All Episodes
May 24, 2023 - Viva & Barnes
01:44:29
MAIDS or Murder? Epstein Threatened Gates? Kari Lake Loses! Free Ambulance Rides! Viva Frei Live!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I was actually going to play this video, but that freeze frame is quite funny.
Okay, let's just play.
Thank you.
Understand, it's not necessary for people to believe this information in order to weaken democratic institutions.
Infection.
Wait until you hear it.
Flood a country's public square.
Flood a country's...
Raw sewage.
You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, plant enough conspiracy theorizing that citizens no longer know what to believe.
Once they lose trust in their leaders, in mainstream media, in political institutions, in each other, in the possibility Pause.
The game's won.
As far as it goes for political disdain, Justin Trudeau is number one.
He's number one.
He'll be number one, I think, for the rest of my life.
Justin Trudeau's number one.
Obama's a close second.
We've got to watch this and just break this down in terms of the absolute...
Confession through projection.
Of the highest order.
It's pathological.
Confession through projection.
But before I do that, let me just make sure that we're actually simultaneously live on all the channels.
Are we good on vivabarneslaw.locals.com?
All right, now we can break down the pathology of this confession through projection.
Let us go break this down statement by statement in between dramatic pauses.
Obama.
Understand, it's not necessary for people to believe this information in order to weaken democratic institutions.
It's not necessary for people to believe the disinformation or the information to weaken democratic institutions.
You don't need to believe it.
You just need to say it enough.
You just have to flood a country's public square.
Flood a country's public square.
Hunter Biden laptop disinformation.
January 6th disinformation.
2016 Russiagate hoax.
Donald Trump having removed the bust of Martin Luther King from the White House.
Donald Trump shithole countries.
Just flood it.
Flood the marketplace.
Flood Town Square with disinformation.
What happens if you do that?
With enough raw sewage.
Raw sewage.
You just have to raise enough questions.
Spread enough dirt.
Plant enough.
Conspiracy theorizing.
Plant enough conspiracy theorizing.
Raise enough dirt.
Russia collusion.
I mean, just only apply it mutandis mutandis to the Russiagate.
Plant enough information, disinformation in the public square.
Just raise enough dirt.
And what happens?
People don't know what to believe.
That citizens no longer know what to believe.
Once they lose trust in their leaders.
What happens then?
Mainstream media.
What happens then?
Political institutions in each other.
What happens then?
In the possibility of truth.
What happens, Obama?
The game's won.
Ooh!
They are telling us what they are doing as they are doing it.
Perfectly.
The game is won.
Once people can no longer even know what to believe, the game is won.
Masks work?
Wear masks.
Masks don't work?
No need to wear a mask.
Conspiracy theory?
Interfering with menstrual cycles.
It's confirmed.
Conspiracy theory causing heart issues.
It's confirmed.
Just flood the market.
Flood the town square with enough dirt, enough sewage, enough conspiracy theory.
Trump-Russia collusion.
January 6th insurrection.
Hunter Biden laptop, Russia disinformation.
Donald Trump quid pro quo.
Flood the market with enough rubbish and people will not know what to believe.
And once you do that, the game is won.
Dramatic pause.
Oh, I get what you're doing there.
All right, everybody.
Good afternoon.
I was supposed to not take the day off.
We're going to have a sidebar tonight with...
Oh, geez.
What's her last name?
Alexander.
It's going to be an amazing sidebar, seven o 'clock tonight.
Scandal.
Scandal, scandal.
We were supposed to go fishing today as a family.
Kids played hooky.
We took the kids out of school today.
And we were going to go fishing.
But things don't always go as planned.
There were some technical issues and we couldn't get out to go fishing.
And I think it might have been for the better.
I got to put a remora on my body.
I'll show you that video at the end of this.
We were supposed to go fishing today.
It didn't happen.
I said, well, that's what I'm going to do.
Let's stream because we were supposed to cover a bunch of stories yesterday and we didn't get to it because the interview with Francois Amalaga was so damn interesting that we went on for two and a quarter hours.
If you didn't see yesterday's stream, go watch it.
A lot of people watched it, at least on Rumble.
You put Francois Amalaga's name in YouTube.
I'm shocked that it didn't get demonetized, but it sure as hell is getting throttled, I think would be the word.
It got graffitied with the COVID banner.
To get more COVID information, go to the CDC website, the same one that's been right and wrong, depending on when you ask them the same question.
Francois Amalaga is a Cameroonian, moved to Quebec, and has become the most famous, the most infamous, but the most infamous COVID-19 lockdown measures freedom fighter that you've probably never heard of.
And I say it, and I'll say it again, the biggest flattery that I can get as a podcasting internet interviewer guy is when people stay on.
Much longer than the time they said they would stay on or that they had allotted.
And Francois said he had 45 minutes to do an interview.
And we went on for two and a quarter hours and he talked about studying math, getting a master's in math, doing the PhD work and being on the verge of getting a PhD, doing the thesis, starting to teach at post-secondary high school, university, CEGEP in Quebec.
And then COVID hit, and it doesn't make sense to him, and he starts fighting for what he believes in.
And at one point, it was a great, great quote.
I'm going to have to go clip the section.
He goes to the police station, and he says, arrest me because I'm not abiding by these COVID measures.
I'm not wearing a mask.
I'm not respecting a curfew.
Arrest me.
Because the woman I love is freedom, and she's in that cell, and if you lock me up, you're going to lock me up with my lover, Freedom, because she's not out there.
It was phenomenal.
So go watch it if you haven't seen it.
I was supposed to cover some stories yesterday.
Never got around to it.
And I said, I'll do it today.
And just to give you a heads up for the rest of the week.
Tomorrow, Ye On Me Park is coming on at 1 o 'clock.
For anyone who's interested, I've got to get my car serviced in the morning.
That's not interesting.
Ye On Me Park, North Korean escapee defector.
It's going to be amazing.
Scheduled for an hour.
We'll see if she stays on for more than an hour.
Then after that...
I'm going on with Owen Schroer on Infowars at 5 to 5.30.
Then I'm doing a podcast with Jojo of Unlearned16, who we've been having back and forth on the Twitterverse, and she was on my channel a couple of weeks ago.
And then I'm going to be on Alex Stein at 7.45-ish to 8 o 'clock.
And then my wife is going to say enough internet for the day.
So that's what's on for tomorrow.
Tonight we've got a sidebar, and we've got a show today.
We're going to talk about Epstein.
Having been maybe gated.
I mean, the question is now, we make the joke that someone's going to Epstein themselves, but what do we say about what happened to Epstein?
I think we have to start saying, you know, he was potentially Bill Gated.
Jokes aside, we're now discovering that maybe it's not the best idea to try to blackmail, extort the most powerful man on Earth.
Sorry, the richest man on Earth.
So some news with that.
Some news out of Canada, which we're going to start with on YouTube, because I want everyone to hear this before we go on over to rumble.
You know, they're just going to expand medical assistance in dying to the mentally ill.
We're just going to expand medical assistance in dying, a.k.a.
euthanasia, a.k.a.
if you ask other regimes, mercy killings.
We're just going to expand it to the mentally ill.
Now we're going to expand it to minors.
Oh, and now, according to a poll, one quarter of all Canadians tolerate...
Approve of the idea of medical assistance in dying, euthanasia, mercy killing for the homeless, if that's the reason why someone wants to end their life.
The slippery slope to hell is paved in purported good intentions, but it's the evil that cloaks itself in benevolence.
We'll get to that.
What else was there?
Carrie Lake lost her case.
No big surprise there.
No real rocket science, but we'll talk about that.
Oh, yeah, that's right.
Injured by a jibby jab?
Injured by a mandatory jibby jab?
Don't worry, Canadians.
Your trip to the hospital is free.
We're going to waive the ambulance fee.
You know, we're going to start with that story because it's so bloody atrocious.
But before we do that, people, before we do that, you might have seen as you started this stream, the little thing on the top right, this ad, this stream contains a sponsor.
Because it does.
And there's a funny story behind this because...
I'm actually, I'm experimenting with this now.
There's a funny story behind this.
Genucel.
So, this is the sponsor.
Now, a lot of you know, I'm not one to care about my physical appearance at the superficial level.
I don't care what my skin looks like.
I don't want to put on foundation.
I don't put on makeup.
I like my hair, yes.
And I like being healthy, yes.
But some people do care what they, you know, they don't want to get old.
They don't like the crow's feet.
They don't like all this stuff.
Okay.
Genucel, I was on with Dr. Drew yesterday, and Dr. Drew was telling me about the retinol thing that firms up the skin.
I was like, okay, well, I have this bottle that they sent me that my family's been using, but I don't care about this stuff.
I'm going to do an experiment with it.
But the bottom line, Genucel, it's an American company, and it's got an amazing story.
This Egyptian pharmacist, I'm not making this up.
I was on the phone with him.
I said, I got to get comfortable with your product if I'm going to do a sponsored video about it.
Egyptian pharmacist comes to America.
Makes his own homemade recipes for skin-firming products.
Offers them to some of his clients at his pharmacy.
And they love them so much, they all start asking him to prepare the orders.
And he's turned it into a business of a product that he put the blends together on his own and turned it into a business.
And so people are into this.
People like looking young.
Having good makeup and all this stuff and a good quality product.
Made in America.
The sponsor of the New Jersey Devils.
Genyacel.
So if you go to genyacel.com and you use promo code Viva, you're going to get 70% off their most popular package.
But here's where...
Okay, remember I've been saying, guys, do you notice my bags into my eyes?
Do you notice I look different?
That's the question.
I'm doing this for science, not because I care about wrinkles.
Although I'd rather get rid of my end-of-the-world furrowed brow wrinkle.
I'm going to do a test.
I've used this retinol stuff now.
Ultra retinol twice or three times.
We'll see.
You will tell me if I start looking younger, more vibrant, et cetera, et cetera.
But bottom line, it's a great company.
Made in America.
Kind of the American dream.
And people like it.
People love it.
I thought it was a great story and a great company to work with.
Okay.
I still look Canadian.
Does that mean...
