Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 23, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:28:56

Kari Lake WINS? Donald Trump STILL Not Arrested? Two-Tiered Justice AND MORE! Viva Frei Live!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	It's never the right thing.
	It's Trump's fault.
	It's Russia's fault.
	That's whose fault it is.
	Okay.
	I'm definitively certain it is in.
	It's there.
	And now I'm going to refresh.
	Yes!
	Okay.
	I'm seeing a weight loss.
	Skip.
	All right, well, do I start again?
	Do I start again?
	Oh, hold on.
	We got Carly Ellison back in the house.
	Flag and report this channel for violation of our community guidelines.
	Election interference.
	I just heard something break.
	It's actually a community...
	Now that we're actually talking about community guidelines, it's a community guidelines violation to incite people to wrongly flag a channel, Carly Ellison.
	So, yeah.
	Hashtag confession through projection.
	Hashtag accuse your enemy of doing that which you are doing so as to create confusion.
	Do I start with the...
	Do I start with the...
	Do I start with...
	I'm not redoing the entire intro, but I think I just heard something break.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Something might have broken.
	You need a bigger hammer, Viva?
	What is that supposed to mean?
	So we're not starting again.
	Everyone might just have to watch the intro.
	Did something break?
	What?
	Close the dog up.
	Text mom.
	Tell her to help you, okay?
	Stay away from it.
	Close the door.
	Okay, just close the door and stay away from it.
	I knew I heard something shatter out there.
	Hold on a second, people.
	Sorry.
	The kids broke something, period.
	They might need your assistance ASAP, period.
	Don't worry about...
	Okay, I'm just telling them to be careful, not step in it.
	I'm not...
	Okay, welcome to Viva Frye vlog channel from my home office where kids are on spring break for the rest of this week and then they're back at school.
	So they're here now, and apparently I'm not cleaning up.
	First of all, Tyson Sperling, those who have been around the channel for a long time know darn well I have a pet peeve in life, and it's broken glass.
	So I let some people who don't have that attention to detail go and do the initial cleanup, and then I go in there with my phone on the ground like this, and then you put the light on the ground.
	Level and angle it up so you can see the smallest specks of remaining glass.
	I bring in the vacuum cleaner.
	I bring in wet paper towels.
	I hate broken glass.
	I once did a Spartan race, and it was a long one.
	I think it was the Ultra Beast, which was like 50 kilometers.
	And the night before, I got a piece of glass in my heel.
	And I'm like, I'm not going to be able to run the race because I've got a microscopic piece of glass in my heel because something broke at the hotel room.
	And I found it before the race.
	So that's it.
	And look, okay, everyone's on me today.
	I bought a better camera.
	I have the camera in the box at the front door.
	I forgot to open it today because I forgot that I had a podcast with Bryce Eddy, which I did earlier today, that is going to be published tonight, from what I understand.
	So check out Bryce Eddy.
	He's going to be publishing the podcast with me and him, if you don't know who he is.
	Yeah, no one cares about...
	I'm sorry.
	Everyone should care about how to clean up broken glass properly.
	You do the initial sweep, you get the vacuum cleaner, you get the small pieces.
	Then you do a wet paper towel, and you get into the nooks and crannies.
	And if you have tiles, you get into the grouting of the tiles to eliminate all.
	And you do this multiple times.
	Okay, done.
	But speaking of nobody caring...
	All right, before we get going, I'm not redoing the intro.
	I was going to continue to read.
	No, I read the article from Bloomberg.
	Potential federal court nominee stumbles.
	Can't identify what a Brady motion is.
	All right.
	On a good note, people, you may have noticed when you came into the stream, it said this video contains a paid sponsorship.
	Because it does!
	And it's one that I use and that I love.
	Oh, they have a new product called Lean Weight Loss.
	Field of Greens, people.
	Let me get to the Field of Greens part.
	The food!
	It's a food.
	Desiccated greens, why I keep it on my desk all the time, I actually do.
	It's a little known fact that the typical human is supposed to have five to seven servings of raw fruits and vegetables daily.
	So you can get the nutrients, the foliage, the roughage, not the foliage, all that good stuff that most people do not get.
	Especially when you're traveling, it's virtually impossible to get your daily dose of fruits and vegetables.
	That's what Field of Greens is useful for.
	This is not an extract.
	It's not a supplement.
	It's a food.
	It's USDA organic approved right there.
	It's a food.
	One spoonful contains one serving of fruits and vegetables.
	Let me see this.
	Antioxidant power boosted immunity.
	All of the good stuff.
	Twice a day, you get two servings of fruits and vegetables with...
	I spoke with the doctor of the company.
	It's good.
	Nothing is as good as the actual raw fruits and vegetables, but it's the darn next best, second best thing.
	For those who don't get their fruits and vegetables in, it's a healthy habit, so you don't sit there and suck back a disgusting chemical-infested diet Coke or sugar-infested regular Coke.
	Fieldofgreens.com, promo code VIVA will get you 15% off your first order and 10% off subscription.
	Something like that.
	Promo code VIVA.
	Get your stuff.
	It's a good, healthy habit to get into.
	Wean out unhealthy habits.
	The link is in the description.
	Thank you very much, Field of Greens.
	There's nothing easier than sponsoring a product that I actually use.
	I love chemically infested Coke, too.
	It creates a bad addiction.
	There's no question about that.
	Okay.
	What are we going to talk about today?
	I called it.
	I called it.
	And you know what?
	Robert Barnes was doing a live stream last night on...
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	And he was talking about the Trump indictment that has not yet occurred.
	And Barnes was going through, you know, element by element.
	I think he cited five elements as to why the indictment is baloney on its face, like Taco Bell baloney.
	Statute of limitations.
	Hush money is not a crime.
	I forgot all the other ones which I'll get.
	Oh yeah, motivated prosecution, malicious prosecution, selective prosecution.
	Trump went through all of the reasons, Trump, Barnes went through all of the reasons why even if Trump gets indicted, it's absolute Taco Bell baloney.
	And I asked in the chat, I was like, Barnes, you know, any chance that they don't now indict?
	So that they can then say, look at Trump spreading disinformation.
	We were never going to indict him.
	He's a liar.
	I was like, oh no, even that question is stupid to some extent because they convened a grand jury.
	Like, they're not convening a grand jury so as not to indict.
	Oh, have I gotten cynical or have I just gotten well-trained by the Barnes?
	Because lo and behold, now there's an article that just came out in Fox News that said...
	Quoting Bragg.
	His name is Alvin Bragg, right?
	I think that's his first name.
	Alvin Bragg.
	Soros funded indirectly through Color of Change PAC.
	Kids are coming in here.
	Now, apparently Bragg is saying Trump misled the public on the possibility of an indictment.
	We're going to get to that.
	We're going to get to Carrie Lake and we're going to get to a bunch of other stuff that's off in the chat.
	But, oh, do we start?
	Well, yeah, let's just start with the Trump and then we're going to go on over to Rumble exclusively now that I've fixed it.
	Thank goodness.
	Okay, here's the link to Rumble.
	So after we talk about this, as of yet, Trump has not yet been indicted.
	Could it be?
	Could it be that, not influencers, that's not the right word, analysts.
	Political commentating analysts may have actually sensitized enough people to the bullshittery that we are currently witnessing with the malicious witch hunt persecution of Donald Trump, a man who so cannot be president again.
	He would lose to a head-to-head with Joe Biden today.
	He would lose to a head-to-head with DeSantis.
	He's so incapable of ever being re-elected as president that the administrative state...
	The deep state, the politicized, corrupt prosecutors throughout the nation are doing everything in their bloody power to make sure that he can't even get on the ballot, to ruin his life, to destroy him.
	What are they doing out there?
	That's how unlikely it is that he can never become president.
	He's such a useless, hapless candidate that they've got to go out of their way to destroy him to make sure that he can never again run for office.
	Okay, here's the article.
	From Fox News today, so take it with a grain of salt.
	My God, I feel smart.
	I feel smart for having suggested it, and I have evidence that I'm the one who actually suggested it.
	They're not going to do it, and they're going to try to blame Trump for having spread misinformation about his potential alleged upcoming indictment.
	Manhattan DA brag.
	I guess you could say he's bragging about it.
	Response to House GOP document request says Trump, quote, Confession through projection.
	Confession through projection.
	Let's just see what happens here.
	Michigan District Attorney Alvin Bragg responded to several leading House Republicans'requests for information on the probe into former President Donald Trump, Now they can back off of it.
	And what they're going to say is, we convened a grand jury only so that we could abide by the rule of law.
