Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 3, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:56:44

China Penetrates Trudeau Cabinet? Queen of Disinformation Begs for Money! AND MORE! Viva Frei Live

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is all private in here it's a private event.
	Private event.
	So I'm not welcome at any conservative events it seems.
	I tried dressing for the part but...
	You're still wearing red glasses.
	Thank you for being cooperative.
	I'm not a much more confused as to why politicians hate me.
	I've never said a single district where it's going to happen.
	We see what you put on Twitter.
	Alright, it doesn't go anywhere.
	I just need to get her name.
	Karima Rules.
	Okay, whatever.
	It goes on for a few more seconds.
	So that would appear to be...
	I did a brief analysis overview of Karima Rule's Twitter feed just to make sure that she's not an overt provocateur.
	Someone who deliberately goes and gets violent, gets rowdy, brings a crowd, actually incites people to get violent or disruptive.
	She seems to be mildly...
	Let's say anti-everything, but might be picking on conservatives these days more than liberals, but, you know, whatever.
	I just went through the Twitter feed to make sure that this is not someone who is known for getting into events specifically to disrupt them.
	Didn't find any evidence to that effect.
	As far as I understand, this was an event that was public, open to the public, and she procured a ticket publicly to this event and was not allowed in.
	Apparently, from what the guy says, Zach, whatever, I don't know who that person is, because of what she puts on her Twitter feed.
	Now, I retweeted that with a little bit of a critique, saying this is not good when Trudeau does it.
	It's not justifiable just because someone who's conservative does it, and...
	I'm not poo-pooing on any of the replies in response to that tweet.
	I'm noticing a phenomenon where people immediately regress into either lack of introspection or justifying what they want to do on the basis that, well, they've done worse to me, therefore it's justified.
	Some people saying she's a known agent provocateur and that she goes in and, you know, puts out critical content.
	Well, that's too bad.
	You don't get to be a politician, open events to the public, and then make sure that the only people who are there are the people who agree with what you're about to say.
	That's what makes you Hillary Clinton, where you have events where you say things to, who is she talking to?
	Talking about, you know, Wall Street, and then you don't want anyone recording and letting out the information.
	If it's not good enough to say to your adversary with pride, you probably shouldn't be saying it if it's going to be a political platform.
	Okay, I'm going to address a couple of comments in a second.
	And people say, well, you know, she's there to disrupt.
	She's there to make them look bad.
	That's not an excuse.
	I'm sure that's exactly what Justin Trudeau says when he pre-bans rebel news from attending events.
	I'm sure that's what he says when he disregards their questions.
	Well, I don't need to ask questions from you.
	That's not how it works.
	And if you are, in fact, pro-freedom of speech, it...
	Admits of the possibility that when you're speaking to the public, you're not going to be able to cherry pick which members of the public get to hear your message.
	And I said, if she makes a stink and she causes a disruption, well, for the love of goodness, let her do it and then get your video bite where you ask her to politely leave and she acts like a lunatic and then nobody's going to criticize.
	Preemptive banning of people that you don't like because of what they say about you on Twitter is not democracy and it's not...
	Any more justifiable when someone who's politically aligned with you does it compared to when your ideological enemy does it.
	And, you know, if that's the basis, would I not be allowed to attend a Pierre Poilier event?
	That's great.
	Just to make sure that the only people there listening to you are the ones who are going to agree with your message and not hold your feet to the fire.
	And people out there are going to say, Viva, stop picking on...
	Pierre Poilier, because if you do that, you're going to increase Justin Trudeau's chances of getting re-elected in what appears to be an imminent upcoming election.
	To which I say this.
	One can view critique as troll.
	Another can view critique as loving, constructive criticism.
	If it's loving, constructive criticism, typically my motto is you compliment publicly and criticize privately.
	That's the tactic I like to adopt with friends, with people who I know I give the benefit of the doubt to because they have a proven track record of being good people.
	Compliment publicly, criticize privately.
	When that possibility is not open and you have no choice but to either criticize publicly or not criticize at all, well, some people might reflexively say that critique is either troll, therefore I can disregard it, or you're doing it out of anger.
	I view critique...
	Even when it comes from bona fide trolls as an opportunity for improvement.
	And I'm not saying this to be glib or sarcastic.
	Typically, the insults that hurt the most are the ones that you feel there might be a little truth to.
	And typically, if there might be truth to things like an attack on the way one delivers a message.
	Oh, you hem and haw too much.
	You talk gesticulate with your hands too much.
	And like, ugh, that hurts me a little bit.
	It might be a room for improvement.
	I'm criticizing Pierre Poiliev relentlessly, remorselessly, as though he were the same position of power that I regard Justin Trudeau to be.
	And one can say, viva, you're being an idiot, you're being a jerk, you're splitting the vote.
	Or one can say, yeah, if Pierre wants to improve, maybe he should listen to the critique.
	Maybe you should let people who are not ideologically aligned with you attend a public event.
	After having procured tickets lawfully, and unless they do something bad during the event, let them listen to you.
	Who knows?
	You might win them over, Pierre.
	They might say something on their Twitter feed afterwards, which might cause you to reflect and say, maybe I should walk things back a little bit with Christine Anderson.
	Maybe I should try to unite the conservatives as opposed to pander to the potential liberal.
	Maybe I should take that criticism to heart and actually allow it to make me a better politician.
	Or shoot the messenger, as they say.
	Now, truth may hurt sometimes, but lies always do.
	Karen, I disagree with that.
	Lies don't hurt if they're not true.
	Like, someone can call me fat if that would be something that even if I were fat that I would find insulting.
	That's not going to hurt me.
	Someone says, Viva, you abandoned your country.
	That might hurt me a little bit because there might be a part of me that actually feels that there might be truth to that.
	I mean, I know that it's not the case, but I was quite open even going through the thought process of temporarily relocating to Florida.
	That went through my psyche.
	The outright lies don't hurt.
	Lies don't hurt because they're not true.
	Why would one take them to heart?
	Where they might hurt is indirectly if other people believe them and then act on them accordingly like, I don't know, whatever.
	So I disagree with that.
	Let me see something here.
	Need to sync Dialogue Locals and YouTube Viva.
	Then the flip side is, not only do I have every right to live where I want, I think the guilt that I feel is not actually a guilt of having abandoned Canada.
	I was having this private discussion with someone.
	I won't mention whom.
	But listening to a book recently, we were talking about gratitude.
	And some people have difficulty feeling gratitude because they feel envy towards those who have more than them.
	Listening to that, I realized my difficulty with appreciating gratitude is that I feel bad for the people who might...
	Not have the opportunity to do the things that I've done.
	But, you know, then the ultimate irony is the people, any of the people, they're not that many.
	Actually, there's not as many as I thought there were going to be who say, Viva, you're a traitor, you fled your country, yada, yada.
	When Bill C-11 kicks in and you need someone and Canada needs someone and I need someone with a platform that can raise awareness about what the hell is going on in Canada, then nobody will be shy.
	I'm going on Jimmy Dore this afternoon.
	To talk about Commissioner Rouleau's exoneration of Justin Trudeau.
	I'm sort of surprised how few people in the States, how few American platforms are talking about it.
	I'm going to make that market.
	I'm going to create the need for that market in America the way olive oil created a need and a market for beautiful, tasty olive oil.
	So I was going to bring up these things here.
	Let me see this.
	My background is distracting.
	That might hurt a little bit.
	Okay?
	Because also, this might be a reality of the problem.
	Thomas Sowell said there's no solutions, only trade-offs.
	I said it yesterday as a joke.
	There are no solutions.
	There's only new problems.
	I think I'm going to have to reposition the back of the studio.
	I think I'm going to have to get a better camera because I'm using...
	It's been very good for the last three years, this VTAD.
	Point-and-shoot plug-in thing, and it's great, but I think I need to get like a DSLR that's going to have nice depth of field that will not go in and out of focus during a stream.
	Then the only problem is you do that, and then it's like mildly out of focus, and you don't realize.
	Okay, whatever.
	The real Bambooga, who I have not seen in a long time, you didn't read my 428,106 super chat.
	Miffed.
	Super miffed.
	All right, so that's the intro.
	Standard disclaimers.
	No legal advice, no medical advice, no election fornification advice.
	I love that dog.
	That is a beautiful dog.
	Super chat.
	So if you see those things called super chats, YouTube takes 30% of that.
	So if you want to support my stuff and you put 10 bucks up on a super chat, YouTube takes three.
	Some people have no alternative and don't mind supporting YouTube and I'm indirectly supporting YouTube.
	True.
	But it's directly supporting my ability to do what I'm doing.
	We are simultaneously streaming on the Rumbles.
	And Rumble has a thing called Rumble Rants.
	We don't have any yet to read.
	Rumble takes 20%.
	So better for the creator, better for the platform, better to support a platform that supports free speech.
	And we are also simultaneously streaming on Locals.
	So when I end this stream on YouTube and then go exclusive to Rumble, we will be on Rumble and Locals.
	And then after we're done with the stream, I'm going to end the stream on Rumble and we're going to have like an after party on Locals.
	VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com You can join and be a member of the community with no financial out-of-pocket support whatsoever.
	Or you can choose to be a supporter.
	It's $7 a month or $70 a year or more because some people actually do pay more than the minimum support amount.
	You can do that.
	And that is it.
	What else?
	Yeah, merch.
	Who, what, when, why, and where?
	Okay, what do we have on store for today?
	Today's going to be amazing.
	I'm looking to see if Alexa Lavoie is coming on.
	Alexa from Rebel News is coming on to talk about the incident she recently had at what is known as the Roxham Road border crossing between the United States and America, where...
	Apparently, it's like the best kept secret.
	The border is open for anybody to cross into Canada from the United States.
	And she was down there documenting what, you know, typically, you know, legacy media ought to be covering because it's an actual, if it's not a national security issue, it's pretty damn close, just an open border.
	People walking across, like literally just walking across.
	And she was confronted by and assaulted by.
	What I think was a human trafficker who is making money by bringing illegal immigrants over the border.
	And I have a bunch of questions for her because one of the questions was, why the hell didn't the Canadian police officer do anything?
	And I think it's because the incident occurred on the American side of the border.
	And then my question was, why the hell weren't they doing anything on the American side of the border?
	So are we zooming?
	The focus looks good.
	No, you see, I can see it.
	Well, if I just move around like this.
	See, that's why I wear the shirt that has words on it so that it helps the camera autofocus.
	Let me just read this one.
	Dude, Rebel News is a joke.
	They fake assaults on themselves all the time and then fundraise off of it.
	They've been caught red-handed countless times doing it.
	Let me just address that because that's...
	Unless I've missed something, that's a lie that won't hurt anybody.
	Emotionally, unless other people believe it.
	Fake assaults on themselves all the time.
	You mean like when Alexa Lavoie got shot in the leg, point blank, by the RCMP during the Ottawa protest?
	She did that to herself?
	That they fundraise off of it afterwards?
	Let's not confuse raising funds for what seems to be a critique of grifting here, as in grifting in the bona fide sense of creating the drama to profit from it afterwards.