Given what's going on in Canada, KC985, I'm not sure that that's a compliment anymore.
Canada.
Oh, Canada.
Genusel.com, promo code Viva, 70% off that package you see there.
And that's it.
I still look Canadian.
I don't know if it's a compliment anymore.
Let's start with...
It's disgusting.
It's disgusting.
It's an old story, but it's disgusting.
It comes out of CBC.
Tabarnouche.
Tabarnouche, c 'est où l 'article de journal?
Where is it?
Dudes, did I not bring this?
I have like one job to do, and I didn't bring this one up.
It was CBC, Nova Scotia, ambulance, wave, fee of vaccine.
Let's just...
Here we go, guys.
It's so thoughtful, and it's so polite.
It's something that can only be done in Canada.
The article is two years old, or a year and a half.
That's about two years old.
Bear that in mind.
The fact that this article is two years old makes it even more shocking, given what's happened over the last two years, given that this is what the decision-making was two years ago.
CBC News.
Like, this is stuff where you say, how did I miss this?
It's because I don't watch CBC News, and I suspect, you know, they report on it.
The CBC reports on it, buries it digitally, so they can say later on down the line the same thing with their toxic face mask story.
Well, we reported on it, but we buried it, and no one saw it.
Listen, it's a joke.
It's a Babylon Bee sick frickin' joke.
I was gonna swear, but I'm not gonna swear just yet.
NS means Nova Scotia.
Nova Scotia to waive ambulance fees for people who have adverse reactions to COVID vaccines.
Do you understand that for one second, people?
Understand that for one second.
You go get the jibby jab.
You have an adverse reaction that is so flipping severe, you need to be rushed to a hospital by ambulance.
Don't worry.
That $165...
It's free.
We'll waive it.
We'll waive it for you.
Thank you for sacrificing your...
It's evil.
I mean, it's evil.
There is no other way to describe it other than evil.
Change follows several people being told their cases weren't COVID emergencies.
At first, they ignore you.
Then they minimize you.
Then they fight you.
It's the same thing.
No, no, look.
Those are not COVID emergencies.
It's not related to the COVID.
I mean, I know you're having an anaphylactic shock or your face is going numb or you're having a stroke and it's within short proximity of having gotten the jab.
Nothing to do with it.
Piss off.
Pay for your own ambulance.
Oh, what's that?
There's too many of them.
We better make this policy.
Sarah Lynn was still in the vaccine clinic when she knew something wasn't right.
I would love to know how amplified this article was at the time.
The Dartmouth, Nova Scotia resident had her first COVID-19 vaccine a few weeks ago.
This is two years old.
And despite knowing this, and wait until you see the statistics cited in this article, they continued to push this for another two years.
Within minutes of getting her dose of Moderna, she was on the floor, unable to move.
Walk it off.
Oh, sorry, you can't walk it off?
Well, let's take you to the hospital.
Don't worry.
The ambulance ride is on us.
Her body was overheated, and then she broke out in cold sweats, and her vision was blurred.
I didn't even make it 15 minutes from getting the shot before you're allowed to leave, she said.
As the muscle parts blocked up, staff at the clinic called an ambulance.
She was brought to the hospital.
She was there for a few hours before starting to feel normal again and was discharged.
No biggie, guys, no biggie.
Go into shock, become paralyzed, cold sweats, but you're fine afterwards.
I mean, whatever that massive immunological response was, forget about it.
Schedule your second shot, guinea pig.
Unexpected ambulance bill.
Lynn said she was extremely exhausted for the next four days.
That's just nothing.
That's nothing.
It's just, you know, you're tired because your body went into some form of shock from a foreign substance being into it.
Walk it off, sleep it off, you'll be fine.
But oh, here's a bill.
It was like I got hit by this truck and just like drained all my energy.
It was crazy.
As her energy increased, so too did her frustration levels.
Last month, the provincial government announced ambulance fees would be waived for anyone with a COVID-related emergency.
This is not the Babylon Bee people.
This is July 2021, Canada.
Let me just see here.
June.
Sorry.
June 15. June 2021.
The move was intended to ensure people who needed help called for it as soon as possible without worrying about the $146 bill.
God, the government is really thinking about you.
When they experiment on you in real time and you have a reaction to it, don't worry about it.
You don't have to pay for the hospital bill.
She was told her situation didn't qualify as a COVID emergency.
Let me see something here.
A COVID-related emergency.
Oh, I get it.
It wasn't a COVID-related emergency.
It was a COVID-jab-related emergency.
Oh, let's see.
Here we go.
But when Lynn asked about her fee-mingway, she was told her situation didn't qualify as a COVID emergency.
Angela Seaboyer was told the same thing.
Another person who had an adverse reaction.
I knew this isn't normal.
The Annapolis Valley resident started having a reaction to her first dose of AstraZeneca a day after getting the shot.
Her symptoms escalated quickly with a crushing headache followed by a burning sensation in her legs.
Totally normal.
Then her stomach became upset and she had difficulty breathing.
I knew this isn't normal.
Something's going on.
An ambulance was called.
She was taken to the hospital.
She was discharged.
With orders to return if her headache got worse or if her other symptoms returned.
She found herself short on energy and easily tired for the next few days.
Eventually, she returned to the hospital, although this time she drove herself.
Are they going to pay for her gas too?
When she found out the bill was coming for the ambulance ride, she assumed she wouldn't have to worry about it, that the fee would be waived.
She found out otherwise.
Do you see what is going on here right now, by the way?
I've talked about the fake news.
Trifecta of strategy.
Ignore, distract, demonize.
We're at the distraction stage here.
Because remember, now what they're trying to make you do is feel grateful for the fact that the costs of your adverse reaction to the jab are being covered.
Feel grateful for that after we make the frustration so that you ignore the fact that you were damaged by the jab.
They said, because I didn't test positive for COVID, it wasn't COVID-related.
I didn't understand that.
Listen to this, people.
This is where they bury the lead.
Because it wasn't even part of the article.
Wait, listen to this.
As of June 4, this is June 4, 2021, 25 million COVID vaccines had been administered in Canada, with adverse reactions reported by 6,864 people, according to the federal government.
That equals about three people out of 10,000 who have reported adverse events.
Don't you love the way they say it also?
That's three people out of 10,000.
Why don't you say one out of 3,000?
Because it sounds more shocking.
Why don't you say 30 out of 100?
Why don't you say 300 out of a million?
That sounds like you're diluting it even more.
Three out of 10,000 who reported adverse events to the JAB.
You know how many people reported hospitalization from the Rona under certain age brackets?
And if you look at the new Israeli study, where they apparently report zero deaths under 50 from the Rona?
That's not me.
YouTube, that's you.
That's an Israeli study.
Three out of 10,000 reported adverse reactions to the jab.
There was so much of it that the province graciously decided to waive the ambulance fee for those who had to be rushed to the hospital.
Because of an adverse reaction to the jab.
They were pleased to learn of the change in the policy.
Oh, I love Big Brother.
Thank you for paying for my medical bills.
Thank you, Don Carleone, for paying for my crutches after you just shot me in the kneecaps.
It's a...
Don't swear.
Don't swear.
It's a gosh darn sick joke.
It would be comical if it weren't so tragic.
I'm glad that you waived a hundred.
You know what?
I would pay $10,000 for that ambulance fee if it would allow someone to sue the government, if it would allow someone to sue the pharma company.
Imagine that!
We're grateful that they've covered our fee now.
It is a crime against humanity that these people were experimented on in real time, unbeknownst to them, because as Daniel Housefather explained, The pharma companies were bypassing ordinary studies, ordinary safety protocol.
They were bypassing ordinary manufacturing production protocol because they didn't have time to do the research, the safety tests.
They didn't have time to ensure quality control in the production because the world needed shit and we just needed to put that shit in their body.
Oh shit, I just swore.
That's an article.
It's an actual article from 2021.
Back then.
They knew people were reporting three in 10,000.
That's one in 3,333.
And that's what they were reporting.
And we know that reports are wildly underrepresented of actual adverse reactions.
So many people were complaining about it that Nova Scotia, as a policy, actually had to say, I'm getting a lot of complaints here that people are getting sick and have to go rush to the hospital after the jibby jab.
Let's throw a couple of bucks their way and pay for the ambulance fee and maybe they'll leave us alone.
Well, they can't sue us.
They can't sue the pharma companies, so they're up shit creek without a paddle.
But let's just, you know...
Here.
Here's some crutches.
Sorry about what I did to your knees.
Oh, don't worry, KC.
You know what?
Segway.
As if this is not representative of the...
That just said, by the way, for the podcast version, people who are watching this on podcast or listening to it on podcast, watching it with their ears, this chat says, Canada now offering free euthanizations.
I have to pull up another video now that you mentioned, now that you reminded me.
That's the jab rubbish out of Canada.
It would be a sick joke if it weren't so bloody tragic, and it's bloody tragic.
Stay tuned, by the way, next week there's going to be some very, very interesting interviews on the channel on a related topic.
I want to get to the other aspect of the fall of Canada.
But first, Master Mulrubius in the house with a Super Chat.
And it'll allow me to do my standard intro disclaimer.
What are we now?
25 minutes into the stream?
Master Mulrubius, $5 Rumble Rant, Super Chat says, leading a petition to change O Canada to uh-oh Canada.
What are you doing?
I would just go with O, O-H, Canada.
O Canada.
One...
Master Mulrubius, thank you for the super chat.
Bill Gates' version of Epstein should be blue screened.
How about crashed?
Bill Gates crashed Epstein.
That's Daniel Whittle for a five pound.
Now, standard disclaimers, and I forgot to say them.
No medical advice, no legal advice, no election fortification advice.
We will be talking about Carrie Lake's election loss.
We're talking about the jibby jab, but I don't give medical advice because I'm not a doctor.
I am just, you know.
A former?
I'm still a lawyer.
Just don't practice anymore.
With half a brain.
Half a functioning brain.
At least.
Maybe three quarters of a functioning brain, and I can put two and two together.
Let's see what we got on Rumble.
We got these things called Rumble Rants on Rumble.
