Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 11, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

01:56:24

Student Debt NOT FORGIVEN! Sue the Doctors! Elon Musk & MORE! viva Frei-Day!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan?
	Senator Paul, I have never lied before the Congress.
	This paper that you are referring to was judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain-of-function.
	Let me finish.
	When you take an animal virus and you increase its transmissibility to humans, you're saying that's not gain-of-function?
	Yeah, that is correct.
	Why were we told later in the spring to wear them when we initially were told not to?
	Okay, that's a good question, and I'm glad that you asked.
	Well, the reason for that is that we were concerned, the public health community, and many people were saying this, were concerned that it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply.
	And we wanted to make sure that the people, namely...
	We did not want them to be without the equipment that they needed.
	We're going to break this down one by one.
	So there's not enthusiasm about going out and everybody buying a mask or getting a mask.
	We were afraid that that would deter away the people who really needed it.
	Viruses don't mutate if they don't replicate.
	So if you stop the transmission and the replication, you're not going to get any more mutations.
	If you allow the virus to spread and replicate...
	Then you give it an opportunity to mutate.
	And that's the reason why we have to shut it down.
	Shut it down.
	Shut it down throughout the country in all age groups.
	So my class decided to stand but not say the words.
	I'll explain the montage.
	Except for the fact that my room does not have a flag.
	American flag.
	But I took it down during COVID.
	Because it made me uncomfortable.
	The American flag.
	Every time I tell this kid, we do have a flag in the class that you can pledge your allegiance to.
	And he, like, looks around and he goes, oh, that one?
	Bombshell New Report says a suspected Chinese spy targeted California politicians.
	And one of her biggest targets was Bay Area Representative Eric Swalwell.
	Do you wish to retract?
	All right.
	For those of you who may not be familiar with the context of that beautiful montage that I took longer than I should have taken this morning to put together.
	Eric Swalwell.
	You may know Eric Swalwell from such productions as The Fart Heard Round the World, which I defended at the time because I think it's juvenile and I also am not convinced it was a fart.
	Eric Swalwell in some flippant Twitter thread, whatever.
	In attacking Senator Tim Scott, who says we are putting parents back in charge of their kids' education, Eric Swalwell, full of hot air in more ways than one, who had a relationship, allegedly, with a Chinese spy, in response to this statement, says...
	I'm so neurotic now.
	I have to go make sure I have the right mic.
	I do.
	I have the right mic.
	Okay.
	In response to Senator Tim Scott, to get the burn, he says, please tell me what I'm missing here.
	What are we doing next?
	Putting parents in charge of their own surgeries?
	Because that's an allegation, you buffoon.
	Clients in charge of their own trials?
	There are such things as pro se litigants.
	When did we stop trusting experts?
	This is so stupid.
	No, Mr. Swalwell.
	This is not stupid.
	You are stupid.
	Yes, I said it.
	When did we stop trusting experts?
	It might be when they got in front of Congress and lied to our faces.
	Let's just go through this.
	When did we stop trusting teachers to teach our kids?
	Maybe when they started pushing radical ideologies that some parents don't like, taking down the American flag in their classroom because it makes them uncomfortable.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	When did we stop trusting experts?
	When in the middle of the most deadliest pandemic that ever known to mankind shuts down the world, the overwhelmed hospital facilities have a trending amount of spare time to make TikTok videos.
	And then I had to throw in the little bit about Eric Swallow with his relationship.
	But listen, if anybody has forgotten about these things, let's go one by one.
	Do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th where you claimed that the NIH...
	Never funded gain of function research in Wuhan.
	I had to edit it a little bit.
	Keep it to two minutes and under two minutes and 20 seconds.
	There was a part where he says, no, I do not wish to retract my statement.
	No, I will not make out with you.
	You hear that?
	Listen to what pathological liar.
	And if this is not criminalized, I don't know what is.
	Listen to what Fauci has to say.
	And by the way, notice the tendency of Fauci in two responses here, but in general to deflect and to.
	Deferred to authority, not authority above him, because he is the science.
	Generally accepted, majority authority.
	Listen to how he does it twice in these clips, and he does it pathologically, because it's one way to deflect responsibility from your own lies.
	Senator Paul, I have never lied before the Congress.
	I love that.
	First of all, I have never lied, awkward pause, before the Congress.
	Oh, I've lied.
	I've lied.
	Never before the Congress.
	Okay, but that was a good comedic pause.
	This paper that you were referring to...
	This paper?
	Tell me about the paper, Dr. Fauci.
	...was judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain of function.
	I'm sorry, I didn't realize what qualifies as gain of function was subject to a poll.
	I didn't realize that what was gain of function was all of a sudden now so subjective People up and down the chain below Fauci, who answered to Fauci and the purse strings of funding, they get to decide subjectively what is objectively gain-of-function.
	Up and down the chain, a bunch of my underlings who rely on me for their very employment told me that it wasn't gain-of-function.
	So when I said it wasn't gain-of-function, I wasn't lying.
	Let me finish.
	You take an animal virus and you increase its transmissibility to humans, you're saying that's not gain-of-function?
	Yeah, that is correct.
	All right.
	That is correct.
	That's not an edit, by the way.
	There might have been some segments.
	That's what he said.
	It's not gain-of-function because we said it's not gain-of-function.
	And I had people below me, up and down the chain, review this paper and say it wasn't gain-of-function.
	So there.
	It doesn't just stop with gain-of-function.
	Y 'all remember the face masks?
	There was a point in time when they said we didn't need to wear face masks.
	Fauci said, don't...
	You don't need him.
	You don't need him.
	Well, that turned out to be a lie.
	A lie, by the way.
	Not a mistake.
	Not an error in fact.
	A lie.
	Why did he lie?
	Are we told later in the spring to wear them when we initially were told not to?
	Consider, by the way...
	Okay, that's a good question.
	I'm glad that you asked.
	I've never lied before Congress.
	I lied to you, young lady.
	And by the way, it's not going to be the first time and it won't be the last.
	Did you learn anything?
	Oh, no.
	Did you learn to trust the experts when we tell you that we lied, but we had a good reason?
	What was our reason?
	We didn't want people taking what we thought they knew they needed to protect themselves, even though we ended up telling them to wear bandanas on their face.
	Well, the reason for that is that we were concerned, the public health community, and many people were saying this, were concerned.
	Did you notice you just did it again?
	Other people were saying this.
	The public health.
	Other people were saying this.
	It wasn't just me.
	Don't point your fingers at me.
	Other people would say I was relying on them.
	And it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply.
	So we were underfunded or under-equipped by our own standards.
	In Canada, by the way, we were under-equipped because Justin Trudeau had donated 16 tons of PPE to China.
	So we don't have enough PPE.
	We don't want to run.
	We don't want to encourage people to do it.
	So we're going to lie to you.
	And we wanted to make sure that the people, namely the healthcare workers, we did not want them to be without the equipment that they needed.
	So we lied to you.
	We didn't mind if you were without the equipment that we thought you could have benefited from.
	So we lied to you.
	They asked him about going out and everybody buying a mask or getting a mask.
	We were afraid that that would deter away from the people who really need it.
	Deter away.
	I don't think he means deter away.
	It means deflect.
	And by the way, here, on the issue of vaccines not stopping...
	No one said vaccines were going to stop transmission, which is exactly why Fauci said this.
	Virus don't mutate if they don't replicate.
	So if you stop the transmission and the replication, you're not going to get any more mutations.
	If you allow the virus to spread and replicate, then you give it an opportunity to mutate.
	And that's the reason why we have to shut it down.
	Shut it down throughout the country in all age groups.
	And then we get into the TikTok.
	Lies, lies, and more damn lies.
	But why don't people trust experts anymore?
	Then you get into the experts of the doctors, overwhelmed, exhausted, sobbing, TikTok dancing.
	Then you get into the teachers.
	Oh, I wonder why people don't trust the experts to swallow well.
	Because they've lied.
	They continue to lie because they've been infiltrated by politics and money.
	And ideology.
	I shouldn't say money for teachers.
	Teachers are still not paid enough.
	But they've been infiltrated by ideology.
	Politics corrupts everything.
	Even the circuitry of a brain.
	Viva, the 2012 Olympics opening told us about COVID.
	Have you seen it?
	I'll start this and I'll go look into it.
	But COVID, coronaviruses have always existed.
	So I'm not sure what you mean by this, but thank you for the super chat.
	Coronaviruses have already existed.
	That's why on the Lysol bottles, it says does not kill coronavirus.
	And in the early stages of coronavirus, because nobody's ever really heard of coronavirus on a mass scale before, everyone's like, holy crap!
	Conspiracy theory.
	So I'll have a look, but I'm not sure what you're talking about.
	But thank you for the super chat.
	You should play the cat flu clip from The Simpsons from 2010.
	Once again, The Simpsons predict the future.
	It's uncanny.
	Chet Chisholm, thank you very much.
	And by the way, I know that you're in touch with my brother, so my brother can give you my contact info.
	Chet, thank you as always.
	So, perfect segue, by the way.
	Experts in what?
	Producing biological weapons of destruction and lying to us.
	Superchats.
	YouTube takes 30% of all Superchats.
	If you do not like that and you don't want to support YouTube directly or indirectly, we have alternatives.
	We're on it right now.
	Rumble.
	They have a thing called Rumble Rants.
	Rumble takes 20%.
	Better for the creator, better to support a platform that you like.
	What else?
	Best place to support me?
	Or Barnes, depending on if you want to support both of us, Locals.
	VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com.
	Tons of exclusive content.
	Barnes' Hush Hushes, Bourbon with Barnes.
	I do exclusive stuff there as well.
	Not on as regular and scheduled a pace as Robert, but it's a wonderful community.
	You don't even have to join as a paying member.
	We have over 100,000 non-supporting members.
	It's a good place.
	So if that's the place you want to support us there, MerchVivaFry.com.
	Although today I'm wearing Salty Army.
	I like this shirt.
	I have yet to have someone stop me on the street and say, Salty Army.
	Re.
	Someone on the street is going to go, Re.
	Not that they should recognize from my channel, but that they should recognize Salty Army.
	And we're like, we'll do the Salty Fist Pump.
	So that's what we got as the intro.
	Why am I not testifying at the Emergency Act Commission?
	Because they are booked.
	They're overloaded.
	They had more people apply than they wanted, than they could handle.
	And I was trying to do it.
	And I was trying to organize with participating parties to come in as a witness.
	But they have been overloaded with witnesses.
	And not everybody who wanted to testify could.
	And if you can believe it, six weeks was not enough.
	But it might be because they've let some people talk for way too much, have way too many redundant witnesses.
	And that's why.
	It's not for lack of trying.
	I did not get my submission in before October 31st.
	I actually wasn't aware of that deadline.
	I was actively trying to, and still am, and I'll just say it loud and proud and publicly, if any party there has a spare hour for a witness, I will testify.
	I would love to testify.
	I was trying to organize it with people involved.
	It looked like it might have happened.
	I don't think it's going to happen because I think they are just outright booked.
	Next week's schedule, I think, is already confirmed.
	And so that's that.
	I tried.
	And I would love to.
	And I would have loved it.
