Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 2, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

01:50:15

Musk Suspend Ye; The Jones Interview; Kari Lake Attorneys Sanctioned AND MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	So what you don't want to do when you're covering the Pelosi family is tell the truth.
	NBC News reporter Miguel Almaguer apparently didn't know that.
	He did some real journalism on the attack of Paul Pelosi, and he has since vanished from the air.
	What happened to him?
	Fox's Trace Gallagher may know.
	He joins us tonight with a story.
	Hey, Trace.
	Disappeared from air.
	Miguel Almaguer is based in Los Angeles, just like me.
	And if you watch NBC Nightly News, the Today Show, he was on all the time.
	Now he's been off the air for almost a month.
	He was suspended by NBC without explanation in early November.
	He's also been off social media except for posting a few vacation pictures.
	And so far, neither Al McGurr, his agent, NBC, or anyone else has issued a statement on why he left, when he comes back, or if he comes back.
	It's a suspension.
	That's a little too far.
	We don't know what was wrong with the original report, other than the fact that apparently they said it did not meet whatever journalistic standards they ever had.
	The witness protection part.
	All right, that's a little commentary, Fox.
	Tone it down a little bit.
	It's probably just a non-disclosure, a non-disparagement.
	Who knows?
	Who knows?
	We know that report.
	We talked about it, but just in case you forgot.
	Specifically challenging whether Paul Pelosi was in danger when police arrived.
	Watch.
	After a knock and announce, the front door was opened by Mr. Pelosi.
	The 82-year-old did not immediately declare an emergency or tried to leave his home.
	They're going to say that's opinion from the reporter.
	That's not a fact.
	That's conjecture.
	But by the way, appreciate the fact that this made it to air.
	Not in a live broadcast.
	Not in like some independently produced video.
	Like what I do.
	No.
	Highly edited.
	Overlays.
	Text.
	Produced.
	presumably went through all layers of editorial oversight and then made it to air didn't even get taken off before like the cbs report in ukraine where they they took it down and re-edited it just based on a on an advertisement or a promotional video alone but But instead, began walking several feet back into the foyer, toward the assailant, and away from police.
	But the very same details have been reported by NBC's local affiliate in San Francisco.
	And local NBC sources tell Fox Digital they believe Miguel Almaguer and the affiliate had different sources that offered the very same information.
	Remember, Almaguer didn't just write a very controversial story and have it edited without the brass at NBC signing off on it.
	It doesn't work like that.
	Somebody approved the story and likely several people approved it.
	And just as likely several people have now signed off.
	On saying nothing.
	It's...
	Oh, and by the way, Almaguer gone.
	Like disappeared.
	Hold on a second.
	What was his name?
	Miguel Almaguer.
	Hold on a second.
	Let's just do this here.
	Miguel Almaguer.
	Where is he?
	This is from four days ago.
	As of November 15, Almaguer hasn't appeared on air.
	Few and far in between tweets.
	What did you learn?
	What did you learn, Miguel?
	What did you learn?
	He's probably sitting there saying, what the hell's going on?
	I did my job.
	You all approved it.
	But apparently, no, no.
	Didn't meet journalistic standards.
	Take it off air.
	No further explanation.
	And I had asked the same questions at the time.
	And by the way, nothing in that report has been contradicted by anything.
	And on the contrary, Confirmed by the police report itself.
	Are we going to have to have another entry into Urban Dictionary?
	Ermagerd.
	Sudden disappearance for doing your job well.
	What time is it?
	12.04.
	Good afternoon, everybody.
	Good morning, California.
	Good morning, Texas.
	Yeah, it's another day of absolute madness.
	Like, outright madness.
	If people are not on Twitter, I sort of envy that level of not being involved in...
	I say I don't get involved in sports.
	I don't find the distraction value added.
	My distraction is Twitter.
	We go to Twitter, we see what's going on today.
	What big players are getting into trouble?
	And yesterday...
	You know, if there's a World Cup of Twitter and there's a final match where there's overtime in a game that's like 4-4, so not a 0-0 boring game to watch.
	A good game.
	Yesterday was the overtime on Twitter.
	And we'll get into this because I know that there's going to be a number of people who, I don't like the word follow, but who have subscribed to my daily digital newsletter because...
	Presumably, they either like the way I think, or for the others, they don't like the way I think, and they like trolling like some of the people on Twitter who follow me, only to insult.
	And not that I'm any better at that.
	I had very few nice things to say to Brian Stetler on Twitter.
	But I know some people are going to disagree with some things that I have to say.
	That's going to be the nature of the beast.
	No one's going to agree with me all the time.
	Sometimes I don't even agree with me all the time.
	I have my view of Yeh as a human and what he's going through, which, funny enough, doesn't undermine my position on what he's, not what he's saying, but rather how people are reacting or how the social medias are reacting to what he's saying.
	But we'll get into it.
	We'll go over a lawsuit, a dismissal of a lawsuit and sanctions against Dershowitz and Carrie Lake's counsel for a lawsuit filed prior to the midterms in which Allegedly, allegations were made that were not just unsubstantiated, but that were so frivolous, they ought to be sanctioned under whatever the rules of procedure are, and the attorneys are going to be ordered to pay legal fees once they put out their costs.
	We'll go over that very quickly.
	And then the standard stuff.
	Doctors who want to express opinions and tell people what to do on the interwebs and then block people for asking them questions.
	Okay.
	Standard disclaimers.
	I'm going to read a couple of Super Chats to get to them.
	Pasha Moyer in the house.
	Serious question.
	Do we know if Almagra is still breathing?
	Apparently he has posted sparse social media posts on vacation.
	I don't know.
	That's all we know.
	I hate those types of jokes.
	Someone didn't do something to themselves because I hate putting that juju out in the universe.
	But we don't know.
	Mr. Wonderful, how's it going?
	4 a.m. in Terra Australis.
	No wonder I barely catch you live anymore.
	You have my support regardless.
	Thank you very much.
	Yeah, that's 4 o 'clock because that's 4 o 'clock in the future.
	What does the future look like?
	One more.
	Okay, we got that one already.
	So 30% of all Super Chats goes to YouTube.
	If you don't like that, we are...
	Simultaneously streaming on Rumble.
	And now that I say it, I think I've realized that I forgot to put the link there.
	Are we good on Rumble?
	Let me just refresh here and make sure.
	Rumble has the equivalent of Super Chats if you want to support the channel.
	They take 20%.
	You can feel better supporting a good platform and more goes to the creator.
	But financial support is not the only or even the best way to support a channel.
	Share.
	Like, share, snip, clip, and spread the word.
	I'm going to put the link to Rumble here.
	You can subscribe or follow us or be part of the community on Locals, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	But the best free way to support, be a member on Locals or just snip, clip, share, away, and spread the word.
	Pin message.
	Okay.
	Now, you may have seen the warning.
	This video contains paid promotion.
	Because it does, people.
	Because when you make it in the world of the interwebs and you get sponsors, but not just a question of getting sponsors, because I've said no to more sponsors than I've said yes to.
	But I've said yes to some because I like them and I work with them and I use them.
	EnviroClean's air filtration system.
	Yes, people.
	It's $699 US dollars.
	That's like $2,000 Canadian.
	No, it's not.
	It's a joke.
	Canadian is...
	$1.32, so that's like 7 times 3, $2.10, so add $2.10 to that.
	That's like $920 Canadian.
	For anybody who knows that you need an air filtration system in your house, you could spend a lot of money on a crappy one and you're just wasting money, good money, for crappy product.
	EnviroCleanse, it's got a big fat HEPA filter, which is one element of the filtration system.
	Then it's got a patented technology in the neutralizing Mineral filter that neutralizes, what do they call the volatile organic compounds, odors, germs, bacteria.
	It's used by the Department of Defense.
	I double-checked this, spent a half an hour on the phone with the science team behind this.
	Used by the Department of Defense.
	There's a reason why the U.S. Navy chose to equip their ships with EnviroCleanse over other air purifiers to help stop COVID, flu, and colds from spreading aboard their ships.
	Used by the Department of Defense.
	In over 300,000 schools in America, I would like to get it in all of the classrooms in Canada.
	And it's fantastic.
	Whisper Quiet, very Matrix-y white box.
	It's good.
	Go to ekpeer.com, as in EnviroCleansePeer.com.
	ekpeer.com, it'll bring you to the website.
	Promo code VIVA gets you 10% off the unit.
	A free air quality monitor.
	It is expensive, and there are financing options that I know of.
	I don't know how it works exactly, but there is 0% financing if you're eligible.
	If you need one, don't get a bad one.
	Get the best one there is out there.
	And thank you, Enviroquence, for having the courage, the audacity to sponsor a channel that promotes hinged, fringed views for the fringed...
	You know what I mean.
	Alrighty, then.
	On that note...
	I use mine in the bathroom.
	They're good for like a thousand square feet plus per unit.
	So if you put them in a bathroom, I mean, unless you have a massive bathroom, you pick the room, you pick the level of the house for the best way to aerate for as much as you work.
	Does it work on gas?
	Oh, does it work?
	I thought you meant it is not gas powered, but it does work on gas.
	Our paralyzed puggle, Pudge, who occasionally poops in her bed, as in every morning, or pees on the floor.
	And her pee, for whatever the reason, is extremely, extremely potent, odorous urine.
	It works.
	As does not wearing shoes in our house because stepping in poo-poo, if you're going to do it, do it barefoot.
	It's a lot easier to clean up.
	All right.
	What do we want to start with?
	Let me see what I have on the notes for the back burner.
	We're going to move over to Rumble sooner than later.
	What do we want to run with as the first story?
	Let's go with this.
	Can't ask questions.
	You get called an anti-vaxxer.
	I like seeing doctors' opinions, and I like asking doctors' questions.
	I have yet to get the answer to this question.
	Dr. Tom Frieden.
	Let me see if we're seeing the same thing here.
	Global health leader and epidemiologist.
	I am not one to poo-poo credentials.
	President and CEO of Resolve TSL.
	I don't know what that is.
	Former CDC Gov.
	Now I got some flags going off, having seen the way the CDC has become corrupted in real time.
	Now I think the old astronaut meme always has been.
	Director of New York City Health.
	Okay, now I'm getting flags going off here.
	He comes out and tweets something we've heard multiple times.
	Risk of myocarditis after receiving an mRNA vaccine.
	Oh, by the way, no legal advice, no medical advice, no...
	Election formification advice, though we're going to touch on all three subjects.
	Risk of myocarditis after receiving an mRNA vaccine is rare in teens and young men.
	Among males ages 12 to 17, the risk of heart problem was 1.8 to 5.6 times higher after a COVID infection than after mRNA infection, according to CDC data.