	And if the grand jury, gosh darn it, if they said we're not going to indict Trump, well, we're just going to live with that.
	And we are a DA that believes in the rule of law.
	We were never going to indict him.
	Or maybe that grand jury, but for the political shitstorm that was caused by Trump tweeting in advance, because Trump is not tweeting this without having some knowledge about it, presumably.
	As his past conduct has confirmed.
	Remember when Trump said, they wiretapped me?
	They wiretapped Trump Tower?
	And then the fake news went ballistic.
	It's a fake news fact check.
	He doesn't get wiretapped because, you know, in today's day and age, when they spy on you, they don't tap wires anyhow because phones don't have wires anymore.
	To think that Trump didn't know what was going on when he tweeted that out would be naive.
	To think he didn't, you know, he just made this out of thin air would be naive as well.
	Bragg's general counsel sent a five-page letter to GOP House Committee Chairman Jim Jordan of Ohio, Brian Steele of Wisconsin, and James Comer of Kentucky regarding the request for documents and testimony in the Trump investigation.
	Do they talk about Soros funding Bragg here?
	Maybe not.
	The district attorney's office said the investigation is one of thousands conducted.
	Do you understand this, by the way?
	Like, you know you're being lied to when this is their reflexive defense.
	The district attorney's office said the investigation, quote, is one of thousands conducted by the office in its history.
	And that Bragg, quote, stands by his pledge, end quote, to release the conclusion of the investigation publicly.
	It's one of thousands conducted?
	How many has your office conducted of a former president of the United States, leading frontrunner for the GOP, and potential future president yet again of the United States?
	How many?
	We do these all the time.
	Oh, your letter dated March 20th, 2023.
	The letter.
	In contrast, it's an unprecedented inquiry into a pending legal prosecution, Bragg.
	At least they're admitting that.
	The letter only came after Donald Trump created a false expectation that he would be arrested the next day.
	And his lawyers reportedly urged you to intervene, the letter accused.
	Neither fact is a legitimate basis for congressional inquiry.
	Bragg's office also, yadda yadda.
	An unlawful incursion into New York's sovereignty.
	Yep.
	If we want to abuse of our prosecutorial discretion to go after a former president on a novel legal theory, which, according to a great many legal minds, not just Robert Barnes, Dershowitz, Jonathan Turley, is full of crap, well, that's our prosecutorial discretion to do so.
	What else is going on here?
	The Manhattan grand jury will not hear testimony, deliberate, or vote on the hushed money case against former President Donald Trump on Thursday, as sources confirm.
	This is from yesterday.
	So they canceled the grand jury hearing that was scheduled for today.
	Let me see here.
	The letter indicates that its request may be related to a review of federal public safety funds, Greg's office wrote.
	But the letter does not suggest any way in which either district attorney's testimony about his prosecutorial decisions or the documents and communications of former assistant district attorneys on a pending criminal investigation would shed light on that review.
	Bullshit!
	It's so easy to determine how they could shed light on the review and whether or not this is malicious prosecution.
	Oh, anyhow.
	So that's what's happening.
	So.
	This is the politics behind the backstory.
	The attorneys, Mark Pomerantz and Carrie Dunn, we talked about this yesterday, sought to prosecute Trump in 2022 in a novel theory of a crime that has probably been prescribed, is the term under Quebec law in the States, has exceeded the statute of limitations by a good two years.
	But Bragg rejected their legal theories.
	They then resigned.
	So was there any political, you know, politicking internally that caused you to reconsider your position, Bragg?
	This indictment comes after years of the district attorney's office aggressively pursuing charges with you and other special prosecutors leading the investigation into every facet of Trump's finances.
	Last year, you resigned from the office over Bragg's initial reluctance to move forward with charges.
	Bragg is now attempting to shoehorn the same case with identical facts into a new prosecution.
	I like Jordan.
	And yeah, that's what's happening.
	Bottom line?
	No prosecution yet.
	But they're trying to paint it as though Trump is the one who spread misinformation by suggesting his arrest was imminent when the arrest probably was imminent and the grand jury might have felt empowered, protected, shielded, morally justified in returning that grand jury indictment.
	And maybe they don't feel quite so confident.
	Maybe now that we're seeing footage of actual New Yorkers who are coming out and saying that this is absurd.
	Even for them, maybe the grand jury is not so confident that they can get away with authorizing this indictment while avoiding public scrutiny.
	All right, the link to Rumble is in the chat again, people.
	Let me see if we're all still good on...
	Yeah, we're good.
	All right.
	Booyah.
	Now let me see something here.
	Rumble says an existing detected...
	Okay, I'm going to refresh this.
	I may lose some Rumble rants.
	Are we live here?
	Okay, we're good.
	What was I going to say before we go over to Rumble?
	Standard disclaimers.
	No election advice, no medical advice, no legal advice.
	These beautiful things called Super Chats.
	YouTube takes 30% of those.
	And if you don't like...
	Giving your hard-earned money to YouTube and you'd rather give it to a platform that actually supports freedom of speech, head over to Rumble.
	They have these things called Rumble Rants, or as I like to say, Rumble Rants.
	And they take 20%.
	So it's better to support a platform that actually supports free speech, the movement that is Rumble.
	And it's better for the creator.
	The easiest way to support the channel without having to shell out anything.
	Like, share, subscribe, and...
	Word of mouth, people.
	No matter how cynical you get, it's impossible to keep up Lily Tomlin, 251 Omega.
	Do you know that that's actually in the banner of my Twitter page?
	That's the banner of my Twitter.
	I replaced a long-running...
	I replaced the original, one that hadn't changed in years.
	My banner in Twitter says, no matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up Lily Tomlin.
	A thousand percent, people.
	Cool whip, anyone?
	You can't have pie without cool whip.
	All right, everyone, let's end it on YouTube.
	Go over to Rumble.
	And then after that, we can mosey on over to Locals because we got funds.
	Oh my goodness.
	Wait until you see some of the videos that we are going to look at today.
	They're good.
	They're good.
	Okay, ending on YouTube.
	There's 2,245 people currently watching on YouTube.
	Mosey on over to Rumble.
	And by the way, I know some of you say, oh, the user interface sucks.
	It got all sorts of problems.
	Text me.
	Put it in the comments.
	Let me know.
	I am mildly close with the CEO, Chris Pawlowski, so I can just message him any recommendations, any suggestions, any people, any constructive criticism.
	that people may have, there will be some growing pains because my goodness, Rumble is growing.
	When you have Crowder pulling in 130, 170,000 live viewers, there will be growing pains.
	But Pavlovsky and Rumble as an entity are well open to legitimate constructive criticism.
	So let me know and I'll do it.
	Do a full show here.
	This is where you were made.
	You just threw us over.
	I can't go to rumble on my TV.
	No, we're going to rumble.
	But hold on one second.
	Someone said something.
	Someone said something that I did want to address.
	Why did I join YouTube then?
	I joined YouTube in 2014.
	And even when my channel started picking up, I didn't realize the...
	I started learning the chicanery real fast.
	But people vote with their dollar.
	People vote with their foot.
	And so now it's time for the remaining 1,800 people to vote with their feet.
	Or don't.
	And then you can watch it when I post the entire stream to YouTube tomorrow.
	So it will be on YouTube, just not live, interactive for everyone to deal with, for everyone to interact with.
	Here we go, people.
	Ending on YouTube in three, two, one, done.
	And now we are on the rumbles.
	Okay, let me go to my notes for the day to see what we're going to pull up first here.
	It's just endless bullshit.
	Oh yeah.
	It dovetails perfectly into the prosecution or the grand jury investigation into Donald Trump out of New York.
	We hear time and time again, no one is above the law.
	If you haven't read or listened to George Orwell's Animal Farm, it's obligatory reading, obligatory listening.
	All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.
	No one is above the law, but some people are certainly more beneath the law than others.
	The DA, you know, New York, they're just looking into standard crimes.
	No one's above the law, not even a former president.
	Except maybe.
	Just maybe.
	The son of the existing president.
	Maybe he's not above the law, but Donald Trump is more below the law.
	Listen to this.
	Phenomenal exchange.
	Pudge, please.
	We're learning here.
	Wilcox, if a person lies on Form 4473 and is a user of unlawful drugs, you can get between five to ten years for that.
	Is that correct?
	Is that my understanding?
	No, I believe Congress changed the sentence last Congress.
	What is that sentence now?
	Up to 15. Up to 15 years.
	Why hasn't Hunter Biden been prosecuted?
	This is an outrage.
	The facts of that case and can't comment on it.
	Okay, who do we talk to to see why this case is not being prosecuted?
