All Episodes
Previous Next
April 11, 2023 - Viva & Barnes
01:19:49
Tiffany Dover GIVES AN INTERVIEW? Trudeau Big Trouble Little China? AND MORE! Viva Frei Live
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
They're proof that gun violence poses a public health crisis in this country.
This new survey data really paints a bleak picture.
It's important to note that this didn't ask respondents, what do you think of gun control?
It asked, how are guns impacting your lives now?
Let's take a look at some of the data here and some of the overwhelming findings.
You can see that over half of those who were surveyed said that they have been impacted by a gun-related incident.
Public health crisis.
Just notice that subtle word right at the beginning.
Yeah, Don, I mean, as if we needed further proof that gun violence poses a public health crisis in this country.
What did they do the last time something posed a public health crisis?
What extraordinary measures did they implement then?
That term is not an accident.
And that's not to undermine the seriousness of gun-related violence.
Let's just...
Gun-related incident, either themselves personally or a family member.
One in five, 20% of Americans surveyed had a family member who was killed by a gun.
I'm going to pause it there, and I'm going to get ahead of the curve on this.
This statistic is bogus.
The statistic makes no sense.
And at a later date, it's going to come out that the methodology was questionable.
It's going to come out that if this number is accurate, it is meaninglessly accurate.
And we're going to get into a few reasons as to how this number can be accurate, but meaningless, but probably more likely than not, totally, wildly inaccurate.
Hold up.
Keep going.
They're by homicide, suicide, or accidentally.
And that is, you know, as we get into the mindset of people in this country, 84% have actually taken at least one precaution to protect themselves or their families from gun violence.
And as we look at...
How did they...
I'm just curious, actually.
What precaution did they take to protect themselves from gun violence?
Did they get a gun?
Did they get something for home self-defense?
Communities of color and its impact.
It's even more unsettling as you look at the survey data.
31% of black adults and 22% of Hispanic adults have actually witnessed someone being shot.
34% of black adults have had family members killed by a gun.
That number, Don, is twice.
Killed by a gun.
It's like the car drove itself into the crowd.
We can stop there with that study.
We'll get into this in a second.
Killed by a gun.
It's an amazing thing.
It was an autonomous thingy thing, like killed by a car.
That statistic is going to come back to be wildly, wildly misleading, even if accurate, because it can be accurate and misleading.
Now, I had two questions from that poll, and it's not like I didn't go to the study to try to find...
I'm not sure if I found the accurate study, the correct study.
Yeah, that's it right here.
Hold on.
I want to bring it up.
I don't want to just see it myself.
I went to try to find what I think is the study.
And I think this is the study.
And I went to try to find the definition of the term family member.
And it's not to be the lawyer and to wordsmith.
How do they define family member?
When someone says, yeah, I've had a family member that was killed by a gun.
What does that mean?
How far extended family are they including as family members?
First cousins?
Second cousins?
Third cousins?
Great grandfather?
Grandfather?
What do they include in the term family member?
And then the second question I had is, does this include war?
And that sounds maybe, again, like wordsmithing.
How meaningful can that be?
We don't know the time frame, the temporal time frame, in terms of who they're asking if they've known a family member that has been killed by a gun.
A lifetime?
If you ask an 80-year-old war veteran, and I'm not saying this to be sarcastic or glib, yeah, he'll know a lot of people who got killed by guns.
If it excludes war, and let's just operate on the basis that they have included suicide.
Did they say they included?
I think they included suicide in that.
And accidents.
That's right.
They included suicide and accidents, which broadens it wildly.
Extended family?
What is included and what is defined as family?
What's the time frame?
Does it include war?
Because you realize...
So, by the way, I went to the study.
Key findings, okay?
And I went into top-line methodology.
And I can't find a definition for family in this.
Family member.
Nor can I find the temporal timeframe that was asked.
Nor I don't know that I've seen where the study was conducted.
We know that they're basing all of this on 1,271 respondents, which is going to play a dovetail into another subject matter for tonight.
You guys go scour this because I tried to look and I can't find it.
And let's just take like the thought experiment, the hypothetical thought experiment.
Everybody on earth is related to this one person.
This one person gets killed by a gun.
100% of the people say, I know someone who's been killed by a gun, even though the person that was killed by a gun, one person.
Now, that is, you could say, it's conceptually possible.
Everyone polled is related to the one family member who was killed by a gun.
They'll all say 100% of them know somebody who was killed by a gun, and yet only one person was killed by a gun.
It's an absurd reductio, but it illustrates the problem.
Not only if the term family member is a little bit broadly defined, not only would it potentially inaccurately broaden the results of the question, you could actually have doubling over of the questions where you can have overlapping extended family members referencing the same person, and so you'll have two people answering yes to the same question that references one person.
Okay.
Stop rationalizing CNN sock puppets.
It's odd.
Hey!
You have to listen to it.
You have to hear it.
You have to try to understand it.
Because I'll say one thing.
Gun violence is definitely a problem.
I don't think that's radical to say.
To say that guns are going around killing people, that's where we start losing track of what the problem actually is.
And when you get into the breaking down of the gun violence, like the most misleading statistic is people say 47,000 people get killed by guns every year in America.
True.
But over 50% of gun-related deaths are suicide.
Suicide!
People want to conflate those two issues.
Tackle suicide as why that's such a big issue in the United States.
So that's one way of conflating the number.
You break it down, I think it was like 20,000, close to 21,000 people were killed in gun-related, excluding suicide deaths in 2022, give or take.
I think that's what it was last.
That's a big number.
But then let's just break it down more, because what makes this issue come to the fore over and over again are school shootings, AR-type things.
I happen to know the statistics.
I don't know them meticulously offhand, but break it down.
The vast majority of those gun-related deaths are committed with unlawfully procured firearms, not rifles, but small arms.
In inner cities and impoverished areas.
And the argument is, just give up bump stocks and we'll stop.
Just give up ARs and we'll stop.
The study that comes out now, this study goes after exactly the opposite of what the standard arguing point is we'll be happy with.
If we stop here, we'll be happy.
I don't believe that statistic.
For one second, I believe the methodology used is wildly...
They're susceptible of inflating the numbers.
It's an interesting thing.
It's making the news now.
It's all over the place.
It's the headlines everywhere.
And they're going to...
Instead of tackling the real issues and ignoring the fact that firearms have been used for many purposes of self-defense, and it's a God-given right self-defense.
And if you think...
The Canadian schnook is exaggerating.
Go up to Canada.
You cannot own a firearm for the purposes of self-defense, even home defense.
Not just that you can't even own a firearm.
You can't own pepper spray for the purposes of self-defense.
You can't own a taser.
You can't own a stun gun.
In fact, if you go to get a gun, even if it's a long arm, you take the two-day course, and you allude to the fact that you're getting a hunting rifle for self-defense purposes, you'll get rejected.
Self-defense in Canada has been...
You can't own nunchucks for self-defense.
So this is now coming from a person who's very reasonable, very sensible, and in the ordinary run of things would say, yeah, nobody should have guns.
Not even the government.
I'm coming from a place now where I see exactly what happens.
And our gun-related violence in Canada, it's definitely lower than the States.
There are other economic factors that might account for that.
But go to Toronto?
Go to Vancouver?
You go to certain cities in certain parts of towns?
Gun violence is a real thing there.
And all committed with black market guns.
I say all.
Virtually all in Canada.
And yet they've gone after the perfectly legal firearms of law-abiding citizens who go get the license, do the course.
They're the ones who can't own the firearm, but the people who commit the crimes don't exactly go follow the laws in terms of procuring their firearms.
One in five people have a family member that has been killed by a firearm.
All right.
If that goes a lifetime, dog, you're annoying me.