	I won't say that I had the same thought.
	I can see how people see this because when they have an incident, they create a website, they create a fundraiser, fight the fines, fight for Art Pobloski, fight for Reamer, the Alberta pastor who just got arrested.
	What do you think they should?
	What's the alternative?
	Don't fundraise off of it and don't raise the funds so that people can contest the tickets so they can go to court to challenge Justin Trudeau's preemptive banning of Rebel News.
	So sorry, Rebel News is not a joke.
	In fact, I think Rebel News might be the only Or one of the last few remaining bona fide journalists out of Canada.
	I'm just going to put my headphone here.
	And I'm not angry at you, and I'm not, like, triggered.
	People say this.
	People need to appreciate what Rebel News does.
	Rebel News is doing what few others are doing.
	And then we got the background is glaring.
	The neon sign.
	Okay, I'll fix things up in the background.
	All right, I see Alexa in the backdrop.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Okay, I'm going to bring Alexa in.
	And then I'm going to bring up the video and we're going to watch it, walk through it.
	But Alexa and I, we go way back.
	I don't know.
	She's been on the channel.
	She's interviewed me.
	Alexa, how long have we known each other for now?
	I think since I joined...
	Actually, I know you before you know me.
	But we know officially when I joined Rebel, I think in June 2021.
	Okay, fantastic.
	Chat, let me know.
	I just stabilized the audio, so let me know if Alexa is too soft or too loud.
	Yeah, I can also maybe put more.
	No, no, it's good.
	I think it's good now.
	We'll see what the chat has to say.
	Just to answer to your person, no, we are not creating our assault or anything.
	It's just...
	People need to understand that Ruben News is one of the few independent journalists who don't take money from the government.
	So that means that we can tell the other side of the story and we have nobody to tell us what to say or not taking that story.
	So that caused that sometimes, yeah, we are targeting by some people.
	To not show what is the truth.
	Because what happened to Roxham Road, unfortunately, you have way more on the story that people need to know.
	Because the man that attacked me is doing that for a long time.
	And he's just helping migrants to cross illegally.
	And he's breaking the law.
	And he doesn't want to have his face to be shown.
	And he got aggressive, so I didn't provoke anything.
	I tried to avoid that man, and he came back, and he tried to hit me and stop me to film.
	Well, let's...
	You know what?
	Even before we watch the video, chat, let me do the poll before.
	Who has known...
	Who knows what Roxham Road is?
	Am I going to do a poll?
	Eh, forget it.
	I'm not going to do a poll.
	It's a pen.
	A lot of people doesn't know, by the way.
	I'm lazy.
	One, if you do not know what Roxham Road is.
	Two, if you are aware of what Roxham Road is.
	You know what?
	No, I'm doing it.
	I'm doing it.
	How do I do a poll here?
	I go like this.
	Start a poll.
	I'm going to say, do you know what Roxham Road is?
	Yes?
	No?
	Ask your community.
	Let's go before we even get started.
	Okay, they're going to answer that honestly.
	It looks like 50-50.
	We'll see how the poll goes.
	Everyone who's answering the poll, answer it before you listen now.
	And if this is the first time you're hearing about it, then answer that you didn't know what it was.
	What is Roxham Road?
	Where is it?
	And how long has it been a thing for?
	Because I think I've heard about it now for at least three years, but I might be making that up.
	Oh, my God.
	Wrexham Road is really a road where people are crossing illegally.
	It's about 50 kilometers from Montreal, South Montreal.
	It's geographically in the problem of Quebec, but in the same time, it should be a problem of all Canada, but unfortunately, it's taxpayers mostly in Quebec that pay for it.
	We are asking for a refund from the federal, but anyway.
	So that road is between two legal borders, Aiming Ford and St. Bernard de la Colle.
	And it's just a dirty road that are crossing through U.S. and Canada.
	Before, in 2017, it was only 10th with RCMP who were arresting people, were crossing illegally.
	With the time, it's begun to be a full building of federal...
	Federal building, actually.
	It's really well made now.
	But rocks and roads have been always a problem.
	I think 12 years ago, some people, very few people were crossing illegally.
	But when in 2017, with the Trump administration, wanted to deport the people who had no paper or no residency or their, I don't know, their green card was expiring, a lot of people were Fleeing deportation.
	And so Mr. Trudeau wrote a tweet that was shared by millions of people saying that if you are fleeing persecution, you can come to Canada.
	Welcome to Canada.
	So at that moment, the increase of people who were seeking asylum increased and increased.
	And just last year, we had more than 39,000.
	Migrant who cross illegally at Roxham Road.
	So it's known around the world.
	A lot of people have known that route via YouTube, as I ask some people.
	And a lot of people know that you can cross at Roxham Road and you will be arrested.
	After that, we will bring to the immigration.
	And after that, they will be bring in hotel paid by taxpayer to wait for their...
	Legal justice appointment, but sometimes it can take three years.
	Until now, it took, I don't know how many times, I think like a couple of months to a year to allow them to work.
	So since they are not allowed to work, we need to help them financially with like some check from the government.
	And so their hotel lodging, everything is covered by taxpayer.
	And so...
	Right now, the big problem is, like, everybody claims that we need to, because you have the third safe country agreement that applies in Canada.
	So that means that when you go to a port of entry, like, if you arrive in the US, because it's a safe country, you can claim asylum.
	But you can only claim it in the first country you arrive.
	But that only applies to regular board...
	Regular port of entry.
	So that means legal border.
	But when you come to an irregular border, that agreement doesn't apply.
	So you can cross from the U.S., that is a safe country, and claim again asylum to a second country, and that doesn't affect.
	So they will not send you back to the country you come from.
	And so Justin Trudeau said that is the third safe country agreement that we need to change to apply to all.
	Port of entry.
	So irregular and regular one.
	And it's why you say that we cannot close Roxanne Road because Roxanne Road would probably be another one would reopen next to it since we have the biggest border with the country, with the US.
	But during the pandemic, that road was closed for a couple of months and the entry would decrease really.
	And we know that you have something to do, but nobody do it.
	Well, the border closed with the rest of the border that closed across the country.
	So nobody was crossing over, even asylum seekers.
	Yeah, but it's what they say.
	But we went on the scene during the pandemic and we were able to see some people crossing.
	Okay, so it's not...
	It's not like it's a hole in the fence where people are, I'm saying just, it's not like a hole in the fence where people are sneaking in and then just dispersing into Canada.
	They do get arrested.
	They then get detained.
	And then because they're claiming asylum, they get put up in some government facility for however long it takes.
	I know that I did speak with some asylum seekers from Rockham Road, actually.
	And they were in Montreal in Place Dupuis.
	And they have a certain time until they receive some money from the government.
	So they are allowed to stay there for, I think, one, two weeks.
	And during the time that they search for sharing a place with someone.
	But they receive the money from the government.
	So the government is actually paying for their lodging through the check that they receive.
	Okay.
	Do we know how much they're getting?
	Subsidized, paid, relatively speaking?
	Is it like $2,000 a month or do we not have an idea?
	I don't have a specific idea, but it depends if you are a family, if you are alone.
	It really depends on many, many criteria.
	And I think a family can receive a good amount of money to find a place to stay.
	But when people are arriving by themselves, most of the asylum seekers will find maybe a lodging.
	Where they live all together in a small place.
	I have no problem with the people who want to have a better life.
	But the fact that the federal government is not respecting our border from other countries, this is the problem.
	And they bypass other migrants who try to come to Canada, who wait for years.
	But it's not the fault of the migrants who come to Roxham Road.
	They have just been told, you want a better life?
	Go there.
	So it's not their fault.
	The fault is the government who do nothing.
	Some people in the chat, I think it might be humorously saying it's Quebec's problem, but first of all, the border is a federal issue.
	Oh, by the way, we are actually sending them to all other provinces right now because us, we are...
	Overload.
	Now, I know that a lot of migrants are in Niagara Falls.
	I think one of the hotels is completely full of 2,000 rooms full.
	And just by the way, the tourist season is coming.
	And at this moment, in Niagara Falls, they actually panic because they are like, are we going to get money from the tourists since it's full of migrants?
	And like...
	It's 39,000 people per year, and it will increase.
	39,000 only at Roxham Road?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	And you know that you have other ports of entry illegally.
	I know you have some in Ontario, but it's not comparable, the number.
	The fact that now it will be the problem of other provinces.
	And by the way, the federal will reimburse Quebec for the fee.
	So it's the problem of all taxpayers across Canada that pay for all the services.
	And by the way, it was $94 million in hotels, I think, in 2021 to 2022.
	About it, $94 million of taxpayer money involved in paying hotels for migrants.
	Okay, that's quite the, what's the word?
	The context, by the way.
	So thus far, there's 400 votes on the poll, and it's 52-48 yes versus no.
	So slightly more people based on the poll, just slightly.
	But it's still, half of the poll people, half of the people polled don't know what it is, which is kind of shocking.
	So let me bring this up.
	Let me see this here.
	I got the video down here.
	There we go.
	Okay.
	Yeah, this is it.
	I'll play it and I'll stop when I have a question, but let's just see what's going on here.
	I then redrew to avoid provocation and drove to Roxanne Road to wait for the taxis.
	That's when I got caught.
	Here.
	Where are you from?
	Just for context, you're on the Canadian side?
	U.S. You're on the U.S. side?
	Yeah.
	They're showing up in cars, which is obviously going to be the question.
	It's taxi.
	Taxi are waiting around the bus.
	We talk about eight.
	A taxi.
	Sometimes you have more.
	It depends.
	You have many bus per day full of migrants that arrive in Plattsburgh.
	And now we actually do know that it's, I think, Mayor Adams, Eric Adams out of New York, who's paying the bus tickets to get them out.
	For those who don't know, I just presume...
	I will add that afterwards.
	Eric Adams, the New York City mayor, because they have a crisis and can't house the immigrants that Joe Biden is allowing in, you know, willy-nilly over the border.
	Paid for the bus tickets to ship them up to the Roxham Road so they can cross into Canada.
	Okay.
	You're on the American side now.
	You're in that area where there's no longer any American border agents and the next...
	Authority figure, police person is Canadian.
	Yes, but the American is not their problem because nobody is crossing into America.
	But in the America side, they have a camera.
	So when they suspect that something is happening, they will call like a state trooper, will come and check around.
	But for them, they are going outside of their country.
	So for them, they have no point to have like a base.
	Well, it's the end of their problem, so to speak, unless an act of violence occurs on American soil.
	Okay, so now it's making sense, except there seems to be an act of violence on American soil, but let's continue watching.
	I'm going to throw the way into that.
	Let me join my job!
	I'm going...
	I'm going...
	Give me that f***ing call.
	I'm going to show you.
	I'm going to break that call.
	Give that f***ing shit.
	You go away.
	You go away.
	Put that phone number.
	You go away.
	You don't touch my stuff.
	Don't touch me.
	I'm going to report your car.
	But you're a witness.
	See that police is a witness.
	You don't touch me.
	You don't touch me.
	Shut the fuck up, man.
	Don't talk to me, man.
	You're telling her to stop.