	I mean, he said very clearly in his book that he used drugs.
	He had a gun.
	Point of order, Mr. Chairman.
	Point of order.
	Point of order.
	Lisa smells.
	Totally irrelevant and not germane to this proceeding.
	He's got his five minutes.
	Go ahead.
	Continue.
	Totally irrelevant.
	He might be right.
	I don't know what the...
	I understand why you do not want Mr. Wilcox to answer that question.
	Because it would be devastating for our claims that no one is above the law and we do not live in a two-tiered justice system.
	It would be devastating.
	It's very clear why you don't want...
	Because there's a dual system of justice in America.
	That's what's going on right now.
	And everybody's talking about it across America.
	There's two standards of justice that are going on.
	By the way, it's not just that there's evidence.
	Hunter Biden's gun.
	I mean, we've talked about it.
	We've talked about it.
	There's video footage from that laptop which our intelligence or American intelligence told us bore the hallmarks or earmarks of Russia disinformation.
	There's a video.
	Of Hunter Biden holding the gun and seemingly pointing it at the camera that came off that computer.
	Hunter Biden has admitted to having done what he did.
	I mean, there we go.
	There we go.
	I'm not going much further than this, people.
	Not only it's a felony to lie on a firearm application.
	Not only did he feloniously lie on a firearm application, he or his fiancée, girlfriend, or whomever at the time, then allegedly feloniously disposed of this feloniously acquired firearm by dumping it in a dumpster behind a school.
	Anything come of that?
	FBI's known about that since, at the very least, 2019, I presume.
	Anything come of that?
	Hell no.
	Why would?
	Why would anything come of that?
	They've got bigger fish to fry.
	Alleged falsifying business records of an alleged hush payment to an alleged porn star a decade ago.
	Yeah, no, but nothing to see here, people.
	So that was one of the lighter-hearted stuff.
	We're going to get into...
	The media lies when we talk about Carrie Lake's victory.
	Maybe not a total victory.
	Maybe not even, if we're just measuring numbers, a majority victory.
	Substantively, it might be the absolute victory.
	We'll see.
	We'll get there.
	Because all the media does is lie.
	I believe it was Mark Twain who said it best.
	If you don't read the news, you're uninformed, and if you read the news, you're misinformed.
	It was either Mark Twain, Winston Churchill, or Denzel Washington.
	One of the three.
	But before we get there, we've got to have a little fun.
	A little fun on the day.
	I hear people screaming.
	We have to have a little fun on the day.
	It's going to be the left eating the left.
	But before we get there...
	Oh, come on.
	I put the video up there because I wanted to deal with it.
	Hold on.
	I have to go get the video.
	James O 'Keefe has started his own thing.
	Everybody should be following James O 'Keefe on his new venture, which is called...
	It's OMG.
	It's amazing.
	O 'Keefe Media.
	I forget what the G stands for.
	All that I know is that it's OMG, which is a great way to remember it.
	He just posted something funny.
	The punchline is just...
	I don't know who the person was that tweeted him, but this is it here.
	Okay, so check this out.
	James O 'Keefe says, why does Franifio want to date me?
	OMG.
	I'm back.
	Okay, so that very punchable face is the face of James O 'Keefe, former head of Project Veritas, guys.
	And is that a Subway commercial?
	No, weirdly.
	Why is Subway there?
	We don't know, really.
	But he, since being ousted as the head of Project Veritas, is starting his new media company, and it's called OMG.
	By the way, The jealousy is palpable.
	The jealousy is palpable.
	I mean, I don't know what the Young Turks numbers are these days.
	I didn't actually realize when I started this that this was from the Young Turks.
	You can tell the jealousy is palpable, that James O 'Keefe is a journalist.
	He is, I won't say potentially one of the last journalists.
	He's one of the few sincere, legit journalists out there.
	Along with Glenn Greenwald, along with Seymour Hersh.
	There are a few that are left.
	The Young Turks are not journalists.
	I don't know if they want to be journalists or they consider themselves journalists.
	They're not.
	They are, as far as rage clicks go, they are rage click propaganda, but the jealousy is palpable.
	First of all, I don't think that's a punchable face at all.
	I think it's a damn good looking dude, but maybe I'm biased.
	Maybe I am.
	Could use a little facial hair, but I like that face.
	OMG.
	Which is the organization of...
	Wait, hang on, hang on.
	It's really dumb.
	Oh, it's really dumb.
	O 'Keefe Media Group.
	It's the O 'Keefe Media Group.
	It's so dumb, we all remember the OMG, even if we can't necessarily remember what it stands for.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Success leaves clues, to quote my father.
	The ball doesn't lie, to quote my father.
	O 'Keefe Media Group.
	OMG, which is probably the dumbest name, the dumbest decision since putting Subway Sandwich in your launch video.
	Oh my god, okay.
	She doesn't understand that she actually just promoted James.
	Not that James O 'Keefe needed her to promote this.
	The dumbest thing ever?
	It's so dumb, it catches, it resonates, and whenever you say OMG or OMG, now you're thinking O 'Keefe Media Group.
	The dumbest decision that he's ever made?
	Why don't we just go compare the graphs of Project Veritas and James O 'Keefe to see who made the dumb decision?
	So, anyway, that's the video.
	Okay, just a little bit more you need to know.
	I don't mind her delivery.
	Her delivery is nice.
	It's sort of reminiscent of Sarah Silverman, but a little better, maybe.
	I'm back.
	All right.
	Hold on.
	There's a punchline to this.
	So, who is Franifio?
	Francesca Fiorentini.
	Chinese-Italian scallion.
	Correspondent.
	Comedian.
	Host of Bitch...
	You Ash...
	Bitchuation.
	Pod.
	The Twitchuation Room on The Young Turks.
	I'm sorry, the one who calls her channel the Twitchuation Room is judging James O 'Keefe for OMG O 'Keefe Media Group.
	Newsbroke on AJ+.
	Okay.
	I just went to the pinned tweet.
	This is her pinned tweet.
	Let's not equate left and right wing rage.
	Right wing rage gave us the KKK.
	Left wing rage gave us the weekend.
	I swear to you, I saw that tweet and I thought it was a parody account.
	Let's not equate left and right-wing rage.
	Right-wing rage gave us the KKK.
	Left-wing rage.
	I don't even care about that.
	Right-wing rage gave us the KKK.
	Does Francesca...
	Hold on.
	Francesca.
	Does Francesca not know of the origins of the KKK?
	Does she not know what the KKK was?
	USA Today.
	Fact check.
	The KKK.
	Did not found...
	Oh, the Democrat Party did not found...
	Come on, get out of here.
	Fact check.
	The Democratic Party did not found the KKK did not start the Civil War.
	The claim, Democratic Party started the Civil War to preserve slavery and later the KKK.
	Friendly reminder, if you support the Democrat Party, you support the party that founded the KKK.
	Let's forget the Civil War part.
	Let's forget that.
	Let's just get to the KKK part because who started the KKK?
	That was the Democrats.
	Other posts making more specific claims about the Democratic Party starting the Civil War and founding the KKK.
	A faction of the Democrat Party started the Civil War.
	Okay, I don't really want to care.
	I'm not interested in that one.
	The KKK was founded by Democrats, but not the party.
	Okay.
	Make it make sense, people.
	The Democrats didn't start the KKK.
	It was founded by Democrats, not the party.
	I can't even tell if this is a joke now.
	The Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1866 by ex-Confederate soldiers Frank McCord, Richard Reed, John Lester, John Kennedy, J. Calvin Jones, and James Crow in Pulaski, Tennessee.
	The group was originally a, quote, social club and, quote, but quickly became a violent white supremacist group.
	Its first Grand Wizard was Nathan Bedford Forrest, an ex-Confederate general and prominent slave trader.
	Experts agree the KKK attracted many ex-Confederate soldiers and Southerners who opposed Reconstruction, most of whom were Democrats.
	Forrest even spoke at the 1868 Democratic National Convention.
	Quote, the KKK is almost a paramilitary organization that's trying to benefit one party.
	It syncs up with the Democratic Party, which really was a racist party openly at the time, Grinspan said.
	But the KKK isn't the Democratic Party, and the Democratic Party isn't the KKK.
	Can you believe these effing fact-checkers are...
	If you don't read the news, you're uninformed, and if you read this shit, you are absolutely misinformed.
	But apparently Francesca reads this shit.
	The right wing gave the KKK, according to Francesca from the Young Turks.
	Again, I'm a Canadian dumbass, and I know these things.
	Although the KKK did serve the Democratic Party's interest, Greenspan stressed that not all Democrats supported the KKK.
	Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize that.
	The Anti-Defamation League's Center on Extremism senior fellow Mark...
	Pitt Kavage told the Associated Press that many KKK members were Democrats because the Whig Party had died off and Southerners disliked Republicans after the Civil War.
	Despite KKK's members' primary political affiliation, Pitt Kavage said it was wrong to say the Democratic Party started the KKK.
	No, it wasn't.
	And you're idiots, USA Today.
	It wasn't the Democratic Party, no.
	It was created by members of the Democratic Party who were so prominent, they spoke at the Democratic National Committee, but according to Flanifio, it's the product of right-wing rage.
	Idiots.
	It's so idiotic, Pudge had to chime in with a, oh my gosh, I can't believe this crap.
	I mean...
	You know what?
	Before we do the rumble rants, the rumble rants, because it's all a beautiful circle, people.
	It's a circle.
	It's got its own energy.
	Put the ball in its hole.
	It's all a circle.
	Because I had pulled up Anna Kasparian's tweet from earlier today, not realizing the Young Turk connection to this idiotic KKK is a product of right-wing rage.
	Fact-checked by USA Today.
	It wasn't the Democratic Party.
	It was just founded by prominent political members of the Democratic National Party.
	Democratic Party.
	And they spoke at the Democratic National Committee.
	And it served as the, what's the word?
	Paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party.
	But it's not.
	It's factually false to say that the Democrats started the KKK.
	You lying buffoons at the USA Today.
	The revolution eats itself.
	This is Anna Kasparian.
	I don't know if there's a rumor that she's not.
	I don't want to start any rumors.
	Someone might have said she's leaving the Young Turks so this is why she's getting angry or whatever.
	I don't know if that's true at all and I don't even forget it.
	Anna Kasparian.
	For those of you who don't know, Anna Kasparian, executive producer and host of The Young Turks.
	It's a beautiful, beautiful rose in her profile.
	She must be a very peaceful woman who takes time to smell the roses.
	Anna Kasparian said today, And I'm quoting Anna Kasparian.
	I was literally shaking when I read this tweet.
	I was shocked at the level of bigotry coming from a white cisgender female.
	When I read this, I had to recoil to a safe place.
	Anna Kasparian, I'm a woman.
	Please don't ever refer to me as a person with a uterus, birthing person or person who menstruates.
	How do people not realize how degrading this is?
	You can support the transgender community without doing this shit.
	Spoiler alert, Anna.
	Apparently you can't.
	And by the way, if anyone thinks she didn't take shit for this, wait until you see it.
	But I had to tongue-in-cheek reply.
	You are a cisgender birthing person with white cisgender privilege.
	And a man can be a woman if he wants to simply by thinking it.
	These are your rules.
	You must now live by them.
	And if anybody thought that she wasn't actually going to take flack for this, let me see if I can find it here in the responses.
	You got Zuby in there.
	Your side is going to roast you now.
	I hope you're ready for the tolerance.
	Here we go.
	This is the one.
	The Humanist Report.
	I don't know.
	Oh, I didn't realize you could see that.
	The Humanist Report is a leftist political news show on YouTube, Facebook, and Twitch, hosted by Mike Figueredo.
	He, him.
	Links.
	What did the humanist report...
	I don't want to presume anything here, but Figueiredo is a Brazilian last name.
	He looks an awful lot like a white male who's now going to tell a female what she has to do in order to be tolerant.
	The humanist report replies, I respect you a lot, but this notion...
	That the mere existence of trans-inclusive terms, rarely used in casual convos, somehow degrades women.
	Comes right out of the right anti-trans, quote, war on women playbook.
	There's a reason why they're praising you for this.
	Let the fight begin!
	Hey Mike!
	You're a guy.
	You're a guy who has no clue what it's like to have your reproductive freedom taken away.
	But consider what it's like to have the same lawmakers who fail to protect our rights turn around and call us people with uteruses.
	It's not inclusive if cis women hate it.
	Can you imagine the absolute insanity of what we're seeing here?
	We have now what appears to be a Caucasian male telling a woman that she should not be offended.
	By being referred to as a birthing person, chest-feeding person, a person with a uterus, or a birthing person.
	White man knows better, woman.
	Be quiet and deal with it.
	Nobody's trying to erase you from womanhood, except some of you are going to be replaced by biological men on the Women of the Year charts.
	Some of you are going to be replaced on the podium by biological males.
	And if you object to that, woman, birthing person.
	You're the bigot.
	Do I want to see how far down this goes?
	How many people are actually trying to use this language?
	Oh, good question, the humanist.
	I actually believe I put together a montage.
	That crap.
	Yeah, this is how it is.
	The revolution devours its own people.
	When there's no more enemy, or when the enemy is not engaging...
	They will make enemies among themselves.
	No one will be holy enough to pass the purity test over the long run.
	It's like Fight Club.
	Over a long enough timeline, the expectancy that there will not be infighting in the revolution slowly reaches zero.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Let's do some rumble rants because I see them.
	It was Ginger Ninja, I think, who told me to do this.
	These are the Rumble Rants.
	$5 Rumble Rant from James Pruitt.
	So now we got OMG News.
	Absolutely perfect.
	Absolutely perfect.
	OMG has now been co-opted by James O 'Keefe Media Group.
	And it's beautiful.
	And you got...
	What was the thing called?
	It was called Twitch-a-phobe?
	What was it called?
	What was Francesca's podcast?
	I can't even remember it.
	I'm never going to forget OMG.
	$20 rumble rant from Britt Cormier.
	Britt, thank you very much.
	Not to get into the whataboutism, but Hillary lied to the FBI more than Flynn.
	She paid for the steal dossier with campaign funds.
	Or did I miss something?
	Why, Britt?
	You may have missed me talking about this Monday because this was the stream.
	It was Sunday that I screwed up on Rumble, where I talked about exactly this.
	Flew under the radar.
	In 2022, Hillary Clinton paid $8,000 to the FEC and the DNC paid $105,000 to the FEC.
	Is it the FEC?
	The Federal Election Commission.
	They paid $130,000 for misrepresenting financing the Steele dossier.
	I don't want to repeat too much.
	The Steele dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign, opposition research, which was itself a bullshit, bogus dossier of lies and misinformation that the DNC lawyer then...
	leaked to the FBI in a meeting that he said was not foreign on behalf of a client, but then billed the DNC or Hillary Clinton's campaign for it.
	The FBI then took that bullshit, bogus, steel dossier that was leaked to it by Clinton lawyers, leaked it to Yahoo News, who then published an article on this that the FBI then invoked when appealing to a secret FISA court to obtain unlawful spy warrants on Carter Page.
	Nothing.
	Bye.
	They paid an $8,000 fine for mislabeling this.
	They lied about funding it, concealed it, leaked it to the FBI who leaked it to the media so they got unlawful FISA spy warrants on Carter Page to spy on the political adversaries.
	Nothing!
	You didn't miss anything, Brett.
	You're actually right on top of it.
	$1 rumble rant from 251 Omega says, Viva Fry, I don't do Twitter, but I feel we are brothers.
	From a different YouTube channel.
	I'm impressed that you're a Lily Tomlin fan.
	Way cool.
	Hold on.
	Let me just...
	Just so that nobody says that I'm...
	Gotta show the receipts, people.
	Check this out.
	And then we're gonna move on with the story of the day.
	Get out of here.
	Get out of here.
	That does it for our Rumble Rants.
	Just here.
	Check this out.
	Boom shakalaka!
	No matter how cynical you get.
	It is impossible to keep up Lily Tomlin.
	All right, let's get to the story of the day.
	Carrie Lake lost most of her appeal.
	If you read any of the news, you would think that she lost most of her appeal.
	And in a technical sense, you'd be right, but you'd be misinformed and misled.
	I put together a bit of a montage here.
	By the way, just so everybody knows, after this, I'm going to go exclusive to Locals and then respond to the tips in Locals and the comments there and have a Locals exclusive where everybody can feel free to sign up, join in, and whatever.
	Here, this was the montage.
	I mean, I took five seconds, but if you just put it in, Carrie Lake Appeal, what would you see?
	Look at this.
	Los Angeles Times.
	Arizona court declines most.
	of Carrie Lake's appeal over her loss in governor's race.
	Washington Examiner.
	Arizona Supreme Court rejects majority of Carrie Lake's governor race appeal.
	Arizona Central.
	Carrie Lake election challenge mostly rejected by Arizona Supreme Court.
	Mostly.
	It's not totally dead.
	It's only mostly dead.