Dog keeps kicking me with his claws.
What's the expression?
There's three types of lies.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
Figures lie and liars figure.
I don't know.
You know what it is.
This is now...
They come up with a study in the wake of a number of bad incidents.
Nobody wants to talk about the mental health crisis, because in Canada we're seeing...
As the firearm laws in Canada get stricter and stricter, the gun violence in Canada gets worse and worse.
In where I lived, in Lower Westmount, in the last year there were two or three shootings.
The stricter the gun laws get in Canada, the worse the gun violence gets, and then you need more laws.
It's an amazing thing.
Ah.
Ah.
I So, how's everybody doing?
What happened today?
My sister-in-law has come to visit and has now gone, so we get one room in the house back.
I went back to Lokahachi, Lokahachi Wildlife Reserve, the Arthur Marshall Lokahachi Wildlife Reserve.
Hold on, hold on, actually, I gotta show you this.
And I went back.
The happy Gilmore alligator was still there.
I didn't get as close as the photograph looks.
But I got a good picture.
Look at this thing.
Look at this.
He got my hand.
But I got that bastard's eye.
Look at that.
That's...
I'm calling him the Happy Gilmore Alligator.
He hangs by the docks.
I presume because he gets fish.
Fed fish or eats the dead fish that people throw back into the water.
And his one eye was open.
Look at the flipping teeth.
It wasn't that big.
It was shorter than me.
If you can believe it, there are some alligators that are shorter than Viva.
But it was sitting there.
I got a nice zoomed-in picture of its face.
I'm very much respecting the distance laws, and they said a fed gator is a dead gator, and I will not be responsible for causing the death of an alligator.
So yeah, there's that statistic.
And we're going to find out after it's made the headlines and after it's been milked for all of the political value that it can be milked for, it's going to just drop off.
And then by the time we find out the number was wildly inflated to inaccurate methodology, it doesn't matter.
The impact has been there.
Now, speaking of polls...
Okay, sorry.
Before we get into this one, we are live on Rumble.
Oh, jeez, I didn't put the thumbnail in.
Darn it.
That's because I didn't get the thumbnail yet.
We're live on Rumble, which is good.
And we are live on Locals, which is good.
And we're live on YouTube.
We're going to end on YouTube in a few minutes, as we always do, go exclusive over to Rumble and Locals, and then over to Locals for the after party where I answer more questions, etc., etc.
What happened with the GoPro contest?
Submissions are in.
I have a folder with all of my submissions.
If I win, you will know.
If I lose, you're going to know because I'm going to make a montage with all of my submissions.
They published the winning video, or they published the video, which is the compilation of all the winners, April 26th.
So I will be watching it then.
And yeah, fried alligator with lemon is awesome.
I've eaten alligator.
It's actually delicious.
Okay, so we're going to go over to Rumble after this.
Sooner than later, we're going to talk Tiffany Dover.
We have the conclusion to the conspiracy theory.
At the very least, the conclusion now, as per Brandy...
I know her last name has two Zs in it.
The conclusion now is somewhat better than the conclusion of that five-part miniseries podcast, which was inconclusive.
We'll get there.
Tiffany Dover.
Justin Trudeau.
He's in trouble.
There were some other things.
What did I say in the title here?
Trevor Little Trudeau.
Tiffany Dover.
There's more stuff.
We'll have fun.
But speaking of bogus statistics and how you take statistics to lie.
And I'm calling out Fox News on this.
Because you see these...
First of all, when Fox News is also referencing...
It was either an ABC poll or a CBS.
It's one of the other three-letter fake news agencies.
I read this article.
Not to say that Fox has not been traditionally anti-Trump.
They've had their issues.
I think they've called Arizona already.
I see an article in Fox News.
I'm like, okay, interesting.
Interesting that it's in Fox News and I read the headline.
I'm like, oh, look at that.
The pressure that is being exerted through malicious prosecution, politicized prosecution, it's having an impact.
Even Fox News now is saying nearly half.
Half of Americans think Trump should suspend 2024 campaign after indictment poll.
About 47% of the respondents believe the indictment is politically motivated.
So you read something like this, and it just makes no sense.
Half of Americans think Trump should suspend his campaign.
Okay, I want to hear more.
Please tell me more, Fox.
It's coming from Fox.
They're not typically anti-Trump.
Former President Trump ramps up his 2024 presidential campaign.
New polling reveals that while more than half of Americans believe he intentionally did something illegal after his indictment, many believe it was politically motivated.
Trump was arraigned Tuesday, yada, yada, yada.
And this is where I get very suspicious.
A recent ABC News...
Ipsos poll found that 48% of Americans think Trump should suspend his presidential election, his presidential campaign following Diamond, up five points from last week.
Now, I had my run-ins with Ipsos during the Canadian elections when I ran, and I questioned some of their results as relates to where Canadian political parties were polling.
53%.
All right.
I want to see this.
How many people were polled?
Typically, it says respondents, and then it says they tell you how many respond.
52%.
Yada, yada, yada.
Respondents, respondents, nearly half.
So it doesn't tell you how many respondents were there.
Chat, Rumble, YouTube, locals.
For those of you who don't know, don't spoil it.
How many people do you think were polled?
How many people were polled in this poll that allowed news agencies to run with the headline, half of Americans think Trump should suspend his campaign?
How many?
Zero to 1,000?
1,000 to 10,000?
10,000 to 100,000?
Maple Syrup says 10. I can't bring up the chats.
I can't highlight the comments in Rumble, which drives me nuts.
1,050 says Timmy or Ninja.
Less than 500 says Debra for USA.
1,050.
Okay, Timmy or Ninja, I think you might have cheated.
I think it was 1,047?
Where was it?
Oh, come on, you nincompoop.
No, no, I have the article here.
Hold on a second.
No?
It was 1,047, give or take.
That's annoying.
It was 1,047.
Give or take, it was 1,000.
They poll a thousand people.
I don't know what age they are, what time of day.
They poll a thousand people so they can then derive these massive conclusions to try to influence public opinion.
These polls are not intended to reflect public opinion.
They're intended to steer public opinion.
And Fox is no better than anyone else.
And it's outrageous.
I'm just going to see if I can't find this.
find this really, really annoying.
I...
I...
Doesn't matter.
1047.
And they run with the headline.
They tell you what to think.
Nobody knows how it works.
They think, oh, well, geez, if it's that many people, maybe I should be on board with this as well.
It's amazing.
It was only 500-ish.
No, then hold on.
It is only 500.
Okay, hold on, people.
Now I'm thinking if I confused it for the polls in Canada, which at the very least in Canada are like 1,000 and change.
No, you're right.
You're right.
You're right.
Okay, hold on one second.
Okay, so that's Justin Trudeau.
That's women's soccer.
We're going to get to that.
That's Tiffany Dover.
That's the flu.
This is from last night.
Tiffany Dover again.
Oh, yeah, here we go.
Okay.
Oh, that's...
Okay.
566 people.
I'm an idiot.
I gave them too much credit.
It was 566 respondents.
Here we go.
This ABC News Ipsos poll was conducted April 6 to April 7, 2023 by Ipsos using the Probability-Based Knowledge Panel.
Registered.
This poll is based on a nationally representative probability sample, 566, at least in Canada.
When they did the election polls, they did a little over 1,000 people for a country of 36 million.
566 for a country of 350 million.
Believe the stats.
Believe the news.
This is what you should think.
Now people should start changing their minds.
Stop supporting Trump.
start supporting DeSantis because Trump is such a wild long shot.
Nobody wants him so much that they have to shape public opinion through these bogus polls.
580.
566.
Okay, we're going to do one more on YouTube before going over to Rumble.
