Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 14, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:50:03

Hunter in Trouble? Pfizer Wants to Cure Cancer? Jan. 6 Injustice! Viva Frei LIVE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Are you going to invite your unvaccinated relatives to sit at the dinner table with you this Thanksgiving?
	Experts are saying you might not want to risk it.
	Here's why.
	According to one expert from McMaster University, vaccines are super effective, but they're most effective when you're surrounded by other vaccinated people.
	If you invite someone who isn't vaccinated, there's a risk of having a breakthrough case.
	Now, breakthrough cases are pretty rare.
	There's only ever been about 8,000 in Ontario, but kids can't get vaccinated yet.
	So part of keeping those kids as safe as possible is telling that one uncle who chooses not to get vaccinated that he might have to sit this one out.
	One bioethicist said that that's actually the more ethical thing to do.
	She also said you should try talking to your relatives about how safe vaccination is.
	The best way to do that is to start the conversation from a place of respect and empathy.
	Say things like, I understand you're feeling pressure.
	I know you're freaked out, but here's why this is important.
	You can read more at globalnews.ca.
	I'm not even angry at Rachel Gilmore.
	I'm angry at Global News.
	This is still up on the internet, people.
	Let me just see when this was.
	I know it's 2021, so the science has changed.
	I want to go through each element of that idiotic video TikTok journalism post.
	And then contextualize it with a tweet from Rachel Gilmore today.
	When was it?
	When was it?
	I can't see too good.
	I know it was from February.
	It was from...
	Does anybody know how this works?
	Oh, here we go.
	It's from 10-5.
	So that's either May 10th or October 5th.
	It's from 2021.
	The science has changed.
	Everybody's learned.
	Everybody's all the wiser now.
	Let's just start this from the beginning.
	And when people ask, How could atrocities have happened in the past?
	Understand how they could have happened, that they did happen, that they did happen, why they happened, and most importantly, how people convinced themselves that they were being righteous in the past when they committed those atrocities.
	Let's break this down element by element.
	Because it's glorious.
	And then I'm going to...
	Intertwine this, or dovetail this, or what the heck is the word?
	Connect this to a book that I just listened to when I was on an airplane for 10 hours.
	Great book, and I'm going to give the Amazon affiliate link.
	Stephen, it's his first name, Stephen Deese's, it's called The Rise of the Fourth Reich, and we're going to get, you know, we're going to tie that all in together in a second.
	Let's just break this down one more time.
	Are you going to invite your unvaccinated relatives to sit at the dinner table with you this Thanksgiving?
	Replace the word unvaccinated with any religious, racial, ethnic, gender term.
	Replace the word unvaccinated with, are you going to invite, what did she say, your unvaccinated relatives?
	Are you going to invite your unvaccinated relatives to sit at the dinner table with you this Thanksgiving?
	Are you going to invite your Jewish relatives, your black relatives, your gay cousin?
	Are you going to invite them to sit at the dinner table with you today?
	Oh, no.
	But this is legitimate discrimination because it's scientific because experts said...
	Experts are saying you might not want to risk it.
	She's not lying.
	She's not lying because she's not telling you you might not want to risk it.
	She's just deferring all responsibility to the expert.
	Do you guys know what the Milgram experiment is?
	I presume everybody knows what the Milgram experiment is.
	Here's why.
	According to one expert from McMaster University.
	Another expert from McMaster.
	That's a good university.
	We used to play squash against them when we were back in McGill days.
	Another expert.
	It's not her saying it.
	She's not.
	Don't look at me.
	I'm not taking your grandmother's house.
	It's the government that's taking it.
	It's the experts.
	Vaccines are super effective, but they're most effective when you're surrounded by other vaccinated people.
	My bulletproof vest only protects me from bullets.
	When you are also wearing a bulletproof vest, I know the analogy is not perfect, but it's pretty damn good, actually.
	I need you to wear a bulletproof vest in order to enhance the protectiveness of my bulletproof vest.
	And by the way, this has all turned out to be scientifically untrue.
	If you invite someone who isn't vaccinated, there's a risk of having a breakthrough case.
	Now, breakthrough cases are pretty rare.
	Put it, make it a quote.
	Twitter.
	Breakthrough cases are super rare.
	My goodness, how within a year they went from being super rare to being the norm.
	There's only ever been about 8,000 in Ontario.
	Times a billion.
	But kids can't get vaccinated yet.
	So part of keeping those kids as safe as possible is telling that one uncle who chooses not to get vaccinated that he might have to sit this one out.
	Safe from what?
	Safe implies that there was something of an excessive or a disproportionate risk for kids in the first place, which there wasn't ever, ever.
	Oh, sorry.
	No, let me rephrase.
	Ever for the Rona, for COVID.
	Statistically, many people don't know this.
	The seasonal flu was more dangerous for children than COVID.
	That was a blessing in disguise that nobody seemed to appreciate back in the day, except for those who knew.
	Oh, protect the kids.
	Tell your Jewish uncle, we don't want your kind at our table this Christmas.
	One bioethicist said that that's actually the more ethical thing to do.
	One bioethicist said that that's the more ethical thing to do.
	And once upon a time, there were bioethicists that told the Nazi regime that killings were actually mercy killings.
	And the ethical thing to do is to end the life of a mentally handicapped individual.
	It was to end the life of a baby born with deformities.
	It's the ethical thing to do.
	Okay.
	Where do I stick the needle in?
	She also said you should try talking to your relatives about how safe vaccination is.
	The best way to do that is to start the conversation from a place of respect and empathy.
	How are you going to do that, Rachel, when you've told them they can't come to the dinner table?
	I respect and empathize with you.
	Don't come in my house, you filthy, unclean cast.
	Say things like, I understand you're feeling pressure.
	Manipulate.
	Be a pathological...
	Oh, my God.
	I know you're freaked out, but here's why this...
	You know who's freaked out?
	You.
	This is important.
	Rachel.
	You can read more at globalnews.ca.
	No, thank you.
	No, thank you, globalnews.ca.
	And by the way, that's still up.
	And the reason why that came up today was because...
	Let me see if I can pull up the tweet real quick, Lack.
	It was because just today, Rachel Gilmore put out a tweet.
	It's all confession through projection to the bottom.
	Rachel put out a tweet today that said, and I quoth the raven nevermore.
	The far right, the far right's priority has been COVID conspiracies.
	And that is still a very dominant theme in their spaces.
	She's just quoting someone.
	Conspiracies are a dominant theme in their spaces, says the woman who said vaccinated people, unvaccinated people pose a greater risk and breakthrough cases are uncommon and you need to get vaccinated to protect the unvaccinated and that children are at greater risk.
	Yeah, the far right are the ones that are conspiracy theorists that spend a lot of time on it.
	What COVID conspiracies are you talking about, Rachel?
	The ones that you helped spread, like that unvaccinated people are a greater risk to the vaccinated?
	Oh, my.
	Goodness.
	How's everybody doing?
	Let me just do one thing first.
	I'm going to go to Amazon, because everyone should read the book, The Rise of the Fourth...
	Are they selling?
	Yeah, Steve Bees.
	Okay, we had him on the channel a while back.
	I listened to it on...
	What's the word?
	Audible.
	Audible would like to thank you for purchasing this production.
	I listened to it over the weekend on Audible.
	Here we go.
	Go get the book.
	Amazon Affiliate Link.
	It's not called Grifting People.
	It's just called Smart Work.
	So I listened to the novel by Steve Deese and Horowitz.
	I forget his first name as well.
	And it's phenomenal.
	It's phenomenal.
	From my own perspective, I would have thought it more productive.
	To not use terms like plandemic and bioweapon when referring to the vaccine.
	Because those types of terms will do nothing to convert the minds of those who are on the fence.
	It might just push them away.
	Bioweapon, I have no problem regarding the Rona itself.
	COVID itself is a bioweapon because I think now that's probably the more likely explanation.
	Something that was developed through gain-of-function research, Concealed, lied about in a lab in Wuhan, China, unleashed upon the world.
	If it wasn't intended to be a bioweapon, it was certainly exploited as one after release to the world, but whatever.
	The jab, I think referring to that as a bioweapon, it might be music to the ears of those who already believe it, but it will do nothing to actually convince those who are on the fence.
	That being said, the book is amazing.
	And it goes, it's 15, 16 chapters, and each chapter is a different story.
	Now, I was already very familiar with a lot of them.
	You had a military doctor in there talking about her experience of discrimination.
	A military doctor in the U.S. military raising the flags about exceedingly high adverse reactions.
	The discrimination she felt for asking normal questions.
	The backlash and the reprisals that she lived through as a result of it.
	You have the chapter on Stephanie DeGarry, Maddie DeGarry's mother.
	You had a chapter on, oh, some parents who had their kids taken from them for treating them with the horse dewormer.
	It's a great read, or in my case, a great listen.
	The narration was actually quite beautiful.
	So go check it out.
	Now, people, for those who didn't know why I was on hiatus from last Friday, I take a day off, and I don't even think it was a day off, and I feel like I...
	Have fallen behind on the world's descent into madness.
	We had our very first meet and greet in Vegas.
	Viva Barnes, Eric Hunley from America's Untold Stories with Mark Robert, his partner.
	And, oh, we've been demonetized.
	Rachel Gilmore, thanks, man.
	This is what YouTube thinks of your reporting.
	We had our first meet and greet in Vegas Sunday night, and it was amazing.
	Friday afternoon, I did an interview with Hotep Jesus, which was phenomenal, in my humble opinion, but all interviews are.
	Then Saturday morning, flew down to Vegas, met up with Eric Hundley.
	We walked the Vegas Strip.
	I did no gambling.
	We did no partying.
	And then Sunday, we had our meet and greet.
	50 tickets sold out in two minutes.
	It was a very small venue, and we're starting small, and we're going to scale up.
	And it was amazing.
	Meeting long-time subs, long-time members of the locals community.
	And then what happened after that?
	So we had that.
	Then I flew back yesterday.
	Got back late at night because flights are just consistently delayed.
	And I'm tired.
	But it was amazing.
	And a moment that will live with me for a long time.
	Hold on one second.
	It was a beautiful moment.
	I know I put it up here.
	Here we go.
	When Robert Barnes, Bobby Barnes!
	I've met Robert Barnes.
	I don't think he had met Mark Robert in person.
	I know he met Hunley in Virginia, but check this out.
	The event was at the Italian American Club.
	It's a restaurant.
	It was the set for a few scenes in Casino.
	And it was fantastic.
	Robert Barnes shows up in a tux like the Rat Pack, and I showed up in an Untuck It shirt that I bought that morning because I decided that a t-shirt would have been too casual.
	I'm down with you.
	I said on a scale of 1 to 10, we got 10, 8, 9, 2, and Sir, you guys see each other all the time.
	Grobert was drinking not just a Red Bull, but a big Red Bull.
	And by the way, I think the announcement has been made.