	But what I might do, by the way, I might just do a day stream.
	What would have been my testimony before the commission?
	I've been going through some of my old streams.
	Not to refresh my memory, to relive that period of Canadian history.
	But it's not for any...
	I was going to fly down.
	Literally.
	Last week or this week.
	I cannot fly down next week because my wife has left me again with the kids for a week.
	So I will not be...
	You see, this is why I know Carly Ellison is a troll.
	Or not a troll, but not a troll.
	It's not what I mean.
	It's a double-fakey satire troll.
	Because nobody stands with the WEF.
	And if you actually seriously stand with the WEF and you tweet that...
	No, but I'm serious now.
	I'm convinced Carly Ellison is a humorous, satire, satirical troll.
	Because I don't even think Klaus Schwab stands with E-W-E-F.
	Anyways, thank you for being here again.
	As always, re-legion in every region.
	Yeah, until they decide that Salty Cracker, like Diagalon, is ideologically motivated, violent extremism, and his network of re's across the nation are...
	A network of IMVEs.
	Thank you.
	Thank you for the Raketa info.
	Rumble will rumble.
	Booyah.
	So, by the way, just to answer that question, I wanted to testify.
	I would have flown down last week or this week.
	I can still testify remotely if it can happen.
	Next week, I can fly down the week after.
	And I would have, and I would love to.
	But if I can't, I will...
	I think I'm just going to do a day stream, like timestamp all of the streams that I did live documenting the protest and say, this is what my testimony would have been had I been able to.
	But it is a good segue.
	Actually, I was going to start the show with this, but I like starting with something more lighthearted and that I can make fun of for the intro rant and not something that I think is actually serious and deserving of our utmost of respect.
	Rosie Barton.
	Rosie Barton from CBC.
	She's not with the CBC anymore, but chief political correspondent, host, Rosemary Barton Live.
	Rosie Barton or Rosemary Barton is the face of Canadian media in the government-subsidized Canadian media sense.
	Rosie Barton, I'll look up her bio afterwards, posts a picture, lest we forget, of the...
	The cenotaph in Ottawa, the war memorial in Ottawa.
	And I was like, I went back to my video footage, and I wanted to see if I had any footage of the violence that occurred against veterans on the Friday and the Saturday, 16th and the 17th of February, when the protest was violently suppressed.
	And I do remember, I backed off when the police were marching in lockstep to take one step at a time, one block at a time, and they took the cenotaph, and I said, I'm not there to get into trouble.
	I'm not there to get arrested.
	I'm there to document.
	And I backed off.
	But I went there the day before.
	I think this is from the 16th.
	And I went back the 17th when they took the entire downtown Ottawa with great force and furious violence.
	But I went back to my stream from the second to last day and pulled up this highlight.
	And on Remembrance Day, I think it's good that we remember and that we...
	In fact, as Rosemary Barton suggested, lest we forget, I think it's important that we never forget what our government did to the veterans that they purport to commemorate today.
	What do you have to say to the world?
	We are living in this.
	What a soldier goes through to protect this country, outside of this country.
	What we dedicate our lives to do, right, is to allow every Canadian citizen the right to do free and unrestricted.
	Protests.
	Peaceful protests.
	All this has ever been.
	All it's ever been.
	And what you're getting from mainstream media has been lies and lies and narratives.
	And it's too late now because at least you're moving in.
	But I wish you could have been here in person to see it for yourself.
	Because the metric that you're getting out of the mainstream is so twisted and wrong.
	I hope you guys can hear it.
	What's your first name?
	Daryl.
	Daryl.
	You're standing here until the swoop hits the fan?
	Yes, it is.
	We'll take a knee right here.
	We can put the cuffs on and take us away peacefully.
	We will not resist.
	Freedom isn't free.
	Stand up for it.
	Hopefully it doesn't come back.
	Sorry.
	that's good that better better men than me and And on Remembrance Day now, they all pay tribute with cheap words while they actually desecrate the memory of what soldiers fought for by having abused of veterans in real time at that protest.
	And so that's what Rosie Barton puts up.
	And I was like, yeah, let's not forget.
	Let's not forget about how they, Justin Trudeau, through his militarized police, brought in armored vehicles, snipers on roofs, literally physically abused, physically assaulted war veterans.
	You heard Chris Deering's testimony at the trial.
	Remind me, people, that's the video that I'm going to play this stream out with.
	My interview of Chris Deering.
	When I had heard, I was at the protest, and I saw another veteran.
	Big, burly dude.
	Looked very much like that guy.
	At the back of a big rig, sobbing.
	And I didn't record him because I felt bad capturing another human in that state.
	Sobbing.
	I had no idea what happened.
	I immediately thought someone in his immediate family had passed away.
	I thought it was the sobbing of infinite sorrow, of grief that you couldn't possibly understand.
	And I didn't know what happened.
	I tried to ask him a question, couldn't even talk to me.
	And then I realized that what had happened was that was the day, by the best of my recollection, where the government had come in and treated veterans in a way that shook this guy's love of country, that shook this guy's conscience to the very core, where he said, holy crap, has my government become the enemy?
	Has my government become the enemy that I fought against?
	And that I fought against in other countries.
	Afghanistan, we fought to free the people from tyrannical governments, oppressive regimes.
	Has my government become that?
	I remember.
	Clear as day.
	I saw the guy either the next day or a couple of days later and we talked.
	Um, um, But that's it.
	I'll pull up that interview afterwards.
	So on this Remembrance Day...
	On this Remembrance Day, what's our PM doing?
	Well, I got to get the parody account afterwards, but what's our PM doing?
	That's Justin Trudeau's ego.
	That's not the right one.
	Thank you.
	Oh, Tabernouche, where is the...
	Here we go.
	What's our dear leader doing?
	He tweets this out yesterday.
	In a few hours, I'll be wheels up for Cambodia.
	Some of you might not know what wheels up is because some of us might not have private jets.
	In a few hours, this is November 10th, last night, 9.12pm, I'll be wheels up for Cambodia.
	Just hop in on my jet, wheels up.
	We're jet setters.
	I'm going to Cambodia this time.
	I'm heading there with Melanie Jolie and Mary Ng for the Asian Summit.
	Where we'll meet with other leaders to create jobs and economic growth, strengthen partnerships, and promote regional stability.
	Stay tuned for updates.
	Well, at least he's not going wheels up to lecture us about climate change this time, like he did the last time.
	Wheels up, people.
	I'm going to look it up after this.
	I had never heard of the term, but I could envision what it is.
	Jet setters go wheels up when their private jets take off the runway and their wheels peel back into the central.
	Part of a plane.
	Justin Trudeau on the eve of Remembrance Day is flying to Cambodia.
	There's a lot of good jokes in there to point out the absolute hypocrisy of this.
	Mine was...
	So this is how he plans on avoiding testifying at the Emergencies Act.
	Who knows how long he'll be gone for?
	He is scheduled to testify.
	Unless he can find a way to get out of it.
	I guess it's easier than saying you have COVID for the third time.
	And then other people were making...
	The internet, if there's a joke, if there's an insightful, whitty remark to be made at a statement, someone on the internet will find it.
	And I'll dare say that everyone on the internet found it this time.
	One guy says, don't come back.
	That's very good.
	The functioning savage PhD's nuts.
	I have no idea who that is.
	That's just fun.
	Dr. Hissy Pissy says, coward.
	That's not so insightful.
	That's just honest.
	Let me rephrase.
	That's not like cutting humor, satire.
	That's just stating the obvious.
	Please don't come back.
	I repeat.
	Really couldn't wait until after Remembrance Day ceremony.
	Thank you, be safe.
	Don't listen to trolls.
	They're fans or they wouldn't be here.
	That's not right.
	That's not true at all.
	Where's the one?
	Dude flies so much he says wheels up like it's a phrase us unsophisticated polluters would be familiar with.
	I love it.
	I could go through Twitter all day long.
	Then we got Gad Saad.
	How much of this trip is paid for with my book royalties that the Canadian government stole from me?
	Gad Saad doesn't mean literally stole.
	He means stole through taxation.
	Gad and I had a discussion about the amount of tax dollars that the Canadian government takes from taxpaying citizens.
	And it's shocking.
	Wheels up.
	This is Freeway Frank, who might be coming on for a live stream.
	He was on the radio way back in the day.
	He's a great guy.
	Wheels up.
	Are you 18?
	Bringing your surfboard by any chance?
	Totally awesome.
	All right, where's the one about Cambodia and communism?
	There was one that said, yeah, it's fitting that you're skipping Remembrance Day to go to a formerly communist regime country that had the greatest genocide or among the greatest genocides in the history of humankind.
	How fitting.
	Are you going to go learn some more about the basic functioning of dictatorships, Trudeau?
	But skipping...
	You know, the most important national holidays, so he can go jet-setting and whatever.
	It's not a new thing for Justin Trudeau.
	For those of you who may not know, he did something probably equally as stupid, but no, a little stupider the last time, where on the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, which I'm fairly certain his government set up as a national holiday, he skipped it to go to the beach.
	Prime Minister's leaders are entitled to vacation.
	They're entitled to family time.
	Full stop.
	Not on a national holiday.
	That they themselves...
	I think the government actually made this a national holiday, but I'm not sure about that.
	Jet setting wheels up to Cambodia.
	Remembrance Day?
	Yeah, I'll be in Cambodia for that.
	And Truth and Reconciliation Day?
	I'm going to ignore some invitations from indigenous populations and just go hit the beach with the family.
	Justin Trudeau, sorry for skipping first day of National Truth and Reconciliation Day.
	Canadian Prime Minister took family home I regret it.
	He apologized for it.
	You know, we can go into it, but Canada's Liberal Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, has said it was a mistake to take his family on holiday on the first day, on the first national...
	Yeah, the first.
	It was the inaugural holiday that he made a national holiday.
	The first National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, honoring the lost children and survivors of indigenous schools.
	He flew to Tofino with his family on Thursday after his own government in June had designated 30 September a federal holiday to underscore the legacy of so-called residential schools.
	He apologized.
	You guys, everyone knows about the, you put in died suddenly in Google and you'll get some stuff.
	Put in, Trudeau apologizes.
	Apologizes.
	Watch this.
	Just put in Trudeau apologies.
	I mean, this is as sad and sick a phenomenon as died suddenly has become.
	Trudeau apology.
	Brown face, unacceptable and racist.
	Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau apologizes for brown face.
	Prime Minister Justin Trudeau apologizes for Tofino trip on Truth and Reconciliation Day.
	Trudeau apologizes for brown face.
	Trudeau apologizes for skipping remember to say, hold on, let's keep going.
	He apologizes for the, okay, that one, for the black face, for the third black face.
	For the holiday.
	Fine.
	Trude apologizes.
	There's more.
	Brown face.
	First Nations.
	Once you get past the first page of results...
	Okay, we got the vacation one.
	Brown face.
	Trude apologizes for not answering First Nations.
	Same one.
	I don't know how far you have to go down.
	How about this?
	You get Jody Wilson-Raybould.
	He apologizes for...
	Trudeau apologizes to Wilson Raybould.
	Let's do a reporter.
	Trudeau apologized to the reporter behind the groping claim.
	How about the WE charity?
