Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 9, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

02:16:55

Viva Mondays! Bill Gates BAD! Washington COMPOST! Another Viva Smear! Viva Frei Live!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	of Michigan proudly presents you the honorary degree Doctor of Science.
	By the authority.
	Okay.
	I'm going to mess it up too.
	By the authority of the State of Michigan vested in the Board of Regents and by them delegated to me, I now confer upon you, Anthony Fauci, the degree Doctor of Science and admit you to all of his rights, honors, and privileges.
	First of all, J.R.S.
	I love you too!
	Woo!
	University of Michigan proudly...
	What the heck is going on?
	What is going on in this world?
	You know, there's two things about this.
	First of all, I was going to pull up videos of Pope Francis addressing a crowd.
	Pope Francis being welcomed by a stadium.
	Of adoring supporters.
	But I didn't want anyone thinking that I was equating the absolute cultish madness that we see surrounding Fauci with what is legitimate, meaningful religious practices.
	Whether or not you are religious, you can nonetheless accept the idea that at its base, religions promote good stuff.
	Principles, faith, love for your neighbor.
	And I don't want to compare organized religion to what is, in my view, nothing shy of organized idolatry of Dr. Fauci.
	It's literally like, it's the scene from Megamind.
	Like the intro scene when, not, oh jeez, not Megamind.
	Oh jeez, what was Brad Pitt's character's name in Megamind?
	Metro Man.
	When Metro Man is addressing the crowd.
	He's a superhero.
	He's like, he's the savior of the earth.
	And someone in the crowd says, oh, we love you, Metro Man.
	He says, I love you too, fellow citizen.
	This is pathological levels of idolatry of another human being.
	Just again, again.
	First of all, why does he need a doctorate of science?
	I know it's an honorary degree, but I thought he was already a doctor.
	Dude, the honorary degree, doctor of science.
	It's like Oasis just entered the stadium.
	Who could...
	And look at the way he even...
	He acts like the Pope.
	Fauci thinks he is a god among humans.
	And look at his face, by the way, when they put the satchel over him.
	I'm going to have a mess of that too.
	Watch his face when they put the satchel over him.
	Look at that.
	I transcend you humans.
	Look at this face.
	So proud.
	He has the blind worship of a stadium of students who are cheering him on like he's a rock star hero.
	I don't understand it.
	I think I do understand it, and I don't think I like what I think I understand of this.
	It's pure media-induced to A very swayable general population who follows the media, I guess.
	Idolatry of a human and elevating this mere human and I would arguably say dishonest, corrupt, incompetent or immoral human because he is.
	Whether you like it or not, this guy is a liar who lied before Congress, lied about...
	Gain-of-function research that they weren't funding in Wuhan, that they were indirectly through third-party NGOs, denied what gain-of-function was to try to downplay what gain-of-function was, to then finally try to hide the fact that what they in fact did, that they lied about having done, wasn't actually gain-of-function.
	He's a liar.
	He's a liar.
	He's corrupt.
	He's unethical.
	And knowing now what I know about his role in the AIDS epidemic, he might be worse than all of that.
	But this crowd at this university cheering him on like it's Liam Gallagher or Noel Gallagher walking into the stadium.
	I love Oasis.
	It's scary.
	They don't know who they're worshipping.
	They don't know that they are actually worshipping a wolf in sheepskin.
	They're actually worshipping a bad man.
	A bad man based on facts.
	And based on evidence, and not based on demonizing an individual for no better reason.
	Fauci is a confirmed liar.
	He is confirmed misleader of the general public, lied about the potential alternative origins of the virus early on, lied about what they were doing in Wuhan, lied about who was funding it, lied about what gain-of-function was, got caught under oath, and then his protest is...
	Is it Rand Paul?
	I don't like the way you're treating me, sir.
	But this is who university institutions have chosen to worship.
	Delusional.
	Pathological.
	Delusional.
	And my goodness, it is time to sensitize people to this information slowly but surely because you can't pull people out of the matrix too quickly.
	We saw what happens in the matrix.
	All right.
	Intro rant over.
	We've got a great...
	We've got a great program.
	We've got a great show today.
	A few big stories.
	Bill Gates, Sweden, and another VivaFry attempt, or I should say another attempt to smear VivaFry.
	It is going to, I mean, it actually will, your jaw will drop not because it has to do with an attempt to smear me per se.
	Your jaw is going to drop because it is symbolic of the level of rubbish coming out of Otherwise, once were venerable educational institutions, much like what we just saw in the intro, and the government's role to play in this, and why this all might be one beautiful synergy circle of corruption.
	We'll get there.
	But before we get there, standard intros.
	I'm starring a bunch of the superchats, which I'm going to get to in a second.
	Superchats, like this one right here.
	Politically speaking, politically speaking, no violence and no joke, by the way.
	I know that that's an expression and it's hyperbolic.
	But without exception, everybody knows that some people don't like it about me because I don't promote people go break the laws and break windows.
	And some people think you're not going to affect change unless you start doing that.
	I think you're wrong.
	And I will always say that I think you're wrong.
	But if I do not get your super chat and it's going to leave you feeling miffed, shilled, grifted, rooked, or whatever, don't give it.
	I do my best to bring them all up like such.
	I don't necessarily read them first as per the...
	YouTube takes 30% of these superchats.
	If you don't like that, we are simultaneously streaming on Rumble.
	Rumble has a thing called Rumble Rants, which only takes 20% for Rumble, which is still better for the creator, better for the platform, and you can feel good supporting a platform that actually supports free speech.
	That's also one of the issues for today.
	Let me read what this was, though.
	I'm hoping to meet Paul Yivre on Saturday here in Nova Scotia.
	I'm going to tell him about the injuries that I and others have sustained.
	None of us have been taken seriously or have received any treatment, 20-plus people.
	I don't know what injuries you're talking about specifically, but we are going to get to this also, the disparate impact that some of these measures have had on people.
	And they're just pretending to now realize all of this.
	I've spoken to a Canadian Forces member who have been injured, and they are being made to take...
	Okay, I see what you're saying now.
	They're third and they're fourth.
	Next week will be fired.
	It's beyond unethical.
	It is.
	In my humble view.
	That's a face.
	Okay, no.
	No, people.
	I know it's a metaphorical expression.
	Yes, politically speaking, sir.
	Thank you very much, Carl.
	Carl, sliding door guru.
	Oh, I see this.
	F, let go license years ago, administrative worship.
	I don't know what that means.
	I love Oasis 2. Oasis used to be my favorite band of all time.
	They broke up on my birthday when I was scheduled to see them in Paris in the year 2000.
	They broke up on my birthday.
	I got to see them once live after that.
	They're actually not all that entertaining live.
	The music is always good live, but they're not always that entertaining live.
	Blink-182, I got to see in Paris with my now wife, then girlfriend, in our first year of relationship.
	Best concert ever.
	But, yeah, the Fauci business, pathological, delusional.
	It is, you can call it mass formation psychosis, but apparently, according to fact checkers, that doesn't exist.
	And the expert fact checkers, by the way, were behavioral scientists.
	Mass formation psychosis doesn't exist, according to expert behavioral scientists.
	Let that sink in.
	But on the issue of scientists, and on the issue of...
	Share screen.
	On the issue of experts.
	Experts whose posts got flagged on LinkedIn and then subsequently reposted because I just posted the words of the individual himself.
	He's not an expert.
	I don't know how on earth he got to be this venerable influencer of global policy.
	But Bill Gates has been at the forefront of a number of global initiatives.
	I don't know how he's gotten the political sway that he's gotten, but he's gotten more political sway, more influence than is understandable, and certainly that is justifiable.
	But he gave an interview to Fareed...
	Oh, what's his last name?
	I forget now.
	Fareed Zakarian.
	Fareed Zakarian.
	That is his last name, right?
	It doesn't matter.
	He gave an interview, and he...
	It seems that the Overton window people has shifted.
	We are now at the point where it is becoming politically expedient, politically acceptable, and acceptable on social media to now say out loud what were the quiet parts before, or to now say out loud what ought to be the quiet parts, or to now say out loud what hitherto had gotten people branded theorists, this is all going to do a full circle, has gotten people...
	Kicked off of social media platforms, flagged, removed, yada yada, etc.
	The Overton window has now moved where it's becoming acceptable and even popular to now say what could not have been said a year ago.
	And by the way, for anybody, let's just open this parentheses.
	For anybody who doesn't know what the Overton window is, it's a great concept.
	Overton window.
	Here, let's go here.
	Boom, shakalaka.
	And I'm going to stop screen sharing with this just to bring up the Overton window because you hear it.
	You know, not everybody takes a moment to pause and say, what actually is the Overton window?
	Wikipedia.
	It's good for certain things, people.
	The Overton window is the range of policies politically acceptable to the mainstream population at a given time.
	It is also known as the window of discourse.
	Let's see here.
	And how does the Overton window move?
	The term is named after an American policy analyst, Joseph Overton, who stated that an idea's political viability depends mainly on whether it falls within this range rather than a politician's individual preferences.
	According to Overton, the window frames the range of policies that a...
	Politician can recommend without appearing too extreme to gain or keep public office given the climate of public opinion.
	And the idea is that over time, the Overton window shifts depending on the media, depending on political preferences, depending on social norms.
	And you will all recall...
	I hope I didn't just end myself from the stream.
	This is one of my...
	Oh, no, I'm here.
	You'll recall that in the early days of the...
	My Sharona Cyrus Schman Schmendrick.
	Who has been here long enough to remember the My Sharona Cyrus Schman Schmendrick?
	Once upon a time, there were certain things you could not even allude to on the platform because society was not ready to hear the thoughts yet.
	The mainstream media was not yet ready to entertain these thoughts yet.
	And therefore, it's sort of like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
	Mainstream media says, you can't talk about this.
	This makes you a crazy person.
	And therefore, it becomes politically unacceptable, socially In socially intolerable, socially unpopular to suggest certain things, you know, like that the virus may have originated through man tinkering in a lab in Wuhan.
	In fact, even back it up, that the virus originated in a lab.
	You couldn't say that at one point.
	At one point, the Overton window had it such that it was racist to suggest that.
	There was a journalist for the New York Times.
	At one point, the Overton window had it that you couldn't suggest it was man-made because that made you, or man tinkered with, man developed through gain-of-function research because that made you An Alex Jones type.
	The window has shifted, it would seem, to the point where it's not only now being acceptable to say that, it's going to be passed off as, we always said that.
	If you think there was two years where you couldn't say what Bill Gates is going to say right here, you're the crazy person.
	We always said this.
	We always warned you of the consequences.
	We always warned you that this was going to have a disparate impact on minorities.
	We always told you that.
	We always said it was a perfectly viable alternative, a perfectly viable theory that this virus originated through gain-of-function research in a lab in Wuhan, China.
	We always said that.
	And if you say that you couldn't say that, you're the crazy one.
	Check this out.
	I had a dream about Bill Gates last night.
	I tweeted this at midnight.
	I should not tweet before going to bed.
	I had a dream about Bill Gates.
	I'll get to it.
	If all we would have had to do was, say, a 45-day lockdown, I think we would have gotten pretty good compliance.
	It says the lockdown starts extending out.
	And, you know, the lockdown hasn't dropped the cases to zero.
	You know, so the counterfactual of, okay, how much worse would it have been if we hadn't had this lockdown is unclear.
	There was a lot of uncertainty about, for example, school shutdowns.
	To this day, you know, there's still arguments about how many cases that avoided.
	It's pretty clear because young people don't get sick from the disease very often that we probably, if we knew everything we know today, we would have shut schools down a lot less than we did during this pandemic.
	I mean, yes, it's tricky for the elder adults.
	It's tricky.
	In a lot of ways.
	And you mean by that high school and under?
	Exactly.
	You know, for college, going virtual tends to work awfully well.
	The infection levels are a little higher as you get up into that age group.
	But K through 12, we have a learning deficit that will take us a long time to erase that.
	And sadly, it's a deficit where the inner city is where it's...
	Almost two years.
	Suburban schools less.
	Private schools, in some cases, like my kids, almost no deficit at all.
	right to jail, right away.
	Thank you.
	We're going to break that down piece by piece.
	Understand...
	Okay.
	I don't say understand the offensive things he said because I'm sensitive or emotional or I think being offended makes me right.
	Understand the shocking...
	Humanly offensive, socially repugnant, morally, ethically, constitutionally irresponsible.
	And I know people are going to say criminal because I think there's a certain element of fraud and abuse in these policies.
	We have to break it down.
	We have to break it down.
	And let's just start with one thing.
	Let me just start with one thing.
	If all we would have had to do...
	Was, say, a 45-day lockdown.
	I think we would have gotten pretty good compliance.
	First of all, his body language.
	A nervous scratching his head like...
	Setting that aside.
	I don't like that demeanor.
	Everything about him actually hurts my stomach.
	But setting that aside.
	I may be biased, but I'm not.
	We would have gotten pretty good compliance.
	May I ask you, Mr. Gates, who is the we to which you're referring?
	Who are you?
	Who are you?
	A businessman who has no scientific expertise, no degree, not an epidemiologist, not a virologist, not a scientist, not a postdoc, not a researcher, not a lab tech, didn't even graduate university, not an elected official.