	I'm talking to you.
	I don't understand you.
	I don't understand you.
	Do you know who I am?
	Do you want to know who I am?
	Do you want to know who I am?
	I don't understand any of the dynamic here.
	Thank you very much.
	You too.
	Keep on doing what you do best.
	Those police officers are wearing face masks outside.
	I still can't get over that.
	This is why.
	This is exactly what it's called.
	Thanks to the RC.
	We don't need to hear you on recording because we got you here in person.
	So have you seen that individual before?
	Do you know who that person is?
	I know that some of my colleagues went in 2019 and they sent me some previous video and he is there.
	So I know he's doing that for a while.
	I did talk with another taxi driver that was really nice to me and he told me who he was and tell me that he's doing that for.
	I think more than five or six years, maybe more than that.
	And this man is apparently, yeah, he's apparently really aggressive and that was said by another taxi.
	And this is dangerous because the migrants are putting their trust on him, but he can be violent and he's Not shame to beat a woman in front of children and family.
	Imagine their shock of the migrant who are already stressed to cross illegally.
	And that woman journalist being beat by the taxi driver.
	If the individual or anyone, and it looks like it's a bloody industry, it doesn't look like it's an accident now.
	If they're doing this day in and day out.
	How are the American authorities not getting involved?
	After this incident, and whoever thinks it might be staged, and if anyone thinks it's not really bad assault, it's only assault to property.
	This is not battery.
	This is assault.
	Oh no, he hit me on my back, and he grabbed my arm really hard.
	I'm actually asking, right now I'm working with lawyers, and I did ask for the footage from the rocks I'm rotating.
	No, the Canadian side.
	Because they have on record, since the RCMP said to me that he saw me on camera, and it's why he went outside to help me out.
	And so I'm trying to retrieve that camera footage, because of course I'm suing that man that not only hit me, but hit my camera in stopping me to do my job.
	And now I'm...
	Just afraid to go again by myself.
	You should have been afraid to go by yourself the first time, Alexa.
	I'm not.
	Anybody accusing Rebel News of grifting is one thing, but accusing you of being idiots, it's kind of reckless, but it's what journalists should be doing.
	I've been there so many times.
	You know, it's always been safe, and I had, like, the RCMP anyway, but that time I didn't expect, because I always take, like, a certain distance, and I know that the migrant will not hit me in front of, like, RCMP that's just there, and they want to cross in Canada, so they know that if they do something, they will not be allowed into Canada.
	Like, you just hit someone.
	Of course, like, at the immigration, they would...
	I have, like, charges against you.
	So, probably I would say I'm naive or anything, but so far, it's always been, like, okay for people to report.
	And, by the way, just last time I went, so many journalists were on the other side.
	And, you know, nothing happened.
	You have always journalists.
	All around because of what Mayor Adams said recently that he was paying with taxpayer money the ticket for the migrants to go up north to our border.
	And that increased a lot of journalists and nothing happened.
	So it's why for myself, I was like, okay, I'm just going there.
	I'm just going to try to report on what is going on, but never I will have a thing.
	That a taxi driver will arrest me?
	Well, a taxi driver might not be the right word for what that person is up to.
	We call them like almost human trafficking.
	Yeah, I think that's typically the term.
	Very interesting.
	And by the way, some people were asking, let me pull up the comments.
	It said, yeah, the cop witnesses a man assault a female and all he says is, do you know who I am?
	I presume they could do nothing because...
	There's an invisible border where you're in the state.
	They cannot cross.
	They would cross illegally in the U.S. to help me out.
	And this is actually breaking the law.
	So when he was saying, do you know who I am?
	It means, do you know that I'm the RCMP, like the federal police from Canada.
	I think he knew, and I don't think he gave a sweet bugger all.
	I mean, that was...
	He didn't care.
	So, you've been reporting on Waxham Road.
	That incident happened.
	I mean, you're going to try to find the individual?
	Oh, I know who he is.
	We found it.
	Oh, really?
	Yeah.
	The RCMP called this state trooper that came to me afterwards and they took my complaint and one of the taxis gave me about the name and I had his license plate.
	So, for me, it was really easy to say, okay.
	This is the company.
	This is the license plate.
	I have the video of the car.
	So with that, the police were just asking directly to the company, who is that man?
	Interesting.
	Okay.
	Because you're still in the States at that point, so you do go to the American authorities.
	Yes.
	Well, that's very interesting.
	To be continued?
	Yes, because as I say, not only we are pressing charge against that man, with the footage, If I can release it, the footage from the RCMP, I will probably show what happened.
	And also, we are probably going to...
	We have a petition at StopTraffickingToCanada.com.
	A petition, and people can also send a message to the Mayor, Eric Adams, to...
	To send a message to stop funding the bus ticket to the migrant.
	And with that petition, we are going to deliver to the US side to make a difference.
	And I'm going to contact also some people in the US side.
	To tell a little bit what is going on and show maybe the evidence of what is going on because it doesn't seem that Justin Trudeau would do anything.
	Justin Trudeau going to do something when a woman gets abused either verbally?
	Justin Trudeau would be right in there with his elbow to make sure he gets the other elbow gay people.
	Look it up if you don't know what it is.
	Yes, I know.
	Alexa, I don't want to get into drama.
	There's a chat in the Rumble Rant that says, ask about Diaglon and what's the problem with Diaglon?
	I don't want to get into any drama.
	Is there something that I don't know about that there's drama involving Diaglon above and beyond the Christine Anderson and Pierre Poilier situation?
	Me, I just asked the question that needed to be said.
	Diaglon, I would say, I don't know much, but...
	I know that you have a figure of controversy, especially by politicians, so it's why I ask questions that is legit to ask.
	I don't even know what the question was.
	What was the question?
	I just say, like, did you aware of, like, when you took the picture, who was the group of the Agolan and the flag?
	And I asked, like, if you knew that he had, like...
	Probably a controversy figure for some people.
	Would you have done the same?
	Because a lot of people have different opinions on different things.
	And it's normal.
	In a society, you will always have different opinions.
	And it's good because in the same time, it brings you to debate and discuss.
	And it's important.
	Same if, as I say, like...
	I don't know really much about that group.
	I just ask questions as if it was another journalist from CBC or another journalist independent.
	What would be the question that Quebecer and the rest of Canada want to know?
	Well, I'll tell you one thing.
	I mean, I would have asked the same question.
	I know the answer to it now.
	I've been asking what her answer was, but I know the answer.
	I mean, so Jeremy McKenzie was on...
	I don't remember.
	It was this week.
	I think it was on Monday.
	I don't know what day of the week it is.
	Jeremy McKenzie was just on, and I had asked him, did you guys troll Christine Anderson, or did she know what was happening?
	Is it Christine or Christina?
	It's Christine.
	And his answer was, no, we told her who we were first, that this would cause a shitstorm, and she agreed to do it and had no problem doing it.
	So I think that answered the question.
	In the same time, she said that she just saw them as comedians, and there was a big mockery of the government, and it's why she did it.
	I will not modify what she says.
	This is her word, and me, I'm just there.
	In the same time, people don't understand that journalists are not really the important part.
	The important part is the people who you interview.
	Us, we are just there to verbalize the question.
	That's it.
	Well, I had the same question, too, because if it were a troll along the lines of Pierre Poilievre when Jeremy met with Pierre, some people could say it's not very nice because you're getting this person unwittingly into controversy.
	But she, I asked Jeremy, she knew they ran it by her, so they didn't exploit her.
	She deliberately, knowingly, and willingly took the picture, knowing that what's being, in my humble opinion, I don't ask or I'm not asking if you agree with it.
	I think what's been done to Diagon is an absolute joke in the demonizing of the meme universe by the Canadian legacy media.
	But I would have said if they exploited Christine Anderson and didn't tell her the shitstorm it was going to put her in and then took the picture and did it, I would say that that's morally dubious.
	But they did, in fact, unbeknownst to me, actually tell her beforehand.
	Amazing.
	What do you have coming up?
	Right now, I did talk with some people in Plattsburgh that's coming up.
	I asked them a couple of questions about the fact that if Canada was doing the same funding post ticket to send them our immigrant, what they would think about it.
	And next week, I'm going to cover again Roxham Road.
	That is my biggest like...
	I'm covering, um, journalistically.
	And, uh, also I have, uh, some politicians to talk about Roxanne.
	And, oh, by the way, um, some, one of the freedom fighters in Quebec, uh, is now facing his fine from the multiple health measure ticket.
	And he's facing around hundreds of thousands of dollars of fine.
	I'm fucking believable.
	Which person is this?
	François, uh, Alma Lega François.
	Oh, the freedom fighter.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Well, he's the one that people have written off as an extremist because he's a little eccentric in the manner in which he does things.
	So he's facing, whether or not it's 100, six-digit, in the order of six-digit fines.
	Yeah, it's 98.320 or something like that, thousands of dollars.
	And he had received a warrant of, like, percussion.
	And now he's a...
	I cannot pay that anyway, so he said that I'm waiting for the jail.
	It's just a fine, people.
	It's just a fine, and then if you can't pay it, then they find a way to jail you for a civil fine.
	By the way, some people who did the biggest crime in this whole world will have less consequences for their action.
	As far as I'm concerned, one of them might have just increased their profits by $20 billion, but that's my own personal opinion.
	Alexa?
	Thank you very much.
	I would tell you to stop doing stupid things, but then you wouldn't be...
	You would not know the truth!
	Who would be, like, telling you...
	I interview a taxi driver, two taxi drivers, who tell us what is going on with this whole border.
	And if I was not there, who else would have, like, interview them and try to show you what is going on, like, with...
	That the bus full of migrants.
	No one in that bus was just going to Plattsburgh.
	By the way, why going to Plattsburgh?
	It's not like a really touristic place.
	But who else?
	What just blows my freaking mind is when Ron DeSantis bought the plane tickets and sent some illegal immigrants to Martha's Vineyard.
	It was human trafficking, criminal probes.
	The most disgusting exploitation of humans for political purposes possible.
	Eric Adams is doing it on a daily basis at a level that far exceeds one plane of, what was it, 50 migrants or 50 illegal immigrants if they said to...
	I mean, look, it is politicking.
	It is using people for political purposes, but it is politics.
	Illegal immigration is a political issue, but when he does it, it's criminal.
	When Eric Adams does it, it's absolutely ignored.
	And by the way, Eric Adams say of the governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, that it was cruel to put the migrant in the bus to send them to New York.
	But by the way, New York is a sanctuary for migrant, not Texas.
	I'll steel man their argument.
	What they're going to say is it was cruel to trick them into saying they're going to get housing and lodging.
	Eric Adams is not tricking them.
	He's saying, go to fucking Canada.
	They'll do it.
	That's what he said.
	Exactly.
	This is the problem of Canada.
	Alexa, thank you very much.
	I will say, obviously, keep up the good work because you do amazing stuff, as does Rebel News.
	And look, we'll do a follow-up and we'll run into each other sooner than later.
	It's always a pleasure to talk to you.
	And don't do it.
	As much as you do stupid things, stay safe.
	I will.
