Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 1, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:58:38

MSM, American Heart Association, and SportsIllustrated GASLIGHTING! Viva Frei Live!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Based on Article 195, it would have been more appropriate for Mr. Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, to address this House according to Article 144, an article which was specifically designed to debate violations of human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, which is clearly the case with Mr. Trudeau.
	And with the Prime Minister of Canada, the way he's behaving right now, he's exactly like a tyrant, like a dictator.
	He's like Ceausescu in Romania.
	If even you doubt, if you raise doubts about the vaccines, you're outcasted.
	What's the difference between what he does and what happened under the Inquisition?
	See, on one side they say, well, we should not believe in God, but on the other side they say, believe in science.
	What happened there?
	You don't have to.
	Science is not about belief.
	Science is about...
	Measurements, conclusions, hypotheses, and arguments.
	Not when it comes to arguing science with tyrants.
	Good evening.
	Good afternoon, everybody.
	I could have gone on for another five minutes with that clip.
	I'll post it in the chat so you can all go and enjoy it.
	But I see our guest in the backdrop, and I'm not asking or expecting...
	Christine Anderson to wait one minute longer because we have a tight time frame.
	So I'll do all the standard stuff afterwards.
	Right now we're bringing in a member of European Parliament, Germany.
	I was trying to do some research this morning, but the internet just says that she's far right.
	Christine Anderson is in the backdrop.
	She was the first person you saw in that five minutes of Justin Trudeau getting roasted at the international level as he so deserves.
	Christine, I'm bringing you in in two, one.
	Christine, thank you very much for being here.
	How goes the battle?
	Well, it's going.
	It's going.
	I guess the 30,000-foot overview for people who may not know who you are, but I think everyone watching here probably does, but give us the overview.
	Well...
	I strongly believe in, you know, freedom, democracy and the rule of law.
	And I will call out anyone who is trying to take that away from the people.
	I really have made that my mission.
	And if that someone happens to be the prime minister of Canada, well, then he'll get called out by me.
	So I'm not kidding around with this.
	So, yeah, that's what I do.
	You've been a member of parliament since 2019, from what I understand?
	Exactly.
	What does that look like for those who don't have any idea as to how European Parliament works under the European Union?
	What does that look like?
	What does your job entail?
	Well, I mean, you know, in theory, as any parliament, we should or are the institution that controls government.
	On EU level, it's a little different.
	Really have any competencies.
	We are not really a parliament, at least not by the standard of democratic principles.
	So we do not control budget or anything like that.
	The only thing we can do is write nice letters to the EU Commission, who, by the way, was not elected.
	They are pretty much running the show.
	So we can write nice letters and asking them.
	It would be really nice if you could do this, that.
	And if they don't, then they don't.
	There is really no recourse.
	We won't have any repercussions.
	So this is really a democracy illusion.
	They're trying to uphold the facade of democracy, but this place has nothing to do with democracy.
	President of the Parliament, Martin Schulz, who is from the Social Democrats, as a sitting President of Parliament, he once said, if EU was a state applying for membership in the EU, it would have to be denied for lack of democratic structure.
	That says it all.
	Now, the question is going to obviously be then, what do you hope to accomplish as a politician if it's nothing more than being a cog in a wheel that doesn't do anything, doesn't go anywhere, but certainly never goes away?
	To be uncomfortable, because they have gotten way too cozy in here.
	And for the most part, the...
	The MEPs here, they really think they're godlike.
	They're untouchable.
	And, you know, if they're in their bubble and they're reaffirming themselves, you know, and confirming themselves, yeah, we're just doing everything the correct way here.
	It's all good.
	So I'm really there to point out how anti, it's not undemocratic, it's actually anti-democratic, how this place works.
	So we are here to point all of this out to the people and to make them realize they may think this is a democratic institution.
	It is not.
	And you can only do that if you are part of this institution.
	And on top of that, I mean...
	I often get asked, well, if you want to abolish the EU Parliament, for instance, or to tear down the EU institutions, why do you run to be a member in that place?
	Well, that's very simple.
	We do live in a parliamentary representation.
	The only way to achieve change is...
	So, of course, you have to be part of a parliament if you want to achieve change.
	And that's what I set out to do.
	And I will continue to do just that.
	But we are really here to just, yeah, show the people that they're being lied to.
	That they're being gaslit, that they're being manipulated, they're being told all these nice things, you know, we're going to live in a better world if you just let us run the show.
	No, point out, no, it's all lies.
	They're covering up the kind of world they want.
	You will not play a part in this.
	If we can just go back all the way to the beginning, born and raised in Germany?
	Yes.
	And what did you do before going into politics?
	Because you got into politics by many accounts later in life.
	What were you doing before?
	Well I was actually a housewife.
	I was a stay-at-home mom.
	I raised three children.
	And yeah, in 2000, I've always voted for the Christian Democrats and the Liberals.
	They were, you know, the former conservative parties in this country.
	And in 2005, I did vote for them the last time.
	2009, I could not vote for them anymore, so I voted in ballot.
	And in 2013, I heard there was a new party being founded.
	And, you know, just from...
	They were EU skeptics, Euro skeptics, and I was like, whoa, what is going on here?
	So getting into politics and becoming a member of that party, that was literally an act of self-defense because I could not stand the way they were trying to really abolish democracy and the rule of law.
	It's interesting.
	You say active self-defense is a very interesting way.
	I didn't get elected, but I felt compelled to run, knowing it was a lost cause, but thinking maybe it wasn't for the same reasons.
	But in Europe now, Brexit is in what year?
	Brexit's 2016, right?
	I'm sorry.
	Yeah, that was voted on 2016, but it didn't actually come into effect until January 31st of 2020.
	That's unbelievable.
	I know.
	They tried everything to undo this.
	Everything.
	But now, so what is the state now with the UK in the European Union?
	How is that working?
	Are they outsiders or has it changed nothing from a practical level?
	No, they are no longer part of, no longer member state of the EU.
	They are now negotiating all kinds of contracts in terms of trade and visa and all of this.
	But what I can say, I mean, before it actually happened, They draw this picture of, you know, once January 31st of 2020 comes around, you know, there's going to be thunder and lightning and Great Britain is going to be wiped off the earth, you know, a huge tidal wave.
	They will just, you know, be gone from the planet.
	That's how they kind of like, you know, fear-mongering.
	The classical fear-mongering.
	If you guys actually do leave, you know, you will die.
	Your country will be wiped off this planet.
	Nothing happened, did it now?
	On the contrary, when you look at the economic data, which were predicted to go way down and they were going to fail utterly, none of that happened.
	None of that happened.
	Where did you learn to speak English?
	Your English is not only impeccable, it's almost accent-free.
	Well, it's not nearly impeccable, but thanks for the compliment.
	I lived in the United States for six years, so yeah, I...
	I picked up that American accent.
	The Americans really didn't number on me for that one, didn't I?
	It's a good accent.
	Okay, so you have the Brexit movement.
	There was fear that it would spread to the other European Union nations.
	There was not just fear-mongering.
	I think there was outright extortion.
	Were they not threatening to frustrate the UK's economic capabilities to exist as a lone entity in Europe?
	Of course.
	I mean, they played every card they had and every trick in the book.
	They thought of everything.
	And they were really trying to prevent that.
	There were even talks about we have to redo the popular vote that they took in Great Britain to kind of redo it.
	But they weren't successful.
	And yes.
	I said back then, I mean, with that referendum they took in Great Britain and then actually leaving, that was the first brick out of the wall.
	So now it's established.
	Oh yes, it is possible.
	You can leave this place if you set your mind to it and you really want to.
	That's, I mean, this president, that's what they were trying.
	To prevent, but they weren't able to.
	So, I'm pretty sure in the years to come, there will be more countries, especially, I would guess, Eastern European countries, because the thing is, they remember what it felt like to live under foreign rule.
	They endured totalitarian Soviet rule, and they still remember how it felt.
	Do recognize the mechanisms and the signs for this, and they're very alert, and they're seeing it all over again.
	Now, this time, they're not put down by force, but by rewards.
	Well, we give you more money, we'll give you more money, and we do this, that, and the other.
	But in essence, it is the same.
	So I'm pretty sure there will be more countries that will leave this anti-democracy.
	What's Germany like on this front?
	They seem to be...
	I sort of understood that Germany was sort of like the bigger player in all of this, but maybe the ones that's financing a lot of the other less successful nations.
	You know what?
	If Germany actually were to leave EU, party is over.
	It's as simple as that.
	With these absurd programs they put into place here.
	And, you know, I mean, it has nothing to do with actually improving people's lives.
	It is all about ideology.
	You know, this whole identity politics madness that's going on.
	You have this climate idiocy going on, this gender idiocy going on.
	It's ideology, but none of that will actually improve regular people's lives.
	On the contrary.
	They have to finance it all.
	And like I said, if Germany were to leave EU, the party is over.
	Is there any movement in Germany to make that happen?
	Or are they content with the status quo?
	Well, you're looking at it.
	No, I'm just kidding.
	No, my party actually, I mean, this place is, like I said, anti-democratic.
	And anyone...
	You know, that is a Democrat and really believes in freedom, democracy and the rule of law.
	You have no other choice but to leave this place.
	So you really have to do it.
	But we are in a minority.
	And as you have stated, of course, we are right wing.
	So, you know, it's suspicious.
	I say that as a joke.
	I'm called right-wing, and it makes so little sense for so many obvious reasons.
	It's the alternative for Deutschland, the alternative party for Germany.
	Is it your political party?
	Yes, it is.
	Exactly.
	Okay, so the question I had was this.
	I've never actually had a member of European Parliament on, so I've never gotten to ask these questions.
	Okay.
	Is the EU...
	Not basically in bed with the WHO, the WEF.
	Have they not been fully infiltrated by these?
	I'm starting to sound like Alex Jones, even in the question.
	Are they not fully compromised, fully infiltrated by the WEF and the WHO and basically subservient to global interests?
	It certainly looks like they are, right?
	I mean, they're doing their bidding.
	Whatever comes from WHO, whatever comes from WEF, or whatever international organization, you know, I call them globalitarians, you know, whatever is coming out of their offices or whatever notebook they have or whatever playbook they have, they fall just right in line.
	But it's not only EU.
	I mean, just look at it.
	It's literally every single government in every single...
	Western democracy.
	They are in lockstep with all of these ideas, agendas, issues, whatever.
	But from a practical point of view, and that's how they look at these things, it is much easier to deal with one entity, that being EU, than having to deal with 27 different national member states.
	You get it?
	They want the EU to become the super state, you know, because then all they have to do is, you know, get Funderland in line and they wouldn't have to talk to 27 prime ministers of all of these different countries.
	It's making things much easier.
	There you go.
	I was listening to Carl Benjamin, Lotus Eaters.
	I don't know if you know who he is, but talking about how, you know, it becomes much easier if all of Europe just becomes districts of the European Union or the WHO.
	And that does not only hold true for, I mean, all these organizations.
	It also holds true for big business, you know?
	I mean, if they had to lobby 27 different decision makers in the countries, that's hard work.
	So you just come here to Brussels, you speak to one person, and it all goes your way.
	Gosh, life can be so easy, can't it?
	No, I had to look it up just to make sure.
	There's a Christine Anderson on the WEF, but she doesn't look like you.
	You don't have one of those profile landing.
	She looks blonde.
	It doesn't look like you at all.
	I wouldn't even put it past them that they would try something like this, just to discredit me.
	It's amazing.
