Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 2, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

02:55:00

Viva a Case of the Mondays! From Justin Trudeau to Johnny Depp - Viva Live!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Cancel student debt, period.
	We are here to tell the president that with the stroke of a pen, he can and should and must cancel student debt, period.
	We have 45 million people in this country who are shackled with student debt.
	You have to realize that 45 million people Who are putting off the opportunity to start that business they wanted to start.
	It is 45 million people who are putting off the opportunity to start the family they want to start.
	That is 45 million people will cancel student debt period.
	We are here to tell...
	Oh boy, I think we only need to hear that once, people.
	Good afternoon.
	Winston says good afternoon, too.
	Good afternoon, everyone.
	I am Winston, your overlord.
	All pray homage to Winston.
	You saw my mouth moving there.
	Oopsie-doodle.
	How's everyone doing?
	Short notice, and I had some trouble getting stuff together this morning.
	Oh, man, oh, man.
	I popped onto the Johnny Depp trial on Rakata.
	I think I have a problem.
	I have a psychological problem now.
	I cannot stand listening to the trial, not on a substantive basis, on the basis that things move so slowly.
	And I cannot...
	I know it's my problem.
	I know it's something that is probably not a good problem to have.
	I'm listening to them.
	First, it's fun to watch.
	Good lawyering, bad lawyering.
	Or just how I might have done things differently.
	We'll get to that.
	And I think this afternoon, I'm going to stream Amber Heard's testimony.
	But I paused.
	I went back during one of the live stream broadcasts of Johnny Depp this morning.
	I paused it at a place where I need to highlight.
	In as much as I would do a breakdown of this segment as to awful cross-examination, lawyering questions.
	I'll look it over afterwards, and I'll give some commentary that one of my other problems is, and I respect people's feeds, and I respect what people want to provide their audience, and I respect what their audience wants.
	People don't seem to want active commentary during the trial, and I'm not good at keeping my mouth closed.
	So anyways, we'll see what happens later on this afternoon.
	We've got to talk some Canadian stuff first.
	But we'll just...
	Look, before we get started...
	Standard disclaimers, no legal advice, no medical advice.
	You know, I'm discovering when I did, and I'm going to still do the car vlogs, the VLAWGS, which are law-themed vlogs.
	Some people said, you know, they didn't like the Philip DeFranco rapid editing, in-your-face style.
	Others did like it.
	But what I am noticing, and I think, and I think it's the future.
	Of the YouTubes.
	And I think it's the future of this type of legal analysis, legal commentary.
	Short, you know, digestible clips.
	But interactive discussion in real time on the issues.
	You know, daytime radio, the only thing that makes daytime radio good is that you can call in and get into a fight with the hosts on CJAD.
	Not that I'm speaking from personal experience because I think they blocked me now.
	But daytime radio, the only thing that's good about it...
	Is that it happens in real time and it's interactive to the extent that it's interactive.
	When it's not interactive, daytime radio is boring.
	It's vapid.
	It's repetitive.
	It's filled with too many freaking commercials.
	But when you can call in, call-ins are the best.
	And YouTube is sort of like where I see the interest in the market and the interest in the content going is long-form, interactive.
	Meaningful, thoughtful discourse.
	Interactive is it?
	Look at this.
	We have a call-in from Fringe Canadian.
	Thank you very much for the super chat.
	Did you see the May Day riot in Montreal yesterday?
	And yet our politicians condemn peaceful protests.
	And look at this.
	With this one question, we're going to have a tangent.
	There was a protest in Montreal yesterday.
	I was not there.
	I would not...
	I would not feel comfortable live streaming from all protests, from all rallies, from all events.
	I saw some clips.
	I wouldn't feel comfortable doing it, but Alexa Lavoie from Rebel News was there.
	And, you know, I think she was there.
	I am fairly certain the clip that I saw came from Alexa Lavoie, which is Alexa the voice, because Lavoie.
	Lavoie in French, by the way, is either the voice or the road.
	Lavoie, like a path.
	There was a protest in Montreal yesterday and, you know, got violent.
	Real quick-like.
	Just smashing windshields.
	And maybe it only happened on one block and it didn't characterize the entire protest.
	No one deemed it to be an occupation.
	I doubt there were cops there taking pictures and going to prosecute and detain everyone for months on end for mischief charges.
	Or actual...
	I don't know if it got more serious than that.
	But no, that's it.
	It's just like...
	It's...
	It's not parallel legal systems.
	It's just two-tier legal system.
	Political slips for some and detention for others.
	So yeah, I saw it.
	And it's not the first time.
	I don't know how long ago it was now.
	When they tore down the statue of Johnny McDonald, I believe, in downtown Montreal.
	When they had the Wet'suwet 'en protest.
	They didn't get violent.
	But they certainly weren't declared occupations.
	They certainly didn't prosecute people for blocking traffic for hours.
	But no, I saw it.
	I don't know who goes to...
	You go to these things to document and it's literally at your own risk and peril.
	Whereas you go to Ottawa for three weeks and the CBC got a little...
	They got a hard time.
	They got called names.
	But that's pretty much all they got called.
	Walking through that racist, xenophobic, transphobic, anti-Semitic protest, I actually had never felt safer in Ottawa.
	I felt safer walking around during the three weeks of the protest to livestream, the two days over the weekend, than I did walking through Rideau Street when the cops were no longer there and Ottawa looked like Ottawa typically looks.
	Homeless people everywhere.
	People on drugs, people in mental distress, not being taken care of.
	Being left to the Salvation Army.
	But I ranted about this yesterday, so I won't do it again.
	Not sure the current topic, but last night with Barnes on Ukraine, see if you can do...
	Oh, Lara Logan.
	Lara Logan, we were supposed to do an interview.
	I'm going to get back to her.
	Reporter with the military who knows about...
	Lara Logan, for any of you who haven't watched her, Amazingly insightful.
	Disagree with whomever you want.
	It doesn't mean that they're not insightful, well-researched, well-presented, and courageous.
	Lara Logan is all of those things.
	Agree or disagree with what she has to say.
	People seem to be of the opinion now that if you disagree with someone, they have to be bad, and you have to be good and virtuous.
	And I'm not saying this to you watching.
	I'm saying this to others who may not be watching or listening.
	Yeah, so Lara Logan is definitely on the list of interesting people to see and speak to.
	It's going to happen.
	It's going to happen.
	Now, but let's just go back to Ilhan Omar.
	There are so many things.
	I try to be fair.
	I do be fair.
	I am fair.
	I will see...
	The other side of the debate, even if I don't agree with it.
	I will argue and steelman the other side of the debate, even if I don't agree with it, and I'll get into it here.
	But you have to listen to this and appreciate the arbitrariness of it, the political opportunity of this.
	And I'm going to stop at a few points just to highlight my points.
	Cancel student debt period.
	We are here to tell the president that...
	I would love someone who knows.
	Just to determine the value of the clothing that she's wearing.
	And the shoes, the jacket looks very fancy.
	There's nothing wrong with fancy clothes.
	There's actually nothing wrong with accumulating personal wealth.
	There's actually nothing wrong with being paid for the work that you do.
	Where it becomes a problem is when you say, you go pander to the people who can't possibly ever afford this either now or in the future.
	You dress in an ostentatious manner while appealing to the people who you're politically profiting from.
	And financially profiting from.
	If anyone knows how much that jacket...
	I don't think we can see the shoes, but the jacket looks potentially identifiable and potentially expensive.
	With the stroke of a pen, he can read it.
	We are here to tell...
	The President, that with the stroke of a pen, he can and should and must cancel student debt.
	Now, I mean, I don't mean to state the obvious to people who know the obvious already, but if you cancel debt that someone owes someone, you're not cancelling it, you're transferring it.
	It's great, you know, if the students don't have to repay the banks.
	Someone does, in theory.
	And if someone doesn't repay the banks directly for that, cancel debt, well, the banks are going to recoup that loss somewhere else down the line.
	It's called passing the buck.
	So with a stroke of a pen, you could also print $800 billion.
	With a stroke of a pen, you could just give everyone a beautiful bill that says everyone would be a billionaire overnight with a stroke of a pen.
	That must make it right.
	That must make it logical.
	That must make it economically sound.
	Period.
	We have 45 million people in this country who are shackled with student debt.
	We have 45 million people in this country whom are shackled with...
	Why can't I get rid of that?
	Get this out of here.
	I don't want to see that.
	No.
	Shackled with student debt.
	Now, by the way...
	The idea of shackles and the idea of comparing having assumed, presumably voluntarily, to take on a debt versus being shackled.
	I hate playing the game.
	What if a Republican had analogized student debt to shackles?
	Shackles really relates to something specific in particular.
	You might have people objecting to the idea of comparing having shackles thrust on your hands.
	To voluntarily choosing to take on a debt so that you could study what you want to study.
	So, interesting.
	Again, double standards up the wazoo.
	You know what?
	It's not double standards.
	Someone said it's not double standards.
	It's hierarchy.
	They get to do it and nobody else does.
	And if anybody else does it and they are lower down on the political totem pole...
	Then they get lambaste.
	How dare you analogize student debt to shackles and everything historical that shackles related to?
	How dare you?
	But Ilan gets to do it.
	The one side of the political spectrum gets to do it.
	When analogizing it, comparing it to debt that someone voluntarily took on to study that which was of interest to them.
	And we'll get a little...
	You have to realize that 45 million people who are...
	Putting off the opportunity to start that business they wanted to start.
	I'm sorry.
	They assume debt to study to put off...
	What did you say?
	Getting that business?
	Starting that business?
	To starting that business that they wanted?
	These are people, students, who presumably took on that debt to learn something so that they can start that business that they wanted.
	I mean, unless what Ilhan Omar is saying is they studied something...
	That is so useless to the business that they want to start that it's actually an impediment for them to start that business.
	I don't know what business she's talking about, but I know there's a lot of people who might actually agree that some of these students have opted to study things which are useless to starting a business.
	And I'll put myself in that category because I was in that category.
	Studying philosophy at McGill.
	For being brutally honest, as we should always be.
	Well, we're always honest.
	We should be blunt.
	Studying philosophy is absolutely useless, useless to starting a business because it's not a trade.
	It's not a profession.
	Studying philosophy as an undergraduate degree is about training the mind, learning how to learn, learning how to succeed in university so that you can then take those skills and then presumably go get...
	A second degree.
	A professional degree.
	A graduate degree.
	So you learn how to study.
	You learn how to do what the teachers want you to do.
	Regurgitate the information that the teachers want you to regurgitate.
	That's what school is.
	Despite all the other stuff, that's what school is.
	Studying philosophy is certifiably useless to starting a business.
	Maybe it will teach you how to think critically.
	That's true.
	But in terms of starting a business, you need to learn specific...
	Specific knowledge, unique to a business, that business, or business at large.
	Hence, an MBA.
	So you go get the philosophy degree, which is useless on its own, except to train you how to think, and then you go get an MBA afterwards.
	I know the argument.
	Not everybody has the privilege or the luxury of doing a useless MBA to then get into a professional trade or a professional degree.
	Then you make those decisions.
	The idea that Ilhan Omar is actually saying your degree is useless to starting the business, that's degrading.
	You're calling someone's degree in philosophy or someone's degree in religious studies useless to starting a business.
	That's kind of me.
	Putting off the opportunities to start that business.
	They studied to invest in that business that they wanted to start so that they would be better at it, so they could make money doing it.
	And then presumably repay the debt that they assumed to get that investment into their education to start that business that they wanted.
	Moving on.
	It is 45 million people who are putting off the opportunity to start the family they want to start.
	Having debt precludes you from starting a family.
	That is 45 million people.
	So that's interesting.
	I started a family.
	We were quite heavily in debt at one point in time.
	So you study something that you get indebted to study, and now you come...
	I'm not going to say crying in any sense.
	I appreciate, by the way, education in the United States.
	Different situation here.
	I know there's state colleges and community colleges that are more affordable, and it might be a case of some people saying, I want to eat the filet mignon, but I don't want to pay for the filet mignon type thing.
	As if to say also that filet mignon is any...
	One university or the...
	The prestigious ones are actually providing any better education than the community ones.
	I think people might take issue with that.
	In some people's minds, it might just be a case of class laundering.
	It might be a case of elitism that many people complain about, that the good universities don't provide anything better of an education than the state colleges, but they certainly give you a better infrastructure of connections and network so that you can say, you're part of the fancy boys club like I went to Harvard.
	I went to University of Toronto, but I went to Université Laval.
	So there are, from what I understand, alternatives, but people might be wanting the filet mignon but not paying for it.
	Or they order the filet mignon and then the bill comes like, I can't pay for this.
	I want filet mignon forgiveness.
	But the underlying, the truly fundamental underlying question is, why only student debt?
	Why only student debt?
	I appreciate the argument that education is a right.
	It should be provided for as affordable as possible, especially to those who don't have the means to pay for it.
	Because if someone who doesn't have the money to pay for an education can't get an education, that's a vicious circle out of which one can never escape.
	But as far as I understand, there are alternatives in the States.
	It's not exactly what...
	In the States, everyone thinks that healthcare in Canada is totally free, totally awesome, and that's one of the misconceptions of Americans to Canada.
	And in Canada, people think like, oh, you can't possibly get an education unless you go to Harvard or spend $40,000 a semester, which is also not the case.