	People, we train the mind here to think critically.
	We train the mind to know when we're being told things and when we're not being told things.
	So let's just read through that again.
	And chat, what's going to be the first flag here?
	Children, let's see what is going to be the first word that comes to mind here.
	Risk of myocarditis after an mRNA vaccine is rare.
	Rare is a subjective assessment.
	What are the odds?
	What are the stats?
	We have heard.
	Varying stats.
	One in 10,000 once upon a time.
	One in 5,000 if you listen to Dr. Kieran Moore.
	One in 5,000 per dose if you listen to a German study that came out subsequently.
	Am I going to see my response here?
	Probably not.
	So what is rare?
	What is rare?
	Like, what is rare?
	And that will allow us also to contextualize the next statement.
	So that's the first question.
	It's nice not being told anything in a tweet.
	Among males aged 12 to 17, among young men, let's see this, the risk of heart problems.
	By the way, notice now it went from myocarditis to heart problems at large.
	What does that mean?
	And why did we go from talking about the risk of myocarditis from the jab being rare, all of a sudden talking about heart problems?
	It's a curious shift in terminology, but whatever.
	Heart problems, whatever that means, was higher after COVID infection than the jab.
	What does that mean, by the way?
	If one thing was more likely than another outcome, it means that both were outcomes nonetheless.
	So the question now that you have to ask is, if heart problems after an infection are higher than heart problems or myocarditis, if we're using it interchangeably, after the jab, it means that there are cases of people getting it.
	After one or the other or both?
	All right, people.
	What's going to be the question now?
	If you get it after both, and as we now know, and this is not medical advice, this is not election fornification advice, this is nothing.
	I could pull up all the doctors in.
	If you can, if there's a risk of getting heart issues or myocarditis after both the jibby jab and an infection, And we know that the Jibby Jab does not prevent infection.
	Are you not merely, in fact, compounding the potential risk in a demographic that is statistically at minimal risk to begin with?
	So this is the question that...
	Are we sharing this?
	Am I sharing this?
	No, I'm not sharing this.
	Hold on a second.
	This is not even basic science.
	This is just freaking common sense.
	What does rare mean?
	Fine.
	We've been told that myocarditis is 1 in 5,000 per dose.
	Also, the jab does not prevent contracting COVID.
	Are we not just compounding the risk of myocarditis, both from infection and mRNA jab?
	What they would have to be able to show in order to justify the recommendation of jibby-jabbing people who are at minimal risk, uber-minimal risk, I won't qualify it any more than that.
	Uber minimal risk in the first place.
	They would have to show that if you get the Jibby Jab, that it will so reduce your chances of getting myocarditis from infection anyhow because the Jibby Jab doesn't prevent infection, that it somehow warrants the additional risk of getting it in the first place instead of just hoping and taking your chances with an infection to begin with.
	It would have to be so much more effective.
	At reducing the risk of heart issues after a COVID infection to justify the recommendation, has any doctor showed us that homework?
	And then I just have to show you my homework.
	This was Dr. Kieran Moore from Ontario.
	We know that the risk is...
	There is a risk, a very small risk.
	One in 5,000 that may get myocarditis, for example.
	You'd have to discuss the risk benefit for a young, healthy person.
	And then the other...
	Homework was...
	Come on.
	The study in Germany, it's in...
	Correction, according to PEI Germany, that was not Prince Edward Island, Germany.
	The report of serious reactions is serious, by the way.
	0.2 per thousand vaccine doses.
	I'm no mathemagician.
	0.2 times 5 is 1. 1,000 times 5 is 5,000.
	The rate for serious reactions is 1 per 5,000 doses.
	So, compound infection with the Jibijab and then compound the risk with each subsequent Jibijab booster.
	I'm no doctor.
	Just a lawyer with half a functioning brain, that sounds like a lot of compounding risk factors for a demographic that is at virtually no risk to begin with.
	And to the extent that we know it doesn't prevent transmission, you don't even get to rely on the argument, well, you don't want to give it to grandma, do you?
	Mr. Wonderful, the only thing West will accomplish is to take votes from Trump.
	Those who are influenced by a sneaker salesman who foolishly married a Kardashian get what they deserve.
	Okay, we're going to get there.
	We're going to get there.
	I'm going to flag it.
	Not flag it.
	Star it and come back to it later.
	And I noticed another super chat.
	It was right here.
	Peckerwood.
	We might hate what Ye said, but hate speech is still protected speech.
	He's still proving there is not free speech no matter how harsh it is.
	You know what?
	Maybe it's time to get to Ye.
	Before we...
	We're 20 minutes in.
	1,143 people.
	This is amazing.
	1,143 on YouTube.
	And we're at nearly...
	We're at 4,400 on Rumble.
	So let's do this here.
	Let's move over to Rumble now.
	Not because the discussion can't be had on Twitter, because I'm putting the video up afterwards.
	Anyhow, I put up Whitney Webb's full interview.
	Put up Whitney Webb's full interview.
	I haven't published it yet because I didn't want it to overlap with this.
	I'm going to publish it after the stream.
	Ashley Rinsberg, who I interviewed yesterday.
	Amazing.
	That'll be put up.
	Shortly thereafter.
	Phil Damaris is not going to make it today.
	We didn't coordinate properly, so it'll happen next week.
	Phil Damaris, the walrus whisperer.
	Let's just bring it over to Rumble anyhow.
	Just reading some chats here before I go.
	Barb, we're going to talk about it.
	We're going to talk.
	There's a lot of people who have a lot of theories, but...
	You have to stick to the ones that have as much justification or as much evidentiary support.
	LOL.
	I like Trump, but he will be even more useless if he actually wins again.
	TPTB.
	To be totally...
	TPTB proved they have control no matter who's elected figurehead.
	TPTB.
	Don't tell me what that is.
	Thank you.
	The powers that be.
	Yes!
	Yes!
	Yes, people!
	I didn't see it in the chat.
	Okay, I promise you I didn't see it.
	Huh?
	Okay, no, hold on, hold on.
	I did not see it in the chat.
	I love that game.
	There used to be a game on the internet called Acrophobia, and it was a game where you would make acronyms with words and the best one would get the votes of the...
	I don't know what ever happened to that website, but...
	Yeah, I got it.
	Okay, good.
	People, let's move over to Rumble.
	We're going to do it right now.
	I'm going to end.
	I've forgotten nothing here.
	One last shout out to ekpeer.com.
	Thank you.
	If anybody needs a good filter, you know the one to get.
	Let us end it on YouTube and bring it over to the Rumbles where we will party hardy until the morning light comes.
	Okay, we're off.
	We're off YouTube now.
	The powers that be.
	Okay, now let's go see what we got in the chat here.
	Okay.
	I listened to the Yay Alex interview last night, and I can't see how anyone can speak of Jesus as he did and not be sincere.
	Sorry.
	Jones phones on Rumble.
	Let's get into this.
	I'll preface this, and I know this is going to upset some people, and I've been consistent from the beginning.
	People immediately, reflexively, once they know that someone has...
	He suffered from mental illness, manic bipolar.
	I think it's not a disputed fact that Kanye has suffered from manic bipolar.
	And it's not the type of thing that goes away.
	It's the type of thing that gets treated and there's ups and there's downs and there's relapses and there's medication.
	And sometimes people who suffer from this when they feel good come off their meds and then they go into another episode and they're not on their meds and they don't appreciate that they're going through an episode.
	And I'm saying this not from my own body experience.
	But from very close, intimate personal experience in my younger years where I knew someone, visited them when they were having an episode in the hospital where they were, met a few other people who became very close friends, and I think they still remember me.
	And when you've seen it and once you've seen the cycle, I had an aunt who was also schizophrenic and would have ups and downs.
	Look, at first, I am very reluctant to immediately reflexively go to that explanation because on the one hand, it's not fair.
	It's not because someone has had a condition in the past that they're having it all the time and that it becomes the default way of dismissing whatever they're saying.
	Also, to the extent that people reflexively do that, it makes people very reluctant to come out and discuss certain issues because, you know, whether or not it's manic bipolar schizophrenia or even having had a stroke.
	When you come out and say, yeah, I had a stroke and I was in the hospital, but I'm fully recovered, everyone always sits there and says, well, maybe there's lingering...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Lingering brain damage, for lack of a more subtle way of describing it.
	So there's that.
	When Ye came out with his Instagram post saying, I'm a little sleepy, going DEFCON 4 on Jews, first of all, there was less of a context in terms of less of a pattern.
	And so I read that.
	I said, look, it's not fair to immediately say, no, he's out of his mind.
	It was not that over the top.
	It was not yet reaffirmed by subsequent behavior and subsequent escalating behavior.
	And there was an innocent way of interpreting that where it could have just been a joke at knowing that, you know.
	Who owns Facebook and who owns YouTube?
	Where Ye was having some problems on Instagram.
	Facebook owns Instagram.
	When he says, I'm going DEF CON on Jewish people, some people read that as being all Jewish people.
	I personally read that as saying Jewish people as in Zuckerberg and whomever else.
	I think Ye is clarified on that later.
	Now the only question is going to be, what's the nature of the clarification?
	Is it a troll?
	Is it...
	Is it sincere anti-Semitism?
	Sincere to the spirit anti-Semitism?
	Is it even anti-Semitism to begin with?
	Or is it an indication of someone who might be having an episode and not being surrounded by people who are taking care of him, but rather potentially people who are exploiting him?
	The interview with Tim Pool, I think neither here nor there except...
	I'm going to read some of these rumble rants afterwards.
	The interview on Tim Pool I don't think was determinate, but it seemed to be part of a pattern of increasingly erratic, escalatingly erratic, escalating erratic behavior.
	But the Alex Jones, the interview on Alex Jones, and I watched it, for me, I don't find what Ye is saying to be so offensive that it should be...
	Outlawed.
	That he should even be banned for, and we'll get to the ban or the suspension, which I don't know if it's been lifted yet, on Twitter.
	But what I think the problem is, is that I think it's indicative of him being in something of a manic state, connecting dots that don't necessarily have connections, and thinking that he's fighting some massive battle the way he's doing it.
	As opposed to actually being counterproductive to the very battle that he purports to want to be fighting.
	And illusions of grandeur, illusions of being connected to God.
	I mean, I know it's a fine line between spirituality and what are typical symptoms of someone going through an episode.
	And the other thing, you know, going to Trump and saying, Trump, do you want to be my running bait?
	That's not edgy.
	That's not ballsy.
	That's not courageous.
	That's either burning bridges or it's detached.
	There's only two ways to qualify that.
	It's not confidence and, hey, maybe that's really going to get Trump's attention.