	Trudeau apologizes for WE charity.
	Trudeau is the apologizer in chief because he's the corrupt prime minister of Canada.
	It's so, I mean, it's just, it's endless.
	It's a joke.
	His apologies are a joke because his indiscretions are a joke because he is an unethical, corrupt, buffoon, tyrant of a leader.
	There I said it.
	I mean, it's like, how many times do you apologize before it means nothing?
	Apparently a lot, because he still got re-elected.
	All right.
	Drama.
	Apologize for brownface.
	Apologize for blackface.
	Apologize for third blackface.
	Apologize for going to Tofino on Truth and Reconciliation Day.
	Apologize to Jody Wilson-Raybould.
	For pressuring her and for firing her.
	Apologize to the reporter that he allegedly groped in 2000.
	Apologize for the W.E. scandal.
	He should have recused himself from the vote.
	Apologize for breaking the code of ethics for the Aga Khan.
	I forgot that one.
	Apologize for the Aga Khan.
	Undeclared gifty trip.
	I left out wanker.
	Oh, no, no.
	That would be an insult to wankers.
	Wankers serve a purpose.
	Wankers in the literal sense.
	Look up Trudeau tears in eyes.
	Oh, I could say much worse, but I choose.
	I still, even in my viva rage, which is, that's pretty much what it is.
	I still try to not cross any lines.
	We're going to move it on over to Rumble.
	Because we're moving on up.
	Okay, we're going to go to Rumble.
	The link's in there.
	Did I put the third blast?
	I mean, that's the, hold on, there.
	Well, in fairness, it was already not sort of double jeopardy.
	It was already fait accompli at the time.
	He had already done it.
	So he's just going to apologize for however many times he did it.
	But he doesn't know how many times he did it.
	He's just lucky that, you know.
	Did he elbow for...
	Apologize for reporting the...
	Hold on.
	I think he did.
	Hold on.
	I think they called that elbow gate.
	I've showed that video a number of times.
	But when he stormed across Parliament floor like the king of the castle and then elbowed an NDP lady in the boobie.
	Trudeau apologizes.
	Let's just see here.
	Apologizes.
	Breast.
	There's going to be two videos.
	There's going to be two that come out for that.
	Yeah, she did it.
	He apologized to Ellen Brousseau.
	If you put in Trudeau apologizes breast, you actually get two different sets of results.
	That's the quality leadership we have in Canada.
	Oh, oh, oh.
	I still stick with the juvenile boobie.
	Or breast.
	Or boob.
	Okay.
	But yeah, Trudeau apologizes.
	I'm gonna make a list.
	I'm making a list.
	I'm gonna make a montage.
	Trudeau apologizes.
	All right, peeps.
	Let's do it.
	Move on over to Rumble.
	Talk about some more stuff.
	Booyakasha.
	Hold on.
	What about...
	I feel like I'm forgetting something.
	I feel like I'm forgetting something, but that's the story of my life these days.
	No, let's do it.
	Let's do it.
	Let's go to Rumble.
	See that number?
	There's 1,035 people who should...
	Mosey on over to the rumble side, the dark side.
	All right.
	Removing on YouTube in three, two, one.
	Every time I do this, it's like catastrophe in the making.
	I feel like I'm going to end the stream by accident.
	All right, people.
	What's been going on in the rumble?
	Some say the tit.
	You could say the tit, but then it gets confusing.
	That's from Melvin Hawkins.
	Then it gets confusing.
	When you actually want to say the teat of a, you know, if you work on a dairy farm, for example.
	Yeah, beautiful.
	Okay, everyone's moving over.
	Good.
	And I've been told, yeah, Rob A is right.
	Hit the plus rumble button.
	Purple heart coffee.
	Red swirly thing.
	That's what's going on in Canada.
	What else is going on in Canada?
	The lawyer that collapsed during the hearing the other day has tweeted that he's okay.
	So thank goodness.
	We don't know what the underlying issues are.
	MSM, Government Subsidized Canadian Media, is respecting his family's right to privacy, medical privacy, now.
	So we don't know what the underlying issue was, if there is one.
	He's alive.
	He thanks everyone for their well's wishes and says he'll be back when he can be back.
	But we've learned a rule.
	This is like rule number seven of COVID logic.
	You cannot ask about someone's vaccination status unless they're admitted to hospital with the Rona and you want to use the fact that they're not vaccinated against them.
	Then you can ask.
	Then it's totally legitimate to ask for their vaccination status.
	Oh, sorry.
	No, sorry.
	There's a point one to that rule.
	You cannot ask for someone's vaccination status.
	Unless it's to board a plane or a train in Canada.
	That's since been rescinded.
	But that was the point one.
	What was the other one?
	Oh yeah, in Quebec.
	You cannot ask for someone's vaccination status unless it's a 13-year-old kid who wants to play after-school soccer at their high school.
	Then you can ask for their vaccination status.
	But a lawyer who has tweeted out hashtag vaxxed to the max collapses in broad daylight in open court.
	You're not allowed asking and you've got to respect their medical privacy.
	And if you don't, you're a bastard.
	Well, hashtag bastard Viva or Viva La Bastard.
	I think, oh my gosh, I'm writing it down.
	I'm writing it down.
	Viva La Bastard.
	And that's going on a shirt, people.
	No, those are the rules.
	And if you disagree with those rules, you're a conspiracy theorist.
	Oh, someone said to me on Twitter, so now you're going to blame everybody fainting on the jibby jab?
	First of all, I blamed nothing on anything.
	Second of all, if that person who fainted yesterday says I just got my fourth booster, I'm going to ask the question.
	And I'm going to suggest to the person, you might want to go file one of those things that are called vaccine adverse effect reports because that is one of the potential side effects.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Can I ask your medical status?
	We're going to violate rule number one?
	Oh, what's that?
	You were, in fact, boosted or jabbed within the last two months?
	I would suggest maybe you go think about filing one of those reports.
	Oh, but I'm not allowed asking?
	Well, then let's just undo theirs.
	Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System.
	Let's just go dismantle theirs.
	Can't ask.
	I'm not going to blame.
	Oh, you're going to blame every case of Bell's Palsy on the jab?
	Maybe if they occur within a certain period of time of the jibby jab.
	I won't blame it.
	I'll just ask the question.
	Oh, you're going to blame every case of a 17-year-old kid dying in her sleep suddenly from heart issues who might have been recently jibby-jabbed?
	We may never know what happened.
	You'll never know what happened if you don't ask the obvious questions.
	You pathological gaslighters.
	Viva el cabron!
	Yeah, so anyways, he's...
	Back when he's able to.
	My immediate reaction, if it was a fainting spell and only a fainting spell because he hadn't eaten that day or was low sugar or whatever, that doesn't result in two days decommissioned.
	At least.
	So yeah, I still have my same questions to that lawyer.
	When were you last jabbed or boosted?
	And if it was within a certain time frame, Have you filed a report with the VAERS?
	All right.
	So that's that.
	That's the update in Canada.
	There is no hearing today.
	There's no commission today because it's Remembrance Day and some people commemorate it and others go wheels up to Cambodia and tweet about it.
	All right.
	Now, let me cue it.
	Let me cue this because I think I can do it.
	Give me one second to go to YouTube.
	I haven't watched The Family Guy in a long time.
	Hold on.
	I was going to bring it up earlier, but here we go.
	I'm going to get past the ad.
	Here.
	I'm not going to give any free advertising here.
	Hold on.
	Okay, here we go.
	I shall cherish this forever.
	I say, Oopie, I'll trade you this baseball for your souvenir bat.
	Sure.
	What did you learn?
	Classic.
	Classic lesson of life that no one should forget.
	What did you learn?
	Well, I'll tell you something.
	I'm asking that question of students who might have been influenced.
	I might even say duped into voting Democrat.
	Based on promises, based on Joe Biden's finally fulfilling what might have very well been, according to many, an unconstitutional promise in the first place.
	You do recall when Joe Biden signed the executive order there for giving student loan, student debt, a certain portion, $10,000 for eligible students.
	You remember, it came by way of executive order.
	There was discussion.
	Executive order for anybody, I mean, whatever.
	Executive order is...
	Not legislative, not judicial, just the executive.
	The president says, I hereby decree by executive order, this shall be the case going forward.
	Joe Biden declared by executive order there was going to be student forgiveness of debt or forgiveness of student debts.
	And people were warning at the time, and I'll take a little bit of credit for this in that I surround myself with smarter people.
	Barnes and I discussed it during a number of live streams.
	Is it constitutional?
	And I say the consensus among those who understand and or respect the Constitution was that it was arguable, that it probably wasn't constitutional, but the joke that Barnes and I were talking about is, who has standing to file a lawsuit?
	Do taxpayers, who are going to indirectly have to flip that bill, back it up for one step?
	When you forgive one debt...
	You're not forgiving debt.
	You are passing the buck onto somebody else.
	There might be some loss somewhere in there, but one person being forgiven from repaying their debts, someone's going to have to pick up that bag or at least a portion of it.
	So you're forgiving student loan debt and then just putting that on the back of other taxpayers who are going to have to assume that debt, assume that loss, assume that cost.
	So Barnes and I, we talked about it, Robert.
	During our Sunday night streams, who would have standing?
	Who would have, in a world where, you know, aggrieved voters don't necessarily have standing.
	Parties don't necessarily have standing.
	Lawsets are tist and tossed.
	And I like that, tist and tossed.
	Because the petitioners don't have standing.
	No longer have standing.
	Latches, mootness, whatever.
	Latches, mootness, standing.
	Who can sue?
	So they're going to forgive student loan.
	It's arguably unconstitutional, but who would have standing to take it to the court?
	People took it to the court, it looks like, and it got struck down.
	Now, do not poop on me for taking this from CNN.
	I want to take the story from the most left-wing of left-wing propaganda outlets because you'll at least...
	Know your enemy, but I want to see how they frame the discussion.
	It was, I think, a day after the midterms, and we'll get to that there.
	What did you learn?
	I got my rock, my rubby rock.
	It was a day after the midterms that a court struck down Joe Biden's executive order as unconstitutional.
	The day after the midterms.
	So Joe Biden got to make the promise.
	He got to ride all the virtue that goes along with making, if it goes through, an ecosystem.
	...economically reckless promise that penalizes the responsible students who've repaid their loan and seems to reward those that did not repay their loan in time or kept it outstanding or a portion of it.
	He gets to ride the goodwill that comes with having made that promise right up until the midterms and then the day after the midterms when people have voted based on party lines and promises and whatnot, it gets struck down.
	CNN Politics.
	And we're going to talk about this in greater detail on Sunday.
	I have not read the order, but I think I have an understanding of how the petitioners had standing and the judge's reasoning in this.
	What student loan borrowers need to know after a federal court struck down Biden's forgiveness program?
	What did you learn?
	Don't trust the politician?
	Maybe get your expectations in line before swallowing it all up?
	It's a gift.
	It's a free lunch.
	You might have to take, there's no such thing as a free lunch 101 in university if they still offer that, if it doesn't trigger people too much.
	Student loan borrowers are now waiting indefinitely to see if they receive debt relief under President Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness program after a federal judge in Texas struck down the program declaring it illegal.
	It's a Trump judge.
