All Episodes
Previous Next
July 14, 2022 - Viva & Barnes
01:40:46
Viva Las Vegas! "Therapeutics", Bannon Trial, Brad Pitt AND MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Do you think a baby that is delivered alive has value?
Yes.
Do you think that a baby that is not yet born has value?
I believe that a person with a capacity for pregnancy has value.
They have intelligence.
They have agency.
I'm talking about the baby.
And I'm talking about the person with the capacity for pregnancy.
And you're not answering the question.
I'm answering a more interesting question to me.
Do you think that the baby that is not yet born, let's say the day before this mother delivers, do you think that baby has value?
I think that the person with the capacity for pregnancy has value, and they should have the ability to control what happens to their lives.
Law professor.
Do you think a baby that is delivered alive has value?
A baby is delivered alive.
One.
Two.
Three.
Four.
Yes.
Four seconds.
Four seconds.
Four seconds it took for this law professor to answer the question as to whether or not a baby that is born alive, a human, has value.
Let me do some math, people.
Let me do some internal calculations.
A baby born alive, does it have value?
I've got to weigh the pros and the cons here.
Four seconds.
And then, pressing the question, because you know where the lawmaker is going with the line of questioning.
It's the reductio ad absurdum.
Okay, if a baby that's just born, you have to recognize it has value.
The second after it's born, the second before it's born, does it have value?
I believe that a...
What does she say?
A pregnancy-capable person?
Has agency?
Well, that's not the question I'm asking you.
Well, that's the question that I'm answering because I find it more interesting.
That won't fly in the court of law, Professor Bridges.
How is the audio?
I'm in a hotel room.
I don't know what the internet connection is like.
All of you, it's late in the morning right now, but in Las Vegas time, in Las Vegas time, It's, what time is it now?
It's early.
It's still early.
Las Vegas, people.
Las Vegas.
The branding for Las Vegas is truly either glorious or plays on the madness of humans.
This place now, other than being for gambling, has branded itself on overpricing everything.
And your willingness to pay obscene prices for things that you know do not cost that in any realm of reality, your willingness to pay for it is reflective of your willingness to pamper yourself while at a resort in Vegas.
This cup of coffee right here?
$5 U.S. Now I know I have to stop converting.
That's $8 Canadian.
Five times $2.30.
That's about $8 Canadian.
No, it's not.
What the heck is my problem?
Six and a half...
Six and a half dollars Canadian.
That's still too much.
That price of coffee is far too high.
I was at the pool yesterday after I got off the plane and hit the treadmill immediately to get out and sweat out nervous energy.
That's a normal price, Viva.
Oh, jeez.
Well, oh boy, I'll be making my coffee at home.
I saw someone at the pool shell out $30 for a spray bottle of suntan lotion or sunblock, whatever you call it.
It's nuts.
Oh, has the video gone bad?
Let me see here.
I got two bars.
It might not get better than this unless I tether off my phone.
I got five bars on my phone.
Let's try tethering off my phone and see if that's better.
Give us a little hiccup, but while everyone trickles in, anyhow.
Tethering on the phone.
Audio...
Video looks clean on my side.
Okay, now let's go to my...
Ah!
Is this better, people?
We're back.
Looks good.
We'll see.
Okay, we'll have to live with it.
Getting better.
Whoops.
Okay, Froze Viva.
How about...
Now it looks better.
I think I see...
Yeah, there you go.
Okay, good.
Good.
This looks better.
Have I unfrozen?
Let's do the movement.
Oh, let's do the clapping that we're going to get to with some...
Okay, good.
Good, good.
Okay, so in Vegas for the Freedom Fest, speaking on a panel with...
Hold on.
Let me bring it up so I don't screw anything up.
Well, I've heard of the Freedom Fest.
Never thought I'd be invited.
The Freedom Fest, people.
Livestream Freedom Fest, July 13th to July 16th for free on Fox Nation app.
The speaker lineup.
Each year, Freedom Fest brings together more than 200 experts.
Speakers, expert speakers, maybe they're expert speakers on a wide range of important topics.
These brilliant voices bring fresh perspectives and insights to issues of the economic, finances, politics, liberty, rights, society, education, justice system.
And it goes on.
And look at some of the panelists.
Zuby, John Cleese, Lisa Kennedy.
Scrolling down, scrolling down.
Oh, Ben Stein, who is on Twitter, people.
And if you go all the way, all the way.
All the way.
Scrolling down, scrolling down, scrolling down.
I saw myself there at some point.
Hold on.
Let's just do this.
Oh, there we go.
There's me.
Booyah.
310 today with Project Veritas.
Okay, let's get that in.
So that's what I'm here for now.
But Vegas, man.
30 bucks for spray suntan.
There's a tech shop.
I went to a tech shop.
They were selling drones.
They're selling literally a $50 drone for $400.
Makes no sense.
But it's in the morning here.
I wasn't able to sleep anyhow, so I figured I'll do a stream and talk about some stories.
Some very, very interesting stories.
Most interesting of which, there's a theme today.
And the theme today is...
They're starting to say the quiet parts out loud.
They're starting to say the quiet parts out loud, and the reason they do it is so they can eventually down the line, when collective memory has turned into what collective forgetfulness is, they can say, we always said it.
We never lied to you.
We always said it.
Because look, a year back we were saying it, whereas two years back we were saying the exact opposite.
But first things first, Britt Cormier, Super Chat, Viva, do not ask me the question you want me to answer.
You want to answer.
Viva, do not ask me the question you want to answer too.
I will only answer questions that I find more interesting.
And I will avoid the ones that are actually damning.
Such as, took you four seconds, Professor Bridges, law professor at Berkeley, to recognize that a born living baby has value.
Maybe...
One minute prior, it also has value.
Maybe one day prior, it also has value.
And then we just get into the debate.
When we take control of the populace, we should change the word money into time and spend by hours because that's all money is, blood and sweat.
Money, to some extent, is worth less than time because money can be acquired.
Time can never be brought back.
Time can never be brought back.
I prefer to answer another question.
All right.
Now I'm going to get angry, by the way, because when I say that they're starting to say the quiet parts out loud, in a way, I'm not being hyperbolic, people.
I like that word.
I'm not being hyperbolic.
It's becoming abundantly clear that people have been lying.
And when government officials And government-appointed medical doctors have been lying, and they effectively come out now and admit that they have been lying.
You know, there's the political solution.
There should also be something of a judicial solution.
This is Kieran Moore, the Chief Medical Officer of Ontario.
You know what?
Before I show you my montage, let me just show you the unedited.
You can hear what Kieran Moore, Chief Medical Officer of Ontario, is now saying as though they've been saying it all along.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Also, first disclaimer.
Or all disclaimers.
No medical?
No legal, no election fortification advice.
Superchats, YouTube takes 30%.
If you don't like it, we are simultaneously streaming on Rumble.
They take 20% of Rumble rants.
So you can support me there.
It'll be better for the platform, better for me.
Or you can support at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
I had dinner with Barnes last night.
No medical advice.
I am not dispensing medical advice.
I'm not repeating anybody's message.
I might be repeating other people's words.
I won't even be repeating them.
I'll just show them.
But this is what the chief medical officer of Ontario is now saying.
And they're going to pretend that they've always said it.
They're going to pretend you did this to yourself.
We never forced you to do anything.
And I can't find the tweet now.
Hold on.
Let me just go back.
Share screen.
What's my problem?
Wait until you hear what he has to say.
And then we're going to parse it.
We're going to break it down.
Why not just recommend it to everybody instead of saying it's a personal decision?
Because at present we're doing a risk-based approach.
What's the risk?
There's always a risk to having any therapeutic versus a benefit.
You want to make sure there's a very strong benefit versus a risk.
If we're an 18-year-old healthy individual, the risk to getting hospitalized, if we have no underlying medical illness, is very, very low.
We know there is a risk, a very small risk, one in 5,000 that may get myocarditis, for example.
And you'd have to have that discussion on the risk.
A complication for the vaccine versus a benefit of decreased hospitalization for a young, healthy person.
Why not just recommend it to everybody instead of saying it's a personal decision?
Why not recommend it to everybody instead of just saying it's a personal decision?
Hey, spoiler alert.
It's not that they already didn't recommend it to everybody.
They compelled pretty much everybody, carte blanche across the board, to get it.
Compelled in the sense that no one physically imprisoned anybody.
Nobody physically held them down.
And stuck anything into their body.
But they said, if you don't get it, quarantine.
If you don't get it, you lose your job.
That is for anybody who has never lost a job or understood what that means for a family, for people who are trying to support themselves and pay rent, pay mortgage.
That is effective coercion.
So this reporter is asking the question, why are you not just saying, give it to everybody?
Why are you saying it's a choice issue?
And he's saying, well, because, no, excuse me.
For the last year, it has been effectively coerced on everybody.