	It's delusional if it was a serious request and it's burning bridges and self-destructive if it wasn't and it was just sort of a ploy.
	Okay.
	So with that said, you can agree or disagree with my assessment, but it doesn't change anything of the substance.
	Yay coming out and saying, I love Hitler.
	And by the way, he did, it's like, let me pull up some of the clips.
	By the way, when Count Dankula taught his pug, you know, gassed the Jews.
	All right, I can understand people finding that offensive.
	But criminal?
	Absolutely not.
	Speech laws preclude that type of what was obvious, clearly intended to be satire at the idea of how awful it was.
	It wasn't like training.
	It wasn't like legitimizing the idea.
	The entire satire was predicated on the idea that it's the most awful thing you can possibly say, and so I'm going to sully this beautiful, cute little pug by teaching him...
	I think the dog was...
	To say the most awful thing on earth, the idea that it led to a fine and imprisonment of Count Dankula, if only temporarily, I mean, it's a preposterous joke, and I'm not going to pull out the as a blank, therefore my opinion is more valid, because it's not.
	That's just my opinion.
	It was preposterous.
	So, everything else about Ye aside, let's just say he is trolling, but just really, you know, a self-destructive troll, in as much as what he's saying is absolutely, I'll say, Atrocious, but deliberately edgy, if that's the point, I still don't think that that should result in what he's saying now and him being booted from platforms.
	The funny thing is, if you just let him say it, it's not like people are going to listen to him and say, oh yeah, you know what?
	He might be right about Hitler.
	I never thought about that.
	No.
	You let him say these things, and people are going to rightly publicly mock him, publicly dissociate themselves from them, and that's what happens with bad free speech, is that the only cure for bad free speech is more free speech.
	But just...
	Let me just get the clip.
	I've been talking too much.
	Here's one.
	Here's one.
	I don't know which one this is.
	And then I get accused of being a bad person or a self-hating person because I don't think that the sanctions are appropriate for the transgressions.
	Let people say stupid things.
	But whatever.
	Let me see here.
	Not this one.
	Not this one.
	Not that one.
	That's Greg Price.
	No, that was...
	Oh, here's one.
	Okay.
	Let's try this one.
	And by the way, the ultimate irony, Alex Jones is coming out of this looking like the most reasonable person.
	I choose to believe because I think it's the case.
	Alex Jones is not exploiting Kanye here.
	I think this was over the top even for Alex Jones and he wasn't actually expecting it.
	He just thought it would be a massively popular interview.
	I don't think Jones is actively, deliberately exploiting Ye.
	In a period where Jones thinks, suspects, or knows that Ye is in a vulnerable position.
	And maybe that's just because I have a, you know, wrong, unjustified spot for Jones, and maybe he's just totally exploiting Ye like everybody else.
	But set that aside.
	Okay, here.
	You're not a Nazi.
	You don't deserve to be called that a demonized.
	Well, and by the way, who called him a Nazi?
	Oh, we'll get there.
	I got that clip as well.
	Cenk Uygur.
	And now...
	Leave it up to what Ye just said to now allow Cenk to say, yeah, I told you, he was.
	Look at that.
	We can have a black Nazi because I don't know what happens when you say, I love Hitler.
	I mean, I don't know what you get called after that.
	Unless everyone says, oh, it was obviously a joke.
	He's saying it to say how bad it is.
	But I don't get the Count Dankula impression from this bit if it's intended to be a bit.
	You're not a Nazi.
	You don't deserve to be called that and demonized.
	Well...
	I see good things about Hitler also.
	I love everyone.
	And Jewish people are not going to tell me.
	You can love us.
	If anybody doesn't know, that's the infamous scene from American History X. You can love what we're doing to you with the contracts.
	And you can love what we're pushing with the pornography.
	But this guy that invented highways, invented the very microphone that I use as a musician, I would fact check that.
	I'm not sure that Hitler invented highways.
	I'm not sure that Hitler invented the microphone that he's using, but this is another indication of something, people, but let's leave that aside.
	I can't say out loud that this person ever did anything good, and I'm done with that.
	I'm done with the classifications.
	Every human being has something of value that they brought to the table, especially Hitler.
	And then you get into the problem.
	And the funny thing is this.
	Am I going to close that?
	Do I want to keep that one up?
	No, I'll close it.
	The irony in all of this is this.
	The people who are now defending Ye and saying he's...
	He's allowed saying it.
	You know, the idea that even Hitler did good things and had value.
	I think a lot of them overlap with the same people who condemned Vaush, for example, when Vaush said pedophilia is not necessarily bad because some people make the most of it.
	Like, some people become successful as a result, but for that act of violence against them when they were kids, they would have never become the successes that they were, so therefore it's somehow...
	From a consequentialist point of view, a good thing.
	Vaush said that in so many words.
	I don't think Vaush should be deplatformed for that.
	It'll be arguable whether or not that's encouraging illegal activity.
	But the people saying, well, Ye should get away with saying this, but some of them were the ones criticizing Vaush for saying something equally illogical.
	The fact that one of the greatest, I know people like to say, Stalin killed more people.
	Mao killed more people.
	Okay.
	There's a number after which you stop counting because genocide is genocide.
	Crimes against humanity are crimes against humanity.
	The idea that Kanye is saying there's value to everybody.
	Okay.
	In a way.
	But it's the especially, especially Hitler.
	Oh, especially.
	Why especially?
	To be provocative?
	To make a point about freedom of speech or because in his mind now that becomes the logical, coherent way to defend freedom of speech by highlighting one of the most atrocious murderous dictators of all time and saying, especially him.
	Or maybe in his own mind right now, he's in a phase of spiritual religious forgiveness and thinks that he's going to be proving an even bigger point to himself.
	By forgiving and by placing greater value on the value of the most heinous of people.
	Either way, it's an indication of something.
	Bottom line?
	Okay, he says something stupid.
	What's the consequence now?
	Before we get there, let me read some rumble rants.
	KGB 2021.
	In my opinion, Elon Musk suspended Kanye's account as an act of compassion.
	Interesting, by the way, we'll get there.
	Not as suppression of free speech.
	Kanye needs to unplug from the matrix.
	It's very interesting because he did...
	I'm going to get to one of the tweets if I can find it.
	Elon did allude to something like that, but censoring people because they're your enemies is just as bad as censoring someone because they're your friend and you want to prevent them from hurting themselves.
	That's not the role of it.
	I mean, imagine...
	You censor an ally because you don't want them revealing information that's going to be damning to their cause.
	I mean, that's like censoring the Hunter Biden story.
	So it's an interesting, thoughtful way of putting it.
	Hold on.
	That was KGB 2021.
	But it doesn't matter one way or the other.
	KGB 2021, $1 rant says it would be the biggest troll event of our lifetime if he did all of this to release him from contracts with Adidas, Polar, and other obligations for yay 2024.
	Trolls are not supposed to be self-destructive.
	I mean, a troll is a troll and maybe, you know, like Gavin McInnes' troll will cause some damage and I'm not sure that that...
	Even that type of troll is not...
	Trolls are not supposed to be self-destructive to that point.
	At that point, hey, the ultimate troll.
	I'm going to jump off a bridge.
	It's going to be the ultimate troll.
	That'll show everybody.
	This is a self-destructive spiral coming from what I think is behavior that's sort of beyond Kanye, out of his spectrum of even erratic behavior and being egged on by two other people who have a lot to gain from this and nothing to lose from it.
	A lot to gain and nothing to lose.
	Smegamis.
	I find Ye's honesty and courage to speak his mind to be refreshing.
	The man laid the foundation of his beliefs as a child of God.
	Love everybody, even your enemies.
	Do you think he honestly believes that Especially Hitler deserves praise.
	I love Hitler.
	And then if you're using the I love Hitler in the sense of forgiveness, it's a far different thing than to say I can forgive even the most genocidal of enemies because that's what Christ would want if you're believing that.
	But I'm not.
	Dhockey966, do you need a video editor?
	I am freelance.
	Let me screen grab that.
	If you ever needed help.
	I know I have someone on the backdrop already, but Chet Chisholm says, did you get a chance to check out my talk with Top?
	I talked about some of what happened to the CAF, the Canadian Air Force, and what we are seeing in EMS injuries from the jab.
	I've had more brought to my attention since.
	I haven't, Chet, but I'm screen grabbing and I'm going to.
	And then I noticed there's a $20 rumble rant.
	If I scroll all the way down to the bottom.
	Oh, did I miss these?
	No, I didn't.
	So that's the gossipy side of it.
	I'll play one more clip.
	LOL, censorship for compassion.
	I have to shut you up for your own good.
	Listen to yourselves.
	Very vestigious.
	Look, it's a forgiving way of looking at what Elon's doing.
	The other way to look at it is there are no rules.
	Elon said two weeks ago, or however long ago, I won't be censoring hate speech, but it won't be getting boosted.
	And now suspending Ye's account for an image that we'll get to.
	For your lovely curly hair care, Barbisa Ariane, thank you very much.
	Okay, hold on.
	There was one more here.
	There was one more.
	I mean, there's a lot of clips.
	And I watched it.
	And that's my opinion.
	You got Nick Fuentes.
	We know what Nick Fuentes has to say.
	He said it before.
	He'll look for any opportunity to say it again.
	And he'll look for any bullhorn, human or physical, that will elevate him to the next level to...
	Get his message out, which for anybody who knows, already knows.
	And those who don't, well, now you know.
	And again, I don't think Fuentes should be necessarily suspended, depending on what the speech at issue is.
	And I've drawn my line at actively inciting violence or threats, harassment, defamation, standard legal stuff.
	But just having racist points of view and expressing them.
	What do you think is going to happen if someone comes out and expresses the most vile forms of anti-Semitic, racist, homophobic rhetoric?
	It's not going to convince people who are rational, reasonable people.
	And you're probably better off knowing who it is that believes the things that you should probably want to know that they believe in the first place.
	That and public discourse tends to have a way of getting people, not shamed in that sense, but...
	Having people respond to them.
	Is it this?
	Not now.
	Oh, this is a New York Times article.
	We're going to get to that in a second, but not right now.
	Hold on, but I know I had another yay clip.
	Okay, so there's that.
	Oh, here it is.
	Okay, let's do this one.
	You know, it takes a lot to make Alex Jones blush.
	Oh my goodness.
	Just because you don't like one group doesn't mean the other.
	I love Jewish people, but I also love Nazis.
	Oh man!
	Well, I have to disagree with that.
	Oh my goodness.
	Also, bear in mind here, for people who want to, I don't know, it's just free speech.
	If what he's saying is, I love Nazis as in the sense of I hate them, but they deserve forgiveness, then you can put it into context here.