	They're going to say that somewhere in here, I think.
	It's a Trump judge, from what I understand.
	There's going to be so many ways of spinning this.
	Some people are going to say, oh, isn't that convenient?
	It got struck down the day after the election, so people voted based on a misunderstanding of a potential promise.
	Others are going to say, well, if it's a Trump judge, where's the incentive in that?
	Some might say, well, the Trump judge was going to strike it down, but if the Trump judge struck it down the day before the midterms, it might galvanize or anger or enrage the Democrat base even more.
	So there's a number of ways to interpret the same set of facts, but let's just get the facts.
	Department of Justice immediately appealed the decision.
	Hold on a second.
	It was struck down by the judge declaring it illegal.
	Department of Justice immediately appealed the fifth.
	So they're appealing.
	So there's going to be months and months and months.
	It's not a final decision.
	Going to go to the appeal.
	But the case will have to play out before the Biden administration can cancel any federal student loan under the program.
	So it's on hiatus, unless they can get a court order, as we'll see.
	Biden administration has faced several legal challenges to the student loan forgiveness program since it was announced in August.
	This is the most significant setback, prompting the Department of Education to stop accepting applications for debt relief.
	Let's see here.
	So this is where we get into standing.
	Biden's program was already on hold due to separate legal challenge, but the administration had continued accepting applications, having received 26 million to date.
	What's 26 million times 10,000?
	A lot.
	Under the rules of the program, Eligible low- and middle-income borrowers can receive up to $10,000 of federal student loan forgiveness and $20,000 in cancellation if they also received a Pell Grant.
	The legal road ahead is murky.
	You know that when CNN says the legal road ahead is murky, unless they mean the process and not their legal chances of pursuing this on appeal, but I think it's more the latter than the former.
	Most people agreed that...
	This executive order bypassed the purse strings of government.
	It basically trumped the powers of the legislative branch.
	It's murky.
	Could take many months before it's resolved.
	The Texas decision, quote, makes it more likely that the issue will ultimately go to the Supreme Court, though it's still too early to say, yada, yada, yada.
	What happens to borrowers?
	Let's see, do we care of them?
	Could take months to overturn it.
	Okay, so they could ask for an emergency.
	They could ask for interim relief to allow the program to move forward.
	We'll see about that.
	The Department of Justice could ask for an emergency stay of the Texas judge's order, if granted, and if a different appeals court ends its temporary stay on the program, pending the case, then the administration would be allowed to cancel debt before a final ruling is made by the Fifth Circuit.
	Let's get to the legal arguments, as determined by CNN.
	But not before I just go grab one thing from the chat here.
	Pelosi said it's not legal name, Jack.
	There wasn't much disagreement on its unconstitutionality.
	The issue is going to be, will any court recognize standing?
	So we're going to get there here.
	The Biden administration has argued that Congress granted the Secretary of Education the power to broadly...
	Whenever they start saying the law broadly gives us the power, you know they're overreaching.
	Student loan debt in a 2003 law known as the HEROES Act, which was passed in the wake of the September 11th terrorist attack.
	The government's lawyers argue that the law allows the secretary to discharge debt in an event of a national emergency, including the COVID pandemic.
	But the Texas federal judge found that the law does not provide the executive branch.
	That's the one that...
	Yeah, the executive, legislative, and judicial.
	Judicial interprets the law.
	Legislative legislates the law, creates it, and executive enforces it.
	And what you have here, arguably, by way of executive order, is the executive branch creating the law.
	The judge found that the...
	Does not provide the executive branch clear congressional authorization to create the student loan forgiveness program.
	This is from the judge.
	The program is thus an unconstitutional exercise of Congress's legislative power and must be vacated, wrote Judge Pittman, nominated by then-Trump President Donald Trump.
	Bias.
	And the only reason he released this decision the day after, it's funny because it's going to be absolutely mutually incompatible alternatives here.
	It's conspiracy to only have it vacated or suspended after the midterms to not impact the midterms so that Democrats could realize that their president promised them something unlawful.
	Or people are going to say, if a Trump judge had vacated it the day before or the week before, it would have galvanized Democrats to show up in even greater numbers.
	You can interpret this whichever way you want.
	In this country, we are not ruled by an all-powerful executive with a pen and a phone, he continued.
	Oh, yes, then we've got to get to the standing part.
	So listen to this.
	The Texas lawsuit was filed by a conservative group, the Job Creators Network Foundation, in October on behalf of two Boers who did not qualify for debt relief.
	So interesting.
	They didn't qualify, and they say, we're being left out of this reimbursement program.
	It's causing us prejudice.
	It's an unlawful program, and here's why.
	One plaintiff did not qualify for the student loan forgiveness program because her loans are not held by the federal government.
	And the other plaintiff is only eligible for $10,000 in debt relief because he did not receive a Pell grant.
	They're saying they're being prejudiced by the way this has been put into effect.
	It didn't go through the standard legislative process.
	We didn't get to put in our comments and ask that, you know, other things be considered.
	And therefore, this is why the executive does not create the law.
	The legislative does it, and it does it through a certain process.
	Involving the Administrative Procedures Act, which we're going to get to in a second.
	They argued that they could not voice their disagreement with the program's rules because the administration did not put it through a formal notice and comment rule making process under the APA.
	Okay.
	Funded by Bernie Marcus, a major Trump donor and former.
	Okay.
	Where do the other lawsuits stand?
	You can go on and read that.
	You can go read the article, but that's it.
	So right now, the day after the midterms, The reality of Democrat promises have come home to roost, at least for the time being.
	Maybe the Court of Appeal overturns this.
	Maybe a zealous Court of Appeals suspends the suspension and allows the program to go forward pending yada yada.
	That's where it's at.
	But it's quite, it's quite, quite interesting.
	If nothing else, students and young people Who were galvanized to vote in pretty high numbers, from what I understand, might want to understand.
	This is by no means just a Democrat thing.
	The government has a tendency of making promises.
	One of Trump's stronger elements was that, for good or for bad, depending on which side of the aisle you were on, he kept his presidential promises.
	On the one hand, because they were probably lawful, actionable promises.
	And on the other hand, because he might have been one of the few presidents in recent history who actually followed through on his promises to such a point, to such a degree, he was faulted for following through on his presidential promises.
	Let me see this here.
	President Trump follows through on promises.
	There was an article I remember at the time that faulted Trump.
	I won't be able to find the article in real time.
	It faulted Trump for fastidiously following through on his presidential promises because people didn't like them.
	And now you have one that a lot of people liked coming from Joe Biden.
	Not so much a promise, an unlawful decree by way of executive order that has, for the time being, been struck down and which was pretty much recognized by most people.
	As being unlawful to begin with.
	There's an article from 2016.
	No, this is from 2020.
	Trump delivered on some big promises, but others unmet.
	That's not the right article.
	So anyways, that's it.
	Cue the Stewie Griffin in your minds all the time.
	What did you learn?
	Ah, student loan forgiveness.
	Here you go, children.
	10,000, 20,000 free.
	Oh, thank you very much.
	We'll vote for you.
	Struck down.
	What did you learn?
	Thanks for your vote.
	What did you learn?
	Some people will have learned nothing.
	Let me see in the chat.
	I took two pictures of some Rumble rants that are now disappeared, so I'm glad I got the picture.
	One is from Jillo463, a $10 Rumble rant.
	Have to leave in a few, but don't forget about Little Castro going on a drag show.
	Oddly, he didn't go in a woman face.
	Oh, Jillo, I talked about that the other day.
	That is...
	Justin Trudeau is making a guest appearance on Drag Race Canada because it's quality programming to begin with and it's totally not a national disgrace and it's totally not a distraction.
	A pandering, childish, transparent distraction from the scandal that is the Emergencies Act inquiry that is currently unfolding and revealing what a petty tyrant Justin Trudeau is.
	All right, so that's it.
	What did you learn?
	Some people, the answer will be absolutely nothing.
	Here's the ball again, and thanks for the bat.
	All right, what else?
	Let's stick to Biden.
	I've got a rage and I've got to vent against this.
	I've got a rage and I've got to vent.
	I've called Biden.
	A bigot through low expectations in the past.
	Not because I'm just throwing that term around loosely.
	The Biden administration has exemplified the concept of soft bigotry through low expectations.
	Or, as I like to just call it, bigotry.
	You remember that they were banning menthol cigarettes.
	And it was to protect children who might get addicted to the sweeter flavors of menthol cigarettes and minorities.
	And I said, do people not understand that by invoking that rationale, and if you think I'm lying or I've misunderstood, you'll see.
	Justin, what's his face?
	Joe Biden banned menthol to protect children and minorities, which shows you exactly what Biden thinks of minorities.
	Joe Biden regards minorities as children that require his presidential protection.
	Let me see if it's in here.
	I covered this back in the day, and I'm just showing how the tobacco industry targeted Black Americans with menthol smokes.
	It's not in here.
	I want to get the one.
	Here we go.
	FDA agrees to ban menthol.
	To protect African Americans.
	To protect African Americans.
	Hold on.
	Sorry.
	I've been told that hearing ice crunch makes people very uncomfortable.
	FDA agrees to ban menthol to protect African Americans.
	Some might call it bigotry of low expectations.
	The savior complex.
	Others might also call it racism in that because Caucasians don't prefer menthol cigarettes, they get to have more of a choice as to what they like than African Americans.
	Today, the Food and Drug Administration, this is from 2021, and I covered it at the time because I just said, this is bigotry.
	FDA announced it will...
	Promulgate a rule banning menthol cigarettes, finally responding to a citizen petition submitted by the agency, yada yada.
	FDA's overdue response to petition was prompted by a lawsuit filed by the African American Tobacco Control Leadership.
	It's a bizarre thing to have.
	The African American Tobacco Control Leadership.
	Hold on.
	This is a major step towards saving black lives.
	However, this is not the end of the next stage.
	Let me see something here.
	Why can't I get out of here?
	No thanks, children.
	You get the idea.
	I don't have the exact article.
	Why menthol bans protect African Americans and CBI?
	In 2020, the African...
	Oh my goodness.
	Whatever.
	They banned menthol cigarettes to protect children and African Americans.
	Who they did studies.
	They showed that African American adults...
	I think it was like 40-some-odd percent preferred menthol.
	I mean, if you want to kill yourself, you're going to have to do it with unflavored, unmenthol cigarettes.
	Go do it with Marlboros.
	Marlboros don't get banned.
	Cigarettes don't get banned.
	Caucasians like those.
	But we're going to ban it to protect you.
	So that's the soft bigotry of low expectations, or as I just call it, what it is, bigotry.
	And here's another example of the pure bigotry of the way Joe Biden sees the world through a lens of race, gender, and whatever that you can monetize for political goodwill, for political capital.
	You help me keep my commitment that I would appoint the first black woman to the Supreme Court, Justice Jackson.
	And guess what?
	She's probably the smartest person on the Supreme Court.
	Well, guess what?
	And because of your vote this year, we're going to keep building the foundation we laid for the first two years.
	You proved once again on Tuesday that our democracy and our democracy, our democracy, the power in the hands of the people.
	You helped me keep my commitment that I would appoint the first black woman to the Supreme Court, Justice Jackson.
