Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 20, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

01:47:46

Gender MOCKERY? Whitmer Kidnapper Sentence REDUCED? Trudeau HECKLED! & MORE! Taco Tuesday

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	People, watch this without my mug in the frame, and then we're going to talk.
	Can I just hate you, you bastards?
	You bastards, bastards!
	Can I just hate you, you bastards?
	Trudeau!
	Fascist!
	Fascist bastard!
	Fascist!
	We hate you, you son of a bitch!
	Get out of this country, you bastard!
	Canadians hate you, you bastard.
	You fascist bastard, Trudeau.
	Canadians hate your guts.
	You bastard.
	Trudeau.
	Fascist, fascist bastard.
	Fascist, fascist bastard.
	We hate you, you son of a bee sting.
	Get out of this country.
	How dare you?
	Good night.
	People, that is not a hero's welcome.
	Oh my goodness.
	First of all, good afternoon, everyone.
	How goes the battle?
	That video is making its rounds on the social medias.
	I can't wait to see how the CBC, Radio Canada, Global News, all the people.
	Complaining about how politicians are getting heckled in public and how it's terrible.
	For some reason, they should be the privileged class that escapes the scrutiny of the public they are supposed to represent.
	Haven't seen how the CBC is reporting on this, if at all.
	We'll see.
	Now, I'm sitting there watching this video.
	There's the part of me, the devil on the shoulder, who says...
	One of the prevailing comments on that video is, I'd like to buy that man a pint.
	Someone says we're not live on Rumble.
	854 people watching, we're live.
	It takes a few seconds to kick in on Rumble.
	The prevailing comment, or at least a recurring theme, a leitmotif, a chorus, if you will, is, Oi!
	I'd like to get that guy a pint.
	That's a terrible, terrible...
	That's just a terrible British accent.
	I was saying...
	The prevailing comment is, I'd like to get that guy a pint.
	Now, the devil on my shoulder says, yeah, I wouldn't do it.
	But there's a part of me that, you know, says, this is what a lot of people are thinking.
	Then the angel on my other side says, you know, if you do it like this, people are going to write you off.
	If you do it like the guy in Alberta who heckled Christian Freeland, people are going to write you off where you have an opportunity to express a political viewpoint in a respectful manner that will be palatable or digestible by the general public.
	But unfortunately, under certain circumstances, when you go to a comedy show and the comedian is just...
	Awful, unfunny, insulting humor, you know, making fun of the crowd.
	They get heckled.
	They get heckled, and sometimes they get heckled offstage.
	Because, A, it's part of the industry, and B, when you insult your crowd, sometimes your crowd is going to yell back, heckle back.
	If stand-up comics can get heckled offstage for being unfunny, insulting, unoriginal...
	Bad comedians, politicians, it comes with the job, can get heckled when they quite literally are destroying the nation that they represent.
	But reading the chat, yeah, that Brit man, first of all, oh, I closed it down.
	I mean, how is the government going to spin this?
	They're going to have to portray this as, look at what happens.
	This ideologically motivated, violent extremism, which they call it now, by the way.
	I-M-V-E.
	They've created committees in Canada to examine ideologically motivated violent extremism that manifests itself in extreme rhetoric criticizing politicians.
	They're going to have to find a way to expand that overseas.
	Trudeau can quite literally not go anywhere on earth, it would seem, without getting heckled by people who loathe him.
	Because of his policies.
	Nobody's making fun of Trudeau because of the way he looks, although maybe some people are.
	Nobody's making fun of Trudeau for any other reason than his policies have been discriminatory, abusive, and disastrous.
	He has...
	I don't even think it's hyperbolic to say he's destroyed the nation he was supposed to be representing.
	He's pit Canadians against Canadians.
	He has come out with some of the most divisive...
	Vitriolic, hateful rhetoric out there.
	He gets to go on Les Quatre Semaines de Julie and call Canadians who oppose vaccine mandates, racist, misogynist extremists who take up place.
	Should we tolerate these people?
	And he thinks somehow that he should be shielded from critique, from heckling, from people who loathe him for his policies.
	It's not exactly how it works.
	But he literally can't go anywhere without getting heckled by the people.
	And not just that, he can't seemingly go anywhere without getting berated by the politicians themselves.
	Do you all remember when he went to Europe and he got lambasted by members of the European Union?
	Let me bring this one up.
	Everyone should remember this one.
	He got lambasted.
	By the European Union, politicians there, who went, I mean, I put together a five-minute montage of it because it was just over the top.
	He gets heckled by the people wherever he goes.
	The only place he can find silence and solitude is either at liberal fundraising events or in the mountains.
	Then he goes to Europe for political reasons and he gets lambasted by members of European parliaments.
	People who were supporting a non-sanctioned movement coming under criticism.
	So clearly the values of democracy being despised by this individual.
	Let us not give someone like this any speaking time in this House of Democracy.
	Let's not give him any speaking time.
	Dear colleagues, dear citizens, Prime Minister Trudeau, I won't do the whole five minutes.
	that we have fought for for centuries.
	Many of us, including me, myself personally, are ready and willing to risk our own freedom and to lay down our own lives.
	Unfortunately, today among us, there are also those who want to trample those basic rights.
	Canada, once a symbol of the modern world, is under Europe.
	Quasi-liberal?
	Past few months, it has become a symbol of violating basic human rights and civic freedoms.
	We have witnessed...
	That'll be enough.
	I'll link it if anybody wants to watch it.
	They say it more politely than the heckler.
	But I've got to tell you something, though.
	The Albertan guy that heckled Chrystia Freeland and called her the B-word.
	Something about the British accent, you call someone a fascist Boston and it almost sounds like a compliment.
	The British accent can turn a heckle into a glorious, almost make it sound like a compliment.
	And that guy reminded me of, I keep forgetting his name, but the soccer hooligan Vinny from Eurotrip.
	When he's driving the bus down on the wrong side of the street in Paris and he's hurling insults.
	I mean, he can hurl the most outrageous insults he wants.
	You fascist bastard!
	Get out of the...
	And it still sounds kind of almost intellectual.
	The beauty and the mystery of the British accent.
	People, let me see what's going on in the chat.
	First of all, let's just see if this has been, not that it matters, demonetized.
	Because I've noticed that the YouTube algorithm does not take kindly to things that are critical of Justin Trudeau.
	Still good.
	Still good.
	Yeah.
	That link, I've shared the video in Locals of the Heckler, shared it on Twitter.
	We'll see what the...
	Response is going to be from Trudeau and his ilk.
	It's so disrespectful.
	Trudeau is a benevolent dictator.
	In his own mind, by the way, when he sees people reacting like this, it has to confirm his own benevolent dictatorship.
	It now confirms to him, oh, these people are so savage.
	They don't understand.
	I'm doing this for their own good.
	I protect them.
	I've got their back.
	I step up, shut them down, jab them up, lock their kids up.
	I'm doing it for their own good, but this rabble.
	They don't even understand that they lash out like animals.
	It just shows that we need more paternalistic government.
	And speaking of paternalistic government, people, one of the subject matters that we're going to discuss today, out of this world, details will come in, but there's already been an update, a Vancouver mother.
	There was an Amber Alert put out in Vancouver for the mother of a child who...
	As far as I understand the story, as of now, did not lose custody of her child, had lawful custody, I believe, had lawful rights, custodial rights of her child.
	Amber Alert put out, and I immediately read the story in, I believe it was in the CBC, I immediately read the story and said, oh, Amber Alert, my immediate reflex must be a bad divorce, one of the parents who...
	Didn't have custody or didn't have visitation rights.
	Didn't, you know, kidnap the kid or didn't give the kid back in time.
	But then I read, you know, next line.
	Oh, three-year-old kid abducted from hospital.
	That's curious.
	It's not like a newborn, someone stealing a newborn because they couldn't have kids or whatever.
	Three-year-old kid, kidnapped from a hospital, kidnapped by the mother.
	And I'm like, all right, immediately there has to be more to this story.
	I then was sent from the same person who sent me this link.
	When I said there's got to be more to the story, and they said, yeah, sure, there is.
	Here's the video of the mother's side of the story, which we're going to go through.
	And there's been an update.
	The mother's been arrested.
	Okay.
	That's number one.
	One of the stories we're going to cover today.
	The other one, Gretchen Whitmer, as per the thumbnail, looks like there's perks to collaborating with intelligence.
	One of the individuals who was allegedly involved in the kidnapping plot of Gretchen Whitmer...
	Who pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 75 months in prison.
	Well, seems that he's had his sentence reduced by half.
	We'll get there.
	We're probably going to get there first because it's not that long or interesting of a story.
	Story coming out of Canada again.
	A teacher at a school called Trafalgar High School in Oakville, Ontario has been making the rounds on the interwebs, making the rounds, pun intended, because a picture was revealed of this trans teacher.
	Wearing the most ginormous prosthetic boobies with the most erect nipples you can imagine to the point where it's so preposterous and so outlandish.
	I still think the story might be something of a double-fakey sort of Eric Andre-like stunt.
	We'll see.
	But thus far, no.
	Thus far now, it's a teacher expressing their gender expression and the school stands behind them with a biological male apparently transitioning Teacher, transitioning over the last year, we'll read the article, wearing the most outrageous, massive prosthetic boobs you can imagine.
	What else do we have?
	There's a few more stories in there.
	Let me see here.
	Hold on, hold on.
	Amber Alert, high school.
	Oh, and then we're going to talk about this sheriff who's a sheriff in Texas who wants to investigate DeSantis for flying 50 migrants to Martha's Vineyard.
	In this sheriff's own town, allegedly, apparently 51 migrants died in a tractor trailer under this sheriff's watch or close enough to it.