	And again, if this is what Ye truly believes, and this is People out there saying, he's finally speaking his mind, letting us know he truly believes.
	You operate with that and you move on from there.
	Just play this again.
	Oh my goodness.
	Just because you don't like one group doesn't mean the other.
	I love Jewish people, but I also love Nazis.
	Oh man.
	Well, I have to disagree with that.
	Oh my goodness.
	People are going to say, he's finally revealing his colors.
	Other people who might also think that he might be going through an episode are also going to say, Manic episodes or bipolar episodes doesn't reveal bigotry, anti-Semitism, racism, discrimination, whatever.
	That is, in my mind, one of the most disingenuous ways of attributing intent to someone because you don't like them, despite the fact that you recognize that they are out of their faculties.
	I mean, if anybody has ever known anybody with Tourette's Syndrome...
	And I have as well, very intimately.
	They don't have Tourette's and randomly spout compliments.
	And there was actually, I say, a bit of a funny stand-up.
	It was a guy, I think he had Tourette's, and he's like, if only this disease allowed you to spontaneously shout out, like, you're beautiful!
	I love you!
	In reality, it's specifically the...
	The lack of inhibition to not do the most awful thing, to not say the most offensive things that you are holding back, not because you believe it, but just holding back because you don't want to say it, because you don't believe it.
	And so the idea that anybody could look at Ye and say, even mental illness or a manic episode or a bipolar episode couldn't explain this because being mentally unwell doesn't make you racist or anti-Semitic.
	That's a very, very disingenuous way of still trying to attribute malice to someone who you have acknowledged.
	Is out of their sorts and in a meaningful way potentially not responsible for what they're doing.
	But I can see...
	I impute to Kanye.
	He thinks in his mind he's decided that this is the proper way to fight whatever battle he's fighting.
	And I think that's because he's out of sorts and in a partial episode and he's got people around him.
	With nothing to lose and everything to gain, as we've seen from the enhanced publicity coming from this.
	All right.
	Now, with that said, I don't think I've missed anything.
	Let me go back to Rumble for a second.
	Not Rumble.
	I'm on StreamYard because I don't have to be on StreamYard when we're solo here now.
	He is having a manic episode.
	Absolutely.
	Bell of the Bayou says, I love the Jewish people, but I also love the Nazis.
	I love how they always leave out the first part.
	I think the first part might make it even worse.
	Because the first part is basically, when he says, I love the Nazis, people are saying, well, he's saying it in the sense of forgiveness because they need to be forgiven for their sins.
	Well, then couple that with the first part.
	It doesn't make it any better.
	What it just means is that he's just saying things that don't make any sense right now.
	People are egging him on because they either think he's fighting for free speech or, and this is my operating theory, they know that he's not.
	They know that all this is going to do is allow everyone to say, anybody on the right Who doesn't condemn this, supports anti-Semitism.
	Trump supports anti-Semitism.
	Anybody defending him now is an intolerant, bigot, racist, well, not racist, anti-Semite, whatever.
	And the people egging him on and encouraging others to support him, I think, are very much enjoying and politically profiting from the divide.
	But I won't get too cynical.
	Well, Barnes and I will talk about it Sunday.
	Only Christ says, Christians believe that all humans are valuable.
	We believe to love the sinner, but hate the sin.
	Ye is obviously being pressed in many ways.
	He may need some compassion and time to heal.
	That much I can appreciate.
	And then, by the way, bear that in mind, Only Christ.
	If you love the sinner, but hate the sin, and then in one sentence you say, I love Nazis.
	Well, I mean, you are effectively saying, if you hate the sinner, Sorry, if you love the sinner but hate the sin, well, then you're saying, I love the Jews, they're the sinners, but I hate their sin, which is going to, if he's of sound mind, is anti-Semitic.
	Anti-Semitic in the sense that it is a sweeping, negative, prejudicial statement about an entire group, which is, I think, is the definition of discrimination at large.
	But I understand that explanation.
	But then the first half doesn't make the second half any better.
	In fact, the second half, if that's the interpretation, makes the first half even worse.
	Joe Mazcu says, I watched the whole thing and nestled deep in his appearance on Alex Jones.
	Hold on.
	I watched the whole thing and nestled deep in his appearance on Alex Jones was the conclusion.
	Therefore, let no man throw stones at Balenciaga.
	Okay, I'm not sure I get that.
	I'm going to have to read that one later.
	And then there was another orange thingy thing here.
	Hold on one second.
	Coming down.
	And then we're going to get to the banning from Twitter.
	Or the suspension.
	Another 10 for Viva's hair care.
	Thank you.
	I thought that said haircut.
	I was going to say, you're wasting your money.
	I'm not cutting my hair.
	Mahuyo, $10 rumble around, says, to be honest, I think he's having a mental fracture, which tends, expands a person's negative emotions or thoughts, and he needs help.
	Anyone who cares for him should get it to him.
	And I agree entirely.
	Because you also see, it's a risky, first of all, it's a very difficult thing just to discuss because the line between spirituality and thinking one is God, being channeled by God, divine purposes, bigger than God, is God.
	You know, it's, anyhow, that's it.
	Joe Maskew says, "Yay on Alex Jones'show is an opportunity to ask when the right stopped beating its wife, lying in wait." Yay on Alex Jones'show is an opportunity to ask when the right stopped beating its wife, lying in wait.
	I'll have to think about that as well.
	Okay.
	Now let's get to the ban.
	Oh, that's why I need to go back to StreamYard because I need to bring up the videos and the clips.
	Okay.
	The ban.
	He's been suspended from Twitter.
	Where is...
	Here, from what I can tell you.
	Okay, so here.
	Oh, sorry.
	I just actually made a poll.
	The justification for the ban was inciting violence.
	And it was inciting violence based on...
	Is there going to be...
	Oh, no.
	Forget it.
	That's the poll.
	I don't know why I brought that up.
	I don't care about that.
	Hold on.
	What I wanted to bring up was here.
	From what I can tell, there had been some suggestion that Elon suspended Ye's account because Jones had tweeted from it.
	For anybody who saw the interview, you probably needed to see the interview in order to understand some of the tweets that Ye put out yesterday.
	But you had Jones tweeted from his phone and they were showing it live.
	Ali, I forget his last name.
	Tweeted from his phone.
	Fuentes tweeted from his phone.
	And so some were suggesting that the suspension was for allowing a banned account to tweet from his phone.
	I don't think so.
	I don't think so because Jones could have been mandated and was verbally mandated by Ye to tweet off his phone.
	It wasn't like taking over an account to make a false tweet.
	But Musk said it was for inciting violence.
	Hold on here.
	Okay, I don't have that tweet.
	Whatever.
	Musk said it was for inciting violence, and this is why.
	Because he had what I guess is his yay 2024 logo, which is purported, unless it's a troll.
	Well, everyone, we had a nice run, Jesus is king, and put up this image of what appears to be a swastika within a Jewish star, or Megan David.
	Okay.
	Some people were pointing out, first of all, that it's a Raelian image, Star of David.
	Some people are seemingly rightly pointing out.
	This is on Alamy's stock photo, by the way.
	That's interesting.
	The Raelian symbol with a swastika embedded on the Star of David of the Raelianism, also known as Raelianism, movement, a UFO religion.
	That was founded in 1974 by...
	It's from Quebec, by the way, the guy, Rayel.
	So people were rightly pointing out that Ye's symbol that he posted that allegedly got him suspended from Twitter is nothing more than...
	Well, nothing more or nothing less is the Raylian symbol, a Jewish star with a swastika embedded in it.
	Now, by the way, this image is for sale on alamy.com.
	For those of you who don't know what Alamy is, it's a stock photo website.
	So the image that Ye posted that apparently incited violence, either contextually or interpretively, on Twitter is for sale on alamy.com.
	Let me just see something here.
	Raelian Wiki.
	I want to make sure.
	I think Rael, he was from Quebec.
	I thought he was from Quebec.
	Hold on.
	Oh yeah, I'd love to support you guys.
	Maybe later.
	No, no thank you.
	What the...
	Clothes!
	I don't want to give you any money.
	Yeah, okay, here.
	Oh, he was French from France and then relocated to Quebec.
	It was what is called a cult.
	But it had that symbol.
	So Ye gets suspended from Twitter for having posted that symbol on the basis of inciting violence, from what I can tell.
	And now we just don't know what the rules are on Twitter anymore.
	And Elon comes out.
	It's now the second time that he's said, when you piss off people on the left and the right, you know you're doing it right.
	There's the old expression, when both parties are upset at a settlement, typically it's the right settlement.
	Or when both parties are upset at the outcome, sometimes the judge just got it wrong.
	So Elon tweets...
	You know Twitter is being fair when extremists on far right and far left are simultaneously upset.
	Twitter aims to serve center 80% of people who wish to learn, laugh, engage in recent debates.
	Ooh, okay, good.
	Let's pick up here.
	And I think this is very disingenuous.
	Because I think the decision to suspend Ye, it's unjustified.
	And it's not because I like anything that Ye has been saying over the last little while.
	But that doesn't mean that he should be prevented from saying it if it's not breaking the rules.
	And we don't know what the rules are right now because we have Elon Musk saying Vox Populi Vox Dei.
	The word of the people is the word of God.
	As in, we will defer to the will of the people.
	Sometimes.
	Other times, I'm doing it and when people get pissed off, I'm going to call them extremists.
	People aren't pissed.
	That Elon is imposing a rule.
	They're pissed that we don't know what the rule is and that it seems to be Vox Populi, Vox Dei one day, and Vox Elon Musk the next.
	So we'll see.
	We'll see where that goes.
	So that's it.
	I'm pissing off everybody, so I must be doing something right.
	Or you might be just doing something wrong, which is...
	Opaque application of the rules is what people were objecting to before.
	If Ye broke the rules, let us know what it was.
	And, you know, vaguely alluding to inciting violence.
	Hold on, let's see if I can find it.
	I'm not going to be able to find it.
	Vaguely alluding to having incited violence is not really going to cut it.
	All right, let's see what's going on in the chat in the rumbles.
	Everyone free speech except yay.
	Ha ha ha.
	That's from 77dad77.
	Yeah, and then you got Kira here says, Astro Hat Elon should never have made a statement that he had no intention of making the real standard.
	Okay, let's see here.
	I think that about does it with Kanye and...
	Smegamiss says, I seen something about Ye saying this was going to be his final post on Twitter and it was a picture of Elon with Ari Emanuel.
	I don't know if true, it was a screen grab.
	I hadn't even seen that screen grab, but what would that be implying?
	That Ye is going to let out some damning information about...
	In fact, never trust a screen grab.
	Because if you can't find an actual link or an archived link, you're asking for trouble by relying on a screen grab.