	Eric Hundley has formerly gone wild and gone free and is now doing the America's Untold Stories Unstructured Podcast Layback News full-time.
	So check out Hundley, America's Untold Stories.
	Give him some support and show him some love.
	All right.
	We are simultaneously streaming on Rumble.
	Check.
	Let's just refresh and see where we're at there.
	Beautiful.
	We're simultaneously streaming on Locals.
	And by the way, sorry, before we get going here, just a standard, you know, now we're doing the cleanup after the rant.
	We will be going exclusive on Locals at the end of this stream for a very special unboxing.
	That's one.
	There's actually two boxes.
	I had to recreate this one because I had to tear off the...
	Address information.
	I don't want to dox anybody.
	So there's going to be a special unboxing exclusive on Locals after we end this on YouTube.
	We go to Rumble and Locals and then we're going to end on Rumble and we're going to be exclusively on Locals for that.
	Okay.
	And then there's another box which is also going to be unboxed.
	No medical advice, no election fornication advice, and no legal advice.
	If you need a lawyer, consult a lawyer.
	You cannot get internet legal advice.
	Any more than you can get internet?
	Medical advice.
	Except it's almost easier to Google pretty accurate medical advice.
	Legal advice is always fact-dependent, jurisdictional-dependent, and if you get advice for free, you get what you pay for.
	Okay, no medical evidence.
	Oh yeah, Super Chats, Rumble Rants.
	YouTube takes 30% of Super Chats.
	If you don't like that, simultaneously streaming on Rumble, they have a Rumble Rant where they take 20%, so better to support a platform that supports free speech and better for the creator.
	You can join us on Locals if you so choose, vivabarneslaw.locals.com, or you can go to Viva Fry and get some merch if you so choose.
	Looking sharp, Viva in Vegas.
	Yeah, I'm going to put up another video.
	Afterwards, there was a piano man and he played Viva!
	I'm not going to sing it.
	I'm going to get the whole stream claimed.
	Okay.
	So.
	Doug in Orlando.
	Viva makes the world a better place.
	Thanks.
	And finally, I subscribed.
	Oh yeah, I should also remember.
	First of all, thank you very much.
	I'm not a sucker for flattery, but I do like being told that I'm...
	Actually making a difference because sometimes it feels like we're screaming into the void, into the abyss.
	And sometimes we are.
	But every now and again, you might just echo back.
	And it's better to scream into the abyss than it is to stare into the abyss because you all know the expression.
	If you stare into the abyss long enough, the abyss stares back.
	When battling monsters, be sure not to become a monster.
	Is Marion taller than Viva?
	No.
	Not that I picked a short woman on purpose.
	Our genes worked well together.
	And by that, I mean our leave our genes.
	Okay, all right, joke's over.
	Okay, so on the menu for today, the rant.
	Oh, by the way, the whole kicker from the Rachel Gilmore disinformation accusing others of spreading conspiracy theories is that a bunch of journalists were just laid off at Global News.
	And I say this not to, like, shout in Florida they got what they deserve, period.
	Losing your job is a traumatic thing.
	Not learning as to success leaves clues, as my father always said growing up.
	The ball doesn't lie was the other expression he always used growing up.
	I used to go golfing with my dad.
	I hit the ball perfectly.
	He says, if you hit the ball perfectly, it wouldn't have sliced 100 yards to the right.
	So the ball doesn't lie.
	When you strike a ball clean, it will go straight.
	Success leaves clues, and incompetence also leaves clues.
	News agencies who are suckling at the teat of government subsidies, direct and indirect, have to lay off employees because they can't do their jobs for Scheiser.
	Maybe they want to take a step back and say, what are we doing wrong?
	Instead of doubling down and keep calling people names, conspiracy theorists.
	So Rachel Gilmore, I feel very bad that she and a lot of other journalists at Global News lost their jobs.
	Maybe if they did their jobs properly...
	They would be value added to the world, and people would have no problem relying on them for the information so they could derive ad revenue or whatever, or subscription-based models.
	Success leaves clues, as does incompetence.
	Oh, hold on.
	Luck is the residue of design.
	I like that.
	And there's another one.
	Success is just a matter of luck.
	Ask any failure.
	That's from a Lazy Boy song.
	So anyways, the kicker is after having...
	They've laid off a bunch of journalists from Global News.
	Rachel Gilmore had a little, what I think was a tiff on Twitter with Global News because, you know, she was suggesting that she had sacrificed a lot, injured a lot, and Global News nonetheless laid her off.
	Nobody's learning the right lessons here.
	All that people want is the truth.
	And if you put out lies, you will see the consequences of putting out lies.
	If you just happen to be bad at what you do and you get it wrong too often, or you make mistakes that are not forgivable mistakes, that also will lead to consequences.
	In terms of viewership, in terms of interest, in terms of reliability.
	Nobody learns.
	What do we got here?
	Happy Taco Tuesday.
	Viva can't wait to make a meetup.
	So we're going to be doing them.
	Master Mulrubius, that is a beautiful flipping cat.
	Is that a...
	Oh, that was my dog.
	We're going to be doing these meetups throughout the country.
	And we figure, you know, within the vicinity of any relatively populous area, we'll have enough people who can...
	So I think we're doing one in Chattanooga.
	It's next on the list in mid-April.
	And then we're going to do one in Florida.
	But we're starting small.
	Get the logistics.
	Make sure it all works smoothly.
	And moving forward from there.
	And for those who couldn't make it to the Viva Barnes in Vegas, we're going to be selling the Hush Hush episode.
	Like a standalone, maybe an hour, give or take, for $9.99.
	Something along those lines.
	Details we're going to figure out.
	On Locals.
	Annual subscribers are going to get it for free.
	So those who couldn't make it are going to get it.
	And it was a good, good hush-hush.
	Oh, I did that by accident, but it was a good, good hush-hush about the Vegas shooter, Steven Paddock.
	Beautiful.
	And the event was just beautiful.
	All right.
	Do we end?
	We're going to end on, I guess, before we even start.
	Or do we do one subject matter on YouTube and then move over to Rumble?
	Come to London.
	There's discussion about going to Australia, but my goodness.
	I don't travel well.
	I don't like not sleeping.
	I don't like flying.
	Yeah, 50 people sold out in two seconds.
	Yeah, Rockstar, it sold out.
	Oh, your name is Rockstar, like a Rockstar, not Rockstar Murray.
	Rockstar.
	I've been saying your name forever, and I just finally got it.
	I heard Rachel Gilmore got fired by Global.
	I don't know.
	I don't know, by the way.
	I wouldn't do like my father, like a Machaya.
	I wouldn't feel good even if she did.
	But maybe people want to learn from their mistakes.
	And that includes Global News.
	Heart Tackle.
	Loved seeing the meet and greet.
	Going to make the next one.
	Keep up all the great work.
	Heart Tackle.
	Makes some good tackle.
	Thank you very much.
	Giacondo Susini says, Viva Old Italian saying, The truth always floats to the top.
	I agree with that.
	The only problem is, depending on the context, other stuff also floats to the top.
	So, okay, we're going to go over to YouTube after I share this deep thought with all of you.
	Expressions in the human language that are mutually contradictory.
	He who hesitates is lost.
	Look before you leap.
	That's the only one I can really think of right now, but there's a bunch.
	Or do we just do one quick story here?
	One quick story?
	I don't think any of them are quick.
	Now, let's do them all on Rumble, everybody.
	And that way, it'll make it easier to snip and clip for Viva Clips on YouTube.
	And to post all things.
	Okay, let's do it.
	Let's go over to Rumble.
	In three.
	So, over to Rumble, and then we're going to cover the stories.
	We've got Hunter Biden finally under the meaningful spotlight, it seems.
	I'm not going to say the walls are closing in like some people are saying, because we've heard that time and time again with Trump, and it's just never panned out to be true.
	But the shit's hitting the fan with Hunter and some questionable business dealings, and the, I don't know, Houseovers.
	Some committee's going to be able to look at it.
	Hunter Biden.
	Pfizer!
	Miraculously has $43 billion to acquire, conveniently enough, a company that is pioneering research in cancer treatment.
	It's just amazing, eh?
	Where'd they get that $43 billion to reinvest in acquiring a company?
	And what a coincidence that they happen to be acquiring a company that treats cancer because cancers are on the rise.
	For one of two reasons, neither of which are good.
	And then some stuff coming out of Canada.
	All right.
	What's a rumble, says rah-rah.
	Let's do it.
	Moving on over to the rumbles, and then I'll see you there.
	Ending it on YouTube in three, two, one.
	Booyah.
	Oh, yeah.
	I think we're alone now.
	Let me share that.
	Let me share just for one second.
	Oh, no, never mind.
	I'm not going to do that.
	It was the Stephen Deese book, which I think I've shared the link already.
	All right.
	What do we start with?
	Hunter Biden?
	Oh, and then I want to talk a little bit about the SVB, the Silicon Valley Bank.
	I'm trying to get someone on who understands that stuff.
	I would say more than me, but just period.
	But there's some fun stuff.
	When you find out that...
	You'll notice a trend on Twitter, people saying, I can't believe the right's going to blame the collapse of a bank on wokeness.
	When you find out that they had like...
	A diversity equity team, but they didn't have a risk controller for the last year of their business for reasons that are not necessarily related to wokeness.
	But when you find that out, there might be a little legitimacy to the rumors.
	Okay.
	Let's do this.
	Let's go to Jonathan Turley.
	The alt-right MAGA Democrat.
	This is from his blog.
	Relating to the Hunter Biden developments.
	Hunter Biden, I mean, it's not new to any of us watching who have been watching for a while because we've known this.
	The legitimacy of the Hunter Biden laptop story, the legitimacy and the impact and the importance of it, not because it had videos of Hunter Biden getting foot jobs and other stuff and smoking crack pipes with people who appear to be underage, but by all accounts who were not.
	Not because of that, although that is highly compromising, and if it were in the hands of the wrong person, it could be the very same blackmail material that everyone was worried about with the bullshit steel dossier, PP on the sheets in a Russian hooker hotel, as it relates to Trump.
	It could have been that type of blackmail material.
	Other than that, 10% for the big guy, the questionable business dealings, and Joe Biden's knowledge.
	Of Hunter Biden's questionable business dealings.
	And then we found out apparently that Hunter Biden was paying his dad what...
	At least Hunter Biden was saying on documents that he was paying his dad $50,000 a month to rent his...
	Was it the Hampton House?
	Whatever his house was where he was storing classified documents in the garage, but the garage was locked.
	The latest developments are now...
	Apparently they're going to get access to Hunter Biden's...
	Financial records, transaction reports.
	And this is from Jonathan Turley.
	And I'll give everyone the link in...
	Oh, no, that's not the right chat anymore.
	Here.
	In Rumble and Locals.
	So you can go check this out if you want to do your own reading afterwards.
	As you should.
	But we're going to go through it right now.
	Time's up.
	Treasury finally agrees to turn over Hunter Biden's transaction reports.