It has not been a you assess your own risks.
It's been do it.
We're not mandating employers to do it, but we're basically mandating employers to do it.
If you don't do it, you can get fired.
Oh, but it was a personal choice.
You have to weigh your risks.
But okay.
Why not just recommend it to everybody instead of saying it's a personal decision?
Because at present, we're doing a risk-based approach.
At present, we're doing a risk-based approach.
That means prior to present, they were not doing a risk-based approach because they weren't.
They were doing flat across the board mandatory.
Mandate or lose your job.
Fire healthcare workers who don't submit.
Employers can fire.
CBC has it as an unemployment requirement.
CBC, the state broadcaster, has it as an employment requirement in their job postings on LinkedIn.
I follow them just because they make me sick.
But it gets worse.
What's the risk?
There's always a risk to having any therapeutic versus a benefit.
Oh, excuse me.
Excuse me, sir.
Did you just call it a therapeutic?
Let's play my montage now.
It is becoming abundantly clear that people need to go to jail for what the government has done over the last three years.
Let's just show you my montage.
I just recommend it to everybody instead of saying it's a personal decision.
Because at present, we're doing a risk-based approach.
What's the risk?
There's always a risk to having any therapeutic, therapeutic, therapeutic, therapeutic, therapeutic, therapeutic versus a benefit.
You want to make sure there's a very strong benefit versus a risk.
For an 18-year-old healthy individual, the risk to getting hospitalized if we have no medical illness is very, very low.
We know there is a risk, a very small risk, one in 5,000 that may get myocarditis, for example.
And you'd have to have that discussion on the risk benefit of a complication from the vaccine versus a benefit of decreased hospitalization.
Um, Hold on one second.
I still hear it in my ear and I have to shut the window properly.
Here we go.
There's always a risk to having any therapeutic.
This is the chief medical officer of Ontario now referring to what people have been insisting is the big V. He's calling it the big T now.
It's always been a therapeutic.
It's always been a therapeutic.
You know, now, once upon a time, people, this is from Forbes.
Some are claiming COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Did I not just hear the chief medical officer of Ontario, Kieran Moore, refer to it as a therapeutic?
Not a vaccine?
Or do words mean nothing?
Men are women.
Men can have babies.
I'm not a biologist.
There are always risks to therapeutics.
Forbes, what year is this?
September 2021.
Nine months ago?
Some crazy theorists, some crazy out there selfish extremists are claiming COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines.
Do I need to play Kieran Moore referring to it as a therapeutic now?
And wait until you read the quality journalism here.
Writer Alex Berenson.
Writer, by the way.
A writer.
Not a journalist.
Not someone with a proven track record of fantastic insight.
He's a writer.
He's Stephen King.
Writer Alex Berenson recently tweeted out the following about COVID-19 vaccines.
Don't think of it as a vaccine.
I bet you he got in trouble for that.
I bet you he might have even gotten sanctioned.
By Twitter.
I bet you, because I know it to be the case, that people on social medias who made this statement a year ago, nine months ago, were penalized for it.
Maybe were deplatformed.
Maybe were ostracized.
Maybe even lost their jobs.
Maybe had the social media virtue signaling mob come after them.
Don't think of it as a vaccine.
Could we think of it as a therapeutic, like chief medical officer just confirmed?
Oh, why do I keep missing this?
Here we go.
Don't think of it as a vaccine.
Oh, okay.
So how should one think about the COVID-19 vaccine then?
As a turnip?
Oh, you're so sassy.
So sassy and so insightful.
Yes, think of it as a turnip.
You idiot.
As a cat wearing a bandana?
Oh, you're so creative.
Well, Berenson continued with, think of it as best, as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy.
And terrible side effects and terrible side effect profile that must be dosed in advance of illness.
As you can see it in the following screen capture.
Oh!
Oh, look at that!
Alex Berenson.
It doesn't stop infection or transmission.
Don't think of it as a vaccine.
Think of it at best as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and terrible side effect profile that must be dosed in advance of illness.
And we want to mandate it.
This tweet is misleading.
Learn why health officials recommend a vaccine for most people.
Just in case we forgot, people.
Just in case we forgot.
Instead of saying it's a personal decision.
Because at present, we're doing a risk-based approach.
What's the risk?
The risk?
There's always a risk to having any therapeutic, to having any therapeutic, therapeutic, therapeutic, therapeutic.
I think I've made the point.
It's preposterous.
It's preposterous.
And it's...
There's always a risk to having any therapeutic.
Nine months ago, Forbes berating anybody who's wacky and out there enough to say, don't think of it as a vaccine, think of it at best as a therapeutic.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Now, by the way, what happens now?
Are we allowed quoting the chief medical officer?
He's CMO.
Chief Medical Officer of Ontario.
Are we allowed quoting that guy?
Are we allowed repeating what Kieran Moore just said without getting yeeted from social media?
Oh, and by the way, extremely rare circumstances of myocarditis.
Extremely small risk.
One in 5,000.
Let's just assume.
That's the number.
But I don't think, in my legal analysis, if they're coming back now and saying, yeah, it's not a V, it's a therapeutic, they're going to come back now and say, one in 5,000, I suspect in six months it's going to be one in less than 5,000.
But let's just even operate on that number.
One in 5,000 is a very small risk.
I'm sorry.
If one in 5,000 is a very small risk, what was the risk of hospitalization for teenagers in the first place from the RONO?
Let me just see if I'm going to be able to find it.
It's infinitesimal.
If one in 5,000 is a very small risk of myocarditis for a young and healthy individual, then how would you qualify the risk of COVID in and of itself for that same individual?
Because I'll tell you one thing.
I know it's less than...
It's more.
It's more rare than one in 5,000.
Risk of...
I'll see if I can get it.
Hospitalization.
COVID.
Risk of infection.
I mean, we're talking infinitesimal.
If one in 5,000 is small, then we're talking infinitesimal.
Let me see if I can find...
A new study found that 179 individuals aged 12 to 18 years hospitalized for COVID-19 in 2021.
I won't be able to find the stat right now.
I should have had it before.
But if 1 in 5,000 risk of myocarditis for an otherwise healthy teenager is very, very low risk, that's exponentially more risky, at least in terms of statistics, than any meaningful hospitalization, and I wouldn't even say death, because in Canada, I believe last I checked...
Two deaths under 19 attributed to COVID-19.
And even that I don't necessarily trust because we saw what they tried to do with one of the cases.
The 14-year-old boy with stage 4 brain cancer in Alberta that the chief medical officer of Alberta, Dina Hinshaw, said died from COVID.
And other factors that played into it.
Yeah, stage 4 brain cancer being in a coma.
If they did it once, they've done it more than once.
Just overnight, by the way.
We've never forced it.
It was a therapeutic.
It had one in 5,000 risks.
Very small.
You did it.
You chose to do it freely.
We never made a blanket mandate.
We never had vaccine mandates.
We never had vaccine passports in Quebec.
No.
Yep.
Well, not way more than contracting.
Way more than having any meaningful hospitalization or death for that age bracket.
It's infinitesimal.
Severe, severe infection.
And even then, no, therapeutic.
But Berenson, Berenson was yeeted from the tweets for saying something similar.
Let's see what we've got here.
Antikami, 37,000 get C9, 18, 19 die.
37,000, can't verify any of these numbers.
Get C9, 19, 818 die.
Of 818, 25 are under 45. Of 25, one is perfectly healthy.
It's infinitesimal.
I mean, I looked at the stats when they're mandating the shot for six-month-olds and up now.
Ashley Case, I'm going to do some super chats before we move on to the next one.
Words have meaning.
We must force them to start using words correctly.
We'll talk about immunity.
We're taking a risk-based approach now.
There's always a risk with a therapeutic.
Some people aren't calling it a vaccine.
Some people are saying it's a therapeutic.
They are turning around the detractors, calling it a therapeutic to rebrand it into something they can keep giving.
Imagine mandating a therapeutic.
Mandating a therapeutic that by this guy's admission has at least a 1 in 5,000 risk of myocarditis.
And then you start reading articles.
Myocarditis is reversible.
Myocarditis is mild.
All that I know is I've spoken to doctors who I know are doctors.
Professionals who say there's no such thing as mild myocarditis, and there's no such thing as reversible.
Okay, okay.
They're starting to say the quiet parts out loud, which means you know that they know that the tide is turning, and they've got to get ahead of the curve in as much as they possibly can at this point, because they're so far behind it.
People are starting to not wake up, because I hate the cliche, but people are starting to get wise.
Justin Love Rempel, thank you very much.
I like that photograph.
Yeah.
Okay, let's scroll back down to the...
Scroll back all the way down to the bottom of the chat.
Cranky this morning now.
Words have meaning.
Yep.
Okay.
So that's it.
Started to say the quiet part out loud there.
But let's get to another one.
Another incident where they're saying the quiet part out loud.