	Now, just a final word on everybody with the free speech.
	Free speech is not about the ability or the freedom to run around shouting the N-word.
	It's not what it's about.
	Or at the very least...
	If you want that, there are platforms for that.
	Free speech is not about being able to express yourself through pornographic material.
	If you want that, go to Pornhub.
	Nobody's complaining that there's no free speech on YouTube because they can't put up porn.
	You're complaining about free speech problems when opaque rules are weaponized for political purposes.
	When opaque rules are weaponized for narrative purposes.
	It's not, in my view, we say free speech when we're actually talking about protected speech.
	Ethnic slurs, for the sake of ethnic slurs, if you think that's free speech, there are places.
	There are places on the internet where you can go.
	But we can all agree that you're not going to have total free speech on any social media platform.
	The only question is going to be, do you agree with the rules to the point where you can...
	Support a platform that has set those rules and that imposes and enforces those rules apolitically.
	You can't have porno on Twitter, although, my goodness, there's some foul, foul stuff on Twitter.
	You can't have porno on YouTube.
	It's not a free speech issue.
	It's a community guidelines.
	And if you want to call it a free speech issue, fine.
	That's the rule of the platform.
	Live with it or don't use the platform.
	But you're not going to get very far by saying there's no free speech on YouTube because I can't put up porno.
	The issue on Twitter now...
	Let me just prove another point.
	Hold on.
	I want to go here.
	Go here.
	Excuse me one second.
	Some of you might know where I'm going.
	If that symbol that Ye put up...
	Let's accept that.
	Agree.
	Because I don't know if there's an alternative explanation.
	Let's agree that that symbol is a Star of David with a swastika in it.
	Okay.
	Well.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Well, some of you are saying, okay, we went over this the other day.
	This image, people call it the East Asian, the Hindu symbol for peace, was the swastika.
	I forget now which was which.
	If it was called the swastika before, the image has been co-opted would be an understatement.
	It has been hijacked and desecrated.
	by the Nazis who used the swastika for the purposes they used it, but it had another historical traditional meaning for peace and prosperity in East Asian cultures.
	The APEC logo, which contains the symbol that is also used in different contexts as the swastika, is still up there and I presume no one's going to take it down.
	So are we now getting into the realm where it's going to be a question of Subjective interpretation of the intent behind an ambiguous posting.
	Or if someone says, death to fill in the blank and then puts in, you know, whatever applicable logos there.
	Well, that's a little bit more clear.
	Although I know people out in the States are going to say it has to be a true threat and not just a generalized, vague threat.
	Again, that law, that's different, legally speaking, in different jurisdictions.
	If the rules just say you cannot say death to and you don't like it, you may not like the rules, but if they're applied equally so that some people don't get away with saying death to capitalists or death to eat the rich, but others get suspended for saying death to whatever.
	If you don't like the rule, that's one thing, but if it's evenly applied and clear, that's another.
	But in this case, now, Ye puts up the Raelian...
	Magenne David with a swastika in the middle gets banned because apparently it's inciting violence, but if you're using the same image in proper historical context or one that people interpret into it, it's fine.
	That's not clear rules that allow for standard non-weaponized application.
	Okay, let me just look in the back and see if I...
	I think we're done with Ye.
	We're done with Ye.
	We're done with the suspension, but we're not done.
	With the fake news.
	Oh, oh, oh.
	Elon says, I'm pissing off the left and the right.
	I must be doing something right.
	Well, I'll say one thing.
	The New York Times is running hit pieces that are supported by findings by the ADL.
	It's interesting.
	Okay, let me just see in the chat here.
	Okay, I'm not going to read some of that.
	During the length of the interview, Ye was calling out Ari Emanuel as one of the people that caused him to lose his contracts, costing him the $1.5 billion.
	He called him out a lot.
	Oh, there's no question.
	He called out, well, the Emanuel brothers and, you know, the Rahm Emanuel.
	Yeah, another thing is, you know, maybe it's not manic, bipolar.
	Maybe it's just an absolute mental breakdown of having lost everything.
	And now he's like, well, that's it.
	It's...
	I'm going death con on himself.
	Either way, I'm going to be called an apologist because I think that he needs compassion and not judgment.
	I'll be called a self-hating whatever because I'm not jumping on the bandwagon that I think Ye is a bona fide anti-Semite.
	I don't.
	I'm also not going to jump on the bandwagon that whatever mental issues he's going through is revealing what he truly believes because Nobody says I love Nazis.
	I don't know a great many people who might even have a proclivity to saying that.
	Nobody says it.
	Certainly not a black person as well.
	One of the more overlooked atrocities of Hitler is it was genocide against the Jews, blacks, gays, gypsies, handicapped.
	It wasn't...
	One and only one group.
	So the idea that a black man is going to say, now, Hitler did a lot of good, I love him, and someone's going to tell me that that's actually what he truly believes, that he's finally revealing because of a mental breakdown or whatever?
	Yeah, sorry.
	We'll agree to disagree, and I will agree that my opinion is better.
	Okay, but now, setting that aside, the ADL should be banned too, SWATME says.
	Well, wait until you read.
	This shite.
	I've also learned you can swear in British.
	You can say fuk in shite and the other word which I won't say because I'm not British.
	The C word.
	But it's not swearing if you say shite.
	Okay.
	An article written.
	We're going to think like lawyers right now.
	Or at least just think like critical thinkers.
	This is from the New York Times.
	I had to go to the archive because it's behind a paywall, and I wouldn't pay the New York Times for toilet paper.
	They would probably dirty my...
	Using the New York Times for wiping your butt would leave your butt dirtier.
	That's how rubbish this is.
	Hate speeches rise on Twitter.
	Is unprecedented, researchers find.
	By the way, spoiler alert, no it ain't.
	Holy crap.
	No, it isn't.
	This is a lie.
	The New York Times is good for nothing but lies.
	NBL.
	Not NBC.
	That's nothing but...
	Okay, whatever.
	Problem...
	By the way, unprecedented hate speech.
	So here, by the way, hate speech rise on Twitter is unprecedented, Reacher's just fine.
	And by the way, they go from hate speech, which is the bold statement, to problematic content.
	What the hell does problematic content mean?
	Do we have to go ask Trudeau?
	Problematic content with unacceptable views.
	So they go from hate speech, which people at least understand what it means in principle, to problematic content, which means nothing.
	And formerly barred accounts have increased sharply.
	No shit formerly barred accounts have increased sharply because Elon's been letting them back, you morons.
	Did we have a...
	Do we have an assessment as to whether or not they were legitimately barred in the first place?
	Problematic content, which means absolutely nothing, and banned accounts are on the rise.
	Yeah!
	Because he's bringing them back because they were probably greatly wrong.
	And by the way, Kathy Griffin came back.
	There were a few.
	There are a few and far in between.
	There were a few on the other side that came back.
	Problematic content and formerly barred accounts have increased sharply in the short term since Elon Musk.
	This is news?
	This is the most idiotic stuff I've ever seen.
	Hold on.
	Okay, I got a notification.
	It seems like a shocking tweet.
	I'm going to go see that.
	Listen to this, by the way.
	Before Elon Musk bought Twitter, slurs against Black Americans showed up on the social media service an average of 1,200 times a day.
	Oh my God, that's a lot.
	1,200 racist tweets a day?
	After the billionaire became Twitter ownership, they jumped to 3,800.
	Holy cow.
	Hey, New York Times, just asking in advance, do you mention at any point how many tweets per day are on the platform?
	Hold on.
	How many tweets are sent per day?
	What's it going to be, a million?
	500 million tweets are sent.
	Are we looking at the same thing before I freak out and think like you're seeing one?
	Every second, on average, around 6,000 tweets are tweeted on Twitter.
	That's far too many.
	Corresponding to over 350,000 tweets sent per minute, 500 million tweets.
	Per day.
	200 billion a year.
	500 million tweets a day.
	But there's 1,200.
	But now there's 3,876.
	Hey Siri, what is 3,876 divided by 500 million?
	That is.00.
	I can't even see this.
	That is.00007 of a percent.
	That is 7,100,000.
	Dude, I can't even do that math.
	I can't even read that number.
	And sorry if I just set everybody's Siri off by doing that.
	4,000 racist tweets a day.
	I don't know what that means.
	4,000 tweets per day on 500 million tweets.
	I'm sorry, New York Times.
	If you think that's an indication of a problem, you guys are the biggest idiots on earth.
	I think that's actually quite amazing.
	I'll tell you this.
	I think I get more anti-Semitic comments on YouTube in a day.
	And I'm not saying that's a complaint or anything.
	It's actually just funny.
	Just to put things in perspective.
	Okay, sorry.
	So I've made the point.
	New York Times, you're idiots.
	And by the way, how much is user...
	I haven't tracked the usership, but I suspect there's probably twice as many people tweeting or at least twice as many tweets, maybe even more.
	Engagement since Elon Musk has taken over.
	I suspect anyone in the chat, if you can find that out while we're live, what is engagement like?
	How many tweets per day now versus before?
	Because Elon showed the graph.
	So it went from 1,200 times a day when there were maybe 400 million tweets.
	Let's just say 300 million tweets a day.
	That's nothing.
	That's non-existent.
	That's not a problem.
	That's non-existent.
	But it went up to 4,000 a day.
	As usership, additional accounts, and increased tweeting occurred.
	Oh, if you contextualize it, it almost sounds like there's actually no problem and no aggravating of any non-existent problem in the first place.
	Slurs against gay men went from Slurs against gay men appeared on Twitter 2,506 times per day.
	Does that include what the left says is an anti-gay slur of calling someone groomer?
	Is groomer one of the allegedly anti-gay slurs that the ADL has determined is an anti-gay slur, even though it actually makes no reference to sexual preference or sexual orientation, but rather only age?
	I don't know what the rules are.
	I don't know what the terms are.
	2,500 times a day to 3,900.
	Jeez, it's almost...
	It's almost like there's a correlative increase that might correlate to increased usership in tweeting.
	And by the way, this is the third interesting part.
	Anti-Semitic posts referring to Jews.
	So is it a post referring to Jews?
	Is any post referring to Jews deemed to be anti-Semitic as per the phrasing?
	Or are they talking about anti-Semitic posts referring to Jews?
	Because I'll tell you one thing.
	If it's an anti-Semitic post, it necessarily...
	At the very least, in accordance with the way the term is being used, necessarily refers to Jews.
	I understand the argument.
	Even people of Arabic descent are Semites technically.
	We all know how anti-Semitic is used today.
	So read this.
	And anti-Semitic posts referring to Jews soared 61%.