It was a small one that I didn't specifically mention that we were going to talk about.
What's her name?
Rapinoe?
Rapinoe.
Has taken to Twitter to promote her support for LGBTQ plus stuff.
And she's come out and says, look, the issue is not male athletes competing in female sports.
We should be worrying about other stuff here.
Let me bring this one up here.
Rapinoe says, her name is Megan Rapinoe, or maybe it's Rapinoe.
Today, politicians in D.C. are claiming to protect women's, she puts it in quotes, quote, protect women's sports, end quote, by pushing a trans and intersex sportsman.
I'll tell you this, the intersex, which I think is the medical anomaly of someone who has external genitalia that does not match chromosomes, I think is, I think there's only been one case of it that I know about, and it was the track athlete.
The intersex is simply not an issue.
The only issue for political purposes, for legislative purposes, are what we're calling trans, which is biological males who want to compete in female categories.
And the reason why that's an issue is because there's no issue about women who transition seeking to compete in men's sports and anybody saying they have any form of an unfair biological advantage.
It doesn't seem to be happening that way.
The intersex nobody is talking about because it's not an issue, because it's an actual anomaly of a medical condition that is infinitesimally rare.
The trans is not a medical condition.
It is definitely recognized in the DSM-5 as a psychological condition.
And it is one that, by its biology, by its nature, trust the science, follow the science crowd, is one that causes concern for biological advantages of males who...
Whatever they do later on in life, have already gone through puberty, have certain biological advantages over women competing in women's sports.
Megan Rapinoe says, today politicians in D.C. are claiming to, quote, protect women's rights by pushing a trans and intersex sports bet.
Call your congressional rep today to say women's sports need protection from unequal pay, sexual abuse, and lack of resources, not from trans kids.
Do we all know what a non-sequitur is?
A non sequitur, at the risk of being accused of misunderstanding yet another argument fallacy, a non sequitur is two statements that are not logically connected whatsoever or a conclusion that does not follow from the premise.
Today, politicians are talking about protecting trans women in sports.
You need to call up and talk about unequal pain and sexual abuse.
And by the way, sexual abuse, although that I know of, it hasn't happened in a physical sense.
But some people might be inclined to consider being involuntarily exposed to male genitalia a form of sexual abuse.
Like, it's an amazing thing.
This actually might have to be one of my follow-up tweets to Megan Rapinoe.
When Riley Gaines testifies that she was forced to change in a locker room with male genitalia, and this intact 6 '2 male...
Is showing his genitalia to women who did not want to see it, who did not want to be in that situation.
Some people, in the ordinary run of things, if I run into a girl's locker room and expose my genitalia, some people would consider that sexual abuse.
They would certainly call it some form of sexual misconduct.
So, there's an interesting overlap as to the possibility of, if you want to protect women's sports from sexual abuse, ask Riley Gaines what she thinks of Megan.
But she says, pretext of the trans and intersex sports ban about protecting women's sports.
No, if you want to protect women's sports, go talk about unequal pay, which has been thoroughly debunked, Megan.
Go watch Nate the lawyer, his breakdown of it.
Thoroughly debunked.
Thoroughly.
It's, at least in women's soccer, thoroughly debunked.
And as far as the 70%, 70 cents on the dollar wage gap goes in the ordinary things, that's been debunked as well.
Sorry to spoil the party.
Sexual abuse?
Hmm.
Lack of resources?
Not from trans kids.
Well, not from trans kids?
It's such an amazing thing.
Other than being a non sequitur, the statement is detached from reality.
People don't know this, or they hear it and they think it's a joke.
The women's national team, on which Megan Rapinoe was a member, To the men's, or I should say the boys.
I mean, I don't know.
Under 15. They lost to, what is it, FC Dallas under 15 boys.
They lost.
5-2.
Yeah, but there's no biological difference between men and women.
The best women's soccer team, or at least the highest caliber women's soccer team, lost 5-2 to the under 15, and I think they lost 8-0 to the under 18. Don't take my word for it.
Are we looking at the same thing?
We are.
Don't take my word for it.
FC Dallas under-15 boys squad beat the U.S. women's national team in a scrimmage.
But they weren't taking it seriously.
The women's team was using it as a warm-up.
They weren't playing hard.
They weren't playing hard.
Megan Rapinoe, who has now made her fame, made her fortune by having the privilege to fight and play on an equal playing field.
Pun intended.
As a result of the sacrifice that women before her made in the name of women's rights, now she gets to climb to the next level and pull the ladder out for everyone else trying to compete.
It's an amazing thing.
Someone used that analogy.
It wasn't even mine, and I like it.
She gets to go up the Heideggerian ladder.
That was not there.
That's my analogy now.
She gets to go up to the next level and pull the ladder out for all the other women who she is now promoting an unequal playing field for success.
It's the ultimate of hypocrisy.
It's like Arnold Schwarzenegger only said, fuck your freedoms after he had benefited his entire life from American freedom.
Howard Stern?
Who was it that said it?
No, I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
Schwarzenegger said, screw your freedoms.
It was Howard Stern who said, fuck your freedoms.
Only the people, the wealthiest, most privileged elite in America.
After they've made their wealth, their fame, their fortune, off the freedoms that allowed them to do that, only then do they then say, screw your freedoms.
Let me pull up that ladder.
Hey, Riley, sorry, you're going to have to compete against biological males.
And I'm doing it, and I want the virtue signaling points.
See, at Megan's stage of professional life right now, money's not the issue.
Competition is no longer the issue.
She competed on a level playing field.
She made all her money.
Now her currency is social media virtue signaling points.
The currency changes as you get older.
And the currency now that Meghan is fighting for, she doesn't need to worry about competition and she doesn't need to worry about money.
In fact, this will probably guarantee her even more money.
She can go be a spokesperson, senior sports commentator for CNN.
Wow, you know what's funny?
I was hearing a ringing in my ears, and as I finished that sentence, the ringing went away.
I think I should lower my blood pressure.
In the name of fairness, Megan is looking out for the disfortunate now.
Those biological males who now want to compete against biological females.
And she's had her life, she's had her good run, and she doesn't give a sweet bugger all if she screws it up for the next generation of women.
All right, people.
Let's do it.
Mosey on over to the Rumbles.
I was told I went live at a bad time because Steve Bannon's War Room is on.
But there is no good time to go live anymore.
And from my end, I just got to go live whenever I get the chance.
Oh, God.
I hear someone playing on a skateboard in the house.
Hold on.
I'm putting the Rumble link in Locals.
That's not what I meant to do.
Okay, everybody.
Here's the Rumble link.
Let me see if I've missed anything in...
In...
Thank you.
In YouTube, before we go over...
Oh yeah, I'm just looking at the...
YouTube finally monetized my Riley Gaines incident.
Two days later, after, you know, it's obviously no longer in the news, nobody really cares about it, and they've certainly been able to curb the discussion about what occurred at San Francisco State University, which is an atrocity.
An absolute atrocity.
Okay.
Dooshkin, check his YouTube channel.
No, this over here.
All right, so let's move on over to Rumble.
By the way, tomorrow's going to be a big day in terms of stuff.
I'm going to be live with Nina...
Nina Infinity.
I'm screwing off the channel.
At 5 o 'clock, and at 7 o 'clock, we've got a sidebar.
Love my tan.
Thank you.
I do think also the lighting is highlighting this tan.
Okay, let's do it.
Let's get to end it at 30 minutes on the nose.
On YouTube, head on over to Rumble.
We're going to talk now.
Tiffany Dover, Justin Trudeau, and a few other things that are smaller because the Tiffany Dover, it's mind-blowing.