	So right now, we're in the circumstance where the new political token is to say, let's forgive student debt, but no other debt.
	There's obviously political opportunism there.
	And why?
	Because promise to give things for free to a younger generation that doesn't necessarily understand nothing is for free.
	You can get their vote for now.
	And then one day they're going to be taxpaying adults and they're going to go, why the heck am I paying 52% in tax?
	Oh, well, you wanted to forgive your student debt 20 years ago.
	Now you got to pay for, let's call them...
	People with a freeloading ideology that says, I want to study a degree which might be useless to a business, and I want to do it for free.
	I'm going to get to the actual steel man of why forgiving student debt in particular, as far as I understand it.
	The question is, though, why only student debt?
	Why not mortgages?
	We took out a mortgage on our house.
	It was big.
	It was big, big debt.
	Big debt that I had to pay for monthly because we chose to live in a house and we chose to try to own with all of the...
	But all of the pitfalls that come with home ownership.
	Why not student credit card debt?
	Why not student clothing?
	Why not student food?
	I mean, paying for groceries is very difficult.
	By the way, the ultimate irony.
	Right now, here's the shiny little thing, students.
	We're going to forgive your student debt.
	Oh, but by the way, your groceries have gone up 30%.
	Your gas has gone up 30%.
	Oh, I'll get that later.
	Phone's ringing.
	Your cost of living is gone.
	Let's distract you from those consequences, but that's Putin's food price hike.
	That's Putin's gas price hike.
	Let's distract you from that and dangle in front of you, but only for some of you who haven't already repaid your student loans, this free little carrot and make it seem like it's a right that you retroactively get to have debt forgiven that you voluntarily assumed for your own self-fulfilling purposes.
	Self-serving, self-fulfilling, self-interested purposes.
	So why only student debt?
	Now, some people will say student debt survives bankruptcy, so you can't even bankrupt your way out of student debt.
	It's a legitimate point.
	Amend the bankruptcy law.
	Let students who want to file for bankruptcy, well, they're not students at that point.
	Let adults who have voluntarily taken on student debt to study whatever degree that they wanted to study that actually they found contributes nothing to the business they want to start, let them make that decision.
	Bankruptcy?
	I mean, to that extent, why not forgive all debt so that people don't have to go bankrupt?
	So the steel man is that there are certain attributes of student loan which make it unique to other debt.
	You cannot bankrupt your way out of it.
	You'll still have to owe it after.
	Well, I would think then maybe as a starter, amend the bankruptcy laws so that students or adults who want to bankrupt themselves out of student debt can do so, but live with the consequences of having to have admitted to their creditors, I can't pay the debts that I voluntarily took on.
	Cancel my visa debt.
	Oh, yeah.
	So it's just, but what it is, it's appealing to the cheapest political denominator.
	Just promise freebies to the people who don't actually contribute in the active sense of paying taxes to pay for this stuff.
	Pretend you're canceling the debt when you're just transferring it to other people.
	And then lo and behold, there's a reason why a lot of students who start off as young, liberal, ideological optimists.
	Turn into 42-year-old cynics who realize there is no free lunch.
	There is no such thing as a gift, by and large.
	And somebody pays for everything.
	Everything gets paid for by somebody.
	And by the way, that canceling the student debt, everyone's going to pay for it, even the students.
	It's like, okay, but you won't pay for that debt so that you have now your degree, which Ilan Omar is saying useless to the business that you want to start.
	Good for you.
	You don't pay for that.
	Write that off and ignore the fact that the rest of your cost of living is going up.
	Okay.
	I've been seeing a lot of super chats come in.
	I've been starring them.
	This mechanism here that I've discovered, thanks to whoever said to do it.
	Not sure of the current topic, but last...
	Okay, so we got to that one.
	Sorry, thank you very much.
	We got...
	This just proves, once again, that leftism is a violent ideology.
	Who knows?
	You go far enough left, you come around another...
	Who knows?
	What it is, is...
	Setting aside the violence that we see in the streets, the politicians who condemn bouncy castles but do not condemn actual defacing and tearing down of monuments.
	I mean, it's amazing.
	It's surreal and depressing.
	Can I call in now?
	Hashtag your Insta message.
	Call-in shows are interesting.
	One thing about a call-in show is I would feel guilty if someone got embarrassed for something they said.
	On the show?
	I know The Amazing Lucas does a call, and it's kind of fun.
	I've seen a few people do some call-ins.
	They're fun to watch.
	But I wouldn't want someone...
	You know, you need a 30-second delay, and then it gets a little more complicated.
	Treats for Sir Winston.
	Viva, love you too, but Winston is prettier to look at.
	LMA.
	I think a great many people would agree with that.
	He's a magnificent, majestic dog.
	Go spend time with your family.
	You're sounding like every other professional complainer.
	Well, Boomer.
	My family, my wife is at work now.
	My kids are at school.
	What am I going to do?
	And it's not complaining.
	It is drawing attention to the absolute insanity, hypocrisy, and economic irresponsibility that is dragging down a society, that is dividing a society.
	Some might call it complaining.
	Others might call it trying to raise awareness of the idiocy so that we can Hopefully, right this ship, which is leaning, I don't care to which side it's leaning, but it's about to capsize.
	The man, we'll see if we do a call-in one day.
	I did HBSC, that's a Bachelor of Science, in bio.
	Then college, ended up in a field that requires no college, but it helps.
	With folks making six-figure salaries, maybe you start a job, maybe you start in a job like that, then chase your dreams.
	Look, at some point, I'm not sure what is worthwhile of the current education system.
	Learning how to think, learning how to work, learning how to meet deadlines, learning how to interact with professors, with students, learning how to function on campus life, these are assets.
	This is really what university is about.
	When university is no longer about that, and it seems to be arguably about...
	Some form of ideological radicalization, ideological indoctrination.
	Then it's not clear what value anyone is getting out of university, except for that wonderful piece of paper that I've got one on the wall.
	McGill University, very prestigious.
	Honors philosophy, wonderful.
	Université Laval, very prestigious within the province, but lesser known outside of the province.
	You know, it's no Harvard.
	And by the way, it was provincial university, cost me $1,800 a semester for the education.
	I paid for rent.
	It was $600 in Quebec City a month.
	This is a little while ago.
	Came out, got a job as a lawyer, and, you know, in theory, things worked out.
	Except I hated the practice of law, but that's a totally different thing.
	Anyways, that's it.
	I disagree, Viva.
	The boat has been listing to the point of capsize, and we are finally writing it.
	Well, I hope that that's some of the, you know, some of...
	That is the benefit to what we're doing.
	There's a lot of people now that seem to be making a lot more sense vocally.
	And I tell you one day, it will become cool.
	It will become popular to actually speak logically and not pander just for political points.
	You know, at some point, being a politician, a responsible one means saying, you have your student loan, we can talk about things like interest rates.
	We can talk about things like...
	Making it easier for people to get jobs.
	Enhancing an economy.
	Can you imagine the people with student debt who have now been basically shut out of life for the last two years?
	Yeah, that's a very big problem.
	It's almost like government causes or exacerbates a problem only to then promise a solution which itself will cause or exacerbate other problems.
	It's almost like that's the cycle of government.
	Because it is, by the way.
	There's no such thing as a free lunch.
	M. Friedman.
	Student loans have increased dramatically since government felt the need of taking over the student loans, one of the reasons why you can't bankrupt out of student loans.
	It's interesting.
	Right on point with government proposing a solution which causes other problems, thus requiring more government intervention to regulate or remedy a problem caused by government intervention in the first place.
	Oh, speaking of...
	Speaking of government problems...
	First of all, let me see something.
	I'm going to see...
	I'm going to...
	Let me just see what's going on with the...
	Oh!
	No, we'll get there.
	We'll get there.
	We're going to go to the trial in a bit.
	But I want to also just go over an old part of the testimony.
	I can't see where that is.
	Now let's just see if we're still monetized, people.
	I know that we haven't said anything bad.
	Demonetized.
	They all get re-monetized after manual review because I have a feeling I know why this happens and it doesn't have to do with content because it gets demonetized before the content can even be...
	They've all been getting re-monetized shortly after the stream.
	So I'm not asking for sympathy or complaints.
	I'm just noticing a trend.
	Inflation is theft.
	You know what else is...
	I mean, there's a lot of stuff that's theft.
	Corruption is theft.
	The government dispensing of our money...
	In ways that benefit the government and not the interests of the citizens whom they represent?
	That's theft.
	It's worse than theft.
	Freaking extortion.
	No, I don't think it's because someone at YouTube personally hates me.
	I think it's just some people who think it's a fun tactic to abusively flag content.
	Flag content because of the interlocutor and not because of the content itself.
	But speaking of government, I mean, you all are going to puke before we get there.
	Before we get there.
	We've got to...
	I talked about it yesterday.
	I don't think I showed the actual comic yesterday.
	This is from...
	I forget where it's from.
	The Hamilton Spectre.
	This is Ezra Levant, who...
	Man, everyone should follow Ezra Levant if you don't already, because whether you like him or...
	I mean, I don't know who can dislike him, but whether you love him or hate him, he finds the good stuff on the interwebs.
	I still have to trust but verify.
	And I had to, like I told him, I could not believe this was real, but I had to go verify.
	This is from the Hamilton Spectre, one of the largest recipients of Trudeau's newspaper bailouts, speaking of the government taking our money to buy off other people, which that's, you know, there's representation and there's taxation, but I don't want to fund the CBC and I don't want to fund bailouts of dishonest, lying media outlets.
	And you'll see why they're dishonest and lying if you had any lingering note.
	So the Hamilton Specter publishes an insane conspiracy theory that the Canadian truckers are organized by Putin, Trump, and the Confederacy.
	And this is the cartoon, people.
	That's Donald Trump, who I believe has actually lost a lot of weight since this individual decided to fat shame.
	But let's set that aside.
	Let's set aside the fact that...
	Who's the graphic guy here?
	McKay, Hamilton Spectator.
	Let's just say...
	Setting aside the fact that...
	I know it's a character.
	It's supposed to exaggerate the features of an individual.
	Trump is looking more fit in recent days compared to this picture.
	But this is actually...
	Someone either believes this or someone doesn't believe it but wants to convince other people that behind the freedom convoy, which even in this comic is characterized by Canadian flags on hockey sticks and freedom from...
	Medical coercion from the government.
	They're alluding.
	This individual McKay is suggesting.
	I also, I'm not sure I like the...
	I know these are supposed to be the puppet handles, but it looks a little religious as well, which irks me because it doesn't look respectful, but setting that aside.
	That Trump, Putin, you can see his little Russian flag here, and the Confederacy were behind the Ottawa protests.
	Despite the fact that even our own intelligence did the post-mortem and determined that the donations came from hundreds of thousands of Canadians and there was no foreign influence in any relevant sense.
	I'm sure there were some Americans who donated.
	I'm sure there were some Europeans who donated to the federally incorporated not-for-profit.
	This is nothing shy of utter absurdity.
	Of utter propaganda, malicious, dishonest propaganda that we the taxpayers are paying for because the Trudeau government took $600 million of our tax dollars and then paid it to the likes of the Hamilton spectator to put out vitriolic, idiotic, baseless propaganda to undermine what was in fact a pure Canadian initiative.
	A Canadian movement to reflect the disagreement, the...
	The dismay of the Canadian population with their corrupt and unethical government.
	And Ezra, I do trust you, but I still have to verify.
	Isaac, this thing can't be real.
	And I went, it's real.
	This comic was so absurd, I actually had to verify on my own that it was for real.
	Holy crab apples.
	It's utterly detached from reality.
	These are the same people calling others conspiracy theorists.
	Appreciate, appreciate this.
	That the likes, the political likes of the individual behind this...
	And the publications that publish this comic call other people conspiracy theorists.
	What is the entity of the Confederation?
	I'm curious.
	What is the organized entity that even exists that would have, could have, or did accordingly?
	What is that entity?
	It's bat poop.
	We just hit two, three, four, five spectators.
	That's a very nice...
	Satisfying number.
	It's lunacy.
	It's lunacy.
	And it's now lunacy that is being funded, at least in part, by our taxpayer dollars.
	Canadians protesting draconian, abusive, unconstitutional government measures from a corrupt and unethical government.
	One dude who's funded by that unethical, corrupt government is suggesting that it's Russia.
	Trump and the Confederacy.
	Which brings us to, as far as I'm concerned, the worst person in the history of Canadian politics.
	Admittedly, my understanding of Canadian politics might be limited.
	Maybe there were worse politicians in the history of Canadian politics.
	I don't think so.
	In fact, hold on one second.
	Before we even get here, I'm going to go to YouTube.
	I'm going to go to details.
	I'm going to go to the chat.
	I'm going to set up a poll right now.
	And it's going to be a very straightforward question.
	Is Justin Trudeau the worst person in Canadian politics?
	And I'm not going to be funny and say yes, yes with turtles.
	It's going to be yes, no with turtles and yes.
	With turtles.
	And because some of you might not want to express an opinion, just show results.
	Is Justin Trudeau, let's make sure there's no typos, the worst...
	I'm going to add one for it.
	The worstest...
	You see, the worstest person in Canadian politics.
	Yes with turtles, no with turtles.
	Just show results.
	Ask your community.
	Let's see.
	Winston is having a dream, it seems.
	He might be having a nightmare, given the subject matter.