	Let me just see how long...
	Okay, it's not too long.
	I get...
	Apprehensive if I look down and it's too long.
	For years, members of Congress have asked for access to suspicious activity reports.
	SARS.
	What an unfortunate acronym.
	Suspicious activity report.
	Yes, SARS-CoV-1.
	Related to the Biden family's foreign business deals.
	Those efforts were cut off by the Biden administration and the democratically controlled House of Congress.
	Isn't that convenient?
	It's not a two-tiered justice system.
	It's a one-tiered injustice system.
	Even after the GOP took over the House, however, the Treasury Department continued to refuse to turn over the SARS, the suspicious activity reports.
	While the GOP had to threaten hearings with Treasury officials, the Department has finally relented.
	It now appears that time is up for the Hunter Biden on the SARS fight, and it could finally answer a number of questions over the alleged influence of peddling the Biden...
	Oh, those questions remain no more but for the people who still believe that breakthrough cases of COVID in the vaccinated are rare.
	I mean, these questions don't exist anymore.
	The least eager...
	We're just going to skip over so we don't, you know, state the obvious.
	The least eager group to see the transactions may be the media, which not only buried the Hunter Biden story, but has shown remarkable disinterest in the...
	They didn't bury the Hunter Biden story.
	They lied about it.
	They didn't bury it.
	They lied about the legitimacy of the Hunter Biden laptop story.
	They parodied talking points coming from the experts, intelligence.
	I mean, you just see, it's the same pattern.
	It's the same playbook every time mutatis mutandis.
	Want to commit atrocities against humans?
	Rely on the experts.
	Want to lie about something that you know is not the case?
	Rely on the experts, who you know are lying.
	Because remember, 50-some-odd intelligence officials signed a letter saying, The Hunter Biden laptop story bears the earmarks or the hallmarks of Russian disinformation campaign when they knew that it was accurate because the FBI had had the laptop since 2019 and could verify and had verified the legitimacy of it.
	The media was not bearing it.
	They were lying about it.
	Indeed, this alleged influence peddling.
	Could not have occurred without assurances that the media had the back of the Bidens.
	Imagine what the media would have done with even one of these deals with foreign political or influence figures.
	Imagine if Trump had done it.
	We don't need to imagine anymore.
	There was one guy, I forget where the tweet was, he says, Hunter Biden deserves forgiveness and healing.
	Jared Kushner deserves to be prosecuted.
	We don't need to imagine what they would have done.
	They would have done a damn thing.
	They've had it for Hunter.
	He deserves forgiveness for being a drug addict, which as if anyone faults on him is about being the drug addict and not living a life of compromising depravity for a president.
	Oh, the genius of Biden's influence peddling operation was to make the media an early and active participant.
	Capture the media.
	They became invested in the denial over two years of belittling or dismissing the story.
	That's right.
	It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them they've been fooled because when they admit that they've been fooled, it either is an admission that they're stupid or it's an admission that they're liars, neither of which is fun to make.
	Especially if you've been peddling the lie for two years, you have to be one big idiot or you have to be one big liar.
	Oversight Committee James Comer has objected that the Biden administration has changed rules governing access to the reports that stood for 20 years.
	Comer has also subpoenaed Bank of America for financial records of 300 Biden business associates.
	Like none of us knew that this was coming a long time ago.
	Comer this morning revealed that the first SARS report shows money going from China to three Biden family members, including one not previously discussed as a recipient of such money.
	10% for the big guy, and you know how the laundering works?
	Well, Joe Biden didn't get the money from China.
	That money went to Hunter, and then Hunter paid Joe Biden $50,000 a month to rent his home.
	I don't know that that's the case, actually.
	That's my hypothesis, but we'll see.
	It is not clear what these SARS will reveal, but the effort to prevent any congressional investigation is striking.
	What's striking?
	Turley has not yet...
	I mean, I think he's being polite and tongue-in-cheek and glib, like, yeah, oh, it's striking.
	Democrat politicians, not that Republicans are any better when they're in power, but they're not the ones breaking the rules right now.
	This investigation goes to an alleged corrupt effort to sell influence.
	Oh, like the Clinton Foundation?
	Or the Trudeau Foundation?
	Many Democrats and legal experts have objected that influence peddling is not a crime.
	No, it's just good politics.
	Unless Trump does it, in which case they'll make it a crime.
	Show me the man, I'll show you the crime.
	However, it is corrupt and squarely within the Oversight Committee authority of Congress.
	Indeed, if it is not a matter for criminal charges, such congressional action may be the only way to force accountability for corrupt efforts to sell influence and access.
	This is a very important point.
	They say it's not a crime, so we're not going to look into it.
	If it's not a crime...
	But it is something that taints politics.
	The only way to look into it would be with the Oversight Committee.
	Imagine they say, look, it's not a crime.
	No, actually, just try to square that interpretation with their position on impeachment.
	It's not a crime.
	Well, then you certainly can't impeach.
	Oh, no, but impeachment is a political process, not a legal one.
	Well, so is the Oversight Committee.
	Or congressional investigations are political remedies, not legal ones.
	When it comes to impeaching Trump for something that everyone admitted was not a crime, good to go for the Democrats.
	When it comes to investigating Hunter Biden, then they say, well, it's not a crime, so nothing to look into here.
	If it were not for double standards, they would have no standards at all.
	And as far as I'm concerned, no, sorry, as far as I am concerned, I have said when it came to impeachment, if it's not a crime, a high crime and a misdemeanor or high crimes and other misdemeanors, It should not be able to serve as the basis for impeachment because of the wording of the law.
	When it comes to oversight, if it were illegal, Department of Justice looks into it.
	If it's not illegal but political corruption, that's what the oversight committees are for.
	They're not a legal prosecutorial body.
	They're a political body.
	Let me see what we got here.
	I don't think there's much more on Hunter Biden except to say...
	It's getting there.
	Hold on.
	What is this article that I have brought up here?
	Oh, this is an archive link.
	Oh yeah, the Wall Street Journal.
	You know it's getting bad when the Wall Street Journal is a little bit better than the other rags, but it's not the Washington Post.
	Republicans to view Hunter Biden's financial records.
	GOP lawmakers pursue inquiry into business dealings of President Sun.
	Remember, it's all about framing.
	It's not President Sun.
	Under scrutiny for business dealings.
	It's GOP lawmakers.
	They're the ones at fault for doing this.
	I don't think there's anything new in here.
	It should never have taken us threatening to hold a hearing and conduct a transcribed interview with an official under the penalty of perjury for the Treasury to accommodate a request.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Okay.
	Anyways, this is all news.
	Hunter Biden is a subject of separate Justice Department investigations related to his taxes and whether he made a false statement in connection with a gun purchase.
	We know that he made a false statement in connection with a gun purchase.
	We know that.
	During a recent oversight hearing, Attorney General Merrick Garland said the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney in Delaware overseeing that investigation, David Weiss, has broad independence to pursue charges.
	Can you imagine if Jared Kushner or Don Trump Jr. had lied on an application when procuring a firearm?
	Had lied, not just a lie about anything, had lied about doing hard illegal drugs to procure a firearm, which is, I believe it's a felony.
	Imagine if one of Trump's kids had feloniously lied on a firearm application, and the object of that felonious lie was a drug addiction problem, and then...
	Directly or indirectly, feloniously disposed of a feloniously acquired firearm.
	Can you imagine the shitstorm that that would have caused?
	But we have to forgive Hunter Biden because he has drug addiction recovery problems.
	And that's why we have to be especially harder on Jared, because he seems to be the product of a reasonable, functional family.
	So we have to be harder on him for lesser infractions than we are on Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, because they're broken people.
	Broken people do broken things.
	Hurt people hurt people, right?
	Their investigation detailed money Hunter Biden had been paid from associates abroad, including several transactions the Republicans said involved potential criminal activity.
	Those included $100,000 a Chinese energy subsidiary sent directly to Hunter Biden's law firm, and roughly $1.4 million that Hunter Biden's law firm sent to a consulting firm linked to James Biden.
	There is no...
	I'll be controversial.
	White privilege is not a thing.
	The thing is political privilege.
	And my evidence is O.J. Simpson acquittal, Jussie Smollett treatment.
	It's not white privilege.
	It's political privilege.
	And it certainly seems to be Democrat political privilege.
	Because they'll find the crime when it's a Republican and they will shut their eyes when it's a Democrat.
	And they have the media.
	They have big tech, and they have politicians behind them.
	They have the holy trinity of fascism behind them to conceal their wrongdoings and prosecute and persecute the fabricated wrongdoings of others.
	And, perfect segue, no better example of that than Jacob Chansley, Jacob Angeli, a.k.a.
	the QAnon shaman, sentenced to 41 months in prison for his plea deal.
	Longer than the Molotov cocktail lawyers got out of New York, but, you know, whatever.
	And the exculpatory evidence that is now being disclosed, and as this exculpatory evidence gets disclosed, who do they go after?
	Not the Department of Justice for not disclosing this exculpatory evidence to Jacob Chansley's attorneys.
	Not the media.
	That did not share this information, but they didn't have it because the January 6th committee didn't disclose it.
	Not the January 6th committee.
	They don't go after the January 6th committee.
	They go after Tucker Carlson for spreading lies by disclosing video footage that is highly exculpatory, to say the least, that the January 6th sham kangaroo committee with its bipartisan traitorous elements of Adam Kinzinger and Liz Cheney did not disclose to the public.
	Why?
	To quote Jim Carrey out of Liar Liar?
	Because it would have been damning for their case!
	Jacob Chansley, people.
	Let's see this.
	Cue it on Shaman.
	And then we're going to get into the fact check, by the way, because it's just...
	Talk about having the media in your pocket, the fact checkers in your pocket, politicians in your pocket.
	Let's see here.
	Let's just look at this video.
	Let's just look at this.
	Oh, by the way, YouTube systematically demonetizing any video or commentary related to the Twitter hearings last week, which dealt with the January 6th and this.
	But let's just watch this.
	Chuck Colesto.
	I don't know who it is.
	Father and former candidate, political strategist, RTs, not endorsements, breaking headlines.
	Okay, good.
	I'll say this guy's good through omission.
	He doesn't have the hallmark red flags in his Twitter.
	Let's just see what he says here.
	Just in censored video reemergence of Jacob Chansley reading Trump's tweet telling protesters to go home and remain peaceful.
	You won't see this on CNN.
	No fecal matter.
	Sherlock.
	Let's just see this.
	Max Max here.
	We have no points.
	Donald Trump asked everybody to go home.
	So what are we going to do?
	We're going to obey our president.
	We're going to do as he asked the Republicans.
	Respect the landlords.
	Respect the capital.
	Respect the capital.
	You know what?
	We're all going to stand a little back here.
	I mean, the only way to rationalize the world to yourself if you've been living this lie for the last two years is to say that this video is a deepfake.