I don't know if I brought this one up yet.
It's phenomenal.
I'll pull up this Freedom Fest panel and just go...
Go to Twitterverse.
It's phenomenal.
I'm a little late on it, but it doesn't matter.
Better late than never.
Listen to what Michael Bolton has to say.
Are we able to do this?
Refresh?
Come on, man.
Play it.
Hold on.
Is it not playing?
Immediate, immediate suspicion of chicanery.
Fair, with all due respect.
It's playing on my phone, so I don't think...
Okay, let's refresh this.
No, you gotta hear this, people.
We've always told you that we've planned coups.
Okay, hold on.
I'm just gonna close this.
Why?
Give me one second, people.
Give me one second.
You gotta hear this.
Share.
Share screen.
Chrome tab.
Well, okay.
So we got Elizabeth Warren.
So this video is playing.
I'm gonna clip this.
This one is playing.
Why won't the Michael Bolton play?
And yes, by the way, his name is Michael Bolton from now on.
What the heck is going on?
Okay, dude, we're doing it.
We're doing it old school.
Kicking it old school.
Okay.
Oh, we're going to get back to Elizabeth Warren in a bit.
Okay, I'm going to play it off my phone.
I don't know why it's here.
To be fair, with all due respect, one doesn't have to be brilliant to attempt to...
I'm getting suspicious, people.
To be fair, with all due respect, one doesn't have to be brilliant to attempt to...
Okay.
Now I'm...
Now I'm suspicious.
Let me just play it off my phone.
Fair.
With all due respect, one doesn't have to be brilliant to attempt a coup.
I disagree with that.
As somebody who has helped plan coup d 'etat, not here, but other places, it takes a lot of work.
And that's not what he did.
It was just stumbling around from one idea to another.
Ultimately, he did unleash the rioters at the Capitol.
As to that, there's no doubt.
But not to overthrow the Constitution, to buy more time to throw the matter Tapper comes back to the question.
read and we were talking about what is capable, what you need to do to be able to plan a coup.
And you, you cited your expertise having planned coups.
I'm not going to get into the specifics, but it's so successful coups.
I wrote about Venezuela in, uh, in the book.
Selling his book, no less, also.
Can you appreciate also the...
The arrogance and pomposity and ego where he's trying to say Trump is dumb.
Trump is a buffoon.
He couldn't have planned a coup because it requires intelligence.
And then Tapper's like, well, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to plan a coup.
And Michael Bolton, who wants to be the smartest guy in the room, is like, oh, I'm sorry, Jake Tapper.
You actually have to be extremely smart.
You have to be as smart as me because I've done it.
To be fair, with all due respect, one doesn't have to be...
Brilliant to attempt a coup.
Oh, excuse me?
I disagree with that.
Somebody who is...
I disagree with that because I'm brilliant.
I hope you guys could hear that.
I'm so cool.
I do coups all...
Oh, no, no.
It's very interesting.
Twitter definitely seems to be...
It won't play.
It doesn't have to be brilliant to attempt a coup.
Dude, did they pull that down?
Does anyone on my Twitter feed see that tweet anymore?
Thank you.
They took it down.
Everyone's getting a playback error.
This is outrageous.
This is outrageous.
I'm going to go post it somewhere else.
I'm going to go post it on Rumble and then share that link on Twitter.
Hearing Michael Bolton and John Michael Bolton is one thing.
Believing that he can be that foolish is another.
It is peculiar.
Why even...
What the heck are you thinking?
First of all, we all know they do it.
It's like, we all know they do it.
Okay, now they're just telling us.
Thanks for being honest.
I mean, we knew it.
I can only think of Bay of Pigs offhand.
We know that they do it.
They know that we know that they do it.
They know that we know that...
Yeah, seriously, it's being pulled from Twitter.
That's phenomenally interesting.
Okay.
Truth will find a way.
To quote Michael Goldblum?
Stephen?
What was Goldblum's name?
Jeffrey Goldblum.
Truth will find a way.
Hmm.
3.10 this afternoon.
Vegas time.
They plan coups all the time.
And it's not easy.
To do a successful coup, you've got to be smart.
Bolton is smart.
Trump is a buffoon.
By the way...
This is what you call a double-edged sword of slicing through the narrative.
It wasn't an insurrection or a coup because Trump's a buffoon and couldn't plan it.
And we do it all the time.
Not here, of course, in foreign countries.
Because we only do it in foreign countries.
When we're going to override democracies, when we're going to interfere in politics, when we lie, we only lie when we tell you we lie.
When we want to interfere with democracy, we only do it in other countries.
Trust us.
Trust us, we're lying.
We only do it in foreign countries.
We would never do it here.
We're responsible and we respect democracy here, just not in places where we go and plan coups to override governments, overthrow governments.
John Ritterhorn says, I'm expecting a new outbreak in national mandates a month or so before election time.
There have been localized outbreaks of something they're calling the Big C. Well, I hope you're wrong.
I forgot to say that Dr. Fauci is already talking about masking up again.
Because it worked so well the first time.
You know, if it doesn't work the first time or the second time, it will surely work the third time.
You always had a choice.
You can choose the VAX or choose to be a member of society.
Who really needs to go to the grocery store or outside?
This is simple, Viva.
Do not be obtuse.
Just kidding.
I got it.
Yeah, yeah.
It's your choice, but if you want to get into Canadian Tire, you've got to do it.
And when I was there and I saw the people who were sitting out there, not allowed in, and the look, I mean, they were statistically representative of the demographics that are statistically less vaccinated than others, and the look on their faces, like, this is outrageous.
And I felt it not as a black Canadian.
I felt it as a Canadian where someone would not get in a carpool with my kid because...
It's a sickening feeling that goes to the pit of your stomach, and it's a gross feeling that nobody should have.
One in 5,000.
Oh, I won't read the rest, but yeah.
No, no.
Immunity.
Immunity.
Diplomatic immunity.
Has Barnes lured you?
So here's the deal.
Here's the deal.
Now I can't even say here's the deal without thinking of Joe Biden.
I'm not a gambler.
I hate losing money.
I don't mind being generous and giving it to somebody, but setting it on fire?
And the gambling?
I lost $75.
And I...
Don't like the way that makes me feel.
Could have bought a nice bottle of gin with that.
Twitter's saying your account's suspended?
No.
Do I get an email if my account is suspended?
Not that I'm nervous.
Is my account suspended?
No, no, no, no, no.
Hold on.
Let's see here.
Viva, so you've...
I bought a lottery ticket, but that's a statistical investment.
Plus, it's only $8.
So, you know, $8 to win $50 million.
That makes sense.
A vet here who has PTSD not from service, but from spending 20 years serving, having my friends...
I'd be named training kids to go fight and being told that I...
that I take up space and should not be tolerated.
This is Canadian, by the way.
This is Justin Trudeau who says, They take up place, is what Justin Trudeau, the Prime Minister of Canada, said about the unvaccinated.
Vet here.
I thought you meant vet as in veterinarian, but veteran, who has PTSD not from service, but from spending 20 years serving, having my friends die and be maimed.
Training kids to go fight and being told that I take up space and should not be tolerated.
Ryan, thank you for your service, which is a sacrifice that people can't fathom.
But thank you.
But Justin Trudeau, after Roe v.
Wade is overturned in the States, says no politician or man should tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her body.
But if a woman chooses not to get vaccinated, she's taking up space.
She's an extremist.
Yada, yada, yada.
Now, is my...
Good job, Viva Persistence.
We're out and we're doing it live.
My account is up.
Okay, good.
It's inconceivable that that could get my account suspended.
So let's have a fight with Twitter if that's the case.
But they are definitely...
I can't play the video back.
They're saying the quiet parts out loud and they're pretending they always have been doing it.
Okay, look, let's just do this for a little scratching our fingers on a chalkboard.
I gotta stop the screen.
There's two.
You know what?
Oh, hold on, hold on.
Before we get to that one, another.
They're saying the quiet part out loud and they don't understand what they're doing when they say it.
This one's courtesy of AOC.
About the January 6th hearings.
You've got Michael Bolton talking about how it wasn't an insurrection because Trump's an idiot and can't plan coups because it requires an expertise that only Michael Bolton has.
It's very hard to do it properly.
Trust me.
We've done it.
Not here.
Not here.
We respect democracy in America.
Not everywhere else.
And trust me when I say that because that's totally what someone who respects democracy would do and say.
Okay.
Let's hear what AOC has to say.
courtesy of Steve Cortez.
These insurrectionists, and that there were actual officers working with this, and we never got to the bottom of that, and we never got any answers about that.
I'm sorry, I'm distracted by her.
I know I gesticulate with my hands.
Does she talk like she's on Twitter?
She talks like she's on Twitter.
There won't be any insurrectionists.
Okay, starting again, and I have to listen to what she's saying.