And I should also end this by saying for those who are new here and don't know how it works, I go to Rumble and then I post the clips or the entire stream to YouTube the day after.
So if you're watching this live or today before the stream goes up, that's the way it works.
Now somebody's crying.
All right, ending on YouTube in three, two, One.
Now.
Do you guys hear somebody crying?
I think we do.
All right.
Okay, now not knowing if you guys hear that, I don't know if the mic picks it up.
Let me see here.
Crimson Clover and Tiffany Dover.
Okay, are we good?
We're good here?
Sure.
Everybody knows the story of Tiffany Dover, I presume.
If you don't know the story of Tiffany Dover, Tiffany Dover was one of the first nurses.
No, she was in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
One of the first nurses to take the Jibby Jab as the...
As the pandemic was, you know, in full swing and they were rolling out the jibby jabs and they wanted to motivate everybody to go get the shot and roll up your sleeve, jabs in arms.
That's how they're going to end this pandemic.
That's how you get your rights back.
Just take a little needle.
Don't be a baby, yada, yada.
So she was one of the first nurses to take it.
She took it.
I think we're going to probably see some of the clips in the video that I'm going to show you from NBC's recent interview with her.
And I know some of you are not going to think it's her and we'll get there.
She faints.
She collapses after taking the jibby jab.
They prop her up.
They take her off backstage.
And that's pretty much the last most people ever heard of her for a couple of years.
Rumors started swirling that she, in fact, passed away.
And they hauled her off and they're trying to conceal her death.
The hospital where she worked, Chattanooga, CMI, Chattanooga Medical Institute, something like that, CHI, they put out a video.
Which was this bizarre video of everybody wearing face masks.
Nobody's talking and it's a three-second video.
Proof of life.
And people dissected that video and said, that's not Tiffany Dover.
Her eyes are blue there.
They were brown or darker when she got the jab.
The conspiracy theory, and I'm putting conspiracy theory in quotes.
I'm not saying it judgmentally.
Because there definitely is a conspiracy here.
There's been a confirmed conspiracy and I'm going to get into it.
The conspiracy is that she died.
They're concealing the death.
And they're using someone who looks like her, but apparently not enough like her to quell public concern, to conceal her death.
The conspiracy goes wild.
And it goes in a variety of directions.
Some people on the internet are offering $100,000 if anybody has proof of life of Tiffany.
Nobody can find her.
Nobody can get an interview with her.
She stops posting on social media.
I'm sorry, I just read a chat.
And that's what happens.
Now, Gonzalo Lira, I'll tell you this, I had never heard of Tiffany Dover.
I don't think I put the name together with the incident, because in as much as I ever saw the incident in the beginning, it disappeared in my memory, which is part and parcel of, I'm sure, what they were trying to do with the collective consciousness.
I started watching Gonzalo Lira because of the war in Ukraine, and he started off every stream with, where's Tiffany Dover?
Mic check one, two, where's Tiffany Dover?
Can you hear me?
And I had no idea what he was talking about.
I had no idea that was her name.
And then I found it.
Then I dove into the conspiracy theory.
Brandy Zrajunya.
Hold on one second.
Brandy, she's a journalist for NBC.
Let me see this.
No, that's the wrong one.
Brandy...
Oh, I forget her name.
She did a five-part miniseries on Tiffany Dover.
Here we go.
Let's go here.
Let's just go to the bottom one here.
We're going to start here.
Brandy Zdrozny...
Stop, stop, stop.
Did a five-part miniseries...
On the Tiffany Dover conspiracy theory called Tiffany Dover is Dead.
And it was purportedly, and I'm saying this to needle or jab, I keep saying Brenda or Brandy?
Brandy.
It was purportedly a five-part miniseries that would quell the conspiracy theory that Brittany Dover is dead because we were led to believe it ended with concrete evidence that Brittany Dover was in fact alive.
I listened to the entire five-part miniseries.
My personal opinion of this, and I've invited Brandy on for an interview discussion if she ever is so inclined to accept.
My conclusion of this five-part miniseries is that it was a gratuitous attempt to attack anti-vaxxers, truthers, whatever the slurs, whatever the labels this five-part miniseries gave to people who had, if not legitimate conspiracy theories, legitimate concerns.
From which they derived conspiracy theories that varied on the scale of plausibility.
One episode was just an outright attack on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Another episode was the history of anti-vaxxers in general, going back to Pamela Anderson.
The five-part miniseries ended with the culmination of Brandy never got the interview with Tiffany Dover.
The proof of life that she had was having heard Tiffany's voice over the shoulder of somebody at a house that she went to to see if she could find Tiffany Dover.
And some posts on TikTok or Instagram that were from an account attributed to Tiffany Dover that had no face, no image, no nothing.
The five-part miniseries ended with that as the evidence for the proof of life of Tiffany Dover.
And I listened to that miniseries and I said...
This is a joke in the sense that nobody could have put this five-part miniseries together and genuinely thought it would quell any conspiracy theories.
They had to have known it would only exacerbate, foment, and resurface conspiracy theories.
Because I didn't...
Chat, go crazy on me if you want.
I don't think Tiffany Dover's dead.
I believe, if you want to judge my opinion, I believe she was injured.
I believe it was covered up.
And I believe whatever time out of the public life that she needed was to rehabilitate.
I don't believe she's dead.
And I know people, you know, they saw a death certificate, all this stuff.
I know the evidence as to why people think she's dead.
I don't believe it.
I don't believe that she's dead.
And yet after listening to that five-part miniseries podcast, I was more inclined to think that she was dead now because that five-part miniseries was almost like a needle in the face of people who...
She touted that theory saying, hey, guys, I got conclusive evidence that she's alive.
And it consists of a seemingly anonymous social media account that doesn't post anything of her face, a voice over her shoulder.
And that's what the producers thought was, you know, the ironclad proof of life for Tiffany Dover.
Sure.
And so I do wonder what the purpose of that miniseries was if it was to revive the conspiracy theory so that one could revive the mockery.
Okay.
It never ended with an interview.
I don't remember exactly when that five-part miniseries came in, but the news of the day is that Brandy got the interview with Tiffany Dover.
She finally said, I'm ready to show my face.
I'm going to do an in-person interview that you can broadcast.
And she sat down with...
Tiffany Dover.
I don't even want to be glib to the point of somebody saying she's Tiffany Dover because I do know there's a lot of people out there who will not believe it's the same person.
So she did that, and I just closed the window.
And I watched it, and I tell you.
So I watched it.
It was the interview, and I had my thoughts.
Here, let's just watch this.
For years now, there's been this very active community sort of telling.
Your story, telling stories about you.
What's your message to that community now?
My message is simple.
It is that I am alive.
I'm alive.
I'm well.
That's it.
I hope they believe it.
For years now, there's this...
Oh, do I ask the chat?
Chat.
I can't do a poll on RumbleGist yet.
One, I believe it's her.
Two, I do not believe it's her.
Okay, I've already started reading some of the chat.
People, the thing is, I know that some people are going to get pissed with me and they're going to say, like, Viva's running controlled opposition.
One, it is not her.
Two, what did I say the first time, people?
One is her, two is not her.
What did I say the first time?
It's her.
Hold on, but chat, I need someone to slow down.
You know what, locals, did I say one, it's her, two, it's not her?
I don't remember what I said.
It doesn't...
Oh, I'm such a senile buffoon.
I'm going to have to go back and watch now.
Let me see here.
Benefit of the doubt.
I call two.
Correct.
One is, two isn't.
Okay, so a lot of people do not believe it's her.
I can understand how people feel that way.
I actually did a little bit of Googling.
No thorough research.
I was looking for one example at any point in time of when a body double was successfully used to conceal the death of somebody.
I couldn't find one.