	And guess what?
	Guess what?
	She's probably the smartest person on the Supreme Court.
	And guess what?
	Not only did I keep my promise, but guess what?
	Oh my goodness!
	Because this is the way I think of the minority class, she might be the smartest one there!
	It's objectification, it's patronizing, and it shows that in his mind, for some reason, there would have been a doubt, or it requires some clarification, setting aside the fact, I've read a few decisions, Kataji Brown, She asked some decent questions.
	I forget what the lawsuit was.
	I forget what the decision was.
	She's smart.
	She might be politically, I'll say politically compromised.
	Her inability to define what a woman is does not have to do with intelligence.
	Some would even say that her unwillingness or inability to define what a woman is specifically has to do with intelligence.
	Intelligence that has been infiltrated.
	To borrow Gadzad's term, a mind that has been taken over by the political parasite, it has to be sufficiently intelligent, the mind, to say, how do I weasel out of answering what a woman is?
	A dumb person can't do that quite so well.
	I don't think Kataji Brown actually did it all that well, but I don't think she's unintelligent.
	I think she's politically compromised.
	But to look at one member of the Supreme Court...
	You helped me fulfill my promise.
	I hired a black woman.
	And at the time, any black woman, he said.
	We're going to pick a black woman.
	And guess what?
	It surprised me too.
	She might be the smartest person on the court.
	That's bigotry.
	And also, by the way, these are nine justices of the Supreme Court of Canada.
	If there's one who's remarkably or noticeably smarter than another, you've got a problem.
	You've got a problem because they should all be pretty much equally intelligent.
	They might not all be equally politically, intellectually honest.
	And some of them might have to be even smart to disguise their political bias through legalese.
	But it's just awful in your face patronizing bigotry through lowered expectations or just bigotry.
	That's it.
	It's a defining feature of Joe Biden.
	It's a defining feature of a party that looks at a person and doesn't see a human.
	It doesn't see an individual with a story and a life.
	It just goes through checkboxes.
	White, black, gay, straight, trans, Jewish, Asian, and for good and for bad.
	Asian?
	Well, you're going to have a tougher time getting into Harvard now.
	You've got...
	You've got some privilege that we need to keep in check.
	White, black, woman, man, trans, Jew, Muslim, Christian, black.
	I said that already.
	Whatever.
	Hindu.
	Whichever one.
	Let's just reduce the person to that so that we can exploit it for political capital.
	Okay.
	That's what I had to say on that.
	I think we're done with Joe Biden for the day.
	Maybe not.
	It's still early.
	But I didn't want to get distracted before going on to the next one.
	And it's a perfect segue.
	Looking at a person, what are you?
	Not who are you, what are you?
	You may remember Chloe Cole.
	And I called her, I didn't, I don't remember how I described her because it's a curious way.
	How do you describe, she's 18 now, but how do you describe a child who Was trans at one point.
	In Chloe Cole's case, a girl who we now know has been diagnosed with autism, among other things, as a child.
	A girl who thinks she's a boy or says she thinks she's a boy at a certain stage of her life begins the physical transformation process into a boy and then says, I've made a terrible mistake and now I'm a vocal opponent of this trans process.
	How do you characterize a person like that?
	How do you describe that person?
	And I think the term is now detransitioning or detransitioned because you got biological male, biological female, people who feel that they're the other, they transition, they're trans.
	I still, you know, trans.
	And then you've got the people who have either started, completed, or have stopped the idea.
	And what are they?
	Well, the term is now detrans or detransitioning or detransitioned.
	Chloe Cole was on my channel.
	We had an amazing interview where she explained things that I had actually never thought of and we're going to get into it as we go through the story.
	She was on Fox News getting what will be the biggest spotlight, not in a cynical cryptic way, in the best way possible.
	She will get the biggest bullhorn to tell her story because, you know, she went from being, as she explained to me, the hero.
	The transitioning hero of her friends and community to the disloyal betrayer of her community when she said, what the heck did you allow me to do as a 15-year-old girl?
	She had a full double mastectomy.
	And we discussed what goes into a double mastectomy.
	It's much more than what I even thought it was.
	You can have breast reduction surgery, remove some of the, I don't know, Fatty tissue.
	A mastectomy, when it's medically necessary, removes the breast tissue, some of the muscle, the glands.
	A transition mastectomy, and I didn't fully appreciate this, when you're transitioning from a biological female to a biological...
	You cannot do that.
	When you transition from a biological female to a male, a trans male, the double mastectomy is not...
	Not just a question of removing breast fat, fatty tissue, muscle, glands.
	As we discussed in this interview, it also involves repositioning the nipple so that it looks like a male breast once this horrendous, severe surgery is done.
	And Chloe was talking about how it's been a long...
	No one...
	Told her what the recovery was going to be like and she's still having issues with this.
	They cut the nipple out and reposition it so that the mastectomized, if that's the word, transitioned female breast is supposed to look more like a male's breast where I guess the nipple is there.
	I don't know.
	She was on Fox.
	Detransitioned girl wants...
	And she was on Fox discussing what I had floated a while back.
	This is what's going to make things change.
	People answer to politics and money.
	And when people start having to pay money for the damages they've done, they start to get a lot more cautious about the actions that they do in the future.
	Detransitioned teen wants to hold gender-affirming surgeons accountable.
	What happens to me is horrible.
	Chloe Cole underwent double mastectomy at 15 and still suffers from health complications.
	Oh, is that?
	That's...
	I think that's...
	Teenage...
	You should all know this if you've watched the interview.
	If you haven't watched it, watch it.
	It's great.
	People say stunning and brave sarcastically.
	She is amazingly brave.
	Teenage Chloe Cole started on puberty blockers and testosterone at 13, underwent a double mastectomy at 15, and detransitioned from male to female at 16. She told a story on Tucker Carlson.
	We all know her story.
	Just in case you don't, she was 12 when she told her parents she was distressed with her gender and wanted to transition from female to male.
	At the time, at that age, she was diagnosed with ADHD, put on a bunch of adult-level medications, from what I understand, was subsequently diagnosed with autism or a spectrum of autism.
	And we'll get into what I know people are thinking.
	They were concerned and they wanted what was best for me, but they weren't really sure what to do with me, so they sought professional help.
	And from then on, I was basically referred to in my gender identity without any questioning from any medical professionals, and they pushed transitioning as the way to treat gender dysphoria, she said.
	She's devastated by the loss of her breasts and has trouble coping.
	She's a strong, strong woman, and she will...
	Nobody will get over it.
	She will not get over it, but she will continue to be the strong person that she is.
	As an adult, I will never be able to breastfeed whatever children I have.
	I don't even know if, because I was put on puberty blockers and testosterone at only 13 years old, I don't know if I'll ever be able to conceive a child naturally, she said.
	I made an adult decision as a child.
	That should be a throwback to the discussion I just had with Kurt from Uncivil Law on Eric Hundley's Live stream at noon.
	The teenager said she is suing the doctors, and everybody should start cheering at this point, who performed the gender-affirming surgery because she wants to end the practice.
	I want to hold the adults that put me in harm's way accountable because what happened to me is horrible, but also it didn't only happen to me.
	That's the worst part.
	It's happening to children all over the U.S., all over the West, and it's spreading all over the world.
	Hold on, who was her attorney there?
	Yeah, that is Harmeet Dillon.
	Okay, I wasn't sure who was in the picture.
	Attorney Harmeet Dillon outlined the case against the doctors, telling host Tucker Carlson they are bringing forth a medical malpractice suit finally.
	Harmeet is amazing.
	Absolutely phenomenal.
	Cole is being represented by a non-profit organization for the Center for American Liberty.
	Our website at center...
	LibertyCenter.org has the letter.
	Oh, hold on a second.
	Let's see this here.
	Has the letter, a very detailed letter that details all of the medical symptoms that Chloe has and the medical malpractice, and frankly, the mutilation that was perpetrated by these medical professionals.
	We intend to shut down this barbaric practice for good.
	Let's just go see what happened here.
	I want to see if we can get that letter in real time.
	Current cases.
	It's genital mutilation.
	There's an adult who wants to do this to themselves.
	That's why adults are adults.
	Under the law, children cannot consent.
	The issue is going to be parents consenting for the children, or in other states, children deciding for themselves without their parents even knowing at least the risk of that.
	I'll get the...
	Here we go.
	Justice for Chloe.
	Justice for Chloe.
	You know, I'll save it for another date.
	Maybe we'll do it Sunday.
	I'll get the letter and I'll cover it later.
	She's suing, and that's what it's going to take to put an end to this.
	When it stops being a lucrative business for doctors and Boston Hospital and whatever, Pittsburgh Hospital, when it stops being a lucrative business and starts being a liability, they'll find a way to stop recommending it quite so often.
	There might still be the absolute outlier of a case, which is what this should always have been in the first place.
	There might be the absolute outlier of a case.
	I can't easily envision what outlier of a case that would be.
	If the idea is, and the only argument, by the way, is that it needs to be done in order to prevent the child from taking their own life, so we'd better do it, otherwise they're definitely going to take their own life.
	There are stats as to the...
	As to whether or not there's any decrease in that potentiality post-surgery.
	But if the argument is that it's the only way to prevent the kid from taking their own lives, that's going to be a very, very, very bad argument.
	And if that is the only argument, and I think it's not even an argument, but it's the only one people use, then you may have your one in a million outlier case.
	Not a gosh darn industry built on this.
	If that is the justification.
	It's the only way to prevent a distraught child from taking their own lives.
	It would be an outlier of an outlier of an outlier, not an industry that it has become.
	Things go from being exceptions.
	There's rules, then there's exceptions, then the exception becomes the rule, to quote City of God.
	There's also my variation of this.
	Things go from being unheard of, to being a trend, to becoming an industry.
	And when they become an industry, they become fundamentally corrupt by the financial aspect of that industry.
	This went from being unheard of to being the absolute outliers of childhood disorders, because that's what it is in the DSM-5, to becoming an industry that is making lots of doctors, lots of money, lots of institutions, lots of money.
	Top surgery, as they call the double mastectomy on a teenager, is not free and it's not cheap.
	And then once you get it covered by insurance, holy sweet merciful goodness, does it become an even more lucrative business.
	So that's the only way that this comes to an end.
	When it starts costing the people who are doing it lots and lots of money.
	And you want to talk about medical malpractice?
	I asked Chloe.
	I said, what did they tell you was going to be the healing process from this double mastectomy?
	People think, oh, it's no biggie.
	They just go in and cut your boobies off.
	No, no.
	It's a big freaking surgery.
	It takes months to heal from.
	And according to what Chloe briefly described with me, she's still suffering problems.
	Now, there was the comment in the chat here that I just saw that said, parents, honor 234, parents all in caps with one, two, three, four, five, six, seven exclamation points.
	I am of the opinion that the minors should also...
	Could also contemplate suing their parents.
	Parents might get sensitized to not allowing this to happen to their kids, not being manipulated into the trend, and also not being terrorized into authorizing it.
	And I asked Chloe, and I am not one to create strife or foment strife between family.
	And I brought it up, and I wasn't going to harp on it for any longer than that.
	I brought up the issue.