	Talk to you soon.
	All right, people.
	That's amazing.
	Now you know.
	And knowing is half the battle.
	Now, what we're going to do...
	Well, let me share the screen.
	I asked the questions.
	I asked the hard questions.
	I didn't know what the drama was.
	And if all Alexa did...
	Was ask the questions.
	It's Friday, 78. Come on, Viva.
	Ask her about Christine Anderson and Diaglon.
	Why would she act like a government puppet?
	From what I'm hearing, she didn't.
	I had the same question for...
	I'll show you something in a second.
	I had the same question for Jeremy because if they exploited Christine Anderson unwittingly, I would have had some moral issues with it, although I would still think the reaction was crazy.
	But now Jeremy told me...
	They prepped Christine Anderson for what they are, according to the Canadian media, and what would happen to her if she did it.
	And Christine Anderson, more courageous than many, said, screw this.
	We're going to make a point here as well.
	Uncle Kenny says, ask her about Diagon Friday 78. What is your problem with Diagon?
	Alexa, got it.
	Booyah.
	Now let me do this.
	Stop screen.
	Let me read some chats here.
	Did I forget any chats?
	Okay, we got Seize the Day.
	Bye, Felicia.
	I mean, Rachel.
	Honk, the truth wins.
	Oh, yeah, so Rachel Gilmore apparently is...
	Okay, and the neon sign is glaring.
	I think we've gotten used to it by now.
	Lighting is good.
	Anyhow, I'll figure it all out, but it's cool.
	All right, we're going to go to...
	Here's the diagonal.
	Now I know what the meme is.
	Where's my...
	I accidentally...
	Or not accidentally, but when I did the stream with Jeremy McKenzie, someone sent me a diagonal ring in the mail.
	And I showed it during the last stream.
	I have it in my alligator's mouth.
	I put it up on one of the things up here just to prop it up for a bit.
	Oh, dear God.
	People are going to accuse me of being a member of a radical extremist, ideologically motivated, violent extremist, anti-Semitic group.
	That's what I heard about them.
	All right.
	I'm giving you the link to Rumble.
	And then we're going to carry this party on over to Rumble.
	What time is it?
	It's 1:48.
	Okay, here we go.
	Boom.
	That's the link to Rumble, everybody.
	Ending on YouTube and to be continued in Rumble.
	And we got some stuff to come to.
	Nina Jankiewicz!
	Sorry, I didn't mean to scream.
	I'm having trouble controlling the module!
	We're going to YouTube to talk about Nina Jankiewicz and Justin Trudeau and some other fun stuff.
	3-2-1 on Rumble.
	Boom!
	Alrighty then.
	Okay, let's see, we're good.
	Let's get ready to locals.
	Oh my goodness.
	There's a picture of East Palestine in our locals community.
	What's been done there is an absolute.
	Absolute abomination.
	All right.
	Looks like we're good.
	Okay, so what do we want to do?
	Do we want to do Trudeau or Nina Jankiewicz?
	We're going to go with Nina Jankiewicz.
	We've got to.
	Nina Jankiewicz, also known as Scary Poppins, also known as...
	She had some other nicknames, which I'm not going to go in.
	I'm going to tell you one thing.
	My bias.
	I'm going to show you my bias.
	I am predisposed to like Nina Jankiewicz, Hank's wife in Breaking Bad.
	I am predisposed to like her because she looks exactly like Hank's wife in Breaking Bad.
	Now, I know Hank's wife in Breaking Bad wasn't necessarily the bestest of characters.
	I defy anybody to tell me that Nina Jankiewicz does not look like Hank's wife from Breaking Bad.
	I mean, it's actually uncanny.
	Hold on.
	That's Hank's wife.
	Nina Jankiewicz.
	Get ready.
	Images.
	It's uncanny.
	Especially that one.
	It's uncanny.
	So, I like Breaking Bad.
	I liked Hank's wife.
	And so when I look at Nina Jankiewicz, I still don't see Nina Jankiewicz.
	I still see Hank's wife.
	Setting that aside, Yeah, she was the kleptomaniac in the show.
	Nina is bat poop crazy.
	I've got to pull up her bio because you won't believe what her bio was to have been appointed to the Ministry of Disinformation of the Biden administration.
	Let me just get her...
	And you know that when the Wikipedia itself is somewhat prejudicial, you know that it's bad.
	For those who don't know who Nina Jankiewicz is, before we get into the fact that she's now asking for money to sue Fox News, speaking of grifts, Nina Jankiewicz, born yada yada yada, is an American researcher and writer.
	She is the author of How to Lose the Information War on Russian Use of Disinformation as Geopolitical Strategy and How to Be a Woman Online.
	A handbook for fighting against online harassment of women.
	She briefly served as executive director of the newly created United States Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board, also known as the Ministry of Truth.
	I mean, it's like, you know, Justin Trudeau calls it medical assistance in dying instead of euthanasia because euthanasia has some baggage to it.
	Previous regimes had called it...
	Mercy killings.
	Orwell called it the Ministry of Truth.
	Joe Biden's like, no one's going to like that.
	We have to call it something better.
	Let's think of something.
	The Disinformation Governance Board.
	Resigning from a position amid the dissolution of the board by the DHS.
	Hold on.
	Here we go.
	What is this?
	Career.
	Let me just get that out of here because I knew that that was the information I was looking for.
	A double major in Russian and political science.
	That's almost as useless as my double major.
	Honors philosophy, minor in Eastern European history.
	Imagine, I consider the minor good for nothing because I don't remember a damn thing of it.
	I consider my honors degree in philosophy.
	I wrote a thesis called Deontological Consequentialism, which I cannot find anymore because it was in my Yahoo account and they deleted my entire account.
	Sons of bitches, if I can swear one more time.
	I'll find a way to find my thesis and then I'm going to share that on Locals.
	I'm going to sell that on Locals.
	I'm going to grift off my McGill honors degree philosophy thesis.
	I need to find it.
	I need to find it.
	Okay, sorry.
	She graduated from wherever there's...
	She spent a semester in Russia.
	In 2010.
	In 2017, she was a Fulbright Fellow in Kiev working with the Foreign Ministry of Ukraine.
	She has also served as a disinformation fellow at the Woodrow Wilson and the Supervisor of the Russian and Belarus Programs at the National Democrat Institute.
	Just bear this in mind, that she served as a disinformation fellow.
	Now, it's not clear how they mean it.
	If she was battling disinformation, Or propagating disinformation.
	But I'll answer that question for you later on.
	Disinformation Governance Board.
	We know what happened.
	She was appointed.
	Her social media history quickly came to the fore.
	And she was mocked into oblivion.
	As was the...
	What did they call it?
	The Disinformation Governance Board was mocked into oblivion.
	It was actually mocked into dissolution.
	Did you just hear my stomach growl?
	If anybody just heard my stomach growl.
	She had a role, allegedly, in combating disinformation, and she was the best of the best that the Joe Biden regime, what do they call it?
	Handpicked her to spearhead the first ever disinformation governance board.
	She was mocked into oblivion.
	They dissolved the board when her social media past came up, and we're going to get there.
	But now she is asking for financial assistance to sue.
	Fox News and Tucker Carlson.
	Jack Posobiec, breaking the news.
	If you don't follow Jack Posobiec, I think everybody follows Jack Posobiec.
	You have to.
	I'm not going to play the full five minutes.
	You might play a lot of it.
	My name is Nina Jankiewicz.
	I'm Hank's wife.
	You may remember me from such amazing series as Breaking Bad, where I was a...
	Okay.
	I'm asking for your financial support of a lawsuit I want to bring against Fox News for their malicious, reckless lies against me.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Chat.
	Who right now is channeling, what's his face?
	Bernie Sanders.
	I would like to ask you once again for your support.
	I'm asking for financial support for a lawsuit that I have yet to file, that I might think of intended filing.
	Malicious, reckless.
	We've got to go through this.
	A year ago today, I realized a lifelong dream and entered public service as a U.S. government official.
	Okay, so it goes on.
	I'm actually nervous about the music.
	Okay, so let's go.
	She gets her job.
	It's a beautiful job.
	Fellow at the thing.
	I got to get to some of the stuff.
	Here we go.
	We got to get to what Tucker Carlson said about her.
	Okay, look at this.
	Look at this.
	The malicious lies is that they were not a disinformation governance.
	They were not the Ministry of Truth.
	They had no ability.
	To actually censor.
	They were just there to advise the government.
	Here we go.
	Here we go.
	This is it.
	Oh, don't do that.
	Oh, don't do that.
	What the flip?
	Okay, here we go.
	Let's try this again.
	I'm asking for your financial support of a lawsuit I want to bring against Fox News.
	Expand.
	Expand.
	This is very annoying, people.
	department ensure that its policies about its existing counter disinformation work were grounded in American values, privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.
	That's all the board was.
	It didn't have the authority to act on its own, but it would act on the recommendations of the Disinformation Governance Board.
	After my position was announced, baseless claims that the board was an Orwellian ministry of truth and I was President Biden's chief censor spread.
	Does she know what opinions are?
	Baseless accusations?
	No, that's pretty much what everyone thought this was going to be because that's pretty much what it was going to be.
	Wait until you hear some more of the baseless accusations as compared to reality.
	Even though the board had nothing to do with arbitrating or restricting speech.
	It just was there to assess, make recommendations that I'm sure would not have been acted upon.
	Distinctions without a difference, also known as disinformation.
	Overly personalized.
	I'm curious about that.
	False and incendiary.
	Let's get to the falseness.
	Mainstreaming online conspiracy theories to tens of millions of...
	There was one conspiracy theory regarding her gender that I don't think Fox promoted and I don't think anybody with half a brain as to what is relevant cared about.
	Americans.
	They lied about my role.
	Was hired to police domestic social media use, period.
	Is now the administration's official purveyor of truth.
	They lied about and completely manufactured my past statements.
	How chilling is it that this disinformation thinks it's okay for her to edit your speech?
	I think that had to do with a question as to whether or not...
	Oh, no, that's right.
	That had to do with her suggesting that other people, fact-checkers, should be allowed to add or edit or add context to social media posts.
	Can you believe that she's trying to raise money on the basis of a lawsuit to challenge the things that she's alleging are baseless, overly personal, and...
	Dishonest.
	These are things that she recommended, and as being described in other people's opinions, I mean, this is, it's, but give her money.
	They called me a liar.
	Nina Jankiewicz is a conspiracy theorist who wants all Americans to believe her twisted opinions and lies are facts.
	All right, so what's the accusation here?
	That she lied?
	Look, we're not going to do this for a full five minutes.
	There was something closer to the end that I think we should get to.
	Oh, now it's going to do the same thing again.
	Oh, is this annoying?
	I'm just going to go like this.
	Jankiewicz, I'm asking for your findings of millions of their viewers.
	Tens of thousands have harassed me online.
	Hundreds have violently threatened me.
	Threatened her with violence is different than violently threatened.
	In addition to the deferral of my dream of serving my country, I've lost something irreplaceable.
	Peace with my son during his first year in the world.
	Fox can't keep getting away with targeting Americans with their hateful rhetoric and lies.
