All Episodes
Oct. 17, 2022 - Viva & Barnes
01:48:26
Kanye West, Emergencies Act Inquiry AND MORE! Viva Monday!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I thought we'd be on break by now.
Good morning, everyone.
We're watching the Emergencies Act inquiry.
We're going to get to other stuff.
But let's start with this.
And then we talked about, from my recollection, This is Ottawa City Manager testifying on Justin Trudeau invoking the emergency act.
Good morning, everyone.
I need to get something back in return.
I'm not going to meet with them just for the sake of meeting with them.
And the police officer suggested, well, maybe we can start getting them, ask them to move the trucks out of some of the neighborhoods.
I said, well, that would be a good thing to try and relieve the This is so boring.
It's so boring.
So does not justify what happened.
Are the witness statements publicly available?
I'm not sure.
They came in also.
So everybody can hear it.
So they all joined the meeting at that time.
And then we had a discussion about-This will not have the viewership of the Johnny Depp trial, everyone.
The protests and would they be willing to move trucks out of the neighborhoods?
They said yes.
Good morning, Rubia.
They didn't have to do that.
And we said, well, then we have to work out the logistics and they'll get back to us.
So we met for about, in total, It's tremendously boring.
Let me know if my audio levels are off.
It's tremendously boring.
But what it's showing, this guy, forget his name, hold on.
This is Steve Kinilakis, city manager for Ottawa, has said multiple times they did not want politicians getting involved with the situation.
Well, they didn't tell me specifically, but I assume that it was a...
A symbolic, significant gesture that somebody, no one was meeting with them, of any official capacity at the political level.
And I would think that, you know, you'd have to ask them when they testify, but I assumed...
The mayor was the first step in trying to open the door.
I'll talk over this for a little bit.
This is the city manager basically saying, we were trying to find a solution to this.
We didn't want it to become political.
We didn't want elected officials getting involved.
And elected officials gotten involved.
I think we exchanged the numbers and then we said that we'd parked cars.
For which Justin Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act.
You know, a number of things happened after that.
Where is the rumble?
I want to see that we're live on rumble.
On the menu today, people.
We're witnessing the Alex Jones effects in real time.
Well, my understanding is that the next day you did indicate to Chief Slowly and Deputy Chief Ferguson, Deputy Chief Bell.
The family of George Floyd threatening to sue Kanye West for claiming George Floyd's death might have resulted from an overdose.
Protest leaders.
Did they express any concerns about that?
Kanye's going to buy Ye.
Kanye's going to buy Parler.
My audio is much louder than the video.
We hadn't at that point figured out the logistics or the terms of what the agreement would be.
That happened later in the week and didn't get finalized until Sunday the 13th, I believe.
So at that point, it was more an indication of what the, I gave an overview of the Chief Slowly and his team.
So you were the one.
I'll be.
What they had asked for and what we were going to pursue in terms of, or what we were going to start pursuing in terms of trying to get an agreement.
Yeah, James Martin says the link has the transcriptions for after testimony, but all witness gave statements in anticipation.
Curious if true.
I know they've been putting statements to the witnesses before they go.
So no details had been fleshed out at that point?
None.
Okay.
So you exchanged numbers.
You briefed the mayor about what had happened.
They're talking about the Emergencies Act being about for parked vehicles, which, according to Mathieu Fleury, are weapons.
Pickup trucks are weapons.
Weapons were parked all over the sidewalk.
I was contacted by Dean French.
And Dean French told the mayor that, you know, the mayor can speak for himself, but my understanding was that he was trying to help.
that he's trying to help to get a resolution to this A tentative agreement, by the way, my understanding is Trudeau knew about the tentative agreement and then declared the Emergencies Act nonetheless.
No negotiations.
Tyrants do not negotiate.
Serge Arpan gave Dean French my number and he contacted me and basically announced himself as a helpful third party that was going to try to mediate between the two to try and come up with an agreement.
Okay, so then you became the point person for that.
No, I became the point person to get to the place where the logistics were agreed to, but the actual negotiation of the terms of the letter that was eventually sent to...
Common sense.
Truck control.
We're going to put on pause sooner than later, and then I'll go back and listen to it later.
I've been listening for about an hour.
I was engaged in that.
Nothing remotely helpful to the federal government.
So between February 8th, when you have the meeting with the PLT members and Tom Marazzo et al., and then the 10th of February, when the call from Dean French comes in, was there any kind of movement on that?
I want to see Jim Watson is on the list today.
Jim Watson is the mayor of Ottawa.
Not going to be a good witness.
This is the witness list for the day.
We're at Steve Kanellakos.
Serge Harpin, city of Ottawa.
Jim Watson is the mayor.
I don't know who these people are.
That's something for Mr. Harpin to answer in terms of what discussions were taking place at that point.
But things didn't really start taking shape until...
Later in the week, early weekend, and it wasn't until probably Sunday morning the 13th that I saw a draft in terms of the terms that's in that letter that was made public.
So you weren't involved in the drafting of the letters?
I was involved in providing some advice on the drafting of the letters based on my discussions with police.
We'll do this for a few minutes, then we'll end it, and I'll come back later after we cover some stuff and talk amongst ourselves.
This is going to be boring as hell.
Was that one of the points of discussion with OPS?
It was generally, yes.
Okay.
So then, if I understand correctly what you're saying, on the 10th, Dean French called and announced himself as potentially being helpful or a potential mediator.
And then the letters were drafted and sent, I believe, on the 12th of February.
And in that time, you were having discussions with Chief Slowly.
Was it Chief Slowly or anybody else within OPS?
Deputy Chief Ferguson?
No, it was...
There were a couple calls.
The one...
The final call was before the letters went out.
It was over noon hour on the Sunday the 13th.
It was right to the wire in terms of when the letters finally were approved.
Okay, so they're dated the 12th, but you're saying they were exchanged on the 13th.
I don't know why the document was redacted.
It was an email with him.
So while they're being finalized, your involvement is getting some input from OPS and suggesting some wording.
To the letter, including the area where the trucks are going to relocate to.
Is that right?
Yeah, Serge had various drafts.
It was going back and forth.
I don't remember the drafts, but different language.
I was providing some edits and some advice on the final language in the letter.
And why was Wellington Street chosen?
Who chose Wellington Street?
Well, that...
How is this similar, different to a regular hearing?
Not sure what you mean by a regular hearing.
This is a purely political mechanism.
Provided for, in the Emergencies Act itself, a requirement, an investigation into the declaration of the Emergencies Act.
They'll make recommendations.
The committee will come to its final findings in February 2023.
This is not really like a court hearing, but at least it's adversarial.
This is an inquiry, not a trial.
Specifically provided for by the Emergencies Act.
Discussion was, would some of them agree to move to a site, I believe it was in the West End, or prior, there was some other site they had.
If they could go there, they wanted to get onto SJAM.
We didn't want them on SJAM.
So there was discussion internally about the parameters of where they might go.
And that's what translated into the logistical meeting that we finally had on Sunday night, the 13th.
The 13th is February.
So before we get to that meeting, before the letters were finalized, I understand that Chief Slowly had a chance to look at those letters.
Chief Slowly is the, I believe now disgraced, former Ottawa police officer chief.
I'm trying to think if he received the draft or not, because he sent me an email asking for a...
Devina, I hope the inquiry's findings are damning.
People don't appreciate this is an inquiry into invoking the War Measures Act, the new version, the new iteration, the Emergency Act.
Thus far, Mathieu Fleury, city councillor, there were cars which are weapons now parked on the sidewalk.
logistical undertaking that will probably take 24 to 72 hours.
We asked that protesters stop asking more demonstrators to come to Ottawa this week and over the long weekend.
So it looks like that highlighted portion of this week and over the long weekend was an edit that he won't Two truckers tried to burn down a building, leaving the residents in fear.
That Chris Jones is a now thoroughly debunked piece of misinformation.
Thoroughly debunked.
That alleged attempted arson had nothing to do with the protesters, nothing to do with the convoy.
Thoroughly debunked.
And if we go to OPS 10664.
Just going to pull up a link here.
We go.
There we go.
It looks to be from Christiane Hano.
And she says, Steve, can you send me a copy of the letters we just discussed on our call?
Redemo convoy negotiations.
Thanks.
And who did you understand her to be?
This is from CBC.
I can't share it.
In a news release announcing both sets of charges against the people who arrested, police said there is no information indicating the men were involved in any way with the protest.
So I highlighted your comments.
I think she was on the call, the noon hour call.
It wasn't a phone call specifically with her.
I think she participated in the noon call with Chief Slowly.
At least this inquiry has two sides, unlike the day democracy almost.
True Vikes fan.
So we had a call at noon hour.
And she's, my understanding from this is, Christiane, you know, is following up on that phone call.
I see.
And this would be on February 13th.
By the way, and that was a CBC article that had to confirm it had nothing to do with the convoy.
Let me get the article so everybody can have it.
It was a lie at the time because people had no reason to say it had anything to do with the convoy.
And it's a bigger lie for anyone to repeat it now.
But alas.
It looks like on Sunday at 1.44, you sent those letters to Chief Slowly, Deputy Chief Bell, Deputy Chief Ferguson, Christian Hano, and John Steinbeck.
That's correct.
And if I can take you to OTT 7009.
OTT, yeah.
OTT.
Here we go.
It looks like title is Police Contact, Sunday the 13th at 3.26.
You say to Chief Slowly, Chief, can you please provide the name and contact info of who will be joining Kim Ayot in the negotiations with the protest leaders to deal with the ingress and, I believe that should be and, right?
Relocation plan?
Oh, they were negotiating a relocation plan?
A peaceful resolution of a peaceful protest?
Well, when the letters were sent, We agreed that we would meet that evening because we wanted to get this going as fast as possible and that they would send a representative group to City Hall to meet with myself, Kim Mayotte, and a senior police official to deal with the logistics because Kim and I were in no position, as I said earlier.
In my testimony, to arbitrarily dictate where trucks would move or to be able to manage the relocation logistically.
We needed police to be able to do that, to facilitate that, negotiate that, and ensure that the relocation plan was consistent with any future plans they had or any safety issues, officer safety issues.