	And Chloe said, and it's something I had not really fully conceived of in my own spirit, her parents were as distraught as one can imagine they would be.
	Not everybody.
	First of all, let's just assume that you have that one outlier of a case.
	You have a kid that is so distraught, the first thing they're going to do is run out and take their own life unless you give them this.
	Short of locking them up, I don't know who ever read The Virgin Suicides.
	Let's just take the parents of that one in a million outlier of a case.
	You have a parent that does not want to lose their child, understands their child is in whatever distress, for whatever the reason.
	DSM-5, diagnose it, whatever.
	And they want to do whatever, they want to do what is necessary to avoid their child doing that.
	Short of locking them up, institutionalizing them, confining them for their own protection.
	Some parents get whipped up into such a frenzied terror that in their own minds, it's the only solution to protect their children.
	And Chloe sensitized me to that aspect of it.
	I'm still not totally sold on it.
	I'm not sold on it.
	I mean, I would not encourage children who are willing to forgive their parents for what they've done to them to sue.
	Doctors...
	Not a question.
	The doctors are the professionals.
	The parents are as much whipped up in the process, you know, sometimes as the kids.
	Other times, you're dealing with parents who might be doing this and allowing this and even promoting this on their kids for some form of Munchausen by proxy.
	And when a child wakes up and gets to the age of 18 and says, holy crap, you know, my mother and my father were posting on social media about how stunning and brave I am for allowing my kid to do this.
	Yeah, sue them.
	Hold the adults to the consequences of their decisions as adults.
	But Chloe did sort of open my eyes to the idea that sometimes, and as she said in her case, her parents were as distraught as she was.
	And she says, I blame the doctors.
	Because my parents came there and said, my kid has issues.
	My kid has mental problems.
	And the doctor said, don't do it.
	She'll kill herself.
	That's it.
	It's your only way as a parent to save your child.
	And the parents...
	In this particular case, seemingly bought into it.
	But there are a great many cases where parents take into social media to say that their five-year-old kid is trans.
	Oh, if that kid gets to be an adult, when that kid gets to be an adult, they might say, holy sweet crap, mom, dad, you exploited me and you damaged me and you're damn well better be certain.
	I'm going to sue you for as much as I can when I get to be an adult.
	And make my own adult decisions and hold you as an adult to the consequences of your decisions as an adult that forever impacted me as your child.
	Has it happened yet?
	When it happens, we'll see.
	Let me see here in the chat.
	There was someone.
	I want to see this.
	It's a trend just like stainless steel appliances.
	Next will be something different.
	This is pure evil.
	A return to peace says.
	Callie Daisy says, this isn't family.
	It's evil.
	There's family who abuse their children.
	That's not family either.
	Janet announces mental illness not cured by genital mutilation.
	And then Saturday seems to have posted a comment one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, ten times in a row.
	So that's Chloe.
	P. Moyer says, but viva.
	Even the one in a million case where the parents feel they need to pursue this action, we need to get to a place where the medical professionals just say no.
	And I agree with that.
	And, you know, let's just make the caveat here.
	I understand that there are going to be people who say medical professionals should always say no to everyone, even adults.
	Do no harm.
	That's the first rule of practicing medicine.
	I'll go out on a more libertarian.
	Do I think they might have mental issues that might explain that desire to do that to their bodies?
	Probably.
	I mean, we all have mental issues to some extent.
	The only question is, do they affect us in a highly destructive manner?
	The desire to slit your tongue down the middle to create a snake tongue Is different to only an extent than the desire to tattoo yourself, you know, up to the wrists.
	And if someone wants to tattoo themselves down to the wrists, go right ahead.
	My best friend back in Montreal had beautiful, beautiful sleeve tattoos, beautiful leg tattoos.
	Definitely not my thing.
	But an adult should be able to do what they want to do, even if it means, you know, putting under-the-skin thingy things on their forehead.
	So the idea is that no doctor should do that.
	Do no harm is the first one.
	Well, then you're going to tell somebody that they can't give themselves massive breast implants if they want.
	Do no harm.
	Some people are going to say, well, that's total harm.
	An adult, let's set all of it aside for an adult.
	For a children?
	Yeah.
	Do no harm.
	And any doctor who does it, it's different only in social stigma.
	It's different from genital mutilation.
	What we condemn out...
	In the far nether regions of the earth, it's different from genital mutilation only because we have found a way to rationalize it and justify it to ourselves.
	So, yeah.
	Viva should get a tramp stamp from KMK0.
	Nope, nope, not going to happen.
	If ever, I don't know.
	We'll see if I ever get it.
	I'm not getting a tattoo.
	My father would kill me.
	Oh, I never hit send on Le Viva Le Bastard.
	So that's the Chloe Cole story.
	Brad Raymond says, Viva!
	Liberal colleges, universities, and educators indoctrinated and raised those woke parents.
	I have no doubt about it.
	I mean, I went to university.
	What year is it?
	I went to university in 1998 was when I got my undergrad.
	And things were, they didn't call it woke.
	The word didn't exist.
	The word was not woke back in the day, but in 98, and I'm from Montreal, so I went to McGill for my undergrad in philosophy.
	There was this university called Concordia.
	Some of you might know it because that's where Gadsad teaches.
	Concordia, back in 98, was anti-free speech.
	I mean, I think they protested Benjamin Netanyahu.
	It was one of the Israeli leaders.
	They boycotted him back in 98. It's always been like this, but my good gosh, has it gotten worse.
	In 98, they were protesting certain speakers at Concordia.
	And I was like, oh, that university's off the rails.
	I'm glad I'm at McGill.
	They've all gone off the rails now.
	Institutionalized off the rails.
	Janet now says, I got my masters in 2005.
	No one told me any of this libtard crap happened after.
	No, no, no.
	I'll tell you, in Canada, I remember it at the time.
	Ash and Cash.
	Ash and Cash says, this is a crime against humanity, teaching children to hate themselves to the point they take cancer-causing, castrating drugs, and sexual organ mutilation is not in any way loving.
	Hashtag no medical advice.
	I...
	No, but people think you can't manufacture mental illness.
	I mean, you can't manufacture trends.
	Mass formation psychosis doesn't exist.
	Hold on a second.
	Check this out, people.
	Let me pull this one up because it's a classic.
	It's a classic.
	That's from SNL.
	Hold on.
	I hear my kid is screaming now all of a sudden.
	Here, hold on.
	Here.
	Google.
	Come on, come on, come on, come on.
	Mass formation psychosis doesn't exist.
	Fact check.
	You're going to laugh at how stupid these people think we are, the fact checkers.
	Fact check.
	No evidence of pandemic mass formation psychosis.
	Say experts speaking to Reuters.
	Okay.
	January 7, 2022.
	I want to get to the kicker.
	Yeah, this is it.
	It's right in the first paragraph.
	Quote, mass formation psychosis, end quote, is not an academic term recognized in the field of psychology, nor is there evidence of any such phenomenon occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic.
	Multiple experts in crowd psychology told Reuters, oh my God, does that, I mean, does everyone see what's going on right here?
	Mass formation psychosis is not a recognized term.
	You know why?
	Because it's called crowd psychology by another name, you idiots.
	No, mass formation psychosis doesn't exist.
	There's no evidence for any such phenomenon occurring during COVID-19 pandemic.
	Crowd psychology experts say.
	Some might say crowd psychology as an expertise is itself mass formation psychosis by another name.
	Mass formation psychosis is nothing more than crowd psychology at a global scale, at a larger scale.
	Crowd psychology exists.
	Trends exist.
	You think it's an accident that everyone in the 80s had those freaking ugly hairdos?
	They were convinced at the time it was cool.
	It was hip.
	Torn jeans.
	Torn jean jackets.
	It was a trend.
	And if anybody doesn't think that this trans ideology...
	It's not the trend of our time.
	That's because you haven't been alive long enough and you haven't read a book.
	It's the trend of our time and it is a vile trend of our time that will go down in history as the trend that tolerated and promoted genital mutilation of confused children who were probably suffering from other underlying issues.
	I know, it's terribly controversial.
	DVR Downmark says, Viva, try the 70s.
	Dude, I'm living the 70s now.
	I actually think there was more style to the hairdos of the 70s.
	Yeah, but no, no.
	Mass formation psychosis doesn't exist.
	Say crowd psychologist experts.
	Okay, you guys are wordsmiths of the devil.
	Meh.
	Meh, boss.
	Shame.
	Okay.
	Anyway, so that's it.
	Chloe is...
	What she described as the backlash that she's suffering as a result of detransitioning, and now she is the enemy to the people who lauded her as the hero of the time.
	A 15-year-old confused child, stunning and brave, when she cuts off her own breasts, becomes the enemy of the movement when she says, how the hell did you let me, as a 15-year-old kid, make that decision?
	That tells you pretty much everything you need to know about...
	About the movement.
	Now, I don't want to talk about the election stuff.
	It's mind-blowing to me.
	We live in an era where Elon Musk is talking about flying people to Mars, but it's three days later and they haven't finished counting ballots.
	It so makes no sense that there's no way of trying to make sense of the absence of sense that this makes.
	But the best, by the way, Cernovich tweeted it.
	And I'm like, I gotta go.
	I trust Cernovich, but everyone gets duped from time to time.
	Cernovich tweeted the screen grab, so I had to go find the tweet.
	Washoe County, blue checkmark.
	Just wait until there's the Washoe County one that got the blue checkmark, and nobody knows that it's not actual Washoe County.
	And by the way, this is the level of distrust that the acquired, you know, the pay-to-play blue checkmark is gonna create.
	Someone's gonna create a Washoe County one.
	Pay for the blue checkmark and put out winner announced in Nevada.
	No, have they announced for Nevada?
	I think I might be getting mixed up with Arizona.
	But this is an actual tweet.
	I had to go check.
	And I had to go, by the way, go check.
	Blue checkmark.
	Click on the blue checkmark.
	This account is verified because it's notable in the government, news, entertainment, or another designated category.
	Okay.
	No one's going to say that this is fake news.
	No one's going to say that Viva retweeted a gag.
	Washoe County.
	We know that our election livestream cameras went dark overnight.
	We investigated what happened and how to prevent it happening again.
	Learn more here.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Did you just say that your cameras, your livestream cameras went dark?
	I mean, I'm a one-guy operation out of my office, and the biggest problems that I have sometimes are slow internet and choosing the wrong mic.
	I know we had an election livestream.
	It went dark.
	These things happened.
	Safe and secure.
	Total.
	Can't be wrong.
	Registrar of voters' livestream cameras.
	What happened?
	Oh, I haven't seen this.
	Hold on.
	Let's see this.
	What happened?
	Washoe Life.
	Washoe Life.
	What happened?
	The livestream computer application lost connection with the courtesy cameras At 11.24 p.m., the evening of November 9. All staff had left for the night about 60 minutes earlier and did not arrive back at the office until 7 a.m.
	Connection was short at 7.53 in the morning.
	Why?
	The courtesy cameras, by the way, this is a good frame, courtesy cameras.
	You never had a right to them, so the fact that they went down, nothing to see here.
	They're connected to a computer application designed for live stream events.
	They intermittently lose connection with the application.
	When this has happened before, Because it has, apparently.