	Trying to silence professionals doing their jobs is not journalism.
	It's vigilantism.
	Oh, I'm sorry, Nina.
	Are you talking about what the media has done to doctors over the last three years?
	Targeting, trying to silence?
	Are you talking about what the Biden administration has done for the last three years?
	Or are you talking about Fox News?
	This is the most egregious, in-your-face, categorical confession through projection imaginable.
	What they're trying to do is silence professionals doing their jobs.
	Hold on.
	I think I clipped that highlight.
	I want to get out of that particular one.
	I think I clipped that highlight.
	Here we go.
	This is it.
	Not now.
	Here, listen.
	Let's hear what she said again.
	To silence professional...
	Here we go.
	Listen.
	Just listen to this.
	Fox can't keep getting away with targeting Americans with their hateful rhetoric and lies.
	Trying to silence professionals doing their jobs is not journalism.
	It's vigilantism.
	And it's ruining lives.
	So that's what...
	Fox can't keep getting away...
	That's what they've been doing for the last three years.
	Vigilantism that has been ruining lives and they've known it.
	Like smearing and silencing Dr. Robert Malone.
	Like smearing and silencing Dr. Asim Al-Hatra.
	Like smearing and silencing Francis Christian.
	Dr. Francis Christian.
	Like smearing and maligning...
	Oh, geez, there's a lot more.
	Peter McCullough.
	No, no, no.
	It's...
	Fox can't keep getting away with it.
	By the way, what did she criticize Fox for having done?
	Spread lies and have called her a conspiracy theorist?
	Oh, Nina Jankiewicz.
	The internet is forever and people don't forget.
	Let's just go through some of Nina Jankiewicz's choice tweets when she is accusing others of lying about her being a conspiracy theorist or having spouted promoted lies in the past.
	Number one.
	This is her, by the way.
	She's got half America, half Ukrainian flag in her bio.
	I thought she looked like an astronaut in this picture.
	But no.
	Number one.
	What year was this?
	2016.
	November.
	Husband texted me, quote, you have news to wake up to, end quote.
	Never thought it would be this.
	Confirms our worst fears about Trump.
	I am horrified.
	I'm literally shaking in my boots.
	And who's she?
	Who's she retweeting?
	Hillary Clinton!
	It's time for Trump to answer serious questions about his ties to Russia.
	And it links to a Slate article.
	Four things you need to know about the Trump Organization's secret server to communicate with Russian Alpha Bank.
	Here's the first thing you need to know about it.
	It was a lie.
	Donald Trump has a secret server.
	Am I wrong, Chad?
	Has that not been thoroughly disproven?
	It was set up to communicate privately with a Putin-tied Russian bank called Alpha Bank.
	When a reporter asked about it, they shut it down.
	One week later, they created a new server with a different name for the same purpose.
	I'm fairly certain this was categorically disproven.
	This was part of the whole Russiagate hoax.
	That's the first one.
	Sorry, that's the same one.
	Let's go to number two.
	Nina Jankiewicz.
	It was a good week in November 2016.
	Trump had not one but two secret email servers to communicate with influential Russian bank.
	Unbelievable.
	You know who had secret servers and was communicating with Russians?
	The Democratic National Committee and Hillary Rodham Clinton.
	If we're actually trying to be factually correct here.
	Number two.
	Oh, look at this 2016.
	This one was earlier.
	Trump's...
	Kremlin ties don't end at Manafort.
	This is serious, people.
	Quoting Kyle Griffin, never seen anything like this in American politics.
	This is what they call the disinformation laundering.
	Hillary Clinton retweeting Slate.
	Nina Jankiewicz retweeting Hillary Clinton, retweeting Slate.
	Right now, it's Nina Jankiewicz retweeting Kyle Griffin, who's retweeting Hillary Clinton, and these circle of lies either get picked up by the media or were initially circulated by the media, then get re-referenced by the media, and what you have is a straight-up...
	What a wrap-up disinformation campaign.
	Mutatus mutatus from what Nancy Pelosi once described it as.
	Nina Jankiewicz, was this one more recent?
	Listened to this last night.
	Chris Steele.
	Yes, that Christopher Steele, the one who lied about the PP Hooker Russia Hotel Steele dossier story, that Christopher Steele, provides some great historical context about the evolution of disinformation.
	Worth a listen.
	But it's lies to have called her a conspiracy theorist, even though she fell for promoted and regurgitated.
	A now disproven conspiracy.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	Mueller couldn't exonerate Trump.
	He could only conclude that there was not...
	There wasn't what they said there was.
	In the chat, circle of jerks, circle jerk.
	Just the Alpha Bank story, I'm certain, was thoroughly disproven.
	I'm forgetting offhand, but I don't want to actually make a factually incorrect mistake.
	Holy crabapples.
	We got NERAC0.
	HRC took her server and classified documents.
	HRC was...
	Okay, I'm not reading the rest of that.
	Kyle Griffin is MSDNC.
	SeleniumMC says, don't forget Biden taking cash from Russians.
	It is unbelievable, says...
	So that's what Nina Jankiewicz claiming to be the victim...
	Is alleging were the lies of Fox News.
	I'm asking you once again to give me some money so I can think about suing.
	Give her money.
	Because Fox News lambasted this person because she was a liar, a conspiracy theorist, and she had been handpicked to lead the Disinformation Governance Board.
	Oh, and also, she did come off as somewhat bat poop crazy.
	Because if you're ever going to have someone in charge of The board, the disinformation governance board, what you want them to look like is this.
	information laundering is really quite ferocious it's when a huckster takes some lies and makes them sound precocious by saying them in congress or a mainstream outlet so disinformation's origins are slightly less atrocious it's how you hide a delighted lie Listen to what she says.
	How do you hide a little lie?
	Rudy Giuliani shared bad intel from Ukraine in the same way she shared bad intel from the DNC.
	Okay, let's see what the next step is.
	Oh!
	This is the point of the show where we're going to say we're kidding, we're making all this up.
	It's Tucker Carlson's fault.
	You think Nina Jankiewicz is crazy for that performance.
	Her voice isn't bad.
	And the message isn't all that bad.
	I mean, it's accurate.
	That's how disinformation laundering works.
	That's exactly what Nina Jankiewicz did with the Russiagate hoax.
	Oh, sweet, merciful goodness.
	So if you want to help her support her lawsuit...
	You know where to find her.
	You know where to find her.
	Give what you can.
	Help her along with her intent to think about contemplating potentially bringing a lawsuit.
	And that's it.
	While you're at it, I would suggest get that money.
	Just put it in a nice little pile.
	Douse some very, very fancy vodka on it.
	And then just set it on fire while you're at it.
	Probably be a better use.
	At least you can drink the vodka afterwards.
	Tucker for the win again.
	Blue Smoke 2222.
	So I saw that this morning and there was just no way not to talk about it.
	Because it's crazy.
	And imagine blaming the media for her losing her dream job because the government dissolved the Propaganda Ministry of Truth board because of the ridicule it got.
	But of course, I mean...
	They just got ahead of themselves.
	They didn't need the disinformation governance board.
	They already had their moles and their intelligence already firmly planted in Twitter.
	They just overplayed their hand, as they always do.
	Oh, yeah.
	So, someone gave her Twitter feed, her Twitter handle.
	I got blocked, like, real quick.
	I was surprised because I was talking about it.
	And other people are saying, wow, I'm blocked.
	I've never had anything to do with her.
	And I'm like, oh, I'm not blocked yet.
	And then five minutes later, I got blocked, obviously.
	Okay.
	Nina Jankiewicz.
	A lawsuit that is bound to fail if it ever takes off, and I guarantee you it will never take off.
	And then the only question is going to be, what happens to any money that anyone gave to that suit?
	Because I guarantee you, in the small print, it says, I may use this for my lawsuit, and if I use it for any other purposes, you will not come after me for reimbursement.
	Although, if anyone who did that for, you know, had done that for Build the Wall, they would still find a way to come after them for fraud and yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, that is it, Canada people.
	Um...
	Thank you.
	We talked about it yesterday with Richard Surrett.
	And if you didn't watch that stream last night, it was phenomenal.
	Richard Surrett is amazing.
	And I didn't even begin to tap into his knowledge and his wisdom.
	It has been alleged.
	It has been leaked by members of CSIS, which is Canadian's Secret Intelligence Committee.
	Something along those lines.
	Oh, CSIS.
	It's Canadian Secret Intelligence Services.
	It has been leaked to the media because Canada's Secret Service is so...
	What is the word when you've lost motivation?
	Discouraged?
	It's a disword, people.
	Despaired.
	They're so despaired and they're so demoralized, is the word I'm looking for, that they need to leak to the media.
	Recommendations that they gave to the Liberal Party that you might want to be careful because it looks like you kind of have been infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party.
	Disheartened, demoralized, corrupt are some of the Canadian Security Intelligence Services.
	Thank you.
	Demoralized.
	They're so demoralized.
	Disillusioned.
	Disenchanted.
	These are all synonyms.
	Castrated.
	Coming out of the Rumble chat.
	They had to go to the media because Justin Trudeau...
	was not listening to their recommendations that the liberal government, this is not, you know, both sides do it.
	No.
	The liberal government has been literally infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party.
	Now, bear in mind, these are just accusations.
	These are just allegations resulting from a leak from people who are in the CSIS, Canadian intelligence.
	And the journalist that broke the story is a reputable journalist with a track record of Accuracy.
	So you can't write it off that it's just some lunatic with a massive fro screaming at his camera.
	This is being reported by credible journalists.
	And it's effing shocking.
	And I'm going to say this.
	What Justin Trudeau's foundation just did, in my mind, confirms culpability.
	But let's start with the story.
	And it's not me.
	This one's coming out of...
	I had to make sure that it's a legit enterprise, which it is, the Niagara Independent.
	We're just going to read some allegations.
	This is Canada.
	Remember when Justin Trudeau said he had a basic admiration...
	Sorry.
	He had an admiration for the basic dictatorship of China.
	And I didn't know until I did the interview with Richard Surratt last night that his father also seemed to have had an affinity.
	For communists.
	Oh, look how beautiful.
	That's Justin Trudeau in front of the flag of China.
	As recently released, CSIS documents reveal the CCP, the Chinese Communist Party, and I'm not calling them the Beijing Party, because people will make a distinction between the Chinese Communist Party and innocent Chinese citizens and Chinese Canadians who are the victims.
	of the Chinese Communist Party.
	And when Justin Trudeau and any of his bought and paid for media try to refer to it as the Beijing Party to not promote discrimination against Chinese Canadians and Chinese citizens, they are actually empowering the abuse by the Chinese Communist Party.
	Went to great lengths to influence the outcome of Canada's two latest federal elections.
	While the major revelation makes top headlines across the country, the It doesn't just play it off as a non-issue.
	He suggests there's something racist about making this a big story.
	He suggests that he doesn't have to listen to CSIS because CSIS doesn't dictate who gets elected and who gets booted from office if it's determined that they were receiving funds from the Chinese Communist Party.
	No.