	I see Christine Anderson, Senior Managing Director, Global Public Affairs, Blackstone.
	But it's not, it's clearly not, it's not you unless you look...
	I swear to God, it's not me.
	Actually, now that I have you here, I won't keep you past 30 minutes.
	And before we get into Justin Trudeau, and I'm going to ask you the tougher question as to why Germany is not much different in their response to COVID as the rest of Europe compared to Trudeau, except less hypocritical.
	The war, Ukraine and Russia, and...
	The role that Germany plays in all of this, how do you account for what appears to be European nations, the Western world, marching quickly towards an escalation to World War III?
	How do you account for this from the interests of Europe, Poland, Germany in particular?
	What accounts for this?
	It appears to be a race to World War III.
	Well, what accounts for this?
	Stupidity.
	No regard for the people, contempt for the people.
	They attempt to get it their way so they can make a buck.
	I don't know.
	It seems complete and utter nonsense what they're doing.
	But on the other hand, it's like, I really don't know what to say anymore.
	I mean, I was, you know, obviously born and raised in Western Germany during the Cold War.
	And there's always been, you know, this threat.
	Of World War III, and we all knew back then that was going to be a nuclear war.
	I mean, really, Putin sitting in Russia?
	And let's be clear about this.
	He doesn't seem to be particularly stable.
	Should you back someone who obviously is not stable, should you back him up into a corner where he has nowhere to go?
	Then, you know, to confront and to go forward.
	And this guy is sitting on nuclear weapons.
	Hello?
	Have they not heard about this?
	So, I mean, I'm just stunned.
	And I really don't know what to say about this.
	But interesting is, though, I mean, when you look at, I mean, what role does Germany play in all of this anyway?
	I mean, yeah.
	Please, let's blast our power supply, you know, North Ring 2. I'm not interested in that.
	You haven't heard a single word from the German government on that.
	Do we know?
	Have we found out who sabotaged the pipeline?
	No.
	Well, they don't seem to be interested in finding out.
	But I can tell you this.
	Had there been the slightest shred of evidence that actually Putin did this, Oh, boy.
	The papers would have been full of it.
	We would have been, you know, from morning to end, to the evening, they would have unloaded their speculation.
	We didn't hear a thing, did we?
	Well, I'm going to ask, if it's rumorings, or if you're allowed to disclose any knowledge you have, rumorings are that it was, it might have been America that did it.
	If, hypothetically, it was America...
	There's all kinds of rumors going around.
	The point is...
	Like I said, had there been a shred of evidence that Putin was behind this, they would have shoved this down our throats.
	But we did not hear a darn thing about this.
	So I know who it wasn't.
	I'm perfectly clear on that.
	But I don't know who actually did it.
	I have no idea.
	And once again, they do not want to know, apparently.
	Because, you know, the info might...
	Yeah, it might upset the public.
	Well, it might implicate an ally.
	Are there rumors, suspicions among the free-thinking members of European Parliament that America did it, and if it were known, that would cause something of a rift between Germany and U.S. relations?
	Well, obviously, we are talking about this, and we are saying, well, if this happened, or if that were the case, then this, that, and the other.
	But we don't know.
	And our government doesn't seem to be in the least bit interested in finding out what actually happened.
	That in and of itself is explicitly suspicious.
	I know.
	What has the winter been like now?
	Because there was talk of a winter of doom and destruction.
	I've heard that in France, they're actually at hotels telling people to turn off their heating at night.
	All sorts of energy protective measures.
	Has the poop hit the fan in Germany?
	Well, no, it hasn't.
	And, well, one of the ministers who was in charge of power supply and all of that, he must have struck a deal with St. Peter because he said it was like August or September.
	He was trying to reassure the public and he was saying, well, our gas supply will last through winter if it doesn't get cold.
	And guess what?
	Can you imagine?
	But like I said, he must have struck some kind of a deal with St. Peter because it wasn't that cold.
	We had like one week in the beginning of December, it was pretty cold.
	And now another week here, but it's not that cold.
	So no, it really hasn't happened.
	But in all the public buildings, they turned down the temperature to 19 degrees Celsius, which is cold.
	If you just sit there, you know, and...
	Do work or sitting work.
	It is simply too cold.
	But no, there have been a couple of blackouts here and there, but it was, you know, regionally contained.
	So no, nothing really happened.
	But winter is not over yet.
	So we don't know what happens.
	And yeah.
	No, no, they're going to say, if it hasn't been too cold, it's because of global warming.
	Now they're going to have to lock everyone down for another reason.
	Yeah, right.
	they really do not know how to pay their energy bills anymore.
	And you see that in bars or whatever, you know, when they're outside sitting and when it's cold, they had like these heating lamps and they shut them off because they simply I mean, we're not talking about triple or quadruple.
	By factor 20. Because we saw there was a graph circulating in North America.
	It's not an exaggeration.
	They've gone up by a factor of 10 plus.
	Yes.
	That's energy cost.
	So there's no energy shortage because everyone's shutting it down, but they are actually...
	That's the increase of energy cost, which...
	Exactly.
	Oh, my goodness.
	Yeah.
	But hey, we're saving the planet.
	They're never going to save the planet because they're not going after the root causes, which as far as I'm concerned are those international freight liners, but whatever.
	They can take a few cars out of the area.
	Okay, so that's WEF, sort of WHO.
	Let's get down to, you know, a lot of people in the West maybe had not heard of you until your...
	Your free expression against Justin Trudeau.
	Why was Justin Trudeau even there?
	Is he as much of an embarrassment laughing stock at the international level as we think he is?
	And how does he get through the day knowing that he is hated by his people and loathed by his colleagues?
	Well, I mean, look at him.
	He is so ridiculous, you know?
	I mean, I was in plenary when he was holding a speech, and I really...
	I made an effort to listen to what he was saying because, you know, I wanted to make fun of it or attack it or whatever.
	I wasn't capable of keeping up my, you know, just staying with him.
	It was so utterly boring.
	He is, to me, he is a laughingstock.
	But he was here because, you know, Russia, Putin invaded Ukraine.
	And so they decided to fly him into parliament to lecture us on democracy and, you know, the rule of law and all of this.
	And so, I mean, whenever there is like a gathering here, I think they had like a EU summit or whatever.
	So there were a couple of world leaders in Brussels anyway.
	So they, yeah.
	They just invited him to lecture us on principles of democracy.
	And the way he chose to do it, oh gosh.
	I was like, really?
	That's the best guy they can come up with?
	Seriously?
	But is he, I mean, you are, you know, you're qualified as whatever, right wing, whatever.
	Is he actually secretly loathed by everyone in European government?
	No.
	There are people who actually like him.
	Oh yeah, there are.
	Of course.
	Tons of them.
	Lots of them.
	Because, like I said, they're all in lockstep.
	You know, members of government who are kind of hoping, you know, to benefit from being part of the club, they like him.
	Of course they do.
	I can't understand it.
	Him coming in and lecturing on Putin while he literally violently suppressed a peaceful protest here.
	It's like, I just have to assume everybody has half a brain and can see through.
	Make no mistake, it's not just Trudeau.
	It's every single Western democracy that is going about these things.
	So we just had, you know, a study brought out yesterday and it was the impact.
	The effect of communication and disinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
	And then we study the impact of fundamental rights violation in the COVID pandemic.
	But make no mistake.
	Yeah, they are talking about, yeah, well, there have been, you know, violations of fundamental rights.
	But it was all necessary.
	We need to save lives and da-da-da.
	And everything they did, this is basic.
	This committee is just, the purpose of this committee is to justify it all.
	So, I mean, you know.
	Yeah, of course, they all love Trudeau because, I mean, he was marching in front of the parade and he was showing everyone how brave he would push down his own people.
	Well, like I said, don't expect proper behavior from...
	Tyrants, Putin and whomever, when you've lost the moral standing to lead, and it's a bad influence where other people in Germany are like, well, okay, let's do something similar, but not as bad as Trudeau, and therefore we can get away with it, and he takes the brunt of the criticism.
	I know.
	Well, the point is this.
	I mean, they are going about it in a much more clever way.
	I mean, you know, they are not rounding up people and locking them up.
	No, they're luring them in.
	We live a better life and we're safe for the planet.
	And, you know, we will live in a better world.
	And, you know, you're morally righteous if you, you know, get vaccinated.
	All of this, you know, it's pretty much they're short-coding it all.
	But, you know, that's the thing I always say.
	I mean, totalitarianism, it never starts out by rounding up people and locking them up.
	I mean, then all hell would break loose.
	No!
	Little steps, one step at a time.
	And before you know it, you know, you may not have any recourse left to do anything about it.
	You said they weren't locking people up, but they did have government-designated quarantine facilities here where they were bringing people, oftentimes without even the right to consult counsel?
	Yeah, I understand.
	What I meant by saying that, they were not systematically, you know, rounding people up.
	That's the end of totalitarianism.
	Once you're at that point, there is nothing you can do about it anymore.
	Now is the time.
	Now you're coming to Canada in, well, I guess next week, right?
	Well, it's February 16th.
	So the first venue is like February 18th.
	And what's the purpose of your tour?
	Well, I just want to meet the people who have given to so many people, millions of people around the world, hope.
	Because that's what the people needed.
	They didn't know what to do anymore.
	They saw something was going on.
	They saw it was wrong.
	But, you know, they were discriminated against.
	They were ostracized.
	They were, you know, made laughing stock.
	They were labeled right-wing extremists.
	I mean, the whole shebang, all of this went on.
	And then there were, you know, the Canadian truckers.
	And they just decided to set their trucks on rolling.
	And these trucks did not only roll in Canada.
	No, they roll all over the world.
	And that spark of hope, that actually, yeah, it started right there.
	People took to the street and they said, well, yeah, if they're doing this in Canada, my government is doing this.
	Yes, we need to do something.
	So I just really want to meet the people who made this possible.
	And I'm dying to meet them.
	Fantastic.
	And I remembered one question I have to absolutely ask.
	It's rumoring in the West, but we've heard Victoria Nuland say this is going back to Ukraine, Russia.
	What do you know about biofacilities in Ukraine?
	What does the European government know?
	Do they exist?
	What do they call them?
	Protective or research facilities, but not bioweapon facilities?
	Does the European government know anything about that that you're allowed to disclose?
	Well, if the European or EU government, please don't say European government because there is no European government, EU government.
	Well, if they know anything about that, they certainly wouldn't share it with me.
	They won't share it with anyone.
	So, yes, there's been talk about that, that apparently was going on.
	But just like that, as so many other issues or, you know, things that they actually should have looked into, it's just being buried.
	You know, I mean, just think about the lab theory, you know, where COVID come from.
	I mean, it took, what, like two and a half years for Tedros to actually, the chief of WHO, to actually admit, well, yeah, it kind of must have come out of a lab, you know.
	But, I mean, just think what, there were scientists, they said, well, that's the only way this, you know, is plausible.
	No, they were deplatformed, they were, you know, taken out of their job, whatever.
	So, I mean, They're trying to keep all of this under wraps and whatever they do, which is not politically desired and does not go with their narrative, they're burying it all.
	So it's actually people like you.
	And I'm really enjoying talking to you, I have to say that.
	And it's really people like you, you know, and other alternative media outlets.
	They really poke the finger in things and, you know, ask these uncomfortable questions.
	But that's how democracy works.
	And I thank you for doing the job and the work you do.
	And you're quite good at it.
	Thank you very much.
	I accept compliments.
	Christina, I know you had a hard half hour.