YouTube takes 30% of those super chats.
Rumble ordinarily takes 20%, but for the rest of the year, they're taking 0%.
So 100% of what you see there.
Finboy Slick, thank you very much.
100% goes to the creator.
At the end of 2023, 2024, they're going to revert to taking the 20%, but it's still a better cut that goes to the creator, better to support a platform that supports free speech.
Canada's so generous.
Next, they'll offer free delivery of maid kits with full money-back guarantee.
You joke, Finboy Slick.
We're on the way to that.
I'm so glad that I, my rumble rant, wasn't even about your secret-smelling mullet.
Let's do it.
Finboy Select, thank you very much.
I think you had some good ones from yesterday as well.
Yeah, that's it.
Pay for your ambulance.
So thoughtful and so cute.
So thoughtful because Canada is a polite society of thoughtful people who are so thoughtful they want to expand its state-sanctioned murder at this point.
I can't even call it euthanasia because it went from...
It went from...
You know, for the terminally ill, in excruciating pain with no hope for betterment of their terminal condition, to the mentally ill, to minors.
They want to expand it to the minors as well.
And now, according to a poll, 27% of Canadians think it's okay to, you know, homeless people, if that's their reason to euthanize themselves.
It was called, I think it was called Action 4. It had Action, A-K-T-I-O-N, with a number.
They called it mercy killings.
You know, because the mentally ill, when you would euthanize them, it would be for their own benefit.
And, you know, the other people who just didn't know that they needed to consent to being euthanized.
And for those who say that this is a hyperbolic, offensive comparison, first of all...
Tough shit.
I'm actually well beyond the point now of trying to placate people's sensitivities for not wanting to admit reality.
But for those who say that it's callous, not equivocal, it's not there yet, mental illness, for those of you who are not lawyers or who have no legal training, vitiates consent for contracts.
You cannot contractually engage with someone when they're in a state of mania.
Mental unwellness, mental illness has been a legal basis for annulling contracts for vitiating consent.
How then can someone who is mentally ill consent to euthanasia if...
The very basis of the reason for which they are purportedly consenting to euthanasia in the ordinary, at least sometimes in law, would result in viciating their consent to contract in the first place.
You can't.
And so what do you end up having if you support euthanizing people for reasons of mental illness?
You have state-sanctioned murder.
You can call it mercy killing.
You can call it euthanasia.
You can call it medical assistance in dying.
You can call it maids if you're too much of a coward to actually call it what it is.
That is what it is.
How can a minor consent to euthanasia when a minor cannot consent in law?
So call it what it is, understand what it is, and if you find the comparison offensive, it's because it is offensive.
But now let's just read this from the National Post, and I will qualify this with a caveat.
I don't believe the polls in general.
We're in a situation where if the poll is right, Gosh darn it is Canada damned.
And if the poll is not right, gosh darn it is Canada damned because you have a government-subsidized media that's trying to make this narrative palatable to Canadians.
And I'll explain what I mean by that in a second.
One-third of Canadians fine with prescribing assisted suicide for homelessness.
This is National Post.
This is not May 16, 1939.
This is May 16, 2023.
Roughly the same number told a poll they were fine with approving made for someone whose only affiliation was poverty.
Hey, people.
No, no, the slippery slope is a fallacy.
It's not a fallacy.
It's a strategy.
It's not a fallacy.
It's a reality.
The slippery slope is not a fallacy.
It's a tactic when what you want to do is get to that dark side of the cliff.
Push, push, push, push, push.
Pull back.
Push, push, push, push, push.
And the other one, it's just a reality.
You get used to abuse and then your threshold for more abuse is that much more attenuated.
A homeless encampment in Vancouver.
Well, not for long if the government has its way.
Not for long if the Canadians have their way.
Oh, but the homeless people, they're mentally ill.
They can't object to euthanasia.
Forget consent.
I mean, we're going to get there.
A mentally ill person cannot object to euthanasia.
One-third of Canadians are apparently fine with prescribing assisted suicide for no other reason than the fact that the patient is poor or homeless.
We're going to see how many people were in this poll.
I bet you it's 1,065.
The results were contained in a recent poll.
I'm just going to click on it.
Let's see here.
Is this going to tell us how many people?
Oh my God, my eyes are so weak now.
Okay.
Generally speaking, guys, this is the question.
Do you support or oppose allowing a person to seek medical assistance in dying in Canada if the conditions explained below are met?
Be eligible for health services funded by the federal government.
This is a very confusing question.
Be at least 18 years old of age, fully competent, have a grievance and irremediable medical condition, make a voluntary request for medical assistance in dying, is not the result of outside pressure.
Give informed consent.
This is one question.
My goodness, this question is not clear.
Be eligible for health services by the federal government or a province.
Be at least 18 years of age and mentally competent.
Mentally competent.
It's amazing.
Have a grievous irremediable condition.
Fine.
Okay, but that's not...
Oh, I'm sorry.
There's more questions.
That's why.
Because I'm an idiot.
What is your personal feeling about medical assistance and dying?
From what you have seen, read, or heard, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the regulations that are currently in place in Canada to deal with the issue of medical assistance and dying?
At this point, only an adult with a grievous medical...
At this point...
Sorry, my reading skills have never been...
Perfect.
Only an adult with a grievous and irremediable medical condition can seek medical assistance in dying in Canada.
Do you agree or disagree with allowing adults in Canada to seek medical assistance in dying because of the following reasons?
Poverty.
Homelessness.
Inability to receive medical treatment.
Wow, don't you love it, the inability?
It's not inability to receive medical treatment, whoever phrased these questions.
It's the incapacity of the socialized healthcare system to provide the medical treatment.
Describing the same thing, but just sort of attributing the blame somewhere else.
Mental illness, disability, and we know the stats.
Now, how many people?
The typical word is respondents.
They're not going to tell us how many people were asked?
All right, well, we'll go back.
We'll see if the article.
Starting in March, Canada, a research co-found that 73% of poll respondents favored the current regime.
And only 16% opposed it.
That is sickening.
That is sickening.
Pollsters also found not insignificant numbers of Canadians who favored assisted suicide in cases where no medical condition of any kind was present.
Mercy killings, people.
27% said they would be fine with legalizing that person's access to MAID if their only affliction...
Was poverty.
Are we going to see how many respondents were in here?
How many?
How many?
I don't think we're going to find the number of people polled.
Wow, they don't even tell us the number of people polled in this one.
Let me just see if I can't.
30 seconds to see if we can find it.
It's typically like 1,000 when they call Friday.
They call in an afternoon and then see who picks up their landline.
Wow, they don't give the numbers of the amount of people polled here, it seems.
All right, well, that's Canada, people.
Oh, no, no.
I'm the heartless bastard for thinking that it should only be used in the most exceptional cases for terminal illness.
Oh, I'm a heartless bastard.
Who am I to say that a mentally ill person can't consent to death?
I'm a heartless bastard for saying, holy shit, do we now see the problem?
I see some of the consistent trolls.
Welcome, welcome in, people.
What I love is that in order to comment, you have to be a subscriber because I put it on subscriber-only mode, so the people who...
Even the trolls are subscribers, so congratulations.
You've played yourself.
That's Canada.
And now that might be the time for us to move on over to the Rumbles.
Talk about Carrie Lake, Jeffrey Epstein, and Big Pete, happy belated birthday.
Also waiting patiently on the sidebar potential.
Big Pete, thank you very much.
Birthday was good.
Had a nice steak.
Okay, let's go to rumble.
It's so gross.
I mean, gross is an understatement.
It's inhumane.
And you see what's going to end up happening here.
I mean, set aside the organ donor issues.
You're going to have a black market if you don't already have, or at least a financial incentive to collect the body parts of the people who are now being pushed into euthanasia.
The question of...
The inability to receive, what was it called?
The inability to receive medical treatment.
No, it's the incapacity of the system to provide it.
And what better way for a government to net a profit on both ends?
Reduce healthcare costs by killing the ill.
Oh, no, it's too expensive for us to treat your otherwise treatable medical condition.
Let's make your life so bloody miserable that you decide to end your own life because you can't find lodging, which has happened.
You can't find adequate treatment for your multiple chemical sensitivity, which has already happened.
Now, hey, the homeless!
So if that poll is accurate, well, gosh darn it, hell is what you make on Earth.
And if that poll is what I suspect it is, you know, they cherry-pick their sample pool so they can fabricate a narrative, well, gosh darn it, enjoy the hell that you're going to inherit up in Canada.
You're trying to condition this Canadian population into being okay with the idea of euthanizing Canadians because of homelessness, poverty.
Miserable life because the socialist government makes it miserable?
Here's a solution.
Death.
And we'll be happy to administer it.
Oh, what's that?
Population is going down.
People aren't having enough babies because they're out there now promoting schmushmortion.
Oh, well, there's an easy cure for that.
Open up the borders.
It's an amazing...
One might say it's a diabolical plan if it's indeed a plan.
Otherwise, it's just an amazing series of accidents, coincidences.
All right, move on over to Rumble.
Let's get out of here.
Link to Rumble is there.
Oh, I almost forgot, actually, before everyone goes there.
Karima, Karima Saad, the Canadian reporter, has been following Jeremy McKenzie's...
Criminal trial for the harassment, for the protest outside the doctor's office.
She's coming on at 5.15.
It's going to be good.
It's going to be...
I don't consider myself on the right politically.
I don't think I know enough about Karima to consider her to be on the left politically.
But it is going to be two people of different silos having a discussion.
And she's going to give us the latest on the Jeremy McKenzie.
There's not really much news there.
But it's going to be fun.
So come on over to Rumble.
And then after that, come on over to Locals because we're going to have the Locals after party.
Then after that, come back for 7 o 'clock sidebar with Alexander.
I keep forgetting her last name now.
Her first name.
I know I got it in the backdrop somewhere.
That's not that one.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Sidebar tonight is with Rachel Alexander.
Story is very interesting and it's going to be fun to watch.
So with that said, people, ending on YouTube, going over to Rumble now in 3, 2, 1. Peace out, peeps.
Okay, are we good?
Let's see.