	No, this individual, this Texas sheriff wants to investigate Ron DeSantis for flying 50 migrants to Martha's Vineyard when apparently under the watch of this sheriff's office...
	51 migrants died in a tractor trailer in Texas.
	It'll be interesting to see who gets investigated for what over time.
	Yeah, that's it.
	Let's just start with...
	Well, first of all, actually, hold on.
	Let me just get over here and see.
	How are we doing on Rumble?
	We are live on Rumble.
	Give me one second.
	Okay, good.
	We're live.
	Standard disclaimers.
	No election fornification advice.
	No medical advice.
	No legal advice.
	We might discuss some medical issues in the context of this Canadian mother story when we get into the reason for which her kid has been taken away from her.
	And Alex Jones, by the way.
	Summary on Alex Jones.
	Let's just start by summarizing what happened thus far today.
	This is Tuesday.
	There's no...
	It's a four-day week in the Alex Jones trial.
	This morning, the plaintiff's attorneys finally finished with their redirect of their second witness, a representative of Free Speech Systems and Infowars, Ms. Paws.
	They spent two and a half days in chief on this rep.
	Of Infowars.
	Did they get anywhere in my humble view?
	No.
	They brought out the fact that she was a new hire brought in to represent the company, even though she didn't know anything about the company until she was brought in to represent it.
	Presumably to give the impression that Infowars deliberately put someone out there who could not answer questions on the company.
	They got her to admit that she wasn't given access to all the documents and whatever, even though it seems that plaintiffs have all the documents and information they could have ever needed to bring a case.
	And that Alex Jones...
	And Infowars marketed, made money, sold products off of their coverage of events.
	There was a short cross-examination of this representative, and then they finished redirect this morning.
	And then plaintiff's attorney brought out a witness who is not a party to the suit, not a plaintiff, not a representative employee or otherwise connected to the defendants.
	They brought out their expert witness.
	Now, I haven't been listening to the testimony since I went with our Locals exclusive at noon.
	But what I heard this morning, they brought out this expert witness who trained FBI, trained at Quantico, works in online terrorism, in that this expert, his expertise is in going online, finding how terrorist organizations recruit.
	Spread information, spread disinformation, as this expert said, as though to equate, and I'm sure some people might agree with it, but I think that would only be people who are viewing this very inaccurately, hyperbolically, as though to equate Alex Jones and Infowars to some form of online terrorist entity terrorist group.
	The expert at one point was talking about misinformation and how these entities use the internet to spread misinformation, to craft false narratives, and then actually started talking about the war in Ukraine and how people are using the internet to spread misinformation as relates to the Yahtzee issue in Ukraine.
	And this expert, I mean, at the beginning they said, you know, this trial is not political.
	This trial is not political.
	And yet, This expert is now in, you know, it wasn't hard evidence being a deuce because it's not related to the file, but, you know, in introduction is coming out as to how his expertise is online surveillance of terrorism, how they spread the information, how they recruit, and then talking about misinformation on the Yahtzee issue in Ukraine and says how people have been using this information to craft a false narrative about Ukraine.
	Because it's not true.
	It's been thoroughly debunked.
	It doesn't even survive scrutiny, this expert says, because the president of the Ukraine is of Jewish origin, he said.
	And so this expert just testified on a totally political issue, en passant, and made a statement which seems to be utterly contradicted by mainstream media itself.
	I'm going to pull up the search results because we're not going to really get into it.
	Just to pull up the search results, when you go to Google, there were reports of the Yahtzee problem in Ukraine that go back eight years.
	Here's one by BBC Newsnight.
	Neo-Nazi threat in new Ukraine.
	BBC Newsnight's Gabriel Gatehouse investigates the links between the new Ukrainian government and neo-Nazis.
	BBC eight years ago.
	There was another one.
	Inside a white supremacist militia in Ukraine from Time magazine, 1.8 million views one year ago.
	And it goes on.
	I mean, I'm going to skip it.
	It goes on.
	MSM had been covering this issue four years over the last years.
	But then this expert comes in in a case about defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress, puts out a sound clip, a soundbite about how this is a false narrative debunked at first glance.
	Because the President Zelensky is of Jewish origins.
	Okay.
	That's basically all we got to.
	And then the expert basically gets into the subject matter of his expertise as an expert witness, which is how they make money online.
	How people make money online.
	Through clicks, through generating traffic, etc.
	So nothing thoroughly interesting that we need to do in a full-day livestream.
	When Jones comes up...
	We'll talk about it, and we'll do a live stream on that for sure when Jones testifies.
	But thus far, you know, it's going to go on for nearly a month.
	It's not going to be something that we're going to sit there and watch day in and day out.
	If you want to watch it without commentary, but I'm going to be following it and giving updates as things go along.
	Okay, with that said, let me just go back here and get the article that I was about to bring up.
	Ty Garbin.
	This is, you'll recall, we had been covering the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot from the very beginning.
	And, you know, from the beginning, some of us thought, after the facts started coming out, that this could have looked potentially like a little bit maybe of entrapment, something of a setup.
	The timing was very convenient for this plot.
	Given the presidential election, the facts around it were very much interesting.
	The nature of the defendants was very much interesting.
	People who potentially never had the means or the wherewithal to carry out that which they were being accused of having plotted.
	Then it became known throughout the course of the prosecution, throughout the course of the trial, that there were more informants and FBI agents involved in foiling this plot.
	Then actual defendants to the plot, which led some people to question whether or not these victims were plotting the plot or whether or not it was the FBI and the informants that were actually plotting the plot to foil the plot.
	Then during trial, it came out that some of these informants, there were more informants and agents than defendants.
	Some of them were getting paid.
	And handsomely, like $60,000 a year, making more from being informants than from their normal job.
	Then it became known that some of the informants were giving gift cards to some of the defendants so they could get the weapons that they apparently never had the means to get in the first place.
	Then it became known that some of the FBI agents...
	We're getting arrested for their own legal troubles.
	Some of the informants were getting indicted for unlawful gun possession charges.
	Then it became known that some of the FBI agents were texting their informants to delete some of the messages between the two of them.
	Then it turned out that two of the four defendants in the first trial were acquitted after having successfully raised the defensive entrapment.
	The other two defendants were...
	There was a hung trial.
	And there was a...
	Why can't I get my...
	There was a retrial for the two defendants that were not convicted.
	And after some important jury selection, the two defendants were convicted after their retrial, in which evidence was adduced above and beyond everything else that we just talked about, which was known publicly, but not necessarily to the same jury.
	In the retrial...
	It became known that some of the FBI informants were women who were sharing hotel rooms with some of the defendants, smoking weed with them, recording them at all times, recording their delusional fantasies while under the influence of drugs that were provided to them by the FBI, convicted.
	Okay.
	Ty Garvin was one of the individuals who pleaded guilty and then agreed to testify in the first trial.
	And he was sentenced for his cooperation to 75 months In jail.
	Well, it seems that after the conviction of two of the four, his sentence was halved.
	If only he had gotten a full conviction of all four, he might have been let out of jail, you know, yesterday.
	But let's check this out.
	Man in plot to kidnap Michigan governor has sentence reduced.
	Ty Garvin.
	One of 13 men arrested October 2020.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	A federal judge on Friday reduced the sentence of a man who pleaded guilty to participating in a foiled plot to kidnap Michigan's governor after his testimony helped convict the ringleaders last month.
	It's amazing.
	It's actually stunning.
	It almost might confirm some theories that people have had where he's going to do 30 months.
	We'll see how much he actually does and whether or not...
	Whatever.
	Ty Garbin, 26, was sentenced to 30 months in prison, less than half of the 75 months he was given in August.
	Garbin's testimony helped the U.S. government win convictions last month of two men for leading the plan to abduct Governor Quitmer from her vacation home.
	A U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker in Grand Rapids cut the sentence in light of the substantial assistance.
	Didn't cut it.
	I thought he helped during the first trial.
	If I'm wrong about that, I'll correct myself.
	But I thought he had helped during the first trial.
	I guess it's not substantial assistance.
	It's substantial success.
	They got the conviction.
	FBI can save face.
	Whitmer can save face.
	And now this guy can get the favor he thought he was going to get the first time when he helped, but was sentenced to 75 months in prison.
	Garbin's attorney petitioned for the resentencing and prosecutors agreed.
	Garbin testified against Adam Fox and Barry Croft, who were found guilty of kidnapping conspiracy and other charges in an August retrial after a jury failed to reach a verdict in April.
	Two other men were released.
	Yeah, yeah, so we got into all that.
	I just wanted to see if he testified.
	Garbin, who was arrested in October 2020, was among 13 men charged with state and federal crimes.
	Seven defendants are facing charges in state court.
	I'm certain he testified as well in the first trial.
	And, you know, I guess he didn't...
	It wasn't successful.
	So you get the carrot after you've...
	I'm going to mangle that expression.
	Yeah, you get the favor only if you get the results.
	If only all four had been convicted, he would have been resentenced to time served.
	Let me see here.
	Just got off Nate.
	The Lawyer's Boozy Buckstream.
	You've been looking at that, Viva?
	I know what's going on, man.
	That's...
	That is...
	Okay, if anybody doesn't know about the Boozy versus Brody beef.
	Ooh.
	The Boozy Brody beef.
	Some shiat has hit the fan on Twitter and the social media.
	This guy named Chris...
	What's his first name?
	Chris Boozy.
	The creator of this thing called Bot Sentinel.
	Which rates people's Twitter feeds as, you know, innocuous to problematic with four variations in between.
	The dude makes it his business to deplatform people, exact social media wrath against people, financial social media repercussions.
	He goes after accounts, and it seems to be highly motivated and potentially conflicted of interest in that.