	I do have to run, yeah.
	Where can people find you?
	I mean, I follow you on Twitter, but what's your Twitter handle?
	Twitter handle, okay.
	Anderson, MEP, AFD, something like that.
	But you know what?
	Just Google me.
	You'll find the links.
	Amazing.
	Thank you very much.
	Enjoy your time in Canada.
	I won't be there, so we won't get to meet in person, but maybe if you're down the East Coast side of the States, we can meet up.
	Alrighty.
	Thank you so much for having me.
	It was a pleasure talking to you.
	Thank you very much.
	Bye-bye.
	Fantastic, people.
	What a boss.
	Thank you, Viva.
	I looked up whether or not Christine Anderson had a landing page on the WEF before this stream.
	I do it with every single politician now.
	And there is one.
	It's just not her.
	I can see how that can cause confusion.
	Hold on.
	Where is it?
	Mr. Anderson.
	Here we go.
	Christine Anderson is Managing Director at Global Public Affairs.
	She's involved in Blackstone, dealing with the press.
	I don't know what Blackstone is.
	So that's clearly not her.
	Christine Anderson is not exactly the most unique of names.
	It's a nice name.
	It's just like, you know, Freiheit.
	Although in Germany, there's a lot more Freiheit than there are in Canada.
	But Freiheit, we're the only Freiheit family in Quebec that I know of.
	And there's only like eight in Canada.
	In the States, it's a little bit more of a common last name.
	There's more Freiheit, and that's because...
	A lot of people defected from Germany who had that name, but they weren't necessarily on the same side of that political conflict.
	Christine Anderson's amazing.
	And you gotta...
	It's becoming something of a rule.
	When the media says someone is far right, I'm gonna like them.
	I mean, it's like, I'm gonna like them.
	And they're not gonna be far right, by the way.
	They're gonna be probably rational, probably centrist, probably more...
	What's the word?
	Not nationalist, because that has a bad connotation, against globalism.
	They believe in national autonomy, national identity, which is not race-based or a national culture.
	Like when Justin Trudeau says there's no such thing as Canadian culture or a Canadian identity, bullcrap there is.
	And you ain't it, Trudeau.
	Let me see in the chat if I missed anything.
	So I'm in the chat in StreamYard.
	Fantastic woman.
	Patriotic.
	Patriotic is a better word.
	Oh God, Viva, you're Jewish.
	LOL.
	Oh no.
	He knows.
	I'm spiritual.
	I enjoy the unholy foods.
	That's fantastic.
	They all know.
	I want to meet the parliamentarian who actually likes Trudeau for reasons other than bad reasons.
	I can understand why some people like Trudeau for the bad reasons because he's the bigger bully in the schoolyard, so you like him.
	Because you get to get away with the lesser level stuff because there's always someone who's worse, more embarrassing, more in your face.
	So that was phenomenal.
	Oh, the dog is...
	Just pooped in her bed.
	Now she's crawling out of her bed.
	Okay, well, at least it's not on me.
	So, by the way, good afternoon now.
	I knew Christine had a hard 30 minutes, so I didn't want to keep her waiting a minute longer than I had to.
	Standard disclaimers.
	Haven't seen many super chats, but if you do see them, Matt, Putin said he'd turn off the pipes if he wanted to stop the floor.
	It makes no sense that Putin would have sabotaged the pipeline.
	It makes no sense.
	Sorry, I didn't mean to yell at you, but yes, that's a good point.
	What makes sense?
	The Americans did it, or American interests.
	The Germans know it.
	And therefore, they're not using it as a pretext to go after Putin, because they would have, in the same way they tried to use the pretext of the two Polish farmers getting killed by a stray missile, which they attempted to blame on Russia for a split second to invoke Article 5 of the NATO agreement, whatever.
	They would have blamed it on Russia, and they would have used it as a pretext.
	They didn't.
	And now the fact that no one wants to know who did it lets you know exactly who did it.
	Viva, did you just say your dog pulled an amber herd on your bed?
	She pulled an amber herd on her bed.
	But Podge is on an all-beef diet, and so the poop is not anything like the amber herd, turd, herd around the world.
	But yeah, I see it happening.
	My office.
	My office doesn't smell good, guys.
	Okay, so standard of claimers.
	No legal advice, no medical advice, no election fornication advice.
	YouTube takes 30% of all super chats.
	We are simultaneously streaming on Rumble, where we're going to go exclusively in a minute or two.
	Rumble has these things called Rumble France.
	Rumble takes 20% of those.
	Those are like sort of real-time tips if you want to support the channel that way.
	Best way to support the channel?
	Viva Bar- Why is it not in my name?
	Edit name.
	You silly.
	Viva, Barnes, La, Dut, Locals.
	Birchgold.com.
	That is the best place to support.
	Be part of the community if you so choose.
	But before we go to Rumble, and I didn't get to do it before we came in here, you may have noticed a little thing that says this stream contains a sponsored promo, whatever it is.
	The sponsor of today's day, Birchgold.com.
	My father always said, making money is hard, losing money is easy.
	And my goodness, my father's still alive.
	He's still spewing out the gems of wisdom.
	Making money is hard, and losing money is easy.
	Because you lose money just by sitting on money.
	You lose money because of other people's idiotic political decisions.
	Printing cash the way Trudeau and Putin, Biden, are doing in the States.
	You can make $100, and then if you just put that under your mattress and sit on it...
	You lost 8% in no time at all because eggs cost $10 for a dozen depending on where you are.
	What's the best way to try to preserve your money and actually make your money expand in value?
	Gold.
	Gold is gold, by the way.
	You're going to get pure gold from any service.
	What you are buying onto is a service.
	Birch gold, multiple thousand five-star reviews.
	A-plus by the Bureau of Better Business, whatever that thing is called.
	Gold, there's a reason why it's been sort of the hedge for 5,000 years.
	Better than Bitcoin.
	Doesn't go up 1,000x overnight.
	Doesn't go down 1,000x overnight.
	You can hold it.
	You can feel it.
	You can also roll over your 401k into precious metals.
	Birch Gold can help you do that.
	Birchgold.com, promo code VIVA.
	You'll get a free info kit.
	No obligation.
	Gold is gold.
	It was the gold standard for a long time for a good reason.
	It stands the test of time.
	It hedges against inflation.
	It's tangible.
	Don't worship it because that becomes idolatry.
	But if you're going to do it, get it.
	You can roll over your investments into precious metals.
	Birch Gold can help you.
	Birchgold.com, promo code VIVA.
	And the links will be or should be in the descriptions.
	Thank you very much, Birch.
	Now, with that said, everybody, the gold standard was awful.
	It might have been awful, but it was the standard.
	With that said, I'm joking.
	It's tongue-in-cheek.
	But if you had bought gold, I mean, it's like the slow, steady thing.
	You don't get rich quick.
	You don't go poor quick.
	And over time, it has proven to be the best investment and the best hedge against all government incompetence, massive inflation, hyperinflation.
	It has to be converted to fiat at some point, but it's a good investment.
	And Birch Gold is the company through which to do it.
	Okay.
	Now.
	Before we get into the Shi 'at of the day, people, I like seeing the numbers go down on YouTube because it means they're going up on Rumble.
	The link is there.
	My silver is doing just fine, says Sad Wings Raging.
	Yeah, well, they do silver and gold.
	They do precious metals.
	I think they even do platinum.
	Anyhow, okay, we're done.
	Thank you, Birch.
	The Shi 'at we're going to get into today, people.
	Gaslighting.
	Up the wazoo.
	They cannot hide the truth anymore.
	To find the truth, come to Rumble.
	This stream will be put to YouTube.
	The balance of it tomorrow.
	But today it's going to go exclusively live on Rumble in 3, 2, 1. Remove.
	I'm looking over at the deuce.
	The deuce in her bed.
	The deuce is not the problem.
	Those are actually easy to clean up.
	It's when she pees on the floor that it becomes more of a problem.
	And she looks...
	Where did the other dog go?
	Oh, here we are.
	Okay.
	She apparently kicked Winston off his bed.
	Winston, what do you have to say to the world?
	Okay, I'm going to put him back down.
	Where do we start today?
	We're going to start with something that's going to make you mad.
	It's going to make you mad because it should make you mad because they're treating us like we're idiots.
	They're treating us like we're gullible, willfully blind idiots.
	And I dare say, not to be mean, Anybody who watches MSNBC, more likely than not that they are gullible idiots.
	I'm going to play it and then we're going to listen to it.
	I'm going to pause it before we even do this.
	Only because Judaism came up today.
	When I was growing up, my grandmother is an immigrant from Russia.
	If she wasn't...
	She was born here, but her parents were from Russia.
	Her first language was Yiddish.
	Growing up, my father used to do this thing.
	Hold on, let me just take this out of here.
	Whenever we would do something stupid and get hurt, he would rub his stomach and go, Machaya!
	It's a Machaya!
	Like you're learning a lesson.
	And that was when we were doing something stupid, jumping off a garage, mixing sugar and salt, Peter, and then it exploded in my face one Halloween and set the kitchen on fire.
	He didn't say Machaya there because I actually nearly...
	Killed myself and burnt the house down.
	But, you know, standard stupid stuff where you learn a lesson afterwards and you learn a lesson because of your own stupidity.
	He would go, Machaya, oh yeah.
	And then he would push the bruises also.
	Like, oh, where's the bruise?
	Oh yeah, does that, does that?
	And he would, you know, humorously, lovingly.
	This, I do not cover these stories for anything of a Machaya.
	I don't cover these stories to say, you know, play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
	I don't play, I don't cover these stories with any of the slightest Inklings of FAFO, F around, find out, or karma, cosmic retribution.
	I don't.
	Full stop, no but.
	I cover these stories because they are important, because other people can potentially suffer due to the suppression, the censorship, and the deliberate gaslighting and twisting of the stories.
	I say I cover these stories because they think we're idiots.
	And the more people that are willfully blind or in fact being duped, the more this is going to happen, where if indeed it has a potential cause that we might start to be hearing about a little more now, it can save other people from the same fate.
	So there's no Mechaia, there's no Schadenfreude, period.
	And anybody who says that there is, is probably projecting their own thought processes to how they view the world.
	What is here is it's genuine bonafide anger and rage and sadness from me.
	Listen to this.
	I know from my Twitter feed that many of you have wondered why I have been off the air for a little while.
	Well, I have been dealing with a little bit of a health scare.
	On December 20th, I began to feel chest pains and they waxed and waned over a period of 10 days.
	This is December 20th, 2022.
	This is Yasmin.
	Vagassian, who is on MSNBC, was on CNN.
	I wasn't quite sure what to make of it, but as it continued to get worse, I started to think something was actually wrong.
	Can we just count the number of on-air medical emergencies that we've seen over the last year?
	We're going to get to it afterwards because three things cannot long be hidden.
	The sun, the moon, and the truth.
	Buddha.
	They can't hide it anymore.
	I don't know if it's the Overton window or the goalposts that are moving.
	They're starting to now just pretend they've always said it.
	The diary of my Twitter life and the diary of my YouTube analysis life has documented it in real time.
	Listen to this.
	It was December 30th when I finally went to an urgent care and was told I had reflux.
	I didn't really buy it, but I was relieved it wasn't my heart.
	My body, though, was pretty certain not to believe the reflux.
	Bear in mind what she's saying right now.
	First of all, I don't know if anybody else is finding the demeanor as very much Tucker Carlson emulating.
	She goes to the ER.
	Certain not to believe.
	My body, though, was pretty...