Kentucky Fritt says, nice to see your pits aren't sweating moistly today.
They might very well be, but you can't see it.
I believe it was a subject also on the call that we needed someone senior.
To be part of the discussions on the logistics for the actual relocation of the trucks.
And who was provided?
Acting Superintendent Rob Drummond.
And what did you understand his role to be then?
Was he going to be...
Partly negotiating what was going to happen?
Well, he wasn't negotiating.
It wasn't really a, well, I suppose it could be characterized.
I'm kind of eager for them to take the morning break so we can get, not to get to some interesting stuff, get to some more interesting stuff.
We've gotten the gist of this guy's testimony.
They were trying to negotiate as settlers, trying to relocate the protesters, but in discussions with Trudeau, knew of this, knew of the potential breakthrough with the RCMP, invoked the Emergency Act, came down with a fist of fury.
Mapping out how it would work, who the contact people would be on the police side, who the contact people would be on the protesters' side.
So he was basically laying out...
Viva, thanks for covering this.
Divina, thank you very much.
I'm also trying to squeeze my way into the witness list.
By then, the idea that they would be relocating to Wellington had already been determined, right?
Yes.
In your call earlier that morning, or at the noon call, did anybody on the call, Steve Beltrish, Ferguson, Peter Sloan...
What are we watching?
If you don't know what you're watching, it's going to be boring.
This is the public order emergency commission investigating Justin Trudeau, declaring a national emergency and invoking the Emergencies Act to violently suppress a peaceful protest.
These are all the witnesses.
It's adversarial in nature.
You've got Ottawa Coalition, OPP, RCMP, Federal, Convoy.
So it's adversarial.
There is cross-examination and good stuff at that.
Chief Bell and Acting Deputy Chief, Deputy Chief Bell and Acting Deputy Chief Ferguson both expressed that they supported this because it would reduce the footprint.
And make it more manageable for their resources.
Writing a book for someone with ADD.
I don't have diagnosed ADD, but writing a book.
For the movement of the trucks.
And so despite Chief Slowly's reservations, did he ultimately agree that this should move forward?
I don't recall that he actually said he agreed, but he didn't object to the point where, because he could have obviously stopped it, but he didn't.
But he didn't.
I never heard him say, we're a go.
He was basically silent on that point.
I don't know what the redactions were.
I don't think it was for like, it might have just been personal information of somebody.
There's no reason why anything else would have been redacted.
But I don't know.
We're at this meeting, February 13th.
You said it was you, Mr. Ayut.
When did they violently suppress the protest?
I don't remember everybody's names.
It was on the list.
Superintendent Drummond was there.
I think Keith Wilson was there.
No, Eva was there.
Keith Wilson was there, I believe, but maybe not.
I'd have to go back.
You'd have to go back to show me the document.
I don't remember the other people's names.
February 20th is when it seemingly ended.
Chris Barber was there.
Was Tom Marazzo there?
No.
Tom Marazzo has been on the channel, ran for office.
Very good guy.
How many protest individuals would you say were there?
How many protesters were there?
I think there were six of them all together.
I don't know if Keith Wilson was there.
Keith Wilson is the convoy attorney representing Brian Peckford as well.
He's been on the channel.
He will come back on to give us some updates.
Especially when there's a ruling on the charter challenge.
They weren't available yesterday, but I'm not sure if they're available now.
But in any event, there were a group of protest leaders that were there, you, yourself, Mr. Ayot, and we don't have a lot of time, so if you can just briefly maybe tell us what happened at that meeting, and then we will have to get my friends to pick it up from there.
My friends.
Sorry, Devine, you're still up there.
Hold on.
We discussed how it could unfold, what the expectations were.
What's his name?
Kenalakos is, I guess, clearly Greek, named but Anglo.
He pronounces Ayotte, Ayotte, which is an Anglophone way of pronouncing a French name.
Ayotte, A-Y-O-T-T-E.
And that they would be going out that night and working truck by truck, talking to everybody to get them in line or aligned.
To support the movement because it was a good thing for them.
And they also made it clear that not everybody will want, some people may not want to go to that other alternate site, the Farmers area.
What will happen if Trudeau is found guilty, asks Kay Campbell 48. There's no guilt or innocence.
They'll come up with recommendations, come to a conclusion invoking the Emergencies Act wasn't warranted, and the repercussions should be political.
I think that's the idea.
I don't believe there are actual sanctions that the committee...
Nobody can find.
But don't quote me on that.
...how that process would work in the morning, who'd be assigned out there from Ottawa Police.
And so when we left the meeting, it was understood we had a map of where the trucks would be moved, what areas we wanted to clear out.
And Rob went back then to talk to his command and the NRCC and incident commanders to bring the resources required.
Hold on.
Cakerbud says, of course they put Viva Frye on the front page of hashtag Jewish media apparatus.
Am I on the front page?
What are you talking about?
If you're talking about Rumble, I didn't know, but thank you for letting me know.
And I should let everyone know who's watching.
We will get to Kanye.
I just want to cover this a little bit.
Show everyone how painfully boring it is.
Watching paint dry.
Might be more exciting, because you might at least get a fly, get stuck in it, and weren't allowing some trucks to move on to Wellington.
Eventually that got sorted out, and they did move a number of...
This guy's testimony, I'm going to keep messing up his name.
...but that's still in dispute.
And a number of light trucks also left, and we ended up clearing a number of streets.
It's Amy says, my three kids and I watched almost every day of you covering the convoy.
My son wrote your name in an assignment to someone he respects.
He said he wants to be like you because you are brave.
Yeah.
Brave or stupid or I don't know what I am.
Nobody knew what it was going to turn into when we were covering it.
It was just covering lies.
I'm just going to take you to the last document, OTT 7480.
Has Zexy Lee gotten her own show on the CBC yet?
Oh, no.
Something's coming.
Something's coming for her.
Some social media success.
This is an email.
Let's see what we've got going on here.
Juicy details.
An email.
Enhance it.
I can't enhance it.
That's her scrolling down.
Just to shorten up, this is a city manager right here basically confirming the city...
Basically had everything they needed.
They just needed to coordinate with police to remove the trucks.
They were negotiating with the protesters, discussing.
They did not want politicians getting involved to politicize the protests further.
I tweeted out what he said.
But I've known Larry.
I know Larry Personal.
Oh, okay.
He said elected officials should not be getting involved with this.
That's what this city manager said.
Justin Trudeau said disregarding.
Wellington is the street on Parliament Hill.
That's the occupation.
It was a parking lot, although there still was a lane to get through.
We just finished a bomb blast assessment, which included the threat of explosives being transferred via large vehicles, hoping we can...
Explosives.
Bullcrap, unless they mean gasoline.
Sorry, that PPS, the Parliamentary Protective Service, did not have notice or information about what was going to be happening with the relocation of the trucks onto Wellington?
Well, I'm not going to speculate on that, but I do know that the PPS was embedded in the National Capital Regional Command Centre.
They are a member of Intersect.
I know that Mr. Brookson spoke to Chief slowly the late afternoon the day before when the trucks were being moved.
So, you know, I think it's a fair assumption for me to make that Mr. Brookson was well-informed in terms of what was happening on the ground from a situational awareness perspective.
And, you know, the bomb blast assessment, quite frankly...
I'm not disregarding it, but it was a little late then.
We already had hundreds of trucks up on Wellington Street to be concerned about moving another 40 trucks up there.
So, you know, that's his role to take care of the security of the hill.
And it's an important role, and I respect that.
But at the time, I felt that Mr. Brookson, when he reached out to me, had the information, especially after he spoke to Chief Slowly, and I spoke to Chief Slowly.
After he had spoken to Mr. Brookson, and she slowly advised me what the conversation was about, where he informed him what was happening.
So I know there was some reporting about it.
They were worried about bombs.
The trucks had been there for nearly, started in January, several weeks, and explosives?
Yeah, gasoline can be in explosives.
And there were outdoor bonfires in pits.
Okay, and so did you tell anybody at the federal level yourself about this deal?
I know February 8 is when you kind of had that discussion, and it also coincided with a tripartite meeting.
Is that something you would have brought up at a tripartite meeting?
I told, I'm not sure when, but I know I told Rob Stewart, the Deputy Minister of Public Safety, and I also sent Rob Stewart the letters that were...
I agree to.
The agreement letters.
And so ultimately, the mayor never met with the protesters.
Is that right?
They never fulfilled their end of the bargain.
So we never met with them.
Oh, Jim Watson, you're going to have some splating to do.
Those are all my questions.
Oh, yeah.
Thank you.
How did that go?
So we went a little bit over, which I regret.
But we'll take the morning break at the moment.
Okay, how long?
We can start with the cross-examinations right after the 15-minute break.
15 minutes?
And I will show a little latitude in cross-examination, given the excess in the direct, which is pursuant to our rule.
Well, hold on.
That direct was damning enough.
The cross is going to be a very friendly cross.
The commission will be matched in terms of cross-examination time.
That's going to be interesting.
15-minute break.
We'll be back at 5 minutes to 12. They will not be back at 5 minutes to 12. Let me make my prediction now.
The commission is in recess for 15 minutes.
La commission enlève pour 15 minutes.
Pause pour 15 minutes.
Prediction, everybody?
They will not be back.
It's already 11.41.
They're not going to be back at 11.55.
Okay.
Good morning, everybody.
Watching that, it's sort of painful, but it's sort of...
It's not so boring.
And this is not to say smart, educated.
It's not so boring when you know what you're looking for.
It's kind of like, if we can think of an analogy, going to a museum.
Going to a museum is not boring if you have an interest in the artwork and you know what you're looking for.
Going to a museum when you have no interest in the art and don't know what you're looking for, not a question of intelligence or anything.
It's a question of personal interest.
It's boring.
I understand that this is going to be boring, confusing, convoluted for a lot of people who are either not interested in what's going on or not sufficiently involved in the details that they can understand the interesting details coming out in the nuanced testimony.
This is the inquiry.
Into Justin Trudeau's invocation of the Emergencies Act.