	But let's just go see what Justin Trudeau had to say.
	Where is...
	Hold on.
	Listen with that.
	Okay, so this is the window.
	Look at what Justin Trudeau actually had the audacity.
	Actually had the audacity to tweet.
	I mean, it will make you puke.
	I'm just going to go flag.
	Oh my God, I got the first vote in.
	Wow.
	No, no, no.
	You probably think you did because there's probably a lot of people who think that they got the first vote in.
	But hold on, let me get that comment off the screen.
	Let's go see what Justin Trudeau.
	I mean, picture his face and picture his voice when he says it.
	No matter who you are.
	The past two years have probably been difficult.
	You know what?
	This is a moment of actual, actual inadvertent honesty.
	No matter who you are, the past two years have probably been difficult.
	Unless you're Justin Trudeau.
	They haven't been difficult for Justin Trudeau.
	They haven't been difficult for, oh, who's that woman in Eileen P. Davila, who's been getting paid $350,000, the chief medical officer of Ontario.
	$350,000 a year hasn't missed a paycheck while they lock down Ontarians.
	It hasn't been...
	I'm sure it's been hard for Dina Hinshaw, but maybe for other reasons.
	It hasn't been hard for the politicians who have benefited tremendously from all of this.
	They've got their raises.
	They get their paychecks.
	They get their vacations.
	They get to travel while we don't.
	They get to cross provincial borders when others don't, Justin Trudeau.
	They get to go to the vacation on Bart's Island, or no, St. Bart's Island, while...
	Posting pre-recorded videos saying we've all got to celebrate Christmas differently this year.
	A dude actually did this out of Ontario.
	They get to travel.
	They get their paychecks.
	They get their vacation.
	They get to see their family.
	So no matter who you are, the past few years have probably been difficult.
	Yeah, unless you're Justin Trudeau off in Tofino on the beach.
	Hell, he's skiing.
	I mean, at least spring skiing.
	He's been skiing.
	You can tell by the tan on his face in one of those videos.
	But just...
	Sorry.
	I digress.
	No matter who you are, the past few years have been difficult.
	So as we mark Mental Health Week, let's hashtag get real.
	And I don't know what this is.
	I don't know what this is, this thing right here.
	Let's get real.
	Green hearts in a green circle with each other.
	Let's check in with our friends and family.
	He's been stealing my line from my vlogs.
	Check in on friends and family.
	Make sure everyone around you is doing well.
	Unless you're the Prime Minister.
	Then you just bring in the police and listen with empathy because no one should suffer in silence.
	This is the guy who all he had to do was listen to the protesters that protested outside of Ottawa.
	All he had to do.
	Let me just get back to this.
	In your face, rubbing your face in poop hypocrisy.
	All he had to do was listen with empathy.
	All he had to do was discuss with people who have been suffering.
	With people who have had a very difficult two years.
	With people who he put out of jobs.
	With people whose kids he masked up, locked down.
	Barred from playing sports because of their medical status.
	All he had to do was listen with empathy.
	What does he do?
	I don't need to show you those videos again.
	What does he do?
	He absconds from his duties.
	He absconds from Parliament Hill.
	He goes into hiding.
	Literally.
	He might have had COVID.
	He invokes, alleges to have had COVID at the time of the protest.
	Goes into hiding.
	Does it not dignify his fellow Canadians?
	With so much as listening to their grievances.
	But why would he have to?
	That was actually just Putin, Trump, and the Confederacy talking.
	It wasn't Canadians.
	No.
	He doesn't listen to them.
	He deploys the police.
	He physically abuses them.
	He psychologically abuses them.
	And then he criminally prosecutes them to the fullest extent of any broken, corrupt, authoritarian banana republic.
	This is the guy now, after he's beaten Canadians, literally and physically, through his police force.
	After he's prosecuted them, after he's detained them indefinitely, this is the guy now telling us to check in on our friends and family, listen with empathy, because no one should suffer in silence.
	Let's just see where I responded.
	Let's just see how far down this thread we're going to see my response, which I know, based on engagement, should not be down on the bottom.
	Here it is.
	224 retweets of my response to his tweet, which...
	How far down do we have to go?
	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31 down.
	Makes sense.
	There's definitely no...
	Downgrading.
	This is all organic, the way it happens, through engagement.
	It's all organic.
	If you think otherwise, you're one of them.
	Listen with empathy.
	Unless it's protesters on Parliament Hill, then unleash the police, beat the ever-loving crap out of them, pepper spray them, strip them of their civil rights, freeze their bank accounts, ruin their lives.
	You are awful, Justin.
	Truly awful.
	And I, you know, at the protest, rolling thunder, the rally.
	Over the weekend.
	There were people saying, it's not even too late for Justin to be redeemed.
	Everyone can be redeemed.
	I'm not even sure.
	You all know me.
	Some of you don't even like the fact that a year and a half ago, I was prepared to forgive Jussie Smollett if he were to ask for forgiveness.
	Apologize.
	A year and a half ago.
	The thing about being bad.
	The thing about being wrong, the thing about being, I won't say evil, although I'm thinking it, but the thing about being abusive or just being an outright bad person or making mistakes is that the longer they go on, the longer is the path to, is it redemption?
	Someone said it wasn't redemption.
	The longer is the path to, not reconciliation, what's the word I'm looking for, people?
	The longer you've been a jerk, the longer it takes to come out of it.
	The more you have to do to establish that trust that you spent so long violating.
	And just taking Jussie Smollett by way of example, that went on for so long, for him to redeem himself, it's not just a question of an apology, and it's not even just going to be a question of a month.
	It's going to take years to rehabilitate because trust is something of a structure.
	Trust is something of a structure that once you destroy it, you have to build it back up again.
	So Justin Trudeau, unfortunately, short of resignation, outright apology, Justin Trudeau, politically speaking, is beyond any form of redemption from a political perspective.
	The man has...
	He's ruined lies.
	He's ruined lives.
	He's ruined Canadian lives.
	And I don't think he's ruined Canada yet, but he's right on the way.
	And then comes out...
	This is gaslighting that is typical of abusers.
	I didn't hit you.
	Oh, you fell down the stairs last night.
	I didn't.
	Oh, you made me do that.
	Let's talk.
	Let's kiss.
	Let me pretend to love you now after I've...
	We have to listen to each other, people.
	Unless it's protesters that I don't want to talk to, then I don't have to listen to them.
	Then I get to actually abuse them.
	And then I get to come out on social media and pretend to be the person that, in reality, I am the furthest thing from.
	It's atrocious.
	And it's abusive and it's devastating for so many.
	So, I'm sorry.
	If this is complaining, I do at the very least hope that it's complaining while sensitizing people to what's going on.
	People who don't know this just see a tweet from Justin.
	And the responses, some of the bot responses to that, thank you so much, Justin, you're the greatest.
	I love you.
	I mean, it's like there's people who live in that reality where that's all they know.
	And they say, oh, he says the right things.
	And, you know, I'm not aware of his...
	Ethics violations?
	I'm not aware of his two ethics violations.
	I'm not aware of his three ethics investigations.
	I'm not aware of...
	He didn't abuse anybody at that protest.
	Those were extremists there.
	He just reinstated law and order to Canada.
	It's enraging.
	There's no other way to describe it.
	It's enraging and it's just the worst.
	Paid my own way.
	Nobody's fault but my own.
	No regrets.
	Not even one.
	I would have liked to have done an MBA because I do think in retrospect, philosophy is good.
	It's culture.
	It makes you sound smarter at parties.
	But I think I would have rather had an MBA because that I appreciate.
	As a lawyer, it took me a long time to understand and learn the financial side of business.
	And if you become a lawyer without knowing how to, you know, analyze a spreadsheet, a financial statement, sorry, not a spreadsheet, a financial statement, a profit and loss ledger, you can't be a good lawyer unless you know these things.
	So, you know, it takes a little while.
	By the way, for everyone praising Bill Maher, yesterday on his podcast, he suggested that Trump was conspiring with U.S. Attorney General to steal 2024.
	These people are calling other people conspiracy theories.
	Theorists, sorry.
	Bezigniz says supersticker, and that is Decepticon.
	Yes, I think that's the Decepticon.
	Wait a minute, maybe that's the Transformer one.
	I'm not your buddy, guys.
	Sorry I was pushing you to film protesters.
	I just worry about the police lying.
	I mean, if nobody filmed the old lady trampled, would we even know?
	No!
	We would think, if all we followed was the Ottawa police Twitter feed, we would have thought...
	This woman, we wouldn't have known that she was an 80-year-old indigenous woman.
	We would have known that a woman threw a bike at the cops.
	Thank goodness for the live streamers.
	Unedited reality, without a filter, which W5 thinks is a bad thing.
	People would have thought a woman threw a bike at police officers' horses and play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
	80-year-old indigenous woman, and it was a walker that she had as the Not military, but highly militarized police force strutted through a crowded protest with eight horses in the middle of winter on frozen icy streets.
	Makes sense.
	Yesterday, a beautiful lady was weeping to Poilievre because she is still locked out of her federal job.
	I'm not giving Poilievre a pass.
	Poilievre, for those of you who don't know, is in the Conservative Party looking to become leader of the Conservative Party.
	They supported vaccine mandates, so it's nice.
	Repentance is the word.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, the conservatives contributed to this.
	They're not getting a pass just because they are now talking the talk, or I should say, saying the right things.
	Yep, that is good for us.
	Live vids, how would we do without them now?
	And just wait, by the way.
	Wait for Justin Trudeau.
	To try to pass the laws that he's trying to pass in Canada, Bill C-11, to try to downgrade, demote, censor, suppress content that is the only light behind the gatekeepers of the state-funded CBC, Radio Canada, and the state-subsidized all other media.
	There's no question.
	And when that happens, I mean, good luck knowing what's going on.
	Fringe Canadian says, OPS, that's Ottawa Police Services or Ontario Police, I think it's Ottawa Police Services, officially concluded the person who danced on the Tomb of Unknown Soldier was not part of the convoy in any way.
	I have my guesses as to who that, what that person might have been affiliated with.
	I think the person was probably just there.
	Was probably, might have just been one of the many people who frequents that area at night.
	I understood it was just someone, a street person, who might have not been all that mentally well either.
	That was what I understood the person, who I understood the person was.
	Bark, bark, bark, bark, bark with Justin.
	Could it be he's operating...
	Okay, I don't get that far into...
	Into presumption of intent.
	I don't know.
	How do you even measure that?
	I've never seen any evidence that would suggest that.
	Barring big changes, I will vote PPC next election.
	Point curation?
	How's it going?
	Oh, hold on.
	I like this.
	But people say that conspiracy theorists...
	Conspiracy is two or more people working towards an end.
	There's nothing but for the fact that it's become a buzzword, a flag word, and it has been weaponized for ideological and political purposes.
	It means nothing.
	It means nothing.
	But yeah, there's, you know, the conspiracy, the people calling others conspiracy theorists.
	Think that Trump, the Confederacy, and Putin were behind the Ottawa protests.
	Think that Russia was colluding with Trump for the 2016 elections, despite all evidence to the contrary.
	Despite the fact that, in reality, the only people colluding with foreign interests to influence things were the Democrats, working with British spies, Russian think tanks.
	That's it.
	It's just...
	It's just...
	Your conservatives are like a neocon rhinos here in the US, part of the loyal to the machine opposition.
	There might be one exception to that individual, but then for those...
	Oh, by the way, there might be one exception.
	Roman Baber, for anybody who doesn't know, member of provincial parliament in Ontario.
	He's going to be live on my channel Friday.
	I think it's one o 'clock.
	I'm going to obviously promote the living heck out of it as the week goes on, but Roman Baber, who might...
	I commended Roman Baber.
	He had been outspoken in his opposition to all of these measures for a long time.
	Bravely so, almost to the point where he almost had his salary slashed.
	Because at one point in time, he put forward a bill which he knew would never get support to slash parliamentarians' salaries while they were shutting down the country.
	You want to shut down the country?
	You want to put people out of work?
	Fine.
	You take the same pay cut.
	What do the members of parliament do?
	They...
	What did they do?
	They shut down his...
	I'm going to ask him more on Friday, but they shut down his bill and then voted to suspend his salary.
	They knew it wasn't going to pass either, but that's how they said, F you.
	You want to try to mess with our salaries, we'll mess with yours.
	My question, though, is if you have principles and you want to affect change, I know what the answer is going to be, but my question is that if you have principles, you're running with a party without principles.
	The argument is going to be, well, we want to change the party, so we need to change it from...
	And I'm going to answer to you.
	You don't get a vote on promises.
	You get a vote on action.
	Anyway, we'll talk.
	Roman Baber's coming on on Friday, so stay tuned.
	And we got, has anyone heard what happened to the other man in the horse trampling?
	No one speaks about it.
	There was a rumor.
	This was a gentleman.
	I think he was wearing a brown jacket.
	There was a rumor that he had been killed.
	He didn't.
	There was an individual who did have a heart attack.
	At the protest, but the other individual who was struck by a horse as well did not succumb to those injuries.
	Nearly all politicians are members of the WEF World Economic Forum.
	Anyone associated with that VI is not to be trusted under any circumstances.
	Funny you should mention that, by the way.
	Let me just see if I have something here.
	I've been given Jim Watson a hard time recently.
	He deserves it.