	Who is this unelected?
	Who is this unelected?
	And I'll say morally corrupt individual for anybody who followed the previous lawsuits that he had with Windows.
	Who is this individual?
	To say, we would have gotten pretty good compliance.
	Who does this guy think he is?
	And more importantly, who made him think that he is in a position to seemingly promote, recommend, and enforce global public policy?
	Who the heck does this guy think he is?
	We.
	We would have gotten good compliance.
	45-day lockdown.
	I think we would have gotten pretty good compliance.
	It says the lockdown starts extending out.
	And, you know, the lockdown hasn't dropped the cases to zero.
	You know, so the counterfactual of, okay, how much worse would it have been if we hadn't had this lockdown as unclear?
	There was a lot of uncertainty about, for example, school shutdowns.
	To this day, you know, there's still arguments about, Overton window.
	Once upon a time, you couldn't say that.
	And I'll say this, you've got to be self-reflective.
	I don't consider this guy to be any expert, so why is he in a position to say this?
	Maybe he's as much of a kook as anyone else.
	But at one point in time...
	Because this is not a new idea.
	This was known, or at the very least suggested, by many, by many much more qualified actual experts than this immoral, unethical business jerk who now thinks he's an unelected official of the world and waiting for his honorary doctorate, doctor of science from Michigan University.
	There were a lot of very smart people saying this from very early on.
	Very early on, because the stats did come in relatively quickly, that children were not vectors of transmission.
	We went from...
	People were not able to say that.
	We went from people knowing that early on, Bill Gates is now repeating it now.
	It's pretty clear because young people don't get sick from the disease.
	That's Bill Gates saying it.
	Pretty clear.
	And yet we still went into school lockdown mode.
	We still went into compelled masks mode.
	We still went into compelled vaccination mode for the very people that Bill Gates is talking about now, saying what's pretty clear now, but people were saying it way back in the day.
	Overton window has moved, apparently.
	Sees very often that we probably, if we knew everything we know today, we would have shut schools down a lot less than we did during this pandemic.
	I mean, yes, it's tricky for the elder adults.
	It's tricky.
	In a lot of ways.
	And you mean by that high school and under.
	Exactly.
	You know, for college, going for...
	By the way, it's Fareed Zakaria, you know, conducting an impressive interview, really pressing Bill Gates.
	Hey, Bill, you know, if I'm doing it, people might accuse me of interrupting, but Bill, when did we know that locking down schools wasn't really doing anything good?
	When did we know that it was...
	Probably not having any meaningful impact on the numbers, or marginal even, according to you.
	But we did know that it was having very serious other impacts.
	As of when did you and the experts of your foundation know that?
	But this is the kicker in the teeth.
	And by the way, if anybody out there thinks that there's not a group of people who consider themselves to be the political, social, global elite, this will eliminate any doubt.
	Play.
	Virtual.
	Tends to work awfully well.
	The infection levels are a little higher as you get up into that age group.
	But K through 12, we have a learning deficit that will take us a long time to erase that.
	And sadly, it's a deficit where the inner city is where it's almost two years.
	Suburban schools less.
	private schools, in some cases, like my kids, almost no deficit at all.
	Right to jail, right away.
	If, if all you.
	Well, if only we knew that it was affecting inner-city kids disproportionately.
	If only we knew that all of this policy was impacting the most vulnerable of society, ethnic minorities, and other people who these very same people always go out of their way to support.
	If only we knew that.
	It's only we knew that.
	Oh, by the way, we did.
	And I'll pull up an article in one second, right after I address these super chats.
	I'm not feeling well.
	Every time I see or hear Fauci, Gates, or Trudeau, I begin to vomit uncontrollably.
	You joke, Gaddy.
	I literally, when I was getting angry about it a moment ago, I was getting nervous that I was actually going to throw up.
	It's stomach turning is what it is.
	It's absolutely stomach turning.
	Blink182, baby.
	Love that you loved that concert.
	Was it a concert or the company you were with?
	Both.
	500 people in a small venue.
	I crowd surfed for the first time ever with the love who became my wife and mother of three children.
	I was so close to the band, I could get sweat and spit from their faces.
	Lamp post your national politics.
	Nope.
	I'm going to have to start reading the chats now before I bring them up, people.
	It's the internet, and it's hyperbolic, but I'm telling you, I'll repeat it all.
	It's not to cover my butt on YouTube.
	You know what that'll do?
	Any form of violence, any form of destruction of property, there are people still in jail from January 6th, so that worked out real well.
	It doesn't work when you give them what they want so they can do what they want with that.
	Write that down.
	Rule of acquisition 25. Fear makes a good business partner.
	No doubt.
	Please consider shutting down YouTube and directing your viewers to rumble.
	It works.
	10,000 of his viewers immediately switched to rumble.
	First of all, I'm thinking about something along those lines.
	There's a reason why I wouldn't do it full stop.
	Because it's one thing to bring your crowd over, but the other thing is you want to reach people who will not see you.
	And it's not clear you can do that.
	By limiting yourself to a platform where you know that some people who need to be reached and don't know that they need to be reached and but for you being there, you will not reach them.
	You will not reach them if you're not there.
	YouTube, like it or not, is the biggest playground and it's the biggest voice and it's where you reach people who don't know you exist.
	It's not...
	I don't think there's any principle in saying I'm only going to cater to the people who already know I exist and make it difficult to reach people who need to be reached who you will not be able to reach if you do that.
	My humble assessment on that.
	Viva found you during the Canadian...
	Sorry, humble.
	Found you during the Canadian Truckers for Freedom.
	Time to say thanks for all your coverage.
	Trudeau sucks for Canada.
	Like you cannot imagine.
	T.S., I'm going to take for granted this is a legit.
	If we knew everything that we know today, therein lies the crux, but we didn't.
	So what's the point?
	Just drama.
	Oh, T.S., thank you for the segue.
	If only we knew then what we knew now.
	I wish that...
	I knew what I knew.
	Where is it?
	Where is it, people?
	If only we knew then what we knew now.
	Here.
	What year is this article from, TS?
	Let me see.
	I know what it's from.
	I just have to find the date so that I can show all of you.
	UK Parliament.
	What date is this article from?
	Can anyone see?
	Oh, here we go.
	October 2020.
	Yep, yep, nope, nope.
	What's the date now?
	We're in May 2022.
	October 2020.
	I'll pin the article if you can read it.
	It's not on all issues.
	People from ethnic minority groups are almost three times as likely to contract COVID and five times more likely to experience serious outcomes.
	Evidence suggests this is largely due to a social inequality such as housing, occupational risk, and access to healthcare.
	Lockdown measures have disproportionately affected some communities.
	Oh, by the way, I wish we knew then.
	I'm sorry, I wish we knew now what we knew then.
	So they're saying on the one hand, cramped living conditions, cramped living quarters, which are often attributable to low housing, low income individuals, are a problem.
	What do you do?
	Lock them down.
	Don't tell me that we didn't know now what we knew then, because we did.
	And there were people saying it loud and clear, but the Overton window hadn't moved yet.
	And they were not allowed to say it.
	It was not politically acceptable.
	It was not socially acceptable.
	And the media demonized it.
	So don't pretend that we didn't know now what we knew then.
	That we didn't know then what we know now.
	Because we did.
	This is from October 2020.
	They're saying, cramped living conditions.
	You know, low-income housing.
	Oh, good.
	Let's lock everyone down then.
	Lockdown measures have disproportionately affected some communities more than others.
	Those from Bangladeshi and Black African communities were more like...
	This is from the UK.
	This is the same everywhere.
	So you can nitpick.
	Oh, well, we didn't know that transmission from children was virtually nil.
	Well, first of all, there were people saying it.
	So the fact that some people didn't know might have been because they weren't listening.
	Might have been because they weren't listening because politically they didn't have to because the Overton window that the media nicely controls hadn't shifted there yet.
	But you know...
	Housing is the issue.
	Cramped housing, where you have close proximity of family members.
	By the way, lockdowns.
	What do you think happens in these communities where you have young people living with old people?
	Or you have lots of people living in closed quarters, cramped quarters, closed living conditions.
	Lock them down.
	I mean, you don't have to be a scientist.
	You could even be a lawyer and say, hmm, when you cancel school and you force kids to stay home, and if you genuinely thought kids were vectors and then you force the kids to stay home, And they need to be babysat by the elderly or by parents.
	Hmm.
	What happens then?
	Lockdown measures have disproportionately affected some communities more than others.
	You see, earlier this year, NHS Race and Health Observatory was established to offer analysis and policy recommendations to improve health outcomes for patients and practitioners from ethnic minority groups.
	So don't let...
	It is a...
	I don't want to presume intentions.
	I don't know if it's a disingenuous cop-out, but it's a cop-out.
	Or at the very least, It's inaccurate to say we did not know then what we know now because we did.
	Some people did.
	Some people were loud and clear about it.
	And others were just not listening because they didn't have to.
	At that time, everyone was so easily manipulated.
	Everyone was so living in fear that to suggest this would have been politically unacceptable.
	Let kids go to school?
	What about the teachers?
	Think about the teachers.
	Oh, what's that?
	Living in closed quarters is going to disparately impact lower income people.
	People of certain...
	Ethnic groups, according to this article?
	Hey, what do you do then?
	Lock them down.
	Oh, what would that do?
	Oh, I'm sorry, that'll exacerbate the problem that we just noted in this article exists.
	Higher infection rates and more likely hospitalization of certain minority groups.
	Oh, okay.
	So, yeah, no.
	You don't get out that easily.
	We knew then.
	We know now.
	We knew then.
	I'm going to screw it up every single time.
	But for some reason, it's interesting.
	You see in real time the Overton window is shifting and it's now...
	I think it's not necessarily the fact that it's politically acceptable or it's now politically expedient.
	It's cover your ass mode for everyone.
	It's Bill Gates coming out and saying, we said it.
	And so that in two years from now...
	Collective memory being what it is, you're not going to remember that he said this two years after all of the damage was done.
	It all gets lumped together.
	He said it.
	So you can't say that he never said it because he said it.
	Washington compost.
	We're getting there.
	We're getting there.
	But what Bill Gates said, it's just shocking.
	Let me just go refresh.
	Oh, and then one of my posts on...
	We're still green.
	Okay.
	One of my posts, the LinkedIn algorithm is still a little bit behind.
	They flagged one of my posts on Bill Gates and removed it for violating their terms of service, LinkedIn.
	Obviously, because what I think of myself is important as much as what other people think of me.
	In fact, what I think of myself is probably more important than what other people think of me.
	So I asked for an appeal, and sure as sugar.
	Because it is what it is.
	Let me just get to it.
	Yeah, they made a mistake.
	I mean, I don't care about LinkedIn as far as I can throw it.
	I couldn't give a sweet anything about LinkedIn.
	But no, that's not the right.
	That's another article we're going to get to.
	Yeah, here.
	Your post is back on LinkedIn.
	We regularly review the removal of content to ensure our policies are applied in a fair and consistent way.
	Initially, your post was removed for going against our policies.
	As part of our review, we now find that your post doesn't go against our apologies and apologize for the mistake.
	LinkedIn, I accept your apology.
	But you know what the problem is?
	Well, there's no real problem because Wikipedia might not update to say, you know, YouTube re-implemented one of my videos.
	I don't know that they apologized.
	I think they might have said, like, you know, they flip it the other way.
	You're probably going to be happy.
	But we apologize for the mistake.
	Your post is back on LinkedIn.
	Thank you, LinkedIn.
	The price of freedom, people, is eternal vigilance.
	Jefferson, I think.
	But, yeah, no, no, we're living through it in real time, and the problem is people are going to forget, and it has to be documented.
	It has to be documented so that in the future they will not get to say, we said it all along, because they didn't.
	They did damage.
	They did real damage.
	They did real damage, and now they're going to pretend that they always forewarned about the damage, and that it was our choice.
	Rule of acquisition, 134.
	There's always a catch.
	There is no question about that.
	I mean, that's akin to, if the product is free, you are the product.
	As a doctor, I cannot confirm or deny that Chase Henderson is, in fact, a real doctor.
	I will take for granted that you are, even though it's the interwebs.
	As a doctor, when I heard Fauci tell everyone to stay inside to prevent the spread, I thought it didn't make sense.
	Get outside and let the sun do its thing.
	If I knew then what we know now, get the F out of here.
	Agreed.
	And not just that, by the way, I had been informed, Chase, we're going to check this out again in real time, that the expression, sunlight is the greatest disinfectant origin.
	I have been told that the expression, sunlight is the greatest disinfectant, actually was born out of the Spanish flu.
	Let's see if it's true.
	My face is so itchy.
	Right there.
	Oh, hold on.
	I'm going to scratch it on camera.
	Okay.
	Share screen.
	Go here.
	We're going to share with this and bring it up.
	Okay.
	Sunlight is the greatest disinfectant.
	And just so everybody sees, this is my search term, quickionary.
	Do we care about a quickionary?
	Here we go.
	I think it's going to be confirmed.
	Louis Brandeis, 1914.
	Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases.
	Sunlight is the greatest disinfectant.
	That does not give us a good enough explanation on the origin.
	Quote investigator.