	It goes after accounts that criticize Amber Heard, and apparently this individual was hired, paid for, and did not disclose that this was the case by the Amber Heard team.
	So, you know, Brody and a bunch of others called him out and then also found out some interesting legal history about this individual, Boozy.
	Questionable bankruptcy claims, unpaid rent, and there has been a Twitter war.
	A social media beef a-brewin.
	Apparently Boozy got Brody suspended from Twitter for 72 hours for targeted harassment because apparently Brody referred to Boozy as a biatch in a tweet.
	And now Brody has...
	They've coined a term Boozy Bucks and people are giving super chats out the wazoo to Nate Brody.
	The internet is a fascinating, fascinating environment.
	From time to time.
	Bot Sentinel is also a bot troll farm.
	No doubt.
	I've been following it, but man, that's not my fight at this point in time.
	And Nate is more than capable, quite clearly more than capable, of taking care of himself.
	And also, if you make it your business to go after people and destroy their lives and livelihoods and get them penalized on social media, you ideally should have a clean history yourself.
	And you should also bear in mind that you're not the smartest person in the room.
	There are smarter people out there who, if you have dirt and relevant dirt in your history, someone's going to find it.
	And lo and behold, it might actually serve to discredit everything that you have been building yourself.
	Rackets is getting in.
	I don't jump into internet drama just for the sake of it.
	If it happens, it happens.
	And it's been happening to me.
	Okay, by the way, people, let's move it on over to Rumble.
	30 seconds.
	The link is in the chat.
	I'll put it right here.
	Let's go take this party where we can talk about massive prosthetic boobies without having to worry about YouTube censorship.
	Because like Tim Pool astutely pointed out, the very image of the massive prosthetic boobies with...
	And I'm saying erect nipples because that's what they are, and that's technically and scientifically how you refer to it.
	YouTube flags it as adult content.
	For good reason.
	I made a joke that, you know, you have something like that in a movie, PG-13, right away.
	Just me, Nicole, have you seen the video of Trudeau singing Bohemian Rhapsody the night before the Queen's funeral?
	Was it the night before or was it the night after?
	Or was it the night of...
	We're going to watch...
	People?
	Mosey on over to Rumble.
	We're going to watch that video as a welcome to everybody who comes on over.
	So let's just take that.
	Boozy Bucks.
	I mean, it's just...
	The internet is...
	It's glorious at times.
	The harder Boozy goes after Brody, first of all, the more Brody actually presents material which is damn relevant and damn incriminating.
	And I mean that in the actual literal sense.
	And also the more it builds up Nate Brody's social media profile.
	And from a cynical perspective, yeah, dude, he's getting boozy bucks.
	They've made a term now.
	And it's not going to end well for Boozy because he's going to do more for exposing himself than for exposing anybody else.
	All right, people, that is it.
	We are winding it down on the YouTubes in three, two, one.
	Remove.
	I think we're alone now.
	There doesn't seem...
	Okay, I'm not going to show...
	It's not Viva fans, or what is it?
	Only fans on YouTube.
	But hold on one second.
	I want to do one thing.
	We are going to go get that video.
	We're going to go get that video of Justin Trudeau singing Justin Trudeau bohemian Oh, yeah.
	Justin Trudeau boxing apparently comes up before Justin Trudeau Bohemian Rhapsody.
	Bullcrap.
	Here we...
	Oh, sorry.
	You don't see what I'm looking at.
	I just puked in my mouth.
	First of all, I don't like singing.
	I cannot sing.
	It makes me uncomfortable to sing, and it makes me uncomfortable to look at people singing.
	This is going to make everyone, everyone here, very uncomfortable.
	Hold on.
	So, okay, let's see.
	Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau can be seen singing Bohemian Rhapsody in tribute.
	It's even worse then.
	Day before, day after.
	He's doing this as a tribute, making himself the star of the room.
	Narcissism.
	Pathological narcissism.
	A legend in his own mind.
	He's there to commemorate a solemn occasion of the passing of the Queen of England.
	And he thinks he has to be the centerpiece of attention.
	People?
	Get your gag reflexes ready, because weed's going to puke right now.
	Hi, Guys!
	There are signs that you have read for your presentation.
	One more time.
	Oh, yeah.
	That is...
	Stop screaming.
	That is horrendous.
	Horrendous.
	Inappropriate.
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	The word I'm looking for is it's inappropriate, but it's also...
	Cringe is the word.
	Awkward.
	Embarrassing.
	Everything.
	When he's not destroying Canada, he's destroying Queen.
	Oh, I'm such an idiot.
	They're singing Queen to commemorate the Queen.
	Oh my gosh.
	I don't think I can keep up with the chat and rumble on that.
	Stop paying taxes.
	Yeah, Achy Dragon.
	Stop paying taxes.
	See how that works out.
	Stop paying taxes.
	No, maybe it's meant as a joke, but...
	Disgusting.
	Disgusting.
	Okay.
	We're alone now.
	We can talk boobies.
	We're going to go...
	We'll start with the boobies.
	Let me just see here.
	I want to show the picture first.
	We've got to get the picture for context.
	I think it's going to have to be in the article.
	This is my Twitter feed, so let's just go to the picture.
	It started making the rounds yesterday.
	That was earlier than that.
	This is where it's coming.
	Guys, this is not to make fun of a person.
	This person is making fun of us.
	That's what people don't seem to really appreciate here.
	This person is rubbing...
	Other people's tolerance in their face.
	This person is mocking other people's good faith tolerance.
	I thought the joke was a gag.
	Hold on, I've lost my window here.
	I thought the story was a gag.
	I thought this was Eric Andre or an Eric Andre type character, Sacha Baron Cohen, whatever, doing a bit, doing a shtick.
	Just to see if people are actually going to...
	If the world has gone so crazy that this individual, who seems to be a transitioning teacher, wore this to school...
	It was a test.
	It was a social experiment.
	It was a prank, bro.
	From the Daily Mail, Canadian high school defends transgender teacher who wore enormous prosthetic breasts underneath tight t-shirt to class.
	Controversial thing.
	Trans individuals?
	No issue whatsoever.
	Full stop.
	None.
	I don't care about people's sexuality in the best possible way.
	It's their choice.
	Consenting adults?
	Do as they want with each other, with their own bodies.
	Period.
	I don't care.
	It's not my thing.
	That's fine.
	There's plenty of things that I do that are not other people's things.
	I don't care.
	I don't care about someone's trans identity any more than I care about them fishing unless it's, you know, oh, I fish too.
	Let's go fishing.
	For discussion, for understanding a person, it's very relevant to understanding a person.
	Beyond that, it's the person's life.
	It's the person's choice, whatever they decide to do with their body.
	And what they decide to do among consenting adults is up to them only.
	This person is dressing like this while teaching.
	And I think it's a high school.
	This is not gender expression in my humble view.
	This is gender mockery.
	Once upon a time, dressing in fat suits was called fat shaming.
	You know, like fat bastard from Austin Powers.
	People took moral issue with that.
	Shallow how?
	When Gwyneth Paltrow dressed up in a fat suit, people took issue with that.
	Dressing up in a fat suit for Halloween, people take issue with that because that they see as fat-shaming mockery.
	For some reason, wearing prosthetic breasts that are...
	These are bigger than basketballs.
	I think these are bigger than basketballs.
	With nipples that are so erect, if this person bumps up against a brick wall, the nipples are going to pop through the shirt.
	Wearing...
	Ridiculously gigantic oversized breasts with ridiculously oversized erect nipples.
	Somehow this is not mockery.
	Somehow this is an expression of gender identity.
	And by the way, I think it's gender mockery and not gender expression.
	But let's just even assume it's gender expression.
	There's a reason why you can't protest at work.
	There's a reason why you want to have artistic expression.
	You want to have freedom of speech.
	You don't get to exercise that.
	Totally and freely at work.
	Whatever gender expression you want to express on your own spare time.
	First of all, not necessarily even in the presence of children.
	You want to engage in certain activity.
	That's all up to you and that's all on you.
	Engaging in it in front of children.
	If this were a movie, this would be PG-13.
	This image.
	It's in fact so adult that YouTube takes issue with it and flags it, according to Tim Pool, and I have no doubt that he's telling the truth, as adult content.
	Let's read.
	Kayla Lumia, a teacher in Ontario, Canada, began her transition a year ago.
	The school has defended her and said they want the site to be safe for all.
	How about what some might say safe for the children?
	And I don't mean safe as I'm not accusing this individual of overt acts of violence or other.
	Psychological.
	Spiritual.
	How about a kid who says, I don't want to see massive prosthetic boobs when I go to school.
	I don't want to see it.
	Hey, let's flip the script a little bit.
	Let's say that this is a transitioning female to male, and that person shows up to school in skin-tight jeans with a massive dildo in their skin-tight jeans, so tight you could see the veins on the massive prosthetic dildo.
	You could see the head.
	You could see the mushroom.
	You could see all of it.
	I'm just curious.
	What would people say if they say a 14-year-old girl has to see that?
	Is a prosthetic dildo, a prosthetic penis, somehow not a legitimate form of gender expression, if we're going by this, as this massive set of prosthetic boobs with firm erect nipples?
	How about it being safe for all, including the children, to not feel uncomfortable by seeing...
	Hyper-sexualized, massive prosthetic breasts.
	Have we asked that question?
	A Canadian high school teacher has sparked controversy after pictures emerged of her wearing large-dress prosthetics while teaching students.
	It has to be a gag.
	The punchline of this story is it has to be a gag.
	It has to be a gag where Lemieux is going to say, I cannot believe the school took the bait.
	That's what the punchline has to be.
	A manufacturing teacher...
	A manufacturing technology teacher.
	I would be very careful working a buzzsaw with those massive, ridiculous, gigantic prosthetic breasts.