Maybe if the committee had actually looked into the problems, AOC, like, why wasn't there enough police there?
Whose decision was it to decline reinforcements?
Whose decision was it to run at half security because of COVID when they knew it was Allegedly planned.
Maybe.
Hey ASC, are you going to make them look into that?
Because the answers might not be the ones that you're looking for, but just wait for this admission.
Admission and recognition, by the way.
And then to this day, we're just supposed to pretend that that never happened?
I have no idea what happened to the people on the inside who were very clearly sympathetic with what was going on and opening the doors wide open for that.
And we're not the doors wide open going on and opening the doors wide open for that.
Seems to me that a number of people have raised that defense.
How could we have known it was unlawful to be in this place when they opened the doors and let us in?
Sucking and blowing is what this is.
It was the most violent protest ever.
People died.
Of medical emergencies and being shot by police.
But it was violent.
But they were opening the doors and letting people in because the police were participating or facilitating or sympathetic to.
I guess both can mutually coexist when there's no logic and no coherency.
I'm supposed to sit here and pretend like none of that ever happened.
And then right afterwards, you have a massive, you know, you just have this idea that throwing money at that problem is gonna make it go away without any accountability.
And so this is where these things are breaking down.
We're not safe.
And it's not just about members of Congress not being safe.
The food staff workers aren't safe.
The janitors aren't safe.
Like, we need to get to the bottom of this.
So that's all I got to say.
Thank you, Congresswoman.
Let's get to the bottom of Antifa, please.
The food staff are not safe.
That's an odd assessment.
The food staff are not safe.
I would probably venture to say that that building now is among the safest, but probably isn't always was.
And the question is, why would the Capitol building?
Have been so vulnerable on a day when they knew in advance what was being planned or certainly what was very foreseeable in...
I'm not saying an insurrection was planned.
A protest was planned.
Hockey celebrations get violent, get destructive.
But the police let them in.
but she was in fear for her life while being in another building off site.
But they're saying it out loud again.
Police open the door and let people in.
That should be a legitimate defense to the people who then said, I didn't know I was trespassing.
I didn't know I was in an unlawful spot for parading and picketing because they opened the doors and let us in to the house of the people.
New member, Elizabeth White.
Elizabeth White, welcome to the channel.
Oh, your internet's bad.
That's all it is.
No, because on my phone.
I know, the internet is bad.
Let me see, I'm still tethering off my phone, but I only see one bar.
Inconceivable!
So they're now basically saying they planned coups, just not in America.
The police let the people in, but it was the most violent insurrection ever.
It wasn't an insurrection because Trump's an idiot, and let's continue going on with this prosecution because it allows us to, you know, go after the likes of Steve Bannon.
Contempt of Congress.
Next subject.
Steve Bannon's trial for contempt of Congress starts next week.
Unless it gets postponed based on a motion that's being presented today.
But hold on before I get there.
Justin Love Rempel.
Health Canada just approved the candy for children aged six to five years.
CBC just announced random testing returning to airports.
CBC just announced random testing.
And if you're not up to date and you come back to your country, 14 days quarantine.
14 days unlawful detention.
14 days...
No due process confinement.
No, she just talks like she's taking the helium.
And then, I wonder what are the vaguest odds on jab mandates for kids in schools in the fall in Canada, US.
I don't think they're betting on that, but I'll go down and look.
And we got the new member in the house.
Okay.
Um...
They do coups, just not in America.
The police let people in, opened up doors, but it was trespassing, picketing and parading on restricted grounds.
Restricted grounds that people were let into because police opened the door to restricted grounds.
But alas, it's given the January 6th committee something to do for the last 500 plus days and six days of hearing during which all of this wonderful idiocy is coming to light.
Above and beyond the circle gratification of diarrhea coming out of their mouths and propaganda that makes a kangaroo court in North Korea look legitimate, quasi-legitimate.
It allowed them to go after Steve Bannon because the committee, I talked about it the other day when we went through the indictment.
I should probably post that highlight.
When we went through the indictment, the committee, through House Resolution 503, gave themselves all the power in the world.
To issue subpoenas, yada, yada, yada, to people directly or indirectly involved in the circumstances leading up to yada, yada, yada.
And they issue a subpoena, a congressional subpoena to Steve Bannon, who does not abide by the congressional subpoena, ostensibly, purportedly, allegedly on the basis of executive privilege that he either thought he had or thought he was given.
And now they're going to trial next week.
And it looks like I'm going to be there covering that.
In the courtroom.
Not in live, but I'll be there.
And it'll be phenomenally interesting.
Jury selection starts Monday, if this trial goes ahead Monday.
But the news of the day is that Bannon is looking for an extension, a delay of the trial, because, you know, the machine, the machine that is fascism, and I'm not using the word hyperbolically.
I'm not using the word Inaccurately.
Fascism being the marriage, the unholy orgy of an alliance between government, big tech, and media.
I believe is the actual definition of fascism.
You have the media distorting, misrepresenting, putting out fake news after fake news about January 6th.
And I'll just think of Brian Sicknick by way of example.
You have the government weaponizing that incident to the fullest extent of political persecution.
And the third part of the fascism was going back to the media.
On the eve of jury selection, in Steve Bannon's trial, what do you think CNN fake news propaganda is going to do?
They're going to run a hit piece on Steve Bannon.
On the eve of jury selection.
CNN apparently is running what I presume is going to be a hit piece.
It won't be favorable.
We can agree on that.
If I live to be wrong, I will apologize to CNN.
I doubt it's going to be accurate.
I doubt it's going to be fair.
And I guarantee it's going to be a hit piece.
Hashtag not a guarantee.
As a result of which, Bannon is again asking for a delay in the trial.
He asked for a delay in the trial of the same judge, Judge Nichols, who is a Trump appointee.
He asked for an extension or delay of the trial last week, I think, on the basis that whatever privilege he thought he had or was given has been lifted and he can now testify.
So he can testify.
Drop the contempt, drop the trial.
I'll testify now, freely, openly.
And therefore, this trial becomes academic.
It becomes sans objet, as we say in French, without an object.
The judge said, no, we're not postponing the trial.
We're going ahead next week.
He's trying again.
Second kick at the can for different reasons.
But this is the latest.
See NBC, so we'll read between the lines.
Former Trump aide Steve Bannon cites January 6th Capitol riot hearing in seeking delay of criminal contempt trial.
By the way, little trivia.
Well, we'll do it afterwards.
No, we'll do it right now.
Little trivia.
How many people have been prosecuted for contempt of Congress?
In the chat, you'll probably know, but let me Google it just in case.
I think I know the answer.
How many people in the history of American politics have been prosecuted?
Not cited for, not deemed to be.
Prosecuted for contempt of a congressional subpoena.
Make a guess, people.
How many people have been prosecuted for contempt of Congress?
I believe the answer is one.
I believe the answer is one.
And I believe it's Scooter Libby.
Oh, no, this might be...
Hold on, we're getting news here.
The last time anyone was convicted...
Of contempt of Congress was Scooter Libby.
Chat's going to know the answer.
I think it's one.
Although I might be mistaken, charged with or prosecuted for versus convicted of.
But I think it's one.
And I think it's Scooter Libby, who from what I understand was already in jail and there was a lot of other context around that.
So it's exceedingly rare to prosecute And from what I understand, almost, not almost, what's the word when something only happens once?
It might happen a second time.
Exceedingly rare.
But they're doing it because it's Bannon.
You know, they went after Bannon for Build the Wall.
They went after Bannon because Bannon is a vocal critic, he's a political ally, and he's a voice of influence and they don't like it.
Former Trump White House aide Steve Bannon again asked the judge to delay the upcoming trial.
Bannon's lawyer this time cited repeated references to him during a hearing Tuesday of the House Select Committee investigation.
The House Select Committee investigation is conducting these public hearings, which are a kangaroo poop show of a trial.
It's not a trial, it's a political trial.
The week before they're going to try to impanel an impartial jury of Bannon's peers are poisoning the well.
By repeatedly referencing Steve Bannon and his role in this, undermining the very fabric of the democracy, the Democratic Republic of America.
But it's not just the government that's doing that, you know, with the help of media.
The media is...
Doing it as well.
Lawyers also said they learned that CNN will air a one-hour documentary on Bannon on Sunday evening, the day before his trial is set to begin in Washington, D.C. for contempt of Congress.
They argue that both events create a very serious risk of prejudice here against Bannon among jurors to be selected for his trial on charges of willfully refusing to comply with the subpoena.
And they take a look at him.
He's bad, bad.
Look at this man.
Defied.
A subpoena of Congress.
You know who else defied a congressional subpoena?
Eric Holder.
Was found to be in contempt of Congress, never prosecuted.
I wonder why.
It's a very weird thing.
The double-edged sword of political justice.
Now, so that's the story.
The defense learned just today that CNN will air a one-hour documentary on Bannon, yada, yada, yada.