	And I live with that fear just because deepfakes are getting so good that it's tough to tell, but it's still easy to tell.
	You're watching a video of Jacob Chansley, obviously out of the Capitol right now, but we'll probably get to some of the video of him seemingly being escorted through the Capitol.
	This is Jacob Chansley saying, I'm reading a tweet from our president.
	He said to go home.
	We're going to go home.
	And by the way, whether or not you think that exonerates Jacob Chansley from his potential crimes, it certainly...
	For the love of all things holy exonerates Donald Trump, the man whose words incited violence, banned from Twitter so that nobody could see his last tweets, which said, we are the party of the police, back the blue, don't be violent, protest peacefully.
	They had to lock his account and ban him so that nobody could see that he actually tweeted that, so that nobody could share his speech where he says, protest peacefully.
	Listen to it.
	If it doesn't exonere Chansley, fine.
	Some of you are going to say he's already committed his crime too late for him.
	You can go home after you've broken a window.
	You deserve to go to jail for 41 months.
	But you can't as easily say, well, now I believe that Trump's words incited an insurrection because A, there were no such words in the first place, and B, we are now seeing hard evidence that the words he actually did use not only did not incite an insurrection, but were the motivating factor for even the most violent elements of that.
	Insurrection.
	To say to the others to go home.
	And as you'll see here, we're not Antifa.
	Let's go home.
	Donald Trump is a, Donald Trump quote, I am asking for everyone in the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful, no violence.
	Remember we are, we are the party of law and order.
	Respect our law.
	This tweet was no longer available to the general public as of the time Trump was banned from Twitter.
	How convenient?
	Enforcement, Inventor Women in Blue.
	No, no, no, pull up the video.
	There's a video.
	41 months.
	41 months in jail.
	Put it on here.
	Put it on here.
	You're the police all can pass.
	Stop it with a day off.
	Okay, I'll pass this time.
	Have a list of you, Charles.
	At least make them a bit.
	No, no.
	You're not going to make a place.
	You're just going to make yourself feel better.
	Yeah, it's going to be a time.
	Just back it up.
	We're not at FIFA.
	We are not at FIFA.
	We are not Antifa.
	We are not Antifa.
	Well, technically some of them might have been Antifa.
	we want to be heard look at this insurrection Look at this violent, violent insurrection.
	41 months in jail is where Chansley is right now.
	We didn't see that footage.
	We didn't see the footage of him literally being walked through the Capitol.
	Why weren't we shown that footage?
	Because it would have been very hard for the likes of Kinzinger to sit there crying.
	Liz Cheney to say, it's my job now to keep Donald Trump away from the Oval Office.
	It would have been very hard for them to maintain that sham of a kangaroo court committee and those eight primetime hearings that they held had people actually seen the actual evidence.
	We sort of said it from the beginning, whether or not we said it too early and didn't have the requisite information to do so, or whether or not we did.
	This was a political setup in the sense of either Active provocateurs in the crowd, because the FBI refuses to state how many provocateurs or people on the FBI direct or indirect payroll might have been there.
	They refuse to confirm that, but we know of a couple who seem fishy.
	We now know of the FBI having infiltrated, allegedly, the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, because they were so infiltrated, they got convictions on the seditious conspiracy charges, so they knew of what was going to go on.
	They knew what was happening.
	So this was either a setup in that it was actually fabricated to happen or facilitated to happen so that it could be highly weaponized afterwards.
	They could grab that 40-plus thousand hours of footage, not release any of it to the public except for their highly edited propaganda bits that would make Joseph Goebel green with envy, so they could get their convictions, get their excessive condemnations, excessive sentencing.
	We didn't see it.
	And there's no question that we didn't see it.
	It's just objective.
	Had we seen it, many of us might have had a different opinion.
	Do I have...
	Let me see if I can actually just get the...
	I want to see if I can get the Tucker...
	I won't pull up the Tucker Carlson video.
	I think we've already seen it.
	Let me just...
	When I talk about the holy trinity of fascism, and it's the actual definition, media, big tech, government working together to control the narrative...
	PolitiFact, one of the fact-checkers that serves as the basis for delegitimizing, downranking, penalizing other people's platforms, other people's channels, other people's content, they ran a fact-check.
	Look at this.
	Look at this.
	They're fact-checking Tucker Carlson's statement.
	Capitol Police officers helped QAnon shaman Jacob Chansley and, quote, acted as his tour guides, end quote.
	You don't need to fact check this, PolitiFact, for the one very obvious reason that acted as his tour guides is quite clearly a matter of opinion.
	It's quite clearly a subjective interpretation of what the underlying statement of fact would be in that they were with him and they walked with him and they escorted him throughout the Capitol building.
	Acted as his tour guides is like...
	The subjective interpretation of the fact that they accompanied him throughout his visit to the Capitol building.
	By the way, they don't just qualify it as false.
	They qualify it as pants on fire false.
	By the way, evidence rebuts Tucker Carlson's claim about Capitol Police acting as tour guides.
	Do you know what a rebuttal is?
	It's not what you would use to say that something is factually false.
	It's what you would say is an argument to contradict something, in which case you have two differing opinions.
	When a rebuttal is involved, it's a difference of opinions, not a difference of facts.
	If your time is short...
	Available evidence rebuts Fox News that they acted as his tour guides.
	Okay, thanks.
	We've read the same thing three times now.
	Officers repeatedly asked Chansley to leave the building.
	This is corroborated by the plea agreement Chansley signed and a capital officer's account of the events.
	Wordsmiths of the devil.
	This is corroborated by the plea agreement, which we know that Chansley was...
	Coerced into accepting, to some extent, and fraudulently coerced into agreeing to, because how can one enter into a plea agreement when they haven't been provided with all evidence, including exculpatory evidence?
	And we know that this is a fact, because Chansley's lawyers have said that the first time they've seen some of this video footage was on Tucker Carlson.
	Notice how they're not relying on the video evidence that I could see with my own freaking eyes.
	They're relying on the words of a man who, under duress after having been in solitary confinement and pretrial detention for an extended period of time, was coerced into signing through vitiated consent because exculpatory evidence had been withheld from him, which, I'm not an American lawyer, but I know that it's a Brady violation.
	So, don't believe your lying eyes, is what PolitiFact says.
	Believe the words that have been literally drafted by the government because Chansley was submitted into agreeing to them.
	Liars.
	Liars, PolitiFact.
	I was going to swear because it's so enraging.
	Capitol Police Chief Thomas Manger called Carlson's claim, quote, outrageous and false.
	Oh, okay, that's great.
	Use more hyperbolic terms.
	That'll somehow make it more legitimate.
	In an internal department memo.
	Oh.
	He wrote that officers used de-escalation tactics to try to talk rioters, by the way, rioters and not Chansley in particular, just notice that word, into getting each other to leave the Capitol.
	Sure.
	Does trying to unlock doors for Chansley qualify as a de-escalation tactic?
	That's...
	Oh, here we go.
	Good.
	We're going to watch it with our own eyes, but don't believe the video you're about to see.
	Just believe what Chansley was forced, coerced into signing, not in full awareness of fact because of Brady violation, non-disclosure of exculpatory evidence.
	Jacob Chansley, more infamously known as QAnon Shaman, serving 41-month prison sentence for his actions.
	While in the capital, Chansley was followed by police officers and repeatedly ignored officers' request to leave the building, according to Chansley's signed plea agreement.
	Because you'll notice, and will notice together when we watch the video, he's not only being followed by police.
	He's also being led by police at certain portions of the video.
	To this day, there is dispute.
	Remember, remember, they said followed by, but they didn't rely on the video.
	They relied on his signed plea agreement.
	Got into the Capitol.
	Yeah, let's just see.
	But according to our review of the internal surveillance video, it is very clear what happened.
	Here he's being followed.
	Was caught on tape.
	The tape show.
	Remember what they said.
	Oh, watch here, guys.
	He's not being followed right here.
	He's not being followed here, PolitiFacts.
	He's being led right here, PolitiFacts.
	And I think there's another one coming.
	Unclear, but he's being led here.
	Look at this.
	He's not being followed here.
	He is being led by the officer in the front with the mask.
	But PolitiFact's not lying because they didn't say that the video, they're not relying on the video because the video shows him being led.
	They're relying on his plea agreement.
	Why?
	Because PolitiFact are facting liars.
	Okay, we saw that part.
	Okay, let's just get to the fact check part.
	Chansley's plea agreement.
	Look, when your argument is weak, what is it?
	When your argument's strong in the law, bang on the law.
	When your argument's strong in the facts, bang on the facts.
	And when your argument's weak, bang on the table.
	They're going to rely on their strongest evidence to support their dishonest, disingenuous lie of a fact check, and that's his plea agreement, because he signed a plea agreement.
	We went through it back in the day.
	He signed a plea agreement after having been apparently fraudulently or unlawfully or unconstitutionally duped, coerced, pressured into signing it.
	The seven-page agreement stated that if this case were go to trial, the government would prove the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt.
	No shit, PolitiFact.
	Because he didn't have the exculpatory evidence that the Department of Justice or the prosecutors had and did not disclose to him that he entered the building, that he and other rioters went to the second floor of the Senate and were met by a line of police officers.
	It's an amazing thing, by the way, to see the video and to see how the video contradicts the plea agreement and yet to still rely on the plea agreement.
	Chansley entered the Capitol through a door other rioters had broken open.
	Chansley and other rioters went to the second floor of the Senate side of the building and were met by a line of police instructing them to peacefully leave the building.
	We didn't see that in the video.
	Chansley went to the third floor, entered the Senate, and proceeded to scream obscenities in the gallery.
	We know that that is, if not outright false, at least partially false, because the video that Tucker Carlson had showed him saying a prayer and thanking the police officers for letting them in.
	Don't believe your eyes and your lying ears.
	Believe the lying plea agreement drafted by the government that was withholding exculpatory evidence from the accused.
	That's what you should believe.
	Chansley next tried to gain entry to the Senate floor and again encountered yada yada yada.
	Chansley climbed to the Senate dais and then sat in the then-president's seat, vice-president's seat, taking pictures of himself.
	Yada yada yada.
	Do we have the video of him saying the prayer?
	Our ruling.
	Carlson claimed police officers helped Chansley and acted as his tour guides.
	Available evidence for bust this claim.
	Chansley was among the first rioters to force their way into the building through a door other rioters had broken.
	Officers repeatedly asked Chansley to leave.
	This is corroborated by the...
	Notice it's always the plea agreement, not the actual footage.
	Oh, liars.
	Liars.
	Liars.
	Let's see if we can get this here.
	Let's see if we can find Tucker Carlson Jacob Chansley.
	I want the prayer on the floor of the diocese.
	Let's see.
	Let me see.
	I'll know when I see it in the scrolly thing.
	This looks more like his opening monologue, and we're not going to see it there.
	Let's see this one.
	Okay, this one might be it.
	This one might be it.
	I think it was towards the end here.
	Okay, here we go.