	I mean, it's like if someone had 12-inch fingernails, I wouldn't expect them to be teaching piano.
	At Oakville Trafalgar High School in Ontario, it has been pictured online taking classes while wearing the huge prosthetics.
	Which stretch her clothing and stick out prominently.
	In response, the high school has doubled down and defended their employee, writing to parents and explaining why they support Lemieux's gender expression.
	In a statement to parents, the school has said, as a school within the Halton District School Board, Oakville Trafalgar High School recognizes the rights of students.
	Oh, do you?
	I would pull my students immediately.
	I would pull my kids if they were there.
	Immediately.
	Staff, parents, guardians, and community members to equitable treatment without discrimination based upon gender identity and gender expression.
	This is not gender expression.
	This is gender mockery.
	Period.
	Gender expression.
	Oh my, it has to be a double-triple gag.
	The school has to be in on it.
	We strive to promote a positive learning environment in schools consistent with the values of the HDSB and to ensure a safe and inclusive environment for all students, staff, and community regardless of race, age.
	So you don't want to protect the children who might be young and maybe shouldn't be exposed to massive prosthetic breasts.
	Sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, social...
	Circumstances or body type size.
	How about people who might feel that this is making fun of them?
	I haven't seen this.
	Is there audio to this?
	I can't believe what I'm looking at.
	And somehow, if you find this morally shocking, you're the bigot.
	Okay.
	Thank you.
	You think this is not a distraction to students who are there to study?
	I'm fairly certain.
	I couldn't verify for certain, but I thought that this school also has a dress code.
	What are we looking at?
	We're looking at the responses.
	I thought that this high school actually had a uniform.
	I might be wrong on that.
	It's a world where tolerance is rubbed in your face.
	And gender expression.
	This is gender expression during work hours in that form.
	I don't know who genuinely believes that this is a genuine form of gender expression.
	Let me see what the chat is saying in the rumbles.
	I just pray the school is trolling to show the shit they've been asked to teach.
	See, that's Joker 76. That's the 4D level.
	The school says, yeah, we support this.
	And then people say, this is ridiculous.
	We'll say, well, you know what?
	In reality, it was a troll, but this is what we're being asked.
	To tolerate.
	Imagine, by the way, from the employee's perspective, we've been demonetized.
	It doesn't matter.
	Imagine from the employee's perspective, from the teacher's perspective, I don't know, they'll file a grievance if they say, sorry, you cannot wear basketball-sized prosthetic breasts with massive erect nipples to class.
	You just can't do it.
	Complaint.
	Labor code violation.
	Imagine if that's what the school is actually facing behind closed doors.
	No.
	It's gender expression.
	And if you don't want your kids looking at that, you're a bigot.
	Well, we'll see.
	There seems to be some pushback.
	But, you know, the most relevant affected people are the students at that school and the parents of those students.
	See what happens.
	But thus far, people, despite my initial reactions, it's not a troll.
	The individual is not claiming it's a troll.
	The individual is claiming it's legit, sincere, Bonafide gender expression.
	And the school, thus far, not saying it's a troll or a double-fakey 4D-level chess game, they back them.
	And it's social media that is saying, what the hell is going on?
	And this seems like it's an egregious mockery of the tolerance of a tolerant and loving society.
	Yeah.
	Okay, I'm reading some of the chats, which I'm not going to bring up here.
	Yeah, so that's that.
	That's Canada making the news again, and for the wrong reasons.
	Canada again.
	Next story.
	And there's some law to this.
	People who have been following this channel for long enough know, you should know, or you have seen at least recently.
	Once upon a time, I said I had a couple of red lines in the sand.
	If things occurred in Canada, which would cause me to question my future in Canada and the province of Quebec.
	Vaccine passport, I think, was one.
	The other one for certain, forget what the first one was.
	The other one for certain was this bill called Bill 15. It wasn't called Bill 15 at the time, but it was the debate as to whether or not Quebec as a province, which typically is not the canary in the coal mine, but is typically the catalyst.
	For policy that spreads to other provinces, Quebec and Ontario and then British Columbia tend to influence the rest of Canada with policy.
	In Quebec, there was a discussion as to whether or not the government amends the Youth Protection Act to remove parental supremacy as the overarching principle, the overarching guiding fact.
	Factor, not fact, sorry.
	The overarching guiding factor, guiding principle of the Youth Protection Act.
	And now, the idea is that the Youth Protection Act, which governs the government getting involved in the case of abuse or issues relating to children, parental supremacy was, until an amendment that passed in the dead of night during a pandemic, parental supremacy was the guiding Principle.
	It was the overarching factor.
	Everything that is done, the parent has the final say to some extent as to what's in the child's best interest.
	Now, obviously, and it doesn't need to be said, but apparently it needs to be said, this doesn't include a parent saying, parental supremacy, I want to abuse my child, and therefore I determine it's in the best interest of my child and the government gets to say nothing.
	That's never what the concept was about.
	The concept was about protecting a parent's right to make parental decisions for their child.
	It was not to protect a parent from abuse where they say, yeah, I'm the parent, it's parental supremacy, piss off government.
	No.
	But what ended up happening is there was this tragic case of a young child that was abused and ultimately died of injuries after being put back into a home, which, oddly enough, in this context, the...
	The adult that inflicted the fatal abuse was not a biological parent, but this child was put back into what was known to be an abusive household, was duct taped to a bed overnight and apparently died as a result.
	Not apparently, sorry.
	The child died.
	And then the government says, how did this happen?
	Well, we put a child back into what we knew was an abusive environment with a parent who was not a biological parent.
	We need to make sure this never happens again.
	Well, we're going to go ahead and amend the Youth Protection Act to eliminate parental supremacy, and now who's going to decide what's in the child's best interest?
	The government, the administrative state, the tribunals, whichever officer is put on a case of alleged child abuse.
	They said they amended the code to remove parental supremacy in Quebec, Bill 15, just recently.
	I don't know if it was a year ago.
	Now I've lost track of time, but it was within the last year.
	And I said, that's the floodgates.
	We are now in a situation where parents no longer decide what's in the best interest of their child.
	How is this going to be problematic?
	Gender transition therapy, for example.
	Right now, we've only had cases where there's been a disagreement among parents as to gender...
	Affirming therapy, whatever it's called.
	Up until now, we've only had court cases involving parents fighting each other.
	Out of British Columbia, there was the case of one parent vehemently opposed to transition therapy for their 12-year-old daughter at the time.
	Mother wanted it.
	Family dynamic, who knows why, whatever.
	Father vehemently opposed it.
	They went to court, and the court determined it's in the child's best interest that the mother get her way.
	And it led to serious problems.
	There have been many cases where it was parents disagreeing over the COVID shot.
	Many cases where the court ultimately came to the conclusion one parent's preference for the child trumps the other parent's preference.
	And the court decides this.
	To the best of my knowledge, there has not been a case yet, but boy howdy is it coming, where both parents...
	We're opposed to something that the child wanted.
	And then the court has to come in and say, who gets their way here?
	12-year-old kid says, I want transition therapy.
	Both parents say no.
	Kid calls Child Protective Services.
	Says, I'm going to harm myself if I don't get this therapy.
	My parents won't let me.
	Government gets its claws in there.
	It hasn't happened yet that I know of, but it's going to happen.
	And if it happens in Quebec, I'll tell you what's going to happen.
	The court is now going to supplant itself for the wishes of the parents.
	Pat Freedom says, not true.
	There is a case where the dad has been sent to prison for intervening in his child transition wishes.
	Pat, I don't know who you're talking to if it's to me, but that's the case I'm talking about.
	The mother supported it.
	The father did not.
	They went to court and the judge agreed with the mother.
	That's not a case where both parents are fighting against the wishes of the child.
	But those cases are coming.
	I mean, it's just a matter of time.
	For gender transition, vaccines, any other issues that a kid says, I want, I want, I want, and the parents who ought to have full parental supremacy say, no, you're a 12-year-old kid.
	Where are your parents when you get to be 18?
	Do whatever you want.
	Until then, where are your parents?
	No, no, no, no, no.
	In Quebec, they passed the Bill 15. In Quebec now, the government is your parents.
	And what's happening in British Columbia now?
	The article has been updated, so I can't get the original, but just check this out, people.
	Here.
	So this is what the article originally said.
	Let me see something here.
	Just want to make sure we're looking at the same thing.
	Yeah, we got it.
	Okay.
	Amber Alert issued for three-year-old boy last seen in Vancouver.
	I read that headline coming out of CBC News.
	Okay.
	My immediate reflex, it's a custody battle gone ugly.
	A parent who didn't have custody or didn't want to give the kid back at the end of the visitation took off.
	The majority of Amber Alerts, as far as I understand, are actually one parent abducting the child, not like total strangers off the street.
	So I read that.
	It's like, okay.
	It's probably just an ugly divorce.
	One parent doesn't want to give the kid back or whatever.
	Then I read the second line.
	Boy was last seen at BC Children's Hospital at 4500 Oak Street in Vancouver.
	Then I'm thinking, oh, this is weird.
	Someone kidnapping a kid from a hospital.
	Maybe it's not a parent.
	Then I go to read the article.
	Check this out because this is no longer...
	I can't find this version anymore.
	Investigators believe he was taken by his mother, Jenina, described as an Asian woman with long black hair worn in dreadlocks.
	It's very interesting.
	At the time of the abduction, I guess the mother had not yet been found.
	She's been arrested now, by the way.
	They're certainly going into a lot of descriptions that the media doesn't necessarily go into all the time when there's an accused, a suspect on the loose, but whatever.
	Describing her as an Asian woman with dreadlocks.
	It might just be so that the public can identify her.
