on.
Other people aren't devaluing him.
He's doing that all by himself.
Imagine that.
Finboy Slick says, best Trudeau insult I've read in a while.
If Turto had an enema, there would be nothing left but a bag of skin.
Ow.
Ow.
The wall's too close to me.
Okay.
People, we've done it.
I don't know how they've done it.
Let me give you all the link to Rumble.
Not Rumble, to Locals.
Let's go over there and party hardy for another 20 or 30 minutes before the kids come down here.
All right, everybody, I don't think there's going to be a sidebar tonight because I don't think there's going to be a sidebar tonight.
Tomorrow, I will be going live.
I think I might be going on Roger Stone's Stone Zone.
I'm pretty sure I am at 5 o 'clock in the afternoon, so we'll be going live tomorrow.
Then there's some travel, and I'll be doing live streams.
The summer is going to be a little more difficult, and I don't have my studio, but we're still going to be doing this live.
As often as humanly possible.
And Sunday nights.
Because it's...
There's never a dull day in a world descending into absolute madness.
So with that said, people, I'm going to end this on Rumble.
Come on over to Locals.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com And thank you all for being here.
So I'm going to end the stream on Rumble.
Come on over to Locals and I'll see you all there, peeps.
See you soon.
Locals.
Are we here?
We're still here.
The fall of Rome.
You know what's funny?
That picture of the fall of Rome?
Actually looks like Montreal info.
Who was that from?
That was from Pasha Moyer.
Okay, so hold on.
Everybody, are we live here?
Let me just make sure we go to all.
Okay, boom.
Are we good?
▲
Export Selection