	I didn't really buy it.
	30th, when I finally went to an urgent care and was told I had reflux.
	Pause.
	She went to an urgent care and was told she had reflux when in reality, as we're going to find out, she had a pericarditis that turned into myocarditis.
	Let that sink in for a second.
	Let the reluctance to discuss the obvious potentially factor into the misdiagnosis that she originally got that could have ended her life.
	Like, does anybody appreciate that?
	You know, when people go to the hospital with chest pains now, there's such a stigma about addressing heart issues because it might be attributed to a certain cause that they, maybe, it compromises their medical assessments.
	And instead of saying, holy crap, you're having heart issues, reflux.
	Go home.
	I didn't really buy it, but I was relieved it wasn't my heart.
	My body, though, was pretty certain not to believe the reflux.
	The next day, on December 30th, I woke up with severe pains both in my chest and in my left shoulder.
	She's lucky she woke up the next morning.
	And it was like a tightening in my chest when I took deep breaths.
	That got worse when I was laying flat.
	I knew enough at that moment to understand that it could mean...
	Could, is the key word here, that I was having a heart attack, especially.
	She knew enough at that moment.
	I wonder why.
	Because it was happening in the left part of my shoulder.
	I want to remind you, I run seven miles three to four times a week, or I did.
	Or I did.
	Can you imagine the realization that someone might have told her, those days for you are over?
	Deal with it and read the script.
	Can you imagine that someone might, call me a conspiracy theorist, someone might have said that to her.
	Those days are over, or at least I did.
	I do yoga.
	I don't eat meat.
	I don't smoke.
	I drink occasionally.
	Not right now, though, because my doctor tells me I can't.
	Can't run, can't drink.
	And those things might be gone for a while.
	Aside from probably not getting enough sleep and working too much, I'm a pretty healthy person.
	My wife, Marion, was listening to that.
	She's like, not getting enough sleep and working too much are probably the two biggest stressors if we're looking for other alternatives.
	Like, I'm pretty healthy.
	Don't eat meat.
	I'm not sure that makes anybody healthy.
	That might actually make them less healthy.
	I don't sleep enough and I work too hard.
	Oh yeah, that and we'll get to the obvious.
	On that day, I was anything but.
	My husband drove me to the emergency room and from there, the nightmare that has been my January began.
	I was diagnosed with pericarditis, inflammation of the lining of my heart, brought on by a virus.
	A literal common cold.
	Oh!
	Oh!
	They think we're idiots.
	I've been alive a long time.
	And I, you know, I'm a hypochondriac.
	I might have other psychological conditions.
	We all know, or we've heard now that, you know, viruses can trigger myocarditis.
	I knew that, you know, viral infections can trigger things like Guillain-Barré syndrome.
	I have a family member who got Guillain-Barré syndrome before the Jimmy Jam.
	Because in the infinitesimally rare cases of a viral infection, these things can happen.
	You know what I don't recall?
	In my conscious, hypochondriacal, obsessive-compulsive, fanatophobia lifespan, which has been the better part of my conscious life, I don't remember hearing this many people getting myocarditis from colds and viruses.
	And...
	They're trying to...
	Tell us.
	This is like communist Russia.
	Chernobyl.
	You're suffering radiation poisoning, and they're telling you you're not suffering radiation poisoning.
	It is what many hypothesized brought down the Soviet Union.
	A lie so egregious, the people said, enough is enough.
	It brought on by a common cold.
	I just happened to get myocarditis from a common cold.
	I just happened to remember...
	Journalists having medical emergencies on air.
	Lawyers collapsing during hearings.
	Athletes collapsing on the field.
	I remember it always happening.
	I also had fluid around my heart that had to be drained or else it could hinder the beating of my heart.
	I was hospitalized for four nights and transferred from a local hospital to NYU Langone here in New York City.
	On January 4th, I was finally discharged after doctors drained the fluid around my heart and I bounced out of the hospital.
	I couldn't get out of there fast enough with the hopes I was on the mend.
	But that was not the end.
	Three days later, I was readmitted when I felt a flutter in my heart, like a butterfly.
	It was inside my chest.
	Performative, by the way.
	Who drafted this?
	Determined I had developed myocarditis, inflammation of the actual heart now.
	Very rare.
	Very rare.
	One in 5,000 young men will get myocarditis from the jab.
	I'm quoting Dr. Kieran Moore.
	Just very rare.
	One in 5,000.
	But Yasmin is telling us that don't look up.
	This is a cold.
	It happened from a cold.
	It happens all the time, idiot.
	You never noticed it?
	The heart muscle.
	I remember being shepherded through the emergency room and wondering, is this it?
	It wasn't, thank God.
	Instead, I spent five more days in the hospital where they ran a battery test, adjusted my meds, and made sure nothing else was...
	Oh, well, did that end?
	I thought it went on for a little bit more than that.
	Hold on.
	Play?
	I remember being shepherded through the emergency room.
	It's preposterous.
	It's outlandish.
	It's outrageous.
	They are treating us like we are idiots with memories of a goldfish.
	I'm going to get something else.
	Another clip up, by the way.
	I just saw a super chat.
	A rumble rant.
	$5 rumble rant from S. Myers 20. Viva, have you seen the 2011 movie Contagion?
	We live in a fake world.
	It literally is the last three years we have lived, except COVID wasn't very deadly.
	Please watch it and tell us what you think.
	I watched it years ago, but I don't remember.
	I don't want to watch those movies anymore.
	But Viva Fry, Stroke Season, Twitter.
	I got to bring this up.
	It's always been like this, people.
	It's not from the jab.
	It can't be from the jab.
	It's from a regular cold.
	We've always had it.
	We've always had this thing called stroke season, which has always followed the flu season by three to four weeks.
	It's such a thing that has always existed that this urgent care doctor...
	Are we sharing the screen?
	No, we're not.
	It's such a thing that the world has always known about that this urgent care doctor learned about it last year.
	Infection and stroke.
	Yeah, I didn't know about this either until last year, but it turns out that after flu season, about three or four weeks later, there is a stroke season.
	And like you said, most of Canada is getting down off of a big hump of flu.
	So now we're starting to see more strokes.
	And a friend of one of my colleagues actually mentioned that at work the other day.
	He said, have you noticed how many strokes we're seeing?
	It's a lot more than usual, it feels like.
	So anecdotally, we're starting to see that.
	So what is the slang between influenza, infection, and stroke?
	Yeah, I didn't know about this either until last year, but it turns out that after flu season...
	The way that doctor delivered it, yeah, yeah, it turns out I didn't know about this either until they told me about it.
	Hey guys, have you been noticing a lot of people having heart attacks?
	Oh, you have?
	Strokes?
	Oh yeah.
	It's strokes.
	He said, oh, why didn't you notice it last year?
	Why didn't you notice it the year before?
	Oh, I only learned about this last year.
	It sounds like Awaken with JP.
	I mean, if you took that guy's script and asked JP from Awaken with JP to read it, you would think it was one of his bits.
	Yeah, I didn't know about this thing until last year.
	I'm an urgent care doctor.
	We're all noticing a lot of people, a lot more people.
	Anecdotally, having strokes.
	I can't say it, because if I say it, I'm a conspiracy theorist right-wing nutcase who's an anti-vaxxer.
	But the doctor can say it.
	It's always been the case.
	They just happen to have only noticed it this year.
	Yasmin gets myocarditis, pericarditis and myocarditis.
	I should pull up some of the other tweets.
	After proudly taking to the Twitterverse to share her vaccination status, after proudly taking to the Twitterverse to talk about when people need the boosters, but it's a cold that gave it to her, nothing else.
	Crazy Guru One says a simple initial cardiogram would have taken out the reflex diagnosis within 10 minutes.
	I don't know.
	And then you get situations like answers for Sean.
	Sean Hartman, 18-year-old kid, goes to the hospital.
	Are the doctors reluctant to even diagnose it?
	Because it might be a problem.
	And so they treat the patients badly and say, go home, here's an Advil.
	And then Sean Hartman, 33 days after his first jab, healthy 18-year-old kid, dead.
	Is the poor treatment of patients resulting from a potential political medical reluctance to acknowledge the problem?
	MNL Hayes, $1 Rumble, says, which came first, the stroke season or the sudden death season?
	Sudden adult death syndrome, people.
	Okay, so that's Yasmin, and it's terrible.
	It's tragic.
	I know there's going to be people who are going to be less sympathetic to Yasmin because of what some might feel to be a history of them pushing the jab on people.
	But I don't take...
	Comfort, solace, or any pleasure whatsoever in the misery of others, and there's no but to that.
	I'm going to get to some articles that we're pulling.
	Let me just go grab one of the many tweets that Jasmine put up celebrating Vax status.
	Celebrating it, but when something happens, when something happens, then you can't ask the question anymore.
	Listen to this.
	Not only can you not ask the question, you're an asshole for doing it.
	Here, let's take the birch one here.
	I know I can use that window.
	Here.
	Look at this.
	Do you think that the definition of being fully vaccinated is going to change, including three shots?
	When it comes to the boosters, you had immunocompromised folks getting vaccinated with their booster shot back in August.
	We're going to be coming up on February pretty quickly as the holidays pass, and that six-month timeline will then surpass.
	Will they then need yet another booster shot to stay protected?
	Right.
	So I think we're going to see a change in definition to what fully vaccinated means very soon.
	it's essentially going to mean three doses of an mRNA vaccine.
	And I think that there are a number of virologists and immunologists who very early on said that they think that this vaccine is going to be a three dose primary course.
	Can you imagine the Orwellian memory holing and revision of history?
	I think there were doctors saying at the beginning, not only were you going to need one, two, three, you're going to need them every 60 days.
	No!
	Do you know what they said at the beginning?
	That they prevented infection.
	That's what they said at the beginning.
	Not that you would end up needing one every 60 days.
	You know what they said at the beginning?
	That it didn't cause myocarditis.
	You know what they said at the beginning?
	That it didn't interfere with a woman's menstrual cycle.
	No, revisionist liars.
	I think I remember them saying from the beginning you were going to need to hook it up to your vein and walk around with an IV all day long or get your banking system shut down.
	Isn't that what they said in March 2020 when they said two weeks to flatten the curve?
	We're seeing.
	And I think also what we're going to see is that we're probably going to have to get boosted.
	It could be every six months.
	But the issue is that science is evolving in front of us.
	We're having new studies out every day, giving more and more supporting evidence to the fact that boosters are incredibly important.
	And now we have Omicron here.
	In fairness, this is December 2021.
	I guess before they knew that the boosters had no impact on Omicron.
	Information which Moderna apparently withheld from the government.
	But, like I say over and over again, there's two types of lies.
	One is saying something that you know is not true, and the other one is being a willful idiot and saying things that you have no reason to believe are true.
	It has a property of immune evasion, which emphasizes the importance of boosters even more.
	And will each of those boosters include protection against the latest variants?
	So, you know, the vaccine manufacturers are currently working on that.
	You know, we may eventually need variant-specific boosters.
	We may eventually need variant-specific boosters.
	What the hell would be the point of taking a booster if it's targeting the original strain and not the variant?
	I'm not a doctor, but that's a reasonable question.
	We may one day.
	Until then, just take the original formulation for all subsequent variants, whether it's effective or not, who cares, and whether or not compounding boosters on the original shots might cause things like myocarditis and pericarditis or strokes.
	It's stroke season after all.
	This is right now a general booster, a general third dose.
	It increases the antibody response to the point where it is protective.