We have seen...
First things first.
Bannon is going to trial in D.C. We know that D.C. is 91-plus percent Democrat voters in the first place.
Documentary or no documentary, 9.1 of 10 juror members are going to be, if not staunchly Democrat, they're going to be Democrat supporters, Democrat voters, Democrat donors, and there's some incestuous connections in this entire thing that will blow your mind.
So one way or the other, Bannon is going to get...
On the jury impanelment, because the likelihood of ending up with one Republican pro-Trump member of the jury, statistically unlikely.
Exactly.
But he's already asked this judge for a delay, and the judge already said no.
The judge said no on the basis that your willingness to testify now doesn't matter.
We're going to go to trial.
As a lawyer, you know, I say like asking the judge, delay the trial because I want to testify now.
And he says, no, now delay the trial because they're going to run a, you know, they've been talking about me all week and they're going to run a documentary.
That's like asking someone for five bucks and they say no and then asking them for 50 afterwards.
So, I mean, I think the chances of success are virtually nil.
And then the other question is, if I'm a judge, I'm going to say, okay, if they don't see this Sunday night, what?
What good would delaying the trial be due on this basis?
People are going to hear about it or they're not going to hear about it.
And if they're going to hear about it, they probably already heard about it.
And if we delay it, it's just going to give more time for more people to go back and look at the hearings and hear more stuff.
And if I'm the judge, I'm just saying, look, Steve, you're not getting you're not getting a not an impartial jury.
You're going to have problems with the jury regardless.
But we'll see.
So that motion is going to be presented today.
I have a sneaking suspicion that unless the judge says, I'd like to go on vacation next week, let's find a reason to postpone this, it's not going to get postponed.
A trial.
It's funny.
A trial in July.
A jury trial in July.
I'm surprised to begin with.
It's the middle of summer.
People are on vacation.
I would have thought the courts would have closed.
At least in Quebec, they close from June or July.
To September, when you have the opening of the courts.
I did not censor anybody's super chat, Big Pete.
Hold on.
I don't even see her super chat, but I see this one.
AOC pretended she was in the Capitol.
She should be able to pretend anything.
I don't think Bannon has asked for a change of venue.
I do not believe Bannon asked for a change of venue either.
Someone says vacation, this is America.
No, but jury members don't want to sit, first of all, in the heat of summer.
And jury members have kids, they have families, they go on vacations, everyone's out of work.
But anyhow, that's it.
So Ben is asking for delay of the trial.
We'll see what happens.
And then we'll see if I'm going to make it down there for in-court, live, tweeting, coverage, streaming, whatnot.
But man, I, you know, this will be the second time.
If Bannon gets convicted, that someone is convicted of contempt of Congress.
YouTube did it.
Not Viva for Big Pete.
Yeah, no, Big Pete knows that I'm not the type of person who censors comments, period.
Unless they come from Russian sex bots.
Let me see what's going on on the Rumble rants.
Or the Rumbles.
Not necessarily the Rumble rants.
Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
Okay.
Who's live on Rumble right now?
I just saw someone else who's live on Rumble.
I was watching Salty Cracker yesterday.
He's a funny man.
Oh, Dave Rubin is live on Rumble.
Yep.
Fauci's admitting it.
Fauci, you know, CMOH, Kieran Waters, they're all publicly admitting now what many have been saying for a long time.
There is no law so obscene that the police would not be willing to enforce it.
There is no law so obscene that the police would not be willing to enforce it.
Well, that's not necessarily true.
Michael Malice says this in Ontario when Doug Ford wanted to empower police to be able to stop, ask someone for ID for being out of their house during house arrest.
Oh, I'm sorry, curfew during COVID.
The police said we're not doing that.
The police said we're not doing that.
Killing with the Canadian today.
No, someone said something about a liar about the sex bot.
Liar.
One of the sex bots was not Russian.
I did.
I started noticing, I believe they're Chinese.
I don't think they're sex bots, though.
They're just bots.
What about Tamara Lich and Pat King?
Tamara Lich has her hearing today.
Holy crab apples.
Let me see what the deal is with that, because that's ahead of...
I'm actually going to post the integral live mouth tweeting.
Tamara Lich has a hearing today.
And I'll ask for an update from someone who I know will know.
Let me see here.
Any update on Tamara Lich?
There is a hearing today?
Okay, we'll see about that.
Okay.
So that's Steve Bannon update.
We'll see what happens.
Contempt of Congress.
Prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Let's take one that's...
This is an older story and I only found it...
I heard about it at the time.
Kim Fox allegedly slapping her hubby?
It's a month old, but I was just reading an article on it and I said if I found it funny and wasn't fully aware of the details, chances are other people are as well.
Let me just go to YouTube and see...
Oh, my back hurts.
Oh boy, okay.
See what the monetization status is of today.
We're still good.
Okay, good.
Yeah, y 'all heard that Kim Fox allegedly slapped her husband.
He called the police.
No charges were pressed.
But you gotta read the details on this.
Kim Fox, by the way, for anybody who doesn't know, the Jussie Smollett corrupt DA who didn't press the charges.
Kim Fox was, I believe, also...
No, who was the one that was involved with the McCloskeys?
I'm getting mixed up between the corrupt DAs, but it doesn't matter.
This is from June, but this is the details of this.
Husband of Chicago state attorney Kim Fox calls cops after she, quote, slapped him over something he posted on Facebook.
They show up at 10 p.m.
Kelly, 48, who works as a public policy manager.
No injuries, no arrests.
The officers activated body cam.
But the details.
They're fighting over a post he made on Facebook.
And Kelly told the police that Kim had asked him to leave and things became physical after he refused.
A police report said that Kelly claimed Kim blocked him from leaving the bathroom.
Grabbed his collar and threw his video game controller on the ground.
I say this without judgment.
Adults playing video games, that's very fine and well.
What the heck is going on here?
What's going on with this dynamic?
She got mad at him for something he posted on Facebook.
Threw his video game controller to the ground.
He tried to turn on the TV and Kimberly snatched the controller out of his hand and threw the controller.
The officer in the report added he could hear Kim reply, All that is true.
That's when Kelly accused Kim of slapping across the cheek, but the officer said there was no redness or swelling visible on his face to indicate being struck.
These are innocent until proven guilty.
This is just accusations made of someone who we know to be a corrupt prosecutor.
It's fantastic.
I mean, it's absurd.
It's absurd that we are being...
Whether or not this story is true, we're being governed by incompetence, corruption, dishonesty.
We're being governed by losers.
There's no other way to put it.
We're being governed by incompetent, corrupt, dishonest losers.
Justin Trudeau?
Unethical.
Liar.
Corrupt.
Penetrated by the WEF.
Half of his cabinet.
François Legault, Prime Minister, Premier of Quebec, corrupt tyrant.
Kim Fox, a state prosecutor, corrupt, to the core.
And sanctions?
Hell no.
Who was it in the McCloskeys who didn't show up to a murder trial and the accused murderer got acquitted, who disassembled and reassembled the...
A firearm for the purposes of prosecuting the McCloskeys.
Hold on.
This is going to drive me crazy.
Who is the prosecutor?
VA and McCloskey.
It's...
No.
I'm sorry, guys.
I will not...
Patricia McCloskey.
Who is the prosecutor?
Prosecution of the McCloskeys.
Oh, Kim Gardner, not Kim Fox.
So it's Kimberly Gardner for the McCloskeys.
Kimberly Gardner, the prosecutor of the McCloskeys, who ordered investigators to disassemble and reassemble a firearm so they could charge Patricia McCloskey with the crime of brandishing a firearm because the firearm needed to be readily capable of lethal use.
And apparently it wasn't because it was disabled.
Oh, no, I just forgot the name.
Kim Gardner, one corrupt prosecutor.
Kim Fox, another corrupt prosecutor.
Nothing.
Nothing happens to anybody.
Unless you're Steve Bannon and you defy a congressional subpoena of an arguably unlawfully formed committee in the first place.
Then you get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law because then's the rules.
The chat knew.
Sorry, I wasn't reading.
I can't read the chat when I'm searching it, but yeah.
Who just unsubbed?
Why?
What did I do?
Because I didn't get to it fast enough?
Kim Gardner.
Kim.
Okay.
Kim Gardner, Kim Fox.
Well, we know these are allegedly controversial things to say.
We know what George Soros poured into the DA race in the McCloskeys, wherever that was.
I forget now, Missouri.
Bannon was on air live during January 6th.
The subpoena to Bannon had to do with statements he made on January 5th.
Viva, did you see the Ray Epps play the victim card in an interview?
I did not.
I'm going to go see that.
At least he's doing interviews.
Ow, I just bit my tongue.
He's doing interviews now.
Hold on.
I think he was just joking.
Nobody would unsub from me.
Come on.
Viva, you can't make everyone happy.
Whatever.