	He deserves it because he says absolutely insufferably idiotic and divisive and hate-inducing things like this.
	So we're asking those individuals who have the right to freely come into our city to be respectful of both our residents and our businesses and our infrastructure.
	And not to provoke some of the kind of racist, sexist, homophobic nonsense that we saw with the trucker's convoy a few months ago.
	Now, someone did say something interesting.
	Hold on, let me see if I can do this.
	If you look down at the Ottawa sign, it does look like something.
	It looks like a letter.
	We're asking those individuals who have the right to freely come into our city.
	I don't want to get into that type of stuff, but someone did notice it, and now I can't unsee it since the person mentioned it.
	That's what Jim Watson said.
	And I said, oh, Jim, amazing how Jim Watson condemns in advance fabricated imaginings of racist, sexist, and homophobic incidents that never actually occurred at the Ottawa trucker protest, yet remains totally silent on actual, concrete...
	And documented incidents of police brutality.
	I'm going to open a second parenthesis here because this is the danger of Twitter, by the way.
	I read someone's response to this and here it was.
	It says, reaching a new level of corruption.
	That's not the right one.
	Where was it?
	Solid.
	Okay, no, I wasn't looking for that.
	Here we go.
	So this guy writes, John Coffey says, you mean the stuff you made up and never happened.
	Keep the narrative going.
	I first read this and I was like, is he talking about me?
	About the police violence?
	But no, it's just how amazing how things can be misinterpreted on Twitter.
	Let me see if someone else misunderstood what he intended to say.
	Are you referring to Viva's claims of violence against protesters or the mayor's denial?
	I think he's referring to the mayor.
	The only way I can know that is I go click on John and he seems to be a follower.
	Oh, I can't see who's following here.
	He's got the Canadian flag.
	I presume he's talking about Jim Watson's absolute fabrication of stuff that never happened to keep the narrative going.
	But it's just funny how things can be misunderstood to lead to unnecessary strife and disagreement in the Twitterverse, almost like it by design.
	But, so I was giving him a bit of a hard time on that, because it's patently absurd, fabricated nonsense.
	And then, look what I just, I mean, it's just funny.
	There's no description.
	There's no picture.
	I don't know why he's on the website, but he is.
	I don't know if the World Economic Forum just picks people and puts them on their website and if they don't ask to be removed or they don't know, they just keep them there and they look like a legit international reputable institution.
	I don't know.
	Or I don't know if Jim Watson actually has some form of affiliation to the World Economic Forum like so many others in Canadian politics, including Chrystia Freeland?
	W-E-F?
	Hmm.
	Chrystia Freeland, she's got more than just her name and position.
	She...
	I reject all of your cookies.
	World Economic...
	She is a member of the Forum's Board of Trustees.
	A little more than just a name with nothing, but why is Jim Watson on the World Economic Forum website?
	Why is Chrystia Freeland on the Board of Trustees of the World Economic Forum?
	She represents Canada and Canadians, not the World Economic Forum.
	Not the interest of the World Economic Forum.
	Anyhow, turns out Jim Watson's there too, for whatever the reason.
	Jim's on it.
	Oh.
	I see.
	Oh, hi, Jim.
	Goodbye.
	So, yeah, interesting.
	I don't understand how it happens.
	I don't understand why it's happening.
	I don't understand what it means.
	I just don't like it.
	I know that I don't like it.
	I don't understand a lot of stuff about how, why, and what.
	But it doesn't look good.
	It doesn't smell good, and I don't like it.
	You know, I know what you're doing right now, and I don't like it.
	Who gets the movie?
	That's an obvious one.
	Singh must be compelled to break with these...
	Singh is a WEF-er!
	Singh...
	Hold on.
	Singh...
	Singh is one of the young global leaders.
	Let me just show everybody so that nobody accuses me of making something up.
	Which one do I got to get this from?
	Ah, cripe.
	Let me open up another window.
	Hold on.
	No, no, no.
	We have time.
	What I love about these live streams is the pace is a little slower.
	We can have a few seconds of silence.
	Doug meets Singh WEF.
	Got a very, very nice bio.
	The WEF is Doing Good by Jagmeet Singh.
	And his pronunciation of his name is Jagmeet, and I'm not...
	Oh, here we go, here we go.
	And just to show my homework, people, just to show my homework, you go to Google, you click on the link, it's there.
	Jagmeet Singh was...
	And look at this beautiful bio.
	Why is Jagmeet Singh...
	On the WEF website.
	Does the WEF think that they are the government of Canada?
	Like, it's one thing.
	Either they think that they are the platform to host our elected officials, so they somehow represent or have anything to do with Canada, or our elected officials are going and pledging loyalties or providing loyalties to an international organization that has no elected business in our country.
	It has no elected...
	It has no influence in our country.
	It has no business in our country or in our politics.
	Doug Meatsingh is there too.
	Don't know who didn't know that.
	Okay, so Pierre Trudeau, founding member of Club Rome.
	Yeah, I don't know enough about that.
	I know Robert talked about that.
	I don't know what that is.
	Spoke about you.
	Spoke about you and Rebel C11.
	Have you spoken in depth yet?
	God bless your family from Barrie, Ontario.
	Siri Alexanderful.
	I think I'm going to do a piece with Alexa.
	She asked my opinion on my concerns about Bill...
	Oh no, it was Bill 15 in Quebec.
	C11 is the one that wants to regulate the...
	It's Bill C10's bigger sibling now.
	Olivia Lucia, thank you very much.
	And accuse your opponent of what you are doing to create confusion and to inculcate voters against evidence of your own guilt.
	You see, I looked this up.
	I'm not your guy, buddy.
	I'm not your buddy, guy.
	I don't think it was Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.
	I think the accuse your opponent of doing what you are doing is actually Joseph Goebbels.
	Goebbels.
	The guy.
	The Nazi propaganda minister.
	I think it actually originated with him.
	I don't think it was one of the 13 rules for radicals.
	But I only learned that because someone challenged me on that and then I learned.
	In 1997-2000, I volunteered alongside Pierre Poilievre and know he's a sharp, upstanding guy.
	From the CPC's point of view, he's their best bet.
	This doesn't mean I'll vote for him.
	Stephen Britton, thank you very much.
	No, I like him.
	He's definitely smart.
	He's definitely sharp and he definitely gave Trudeau the hardest time for all of his chicanery.
	But he's still running with that party that supported vaccine passports, supported lockdowns, supports the Paris Accord, supports carbon taxes.
	The party is no different than the Liberals.
	I don't care.
	They're as woke as anybody else.
	I don't know what Pierre Poilievre...
	You don't change the party as the leader.
	The party will get what it wants.
	And if it doesn't want Pierre Poilievre, by the way, they're going to screw him out of the leadership.
	Because politics is filthier than a metro poll, a subway...
	Hand pull thing.
	It is.
	And those are dirty.
	Filthy.
	What else do we got here?
	WF is the government of the world.
	No, it's funny.
	Two years ago, I didn't know what the WF was.
	Two years ago, someone said the Great Reset or you'll own nothing.
	I remember my initial reactions.
	It's all out there.
	And then it just becomes fact.
	It just becomes accepted fact.
	Oh, I just saw a new member come.
	There we go.
	All right.
	So that's what's going on there.
	Has the trial resumed?
	I want to show you one thing from the trial.
	Hold on.
	Let me get to my footnotes.
	My notes.
	Well, there's the Rachel Levine story.
	Yeah.
	I'll share this because I'm going to poke a little fun at Fox News, and it'll lead to the other poking fun at Fox News.
	Rachel Levine, who is the chief...
	What's the title for Rachel Levine now?
	Rachel Levine says pediatricians all agree on gender-affirming care, which according to Fox News...
	First of all, guys, I don't like people using deliberately unflattering pictures regardless, and I...
	In as much as possible, try not to use deliberately unflattering pictures because it cheapens the message and it looks like instead of being a legitimate critique piece, it's just a hit piece.
	This is an unflattering picture.
	Fox can probably do better than that just in terms of like, you don't want people discrediting right off the bat, but let's just see what this article alleges.
	And you don't see it because I got to bring it in from here.
	Okay, so hold on.
	Here.
	Rachel Levine says pediatricians all agree on the importance of gender-affirming care for children.
	Gender-affirming care includes, this is according to Fox News, so take it with whatever grain of salt you want to take it with, irreversible surgery for adolescents on a case-by-case basis, according to HHS, and that is Health and Human Services.
	She's the head of HHS.
	Assistant Secretary of Health Rachel Levine, the highest-ranking transgender person in the U.S. government, claimed During a recent interview with NPR that there is no argument about gender-affirming care among pediatricians and doctors who specialize in adolescence.
	By the way, this is not true because I happen to know some doctors, pediatricians who will disagree with this.
	Even if it were true, unanimity among science is not a good thing.
	It's arguably a bad thing and shows that politics and ideology has infiltrated science, which is itself always supposed to be questioning, always supposed to be open for debate and discussion, and always supposed to be ultimately about bettering the process and coming to the right answer and not heeding to dogma.
	Levine made the comments ahead of a Saturday speech at a Texas Christian university during which Levine blamed the high rate of bad ideations among transgender...
	On harassment, scapegoating, and intentional abuse, according to a prepared remarks given to the NPR.
	We know for a fact that this statement ignores stats that come after any gender-affirming care that some may have been provided.
	And so the statistic to which Levine is referring is inconsistent because I believe the same stat is true even after gender-affirming care, in which case...
	In which case, draw your own conclusions.
	I'm not a scientist or a pediatrician.
	I don't want to see that.
	I don't have toenail fungus, people.
	I don't know why that ad's coming up.
	Anyways, it's...
	Oh, here.
	And then we go.
	According to definitions laid out in a fact sheet from Levine's Department of Health and Human Services in March, gender-affirming care includes social affirmation at any age, Puberty blockers during puberty, hormone therapy starting during early adolescence.
	Irreversible surgery is typically used in adulthood or case-by-case basis in adolescence, according to the agency.
	And this is one of those situations where I'm trying to conceptualize when, if ever, irreversible surgery in adolescence could ever be anything other than something that should never be...
	Authorized or allowed in law or recommended by any doctor.
	I'm having difficulty thinking of a case where anyone can say a child wants to do something to their body.
	A child which they're recognizing is young.
	Unable to consent of their own accord, hence their minors and hence they rely on their parents or sometimes the government if the parents want to do something irreparable or irreversible or illegal.
	You know, I have trouble conceiving or conceptualizing of any circumstance where irreversible surgery could be preferred.
	And say, physiologically unnecessary surgery.
	Psychologically, there's an argument.
	I'm not sure that the surgery is going to quell or ultimately resolve any of these psychological issues.
	But physiologically unnecessary surgery, this is not a malignant tumor.
	It's not a testicular torsion.
	It's not a hernia.
	This is not something that's needed to be done to resume proper functioning of the body.
	Some might even say quite to the contrary.
	I'm having trouble thinking of a case where this should ever be justified on a minor, even if a doctor specializing in this says it's in the child's best interest.
	It's such a...
	And that this has become the litmus test issue of modern discourse.
	You go to Levine's Twitter feed, you would think that Levine's only purpose in the position as assistant director of HHS is only this one issue.
	It's...
	You would think...
	I went through it.
	It's surreal.
	It's surreal.
	I don't know what this is.
	You would think that this is the only issue and the biggest issue facing America these days.
	But what has turned into a political wedge issue is typically disproportionate to the amount of people that it actually affects.
	It's easy political litmus test, divide and conquer.
	And everybody agrees.
	Everybody agrees.
	I mean, everybody agrees that irreversible surgery could, in theory, in some cases, be authorized on a minor.
	If all pediatricians agreed with that, I would be shocked and I would have some serious questions for the field of podiatry.
	Oh, yo, what's happening, Alviva?
	Came from Styx Stream.
	Welcome, Mr. Wonderful.
	I didn't know Styx was live streaming.
	Unanimously, the scientific community believes one promotes the theory of evolution as fact, silencing creation scientists, but the truth, the science.
	Oy.
	It's...
	No, but I'm just, conceptually, circumcision, I appreciate the argument.
	People say it's a form of genital defacement.
	The circumcision is the most borderline of borderline cases in that it doesn't impede any proper functioning, at least male circumcision.
	Yeah, you know, it affects.
	It's cutting off useful skin, yes.
	There's medical reasons for which it could need to be done on a case-by-case basis.
	I appreciate the argument, but, you know, materially different in that it does not impede functioning.
	But again, I'll appreciate that some people don't agree with that and think it's on par with the rest.
	I would disagree.
	And we'll never agree on that because we agree on the disagreement of the fact, but then we just have our own separate opinions.
	But I'm having trouble appreciating or envisioning any circumstance where irreparable surgery on a minor for what is, at its heart, psychological distress issues is the right thing to do.
	But Levine says it's unanimous, and it's now become, you know...
	Anyway, it's now become the political litmus test of our time, which determines whether or not someone is transphobic or trans-tolerant.
	Whether or not you think minors, even with parental consent, should not be allowed to do certain things to their bodies until they become adults.
	Okay.
	So that was a Levine.
	And then just the Fox News.
	Hold on, there was one other bookmark that I had there.
	So I got the article.
	Okay, but that brought us into another one of Fox News' wicked, wicked editorializing in the content, in the journalism that they produce.