	As we saw in the Pfizer study, it is protective against even some of these new mutations As we saw in the Pfizer study, Pfizer, the company that paid $2.3 billion for withholding information.
	So, oh, there was one more.
	Hold on, hold on.
	There was one more.
	But don't ask any questions about it, because if you do, it's not nice.
	And it's conspiratorial to suggest that Yasmin's bout of pericarditis and myocarditis might have something to do.
	April 26, 2021.
	Maya for Mayer.
	It was so much fun to bump into my friend Yasmin V, but strange not to be on the same side of the camera.
	Strange not to be on the same side of the camera together.
	Also, we are both vaccinated.
	That was confirmed before this pick.
	How many shots did Yasmin have?
	Hey guys, I'll be the asshole.
	I've asked the question publicly.
	How many shots has Yasmin had?
	And what was the proximity?
	Of any last shot or the last shot Yasmin has, shot or booster, in proximity to her bout and diagnosis of pericarditis and myocarditis?
	You know what answer I've gotten to that question as I've gotten to all the other previous questions along those lines?
	Goose egg.
	Oh, great.
	Now someone's going to scream, grab that, say that I just flashed the white power sign.
	Goose egg.
	You know what a goose egg is or the bagel?
	Nothing.
	No answer.
	No nothing.
	At least she hasn't blocked me on Twitter yet.
	And my question is this, and it's a serious one.
	Have these public figures been presented with or compelled to sign non-disclosure agreements as relates to any such incident that might become public?
	Have their contracts been revised or do their contracts have provisions in them precluding these public figures, journalists, whatever you want to call them?
	From discussing these things openly?
	Are they required to read the script?
	Are they even free to answer the question?
	But I will be the a-hole.
	I will ask the question.
	And the fact that it's so bloody shocking when I ask the question is itself also telling.
	Me getting, I won't say political flack, or me getting social media shaming, getting called names, a publication in Canada, what was it called?
	La Presse.
	A publication in Canada basically, I think, referred to me as a conspiracy theorist because of the tweet I put out after Jessica Robb, a CTV journalist, now famously had a medical emergency on air and has been noticeably less present that I can see in the media.
	I was called a conspiracy theorist for asking the bloody obvious question of someone who had also previously posted a number of...
	Happy to be proud to be vaccinated.
	I'll be the head of that spear and just ask the obvious bloody question.
	Yasmin, when was the last shot you got?
	How many of you had in proximity to this medical emergency?
	For which I wish you nothing but the best.
	I know there's people out there who are not that forgiving or who might be a little bit more angry at people who they might blame for being responsible for pushing this on other people and having this happen to other people.
	That's not me.
	CrazyGuru1 says, Oh, Moderna, who had never made a vaccine until the alleged COVID pandemic.
	Hmm.
	Pfizer, $2.3 billion.
	Criminal civil penalties paid to the Department of Justice 2009.
	Johnson& Johnson.
	These are two of the three.
	Jibby jab manufacturers, they were ordered to pay $2.2 billion in criminal and civil fines in 2013.
	The only reason Moderna has never been ordered to pay a criminal or civil fine is because they've never had a product that they've marketed to the public.
	I was on Radio X on Tuesday, dropping these truth bombs in French.
	Afterwards, I was like, mom, mom.
	That's Freudian.
	Marion, I call her mom in front of the kids.
	I was dropping truth information that people would say is conspiracy theory, except for the fact that it's true.
	So I wish Yasmin had nothing but the best, but these are questions that we're not only entitled to ask, we can reasonably expect answers to, because these people have been pivotal in pushing a message on the general public, and if they're suffering the consequences of anything that could be potentially tied to the very policy and...
	These practices that they were pushing, and I just say jamming down the throats of a vulnerable, terrorized general populace, they have to answer these questions.
	I have to ask them, and they have to answer them, but they won't.
	And I will continue to do so.
	Now, let me see something here, by the way.
	Talk about three things cannot long be hidden.
	The moon, the sun, the moon, and the truth.
	Which one do we start with?
	Let's start with...
	Sports Illustrated.
	Where is it?
	That's the Sports Illustrated.
	Now, we're going to start with this one.
	This is from the Heart and Stroke Association.
	This is from the Heart and Stroke Association.
	Myocarditis.
	What is myocarditis?
	Myocarditis is a serious, though rare condition where inflammation develops in the myocardium.
	Or middle muscular layer of the heart wall.
	By the way, this is from the American Heart and Stroke Association.
	Myocarditis is a serious condition.
	Let's just say, not mild, not, oh, 16-year-old boy got myocarditis, he'll be fine.
	Go home, take an Advil.
	Serious condition.
	Rare condition.
	How rare?
	Well, we know, know how rare.
	Myocarditis can weaken the heart and its electrical system.
	As a result, the heart's ability to pump blood declines.
	The condition may be acute and resolved quickly, or it may be chronic, lasting longer than two weeks.
	In severe cases, myocarditis can lead to stroke, cold season, people, heart attack, heart failure, or death.
	Often the cause of myocarditis is unknown.
	Commonly a viral infection, such as a cold or flu, bacterial infection, or fungal infection can lead to myocarditis.
	Medications, autoimmune disorders, and toxic substances can also cause it.
	Is this...
	So I'm going to skip to a little bit.
	Staying healthy.
	Proper heart function can be supported by lifestyle changes.
	Some of these changes include reducing sodium intake, avoiding alcohol, Quitting smoking, of course.
	Patients with myocarditis are often advised to avoid competitive sports while active inflammation is present.
	Listen to this.
	Myocarditis and COVID-19.
	So when was this?
	Last reviewed?
	September, October, November, December?
	January?
	Four months ago?
	Yeah, four months ago.
	Listen to this.
	Health organizations such as the Centers for Disease, the CDC, continue to monitor whether myocarditis is linked to COVID-19.
	Researchers have, by the way, it's infine, as we say in law.
	This is right at the end of the article.
	In the event that everyone makes it past, you know, all of the reassurance is rare.
	Don't worry about it.
	Researchers have published several studies on myocarditis in COVID-19 cases.
	Oh, they're doing COVID-19, not the vaccines, and vaccines since the start of the pandemic.
	Some include an international study published in April 2022 found about three in every 1,000 patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 infection developed acute myocarditis.
	There's a lot of breaking down of those stats, which we're not going to get into now.
	Three in every 1,000 patients hospitalized due to COVID developed acute myocarditis.
	The study used data from the first 15 months of the pandemic before the vaccines were widely Oh, that kind of contradicts what you said earlier, but...
	But the study notes that information on longer-term outcomes is lacking and future studies are needed.
	How then do you say future studies are needed?
	I'm sorry, I'm getting ahead of myself.
	Myocarditis was reported at a higher rate than expected among some people who received the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, according to a July 2021 study.
	Most of the suspected myocarditis cases in that study developed after the second dose and were among males aged 12 to 39 years old.
	More studies are needed.
	Higher rate than expected.
	Despite these cases, the study stated that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccine outweigh the rare risks of myocarditis.
	Say the line, Bart.
	Say the freaking line.
	Higher than expected among young, healthy males at Virtually no risk of COVID itself.
	Higher than expected.
	More studies are needed.
	The benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine outweigh the risks.
	Please go take it.
	Thank you very much.
	You have been compliant citizens for the good of the greater good.
	Enraging.
	Light Giver Wings, $20 rumble rent, says Steve Lam, I don't know who that is, wrote an article in IQ Magazine.
	Blaming the unvaxxed for having inside knowledge of the jab and says we have blood on our hands.
	LOL.
	Okay.
	So I know what you're talking about.
	I didn't know who the name of the author was.
	That's the author that says...
	Hold on.
	Am I out of the screen?
	That's the author that said...
	Oh, sorry.
	The article that said...
	It was in IQLY.
	An article that says the unvaxxed knew why didn't they warn us.
	There is currently a dispute as to whether or not that's parody.
	A troll.
	It was published in some online publication called IQLY.
	It looks like parody.
	IQLT?
	No, that's a stock.
	The Unvaccinated Have Blood on Their Hands article.
	So it was published...
	In some publication, which kind of looked like parody, but the problem is, it started in the conversation, and where?
	I asked him in a tweet, IQL, if anyone knows what it is.
	It's unclear if that was parody or not.
	It looks like the website might be parody, but my goodness, if it is, they're not showing it and they're not telling it and it's to be deduced.
	Mark 2112, a $2 one brand says, what if this was all part of the plan to get people to lose confidence in vaccines so that the next virus that is introduced will wipe out the independent thinkers and leave the sheep?
	Hey, look, if you're writing a novel, that's certainly a plausible way of writing it.
	And by the way, when you talk about losing faith in the CDC, I like...
	I went to the CDC website.
	No, sorry.
	I googled polio for totally unrelated reasons.
	Polio vaccine.
	And I go to the CDC website and I'm reading the CDC website and I'm reading it now with what I have a view in mind that the CDC are pathological liars.
	And I know that they've lied about the Rona jab.
	I mean, I know it.
	We all know it.
	It's virtually undeniable at this point.
	And now you go back and you say, well, what else did they lie about?
	Whether or not it's intended, it's going to be the effect that people have now lost faith in the medical system for a reason which we're going to bring up after this article.
	Another one that cannot be hidden.
	Let me see this here.
	Look at this.
	Oh, remember when they told you, you're crazy for thinking you're noticing more strokes.
	You're crazy for thinking you're noticing more myocarditis, pericarditis.
	You're crazy for thinking it's a real risk.
	You're a conspiracy theorist.
	But then read this article.
	This is Sports Illustrated from January 31st, 2023.
	They're the toughest of the tough.
	But when their NFL teammates started dying, these men grew afraid.
	Bear in mind what's being said here.
	When they noticed a lot of their friends dying, the problem is not that their friends are dying.
	The problem is that they're afraid.
	The problem is that they noticed it.
	More than 40 current or former pro players aged 50 or younger have fallen since 2021.
	The number is staggering.
	Remember when they told you that it's a conspiracy theory that suggests that athletes were dying at a higher rate or more often than we've ever noticed before?
	Oh, that study that came out that said the collapsing of athletes is up 1,100%.
	It's a fake study because some guy went to the source there, Science Daily, or whatever the website was, and found a few examples of people who don't qualify as athletes.
	They told you you were crazy for thinking athletes were dying or collapsing at higher rates now, and now Sports Illustrated comes out and says they're going to attribute it to something else, most likely.
	But the number is staggering.
	It's not happening, but it's staggering.
	But it doesn't account for their peers' despair.
	Let's see this here.
	Do I want to go through this?
	Marcus Harris' television flickered with images of the sport to which he dedicated nearly two decades of his life.
	He felt pains and nostalgia.
	So he did what hardened men are often too reluctant to do.
	He let a friend know that he missed him.
	okay let's just keep going down here In 2022, Charles Johnson, a former receiver who went to Super Bowls with two teams and later suffered brain, head, and spine, neck injuries, died by suicide at age 50. Marion Barber, a running back of the Cowboys, died at 38 of heat stroke.
	Tony Sarasa, a Colter, fell asleep at 55 and never woke up.
	The cause remains unconfirmed.
	Shane Oliveira, fell by heart condition after struggling with prescription painkiller.
	ALS.
	We're going on.
	In all, 44 current or former NFL players aged 50 or younger have died since the start of 2021, according to Pro Football.
	While Pro Footballers tend to have longer lifespans than the general population, they are more vulnerable than their counterparts in other sports to suffering neurodegenerative cardiovascular disease.