	Quote investigator in the 1860 well-known transcendentalist philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson published a collection of essays on...
	The Conduct of Life, which included a piece titled Worship.
	Emerson employed an analogy equating the protective illumination provided by gaslight and the protective information provided by publicity.
	Okay.
	Oh, here we go.
	Sunlight.
	And then we got in 1879.
	Laws of Health, edited by Robert Walter, published a short article without a byline about disinfectants, which included the following excerpt.
	Sunlight is the greatest disinfectant.
	Malaria, for instance, which is one of the most difficult things to contend against, is dissipated when the sun shines and exerts its pernicious influence at night.
	Interesting.
	And that's close enough.
	Let me just make sure that I am still here.
	That's close enough, people.
	So sunlight is the greatest disinfectant.
	I'm not sure that's a quote by Jesus.
	Someone just said that, but...
	So some people said, you know, back in the Spanish flu when people were ill, they put them outside and I saw some pictures in one of the alleged origins of the expression of people basking in the sunlight.
	One thing is for certain.
	Sunlight is good for you.
	Not too much of it.
	Although, you know, whatever.
	Vitamin D. We know that, you know, in countries, Nordic countries, northern of the hemisphere in the wintertime when you don't get enough sun, you get something called seasonal affected depression disorder.
	SAD.
	We know that certain...
	Illnesses are exacerbated by vitamin D deficiency.
	Sunlight is also, when it comes to scabs, wounds, let them dry out.
	Let the sun clean it out.
	I mean, we know it.
	It's not like we didn't know it two years ago.
	So when they were saying, constantly disinfect, lock yourselves in your homes, don't leave, don't socialize, don't go out and get fresh air and natural sunlight, natural exercise.
	I'll proudly say I was among the earlier ones to say, what the F are you telling us to do?
	You have kids.
	Anybody who has kids, you know.
	Let the kids eat dirt.
	There's a book written by a scientist on it.
	I'm continually refreshing to see if we're still green.
	We're still green.
	Look at that.
	Let the kids eat dirt.
	You do not develop a strong immune system by putting yourself in a bubble.
	When this all came down and they said constant disinfection, you know, the alcohol spritzers became the new holy water for this Fauci movement of madness.
	Stay home.
	Don't go outside.
	Don't get exercise.
	Constantly disinfect.
	I mean, I was asking the questions, and I predicted it, actually.
	My prediction didn't come to fruition, but I said, look, it did to some extent.
	After a year and a half of doing this, what do you think is going to happen to kids who don't develop normally?
	In Florida, or in Florida, I think it was in the States, and I think it was Florida, they were noticing a lot of kids going to the hospital, being hospitalized, but not for Rona issues, for other rhinoviruses that they would have otherwise naturally been exposed to, but for the fact that everyone had been leading a compromised exposure existence for over a year and a half.
	Was it in Florida?
	I forget where it was.
	It was somewhere where they were saying...
	The hospitals are overrun by children, and it's not the Rona.
	You know what?
	I'm not going to be happy unless I confirm this as well.
	Hospitals overrun kids, not coronavirus.
	Oh, here we go.
	I don't know if it was also Florida, but this one seems to be in Quebec.
	Let me see if this is the proper article.
	Share.
	Chrome Hospital, Quebec Kids Hospital, packed, not with COVID, but unprecedented surge in other viruses.
	This is from September 2021.
	September, October, November, December, January, February, March, April, May.
	Eight months ago.
	I wish we knew then what we knew now, right?
	Any Montrealer who's gotten in the habit of checking hospital statistics has probably been alarmed if they looked at them.
	They're up recently, especially if they have kids.
	Quebec schools are coping with a surge of COVID-19 cases due to the more transmissible Delta variant.
	Meanwhile, the stats show the emergency room of the Montreal Children's Hospital was over 150% capacity this week.
	Oh, parents wondered if the summer's warnings had come true.
	A big uptick in Delta among kids.
	Oh, but wait a minute.
	No!
	Doctors say...
	Highlight properly, please.
	No!
	Doctors say Montreal kids with coronavirus aren't the ones filling the ER but some of the overcrowding is still related to the pandemic and it's still serious with an extraordinary spike in viruses that normally appear in winter circulating now among children.
	One can hypothesize as to why but also do you see how they're like they're linking the consequences of their policy to the justification for their policy.
	You have to appreciate this.
	This is arguably The consequence of bad policy.
	We're seeing a spike in other stuff.
	Why might that be?
	Maybe because kids have been living in a proverbial bubble, so to speak, or actually a physical one, where they haven't been getting exposed to viruses to which they would otherwise normally be exposed, normally develop, or normally respond to in a way that would not result in hospitalization.
	Maybe that's the consequence of the bad policy, but here they flip it and they say no.
	This is the result of that for which we are implementing policy in the first place.
	They're saying kids with coronaviruses aren't the ones still in the ER, but some of the overcrowding is still related to the pandemic.
	Yeah, I guess if something is the consequence of bad policy, technically it's related to the pandemic, but not in the sense that we understand, not in a meaningful sense, not in the correct sense.
	It's related to the pandemic because it's the consequences of stupid, unscientific policy.
	Anyway, so that's it.
	I didn't make it up.
	I don't know if it was also in Florida.
	I just saw it.
	More kids than they've ever seen being hospitalized, but not with the Rona.
	Other stuff.
	I'm sure it has nothing to do with canceling school, constant disinfectant, social isolation, physical deprivation of movement.
	They locked...
	They locked the dog run in Montreal in the early stage of the pandemic.
	They padlocked the outdoor dog run fence shut.
	I tweeted about it to keep my diary of the times.
	They took down the basketball nets where I live.
	They took down the swings where I live.
	They shut down the playgrounds where I live.
	And they did it elsewhere.
	Am I out of focus?
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	No, no, it's...
	They shut down the playgrounds.
	They basically said, kids, you don't get to go and get exposed to the other viruses that you would otherwise get exposed to.
	Constant disinfecting.
	Constant living in fear.
	Constant living in stress.
	Not getting normal physical activity.
	Who could have foreseen it coming?
	Except for those who foresaw it and who warned about it.
	And then when it happens, well, we didn't know it.
	We didn't know then.
	It's amazing what you don't know when you don't leave your political, ideological, scientific silo.
	What did you just say?
	blame shane mate If only people didn't know that, you know, leading an unhealthy life leads to an unhealthy life.
	You know what?
	But the thing is this, okay?
	Full circle.
	If only people knew that being healthy led to a healthy life.
	My goodness, if only we had experts.
	If only we had experts.
	To tell us this, to confirm this through scientific study.
	If only we had scientists to confirm that being healthy is good for your health.
	Don't worry, people.
	Don't worry.
	Look no further.
	Look no further than the fine folks at the Washington Compost finally getting to the real science.
	Zuby posted this originally, and I was like, I saw the headline.
	Healthy lifestyle may increase life expectancy, research says.
	This is Pulitzer Prize winning stuff right here, people.
	Washington Post, you're doing the Lord's work.
	We were uncertain about this.
	This is going to drive people out there to go live healthy lifestyles.
	Because healthy lifestyles may, may increase life expectancy.
	We're not sure.
	I mean, and I said, this is...
	Literally, idiocracy levels of idiocy.
	These people have to be the stupidest people on earth.
	Seriously, they make President Camacho.
	Everyone's got to watch Idiocracy.
	They make President Camacho look like a Nobel laureate.
	Washington Post is printed diarrhea.
	Hashtag WAPU.
	I want to make that one trend.
	Article here, in case you don't believe it.
	And we'll get to that article in one second.
	Let me just get to a super chat that I just saw come through and another one that I missed.
	Kids aren't getting...
	Kids aren't getting abnormal levels of activity.
	I will say they're getting abnormal levels of inactivity.
	And I would dare say it's compelled by the government.
	Greetings from Toledo, Ohio, the walleye capital of the world.
	Congrats on your first catch.
	For anybody who doesn't know, Viva Family is a second channel where I post absolutely nothing related to the garbage that we're going through in the world right now.
	And Viva Clips, where I post clips from these streams and other stuff, which is random.
	I have two clips currently pending, but they've been demonetized, and I want to wait for manual review.
	Apparently, Amber Heard, no good.
	Oh, a National Post article about a woman suing Ford's government.
	Isaiah 512.
	ESV.
	What does ESV stand for?
	What does ESV mean?
	Okay.
	Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.
	This is where I say I'm not a religious person.
	I believe the Bible is an amazing book in terms of principles, fables, morality, even if I'm not convinced on the religious aspect of it.
	But yes.
	It has meaningful lessons to be learned.
	First they came, the poem of protest, just saying.
	No question.
	And then there was...
	Where was it?
	I think I'm way up in the chat now.
	Lying for scurvy.
	Okay, we got Viva, found you during the...
	I got that one already.
	But hold on, there was one more that I want to get.
	Bear with me.
	It's right here.
	Good.
	Oh, no.
	That's not it.
	Son of a beast.
	All right.
	I might have missed it.
	It is...
	Oh, no.
	I just read it.
	It's Jason Lippert.
	It's the woe from the Bible.
	Okay.
	Do we want to read this article?
	I don't know that I'm going to get past the paywall this time around.
	I don't know how it works.
	Every now and again, you get past the paywall and you can read the article.
	Where is it?
	Let's just go read the article.
	Fingers crossed.
	Because we need to know this.
	Healthy lifestyle may increase life expectancy, research says.
	A healthy lifestyle may allow older people to live longer, with women adding three years and men six to their life expectancy, suggests research published in the journal BMJ.
	In addition, more of those years may be dementia-free.
	More than 6 million Americans, 65 and older, have the most common times.
	The study found that at 65, women with the healthiest lifestyle had an average life expectancy of about 24 years compared to 21 years for women whose lifestyle was deemed less healthy.
	Life expectancy for men with the healthiest lifestyle was 23 years versus 17 years for men who were less healthy.
	This is rocket science.
	I want to see if alcohol factors into the diet.
	The current research developed a healthy lifestyle scoring system for their participants that encompassed five factors.
	Listen to this, by the way, and then compare this to what the government told everyone to do for the last two and a half years.
	Diet.
	Who remembers that guy in New York?
	The one who makes me want to puke as well.
	The governor of New York, that guy who was eating a burger, saying, oh, oh, oh, that tastes like, that's, go get a, go get a, go get jabbed and we'll give you a burger.
	What was his name?
	What was his name, Chad?
	I can't, I can't go on until I know it.
	What was the mayor who did that awful, disgusting thing?
	He dressed in the, in the sports outfit.
	The guy, not Cuomo, it wasn't, de Blasio.
	It was de Blasio.
	Sits there.
	Go get vaccinated.
	You get a burger and fries.
	After you've been locked in your one and a half studio apartments in New York for the last year and a half, go get jabbed and we'll give you a burger and fries.
	Some places we're giving free beer.
	I have a...
	I obviously have my own vices, so I'm not going to judge the beer or the alcohol part, but the junk food.
	And then what else were they doing at other places?
	Giving away junk food to go get the jab.
	So now the scientists have confirmed.
	I wish we knew then what we knew now.
	When they were bribing people to go get jabbed with junk food galore.
	The five factors for health.
	Diet.
	Cognitive activity.
	What do you think was happening when they were bombarding people with fear porn media?
	Don't shake hands.
	Don't wash your fruits.
	What do you think was happening to people when they were doing that?
	What do you think was happening to their cognitive...
	Now they're calling cognitive decline a symptom of long COVID.
	Oh, confusedness.
	Anxiety.
	Oh, that's long COVID.
	That has nothing to do with being locked alone in your studio apartments for the last two years.
	But we're only now realizing, because an expert said it in the Washington Post, that diet, cognitive activity, physical activity...
	Oh, there's your smoking and alcohol.
	Darn it.
	Well, look, I'm not perfect.
	But I try to make up for it elsewhere.
	I don't smoke.
	But I do enjoy a sniff to report at Christmas.
	Who knew?
	So of all these five factors that they now know are...
	How do I get rid of that?
	Are good for health.
	Diet, cognitive activity, physical activity, and eating well.
	What have they been doing to people for the last two and a half years?
	What has government, by policy, been doing to people for the last two and a half years?
	Alright, we've now got Washington Post confirming that what the government has been doing to us for the last two and a half years has been...
	Bad for our health and decreasing our life expectancy.
	Will anyone...
	If only we knew.
	If only we knew.
	But will there be any consequences for the fact that now we have experts confirming that what the government has been doing to us for the last two and a half years has been physically, psychologically unhealthy and has been decreasing life expectancy?
	What do you think is going to happen?
	I'll give you a hint.
	It's a big fat bagel.
	A big fat goose egg.
	I don't know what it is for everyone.
	A big fat donut.
	Nothing.
	Nada.
	Zilch.
	Nothing.
	I'm going to crack my back.
	Oh, that's good.
	Oh, that was a good one.
	Okay.
	Let's see what we've got here.
	Super chat.
	Thought.
	I never had to or knew anyone who went to the ER for the flu.
	Maybe it wasn't worse than usual, but everyone was scared it might be COVID.
	I never had to or knew anyone who went to the ER for the flu.
	I ended up in the ER with one of my kids who has asthma, and whenever we get the flu, it can trigger bad reactions, but it's typically as a child.