Now, I do know, everybody knows, they do use body doubles to protect politicians who are under threat.
They do.
Have body doubles for Kim Jong-un, sit-ins, whatever.
I know that.
But if anybody knows of any successful example in human history where someone had died and they replaced that person with a body double successfully, if only for a certain period of time.
Don't say Ringo Starr or whoever it was from the Beatles.
Has it ever been done?
And if we're going to go down that rabbit hole...
I don't think that's the easiest way to conceal a death.
I think the easiest thing would have been to pretend that she's alive for a few years and then find another way to cloak the death.
Because I don't think it's something that's sustainable.
So that's what I think.
And you can judge me for it.
I do definitely think something happened to her.
And I think that's pretty much confirmed now.
So she does the interview.
And I found something particularly interesting, which I put together this montage.
People thought that I was dead.
I put together just a few clips from the four-minute interview with NBC.
At the time of watching this, I didn't realize that Brandy had done an extra episode for the podcast.
Don't worry, we're going to get there as well.
So this is the montage that I put together of the highlights from the interview that raised some very big questions for me.
People thought that I was dead.
People thought that I was an actress paid to do this, that I was paid off by Big Farm.
Why not come out and dispel these rumors?
Initially, that was exactly what I wanted to do.
And unfortunately...
I was told that that absolutely would not happen.
So by the way, just notice...
I don't know if this was an edit by NBC for any other reason.
Notice the hard edit.
Unfortunately, hard edit.
And then the beginning of a sentence, mid-sentence.
And unfortunately, I was told that that absolutely would not happen.
I was told that that absolutely would not happen.
I wanted to do.
Appreciate what the question was.
Why didn't you just come out right after the incident?
The world is on fire.
Everybody thinks you just collapsed as one of the first people taking the jab.
Why not just come out right away in person and say, no, I didn't collapse.
I had a fainting spell because that was her explanation.
I had a fainting spell.
And unfortunately, I was told that that absolutely would not happen.
I was told that that absolutely would not happen.
The hospital told you not to speak out.
Correct.
Yes, it would be irrecoverable damage is what I was told.
If I was to speak out and have another episode.
Have another episode.
Her excuse was that she is prone to fainting.
It's happened to her her entire life.
Whenever she feels like the subtlest of pains, she's prone to fainting.
That's the ex post facto explanation as to what happened to her.
Even if that's true, is she the best first person to line up and take the jab?
Probably not.
But she says...
If I were to come out and say what happened and have another episode, I don't even know what that means, but listen to this because it gets really good here.
It would be irrecoverable damage is what I was told if I was to speak out and have another episode.
Have another episode.
CHI Memorial has repeatedly denied knowledge of any directive asking Tiffany not to speak or post, including in an interview for our podcast.
I remembered this from the podcast.
I'm not aware of anything that...
Ask Tiffany not to respond.
Hold on.
Karen Long, Media Communications Specialist, CHI Memorial, the hospital.
Chattanooga Hospital.
I don't know.
The hospital recently telling NBC News, we have no new information.
People thought that I was dead.
People thought that I was an actress paid to do this.
That I was paid off by big farm.
I was told there would be irreparable, irrecoverable damages if I were to come forward and say...
That I didn't die from taking the jab or that I didn't suffer an adverse reaction?
Do you know what's more likely?
That she was told, if she comes out and says, you got, I don't know, let's just say Bell's palsy.
You suffered one of the identified adverse reactions.
If you were to come out and say that, don't worry, it'll go away.
No big deal.
I got the, you know, what happened?
The hunt?
Something hunt?
You know, if she were to come out and say, it's not a big deal.
I just...
I had one of the known adverse reactions.
That would be irrecoverable damages.
Irrecoverable to whom?
Pfizer, because that would probably impact the rollout and the uptake willingness of a general public that just witnessed this.
If she's one of the first 40 that gets it and she has an adverse reaction, that's not good statistics.
The other thing that troubled me about that is that I remembered.
Not that it means I'm smart.
I remember the hospital denied the existence of an NDA, non-disclosure agreement.
They denied the existence of it.
So I wrote out, and Brandy, to her credit, got back to me.
Up, up, up, up, up, up.
Oh, hold on one second.
Hi there, did you listen to this?
Okay, so here.
Just watched the Brandy's piece on NBC.
In summation, Tiffany initially wanted to talk but was told that it would absolutely not happen.
In Brandy's concept...
Tiffany's family asserted there was an NDA.
There was.
Yet her employer, CMI Memorial, says they were not aware of any such NDA directive.
That's a pretty big discrepancy.
Some follow-up questions acutely missing.
Who told Tiffany not to talk initially if it wasn't her employer?
Or are we to believe that Tiffany is lying about that?
I don't believe that Tiffany's lying about that.
I believe she was told not to talk.
Were there any emails?
Is there an NDA?
And if so, between whom?
Someone is not a conspiracy theorist if they see these glaring inconsistencies.
Then Brandy says, did you listen to the last episode of my podcast?
And I was like, oh, I didn't know that there was one.
Then I went and listened to it.
And I've got to show you what I found there.
Oh, is it not there?
I listened to the podcast.
It was a 50-some-odd-minute podcast.
I listened to it at one and a half, and I got through it relatively quickly.
Do you know what the kicker was about this?
I've got to play it to you because it highlights the problem with so-called journalism of today.
An absolute, absolute indifference.
An absolute lack of intellectual journalistic curiosity.
What's the discrepancy?
She says that I signed an NDA.
I was told...
I was told it would not happen.
I'm not going to be able to talk.
Irrecoverable damages.
That sounds like a threat.
Open your mouth and you're going to cause us damages and we'll sue you for it.
We'll go after you for it.
We'll make your life hell for it.
But the hospital says no NDA and then recently confirms no new information.
Oh.
Listen to this.
This is from the updated podcast.
I also reviewed a recording I have of a call with Long two days earlier.
Where she expressly says that the hospital does not manage Tiffany's personal social media use.
Because in the NDA that Tiffany says, it wasn't so much as an NDA, they called it like a behavioral compliance thing.
It was just to govern her conduct.
It wasn't a non-disclosure agreement or labeled as such.
It was a behavioral report for something that the hospital coerced or highly recommended she sign.
The hospital says we don't control her social media.
I also reviewed a recording I have of a call with Long two days earlier, where she expressly says that the hospital does not manage Tiffany's personal social media use.
CHI Memorial's representatives never told me the truth about this, and I'm still not sure why.
CHI Memorial's representatives never told me the truth about this, and I'm still not sure why.
you Are we listening to the same thing?
CHI Memorial's whoever never told me the truth about this and I'm still not sure why.
Do you know what the problem is?
First of all, the framing of that description.
They never told me the truth.
No, they lied to your face, Brandy.
They sat you down.
And if you didn't know that they were lying, they made a fool of you because you regurgitated their lie to the world.
People who were called conspiracy theorists were mocked and shamed and derided for saying, I don't believe the hospital.
Something's up here.
You're a whacked out conspiracy theorist.
They lied to the journalists.
They lied to NBC, assuming that Brandy didn't know that they were lying.
And I don't think Brandy did because nobody likes having repeated...
They lied to Brandy.
They lied to Tiffany.
Or at least they made Tiffany look like a liar.
They lied to the world.
And I still don't know why.
Did you ask?
Why would you have lied about what happened to Tiffany?
Why would you have lied about compelling, coercing Tiffany into signing an NDA?
Why did you lie to me?
Why did you get me to repeat your lie on blast through NBC to the rest of the world?
Did you think to ask that question?
And if not, why not?
Can you imagine?
They lied about that.
We know that the hospital lied down.
Black and white.
Even Brandy of NBC admits the hospital lied.