All right, we are very good.
Good, good, some might even say.
Here, let's bring up some rumble rants before we go on to the Epstein.
And the Epstein story, it's not so much the story that's funny.
That's interesting.
What is super interesting and almost funny, if it weren't so diabolical, is reanalyzing...
A Bill Gates answer to a question about Jeffrey Epstein in an interview, which has now taken on an entirely new meaning.
Share screen.
Finboy Slick says Russian sanctions equals fertilizer shortage.
Recompose first company to turn dead people into fertilizer.
Canada expanding use of MAID.
Sounds like a private partnership.
I'm not there yet.
Because I think they're not going to go to fertilizer with the dead bodies.
They're going to go to organ harvesting.
And I'm fairly certain they're already there.
They're going to go to organ harvesting.
And what's going to end up happening, it's not much different than China.
They're going to have organ harvesting.
And where are you going to get your new kidney, your new lung?
Well, let's pressure some homeless person into death because their life is so miserable because the socialist government that is Canadian government can't provide for you.
Wouldn't you rather be dead?
Oh, and look at that.
We've got someone waiting for your lungs, your heart, your eyes, whatever.
Entry required.
How can children with multiple mental illnesses be deemed competent for consent of medicinal and surgical sterilization and their, quote, doctors be prohibited from questioning their life-altering whim?
Hashtag Sochi.
Now, entry required is referring to the conversion ban law in Canada.
I forget which law it is.
Bill C4, C6.
It's one of the ones.
It's law now in Canada.
It is now officially criminalized to try to convert a kid.
Conversion therapy.
But only in one direction.
You can convert a kid from a boy to a girl in as much as anybody thinks you can change your sex through transition, whatever it is.
I think it's Frankensteinian child mutilation.
You can go that way.
You can tell a straight kid they're gay.
You can't tell a gay kid they're straight.
You can't tell someone who thinks they're trans, you'll grow out of this, don't do that.
That's the conversion that's banned.
The conversion that's promoted and not just, I was going to say tolerated, not just tolerated, but promoted.
That conversion is from straight to gay, straight to trans, boy to girl, and as much as that can ever be achieved through...
Whatever those monsters are doing, and if you don't know what they're doing, you have to go see what that surgery actually entails.
There's an actual law that criminalizes trying to tell a kid, you'll grow out of it.
Psychiatrists are now basically criminalized from practicing their profession.
Jordan Peterson talked about this.
Psychologists and parents from having these discussions with their own kids.
Finboy Slick says, one's distrust of the Canadian government might be considered a made-eligible mental illness before dying.
Double whammy!
Whammy!
If you're homeless after they cancel your bank account.
Okay, there we go.
Oh, it's outrageous.
It's absolutely outrageous.
Okay, let's see if we're good here.
And let me just see.
Let me refresh.
People, there are 224 thumbs up thingy things.
Give it a thumbs up and let's see if we can get to a landing page of the Rumbles.
We're not there yet.
We're not at the landing page.
I still don't know how it works here, but I'm told that if you hit the thumbs up, it does make a difference.
And what I'll do now is I'll just say...
I'm going to tweet this out because I forgot that I haven't live now.
And Karima is coming on at 17.15 to talk about Jeremy McKenzie's...
Mackenzie's trial.
All right.
Done.
So, let's actually, before, let's cleanse our palates with a little humor.
I was going to start with this on YouTube, but I didn't want to make it.
Justin Trudeau makes us want to gag.
Michael Rappaport is just foul.
Michael Rappaport, he used to be a good actor.
He used to be a good actor.
I used to like the guy.
He has turned into a broken man.
Trump has broken people irreparably.
He's broken a rift in the continuum of human psychological and intellectual development.
He has broken people beyond repair.
Michael Rappaport is one of those people.
For those of you who don't know him, he used to be a great actor.
Dick Ritchie in True Romance.
I forget who he was in Copland.
He seems like a funny guy.
I didn't know he was Jewish.
He brought that up one time.
I always thought he was like one of those crass Boston type of...
Religion even never came into play until he called someone a name and then said that he was being attacked for being Jewish.
And I'm like, I know.
When you grow up, you learn real quick that Roseanne Barr is Jewish.
Pee Wee Herman is Jewish.
I never knew Michael Rappaport was Jewish.
He is.
And I got to tell you, he's not making me look good or feel good by comparison.
This is what he has to say about Marjorie Taylor Greene.
He's got a thing for Marjorie Taylor Greene.
But listen to this.
Let's reflect back on Obama's intro, Confession Through Projection.
Listen to the adjectives that Michael Rappaport uses to describe Marjorie Taylor Greene.
And just imagine who he might subconsciously be talking about.
Me, Michael Rappaport, I am calling for the impeachment of miserable, mutant, deranged, muppet-faced Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Muppet-face.
Today!
Muppet-face.
I don't ordinarily talk about what people look like.
Mean.
Deranged.
Muppet-face.
The gimp.
The gimp from Georgia, who should be walking around with a...
With a rubber ball in her mouth.
Because she's a true blue mean.
True blue mean.
Mean.
Angry.
Angry.
Demented.
Demented.
Look at that face.
And tell me that this guy does not understand that the adjectives he uses to describe others are a reflection of the way he feels about himself.
Dead-armed gimp.
I don't know what dead-armed gimp means.
With little.
Little rock-hard, flat feet.
Okay, the rest is just stupid.
Now that we've cleansed our palate with a moment of serenity, don't let your minds get broken, people.
Mean.
Deranged.
Demented.
Muppet-faced.
I mean, it's crazy.
It's crazy.
It's crazy.
Obama's sitting there talking about what they do, what he has implemented by strategy, and...
It's an amazing phenomenon.
You see it in others because you feel it of yourself and you feel ashamed about it of yourself.
And so the way to deflect your own shame from your own sentiments of your own foibles is to criticize them in others when they don't exist in others, but for your perception of them and projection of them onto others.
All right.
Freudian Viva is done for the day.
Let's get to the Bill Gates.
The Bill Gates story.
Here we go.
Okay.
People.
I'm curious to know what everyone thinks about my psychoanalysis.
I don't consider that to be medical advice.
It isn't.
Or psychological analysis.
It is my ability to read humans, and I place a lot of faith in my ability to read humans.
It's kept me out of a lot of trouble in life.
When you're a lawyer, and what they call, I was never a street lawyer, but a solo practitioner, where you take walk-ins, and you meet clients, and you have to decide, in short order, is this A serious person with serious problems?
Or is this a mentally unwell person with problems that result from their mental problems?
And their mental problems and their problems in life are quickly going to encompass and envelop you.
Are they going to be good clients, bad clients, grateful clients?
You have to develop that skill quickly because your survival and sanity depend on it.
All right, Wall Street Journal people, Jeffrey Epstein.
I mean, this is like...
I don't read novels, but this is like Tom Clancy-esque.
And what happened to Jeffrey Epstein?
He totally, absolutely, obviously, logically ended his own life.
Totally.
The amount of times they say disgraced financier...
By the way, look at this.
Control all F. Disgraced.
How many times did they say it twice?
Okay, that's not so many times.
The disgraced financier was trying to set up a philanthropic fund that he hoped would include the billionaire as an anchor.
By the way, confession through projection, the other thing that bad people tend to do, they tend to really, really, really let the world know about all the good things that they're doing.
Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, I'll stop naming names.
Jeffrey Epstein discovered that Bill Gates had an affair with a Russian bridge player and later appeared to use his knowledge to threaten one of the world's richest men, according to people familiar with the matter.
I have to be skeptical about this because people are familiar with the matter.
I don't place much stock in that when it comes to anonymous complaints against Trump.
But there are emails in here.
Let's just get to it.
The word I'm looking for was coding.
Coding.
Here we go.
Microsoft co-founder met the woman around 2010 when she was in her 20s.
Epstein met her in 2013, later paid for her to attend software coding school.
In 2017, Epstein emailed Gates and asked to be reimbursed for the cost of the course.
According to people familiar with the matter...
Okay, let's get to the email.
Here we go.
This is it.
I get that word out of here now.
In 2017, Epstein contacted Gates about the Russian bridge player, years after their relationship had ended.
Apparently Bill Gates is something like 30 some odd years older than the Russian bridge player at the time of the affair.
And I don't really...
Consenting adults can do what they want.
The issue is whether or not they're consenting adults.
My best buddy's parents were 22 years apart.
And it was a little weird growing up, but...
20 to 40, 20 to 50. Okay.
Grown adults, they can do their own thing.
In 2017, Epstein contacted Gates about the Russian bridge player, years after the relationship had ended, according to people familiar with the matter.
He sent an email to Gates asking to be reimbursed for the costs of Anatova's coding school, the people said.
The sum was immaterial for the two men, and the tone of the message was that Epstein knew about the affair and could expose it, the people said.
The spokeswoman for Gates said he didn't make a payment.
Mr. Gates had no financial dealings with Mr. Epstein.
Days before he died in 2019, Epstein changed his will and named Nikolic as backup executive.
And Epstein didn't discuss the idea with him.
He couldn't have listed Bill because it would have been so obvious, so he chose me.
So the question is, what else might Jeffrey Epstein have had in terms of dirt on Bill Gates?
Or others, for that matter.
Who were the clients of Bill Gates and Ghislaine Maxwell?
Who knows?
They were human traffickers with no clients.
So that's the latest.
Don't threaten the world's richest man.
It might not end well.
And thinking of that now, let's go back to an interview.
Look at that face.
I mean, it's...
It's the meme for evil, Dr. Evil.
Who was this interview with?
PBS.
Okay.
Listen to this.
Look at demeanor.
I, again, I consider myself to be a good read of a person, a good read of character, a good read of body language.
Let's watch the entire thing.
...reported at that time that you had a number of meetings with Jeffrey Epstein.
Who, when you met him 10 years ago, he was convicted of soliciting prostitution from minors.
What did you know about him when you were meeting with him, as you've said yourself, in the hopes of raising money?
I really knew nothing.
You know, I had dinners with him.
I regret doing that.
He had relationships with...
By the way, by the way, stop.