	And then if you read a little further into the Los Angeles Times article, in an order Wednesday, the state's highest court said a lower court erroneously dismissed Lake's claim challenging the application of signature verification procedures on early ballots in Maricopa County.
	Why, that actually sounds like a very material aspect of the appeal that succeeded.
	The court sent the claim back to trial to consider.
	She lost most of it.
	Let's pull up another article.
	Let's pull up the New York Times.
	Bastions of truth and accuracy.
	Still have up on the internet Brian Sicknick murdered by a group of Trump supporters.
	Still have that up on the internet.
	Never formally corrected, retracted, apologized for that.
	The New York Times.
	Arizona Supreme Court.
	Turns down Carrie Lake's appeal in her election lawsuit.
	Can you believe that this is the headline?
	They didn't even go with mostly.
	Might have to read the next line to...
	Hold on.
	Got a dog dragging her paralyzed privates.
	Oh, scheisser.
	Okay, that's what I wanted to avoid.
	Get it.
	Come on.
	Right.
	Just dropped a flipping hard drive on the ground.
	Yeah, Pudge scoots her butt along the floor and private parts end up getting snagged in cables and pulling computers off tables.
	The New York Times doesn't even put in the word mostly in their headline.
	Arizona Supreme Court turns down Carrie Lake's appeal in her election lawsuit.
	I mean, I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
	This actually feels like it has to be wrong.
	This feels like it has to be a bogus headline.
	They don't even put in mostly.
	The justices refused to hear Mrs. Lake's claims disputing her loss in the governor's race, but sent one part of her lawsuit back to a court, back to a trial court.
	I'm sorry.
	So then your headline is a lie, New York.
	Your headline is a bloody lie.
	Turns down Carrie Elections appeal in election, but it sent one part of it back for trial, for review.
	Oh, so you're liars.
	Arizona Supreme Court on Wednesday denied a request from Carrie Lake to hear her lawsuit disputing her loss last year in the governor's race.
	The lawsuit was based on what the court said was a false claim by Miss Lake, a Republican, that more than 35,000 unaccounted ballots were accepted.
	We're going to get into this statement, by the way, because this is where the court, as you'll read from some people's tweets, reserved the right to seek sanctions for this allegedly false claim.
	In a five-page order written by Chief Justice Robert Brutinelle, the court determined that a vast majority of Ms. Lake's legal claims, which had earlier been dismissed by lower quotes, lacked merit.
	The vast majority.
	We're two paragraphs in and they're finally attenuating their headline lie.
	The Court of Appeals aptly resolves these issues, Chief Justice Brutinelle wrote, adding that the petitioner's challenges on these grounds are insufficient to warrant the requested relief under Arizona or federal law.
	Fine.
	But the justices on Wednesday...
	Ordered a trial court in Arizona's most populous county, Maricopa, to conduct an additional review of that county's procedures for verifying signatures on mail-in ballots, keeping one part of her lawsuit alive.
	I'm sorry, you said they rejected it.
	They turned it down and yet kept it alive?
	The decision dealt another setback to Ms. Lake, a former television news anchor whose strident election denialism helped her to gain the endorsement to former President Donald Trump.
	Ms. Lake tried to put a positive spin on the ruling.
	Accuse your enemies of doing what you are doing so as to create confusion.
	Hashtag confession through projection.
	Get your own shirt at vivafried.com.
	Contending that Twitter that remanding the signature verification aspect of her case back to the trial was vindication.
	It was.
	And it's probably the most material element, the most material claim of her appeal.
	But it's not the New York Times that's trying to put a negative spin on this or a spin that makes Carrie Lake look like a loser.
	It's Carrie Lake who's trying to put a positive spin on the fact that they are going to address signature verification in Maricopa County, at the very least on early voting ballots.
	Ms. Lake had argued that a material number of ballots with unmatched signatures were accepted in Maricopa County.
	The Supreme Court agreed with the appeals court ruling on the matter, effectively saying that she would have to show the number that proved the election outcome would plausibly have been different, not simply an unearthed assertion of uncertainty.
	She fell to Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, by 17,000 votes, yada, yada, yada.
	Representative is Ms. Hobbs.
	They did not immediately respond to requests.
	Who cares?
	Okay.
	Liars.
	Just...
	Bloody liars is what they are.
	And don't worry, people.
	We're not just going to rely on the New York Times or my word here.
	Here's a link to the article.
	Let's just go look at the order.
	It's not very long, but there's two elements that I want to look at.
	I was going to do a car vlog on this, but Viva Fry might turn into Jablinski Games for the next vlog.
	Like, oh, we're going to do the vlog.
	We're going to do it.
	Jablinski Games, for anybody who doesn't know.
	How do I get...
	There we go.
	Okay, so I think that's...
	Can I zoom in on this?
	Oh, Robert Gouveia is live in 30 minutes.
	Okay, I don't think I can zoom in any more than this.
	We see this?
	Okay, good.
	Let's just go down here.
	On December 24th, this is the order filed yesterday, March 22nd.
	Plaintiff Carrie Lake, Katie Hobbs, Honorable...
	It's an en banc ruling, I think.
	The judge, Peter Thompson, in and for the state of Maricopa.
	Oh, no, that was against the parties.
	That doesn't matter.
	I thought it was an en banc ruling.
	Let me just see something here.
	Now, who cares?
	Okay, it doesn't matter.
	Let's just go read through this and stop scrolling to make everyone know.
	On December 24, 2022, the trial court issued its advisement ruling rejecting Petitioner Lake's challenge and confirming the election of Katie Hobbs as Arizona governor-elect pursuant to yadda yadda yadda.
	The Court of Appeals affirmed In an opinion issued February 16, 2023.
	Petitioner Lake filed her petition for review and request for expedited consideration on March 1. Oh yeah, the court en banc, meaning on the bench.
	We've talked about this.
	En banc is like a panel of the judges of the Court of Appeal.
	Granted petitioner's motion for expedited consideration.
	Of her petition for review.
	Okay.
	The court is considered Petitioner Lake's petition for review and responses filed by the governor, Katie Hobbs, yada, yada, yada, Maricopa County.
	The court has also considered the record the trial court ruling and the court of appeals opinion affirming the trial court.
	The court is also considered briefing.
	Okay, fine.
	Amity from whom?
	Okay.
	So they deny it one through five and seven, but leave six.
	The Court of Appeals aptly resolves these issues, most of which were the subject of evidentiary proceedings.
	So everybody knows this is under Quebec law.
	I think it's pretty much the same under all appellate review.
	But the level of deference that the Court of Appeal gives to the lower courts when it comes to appreciation of the evidence is greater than when it comes to questions of pure law.
	So the Court of Appeal will intervene on matters of law, almost as a rule, but will be much more reluctant to override the trial judge's appreciation of the evidence, which they say the trial judge is uniquely or singularly in a position to better appreciate than an appellate court, which doesn't actually hear witnesses or assess evidence.
	Okay.
	It is ordered denying review of the issues one through five.
	It is further ordered granting review of issue number six to the extent To the extent count three of the complaint challenges the Maricopa County recorder's application of signature verification policies during the election.
	Issue number six asks, did the panel err in dismissing the signature verification claim on latches, mischaracterizing Lake's claim as a challenge to existing signature verification policies when Lake in fact challenged that Maricopa County, or Maricopa, Failed to follow these policies during the 2022 general election.
	In count three of her complaint, which alleged a violation of the Arizona rules of whatever the statute petitioner alleged in paragraph 151, upon information and belief, a material number of early ballots cast in the November 8, 2022 general election were transmitted in envelopes containing an affidavit signature that the Maricopa County recorder or his designee determined did not match the signature in the putative...
	That's not a small thing.
	The Maricopa County recorder nevertheless accepted material number of these early ballots for processing and tabulation.
	Contrary to the ruling of the trial court and the court of appeals opinion, this signature verification challenge is to the application of the policies, not to the policies themselves.
	Therefore, it was erroneous to dismiss this claim under the doctrine of latches.
	Because Lake could not have brought this challenge before the election.
	Can you imagine the lower court and then the lower court of the lower, the court of appeal dismissed it on latches, said that she took too long to contest this aspect of the election, which didn't occur until the election itself.
	Sorry, latches.
	We're going to have to put you up in the pantry and...
	Lock you up behind some latches.
	Oh, for God's sake, that's terrible.
	So, no.
	Yeah, technically, five out of the six claims were dismissed.
	The one perhaps most material aspect of the appeal was allowed.
	The judge concluding that you can't bar Lake from appealing that on latches when the cause of action only arose when they apparently did not properly match signature verifications on the early voting with the voter record.
	Holy sweet merciful goodness.