	Framing.
	Obviously, we're not going to take suicide examples.
	Framing.
	It is happening more and more, but in this particular context, we're going to frame it another way.
	When it comes to strokes, stroke season.
	When it comes to NFL players, it's because they're known to have...
	They have a longer lifespan, but they also succumb earlier to cardiovascular disease.
	Oh, okay.
	That makes sense.
	That's congruent.
	Stroke season.
	Myocarditis season.
	They suffer other health issues.
	When you said it was happening and we said it wasn't, well now we're saying it's happening but the cause is something different.
	The Overton window has shifted.
	The goalposts have moved.
	Now, losing faith in the medical profession.
	Check this out.
	I'm not going to play the whole thing.
	Not only do they lie to you, not only do they Dealing with medical board complaints.
	Two and a half years ago, I sat at the same desk.
	Two and a half years ago.
	And I came before you, not for me, but for you.
	And I said, If they can do it to me, they can do it to you.
	Two and a half years ago on July 4th weekend, I let the world know that I was being investigated for the first time in my career by the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice.
	Two months earlier, I had addressed my concerns regarding how death certificates were completed in days gone by and how Modifications had been suggested by the Department of Health and the CDC.
	And I told you that.
	If they can do it to me, they can do it to you.
	I'm going to stop there because I don't want to play the whole thing.
	I want everybody to go listen to this themselves.
	Some people were correcting me.
	I said if they can do it to him, they will do it to others.
	And others were rightly correcting me and saying if they can do it to him, they have done it to others.
	You lose faith in the CDC.
	You lose faith in the practice of medicine.
	You have administrative bodies imposing licensing sanctions on doctors for suggesting then what is now accepted fact.
	You recall back in the day, because I lived through it and I will never forget it.
	They were saying back in the day, they are exaggerating deaths by COVID.
	Because they're saying people who died with COVID died from COVID.
	There was the famous example of the motorcycle accident, which I think has been confirmed is true.
	The motorcycle accident.
	Motor cyclist died from COVID.
	Yeah.
	Oh my goodness.
	Let's go to the...
	Holy cows.
	It doesn't end.
	It doesn't stop.
	Go to Snopes, people.
	There was the case of the motorcycle, the fatal motorcycle crash listed as COVID.
	Was a fatal motorcycle crash listed as a COVID-19 death in Florida?
	A case that was initial tallied among coronavirus deaths in 2020 caused some confusion.
	So the answer is yes.
	But what's the ruling here?
	A motorcyclist killed in a crash in Florida was listed as a COVID-19 death.
	Outdated.
	Snopes is still fighting.
	Whatever.
	In late July, yada, yada, yada, Florida was among the states experiencing a surge in COVID cases amid the ongoing pandemic.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Okay.
	During a press conference, DeSantis pointed out the case of a motorcyclist saying, The guy died and they attributed.
	Contrary to what DeSantis stated, the CDC guidance doesn't direct caregivers to list all deaths as COVID-19 deaths simply because they decide with it.
	Instead, it instructs caregivers to list various factors contributing to death in appropriate sections of death certificates.
	In other words, it does not state that anyone who suffers a non-natural death such as a traffic accident should be listed as a COVID death.
	If they also happen to test positive, even if that disease didn't cause their death.
	It does appear to the case, however, that a motorcyclist was killed in a traffic accident, also tested positive for COVID-19, and was initially listed among Florida's COVID-19 deaths.
	But officials from Florida Department of Health said that person has since been removed from the count.
	Oh.
	So you know what Snopes, you fact-checking liars, should say?
	Fact-check, true.
	It did happen.
	And back in the day, we were called idiots and conspiracy theorists for repeating the story.
	Fact check outdated?
	That's a funny way of saying true.
	You fake fact checking liars.
	Oh, by the way, you know when they say if they can go after Dr. Jensen, they can go after others?
	And people say if they've gone after him, if they can go after him, they have gone after others.
	If they listed one motorcycle death as COVID?
	It's not removed.
	It's been done elsewhere.
	It's been done elsewhere.
	And you know it has.
	Because two years later, they say we haven't been distinguishing between hospitalized with COVID versus hospitalized from COVID.
	And it only becomes a talking point two years into the pandemic after conspiracy theorists had been saying that that was the case from day one.
	From day one, when they had their death count on the, what's it called?
	The Chiron?
	The Chiron?
	Whatever that thing is called.
	When they had the death count.
	The live death count on the Chiron of CNN and MSNBC when they were counting the deaths, toweling it, like a casino Vegas, like a Vegas casino.
	They weren't distinguishing between died with versus died from, but they sure as hell were including those numbers when they were trying to terrorize everybody into submission.
	When they had their hospitalization cases of COVID in Quebec to justify the curfew, to lock us down in our own homes for five and a half months.
	They sure as hell were counting cases, and they sure as hell were not distinguishing back then and only admitting it later.
	when people said it at the time.
	They were called conspiracy theorists and purveyors of misinformation.
	Chiron, yes.
	Okay.
	Chiron equals Chiron, yes.
	Okay.
	Oh, but they tell you afterwards, after they've moved the goalposts, the conspiracy theorists of the time become the truth tellers.
	It's unbelievable.
	Here, someone sent me this right before we started and I didn't get to it.
	Ottawa can deny EI benefits to man fired for refusing COVID vaccine court rules.
	It is likely that he will find this result frustrating because my reasons do not deal with the fundamental legal, ethical, and factual questions he is raising.
	That sounds like a good decision already.
	When Anthony Cecchetto refused to get a COVID shot or submit to antigen testing for the virus, he was fired from his job.
	He challenged that decision, but a federal court has just ruled against him, saying the reasons for his firing met the EI's definition of misconduct.
	The term means only that someone consciously defied an employer's policies, even if there was no malicious intent, the court said.
	Cachetto is not alone in challenging what happened to him, attracting little public attention.
	Scores of workers fired for refusing to be vaccinated have appealed subsequent decisions to refuse them EI benefits to.
	The large majority of cases heard by the Federal Social Services Tribunal have gone against the employees.
	Who would have thunk that a highly weaponized, highly politicized administrative body, tribunal, who would have thunk they could ever do this?
	And they are among a slew of others disputes heard by courts, labor arbitrators, and various administrative tribunals on the legality of vaccine mandates and assorted pandemic-related public health rules, with most of the adjudicators upholding the measures.
	You don't say, who appointed those people?
	Who pays those people?
	I mean, the citizens pay them, but who writes their checks?
	The very government that they're defending.
	The very employers.
	It is likely that he will find this result frustrating because my reasons do not deal with the fundamental legal, ethical, and factual questions he is.
	What the hell does it have to do with him?
	Said Federal Court Justice William Pentney.
	Hold on.
	In his decision last week, that is because many of these questions are simply beyond the scope of this case.
	Pentney, meanwhile, used his written decision to thank court staff, despite the lack of advanced notice, for rapidly setting up a system to conduct Seketo's hearing remotely.
	After he refused to comply with the court's masking requirements.
	Did they quote that part of the judgment?
	Because I read that somewhere.
	The judge imposed masking now for people entering the court, and he refused, so they set up remote.
	This filthy heathen is not going to enter the courtroom.
	The former employee of Lake Ridge Health, which operates several hospitals in cities just east of Toronto, could not be reached for comment.
	Chiquetto began working at Lake Ridge in July 2017, the decision saying only he held various jobs.
	He refused to get the shots or undergo testing, which resulted in his suspension.
	Then he was fired and ruled ineligible for EI because misconduct.
	Fired for cause.
	In his appeals, including to the federal court, Chichetto argued that his rights have been violated on a basis of medical choices.
	The worker submits that vaccine mandates and policies are affecting, he says, they are destroying many people's lives, and this has to stop.
	But EI rules say someone fired for misconduct can't get benefits, and the commission only had to decide whether Chichetto was fired for willfully violating his employer's rules, putting other issues outside the purview of the court.
	Well, there you have it.
	The judge, just not to show any potential political or ideological bias of the judge, insisted on masking requirements to attend the court.
	And when he didn't wear the mask, they had to do this all virtually.
	And I saw my brother, Lion Advocacy on Twitter, tweeted the last section of the judgment where he thanked the court staff for accommodating because the dirty, dirty employee refused to wear a mask.
	Unvaxxed and no-masked?
	He can't enter the courtroom.
	That second-class citizen of another cast should stay outside.
	All right, that's what's going on in Canada.
	Let me just see what else we have on the back.
	We've got good stuff yet left here.
	Oh, we're going to stick with Meanwhile in Canada.
	Let's stick with Meanwhile in Canada and see what...
	Actually, this is sort of like a hybrid.
	It crosses over what's happening in Canada versus what's happening in the States.
	Our Canadian government are passing motions or recommending motions to condemn Fox News and Tucker Carlson in our freaking government.
	This is what they think they have to be doing with our time and our money.
	Listen to this.
	And by the way, how do I escape here?
	By the way, Mark Gerritsen, who's got a Ukrainian flag in his bio, is a liberal MP from Kingston.
	I wonder where his loyalties lie.
	It doesn't matter.
	He's got the Ukraine flag and bio.
	Does he have pronouns?
	No.
	Does he?
	No.
	He's criticizing the conservatives for voting down this motion to condemn Fox News and Tucker Carlson.
	Watch how Conservative MPs reject an NDP motion to call the House of Commons to condemn comments made by Fox News personality Tucker Carlson to use armed forces to liberate Canada of Justin Trudeau.
	How dare they not waste Canadian taxpayer dollars to condemn a TV host, a TV show host.
	Listen to this.
	It's classic.
	Mr. Speaker, after consultation with the parties in the House, if you seek it...
	I believe you will find unanimous consent for the following motion.
	That given the rise of far-right and associated violent extremism led to the attempted insurrection in the United States, the House condemns recent comments made by Fox News personality Tucker Carlson in which he suggests U.S. Armed Forces liberate Canada from the current Prime Minister.
	All those opposed to the Honourable Member moving the motion will please say nay.
	I'm afraid we don't have...
	Outrage!
	Outrage!
	How can you not condemn Fox News?
	I replied to Gerritsen.
	I don't have the tweet up.
	I replied, oh, you want to condemn Tucker Carlson and Fox News for misinformation, disinformation?
	How about you start with...
	I just gave them the slew of CTV news posting disinformation.
	This is what our Canadian government thinks is a worthwhile use of our taxpayer dollars in government time.
	Condemn Tucker Carlson and Fox News.
	And they think that it's outrageous that people find this outrageous.
	Let's see what the chat has to think about this.
	Ha ha ha, Nature Lover Freeman says.
	So funny, says J. It ain't funny.
	First of all, I think there's a lot of people who might agree.
	You know what?
	This NDP idiot says it's an outrageous statement to say that the US should liberate Canada of Justin Trudeau.
	How about that the US might actually think it's a legitimate defense to their national sovereign integrity to invade Canada?
	When you have a country that you share a border with, a very big, unsecured border, when you have that country training Chinese soldiers on their soil for winter combat...
	Some countries might find that to be a threat.
	Some people might find that to be a risk to national security to be training Communist Party soldiers on Canadian soil on your border.
	And you think I'm lying about this, don't you?
	Maybe some of you don't.
	Canada train Chinese soldiers.
	When they get caught doing it...
	What do they say?
	We're no longer doing it.
	This is one of the truth bombs I was dropping on Radio X with Dominique Marais on Tuesday.
	People think this is conspiracy theory.
	Listen to this.