I don't even know what I did.
I take criticism.
I just need to know what it was.
Okay, what was the other stories that we had on the menu for the day?
Oh.
Oh, so today.
No, let's do it.
Let's punish ourselves.
Let's punish ourselves right now.
In Massachusetts, right now, those crisis pregnancy centers that are there.
To fool people who are looking for pregnancy termination help, outnumber true abortion clinics by three to one.
We need to shut them down here in Massachusetts and we need to shut them down all around the country.
Can we appreciate not being able to torture a pregnant person like that?
In Massachusetts right now, those crisis pregnancy centers that are there God forbid.
Clinics, crisis clinics, that are intended to advise, counsel, maybe offer advice to people who find themselves pregnant, surprisingly so, or under whatever circumstances.
Elizabeth Warren says they're there to fool people, to torture pregnant women.
Shut them down.
My body, my choice, out of Elizabeth Warren's mouth.
Also, shut them down.
Don't give them a choice.
Don't even let them see the other side.
No more discourse, people.
And shut down clinics, even if we assume that what she's saying is accurate enough, sufficiently accurate.
The purpose of these crisis clinics, crisis pregnancy clinics.
Or to counsel, advise it, and maybe talk someone out of terminating.
Let's just assume that that's what it is.
Shut them down.
Well, what happens after you shut them down but people continue to try to talk people, maybe out of terminating?
What happens then?
Are we going to pass legislation that says counseling or advising someone to not terminate a pregnancy is illegal, should be illegal?
It's torturing a pregnant woman to have a discussion with her, to maybe Maybe to say that there's options out there.
Maybe even just to try to open their perspectives to the, call it an opportunity.
Shut it down.
Shut them down.
Free speech for me, but not for thee.
Choice for me when you agree with it, but if there's anything else that gets in the way of what I think has to be your choice, shut it down.
And it's one step.
I mean, it's one step towards that because we're seeing it.
We're seeing it a push for outlawing conversion therapy, you know, that being trying to talk, trying to, I don't even know what, I know what conversion therapy is defined as, but the idea of trying to counsel children instead of trying to physically alter them based on what they believe to be their lifelong decisions at a given point in time, they're talking about outlawing discussion.
That type of open discussion between therapists, doctors, and patients.
They outnumber termination clinics three to one.
Oh my goodness!
Maybe that should make sense since maybe it should not be the case that one in three people or one in four people who find themselves surprisingly pregnant should be running off and doing that.
Maybe?
And maybe, by the way, if we're talking about confession through projection and when Elizabeth Warren sees these pregnancy crisis clinics, she immediately thinks they're trying to trick people into a procedure.
Maybe, just maybe.
That's actually arguably what's happening at these clinics, the termination clinics, where they maybe, just maybe, pressure people, make it look like there's no other option.
Maybe, just maybe.
Torture the pregnant woman to say your life is over if you carry this to term.
What chance is the baby going to have?
You want to bring a baby into this world and it's going to be all totally unfortunate so just end it now?
Maybe just maybe that's actually what the clinics are doing and maybe just maybe, maybe just maybe there might be some underlying financial incentive for the clinics to do that.
Maybe just maybe there's a marketplace and maybe just maybe these clinics Pressure people into a certain procedure because maybe just maybe they might have something of a financial interest to do so.
Maybe just maybe.
Ooh, that might be a good shirt.
Maybe just maybe.
Yep, Elizabeth Warren.
But she's all about women's choices unless she thinks they might be talked out of the decision that she wants them to make.
Let's just one more time.
One more time for the road, people.
In Massachusetts right now, Those crisis pregnancy centers that are there to fool people who are looking for pregnancy termination help outnumber true abortion clinics by three to one.
We need to shut them down here in Massachusetts and we need to shut them down all around the country.
You should not be able to torture a pregnant person like that.
Imagine the idea of Allowing discussion is torturing.
Hey, you know what?
If the pregnant woman doesn't like the advice that she's getting at one clinic, one out of four will be the one where she can go to not get tortured.
I had an interesting discussion with someone yesterday talking about evil in the world.
And it's tough to not see evil in this.
There's a discussion, there's a middle ground here where I wouldn't call someone evil for choosing something that I don't think is, that I, one minute before, or does a baby alive after birth have value?
To take four seconds to answer that question, I'm going to say that makes you, it doesn't make you nice.
There's a room for disagreement without throwing around the label evil.
But I'm seeing a lot of what can only be qualified as true evil, in the sense that you get doctors now saying it loud, out loud, and proud.
Therapeutic, minimal risks, one in 5,000, mandate it.
And it's coming back.
With Elizabeth Warren, it's not evil, it's stupidity.
I'm not...
I think it's the worst type of evil.
It's what Lewis Carroll described as the evil...
That the individual thinks is morally justified and they'll torment you.
Let me get the quote.
They will torment you incessantly because they genuinely think that they're doing it.
Lewis Carroll, I think it's tyrant.
The greatest Lewis Carroll quote Lewis Carroll Tyranny?
It's worth...
Let me get this here.
Here we go.
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.
It would be better to live under the robber barons.
Stop it.
Get that thing out of there so I can see this.
Son of a beast thing.
Okay, I'll read it.
I can't...
I can't see it because there's a damn ad over it.
I literally can't read it because there's an ad on it.
Give me one more second.
I'll get it.
It's beautiful.
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.
It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.
The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep.
His cupidity may at some point be satiated.
But those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
It's beautiful.
That's where I think Elizabeth Warren is at.
That's where I think Justin Trudeau is at.
That and, you know, the pay is good.
They never have to worry about the things that other people have to worry about.
And speaking of Justin Trudeau, and speaking of the Freedom Fest, and the panel at 310 this afternoon, First Amendment under assault by the government.
I'm going to be addressing the Bill C-11 part.
Obviously, Bill C-11 in Canada.
And it's going to be phenomenally interesting.
Bill C-11, everybody knows the Online Streaming Act, and to be fleshed out in more detail later on, but I've talked about it at length, passed the House of Commons in Canada, is waiting to go to the Senate.
I just have to show you just the ultimate irony of all of this.
The Online Streaming Act is going to require Canadian content, CanCon, from online creators.
And the idea, like, what is Canadian content has always been nebulous.
It's going to require Canadian content creators to actually finance the system.
And if they don't create sufficient Canadian content, they could be demoted, downgraded, fined.
But just one example, by the way, CBC.
Is Canadian by definition.
Whatever CBC does will be Canadian content, even when they spend exorbitant amounts of time covering the January 6th hearings.
When the CBC does this, it'll still be Canadian content for the purposes of the application of any law that might otherwise downgrade or demote the discoverability of CBC online.
If I do it under this Bill C-11, if I were to do it from Canada under this Bill C-11, guaranteed I get demoted.
If not suppressed or sanctioned.
This bill is the government's attempt to restrict freedom of speech, restrict the freedom of the press, and do so for our own good, people.
It's the benevolent tyrant.
We're only imposing the Online Streaming Act on the internet because we want to do what's good for Canadian culture.
We want to bring attention to Canadian music to Canadian content.
It's for the good of Canadian culture.
So it's going to be a fun discussion this afternoon.
What else was there that's on the menu?
Well, I think that's it.
What is...
Oh, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on.
Let's just go back to Twitter for one second.
Let's just go back to Twitter.
There's more.
But wait!
There's more!
Viva Frye.
First of all, we're going to go see.
I don't think it's an internet issue, although it's got...
Fair, with all due respect.
One doesn't have to be brilliant to attempt a coup.
I disagree with that.
As somebody who has helped plan coup d 'etat, not here, but other places.
It takes a lot of work.
And that's not what he did.
It was just stumbling around from one idea to another.
Ultimately, he did unleash the rioters at the Capitol.
As to that, there's no doubt.
But not to overthrow the Constitution, to buy more time to throw the matter back to the states to try and redo the issue.
We were talking about what is capable, what you need to do to be able to plan a coup.
And you cited your expertise having planned coups.
I'm not going to get into the specifics, but...
Successful coups?
Well, I wrote about Venezuela in the book, and it turned out not to be successful.
Whatever.
Yeah.
I met Eliza Blue last night, and I know what people might be thinking.
You'll notice the Keanu Reeves hand.
A married man.
And there's Viva Barnes.
We had dinner last night, Robert and I. And then there's Justin Trudeau posing with ice cream.
I don't know what it is about perverts and ice cream.
I mean, I know the stereotype, the cartoon, is that perverts use ice cream to lure children.
I know it.
Why are they actually doing it in real life is beyond me.
Okay.
Let's see if there's any questions in the chat.
Let's do two scoops.
Oh, the Kim Fox 911 call was just made public.
I will never leave my wife.
And I'm doing the Keanu hug, man.
Can't go wrong with the Keanu hug.
Okay, hold on.
There were two super chats.
Britt Cormier.