Under the law of the Emergencies Act, it says, you know, if there's a national emergency, a threat to crisis, to infrastructure, national independence, whatever, you can declare an emergency, suspend civil rights, bring in the military, just like Justin Trudeau's daddy did during the FLQ crisis of the 1970s.
Except Trudeau's dad had more grounds to invoke the Emergencies Act than Trudeau ever did.
During the FLQ crisis, Le Front de Libération de Québec, There were actual bombs going off in mailboxes.
There were actual...
A politician was kidnapped and murdered.
Pierre Laporte.
You know, during the FLQ crisis, there was actual domestic terrorism.
Now, Trudeau's daddy invoked the act and then weaponized even the legitimate invocation of the War Measures Act to persecute his political adversaries.
This is a...
It's a freaking joke.
Everybody who knows anything about anything knows that this is a joke.
Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act for three days.
To rescind it prior to its getting ratified by the Senate or rejected by the Senate.
So this will be boring to people who don't know what's going on, are not interested, or are not that into the details.
What's the guy's name that we just watched?
Steve Kanellakos.
His testimony was kind of boring, but kind of not.
Because Steve Kanellakos, city manager for the city of Ottawa, You'd think he might actually be sort of on the side.
It doesn't sound like he was on the side of Jim Watson.
It doesn't sound like he was on the side of the OPP.
Certainly not on the side of Trudeau.
Basically said, we had what we needed to do.
These were like city ordinance issues.
We could tow the trucks.
It was just a little complicated because you had trucks backed up against one another.
You have to clear some room to tow some trucks.
It's not necessarily the safest thing.
It was a question of parking.
It was a question of like...
Violating city ordinances.
We did not want politicians getting involved.
We were negotiating with the protesters.
And politicians got involved and used the nuclear weapon to resolve a protest on Wellington.
Now, the inquiry itself is adversarial.
So it's not like the January 6th sham.
The January 6th debacle.
arguably unlawfully formed, that doesn't have the required quorum in the first place, that is bipartisan because Liz Cheney, who just lost her re-election bid by 32%, and Kinzinger, who is as much of a Republican as I am un-American, that's the bipartisan aspect of their bipartisan committee that doesn't meet the quorum that was unlawfully, allegedly not legally formed.
Okay.
Okay.
What type of adversarial system do you think you have under those circumstances?
None.
This inquiry is adversarial of sorts in that you have various parties actively participating, represented with diverging interests.
So it is actually adversarial.
There was a cross-examination of Mathieu Fleury, Catherine McKinney, city councillors to Ottawa.
Their cross-examinations didn't go very well.
They did not look very good on cross-examination.
In fact, they looked so bad that the highlights of Catherine McKinney's testimony that I was tweeting out over the weekend caused her to block me on Twitter.
Mathieu Fleury, who testifies eloquently in English for hours, all of a sudden, when asked to explain what he meant by microaggressions in the context of the Emergency Act, all of a sudden, doesn't speak English.
And then you got...
Catherine McKinney up on stage on a live mic, instructing the other city councillor to answer in French to frustrate the cross-examining attorney's ability to cross-examine.
Egregious abuse of power, nature lover, to say the least.
So that's what's going on.
Let's get into a couple of interesting stories because now we're actually seeing in real time, we're going to call it the Alex Jones effect.
The Alex Jones verdict effect.
Before we do that, people, you might have noticed.
That this stream said paid promotion on it.
Because I've got a sponsor.
I've got multiple sponsors now.
Courageous people who actually don't mind sponsoring a fringe minority with highly informed, educated, eloquent views.
They don't like it.
But I've got one.
And it's not just a sponsor.
It's a product that I actually do use myself.
Home title lock.
Now, I have to...
I've been told to stick to the script.
Because my riffing sometimes goes a little off.
Home title lock, no joke.
I'm actually not reading from the script now.
You'll see I'm making eye contact with all of you.
I just need to remember one point, which is the perk for using home title lock.
I actually use home title lock.
We moved down to Florida.
Someone consulted me as a potential sponsor.
Home title lock, you got to make sure people are not borrowing fraudulently against your home so that you find out from the bank, you owe them $40,000 because someone took your deed of sale.
Forged your signature and borrowed money against your house.
They come to talk to me and I say, okay, well, hold on.
I need to make sure this is legit.
And so I go to talk to my insurance, parentheses, in America.
They reach into your bottom and they pull out money through insurance.
Health insurance, home insurance, car insurance, hurricane insurance.
You pay up the wazoo for insurance, insurance, insurance.
And it's not even clear what you get for the insurance at the end of the day.
Setting all that aside.
I call up my home insurance guy.
And I say, do I need to worry about this type of fraud?
And should I use this product?
And he says, yes and yes.
And the way it works, you can go to the registry, the public registry, pull up a deed of sale and forge a signature and borrow money against the house.
Sorry.
You don't transfer the ownership of the house so you have like someone showing up on your door and saying, thank you for leaving my house right now.
What ends up happening is you have collectors that end up showing, not necessarily at the front door, but they say, You borrowed $40,000 and we secured it against your home.
And you're like, no, I didn't.
And they're like, yes, you did, because someone forged it.
Home Title Lock basically surveys and notifies you and freezes any potential borrowing if someone goes and pulls your deed of sale.
Now, the first thing, though, is to go and make sure that your house, your property, whatever, is actually in your name.
And that is the benefit of using hometitlelock.com forward slash Viva.
I'm going to read this part.
Make sure your home title security is in your name.
You can do that now by going to hometitlelock.com slash Viva.
Use my promo code to enter your address for a free, no obligation home title scan.
That's $100 value.
Free.
So if you own property in America, this is not for Canadians.
If you own property in America and you want to make sure that you don't get defrauded out of the equity in your property or have someone add to your already existing mortgage, Go to hometitlelock.com forward slash Viva.
Make sure that the title is in your name.
20 bucks a month.
You'll get notified, or $19.95 for the psychological aspect.
You'll notice that if someone does try to borrow against your house, you'll get notified.
There'll be a freeze on it so they cannot borrow against your house.
And I'm going to have them on Friday for 10 minutes to explain.
Now I'm going to bring up Viva as a grifter, Keith Hutchins, who I know is a proud troll of the channel.
And I say troll humorously.
Keith, you should learn the difference between a grifter and a hard worker.
Ironically enough, by the way, grifter and grafter, two different words, and they mean diametrically opposing things.
Grifter, for those of you who don't know, is an individual who creates drama in order to profit from the drama.
That's what a grifter typically means.
A grafter, under British lexicon, is someone who works hard.
So that's a typo.
Keith, I presume that's a typo and you meant to call me a grafter because I am, in fact, a hard worker, a diligent hard worker, despite all of my propensities for wanting to go out and fish 24 hours a day.
So that's it.
Viva.
HomeTitleLock.com forward slash Viva.
You get the free assessment, $19.95 a month, so that you can at least rest assured that if something happens, you're going to get notified and that they're not going to be able to go that one step further and borrow against your property.
Now, The Alex Jones effect.
Do we move this on over to Rumble exclusively?
Let's do it.
Let's do it.
I didn't put the link in.
Let's get on over.
Let's mosey on over to the Rumbles exclusively.
So we can go party hearty over there.
Not so we can do anything that I wouldn't do here.
I'm going to post this stream to YouTube tomorrow.
Because Rumble supports free speech.
Rumble supports creators who support free speech.
And that means sometimes tolerating the speech of people who you don't like.
You don't need to protect the speech that you do like.
That's not the speech that needs protection, people.
So let's wind this up on YouTube.
Head on over to Rumble.
I will put...
Give me two seconds to put the link here.
And we're going to talk about the Alex Jones effect.
We're viewing it in real time.
Ironically, now I see the ad on my video is home title lock.
Link to Rumble here.
Boom, shakalaka.
I'm going to pin it.
And then we're going to move on over to the east side.
Because we're moving on up.
Moving on up to the east side.
Let me see here.
I just saw Super Chat before I go over.
There it is.
Quick take on the fishermen getting arrested and having their property taken as evidence.
The walleye cheater guys.
Well...
I don't know what property was taken as evidence.
The civil forfeiture stuff, not a fan of, period.
Not a fan.
Vehemently against civil forfeiture.
It's just non-judicial theft.
Seizing their boat, their tackle as evidence, I can imagine there being some correlation there to the extent they get it back, investigate, get it back.
But the charges?
Dude, they were attempting to fraudulently misappropriate close to $30,000 in winnings.
That's a threshold.
That's a big threshold.
Thank you for the super chat.
But yeah, no, civil forfeiture is a very, very big no-no.
It's seizing a property in the absence of a court order at the investigative level only, and then sometimes you never get it back.
No.
Okay, ending on YouTube, going to Rumble.
People, see you there in 3, 2, 1. I think we're alone now.
I can end this.
Okay, good.
Got to go back to StreamYard.
And let me make sure that we're still live on the Rumbles.
We are.
And there's a $5 Rumble rant there, which reads as follows.
Glasich says, Rumble Rant, good, good, gobbles.
Thank you very much.
$5 Rumble Rant.
No legal advice, no medical advice, no election fornification advice.
Rumble Rants, Rumble takes 20%.
If you want to support the channel, support what I do, if you want to support Robert Barnes and myself, the best possible place is local.
Viva Locals.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
All right, let's talk about the Alex Jones effect.
We saw it.
As jokes beginning the day after.
Oh, I hope you got a billion dollars.
You said something that hurt someone's feelings.
I hope you have a billion dollars.
Oh, you said something false that hurt somebody's feelings.
I hope you have a billion dollars.
And I'll put the caveat to this.
I've said it before and some people don't even like it.
In the ordinary run of things, if Alex Jones had gone through a normal trial, an actual trial within whatever statute of limitations applied, I could see him being held liable for certain statements he made.
Easily.
What the quantum should be for a fair, just compensation?
Not a billion dollars.
But I could have seen that happening in the ordinary courts of things for certain defendants, for certain specific comments, mitigated by the mitigating factors that were not allowed to be presented in that trial.
I could see that happening.
So it's not...
We all know this.
Free speech does not include defamation.
It does not include the right to say threats, true threats in America.
Free speech is not unlimited speech.