	Here we go.
	Right here.
	Thanks for them in a prayer on the floor of the Senate.
	Watch.
	Obscenities, remember.
	Stop.
	Remember, the plea agreement that he was coerced into signing through deceit and dishonesty and constitutional violations.
	The plea agreement says he shouted obscenities.
	The video evidence.
	We counted at least nine officers who were within touching distance of unarmed Jacob Chansley.
	Not one of them even tried to slow him down.
	Chansley understood that Capitol Police were his allies.
	Video shows him giving thanks for them in a prayer on the floor of the Senate.
	he signed an agreement that said he showed up Senate.
	Thank you, Father, for paying the inspiration needed to these police officers to allow us in this building.
	Contrast the reality of what Jacob Chansley did in the Capitol building on January 6th, the indisputable facts recorded on video, some of which has never before been seen.
	With the depiction of Jacob Chansley that you've seen in the media for more than two years.
	He's a terrorist, they said.
	He should be killed.
	Shoot him.
	Shoot him.
	The tolerant left people.
	Shoot him.
	Shoot him.
	Kavanaugh, you know, interruptions, protests.
	Heroes.
	Liars.
	Period.
	So that's And Chansley, meanwhile, 41 months.
	And there's very little chance that he has of anything.
	They can try to argue to undo his plea deal.
	He's going to stay in jail until they can attempt to argue that there was fraud, constitutional violations, that he should be released.
	He admitted to things.
	I mean, the argument's going to be, even if there is exculpatory evidence out there, you admitted to criminal wrongdoing.
	Royally screwed.
	41 months, by the way.
	Remember, 41 months for that is just punishment.
	Brittany Griner going to Russia, smuggling drugs into a totalitarian regime, getting nine years or seven and a half years?
	Get the president involved.
	So that's it.
	That's the latest on...
	I don't think there's anything more on Jacob Chan.
	It's the injustice that keeps on giving.
	And it's terrible.
	Shall we do something funny because the world is filled with idiots?
	Oh, you know what?
	Let's just do another...
	Just PolitiFact, by the way.
	Pants on fire to that.
	I'm just going to never stop reminding Rep.
	Colin Allred.
	You might remember Rep.
	Colin Allred from such congressional hearings as last week's Twitter files where he had the audacity of calling...
	Journalists Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger tinfoil hat conspiracy theories.
	Something along those lines.
	Rep Colin Ulrich in February 2021 as relates to January 6th wrote this in a tweet.
	Nearly one month ago, this was after it was known to be bunk except to the New York Times, the Capitol was attacked by a violent mob who murdered Murder.
	Lie.
	It was known enough then, even if Rep Allred wants to plead ignorance back then, it's known to be a lie now.
	Murder.
	My heart goes out to his family and his loved ones.
	So much so...
	That I am willing to promote a lie.
	Exploit his tragic, untimely, but death from natural causes.
	Exploit his death for political purposes is how much my heart goes out to his family.
	PolitiFact?
	Gonna fact check that one or is it not important enough?
	Got to go fact check Tucker Carlson when he's clearly giving an opinion of an assessment of a set of facts which you did not contradict except by contrasting a written statement that someone was coerced into signing with video footage that does not corroborate what you see in that video.
	I won't hold my breath.
	Let me go to a rumble and see what's going on here.
	Oh yeah, well there seems to be some...
	Well, Real Truth 22 says, Sicknick think Nick was sick and dies of a stroke.
	Brian Sicknick died of a stroke.
	That's what the medical experts that even the Capitol Police have to acknowledge in the findings died of natural causes, a series of strokes.
	The timing is very interesting, given that all of the Capitol Police officers presumably had to be vaccinated.
	That thought never occurred to me at the time, and it has since occurred to me.
	So don't hold your breath for PolitiFact to actually do real fact-checking.
	Expect them to continue to fact-check statements of opinion and act as wordsmiths to the devil because that's who their employers are.
	Okay.
	So the next it looks like we're either going to go with...
	Let's do something funny.
	Did you know that the Oscars happened Sunday night?
	I did not know that the Oscars occurred Sunday night, because I don't give a sweet bugger all about the Oscars anymore.
	But we were having our own Oscar party at the VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com meet and greet at the Italian American Club in Las Vegas, and it was glorious.
	But the Oscars occurred Sunday night, and holy shiatt is some stuff kind of funny.
	I don't want to ruin the punchline.
	No, I do want to ruin the punchline.
	We've got to start with the punchline.
	NPR, which I believe is...
	Stay funded?
	Propaganda?
	Listen to this and try to make it make sense.
	Michelle Yeo wins the Oscar for Best Actress making history as the first person who identifies as Asian to win the award.
	I'll read it again.
	Michelle Yeo wins the Oscar for Best Actress making history as the first person...
	Who identifies as Asian to win the award?
	Like, call me a variety of names.
	I can tell she's a woman and I can tell she's Asian.
	Identifying as would seem to suggest to me that she isn't Asian and identifies as or thinks she's...
	Look, this is the reality of, you know, when someone says I identify as, When someone says I identify as and then puts in whatever, it necessarily is predicated on the underlying acknowledgement that they are not what they identify as because if they were that with which they identify, they would not need to identify as because it would be superfluous and factually redundant.
	So she doesn't need to identify as Asian.
	She is Asian.
	And I had no allusions to the...
	I didn't think she was a black man.
	I mean, I'm glad she identified as an Asian woman.
	Because I thought she was a black man for a second.
	I thought she was the first black man to win Best Actress.
	But it's not just the abject stupidity of the NPR.
	The first person who identifies as Asian.
	Why is their tweet different than the headline of the article?
	Why is their tweet different than the article itself?
	The headline of the article doesn't say the first woman to identify as being Asian.
	It just says Michelle Yeo is the first Asian woman to win Best Actress Oscar.
	Good!
	That was very weird.
	That's reporting, I guess.
	For the first time in its 95-year history, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has awarded the Oscar for Best Actress in a Leading Role to an Asian Woman.
	Why did they not feel compelled in the article to say to a woman who identifies as being Asian?
	Why not?
	I mean, did they even use the word identifying here?
	They didn't.
	So what is it about the platform and virtue signaling that occurs on Twitter that would compel the NPR to refer to her as a woman who identifies as being Asian in the tweet, but not as a woman who identifies as being Asian in the article?
	It's an interesting question to ask, but one thing is true.
	The NPR is a fecal rag.
	That deserves to be mocked into oblivion.
	The Oscars are a fecal matter show that deserve to be ignored into existence, and I suspect that they are.
	Let me just see what the ratings were this year.
	I imagine Oscar ratings 2023.
	I imagine they're at an all-time low, but let me just see here.
	Oh, it's up 12% from last year.
	Well, shoot, they're coming back.
	Yeah, but it's hilarious.
	She identifies as being Asian.
	Thank goodness you clarified that, NPR.
	I was confused.
	You saved me some embarrassment.
	But how do they know that she identifies as a woman?
	She might actually be the first man to win.
	She might be the first Asian man to win Best Actress.
	Who knows?
	If she identifies as a white man, did she just become the first...
	Man to win Best Actress.
	My goodness.
	The thought experiments that arise from thoughtless, idiotic, unscientific virtue signaling, they're endless.
	Ah...
	Okay, well, that's the article.
	We just talked about that.
	The first Asian woman who identifies as black man.
	Won Best Actress for the first time in the history of the Oscars.
	All right, anyways, the Oscars have been dead to me for a long time.
	But while we're on the subject of virtue signaling, idiocy, lunacy, madness, that has real-time consequences of people simply tuning out of Hollywood, the degeneracy of Hollywood, the moral depravity of Hollywood, and the outrageous, incessant virtue signaling of those Hollywood awards.
	Let's go to this article.
	This is from Business Today.
	Not me.
	I don't know if it's a right-wing entity.
	I don't know enough about it.
	Silicon Valley Bank people, for those of you who don't know, collapsed on Friday.
	Or was taken over by the federal government managing entities, whatever the FDA is.
	They're taken over Friday afternoon, and a second bank has collapsed on Sunday.
	And some people were suggesting that maybe the bank ought to have been in the business of banking and not the business of virtue signal wokeness, and maybe if they focus on their core functions of a freaking bank and not on the ancillary virtue signaling elements that look good but don't contribute to growth of, you know, woke virtue signal, whatever you want to call it.
	They've gone under, or at the very least have been placed under federal, do we call it a trusteeship?
	Business Today is reporting.
	Get woke, go broke.
	Silicon Valley Bank's top woman executive, LGBTQ plus activist, gets targeted for lenders' failure.
	With over $209 billion in assets, the California-based lender was the 16th largest U.S. bank.
	The bank became the largest to collapse since the 2008 financial crisis.
	I don't know who the bank boss is.
	The boss of financial risk management and SPV's unit, Jay...
	Or SAPA.
	We're going to go see it.
	So let's see what the article has to say.
	Silicon Valley Bank, which recently collapsed after disclosing a $1.8 billion loss, operated without a chief risk officer for almost nine months between April 22nd and January 2023.
	Don't worry, people.
	The experts are taking care of us.
	Oh, my gosh.
	It's not because of wokeness, people.
	It's because the previous risk, what do they call them?
	The risk officer apparently resigned.
	It wasn't on the priority list to replace them, apparently.
	The bank's former head of risk, Laura Izurieta, left in April 2022 and was not replaced until the hiring of Kim Olson in January 2023 with over $209 billion in assets.
	The California was...
	Okay.
	However, in a twist...
	The boss of financial risk management...
	At SVB's UK branch, Jay Ersapa has been accused of prioritizing pro-diversity initiatives over her actual role.
	While Ersapa acted as the CRO Chief Risk Officer for Silicon Valley Bank in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, she organized a range of LGBTQ plus initiatives, including a month-long Pride campaign and a, quote, safe space, end quote, catch-up for staff.
	Why would the chief risk officer be doing that?
	In the past, she has also moderated the EMEA Pride Town Hall and served as a panelist in the bank school.
	I mean, my goodness.
	Hey, at least they feel good.
	Global Pride Town Hall to share her experience as a lesbian of color.
	Hmm.
	Where else has that identity...
	Politics pattern come up.
	Oh yeah, that's right.
	The most incompetent press secretary the American history has ever had the pleasure of seeing Karine Jean-Pierre.
	She's the first black lesbian press secretary and she let the world know the first time she took the podium because that apparently is her qualification.
	And I'm saying it despite all aspects of identity politics and not because of it.
	She is the worst, most incompetent, most incoherent, most dishonest press secretary I have ever had the pleasure of witnessing in my politically Well, I mean, look, and by the way, if it worked out so well for the bank, it's got to work out well for the government as well.
	The only difference being the bank, when it fails, gets government bailout money, as seems to be, you know, the trajectory right now.
	When the government fails...
	Will they just make government bigger to analyze, investigate their failure, and figure out ways to prevent such failure, which typically means more government?