	I read this now as any post referring to Jews is being regarded as anti-Semitic, even if the content might not be anti-Semitic in a traditional sense, but whatever.
	Do you know what's acutely missing from this phrase here?
	How many?
	How many tweets per day are anti-Semitic?
	Let's just say...
	I don't want to overblow it.
	Let's just say that there's 5,000.
	Let's just say that anti-Semitic tweets lead the way.
	There's more anti-Semitic tweets than racist or homophobic tweets combined.
	Let's say then that there's 8,000...
	Anti-Semitic tweets a day times 365.
	That would be almost 3 million anti-Semitic tweets a day.
	Let's just say that there's 10,000 anti-Semitic tweets, anti-Semitic posts referring to Jews or Jews.
	10,000 a day.
	Let's say there's twice as many as anti-Semitic or racist or anti-gay.
	Let's say it's 10,000 a day times 365.
	That's three and a half million a year.
	Okay.
	We don't know because the ADL, these findings from the Center for Countering Digital Hate.
	Oh, that's a great name.
	The Anti-Defamation League and other groups provide the most comprehensive picture to date of how the conversations on Twitter have changed since Musk completed his form.
	Oh, really?
	Have they?
	While the numbers are relatively small, researchers said...
	The increases were atypically high.
	Was the increase in usership atypically high?
	Oh, but the numbers are small and the increases are atypically high.
	Okay.
	Let me breathe this down here for a second.
	Even assuming, let's just go by the numbers, that there were two and a half times as many anti-Semitic posts as there were racist or homophobic ones.
	That could be at most 3.6 million bad tweets a year.
	Well, I just went to...
	I mean, you can't find everything right away, but you can find some things right away.
	Oh, dammit, I should have had this ready.
	Dammit.
	Is this it?
	Is this it?
	Nope, that's not it.
	Am I sharing my...
	Well, I'm on my Twitter feed, so...
	Excuse me.
	Choked in my own tongue there.
	I tried to find some previous reports by the ADL.
	What did I notice?
	Oh, look at this here, from the ADL.
	This is from 2018.
	This is from 2018.
	Quantifying hate, a year of anti-Semitism on Twitter.
	Using a proprietary.
	Wide-ranging query, as well as statistical methods and expert analysis, COE analysts were able to determine that roughly 4.2 million anti-Semitic tweets were posted and reposted on Twitter in the one-year period specified of 2018, four years before Elon would take over the company.
	We estimate that the tweets were issued by approximately 3 million unique handles, 4.2 million anti-Semitic tweets in 2018.
	Of course, 4.2 million tweets is a very small number out of the trillions of tweets sent on the platform each year, but that does not negate the lived experience of Jews who have found Twitter to be a toxic environment.
	The number is still large enough to underscore the powerful harassment that exists and the ease with which a relative handful of users can infect our shared social media environment with negative stereotypes and conspiracies about Jews.
	4.2 million tweets over a year of trillions of tweets.
	2018.
	I'd like to know what it was this year.
	I'd like to know what it is, what it's on par to be this year based on aggregate tweets.
	Because something tells me, by the way, it's actually no worse and if not, maybe even a little better than previous years.
	One thing is certain.
	It was bad in 2018.
	Another thing according to the ADL.
	2021, anti-Semitic incidents in the U.S. soared to a record high this year.
	34% increase is a deeply troubling indicator of our country's trajectory.
	Now, but go ahead and blame it all on, go ahead and blame it all on Musk.
	Go ahead and blame it all on Musk, a problem that has existed for, in as much as you've identified it as a problem, has existed for years before.
	Only Christ says, Viva, I love your compassion, insight, and humor.
	You have a lot of Jesus's qualities.
	What a blessing you are, only Christ.
	I'm not a religious person.
	That was a $5 rumble rant.
	Thank you very much.
	I'm not a religious person, but I like...
	I am genuinely appreciative of compliments that I genuinely appreciate, and not superficial ones.
	I can be called good-looking all day long.
	It doesn't faze me because I actually don't believe it.
	But kindness is something that I think...
	Kindness and understanding is something I think is important.
	Even if I get called a lefty, you know, an apologist.
	Although I also get called a self-hating Jew by others.
	Well, people are very much against the idea.
	First of all, some people would want to join but don't have a cell phone.
	It's one of the problems with Rumble.
	You have to have a cell phone number or a telephone number.
	Rumble has a way around it.
	One of the complaints was, well, A, I don't want to give my cell phone number, and B, some people just don't have one, but they've worked around that, but that's it.
	Denise Ann 2, $1 Romance says, I'm a free speech absolutist.
	I may not agree with the things people say, but I think they have the right to say them.
	Yes, Denise, but I'll ask you the obvious question.
	Do you believe in allowing people to threaten people's lives?
	I don't think anybody's a free speech absolutist if it means you can say whatever you want, whenever you want, without consequence.
	So, yeah, do you support?
	Criminal harassment.
	Or I guess it wouldn't be criminal if you support.
	Do you support harassment?
	Threats of assault.
	Threats of violence.
	Public disclosure of private information.
	If I get someone's tax return, freedom of speech for me to say a number of things.
	If I find out certain medical conditions, freedom of speech, there are limits.
	Period.
	And that's why we call it protected speech, I think.
	Yeah.
	No cell phone service where I live in BC says Chili Boo Revolution.
	At the risk of reading this, real truth...
	All right, well, Viva is spicy today.
	Real truth, I know the arguments.
	I've heard them.
	Yeah.
	So I think we're done.
	Are we done with that fake news crap?
	New York Times being a bunch of pathological liars.
	And by the way, they didn't include a link to the ADL's findings or methodologies.
	I'd like to see it.
	The shift in speech is just the tip of a set of changes under the service of Mr. Musk.
	Can you imagine?
	They spend their time with a hit piece on Elon Musk while stroking the ego and maybe even other bodily parts of Sam Bankman freedom.
	These changes are alarming, Reacher said, adding that they had never seen such a soft increase in hate speech, problematic content, problematic content, and formally banned accounts.
	Do you not understand how they've lumped in to their critique policy?
	Yes.
	Critics will not like formally banned accounts coming.
	You don't like it?
	Leave the freaking platform.
	If you are that...
	And I don't use the word snowflake very often.
	You know, I did use snowflake quite often before because snowflakes are singularly unique.
	That's how I was brought up with the term.
	My father said, we are all snowflakes.
	No two are the same.
	That was before science proved that you can make two identical snowflakes.
	But setting that aside, I was brought up with the term snowflake, meaning we are unique individuals in this world.
	But if someone is that much of a snowflake that band, not Count Dankula, Sargon of Akkad, Carl Benjamin coming back.
	Well, that's problematic speech right there.
	I believe he once suggested that Gamergate was actually a total bogus claim.
	It was very misogynistic of him.
	Yes.
	Okay.
	New York Times is garbage.
	What else was there that was related to the New York Times?
	Oh, no.
	So that's it.
	I just...
	Did you review the findings?
	4.2...
	3,000...
	800 allegedly homophobic or racist tweets of 500 million.
	You know what?
	You know what has greater odds?
	Heart issues from the Jibby Jam by a factor of a billion million.
	All right, we're done.
	What else was there?
	Carrie Lake.
	No, let's actually, this is a perfect one.
	This is the absolute level of the world right now.
	This doctor...
	Can I see it in...
	Oh, I can see it in incognito mode.
	Good.
	Because he banned me.
	Dr. Jonathan N. Stay.
	Doctor.
	Clinical psychologist.
	It's amazing.
	The clinical psychologist can tell you to get vaccinated, but the epidemiologist can't complain about the vaccine.
	One is stunning and brave.
	A clinical psychologist telling you to get vaccinated, but when an epidemiologist or the...
	Co-creator of the technology itself says, I got problems and I got questions.
	They're quacks.
	They don't know what they're talking about.
	Stay in your lane.
	Clinical psychologist, adjunct professor, Hugh Calgary.
	Science first.
	Bylines, science.
	CBC News.
	Slate.
	Global News.
	What does he have to say?
	Doctors are amazed at these 10 ways to boost your immune system.
	The tetanus vaccine.
	The measles vaccine, the polio vaccine, the mumps vaccine, the HPV vaccine, the pneumonia vaccine, the hepatitis B vaccine, the rubella vaccine, the diphtheria vaccine, the COVID-19 vaccine.
	Who's his slot?
	Who's his slot?
	I don't even know who this person is or why he's dead.
	Anyway, first of all, I'm no doctor.
	But I don't even think that we would refer to getting the tetanus shot as boosting your immune system.
	I think it would be protecting yourself from potential infection, which is not about boosting your immune system, but rather training your immune system to have a specific response to a specific threat.
	Whatever.
	Doctors are amazed at these 10 ways to boost your immune system.
	To which I responded...
	Forget exercise for a healthy diet, sunlight, vitamin C, vitamin D. It's vaccines, vaccines, and more vaccines.
	And by the way, I've had a tetanus vaccine.
	I've had, I'm not getting the shingles vaccine because I got the two.
	I've had, I think, all of those shots, even the one at the end.
	This is what state-sponsored medicine looks like.
	CBC, Global News.
	What is not unhealthy about medicine?
	Working with the government and government subsidized media.
	What's not unhealthy about that?
	That and the Jonathan Stee is also a proponent of weaponizing licensure.
	I make sure that it's not parody first, so I have to go through the account.
	And going through the account, I came across this gem.
	Physicians who actively spread anti-vaccine propaganda should not have licenses.
	This clinical psychologist...
	Has determined that he knows what is anti-vaccine propaganda and he is a proponent of weaponizing licensure to sanction wrong think.
	The CBC would be proud, comrade.
	Justin Trudeau will be very proud.
	You will be the last one.
	You will be the last one who gets punished under the government after all other enemies of the state have been taken care of.
	Then I got blocked.
	Yeah, because that's what happens.
	That's what happens.
	You get just straight to block.
	All right.
	And then the last story of the day, not the least.
	Carrie Lake has lost a lawsuit.
	Let me just remember the page was page 19. I took notes, but Carrie Lake filed suit.
	This is pre-midterm litigation.
	This is not litigation related to...
	Well, I say that, but...
	Okay, here we go.
	This is not some of the current lawsuits which are currently pending, but my goodness, it'll send a shot across the bow of all attorneys representing.
	This is Carrie Lake versus Katie Hobbs.
	At issue is the federal...
	Okay, so at issue here is a motion to sanction because the lawsuit had been dismissed and they go over the reasons for the dismissal, but spoiler alert, there were sanctions.
	And sanctions against counsel.
	In this case, plaintiffs challenged the procedures for administering elections in Arizona and sought an injunction compelling defendants, election officials at the state and county levels to follow alternative procedures for collecting, storing, counting, and tabulating votes in the 2022 midterm elections.