	Oh, Canadian soldiers no longer training Chinese troops, Defence Minister says.
	Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan has confirmed.
	Canadian soldiers are no longer training members of the Chinese military amid scrutiny following a report that senior civil servants opposed a decision last year to stop training activities with the regime.
	A report by the Globe and Mail on Thursday cited documents mistakenly...
	We only found out...
	They only stopped doing it.
	They only confirmed they're not doing it now after it was mistakenly disclosed to the public.
	Oh, sorry.
	We accidentally told you we were training the enemy.
	On Canadian soil, now that you found out, we're no longer doing it.
	Nothing to see here.
	Go home.
	Here's another $600 million.
	Mistakenly released under Access to Information Laws, which said Global Affairs Canada pushed back at the decision by Chief of Defense Staff General Jonathan Vance last year to cancel the training.
	The training was set to see Canadian soldiers train Chinese soldiers in winter activities at Pitawawa, which is in British Columbia.
	The matter dominated question period in the House of Commons with Sajan blaming the former Conservative government for having signed a military cooperation plan.
	I can blame them too.
	They were doing it.
	They're no longer doing it.
	And you only knew that they were doing it because they accidentally told you that they were doing it.
	So yeah, I could see the American military saying, you know what?
	Screw Canadians.
	We're not going to overthrow Trudeau's regime to protect Canadians.
	We're going to do it to protect America.
	Because Canada sure as heck is doing some stupid things up there.
	Mm-mm-mm.
	Is someone criticizing me in the chat?
	Nature Lover Freedom says, Viva has 318,000 followers.
	Must be doing something right.
	Smiley face.
	Who insulted me?
	Who insulted me here?
	I don't think anyone insulted me.
	Thank you very much, Nature Lover.
	So, yeah, that's what the Canadian government...
	When they're not gaslighting you...
	When the psychopath himself is not gaslighting you, they're trying to pass motions in Parliament to condemn the big bad man Tucker Carlson.
	Ignore CTV who said, you know, vaccines prevent transmission.
	I forget what the other four stories that I posted on Twitter were where they got things wrong.
	Throwback.
	Throwback to the psychopath himself, by the way.
	And the Canadian journalism.
	That is just asking the hard questions.
	Get ready.
	Just recently, you and your wife got your shot, your first shot, on her birthday of all days.
	Did you feel a sense of relief and joy?
	Can we all just appreciate that question?
	This is, I forget her name now, she's a journalist or a host at ET Canada, Entertainment Tonight Canada.
	There are lobball questions, and then there are I don't want to be graphic or crass.
	There are lobball questions on steroids.
	Just recently, you and your wife got your shot.
	She's so authentic and she's so sincere in this pursuit of truth.
	Shot on her birthday of all days.
	It's a birthday gift.
	But don't, never mind.
	Feel a sense of relief and joy?
	You know, it's amazing because we were talking about how important it was for everyone to get vaccinated and what a big deal it was to get vaccinated.
	So I thought that was all built in already.
	But getting that shot really was an amazing feeling.
	It hits you.
	Did you cry?
	I cry at movies.
	I didn't cry at the shot, but it was a moment where you realize, okay, this is it.
	And it wasn't so much because I felt that I'm at high risk because we're being careful and I'm healthy and I'm young and all that.
	But at the same time, it's knowing that each of us doing our part is getting through this because we don't get through this unless...
	The vast majority of the population gets that.
	By the way, you understand what he's saying here is that I'm not at risk.
	I did it to protect others.
	And Pfizer never tested for transmission.
	So when they said it's 100% effective at preventing COVID, they knew that they had never even tested for transmission.
	What did Justin Trudeau know at the time?
	He's telling us to do it not for yourself, but for others to suggest it prevents transmission, which it doesn't.
	What did he know at the time?
	But then also listen to how we get through this when enough people get it.
	Canada was over 80% double vaccinated.
	Shot and then a few months later gets that second shot.
	That's how we get it.
	You know what was missing from that statement?
	There was no booster.
	There was no every six months.
	Although people were saying it at the time, they were called conspiracy theorists.
	And it's something that...
	Everyone can do.
	And we're just seeing Canadians come out in such strong numbers all across the country to say, yeah, I want this COVID thing to end.
	I want to get back to normal.
	And the way to do that is to make sure everyone, even that crusty old uncle who resists or that friend who's skeptical, encourage them, convince them, tell them that they need to get vaccinated because this is how we get through it.
	Can you imagine?
	It's inconceivable to watch in retrospect.
	I'm reading some of the comments, which I won't read out loud.
	He makes me mad, and I am not Canadian, says PB Johnso, one, two, three.
	Everything that he just said there turned out to be factually incorrect and outright a lie.
	Once we get to a certain threshold, it'll be over.
	Oh, no, that's right.
	Oh, we got to 82%.
	Well, now you need your booster.
	Oh, and if you don't get your booster, you're going to get fired for misconduct and you're not going to get employment insurance.
	Viva stopped the punishment.
	Stop!
	Stop!
	He's already...
	Okay.
	I had to bring it up.
	I have to periodically remind everybody.
	By the way, one and two in the chat.
	One, you had never seen that video clip before.
	Two, you had seen it before.
	Let me know in the chat.
	Unmute.
	One, you had never seen that before.
	Two, you had seen it before.
	While you do that, I'm going to go cough.
	One, you had never heard it before.
	Two, oh my goodness, there's too many ones in there.
	Too many ones.
	You have confirmed that I have to periodically go back to...
	Okay, close that.
	So anyways, that's Justin Trudeau being a gaslighting psychopath.
	There's no other word for it at this point in time because there's no other word for it.
	Do I play the video again?
	I'm not going to play the video again.
	Canadian soldiers no longer.
	No longer.
	Okay, we're going to go through some other things that are important in Canada that might not be relevant to the rest of the world except as a bellwether for what's coming.
	We have talked about Bill C-11 in Canada.
	That is the Online Streaming Act, which would seek to govern online social media platforms like broadcasters under the Canada Broadcast Act, which would impose Canadian content requirements on them, CanCon requirements, language stuff, potential fines.
	Basically, they would be under the social media platforms.
	If they act like broadcasters, would be...
	Under the authority of the CRTC, which is the Canada Radio Television Commission, Bill C-11.
	And it is now going...
	It was Bill C-10 once upon a time, and then it died because it didn't get passed before a federal election was called in 2021.
	They reintroduced Bill C-10, this time as Bill C-11, to coerce online platforms to create a certain amount of Canadian content.
	It basically subject them to the Canada Broadcast Act and all of its requirements, all of its provisions, and the authority of the CRTC.
	It is nothing other than disguised censorship so that Justin Trudeau can turn Canada into the basic dictatorship of China that he so admires.
	It has gone through two readings in the Senate, and it's now getting ready to undergo its third reading before the Senate, where the Senate might make modifications, send it back to the House to see if they're going to approve the modifications, and then the Senate ultimately has to approve it in order for it to get royal assent become law.
	Listen to this commentary on it, and I'm going to go read the chat while we do this.
	One night after my reading at Harbour Fund in Toronto, two people approached me.
	One was the great Irish writer Roddy Doyle, telling me he had long admired my work.
	The other was the First Nation writer Richard Wagmus, telling me he started writing because he was influenced by my work.
	Both were very kind, lived thousands of miles apart, one Irish and one First Nation, and the writing had little to do with identity politics, but it did have much to do with identifying.
	I do not know who would be able to tell me what Canadian content is and what it is not, but I know it won't be in the Minister of Heritage's power to ever tell me.
	We have yet to make a great movie about hockey, for God's sakes.
	A great movie about Juno Beach, a great movie about Dieppe, or a movie about the young Canadians fighting to death in Hong Kong.
	I think some people might disagree with no good movies about hockey.
	We had Le Boys.
	I don't know where Canadian bacon was made.
	I think that was actually made in the States.
	Our ancestors and singers and writers, too, have gone away because they had to.
	For too many in power have no knowledge about these things.
	We have filled the world with our talent, but not because of the Minister of Heritage.
	We have spread our books and movies across the world, but it is not because of some formula.
	We have insulted so many of our authors and singers, our actors and painters, by not paying attention to them and then claiming them when they go somewhere else.
	They come back to get the Order of Canada and to be fed it at Rideau Hall.
	Drake is known worldwide, but not because of the CRTC.
	Thank God Drake was not up to them or Leonard Cohen or Gordon Lightfoot either.
	You see, we have gone back to the age of Cicero without even knowing.
	In that age, scapegoating was considered a blessing and mob action against one person was considered justice.
	It was Christ actually who taught us that scapegoating was a great lie and pleaded with us by his death never to return to that state.
	This law will be one of scapegoating all those who do not fit into what our bureaucrats think Canada should be.
	Stalin again will be looking over our shoulder when we write.
	We have come a long way from Cicero.
	Thank you very much.
	Hear ye, hear ye.
	Federal government administrators are going to decide what's Canadian content.
	Surely that's not going to be weaponized.
	It will be weaponized, and don't call me Shirley.
	That law, the Bill C-11, may as well be called the Rebel News True North.
	I don't yet think I could put my name up there with them.
	That law is nothing but disguised censorship.
	Federal bureaucrats.
	Decide what Canadian content is.
	Federal bureaucrats decide what, um, what was it, uh, misconduct is.
	Be compliant, be subservient to the government, toe the line, spread the word, and we'll spare you the stick.
	Oh, what's that?
	The employee there didn't do it?
	Well, some government bureaucrat administrative tribunal says, well, too bad for you.
	No employment insurance for you.
	You're fired for not submitting to a medical procedure and an invasive test.
	Another government bureaucrat is going to come and say, oh, what's that, Viva Farah?
	You talk a little bit too much about impeachment.
	We're going to shut you down in Canada.
	Oh, what's that, Rebel News?
	Yeah, we just don't like you.
	So we'll find some provision.
	So apparently...
	A committee reviewing Bill C-11 has proposed some changes.
	If the Senate passes it with the changes, the government has to approve it.
	We'll see what happens.
	I'd say it's the beginning of the end, but it's been this way for a while, so we're well into it.
	And Bill C-11 is not the only bill that would turn Canada into the basic dictatorship of China that Justin Trudeau loves so much.
	Michael Geist, who is the individual that I follow on Twitter to keep up to speed on these things, We'll see if I can ever land him for a show, land him on.
	I'm not sure if I'm too politically toxic to be associated with in Canada these days.
	Probably am.
	There's another one, Bill C-18.
	I forget the Bill C-18.
	The Online News Act.
	It's an amazing thing.
	All of these laws that are just getting cramped through Parliament, in the dead of a pandemic, while the world is falling apart, while Justin Trudeau is saying, hey, look over there at Ukraine.
	All of these laws that are coming, Seek to regulate free speech and news sources.
	Anything that might undermine the regime.
	Shakedown completes the story behind Bill C-18's shameful legislative review process and the race to mandate payment links.
	Later today, the House of Commons will vote to approve.
	Let me just highlight where we're at.
	Bill C-18, the Online News Act, sending it to the Senate just prior to breaking for the holidays.
	While Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez and media lobbyists will no doubt celebrate the milestone, It's been an utter embarrassment for the worse.
	The government cut off debate at the second reading.
	Back it up.
	Doesn't matter.
	We'll go to the second paragraph.
	I've chronicled for months Bill C-18 as the product of an intense lobbying campaign from some of Canada's largest media companies.
	While the Globe and Mail broke from the pack at the last minute, years of one-sided editorials even devoting full-front pages to the issue had its effect.