	Her LinkedIn profile indicates that she has had a successful career, having worked for several high-profile names in the finance sector, including Citi, Barclays, and the consulate from Deloitte.
	I'm old school.
	I don't consider having bounced around private enterprise to be a sign of success.
	I actually consider it to be a flag when hiring.
	Yeah, I worked at Citi, Barclays, Bank of America, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, I don't know, just throwing names out.
	I know the industry might be different and people do maybe bounce around a lot.
	I've never found that to bode well for confidence.
	The bank's CEO, Greg Becker, credited Olson's deep and multifaceted financial service experience as a senior risk leader.
	Regulator and bank supervisor, who also hosts LGBTQ plus events and sits on panels because, you know, that's related to risk.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	But biased critics have hit out.
	Biased critics.
	Not just critics.
	Biased critics have hit out at USAPA's apparent preoccupation.
	It's not biased and it's not apparent.
	It's a preoccupation.
	One Facebook user, Paul Tucker, wrote, yada, yada, more diversity hires?
	Okay, fine, then woke credentials.
	They all have pronouns in their bile which are filled with corporate news speak.
	This is what happens when you allow people to manage your money based on woke principles instead of their actual skill and competence.
	Who could disagree with any of this?
	I hope the depositor at this bank enjoy all that diversity because diversity is your strength.
	A, I hope he's not Canadian.
	He signed off the post.
	Get woke, go broke, eh?
	Oh my goodness.
	Some also came to the rescue and talked about how greed and other hyper-capitalistic mentality were the reason for the collapse of the bank and not USAPA's gender or woke ideals.
	How about if the gender or woke ideals were actually part of the hyper-capitalistic mentality where they think that in order to be hyper-successful in today's day and age, you have to flamboyantly flaunt your gender And woke ideals?
	That's the way to get capitalistically successful?
	What if that actually marries together?
	Despite what you think.
	But the reality is far different.
	It doesn't work together.
	Um...
	Thank you.
	I cannot send rumble rants.
	What's going on, says CrazyGuru1.
	I don't know.
	Well, don't worry about it, but you could...
	Don't do a rumble rant.
	This is CrazyGuru1 who just said, I cannot send rumble rants.
	Go to Locals and subscribe for the year.
	Far better value.
	And it's the gift that keeps on giving, because Rumble, Locals is amazing.
	Rumble is amazing as well, but our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com committee.
	A community is glorious.
	Yeah, get woke, go broke, or go woke, go broke, whatever the hell it is.
	It's preposterous.
	And it is prioritizing the wrong things, but because they think it will make them successful in doing so.
	They're not doing it because they don't think it's going to make them money.
	This is what people don't understand about...
	Big tech, big companies co-opting movements.
	They're not doing it because they give a shit about you.
	Sorry to swear.
	They're not hiring what people refer to as And
	spoiler alert!
	It won't.
	It doesn't.
	And you're going to see more and more of this happening.
	There's a reason why people are not watching sports.
	There's a reason why people are not watching the Oscars, the Golden Globes.
	They don't like it.
	They don't want to see it.
	When it comes to businesses, they don't give a sweet bugger all about it.
	Consumers do not care about whatever you want to call it.
	They obviously don't want to see overt discrimination for baseless reasons.
	I will not hire Jews or blacks is never going to be a good business model, but it's already illegal.
	But I will not hire whites because of diversity is also something that people don't want to see because that's not reverse discrimination.
	That's just discrimination.
	Diversity hires for the sake of diversity hires.
	So you can say we are a diverse and inclusive community here at...
	Silicon Valley Bank.
	Bring your money to us.
	Yeah, I think people would be more interested in actually a company that is run based on meritocracy and not gender ideocracy.
	That's the word I'm looking for.
	Ethnic concept?
	Identity.
	Identity.
	You know what I mean.
	I can't get it out of my mouth.
	So, yeah, here's another article.
	Is this the same one?
	This is banking dive.
	SVB had no risk chief through much of 2022.
	Proxy statement shows.
	People going to get sued.
	The collapse of Silicon Valley may have appeared as sudden and unexpected on the outside.
	Yeah, it's the old expression.
	It happens very slowly than all at once.
	But the company and its chief risk officer parted ways in April 2022, and its risk committee more than doubled its meetings to 18, suggesting growing concern in the bank's position, according to the company's 20. Depositors.
	Advised by venture capital firms to pull their money after the company sought a $2.25 billion capital raise to shore up its equity position, withdrew some $42 billion in cash over 44 hours, creating a liquidity crisis that led to the FDIC to take over the bank.
	That's flipping amazing.
	Can you imagine these?
	A lot of people don't realize this, and I am not a financial advisor, expert guru.
	I'm an idiot, period.
	So I'll give you the idiots, you know, the crisis for dummies 101.
	When you deposit your money into banks, they don't just keep it there.
	They invest it.
	They make purchases.
	They buy Bitcoin.
	They buy stocks.
	Sometimes the stocks go up.
	Sometimes they go down.
	But they don't always have, and they don't have, period.
	Dollar for dollar, the value of everybody's deposits, that beautiful number you see on your digital bank account, they don't have that in the coffers.
	And like we discovered in Canada, when the government messes with the banks by, you know, freezing people's bank accounts, it causes other people to go say, well, geez, before they freeze mine, I want my money out.
	And the bank's like, I don't have your money.
	Your money is tied up in Bitcoin, and Bitcoin's down 50% since we bought it.
	I don't know if that's the actual example here.
	Your money's tied up in real estate.
	And whoa, the market's about to tank.
	So even if we liquidate all of our portfolio to be able to cash you out, we might not have $209 billion in assets.
	So they got $209 billion in assets, which means that they don't have all the cash on their accounts.
	And people come in and pull out $42 billion in 44 hours.
	That's like a fifth or a quarter of the company's total assets.
	Holy shit, is that going to cause a problem?
	But nothing like making people panic, nothing to make people panic like saying, we need $2 billion more.
	That's not good.
	The 40-year-old bank's rise is tied to Silicon Valley's storied technology boom, but as some analysts believe, it kept too much money in long-term bonds at a time when interest rates were going up, forcing it to liquidate investments at a loss when depositors started withdrawing their money.
	I might know a little more than I think I know sometimes, but that's the extent of what I know.
	They invest your money, and sometimes they lose your money, and all the time they do not have dollar for dollar enough money to satisfy everyone's withdrawals if everyone comes in and says, I want my cash.
	This is classic asset liability mismatch triggered by higher rates and compounded by leverage.
	See, the triggered by higher rates is what concerns me because who's raising the rates and why, and are they raising the rates knowing that this might happen?
	Some might say this almost seems like an unfortunate...
	Fidelity analysts say the bank was poorly positioned as the Federal Reserve increased rates.
	Or maybe the Federal Reserve should not have increased rates, knowing that this might happen to some big banks.
	Who knows?
	SVB bought bonds in prior years when it was cash-rich, it said, but that was before the Fed began aggressively hiking rates and the venture capital market experienced some turbulence.
	Internal changes.
	Chief Risk Officer stepped down in April.
	The proxy shows leaving the company without someone in that position until January, when the company announced that it had hired Kim Olson, a former CRO Chief Risk Officer at Sumitomo Mitsu Banking Group.
	Mitsui.
	Mitsui.
	Kim's deep and multifaceted financial services, yada yada.
	Who cares?
	When she left her role, she signed a separation without cause agreement and stayed on for another six months.
	Yada yada yada.
	It has nothing to do...
	With their woke politics, their woke emphasis, their obsession with identity politics, that they could have done anyhow.
	It just had to do with their overall incompetence, that they didn't invest account holders' monies in a responsible manner that allowed for them to honor a massive $42 billion withdrawal of cash.
	Outrageous.
	All right, I think that does it on that.
	I don't have enough expertise to actually add anything more to that discussion.
	Except to say that, you know, holding gold, physical gold in a safe, in a bank, not always all that safe because, you know, as we've seen, the FBI can come in and seize the assets of the bank, freeze the, seize the vaults.
	Having it in your house, you know, is better, but burglaries and house burning down.
	Dude, it's like...
	Digging a hole outside and making a map.
	These are time-tested, or I should say, these are historical concerns.
	How you make money.
	Once you've made your money, how you protect the value of that money.
	How you protect that actual money.
	Because if it's not pirates at sea who are looting your gold, it's the government who are seizing it at vaults.
	Or banks who are badly investing it.
	Gold.
	Some people say Bitcoin.
	Bitcoin is doing very well now because of this panic, but okay.
	Anyway, that's it.
	It's not...
	What was the word?
	Biased commentators who are suggesting the woke politics of the bank had something to do with their incompetence.
	Success leaves clues, as does incompetence.
	And right now, a lot of people are very concerned about where their money is going to be.
	Okay, so we got the NP.
	How many times did I pull that article up?
	All right.
	We're going to save the best for last.
	We'll save Pfizer for last.
	And let's talk a little bit in Canada.
	But first, let me just see what's going on in the Rumble chat.
	Guns, gold, and a getaway plan.
	You can't eat gold.
	Yeah, people have their investment advice.
	And the bottom line, like I was talking with a financial advisor, gold's nice.
	But if the system has collapsed to the point where you are relying on gold coins to live, good flipping luck.
	You're going to scrape off a quarter ounce or a tenth of an ounce of gold and give me a loaf of bread.
	Andrew Jenkins says, the sole thing I dislike about Rumble is the inability to edit video comments.
	Liquor in mason jars, Vicky Lynn 1974.
	Well, that will certainly help everyone cope with the collapse of the world, but that won't help.
	Bartering.
	Bartering.
	That's what it comes down to.
	What do you have to barter?
	Here's a gold coin.
	That's one ounce, and I just want a loaf of bread.
	That's an expensive loaf of bread you just bought there, sir.
	All right.
	Let's go to Canada.
	Because Canada is preposterous.
	There was a scandal in Canada because a Conservative MP allegedly said something shameful about Melanie Jolie, who is the Minister of Foreign Affairs, I think.
	Melanie Jolie came out and said, I looked, I stared into the eyes of my Chinese counterparts and I said sternly and firmly, we will not accept foreign interference in our elections because the Canadian Surveillance Intelligence Society, CSIS, Canadian Secret Intelligence Services.
	Leaked to the media that they had raised concerns with the Trudeau government of foreign Chinese financial interference in prior elections, 2019-2021, prior foreign Chinese financial interference by way of million-dollar donations to the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation.
	They raised these concerns with the Trudeau government, and the Trudeau government said, who the hell do you think you are, CESIS?
	But then it was leaked to the media.
	And Justin Trudeau came out and said, we don't have to listen to CSIS.
	They don't tell us who we get to elect.
	They're not in charge of democracy.
	And if CSIS tells us that one of the candidates that we had at Richmond Hill or wherever was actually propped up and voted in as the liberal candidate by Chinese Communist Party influence who bust in students and elderly to vote for him, well, we're not.
	We're not.