	Oh no, but Carrie Lake is spinning this as a victory.
	Then you're going to hear some people citing this.
	Her appeal was so dismissed, according to the New York Times, even though it succeeded on one element, that the judge reserved the rights for sanctions.
	Listen to this.
	It's further ordered petitioners may file a response and respondents may file a reply to respondents' motion for sanctions in accordance with RCAP rule, whatever, I don't know what that is.
	The parties shall address as a basis for sanctions only petitioners factual claims in her petition for review, i.e.
	that the Court of Appeals should have considered the undisputed fact that 35,563 unaccounted for ballots were added to the total of the ballots at a third party processing facility and not legalized.
	So the sanctions is only going to pertain to statements of fact that the court has now determined to be factually unsupported by the evidence.
	The sanction will only apply to petitioner's factual claims.
	I'll just say that...
	So, the motion for sanctions will not rely on arguments of law, but rather only on arguments, statements of fact that were subsequently disproven.
	If sanctions...
	I mean, here's my bold prediction as a lowly Canadian dumbass with nothing but a Quebec law degree.
	There will be no sanctions awarded in this case.
	Period.
	You cannot, in my humble view, dare entertain the idea of awarding sanctions when the appeal has been successful, if only in part.
	That's my humble view.
	And the idea of parsing out sanctions to sanction certain statements that were not sufficiently proven in court despite the fact that an element of the appeal was successfully argued and granted.
	Would be an absolute weaponization and bastardization of the sanctions process itself, based on my understanding of how sanctions are applied in Quebec.
	In Quebec, just so you should know, to get sanctions, in my view, they're handed out like Halloween candy in the United States.
	To get sanctions in Quebec, you have to prove a patent manifest abuse of the judicial process.
	Not malicious prosecution, sorry.
	Malice in the filing of the lawsuit, malice in the conduct of the lawsuit, not having made certain statements of evidence that were ultimately not panned out or retained by the court.
	So I'm predicting that there will be no sanctions in this court.
	But with the caveat, if sanctions are awarded, it would be the most absolute politically motivated bastardization of the sanctions process.
	There I said it.
	Now, just imagine what your understanding of the Carrie Lake decision is based on what we've now gone over together, based on the actual court filing as opposed to the bullshit headlines in mainstream media and the absolute misinformation, disinformation reporting from the old gray lady, the New York Times.
	It's night and day.
	It's night and day.
	Let me just see if there's anything else I missed about Carrie Lake.
	I mean, we can go to some of the tweets, but hey, just know, when you see some of these tweets, oh, such a frivolous appeal that was granted in part that the court reserved the right for sanctions on only some of the claims, you're being misled, you're being duped, and there are going to be a great many people out there who are not going to understand that not only did Carrie Lake not lose on her appeal, she actually succeeded, albeit on one of the claims, but albeit...
	I would argue the most important aspect of her appeal.
	And my goodness, my goodness, the fury that you are going to hear if the signature matches don't match.
	Someone just said, Minimum Underdrive says, New York Times subscribers don't get past the headlines.
	No question about that.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com members are slightly above average and get past the headlines.
	Yeah, I don't think there's anything more on Carrie Lake.
	Good on her.
	Oh, no, except for the media demonizing her.
	An election denier.
	My goodness, is she tenacious?
	Is she...
	I think she's charismatic.
	I know that she was a reporter, so that might explain some of the reflexive charisma.
	I like Carrie Lake, and I won't apologize for it.
	Period.
	Let me just bring up...
	There was another Rumble rant.
	Brit Cormier.
	Most, almost all, and majority means not everything.
	Remember, Wesley was not only mostly dead.
	Remember, Wesley was only mostly dead, according to Miracle Max.
	Brit, you and I, I tell you, we have the same sense of humor, we have the same repertoire, and the same appreciation for wonderful movies.
	Oh, what's up, Pudge?
	Do I get bodacious?
	Let's see what happens.
	Come here.
	One, two, three.
	Here's proof of life of Pudge.
	Pudge, what do you say?
	The last time I did this, she pooped on me.
	How you doing?
	You like life?
	Okay, get out of here.
	Oh!
	I am going to have to wash my hands because I did grab the underside of her woman bits.
	Okay, that's it for Carrie Lake.
	There's some other fun stuff on here before we go exclusive to Locals, but now is the time of the stream where I'm going to start sharing the Locals link for anybody who wants to go join us and our wonderful community.
	We're at over 107,000 members of vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Those are not paying members.
	You can join and be a member and get tons of amazing content on Locals without having to be a supporter.
	But if you want to support...
	You are more than welcome to come and support.
	Seven bucks a month, $70 a year.
	You get tons of exclusive stuff.
	Robert Barnes' Hush Hushes.
	Down you go.
	And a bunch of other stuff.
	So that's it.
	That's the link there now for locals.
	There's some good stuff.
	Some news.
	Some actual news.
	It seems that CTV propaganda out of Canada has to report the bad news.
	I love it.
	It's almost a full circle.
	And tomorrow I'm going to be using the good camera.
	It's an amazing camera.
	My wife, it's been sitting in a box by the front door.
	Here.
	Can you believe the intolerance and the injustice of the world athletics bans transgender women athletes from female competitions?
	I'm just trying to make sense of the headline itself.
	World athletics.
	Bans transgender women athletes from female competitions.
	Has CTV News just stated that there's something unique to being a female?
	I don't know.
	I think CTV needs to be cancelled.
	In fact, I think they need to be cancelled regardless, but for other reasons.
	Track and field banned transgender athletes from international competition Thursday while adopting new regulation that could keep Castor Cementia.
	I don't know who this person is.
	Castor Cementia and other athletes with differences in sex development from competing.
	Okay.
	Okay, we're going to have to parse through this.
	Can you imagine we live in a world where it's expected to stoke outrage that biological men who transition according to the colloquial understanding of the term, biological men can't compete in sport categories designated for biological women because of the differences in biology between biological men and biological women?
	Can we believe that we're living in this universe?
	It's expected to stoke outrage.
	It's not like the headline is...
	Trans people should not be allowed to drive cars.
	Trans people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
	Biological men should not be allowed to compete in sports designated for biological women.
	That's expected to stoke outrage.
	Make it make sense.
	The World Athletics Council adopted the same rules as swimming did last year in deciding to bar athletes who have transitioned from male to female.
	They haven't transitioned from male to female.
	They have cosmetically altered their exterior.
	To have the attributes generally recognized as female genitalia.
	The unfortunate thing is that, biologically speaking, I say unfortunate, the reality is they're still biological males.
	They haven't transitioned.
	They haven't changed their genomes.
	They haven't changed their biological development.
	They have changed a cosmetic appearance on the external.
	With, when it comes to sports, all of the inherent biological advantages of having been born male as relates to competing with women and have gone through male puberty.
	No such athletes currently compete at the highest elite levels of track.
	Another set of updates for athletes with differences in sex development will impact 13 athletes.
	What does that mean, actually?
	This is interesting.
	I'm not sure what this means.
	WA President Sebastian Coe said they include Semenya.
	Dude, what is this?
	Maybe I should know what this is, and maybe I do and just haven't heard the term.
	Semenya has been trying to compete in longer events.
	She finished 13th in her qualifying heat.
	At the 5,000, okay.
	To compete at next year's Olympics, she would have to undergo hormone-suppressing treatment for six months, something she said she will never do again, having undergone the treatment a decade ago under previous rules.
	Okay, so, sorry.
	Differences in sex development.
	How is that different than what is referred to as transgenderism?
	Differences in sex development.
	A group of rare conditions involving genes, hormones, and reproductive organs, including genitals.
	Okay, so this is interesting.
	This might be the actual anomaly, the actual medical anomaly that is used interchangeably with transitioning from biological male to biological female, which is physically, physiologically impossible.
	Differences in sex development is a group of rare conditions involving genes, hormones, and reproductive organs, including genitals.
	It means a person's sex development is different to most other people's.
	Sometimes the term disorders of sex development is used.
	Why does DSD happen?
	You or your child may have sex chromosome bundles of genes usually associated with being female or usually associated with being male, but reproductive organs and genitals that may look different from usual.
	This is the actual medical scientific anomaly that people try to invoke when arguing for transitioning from a biological male to a biological female.
	This happens because of a difference between your genes.
	How you respond to sex hormones in your body?
	It's inherited, but there's no clue why it happens.
	Most common times to find out that a person has DSD are around the time of their birth or when they're a teenager.
	Using female pattern genes with genitals that look different to girls' genitals.
	Some people have XX chromosomes, usually female, with ovaries and a womb, but their genitals may not look the same as many females.