	Real democracy means security does not have any recommendation or any role to play in saying, boot somebody from your cabinet because they are a compromised Chinese asset.
	Not me writing this.
	Who is this?
	Chris George.
	Five-minute read.
	We'll read it in three minutes.
	The Chinese Communist Party covertly influenced Canada's 2019 and 2021 general elections in order to re-elect a liberal government.
	If they really did it, why would they do it to influence only a minority government?
	They would have done it for a majority...
	Sorry.
	I don't mean to make fun of stupid arguments.
	Let me steel man the stupid argument.
	If the Chinese Communist Party...
	We're going to interfere with Canadian federal elections.
	Why would they only do it to ensure a minority Trudeau government and not do it so egregiously and produce results that no one would ever believe in their right mind and cause it to result in a Trudeau majority government?
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Did I answer that stupid question by infusing it with facts that make it look like a stupid question?
	I went door to door in the 2021 election.
	Getting signatures to run for the People's Party of Canada.
	I live or lived in Westmount Notre-Dame-de-Grasse region that has gone liberal for the last three decades, save and except for one time when, because of the riding map, they went NDP when Jack Layton was involved.
	My riding goes liberal as a reflexive rule.
	I jokingly said I could have run my dog for the Liberal Party.
	I could have put vote Winston.
	For the Liberal Party, and Winston would have gotten elected.
	But over 50% of the writing votes Liberal.
	I don't even think they...
	So, I went door-to-door in that writing.
	I did not meet one person who liked Justin Trudeau.
	Now, some of you are asking, how would I know?
	If I'm running for the PPC, they wouldn't tell me they like Justin Trudeau.
	Well, when I went door-to-door, they didn't know who the...
	PPC was until I mentioned Maxime Bernier and some of them actually refused to even sign so that I could get my name on the ballot.
	Everyone hated Justin Trudeau.
	It's like everyone loves Raymond.
	Everyone hates Justin.
	Everyone.
	And even longtime liberals are saying, I don't know if I can vote for Justin this time.
	He's too much of a sack.
	I'm going to vote NDP.
	And I'm like, good, go waste your vote getting someone who's no better than Justin, you know, a seat.
	Nobody liked Justin.
	The idea that Justin could have secured a majority government, that would have been like Joe Biden getting 81 million votes.
	I'm joking.
	So the argument, well, if they're going to interfere, why wouldn't they just make sure he got a majority government?
	It's a stupid hypothetical.
	A, because it would be implausible, laughably so on its face, and require a little too much fortification.
	And B, A Trudeau minority government, when propped up by the noobs at the NDP, is not much worse than a Trudeau majority government.
	So, set that argument aside now.
	Prime Minister Justin Trudeau does not want Canadians to know about the Chinese operations in Canada.
	These are two threads that are woven through a never-ending story of intrigue, scandal, false narratives, serious matter, yada, yada, yada.
	Last Friday, the Globe and Mail published a full front-page story by veteran parliamentary reporter Robert Fyfe and Stephen Chase about a clandestine operation run by the CCP, the Chinese Communist Party, to undermine, sorry, to unduly interfere in the outcome of Canada's latest election.
	The new story begins, by the way, what does this sound like?
	What does this sound like?
	China employed a sophisticated strategy to disrupt Canada's democracy in the 2021 federal election campaign as Chinese diplomats and their proxies backed the re-election of Justin Trudeau's liberals, but only to another minority government and worked to defeat conservative politicians considered to be unfriendly to Beijing.
	Sounds a lot like that Time magazine article describing a secret cabal of well-funded individuals across all ideological spectrums who were changing the rules, changing the laws, controlling the flow of information.
	Thank you.
	We'll skip to the essential stuff here.
	Get that out of here.
	Two candidates.
	Misinformation about conservative foreign policy.
	Hmm, where does this sound familiar with?
	Having businesses hire international students to volunteer full-time for liberal candidates and providing cash refunds to donors for the portion of their donation not covered by federal tax credit.
	It's all allegations, people.
	In their news article, I'm just going to keep the...
	Paragraph I'm reading at the top.
	Fife and Chase also reported that the CCP is executing a strategic plan to target Canadian legislators, government officials, and business leaders, as well as academic and research and development institutions.
	Fang Fang would like to have a word with the CSIS.
	Blackmail, bribery.
	Remember a while back we talked about these...
	Apparent Chinese police stations or Chinese security stations on Canadian soil.
	They're only offering assistance to Chinese nationals.
	Oh yeah.
	It's assistance in that you have family back in China.
	We know where you live back in Canada.
	We can ruin your family's life in China if you don't do what it is that we're demanding that you do.
	That type of bribery?
	I mean, it all makes sense now.
	Looking back, but unfortunately, life can only be lived forwards.
	PM Trudeau's immediate response to the Global Mail front page story was to ignore the substance of the revelations, and he expressed concern over CSIS's leaked reports.
	Trudeau, in so much as said, move along, there's nothing to see here.
	It's certainly a sign that security within CSIS needs to be reviewed, and I'm expecting CSIS to take the issues very seriously.
	What's up?
	What do you want?
	It's on the floor.
	Get out of here.
	The dog...
	Got the bread.
	The dog got the bread.
	Take this and go give it to mum, please.
	Okay, well, I mean, it goes on.
	I'm going to share the link, although if you followed us on Locos, you would have already seen this.
	For years, Trudeau and his ministers have downplayed suggestions of foreign interference in Canada's elections.
	The past few months, Trudeau has denied possible interference or nefarious activities by the CCP.
	This is the same CCP that Trudeau's government was training Chinese soldiers on Canadian soil for winter conditions.
	I was going to swear.
	I was going to swear.
	Global News reporter Sam Cooper has also come forward with the evidence of a 2017 memo prepared for the PM that specifically warns of CCP influence on Canadian officials and institutions.
	The PMO memo was written by the Office of National Security and Intelligence Advisor at the request of the PM's Chief of Staff, Katie Telford, and provided the Privy Council clerk.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	I'm...
	I mean, I'll share it.
	It's worse than anybody could have actually possibly imagined.
	I mean, this is what it looks like when your government is penetrated by the cabinet of the world.
	I'm joking, but I'm not joking.
	You have Klaus Schwab talking about having penetrated over half of the cabinet of Canada.
	And Justin Trudeau, he was one of my young global leaders here.
	He's very good.
	He follows good orders.
	He implements things without questioning.
	He's a very, very good young global leader.
	WEF.
	By Klaus Schwab's own admission, penetrating half of the Canadian cabinet.
	Justin Trudeau.
	I mean, just to put it all together now.
	Training Chinese soldiers on Canadian soil for wintertime combat.
	Donating 16 tons of Canadian PPE to China in February 2020, knowing the pandemic is coming, as a result of which...
	Long-term healthcare facilities were under-equipped, ill-equipped, and suffered seriously terrible consequences as a result of being under-equipped.
	Justin Trudeau, what was it?
	The Trudeau Foundation taking hundreds of thousands of dollars from Chinese billionaires.
	And we talked about it yesterday.
	The person that Justin Trudeau suggested should look into this was the same person who was...
	Involved in the Trudeau Foundation when they were receiving funds from Chinese billionaires.
	Hold on, let me get that article.
	Don't trust me, by the way.
	Oh, but David, now you're trusting CTV News when you call them liars all the time.
	Sorry, sorry.
	Let me not mock the stupid argument.
	Let me just steelman it.
	Viva, aren't you a hypocrite for calling CTV News captured media, wholly bought media?
	Purveyors of propaganda and disinformation, yet you rely on them and trust them when they run a story revealing the corruption of the very government you suggest pays them off?
	Yes!
	First of all, I don't trust them as far as I can throw them.
	I use them specifically as the source because when they finally are compelled to bite the hand that feeds them.
	When they're finally compelled to tell the truth or to make admissions that run contrary to their historical narratives, to their historical defense of the government, you know that they are more credible of a source.
	Because if they didn't have to do it, they wouldn't do it.
	But they have to do it because it's too damn obvious now.
	And do I care where the information comes from when it's...
	A news source confirming that the Trudeau Foundation is going to return $200,000 donation over possible connection to China?
	Oh no, I'm going to use it.
	Because this means that it must be even truer that they are finally compelled to admit it.
	But even when they do admit it and they're compelled to rat out their boss, rat out the person that's been subsidizing their activities for years, they still have to cover his ass.
	Possible connection.
	It's possible.
	Trudeau Foundation to return $200,000 donation over possible connection to China.
	Listen to this, people.
	This is just, it's too much.
	The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation says it is returning.
	$200,000 it received seven years ago after a media report alleged a potential connection to Beijing.
	Do you see how they did it?
	So no.
	CTV News will remain government-subsidized propagandists, purveyors of disinformation, because even in the outrageous admission that they have to report on, listen to the qualifiers.
	Pierre-Ela Trudeau Foundation says it's returning.
	$200,000 received seven years ago.
	So long ago, you should have forgotten about it by now.
	After a media report, they won't say which one, alleged potential connections to Beijing.
	How many qualifiers do you have in there?
	The Globe and Mail, citing unnamed national security source, published a report on an alleged plot by the Chinese government to influence Justin Trudeau after he became liberal leader.
	The report alleged a Chinese billionaire was instructed by Beijing to donate $1 million to the Trudeau Foundation in 2014, a year before the liberals came to power under Trudeau.
	The report says that he...
	And a second wealthy Chinese businessman donated $1 million in honor of the elder Trudeau in 2016, including $200,000 to the foundation.
	You know, there's an old expression, I judge myself by the enemies I've made.
	Well, you can also judge yourself by the friends you've made.
	Indirectly, maybe directly, Chinese Communist Party is donating millions of dollars in honor of...
	A family member.
	I'm not sure that that's the type of honor that you want.
	Pascal Fournier, the president and CEO of the Trudeau Foundation now, which the prime minister has not been involved with since becoming leader.
	Isn't that convenient?
	Says the amount has been refunded.
	Oh, well, if it wasn't a problem, why would you refund it?
	Fournier's statement says, his statement, did anybody call him?
	Let me see, maybe they did call him.
	For additional statement.
	Fournier's statement says we cannot keep any donation that may have been sponsored by a foreign government and would not knowingly do so.
	Oh!
	We wouldn't knowingly do so and the only reason we're giving it back now is that a whistleblower from Canada's secret intelligence services ratted us out.
	Well, now that I've become aware of this problem, of which I was entirely aware beforehand, but now the public knows about it, we're going to give it back and we're going to try to make ourselves look virtuous in doing it.
	CTV News, could you run an article that makes us look virtuous while we admit to treasonous wrongdoing?
	The Canadian press could not immediately reach the individual at the center of the report by the Globe and Mail and said Tuesday he did not immediately respond to a request.
	This report by the Canadian press was first published March 1st.
	The moon sets above a Chinese flag in Beijing.
	Thursday.
	What a bizarre picture to use as the image.
	So, nothing to see here, people.
	And you're racist for thinking you see something.
	Oh, let me see here.
	So, OneToGo2017 says, even if Trudeau returns the $200,000 in campaign donations, the purpose of the donation was re-election.