	This is from Amber Heard, which is going to bring us into the next subject, but it's good.
	Fox News put out an article, and you just read this, it raises the question as to what...
	The role of journalists are in terms of being journalists, disclosing their own opinions when they have one on a subject, and or discreetly, because some people might not even notice this, editorializing the content on which they're supposed to be providing the facts.
	This is just an excerpt from the article.
	The London Fields actress has remained largely stoic.
	Aside from the occasional eye roll or smirk as Johnny Depp and a parade of witnesses mercilessly picked apart her character during the trial that opened April 11 in the Fairfax Circuit Courthouse in Virginia.
	People read this.
	I mean, I don't know how anybody reads this.
	The way I read this, stoic is a good thing.
	Stoic is when you retain composure during an unjustified assault on character.
	I think.
	Unless it has a negative connotation, which I don't think it does.
	She's remained stoic, brave, courageous, standing up for herself and retaining composure while Johnny Depp and a parade of, it's a circus, a parade of witnesses mercilessly picked apart her character.
	I didn't know that, I don't know why Fox News has it in to support Amber Heard and not just, you know, go with the flow of the trial.
	And I said, this is some seriously interesting editorializing.
	Because it is.
	It's wicked, wicked, insidious editorializing.
	I don't know why.
	Anybody who has any theories, let me know.
	But it's like, it's the question is like, what is the role of a journalist in being a journalist?
	You have to disclose your bias or your own opinion if it's relevant.
	But when you're supposed to be putting out journalism, I just touched my glasses and put a fingerprint on it.
	Harambe, thank you.
	Oh, that's okay.
	If you're supposed to be a journalist, I mean, you say, okay, there were many witnesses who impugned her character.
	That's a factual statement.
	There were many witnesses who called into question or attacked her character.
	Fine.
	Merciless.
	They paraded witnesses who mercilessly mocked her while she remained stoic in the face of all of this egregious abuse.
	I mean, that's over the top for me.
	That's over the top, and I don't know why Fox is doing that, but I don't care.
	It doesn't matter.
	It's just to say you got to read everything.
	You got to know how you're reading things in order to know when you are being told what to think as opposed to being given the information with which to think.
	I'll see if the trial is due.
	I want to go back.
	I was watching it this morning and it's interesting.
	That is not it.
	Case of the Mondays.
	No, that's this stream.
	The Johnny Depp Amber Heard defamation.
	Okay, here.
	I'm going to bring up one section of this and then maybe we'll just go and do look and see where the trial is now.
	It's Hollywood Project Mockingbird story.
	It worked on you, Viva.
	It's a joke story.
	Please wake up, sir.
	Well, RR2.
	I'll tell you one thing.
	I said it before.
	When Gaffigan says wake up, wake up me is a meaningless statement.
	I believe that I'm paying proper attention.
	It might be a distraction.
	I don't think it's a distraction because we're still talking about everything that is important.
	It's not because something might be less important or more Hollywood that it becomes irrelevant.
	There's something to learn from this in terms of the practice of law, in terms of how to ask questions, when a cross-examination is going bad.
	And there's still enough time in the day to deal with all the other stuff like Ottawa, which I did, covering all of the important lawsuits, which we did last night for two and a quarter hours.
	So there's time in the day.
	But fun is fun nonetheless, and there's always time in the day to have fun while learning.
	What is this?
	Stoic refers to someone who has not easily aroused.
	I'll have to Google that.
	But it's theater.
	First of all, everything is theater to some extent.
	You can learn something from everything, and if you don't learn something from everything, then you're wasting opportunities regardless.
	But I want to show this part of the cross-examination where this is bad lawyering, and this is bad practice, and you can learn from it.
	This individual who we're looking at, I'm not making any jokes.
	The chat was making enough of the jokes then.
	I'm on Yahoo now, so I'm not on Rakata's chat, but on Rakata's chat, you can imagine some of the comments in the chat.
	But this is Johnny Depp hired security in cross-examination.
	And it's bad cross-examination.
	And it is the example of when the lawyer is trying to testify, thinks that you make the evidence by asking a question, and then when the witness contradicts or doesn't affirm the substance of the question, move on and ignore it as though you've made your point just by asking the question in the way that you wanted the witness to affirm the information.
	Listen to this.
	What he had on his hand could have been a hard cast, correct?
	So just so we understand also, it's fun stuff.
	By the way, this is why I have trouble watching this.
	I want to talk all the time over this, and if I do it, I will.
	And if people don't like it, too bad.
	But what he had on his hand could have been a hard cast.
	Now, when you're asking for someone's opinion, a hypothetical of a witness of fact, there's an objection.
	It's a hypothetical question you're asking for an opinion.
	It could have been.
	Okay.
	There's no objection here, but it could have been.
	I have no idea what was under the wrap.
	And isn't it true that while he was on the mezzanine level and misheard and her sister were there, that he was reaching for Amber's hair while he was trying to hit her with that cast, correct?
	So this is a loaded question with facts that have not been provided by the witness.
	And he's asking this other witness thinking, I'll just put the words in your mouth.
	It's not correct.
	And then just move on.
	And then just move on and try to do it again.
	You can't say for sure where Whitney was standing on the mezzanine level during this altercation, correct?
	That is correct.
	And it's possible that she was standing in between Mr. Death and Ms. Hurd then, correct?
	No.
	Well, you say you can't say for sure where she was standing.
	So she could have been standing in between Mr. Death and Ms. Hurd, right?
	No, because I stepped in between Ms. Hurd and Mr. Depp.
	So she definitely wasn't standing in between them.
	Well, in fact, you saw Mr. Depp push or shove Whitney Hurd, correct?
	Absolutely not.
	He asked the question, absolutely not, and then keeps going.
	And you understand what's going on, right?
	He's just trying, the lawyer is just trying to make the evidence that testimony was provided that Amber Heard is in fact the one with a closed fist who punched Johnny in the face.
	This security guard says, Johnny told him, you failed me.
	This lawyer is now saying, didn't you see him do this to her?
	No, I didn't.
	And then, no, it just keeps going.
	It's...
	Terrible.
	That is not correct.
	Just move.
	Keep going.
	Rottenborn.
	Rottenborn.
	It's a terrible name, by the way.
	Now, moving on to April 2006.
	Moving on.
	Moving on!
	That didn't work.
	It is...
	You can think it's a show, people, and it is a show, but you can still learn things from shows.
	The lawyer was really objecting to the answer, not the question, but the judge clearly wasn't going to let him get away with it, and rightly so.
	So, you can learn things from shows.
	There's nothing wrong with learning things from shows.
	And it's actually, you know, a lot of people use it as a good excuse to watch bad shows.
	If you learn something from something, it was not wasted time.
	The Depard lawsuit is a lawsuit between two millionaires.
	It has zero significance on the average human being.
	It is not relevant to men's rights.
	Well, okay, you may be right.
	It is not as though everything that everyone does at every waking moment of their life has to have some grand import on humanity.
	It is a fight between two millionaires, multi-millionaires, over...
	What's my brother calling me?
	It's a fight between two millionaires over a lifestyle that people don't have.
	I think there are some relationship issues that people could learn from in all of this.
	It's relevant to men's rights.
	It's a big spotlight on men's rights.
	I appreciate that, too.
	In fact, one of the biggest issues that people have with this is that men's rights activists are using this as what some believe to be an excuse to undermine women's rights.
	It's just like a crazy thing.
	You can't have coexisting rights.
	They have to all be competing.
	You can't just have human rights.
	If you talk about men's rights, you are denigrating and undermining women's rights.
	All that to say, it's a show.
	It is a show.
	And you can still learn something from it, like how not to cross-examine a witness.
	You don't get evidence in by infusing it in the question only for the witness to contradict in their answer.
	It's not evidence at that point.
	In fact, quite the opposite.
	When you ask a question and you don't get your answer, moving on.
	And everyone wants their, like, Jack Nicholson.
	Caving on the stand.
	Of course I saw that.
	Everyone wants that moment.
	It doesn't happen in law.
	And it's juvenile to think you're going to make it happen.
	So, anyways, that's it.
	I was watching that.
	It's fun to watch.
	On the streams, people are too sensitive about talking.
	Not too sensitive.
	People don't want the commentators talking over the trial so much.
	So, I mean, I say show or not.
	I can't sit in front of my computer and camera and live stream and not talk and say what I'm thinking at that moment.
	If JD can't get justice, no one can.
	But bear in mind, STFU FFS, everybody knows what that means.
	This is for defamation.
	And so the question is, again, not the men's rights issue or the fact that men are sometimes abused in relationships by women, even though people think it can't happen.
	This is the defamation case at the end of the day, and the question is going to be, sufficient truth?
	Is the truth no worse than the lie?
	That's going to be one of the other interesting legal questions, is the truth in this case just as bad as the lie?
	We saw it in the CNN versus Project Veritas case, which is also a show, people.
	It's a show that has more political importance.
	It's a show that has more relevance in terms of media and journalism and arguably a longer-lasting impact on the future of Western society.
	I agree with that.
	It's still a show.
	And in that CNN defamation case where Project Veritas was suing CNN for suggesting that he was kicked off of Twitter for providing misinformation and CNN files a motion to dismiss and their argument in that motion to dismiss is, Okay, look, maybe he wasn't kicked off of Twitter for providing misinformation.
	He was kicked off of Twitter for providing private information, for doxing an individual.
	And the judge granted the motion to dismiss on the basis that the truth was...
	Oh, the lie was no worse than the truth.
	So the judge basically came to the conclusion that the lie, that...
	Veritas was kicked off of Twitter for providing misinformation was no worse than the truth that they were kicked off of Twitter for doxing an individual or providing private information of an individual, which in my mind is absolutely untenable.
	Accusing a journalist of lying or providing misinformation is far more defamatory than accusing a journalist of leaking private information or doxing someone.
	They both might make the journalist an a-hole, but one makes the journalist an a-hole and a liar.
	And if you're deemed to be a liar of a journalist, it kind of damages your business model.
	So, I mean, in this case, there might be that argument that Johnny Depp, the truth of what happened in their relationship, that Johnny Depp called her names, gave her as good as she gave him in terms of verbal abuse.
	The truth is just as bad as the lie that she was a victim of domestic abuse.
	We'll see.
	That certainly will be one of the legal questions.
	And there are important legal questions in this case.
	The thing that drives me nuts is you get a jury trial.
	You don't get a written decision that motivates the reason for which the decision is being rendered.
	Well, I joined late.
	Actual work got in my way.
	And I just want to say I am not the hired security guard for JD.
	No, seriously.
	Well, he didn't have glasses.
	But I do see the resemblance.
	I would certainly go more with Isaac Newton for your avatar.
	Oh, man.
	I cracked my back a little bit.
	CNN is not a joke.
	CNN would be a joke if it were funny.
	They are too dangerous to be a joke.
	Mr. Wonderful.
	Anyone thinking this has value to the average man in a legal or any other sense watches TMZ way too much.
	Mr. Wonderful.
	I'm going to disagree with you.
	I respectfully disagree with you.
	And I also...
	Well, TMZ, by the way, might be one of the remaining...
	Legit journalism sites.
	They at least post video stuff and uncensored stuff.
	Watching my cousin Vinny will teach you something about law.
	It's funny.
	It's entertaining and educational.
	This, if you're interested in the gossip, no shortage of gossip.
	If you're interested in the law, there's no shortage of how not to conduct a cross-examination.
	Almost half of the domestic abuse incidents are directly to the male partner, but men are constantly maligned.
	Last SC for the day.
	Thank you, Steve.
	And you know what?
	When Karen Stroud was on, there are stats.
	There's stats on reporting, not reporting.
	There's stats on the type.
	These are discussions I don't like getting into, but there are stats.
	Yeah.
	You all know Karen.
	We had a fantastic discussion about it.
	Eyal Naman.
	I thought for a second it was Eyal Nerman.
	It might have been Nerman.
	It was Neman or Naaman.
	Depends on the things which we don't see on the bottom of the vowels.
	Eyal, thank you very much.
	Love Mondays.
	Well, I tell you, going live on a Monday feels good.
	Ah, Viva Fry, dangerous for sure.
	Don't forget MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Compost.
	Yep.
	It's an amazing thing.
	You know, like Elon Musk buys Twitter.
	It's an affront to free speech.
	Everyone, the world is going to crumble.
	Jeff Bezos buys Washington Post.
	I mean, I guess they're tacitly admitting nobody reads the Washington Post.
	People actually are on Twitter.
	Like one is actually relevant for influence and the other one is just a rag that everyone understands.
	You wouldn't even want your dog to poop on it because, you know, they might get some of that.
	Awful print on their foot.
	Viva and Canadian Girl were my takeaways from the Freedom Convoy, but they took Canadian Girl away.
	Anyone have any news about her?
	I have to go see who that is.
	I think I know who that is, but I'm not sure.
	I think she was posting clips of other people's stuff and might have gotten into trouble for that on the YouTubes.
	So, anyways, that's the latest.
	What is...
	That's our chat here.
	I want to go see what was going on with the trial.
	I want to see when Amber Heard starts testifying.
	I don't think she's testifying today because I think we're too far behind.
	Johnny Depp.
	Okay, let me refresh this and just see what's going on.
	Oh, cripe.
	Hold on, let me mute this for a second.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	They seem to be still on break, so let's just keep that in the backdrop.