It's protected speech.
And people say factually incorrect statements that damage reputations or that cause harm.
That's a limitation on free speech.
Or at the very least, flip side, there's consequences to people who want to exercise their speech that way.
The problem, and anybody who has the slightest conscience or sense of justice, should be everyone deserves a trial.
And regardless of how egregious you think their conduct is, they still deserve a trial.
Even if they are foreclosed from pleading, they have the right to cross-examine, they have the right to insist that the plaintiff make their case before a jury, which was denied to Alex Jones.
So even if he had gone through a trial in the fairest of circumstances, I could see some of his statements being actionable and being punished.
Fairly and justly, a different realm.
Others might have been time-barred, others might have been unspecified as relates to the individuals about whom the statements were made, and others might be just not actionable.
But the trial...
The trial is what it is.
My goodness, they're back at 11.55.
Hold on.
Let me put it on pause and we'll come back to it afterwards.
They're back at 11.55 and I'm wrong.
Let me just put the whole thing on pause.
Ottawa's hearing.
Damn it.
Ottawa Public Hearing.
I'm going to put it on mute and we'll come back to it after I finish this segment.
So the Alex Jones effect in real time right now.
The day after the verdict, everyone's on Twitter.
Oh, don't.
You insult somebody?
A billion dollars.
You get a billion dollars.
Well, now Kanye West is being threatened with a suit from the family of George Floyd for statements Kanye made, what day is it today?
Apparently yesterday, about his opinion or what he believes to have been the cause of death of George Floyd.
He made a statement that George Floyd...
And this is Kanye's statement, interwebs, interworlds.
This is Kanye's statement.
Although it was a disputed fact at trial, it was a position of the parties at trial that George Floyd died from a drug overdose and not from asphyxiation from the knee to the neck of...
I can't believe I can't remember his name now.
Derek Chauvin.
Now, ultimately, the jury found that the cause of death was Derek Chauvin and not drug overdose, so the defense didn't work.
But it was a defense raised by Chauvin at trial.
Kanye West is on a podcast.
And makes this affirmation or makes a statement to this effect.
And the Alex Jones effect, rippling in real time, being what it is, lo and behold, a billion dollars.
Kanye, you said something that someone thinks is factually incorrect.
By the way, a judicial fact is a little different than a fact fact.
But nonetheless.
Judicial fact.
The jury found the cause of death was not fentanyl overdose.
It was Derek Chauvin's knee.
Kanye gets on a podcast and says something which is factually incorrect to the judgment in this case.
For now.
For now, by the way.
There is an appeal that's going to go down.
Fact today might not be fact in three years from now.
If ever the decision gets overturned on that aspect of causality.
Because bear in mind, people, if it were the case that George Floyd...
Did die or would have died from drug overdose.
There's a causal link between the...
A causal sever in the chain of events that could have incurred the culpability of Derek Chauvin.
It's going to go to appeal, presumably, although maybe not because Chauvin did plead guilty to federal charges.
So let's just assume it's a judicial fact.
Kanye West says something different, and now the family's saying, you can't defame a dead person, but...
You said something that we think is factually incorrect and it's causing us distress and we might pull an Alex Jones.
Or we might pull a, you know.
George Floyd's family.
We're looking at the same thing.
Has said it may sue Kanye West for suggesting Floyd's brutal, caught-on-camera death under the knee of a murderous Minnesota cop was really a fentanyl overdose.
There's a lot of descriptiveness in there for journalism.
George Floyd's family has said it may sue Kanye West for suggesting Floyd's brutal, caught-on-camera death under the knee of a murderous Minnesota cop was really a fentanyl overdose.
Quote, while one cannot defame the dead, the family of George Floyd is considering suit for Kanye's false statements about the manner of his death, the attorney Lee Merritt confirmed late Sunday.
Quote, claiming Floyd died from fentanyl, not the brutality established criminally and civilly, undermines and diminishes the Floyd family fight.
Merritt said that the members of the Floyd family contacted me distraught over the reprehensible remarks that Kanye shared in an hours-long interview on the Drink Champs podcast Sunday.
They're going to have to call him boozy, not Yeezy.
Boozy easy.
During the boozy chat, West, now named Ye, said he was inspired by watching The Greatest Lie Ever Sold, the documentary about Black Lives Matter by Candace Owens, whom the rapper modeled his controversial...
This is the tweet from the attorney for the Floyd family.
They hit him with, quote, quoting Kanye West, people.
Everyone.
I'm quoting Kanye West.
I also took flack for saying early on that Chauvin was probably guilty.
The trial did raise some, I think, legally, did raise some meaningful, reasonable doubts.
Not enough for the jury, but if you want to know how the practice of law should look, the defense did a pretty decent job raising reasonable doubts.
As good a job as they could have done, given the very damning video evidence.
Quoting Kanye, quote, they hit him with the fentanyl, end quote, West insisted on the May 2020 death of 46-year-old dad.
Floyd, that sparked international race riots and protests.
Quote, if you look, the guy's knee wasn't even on his neck like that.
End quote.
Ye insisted of then Minneapolis cop Derek Chauvin, who was later convicted of murder.
I'm not sure that I agree with that observation.
I know some have tried to reenact and gotten in trouble on YouTube for that, but I'm not sure I agree with that observation.
But I would probably take that as Kanye's opinion.
Can one have an opinion that contradicts a court ruling?
This is the world we're going to be living in, hitherto, under the Jones effect.
Can one have an opinion that disagrees with a court finding?
Court findings now, by the way, are undeniable factual truths.
So wrongly convicted individuals historically cannot question them anymore.
Oh, but you can then.
But this is a serious question.
A court ruling.
The court says, yeah.
Guilty.
Can I not say I still think the guy was innocent?
Am I compelled to say that O.J. Simpson was innocent?
O.J.'s going to threaten me with a billion-dollar lawsuit if I come out and say I think O.J. Simpson is guilty despite being found not guilty?
Think about where we're going, people.
O.J. was acquitted.
I don't think he was innocent.
Barnes thinks he was innocent.
Maybe Barnes thinks he was legally innocent.
Oh, can O.J. sue me for a billion dollars now for saying, I think O.J. was guilty even though he was found not guilty by a court of law?
Well, if we want to go with the new Alex Jones precedent that Lee Merritt is putting out there, if you say you think O.J. Simpson is guilty of murder despite having been found not guilty of murder, you open yourself up to a defamation lawsuit.
It'll upset O.J. It'll upset his family.
Ye also dismissed Floyd's emotive cries for his mother, which was captured in Onlooker's harrowing video of his death while pinned to the ground by four cops with Chauvin's knee on his neck.
This came out at trial.
They said he screamed for his mama.
Mama was his girlfriend.
It's in the documentary, said Ye, who called himself, quote, Moses out there and the new, quote, Godfather Michael Carleon.
All right, whatever.
That's not in the documentary.
That came out at trial.
Or that was an argument at trial that Mama was the nickname for his girlfriend who was in the car or who he was calling out for as he was getting assaulted.
Chauvin, who kept his knee on Floyd's neck after he'd gone limp, had also tried to blame drugs found in the system for his death.
However, the medical examiner and a flurry of other espers all made it clear that the cause of death was lack of oxygen and compression on Floyd's neck.
And here we go.
Picture.
Chauvin accepted as much when he pleaded guilty to a federal charge for depriving Floyd of his constitutional right to be free from unreasonable force from an officer.
I think that might be an arguable statement.
He might have pleaded guilty to violating constitutional rights but not admitting guilt to causation of death.
The defendant held his knee across Mr. Floyd's neck and his shoulder and his right knee on Mr. Floyd's back and arm.
His plea agreement in that...
Oh, the defendant held his left knee across Mr. Floyd's neck, back, and shoulder, and his right knee on Mr. Floyd's back and arm.
His plea agreement in that case stated, as Mr. Floyd laid on the ground, handcuffed and unresisting, the defendant kept his knee on Floyd's neck and body.
Even after Mr. Floyd became unresponsive, the offense resulted in bodily injury to and the death of George Floyd, it added.
The offense resulted in bodily injury to...
That sounds like an admission of guilt.
As well as a potential lawsuit, the statements by West, who is already under fire for anti-Semitism, sparked further outrage by civil rights leaders.
Okay, never mind.
I was going to say something.
Activist Lance Cooper was among many who said the Floyd family should sue Kanye, just like Sandy Hook families sued Alex Jones.
George Floyd didn't die because of fentanyl, that racist overdose theory.
A black man is raising that theory.
And they're calling it a racist overdose theory.
Was used to smear his name in court.
The drug content was not a contested fact in court.
The question was whether or not it reached the levels of lethal dose.
I don't think there was no disputed fact on whether or not Floyd had drugs in the system.
The only question was whether or not it was the cause of death.
And the experts said no.
And the jury found no.
It was the knee to the neck.
But!
Disagree with a judicial finding now.
Defamation.
Let's finish up that article and then we'll get back to this hearing.
But this is it.
This is the New World people.
Martin Luther King's youngest daughter, Bernice King, said she was, quote, praying for George Floyd's family who, after erroneous, terribly insensitive comments that never should have been made, are enduring more today than they were yesterday.
During the chat, Kanye wore a cap with 20-24 on the front and made clear he planned another run for the White House.
Well, that probably won't go very well, but...
So that's the latest now.
The Alex Jones effect.
Opinions.
This is going to be the question.
Is he making a statement of fact or is he making a statement of opinion?
I don't care what the jury found.
I believe and I feel.
I saw a documentary.
This is my conclusion.
This is my opinion.
Even if it is made as a statement of fact in the mind of Yeh, it was the defense raised during the trial.
So there will be, in theory, at the very least, litigation privilege.
If he's reiterating the defense raised by the defense at trial, even if it wasn't withheld by the jury, can that be defamation now?
This is what we want?
Espousing a belief that was promoted as a theory during trial?
Nope.
Can't do it anymore.
Now it is verboten.
No longer any room for discussion on it.
And if you talk about it, and if you say what you think, and it runs counter to the narrative of the time, billion-dollar lawsuit.
Ah.
you Okay, well, that's the article.