	We'll get there because there's separate litigation.
	These alternative procedures included requiring voters to cast their votes on paper ballots and ordering election administrators to count every ballot cast by hand.
	On August 26th, the court granted motions to dismiss filed by the defendants and dismissed plaintiffs FAC in its entirety.
	That is the filed amended complaint.
	Dismissal order.
	The midterms took place on November 8, 2022.
	It was dismissed in August.
	The court's dismissal described in detail the allegations plaintiffs raised in their first amended complaint, as well as the current procedures used to administer elections in Arizona.
	Here the court will presume...
	So they go over it.
	Broadly, plaintiffs alleged...
	That the electronic voting machines certified for use in Arizona, including optical scanners and ballot marking devices, are potentially unsecure, lack adequate audit capacity, fail to meet minimum statutory requirements, and deprive voters of the right to have their votes counted and reported in an accurate, audible, legal and transparent process.
	Plaintiffs allege that the machines are rife with cybersecurity vulnerabilities and allow for unauthorized persons to manipulate the reported vote counts in an election and potentially change the winner.
	Plaintiffs claimed that Arizona's audit regime is insufficient to negate these vulnerabilities and that the only way to overcome the security issues they identify is, quote, for the court to order an election conducted by paper ballot as alternative to the current framework.
	Plaintiffs requested the court implement certain procedures including the use of proper ballots and live stream hand count of ballots, assuming the cameras don't go out like they did in Nevada.
	Plaintiffs maintained that the Cyber Ninja's hand count of two contests in 2020 general election in Maricopa County offers a proof of concept and a superior alternative to relying on corruptible electronic voting systems.
	I skimmed through this and this is one of those...
	This is one of those cases where I wouldn't say, all right, bottom line, the motion was dismissed.
	The conclusion was that they made unsubstantiated allegations that they tried, unsubstantiated, frivolous, baseless accusations that they tried to remedy in their amended complaint with further hypothetical accusations.
	And it was so over the top, so unsubstantiated, so not supported by the evidence.
	That it was dismissed on a motion to dismiss.
	To me, this is not quite as clear as a $1 billion condemnation and damages against Alex Jones, where I don't think I need to have really seen the evidence or know the evidence thoroughly to know that that's outrageous, over-the-top, and unjustifiable in fact and in law in any realm of the universe.
	Not having been there, not being familiar with the evidence, and maybe we can get Dershowitz on to Talk about it if he wants to, but he might be a little peeved because we'll get to the conclusion.
	I'm not as comfortable to say, well, if any of these allegations were sort of like some of the allegations we saw about Dominion back in the day that led to defamation lawsuits, okay, I don't know.
	This is not as black and white as a billion-dollar judgment or a $2.7 trillion award in damages.
	I don't need to see that evidence to know it's absolute rubbish, absolute untenable.
	Judgment.
	Award.
	It might be a little grayer here, but regardless.
	Unsupported claims based on speculation and conjecture.
	We're just skipping over so you can get the essence.
	The Maricopa County defendants argued that plaintiffs violated the rules of procedure, pursuing untenable and unsupported claims based on conjecture and speculations, claims that are, in a word, frivolous.
	They point to plaintiffs' reliance on testimony and allegations that are entirely unrelated to elections in Arizona, plaintiffs' allegations concerning alleged foreign manufacture of election machines that fail to identify the specific machines or parts.
	I was brought up in a legal system where you make allegations and you get a discovery in order to substantiate them or prove them or allow the defendants to say there's nothing and therefore it's frivolous.
	Seems we've bypassed a lot of that in recent times, but...
	I was always shocked that in the States, motions get dismissed, on motions to dismiss.
	In Quebec, at the very least, it's virtually very difficult.
	Defendants further cite to their response to plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, MPI, in which they discuss plaintiff's reliance on the distinguishable curling case.
	I don't care about this.
	All right.
	Plaintiffs counter that their claims are well-founded and meritorious.
	They argue that the summary allegations of the First Amendment complaint about the vulnerabilities of the voting machines are supported by detailed allegations, which are in turn supported by the evidentiary record of plaintiffs.
	A judge says no.
	An in-depth discussion of plaintiffs' allegations in support of evidence is unnecessary here for the purposes of valuing whether their claims rest on an adequate legal and factual basis.
	Whatever weight one assigns to plaintiffs' evidence, an essential flaw remains in their overarching theory of the case.
	Simply put, there are yawning gaps between the factual assertions made, the harm claimed, and the ultimate relief requested.
	Plaintiffs never put forth sufficient allegations about Arizona's election systems, let alone sufficient evidence.
	to support any such allegation to demonstrate a likelihood that Arizonians' votes would be incorrectly counted in the 2022 midterm due to manipulation.
	That leaves the window open that they might be incorrectly counted for other reasons.
	Or there might be other problems, which we'll get to.
	Bottom line?
	Judge said, no, frivolous, dismissed, and now you get sanctions.
	That's how frivolous it was.
	The court reached this conclusion, its dismissal order, where it ruled that plaintiffs claimed injuries were too speculative to meet the injury-in-fact requirement for standing under Article 3. Okay.
	And where are we now?
	I'll give everyone...
	Oh, the link is in Locals, by the way, so if everybody wants to go read it.
	But listen to this.
	Sanctions.
	So frivolous, dismissed on a motion to dismiss.
	The court concludes that sanctions are warranted under Rule 11. It finds that plaintiffs made false, misleading, and unsupported factual allegations in their First Amendment complaint and motion for preliminary injunction, and that their claims for relief did not have an adequate factual or legal basis, grounded in a reasonable pre-filing inquiry.
	They should have known.
	It was so baseless they should have known.
	The Court for the Fights of Plaintiff's Counsel acted at least recklessly in unreasonably and vexatiously multiplying the proceedings by seeking a preliminary injunction based on the frivolous claims.
	Wow.
	I mean, they went after licenses against the Dominion attorneys or Trump's attorneys.
	And now, not only is it a dismissal, but listen to this.
	Here, while there are reasons to believe that plaintiffs themselves contributed to the violations of the rule, including that they themselves apparently have voted on paper ballots, contradicting allegations and representations in their pleadings about Arizona's use of paper ballots, there is not a sufficient record that compels the court to exercise its discretion to sanction plaintiffs under that part of the rule.
	Yada, yada, yada, yada, yada.
	Lastly, the courts must identify an appropriate section.
	Did we get to the lawyer yet?
	I think we got to the lawyer here.
	Yeah, this is it.
	Sanctions imposed must be limited to what suffices to deter repetition of the conduct or comparable conduct.
	Where sanctions are, quote, imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, they may include payment of reasonable attorney's fees.
	Here the court finds the payment of Maricopa County defendant's reasonable attorney's fees is an appropriate sanction for the conduct of plaintiff's counsel.
	Which forced defendants and their counsel to spend time and resources defending this frivolous lawsuit rather than preparing for an election over which plaintiff's claims baselessly kicked up a cloud of dust.
	Plaintiff's counsel therefore held jointly and severally liable for the Maricopa County defendant's attorneys in this case.
	Who can believe that?
	But by the way, You all know the punchline, but let me get to it anyhow.
	It was so frivolous.
	It kicked up a cloud of dust that cast a cloud of uncertainty on the election.
	Shame on them and shame on their attorneys.
	Luckily, the dismissal came before the video that we're about to watch, but the order came after it.
	Who knows what video I'm going to right now?
	And I bet some of you do.
	Hello, Maricopa County.
	I'm Bill Gates, the chairman of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
	And I'm Stephen Richard, the Maricopa County recorder.
	And we're here to give you an update on how things are going so far with the election.
	They're going great.
	They're going great.
	But!
	We've already had almost 44,000 people show up this morning, check in, and be available to vote.
	And things are going great out there, but there's one thing that we wanted to address.
	There's one little thing we want to address.
	...people aware of today, and that has to do with our tabulator.
	I'm sorry, what's wrong with the tabulator, Mr. Bill Gates?
	About 20% of the locations out there...
	Where there's an issue with the tabulator where some of the ballots that after people have voted them, they try and run them through the tabulator and they're not going through.
	20% of the locations, not 20% of the machines.
	It could be much more than 20% of the machines, but 20% of the locations.
	The cloud, these frivolous litigants and their attorneys kicked up a cloud that undermines the integrity.
	The competence of the election officials.
	And there's about 20% of the tabulators, they're not being read in 20% of the locations on election day.
	And it's making for some long lineups.
	Things are going great, except for that.
	But the good thing is, first of all, we're trying to fix this problem as quickly as possible.
	We're trying to fix it.
	Sure, it's the day of the election.
	We're trying to fix it so that everybody can get their votes in and not have to wait three hours in line and deter people from voting on Election Day who happen to be majority Republicans.
	Yeah, sure.
	We're just trying to do that.
	Okay, but it's good.
	It's good.
	We also have a redundancy in this.
	Oh, yeah.
	If you can't put the ballot in the tabulator, then you can simply place it here.
	Look at this guy on the right.
	This guy's like, holy crap.
	He's holding in diarrhea right now.
	...box where those ballots will be kept.
	For later this evening, where we'll bring them in here to Central Count to tabulate them.
	So this will function much like early voting functions, in that we would get your ballot back.
	Once we've signature verified it, we would send it to our central tabulators.
	Ballots that are in here will already be, in effect, signature verified, so we won't need to confirm identity, but we will central tabulate them.
	This is actually what the majority of Arizona counties do on Election Day all the time.
	All the time.
	And just one thing to keep in mind, we have 223 vote centers across the county.
	223 vote centers across the county.
	There's only problems at 42 of them, okay?
	So go find another one.
	Get in your car.
	Go drive wherever you have to go.
	Wait in line for however long.
	223.
	40 of them have a few problems with the tabulator.
	How is that, by the way?
	It's so easy to do.
	It's a very Canadian accent.
	It almost sounds like what we call the Canadian accent, eh?
	If there are long lines at the location where you're at or issues with the tabulator, how dare Dershowitz have kicked up a cloud of doubt over the competence and integrity of the system?
	Doesn't matter.
	Thanks so much.
	And everybody who haven't yet, get out and vote.
	If there's time left in the day after you've wasted three hours in line and then had to go to another station to do it.
	Oh my goodness, people.
	Denise Ann, the $1 rumble rant in the rumble rant, says, David, let me clarify.
	You can say whatever you want, but that doesn't mean there won't be consequences to what you say.
	Well, true, but I think, I mean, that exists now, in a sense.
	You can threaten someone's life, and you'll just get arrested and go to jail.
	That's typically when people say free speech at salutis.
	They don't mean, they mean consequence-free.