	Although I'm not going to have time this afternoon to go into this in any meaningful detail until Amber Heard gets up on the stand.
	So what's going on in the chat, people?
	Let's see this.
	Yeah, I'd be surprised if she gets on the stand today.
	I mean, it's inconceivable.
	They're going to come back at, what, 2 o 'clock, and it's going to be another two and a half hours on the day.
	The other thing is you see how much time gets wasted in court.
	It's just...
	It's just...
	It's endless.
	Endless wasted time in court.
	Holy crab apples.
	My phone is going off the hook a little bit.
	Okay.
	Booyah.
	I'm looking for Rumble.
	That's what I wanted to get to.
	See if we missed anything.
	And people, if I have...
	Let's see what else.
	I'm going to go back to my YouTube timeline.
	Twitter timeline.
	Live streaming right there.
	Let me just see if I missed anything here.
	I did not.
	Okay, good.
	Let's see what else is going on.
	What do you think her stand will be, and can her lawyers somehow pull this off?
	Despite what Fox is saying, it's, I believe, thus far it's been an unmitigated disaster.
	What is her defense?
	Unless she has some bombshell testimony coming out, it's...
	I think it's just going to be a meltdown.
	I mean, I think it's going to go from bad to worse.
	And I've made predictions as to what's going to happen during her testimony.
	She is going to have a blow-up on the stand.
	So...
	That's my prediction.
	That's really all I care about right now.
	Right now, it's fun to watch.
	Let it play.
	It's background noise.
	It's daytime radio with Colin.
	But it's a lawyering lesson.
	You learn how to ask questions, and you learn what a bad question is.
	Compound sentences, questions that are convoluted, asking the wrong questions.
	The lawyer cannot...
	You have to lead the witnesses to where you want them to go.
	You can't just tug them there, and you can't just jam words down their throat.
	So we'll see.
	We'll see where that goes.
	I don't think it's going to go well for her at all, and I want to see if I'm right about that.
	Okay, let's go back to Twitter for one second.
	Share.
	Johnny Depp.
	Viva Frye.
	I don't know if I see that.
	Okay, that was the article.
	This was student loans we talked about.
	Jim Watson we got.
	And then this goes back to last night.
	I want to talk about the Ottawa Rolling Thunder rally.
	And actually this.
	Hold on.
	Let me see.
	I'm going to do one thing.
	I'm going to play the Padre's speech, just a portion of it.
	The Padre, I never knew what a Padre was.
	It's like a religious member of military, like a chaplain in the military.
	And gave an amazing speech.
	Did I just close down the stream?
	Okay, there we go.
	We're still here.
	So let me just go to YouTube.
	Remind everyone about Viva Clips.
	Viva Clips, Padre.
	Here we go.
	Let's just play a little bit of this.
	God, I hate ads.
	Why do these people run ads on their videos?
	The industries we work in and the society...
	...and they're not going to be able to do it.
	Thank you.
	Oh, wait.
	Where's the screen?
	Hold on a second.
	I can't find the screen.
	Share a screen.
	Hold on.
	It's coming.
	And I want to thank God for all of you so I can be there with you.
	Thank you.
	Here we go.
	That's my problem, man.
	And so the CDS called us disgusting for not desecrating, but decorating with patriotism and honor to our fallen comrades taking occupying space in our city of Ottawa.
	It's the most proud I've ever been in a long time, standing there, courageous, with all you people singing the national anthem, wearing my coffee for the first time, and the legal and successful Freedom Convoys.
	Why do I say successful?
	The provincial mandates wouldn't have been lifted if it wasn't for these truckers.
	And though we still pray, though, for the lifting of the irrational, segregationist, discriminatory, unscientific, and abusive federal mandates.
	Now, in the Christian calendar during the second week of the holy season of Easter, we mark the martyrdom of St. Mark, who wrote one of the Christian Gospels.
	And St. Mark questioned the superstition of his day, and he stood up for his cause, the message of the Bible, that God so loved the world that he gave his life for the salvation.
	And so in AD 68, those who deemed that he had unacceptable views, they placed a rope around his neck and they dragged him through the streets until he was dead.
	Now, even if you're not religious, I'm sure that you can admire his courage of standing up for his beliefs and the truth in light of oppression, false narratives, and even government propaganda and muscling of free speech that he encountered in his day.
	It was quite a good speech.
	I'll clip the link.
	And let me see here.
	I'll clip this in here so people can watch it.
	It's a great speech.
	And it's just very sad to see what's going on in Canada where you have their objectively peaceful protests.
	They are...
	I mean, it's like...
	I'm listening to the book.
	Jeez.
	The Grey Lady Winks.
	And...
	The way things went down in other countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and when you read about how it happens, and you actually talk to the people who lived through these regimes.
	I spoke with a Cuban individual in Montreal.
	I spoke with Polish individuals, Hungarian.
	When they talk about how the government prohibited public gatherings, criminalized public gatherings, sanctioned free speech, It is mutatis mutandis what's going on in Canada right now.
	The government has effectively criminalized certain types of public assembly.
	They've criminalized it.
	The protest on Friday, and it wasn't even a protest, the rally, where you had people marching down Wellington Street in Ottawa, which is still closed off.
	It has cement barricades in front of it, and I showed that.
	The street's not open.
	You have people marching down there.
	Just marching in unison.
	There was a confusion as to where the itinerary of the rally they were supposed to march.
	It doesn't really matter, but you're supposed to go down the street and then left, as opposed to down and straight.
	And for whatever the reason, the police obviously allowed bikers and a big rig to go straight or to park on the street that went straight where people were supposed to go left.
	And then what ended up happening?
	People thought that's where the rally was intended to go.
	Because a big rig was there that was allowed in, as were bikers, and people went there.
	It wasn't even one hour into that diversion from the itinerary, the itinerary being the route, that the government came in with fists of fury.
	And I say it, it makes me laugh because the fist of fury was, I think it's from a movie that was a comedy.
	The government came in, let me get it, let me get it.
	The government came in, and I'll show you the funny part of it.
	I'll just go to Jagmeet Singh here.
	Let's just do this.
	The government came in.
	It hadn't even been one hour that this occurred.
	We've eclipsed French horn.
	And the government came in literally like the forces of evil out of a Star Wars movie.
	Not even one minute in.
	Initiated violence.
	And they initiated the violence so they could then justify their presence.
	Just look at this.
	It's a funny clip because there's some dude with a sousaphone.
	It's not a French horn, a sousaphone playing the theme song from Star Wars.
	Just look at the police formation here.
	This is Friday night.
	It's still light outside.
	Look at this police force.
	Look at this police show.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	I love the way he bows at the end.
	Such professional training.
	But just look at...
	This show of force.
	This is one hour into the first night of the rally.
	These cops showed up.
	It's a battalion.
	I don't even know it's a battalion.
	They showed up within one hour of this rally being held and within 25 minutes of it deviating from its intended itinerary onto a street where the only reason it was there was because police had allowed a At least one big rig.
	It was a huge, big, big rig.
	And a bunch of bikers.
	It's this...
	I don't want to say a gang.
	It's a biker organization called Faland or something.
	Someone's going to know what it was.
	It's like...
	And I could just hear the government.
	Well, we brought them here.
	We have to use them.
	And then they came in and they initiated violence.
	And there's some people...
	We live in times now also where it's like...
	It's like from the Alex Jones deposition, like the conspiracy psychosis.
	Once the people are on the street and they're being allowed in and the cops are allowing them in, people start thinking, did the cops allow them in to set them up?
	Did the cops allow them in specifically so they could then declare it unlawful, so they can then come in, initiate violence, knowing that they're going to elicit a violent response, so they can then break windows, which they did, tow trucks, which they did.
	Which they did.
	And we're bringing it back to Cuba, to Venezuela, to all other authoritarian regimes where they outlawed peaceful assembly.
	It's always done for your protection.
	And you let things like this happen, and then you weaponize them politically.
	Look, we're doing it for your own safety.
	These always get violent.
	These pesky rallies, these pesky exercise of freedom of association, they always get violent when the police come in.
	In flanks, heavily armed, rubber bullet guns, arms, drones in the sky.
	It always gets violent when the police come in and shove a female protester to the ground, thus making the crowd angry, and they shove back, and then look, you got what you wanted.
	You got what you needed.
	So we have to shut all of these protests down because they're violent.
	And it's...
	It's what they want, and it's the game, and it's the back and forth.
	And it's just how you get to outlawing peaceful assembly, which is effectively where Canada is right now.
	On the Saturday, when the itinerary was supposed to be, the bikers were supposed to do a route around the cenotaph, around the war memorial.
	Let me see if I can find that clip, actually.
	When the bikers had wanted to do a...
	A loop around the Senate path.
	And they weren't allowed to.
	The cops said, no, you can come close, but you can't go around the Senate path.
	The war memorial.
	And...
	Hold on a second.
	I'm going to find...
	I'll find it.
	On Friday, they come in and they clear that street where people accidentally went onto because they saw a truck there.
	They clear it with extreme force.
	They clear it so that the next day it's empty.
	There's nobody there except for the same people that the government has been neglecting for years.
	The homeless, the mentally unwell.
	And I went down that street to try to get to the Tim Hortons to get a cup of coffee.
	And I appreciate I'm neurotic and I'm more sensitive to...
	Threats real or imagined.
	I didn't even feel safe walking that street alone the next day.
	There were no cops there.
	The only people who were there were the people that they have been neglecting systematically for years.
	People who are clearly in such mental distress.
	I was being yelled at by somebody who I've never seen before telling me to come over there.
	He just wants to talk to me.
	Nothing to do with live streaming.
	It just has to do with the state of Ottawa.
	The state of neglect of the people who are the most vulnerable and need the most help.
	But no.
	Cops don't have time for that.
	They just have time to clear out peaceful protesters who were actually assisting the homeless more than the city of Ottawa ever was.
	But that's what they did.
	And then the next day, the cops don't give the bikers the itinerary they wanted.
	They don't let them bike by the cenotaph.
	But they do it themselves.
	I'm going to go to the Polish lady who everybody seems to love.
	Polish lady who called me a...
	Don't be a sissy.
	They don't let the bikers go through because it would be dangerous or whatever.
	The cops did at least three loops on their motorcycles.
	It almost felt like a middle finger, like a snub, like F you.
	We don't let you do it, but we're doing it.
	And they did it in a way that almost...
	Here, I'll show you this.
	I'll show you this.
	Hold on.
	mute we walk old worlds to start uniting people and that's what i'm gonna do fantastic See you again.
	Stay out of trouble.
	Let's see what's going on here.
	We are not on the private property.
	This is a public property.
	Section one, we have the right to be a right for a free people.
	Peaceful manifestation.
	No, you're right, okay?
	No, you're right.
	This is a public place, especially this one.
	So we have the right to be here and we are here.
	We just arrested...
	Sorry, it was a bummer.
	It was a bee.
	It was a bee.
	Freedom fighter.
	I'm afraid of a small bee.
	I'm a pussy.
	Listen, I love you anyhow.
	They just arrested my friend.
	Why?
	Because she had a heart, she made a white heart, you know, carbon.
	It dropped, 60 years old woman.
	It dropped and she tripped on the sidewalk.
	So the policeman stood on the heart, she tried to pull it out.
	He pushed her, he brought on me, I pushed the policeman, she spit on to his face.
	They just arrested her.
	Watch what happens now, by the way, in the background.
	watch this Okay, what do you have to say?
	Hold on, I want to show the part where I think the cops...
	Okay, here.
	Watch what happens now.
	Watch this.
	They come through with the bikes.
	this is the exact route that the bikers wanted to do I think the guy, I think, internet, if you could rewind about 30 seconds, did that police officer stick out his foot to try to kick the wall?
	Three hours, 10 minutes.
	So, and I'm not trying to create drama.
	I saw that, where the cop biked, the guy chasing the cop with the Canadian flag on his back, someone I'd seen multiple times during the, when I, I've seen that guy multiple times during the Ottawa protest and he was live streaming as well.
	What I saw was that the cops on their motorbikes came so close to the ralliers that they, in fact, I spoke to someone who said they were clipped by the cops.
	Like the cop came by and the mirror clipped him as he went by because they were so close.
	Maybe an accident, whatever.
	Unnecessarily close and deliberately so to the dog that was sitting there where I swear to you I...
	I thought I saw what I saw.
	I went back and looked, and I couldn't see anything in the footage.
	But these ralliers wanted to ride their motorbikes on public streets around the cenotaph.
	The cops said no for whatever the reason.
	I think it was a last-minute change.
	And then three times they drove around the memorial.
	Now, I will always steal men the other side, even if I think they're wrong.
	The argument might be that they were clearing the traffic of pedestrian traffic, making sure it was safe to allow for traffic to resume, because shortly after their third victory lap of the Cenotaph, vehicular traffic was going through.
	Can we charge one?
	That's fear and loathing in Las Vegas.
	So that might be the steel man argument.
	They had to clear it.
	They go once, twice, three times, make sure it's clear, let traffic go through.
	Other people might think it was cops trying to provoke.
	And then you hear the story from the Polish woman.
	Yeah.
	Her friend spat in the cop's face.
	That's going to get you arrested every day of the week and thrice on Sunday.
	But they were shoving people.
	They shoved them knowing that people shoved back.
	That's when you just get hauled off.