Always be cautious of the righteous.
They can justify any action for, quote, good of all.
There's no question.
This is one of the reasons I'll be leaving Massachusetts and heading to sunny Florida.
All that I know is yesterday I woke up in hot and humid.
Florida flew to Vegas, and it's so freaking hot, but the amazing thing, you don't sweat in the 114 degrees out here, which is even almost worse than schvitzing like a pig, although pigs don't schvitz, yeah, I know, in Florida, because you don't know when you're losing all of your humidity, your body, and you don't know when you're losing your hydration.
It's an interesting difference.
The hot, muggy, humid Florida versus the dry heat of Vegas.
One in 5,000 is not bad.
This is how good those odds are.
I would take a wager if the chances of winning were one in 5,000.
If I knew there was one poison jelly bean in a jar of 5,000, I wouldn't take it.
So it's that good and it's that bad.
Those are good odds if you want to maximize your odds to have something unlikely happen.
Those are bad odds if you want to avoid the chances of something bad happening.
Pelosi likes ice cream too.
Oh, so Ray Epps did an interview with the New York Times.
Oh, I guarantee that was a fair and balanced interview.
Guaranteed.
You're thinking too deeply, Viva.
The ice cream is more about sham people wanting to be seen as personable.
Hold on.
That is what I wanted to bring up.
Well, there's the photo op.
Nobody can be unhappy with ice cream.
When you have ice cream, it's the international sign of happy children, perverted adults, and so on and so forth.
Let me just go to my Twitter.
You want to talk about being led by liars and phonies.
Big fat phonies is in Family Guy.
Big fat phony!
Justin Trudeau, they do these photo ops, and they think we're idiots.
They think the aggregate knowledge of the internet will not find out that they're lying idiots.
So Justin Trudeau, because he's such a man of...
Look at that.
Look at that.
That forced laugh.
There's a way to tell when someone's forced laugh.
Oh, and look at his beautiful gaze here.
I don't always eat ice cream, but when I do...
By the way, anything funny about that, by the way?
When he got his ice cream, it's a melting compressed piece of thingy thing.
Two seconds later, it's a beautiful cone as he sits there thoughtfully listening to people that he doesn't listen to and doesn't have to.
But it's even more shocking than that because the aggregate knowledge and the observing eye of the interwebs are phenomenal.
You have one picture here with that same melted ice cream cone that somehow gets erect as the ice cream melts.
The lady on the right, don't know who she is offhand, that's brown ice cream at best swirl.
That's brown soft serve ice cream or at best swirl because maybe on the inside left there's some swirl.
Okay.
Two minutes later, that's white ice cream.
Look at these people just sitting there with untouched ice cream in the heat of the sun.
And they're all just intently listening.
And I'm not judging people for their own life decisions.
I'm judging the Prime Minister for pushing this.
The lady on the left wearing a mask outside.
I don't know what she's going to do.
She's going to pull down her mask to eat her ice cream?
And she'll be safe when the mask is up?
But, you know, not exposed to lethality when she lowers it to eat the ice cream?
Or is she just not eating the ice cream?
In which case, why does she have it?
This is all madness.
This is all institutionalized madness.
And there is no other way to describe it.
Liars.
Deceitful.
Corrupt.
People.
There's just nothing.
Then there's this.
The story is from 14 years ago.
I remember the story.
A trans man who still had a uterus.
End it there.
End it there.
Words have no meaning anymore.
Words have no meaning anymore.
Married a woman who had previously had a hysterectomy.
I'm sorry.
A man who still had a uterus married a woman.
Can we define what a woman is here?
Who had previously had a hysterectomy.
He became pregnant with donor sperm and delivered a baby despite living as a man for 20 years.
Living as a man.
I thought you just called the person a man.
Living as a man is...
At a loss for words.
If someone else were to say that a trans person is living as a man, they'd get cancelled.
It may not be common, but it happened.
Yes, it did.
There's no doubt that happened.
Does that change anything of the definition of words?
Does that change anything of the XXXY gametes biology?
No.
I guess it's fascinating.
I don't think anyone deserves to be judged or discriminated against.
That's not going to say that a man still had a uterus.
Or a woman...
I mean, I don't even know how to use the words anymore.
Yeah, that's it.
Okay.
So that is what we have on the menu for today.
So apparently, by the way, it's going to be live-streamed.
The panel this afternoon.
On Fox News Nation.
Fox Nation app.
Now, I think you can get to that from the link to the Freedom Fest.
So I'm going to put that here if anybody wants to try to find it.
I should probably eat some breakfast.
I've been awake now for three hours.
Yeah, I'm going to go eat some breakfast.
Okay, let's just see.
I disagree with the righteous comment.
You could have righteous anger towards people who abuse children.
No, they're talking about people who are convinced that their tyranny is morally justified.
What I found is that the greater good can literally justify anything.
And I have now gone back to how atrocities have been justified for the greater good.
We have to sacrifice our humanity for the greater good.
What greater good is that, if not outright?
Evil.
There was another super chat that I saw here in yellow, or maybe it's all the way at the bottom.
Yeah, sweat like a pig, although they say pigs don't sweat.
If you've ever touched a pig, you know that they don't sweat.
They are surprisingly firm, and they sweat from the nozzle, the snout.
Okay, here we go.
I have wanted to say for some time you must have absolutely the best wife ever.
She's the best wife ever.
I am...
The best wife ever.
And I hate traveling without my family.
Because I don't like having fun experiences without them.
I was in the pool and there's a waterfall thingy and it's fun.
It's not fun alone.
Life is filled with experiences that only have meaning when they're shared with others.
So that's it.
I don't like traveling alone.
But sometimes...
For the greater good, it must be done.
No, I'm kidding.
But for the ban in trial, I'm not sure how a family might deal with five days in Vegas.
Not Vegas, in Washington.
But we'll see.
Okay, let's get to some questions that are not necessarily super chats.
Let me see here.
For all of Canadians living in Canada, Ontario lockdowns and COVID coming back soon.
I genuinely hope it's all wrong.
But when the theorists from the beginning were saying, here's what's going to happen, here's the timeline, and I spent time criticizing it because the timelines always adapt and then there's a recirculated version going around the internet.
But I do remember on the timeline of events...
Am I sweating?
Yeah.
On the timeline of events for like third quarter of 2022, they were talking about internet going down.
And then you have Rogers with an actual outage for a day and a half and people can't do their banking.
I see how people could like, I don't know.
It's a little bit like, not fortune tellers, but a little bit like the fortune tellers who ask broad questions or they ask you questions that they know are basically Statistically true of most people.
You've suffered trauma in your life.
And then the person's like, yes, I have.
And then they offer a bit of information that allows the person to guess more.
And then you think the person's actually fortune-telling when they're just reading bodily cues.
A lot of these predictions in that apparently leaked memo from a Liberals meeting saying how they were going to devastate the economy, yada, yada.
The memo contains things that happen regardless, periodically.
There are internet outages all the time.
Facebook goes down.
Twitter goes down.
Banking goes down.
It happens.
And so you make a prediction that happens regardless just statistically such that when it happens, you can say, look, I predicted it.
So that's how I view these things.
But my goodness, it is kind of funny.
It is kind of funny when these theories are floating around and then lo and behold, banking goes down.
Lo and behold, China and Bill Gates are buying up many, many acreages of land across the U.S. The random...
Hey, dude, those...
My theory is Trudeau's desire is to create a hermit nation that he can govern like Kim Jong-un governs North Korea.
And what better way to do it?
You're not going to get freedom-loving Americans coming up to Canada to...
Experience the joys of Canada when more than in Canada would have to go to quarantine if they're even allowed in.
I don't know if unvaccinated non-residents or non-citizens are even allowed into Canada.
I think they are.
But I think they have to quarantine for no less than 14 days.
Who the hell is going to do that?
And even if I am up to date, I'm not giving my money to fascists.
I have not gone to certain places because I don't want to support the local government and I don't want to tacitly condone what they're doing.
And sure, there's certain places I just won't go out of principle.
I can see people say, who the hell is going to want to go to Canada?
Because the skiing is good?
Well, you've got the Rockies in the States.
Because the fishing is good?
You've got fishing in the States.
But go there and support Justin Trudeau?
So he's going to create a hermit nation.
He's going to create a hermit nation because nobody's going to travel there.
People are going to have difficulty leaving.
Internet's going to be heavily regulated for Canadian culture, for Canadian content.
That's creating a hermit nation that is going to turn Canada into...
Take your historical pick.
Viva, here's a quote I got from Ernest Hemingway last night.
There are many who do not know they are fascists, but we'll find out when the time comes.
Lots of great coats.
Mark...
Oh, that was Ernest Hemingway.
I was going to say Mark Twain is the best, but...
10X Bowl, what do we got here?
I'm making a wager that Florida climate will cause you to cut the mane soon.
Never.