	I ended up in the ER because I had croup so bad I could barely breathe.
	Croup is the worst for anybody who's had it, and my kids have it.
	Kids have it because it has to do with the size of your...
	Not your trachea, but it has to do with the size of...
	The passage through which air comes, and when you're young at that age, it gets inflamed.
	When you get an ordinary virus, an ordinary flu, and it causes croup, it's very scary because it does lead to problems breathing.
	You wake up and you're like, and then you panic.
	You go to the hospital.
	By the time you get to the hospital, it's gone because the first thing they say to do is get outside into cold air, which sort of reduces swelling.
	We've ended up for the flu a couple of times, but I have no doubt this time around people were freaking out.
	Am I having breathing problems?
	People are freaking out because they've been living for two years under permanent fear where anything is a symptom of something which the media has convinced you is going to kill you in the most horrible, horrible way.
	But now, lo and behold, Bill Gates comes out and says, you know, we now know it's pretty much like something else but a little bit different because it affects old people worse.
	And the lockdowns were useless except they, you know, unnecessarily prejudiced minorities and the most vulnerable of society.
	It's amazing how all that works.
	Robert Bribourg, science has known for decades that vitamins and minerals are essential to human function.
	Never recommended.
	Most people have multiple deficiencies.
	I have actually grown to learn that I never knew it, but it's like, I never knew it because it never affected me.
	I'm healthy.
	I eat well.
	But there's a...
	Apparently, you know, seasonal vitamin deficiency.
	Seasonal vitamin D deficiency in Nordic countries.
	I mean, I knew that part because I'm familiar with the psychological side of winter.
	Everybody gets depressed.
	You get depressed.
	You get tired.
	You get fatigued easily.
	You have six hours of sunlight if you're lucky.
	Yeah, but they knew.
	We knew.
	But thank goodness, now there's a study from the Washington Post confirming being healthy.
	Might be good for your health.
	Might be.
	Suggests.
	Research suggests.
	And what the government has been telling all of us to do for the last two and a half years has been the antithesis, the exact opposite of that which research says now is healthy life.
	Exercise, activity, cognitive activity, good diet.
	Reminds me of a 2047 virtual revolution.
	Bad movie on Amazon.
	They want people trapped inside a metaverse.
	It lowers life expectancy so they don't have to pay for healthcare for most people.
	It's an interesting observation because I did do an interview with Eric Duhem.
	We were talking about the fact that we have an aging population in Quebec.
	Virtually half of our provincial budget goes to healthcare services.
	If one wants to theorize...
	There will be fringe economic benefits, for lack of a better word, to what the government did.
	Because they did 80% of the deaths in Quebec, 75% to 82% of the deaths in Quebec, and Canada as well, to a large part, long-term healthcare facilities.
	Who did the government actually end up killing through their bad policy?
	The people who were going to be the biggest drain on the healthcare system in general.
	Was that a double?
	I hope you didn't double that chat.
	Oh, no, sorry.
	This is a different one.
	Governments spent millions of dollars on a study that shows...
	No medical advice.
	No medical advice.
	But when Trump came out and said, you know, like, UV whatever, people were rightly pointing out that this is a treatment for a lot of other things.
	No medical advice.
	No legal advice.
	No election fortification advice.
	Thank you very much for the super chat, Chase.
	Bring this one out.
	Bring this one up.
	Thought.
	I never had...
	Okay, we got this one.
	What do we got here?
	Dubé, the Minister of Health in Quebec, was giving a hot dog for a vaccine.
	Now, I'm not going to be a hypocrite.
	I like eating beef jerky.
	I think it's healthier than hot dogs.
	I like eating a lot of red meat.
	It's probably not good for me, if the studies are right, but I like red meat.
	I'm not going to live a life of passionless eating just because I think it might get me a couple of extra years.
	I'm just going to exercise and do other stuff that might compensate for my bad habits.
	I love a barbecued steak.
	More than anything.
	Hot dogs are pretty disgusting, though.
	You have these things called carnazzo.
	It's like salami, but it's dried salami.
	It's delicious.
	It's probably not good for you.
	But exercise and, you know, compensate for it or offset it in other respects.
	But yeah, they were all doing it.
	It wasn't just de Blasio and...
	Who was it?
	I mean, in the chat, you can mention all the names of politicians, government officials.
	Just offering the most unhealthy, what's the word?
	Bribery out there.
	The hell is long...
	Crash!
	Google it, man.
	Everything.
	It's everything now.
	According to Teresa Tam, I wasn't going to punish you with this, but I'm going to do it now.
	According to Teresa Tam, 50%, almost, potentially, 50% of people who have contracted COVID are suffering from long COVID.
	But do not trust me.
	I am not the chief medical officer of Canada.
	That was funny yesterday.
	Don't trust me.
	Do not trust me.
	I'm just a lawyer.
	I'm a lawyer with a quasi-functional brain.
	Trust Dr. Theresa Tam, the chief medical officer of Canada, the woman who said you should consider wearing face masks during sexual activity.
	I'm going to show you that just to prove to you that it actually existed.
	But this is what she says about long COVID.
	I think we are still trying to understand long COVID more, including the prevalence of long COVID post-infection.
	And there's various estimates.
	I think that at the WHO estimates, the earlier estimates put it at 10 to 20%.
	But we know that more recent estimates...
	I have put it at maybe as high as 50% for those who have been infected with COVID-19.
	In summary, though, even now, we probably anticipate that the impact of long COVID is going to be quite substantial.
	And there's a huge range of symptoms that people are trying to understand.
	There's over 100 of them that may be different.
	Underlying pathophysiology or pathogenesis for some of these symptoms, that still has to be further understood.
	But I think while the data is relatively scant, there's emerging data to show that vaccines are able to provide a level of protection against long COVID.
	Some studies put it at 50% effectiveness.
	That still has to be further studied.
	But I do think that the vaccine plus approach is still the way to go.
	I think we are still trying to...
	Can't do it again.
	The data is scant, people.
	So let me just come to some very concrete conclusions.
	Data is scant, but this is what I think.
	They say with a straight face...
	No, sorry, I didn't mean to...
	I know there's an internet meme out there.
	I don't make fun of the way people look unless it's somehow relevant to the discussion.
	Like, you know, someone walking around with purple hair and then complaining that everybody's looking at their purple hair.
	That's when what one looks like is relevant.
	What she looks like is not relevant to the discussion.
	But for those of you who do...
	By the way, everyone should follow Rebel Media.
	I don't think I need to tell people to go follow them because they're doing good work.
	But I'll say it nonetheless.
	Theresa Pam.
	Mask.
	Sexual activity.
	I mean, everybody's watching it.
	You're going to know this already, who's seen this.
	But for those of you who don't.
	CTV News.
	Canada's top doctor.
	Consider using a mask during sexual activity.
	Uh, got an email.
	Forget that.
	Canada's top doctor dispensed some important sexual education.
	By the way, this is the media corruption.
	Ordinarily, anyone with half a brain would say, Canada's top doctor dispensed some of the most idiotic, counterintuitive, illogical, and I would dare say unscientific medical advice ever.
	That's how most people would view it, and that's probably how most people do view it.
	But CTV, you know, it's the type of coverage that $600 million in bailout will get you.
	Canada's top doctor dispensed some important sexual education today for those attempting to date during a pandemic.
	You know what?
	I can't actually tell if this is being sarcastic or not.
	Is this troll level?
	Important sexual education today.
	Maybe they're making fun of her.
	Consider wearing a mask during sex.
	Dr. Theresa Tam put out a statement Wednesday that covered how best to keep yourself safe.
	From COVID-19, when putting the P to the V, people, let's just appreciate, when exchanging bodily fluids in the most intimate manner possible, when you're arguably putting, you know, body parts together and body parts in other places, she put out a statement Wednesday that covered how to keep yourself safe from COVID-19 while engaging in sexual intercourse.
	You can read it in her voice.
	I'm not going to.
	Sexual health is an important part of our overall health, she said in the statement.
	However, sex can be complicated in the time of COVID-19, especially for those without an intimate partner in their household or whose sexual partner is at a higher risk for COVID-19.
	While obviously the sexual activity with the lowest risk involves you...
	She means masturbation, people.
	Dr. Teresa Tam is telling you to masturbate.
	In the name of COVID, masturbate.
	Let me just go refresh here and just see what's going on.
	See what's going on with it.
	We're still green!
	Yeah, so in the name of public health people, do it yourself.
	But if you really need that human interaction, if you really need for your cognitive activity, if you really need...
	By the way, sexual activity is also known to...
	I believe it's known to prolong one's life.
	But if you need to go out and be a human and do the things that loving humans do, if you need to go out and do that, one important first step is to trust that your partner is following COVID-19 precautions themselves and will be honest with you if they experience symptoms.
	Current evidence indicates that there is very low likelihood Of contracting the novel coronavirus through semen or vaginal fluids, she said.
	However, even if people involved do not have symptoms, sexual activity with new partners does increase your risk of getting or passing COVID-19 through close contact by kissing.
	Can you imagine that we're talking about having sexual activity with new partners and Dr. Teresa Tam's biggest concern for those presumably younger people?
	I don't want to envision.
	There's nothing wrong with older people doing this.
	You don't want to imagine it, and you don't want to imagine yourself getting old and then having the young generation be grossed out by the thought of you engaging in it, even though when you get old, you're probably still going to want to do that.
	This is crazy.
	I mean, it's just absolute idiocy.
	She recommends couples skip kissing and avoid face-to-face contact or closeness during sex.
	In other words, don't be human.
	Don't be human.
	By the way, there was another one who said glory hole, who suggested a hole in the wall.
	Or a barrier to the sex.
	Consider using a mask that covers your nose and mouth.
	This is a doctor.
	This is a doctor saying this.
	But let's just do this.
	Let's just do this one.
	I'm not going to say these words.
	they didn't use these exact words.
	laughter People!
	These are the times we're living in.
	Try glory holes for safer sex during coronavirus, BC CDC says.
	BC health officials are recommending an age-old.
	An age-old, occasionally cutting-edge tactic?
	That's not how I would describe glory holes.
	You bought out filthy, lying media.
	That's not how I would describe glory holes.
	In any realm of the universe, I haven't studied the history of glory holes.
	I would not describe them as cutting-edge tactic or age-old.
	I would not describe them that way.
	But I guess when you're trying to sell the crap that the government doctors are spewing and you're subsidized by the government, you'd better spin that crap so that people think you have some legitimacy as a news institution and that they have some legitimacy.
	They're describing.
	I mean, chat, you can describe in as many words what your perception.
	Do you consider it cutting-edge, age-old, or something else?
	You just go ahead and let me know.
	And I say that without judgment.
	I say that without judgment for people's fetishes, but I wouldn't call it cutting-edge.
	The BC center...
	Oh, this is another.
	Here, you've got Bonnie Henry.
	She was a great, great, great doctor during...
	It's almost.
	Okay.
	This is just, it's beyond abhorrent.
	The BC Centre for Disease Control added new recommendations for socially distanced sex to its COVID-19 website this week.
	One of those tips was to try using a glory hole.
	Did they actually use the word glory hole?
	A hole cut in a wall that's only large enough for a wanker to slip through.
	Oh my.
	God, they actually use the words.
	I don't mean to use God's name in vain, but every now and again, you have to.
	Glory holes are typically associated for anonymous oral and penetrative sex, according to Urban Dictionary.
	Not according to the Urban Dictionary, according to humankind.
	But they're also an excellent way to eliminate physical contact during intercourse, the BCCDC says.
	Use barriers like walls, e.g.
	glory holes.
	I'm done.
	I'm done.
	I'm almost done for the day.
	This is moral depravity.
	This is actual moral scientific depravity.
	And I gotta tell you, it's not moral depravity because of the act.
	It's moral depravity because you have scientists pushing this and then cloaking it under the guise of science.
	Any doctor who recommended this should have their license revoked.
	Period.
	Period.
	Full stop.
	I'm not a doctor.
	I'm a citizen saying that.
	Why not suggest something so absurd if you don't have a significant other?
	Anyway.
	Holy, sweet, merciful goodness.
	It's idiocracy.
	We're living through idiocracy.
	Try a glory hole.
	There's a joke in here somewhere.
	There's an old joke.
	There's an old joke.
	I can't tell.
	It's from Blanche Knotts.
	Teresa Tam...
	Is the Dr. Nick of Canadian Healthcare System.
	Hi, everybody!
	Are you looking to have sex during COVID?
	Try a glory hole.
	It's very good.
	I mean, it's like, I can do a decent Dr. Nick.
	It's been a while, but it's beyond the realm of stupidity.
	Everything, and I mean everything they've been telling us and continue to tell us, is either ignorance, deception, or in most cases, out-and-out lies.
	Are you trying to have sexual intercourse during a pandemic?
	Why not buy my glory holes?
	You can get them at the Upstairs Medicine Institute.
	Okay.
	My God.
	If I were sassier, I would really do some good...
	If I were sassier and better with editing, I would do some awesome stuff in terms of edgy, edgy memery.
	Let me see what we got on the rumbles.
	If I missed any chats on the rumbles, let me know and I'll periodically go back.