	It might also be to try to paint this individual as exactly what the media is going to want to paint her as, depict her as.
	Listen to this, though.
	The mother, as far as we know, she was not deprived or denied custody rights of her own child.
	She was wearing a black jacket and a black toque, glasses, gray sweatpants, and a striped messenger bag.
	She has a tattoo sleeve on her right arm.
	Police are warning the public not to approach the suspect, but to call 911 instead.
	Hmm.
	Wow.
	Sounds like she's very, very dangerous by the looks of it.
	So I read this now.
	CBC, strike one.
	A child taken from a hospital by his mother.
	Strike two, there might be something more going on here.
	And then the warning.
	Don't approach her.
	She's dangerous.
	Armed and dangerous with those dreadlocks.
	I tell the person who sent me this, there's got to be more to the story.
	And lo and behold, there is.
	And this is it.
	Now I'm going to pull up her video, her side of the story.
	Okay, and cover my ass full caveat here.
	In as much as I know this is her, in as much as I know the story fits together, it's impossible to...
	Get this out of here.
	It's impossible to make sure everything is a thousand percent accurate.
	We live in bizarre times.
	And as much as it's possible, this looks like the woman talking about the incident.
	Definitely fits the description.
	She looks totally armed and dangerous.
	Stay away from her.
	If you see it, avoid her at all costs.
	Call the authorities immediately.
	A mother has taken her own child.
	This is her side of the story, and we'll go through it.
	Hello, my name is Willow Skye, and I am currently in a battle with the ministry over the well-being of my child, and I would like a moment to explain to you what's going on.
	Now, people are going to look at this and say, she looks a little hippie, maybe doesn't trust medicine, maybe she should have her kid taken away from her, maybe they should trigger an Amber Alert, because she didn't want to...
	She'll tell her story.
	Why would she have taken her kid from a hospital?
	And why would the government now be issuing an Amber Alert for a mother taking possession of her own kid?
	Then it makes sense.
	And it has to do with her not consenting or not necessarily wanting to put her son through certain medical treatments.
	Here's the story.
	On Sunday night, the 11th, I received a phone call from my mother.
	Stating that she called an ambulance for my son, Pi, who broke into a high fever, which led him to have a seizure known as a febrile seizure.
	Now, question I have here.
	Okay, her mother is watching her kid.
	Why?
	Maybe she did lose custody of her kid, but by the sounds of the story afterwards, it doesn't sound like that.
	Maybe she was out, I don't know, doing something and her mother was babysitting.
	I don't know.
	There's a question right there.
	I was driving down from a camping trip and therefore was unable to be present for the incident.
	I returned home Monday at 2 p.m. and was contacted by Dr. Shane at the Surrey Memorial Emergency Pediatric Center telling me that my son's blood work...
	By the way, everybody, she says she was camping and I'm not calling anybody a liar.
	I'm just, you know, as a lawyer, she might say she was camping.
	There might be something more to that side of the story in terms of custody or custodial rights.
	Don't know.
	From her own story right now, set aside the camping.
	That's why I wasn't there.
	Her mother was watching her kid for whatever the reason.
	Okay.
	They contain bacterial infection and he will need a dose of IV antibiotics.
	We arrived, me, Pi, and his father at around 7.30 p.m. to administer the intravenous antibiotic and left at around 11 p.m.
	Thus far, though, it sounds like both parents have full custody over their child and there's nothing like that going on.
	Kid gets sick, gets a massive fever, has a seizure, which is not good at all.
	IV antibiotics, according to the story.
	During our visit, the doctor let us know that the bacteria known as Streptococcus pneumoniae was possibly found in my son's blood.
	However, the bacteria culture grew after 12 hours of my son's blood sample taken.
	The doctor informed me that there could be unknown contaminants such as bacteria on the skin.
	That went in contact with the blood sample.
	We went home with some oral antibiotics as well, known as amoxicillin.
	And I followed the doctor's orders.
	That's probably amoxicillin, I think.
	But it is IV antibiotics because it was a serious infection.
	And then oral antibiotics.
	Okay.
	And by the way, we'll get into the antibiotics.
	There's an argument or there are people who say that antibiotics are being way overprescribed.
	But when a kid has a seizure because of a high fever and a blood infection, probably the time to...
	To take that risk in as much as it is a risk.
	The next day, Tuesday, they called us in for another appointment at 2.30 p.m., this time at the Child's Health Center for a checkup.
	We arrived and waited for a while.
	So they willingly go back to the hospital to the clinic.
	They willingly take their kid back for medical follow-up.
	Dr. Hirsch came in and told us that Pi has possible bacterial infection in his blood.
	But they need to know if it's attacking my son's brain, causing meningitis.
	At this point, my son looks and feels completely healthy.
	No fever, no coughs, no runny nose, energy levels high, and he's been eating just fine.
	Now, irony is that she says, you know, kids healthy, kids no coughs.
	You're going to hear the kid coughing in the background.
	The internet is astute.
	They pick up on everything.
	You'll hear it.
	Dr. Hirsch then proceeds to give us the options.
	Let them perform a lumbar puncture spinal tap to remove fluids from his spine to see the health of his brain cells and then administer 10 days of IV drip into his system.
	Or B, get him on a 14-day IV drip of antibiotics.
	He says to me, all this to be done starting tonight.
	I'm in shock at the severity of the solutions presented.
	Now the story is starting.
	You can reconcile this version of events with the story run by CBC.
	I look at my healthy, happy son and their incohesive blood work test and I reply, "No, we will not do that." Dr. Hirsch then looks at me and says, "If you refuse this treatment, I will have to report you to the child ministry and they will file your response as neglect to your child's health." My heart drops.
	You can skip a little.
	I don't want to keep going through this here.
	And make an informed decision.
	Start the procedures.
	I talked to the head physician of the pediatrics and he would walk me through all procedures to ensure I feel comfortable with everything.
	But now the head of the ministry is on the speaker telling me I need to stay and start the procedures.
	I politely say no because I told them I wanted to wait until I get back the blood test from today and make an informed decision.
	She says to me, "We will be sending enforcements to take your child to give him the medication he needs.
	Call your lawyer." I hold in all the tears, all the anger, just so I could make it out with my sanity.
	Is this really happening?
	Visions of my crying son being ripped out of my arms fill me.
	It only takes them two hours after to send more social workers with police officers knocking at my door, searching to remove my son from me and infringe on our medical freedom.
	And just hours earlier, I had taken my healthy and happy son to the park where we enjoyed a box of pizza.
	You hear him coughing in the background.
	With no choice.
	And now I'm here living in fear about the future of my son.
	I will face these people again on Saturday morning.
	So, bottom line, that's her version of events.
	They tell her to kid sick.
	They don't know what type of infection it is.
	They want to do a spinal tap.
	And a spinal tap is not a nothing procedure.
	I mean, it's just so we know.
	It's not just a rock bend or a mock rock bend.
	Where is here?
	Lumbar.
	Lumbar puncture spinal tap.
	A lumbar puncture spinal tap is a test used to diagnose certain health conditions.
	It's performed in your lower back.
	In the lumbar region, a needle is inserted into the space between two lumbar bones to remove a sample of cerebrospinal fluid.
	This is the fluid that surrounds your brain and spinal cord to protect you from injury.
	Okay, it's done for testing for infections.
	Everybody knows that.
	Risks.
	Although lumbar puncture is generally recognized as safe, generally recognized as safe, it does carry some risks.
	Post-lumbar headache.
	25% undergo experience headache due to fluid leaking into nearby tissues.
	The headache typically starts several hours up to two days after the procedure and may be accompanied by nausea, vomiting, and dizziness.
	Headaches are usually present when sitting or standing.
	Back discomfort of pain.
	Bleeding.
	Bleeding may occur near the puncture site or, rarely, in the epidural space.
	Brain herniation.
	Increased pressure within the skull due to a brain tumor or other space-occupying lesion can lead to compression of the brainstem after a sample of cerebral spinal fluid is removed.
	To prevent this rare complication, a computerized tomography scan or magnetic resonance It's often performed before a lumbar puncture to look for any sign of space-occupying lesion resulting in increased intracranial pressure.
	It's not a nothing procedure.
	And then this just goes back to the basic questions.
	I think we can appreciate what is going on.
	Amber Alert issued because she took her kid from the hospital because she ultimately decided, I don't want my kid going on 14 days of antibiotics when I think the kid's fine and maybe a little bit of a cough.
	Certainly don't want...
	A spinal tap?
	And the state has said, if you say no to the doctor's recommendations, we know what's best now.
	And we're going to say that you're kidnapping your own child.
	Issue an Amber Alert.
	She was arrested.
	Hold on.
	She was arrested.
	Where's the article?
	Police cancel Amber Alert from the CBC.
	Three-year-old's mother has been arrested.
	Vancouver police say a three-year-old boy who was the subject of an Amber Alert late Monday was found near Calgary on Tuesday morning.
	Police believe the child was taken from BC Children's Hospital in Vancouver.
	A statement says that the three-year-old is now receiving care and his mother has been arrested after they were both found near Calgary.
	The Amber Alert was cancelled shortly after 6. In a statement late Monday, police say the boy was receiving treatment for a medical condition.
	The mother seems to have explained what that medical condition was and what the treatment was.
	I'm not taking sides on this, and not because I'm fence-sitting.
	I'm not taking sides because we can all agree on the black and the white of these examples.
	A case that has made it to court many times, the reflexive example, Jehovah's Witnesses who don't believe in blood transfusions and a number of other medical procedures, when there's a minor that requires a blood transfusion, The courts have systematically come in and say, yes, the minor, we're going to override the parents' religious decisions or the religious preferences when it's life-saving for the child.