	They may have a more developed clitoris and their vagina may be closed.
	Doctors refer to this condition as 46XXDSD.
	This is fascinating.
	The most common cause is congenital adrenal hyperplasia.
	A person who has CAH lacks an enzyme that their body needs to make the hormones cortisol.
	Okay, fine.
	It can cause serious health issues such as life-threatening kidney problems that need to be treated as soon as possible.
	Genes usually seen in males with genitals that look the same as most girls and some internal male structures.
	Some people have XY male chromosomes, but their external genitals may develop in a way, in the way for boys or girls.
	Sometimes it's, okay, doctors refer to this as 46XYD.
	This is fascinating.
	We're all going to, okay.
	So anyways, so now we understand what her medical condition is.
	And this may be one of those cases where How do you refer to the person if they look male but have female chromosomes or they look female but have male chromosomes?
	It might be the genuine cases where there might be no right answer.
	Let me go share that because that's actually utterly fascinating.
	But the news is that biological males who have gone through puberty, who have developed the muscle mass as a result of...
	The difference in levels of testosterone between biological males and biological females who have muscle mass, bone density, on average longer arm spans, will not be allowed to compete in the biological female category which was set up because of what would inherently, invariably, and necessarily be biological male dominance because of inherent biological advantages, physiological, physical advantages that biological males tend to have as a rule over biological females as a rule.
	Yes?
	There are many women out there who are stronger than me.
	There are many women out there who can run faster than me, who could kick the ever-loving piss out of me.
	Ronda Rousey, I'm looking at you.
	But on average, and at the highest ends of competition, you will not find those exceptions dominating.
	You will find the rule will dominate, which is exactly why sports categories were created for biological females to avoid biological male domination and allow biological females to compete among their biological equals.
	Of which, and it's not discriminatory to say, a biological male transitioning into a female...
	which can never physiologically be done, but only superficially and cosmetically, will always have an advantage at the competitive levels.
	The Real Man says there are exceptions to every rule, but that does not make an exception a rule.
	To this I would respond with three things.
	City of God, great Brazilian movie.
	The first time is the rule, the second time is the exception to the rule, and the third time the exception becomes the rule.
	Unrelated to the discussion, but just a great expression to have at the back of your head.
	I have a different theory about this.
	There are actually no such things as exceptions to rules.
	It's not an exception.
	What you'll actually find for everything that is colloquially referred to as an exception to the rule is that it actually just abides by another rule.
	It's not an exception to a rule.
	There's just another rule that you didn't know about that covers that seeming exception.
	It's like, you know...
	In chess, pawns can only move once or twice.
	They can only move twice off the initial file or rank.
	I forget which one it is.
	And they can only move forward.
	The exception to that rule is en passant.
	No, that's not an exception to the rule.
	That is another rule that most people don't know about that they then view as an exception to the rule when it's actually just a sub-rule that creates what would otherwise appear to be an exception.
	That's my two cents.
	The two cents of my professor, my labor law professor at Université Laval, Réjean Breton, my goodness, if anybody knows who he is, was a great, great professor.
	He was controversial at Université Laval, Laval University in Quebec City, because he was anti-union, he was pro-American, and he said things that were blasphemous.
	He said that America is not a racist country.
	I remember the first law class I had with Réjean Breton, and I didn't know he was controversial at the time.
	He says, oh, he gets it.
	He's like, America's a racist place.
	It's a terrible place.
	It's the most racist place in the world, right?
	Who's the most powerful person in America after the president and the vice president at the time?
	And I think it was Colin Powell.
	I forget who Condoleezza Rice was at the time, but she was also high up there.
	And he asked the class, who is the next most powerful person in America after George Bush?
	And I don't even remember his running needs.
	Dan Quayle?
	And I answered.
	He's like, oh yes, the most racist country on earth and the third most powerful person in the nation is a black man.
	Réjean Breton in our labor law class says, you do not make policies based on the exception.
	He believed in the exceptions to the rule.
	He believed in, like, there will be people who will not be able to fend for themselves in this world.
	There will be people who are too poor to afford health care.
	There will be people who can't do it on their own.
	There will be employees who are incompetent.
	You do not make policy based on the exceptions.
	What you do is make policy to respect.
	And not cater to, but accommodate the exceptions, but you do not make policy based on the exceptions, because all that you end up doing there is having lower tide lowering all ships.
	You have a dumbing down of everything when you make the rule based on the exceptions, as opposed to making a rule to accommodate the exceptions.
	I forgot how we got off on that, but whatever.
	And in that time...
	I have seen more rumble rants.
	From a face to...
	Chicago Fawcett.
	Oh, okay.
	Hold on.
	Let me see.
	Where do we go?
	Most of all...
	Okay, so now we get...
	Okay, so Britt Cormier says most of all...
	Okay, Britt, I got that one.
	Tropical Rocket.
	$20.
	Tropical Rocket, Rocket, a $20 rumble rant says, how does a Jew get that gorgeous 10?
	Well, 5,000 years of having roamed the desert, we have stuff in our skin to allow for fast tanning.
	That, and I try not to use suntan lotion, because it's going to sound crazy.
	I don't believe suntan lotion is healthy.
	I don't believe that getting sunburned is healthy either, so it's a question of wearing long sleeves, pants, staying out of the sun, in the heat.
	But no, sun is healthy.
	But us Israelites, or Semitic...
	We do have malotonin that comes out when we get tan.
	We're not Irish.
	We're not Nordic.
	We're historically from the desert.
	Thank you, though.
	How does a Jew get that gorgeous tan?
	Uncle Kenny, unboosted trans should not be allowed healthcare.
	Unboosted trans.
	Should not be allowed.
	I think there's irony in there, but I don't know.
	Okay, Chicago Fawcett.
	This is what I was getting to.
	A $2 crumble rent.
	Viva big fan.
	Dittos.
	You just made me realize that in order to get around legal issues, we are probably going to see a push from athletes to have such division in sports as men and continued and biological men.
	But I know that the Special Olympics had legal issues with the name when they were first formed.
	Any precedence between...
	That and this subject.
	I don't know if any special...
	I'd be curious.
	I wasn't alive back then.
	The Special Olympics, was it tolerated at the time and only retroactively became somewhat offensive?
	I can understand that.
	This is the amazing thing.
	If trans people are as numerous as they are, it's not complicated.
	Have a specific league.
	Also, it's very much not complicated.
	You know, in wrestling, I used to wrestle Greco-Roman in high school.
	Pretty damn good, but never the best because I was always a very heavy kid for my weight category.
	So I weighed 155.
	I pretty much weighed what I weigh now.
	In wrestling, there's a reason why you can always wrestle up, but you can't wrestle down.
	If I'm 110 pounds, I can wrestle in the 150 category.
	I used to weigh in at 145, give or take, maybe I could crack 140 if I really lost weight.
	I voluntarily wrestled at 155, 160 sometimes.
	Because you could wrestle up because it procures you no physical advantage, but you can't wrestle down.
	That should just be the rule when it comes to trans athletes in sports.
	If you want to transition and you're a fully grown adult in full awareness of fact and law and the absolutely devastating and awful side effects, And healing process that comes from actual bottom surgery and actual top surgery.
	Wrestle up.
	You should have the freedom to wrestle in your biological birth category.
	And wrestle up if you want to.
	If a female, if a biological female who goes page and decides they want to have surgery and become cosmetically male, do whatever you have to do down there.
	They should be allowed to wrestle up and compete in biological male sports.
	But if they're taking testosterone as part of their transition process, they're automatically not allowed competing in biological female sports.
	So the solution is not complicated.
	Either a trans league, where trans athletes compete among trans athletes, or they do what we did as wrestlers.
	You can wrestle up, but you can't wrestle down because it's just not fair otherwise.
	Why is that controversial?
	And you want to have transgender person of the year?
	Go ahead and do it.
	But have a Fink.
	The person's name is Fink.
	I'm not calling them a name.
	Take a place of woman of the year, a category that was designated to recognize the achievements of biological women who historically or physiologically had been cut out of politics or sports.
	I mean, have a trans person of the year.
	While respecting categories that were created to right historical injustices and biological inequities.
	Not complicated.
	X-S-S-F-D-I-T.
	I'll go out on a limb and say pretty much any biological female can outperform Dylan Mulvaney in any physical competition.
	You'd say that, but I don't know if Dylan looks like he's, you know...
	Very petite to begin with.
	But no, put Dylan in a wrestling match.
	Train him.
	He could be a scrappy wrestler.