	Can you imagine the difference we would have made if we spent half as much money as we spent on COVID taking care of obesity?
	Hey, you can't say that.
	Can't tell people to get healthy that way.
	You can only tell people to get healthy through shortcut perception of shortcut shortcuts.
	Don't go exercise.
	Don't lose weight.
	Don't have a decent resting heart rate, low blood pressure.
	Go out and get the jab and enjoy your burger and fries, you sloth.
	It's basically what they said.
	Viva.
	Beef jerky preservatives and sugar is probably one of the healthiest things you can eat.
	Yes.
	The only problem is that, you know, I like...
	I like...
	Oh, geez.
	How can I possibly...
	How can I possibly blank out so much here?
	The beef jerky that sponsored the WSOP forever.
	Jack Flinks.
	I tried to make my own beef jerky.
	It's good, but never quite as good as the one with nitrites and sugar.
	But yes, agreed.
	Her voice makes peanuts teach receiving.
	Viva, I'm curious how you barbecue a steak.
	I guess we have a different definition of barbecue in Memphis.
	You do.
	And I've taken flack for calling charcoal and steak a barbecue.
	I'm told that that's called grilling, and I don't know what the definition of a barbecue is.
	But I like open charcoal.
	Thick steak, Pittsburgh rare.
	Charred on the outside, very rare on the inside.
	I don't know if that's going to get me in the good books of Memphisians.
	Memphisites.
	Memphisodians.
	One day I'm going to go to Memphis.
	One day I'm going to drive across America.
	Now you know why I want to leave this country.
	The government is mentally insane.
	Bearland?
	You and me both.
	You can't even fight this.
	I don't know how you fight this.
	Because at some point sooner than later, this is going to be the perfect segue into my next bit.
	My next story.
	Salty Army reporting is...
	Let's try to keep the referencing woodchippers to a minimum.
	You know, they're making it harder and harder to even speak out against this.
	And I'll tell you why in a second.
	Eyal Naaman says, only light can drive out darkness.
	Thank you for being the light.
	Yep, thank you very much.
	I mean, this was not a path that I ever thought I'd be on in my life.
	I wanted to be Casey Neistat in substance, like lighthearted stuff, good-natured stuff.
	I think it's obviously still good-natured.
	It's meaningful.
	But lo and behold, life...
	Pushes you in the direction sometimes and then...
	It's not even a question of fighting the tide.
	It's just a question of, holy crap.
	This is my Ikigai.
	But only light can drive out the darkness.
	Thank you for being the light.
	And this is next segment.
	It's becoming increasingly difficult to speak out against these idiot policies.
	Glorials have electrolyte there.
	Everyone needs to see idiocracy.
	They're making it very difficult to continue doing this.
	Whether it's the fear of having your bank account frozen for having attended a rally or having donated.
	I publicly disclosed my donation to the GoFundMe and then to the Give, Send, Go when GoFundMe shut it down and reimbursed it.
	I said, GoFundMe is not going to tell me who I can and cannot.
	Support as far as federally incorporated not-for-profits go.
	They're not going to tell me that.
	And I gave a spite donation, which was 20 times, maybe more.
	I forget what it was.
	Give or take 10 to 20 times more than my initial donation to give, send, go.
	I said, I'm not going to be, I'm not going to be, the government's not going to tell me which federally incorporated not-for-profits I can donate to.
	And then, you know, I publicly stated it.
	And then...
	There's a leak.
	And then the government comes out and says, we're going to go after everyone who donated to a not-for-profit incorporation that we, the federal government, gave status to.
	And they terrorize you psychologically, spiritually, economically, as they're terrorizing all of the people who are facing serious and not-so-serious charges from attending this protest, which you think it's unlawful, whatever, that's to you.
	But it hasn't been declared such, nor have there been any convictions as such at this time.
	But they're making it increasingly difficult psychologically, spiritually, to even know when you're crossing.
	What they arbitrarily determine is the new line to go after you, to weaponize everything to go after you.
	And they're making it more difficult in terms of legislation.
	In Quebec, they passed Bill 15. Removing parental supremacy as the overarching guiding factor of the Youth Protection Act.
	What do you think it's going to do?
	It's going to authorize and empower the court system, the administrative system, the government, to take children out of their families if they determine that what the child is asking for is in the best interest of the child, notwithstanding any parental opposition to it.
	And they start off with the overt, egregious examples.
	And then it's going to be other stuff that we know it's going to apply to.
	So Quebec passed that law, basically telling parents, where are your kids' parents?
	We are your children's parents right now.
	Sorry.
	Oh, sorry.
	You thought you had parental supremacy that you were going to determine what's in your child's best interest?
	That's us now.
	Quebec did that.
	Ontario, they're passing a...
	I mean, I don't live in Ontario, so I don't follow that legislation as much as other people, but arguably outrageous CRT stuff that is indoctrination of children and not education of children.
	And federally, it looks like Bill C-11, the sequel to Bill C-10, which wants to regulate the internet and social media platforms and social media accounts under the Broadcasting Act, the way the government regulates TV and radio.
	They're going to pass that.
	Bill C-11.
	And it's going to make it...
	They know what they're doing.
	This is...
	Ordinarily, it would just be a money grab.
	You know, try to tax the Netflix, the Hulus online.
	But this is not only a money grab.
	This is suppression of information that is competing with the flailing, despite government subsidy, legacy media.
	And so I got this...
	Someone notified me of this publication in a journal.
	From the Simon Fraser Institute.
	And I was thinking about it, do I even cover this?
	Because I don't want to give it more light than it deserves.
	Sunlight is the greatest disinfectant.
	And also, drawing sunlight onto absurdities is the biggest way to get people to know what's going on.
	Because this is, in as much as it's the insidious corruption between government and the media, how the media then covers stories, demonizes, slanders adversaries, so that the...
	Government that pays them can then take those stories to then further demonize and eventually legislate against their political adversaries.
	It's the same thing in research.
	For anyone who doesn't know what the Simon Fraser University is, it's a reputable university.
	I'm fairly certain I actually applied to it, I think, for film, if I'm not mistaken.
	Last I checked, and I don't know how far down it's fallen since, But it was, in my memory and in my assessment, a reputable educational institution.
	We're asking big questions.
	Question about the future of FSU.
	Okay, you know what?
	Hold on.
	Let's just go to Wikipedia.
	Simon Fraser University.
	Oh, I'm sure I applied.
	I'm fairly certain I applied because it was in British Columbia and I wanted to leave Quebec.
	Simon Fraser University is a public research university in British Columbia, Canada, with three campuses, Burnaby, Surrey, and Vancouver.
	The 170, 420 acre main Burnaby campus, it's located 20 kilometers from downtown Vancouver, was established in 1965 and comprises more than 30,000 students and 160,000 alumni.
	The university was created in an effort to expand higher education across Canada.
	So it's a legit institution.
	Someone sends me a publication that they came across.
	And we're going to assess the...
	It's a legit institution.
	They do research.
	Let's just talk about this piece of stuff.
	The article was published in...
	I noticed it on...
	Well, someone sent me this link.
	And let's analyze this study, shall we?
	It's fantastic.
	How Google autocomplete algorithms...
	Let me start this again and read the sentence properly.
	How Google autocomplete algorithms about conspiracy theorists mislead the public?
	By, and I believe these are all doctor, they go by doctor, Ahmed Al-Rawi, Carmen Celestini, Nicole Stewart, Nathan Warku.
	How Google autocomplete algorithms about conspiracy theorists mislead the public?
	I'm going to save the punchline for the end.
	Introduction.
	We'll just read this real quick like.
	Despite recent attention to the impact of social media platforms, remember Bill C-11 in the background, by the way.
	Remember regulating misinformation.
	Think of the disinformation governance board, the ministry, the literal ministry of truth out of the states.
	Keep all this on your frontal cortex or whatever.
	Keep it in your brain.
	while we're going through this.
	Despite recent attention to the impact of social media platforms on political discourse and public opinion, most people locate their news on search engines.
	Source.
	When a user conducts a search, millions of outputs in the form of videos, images, articles, and websites are sorted to present the most relevant search predictions.
	Google, the most dominant search engine in the world, expanded its search index in 2009 to include the Autocomplete function, which provides suggestions for query inputs.
	Okay, interesting.
	Google autocomplete function allows users to, quote, search smarter by reducing typing time by 25%.
	Okay, autocomplete.
	How does it autocomplete what people are looking for?
	Google's complex algorithm is impacted upon by factors like search history, location, and keyword searches.
	And there are policies to ensure that autocomplete function does not contain harmful content.
	Okay, who thinks they know where this is going?
	Let me see here.
	Okay, fine here.
	In this article, we argue that these subtitles are problematic because they can mislead the public and amplify extremist views.
	Google's autocomplete feature is misleading.
	Google's autocomplete function is misleading because it does not highlight what is publicly known about these actors.
	We're talking about the fact that when you put in somebody's name, it's going to autocomplete with the recommendation of what the person arguably is either known for, accomplished for, or has done.
	So you put in Justin Trudeau, you can suspect that Google is going to autocomplete with Prime Minister of Canada.
	You Google Donald Trump.
	You could presume that Google autocomplete is going to autocomplete with 45th President of the United States.
	We can test that afters anyhow.
	Where were we?
	Listen to this.
	Google's autocomplete feature is misleading because it does not highlight what is publicly known about these actors.
	The labels are neutral or positive, but never negative, reflecting primary jobs.
	Imagine it's neutral and that's a problem.
	Or positive.
	I don't even know how they determine that.
	But never negative.
	Reflecting primary jobs and or the actor's preferred descriptions.
	I don't know how they know what preferred is because I don't think Google consults the actor to determine what their preferred description is.
	This is harmful to the public because Google's search ranking can influence a user's knowledge and information preferences through the search engine manipulation effect.
	What do you think they're arguing for here?
	What do you think this research paper is arguing for right here?
	Users' preferences and understanding of information can be manipulated based upon their trust in Google search results, thus allowing these labels to be widely accepted instead of providing a full picture of the harm, their ideologies, and their views.
	Where do you think this is going, people?
	Algorithms that mainstream conspiracies.
	Oh, let me just see.
	I don't want to bore you because I don't want to go through this entire thing.
	Our study fills a major gap in research as it examines a subcategory of Google's autocomplete algorithm that has not been empirically explored before.
	Unlike the standard autocomplete feature that is primarily programmed according to popular searches, we examine the subtitles feature that operates as a fixed label for popular conspiracists within Google's algorithm.
	Our initial foray into our research revealed that this is not only an issue with conspiracists, but also occurs with terrorists, extremists, and mass murderers.
	Look what they're doing here.
	Look what they're doing.
	Google is providing neutral descriptions in the autofill, or even positive, but never negative, to people that we now have...
	Well, you're going to see it right here.
	What's their methodology?
	Using a manual query, we searched Google for subtitles ascribed to conspiracy theorists and found that the results were consistent across different countries.
	We looked under the subtitles ascribed to conspiracy theorists.
	How did they determine who was a conspiracy theorist?
	Now, anybody want to take a guess?
	By the way, I reached out to the authors of this publication.
	I'm just saying, I'm curious, how did you determine?
	Who were the conspiracy theorists that you were going to look up in Google search to determine whether or not Google auto-completed their search names with what you think should be their conspiracy?
	How did you determine who's a conspiracy theorist?
	It does not explain the methodology.
	Listen to this.
	Regardless of language input for the country location established by a VPN, the search terms remained stable regardless of who conducted the search.
	The conspiracy theorists in our database cover a wide range of conspiracies, including historical figures like Nesta Webster and John Robison, who were foundational in Illuminati lore, as well as contemporary conspiracists such as Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	Okay.
	So, by the way, just to appreciate the methodology.
	Of the 37 conspiracy theorists we searched, table one of the appendix, seven do not have associated subtitle and the other 30 have distinctive subtitles, but none of them reflects the public knowledge of the individual's harmful role in disseminating conspiracy theories.
	Yes.
	They made a list of who they think are conspiracy theorists, put those names into Google, didn't get the autocomplete results that they wanted based on their assessment of them being conspiracy theorists, and they're saying that Google is broken.
	This is basically saying...
	We think this guy is a conspiracy theorist.
	Google's not saying it is.
	Google's wrong.
	We need to regulate Google.
	We need to fix Google's problem because we've put together a list.
	It's a known fact that the people on this list are who we say they are.
	And the fact that Google doesn't identify them that way, that's Google's problem.
	That's Google's fault.
	Google is promoting misinformation and disinformation.
	Let me just get some examples here.
	Let's just get a couple of examples.
	Here we go.
	Another example.
	Another significant example is Jared Miller, who is listed as American performer, despite the fact that he is in the Las Vegas...
	Despite that he is the Las Vegas shooter who posted anti-government white...
	Jared Miller?
	I'm going to have to look this one up, because I...
	Who is Jared Miller?
	Let me see here.
	Let me see here.
	I wanted to get one of the more questionable examples.
	Although subtitles under an individual's name are not audio, video, or image content, the algorithms that create these subtitles are an invisible infrastructure that could cause harm.
	Oh my goodness, I'm missing one part here that was just outrageous.
	Alright, let's just go.
	For example, a conspiracist like Alex Jones is labeled as an American radio host, despite losing two defamation lawsuits for declaring that the shooting is sent.