	I have the right to say it, and you don't have the right to stop me.
	But, yeah, that's it, guys.
	Just go, go, go, go.
	Go find another place and just hope that that one's not one of the one in five that has some problems with some of their tabulators also.
	Yeah.
	All right.
	I think we've done it today, people.
	We've had a very, very good...
	I don't want to hear Bill Gates again in my ear here.
	Let me go to the chat and make sure that I haven't forgotten anything.
	Don't you know?
	Intolerance is the solution, people.
	Tard with hard R. Okay.
	Scotty, beam me up, please.
	That is from...
	Oh, you sound like a hosier, eh?
	Notice how the problems arose on Election Day.
	This is bellow 10-22.
	That is when the Republicans voted, so all they had to do is time the machine problems for that day.
	They were suing in advance on other issues, not even knowing of the actual problems that would occur on the day of, and in a judgment that was so frivolous, in emotion that was so frivolous because it alleged unsubstantiated problems with the Arizona-Maricopa County systems, dismissed and sanctions, despite the fact that on election day, all the poo-poo hit the fan.
	Do I have to?
	Oh, God.
	Okay.
	Yeah, I'm on Freeform Friday with Eric Hundley this afternoon.
	Eric Hundley and Mark Robert.
	And I saw a provocative tweet, which I shan't repeat over here.
	I think we've done everything we've done that we had to do for today, people.
	What was I going to say?
	Oh, well, you know what?
	Well, before we forget, Viva Freya.
	Everybody.
	The best way to support the channel with some awesome merch.
	Oh, look at what I'm wearing today.
	By the way, you know what's amazing?
	That's what my hair was like about a year ago.
	No.
	That's my hair from like March.
	My hair has grown fast.
	If you want to get some merch, everything is here.
	We got the Viva Barnes University.
	I tell you what, you got good, good Barnes on a cup.
	You got the anti-authority rhetoric.
	I need to get that one for myself, actually, because I need to wear that.
	Bouncy Castles Happen.
	You can do that.
	Viva Clips, all of the shorter clips, go to Viva Clips so you can subscribe there.
	I would love to get to 100,000 there just so I can get a plaque and then piss off with that.
	Idolatry.
	But Viva Clips is where all of the short clips go.
	Random stuff.
	So you can subscribe there.
	Viva Family is the family non-law related stuff.
	What else?
	All of the streams go on podcasts as well.
	It's called Viva Barnes Law.
	No, it's called Viva and Barnes Law for the People.
	On Podbean, Stitcher, whatever.
	The podcast platforms.
	So the audio of all of these streams goes out there.
	Almost all the streams.
	VivaBarnesLaw.local.com is where the party's at.
	And that's it.
	I think we did good today.
	We've learned.
	We laughed.
	We loved.
	We lived.
	I'm going to go get some sun.
	Maybe go fishing.
	5.30 on...
	Oh, it's Freeform Friday with Grobert and Hunley.
	I'll be there.
	Zebra...
	No, Zero Brain Podcast.
	I thought that was Zero Bra.
	I thought it was a nudie podcast.
	That shows where my head's at.
	Says, Viva Mullet.
	There will be no Viva Mullet.
	Viva has a mullet on his balls, facts, tarred with a hard arm.
	No, I do not.
	I do not.
	Abolish Congress.
	Bapan0402.
	Alma Alma says, if yay swastika, star of David combination symbol with him saying that people who suffered under one are now acting like them, maybe there should be a further discussion rather than knee-jerk reaction.
	We have to see what Elon's response is going to be.
	Africa Nature says there's nothing to sphere but sphere itself.
	Okay, I get that one.
	Hold on a second.
	I'm going to go back to Twitter.
	I'm going to go through my diary of insanity, add the stream, and make sure we got everything.
	Has Elon replied to this?
	Okay.
	No.
	So that was there.
	Okay.
	What's this?
	New York Times story.
	We covered it.
	Oh!
	Oh!
	Oh, I almost forgot.
	Guys, this is glorious.
	This is glorious.
	Maxine Waters.
	FTX.
	We're going to talk about the latest on Sunday.
	He gave an interview.
	And then you got the likes of Kevin O 'Leary saying, call me crazy, but I think I believe the kid.
	He's innocent.
	Another guy says the same thing.
	Maxine Waters tweets at SBF.
	We appreciate that you've been candid in your discussions about what happened at FTX.
	Are you out of your effing mind?
	He is on record in text messages saying that he only made public statements, certain public statements, for PR.
	For regulators, the man has admitted to lying publicly for PR, and you buffoons, you lying buffoons, are now thanking him for being candid?
	You're thanking someone who admitted to lying for PR for being candid.
	You're not buffoons.
	You're not dumb.
	You're absolute liars.
	SPF.
	Sorry, let me go back to it.
	Maxine Waters.
	We appreciate that you've been candid.
	We appreciate that the liar says he's been candid in your discussions about what happened at FTX.
	Your willingness to lie, sorry, to talk to the public, will help the company's customers, investors, and others recover nothing on their losses.
	To that end, we would welcome your participation in our hearings on the 13th.
	Can you imagine?
	First of all, Maxine Water.
	Madam has gone from blowing kisses.
	She's gone from blowing kisses to SBF in public.
	Unless she's kissing somebody else.
	Blowing kisses to SBF in public to blowing digital kisses on Twitter.
	I forget.
	I tweeted out yesterday with...
	These people are idiots.
	And, oh, she would welcome him?
	They subpoenaed Steve Bannon.
	They subpoenaed...
	However many other people, I can't think of names offhand, they convicted Bannon of contempt of Congress for not abiding by a congressional subpoena, but she's inviting him so publicly via Twitter.
	Oh, we'd love to have you, liar.
	We love the fact that you lied for PR purposes, but thank you for speaking so candidly about FTX.
	Would you come?
	I guess maybe jurisdictionally they can't get him wherever he's at.
	A nice polite invitation on Twitter.
	Would you come and say hi to SSPF?
	Pre-dawn raids.
	Armed pre-dawn raids for others and congressional subpoenas for others.
	Let me just scroll down because it was...
	Kevin O 'Leary and another person were like...
	You can't even understand.
	Was it the day before yesterday?
	What day?
	I thought it was yesterday.
	I may not be able to find it.
	You go to the Washington Post article.
	It was the article where they shared his text messages with a journalist and he's basically saying, yeah, I lied for PR purposes just to get regulators off my back.
	Unbelievable.
	All right, people.
	No, we're going to end it with a video.
	We're going to end it with a nice non-law video.
	What do we do?
	Viva family.
	Let me see what we're going to do.
	Cooking.
	Cool cooking video today.
	No, not that one.
	Not that one.
	We've got to end with something.
	Eight minutes is too long.
	Eight minutes is too long.
	Viva Family Fish.
	Let's see here.
	Okay, I'll find something.
	Hey, you know what?
	Let's do Waco, Texas.
	This will be a good one.
	My visit...
	Oh, my God.
	I'm getting an ad for Masterclass, and it's got Bill Clinton on it.
	All right, people.
	To play us out today, Our trip to Texas, which was actually at the time of the Alex Jones trial.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Got to share here.
	Share here.
	Everybody, thank you for being here.
	Thank you for spending the afternoon with me.
	Forgiveness, kindness, and understanding.
	I was going to make the joke, judge not.
	I wasn't going to make the joke.
	I was going to say, judge not, lest ye be judged.
	But someone's going to read a joke into there that was not intended.
	Just to say that, you know, judge not lest ye be judged is not a command not to judge.
	It's a command or a warning to judge knowing that if you do judge, you will be judged accordingly.
	So judge people fairly, judge people by standards, and judge people with forgiveness, compassion, and understanding.
	Not so that we can capitalize and exploit off people's public meltdowns, personal weaknesses, but also not to give a pass to people who would also exploit such people.
	Conduct yourselves in a way in this battle for the culture wars, as they say, in a way that would make your parents, your children, and your pets proud, and you can do no wrong.
	And with that said, everybody, ugh!
	Ugh!
	Yo, God, please, go away.
	I don't want to see that at all.
	That's the stuff of nightmares, actually.
	I'm coming to get you.
	I'm going to eat your soul.
	Oh, okay, fine.
	Enough.
	Let's play it.
	You should care about it, and you should want to help.
	I got a wiffle ball for that, and a wiffle ball.
	And I'm getting into wiffle ball.
	Yeah!
	Texas was amazing.
	Thank you.
	We stayed at the cutest.
	Hold on, I'm going, I'm doing a sweep to make sure no one forgot what it was.
	In, just outside of Waco, this is cute little Airbnb.
	It's got a little wrap-around porch here.
	bedroom on the main floor two single beds upstairs pull out couch Perfect for us.
	Dave's doing the last sweep.
	It's like a 10-minute drive into...
	To Waco.
	I did the booking and I really just wanted to see magnolia silos and the table, the magnolia table.
	Lone Ranger beer, the yogurt and the spinach in the fridge?
	No, you're not.
	I think we need the Lone Ranger beer.
	We wanted to try local Texan beer.
	We had another one.
	It was really good.
	This Lone Ranger.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	I could have left.
	Actually, we're going to try and do a tour because I read the book by Chip and Joanna Gaines.
	It's such a cool story.
	It's like how they've really turned Waco and just their journey.
	We're going to do a little tour through Waco, see some of the sights that Chip and Joanna Gaines talk about in their book.
	I read it today and such an inspiring story and we will just check it out.
	Hot as heck.
	It feels like a hairdryer.
	Sometimes just like blowing it on you.
	I went for a jog yesterday in the heat, 104 degrees.
	It's like jogging in a dry sun.
	What's today's healthy snack?
	Spinach with tajan sauce.
	Tajan spice is delicious.
	And he got attacked by a beetle.
	I thought something, some insect was crawling on my face today.
	We're off.
	I saw it here first.
	This is it.
	biggest washers in Waco.
	There are the silos.
	Oh, please sugar.
	That's cute.
	We were here yesterday.
	We were here yesterday.
	Yeah, it's right here.
	This is it.
	Nobody wants to go in and get a piece of banana bread.
	Is it just me?
	They don't even know what they're saying no to.
	Children, like true children, they don't even know what they're saying no to, but they want to say no.
	Reflex it.
	Last chance.
	I can't believe nobody wants to come to the bakery.
	I've overdone it.
	Incries are so fun.
	Thank you.
	It's been a long wait at all, but they didn't have banana bread, even though the store only smelled like banana bread.
	And I asked, and she said she couldn't smell anything.
	If you work there long enough, you lose your sense of smell of all the amazing baking.
	Okay, that's it.
	Sorry, I didn't understand you.
	Please speak your driver license number, social security number.

▲