And there's more with Ye, because apparently he's buying Parler.
Could be interesting.
I don't want to poo-poo on parlor, but I do wonder if that's a bad investment.
All right, let's get back to the hearing for a little bit, people, and let's just see what's going on.
How do I get the audio?
This?
No, because that's not the window.
That is the window.
Hold on.
Audio.
Since the Freedom Convoy, the city has exercised its delegated authority.
I assure you we did not miss much.
To close down roads, for instance, for Rolling Thunder.
Yes, in collaboration with police.
And for Canada Day as well.
Yes.
And so, in effect, since the protests, the parties have, in effect, created exclusion zones.
Is that right?
That's correct.
And, in fact, if we could turn up a document...
OTT 26171.
Sorry.
If we could scroll down, please.
Okay, so now they're going to go and show how they have the means of blocking streets, of dealing with protests without having to invoke the Emergencies Act.
Opposing a motion.
I don't know if you recall that.
I do.
And the motion being put forward by Councillor Leeper is for the General Manager of Public Works to work with city councillors to close some roads to diminish the volume of vehicles able to access the downtown core.
Do you recall that motion?
I do.
And that was, I guess, his concern was the...
This is so boring.
It's going to be hours to get to a few gems.
The city does have the last sentence.
While we have the delegated authority to close roads, I would suggest in this case we would only proceed to do so if supported by OPS.
Ottawa Police Services.
And you agree that that is an accurate statement?
Well, at that stage, based on what was happening in the city, we wouldn't be closing roads without the support of OPS unilaterally.
I do love the Canadian accent.
We wouldn't be closing roads without the support of OPS.
It wouldn't be the right thing to do.
That was Scottish.
I don't know.
It just turned Scottish all of a sudden.
I'm just moving on to talk about the issue of ticketing.
And one of the concerns expressed by councillors was the presence of trucks filled or parked on the Queen Elizabeth Drive and the request by some councillors to have them ticketed as of January 30th.
Yes.
All that?
Yes.
And you've expressed the view that you did not see what ticketing would accomplish in that.
Where to get merch?
TJ61 asks.
Would you like me to expand or just say yes or no?
Sure.
Feel free to.
Ticketing, it's like everything else.
You can give someone a ticket and if they don't care they got the ticket and they're willing to pay.
No action necessarily results from the ticket.
It's like your car parked on the market.
If you're rich enough, it's a right to break statutes.
Without some kind of enforcement action to move it, the truck basically stays there.
People might feel better that we ticketed the car or the truck, but the truck's not moving unless we actually tow it.
Correct.
And I guess you would, and I can call up the document.
It's OTT 29632.
Do we want to watch all of this all day?
This might be too boring even for the internet.
I understand that this is a series of text messages.
Let's go into the chat.
Do we want to watch this or do we just cover some stories and I'll listen to this in fast forward motion later on and give you some highlights.
This is boring for me and I'm interested in it.
Who's this?
Give me one second.
If you look at 1008.
32. And you can read up above just to give yourself the context.
But one of the concerns that Mr. Ayut expressed about this is ticketing will also anger the demonstrators.
Okay, that was not an emergency.
That was a concern for sure.
Hold on, we say no, Viva.
Fast forward, no.
So, hold on.
Please move on.
Let's make this clear for me.
Move on, yes.
Move on, no.
So, yes.
I'll turn this off and we'll talk about other stuff.
No means we stay on this.
Starting now.
We need a poll function here.
Do we have a poll function in Rumble?
Watching hairs grow on my beard was more fun than this.
It's boring.
This is going to be interesting when you highlight it later.
It won't.
If we don't pay attention to it, move on.
We'll pay attention to it, people.
Don't worry.
I'll get the highlights on Twitter afterwards.
Potentially, yes.
And enraging protesters, you shared the police concern that that could be counterproductive.
Yes.
Enraging the protesters.
We're done, people.
Enraging the protesters.
You know what you would have had to do to enrage the protesters?
There would have been nothing that you could have done to enrage the protesters, because even when Trudeau came in with armored vehicles, snipers on roofs, pepper spray, batons, that didn't enrage the protesters.
They sat there, they got assaulted, they got arrested.
They didn't even really fight that.
You'll see some videos of the shoving back and forth when I was there, and I was noticing the police doing their thing.
They were coming with barricades, just taking a step every couple minutes.
Take a step.
Push everyone back.
Take a step.
Then, that didn't enrage the protesters.
Some of them were there on camera to me saying, I'm getting arrested at the monument.
Some veterans saying, I'm staying at the war memorial.
I will get arrested if I have to.
And they didn't.
They ultimately moved and a few of them did get arrested.
A few of them got savagely assaulted, in my humble opinion.
Enrage the protesters.
You can't enrage good people to do something that they will not...
I guess you could.
That's not true.
You can enrage good people if you antagonize them enough, but those protesters never got enraged, never got antagonized, and never got violent, even when Justin Trudeau's non-military but highly militarized police force got violent.
Okay.
Ye is also going to buy Parler.
Let's just pull this one up, because this is another interesting one.
Even if I had the money, and I don't.
I would not buy Parler.
That's not a poo-poo on Parler.
I'm not sure what the current status of Parler is.
I know that it's accessible on laptop or on computer.
I have not tuned back into Parler since they got shut down by Amazon Web Services.
And ultimately, I enjoy the...
Environment in Twitter for the purposes of what I do on the interwebs more than what I feel to be something of echo chambers.
And not echo chambers in a bad way.
It's like, I want to know what the people who don't agree with me think.
I want to know what the people who hate me have to say.
Which is why I find Twitter a little more enticing, alluring.
What's the word I'm looking for?
Something that gets you excited.
Invigorating.
Stimulating.
Anyhow, so let's see.
Kanye West to acquire conservative social media platform Parler.
Looking at the hat now.
Kanye West is acquiring Parler, the alternative social media platform favored by many conservatives.
Parler parent company announced the deal Monday morning, saying West has made a groundbreaking move into the free speech media space and will never have to fear being removed from social media again.
Well, I think Rumble...
To the extent you don't break the law was probably the place to do that in any event, but I'm biased because I'm exclusive to Rumble.
The acquisition comes after West, who has legally changed his name to Ye, had his account temporarily locked by Twitter this month over an anti-Semitic tweet.
Exact terms of the Parler deals weren't discussed, though Parler said it must still enter into a definitive agreement with West and expects to close in the fourth quarter.
Parler's parents, Parliament Technology, that's not bad, would remain involved by providing technical services and cloud support.
Buying Parler could make West the latest celebrity owner of a social media platform after former President Donald Trump's bid to win over conservatives with truth social media, Tesla buys Very interesting.
Will not the people who think a certain way come, but will the other people come?
Will Gavin Newsom go to Parler so that he can...
Try to convince people on parlor.
It also highlights how a small group of wealthy men, some of whom were banned or suspended themselves for incendiary remarks.
What were Trump's incendiary remarks?
Are looking to own social media platforms in an...
What were...
Well, I can think of Musk's incendiary remarks.
He referred to somebody as a potato file.
Yeah, they want to bolster free speech, yada, yada, yada.
Oh, let's hear this.
Let's hear this.
In a world where conservative opinions are considered to be controversial, we have to make sure that we have the right to freely express ourselves, said Western Pressways.
Fine.
I want to get...
We know the controversy.
Speaking on CNN, Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL's CEO, called Parler a haven of hate.
It's funny he calls Parler the haven of hate when all of the actual planning for January 6th occurred on...
Twitter and Facebook, I believe.
Parler was founded in 2018 and saw rapid growth in 2020 election, billing itself as a loosely moderated free speech haven.
The app became popular with conservative politicians and media figures, peaking at an estimated 2.9 million daily users.
Yada, yada, yada.
In the weeks following the January 6 riots, Parler was removed from both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store for what the company said was a failure to adequately moderate violent rhetoric on the platform.
May I introduce you to Twitter?
You pathological liars.
Of course, Amazon Web Services...
No, sorry.
Apple Store and Google are not going to sanction Twitter.
But if you want to see actual violent content, actual planning, orchestrating, Twitter is the place.
Twitter is the app.
Not Parler.
Documents provided to the House Committee investigation, the Capitol writes, have shown how the Secret Service was aware of posts on Parler that suggested the possibility of violence surrounding that day.
Oh, interesting.
The House Committee says Secret Service was aware of posts on Parler that suggested the possibility of violence that day, and yet Nancy Pelosi said no-no to the National Guard even when the Capitol Police were at half-staff because of COVID.
Oh yeah, no-no.
And apparently they couldn't have foreseen anything coming.
Intelligence did not know what was going to happen to be able to prevent, to have a few National Guardsmen, maybe not to open up doors to the Capitol building.
No, no.
Documents show for the committee, that beautiful bipartisan committee, Secret Service was aware of posts on Parler that suggested the possibility of violence surrounding that day.
And yet, Nancy Pelosi said, no National Guard, even though everyone knew the Capitol Police were understaffed, not half-staffed, understaffed.
Because of COVID.
Oh, and by the way, Parler has written to Congress claiming that they were a scapegoat?
Oh, yeah.
Because the actual planning occurred on Facebook and Twitter, from what I recall.
Parler has since been restored to both app stores after making changes to its content moderation practices.
Well, maybe I have to go back and pick up my handle there.
Parler has faced more competition in recent months.
Yeah, we got Truth, which I'm still not on because my phone is still under the Canadian operating system and I can't get the app.
It could also mean effectively that Musk and Ye, who are said to be friends, are now competing with each other.
After Ye's anti-Semitic remarks, which sparked an outcry, Musk tweeted, talk to Ye today, talk to Ye today, and expressed my concerns about his recent tweet, which I think he took to heart.
Hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on.
Kanye West, anti-Semitic.
What was it?
I saw the Instagram post.
Images, will that do it?
Is this it?
I thought that was an Instagram post, not a tweet.
Maybe it was a tweet.
Okay, whatever.
So that's Ye looking to buy or going to buy Parler, although I never believe these deals are...
I don't believe these deals go through until the ink is dry on the paper.
So we'll see what happens by the fourth quarter time.
But that's it.