	When it comes to, I don't know if we take certain examples of certain modern times, if the government were to come in and say, despite parental objection, we're going to come in and give a little jabby-jabby to a child, I think most people would agree that that's...
	Absolutely impermissible.
	And now we're sort of in a zone, in a gray zone, not knowing more details than this.
	If the kid is suspected potentially of having, oh geez, non-encephalitis.
	I forget what it was.
	A very serious brain swelling, brain infection.
	And the mother, who is not a doctor, says, I don't want to do the spinal tap and I don't want to do 14 days of antibiotics because antibiotics can upset your gut, yada, yada.
	Okay, now we're in one of those zones where More facts and whatever.
	But we're quickly, very quickly, in real time, getting to a concrete example where a mother says, no, I don't really want to do that medical, not urgent, not life-saving, kids not in a seizure, kid apparently, if we believe the mother, doesn't even have fever anymore, but it could come back and it could come back with a vengeance.
	We're in a situation now where a doctor is making recommendations for a serious invasive procedure, which is the spinal tap, or arguably a serious...
	Which is 14 days of IV antibiotic drip.
	Which a parent might say, look, I don't think it's necessary.
	We'll come back in a day or two if the situation gets worse.
	But a doctor says, no, no, no, no.
	When I recommended it, it wasn't a recommendation.
	It was an order.
	And if you don't do it, government's coming in, literally taking your kid away from you, literally subjecting them to the medical procedure that you objected to, and literally arresting you.
	And now I want to know what people think of that.
	I'm not on the fence in terms of sitting on the fence.
	In this case, I agree on the black, I agree on the white, and then, you know, for everything in between, you'd have to find out.
	A parent's decision to not get glasses for their kid who has eye issues because they, for whatever the reason, you know, I won't make up a, might be a bad example, but, you know, parents...
	Exercising their parental rights capriciously to damage their children.
	Let's say the kid needs glasses.
	Parents say, I don't like glasses.
	I don't want them.
	Not getting my kid glasses.
	Not life-threatening.
	Not life-altering.
	Not an emergency.
	But I could understand a court saying, no, I'm sorry.
	Kid's getting glasses despite parental objection.
	But this one's interesting.
	And I have seen firsthand in life and anecdotally.
	Doctors prescribe antibiotics reflexively.
	It's sort of...
	Actually, let me see if I can find something to substantiate my claim.
	I think it's a well-known thing that antibiotics are overprescribed.
	Antibiotics overprescribed.
	I don't think I'm making...
	No, I'm not.
	Okay, CDC.
	Here we go.
	Now, I'm not saying it's one of those cases, people.
	I'm just saying, I thought I recalled, having seen this, the CDC says, this is May 3, 2016, and I doubt things have changed much, one in three antibiotic prescriptions unnecessary.
	New CDC data show large percentage of antibiotics misused in outpatient settings.
	Now, I don't know if this is outpatient, inpatient.
	I think at this point it's outpatient because the kid's out of the hospital.
	Anyhow, so that's it.
	It's a known problem.
	In fact, antibiotics are so overprescribed that people are growing resistant to them.
	They're not doing their job properly when they're actually needed for things like staph infections and whatnot.
	So there's a legitimate question to be asked here.
	Is this reflexive 14 days of antibiotics?
	That's hefty.
	Not as hefty as a spinal tap on a three-year-old.
	But, anyhow, that's the situation.
	S.C. Britton.
	Says there was a JW case where the child didn't want the transfusions and the courts backed her.
	She ended up dying, but this mother gets into legal trouble.
	Jeez.
	SC Brighton, I think that was a 14-year-old kid, right?
	I'm fairly certain I remember that one.
	That was a 14-year-old Jehovah's Witness who refused it and subsequently passed away.
	So I don't know if they said in that case, I don't recall if they said the kid is old enough to appreciate what they're doing.
	Let's just say a seven-year-old.
	I mean, fairly certain, Britain, that it was a...
	I'm fairly certain it was a 14-year-old kid, so I don't know if the age maturity deemed...
	What's the word that we're looking for?
	Oh, emancipation of the child.
	I don't know if the maturity of the child played a role in that decision, and I suspect it did.
	I suspect the decision would be much different for a seven-year-old who can't possibly fathom, contemplate the consequences of the decision.
	Rob A. says, the state does not own your child.
	You have parental supremacy.
	Court order only can override that.
	Oh, here they had their due process here.
	A doctor calling Child Protective Services because the mother didn't want to give her kid antibiotics.
	It might be a stupid thing.
	And maybe the kid's going to end up in the hospital two days later.
	Then it is not emergency application.
	It's preemptive.
	And then does the government get to override parental consent for preemptive measures?
	Viva is like riding a bike on a road with random ditches.
	I take that in the best possible way.
	But I'll flip it into a positive.
	It's like riding a bike with Viva.
	Who said that?
	Run 4747.
	Viva's like riding a bike on a road with random ditches.
	I say it's like riding a bike on a road with random mountains.
	Random hills of beautiful flowers.
	So that's Canada.
	It's two decisions now coming out of Canada.
	Let's get back to the States, people.
	Let's get back to the States here.
	I think this is the story.
	Yeah, here we go.
	Let's watch this.
	Now, everybody knows...
	With an investigation.
	Quiet.
	I'm not an American attorney.
	I have no expertise in American law.
	I think I've learned a lot over the years, but no expertise.
	So do not come here for legal advice.
	Even if it were Quebec legal advice, I still wouldn't give it.
	I just, I sometimes think I know the questions that ought to be asked under certain circumstances.
	Let's listen to this.
	Let's listen to this.
	We are opening up a case with an investigation with regard to the suspected activities involving the 48 migrants from Venezuela that, as we understand it at this point, the facts of the case at this point, are that on Wednesdays...
	If I'm reading into body language, which I am...
	I notice a lot of rocking from side to side, a lot of uncomfortable body movement, which leads me to believe that this individual, in his heart of hearts, is doing something that he knows is an absolute disingenuous political stunt.
	That's my take.
	Take it for what it's worth.
	I also have no formal training in body language or behavior studies, although I think 13 years as a practicing attorney and half a brain will teach you a few things.
	September 14th, here in Bexar County in the city of San Antonio.
	They're touching his face again.
	Here in Bexar County in the city of San Antonio.
	Very uncomfortable.
	Our understanding is that a...
	And by the way, it's not just body language, it's also language language.
	Uncomfortable body language with a lot of qualifiers in speech.
	Now, I use those qualifiers.
	Our understanding, my understanding, maybe I'm wrong.
	I use those qualifiers oftentimes, or I often use them on purpose because I want to highlight the fact that I'm not entirely certain.
	And if I've made a mistake, I don't want anyone thinking I've made a categorical assertion of fact.
	This individual seems uncomfortable because, well, my understanding, and now we want to open an investigation.
	The Venezuelan migrant was paid what we would call a bird dog fee.
	To recruit approximately 50 migrants from the area around a migrant resource center on San Pedro here in San Antonio.
	As we understand it, 48 migrants were lured.
	I will use the word lured.
	Oh, I know you will.
	Under false pretenses into staying at a hotel for a couple of days.
	They were taken by airplane.
	At a certain point, they were shuttled to an airplane where they were flown to Florida.
	And then eventually flown to Martha's Vineyard.
	Again, under false pretenses is the information that we have.
	Is the information we have.
	It might be totally wrong.
	So if it is, but let's open an investigation.
	Promised work.
	They were promised the solution to several of their problems.
	They were taken to...
	They were promised the solution to several of their problems.
	Vague, vague verbal diarrhea.
	Martha's Vineyard, from what we can gather, for nothing, for little more...
	Then a photo op, video op.
	And then they were unceremoniously stranded in Martha's Vineyard.
	They want to open an investigation.
	This guy wants to open an investigation into DeSantis.
	Because, I mean, so much fluff, undefined, ambiguous terminology.
	Some might say it doesn't seem that they know very much.
	Maybe they've got them dead to rights.
	They've got the receipts.
	A bird dog.
	They were led to a hotel under false pretenses.
	They were promised work.
	I'm sorry.
	That seems to be what the promise is, even coming out of Martha's Vineyard.
	They just don't want them working there.
	He wants to open an investigation into DeSantis.
	Now, when I say the internet is smarter than any one individual, What does political affiliation surprise you?
	Democratic Party.
	I would not have gone there until I knew it.
	It wouldn't surprise me.
	What did surprise me was the awful reality of a tragic, horrific event that might have occurred, if not directly under this individual's watch, in his jurisdiction.
	He's complaining.
	Wants to open an investigation into the transportation of 50, 48 migrants to Martha's Vineyard when it would seem more migrants died in his jurisdiction, potentially under their collective watch.
	More migrants died in Texas under this guy's collective watch than were flown to Martha's Vineyard.
	And he wants to investigate DeSantis.
	Interesting.
	I'll pull up the article.
	The reality is more shocking than you can imagine.
	One big campaign stunt.
	Is this the one?
	Is this the article?
	Is this the article?
	Oh, no.
	Okay, here we go.
	This is the article.
	One big campaign stunt.
	Bexar County Sheriff criticizes Abbott on immigration, wants to meet with Biden.
	This is from June 29, 2022.
	Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar sent a letter to President Joe Biden on Tuesday criticizing Greg Abbott policies, someone running with the Democratic Party seemingly playing politics not once but twice now, on immigration and human smuggling and urging the president to meet with Texas sheriffs to address fallout from the rising number of immigrants crossing the border.
	In the letter Salazar said about Abbott, Salazar said Abbott has used the issue of immigration and humic smuggling for one big campaign stunt.
	Governor Abbott wasted excessive assets and personnel on an ineffective farce of an effort, said Salazar, a Democrat.