	And why do you need that many police officers?
	Security is one thing.
	Suppression is another.
	To make sure that things...
	Bees are scared.
	I didn't know it was a honeybee.
	I thought it was a wasp.
	And those wasps are bastards.
	They're nature's bastards.
	I'm actually not scared of spiders, crocs, or snakes.
	I played with a spider, a yellow sack spider.
	It crawled in my jacket and then bit my stomach.
	And it's been itchy, but it's better now.
	But they needed the cops for security, not for suppression.
	They needed to promote that rally, not demonize it.
	They needed to use that rally to bring people to Ottawa as it did.
	To bring business to those businesses as it did.
	Those poutine stands, where I had the most delicious poutine ever, were busy.
	Those poutine stands saw some serious business because of the rally.
	But this government wants to turn...
	It doesn't want to turn Canada into Venezuela or Cuba.
	It just wants to make sure it's controlling things for your safety.
	And for your safety means so that people cannot vocally criticize the government for government abuse.
	And lo and behold, that's how you get Cuba.
	That's how you get Venezuela.
	That's how you get East Bloc communist countries.
	They are shutting you up for the safety and security of society at large.
	And then lo and behold, what happens?
	Any critical speech of the government is subversive.
	It's dangerous.
	And then you get exactly what you saw in that Associated Peace Press in Ukraine.
	You get armed government officials going door to door, arresting people in accordance with law for posting anti-government messaging.
	You may hate it.
	You may think it's wrong.
	You may think it's disloyal.
	You may think it's unpatriotic.
	But if you have a country, a free country, and you have a country that actually respects a charter or a constitution, it's free speech.
	And when you no longer have that...
	You no longer have free speech.
	you no longer have a free society.
	They ran three times through there.
	It was the RCMP in particular who were the most least friendly.
	The OPP, the Ontario Provincial Police, they were very friendly.
	I don't think they wanted to carry out certain orders.
	The RCMP.
	Justin Trudeau's RCMP were not friendly to me, and I smile all the time.
	They were not friendly to me.
	They gave me the look like, I'll keep my distance, and I guess that's what they wanted.
	But when you don't feel safe in your own country, it's a problem.
	They are shutting you up for their own good.
	This is true.
	Hold on, now I flagged some...
	Depp was slandered and silenced.
	Even if he loses, we all win.
	Because CNN ran with herds, lie, and it's yet another red pill, and you missed my other $2 superchat.
	Sorry, STFU, FFC, FFS, but thank you.
	Even if Fisman's study was right, only 20%.
	No medical advice.
	Actually, Lauren, I'm not allowed having thoughts.
	I'm not allowed having thoughts or discourse of this nature.
	But thank you for the super chat.
	I say that fastidiously tongue-in-cheek.
	I mean, I know the limits of my own knowledge.
	I also know the limits of logic.
	Lian Bibaud says, Can it be true that Pierre has changed his stance on mandates after seeing how destructive they are?
	Isn't it good to get enlightened PPC for me?
	Yeah.
	Then he's got to apologize for having taken the wrong position and not pretended he had the right position all along.
	That's it.
	He was wrong.
	I made a mistake.
	I'll tell you one thing, people.
	I supported...
	I had no problem with the two weeks to flatten the curve.
	For me, it was unprecedented.
	Everyone was panicked.
	Two weeks to flatten the curve, it was a great excuse to lay back with the family.
	I'm happy to say that I realized I was wrong about by April.
	And I have the correspondence to prove it, but I would never...
	Oh, yeah.
	Anyhow.
	If we don't stand for something, we fall for anything Irene Dunn.
	I also think that was in a Taylor Swift song.
	Neil Larson, I hope you did not mean to put in a comment with that super chat.
	I'm going to thank you for the chat.
	And if you did, just go back and put it in and I will find it without feeling compelled to put in another super chat.
	It's weird listening to Viva at normal speed.
	I typically play these back at one to...
	Gito, so I listen to books at one and a half.
	When I go back to one, it sounds like I'm in deliberate slow mode.
	Like it sounds like they are slowing down to deliberately annoy my brain.
	Yeah, so it's funny.
	When I play myself at one and a half, or 1.25, just to make sure my vlogs don't have...
	What's the one I'm looking for?
	Errors?
	I find it hard to follow me.
	I want to bring one up, a chat that I just saw here.
	It had to do with an old talking point that I've discussed many a time.
	PPC vote splitting won Trudeau the last two elections.
	15 ridings in Ontario alone.
	Don't complain about the current government if you're not willing to help change it.
	And by help change it, you mean...
	Forcing me to vote for a party that I don't believe in because you're telling me that's the only way to change things?
	Aaron Taylor, I respect your opinion.
	I'm not trying to make fun of you.
	And there's no but.
	I do not accept this argument.
	This argument is tantamount to saying, vote for a party you don't believe in because that's the only way you're going to make change.
	And by the way, Trudeau did not win the last two elections.
	He has a minority government.
	And to say that Trudeau...
	I'm not voting for a bad choice because someone else tells me it's strategically advantageous to do it.
	That's called playing bad chess.
	And by the way, it's a question of fundamental belief.
	You're telling me this argument is vote for a party you think are hypocrite liars but maybe less so than the other hypocrite liars.
	Because it's the only way you're going to get the hypocrite liars out of power?
	I'm sorry, that just seems like a way to get other hypocrite liars into power.
	And you know what?
	If the Conservative Party has to suffer through another election, another...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Mandate.
	It's not even a mandate.
	It's a minority government of minority governments.
	They have to learn a lesson too.
	They're not going to learn a lesson by being crappy and thinking they're going to get my vote because they're less crappy than someone else.
	Pshaw!
	Harumph!
	Harumph is what I say.
	I'm saying this respectfully, lovingly with humor.
	I disagree with that stance.
	Not bringing up that comment.
	Thank you for the truth, Cat Hunter.
	Thank you very much.
	Okay, that might be your name.
	I thought for a second that was a vocation.
	I hunt cats on the weekend.
	Mm-hmm.
	Stray cats.
	I'm joking.
	Cat, thank you very much.
	I read that the wrong way for a second.
	S. McBee.
	Viva, how is it that a judge called the trucker convoy legal, that the media is still calling it illegal and an occupation?
	Good question, Esmigbee.
	Hold on.
	Let's bring that up, because I had this fight with somebody.
	It's an illegal protest.
	Unlawful protest.
	And I was like, do tell.
	Ottawa injunction.
	This is in the context of another court case honking, and I'm going to try to get the PDF.
	Give me a second, peeps.
	Here we go.
	And as always, people, do not trust me because I think I've earned your trust, but verify everything I say.
	And I verify everything I say because every now and again, I just have absolutely wrong memories, which is very much disconcerting to my own psyche.
	So you see where I am here.
	I put an Ottawa injunction PDF.
	City of Ottawa versus persons unknown.
	We're looking at it.
	We see it.
	How do I get rid of this?
	This?
	Okay, good.
	And let's zoom in a little bit.
	This is Superior Court of Justice, Ontario.
	Citation.
	That's February 22nd.
	Endorsement overview.
	The respondents.
	I'm not going to highlight it.
	I think we can see it.
	The Respondents Freedom Convoy 2022 arrived in Ottawa on January 28, 2022 to demonstrate initially against COVID-19 vaccine requirements for truckers to re-enter the country by land introduced by the government of Canada.
	It has grown into a broader demonstration, the demonstration against COVID-19 measures.
	Rally was held, yada, yada, yada.
	The evidence, yada, yada, yada.
	The law, we're talking about the law.
	And then do we get to the order?
	Where's the order?
	Oh, this isn't the order.
	Cripe.
	This is not the right one.
	Let's try to get the right one.
	That'll be better.
	Here we go.
	The court order.
	Dated February 22nd, 2022.
	City of Ottawa Persons Unknowns.
	Order.
	The application is made by the City of Ottawa.
	Heard yada yada.
	They've heard the submissions in the applicant.
	We can skip to it.
	It orders that an interlocutory injunction is granted pursuant to section 440.
	So this is not in the class action lawsuit.
	It's just another injunction.
	And it says that it orders the people, having notice of this order, are hereby restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly by any means whatsoever.
	And this is the thing that some people don't appreciate.
	The court order itself was somewhat limited.
	Listen to this.
	Breaching any of the bylaws.
	We need to go to the word horn.
	They shall not cause any noise likely to disturb the inhabitants of the city, including but not limited to causing noise by honking air horns, car horns, train horns, in real time, or playing pre-recorded horns.
	That's interesting.
	And then there's some other issues.
	And then let's see where it was.
	Here we go.
	And then...
	Where was the section where it said?
	Hold on.
	Peace.
	Here we go.
	This is the section, people.
	This is the important section.
	This court orders that provided the terms of this order are complied with.
	The respondents, and what are the terms of this order?
	No honking, no noise, non-encumbering, damaging the highway.
	A bunch of stuff in this order.
	They shall not set or maintain an open fire without having obtained the necessary...
	I'll clip this so you can all see this.
	But what does it say?
	They shall remain...
	Provide the terms of this order are complied with, the respondents and other persons remain at liberty to engage in peaceful, lawful, and safe protest.
	And yet, the government declared the protest unlawful.
	Almost on their own.
	Almost in the absence of any court order having declared the protest unlawful.
	And by the way, if people breach the terms of that court order, the protest, peaceful protest, does not become unlawful.
	Their acts become potentially contempt-worthy, contemptible.
	But that's it.
	That was it.
	And nonetheless, nonetheless...
	Oh, okay.
	TS.
	Has Viva ever talked about what he would have done during this pandemic?
	His plan.
	Okay, sorry.
	And now I initially read that as an aggressive attack.
	And maybe that's wrong of me and I shouldn't.
	Maybe this is an actual legitimate question because it is one thing to complain.
	It's another thing to propose solutions.
	Let me see if I can't find this.
	Viva Frye tweet protect vulnerable live lives.
	Let me see if I can find this real quick like.
	Let me see.
	Is this the one?
	Oh, God.
	Is November 2020 early enough?
	I think November 2020 is early enough.
	So let me just see.
	Here.
	Not copied a clipboard, dude.
	I want to share screen.
	Oh, this producer.
	I got to tell you.
	Okay.
	Viva Fry.
	November 20. I can't recreate the past.
	I can only...
	Have I ever?
	It's been a policy failure from day one.
	This is not the earliest tweet that I've had proposing the solution.
	Or an alternative, but this is one.
	Quarantine the sick and exposed.
	That makes total sense.
	Nobody would ever have promoted the idea that those who are, in fact, infected with the Rona should be running the streets.
	Nobody would ever think that.
	In fact, as far as I'm concerned, if you're sick in general, stay home.
	Nobody wants your germs.
	But it's a pandemic.
	Quarantine the sick and the exposed.
	Protect the most vulnerable, because there are people who we know are statistically vulnerable to the Rona.
	Allow the least vulnerable to live and provide a functional society needed to support the most vulnerable.
	Right now, we are punishing the healthy while torturing the most vulnerable.
	Now, I think I may have written this tweet.
	When did my grandmother-in-law pass away?
	After 18 months of torture.
	She didn't pass away from the Rona.
	She passed away from a broken heart and loneliness.
	So yes, I do not just complain.
	I have proposed what was obvious.
	Logical, calculated risk versus calculated reward from the beginning.
	And I know that I said it earlier, because people are saying, it's easy to complain, what would you do?
	Well, you know what I would do?
	I would not lock down the healthy.
	When in the history of humankind have people locked down the healthy?
	And not just the healthy, but the healthy and statistically not vulnerable.
	When has anyone ever done that?
	Other than in communist regimes and wartime.
	When?
	The answer is never, by the way.
	I don't mean to answer my own questions.
	Sorry, I already got to that one.
	So that was the solution.
	That was the solution adopted by a great many places whom now, in retrospect, in hindsight, did better.
	Did better, or at the very least, no worse, than the countries that...
	Crippled a generation, tortured a generation, and are now seeing the obvious, predictable effects, and I wouldn't call it side effects, necessary consequences, obvious consequences of what they did.
	I mean, it wasn't foresight at the time.
	Barnes, you know, was one step ahead of me, but he is, and I get jealous of it.
	You know, when he came out right from the beginning.
	And said, this doesn't make sense.
	You lock people down or you keep kids out of school when the parents have to work.
	And then you end up basically, necessarily in many cases, getting the grandparents to babysit the kids.
	So you are, by the nature of what you're doing by shutting down schools, effectively pushing what they thought at the time were the vectors of transmission, which we probably now know is not the case, to those who we knew at the time and know even more now are the most vulnerable to it.
	I mean, it was nuts.
	It was stupidity from day one.
	Let me rephrase.
	It was stupidity from week three.
	After the two weeks to flatten the curve, if it were that, after two weeks of that, when we saw what was happening and we were able to gather in real time, it became sheer lunacy.
	But it became sheer lunacy which snowballed on itself.
	It became a competition among states, among provinces, among countries, as to who could be the most maniacal in their response Safety.
	So, yeah.
	I was vocally saying what I thought.
	But it is easy for me to say what I think should have been done.
	Hindsight's 20-20.
	But this is not just hindsight.
	It became clear very early on what we were doing was stupid.
	And it became clear very early on that what we were doing was going to have...
	Lasting generation, devastating generational consequences.
	And it has, and it will continue to do so.