	A 110-pound biological male competing against that 110-pound biological female will not be a fair fight when you take the most competitive fighters in that weight class, period.
	period.
	Nike seven $1.
	Oh, that was a $5.
	Thank you very much.
	X SSF D I T a $1 Rumble at Nike seven Viva and Viva have Blair white or Canadian trans Julia Absolutely.
	And there's Chad Green, I think.
	There's a number of them.
	I'd love to have an irrational trans person on to see if I can't...
	I'm convinced I would be able to, through discourse, cause them to admit...
	What is patently obvious and what we've fleshed out here today.
	The reality is that an irrational trans advocate will not come on the channel because of the risk that if I get them to tacitly or even, I dare say, explicitly admit the obvious, they will get destroyed by their allies in as much as Anna Kasparian is now going to get destroyed by her allies.
	They won't.
	An irrational person who has to propagate the narrative will not come on.
	Because the real risk, and it's not to flatter myself, the risk is that they will say something that will get them destroyed by their own allies.
	It's the reason why the protesters at the Ottawa Convoy, the counter-protesters, would not speak to me.
	I got one to speak to me.
	Sorry about that.
	Sorry, hold on.
	I got one to speak to me, but there's a reason why their leaders told all the counter-protesters do not talk to them, because they would say something that would get them destroyed by their own side.
	That's why.
	I said it on Twitter, when they block me, it's not because they don't want to hear what I have to say, it's because they don't want their followers to hear what I have to say.
	Their followers know that if they say the wrong thing, they will get destroyed as quickly as their side destroys their ideological adversaries.
	And that's all I have to say about that.
	WhiskeyhornAlta says, power slap is UFC knockouts without the foreplay.
	I gotta tell you, I can acknowledge it's an absolutely idiotic sport, but gosh darn it is it still fun to watch.
	I like watching bowling and I like watching darts, so that might tell you, you know, give you a little bit of an inkling as to my sports proclivities.
	Okay, with that said, let me just see something here.
	What have we got left on the back burner?
	I'm not sure that we have much.
	Okay, I got Anna Kasparian.
	Okay, so we covered the humanist.
	We covered the white male lecturing the white female on her intolerance and promoting right-wing anti-trans ideology.
	All right, we're going to end on a fun one.
	Chat, let's hear what everyone has to say about this.
	Tipping!
	Before I even bring this up, it's a total, what's the word?
	It's irrelevant, but it's fun.
	In the chat, what is a standard tip?
	What's a standard percentage for a tip?
	Let's just see.
	What does scrappy triple Viva mean?
	No, not tipping cow's detonator.
	What is a standard tip to ensure prompt service, which is a rumor?
	Okay, $3.
	Wrong.
	$15, says Ravenous.
	$15, says John Coin Gold.
	And a lot of people are saying $20.
	Look, I'm old enough to remember.
	It was 15%.
	15% was standard.
	And I mean, this was our rule back in Quebec because that is typically what tax was.
	And so it was very easy math in Quebec because...
	You tip 15%, and that's what tip was.
	Post-COVID, or since 2020, standard seems to have gone up to 20. Although most people say 15 to 20, 20 is too high, says molten salt.
	Let me just pull this up here.
	Look at this.
	Before we get into it, I just want to look at the picture.
	Okay.
	First of all, 694.
	I don't know how many people are at the dinner table.
	Look at the world that we're in now.
	Suggested tips.
	Start at 20%, 22%, or 25%.
	Okay.
	This is a totally...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Humorous, irrelevant.
	The person...
	Apparently it came from the waiter who said, somebody had the balls to tip me $70 on a $700 dinner, which I don't know if this included tip.
	I think this might be...
	Not tip, but if this is...
	$700 after tax.
	Typically, people tip pre-tax, so you're not paying tax on that, whatever.
	Person's complaining they only got a $70 tip on a $700 meal.
	That's 10% if it's not before tax.
	I think it might be, whatever.
	That's low.
	If you're pissed off, you'll leave 10% to make a point.
	I take issue with the fact, first of all, I always tip very generously.
	And this is not a humble flex.
	It's tips typically.
	I don't do $700 things.
	So when I tip 20 or 25%, it's sometimes, you know, at a coffee shop where it's the difference between $2 and $2.50, depending on what we order.
	But I do find it very presumptuous that tips are starting at 20%.
	Like, where does it end?
	Does it end at 100%?
	150%?
	Like, and people think, well, cost of living is going up.
	Okay, but cost of living is going up for everybody.
	Oh, sure, if you're eating at a fancy restaurant, you have the liquidity to do it.
	Okay, true.
	Until it becomes so expensive to eat at a fancy restaurant because I've got to tip 50%, then nobody can do it anymore.
	Cost of living is going up because of incompetent government policy and massive inflation.
	But this person was saying, Europeans.
	Oh, that's right.
	We need to ban Europeans from traveling here until they learn how to act.
	I lived in Paris for one year, 99 to 2000.
	And when I went to Paris, I couldn't understand why all the waiters and everyone were like, oh, thank you very much, monsieur.
	Because I was tipping.
	And I didn't know that in France and Europe as a whole, oftentimes the tip is already included.
	So when I was tipping, not only was I tipping when the tip was already included, but I was tipping on the amount that included a tip.
	Some Europeans just don't know that in America, the tip is not already included into the price.
	Although it would be hilarious if in this bill...
	The tip was already included because maybe they were a party or whatever.
	And yeah, all that to say, the first reflex should be forgiveness and not judgment.
	It'll be easier on the person, on the waiter.
	Just take for granted that maybe these Europeans thought the price, that it already included the tip and what they thought they were doing was extra generous, giving another 10% because they thought the tip was already included.
	From the other perspective, Starting recommended tip to 20%.
	It's getting absurd.
	It's getting absurd.
	Okay.
	I think we've done it all today, people.
	Brickhouse Nutrition, yeah, covered that.
	Fake News Media, covered that.
	All right.
	Now what we're going to do, come on over.
	Let's see how many people we can get to come from the near 7,000 people watching on Rumble.
	Come on over to Locals.
	You don't have to decide to be a supporting member.
	You can just become a member.
	Although you're free to be a supporter as well.
	Last thing, you know what, before we do that, last thing, because I plug everything else except better than my own merch store, people.
	VivaFry.com.
	We have merch.
	Live free.
	Live free.
	VivaFry.
	Viva Barnes University.
	Not a real university.
	We'll be wild.
	The words that are insurrectionist rhetoric.
	And the ever-classic, politics ruins everything.
	Go to vivafry.com if you want to get some merch.
	It's fun stuff.
	All right.
	Right now, we're going one last time.
	Let's do it.
	Going to locals exclusive.
	And that's it.
	That's what we're doing.
	Come to Locals.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Probably see you tomorrow because something's going to happen between now and tomorrow.
	We're going to have to go live next week, by the way.
	Next week.
	March 30th.
	In-studio interview with...
	If anybody gets it, chat.
	Let me know what you think.
	By the way, before you go, hit the thumbs up plus thing.
	The thumb up is only like 275 thumbs up.
	Go hit the thumbs up.
	Apparently it helps on Rumble.
	You know who's live in studio next week?
	No one's going to get it.
	March 30th.
	1.30, 2 o 'clock, give or take.
	I'm going to determine the time exactly.
	Viva and Barnes sidebar with sticks.
	I need to have the circumcision debate with sticks.
	Not James O 'Keefe.
	Not Jimmy Dore.
	Not Trump.
	Although I'm reaching out to other people.
	Libs of TikTok.
	In person.
	Local studio next week.
	Exact time to be determined.
	But it's going to be revelatory.
	It's going to be amazing.
	So stay tuned for that.
	And we're going to have a lot of great stuff coming in between.
	All right, peeps.
	Do it.
	Ending on Locals.
	Oh, Tropical Rocket said, people that have worked for tips tip good.
	I worked at a coffee shop once for not a long period of time because the smell of coffee gave me a migraine.
	I never had those jobs that were tip jobs.
	I just think, you know, by and large, for the amount extra that it's going to cost, it's a symbolic gesture and therefore a more important one than the extra 50 cents to a dollar.
	Although if you're spending 700 bucks on dinner, yeah, it makes a big difference.
	But okay.
	Ending on Rumble.
	Moving on with the locals.
	Everybody, enjoy the evening.
	Peace and locals.
	I'm a coming, Pa!
	I'm a coming.
	Right now.
	Boo yakasha.
	Okay.
	Locals.
	How goes the battle?
	254, 256.
	Let's see how many...
	Asking people to click and click and click.
	Yeah, it's a sports filter, as we used to say in the rock climbing industry.

▲