	I know it's ineffective because my deputies and surrounding county sheriffs deal with the aftermath every single day in the form of vehicle pursuits and even rescue operations with dozens of victims at a time.
	He says, Oh, look at this.
	The letter comes one day after 51 migrants from Mexico and Central America were killed in a sweltering tractor trailer on the city's southwest side in one of the deadliest such episodes in recent history.
	11 other people who were rescued from the trailer and were hospitalized, including an adolescent boy who was in critical condition at University Hospital.
	Authorities estimate that up to 100 people could have been packed inside at one point.
	This is what's happening in his jurisdiction.
	He's blaming everybody else and accusing everyone else of political stunts and wanting investigations to be opened.
	On Tuesday, Biden blamed the disaster on the criminal smuggling industry.
	He touted an international anti-smuggling campaign his administration launched.
	Initial reports of that this tragedy was caused by smugglers or human traffickers who have no regard for the lives they endanger and exploit to make profit, Biden said.
	This incident underscores the need to go after the multi-billion dollar criminal smuggling industry, preying on migrants and leading to far too many innocent deaths.
	51 people died in this sheriff's jurisdiction.
	Under this sheriff's...
	Collective watch.
	And this sheriff is talking about political stunts and wants to investigate Governor DeSantis.
	Doctor, heal thyself.
	Sheriff, investigate thyself.
	Because that is atrocious.
	And the amazing thing, the amazing thing, 51 people die under the sheriff's watch and they play politics with it.
	Let me see something here.
	I think there was something more to that story in the share.
	And I just asked a question.
	Again, I'm not a lawyer in the States.
	I'm a lawyer in Quebec.
	I just asked a question.
	What jurisdiction does a Texas sheriff have to investigate a Florida governor?
	I mean, I know the answer has to be it's a crime that was perpetrated.
	In Texas.
	So in Texas, there was fraudulent misrepresentations to migrants in Texas to induce them to go to a hotel in Texas, then to fly to Florida from where they flew to Martha's Vineyard.
	So if the wrongful act here was the misrepresentations to fly them from Florida to Martha's Vineyard, and this rogue Texas sheriff wants to find a way to investigate a governor of another state, he's going to have to find a way to tie that I know the argument.
	It's the disingenuous argument that needs to be made.
	But in reality, what jurisdiction does this sheriff have to even discuss opening an investigation into Governor DeSantis?
	To me, just being a little bit of a cynic, it reeks of a political stunt.
	A politically motivated stunt to use migrants as political pawns for political purposes.
	And maybe the cynic in me also, maybe as a distraction, from the atrocity that occurred in Texas in this guy's own backyard.
	51 people dying in the back of a tractor trailer.
	Oh, and I'm old enough to remember an election where talk of, they were called coyotes, where talk of coyotes and a border crisis was scoffed at, and I believe it was called racist at the time.
	Yeah.
	Now it's literally in some people's backyard with the most catastrophic of consequences.
	And now, you know, they talk about completing the wall, not building it.
	They talk about patching holes.
	They talk about a crisis.
	When 51 people dying in the back of a tractor trailer.
	I cannot imagine the horror of that.
	Yep.
	Sheriff?
	Investigate thyself.
	Let's go to the chat and see if the chat has any...
	Anything says the federal government is forcing this on border states.
	And then...
	Take 50 migrants to Martha's Vineyard by plane.
	Kidnapping.
	Investigate.
	Criminal charges.
	Biden.
	Takes the legal term as illegal aliens.
	Flies them in the dead of night to New York, anywhere in the States.
	Oh, that's fine.
	That's DHS immigration policy.
	DHS, according to one of the lawyers, Madam Self, her name is Self, Stephanie Self, I think, on Martha's Vineyard, talking about how the Department of Homeland Security is falsifying addresses of random homeless shelters across the country.
	And then in the dead of night, Biden is flying.
	Illegal aliens across the country and just plopping them in various locations, potentially on the basis of totally fraudulent addresses indicating homeless shelters in, I think she said Wichita.
	That's fine.
	DeSantis flying 50 migrants to Martha's Vineyard, a place that can easily accommodate.
	No, that's a crime.
	A crime for the morally virtuous for me.
	Someone had a spicy take.
	I think it's Dave Smith on Twitter.
	America should follow Martha's Vineyard's strategy when it comes to illegal immigration.
	Martha's Vineyard gets to get the National Guard, round them up, and then put them on a military facility.
	That's not...
	That's not detainment.
	That's not arrest.
	That's not civil rights violations.
	Armed National Guard'smen, 125 of them, to round up 48 to 50 migrants to bring them to a military detention center, it was voluntarily done.
	According to CNN, they voluntarily got on the bus to go to a military detention center in Cape Cod, but they were kidnapped by DeSantis when they were put on a plane and flown to Martha's Vineyard.
	All right, people.
	Oh, crack my back.
	One more.
	There's one more story here I think that we got for the day before I'm going to exercise, go outside, smell some fresh air.
	There's another story here.
	Hold on.
	Where is it?
	Here it is, people.
	View and accept.
	Okay.
	Reject all.
	Fine.
	Listen to this, people.
	Sky News.
	Take it for what it's worth.
	Sky News is the Fox News of wherever.
	Listen to this.
	More people have been dying this year due to irregular heartbeat, official figures suggest.
	Doesn't say anything definitive, it's just a suggestion.
	September 20th, which is today.
	Excess deaths or extra deaths are the number of deaths that are above the long-term average for a particular week or month of the year.
	Okay.
	Deaths due to an irregular heartbeat are likely to be one of the reasons more people than usual have been dying this year, with the number well above average so far.
	Irregular heartbeats.
	Arrhythmia.
	The number of deaths registered in England and Wales due to cardiac arrhythmias was more than usual for much of the first half of 2022, according to the office.
	of National Statistics, the ONS.
	Deaths in this category had the second highest excess mortality figures in March and April, up from being the eighth highest in February and the fourth highest in January.
	I don't know if it's the same answer.
	I think I also recall reading somewhere that there's more heart attacks in winter.
	People shovel snow, less light, less exercise, whatever, colder weather.
	I don't know if that's true elsewhere.
	Excess deaths or extra deaths of the number of deaths, but we read that already.
	There were 234 excess deaths due to an irregular heartbeat registered in March and 138 excess deaths in April.
	In both months, this was the second highest number of excess deaths by cause.
	Behind only those due to ill-defined conditions, that is also problematic, a definition often used to cover symptoms such as old age and frailty.
	Yeah, and what if that old age and frailty was...
	There's a loud noise outside.
	What if the death from old age and frailty happens to be triggered by COVID itself?
	Who knows?
	All that to say, it was the second highest, arrhythmias, irregular heartbeats.
	The total number of deaths due to an irregular heartbeat was 37.1% above average in March and 23% above average in April.
	A sharp jump from 13.7% in January and 9.7% in February.
	That's, by the way, that's four months where it was significantly above the same timeframe from the year before.
	Percentage remained high in May.
	Jesus.
	39 and 17%, but the number of excess deaths for this category ranked lower in 5th and 8th place.
	Other leading causes to have contributed to excess deaths this year include, oh, heart disease.
	Dementia and Alzheimer's.
	Okay.
	Just excuse me, a heart disease.
	What else do we got here?
	You know where we're going with this, people.
	May and June saw a particularly high level of excess mortality, which deaths up 15% and 8%.
	COVID-19 has only been partly responsible for excess deaths in recent months, the ONS said.
	Of the 6,473 excess deaths in May, more than three quarters were not due to the coronavirus.
	The proportion was even higher in June.
	82% not due to COVID.
	That is shocking.
	I'm sure it's all those supplements that the young people are taking.
	It's got to be the supplements.
	All right, that was the punchline to all of this.
	I'm including the link so you can read it.
	Arrhythmia.
	Maybe one day I'll be able to have a discussion with a doctor who people are finding other explanations.
	Heart condition's not about the jab.
	It's about long COVID.
	It's not about the jab.
	It's about COVID.
	It's not about the jab.
	It's about stress.
	It's about lack of activity, social isolation.
	You know what?
	At the end of the day, if it's as a result of government action or inaction or as a result of what I consider to be government abuse, Oh, it won't make me feel any better if excess deaths are up however much.
	Not because of the jab, just because of the isolation and the government lockdowns.
	That won't make me feel any better.
	Sorry.
	Call me a curmudgeon.
	Dr. John Campbell did a video on excess deaths in the UK just a couple of days ago.
	Dude, that came from Fat Slice in Rumble.
	Everybody's going to be doing it because the phenomenon is the same.
	Thus far, in a great many places.
	New Brunswick, Alberta, UK, Wales.
	I mean, I can name it.
	Yeah, but it's not from the jab, necessarily.
	It's just from everything else the government did in its useless, futile, and ill-thought-out attempt to combat a virus.
	By destroying generations.
	I mean, that's effectively what they've done.
	All right, let's see if we can get...
	There are some more links in the back.
	Let me just see if I didn't forget.
	Okay, that's the man in the Gretchen Whitmer plot.
	We got that.
	Okay, we got the guy who wants to investigate.
	There was another one about the COVID vaccine.
	Waning over time.
	Sorry, I don't mean to bypass the Epoch Times, but we're going to.
	Because this story is also just, you know.
	At the same time, people, the governments, despite all the figures that are coming out that are undeniable as relates to risks for young men.
	They're pushing it.
	In Canada, Western University, I don't know if they've retracted this policy, were requiring boosters for their students, which include young men who are 1 in 5,000 either per dose or 1 in 5,000 risks of myocarditis from the jab.
	Western University was requiring it to return to classes, a booster.
	Our government in Canada, pushing it on 5 to 11-year-olds.
	There are studies to prove anything, so take it with a grain of salt.
	COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness estimated to turn negative over time in children study.