What did you know about him?
I had dinners with...
I regret that.
A deflection.
That's not an answer to the question.
What did you know of him?
People, he said, would give to global health, which is an interest I have.
Not nearly enough philanthropy goes in that direction.
Those meetings were a mistake.
They didn't result in...
What did you know of him?
Not what is your retroactive analysis of...
What he purported, and I cut them off.
That goes back a long...
Time ago now.
With the hands.
With the hands.
There's nothing new on that.
It was reported that you continue to meet with him over several years.
This is stress and release.
Listen to this.
And that, in other words, a number of meetings.
What did you do when you found out about his background?
Well, you know, I've said I regretted having those dinners.
What did you do when you found out about his background?
Well, I guess the answer is nothing.
Just hoped other people wouldn't find out.
There's nothing, absolutely nothing new on that.
Is there a lesson for you?
Is there a lesson?
Listen to this.
This is it.
This is like, this is saying the quiet part out loud by accident or on purpose.
For you?
Is there a lesson?
Anyone else looking at this?
Well, he's dead.
So, you know, in general, you always have to be careful.
How many people have seen this interview before?
Is there a lesson for...
And there's nothing, absolutely nothing new on that.
Is there a lesson for you or anyone else?
Well, there's a lesson for Jeffrey Epstein, and he learned it.
Is there a lesson for you, for anyone else looking at this?
Well, he's dead.
So, you know, in general, you always have to be careful.
He's dead.
In general, you always have to be careful.
If he committed suicide, well, you don't have to be careful about your own actions to yourself.
Is there a lesson anybody else has to learn?
Well, he's dead.
So in general, you have to be careful.
You know, I'm very proud of what we've done in philanthropy, very proud of the work of the foundation.
He's smiling.
That's what I get up every day and focus on.
Oh my...
It's...
I mean, that's...
People?
That's outrageous.
Is there a lesson anybody should learn here?
Any lesson?
Well, he's dead.
So you gotta be careful.
Kill one person, you're a murderer.
Kill a million.
Oh no, sorry.
I'm an idiot.
One person is murdered.
It's a statistic.
I just blew it again.
One person murdered is a tragedy.
A million people murdered is a statistic.
That in retrospect, and now knowing what we now know, that allows us to reinterpret that statement of the past in an entirely new light.
Tried to blackmail Bill Gates by threatening to expose his relationship with a woman who at the time was 30 some odd years his junior.
Maybe other stuff too that he wasn't stupid enough to put into writing.
Try to blackmail the guy and now go back and analyze that question.
Is there a lesson for anybody to learn here?
Well, he's dead.
Anybody else want to blackmail me?
I didn't think so.
It's like Ben Stiller from Happy Gilmore.
Anybody else's fingers hurt?
I didn't think so.
By the way, I watched Happy Gilmore three times yesterday.
It's the perfect movie.
All right.
Oh, you know what?
There's one that I didn't...
There's one story that I wanted to bring up.
Okay, so that's Bill Gates.
Let's just get the Carrie Lake stuff out of the way here.
Carrie Lake loses for a second time and court went to bid over to...
They set up a situation.
The judge set up a situation that Carrie Lake could not win based on the parameters of the threshold of evidence that needed to be met.
In order for her to succeed on her sole remaining claim, which was that Maricopa County did not follow any meaningful, did not respect its own protocol as relates to signature verification.
The judge set up a situation where it would have been virtually impossible for Carrie Lake to meet that threshold.
We talked about it with Barnes.
We knew it was coming.
If I had a bet that paid 100 to 1, I would have still bet that she would have succeeded because it would have paid off.
But if it was a betting game, it was a no-brainer.
The judge had set up a circumstance.
I think they described it in this article.
What Carrie Lake had to do in order to succeed on her sole remaining claim, and it was impossible.
Now, whether or not the Court of Appeal comes and overturns that and says it was an error in law to set the threshold at that high bar, whatever.
As Barnes has said, and as others have said, Carrie Lake's success lies not in the failure, but in the exposure.
Success would have been success, but this was sort of a win-win in a sense because we all saw the guy there, you know, like that little bird that dunks in the water.
Oh, signature, signature, signature, signature.
Less than three seconds to verify.
300,000 signatures.
That is no verification at all.
The mail-in system is a joke.
And with justice like this, if you don't change it at the legislative level, well, you know that there's a problem and you're not doing what you need to do to resolve it.
The article.
Judge confirms Katie Hobbs' election as governor six months ago.
Ruling says Lakes attorneys failed to show misconduct in signature verification of early ballots.
Misconduct already.
I'm not sure that that was the word the judge used, but she didn't need to show misconduct.
She just needed to show that they did not follow their signature verification protocol, which we all know that they didn't if anybody saw the trial, the first one and the second one.
Second one, it was even more eloquently detailed.
Maricopa County judge on Monday threw it.
Republican carried Lake's final legal claim to overturn the election.
Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson ruled that Lake's attorneys failed to show.
Here it is.
Clear and convincing evidence of misconduct in verifying early ballot signatures.
That's not exactly where they explained the threshold.
Confirmed.
Katie Hobbs.
Good.
Yada, yada, yada.
Okay, let's skip that part.
I wanted to show what she had to show.
Thompson, there we go, set the high bar for Lake's attorneys to win the case.
Highlighting it, I'm going to stop highlighting it now.
Thompson set a high bar for Lake's attorneys to win the case based on their own claims.
Show no signature verification was done and prove there's a mathematical basis to claim that the failure cost Lake the election.
The second part is where I think I have a, I take issue in my understanding of the law.
I take issue with the legal aspect of that.
Because it would be impossible to say, look, they verified all those signatures.
There's no way of saying, without comparing the signatures, that the ones that they approved went to Katie Hobbs when they should have been annulled.
They could have just as easily gone to Cary Lake when they should have been annulled.
So the second half of the claim is immaterial to the only legal question that mattered, in my understanding, or at least what ought to have been the law, that the only thing that mattered was showing that they did not do.
A signature verification.
They had protocol in place.
It required comparison of four points.
It required training of the signature verifiers and that woodpecker, as the lawyer called him.
Click, click, click.
Good, good, good, good, good.
In approving, in three seconds or less, 350,000 ballots.
That is tantamount to no signature verification.
You didn't need to show that they would have gone to Cary Lake, but they went to Katie Hobbs.
You just have to show that they did not respect their own protocol for signature verification.
That's what I think the legal standard ought to have been.
And we'll see if the higher court says that's what it should have been.
But at the very least, we know that that's what it was, and that's not what happened.
That it would have gone to...
That it cost Cary Lake the election, purely hypothetical.
Thompson ruled that he didn't find clear and convincing evidence or a preponderance of evidence to support the claims.
Former TV anchor never conceded a 17,000 vote defeat.
She's considering a run for the Senate.
And it faltered on.
Then they go with the trial.
Under questioning by a Maricopa County lawyer, she agreed that she verified ballot signature.
Yeah, they said we verified them.
Three seconds.
Two seconds?
Yeah.
I saw a signature.
I verified a signature.
It's easy to play Monday morning quarterback and say what ought to have been done, what should have been said.
If they kept it quick, short, concise.
If the glove don't fit, you must acquit.
Hocus pocus, out of focus.
What was another good one that was of recent memory?
Three seconds or less signature verification is no signature verification.
But anyhow, so she's got appeals.
From what I understand, she's announced that she's going to appeal.
Whether or not they're robust grounds of appeals, whether or not the higher courts are going to do anything unlikely, I think.
But she lost.
That's it.
It was fun to watch.
Anybody who watched it knows what a bloody joke it is.
A sad, sick joke.
But a lot of people didn't watch.
A lot of people are just going to read the news and say, ah, she lost.
Clearly, everything's good.
Everything's fine.
Carry on.
Castello won.
$5 crumble rant.
Was it Trump or the CERN Collider?
I've heard the CERN stuff.
It was Trump.
It was Trump, and I'm convinced that Mark Grober is onto something when he says this is another form of MKUltra mass formation psychosis of sorts.
They're doing something.
They figured something out, whether it's the TikTok algorithm.
I would sooner blame TikTok than the CERN Collider.
Costello, but thank you for the rumble rant.
Entry required.
Says, we knew Epstein's orgy island was a honeypot CIA blackmail trap after his Bush administration child sex trafficking conviction and slap on the wrist sentencing.
Mr. Entry required.
Yeah, and anybody who's been watching Alex Jones for a decade knew this well in advance.
Fleet Lord Avatar.
The thumbs up gets a higher on the leaderboard ranking, which underperform every time front page is done with algorithm.
Okay.
I don't really care anyhow about the front page or any of that stuff.
I do notice that a lot of people watch the streams for days afterwards, which is fantastic.
The stream I did with Alan and Taylor Martin over the weekend about the death of their daughter.
She was three and a half months after the first jab, and they still don't know if she got the booster because the doctor's stonewalling them despite their HIPAA requests for their own daughter's medical information.
Horrific.
Oski Weewee says not every player on the baseball team has to cheat to throw the game.
Okay.
Thank you, guys.
That was the other story that I wanted to bring up.
The white face of...
Speaking of...
Alex Jones and his observation that they do the same thing, they run the same play over and over again.
Oh, this is just another article on Kerry Lake.
Okay, this one's from the Associated Press.
See, I have to cross-reference my articles to make sure they were not in mid-February.
Okay, so this one I don't think is mentioning whether or not there's an appeal.
But hold on a second.
U-Haul.
Speaking of Alex Jones, Alex Jones wisely said on my channel, U-Haul crash, White House, Nazi flag.
They use the same MO over and over again.
And he says they have one playbook and it's amazing that it still continues to work.
White supremacist.
They said it was a white supremacist for a little while and they had their beautiful...
Nazi flag just...
Oh, tabernush.
Come on.
19-year-old accused of U-Haul crash near White House had Nazi flag planned to seize power.
They ran with a white nationalist because the dude apparently had a Nazi flag.
Do we have the picture?
Do we have the picture?
This amazing picture.
There it is.
Oh, no, that's not the right one.
That's not the good picture.