What else did they lie about?
They lied about an NDA telling Tiffany to not be quiet.
Did they lie about why?
Tiffany says, Tiffany's explanation.
In the interview, or in the podcast, was that the hospital was overwhelmed with calls, with conspiracy theorists, with harassment, with social media tags.
They were overwhelmed, and they thought this would be the best way to suppress that overwhelming rush from social media.
I mean, that explanation doesn't make sense, because they knew that by keeping quiet, they were propagating, exacerbating these conspiracy theories.
They told her not to go public.
They told her to shut up for two years because to talk would cause irrecoverable damages?
When the silence is what caused any damages?
When the silence of not saying what actually happened, if all that happened is she fainted, caused a much greater degree of vaccine hesitancy than coming out live and saying, she's fine, she just fainted?
Bullcrap.
What else did they lie about?
Who else is there an NDA between?
You want to know what is guaranteed?
Hashtag not a guarantee.
You want to know what's guaranteed?
Pfizer and or Moderna or AstraZeneca, whoever was in the jab business at that point in time, was involved in this damage control.
They were 1,000% involved.
It would be inconceivable that they weren't.
This incident doesn't put the spotlight on...
CHI.
It doesn't put the spotlight on the hospital in Chattanooga.
It puts the spotlight on the product that is going to make $20 billion for Pfizer.
And there is absolutely, in no realm of the universe, a possibility that the PR team from Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca were not involved with this, saying, you're going to shut your mouth, Tiffany.
Yeah, okay.
And when you come out, you fainted.
You fainted, but we can't see you for the next little while.
Was there an NDA with any pharma company?
Did Brandy ask if the pharmaceutical companies were involved with any discussions with CHI?
They lied to my face, and I still don't know why.
Because they have something to hide, Brandy.
There's not the slightest degree of intellectual journalistic curiosity, or honesty for that matter.
They lied.
You repeated their lie.
You put out a five-part miniseries in which you propagated a lie.
From the hospital.
Demonized people who said, I don't trust the hospital.
The hospital's lying to us.
It's outrageous.
Money, and everybody's saying money, money.
There's no question.
Can you?
And by my genuine belief, she suffered one of the known adverse reactions.
Which ones?
I don't know, but it's one that took some time to heal from.
I know some people want to go the one step further.
And I can't blame anybody for that anymore.
I got into a back and forth with Brandy on Twitter.
And I was like, you know, it was very convenient.
In a sense, there are a number of alternatives to this.
Like, why would the hospital have done this?
There was a way of capitalizing off the conspiracy theories.
There was a way of weaponizing what they knew would happen given their conduct.
Be deliberately opaque.
Don't tell people the truth.
Let people's imaginations run wild so that you can then mock them and degrade them and weaponize them politically as anti-vaxxers knowing that it's going to happen.
You know people are going to come out with...
Some of them are going to be more outlandish than others, but the more silent you are and the more it looks like you're hiding things, the more people are going to go creative in the theories to explain it.
The more you weaponize politically an incident, the more people are going to look for conspiracy theories to explain it, and you can just take some other events, you know, Alex Jones-type events, or Alex Jones-type covered events.
It's entirely conceivable, and almost it would have been a wonderful double fakie.
Let's be deliberately opaque.
Let's be deliberately non-transparent, which just means opaque, and let's let...
Run wild with conspiracy theories so we can make fun of how crazy they are and so we can use them to further, I don't know, justify controlling disinformation on the internet.
An amazing thing.
If you don't have people saying things that might be outlandish on the internet, well, you don't have that to rely on when you want to go to Twitter and say, you better take down these posts and take down the less crazy ones as well.
So there's that.
And then, so I say, you know, it's very conceivable.
It was very opportunistic to allow this to spin out of control because it allowed the media to go and demonize a large portion of what they attribute to be Trump's base.
And then Brandy's like, well, you think the Chattanooga Hospital is going to do that?
I was like, no, because I have no doubt that the bigger players were involved in this.
It would be absolutely naive and idiotic to think that they weren't.
But the most plausible alternative is that she just suffered an incident.
She needed to recover.
She could not be seen while she was recovered.
And today they say, shut your mouth.
Oh, you think blurred vision?
And I can't think of another type of...
Maybe it was a minor stroke?
I don't know how fast they...
Hypothesizing.
Something that can happen quickly.
Something that needs to be recovered from.
And something that needs to be concealed.
Because if she comes out and says, it was nothing serious.
Look, I'm fine now.
And they're like, yeah, that's going to be serious.
And that's going to impact our bottom line big time.
That's going to basically put a titanium rod in the spokes of our jab bicycle.
That would be irrecoverable damages.
And that's what I believe.
Can't trust the media anymore, Maples here at 123 says.
The five-part miniseries was a hit piece on anti-vaxxers, RFK Jr., who's now running for the Democratic candidacy for president, and a fluff piece for Pfizer because it did nothing but say how...
Safe and effective the jab was throughout.
And basically a kiss.
A little pat on the butt to the hospital.
They never told me the truth and I never found out why.
Never asked either.
Anyhow, that's it.
I invited her on and said I would not be hostile with her whatsoever.
It would be very much like a Eugene Gu type interview.
We'll see.
Open invitation as per Twitter.
As per my tweet on the subject.
Now, let me see this here.
Make sure I got everything.
Okay, so that's the one we just saw.
I don't think there's anything more on the Tiffany Dover.
Okay, so hold on.
I keep bringing this up.
This was the incognito.
I asked it.
It's funny.
The answer to the question.
Yeah, we lied to you.
Piss off.
We're just a hospital.
All right.
That's it.
Now...
Oh, no, no, hold on one second.
Before I bring up the article, everybody?
Gag reflexes at the ready?
Go get ready.
We're going to have to go listen to Justin Trudeau.
Share screen.
From Pleb the Reporter.
Listen to this.
Where is he and why are there other...
Okay, that's better.
Justin Trudeau, people.
In regards to the CEO and the board...
His face.
Oh.
Oh my...
It actually makes me nauseous.
In regards to the CEO and the board of directors resigning from the Trudeau Foundation.
The CEO and the entire board of directors has resigned from Justin Trudeau's.
It's not Justin Trudeau's.
It's his father's Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation.
It's like the Hillary Clinton Foundation.
There was definitely no pay to play there.
That's the news.
Someone asked him a question on it today.
Given that they cited politicization, will you continue to appoint people connected to the foundation to do work for your government?
Those people who are trying to...
Short-term political gain.
Short-term political gain.
By increasing polarization and partisanship in this country.
By launching completely unfounded and ungrounded attacks against charity.
Ungrounded.
Ungrounded.
Unbounded.
These or foundations must not succeed.
Canada is a place where we support good works of all different types, and we need to continue to do that.
I have no doubt that the Trudeau Foundation, like foundations and charities that conservative politicians have attacked in the past, will continue.
to do the excellent work that it will do.
But as I've said many times, it's a foundation in my father's name that I have no direct or indirect connection with.
No direct or indirect, and I think he tried to say connection.
But he got something caught in his mouth.
I made a little highlight.
It's actually quite genius.
And the board of directors resigning from the Trudeau Foundation.
Given that they cited politicization, will you continue to appoint people connected to the foundation to do work for your government?
In regards to the CEO...
Now, let's just see if this is still the case.
Do you know what...
It's kind of a big deal.
He said, I have no direct or indirect connection to the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation.
Justin, do we know what indirect means?
I don't know if it's a lie, because I don't know what Justin Trudeau's connections, direct or indirect, to the foundation are.
All that I would venture a guess is that I...
First of all, this is an easily verifiable statement because indirect is a lot broader than direct.