	Indeed, Canadian newspapers would be exhibit number one for how government intervention in the media space has a direct impact on the independent press.
	This is where they want to charge for click links.
	On social media platforms, which would have the...
	I'll give everybody the article.
	You can go read this.
	They want to charge for clicking through links, which would have the invariable effect of basically Google and Facebook not sharing news links.
	So where are you going to get your news from?
	It's going to limit where you can get your news from, and it's certainly going to facilitate controlling a narrative.
	You got Bill C-11, Bill C-18.
	Bill C-11 also, when it was Bill C-10.
	Jammed through in the dead of the night.
	Last minute changes that broadly expanded the application of the law.
	Despite public denials that the purpose of the law was not to get people's social media accounts.
	They had an exclusion in there that excluded social media accounts.
	They removed the exclusion.
	Told you that there was no reason for the removal of the exclusion.
	That they still don't want to get social media accounts unless they act like broadcasters.
	And they're doing the same thing with Bill C-18.
	It is an attempt.
	To control free speech, to control access to information, to control the news, and to basically prop up Canadian legacy media that is captured legacy media on the only platform where they're losing all influence, digital, internet.
	And that's it.
	Full stop.
	Bill C-18, Bill C-11, we'll be following it, and I'll try to get someone else.
	On to talk about that as well.
	And then two fun stories.
	Bill, not Bill Clinton, what's his name?
	Bernie Sanders.
	Bernie Sanders is Abe Simpson from The Simpsons shaking his fist at the clouds.
	It was just so funny because it seems that everyone banks on the collective consciousness having the memory of a goldfish.
	Bernie Sanders is the individual who got cheated.
	In the 2016 primaries by the DNC and by Hillary Clinton.
	Cheated.
	Screwed.
	Rigged.
	Bent over and violated outright.
	Known to everybody.
	It's like everybody knew Bernie Sanders was cheated and then he turns around and tells everybody to endorse the person, the candidate and the party, who just screwed him.
	2016.
	Bernie Sanders tweets out today, virtually all Democrats talk about the need for campaign finance reform.
	Talk is easy.
	What am I going to do?
	I'm going to write a sternly worded letter to the DNC.
	Now it's time to walk the walk.
	I wrote a letter to the DNC today on why we must stand up for democracy and super PAC spending in primaries.
	There's my tweet.
	Good.
	Listen to this.
	Listen to this.
	Dear Jamie and DNC leadership who screwed me.
	And then I still turned around and told them I love Big Brother.
	I am writing you today to urge the Democrat National Committee to end super PAC spending.
	Why in the hell would they do it, Bernie?
	Are you stupid?
	Or is this what we call controlled opposition?
	Or is this...
	I can't...
	Do you think they don't know what the problem is, Bernie?
	Let's be clear.
	What do I say, people?
	Let's be clear.
	The disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision is an undermining American democracy.
	It's working very well for the Democrats.
	It's working very well for the two-party system, of which you are a member, Bernie.
	You didn't have to be.
	Everybody should go watch the Jimmy Dore interview I did last week.
	In the last election cycle, right-wing billionaires, only right-wing, by the way, nothing to do with FTX funneling hundreds of millions of dollars to the DNC, to the Democrats.
	Do you think they're going to undo that, Bernie, you buffoon?
	I mean, this is so stupid that it can't be stupidity.
	It has to be malice on your part, Bernie.
	Right-wing billionaires funded millions of dollars in spending against progressive candidates in competitive primaries.
	Those funds were often used by super PACs to run outrageous and dishonest attack ads.
	How much did FTX give to the Democrats, Bernie?
	Over $100 million, according to Elon Musk?
	Maybe upwards of a billion?
	Yeah, it's only...
	Right-wing billionaires.
	I'm surprised he's not saying extreme MAGA Republicans.
	He says it twice, by the way, at least for now.
	Right-wing billionaires spend unlimited amounts of money to undermine our democracy, mislead voters.
	By the way, he's describing right-wing billionaires.
	He's talking about Democrat donors here.
	He's talking about the DNC and maintain the status quo.
	When we talk about billionaires buying elections, this is exactly what we are talking about.
	Here is the simple truth.
	The Democratic Party must not allow oligarchs and And their super PACs often aligned with Republicans.
	What fucking delusional world are you living in, Bernie?
	Do you think anybody's stupid enough to believe this?
	They probably are.
	And anyone who listened to you and turned around and voted for Hillary after she made a fool of you has to be equally as much of a fool.
	If Democrats really believe in campaign finance reform, they don't!
	We must ban super PACs in primaries.
	They won't!
	As you know, this week the DNC is holding meetings where there will be a resolution introduced to ban dark money in primaries.
	Oh, you got a lot of that last time.
	Mind the Gap got $200 million this time, I think.
	$140 million they spent.
	Unfortunately, during the last DNC meeting resolution wasn't allowed to come to vote.
	Now it will be introduced again.
	I believe strongly that there should be public debate.
	And a vote on this important measure.
	Once again, I am not asking for donations.
	Virtually all Democrats talk about the need for campaign finance reform.
	No, they don't.
	Talk is easy.
	Sure is.
	Now it's time to walk the walk.
	Let's stand up for democracy.
	Bernie Sanders, the angry old man yelling at clouds.
	I've had enough of this.
	I'm going to write a sternly worded letter to the crooked DNC.
	Surely they're going to do something about it.
	Oh, that's funny.
	Okay.
	Laugh my ass off for sure.
	Okay.
	And then I think we've just got...
	How long have we been going for?
	An hour and 50 minutes.
	Tabarnouche.
	I have to pee.
	I didn't even realize.
	Okay.
	There was one more.
	There was one more.
	In your daily dose of hypocrisy, Democrat hypocrisy.
	You see, it all fits together.
	It's like a beautiful circle, people.
	This is from Fox News, so you can probably, you know...
	Assess the framing accordingly.
	Biden supporter Stephen Curry moves to block low-income housing near his $30 million mansion.
	Curry and his wife also asked the local government to build fencing to block low-income residents from seeing their home.
	You imagine you own a $30 million home and you ask for taxpayers to build a fence so that people can't see into your $30 million home.
	The audacity it takes to do that.
	Okay, doesn't matter.
	NBA superstar.
	Stephen Curry, who sounds about as morally bankrupt as other NBA superstar LeBron James, who publicly endorsed Joe Biden for president in 2020, is opposing a low-income housing development near his $30 million mansion, according to a local news report.
	We hesitate to add to that not-in-our-backyard literally rhetoric.
	But let's go ahead and do it.
	Not in my backyard, people.
	Get those low-housing places, low-income housing, away from my house.
	That's how it works.
	No borders at the southern border, but I want a damn big border around my house.
	I want you to pay for it, and I want you to keep the rabble away from me.
	I don't want them seeing my pool.
	But we wanted to send a note before today's meeting.
	Safety and privacy for us and our kids.
	Oh, why?
	Because low-income people are just fundamentally dangerous?
	Stephen Curry?
	That sounds kind of...
	Like a mean generalization?
	Continues to be our top priority.
	Safety for us and our kids, not the well-being of our citizens.
	Continues to be our top priority.
	And one of the biggest reasons we chose Atherton as a home.
	We chose this place because the poor people aren't here.
	Don't bring them in.
	And if you do, build me a fence so I don't have to see them.
	It was an attempt by Stephen Curry, who was the fifth highest paid athlete in the world, to prevent undesirables from crowding the area around his home.
	Atherton is one of the most exclusive communities in the U.S., with Forbes ranking it as the most expensive.
	Wow.
	The Curry family also pointed to local government, also petitioned the local government to build a fence and shrubbery around their home to protect the family from the watchful eyes.
	If they couldn't block the new families from joining, they heard entirely.
	Should that not be sufficient for the state, we ask that the town commits to investing.
	It's an investment to block the view into his $30 million mansion.
	Considerably taller fencing and landscaping to block sight lines.
	Council member Rick DeGolia.
	Has reportedly said that it's not possible to build low-income housing in Atherton since land is worth about $8 million per acre.
	Curry is one of the highest-profile Democrats in the country.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	In 2020, he brought his family out to endorse the Biden for president as the DNC, during which he referenced social justice, racial equality, just not in my backyard.
	This year, Stephen Curry did a photo op of the president in a picture captioned, Team Captains.
	Okay, and we don't care about that.
	Fox Digital has reached out to the board of an Atherton Homeowners Association for additional comments but has not yet heard back.
	Not in my backyard.
	Literally.
	I think we've done good today.
	Let me see what we've got in the chat.
	Yeah, build a wall.
	Build a wall, just not at the border.
	Kenzie67 says, much to us, listen for laughs.
	Dr. Malone is in it.
	Link is safe.
	I'm going to look at that.
	I'll watch that after.
	Let me just open it up.
	But now, let me go see what's going on in the Rumble Rant chat.
	Ugh, I didn't...
	What in the what?
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com That's an old chat.
	Did I not set up a chat for this one?
	I'm an idiot.
	I thought I did.
	Everybody, thank you all for coming.
	What I think I need to do...
	You know what I'm going to do?
	Because I only played the first two minutes of the Viva Kayaking, I'm going to play the best part of that video.
	Because Rumble has a thing where the video cuts out and the video cuts out, so if it cuts out, it should cut out on a silly video.
	By the way, tomorrow...
	Constantine Kissin from Trigonometry at 11 o 'clock, our time.
	And let me just go to my calendar.
	And Friday, special guest, which you're not going to want to miss at noon.
	Tomorrow, Constantine Kissin, Trigonometry at 11 o 'clock.
	Friday, special guest.
	You're not going to want to miss it.
	I'm going to announce it tomorrow so that there's no distraction.
	But for now, for now, people, I'm going to play this out.
	I'm going to thank everybody for coming.
	I'm going to say the same thing I say every time, people.
	Do not lose faith.
	Do not succumb to the demons that call you to misbehave.
	Do not become the monster that you are battling and do not be consumed by the abyss into which you might be staring.
	Lord loves a working man.
	Continue to conduct yourselves in a way that would make your parents, children, pets proud.
	You can do no wrong.
	And with that said, see you tomorrow at 11 o 'clock.
	I don't know that we're going to have a sidebar tonight.
	Probably not.
	We'll see, but stay tuned.
	And see you tomorrow, peeps.
	Enjoy this.
	Check this out.
	Oh, yeah.
	Okay, now here is the...
	Here is the challenge.
	Alright, now we're going to try to change the front.
	And...
	Okay.
	Let's just hit it like this, and we're done.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Now let's see how we do this.
	And can we get up into the kayak?
	Yes we can, look at that.
	Okay.
	It's just that easy.
	Now let's try to take a wave.
	Oh wow.
	Got a wave here?
	Yes, yes, yes, yes.
	Okay.
	Okay, so we know that we can tip, we can get back in, and we'll still be good.
	And that's amazing.
	Booyah.
	That looks like a buoy.
	That looks like a dead scuba diver.
	That's not a dead scuba diver.
	I haven't seen any bait balls or any fish or any turtles or any sharks.
	It's just beautiful though.
	Okay, well over here.
	Okay, I'm bumping on it now.
	Oh gosh, get away from here.
	Over here.
	Alright, we're out Alright, we're out All right.
	Alright, that's it.
	We're back.
	I'm gonna go ask the lifeguard what the deal was because I'm not...
	I'm always a believer in it, but sometimes it is better to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission.
	So we'll see what, if any, rules there are.
	But that was the adventure.

▲