	This is a research paper.
	First of all, so they think now that, you know, he lost a defamation lawsuit, so therefore Google should now qualify his autocomplete the way they think they should.
	Another conspiracy theorist, Gavin McInnes, the creator of the far-right neo-fascist Proud Boys organization, a known terrorist entity in Canada.
	I've talked about this in Canada.
	The fringe benefits of qualifying a group as a terrorist organization, you get to seize their assets a lot more easily through the court system.
	And look at this now.
	If the organization is declared such by the government, which it is, well, now they're going to say that you should...
	The autocomplete on Gavin McInnes should somehow make reference to this?
	He's listed as a Canadian writer, figure one.
	Okay, so...
	We see where we're going with this.
	I'm not even sure that we see it.
	Chat, where do you think we're going with this?
	Let me see something here.
	The chat's going to get some of the aggregate knowledge to this that I might not even have offhand because I didn't really go too far.
	Here, chat, I'm going to cut and paste this.
	You can go look at this article.
	Here.
	Where do you think this is going?
	They want the government to regulate Google.
	They want the government to basically label people automatically.
	They want...
	Active manipulation in Google search results to brand individuals that they deem to be conspiracy theorists or whatever as such to influence public opinion.
	Bottom line, this publication is seeking to do exactly that which it is alleging Google is wrongly doing.
	Manipulating the search results to mislead or control public perception.
	But it's okay, fine.
	So it's...
	Simon Fraser University putting out some arguable bad logic, arguing from conclusions.
	We put together a list of bad people.
	We put together a list of people we think are bad.
	Google doesn't identify them as bad.
	Google is wrong.
	Fix it, Google.
	Government, get involved.
	To conclude, algorithms automate the search engine that people use in the functions of everyday life, but are also entangled in technological errors, algorithmic bias, and have the capacity to mislead the public.
	Through a process of reverse engineering, they didn't reverse engineer anything.
	They argued from the conclusion.
	Through a process of reverse engineering, we searched 37 conspiracy theorists.
	How did they determine they were conspiracy theorists?
	They made their list.
	To decode the Google autocomplete algorithms, we identified how the subtitles attributed to conspiracy theorists are neutral, positive, but never negative.
	Neutral.
	God forbid.
	Positive.
	Okay?
	I don't even know how you determine positive.
	But never negative.
	Which does not accurately reflect...
	The widely known conspiratorial discourse these individuals propagate on the web.
	This is problematic because algorithms that determine these subtitles are invisible infrastructure acting to misinform the public and mainstream conspiracies with larger social, cultural, and political structures.
	This study highlights the urgent need for Google to review the subtitles attributed to conspiracy theorists, terrorists, and mass murderers to better inform the public about the negative nature of these actors, rather than always labeling them in neutral or positive ways.
	This is their study.
	Their conclusion is that Google is misinforming the public because Google does not autocomplete based on whatever millions of points of data they use to generate that autocomplete.
	They don't do it in a negative way.
	Authors want the 37 people that they arbitrarily picked and put in their appendix as known conspiracy theorists to label them that way.
	So it's a bad, stupid study with a fundamentally flawed premise of research, with a foregone conclusion that it seeks to get to, which is that we don't like these people.
	We want Google to auto-populate that these people are bad because we think that people should hate these people.
	Fine.
	A dumb study.
	Funding acknowledgement.
	This is where it gets very, very interesting.
	This project has been made possible in part by the Canadian Department of Heritage, the Digital Citizen Contribution Program under grant.
	They were funded by Canadian taxpayer dollars coming from the Canadian Department of Heritage.
	You have the government funding research.
	I don't know if this is public or private.
	Funding research to come to the conclusion that the government needs to get involved to regulate the internet.
	Regulate Google search results.
	The government is funding this.
	And the government wants them to come to the conclusion that Google has a problem and it needs the government to intervene to yield the search results that the government wants through this surreptitious funding of this study.
	Of the Simon Fraser University, Simon Fraser Institute, to come to this conclusion.
	It's almost like when you pay the media, the media frames stories in the way that you want, like glory holes are cutting edge.
	It's almost like, you know, like it's important sexual education to wear a mask.
	It's almost like the paid media spinning that crap in that way to make the government look good.
	Now the government is subsidizing this research.
	To get this institution to come to the conclusion that the government needs to intervene in Google search results.
	There's a bigger punchline to this, though, people.
	There's a bigger punchline to all of this.
	You guys want to go see what's in the appendix?
	Who's going to get the punchline?
	What's in Appendix 1 with the 37?
	Appendix 1. No, this is Simon Fraser.
	Someone says Fraser Institute is different.
	This is Simon Fraser University.
	I thought I made a big mistake there.
	This is Simon Fraser University.
	What's the punchline, people?
	What's in Appendix 1?
	Table 1. The subtitles of conspiracy theorists on Google Autocomplete.
	Has the chat got...
	Yeah, Steven Paddock was the Vegas shooter.
	Not that guy.
	Punchline is, look who's in the appendix, people!
	Viva Fry!
	Oh, and by the way, Viva Fry is in this YouTuber, Canadian influencer, on the far right of COVID conspiracy proponent.
	What the hell does that mean?
	But by the way, it's not just that I'm on the list.
	I'm on the list in this appendix with people.
	I mean, let's just go through it.
	Just say hi to them.
	Alex Jones.
	Barry Zwicker.
	I don't know who that is.
	Bart Sibyl.
	I don't know who that is.
	Ben Garrison.
	I think I know.
	Brittany Pettibone.
	Don't know who that is.
	Catherine O 'Brien.
	Don't know.
	Dan Bongino.
	Dan Bongino is a known conspiracy theorist who is negatively impacting the world.
	Who else is in here?
	David Icke.
	I don't know who that is.
	David Will.
	I'm not trying to be a glib or like show.
	I don't know a lot of people who are more prominent than me.
	Who's in this list, people?
	I just spat on my computer.
	I'm just frothing at the mouth laughing.
	Jack Posobiec is on the list.
	Known conspiracy theorist who is propagating hate on the interwebs.
	James O 'Keefe is on the list, people.
	Laura Loomer on the list.
	Congratulations, people.
	You made the list.
	Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	Well, we know her because we saw her in the...
	She was actually referenced in the actual paper.
	Mark Dice is on the list.
	There were some other good ones.
	Naomi Wolf.
	Owen Benjamin.
	Pamela Geller.
	Paul Joseph Watson.
	QAnon Shaman.
	The guy who was arrested and sentenced to four years in jail for...
	Breaching the Capitol.
	Richard Spencer.
	I didn't know that he was known for conspiracy theories.
	I knew that he's known for other stuff.
	Sidney Powell.
	You know what?
	I wouldn't call Sidney Powell a conspiracy theorist.
	I would just say that she, you know, she adhered to theories that did not pan out.
	Stéphane Molineux.
	Viva Frye.
	Do you know what's the most shocking thing about this, though, by the way?
	You have...
	Because the whole point of this article was that it's problematic in the way...
	That the subtitle populates to mislead the public.
	You know, Alex Jones, it doesn't say conspiracy theorist.
	It says American radio host.
	That's problematic because they think he's a conspiracy theorist.
	Dan Bongino, it says American radio host.
	They don't like that because they think Dan Bongino is a conspiracy theorist.
	Their complaint of this article was that the subtitle being produced was misleading.
	James O 'Keefe, it says American activist.
	I don't know why that would be problematic or misleading at all.
	Sorry, Jack Posobiec.
	Same thing with James O 'Keefe.
	The issue with the article was that they didn't like the subtitle description that Google was auto-populating with.
	So why is it even weird?
	Well, John Robinson's there.
	I don't know what his subtitle is, but when it comes to Viva Frye, who managed to make his way onto this list, there is no subtitle that gets populated.
	So even by their own theory of their own study, there is no subtitle being populated.
	Which leads me to ask, How on earth did I get on this list?
	This is funded by Canadian Heritage, by our government, by my taxpayer dollars.
	Funded this search to say that these subtitles being produced on Google Autocomplete for known conspiracy theorists are misleading.
	And yet the example they've slapped me on the list, I don't even, my Viva Friday, as far as I know, I don't even know that, doesn't generate a subtitle.
	This is what you call, as far as I'm concerned, the wrap-up smear.
	Oh yeah, and they call James O 'Keefe misleading.
	He's gotten more retractions than anyone out there.
	My name is on that list and I want to know how it ended up on that list.
	Now I've asked for a, I filed a privacy request to the government and I've requested with the Simon Fraser University to just let me know how my name got on that list and what information they have on, what information they acquired, gathered, were given or whatever to get my name on that list in an article.
	The purpose of which is to say the subtitles are misleading because they misidentify and they put me on that appendix of known conspiracy theorists to show that the subtitles are misleading and I don't even have a subtitle by their own study and yet my name is still on that list.
	Not referenced anywhere else in that article.
	Anywhere.
	It's over the top.
	I mean, it's actually over the top.
	And if one were to theorize...
	As to why my name might be on that list is so that it's the wrap-up smear, pure and simple.
	You know, I did wonder whether or not Jagmeet Singh knew I existed until he, I guess, accidentally hearted one of my tweets.
	Do I have any doubt that the government knows, you know, the government is familiar with my channel?
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	Maybe.
	But it would seem very convenient to put my name on that list, even though I don't even satisfy the criteria of the study itself, just so now...
	Other people can say, oh, there was a Simon Fraser University article that said Viva Frye is a known conspiracy theorist on the, what did they say?
	The far right of the COVID conspiracy.
	Yep.
	It's madness.
	It's almost like Google uses neutral descriptions to avoid defamation losses.
	Well, it's almost also like Google...
	Google uses millions of data points of information to determine what the most appropriate description is.
	They're not manually doing anything in this.
	They're either going to manually auto-complete the subtitles.
	This is based on millions of data points.
	Googling the names, where they come up in the news, where they come up in articles.
	There's nothing manual about this.
	They don't like the organic.
	Autopopulate subtitles because it doesn't give them what they want, which is they want the label so that they can now take this report to the government and say, government, you've got to regulate this.
	Look, it's the government subsidizing research that's going to empower the government for more government intervention.
	Oh, that sounds very conspiracy.
	And imagine, what the hell does conspiracy theorists even mean?
	I mean, a conspiracy is two or more people working towards an end.
	You know who the biggest conspiracy theorists are?
	Rachel Maddow.
	Yeah.
	Talking about...
	It's a bona fide conspiracy if it were to have been true in the first place.
	Trump working with Russia to overthrow an election.
	That would have been, if it had panned out, in fact, a bona fide legitimate conspiracy.
	And she promoted the theory.
	Brian Stelter.
	Oberman.
	I mean, I'll put...
	I'll put...
	I'll put...
	What's his name?
	Tucker Carlson in there.
	You know, promoting theories that Hunter Biden was working with...
	Foreign governments to facilitate contracts for certain research purposes.
	That's a conspiracy theory in the actual literal term, in the actual literal sense.
	The funny thing about this article, it doesn't define what conspiracy theorist is.
	It doesn't identify how they got their appendix of the 37 known conspiracy theorists.
	And it ignores, you know, it mentions how Google does it, but effectively it says, we know better than Google's.
	Algorithmic, auto-populate based on all the information that is not known to these individuals.
	I missed a lot of superchats, I think, that I want to try to find if I can.
	But it's very interesting.
	The government is funding these studies to create a problem to regulate.
	To create a problem to regulate.
	To stifle the free dissemination of information on the interwebs.
	They're going to use this undoubtedly.
	The government that funded this is going to try to use it.
	Find a convenient way to use it.
	We'll see.
	Passing Bill C-11 to derank illegitimate, non-authoritative news, misinformation.
	All in real time, people.
	It's fascinating.
	Thank you very much.
	What do we got here?
	There's never been a left-wing or far-left conspiracy theorist.
	They are losing control and panicking.
	Well, that's definitely one way to look at it.
	I was just flabbergasted to see that the study is so stupid.
	I mean, I guess it's logical on its face.
	It starts with a conclusion.
	These are conspiracy theorists.
	We've identified them, us, in our appendix.
	Why hasn't Google?
	It must be Google's problem.
	It couldn't possibly be you guys.
	It couldn't possibly be you can't define your terms.
	This is only your own personal opinion.
	And you're the problem, not Google's algorithmic determination of auto-populating based on data, search histories, which are personal, incidentally.
	I'm on the list because I have no description.
	So it makes total sense to just call me a name.
	I don't even fit the criteria of the problem that they're identifying, but put me on the list and look at that.
	I mean, it's going to be convenient for someone.
	So anyways, that's it.
	I thought that was very interesting.
	I will follow up when I get news from them.
	I wrote the two lead authors an article.
	Hold on, let me see if I can actually...
	I won't share it because it's in my outbox.
	I wrote them an email.
	Conspiracy?
	Let me see here.
	Let me see where...
	Yeah, so basically I said, hey, dear doctors, David Fry here, aka Viva Fry on social media.
	I recently came across your publication entitled How Google Autocomplete Algorithms About Conspiracy Theorists Mislead the Public.
	With a link.