There was an amazing picture where just like, you know, after the crash...
Authorities, for whatever the reason, laid out the Nazi flag on the ground.
There was actually somebody taking a selfie with it.
There we go.
Look at this.
Look at this.
New investigators are pulled.
They pulled what appears to be a Nazi flag out of the U-Haul, but they haven't provided any further details.
Here's what we know.
A Nazi flag.
And then they put it on the ground right next to the truck so that people could take pictures.
Much like when they took Donald Trump's classified folder.
I mean, like, remember once upon a time, speaking of Michael Rappaport and Copland, and how once upon a time cops used to just plant drugs on people and then arrest them?
Plant a murder weapon?
Plant a weapon somewhere and then arrest them?
Set aside, you know, people are like, oh my god, nobody even asked the question, like, is it conceivable that someone just planted that flag there?
But even let's set that aside.
Let's say that this crazy white supremacist, he's Indian, by the way, we're going to get there.
Let's just say that this crazy white supremacist had a Nazi flag in the truck.
The first thing authorities do is just go to the car, take it, lay it on the ground so everybody can take a picture with it and send it to social media.
It's amazing.
But who did this?
Who was this awful, evil white supremacist, this 19-year-old white supremacist that was crashing a U-Haul with a Nazi flag into the White House to seize power?
Secret Service investigating a U-Haul crashed into Lafayette Square across the street from the White House.
Incident happened, yada, yada, yada.
Who's the individual?
Investigators apparently found a Nazi flag inside the truck, but no other information was provided.
Secret Service released the following statement.
Shortly before 10 p.m., Secret Service uniformed division officers detained the driver of a box truck.
After the vehicle collided with security barriers on the north side of Lafayette's Ground 16th Street, there were no injuries to any Secret Service or White House personnel.
Yada, yada, yada.
According to the U.S. police, Kandula...
Hold on a second.
We missed his name.
Copy.
Who was this white supremacist, you might ask?
The driver has been identified as 19-year-old Sai Varshith Kandula of Chesterfield, Missouri.
He's not white people.
I'm going to throw that out there.
Now, maybe this was the traditional Buddhist Indian reverse swastika that you find on old incense burners.
I remember once when I used to be into incense back in the day, I got an incense packet.
I was like, holy crap, this has got a swastika on it.
And then I had to look it up and say, oh, it's the Indian swastika symbol inverted.
Maybe it was that.
Maybe this flag was the old school Nazi flag.
The individual...
Who crashed the truck with a Nazi flag?
His name is Varsith Kandula.
He's neither white, and I don't know if he believes in white supremacy.
Same tactic over and over again.
By the way, the media had formally run with the narrative that the dude was a white supremacist before they found out he was an Indian individual, an Indian male.
But it doesn't matter by then.
By then, the disinformation has flown across the world while the truth seekers are still putting their pants on.
And then people started coming out and saying, yeah, this dude, I think his name is an Indian name, and I'm just waiting, waiting for the confirmation from the very same media that initially said it was white supremacy.
But maybe he's the Indian face of white supremacy, because Larry Elder is the black face of white supremacy, according to left-wing media, LA Times.
Let me see.
The Attorney General of Florida, she's the Latino face of white supremacy.
Varsith is the Indian face of white supremacy.
Or maybe, you know, just an MKUltra operative brainwashed into, you know, doing absolutely outrageous crap.
Okay, what else do we have before?
Well, we're going to get back into the Canadian stuff.
I want to bring something up the other day.
The other day I was having a...
When I had Francis on yesterday, and Francis mentioned Viva, have you heard the latest statistics as relates to excess mortality out of Quebec?
And he gave me a number which I thought was absolutely...
Implausible.
That excess deaths in Quebec for the age bracket of 50 and under was up like 71%.
I said, that's...
I didn't call him crazy.
I said, that doesn't seem right.
And I'm going to go double check this because I can't believe it.
Is this it?
Yeah, this is it.
Oh, I'm unable to view the tweet because I...
Oh, come on.
Well, now there's a punchline as I got blocked by...
Oh, that's not...
How am I getting blocked in incognito?
Hold on.
This doesn't make sense.
See it for a split second at least.
Well, that doesn't make any sense.
I'm always able to see this in incognito.
Hold on.
Oh, you know, I'll get to it afterwards.
Karima is in the backdrop, people.
Okay, we're going to get back to that.
But bottom line, excess deaths are up like 50-70% as of the first two weeks of April.
This doctor posted the tweet.
And I'm like, oh, that's very interesting.
I DM her on Twitter and say, would you come on to discuss these statistics?
I don't get a response.
Then I, because now I'm interacting with this account, I see another tweet that says, we don't talk enough about health supremacy and white supremacy.
And then I tweeted, is this tweet a joke?
And was blocked within a minute.
And not just that.
I was blocked and anyone who follows me was blocked.
This is the absolute state of medical thought in Canada.
But let's get to the absolute state of journalism in Canada because you can't trust mainstream media.
You got to go to alternative, independent.
And I have never met Karima in person before.
I'm going to do it right now.
Karima, I'm bringing you in.
Three, two, one.
Karima, am I pronouncing your name correctly?
You are.
Karima Saad.
Let me get my camera back down here.
First of all, nice to meet you.
I've only known you from the interwebs.
Very nice to meet you as well.
I'm a lot less of an extremist than the internet might otherwise describe me.
We've been in passing, actually.
I have lots of footage of you that we've never met directly.
Oh, sorry.
Was it during the trucker convoy?
Yes, yes.
I would say mostly in Ottawa.
Okay.
I was nice and polite to you when we saw each other?
Always.
Good.
Karima, tell the world who you are for those who don't know.
Sure.
So my name is Karima Saad.
I am a Toronto-based lawyer and I've...
Sort of come into journalism throughout the pandemic, I would say.
And I follow very closely protests and political movements in Canada, specifically in Ontario, with on-the-ground reporting and analysis that I then take back to my Twitter account and to the broader media.
Now, what law school did you go to?
Ottawa U. Yeah, that's a good one.
So you got your civil and common law?
No, I did just the English common law.
I was actually in a joint program with Carleton.
Okay, very nice.
And did you ever practice law?
I'm a practicing lawyer.
Oh, okay.
Cool.
On your own?
I wear many different hats.
But my practice is mostly housing-based with a little bit of criminal and sort of a niche in cannabis.
Cannabis and housing, cannabis and criminal law.
That's actually kind of interesting.
I was going to ask you the obvious joke question, but I don't want to get you in trouble with anybody.
How long have you been practicing for?
I got called in 2016.
Ever since then.
Very fresh.
Okay, very cool.
That's interesting, actually.
Well, that would explain why you are eloquent and diplomatic in your dealings, even with people who are not being eloquent and diplomatic with you.
Where I think I first remember identifying who you are is when Poilievre or the Conservatives removed you from one of their events, which I didn't think it was an injustice.
It is an injustice, even if you were there as a...
I'd say, look, if you start protesting and making a scene, then they can remove you, but preemptively removing people who they think are not ideologically aligned is bull garbage.
What ended up happening with that?
Did they apologize and let you attend further events?
Yeah, third time was the charm.
So I showed up to his third event three nights in a row, and I think after some of the stir that was caused, and a lot of people writing into the Conservative Party, both...
You know, on both sides of the aisle, who were concerned about this trend of suppressing expression, like you said, preemptive silencing of discourse for no real reason, because I've never caused any problem at any event.
And, you know, it was much like the event of his that I had previously attended in April of last year.
So, you know, it just it worked out in the end.
Okay, good.
So they made a mistake and they righted that wrong by allowing it.
We'll keep this apolitical, unlike some other...
I can't even say the word.
I'm going to have to be courteous.
Well, and they righted the wrong.
There was a lot of pressure, right?
The optics of it were very poor.
And they took stock of that and reacted accordingly, which I think makes sense for politicians.
What I liked is that there was actually a lot of pushback, not just...
It was across the board.
Absolutely.
Amazing.
So you're covering...
This explains now why you're covering a lot of the legal stuff.
You're covering McKenzie.
So Jeremy McKenzie, he's been on the channel multiple times.
I actually received in the mail.
I'm not affiliated with anybody, but they sent me a Diaglon ring, which...
It's so amazing.
It's like an NFL Super Bowl ring.
But Jeremy McKenzie, founder of Diagilon, raging dissident.
I'd say political public enemy number one in Canada right now.
He's got those pending gun charges, assault charges from something that occurred years ago in Saskatchewan.
Was arrested, detained, solitary confinement, yada yada.
He's now, Karima, he was in court on the charges of him protesting outside a doctor's home.
What are those charges?
It's not stalking, but what are those charges again?
So the underlying charges for this particular set of Nova Scotia charges is criminal harassment, mischief, and intimidation of a public health official.
So that's that relatively new provision in the code.
So that's what was underlying.
The court appearance that I attended today.
I am aware that he has other charges in different jurisdictions, so lots on the go.
I mean, I know that in tweeting earlier today, you'd refer to him as a political prisoner.
I have to push back a little bit on that because in Canada, we don't really have political prisoners.
We do have criminal charges here, a real set of criminal charges.
What has interested me in this is the political dimension to it.
So I acknowledge that there is and there are allegations of improper political interference and influence.
But I think the language is very important because this has broader public interest than just McKenzie's charges.
Now I'm going to push back on your pushback.
Very rarely do tyrants refer to themselves as tyrants or dictators, and very rarely do they refer to their political prisoners as political prisoners.
It's sort of necessarily a hype.
Right, but there's a definition to that word, and it doesn't really apply here.
Would you have qualified Tamara Lich or Pat King being detained for months on end for mischief charges as political prisoners?
Well, both of them were denied bail initially because they didn't meet.
The criteria for bail, right?
Per a judge, different reasons for both of them.
One was a very weak bail plan.
The other was initially a very weak surety, right?
So we have to kind of consider these cases in the silos in which they exist.
Now, again, are there political dimensions to this?
Absolutely.
And I think it would be...
I say that because it happens elsewhere in the world.
Currently in Pakistan, we have a political prisoner, right?
Like a member of the opposition.