In fact, the wager should be humidity and massaging my scalp will cause my hair to grow even longer.
And I got to tell you...
I'm liking...
I'm liking the...
If it's a man bun or samurai ponytail, I don't know what we call it.
I like the samurai ponytail.
Oh, yeah.
And what happened?
Zelensky now realizing that there's no honor among scoundrels and Trudeau stabbing Zelensky in the back for whatever agreement they thought they had.
And, you know.
People forget history.
Some people don't even know history to know that there's something to know that they could have otherwise forgotten.
Yeah.
Top knot.
I go with samurai ponytail.
Of course, now I'm just going to have to, you know, live like a samurai, which I don't.
Now you can't cut it.
No, no, I agree.
Oh, my goodness.
Okay.
Oh, here we go.
So I just got news.
The Bale Review...
Let me see this here.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Alright, so apparently today, as far as Tamara Lich goes, today's hearing is procedural to schedule timeline, time frame, and apparently, subject to error, people, so don't hold me to this, the hearing ought to be next Tuesday to determine whether or not she's released from jail.
So today, hurry up and wait.
Gotta get to court.
How long do we need for this hearing?
Okay, so we're gonna need...
Crown's going to have two hours of argumentation.
All right, well, we're going to need a full day for that.
So let's schedule for next week.
And in the meantime, a Metis woman is sitting in jail for alleged mischief, alleged accused mischief and alleged noncompliance with bail terms.
That's Canada, because we're the misogynists and we're the racists, not...
Justin Trudeau.
There was something...
Hold on, let me see this here.
Let's get this one out of here.
That's not the one I meant to bring up.
This one here.
Now that you're in the U.S. Okay, sorry.
Trade in the Subaru.
Oh, and Pat King.
Pat King, last I heard...
And again, this is not confirmed.
I'm just going to go look it up.
Last I heard was discussing a deal because things are not ever going to get better for Pat King, especially now that this precedent has been set with Tamara Lich.
Pat King news.
Let's just see if there's any news on Pat King.
18 hours ago.
Let's see this.
We got this.
This is from The Star.
Pat King's been in jail for four months.
On also mischief charges, but also alleged perjury during one of his bail hearings.
Convoy organizer Pat King seeks bail after almost four months behind bars.
Can you imagine it's been four months?
By definition, there's been a change of circumstance that should warrant a new bail hearing.
The 44-year-old Alberta man was in court Wednesday to appeal an earlier decision that denied him bail.
His hearing is set to continue Thursday.
Look at that bad man.
He said bad things in the past, and then he participated in a protest.
So I support him being locked up indefinitely, is what too many Canadians are saying.
Pat King, a prominent figure facing criminal charges for his role.
Say what the charges are.
Mischief.
The 44-year-old man appeared in Superior Court in Ottawa on Wednesday.
Where he was seeking bail after a prior decision to deny his release from jail while he awaits trial for his alleged role in the convoy demonstration.
Evidence presented during the hearing cannot be recorded because of a court-ordered publication ban, and before anyone freaks out, my understanding is that's a defense-requested publication ban, I think.
King's bail review is scheduled to continue Thursday with the decision on his bid for release to come next week.
Four months.
A figure of the far right.
King was one of the organizers, no he wasn't, of the convoy trucks that drove to Ottawa and occupied the streets around Parliament Hill from late January.
This is a, I dare say it, a fair description.
Fairer.
They parked.
Parking is occupying a spot.
Yeah, I've heard you occupy a car spot.
Fine.
Around Parliament Hill.
At least they're not talking about an occupation, a crippling of all of Ottawa.
Riot squads and tow trucks cleared the protest three weeks later after the federal government gave police and banks special temporary powers under the Emergencies Act.
Are they going to mention that they revoked it, that they rescinded it, that it was never ratified by the Senate?
They gave them the powers.
We don't know if it was ever lawful.
I don't think they're going to mention that.
King livestreamed his arrest and was denied bail one week later after an Ontario court justice concluded there was a substantial likelihood he could re-offend.
The re-offend...
Oh my God.
And that his release would harm perceptions of the administration of justice.
They are torturing you and they think they're doing it for righteous purposes.
This judge actually thinks indefinite detainment of an individual accused of charges of mischief-related conduct.
That it would offend the administration of justice to release him, not to detain him.
He's charged with mischief, obstructing a police officer, counseling others to commit mischief, counseling to commit intimidation to obstruct police, and blocking or obstructing one or more highways.
Let me just see something here.
Let's try to see something for the sake of this.
It's thought police.
It's Minority Report in real time.
Let's see.
Canadian...
Just another story.
Just another story from Canada.
Not yet.
Chad?
I don't know who this person is.
I know I saw somebody tweeting what looked like a spliced newspaper clipping that says, Tamara Lich, bail granted for someone who's accused of a certain type of assault.
A former successful swimmer in the NCAA who represented Canada at international meets has been granted bail.
He's been granting bail.
Pending appeal of a 54-month prison sentence for someone in a Calgary apartment.
This is Canada, people.
He was convicted.
He was convicted.
In December 2020, and then handed a four-and-a-half-year prison sentence.
He has since appealed the conviction, arguing the trial judge made it...
Fine, fine.
Avail yourself to all of your legal remedy.
Absolutely.
Alberta Court of Justice...
Alberta Court of Appeal Justice Barbara Lee Veldewis released a written decision on Friday acknowledging the seriousness of the crime, but said that with no other criminal history and having complied with all previous orders, he was a low flight risk and not a threat to society.
This is Canada.
Organize a protest, block a street, counsel others to commit mischief.
You're a threat to society, warranting indefinite detainment.
Assault someone of a very specific nature.
Get convicted of it.
You get released.
That's fine.
He complied with his prison sentence, I guess.
He complied with previous detainment.
He's not a threat to society.
Yep.
The law is, they say, justice is human.
Miracle Mile at Planet Hollywood Good Eateries.
What time is this?
It's 9.06 here, so I should probably go into this.
Justice is human.
In every case, a justice can find a reason to go one way or the other.
Convicted of assault of a very, very violent nature.
Vile nature.
Convicted.
You've had your trial.
You were convicted.
You get out on bail.
Accused.
Of mischief, which consisted of parking cars on a street and honking horns, at worst, detained.
Viva, do you know anything about Louisiana, Missouri lawsuit against potatoes, this administration concerning First Amendment rights?
I saw that they're going to be allowed to proceed to discovery.
Who tweeted it?
I took a screen grab.
I know that they are allowed to proceed to discovery, from what I've read online.
Not much more than that, but we'll talk about it Sunday.
Yeah, it's easy to say taxation is theft.
You can't easily stop paying taxes without going to jail.
Good luck with that defense.
Oh, and I just happen to...
Lovely curly hair.
Curly hair people unite.
Thank you very much.
Voluntarist girl.
So, let's go back down here.
Don't eat fish at Lake Mead.
I wonder if there's any fish in Lake Mead.
As we flew over it, it was clear Lake Mead was exceedingly low, because you could see, from the airplane, massive amounts of lighter rock where the water level has clearly descended recently.
I don't know what's in that water, but as the water evaporates, it gets more concentrated for pollutants, as anybody who's ever been to Salton Sea would know.
Ah.
Ah.
Thank you.
What is in that picture?
That's a cat's butthole.
Oh, now I saw your name.
Kitty Browneye.
It all makes sense now.
Midterms coming soon in the U.S. and they will drain the swamp and then come over to Canada and help there.
Can't have global commies.
Very dangerous next door.
Yeah, I got pulled in by the butthole.
Okay, people, I'm going to go.
Let me just make sure that we did not lose anything on the rumbles.
So I'll be covering with an update on Pat King for sure, but I don't think we're going to have a judgment today.
Tamara Lich, it looks like the substantive aspect of the hearing is going to be next week, so I'll be covering.
I mean, I'll be on that as well.
There's enough time in the day.
And that is it.
Thank you all for sharing my morning, your morning to afternoon with me all together.
Don't lose faith.
This too shall pass.
People are starting to get fed up and people are starting to be more vocal and people are starting to realize there's liberation in speaking up, being honest, being true to yourself.
It is very liberating.
And more people are realizing that, and that's a good thing.
I saw something.
Thanks, Viva.
Rex Rockstay Murray.
It's a turkey head that's circled in green, in purple.
God bless each and everyone.
Barb, Arianne, I'm a secular religious individual, but God bless everybody.
And I say don't lose faith as in trust the plan.
Be good.
Do good.
And the world will be better.
I think we can't end it on more of a white pill than that.
3.10 this afternoon, people.
And until then, I'm going to go meet some folks downstairs and shake some hands and mingle.
And probably meet up with Barnes again before I leave.
Everybody, enjoy the afternoon Eastern time.
Enjoy the rest of the morning Pacific time.
And I will see you all on the interwebs later today.
▲
Export Selection