	Not that it weans and just goes away.
	That it weans and then actually makes a child more susceptible to getting the virus.
	The effectiveness of COVID-19's jab against infection turned negative over time for children aged 5 to 11, according to News said.
	But you don't want granny to die, so just sacrifice your children for granny, you selfish bastard.
	Researchers found that for kids in the age group, the effectiveness peaked at 60 to 70 percent several weeks after the first dose.
	It then dropped to nearing zero at 18 weeks, or week 18. For previously uninfected children and week 20 for previously infected children.
	So for all of that, you got an extra two weeks of protection for previously infected children.
	Canada follows the science and does not recognize natural immunity.
	After that, the effectiveness was pegged as turning negative, which means the vaccinated children were more likely to contract COVID-19 than unvaccinated children.
	Let me just make sure I understood that.
	After that, the effectiveness was pegged as turning negative, which means that vaccinated children were more likely to contract COVID-19 than unvaccinated children.
	Well, damn it, they just vaccinate the unvaccinated children and they'll all be equally likely to get COVID again.
	They'll all be equal again.
	Research cautions against reading too much into this.
	The estimates because of potentially confounding factors.
	Okay, let's hear it.
	Our study showed a decline over time of vaccine effectiveness among Omicron infections in children.
	However, not many children have been infected for more than five months.
	However, not many children had been vaccinated for more than five months, so there was great uncertainty in the estimate of vaccine effectiveness after five months.
	Okay.
	Thus, one should focus on the trend of waning effectiveness rather than the estimate at the end.
	Oh, natural immunity did appear to do better against hospitalization.
	After starting at 99.5% in the first month, the protection was still high at 86.9% after 10 months, according to the estimates.
	The effectiveness of Pfizer's vaccine, known as Biont, against hospitalization, peaked at 88.2% at four weeks after dose one and was down to 76%.
	after week 20. The uncertainty surrounding the estimates of the protection against hospitalization in both groups were greater because of the small number of hospitals Yeah, but Canada still won't recognize natural immunity.
	And even if you've had the RONA, if you're a foreign national, you cannot get into Canada.
	And apparently, according to Biden, COVID's over.
	But you still can't get into the country if you're an unvaccinated foreign national.
	Because COVID might be over.
	But the government isn't quite ready to give you back those privileges yet.
	Yeah, let's just do this here.
	And then we're going to end it on this.
	COVID's over, people.
	Joe Biden walking a factory.
	Talking about how the pandemic is over.
	And my goodness, this 60 Minutes interview that he did, which I'm sure was fluffed up, edited, you know, more than Terminator 2, still makes him look like a raging buffoon, where the White House has to disavow certain statements he made.
	Some statements are just pathologically dishonest on their face.
	And now some medical professionals have to walk back Biden's statement here.
	Let's just look.
	Look at this.
	Walking with confidence, the leader of the most powerful nation on earth.
	Mr. President, first Detroit auto show in three years.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Is the pandemic over?
	The pandemic is over.
	We still have a problem with COVID.
	We're still doing a lot of work on it.
	But the pandemic is over.
	If you notice, no one's wearing masks.
	Everybody seems to be in pretty good shape.
	And so I think it's changing, and I think this is a perfect example of it.
	This president's first Detroit auto show in three years.
	Notice the editing, by the way.
	Is the pandemic over?
	The pandemic is over.
	We still have a problem with COVID.
	We're still doing a lot of work on it.
	But the pandemic is over.
	If you notice, no one's wearing masks.
	Everybody seems to be in pretty good shape.
	Everybody seems to be in pretty good shape.
	And so I think it's changing.
	They're doing their best to make this guy look good, and he still looks bad.
	And then you still have doctors coming out and saying, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	Take that back.
	Pandemic's not over.
	Still have people dying from COVID.
	Although, have they even gotten to the point where, you know, Hoshel of New York was saying, we've really got to get to the point, and this is after two years, we've got to get to the point where we know if people are hospitalized with COVID versus hospitalized from COVID.
	That was two years into the pandemic.
	Have they said, have they resolved that oversight yet?
	Oh.
	Well, that's it.
	People, another wonderful afternoon of covering the latest.
	Have I missed anything in the news?
	I mean, the legal side to the madness, there is one.
	We're seeing in real time what happens when tolerance and good faith, openness, looks like it's getting abused, when warnings about what happens when the government thinks it...
	Is the parents of your child and that the children are community children and not the parents' children?
	We're seeing it in real time.
	And my goodness, it's happening real quick-like.
	This is like Jordan Peterson rang the warning bells on Bill C-16 there, the one that added gender identity to the criminal code for aggravating factors, among other things.
	He rang that bell or raised that flag.
	He warned.
	He shook that flag.
	You don't have to say it, people.
	The thing with the thing.
	He was warning the world about that.
	Back in 2016, we are there now, and we're going faster into that same direction in real time with more legislation that is turning citizens into property of the state.
	Pandemic's over, though.
	But, my precious, the government's going to keep those emergency powers indefinitely.
	That's how it works.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	VickyLin1974 says, thank you for all you do to try and inform folks and keep us sane.
	My pleasure.
	I think at some point the difficulty is for me to keep myself sane because it's like, it's endless.
	Endless, it feels like a black hole that sucks you in.
	Where you say like, okay, it's always darkest before the dawn.
	Surely it has to be before the dawn now.
	Nope, nope.
	We're just going to go ahead and go one day more and get a little darker.
	We're talking about trans rights and we want to live in a world where people coexist peacefully.
	And then you have people seemingly attempting to exploit the good faith of others.
	Biological males competing in biological female sports.
	And then say, tolerance, don't be a bigot.
	We want to express people want to transition?
	Okay.
	People want to transition in a way that makes a mockery of those who are sincere in their beliefs and show up to high school as teachers with basketball-sized prosthetic boobies?
	Yeah, no, no.
	What's the next step?
	The next step is going to be a big, massive, veiny dildo in skin-tight jeans.
	And if anybody says, I don't want my 14-year-old girl seeing that, The school's going to say, don't be a bigot.
	We want to make this inclusive for everybody.
	So shut up.
	That's where we are.
	Okay.
	People, get out there.
	Talk to people.
	Interact with people.
	The world is still beautiful.
	Nature is still beautiful.
	Continue to, you know, the heckler, it might make you feel good.
	Some people are going to feel compelled to do it.
	You're on a public street.
	You think a politician's a Fascist bastard.
	Hands off.
	Don't throw things.
	Don't be violent.
	Don't act in a way that would embarrass your parents, your kids, or your pets.
	And you will succeed.
	We're at a point now where I think even those in the middle are starting to have their eyes not opened, pride opened, like the guy from A Clockwork Orange.
	Look at it.
	This is where it's going.
	And if you continue being silent and you continue saying, It's not so bad.
	It's not so bad.
	Just leave me alone.
	I don't want the pressure.
	It's going to get a notch worse until one day you're going to say, holy crabapples.
	Our good faith is being exploited here.
	Okay.
	Good day, Viva.
	RealTruth45.
	And then one says, where is the white pill, Viva?
	Rob A. Where's the white pill?
	You know what?
	I've got to have a reflexive answer for that.
	Every day, because that question's going to come.
	Where's the white pill?
	Where's the white pill?
	Rob, the white pill is education and knowledge in and of itself.
	The pendulum will swing back.
	People are starting to see the absurdity.
	I will not say that that guy heckling Trudeau is a white pill.
	The white pill is that the...
	Sentiment is now so pervasive.
	It's now so popular.
	And not that popular means anything, but it's gotten so egregious that even the middle of the ground, middle of the line people are starting to say, it's gone too far and we've got to start politically, metaphorically pushing back and taking back our freedoms and a world of sanity.
	Kids should not be being exposed to these types of things.
	And I think people are starting to get wiser.
	That's my white pill.
	It's actually not that white, but I did my best, Rob.
	Okay.
	Let me see here.
	Let's get some comments.
	Oh, my God.
	Chief white pill, the real rabbi says.
	It might have been a black...
	It was a black pill that I used liquid paper to touch up.
	Heartland Denizen says, So far, Canadians can still find refuge in Florida.
	And Canada seems to be maybe making something of a change.
	We'll see what Poilievre does.
	Maxime Bernier is there to hold Poilievre's feet to the fire.
	There is something of a political change happening.
	So that is the actual white pill.
	Let's see.
	Proud of the UK says, banned from YouTube.
	InfoWars had this solved about a week after it started.
	Oh, I know.
	I'll go back and watch the trial.
	Cis75 says, White Pilled is seeing Trudeau get bitched at and we know we are not fringe minority anymore.
	Okay, phrased that way.
	Yeah, okay.
	The white pill, the fringe minority looks like it might be a lot more people.
	And they're not racist because some of them and a lot of them are actually black.
	They're not misogynist because some of them and a lot of them are actually women.
	They're not bigots because a lot of us are actually.
	We're so tolerant, we think people should be making their own decisions and left to their own devices in as much as humanly possible.
	Not told what they can eat, when they can leave their house, where they can work, what they have to put on their faces, what they have to put on their kids' faces, what they have to put into their kids' bodies.
	No.
	So yeah.
	I think a lot more people are getting wise to it.
	And as these numbers continue to come out, it's going to be a black pill mixed with a white pill because people need to see the harsh reality in order to know and understand that it has to change.
	And if it doesn't change, it'll keep going on like this.
	Okay, go.
	With that said, people, exercise.
	Just get out there, exercise, and just, you know, don't exercise too hard.
	Okay, that's terrible.
	Get out there.
	Fresh air.
	Enjoy the day.
	See you tomorrow, sidebar, in the evening, and I may go live during the day.
	We'll see what happens.
	Go.
	Enjoy it.

▲