	I was surprised to note that my name appears in the appendix, Table 1, the subtitles of conspiracy theorists on Google Autocomplete, and I am described as a, quote, far-right and COVID conspiracy proponent, end quote.
	I am curious as to what methodology was used to arrive at this conclusion.
	Indeed, I have published over 2,600 videos on my VivaFry YouTube channel and have never had so much as a community guidelines violation.
	The same is true of Facebook and Twitter.
	And now it's also true of LinkedIn as well.
	Would you be interested in coming on my channel for a live stream discussion about your publication?
	We would discuss the methodology used to prepare the list of names in Table 1, the problems you believe exist within the Google search engine, and the solutions you would propose.
	Incidentally, if my name was included in Table 1 by accident, oversight, or inaccurate information on my channel and content, I would appreciate my name being removed from that list as it is quite clearly factually incorrect and defamatory.
	Kind regards.
	David Frye.
	I did not get a response as of yet.
	I've now tried the ombudsman, and I've tried someone else reaching out to someone else.
	I'll get an answer.
	And I also want to know what information Canada Heritage, my own government, might have on me that it's using and or acquiring through research that it's funding in part or in whole.
	Well, that was funny.
	Anyhow.
	What else do we have?
	Did I miss it?
	Oh, hold on.
	I did miss two chats here, I think.
	I caught something from...
	Okay, sorry.
	I thought...
	Kitty, kitty.
	First of all, get better, you'll be fine.
	But 50...
	Can't even make jokes anymore.
	I thought that super chat was going to go to a joke.
	I caught it from a sexual activity.
	I was going to make a joke there, but get well.
	Get well and be well.
	And what do we got here?
	Viva!
	My wife and I are moving from Virginia to Tennessee in 83 days.
	We realize that Republicans rarely fix or reverse what the Dems did, so we're going to a state that Dems haven't ruined.
	Join us.
	I know that there have been Canadians fleeing.
	I won't say fleeing, but rather perhaps obtaining freedom in Tennessee.
	There have been a number of states that are on the list of recommendations.
	Tennessee was one of them.
	New Hampshire, Florida.
	Texas.
	People were telling me Georgia was not bad, but I think Georgia was bad.
	Anyhow, duly noted.
	Enjoy the move.
	At some point, it's like, until public opinion is changed to the point where this idiotic nonsense is no longer politically tolerable, until the Overton window has moved enough in the future that this crap is unacceptable.
	Yeah, you're going to have to fight the political fight from the places that are going to be the most strategic to do so.
	No comment.
	Hey V, thanks for doing this stream on Mondays.
	I can't stand to watch Sunday stream.
	What?
	It's like watching the Hartford Convention of 1814 Live knowing what...
	I don't know what that means, Alex.
	I do know that you don't get along or you disagree...
	Not get along.
	You disagree with Barnes on Ukraine.
	I do know that.
	Yeah, and this is more like daytime meandering.
	What time is it?
	I've got to pick up a couple of kids.
	I've got time.
	Okay.
	But yes, thank you very much for being here, Ambrose.
	Even if we disagree and even if you disagree with Barnes, you can disagree with him.
	The trick is still to listen, hear, digest, even if it's only ultimately to disagree and potentially disregard.
	You'll still learn from listening to people you disagree with.
	MSM trying to spin Musk's joke about the danger to his life.
	To mean he is afraid of Putin instead of others.
	Can't wait for his response.
	There's a type of...
	I want to say like OCD issue where you don't like making certain jokes or comments.
	I forget what the term is.
	You don't want to even make the joke have the thought for fear that you're going to make it come to fruition.
	I'm superstitious like that.
	I don't like...
	I have dirt on Hillary.
	I don't like those jokes because I'm superstitious in a way.
	I saw Elon's tweet.
	I was going to make a joke about it, but I don't even like making jokes about those jokes.
	There's a far-left conspiracy, extremists across Europe.
	It's why they don't like Hungary and other area in the world.
	Just imagine the ball-faced audacity of this Simon Fraser University to put out an article talking about known conspiracy theorists from the people who believe Honk honk is an alliteration for a Schmittler quote, who argue that the protests, the Ottawa Convoy, was racist, xenophobic, transphobic, anti-Semitic, anti-Black racist, intolerant.
	These are the people who believed and promoted on the media that the fundraising was foreign money, Russian influence to promote that protest.
	These are the people now...
	Talking about other people, calling other people conspiracy theorists.
	I mean, that entire article, how Google autocompletes it to not call the bad people that we think are bad, bad people, pure confession through projection.
	The person is imagining, literally, this article is literally imagining a conspiracy that Google is going out of its way or deliberately misleading the public based on its subtitles.
	The author, who's labeling other people conspiracy theorists, is suggesting, That Google is conspiring to misinform the public through neutral or positive autocompletes and subtitles.
	Let that bit of irony sink in.
	I mean, the thing is, the more self-righteous you get, the more impervious to actual irony you become, especially your own.
	Someone has to write that down.
	That was a good one.
	I thought Rachel Maddow was Chris Hayes.
	I don't know who Chris Hayes is.
	Chris Hayes is like the, what a wicked thing to do.
	Oh, I won't sing.
	I'm going to get copystruck.
	Okay, so hold on.
	I saw some chats that I did miss.
	Did I?
	Did I?
	Clearly, you won the list because...
	Okay, I got to that one.
	So anyway, that's the latest.
	It's fun stuff.
	It's amazing news.
	It gives you stuff to talk about, but it shows you the absolute outrageous level.
	It's police state.
	It's a police state in Canada.
	You have the government funding research so they can then get a study that says that there's a problem that they need to go and crack down on.
	Internet misinformation.
	I'm sure they're going to use that study in their arguments for Bill C-11.
	Maybe.
	I don't know.
	Everything including that hair and the blind house pet is a right-wing dog whistle.
	Don't forget the paralyzed one.
	Pudge the paralyzed Puggle.
	Who pees on my shoes so often.
	Dogs across the...
	City.
	Sniff my shoes because there's stuff on them.
	Above my pay grade says, Thanks for what you do.
	Trying to spread the message of truth to my peers in the military.
	Check out Above my pay grade.
	Above my pay grade?
	I have not seen your channel.
	This is not a vouch.
	But everyone, if you're curious, you want to see?
	I like the avatar.
	Yeah, it's a very good avatar.
	Very Renaissance avatar.
	Above my pay grade.
	I caught long political gastro.
	Any cures yet?
	Turn off CBC.
	Heart Tackle!
	Did you finally get the package?
	I hope.
	I spoke to the folks at UPS, gave them another delivery address, so somebody's going to receive that and I'll be able to pick it up.
	I want to do the unboxing.
	I didn't get it today, and I would have done the unboxing live if I had.
	When I get it, I'm going to do the live unboxing.
	I'm curious to see what the tackle is.
	And I want to go fishing again.
	My goodness.
	What else?
	Viva, your hair is as pretty as your dog, Winston.
	It is...
	Conspiracy theorist?
	Critical thinker.
	It's just...
	It's so preposterous because the term means nothing.
	I don't want to actually...
	I don't want to just be vague about it.
	We're just going to go here, by the way.
	We're just going to go get away from that article.
	Conspiracy.
	This is not a joke.
	Conspiracy.
	Criminal Code of Canada.
	Conspiracies.
	Here we go.
	Because, you know, words have meanings.
	Proceeds of crime.
	Where is it?
	Where is it?
	Conspiracy.
	Here we go.
	A conspiracy or an attempt.
	Is there another definition of conspiracy?
	Conspiracy.
	Attempt, conspiracies, etc.
	Here we go.
	Look at this.
	Where is the definition?
	Conspiration.
	Conspiracy.
	Sorry, guys.
	We'll get this.
	I'm not spelling it properly.
	Hey, conspiracy, conspiracy, conspiracy.
	Everywhere.
	Okay, we need to get the definition.
	Conspiracy to commit.
	Here we go.
	Conspiracy to commit offenses.
	Everyone who, while in Canada, conspires with anyone to do anything.
	Conspiracy literally means one person conspiring, working with another to do something.
	And now these authors of this publication want to argue that YouTube has to label people based on being conspiracy theorists.
	Theorizing on how people work together to accomplish lawful, unlawful, unethical acts.
	Okay.
	All right.
	It means nothing.
	So this entire journal is predicated based on a term that means nothing, off a list that they compiled based on their own preferences and their own foregone conclusions, and they want to arrive at their conclusion that something must be broken.
	It's not them.
	Everything including that here...
	Okay, sorry, I got that one already.
	Hold on.
	Going back to the bottom here.
	Sorry, I didn't mean to bring up...
	Above the Patriot.
	Me and my wife celebrated our last two marriage anniversary apart.
	We decided not to take...
	I am locked in Canada going two years...
	It's not sad, Let's Talk TV.
	It's inhumane.
	It's inhumane.
	Oh, this makes me...
	Because I think a vaccine passport is inhumane.
	Now you can travel, by the way, but if you want to come back, two weeks.
	Two weeks, no less than 14 days in quarantine.
	You could have a negative test.
	You could have gotten COVID within the last...
	Apparently, you could have gotten COVID recently.
	It doesn't matter.
	Woohoo!
	Put in fishing shirts for the whole fam.
	Have a great day.
	Thank you very much, Hard Tackle.
	And you will know when I get it.
	And those bearded dimples are clearly disinformation, misinformation, problematic, and adorable.
	The dimples.
	I still haven't lost my smile, but my goodness, is it difficult sometimes.
	Just watched 2,000 Mules.
	Americans should have so many questions.
	I watched it yesterday.
	Barnes and I talked about it.
	I'll post the highlights to the Viva Clips channel sooner than later.
	Okay, now, anything on the Rumbles is, let's see, the Rumbles.
	No, we have 2,000 people watching on Rumble, which is fantastic.
	Rumble.
	Anyways, I've got an idea.
	I'm going to float it.
	I'm going to try to pitch it, see if Rumble takes it.
	And it would be the best of both worlds.
	I do a lot of research for work.
	It is telling that you can't even say why someone may believe something without others saying you also believe it.
	It will be cool one day to have open discourse.
	You know, it's a terrible thing.
	I don't even think people should be prevented from saying terrible things.
	Threats, outright harassment.
	Doxing, yes.
	Defamation, you're taking your chances.
	But not to be allowed to discuss what even I might think are untenable theories?
	Bullcrap.
	And one day it will be cool to say, do it, man.
	We won't agree.
	I will never agree that such and such event never happened.
	I won't agree with it.
	I may not even engage in the discussion with you because I know where it's going to go and we're never going to get anywhere meaningful.
	But I don't think you should be prevented from saying it.
	That day will come back because people are getting freaking fed up with this nonsense.
	Government does not know best.
	Daddy doesn't know best.
	Government certainly doesn't.
	Okay, that's it.
	Let's do this.
	Oh, let's get this out of here.
	Wait, no, hold on, hold on.
	going to share one more time because i think i'm going to check my my my tab list Oh, you know what?
	I'm going to bring up a couple of tweets.
	This goes way back to the beginning.
	Bill Gates, rubbing in your face, my children don't have a deficit because I send my kids to private school.
	The inner city kids, two years behind.
	Two years of their educational, psychological development.
	Two years deficit now.
	In the middle school, I don't know what the word was.
	Other schools, not so bad.
	In the private school, my kids don't have a deficit.
	None of this crap is going to affect me.
	Hell, I'm worth twice as much now as I was before promoting these policies, which I'm now saying were ill-founded.
	Assuming we didn't know then what we now say we know.
	My limited understanding, my limited observation when it comes to the lockdowns and COVID response restrictions, the vast majority of the people who support the measures from citizens to politicians are not actually suffering any meaningful consequences from them.
	And Bill Gates, that raging Raging hypocrite.
	And that's putting it politely.
	My kids, I have no deficit.
	They go to private school.
	They're fine.
	I have a live-in school teacher.
	I haven't suffered any financial.
	I'm worth more now than I've ever been by promoting policies which I'm now basically telling you were wrong to begin with and only harmed or harmed exponentially worse inner city vulnerable people.
	And then you got your Jagmeet Singh.
	I just have to point, I will point it out in as much as anybody's going to listen.
	Jagmeet Singh celebrating Black History Month.
	Justin Trudeau celebrating Black History Month.
	The politicians who are now celebrating Black History Month are the same ones imposing a vaccine passport system which has had, which has a disparate impact on Black Canadians.
	We love, we're tolerant.
	You're the racist.
	You're the misogynist.
	You're the xenophobe.
	You are.
	But I'm implementing a vaccine passport that I know is going to disparately impact Black Canadians, Latino Canadians, Indigenous Canadians.
	But you're the racist, not me.
	You're the racist because I say you are.
	I'm not the racist because I'm actually implementing policies that are having a disparate impact on racial minorities.
	You're the misogynist.
	Meanwhile, I'm telling a woman what she can do with her body when I think I know better with her body than she does.
	Okay, just...
	Endless, endless, endless.
	Oh, I saw something here.
	Hold on.
	Viva is my favorite far-right left-wing liberal.
	I mean, it's so crazy because I get accusations of both.
	Viva, would you tolerate Holocaust deniers in a free and open society?
	Yes, I would.
	And me being Jewish doesn't make my opinion any more meaningful.
	Than anyone else's.