He could have mitigated what might be a dishonest statement saying, I have no direct connections to it.
My name's not there.
But if it turns out his mother, wife, brother, I don't know, children, best friends, he might have an indirect connection there.
I'm sure the Canadian journalists are scouring the internet now to find it, I'm sure.
But...
Let's just see here.
This story, it's a small story.
Massive corruption in the Justin Trudeau Foundation.
A legend.
Taking Chinese Communist Party donations in the orders of up to a million bucks.
Reimbursing some of it because they don't like the Communist Party connection.
And then the CEO and the board of directors all resign.
It's a small story.
You know what was on the front page of the CBC?
This, on their digital.
We'll see if it's still there.
They say they shared an abusive partner.
Now they warn others about their ex.
That was the top story on CBC.com.
You know what the second story was?
This one right here.
Troubled Calgary builder leaves Edmonton homebuyers with mortgages to pay on unfinished homes.
You know what the third story was?
Canadian content people.
It's coming from CBC.
Brittany Griner working on memoir about unfathomable Russian captivity.
Let's just go CBC.com.
Is it CBC.com or CBC News?
I mean, it's a crown corporation.
They had to have gotten the good one.
They didn't get the good one.
CBCnews.com?
Monkfish.
Dude, what the heck?
Google CBC News.
Let's go see.
Oh, CBC.ca.
I'm an idiot.
Let's see what the top stories are now.
I've given them time.
I tweeted at them.
Let's see if this is a story that they're covering yet.
We're on the webpage, landing.
602.
Oh, it's thunder.
No, that wasn't thunder.
Someone's dragging a chair.
Okay.
602, CBC.
Same header.
Western Premier blasts Limiti for suggesting Ottawa might look at province's power over natural resources.
That's number two.
Number three, Canadian content people at cbc.ca.
They get favored.
Manhattan District Attorney sues Republican Jim Jordan over Trump prosecution.
Next story, Blue Jays.
Other than that, Tupperware.
Tanks.
As company warns, it may go out of business.
My goodness.
It's like, I'm interested in all of this.
Must watch.
There we go.
We got more world.
Canada.
Hundreds of charges laid.
173 guns seized in cross-border firearm trafficking.
Trudeau shrugs off reports about Russian hackers.
Where the hell is the story?
I mean, it's actually amazing.
Foundation?
Is it?
Oh, there it is.
There it is.
Oh, where is it?
Oh, it's right there, idiots.
CBC covered it.
You can't say that they didn't cover it.
CBC, the $1.2 billion in government federal funding.
They're not beholden to Trudel.
They covered this very, very, very disastrous story.
If you can find it.
Trudeau Foundation president board resigned citing politicization of China-linked donation.
Charities leadership cites controversy over Beijing-linked donation.
You have to read this, by the way, because we're going to read it not all the way through.
The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation's president and board of directors have resigned en masse.
Ça, c 'est le français pour dire.
En grand nombre.
It's a joke.
It's an English word.
Citing the charity's entanglement.
In the ongoing foreign interference controversy.
That's, you know, that pesky little story about the Trudeau Foundation accepting Chinese donations, the CPC, Communist Party of China, CCP?
The Communist Chinese Party potentially interfering with elections and getting Handong elected, allegedly, potentially allegedly.
Handong denied it, said he's going to sue Global News, hasn't done anything yet.
Just that minor entanglement stuff here.
In the statement, the foundation said that a $200,000 donation in 2016 from a businessman linked to the Chinese government, quote, has put a great deal of pressure on the foundation's management and volunteer board of directors, as well as on our staff and our community.
They're the victims, people.
The charity announced last month that it would return the donation.
Listen to the framing.
The conservatives criticized the government over the matter.
Saying the donation compromised a government report on the integrity of the 2021 federal election.
The circumstances created by the political...
Listen to this.
This is it.
They're not lying.
CBC's not lying.
They're just repeating what someone told them.
The circumstances created by the politicization of the foundation have made it impossible to continue with the status quo, and the volunteer board of directors has resigned, as has the president and CEO, the statement said.
It's the politicization of the foundation.
It's not the fact that they took Chinese Communist Party money, indirect or maybe quite direct.
It's not that they took...
CCP money has massive donations to the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation.
That's not the problem.
The problem is that people politicize it.
The victimizers have made themselves into the victim.
It's pathological.
I don't think there's much more to this.
The foundation is independent.
Just wait.
And Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has no involvement with it.
I presume he has no direct involvement with it.
The Trudeau Foundation is a foundation with which I have absolutely no intersection.
That's even broader.
Trudeau told a news conference today, it's a shame to see the level of toxicity and political polarization.
No, I'm doing it better than Trudeau.
But I am certain that the Trudeau Foundation will be able to continue to ensure that research into the social studies and humanities at the highest levels across Canadian academic institutions continues to come for many years more.
Oh, so Canadian institutions are getting funded by Chinese Communist Party money.
I'm sure that has no influence on the end goal of the company, of the charity.
Charity established in 2001 to honor the former Prime Minister, Pierre Luchudo, Fund Scholarship, and then yada, yada, yada.
Is there any more here?
Thank you.
Okay, so this is a little more nuanced.
We can get into that later.
But, hold on.
There was something I wanted to bring up here.
I'm going to Wikipedia, and I'm not going to Wikipedia because it's reliable.
I'm going to Wikipedia because it's knowingly, overtly, and unabashedly political.
And so, therefore, you know that whatever bad things it has to say, it's ten times worse in reality.
I just want to hear how Wikipedia defines the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation.
The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation, here we go, founded in 2001 by friends and family, friends and family of former Canadian Prime Minister.
Friends and family founded it, but Justin Trudeau has no direct or indirect relationship to it.
Interesting.
The foundation supports creative and critical thinkers who make meaningful contributions to pressing social issues through scholarships, fellowships, mentorships, and public interaction events.
I would love to know who the Trudeau Foundation has paid for public speaking events.
I'd love to know.
I mean, I'm sure I can find out if I go look and it'll be fun.
It has granted hundreds of significant awards to top researchers and highly accomplished individuals in Canada and abroad.
It's weird.
Pierre Lachudo Foundation had four presidents since its inception.
The first president's CEO, Stephen Toope, took up his position at the beginning of August.
Interim president Lowy served, whatever, through June...
Okay, fine.
We don't care about that.
Funding!
In 2002, the government of Canada endowed the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation with $125 million Canadian to fund the creation of a program for advanced studies in the social sciences and the humanities.
An agreement on the advanced research in the humanities and humane sciences fund was signed March 2002 between the government of Canada.
This doesn't sound very independent whatsoever.
How is this independent?
Here we go.
Now we get into the good stuff.
They only got $125 million from the Canadian government.
Who was in power in 2002?
We'll see that in a second.
Directed donation from Chinese government.
This is on Wikipedia.
The Globe and Mail reported.
It didn't happen.
Someone reported it.
The peer Elliot Trudeau received a $200,000 donation from Chinese billionaire Zhang Bin.
This donation was allegedly made at the direction of the Chinese government, with the promise that the government would repay the donation according to anonymous, unconfirmed CSIS sources.
Canadian Secret Intelligence Service?
The donation was allegedly accepted by then-CEO Morris Rosenberg.
In March 2023, Rosenberg defended acceptance of the donation by saying that Canada and China had a better relationship at the time.
Oh, I'm sure China and Trudeau have a very good relationship right now.
According to the same unconfirmed CSIS source, an additional $750,000 was donated to Pierre Trudeau's alma mater, Université de Montréal, Faculty of Law, while $50,000 was allegedly donated for the construction of a statue at the University of Montreal.