	Such as on election night, when one camera went dark, staff was able to see the disruption and restore it.
	It just took 13 hours?
	Security.
	The Washoe County Security Administrator has reviewed the building's security cameras.
	According to the Washoe County Security Administration, that footage shows the parking garage, the hallway between the garage, and the entry door.
	Like, I'm not saying anything happened.
	It's just kind of freaking funny.
	Hold on, I'm going to cough.
	Nothing to do with the Rona.
	It's kind of funny.
	Nothing to see here.
	Literally.
	So sketchy.
	We're flying people to the moon.
	Although we can't actually do that again because we destroyed the technology.
	We want to fly people to Mars.
	We've got satellite technology.
	Up in the sky.
	That is bouncing around cellular connections from one side of the earth to the other.
	But it's...
	What's the date today?
	November 8 to 9. It's three days later.
	And we still don't know who won.
	In Arizona.
	Carrie Lake.
	Because we haven't finished counting votes.
	Let's just see where we're at with Carrie Lake.
	Nothing is going to instill more confidence.
	In the election process than that.
	Get out of the New Mexico.
	I just want to see what the votes are.
	And what percentage has been counted?
	Oh, this is so...
	Offensive Trump candidate called out by head of Arizona vote count.
	Tensions running high.
	Get out of here.
	I'm not starting a free trial.
	In the crucial state as Donald Trump weighs in.
	Offensive.
	I'm not reading this crap.
	Tone down her rhetoric with tensions running high.
	Why should tensions not be running high?
	It's only three days later and they haven't finished counting ballots.
	Totally normal.
	Totally a sign of a proper functioning system.
	Okay.
	Let me see what's going on in the chat.
	The fox is in charge of the hen house in Arizona and that much is true.
	That much is true.
	But I'll tell you, Charlie Kirk has been covering this day in, day out.
	Jack Posobiec is covering this day in and day out.
	I can only bear so much of it.
	Election night itself was already too much for me.
	Now I'm reading some of the chat.
	Love Trump, but he needs to just be quiet now.
	Janet and now.
	Diva, talk about climate reparation.
	It's the subject of Copenhagen COP27.
	Oh, no.
	Arizona has 85% counted.
	Okay, so that's DVR down mark.
	85% counted.
	Hey, it's totally normal.
	And Carrie Lake is confident, and so is Charlie Kirk, that of the remaining ballots to be counted, they're going to be largely in favor of Carrie Lake.
	It's entertaining.
	It's nerve-wracking.
	But elections are not supposed to be entertaining and nerve-wracking for this reason.
	Okay.
	There was something else in the back burner here.
	Hold on one second.
	You know what?
	Speaking of the blue check marks and parity accounts that deserve the blue check mark.
	Because they started off as parody accounts, people follow them as parody accounts, and they're the best parody accounts out there.
	Justin Trudeau's ego, if you're not already following it, follow it.
	It's so good.
	Every time I read the tweet, I keep forgetting it's Justin Trudeau's ego.
	I'm like, oh, wow, he's really a bumhole.
	And then I see that it's Justin Trudeau.
	He can't be this much of a bumhole.
	And then I realize I'm reading Justin Trudeau's ego.
	It's beautiful.
	So this is what Justin Trudeau put out.
	He mocks Supreme Leader in a different manner than I do.
	I mean, it's so good because first paragraph is as good as real.
	Second paragraph, Is as good as real, but tactless.
	Or maybe like, you know, ill phrased.
	And then the third paragraph, in your face, why he is awful in all respects.
	And then a beautiful picture of him going wheels up.
	And I love seeing...
	Oh, then you go down there and then you see more parody accounts, satire accounts, interacting as though it's legit.
	And it's a confusing world in which...
	To currently be alive.
	Now, but hold on.
	The most recent news on Elon Musk spends Twitter Blue.
	I think the most recent news, by the way, from Elon Musk and Twitter Blue.
	Is Vanity Fair going to be...
	You give credit to Elon Musk where it's due.
	And others have noted, this is not my original thought, I am not joining your filth, Vanity Fair.
	He's testing in real time.
	And testing where you see what the problems are very quickly in real time.
	Elon Musk, surprising absolutely no one, suspends Twitter Blue after just two days.
	Let's just say there were some user verification issues.
	They might be right.
	It's not because it's Vanity Fair that they're not right.
	And I covered a story yesterday of this college student spent eight bucks, ten minutes, blew up some football coach thing with some rumor because he bought the blue checkmark, created an account that looked very similar to the actual blue checkmark.
	People read the news thinking it was coming from the blue checkmark that they had grown to trust and know.
	Retweeted it, started a rumor that some coach got fired and that's all I know about football.
	Less than 48 hours after its launch.
	Twitter Blue, Elon Musk's pay-to-play verification system, now appears to be offline, marking the almost inevitable suspension to a service that sparked widespread concerns among users from the get-go.
	The $8 per month product granted any paying subscriber a blue verification badge without asking for proof of identity.
	And we're going to get into all of the problems of running a business.
	You know, like Rumble.
	Do you hear the dog?
	It's 3.30.
	I fed the dog at 6.30 this morning and she's hungry all of a sudden.
	Oh no.
	See, it took too long.
	No.
	People don't like Rumble because they have to enter a telephone number to get an account.
	So people want the anonymity of the internet with certain features that they see others who are not anonymous on the internet getting, and then don't want, they want the benefits without actually having to compromise anything on the anonymity side of things.
	And the problems that happen, exactly what we saw.
	After being officially introduced Wednesday morning, Twitter Blue triggered a cascade of chaos and confusion on the platform.
	Countless blue checks accounts, impersonating celebrities.
	Well, this is the thing.
	A blue checkmark impersonating the Pope?
	Few people with...
	Half a functioning brain are going to believe it.
	Blue checkmarks impersonating corporations?
	Celebrities?
	People will easily, and not to be blamed, retweet it because they're not going to go into the blue checkmark to see what the handle says specifically.
	They're not going to go click on the blue checkmark to see if it's a verified account or a bot verified account.
	And they might not go to the landing page of the account to see if...
	Ethan Klein's scribbled parody account on his otherwise verified account.
	Some white supremacists also subscribed to the service with at least one neo-Nazi posting racist and anti-Semitic screeds under a verified badge.
	That's not the problem, people.
	If I see a verified badge under a neo-Nazi comment on Twitter...
	Okay.
	But as of Friday morning, the platform's iOS app removed the option to sign up for Twitter Blue for most users.
	Internal memo.
	By the platformer's Zoe Schiffer, Twitter staff noted that it was suspending the service to help address impersonation issues.
	That is the only issue with verification.
	I had the debate on Hunley this morning.
	On YouTube, the verification...
	It comes at a certain objective metric, 100,000 subs, if YouTube decides to send you the silver play button and verify your account.
	The reason, in essence, of the verification was not for hierarchy, elitism, or whatever.
	It was a channel gets popular.
	It gets known in the public domain.
	What do people do?
	And you've seen it on YouTube.
	They create an avatar that looks just like the original account.
	They go into comment sections and say, you've won a prize.
	Click on it and people click on it and either get, I don't know, they get whatever.
	Or it says, you know, they go promote Bitcoin.
	And the solution to that was to let people know which is the legitimate popular channel so that others cannot ride that popularity for parasitic predatory reasons.
	Now, that was in a sense, I presume what the rationale was on Twitter as well, the way it ended up getting Exploited and abused was by having no objective metrics for verification.
	It became a political status symbol where awesome, popular, notable handles, accounts were not getting verified because of politics, presumably, while other lesser known, lesser notable were getting verified because of politics, because of industry, because of...
	Backed by a mainstream media organization?
	Backed by a mainstream political party?
	Automatic verification.
	Unless you're of a certain political persuasion, then there might be some hiccups.
	No.
	The way to democratize the blue checkmark?
	Just pay for it?
	Great.
	Until the inevitable happens.
	The foreseeable inevitable.
	And maybe this was Elon's way of saying, look, it's not that simple, people.
	You can't just pay for it.
	These are the problems you're going to have.
	Maybe you're going to have to show ID in order to get it so that we know that you're not going to go and absolutely abuse of it if only for one day to cause shit.
	And then people say, well, I don't want to give you my ID.
	I want the blue checkmark, but I don't want to have to upload ID to Twitter.
	I don't trust you.
	Oh.
	So the blue verification checkmark, which in theory was based on trust, but got absolutely politically weaponized on Twitter.
	People don't want to trust.
	The platform to give them their IDs.
	I'm pretty certain that everyone who got verified in the old sense had to upload photo ID, government photo ID.
	If my memory is not totally compromised, I had to upload a passport.
	And on other platforms where you just want to...
	You want to make sure people don't impersonate.
	People don't use your name to spam, scam, and start rumors.
	Anyhow, growing pains.
	Maybe Elon just wanted to show everybody that that's exactly what's going to happen.
	Maybe he's going to figure out an easy solution to it.
	Different colored checkmark.
	Anyhow, but that's it.
	That's where we're at now.
	Early on Friday, Twitter announced, to the confusion of many users, that it had restored its gray official badge, a clunky separate form of verification meant to...
	Differentiate some important accounts from would-be impersonators.
	The official badges had originally launched in tandem with Twitter.
	I didn't even realize that that gray official was something that was just recently launched as well.
	I didn't even know what it was.
	All right, whatever.
	So that's it.
	The official badge has also sought to distinguish authentic accounts by including clickable fine print under...
	Actually, let's read this.
	The relaunch of the official badge appears to be a stopgap attempt.
	At addressing the concerns of corporations and advertisers.
	Notable among them was Ellie Lilly, a pharmaceutical company that recently condemned a fake but verified impersonator who tweeted, we are excited to announce insulin for free now.
	In response, the real company account tweeted an apology to those who have been served a misleading message from fake Lilly accounts.
	You want to kill advertiser revenue fast?
	That's the easiest way to do it.
	It was suspended, not after the damage was done.
	So the account was suspended.
	Wow, we were playing catch-up to the problem after the damage has been done.
	You know what the easiest way to make sure that that doesn't happen?
	Make the person who wants to pay $8 for the blue checkmark show photo ID so that Illy Lily can sue their asses for any damage that they might have caused through their impersonation.
	Sure, you banned them after the fact.
	Confusion could have even compromised the share price.
	Upload a passport or a driver ID.
	Like all the other verified checkmarks had to do, so that if you choose to do that, Ellie Lilly knows who to sue.
	In addition to its official badge, Twitter has also sought to distinguish authentic accounts by including a clickable fine print.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, fine.
	Last night, I was easily and quickly verified, wrote Marky.
	The rapid platform changes and removal of these safeguards are dangerous and its leadership have a responsibility to the public to ensure the platform doesn't become a breeding ground for manipulation and deceit.
	Yep.
	Yeah, I'll give that to everybody out here so you can read it.
	Now let's see what the chat has to say about that.
	TimeBandit66, I never had a Twitter account, but then got one because Viva has one.
	Then I realized the crap that is on Twitter, so I deleted the app.
	No time for the hate all over that platform.
	TimeBandit66, I tend to agree with you, but it is also a good place.
	On the one hand, for knowing what politicians are saying, for knowing what your ideological adversaries are saying, and it is a good place for the dissemination of information.