	We're not.
	Getting rid of him.
	It's not your role to interfere with our democracy, Ceases.
	It's our role to interfere with the democracy.
	So Melanie Joly, who happens to be a relatively young, attractive female, and the reason why I say that is because that's what they're now relying on to suggest that any critique of her is a critique of her, not because she's an incompetent politician and possibly even corrupt, but because she's a young...
	Attractive woman.
	And therefore, any criticism directed at her is based on that and not her incompetence because identity politics and wokeness turns everything to shit, to quote Donald Trump.
	So listen to this.
	This is the story.
	Rachel Aiello.
	Where's she?
	Rachel Aiello?
	CTV News.
	CTV News.
	Liberal and NDP, that's the New Democratic Party MPs, called out Conservative MP Michael Cooper over what they described as a shameful and completely unacceptable comment he made to Foreign Affairs Minister Melanie Jolie during a hearing on foreign interference on Thursday.
	So, I read this article before I even heard what the statement was, and I thought for a second he would have had to have said something like, use the bad word, like the B word.
	Or said that, you know, women can't fight.
	I don't know.
	I didn't know what he said, so I thought it actually had to be bad.
	This is what he said.
	You've talked tough.
	You've talked tough with your Beijing counterpart, so you say.
	You even stared into his eyes.
	I'm sure he was very intimidated, said Cooper in questioning Jolie during a combative and intense meeting at the procedure on House Affairs Committee for the PROC.
	That sounds bad.
	You even stared into his eyes.
	I mean, it sounds like he's suggesting that she was trying to use her beauty as a young woman to gain influence or to influence her Chinese counterpart.
	And anybody who reads this, without knowing what Melanie Jolie herself had tweeted previously, might think that that's where the sexism came in.
	You even stared into his eyes.
	I'm sorry, are you suggesting, Cooper?
	That Melanie Jolie was trying to use her beauty as a woman to influence?
	That she stared into his eyes?
	Is that the sexist comment?
	No!
	Because that's what Melanie Jolie said, by the way.
	I'm going to get her tweet in a second.
	She put out a tweet that said, I stared into his eyes and I was stern.
	And what did she say?
	And so he's basically using her words and saying, I'm sure he was very intimidated.
	Call me an asshole?
	Gender?
	Or any form of...
	Improper suggestion there never occurred to me.
	What occurred to me is that she is the minister of, what is it, foreign affairs for a corrupt, bought and paid for Chinese infiltrated liberal party.
	Who the hell would be intimidated by anything?
	Anybody says within that corrupt Chinese Communist Party infiltrated party.
	Who would be intimidated by someone you own telling you the way it is?
	I'll pull up the tweet just so everybody can appreciate this.
	He didn't suggest that she stared into his eyes in a loving, seductive manner.
	She used those words herself.
	Jolie and Intergovernmental Affairs, yada, yada, they were testified.
	Okay, Cooper's comment was in reference to something the Minister of Foreign Affairs said earlier in the meeting about a recent conversation she had with her Chinese counterpart.
	Let me just see if we can get the actual...
	the actual tweet...
	stared.
	Hold on, let me just see.
	Wow, they really don't give you the original one here.
	Let me give you the tweet.
	Melanie Jolie stared into I's Twitter.
	Hold on.
	Give me two seconds to see.
	It's funny.
	The only thing that comes up now is the article.
	Oh, come on.
	Melanie Jolie, stern warning.
	Let me just see.
	I need to get her original statement.
	Oh, come on.
	Hold on, people.
	Melanie Jolie.
	I got to get it.
	It was on her Twitter feed.
	Here we go.
	Let me see something here.
	This might take a little while.
	I'm going to find it.
	Stared into eyes stern.
	Ah.
	Stared into eyes stern.
	We're going to do it.
	I said Chinese, so Chinese counterpart.
	Okay, let's see here.
	Oh, I'll get it afterwards.
	Here we go.
	Let me see if this is the right one.
	That's not the right one.
	Alright, I won't be able to find it.
	I'll find it later.
	Oh, I'm an idiot.
	It's right here.
	I'm such a flipping moron, people.
	If I were reading the chat, I'd be reading the chat saying, Viva, you're a moron.
	It's right there in the article.
	Okay, it's right there in the article.
	Let me pull it up again.
	And now I can't find the article.
	All right, whatever.
	It's right there.
	It says, I was extremely clear.
	I looked at him in the eyes and said to him, quote, first, we will never tolerate any form of foreign interference in our democracy.
	I looked at him.
	What did she say?
	I looked at him in the eyes.
	And this guy is the misogynist, unacceptable, shameful.
	It's an amazing thing in the mind of a liberal politician.
	Everything is based on identity politics.
	No one is a human.
	They are reduced to their gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and therefore any critique of them is reduced to a critique based on that element of reduction of a human that the tolerant liberals are so famous for.
	I stared at, she says, I looked, no, she says, I looked at, I stared at him in the eyes.
	She said it.
	And then when someone else uses her words against her, they become the misogynist for a misogynistic attack, which is an amazingly convenient thing because what it allows for her to do is say whatever the hell she wants.
	And if anybody uses her own words against her, they become the misogynist.
	Here's the bottom line, Melanie Jolie.
	The criticism is not based on you being a woman.
	It's based on you being incompetent out of your realm.
	In what you're doing in politics and being a member of a fundamentally corrupt, amoral, immoral, compromised political party that is the Liberal Party.
	Period.
	Okay, what time is it?
	Oh my goodness.
	Okay, so we're going to...
	Here we go.
	This is the article.
	Okay, we can get rid of that.
	Chris Cooper called to apologize.
	Apologize, damn you.
	Apologize for using her own words against her to criticize her for being a member of a corrupt political party supporting a man who has proven himself to be racist, misogynist, allegedly a woman groper.
	He apologized for improperly touching a reporter back in the year 2000.
	Corrupt.
	Two times ethics breaching.
	Divider in chief.
	Criticize her and it's obviously because she's a woman.
	We have to treat her unequally because she's a woman, according to the liberals.
	Don't treat her equally.
	Don't treat her like you would treat any other politician who's in similar circumstances.
	Go easy on her.
	She's a woman, is what the liberals are saying.
	Why?
	Because they happen to be everything that they accuse other people of being.
	Liberal politicians I'm talking about right now.
	Not good, peace-loving people who consider themselves to be liberals, although they should find a new political party to support.
	Okay.
	There was another Canadian one, which...
	No, this is not important enough.
	Maybe it is.
	I'll save that for locals afterwards.
	Okay, people.
	Saving the best for last.
	And it's just...
	You think they're gaslighting you, and you think they're doing it on purpose, and I don't know how to end that sentence except to say it looks like they're doing it on purpose right now.
	And when you get to the punchline, we're going to go through the insidious corruption aspect of this, or the opportunism, or the convenience of having $43 billion at hand because of an arguably defective product that you just sold to the world.
	Now you're fortunate enough, because you have no liability, to have $43 billion on hand to purchase another company.
	Let's just get to the news, then we're going to get to the corruption.
	Do I want to start with a tweet?
	Not now.
	Here we go.
	Pfizer joins us now.
	Stop, stop, stop.
	I was going to start with this.
	This is Chief Nerd.
	Who's Chief Nerd?
	I like Chief Nerd.
	Full-time software engineer, part-time citizen journalist, big pharma veteran.
	I think I like Chief Nerd.
	It doesn't matter.
	It's not because I like them that I'm going to view their message any differently.
	But this is what Chief Nerd posts.
	Don't play the audio yet until I'm done talking, ma 'am.
	Pfizer buys CJN.
	CEO Burla.
	An oncology pipeline.
	Look at that face.
	He's so flipping happy.
	Look at that.
	That is what we call a shit-eating grin.
	I'm sorry, I have to swear again.
	When people talk about a shit-eating grin, that's a shit-eating grin right there.
	I don't know if I'm even using it in the right way, but what does Borla have to say about his smashing success and ability to buy out a cancer manufacturer?
	Let's hear this.
	Albert Borla, the CEO of Pfizer, joins us now.
	Albert, great to see you this morning.
	$43 billion, a huge price tag.
	Tell us why CGen is worth it.
	It's a huge price tag.
	Why do you have that money, Burla?
	Liability-free manufacturing.
	I mean, it's a slot machine that is a win on every pull of the slot, and you don't have to put any money into it.
	That's a big price tag.
	Why is it worth it?
	Well, it's not my money, so what do I give a crap what I do with it?
	Pfizer.
	Look, Meg, very nice to see you.
	But cancer is one of the biggest therapeutic areas.
	And right now, one in three people in the world are going to have cancer in their lifetime.
	Do you understand what you just said?
	Why do you buy CJ?
	Well, cancer is very good business.
	So it's not because I have expertise.
	It's not because I genuinely want to help.
	It's because there's a big market there.
	And if shit, if we can do something like we did with COVID and get liability-free treatments...
	Where all we do is sell it to the government, and they mandate it on people, and then we can't get sued?
	Well, it's a very, very good business model.
	I mean, yeah, it's a good business model, Burla.
	Unfortunately, the numbers that people are affected is even larger.
	Oh, yes.
	Because people, if not as patients, they will be affected as a husband or wife, they will be affected as a daughter or son, and even worse, as father and mother.
	Am I wrong?
	Am I imputing evil to this man?
	Or does he look like he's smiling as he's talking about the devastating consequences of cancer?
	He really looks like he's smiling.
	But I mean, I guess when you've made so much money, like, you know, if you've gone to Vegas and you've made, you know, a million bucks, you'll be smiling on the airplane home.
	And Sizen is having one of the greatest technologies to battle cancer.
	It's called ADCs.
	These are turbo...
	Turbocharged guided missiles.
	They are attacking the cancer cells and can make a huge difference.
	Turbocharged guided missiles.
	Does everybody appreciate that Borla is not a doctor, by the way?
	We'll get to that in a second.
	I'm fairly certain he was a vet.
	They are turbocharged laser guided cyanide tipped missiles that they go into the cancer cells and they...
	Tell the cancer, bad cancer, you must die now.
	That's the technology.
	It's amazing technology.
	I would say this is something like the mRNA for vaccines.
	They have to be gaslighting us.
	He has to be doing it on purpose.
	We have amazing technology.
	It's like mRNA vaccines for COVID.
	I'm not going crazy.
	They're attacking the cancer cells.
	These are turbocharged guided missiles.
	They are attacking the cancer cells and can make a huge difference.
	I would say a disease is something like the mRNA for vaccines.
	It is a disease for cancer.
	So we think that we can make it...
	He didn't say COVID here, but it's like the mRNA for vaccines because those have been smashingly successful.
	Very big difference with this technology in our hands and provide a relief to the world at a scale that has not been seen before from this devastating disease.
	Wow.
	And you also expect that this...
	That's so great.
	Wow.
	I really understand how it works.
	It's turbocharged, laser-guided rockets that blow up cancer cells.