	So I don't say, I don't say as a Jew, I still think it should be allowed, because me being a Jew is irrelevant to that consideration.
	And they should be allowed to speak.
	I do not, I do not, I do not think this legislation prohibiting certain discussion on the Holocaust, I don't think it's good.
	I think it actually causes more problems.
	It causes more problems because in the eyes of some, it's going to legitimize what I think are absolutely untenable positions.
	It's going to legitimize those positions.
	And on another hand, it's going to create friction in that why are there laws prohibiting certain speech of denial of the Holocaust, whereas there isn't even recognition of the Armenian Holocaust.
	So you create a divide on two fronts with that type of policy.
	On the one hand, you will legitimize...
	Those who already believe what I think is untenable to a great extent, depending on the nature of their argument, you'll legitimize their beliefs, which I think are untenable, and you're going to create divide because you're going to create, you know, all animals are created equal except some are more equal than others.
	So you can't deny the Holocaust, the World War II Holocaust, and yet there are still some countries that don't even recognize the Armenian Holocaust.
	You think that's good for social cohesion?
	You think it's good for social discourse?
	I want to know who they are!
	I want to know who the Holocaust deniers are, because I might want to gauge my conduct and my affiliations accordingly.
	So yeah, I hope that answers your question.
	It's a legit question, but I'm not ever going to preface my answer by saying, as a Jew, look, my position must be even more valuable than someone who's not Jewish who has the same position.
	No, because it's an irrelevant consideration.
	My identity and that consideration is irrelevant.
	Well, no, they won't let Viva live.
	What are you talking about?
	Don't say those.
	I'm not that much of a threat.
	But no, it's the Holomador.
	It's like you create legislation to prohibit discourse on the Jewish Holocaust while you still haven't even recognized the Armenian Holocaust.
	I mean, that's...
	It ostensibly creates two tiers of justice, two tiers of citizens, preferential treatment, or it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander.
	So you do it for all or you don't do it for any, and you actually let the people who hold unacceptable views express those so we can know who they are and we can govern ourselves accordingly.
	What am I saying?
	It's holodomor.
	Holodomor.
	The D comes before...
	The D comes before the M. That's how I make sure not to make the mistake.
	Oh, leave.
	Okay.
	Freudian.
	That's a Freudian slip, people.
	That's a Freudian.
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Freudian.
	What is it called?
	Dyslexia.
	Freudian dyslexia.
	Anyhow.
	So, yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	Go check out my...
	Hold on.
	I'll put it in here.
	Thanks for searching for truth, Viva.
	Hold on, people.
	More important, sometimes more important than the truth, is a good fishing video.
	It's not the best, but it's pretty darn good.
	I'm going to put it in the chat.
	You can go check out the Viva Family channel.
	I hope that was unacceptable to you.
	People are within their rights in a free society to hold unacceptable views.
	When it becomes promoting violence, that's where I have my limit.
	No threats, no promoting violence.
	No doxing.
	No public disclosure of private facts.
	It's not hard.
	But if someone wants to say something that I think is absolutely idiotic, let him say it.
	Being true to our principles is the core that keeps us wise and rational in chaotic times.
	You are an outstanding example of this.
	Thank you very much.
	Now, I wouldn't engage in a public debate because I could engage in the debate and I know exactly where it's going to go.
	The debate with the deniers always goes to a place where nobody's going to be able to verify that which the debate is going to hinge on.
	Nobody's going to be able to ever be there in person to respond to some of the arguments.
	When the issue, when the shooting, when January 6th occurred and Ashley Babbitt was shot, and there were people saying, it's a fake video.
	You're within your rights to say it.
	I know where that discussion is going to end.
	You should not be prevented from saying it, but I, you know, I think it's wrong, and I'm not going to engage in the debate.
	Thank you very much.
	Should we rename Gen Z to...
	Okay, dude, that's not bad.
	That's funny.
	The jab exaction letter saved mine and about 15 other people from being forced to get the jab or get terminated.
	Thanks from New York City.
	I can't even take credit for that.
	That was Barnes on Viva Barnes Law.
	That was Barnes.
	On.
	Which way is this?
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com And I wore my anti-media shirt specifically for today.
	Not to quibble, but it is ho-load-o-more.
	Okay?
	I will do my best to not make that mistake again.
	What is ho- Dude, I can't read that.
	Yeah, well, now we know, Shane Souza, the two people, at least one person, we know Ashley Babbitt, and I forget the name of the other individual who now, it seems, might have been, you know, succumbed to active police intervention and not to medical emergency as was initially.
	As was initially disclosed or reported.
	Viva's mystery tackle reveal coming soon.
	There was this channel where they did the mystery tackle box and you had to catch fish with what was in it.
	Who was doing that?
	Oh, was it the Australian kid?
	There was a YouTube channel where they were sending around a mystery tackle box that you had to catch fish with.
	DeSantis will win.
	Well, the question is going to be what comes for 2024?
	Because, look, I watched Donald Trump's rally.
	Some of the things he said, I can't tell if they are next-level trolls or he's just out of touch.
	The thanking of the Johnson& Johnson folks, I watched it and I was like, is this like a passive-aggressive way of calling them out to shame them?
	Because if it was, the crowd didn't get it.
	The crowd did not seem to like what seemed to be Donald Trump celebrating the presence of Johnson& Johnson.
	Set aside my own public opinion.
	Public opinion.
	Set aside my own personal opinion.
	Whether or not you hate or love Johnson or whatever, you have to know that among Donald Trump's supporters, those who are going to be at a Trump rally, they're not going to like the J&J, the Pfizer's, the Moderna.
	They're not going to like those execs.
	So when Trump is at his own rally, either calling them out or celebrating them, you have to know that if it's a celebration of who they are and what they've done, by and large, Trump's base is not going to like that.
	As will a lot of other people who might hate Trump, but also not like Big Pharma.
	So I couldn't tell if he was being serious or not.
	To me, it almost smelled like a 4D level chess troll.
	Like, hey guys, look, Johnson& Johnson's here.
	I don't know.
	If anybody knows, you let me know what you think.
	I'm reading some of the chat here.
	See, but then this is one of those...
	Trump promotes the vax during every trial.
	This is one of those things where, depending on how you read the way Trump's doing it, is it a Twitter-like satire, sarcastic sass, or is he legit doing it and just really not reading his base, not reading his supporters?
	I don't know.
	I think he might be serious and...
	He's serious.
	Yeah, so that's it.
	I think it's a good point that might be more of his own ego that he sees that.
	What was it?
	Warp Speed as his own success, despite the fact that even, you know, his most ardent supporters don't like that part of it.
	Where was I?
	Just saw something.
	Viva.
	Daily reminder.
	Yeah.
	Well, there's a lot of people who believe that, but we're not allowed having an opinion on that.
	The Overton window on that, by the way, is also going to shift over time in short order.
	That Overton window is in the process of shifting.
	Slowly.
	But arguably 2,000 mules is going to have a role to play in shifting that window.
	Okay, I'm going to try to get to some non-superchat questions just before I head out.
	I'm not going to read ones.
	There's no point in getting in trouble over some...
	Cutting edge.
	It's not a sign of something you'd see in Vegas.
	People can be into their fetishes and I know what I'm going to do and I know what I'm not going to do.
	I'm not judging people's fetishes.
	To call it cutting edge and as old as time, you've got to be kidding me.
	That is the type of media coverage that $600 million of bailout gets you.
	2,000 Meals, by the way, go watch it.
	It's on Rumble.
	It's on Locals.
	If you buy an annual subscription to Dinesh D'Souza, you'll get it.
	Just so everybody understands the title, the idea is that there were 2,000 individuals that they geolocated their movement within a certain geographic vicinity of Dropboxes and 501c3 organization vote not-for-profits and attack the data, attack the methodology, or attack the conclusions.
	The observation was that there were 2,000 people called mules who, for whatever the reason, were visiting multiple Dropboxes repeatedly, 10 in a day, and going to these organizational locations.
	So they came to their own conclusions.
	You should watch it.
	I believe it's pay only.
	But I've been told that people have found it for free on Rumble, so I don't know.
	But it's interesting.
	Yeah, it's a very straightforward documentary.
	Definitely worth a watch, even if you're going to disagree with some of the stuff.
	Oh, how did we get...
	Chance, if you missed how we got to glory holes, you've got to go back up and see when we were reviewing recommendations from our top health doctors in Canada that when engaging in sexual activity during COVID, use face masks, use glory holes, use barriers between you so you can put the P to the V without actually kissing because that's normal.
	That's normal stuff in idiocracy land.
	No, he doesn't.
	Trudeau wears his mask to bed and to toilet.
	No, but then he takes it off when he wants to chastise the media.
	Anyhow, it's beyond preposterous.
	Okay, so what else?
	I think we've covered everything I had on my notes.
	Okay, Google autocomplete.
	We got that.
	Oh, no.
	I was going to...
	No, forget it.
	I won't do that.
	Okay.
	Serious question.
	That was about Fauci.
	No, we're good.
	We did it all.
	People, we've done our homework.
	And I hope I've enlightened you, made your day a little better.
	Share the information.
	We will make it cool again to have open discourse and to tolerate freedom of speech, even to hear the bad things that we don't like.
	I have not blocked anybody.
	On YouTube for substance, because they've irritated me, because they insulted me.
	I blocked the Russian sex bots and overt calls to violence to the extent that I've ever seen them.
	And on Twitter, you'll notice I have not blocked anybody.
	And I have not blocked anybody on one of the other platforms I use.
	Who knows?
	Show the walleye?
	Okay, fine.
	Okay, hold on, hold on, hold on.
	Let me get past the ad on this.
	I'll show the walleye.
	Well, you know, I'll give a little teaser so that people can...
	Do not shut down by accident, you silly person.
	Let's go to share screen.
	Share screen.
	Chrome tab.
	Caught my first walleye.
	Here we go, peeps.
	Check this out.
	Are we seeing the same thing?
	We are.
	This is the vlog.
	It's not highly edited.
	Who would be interested in a Viva livestream fishing afternoon stream?
	Yes, but don't catch turtles?
	No, even with turtles.
	Yes, 74%.
	I just want you to know, I think this is a bad idea.
	So my computer is...
	Let me see if we can see where my computer is.
	My computer is right there.
	What I'm circling, it's got a...
	It's got a convoy sticker on it, which is kind of funny because I got that at the convoy.
	And when I went to court to hear Randy Hillier's contesting his bail hearings, I opened up my computer and I was like, holy cow, is this going to get me kicked out of the courtroom?
	This is the free Canada in which we live.
	So that's my computer.
	Somewhere in there is my iPhone right there.
	That's a plastic bag that I was going to use to cover my computer when I went live.
	I'm freeing your canoe out into the middle of the lake.
	I'm just documenting it because I think it's a bad idea.
	Okay, we're going to skip to the walleye.
	Oh my gosh.
	Okay.
	I've never caught a walleye before.
	It's skin.
	It's very rough.
	It's not soft.
	Are you getting this?
	Okay, we're going to put it back.
	Okay, people.
	If you like fishing, that'll make your day.
	If you think fishing is causing unnecessary torture to animals, and I get it a lot, again, you're within your rights to have your opinion.
	I love fishing.
	If the fish gets mortally wounded, I will kill it and I will eat it.
	If I can release it, I always will release it.
	That was a nice walleye.
	Walleye is the best eating.
	I think technically, legally, I would have been allowed to keep it because I think we're right out of the spawn season, but it was barely hooked in the lip and I put it back.
	Yeah, so go check it out here.
	Did I post it?
	No, I'll post it again.
	Three times.
	Okay.
	People, go enjoy the day.
	I've got to pick up two kids now in 15 minutes.
	I'm going to go have my Yerba Mate caffeine afternoon kick.
	Soccer practice, and then I'm going to hop on the treadmill this evening to get some exercise.
	I went biking this morning with my oldest.
	I'm at the point now where I'm a better biker than even my 22-year-old nephew.
	And I hope to be so in 10 years.
	I remember biking with my dad when I first got my mountain bike when I was 16 years old.
	I want to be able to dominate my kids at biking for as long as possible.
	So, that's it.
	Okay, people.
	I hope I have not missed anything.
	Big kid, good eating?
	Yeah, that's what I've been told.
	Big kid, viva.
	I look wild.
	Kids are like the parents.
	Okay, let's do this.
	And I am going to do the live stream vlog fishing.
	I'm going to live stream when it's calm on the water and I can actually live stream.
	Do this in the canoe while fishing.
	It's going to happen.
	But that day, it was too windy.
	It was too windy to do.
	Let's do it.
	People, go.
	Enjoy the rest of the day.
	Thank you for being here.
	Probably going to go live tomorrow.
	We've got a sidebar Wednesday.
	Barnes is live tomorrow with the Durant, so check it out.
	Follow us if you are so inclined.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com You don't have to be a paid subscriber.
	There's a ton of content that is for everybody, but there are goodies for those who support.
	That's it.
	Go.
	Sunlight.
	Exercise.
	Healthy.
	Talk to people.
	Go outside and interact face-to-face and see that...
	There is, in fact, more that joins us than that separates us, but you wouldn't know that from social media or the media.
	All right, peeps, enjoy the afternoon.

▲