So Ye is going to buy Parler.
Ye might get sued by the family of George Floyd.
And this is the world that people are ushering in, thinking it can never go wrong.
It can never come to me.
If I say, let me think of something, for example.
Oh, I don't know, that politician who claimed that Brian Sicknick was bludgeoned to death?
If I'm Brian Sicknick's family, billion-dollar lawsuit.
Anybody who says Brian Sicknick was killed by the mob of Trump protesters...
Oh, hold on.
Hold on.
Let's just do this, actually, in real time.
Let's just do this in real time.
A New York Times.
Sicknick killed by mob of Trump protesters.
Let's see if this is still up.
It is.
He dreamed of being a Capitol Police officer, then was killed by a pro-Trump mob.
The death of Brian Sicknick, a military veteran, an experienced Capitol Police officer, amplified the tragedy of Wednesday's riots and undermined Trump's pro-law enforcement claims.
This is still available.
In fact, it's not even behind the typical paywall.
Published January 8, 2021.
Updated March 24, 2021.
New information has emerged regarding the death.
Of the Capitol Police Officer Brian Quicknick that questioned the initial cause of death provided.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Even your update is a pathological lie, New York Times.
You're making a factually incorrect statement about somebody's cause of death.
Lawsuit.
You should be found guilty by default verdict and a billion dollars.
This is still online.
And even the correction is bullcrap.
And I'll read it.
Again, just so everybody understands.
The New York Times.
He dreamed of being a police officer.
Then he was killed by a pro-Trump mob.
Brian Sicknick, who coroners determined died of natural causes of a stroke.
And it was known at the time, by the way.
Who was it?
The other guy there?
Viva Fry Sicknick.
I tweet.
Who was it that just said it?
Do we have a politician?
What's his name?
Mondaire.
Mr. Roy, you too are an attorney.
Mr. Bishop speaks often about how brilliant of an attorney he is.
You know that at least one Capitol Police officer was bludgeoned to death by the crowd at the January 6th riots?
I said a police officer was bludgeoned to death.
I did not say at the hands of whom, Mr. Bishop.
Who are you referring to, if you don't mind?
I can get that information for you in a few minutes.
Well, I just want to make sure, because I...
Are you denying that at least one Capitol Police officer was murdered in the midst of what happened on January 6th?
I think I am denying...
I mean, here's what I...
I understood that there were reports early on that...
We don't need to watch this again.
Mondaire is his name?
Politician?
Making a factually incorrect statement about someone's cause of death?
Which should cause distress to the family?
Rep Mondaire Jones.
Yep.
Rules are rules.
Even if they're bad rules, right?
Now, hold on.
I saw some super chats which disappeared.
Rumble rants, sorry.
Rumble rant from TJ61.
I would love to watch if you were testifying.
And that's at the...
We'll see if I can get up there.
Where to get merch?
Oh yeah, I put it there.
VivaFry.com for anybody who wants merch.
There's some nice shirts, hats, bumper stickers, and whatnot.
So that's it.
Hey, rules are rules.
Even if they're bad rules that are totally unjust.
Oh, unless we always knew that they were only going to be weaponized in a partisan, politicized manner to one side.
Mondaire is not going to get sued for a billion dollars.
Even though he lied about the cause of death of an individual, which I would imagine causes distress to the family.
Sicknick died of a stroke.
Coroner confirmed it.
It was bunk from day one that he got bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher.
New York Times said it, affirmed it, and even their correction does not adequately correct it.
Mondaire, two years later, is repeating that a police officer was bludgeoned to death.
Lawsuits.
No?
That's how it works.
What else?
There is more.
There is more.
Oh, no.
We got to watch this.
I know some...
I know that the only people who don't like Rebel News...
I shouldn't say the only people.
Rebel News.
Some people don't like him, but I think those are...
I would suspect those are politically motivated individuals.
Listen to this.
Love him or hate him?
They've got cojones.
They've got courage.
They've got audacity.
And they are relentless.
Let me get the actual...
I don't want to get anybody's name wrong.
Oh, son of a beast.
Tamara Ugolini.
I think she's relatively new to Rebel because I haven't seen her very many times.
She goes and asks General Tedros there of the WHO, are you going to do lockdowns again?
Watch this.
First of all, I'll give everyone a link to the tweet so you can go show some love or, you know, just support them by following them and get some news from there.
Here, in the link.
Let's see how this goes.
It's classic.
Hey, come on, Internet.
It's got a problem.
Is it?
Okay.
How are we?
How are we?
Refresh.
Okay.
Tedros, how are you?
How are you, Mr. Tedros?
Devastatingpo.com Mr. Tedros, how are you?
How are you, Mr. Tedros?
If you could do lockdowns again, would you do them?
Why is he touching her like that?
Mr. Tedros, if you could do lockdowns again, would you support them?
That's what you got for unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats heading in there to the WHO conference, World Health Summit.
Tedros was nervous about how that went.
Can I just show something?
Maybe this is my own sensitivity to the NCD.
Why is he touching her shoulder?
Why is he snuggling up to her?
That makes me uncomfortable.
I won't project and say whether or not the reporter is uncomfortable.
If you could do lockdowns again, would you support them?
I'm sorry.
Sorry, sorry.
You're done.
You're done.
We don't answer to you.
Would you support them?
That's what you got for unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats.
What did you learn?
What did you learn?
Don't ask.
You filthy rabble.
They don't have to answer your questions.
They're royalty.
They're unelected.
Unaccountable royalty.
They don't answer to the plans.
He thought she was friendly.
He thought she was on his side for a bit.
She's a great Ontarian.
But my goodness, who puts their hand on another person's body like that?
I mean, Joe Biden for one.
Yeah, that's inappropriate.
Dominance, says Mama 2004.
Yep.
Everything about it is wrong.
But he can't say that they won't go to lockdowns again because they were so effective the first time.
They were so not crippling, not devastating.
They were so not traumatizing and not destructive for our younger generation.
And above all else, they were so damn effective that states and countries which didn't lock down Basically had the exact same graph chart and results as relates to the Rona, as did the states that did, but they might not have the same lasting, devastating impacts on a younger generation.
But it worked so well the first time.
Let's do it again.
And I don't have to answer questions from the rabble like yourselves.
You're a journalist asking me a hard question?
Poof, poof.
I take my hands off your dirty shoulder.
And I say, go away!
And I have my...
My minions come between us.
Create the necessary distance so I can recoil to my group of political elites, unelected officials who are governing and dictating national policy.
But people, look, don't worry.
It's not just that guy, Dr. Teros, whatever his name is.
It's not just him that is, you know, if it didn't work the second time, the first time, surely it'll work the second time.
Canada, Dr. Kieran Moore, Ontario's top doctor, urges mask wearing, warns mandate.
You'd think we were reading something from October 2020.
You'd think we were reading something from August 2020.
Oh no, I would say you would think we were reading something from March 2020, but in March 2020, the top doctor was saying, you don't need to wear masks.
Don't worry about it.
Masks are useless.
That's what the doctors were saying back then.
Now, if you say that, it's medical misinformation that can get you flied.
But when Fauci said it in March, April 2020, fine.
But you'd think we were back in August 2020.
Wear masks, people.
Wash your fruits when they come home from the grocery.
Leave your groceries in the garage for two days after purchase.
And if you think I'm joking, I don't know if I can find the link fast enough.
I'll try to find it after this.
Doctors, or at least one doctor on YouTube, was saying that.
I remember hearing it in the news.
Leave your groceries for two days.
Wash your fruits and vegetables.
I'm not ashamed to admit it.
I was pretty crazy in the first two weeks.
I remember my kid borrowed a book from her friend and I made her leave it outside overnight.
I'm capable of making mistakes.
I'm capable of succumbing to the fear that people, humans, are tempted to succumb to.
Which makes them act totally, totally irrationally.
Let me just go to Rumble and make sure everything's good there and see what we got.
You should wash your fruit always.
True.
But I have a theory about washing your fruit always.
Who said that?
Hold on one second.
That was in the Rumble rants.
My theory now is for the amount of stuff that you don't see going on.
This is from Alice Pleasance Liddell.
You should wash your fruit always.
My theory is that for the stuff that you don't see, to do something relatively trivial like that does nothing.
And I mean, grapes, things that you're eating raw that have nooks and crannies where insects can hide in between, fine.
But washing an apple, whatever's on it is on it, and you're not getting it off with your shirt or your water.
All right, whatever.
But I'm not a doctor.
No medical advice.
I'm also a compulsive neurotic with totally irrational fears where, you know, I'll eat a live But I will, you know, think I'm going to die if I touch raw egg.
Ontario top doctor urges mask wearing, warns mandates could return.
Ontario's top doctor fears rising COVID-19 cases and the approach of winter could further jeopardize the province's struggling healthcare system.
The healthcare system, I'm going to say it over and over again, has been struggling for decades.
2018.
Ottawa, Ontario, was canceling elective surgeries because of a relatively bad flu season.
People should recall, there was a flu season that was so bad, I think in the States, 60 to 80,000 people died of the flu.
No one batted an eye.
Worst flu season, I think it was 2018, deaths.
The CDC estimates 52,000 Americans died.
Of influenza during 2017 to 2018.
I thought there was a worse season than that.
How about 2018?
2018 to 2019?
That's a cool 52,000.
Thank you.
I can't find it right now.
Just a cool 52...
Oh, here we go.
Here we go.
Longer than usual and M-shaped CDC 2018-2019 flu season was odd but not as severe as the previous deadly season.
Let me just find 80. Here we go.
Death marks...
Okay, 2017-2018 flu season, the deadliest in four decades, topped 80,000 deaths.
You all thought I was lying?
You all thought I was mad?
2017-2018, just a cool 80,000 people dead.
Nobody batted an eye.
That was 2017, 2018.
Where it was so bad, in Ontario they were cancelling elective surgeries.
The healthcare system has been in shambles for decades in Canada.
But now it's the best excuse ever to reimplement idiotic, unscientific policy.
In an interview with Global News, Dr. Kieran Moore, Ontario's medical officer of health, urged people to get vaccines even after he referred to it as a therapeutic and recognized that it comes with a 1 in 5,000 risk of myocarditis for young men.