	Returning loans is not justice.
	It accomplished exactly its intended purpose.
	Not just that.
	Interest?
	If you're lucky enough, you could get 5% interest if you have any money to invest with government bonds.
	But the argument goes you double your money every seven years if you're lucky.
	Well, that should be $400,000.
	Sorry, I got distracted.
	It's me again, Sai, says Viva on Fire today.
	Look, I get distracted by trolls sometimes and I get distracted by flattery.
	$200,000.
	Here it is.
	Thanks.
	Thanks.
	Mission accomplished.
	We've trained your soldiers.
	We've given you our PPE to the detriment of our own people.
	Oh, shit.
	We just got ratted out by a whistleblower in our Secret Service.
	I'll give it back.
	CTV News, Associated Press, be kind enough.
	Make me look good while you do it.
	Don't ask me too many questions.
	Oh, God.
	Excuse me.
	That wasn't a fart.
	That was the handles on my chair.
	Nothing to see here except the fall of your country into literal communism.
	I feel like an idiot because now, you know, I laughed early on in the pandemic.
	I didn't laugh.
	I saw that meme.
	It says the end stage or the next variant of COVID is communism.
	Canada has turned into a communist totalitarian regime under Justin Trudeau's leadership.
	No buts, no nothing.
	It's as clear as frickin' day.
	Oh, well, on that subject.
	Hold on one second.
	I noticed a chat.
	Right over here, good sirs.
	Here are two rumble rants.
	Uncle Kenny says his real father was a commie.
	Rachel Gilmore South.
	Okay, Uncle Kenny.
	So I'm not...
	I talked about it yesterday.
	I'm not going to revel in Rachel Gilmore being laid off by global news.
	I don't revel in her misery.
	Period.
	They're all going to learn the wrong lessons.
	And by the way, there will be infighting.
	Rachel Gilmore, she was doing it already in some of her tweets yesterday, is going to go after Global News.
	And maybe Global News would be profitable if they weren't a propagandist fecal rag that they are.
	And maybe they'd be able to employ their journalists if they weren't a propagandist fecal rag that nobody wants to even, you know, lie in a birdcage with, digitally speaking.
	And maybe the journalists would have kept their jobs if they had put a little pressure on their employers saying, no, the people want the truth.
	The people, despite what you think, are not stupid.
	And they can see through this crap.
	The people aren't cool with $800 or $600 million bailouts to print media.
	They're not cool with people getting their tax dollars to subsidize their own incompetence and demonizing of those very people.
	They're not cool with that.
	Do your job.
	Do it well.
	And typically, Success will follow.
	Typically.
	Not always.
	Sometimes there is no justice in the world.
	Okay, so let me see.
	Do I have anything more about Justin Trudeau being a closet communist?
	No, I am going to give Pleb a shout-out.
	And I know that he's going to clip this again and say, Pleb, behind the CPC...
	Jeez Louise, the P...
	The PPC.
	I said, my only problem with the PPC is that the letters are too close to the CCP.
	People's Party of Canada, the party for which I ran.
	And the CCP, which is the Communist Chinese Party.
	No, it's the Communist Party.
	Whatever.
	He does good work.
	And I won't apologize for saying that.
	And he's kind of funny.
	Here, hold on a second.
	Let's just give this a few seconds.
	Everyone needs to have this.
	Nobody needs to have that.
	I don't know what it is.
	Limited stock.
	I need to get one.
	Here.
	Ladies and gentlemen, it's the pleb.
	Ni hao.
	That should be enough.
	That should be enough for all of you to want to go check it out.
	The pleb may say idiotic things on Twitter, and he's damn well within his rights to do it.
	And I'm saying that tongue-in-cheek.
	But that's some funny stuff.
	Pleb has the sense of humor that if I were a bit of an edgier content creator, I would do.
	The music.
	The intro.
	Go watch it.
	But I think we might be done with Justin Trudeau destroying Canada and turning it into an absolute state of communism.
	I think we looked at this yesterday.
	Yeah, we did.
	This is just Canada arresting a pastor.
	Look at this policeman.
	Is there a reason you're blocking me from using the sidewalk?
	Obstruction.
	They're working here.
	Obstruction.
	They're working here.
	Look at this.
	I wouldn't pick a fight with this guy.
	They're arresting a pastor for protesting an age-friendly drag show.
	Stay out of their workspace.
	Do you mind if I ask you what he's being arrested for?
	Are you going to provide your identification?
	Pardon?
	Will you provide your ID?
	It's for you to answer the question.
	It's not a police state, people.
	If you say it's a police state, you're being hyperbolic.
	The amount of people who told me I was being hyperbolic when I said Canada's turning into a police state, that was during curfew when you couldn't leave your house after 8 o 'clock at night.
	I got called hyperbolic.
	No.
	You want to give me your ID so I can know who you are and where you live so that if you ask me a question and do something with the information afterwards that I don't like, I can show up at your house as a member of the RCMP?
	Show me your papers and I will answer your question, sir.
	Ow.
	I gotta stop banging this thing.
	Yeah, no.
	Canada's not a police state.
	This is totally a free country.
	Arresting pastors because they were protesting a...
	What do they call it?
	An age-friendly?
	Reimer arrested pastor.
	Pastor arrested for protesting a...
	An age-friendly drag show.
	Just trying to find one decent article.
	It's actually kind of amazing that more people are not reporting on this.
	Pastor Reimer.
	It's not Jim Reimer.
	It was Derek.
	News.
	It's amazing.
	This is the original story.
	It's amazing.
	The only outlets that will really cover it are the fringe ones so that people who don't want to believe this is happening in Canada can pretend it's not happening in Canada.
	Calgary pastor threatened with arrest.
	Well, we know how that story ended.
	For disrupting drag queen story time, Western Standard.
	Western Standard, I think, might have a bit of a bias.
	So if you want to write off the facts as being tainted by bias, go ahead.
	Full disclaimer.
	Pastor Derek Reimer is physically thrown out of a drag queen story hour being hosted by the Calgary Public Library.
	Remember, people, get mad at the pastor for protesting and not mad at the fact that there is a drag queen reading hour, story hour, being hosted at a public library.
	Play it here.
	Play it here.
	The cops just showed up to my house this morning wanting me to go down to the cop shop with them.
	I can't get a hold of my lawyer right now.
	And I'm not going to go with you guys.
	I'm not really sure what's all going on.
	So I'm not comfortable with that.
	Yeah, that's right.
	So you guys just do whatever you got to do.
	And I got to go to work.
	I'd be terrified.
	We'll take it from there.
	Guy's got a gun.
	Where is this guy from?
	Like, Boston?
	Mischief.
	Right.
	Okay.
	I understand.
	Totally normal.
	Mischief.
	Sure.
	Seriously, this guy sounds like he's out of goodwill hunting.
	I'm not impressed with playing games here.
	I'm not interested in playing games with you, so let me show up at your door without a warrant and ask you to come with me.
	We'll just take you to a government-designated quarantine facility.
	Okay.
	Change your mind.
	If you change your mind.
	Wow.
	That's actually terrifying.
	The video starts off with Reimer opening the door to his house.
	Yada, yada.
	We just saw that.
	But where is the video of him interrupting?
	Here we go.
	This is it.
	We're trying to read.
	We're trying to have a drag reading hour for children at the public library.
	Will you please leave?
	I thought it was a public library.
	It's your choice to deal with the police.
	Very abusive in there.
	I'll be fair to Reimer.
	He kind of took a dive here.
	He kind of looks like a European soccer player a little bit.
	Uh-oh, what just happened there?
	Oi!
	Kind of took a dive like...
	Oh, what is wrong?
	Right now, right now.
	We have the police coming, so it is your choice to leave or deal with the police.
	Very abusive in there.
	We are abusive.
	For love is love.
	That looks like very hateful.
	Mischief, by the way.
	Arrested for mischief.
	cuffed and halved.
	I think the problem is there's adults in there trying to have fun.
	Let's do sexually inappropriate things with children.
	For the children.
	We aren't supposed to be homosexuals and transgenders.
	Those that do this will not inherit the kingdom.
	Now I may disagree with what he's saying here.
	We're going to stay right here.
	Mr. Ramos, please, I can speak as I please...
	And I can speak my religion.
	And what happened in there is abuse, right?
	And they physically threw me out of there, which is all recorded.
	So I'm happy that their faces aren't recorded.
	You guys are indoctrinating children.
	Do we know what they were reading to the children?
	We're talking about it right here.
	And we're coming down to more and more of his shows to say that this is not okay, that this is wrong, that this is evil.
	To have a pervert trying stuff like that is wrong and evil.
	Stop yelling in the library.
	That's the mischief!
	He wasn't using his indoor library voice.
	The homosexual agenda is sweeping the city and the globe.
	We've got to come against this.
	We've got to stand against this.
	Now is the time.
	I'll disagree with Reimer and I'll tell you why in a second.
	I will disagree with Reimer.
	I do not believe homosexuality is a sin by any means, nor do I believe being transgender is a sin.
	Full stop.
	I believe that reading anything, sexualizing anything for kids is objectionable.
	Very seriously objectionable.
	And for those who are saying, well, It's not...
	It's just a drag queen or king.
	I don't know who's there.
	They're just reading ordinary books to kids.
	There's nothing sexual about it, to which I'll say it may be arguable, but I'll tend to agree with Jordan Peterson's take that the mere act of dressing up as another sex for the purposes of drag purposes is itself sexual by nature.
	Period.
	And that the only reason that people are deriving some form, the adults are deriving some form of pleasure by doing what they know is fundamentally naughty, by dressing up in drag and reading to kids.
	Because if nobody knew, and this was just reading to children, and someone was dressed in drag and nobody knew, the individual would obviously not derive the same sense of satisfaction that they do derive when everyone knows they're a man dressed up like a woman reading to children.
	Maybe that's controversial.
	I don't happen to agree with Reimer's position that homosexuality is a sin, but I'm not a religious person like that in any event.
	I understand people believe it's a sin.
	They're entitled to their beliefs in as much as they don't act out anything on an individual who they believe to be a sinner.
	There's plenty of people who believe I'm going to go to hell or that I'm a sinner for other religious reasons.
	They can believe those things so long as their beliefs don't interfere on my freedoms.
	But this is what can...
	That guy just got arrested on mischief.
	This, you know, same, presumably the same provision of law that Tamara Leach, Pat King, I'm dropping, I'm forgetting a name now.
	I'm forgetting names were arrested on and detained for, for lengthy periods of time.
	Uncle Kenny put up a link, a Twitter link.
	I don't know what it is.
	Let me see what I can use.
	So, anyways, that's it.
	Cops show up to your door days later as if we don't have, I'll say, real crime in Canada.
	As if we do not have actual real crime in Canada.
	That this is what our resources are being diverted to.
	We have real crime in Canada, people.
	And people might want to look into the massive spike in crime.
	Let me see here.
	Okay, there's a joke of Klaus Schwab penetrating the cabinet.