	And contribute something like $10 billion in revenue for Pfizer by 2030, contributing to an overall goal you've set that you've been trying to meet through M&A.
	Just tell us about what the financial impact on Pfizer will be here.
	It'll be very good.
	It's going to be very positive, the financial impact on Pfizer.
	We should be able to fill the gap, as you said, of between 25 and 30. This is where we're facing LOEs.
	And to get the target to achieve 25 billions through M&A.
	Until yesterday, we had 10 of these billions in the bucket.
	And now we have another 10, more or less.
	So we are 80% in this goal.
	and that gives certainty clearly to investors that our situation in the years 25 to 30, it is pretty good.
	This has got to be enraging everybody.
	We can do what we did with mRNA.
	What did you do with mRNA technology, Borla?
	What did you do with the mRNA vaccines, which are not a vaccine because they don't protect from transmission contraction, at best a therapeutic and at best a therapeutic that actually causes, that has a negative risk factor with a great many people.
	What did you do with that technology?
	It's great.
	We will deal with cancer the same way we did with COVID.
	Well, holy crap.
	Here we can achieve tremendous revenue synergies and we can achieve cost synergies by being able to implement things at scale.
	The financial returns of Pfizer will be very good with a relatively very low risk profile target.
	Okay.
	Let me just pull up there because there was another article where I think someone said, look at the...
	Someone who I consider to be a troll.
	I don't remember the name, and it's not one that I've seen, but he says, oh, look, it's those anti-science, anti-vaxxers.
	You tell them that you have a cure for cancer, and they're going to be suspicious.
	When Albert Bourla tells me that he has a cure for cancer, I'm going to be suspicious.
	When Albert Bourla takes the billions of dollars that he was just gifted by the government and then buys a technology that, lo and behold, He buys a company that apparently has a technology to treat an increase in cancers and we're noticing an increase in cancers.
	And some people are suggesting that the increase in cancers might have to do with Albert Bourla's other smashing success.
	Yeah, I'm going to be suspicious.
	And I'm going to be damn suspicious.
	Damn, damn, damn.
	Here we go.
	Here we go.
	So this is from Yahoo News.
	Take it for what it's worth.
	Pfizer to battle cancer with CGen merger, CEO Albert Bourla says.
	It'd be very good to stock price.
	It'd be very good.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	The transcript.
	Pfizer has agreed to pay $43 billion, including debt, for biotech company CGen and its pioneering cancer treatments.
	With more on what this major merger means, yada, yada, yada.
	I guess we should read the question.
	I'm only going to go with the first one.
	Albert, it is a pleasure to talk to you here today.
	Congratulations on this deal, which, as I said, is a big one.
	And in reading some of the analysts' coverage, they are talking about the fairly hefty premium that you're paying for CJIN.
	Presumably, you had to outbid some peers.
	There had been some reports on others being interested in the company.
	Why is it worth it for you guys to buy this company?
	And at this price, Albert Bourla.
	Let me start by what we're trying to achieve, right?
	It's to battle cancer.
	And cancer is just one of the deadliest diseases in the world.
	Right now!
	One in three people are set to get cancer in the course of their lifetime.
	And a disease, which is the technology that CJN is mastering, is considered one of the best ways to be able to battle cancer.
	Yeah, one in three people are going to get cancer.
	And cancer, for those of you who don't know, is in fact spiking right now.
	And I'm not saying it's spiking because of a certain spike protein.
	Whether or not cancers and aggressive cancers are spiking because of the jibby-jab weakening immune system and natural immune responses, Whether or not cancers and aggressive cancers are spiking because people haven't gone to doctors in three years because they've been locked down, shut down, and terrorized down to not even go get checkups, treatments.
	Whether it's A or B, it's a distinction without a difference, save and except for who deserves to be in jail at the end of the day, after a fair trial, of course.
	So it's either from Albert Bourla's own product, Or it's as a result of the...
	It's the consequences of the actions of the very same government that gave Albert Bula immunity to produce a product that was very arguably effective and not so arguably unsafe for some.
	Or at the very least, less safe for some than for others.
	What a coincidence.
	The cancer is...
	There's a lot of cancer now.
	Whether we did it or the people who immunized us did it, there's a lot of cancer.
	So let's treat that cancer because it's a good business opportunity.
	It might be one that actually results from our own incompetence and corruption and falsified studies.
	But hell, it's an opportunity.
	Never let a good opportunity go to waste or a good crisis go to waste.
	But that's not where I wanted to get to.
	It was the next part.
	Here we go.
	Back to Burla.
	So in reality, what we're trying to do is to be able to make a meaningful difference in the health of people as we did with COVID.
	Sorry, I've got to get out of the voice now.
	As we did with COVID.
	Burla, you produced a vaccine after having touted it as being 100% effective at preventing COVID to then admitting that it does not prevent contracting, carrying, or transmitting the virus, that it might cause myocarditis in excessively high proportions of a demographic that's not at risk for COVID in the first place.
	Among other health issues that it might cause, after having arguably, but not so arguably, fudged, falsified, lied about your trials.
	Matty DeGarry would like to have a word with you, Albert.
	And he's putting it in the same sentence as if to say, there's nothing you can do about this.
	We have screwed you so hard.
	We are so in bed with the politicians who immunized us from screwing you so hard.
	And we're going to rub in the face that we screwed you hard with a product that we were paid to develop, shielded from liability for having developed that didn't do what we said it did and probably did a lot more than what we said it didn't do, and now trust us with this other cancer product.
	We're going to treat you for the illness that we might very well have given you.
	And that's all I have to say about that.
	The rest of it you can go read.
	I'm sure it'll be great for shareholder value.
	Until these companies have their immunity stripped because they lied about their trials, they concealed evidence from the government.
	If it's true, and I believe it's true, I hope the day comes when they face the legal ramifications for what they've done.
	Because I don't think there can be justice on this earth for the wrongs that I firmly believe that they've caused.
	But heaven and hell are the same thing.
	It's an eternity of hearing what people say about you in your absence.
	And I know what I'm going to be saying about Albert Bourla, Justin Trudeau, Joe Biden, all of these politicians for what they've done to us, our children, our family members, and what they continue to do.
	And I do hope that one day liability is stripped and these companies face the legal and criminal...
	consequences of what I believe is quite clear that they have done to us and to everybody.
	Did I end it on a too dark of a note, people?
	Oh, there's three thingy things there.
	Rumble rants.
	All from Crazy Guru 1. I'm going to read these.
	Let me bring them up.
	Again, no medical advice, no election fortification advice, but hold on.
	Before I do that, so I don't lose you, people.
	Head on over to Rumble because...
	Not Rumble.
	Locals.
	Got two boxes.
	I don't know what's in this one.
	Okay.
	I know what's in the other one.
	And it's a special unboxing that you're going to want to see.
	And I'm going to get to the tips and the comments in the Locals chat.
	Let me just bring this up before we end on Rumble as well.
	This one right here.
	Okay.
	CrazyGuru1 says, the cure for cancer has been around for a long time.
	Look at the cancer law which bans cancer cures from the 1930s.
	Spike proteins again, Pfizer.
	Mm-hmm.
	How can she be so happy?
	CrazyGuru, if you're in our local...
	Well, are you in our locals community?
	Whatever.
	Share the links and we can have a look in locals.
	Thank you for the rumble rants.
	All right, everybody.
	So we're going to end it on rumble.
	We're going to end it with a video so that it doesn't get too cut off.
	Let me see what video I can end it with.
	Oh, actually, this will be a good one to end with.
	Here.
	RFK, and then after RFK speaks, I'm going to end the stream on Rumble, go to Locals for a little after-stream partay, hey, and do the special unboxing, which you're going to not want to miss.
	Okay.
	So start making your way over there now, and let's end with Robert Kennedy Jr.
	You might have a picture of me holding an RFK Jr. mug if he makes them.
	We'll see.
	The idea that it could plausibly be as a Democrat candidate, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. versus a Republican candidate, Donald Trump Jr., if we thought the 2020 election was big.
	Holy crap.
	It would be a populist dream and a deep state nightmare.
	Now...
	Let's listen to RFK Jr.
	And when he's done talking, I'm going to go over to Locals, and I hope to see as many of you there as possible, as you want to get there.
	And that's it.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Another good day.
	Tomorrow, we've got a sidebar tomorrow night.
	And what else?
	I'll probably be live at some point tomorrow.
	Maybe in studio with someone very special.
	We'll see.
	Okay.
	Listen to RFK.
	I also just want to highlight, thus far, there are no community notes.
	Actually, let me just make sure that that's true.
	Thus far, as far as I can tell, there are no community notes on Twitter to add context, clarification, or spin to what Robert F. Kennedy is about to say right here.
	Listen to it, because it puts it all together perfectly.
	The Pentagon was very worried about actually launching a full-blown bioweapons arms race.
	Because they said, nobody, you know, this is very sketchy.
	The Patriot Act, you know, exemptions are very sketchy and people don't even know about it.
	And so they didn't want to do it.
	So they took the money that Cheney gave them, $2.2 billion, and they funneled it through NIH.
	And it all went through Anthony Fauci.
	So beginning in 2002, Anthony Fauci got a 68% raise from the Pentagon for doing bioweapons development.
	And he got a raise of billions of dollars a year to do it.
	And then he started building, that's when they started doing all this gain-of-function.
	And then in 2014, three of those bugs escaped in high-profile escapes from different labs in the United States.
	Fauci built all these new labs at BU at Galveston to do his shenanigans.
	And so three of the bugs escaped, and they received publicity in a small box and a lot of really bad things.
	And then Congress held hearings on it.
	Everybody was angry.
	These bugs escaped, and 300 scientists, top scientists, sent letters to Obama saying, you've got to shut down Anthony Fauci because he's going to create a pandemic.
	And so Obama ordered a moratorium, and at that time, Fauci had 18 different gain-of-function experiments he was doing around the United States.
	Obama ordered him to shut them all down, but he didn't.
	What did he do?
	He instead moved his stuff offshore to Wuhan, where he could do it out of sight.
	Through a third-party NGO?
	Of these 300 scientists and nosy...
	White House officials who were trying to shut him down.
	Third-party NGO.
	And they continued to do it with Ralph Baric, the same people he was funding here, Ralph Baric.
	EcoHealth Alliance.
	and Peter Dezak, and they moved their operations to the Wuluhan Lab.
	Everyone has to read Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s book, The Real Anthony Fauci, and you'll understand history doesn't repeat, but it tends to rhyme.
	And what we've lived through under COVID.
	Mutatis putandis was what the world lived through under HIV-AIDS.
	All right, everyone on Rumble, I'm going to go end the stream.
	Make your ways, ons, overs to the locals.
	It's going to be good.
	There's a link, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Thank you all for being here.
	For those who are not going to make it over, and everyone else, I'll see you in locals, and for those others, see you tomorrow.
	Peace.
	Now, let's see.
	Are we still good on Locals, people?

▲