Even after he said that.
Oh, hold on.
Just so that nobody thinks.
Kieran Moore.
Myocarditis.
Tweet.
Just so nobody thinks.
Just so nobody has any doubt.
I'm not making this up.
I'm not making this up.
I commend it to everybody instead of saying it's a personal decision.
Because at present we're doing a risk-based approach.
With the risk.
There's always a risk to having any therapeutic versus a benefit.
You want to make sure there's a very strong benefit versus a risk.
For an 18-year-old healthy individual, the risk of getting hospitalized if we have no medical illness is very, very low.
We know there is a risk, a very small risk, one in 5,000 that may get myocarditis, for example.
And you'd have to have that discussion.
So with that parentheses closed, everyone, this is the same doctor.
He doesn't look like Stalin.
He looks like Lenin.
In an interview with Global News, Dr. Kieran Moore, whatever the officer, urged people to get what he had previously referred to as a therapeutic.
Boosters and wear a mask to avoid...
An unmanageable surge in hospital admissions, like they had in 2018, before COVID.
He said the rate of uptake for fourth doses by Ontarians, age 70 and older, around 16% was not acceptable.
Oh, well, maybe there's a lot more fringe minorities with unacceptable views, Dr. Kieran Moore, Justin Trudeau.
Oh, I guess all of the...
What's my problem?
84% who aren't getting the booster, are they anti-vaxxers?
Are they a fringed minority with unacceptable views who take up place or extremists?
Should we tolerate them?
It's very interesting.
It's very interesting as people get additional information, decision-making changes over time.
The fourth dose by Ontarians, around 16%, and that means 84% of Ontarians are selfish bastards who want Granny to die.
Or, or...
Or they listened to Kieran Moore when he spoke previously.
Not acceptable.
It's not acceptable.
And said public health measures like mandatory masking could return if necessary.
I don't give the middle finger.
If I were to give the middle finger, I would not have enough middle fingers on my body.
I would go to my middle finger toe.
If I were, I don't give the middle finger.
It's not polite.
Doesn't mean I don't think it.
And sometimes I...
Speak out loud what I'm thinking.
16% is absolutely not acceptable to me, he said.
Urgent.
Who the hell do you think you are, Kieran?
Not Kieran.
Is his name Kieran?
Kieran.
Who the hell do you think you are?
16% is not acceptable to me.
You naughty, naughty fringe minorities.
You better go get that fourth jab.
Not the third, the fourth.
And you're all going to mask you up and mask up your children again.
While a return to mandatory masking is not yet being recommended, did it work the first time?
Just curious.
You're a doctor, Moore.
Did it work the first time?
Moore called upon people to consider wearing a mask indoors as cases rise and said he would not hesitate to recommend a stronger measure if necessary.
Crack the knuckles.
Crack the knuckles is an easy way not to succumb to primal instincts.
Oh, I will not hesitate.
Not acceptable.
Can we see the...
You follow the science, Dr. Moore?
Can we see the science that shows that it worked the first time?
I won't hold my breath.
If there's a significant impact on our healthcare system, we can't care for Ontarians properly, which you haven't been able to do for years, if not decades, and you knew about it.
I will absolutely have the conversation with the government around whether to have the mandate for a set of period of time.
It's not science.
It's punitive.
And if anybody doesn't understand it from the phrasing of this sentence, did it work the first time?
Yes or no?
You better show the evidence if you say yes.
If they don't get their damn jabs, and I think that there's a healthcare problem which has existed for decades, I will not hesitate to punt.
Masks for you, young man.
Back to the masks.
Like a parent scorning their child.
Just want to see how much is left in this article.
Data maintained by Public Health Ontario shows the percentage of positive cases increased.
Does the data show that the masks worked had any impact whatsoever?
In the week, yada, yada, who cares?
Hospital admissions are also higher.
Like they are every winter.
Moore, who has previously said Ontario needs to learn to live with COVID, said annual bursars may become a reality.
Your reality.
It may be that every winter you'll need to get an annual booster to protect us.
Oh.
Even if it means one in 5,000 young men is going to get myocarditis.
That's a risk Kieran Moore is willing to take.
That's a risk doctor is willing to take with your kids.
Yada, yada, yada.
Ontarians 12 years and older have been eligible for Pfizer's bivalent booster.
Bivalent, it sounds so fancy.
With the government expanding its age range on October 17. The Ontario government is reminding people to stay up to date with their vaccines as we enter respiratory illness season.
You might be entering...
Another illness season.
One that will affect 1 in 5,000 people, even according to Dr. Kieran Moore's own statements.
And by the way, German studies actually came out afterwards and showed that it's 1 in 5,000 per dose, not 1 in 5,000 per person.
Keep getting those doses.
Appointments can be made through the...
Go book yourself.
The booster shot, yada, yada, yada.
Ontarians know that masking has worked.
Oh, no, no, no.
Sorry, I don't know anything.
Prove it.
I know nothing.
I'm a clean slate, Dr. Moore.
Over the last two years, we've had minimal influenza affecting our healthcare system.
I've heard theories as to why that would be the case, even if it is the case.
It wouldn't be because of masking, Moore.
Oh, it's so irritating, because I'm not a doctor, but I do listen to some doctors.
And some theories were that when you have two competing respiratory illnesses, the one that is more contagious will be the one that dominates that season.
So the reason why there might not have been as many...
Influenza cases hitting the hospitals was because COVID was more contagious and therefore was the virus that thrived.
And it had nothing to do with masking.
Because, by the way, if the masking worked, did it work for the Rona?
It's enraging.
I'm enraged against the machine.
Oh, yeah.
You better do it.
or we're gonna bring back the masks.
Oh.
Oh.
you Thank you.
Man, I feel crazy.
It's like I just...
I know these...
If we've been living through this together on this channel, I now know.
Kieran Moore comes out and is now referring to it as a vaccine when previously he reverted to it as a therapeutic.
He's now saying it's necessary.
To reduce the risk when he said previously, 1 in 5,000 risk of myocarditis.
He's now saying that the masks worked because we reduced the cases of influenza where they did not reduce the cases of COVID, which was the reason for which people were wearing the masks in the first place.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
Okay.
There's more.
There's more.
Let's see what else we got here.
Ontario's top doctor.
Okay, now we just read that story.
Let me get that out of here.
No, I don't want to invite anybody.
I want to see what else we had on the menu.
Kanye.
Okay, we got that.
JPMorgan Chase cuts ties with Kanye.
Consequence sound.
I couldn't find this story confirmed elsewhere.
Apparently that JPMorgan Chase cuts ties with Kanye.
Following allegations he praised Hitler, it's not clear that those two things are connected.
That someone alleged Kanye praised Hitler, I'd love to see evidence of that.
And contemporaneously, J.P. Morgan Chase cuts ties with him, no reason given, but it was the week after his social media posts.
So, okay, we'll scrap that for now.
And I think that might be it for the day.
J.P. Morgan.
Oh, yeah.
Does anybody know how many people died?
How many deaths in Canada in 2021 were attributed to COVID?
And there's a reason why I'm asking this.
We're not done yet, people.
We ain't done yet.
Let me go to Twitter just for one second.
Does anybody in the chat know?
No exaggeration.
Don't troll.
How many deaths in Canada in 2021 were attributed to COVID?
Because I want to compare that to the number of people euthanized in Canada.
Johnny A says, Trump is an effing genius.
And I sense there might be sarcasm there.
I'm not sure.
Oh, man.
There's a couple more fun stories to cover here.
The benevolence of people who think they're doing the right thing by destroying property, violence, suppression of free speech.
The road to hell is paved in benevolence.
Okay, here we go.
Let's check this out.
Let's just watch this.
This is fantastic.
Property violence is not violence anymore, people.
Eco-activists spray paint Aston Martin's showroom in London.
Hours after they were branded thugs and vandals by the UK Home Security Home Secretary.
We will not be stopped by injunctions that are intended to silence.
If I may, I mean, I'm just...
This man is not going to give redheads...
There's already a meme out there that is not going to be contradicted by this.
Let's just hear this.
We're a non-violent civil disobedience movement.
Property violence, young man, is violence.
You are not non-violent.
Just let me throw that out there right now.
We know that the changes in the law, the injunctions against us, are irrelevant in comparison with mass starvation, with the genocidal policies that our government is pushing for with their 100 new fossil fuel licenses in the North Sea.
Wait until this dude finds out where the minerals come from for the green energy that he ostensibly is supporting.
Just wait until he finds out.
I mean, he's going to be flabbergasted.
Wait until he sees images of what lithium mines look like.
He doesn't have to worry about being poisoned because of some runoff from a mine in Africa, South America.
He doesn't have to worry about it.
He's in London.
He gets to spray paint, cause property damage, commit property violence, and apparently, I don't know how long that goes on for, not getting arrested all that quickly.
Wait until he finds out where...
Where the rare earth minerals come from that are required for the green energy that he so thoroughly loves.
But that wasn't the only story.
This is what I wanted to get to.
The reason why I asked...
Here, let's see if I actually got an answer to the question.
How many deaths with cause of...
Yes, okay.
I know the sneaky counting.
I actually just want...
That's why I phrased the question the way I wanted.
Here we go.
Okay, that's not what I want to see.
So I want to know how many Canadians' deaths were attributed to COVID.
Because in 2021, 10,064 Canadians were euthanized.
So I just want to know how many deaths they attribute to COVID so I can just, you know, contextualize that number.
But I've got to tell you.
I tried to look for the answer.
I couldn't find it myself quickly enough.
Yeah, you're all very funny.
All of them.
That's not the purpose.
All right, well, I couldn't get an answer.
I'll see if I can find it.
But you know that the euthanasia laws in Canada are becoming problematic when even W5, the outlet that...
Defamed me as far as I'm concerned, but I don't think anybody's watching them anymore.
But W5, when they start running pieces critical of this policy, and it wasn't even really that critical from what I saw.
Someone was watching it and sent me a few clips of the W5 talking about the euthanasia laws in Canada.
But it highlights a point that I've been talking about for a while now.