According to unconfirmed CSIS sources, Zhang had originally requested that the statue be of both Pierre Trudeau and Mao Zedong.
But the university rebuffed this proposal and a statue of only Pierre Trudeau was ultimately planned.
According to the Global Mail, Alexandre Trudeau attended an event commemorating the combined $1 million donation as a director and member of the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation with Zhang and Chinese consulate staff in attendance.
Allegations regarding the role of the Chinese Communist Party in directing the funding of the donation were revealed as part of a series of leaks.
Claiming to be from the Canadian Security Intelligence Services regarding Chinese political interference in Canada.
On March 1, 2023, the Trudeau Foundation announced it would return $140,000 thus far received from Zhang.
The remainder of Zhang's 200,000 donations was never received.
Justin Trudeau divested his interest in the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation in 2013 when he entered politics.
But Justin's brother, Alexandre Trudeau, remains...
A foundation board member.
That sounds, Justin Trudeau, like you have an indirect connection to the Pierre Elliott.
It sounds like you do.
Would that not be indirect?
Your brother is still on the board?
Wow.
It's just corruption through and through, people.
And that's what's going on in Canada.
Um.
So hold on.
Okay, I had an article that was in CTV News.
Let's just go to ctvnews.ca.
I presume that's what it is.
CTV News?
What's the cover page of CTV News?
Impossible to continue.
Trudeau Foundation board resigned.
Top story.
Why would it not be on...
Let's just go back.
I can't believe where it was on cbc.ca.
I can't believe where it was on cbc.ca.
No, no.
Got to keep looking.
Foundation.
It doesn't even seem to be there.
It's...
Okay, I don't care.
We're closing now.
All right, so that's it.
It's on CTV News cover page, not CBC.
CBC News is more interested in Brittany Griner's memoir.
CBC News is more interested in Brittany Griner's memoir.
Okay, so we got that.
Let's go to Rumble and see what's going on in the chat.
Oh, Trudeau missed the ethics courses.
Lash Vrenoir.
He got an ethics crash course twice when he was twice bound to be in breach of his ethics.
I mean, he should have gotten it the first time.
Hold on.
What's this?
I had something.
I had this here.
Oh, this is...
Okay, so this is the statement from the Board of Directors.
In recent weeks, the political climate surrounding the donation...
Okay, whatever.
We know what's going on there.
There's another interesting law that's being passed in Canada relating to internet infrastructure as an essential resource or as a vital infrastructure which gives the government basically the power to regulate and control access to it.
I'm going to talk about that later.
I need to get more up to speed on that.
Oh, yeah.
Let's talk about this right here.
Okay.
You'll recall the other day, I brought some attention to Steele and Vance's show.
They were talking about Billboard Chris, who was recently assaulted in Vancouver at an event where he was in your face, standing there quietly with a billboard that said children cannot consent to puberty blockers, violently assaulted by a seemingly person who identifies as trans, shouting F you in his face.
Loudly, repeatedly.
Violently assaulted twice on that same day.
Vancouver police, as I haven't heard anything new, did nothing.
Steele and Vance talked about it and had this to say about...
Billboard, Chris.
And then he's just agitating.
And not just against the people who were there to celebrate the trans community.
Also, going after the police.
There was one female officer in particular.
They were just going hard after her.
Watch this.
It's crazy.
It's crazy.
Yeah.
Honestly, I'd want to.
It's crazy.
Yeah.
Honestly, I'd want to.
It's crazy.
Did you just say he came here to incite violence by forcing his opinion on people?
Yes.
Well, anyways, they blocked me within two minutes.
Maybe it was not within two minutes.
I've been blocked by Jody Vance because this is the state of journalism at large.
When I go into the other side, the echo chamber of the other side, and I just go click on...
Let's take just an actual example here.
We'll take an example of Mehdi Hassan.
When I go into Mehdi Hassan's...
Twitter feed.
Let me see if I can get a good example.
Let's just take here.
Let's take this one.
This is not going to be a good example.
When I go into the echo chamber silos of the other side, the left, like, you know, blue checkmark.
Mainstream media journalists, celebrities.
I'm shocked.
I'm stunned by how many...
You are unable to view this tweet because the tweeter limits the people who...
I'm shocked by how many people I'm blocked by.
I've obviously never interacted with.
It's a bloody echo chamber.
But it's an echo chamber where they cannot even stand to see, to hear what the other side might have to say.
And I don't think I'm particularly controversial or partisan in my analyses, although I'm sure some people would disagree with that.
They want to talk.
They want to share their ideas.
And the second they get called out on it, they block.
And I'm now thoroughly convinced they do not block because they don't like what you have to say.
They block so that their crowd does not get exposed to the truth.
But it's an absolute wonderful phenomenon whenever I go into the tweets of someone else.
The amount of times I see...
Okay, here's a decent one.
Here's a decent example.
Mehdi Hassan.
Let's go see what he's...
He's still...
He's still railing against Matt Taibbi.
So let's see here.
He says, what's the latest?
Reminder, the EIP came...
Oh, here we go.
To be clear, Taibbi deliberately and under oath misrepresented a non-profit for a government intelligence agency and suggested another non-profit travel back in time to get 22 million posts labeled and misinformation.
These errors aren't minor.
Okay.
Oh, he's going with Screencap Merchants again.
He likes that name.
So I scroll down.
There's one I'm unable to view.
Thus far, only one.
Not so bad.
Not so bad today.
It doesn't really matter.
Echo chambers, people.
So those people blocked me after I called them out.
Now, all right.
Let me see what's going on here.
Chat.
These people, this is MTannyB4747.
These people are not actually left.
They are neoliberal status quo authoritarians.
Who was I listening to?
They're basically referring to them.
True.
They're totalitarians.
They're authoritarians.
They want to tell you what you have to think, what you have to say, who you can associate with.
When I reached out to Brandy publicly and said, come on my channel, I think it's not a small factor of consideration.
That she can't come on my channel because she will get excommunicated simply by associating with someone who thinks that men should stay in men's sports and women should have their sports for biological reasons.
I'm convinced that a great...
Which is why I was kind of impressed with Eugene Gu, but maybe he has now become the known spokesperson for that side that does the interviews.
But I don't think Brandy and I don't think others could actually come on and even just have a pleasant discussion with me because they would get annihilated for fraternizing with the enemy.
I hear a kid who's not having a good afternoon.
And that's it.
Let me see here.
I think we might have a short show today, people.
I'm going to go over to locals after this.
What else?
Oh, hold on.
Okay, so we got the gun statistics, which I don't believe.
We got Justin Trudeau.
We got Tiffany Dover, the conclusion of the conspiracy theory.
Everybody can go and rest up now.
The truth has been told.
I think we are good until tomorrow.
Tomorrow's going to be a big day.
I forget who the sidebar is, but tomorrow's going to be a big day.
So let me go.
I'm going to give everybody the link.
We're going to go over to locals, do a little intimate Q&A.
Everyone in the chat, did I miss anything?
Is there anything that anyone in the Rumble chat wants to ask before we leave?
The far left are the fascists, they call everyone else.
Gary299.
All right, go.
Let's go.
Boring!
Chag Sameach David from M. Sidloid.
Thank you very much.
Same to you.
Happy Easter to everyone who celebrated it.
Thanks for the show.
Molten Salt.
Okay, we're going to take the party over to locals.
Everybody on Rumble.
Thank you for being here.
Thank you as always.
I will see you all tomorrow.
And I'll blast out the links as to where I'm going to be during the day tomorrow because I think I might have actually two interviews.
Go in peace.
Enjoy the evening.
Locals.
I'm coming, locals.
Coming now.
Okay.
Let's go to locals.
Make a checklist for streaming.
USA Now.
▲
Export Selection