In Pakistan, do they call them a political prisoner or do they purport that they broke some serious law and that their detainment is justified and necessary?
The measure isn't...
What the state is describing.
It's an assessment of how did this person come to be?
Is there at least, like on its face, a basis for criminal charges?
There are and there have been here.
So we can move on from this point.
Well, I would say this, because I think when people use the term political prisoner, it is necessarily a matter of opinion, and they're applying criteria as to what they think is legitimate legal bases versus politically motivated bases.
I would just only push back to say like, I love that term, that pushback, but I would say.
Detaining anyone on mischief charges for months on end because their bail plan was not satisfactory is such an abuse of the bail system.
There is no basis for which anyone on non-violent mischief charges should ever be detained.
Least of which, if we compare it to the guy who actually ran over four protesters in Saskatchewan, Winnipeg, I think, got out on bail.
A big money bail, but still got out from a violent crime.
I was surprised to see that Pat King...
Was in the way that he did, right?
Now, the fact that he was held for a bail hearing, that was a matter of Crown discretion, and it was a bit unusual.
But the actual bail hearing as it unfolded, there were a lot of inconsistencies that then justified a detention, right?
So it...
The initial sort of act of prosecutorial discretion, that's something that comes up in the cases that I'm observing here and now as well.
So it's relevant, but, you know, I'm a bit torn on it, yeah.
Prosecutorial discretion often comes up in cases of political prisoners because that's exactly what gets us there.
It's like, I appreciate you, you're diplomatic and you have to be, but some people would say like, you know, even Saying it's surprising and abnormal or atypical.
I mean, we've crossed a Rubicon, even if the person who is not willing to admit its political prisoners is willing to admit that.
Okay, and set that aside.
When I use the term, I'm not using it as a matter of fact.
It's clearly my opinion, and I genuinely believe it.
But so he's facing a number of charges.
Whether or not we think these are totally trumped up, malicious retribution for having ratted out potential misconduct of the RCMP.
Whatever.
But the criminal harassment.
So the basis of this, he explained it when he was on for the interview.
He was protesting outside a doctor's house.
I forget what the reason was specifically for this doctor.
This was COVID related?
Yes.
So Dr. Strang is the chief medical officer of health in Nova Scotia.
I don't know the specific grievance that was being protested, but it was...
Okay.
Presumably relating to COVID.
And the matters of the fact here is that he was protesting outside the home, which is not something I would ever do myself or recommend anybody do.
He was doing it.
There were a number of people there, but he and his girlfriend were the only two that got arrested.
That's my understanding.
And so he was in court now.
This was not going to be the hearing on, I say the hearing on the merits, that's the civil term, but this was not going to be the trial.
This was a preliminary hearing to compel disclosure of potentially exculpatory evidence that had not been disclosed by the Crown?
Correct.
So it's a disclosure application and looking for communications between a variety of parties, including the Crown prosecutor, police, and members of the executive branch.
All right.
And now, so it was fascinating, your tweet, it was a quick tweet because they continued for the reason which you're going to explain, but did you see the motion or did they flesh out the allegations of the motion as to what specifically was withheld by way of potentially exculpatory evidence?
No, we really didn't get into the substance of the matter today.
I was able to briefly peruse...
Materials that were present.
So what I understand is there are a series of breaches or alleged breaches that Defence Council plans to raise in relation to this specific set of charges.
And so some of that pertains to the possibility of withheld evidence, the imposition of bail terms that may have been influenced by Political parties or actors, an improper exercise of police discretion in the arrest itself, and an allegation about not having access to counsel the night of the arrest.
So distinct issues, but cumulatively, potentially grounds for an abusive process, but we'll have to see, obviously, how the evidence comes out in court.
And now the ultimate twist to all of this is that the judge is now deliberating on a motion to recuse.
Is that what I understood?
Not quite.
The judge has already recused herself on the basis that one of the witnesses who was going to participate in this motion is someone who she knew from high school.
So kind of a small world effect in the courtroom that, you know, I think was maybe done out of an abundance of caution, and not necessarily because the judge didn't think she could render a fair decision, but recusal motions, and this was done on her own initiative, but it's about the apprehension of bias or fairness.
Out of an abundance of caution, that's how the judge decided to proceed.
Obviously, it means a bit of delay and, you know, I'm sure a little bit of disappointment on the part of defense and Jeremy himself just as far as having taken the time and effort to line everything up and then, you know, having it pushed back.
Well, so that's interesting.
The judge brought this recusal of her own, what do they call it?
She brought it on her own and not by way of motion from McKenzie's counsel.
Correct.
That's right.
That's cool.
I mean, I have two reflexes to that.
Barnes, you know, the other lawyer that I do streams with says, you know, the only judges who are conscientious enough to recuse themselves are going to be the ones who are going to recuse themselves.
And the ones who are going to be so biased are never going to recuse themselves in the first place.
That, and now I'm thinking maybe this judge just wants to get the hell out of this case.
And found a reason to get out, leave this politically toxic case in the hands of another judge who's going to have to decide, you know, maybe to do the politically unpopular thing and let big bad man Jeremy, you know, dismiss the charges.
I don't know.
Obviously, I can't make that speculation.
I got the sense that the judge was prepared to engage with the materials and then, you know, an unforeseen circumstance.
Cool.
Now, this was in Ottawa?
This is happening in Halifax.
So you're based out of Halifax?
Nope.
I'm here for this.
Like I said, I do my best to be on the ground wherever possible.
And this is a very, I think, an interesting case and series of cases.
That's okay.
So you're based out of Ottawa.
Now you went from Ottawa to Halifax.
I'm based in Toronto.
You're based in Toronto.
That's even worse than Ottawa.
I got two brothers in Toronto, both of whom are lawyers, but one actually practices.
Very cool.
So now you've flown out all for this and now it's over.
You're going to go back to Toronto.
Yes.
Yeah, that was a disappointing outcome for me too.
Had you ever been to Halifax before?
Yeah, I was here actually in the fall speaking at a conference.
Very cool.
Karima, will you promise to come?
You don't have to promise.
Will you come back to give us periodic updates?
Listen, the whole reason that I am doing this and following this at all is because I...
My goal is to combat disinformation.
And I think that specifically around people involved with or adjacent to the convoy, there is a lot of just wrong facts.
And I like being able to convey what I am seeing and I see it through a legal lens.
So the short answer is, you know, if you're interested to have me back, this is a case I'm willing to discuss.
So thank you.
Fantastic.
And I hope you don't get any blowback for having come on.
We all know that I am going to receive a lot of blowback.
But, you know, the fact of the matter is that discourse matters and facts matter.
And I think that, you know, even if we have not landed on a conclusion that I'm happy with on the political prisoner term, it's, again, at least...
The meaning of information, right?
The goal of discussion is not to convince the adversary.
It's to understand and at least understand where you disagree.
Karima, you are welcome back anytime and for a longer format if you so choose.
But thank you very much for coming on.
I don't think even if I lived in Canada still at this time, I wouldn't fly from Toronto.
You flew.
I flew.
I did not scooter.
I would have probably insisted on driving, and that would have been one heck of an investment for a one-day hearing that gets postponed.
Karima, thank you for coming on.
Keep in touch and let me know.
I keep following you, so if there's news, I'll retweet it as well.
But thank you for doing what you're doing, and I've never seen you be unfair.
Even if we agree to disagree, or at least I know where I disagree with your line of reasoning, I think this type of discussion is actually quite useful.
So, peacemaking discussion.
Thank you for having me.
We'll talk soon.
Alrighty.
That was good.
That was fantastic.
She's going to be in so much trouble when her friends see that.
This is how naive and stupid I am.
I think anybody who might be inclined to get mad at her for even engaging with me is going to see and say, how can anyone feel bad for engaging with Viva?
I could have Harry J. Sisson on this channel and he might quickly get over the fact that I'm not...
What the tone of my Twitter feed might lend people to think I am.
Um...
Thank you.
So that's it.
We're not done yet anyhow.
We're going to do one more story and then...
What the heck is going on here?
And then we're going to go over to Locals because we're going to do the Locals exclusive.
I got some catching up to do with the Locals community.
And then I got a refresh, shower, reapply my GenuCell.
Ultra...
What if I put this in my eyes?
Will it make my...
I'm joking.
I'm not going to experiment with this stuff.
Let's do one more.
Let me see what I got in the backdrop.
I got so much...
I had so much news backed up since the other day.
Caitlyn Jenner's story.
Forget about it.
Lisa...
I can't...
Tabarnouche, I wanted to bring up the things here.
I can't...
I can't bring it up.
Because I'm blocked.
The statistics.
It's important.
Let me get to the statistics here.
Let me see this.
Beck, excess mortality, April 2023.
Cripe.
Oh, nope.
Can't even do it.
Can't even do it because I'm unable to view the tweets.
Oh, that sucks.
Let me see if I can't find a way.
It doesn't make sense that in incognito...
Why in incognito would I be unable to see the tweet?
It doesn't make sense.
Copy link to tweet.
We're going to do this.
I figured out a way to bypass the...
Nope.
Can't do it.
The numbers are bad, people.
The numbers are bad.
Inexplicably bad, but explicably bad.
So I can't see the numbers.
All right.
What else do we have here?
Adam Schiff, people.
Oh, we're going to end on this.
No!
No!
Very quick, like E. Jean Carroll has asked to amend her complaint after the jury rendered its findings of liability.
I gotta ask Barnes about this.
I don't know how this works in American law.
How you could amend your proceedings after a verdict.
I don't understand it conceptually.
It's like, oh yeah, well now that I won the case, I want to increase my damages, my punitive damages, because of how bad something Trump did after the verdict.
Outside of the court, not in the context of the lawsuit, E. Jean Carroll asked Judge to amend the lawsuit to seek further damages for what Trump said at the CNN town hall.
If E. Jean Carroll was smart, E. Jean, if you're listening to me right now, sue CNN.
They facilitated the defamation.
They allowed that monster to come on the platform and defame you after you won your wonderfully just, fair, and totally apolitical case of defamation for Trump denying...