I don't think I've been talking about it for a while, but it highlights a point that we've brought up.
10,064 Canadians.
We're euthanized in Canada in 2021.
That represents over 3% of all death in Canada.
Let that sink in for a second.
It represents 3% of death in Canada.
They are going to expand the eligibility for maids, medical assistance in dying, to include the mentally ill or the mentally unwell.
I don't know if mentally ill is a politically incorrect term, but I'm going to use it anyhow.
Mentally ill.
They're going to expand it to include mental illness because, according to the debate that occurred in the Senate, it would be discriminatory not to offer the service of assisted death to the mentally ill.
It would be discriminatory.
You've got to allow the mentally ill who, in law, cannot consent to contract under certain circumstances, you've got to allow them the opportunity to consent to being euthanized by the state.
And people are...
Not in as much uproar as they should be, but we saw now in Belgium, was it Belgium or Brussels?
Brussels is the capital of Belgium.
Belgium.
A 23-year-old woman who survived the ISIS terror bombing a few years ago, euthanized because she had depression and couldn't go on living with the stress of what she went through.
Euthanized a physically healthy 23-year-old woman who suffered from...
It's not rocket science.
She suffered from some mental issues.
To not be able to move on and to have the depression, anxiety, on a...
What's the nut?
Cornucopia.
On a slew of medications.
She was euthanized.
And this is coming to Canada.
And there was a clip from the show that someone sent me.
And they said, this law is not going to protect the mentally ill.
From anything.
It's not going to protect them from themselves and listen to one of the people.
That provides a pathway to death.
I have a patient right now who is saying I would never kill myself on my own, but I will kill myself with MAID because that's not suicide.
I was like, oh, this is way less stressful when I get to work in a field that's helping more people.
Serena Baines is afraid of dying too.
This 24-year-old, University graduate works part-time and is about to leave Vancouver for an internship in Ottawa.
But as someone with depression, anxiety, and borderline personality disorder, she fears the new legislation won't protect her from herself.
Because I experience suicidality so often, I'm understanding that if I wanted to access MAID, that I could in a time of Suicidality.
And I'd probably be successful at it.
Oh yeah.
No question.
And the government would think that they're doing something good for you.
Who are we to deny this to someone who's mentally ill?
Someone who suffers from depression?
Who are we to not grant them what they say that they want now in the moment?
I'm sure the system is going to work perfectly to protect people from these moments where they need the protection from themselves, not the assistance from the states to carry out the ultimate decision on themselves.
it's Can you imagine?
I can't skip to the future fast enough, nor would I want to, even if I could.
I saw the movie Click, and it's a depressing-ass comedy.
We're going to get to a point in the future where we're going to look back at Canada and the transformation of Canada under Justin Trudeau.
Censorship, political division, racial division, charter rights violations, desecration of the economy, abuse of a generation of children, spike in self-harm, drug addiction, drug overdoses.
Desecration of the fundamental rights that made Canada what it was, and now the assistance of suicide that takes suicide, within the four years that this legislation has been implemented, I think it's four or five years, takes euthanasia, medical assistance in dying, to represent 3% of the deaths in Canada.
3% of all death in Canada was at the hands of the government.
Through this euthanasia policy, medical assistance in dying.
Call it maids, because it sounds so much better than euthanasia.
And that number is only going to go up.
Oh, hey, doggy.
Doggy knows what's going on here.
One of the cases in Canada consisted of someone with chemical sensitivity, also known as allergy, because she couldn't find adequate lodging.
And by the way, don't trust me.
Don't trust me.
Let me rephrase.
Trust me, but verify me.
Here.
This is where I was trying to find the stats.
Here.
No, let's go here.
One of them was maids, Canada, chemical sensitivity.
We all heard the story of the veteran with PTSD who was offered maids.
Woman with chemical sensitivities chose medically assisted death.
After failed bid to get better housing.
My goodness, does the government just not get to profit on both ends of this?
They don't have to provide the better housing.
They get to free up a space in the healthcare system.
Don't trust me.
What was the other one?
There was another case of maids in Canada.
Oh!
Oh, this one.
Hold on, hold on.
Maids, Canada.
COVID depression.
There was a woman who was given medical assistance in dying.
And her family could be with her to assist her in death, but not to assist her through the COVID pandemic.
Finally, finally, people are starting to talk about it.
More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically assisted death in 2021.
What was the story about the person?
Family couldn't be with her vaccine.
That's something about vaccine.
I think it had to do with this.
I won't be able to find this one.
But this is the legacy of Justin Trudeau's Canada.
Some of you say it's not one person.
Whether or not it's...
A cabal, for lack of a better word.
It has been under one person's reign that Canada has been destroyed.
Hopefully not irreparably.
In seven short years.
It started in 2015 when Trudeau took office.
Internet censorship.
Increased powers of the state.
Increased provisions of criminal code to further criminalize speech.
2016, Bill C-16.
Jordan Peterson raising the alarms back then.
Bill C-11, regulate the internet.
Medically assisted death before COVID.
Then comes COVID.
Justin Trudeau donates our PPE that his top doctor is now going to threaten everyone has to wear again.
Shut down the economy.
Isolate children.
Set people back years, if not decades, for psychological, intellectual development.
Self-harm, drug overdose, spiking in Canada, economy in shambles, shipping billions of dollars or hundreds of millions of dollars to finance foreign conflict, and now basically, yeah, let's let Canadians, let's give them free reign to kill themselves, or not to kill themselves, to allow the state to kill them.
Don't call it killing them, though.
Don't call it euthanasia, either.
Let's give it a nice, clean name, like maids.
Medical assistance in time.
Let me see something here.
All right.
That is it.
That is it.
I'm going to go back and listen to the hearing.
Let me give everybody the inquiry link.
So everybody can go inquiry.
Inquiry.
I will listen to the inquiry all afternoon.
With my MOC, I'm going to...
Reach out to some people here.
Okay, where are we at with the inquiry now?
I'm going to go listen to it, but I'm not just going to stay live and do it for the sake of staying live.
Everyone, if you want to watch it, rumble.
Is this it?
What's going on?
My phone is beeping, but I'm not.
Okay.
Let me give you all the link.
Here, this is the link.
Go listen to it.
Inquiry!
And I'm going to go have either a Red Bull or a Field of Greens, but I need caffeine, or a cold brew.
I got a new bottle of cold brew.
Honk, honk, honk, psyop.
Don't say that!
That's an alliteration for Heil Hitler.
One of the parliamentarians said that.
So...
That's it.
Go, everyone.
Enjoy the day.
Thank you for being with me this morning.
I think I'm going to read the room and not live stream the inquiry unless there's something really interesting, like a really good witness.
Like maybe Jim Watson, the Ottawa mayor, would be good.
If Justin Trudeau ever takes the stand.
Everyone says no Red Bull, no Viva.
Okay, fine.
I'll do.
I will do cold brew.
I just couldn't find the Perrier caffeinated beverage that I fell in love with.
So that's it.
Everyone, go enjoy the afternoon.
Just to thank my sponsor again, Home Title Lock.
Go get that free assessment to see if you actually have the deed to your property.
HomeTitleLock.com forward slash Viva.
Viva working the graft and not the grift.
Hard work.
And I want to thank Home Title Lock for actually having the courage to sponsor a channel like mine.
It says something about the product, but I also use the product.
As I do field of greens, but that's tomorrow.
So go enjoy this and don't lose faith, but don't have blind faith.
The Lord loves a working man.
God helps those who help themselves and so on and so forth.
But whatever you do, I know Jeremy McKenzie.
I've been seeing some of the chat.
Jeremy McKenzie is in jail and apparently hasn't been heard from.
And I've reached out to see if I can get any actual reliable news because, you know.
Again, whatever you think about people who say and do stupid things, you have to make sure the system remains a system of justice and not a system of political punishment.
But it seems that the judicial system everywhere has now become a weaponized system of political punishment where allies get off and adversaries get the boot.
So, inasmuch as everyone continues to inform themselves and do what they can, do it in a manner.
That will make your parents, your children, and your pets proud, or at the very least, not ashamed of you.
What do you say, Winston?
He smells good.
And you know what?
Because I know that I have to leave this with a video so that it doesn't get cut off on rumble.
I'm going to give a cute video of Winston.
Let's just see here.
Winston when he was a baby.
Leave a family, Winston.
Hold on.
Bear with me.
Bear with me, everyone.
We're going to have a beautiful video.
To play us out.
Viva family, Winston.
Yes.
How long is this video?
A day in the life of Winston.
Not going to play the whole thing, but I'll give everyone the link.
Hold on just one second.
Here's the link, and I will play us out with this video.
It's a good one.
Thank you all for being here.
I will see you tomorrow.
Are you recording?
I'm recording.
Okay, this is an introduction to Winston the Westie.
Look at that little baby.
We have recently adopted him.
Apparently, he's going to go blind, so they couldn't find anyone to adopt him, let alone purchase him.
That's what I look like.
Apparently, worst case scenario, he might have to have both of his eyeballs removed at a cost of $2,000, which is the worst case scenario, but it's called lentiglobis or lenticonis.
I'll show you as I get him close to his eye.
There, you can see.
The milky part right there.
It's gotten worse, but his eyes didn't expand with pressure, so they don't need to be removed.
And we're past the danger zone of the first year.
Okay, enjoy it.
Go.
Everyone have a good day.
Spoiler alert, you're not going to get the entire video.
Well, from a neuroscience perspective, if he's losing his vision, his other senses will adapt.
Look at it.
Watch his ears.
Look at that.
He hears very well.
He's going to be a very smart puppy.
Smartest dog in the world.
So we are going to train him in anticipation of going blind.
So that means not treating him like a baby.
And as much as you want to carry him everywhere, I'm going to show you what we're going to do.
Get him used to walking on a leash where I make little noises as we walk.
And then tug on the leash so he follows the weight of the leash.
He's going to learn how to walk downstairs.
What?
It's the cutest dog on earth.
What?
Okay, can I take you to work?
Good boy.
Good girl.
Okay, here.
You see the ball?
You see the ball?
Okay, good.
Now, let's do this.
Export Selection