	So that's what's going on in the non-police state of Canada under the non-communist leader Justin Trudeau, who is not taking bribes from the Chinese Communist Party to ensure that his MPs get elected over conservatives based on foreign interference in elections through the use of disinformation as it relates to conservative parties.
	It's all not happening, and everything is good, and Justin Trudeau is good, and he is a supreme leader.
	And we should all thank him for his loyal service.
	All right.
	What do we have next?
	No, so I'm not bringing that.
	That's not what I want to bring up.
	Next.
	Okay, so hold on.
	We got Alexa Lavoie.
	So we're going to close that down.
	We're going to go back to the state stuff before we end here and then go to locals to...
	Let me see what's going on in the chat on locals.
	Oh, my goodness.
	There's 127 people watching.
	There's a lot of comments.
	And we're going to get...
	I'm going to get to the...
	Oh my goodness.
	There's some pictures in there.
	When we end on Rumble, you're going to want to go over to locals.
	I was going to bring up something.
	Oh yes.
	Okay, before we get back to the American...
	I don't often talk about my experience as a lawyer because I don't...
	I'm not good at flattering myself except to say that I'm short and I have very...
	Awkward-sized bow legs.
	And I can run good.
	I was sworn in in 2007 and practiced actively until 2017-2018.
	And practiced less actively until 2020.
	And then even after the COVID, when I had a couple of files left, I've got a decent amount of litigation experience and a decent amount of law experience.
	In Quebec, that's the only place I'm certified to practice.
	The insanity coming out of some legal minds in the US.
	It will make you laugh and cry and possibly vomit at the same time.
	We'll get there, but not after.
	I'm going to address a member of Canadian Parliament who's addressing me.
	So we've got to go all the way back.
	We've got to go all the way back on this thread here.
	Okay.
	Oh, it's so flipping good.
	It's so flipping good.
	Mark Gerritsen.
	The man who I've been needling because he has a foreign flag in his official Member of Parliament bio.
	It could be Ukraine.
	It could be any other flag.
	And I would have had the same questions from a serving Member of Parliament.
	You're flying a foreign flag in your bio.
	Who do your loyalties lie with?
	Am I wrong?
	And this would apply to anybody, by the way.
	And it will apply.
	If there's someone who has a Canadian flag and an Israeli flag in their bio as a sitting member of parliament, I'll ask the same questions because I have the same moral qualms with this.
	So this is not directed at Ukraine and I wouldn't give anybody a pass.
	You fly another flag in your official member of parliament bio while you are a sitting member of parliament.
	People will rightly question your loyalties.
	People will rightly question whether or not the policy that you're advocating for is good for the citizens you were elected to represent or the ones you are electing to represent in your Twitter bio.
	Okay.
	With that said, Mark Gerritsen, king of stupidity by my assessment on Twitter, the sitting conservative MP refers to this sitting conservative MP.
	refers to another sitting member of parliament as, quote, an agent of Beijing.
	I would say it's time to lawyer up, Blaine.
	So first of all, I'm not sure what parliamentary sovereignty, if it extends past the steps of parliament or where this individual is.
	This is Blaine Calkins.
	I don't know who he is.
	Let's see who this person is.
	We're going, we're going, this is like unthreading inception.
	Member of parliament for the federal constituency of Red Deer, Alberta.
	Shadow Minister for Hunting, Fishing, and Conservation.
	Okay.
	Doesn't have a foreign flag in his bio.
	He says...
	Blaine Culkin's Member of Parliament.
	I think this might have something to do with the story that we just read.
	I think.
	Hi, everybody.
	Blaine Culkin's Member of Parliament here at the Calgary Airport on Tuesday morning heading back to Ottawa to go to the Procedure and House Affairs Committee to try and get answers as to what Justin Trudeau knew when he knew it.
	what the liberals did about the information they had about one of their candidates hand on being an agent for beijing the guy's hand on the agents deserve answers i'm off to ottawa to try and get So the individual that he's talking about is an MP named Han Dong, unless I'm making a mistake, who was the recipient of aid funds.
	Apparently, like, his nomination...
	It was basically orchestrated by Chinese Communist Party interests.
	They apparently bust in students.
	They bust in the elderly, who apparently, as per the CSIS leaks go, had Handong's name written on their forearms because they didn't know what the hell they were doing, why they were there.
	Apparently, Justin Trudeau knew this.
	And Justin Trudeau came out the other day, if I can find the clip before the stream is over, I will, and said, CSIS doesn't get involved in democracy.
	It's not because CSIS says something that I have to do it, because that's not how democracy works.
	How democracy works is Chinese interests, the Chinese Communist Party, influencing who gets elected by spreading disinformation about the conservative candidate in that writing.
	Hi, everybody.
	Blaine Culkin's member of parliament.
	I want to hear what he said again.
	Here at the Calgary airport on Tuesday morning.
	Heading back to Ottawa.
	Heading back to Ottawa.
	Procedure in House Affairs Committee.
	I want to try and get answers as to what Justin Trudeau knew when he knew it.
	What the liberals did about...
	The information they had about one of their candidates being an agent for Beijing.
	Canadians deserve answers.
	I'm off to Ottawa to try and get them.
	Well, that doesn't sound bad to me, but maybe I just lost my sensitivity.
	Mark Gerritsen says this sitting Conservative MP refers to another sitting MP as an agent of Beijing.
	Lawyer up.
	Why?
	I mean, do we now have...
	A sitting MP threatening another sitting MP with a lawsuit?
	Is that a problem?
	I mean, did you just accuse another sitting MP of having broken the law?
	Because that's defamation.
	Accusing someone of having committed a crime when they didn't is potentially defamation.
	And maybe even more so in Canada because we have looser defamation laws that are more...
	Plaintiff friendly, that is to say the defamed friendly, than the defamer friendly.
	It seems to me that Mark Gerritsen is suggesting that Blaine Calkins may have done something illegal.
	Is it time for him to lawyer up?
	I shouldn't have called him a dumbass.
	You literally have the flag of a foreign country with strong Nazi ties in your bio as a sitting member of parliament.
	You dumbass.
	Lawyer up, Mark Gerritsen.
	The thing is, these are things that you would, I would have said this in person, and it would have had my loving, humorous tone, like, you dumbass.
	But no.
	So then what happens here?
	What happens here?
	And I write, in case of the inevitable bloc, Liberal MP for Kingston and the Islands, Parliamentary Secretary for the Government House Leader, let's fight back.
	Let's fight back alt-right.
	Let's fight back alt-right populism together.
	Something wrong with populism, Mark?
	Are the people not entitled to think they know what's best for them?
	No.
	We have to defer to your corrupt regime, your corrupt compromised regime.
	So I said, in for the inevitable block, to which he says, block?
	Are you kidding?
	You're the reason I do this.
	I have no problem putting your blatant ignorance on full display so that people know what we are really up against.
	Good.
	He has not accepted my invitation.
	To come on and talk about the corruption within his government.
	Does this go further back?
	No, it doesn't go further back.
	He has not accepted.
	Mark Gerritsen, you have an open-ended invitation to explain why you are flying the flag of a foreign country in your official MP bio while you are a sitting MP.
	You have an open-ended invitation to come and explain whether or not the Chinese Communist Party has infiltrated the Liberal Party.
	You have an open-ended invitation to come onto my channel The 10,064 deaths by government-sanctioned killing, euthanasia, medical assistance and dying in 2021.
	You have an open-ended invitation to come on and explain why Canada is siphoning billions of dollars to Ukraine to fund foreign conflict, which is resulting in the death of foreign citizens.
	It's not your own.
	They're not your kids, Mark.
	You have an open-ended invitation to explain why you're siphoning...
	Billions of dollars to fund foreign conflict while we can't even subsidize our own hospitals properly and people are actually dying in the ERs across the country.
	Open-ended imitation.
	And by the way, you want to see how a discussion goes with someone who I consider to be an ideological adversary?
	You can watch my interview with Eugene Gu.
	It will be respectful, but you'll never come because you are disingenuous, dishonest, and you cannot answer these questions without lying.
	And so your best bet is to avoid them altogether, as you've done.
	Put a fork in it.
	Put a fork in it.
	All right.
	And then just to get back to the Canadian.
	Oh, geez, it's three o 'clock.
	I'm going to be on with Jimmy Dore at four o 'clock and I've got to take this after party.
	Oh, you know what?
	I'm going to save this for the after party in Locals.
	We're going to end it now.
	I'm going to share the link to Scary Poppins stream.
	Put it in Rumble.
	Everybody, thank you for coming.
	Thank you for joining.
	Thank you for being here.
	Snip, clip, share away.
	Let the world know.
	For all of those who are screaming into the void, you are not screaming alone.
	And may we all scream into the void together and maybe somewhere...
	Someone on the other side of that void is going to hear the truth.
	Stop promoting locals, my man, Sid Loho.
	Thank you for the advice and no.
	And what you'll also notice, by the way, there's a little red button underneath the Rumble page that says join.
	You can join me on locals if you want.
	No pressure.
	Who said that?
	Sid Loco?
	Sid Loho, you might also be surprised.
	Some people actually take enjoyment in supporting creators that they appreciate.
	Some people actually would want to do it.
	And if they don't know where, that's where you can do it.
	Much in the same way that I enjoy supporting fundraisers, charities, and causes that I thoroughly believe in.
	I donated the first $1,000 to Jeremy McKenzie's Give, Send, Go campaign that I set up for him.
	There was someone in our locals community the other day whose dog suffered a slipped disc, and they actually spent the money on the surgery.
	And now they're trying to recoup some of their losses, and I gave them $180.
	Even though it's not callous, we did not do that surgery on Pudge when she slipped her disc.
	It was my sister-in-law's dog at the time because I don't believe in more callous.
	I don't believe in investing that amount of money into a dog where you have a child's education to pay for, but I genuinely appreciate that some people would do anything and would go into debt for their dogs.
	KC15 says Alex Jones.
	That's Alex Jones was right.
	Okay, so the next story, which we're going to cover, I'll just give you a little glimpse.
	Lawrence Tribe with possibly the most idiotic take in the history of constitutional law.
	I just woke up the dog.
	I'm sorry.
	So everybody, you have the link to locals.
	Let's go have the after party there and address some of the locals' chats and tips.
	Thank you for being here.
	Four o 'clock, Jimmy Dore this afternoon, people.
	It's going to be Beautiful.
	And now I'm going to end this stream on locals.
	No, on Rumble by going to live stream.
	I'm hitting the end.
	I'm just going to say end live stream.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com And what else?
	I know that I have to play something because Rumble tends to cut the last few minutes of the video.
	So I'm just going to talk for two more seconds.
	And now we're done.
	See you all on Locals.
	Everybody else, if you're not going to go, see you Sunday night for what is going to be an amazing stream.
	I was going to talk about the Murdoch conviction today, but we'll talk about that Sunday night.
	I didn't watch enough of the trial to be any form of an authority to have an opinion on it.
	I have an opinion.
	If you want to hear it, we'll talk about it Sunday night with Barnes.
	VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com.
	Go enjoy the day, enjoy the weekend.
	Locals, I'm a-coming!
	I'm a-coming, Pa!
	Yes, we're ending it here.

▲