	Elon is right.
	Twitter is probably the best threat to mainstream media journalism out there.
	But you need certain safeguards so that you avoid having it become, I don't know, just a place where nobody can trust anything anymore.
	And not that like the Chris Cuomo is my go-to example, the JTAB.
	Not that CNN is trustworthy.
	Just that when I see something from CNN, I know that it's actually coming from the actual CNN so that I can rail against it appropriately.
	So we'll see what the solution is.
	We'll see what the solution is.
	But part of me now thinks Elon just, you know...
	Do it for two days.
	Show everybody what the obvious problems to what people are clamoring for are and make a few bucks.
	Make a few bucks in the meantime.
	Because I had a bunch of people who got the Twitter blue or whatever it is.
	Am I going to get in trouble?
	I think I have to end soon.
	Let me see what I had on the back burner here.
	No, I got the Justin Trudeau.
	Teen Transition.
	So I think we've covered everything.
	Let me just go back to my Twitter account.
	Speaking of which...
	What I use Twitter for.
	A running diary.
	A descent.
	A running diary of the world's descent into madness.
	I want to go back to my earliest tweets and just see.
	I will remember what I thought of the world way back in the day.
	Just by what my earlier tweets were.
	I remember being too shy to even share my thoughts, what I really thought.
	Student loan we covered.
	Chloe Cole we covered.
	Eric Hundley, I think you've all seen that, but I'll, you know, go check out Eric Hundley.
	Okay, so I'm having a discussion with some people about the Twitter blue problem.
	This is that, yeah.
	Oh yeah, this is classic.
	So Reuters, Reuters runs a story.
	I haven't read the whole article.
	Tesla's considering exporting China-made electric cars to the US, a reversal that would reflect the automaker's deepening cost advantage.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Okay.
	To which Elon Musk says, false.
	Now, my jokey joke is, is Reuters facts now going to fact check Reuter and say, claim!
	Tesla's considering exporting China-made electric cars to the US.
	It's false because the CEO said it's false.
	No.
	They will not fact-check themselves because they're liars.
	And the fact-checkers themselves are the wordsmiths of the devil.
	I would put that on a shirt, but that would just be too confusing for anybody who would see it.
	This will not be the movie to play us out.
	This will not be the movie to play us out.
	But everyone needs to see this.
	Our guppy had the longest poop of any fish that I've ever seen in captivity.
	Look at the length of this poop.
	This is a world record.
	No, it's not.
	Has anyone ever seen anything like this?
	It's a parasite.
	Be quiet.
	Yeah, so.
	We're going to win the.
	No, you're not.
	The poop is longer than the body.
	I've submitted it to...
	How do I get out of here?
	I've submitted it to Guinness.
	We're waiting on the...
	Viva, fact checkers are the wordsmiths of the devil.
	That's me.
	That's my saying.
	Don't steal.
	Switz guy.
	That's my expression.
	Wordsmiths of the devil.
	Has anyone seen a poop on a guppy?
	It's a molly.
	I think those are called old molly.
	Is it poop or is it a worm?
	I seriously thought it was a worm entering the butthole of our molly.
	Viva.
	Anyways, that was a good one.
	So, what was I about to say?
	I think that's it.
	To play us out today, people, I'm remembering.
	Which is a good sign, because senile buffoon.
	Viva Frye Veteran Ottawa Convoy.
	We're going to play out Chris Beering.
	Oh, I hope I can find it.
	It might take me a few seconds to find.
	Viva Frye Ottawa...
	Dude, come on.
	I mean, I know I interviewed Chris Beering.
	Oh, this might take a few more seconds.
	You know what?
	No, we're going to do it.
	Give me this.
	Oh, that's the other guy.
	That's a four-hour stream.
	There was the veteran who had his body literally blown up in Iraq.
	It was Iraq or Afghanistan?
	I forget now which.
	And he was at the protest and he was arrested and he testified during the trial.
	It's not going to be...
	It won't be live.
	It'll be here.
	Okay, give me a few seconds.
	I'll get it.
	And he testified as to what his government did to him in his own country after he fought to free foreign citizens From the grips of tyrannical governments.
	And I'm going to play this out today.
	Right after I go.
	Oh my goodness, I'm such an idiot here.
	Okay, there we go.
	January?
	February Well, I can't even find it.
	Well, I'm an idiot, so forget that.
	I'll go with Jack Spinney, another veteran.
	Another veteran that I saw there.
	Here we go.
	We'll end with Jack Spinney, who's an amazing guy that I met at the protest.
	A veteran, shoveling the snow, salting the sidewalks at the protest, at the cenotaph, the war memorial.
	And it was beautiful.
	Just before I do that, let me see what's going on in the chat.
	Chris Deering.
	I'll find it and I'll flip it around.
	DVR Danmark says, thank you for sharing your fish poop today.
	The fish poop I can share.
	Pudge poop I cannot.
	And Kenzie67 says, Chris Deering.
	I'll find the stream and I'll share it on social media afterwards.
	I can't find it right now and I don't want to keep everybody waiting for too long.
	So we're going to end it with this.
	Everybody, Sunday night, I will see you.
	A fair warning heads up.
	My wife is leaving me for a week with the kids alone.
	And the schedule is busy for other reasons.
	So if I look like I'm on the edge of the verge of a nervous breakdown, it might be because I might be, but it might affect scheduling somewhat.
	They'll be in school, so I should be able to do streams during the day.
	Sunday night, we're going to have a stream.
	Tomorrow, Viva Family, I'll do something good.
	I've got to edit two Viva Family videos.
	One is the fish that I caught yesterday, and the other is the second tooth.
	That my kid, my youngest, just lost.
	We tried to do it with a meteorite and it didn't quite work out.
	So you'll see that in a bit.
	But for the now, for the time being, everybody, thank you for having spent the afternoon with me.
	Hope everyone is doing well.
	Don't lose faith, but don't keep faith in a blind way and conduct yourselves in a manner that would make your parents, your kids, and your pets proud.
	And you can do no wrong.
	With that said, enjoy Jack Spinney, one of the veterans, the honorable veterans on this Remembrance Day.
	May we always be thankful to our veterans and never forget it, never take it for granted, and never let our tyrannical governments take it away from us in real time for our own good.
	Jack Spinney.
	People watching this have to appreciate what we're looking at versus what we're being told.
	You have to appreciate it and you have to share it with anyone with half an open mind.
	How you doing?
	I was going to ask you if you didn't mind being on camera.
	I'd love to, man.
	I watch you in Burns every week, man.
	So I was going to say, you don't work with the city, sir.
	No, sir.
	I'm a homesteader from elsewhere, Nova Scotia.
	Nova Scotia?
	Yes, sir.
	That's a far drive.
	I've been back here twice this week.
	It's a 12 hour drive each way?
	No, no, no.
	It's a 16 hour drive each day if the weather's good.
	So I came up with the East Convoy on Friday.
	I had a buddy of mine.
	Didn't think we were going to be here this long.
	So I came back.
	I had to take him back.
	Went down Tuesday.
	Drove down.
	Had lambs born on the farm Wednesday.
	Watched up a stone job I've done because I do stone masonry as well.
	Get some cash.
	I drove back straight here 17 hours.
	What's the name of the stone washing company?
	No, I'm a mason.
	There's no company.
	I work for myself.
	I'm a homesteader.
	I just want everybody to leave me alone.
	And the lambs gave birth.
	The sheep gave birth to the lambs.
	Yes, correct.
	I have always wanted to deliver a large animal.
	It's not as good as you sound.
	I pulled twin cows before.
	It's not that great.
	I want that.
	One day I'll have that.
	My uncle has access to cows, so maybe this summer.
	Oh, yeah.
	You're shoveling the snow.
	I'm asking, for what reason are you doing that, sir?
	I'm shoveling the snow because the government of Ottawa or the government of Canada has...
	They're not going to.
	They won't even restock the salt so we can salt it.
	So we're bringing in salt ourselves.
	So we can salt the walkways.
	This fence is an absolute disgrace to veterans.
	If you're a veteran, you come and touch the monument.
	You come and touch the monument.
	I had my friend...
	My friend, Master Corporal Rob Campbell, lovingly known as Soup, was murdered in Nova Scotia over a settlement that he got from the government finally instead of living in poverty for 15 years.
	And I couldn't even lay my fucking flowers on the tomb because of this fence.
	And what's the point?
	What is the point of this?
	It's a little show play, right?
	Just like they're stealing gas.
	All they want us to do is overreact.
	And instead...
	We're going to do the most Canadian thing in history and be calm, peaceful, clean up the streets, feed your homeless, and lower your crime rate.
	This is not for giggles in any way.
	Can I see your hands, please?
	I do want everyone to look, because when I shake a hand and you can see and feel the callus, do you want to see the scars?
	Do you want to see the scars, man?
	First of all, you have a very, very good handshake as well.
	I'm a 12th generation farmer, right?
	And to be honest, they have no leverage to make me get shots.
	I live on a dirt road on the Bay of Fundy in Nova Scotia.
	I could easily be sitting home and farming.
	I have things to do.
	But what's the point?
	My 65-year-old mother, who has never been to the hospital, takes no pills, will outwork any of you, has to be double-jabbed to watch her grandkids play soccer outside.
	I'm not going home.
	What's the point?
	I'm not going home.
	None of these guys are going to go home.
	Even Mr. Pelivo, you can come down here and you can glad him with everybody, but you voted unanimously with every Liberal bill since forever.
	So who are you?
	I want somebody with some actual morals.
	I'm going to put this out to you.
	Every day at 1 o 'clock, the veterans that are here, come down and meet.
	I told you, Mr. Bernier, Mr. Maxime Bernier, that we're here.
	Didn't see you yesterday.
	You were here.
	Are we going to see you today?
	Because I would love to see you.
	I'll let you go.
	Yes, thank you, sir.
	I can't tell you how much we appreciate you doing this, man.
	We all know what the propagandists are about.
	People are starting to find us.
	Yeah, every day we're here and we keep being as Canadian as possible and being non-violent.
	Are Bouncy Castles a domestic terrorist training ground?
	Is that what it is?
	Is foam axe throwing?
	Is feeding your homeless a domestic terrorist training ground?
	Get down here and see it for yourself, people, because they're lying to you like they've always lied to you.
	Thank you, sir.
	Don't give them any idea.
	With the domestic terrorism training ground.
	I saw that Bouncy Castle.
	What do you mean, man?
	I personally have had messages from local residences.
	Local residents saying they've never felt...
	Safe bringing their children down here because of the homeless problem, the OD, the drunks.
	So I'm sorry, Mr. Mayor of Ottawa, that we came in here in two days.
	We sort your homeless problem out and your crime problem out downtown.
	Sorry.
	And then they have the audacity to declare a state of emergency.
	Another one?
	Another one?
	They learned the right lessons from the first one that lasted two years.
	This occupation, state of emergency, will last another two years.
	They'll have to drag me out of here.
	Thank you very much.
	No, thank you, man.
	Thank you for getting the truth there, brother.
	I really appreciate it.
	It's not hard when you just have me a favor and throw that out for me.
	Absolutely, sir.

▲