That he did something to you that the jury found that he did not even do to you.
You should absolutely sue CNN.
And that near $1 billion settlement from Fox News is just that.
That's what you need, right?
You need like $787.5 million.
E. Jean Carroll asked the judge to amend her initial defamation case against the former President Donald Trump to seek punitive damages after he repeated his statements in a CNN town hall.
She has to sue CNN.
They platformed it.
They were acting as a publisher, not a platform.
Hmm.
Sue them all.
The request made in the letter to the judge seeking clarity on the initial lawsuit following a civil verdict earlier this month, giving him $5 million.
Cal's attorney said Trump's defamatory statements repeated during the town hall earlier this month go directly to the issue of punitive damages, which are intended to punish the person found liable.
I mean, it's...
Carol's initial lawsuit was held up on appeal and relates to statements Trump made in 2019.
The trial involved a statement Trump made in 2022.
An appeals court sent the lawsuit back to the lower court judge just before the trial.
It is up to the judge to determine whether it moves forward.
Yeah, let's go.
After that, wonderfully fair, totally proper trial.
I want to amend my claim after the verdict is in.
To increase the amount.
Okay, we're ending on this story, people, before we go over to the locals.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
He's found me.
What do you want?
Wait, I'm still alive.
I'm still alive.
I'm still alive.
Okay, take the dog.
Take the dog and get out of here.
Go out.
Marty, they found me.
I don't know.
How about they found me?
Do me a favor.
Do me a favor.
Take this and go give it to mom.
Mommy's not here.
Okay.
Seriously, get out.
I got to finish.
I got to finish.
Go.
Okay.
Adam Schiff.
House Republican trying to expel Schiff wants him to pay $16 million fine for collusion.
Do you remember when Adam Schiff came out and said, came out and said, clear evidence of Russia collusion.
Rep.
Adam Schiff, Democrat, should pay millions for pursuing a now discredited theory that former President Donald Trump colluded with the Russians ahead of the dieta.
Rep.
Anna Paul and Luna, Republican from Florida, filed a privileged resolution on Tuesday afternoon to censure, condemn, and fine Schiff $16 million, which is half the cost of the special counsel investigation, yada, yada, yada.
Schiff led a similar investigation during his time as chairman.
Do we need to go over what the Durham report concluded?
There was not an iota of evidence to support the claims behind the PP dossier, Steele dossier.
Not a shred of evidence.
Confirmation bias by the FBI who never should have investigated, never should have initiated a full investigation.
They didn't follow the evidence, and they ignored evidence that would have otherwise proven that this was all bogus from the beginning.
Schiff came out and said, clear evidence.
I've seen it with my own eye.
I don't make fun of his buggy eyes because he might have a medical condition that I don't know about, and I'm not joking about that.
I saw it with my own eyes.
He's an ugly person, spiritually.
But you make fun of someone who might actually have a medical condition, and it's not fair, it's not nice, and it's irrelevant what they look like.
But I start with my own eyes.
The liar came out and said, knowing full well that nobody could contradict his lies, because in contradicting his lies, they would be violating confidentiality agreements.
Lied to the American people.
And let's go back to Obama.
Sewage.
Flood the public market, public square, with sewage.
And...
People don't know what to believe.
Oh, it did a little more than cast doubt on whether the FBI should have investigated connection between Trump and Russia.
Many Republicans have deemed the investigation into Trump to be a political stump and weaponization of the federal government.
Washington Examiner, I thought they were a little more right-wing.
This is like...
Giving way too much benefit of the doubt to the findings of the Durham report.
It didn't cast doubt.
It said the FBI should never have investigated this.
It was ridiculous, unsubstantiated.
They were blinded by confirmation bias.
And it's not just Republicans that are saying this is ridiculous, what Mueller did for three years after, investigate a bullshit story that never had any merit to it in the first place.
Oh, but he prosecuted it.
He got people to plead guilty to a false dossier that never should have been investigated in the first place.
It's amazing.
It's amazing how they can get you on the procedure if they can't get you on the actual substance.
He's been a longtime target of the Republicans, yada, yada.
Schiff lied to the American people.
He used his position on House Intel to push a lie that cost American taxpayers millions of dollars.
It cost American taxpayers the truth.
It undermined and hampered President Trump's first three years in office.
It undermined his presidency on the basis of a grotesque political lie.
I just got a notification that Robert Gouveia has published a video.
He is a dishonor to the House of Representatives.
I agree with that.
California Democrat responded to Luna saying MAGA Republicans would go after anyone who defends the rule of law.
Can you imagine what a pathological liar he is to double down, triple down, quadruple down, Googleplexian down on his lies?
It's outrageous.
The motions against Schiff if carried out could endanger his chances of succeeding Senator Dianne Feinstein.
Who is retiring?
The question is, and my only question is, who would pay that $16 million?
Does that come out of a fund to pay off their lives like they have their sexual harassment settlement fund in Congress?
Who pays for that?
Because I have a feeling it doesn't come out of Schiff's pockets.
In fact, I'm like 90,000% certain it doesn't come out of Schiff's pockets.
So that's it.
Okay.
People, I could go forever because I still have stories, but I think news.
Tonight, 7 o 'clock, Rachel Alexander.
Tomorrow, 1 o 'clock, Ye On Me Park, North Korean defector.
5 to 5.30, I will be on Infowars with Owen Schroyer.
6 to 7.30, it's not going to be live, but I'm going again with Unlearned 16. 7.45 to 8 o 'clock, Alex Stein, Primetime 99, pimp on a blimp.
And that should be all I do for tomorrow.
But now we're going to go to Locals.
I'm going to give everybody the link there.
Go over some Locals tips.
I am going to play a video to play us out today, people.
I know I published it on Rumble, so let me just play it off Rumble.
And now for something completely different.
Ah, yes.
A video.
A beautiful video of my visit to the Marshall.
What the heck?
Arthur R. Marshall.
Loxahatchee.
Wildlife Refuge in Florida.
It's beautiful.
I want to thank everybody for coming.
Thank everybody for the Rumble Rants, the support.
Snip, clip, share away.
The rest of the week is going to be amazing.
And thank you for being here and thank you for giving me the encouragement that I need sometimes to keep plugging away in this world of madness.
A dark world.
I was DMing one of my...
Sources, who's become a friend.
And I was like, shit, it's a fucking dark day again.
Hey, having an adverse reaction?
We'll pay for your hospital, your ambulance.
I was like, I don't know if we're at that darkest point before the dawn.
And I don't know how much darker it can get before the dawn, but if it needs to get darker before the dawn, may it get there quickly.
But thank you all for, you know.
Helping me through this, and I hope that all of this can help you through this.
But now, on the lighter side of things, there is beauty in this world.
And more often than not, it involves the absence of humans.
I won't play the whole thing.
It's long.
I'll play the last...
I'll play a couple of these.
This is the Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee Wildlife Refuge.
It's beautiful.
Arthur R. Marshall Lokahatchee.
The music is in the link.
I've been to this place now three times and I've been meaning to do a dedicated video every time we go.
It's a National Wildlife Refuge and it's amazing.
There's a place where people can fish and go kayaking and there's always gators there.
That's where I saw the Happy Gilmore Gator with one eye.
I'll show you that video in a second.
We're at the Lokahachi Animal Wildlife Refuge in Florida and there's an alligator.
There's a bunch of alligators all over the place here but there's one right there.
Yeah, and it's the Happy Gilmore alligator.
Look at this.
I've been looking at it and something looked a little funny about it.
It's missing an eye.
It's missing an eye.
Look at that.
And I just watched Happy Gilmore.
It looks just like that.
And it's got like a center where you can go and learn things about stuff.
I'm making a video.
Hi.
How you doing?
Yeah, the season's passed.
It's on my phone, yes.
You've got the underground tunnel here.
Oh yeah, look at this.
Oh, that's a catfish.
That's a pike.
I haven't seen any pike here yet.
That's a spotted garst.
Stop doing that.
This thing was designed for adults.
Ouch.
Ow.
Get out.
Get out.
Go.
Do not read that sign.
Dude, that's not a real snake.
There is actually a really cool fake boat tour.
Is anyone here not in our family?
Alright, look at this.
Look at this.
They're going through the Everglades at a tremendous clip.
There's a fan.
There's a fan of air.
There you go.
Oh, okay, wait.
Okay, it's starting.
That's it?
Everybody's done?
You know you're going to be tested on this afterwards, right?
Why is it called sawgrass?
Quick question.
If you go up and, like, cut your fingers.
If you go up or down.
Okay, kids are awesome.
Your skull.
Yes.
Okay.
All right guys, this is it.
There's no feeding frenzy here.
The time I was here before, there was a feeding frenzy of white egrets or heron.
I don't exactly know.
That's a dragonfly.
That's beautiful.
Oh, that is a dragonfly.
Apparently this is known as a feeding frenzy.
You can see the fish jumping out in the middle.
Oh.
You see that?
Look how beautiful this is.
Last time we were here, we saw a snake.
I think it was a water moccasin.
We saw a giant barred owl.
So whether or not we see those today, I'll loop those videos in and we will definitely see alligators down by the canal.
But look how big this is.
Yes?
What if you see an alligator but then you edit it onto the trees?
That's not possible, sir.
I love the portrait you can't bring.
Come in close and then I have to bring it back.
But you can do it once you get it.
Oh my goodness, look.
Let's see.
I'm gonna do it easy.
Open it.
Oh, what are we looking at?
Well, would you look at this?
A big steaming pile of turd.
I think it's turd.
We're going to end it on that.
If you want to see how this video ends, people...
Wait, let's just leave it on the turd here.
I do want the internet.
What are we looking at?
Would you look at this?
A big steaming pile of turd.
Look at that turd.
It's not human.
If it is, that person's got a very weird diet.
Some people are suggesting black bear.
I have not seen a black bear in the Loxahatchee Reserve.
But that's a massive pile of turd.
So enjoy that turd until I end the stream on Rumble and I'll see you all on Locals in 30 seconds.
People, Viva Random on Locals.
You can watch the rest of that video.
Hey, locals.
Export Selection