	Setting aside all the other stuff.
	Deep, you know, PP, not PPE.
	Polypropylene and PET plastics now being found deep in the lungs of humans for the first time.
	Total coincidence.
	Self-harm to teenagers.
	Total coincidence.
	Overdose.
	The stuff you can't mention, the self-harm you can't mention on YouTube.
	People now not being diagnosed with illnesses that are now getting diagnosed and it's in advanced stages.
	I mean, I know people.
	Directly.
	Okay, hold on.
	You are too black-pilled over Pierre.
	The reality is PPC is going nowhere, unfortunately.
	I couldn't get behind Bernier because it seemed like he was surprised over everything.
	Kind of out of touch.
	I do not think I'm black-pilled about Bernier.
	I just think he's, I mean, I think the party is, they might earn some votes back when the party does something other than promise to be different.
	When freaking O'Toole's coming out and saying, oh, when we're elected, we'll repeal Bill C-10.
	I was like, hey, that's great, dummy.
	It hasn't been passed into law yet.
	How about you just fight against it being implemented as law?
	I didn't mean to call him dummy.
	I did that for rhetorical effect.
	Or let's see if we can do this.
	V'yahu ata tsarich lehasbir leishdach she'ata chamo sh'moshun asur lecha lichtov et hash'ar.
	Damn it.
	Okay, you know what the problem is?
	I can only read cursive now, fluently.
	Ve'yahu, ve'yahu atah tz'arikh le'hasbihir la'ish'tah she'atah k'mo sh'mesha'sh'mshon, sh'mshon?
	It might be sh'mshon.
	Asur l'ach l'k'tov atah.
	So something about forbidding someone from writing something.
	It's been a long time since I've practiced my Hebrew.
	I can still understand it.
	It's tougher to read capital.
	I can read cursive a little more easily.
	All right.
	Dreyf says, usually pro-police, but last two years definitely gave me mixed feelings about the police service.
	When two weeks became two months, then two years, livelihoods destroyed, violating people's bodily autonomy, and artificially making criminals.
	And I agree with you.
	I have...
	I won't say...
	I mean, you have to be pro.
	I'm not reflexively anti-law enforcement.
	If there's an incident, I don't reflexively run to police abuse.
	When I see them pepper spraying someone in the face in a Tim Hortons because they're not wearing a mask, violently hauling them to the ground, then I have very big problems with what the police are doing.
	When the police become...
	You know, everybody always gets...
	You get nervous when a cop is driving behind you because you think you might have done something wrong in your car.
	You know, there's always that.
	But when you actually fear them showing up at your door for a social media post or, you know...
	I got a call from the government suggesting that my five-year-old, no, not my five-year-old, my eight-year-old had to be in isolation.
	This is a while back because someone in her class tested positive, then gave our contact info as people that this individual had come in contact with.
	And the government expected me to isolate my healthy, testing negative eight-year-old.
	And it was for like a long period of time.
	This is after, by the way.
	They said that it was a miscommunication, what the health people said in the Peel region.
	Oh, we didn't mean you were supposed to isolate children because of crossing paths with someone who tested positive.
	But they said that.
	And then I get a call from the government saying that they got my info from someone who tested positive and provided my info for them.
	And now I'm expected to isolate my eight-year-old.
	And that I said, when I told someone, thank you for calling me.
	And don't, you know, I didn't say it in so many words.
	Then I'm legit fearful that someone's going to show up at my door.
	I mean, they've turned us against each other.
	They've turned us against the police.
	They've turned the police against us.
	And they've turned the police against the police.
	I mean, whatever.
	I've said it again, but they've systematically just destroyed and violated what was a free and Canadian society.
	And they make you fear everything.
	They make you fear your own thoughts.
	And that's part and part of it.
	It's child abuse.
	If you isolated your kid like that, you would be charged with neglect.
	Two years ago, yeah.
	Two and a half years ago, yeah.
	Now, it's moral to do because the government says you have to do it.
	Okay.
	Were you ever really free?
	I don't know.
	I felt freer.
	We had fewer laws.
	So I think we were freer.
	We were never really free.
	I don't know what that really means, but, you know.
	I read an article by Jacques Beau regarding Ukraine.
	Long, but very informative.
	It would seem the media and government are lying.
	But why?
	Everyone should read Grey Lady Winks.
	Why?
	Why would the New York Times have lied about what was going on in Yahtzee Germany?
	Why would they have lied about the Holomodor?
	Why would they have lied about the Ukrainian famine, the Ukrainian Holocaust?
	Why would they have lied about what the Soviets were doing?
	Why would they have lied about Cuba?
	Why would they have lied about Vietnam?
	Why would they have lied about things?
	The reasons are always the same.
	Political interests and financial interests.
	And you just have to find out what they are at the time.
	It's shocking.
	It's always been this way.
	It's always been this way.
	How would Canadians have power to demand term limits for those who serve the people?
	I mean, you have elections.
	And they can keep getting re-elected.
	It's disgusting how fear became a freaking virtue.
	Emanuela de Lisi, yes.
	And the thing is, it's not the fear that's the virtue.
	It's the fear that's the object.
	And then everything you do to satisfy the fear becomes an act of benevolence because it's cloaked as caring for others.
	I was in the park yesterday.
	Beautiful, sunny day, 20 degrees.
	I saw a family of a kid, three middle-aged adults, wearing M95 face masks in the park.
	And they were with the grandfather, I think.
	I couldn't get clear on the dynamic of the family.
	They were with the father, the grandfather, who was the only one not wearing a mask.
	And I was wearing my shirt that said, politics ruins everything.
	And the unmasked grandfather says, I like your shirt.
	I don't know which way he thought he liked it or which way he thought I intended it.
	He, in that family environment, was the only one not wearing an M95 mask outside at a park on a sunny day on a beautiful, beautiful spring day.
	And I want everyone to know this is not about mask shaming and this is not about judging anyone for their decisions.
	If they were all COVID positive, I could understand it.
	This is a question of, I could perceive this to be, on the one hand, The manifestation of irrational, overwhelming fear.
	They might think we need to do this to protect my grandfather or your grandfather, my father.
	They might think they have to do this and they're being benevolent by doing it.
	But it's traumatic.
	It's manifestation of psychological trauma.
	That's what it is.
	I don't judge them for it.
	I feel bad for people who feel compelled that they need to give themselves this security blanket to do these things.
	The FDA Advisory Board voted 15 to 1 against the booster Zoom meeting.
	All the doctors on the panel said...
	Can't finish the sentence.
	Thank you for the super chat.
	Let me see here.
	We are in the top 10 freest countries on the planet.
	First of all, I disagree with that statement.
	I don't know how it's possibly measured.
	I don't care if that's a sign that other countries are worse, TS.
	We are the top 10 freest countries on the planet.
	Who did that study?
	And TS, by the way, if that's true, and in the top 10 freest countries on the planet, the citizens can be lawfully curfewed into their homes for five months, I don't care that I'm better than North Korea.
	That's not my standard of a free society.
	That's great.
	There will always be worse people out there.
	That doesn't mean that I don't strive to be the best.
	And I would give you the number one freest country on earth.
	If the other nine are North Korea, that is a metric of measurement that is utterly useless.
	We are not a free country right now.
	We are, in fact, a police state right now, in my humble opinion.
	We're literally a police state because people are being prosecuted by the police for exercising their charter rights.
	We are literally a police state because for a while, we literally could not leave our homes after 8 o 'clock at night for five months.
	It's not a free country.
	It's not a free province.
	We have 12-year-old kids who can't fly or take the train because of their medical status.
	We're not a free country.
	And if we're free of the North Korea, good for you, good for me.
	That's not my standard of measurement.
	I do not hold tyrannical countries as the measurement for what we are willing to put up with for tyrannical corruption here.
	Sorry.
	The Canadian Constitution Foundation are going to court to get the secret papers in the Emergency Act.
	They think they will get them.
	They should.
	Oh, my God.
	Oh, wow.
	Who heard that?
	That was good.
	They should, if there's anything remaining of our judicial system.
	The government that is required to form an inquiry to look into why they invoke the Emergencies Act is limiting the scope of the inquiry that's supposed to investigate their behavior.
	Yep, it's a free country.
	It's a free country when the government offices are locked.
	They don't consult with their population.
	They don't pass laws in the legislative manner through public debate, evidence, actual legislation.
	They invoke the Emergencies Act in the most abusive and unjustified manner possible.
	Freeze bank accounts in the absence of court orders, immunizing the banks for so doing it or promising to.
	Yeah.
	With free societies like that, who needs tyranny?
	Who needs communism?
	Who needs fascism?
	And the state-funded media is trying to convince the citizens that it's normal, it's acceptable, and they need it for their own protection.
	From that racist, misogynist, hate-filled Ottawa protest.
	Top ten, then there are very few countries.
	Then the freedom bars...
	The secret papers, from what I understand, the government basically redacted a bunch of documents that they're not providing as to the evidence on which they decided to declare the Emergency Act in virtue of which it was justified.
	That's what I understand.
	Can we discuss what can be done?
	I'm not optimistic, so don't ask me.
	Hey, it's the People's Democratic Republic of Korea.
	That's it.
	You give it the most opposite name.
	And that's it.
	Okay, so here we go.
	Switzerland?
	Nine?
	What are these, ratings?
	Australia?
	I mean, okay, yeah, I'm sorry.
	New Zealand?
	New Zealand, where people were put in quarantine facilities.
	Where people were escaping barbed wires, quarantine, where they couldn't travel from one Australian state to the next.
	Yeah, all right.
	All right.
	That's great.
	Anyways, I disagree with this.
	This is a wonderful chart.
	To me, Luxembourg, I think, I would agree from what I understand.
	Switzerland, I would agree from what I understand.
	New Zealand?
	Australia?
	Canada?
	I mean, that's got to be a joke.
	Okay, so that's good.
	I don't know where it comes from, but yeah.
	Viva is Samson the Great, a biblical hero.
	I'm not cutting my hair anytime soon.
	I don't think my hair is my strength, but I like it.
	Alright.
	Was that a WEF?
	Anybody who says Australia is a free country will agree to disagree.
	Australians don't consider Australia a free country.
	Dictator Dan.
	does not consider Australia a free country.
	Nobody considers Australia a free country.
	Australia is not a free country.
	Canada is not a free country.
	When you cannot leave your country or return to your country freely, it's not a free country.
	And right now, by the way, unvaccinated or non-exempt individuals, 12 and up, cannot freely leave or come back to their country because in coming back, they are required to quarantine For at least 14 days.
	Healthy people who tested negative in returning to their own place of birth, 12 years old and over, if they are unvaccinated and not exempt, they are required to quarantine.
	They are required to go in house arrest, because that's what it is, for no less than 14 days.
	Do not tell me Canada's a free country.
	How do you make it better?
	I don't know.
	I get a bad feeling too many people want this.
	I don't think 14 days is correct.
	You're right.
	At least 14 days.
	Go look at the Arrive Can app.
	Go look at the government requirements on the government website.
	If you don't think it's correct, and it is correct, I believe then you should concede that we don't live in a free country.
	Hold on.
	Let's just resolve this now.
	I don't believe that they've changed it.
	Unvaccinated.
	Unvaccinated Canadians returning To Canada, who are not exempt.
	I'm just putting in words.
	Okay, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go pull up the evidence of the free country in which we live.
	Government of Canada.
	Okay, I hope I didn't misread this.
	Let me just make sure I can see both screens at the same time.
	We are On, Government of Canada announces additional easing of border measures effective April 25. What date are we now?
	We're May 1st.
	Scroll down.
	Unless otherwise exempt.
	All travelers eligible to enter Canada who do not qualify as fully vaccinated will continue to be tested with COVID-19 molecular tests on arrival and on day 8 while they quarantine for 14 days.
	This includes unvaccinated and partially vaccinated travelers.
	Sorry, it's not at least 14 days.
	They have to test unless otherwise exempt.
	All travelers eligible to enter Canada, this includes citizens who do not qualify as fully vaccinated, will continue to be tested with COVID molecular tests on arrival and on day 8 while they quarantine for 14 days.
	This includes unvaccinated or partially vaccinated travel.
	And by the way, people, do not think for one second that if you are fully vaccinated now but haven't gotten the booster yet, that very soon, You are going to be partially vaccinated and therefore not fully vaccinated and therefore subject to 14 days quarantine.
	Okay, and I'll just, I'll clip the link.
	So, that resolves that.
	I hope that resolves that.
	We're my second view.
	Okay, no, I'm just saying.
	That applies as of April 25. And I do believe, I know for a fact previously it said at least 14 days.
	And I know for a fact also that this applies to Canadian citizens who do not qualify as exempt.
	Only by virtue of their medical status.
	And by the way, I've said it before and I'll say it again.
	Justin Trudeau.
	Who accuses everyone of racism, misogyny, and whatever you can think of?
	Knows damn well which Canadians are statistically most likely or more likely to be not fully vaccinated.
	That it would be Black Canadians, Latino Canadians, Indigenous Canadians, and to some extent females who might want to have control over their own bodies.
	So what is he basically saying?
	Black Canadians, Latino Canadians, Indigenous Canadians, you are more likely, if you decide to travel, to be placed under arbitrary, malicious, unconstitutional house arrest should you decide to come back to your country.
	But I'm not racist.
	I only implement policies which have a disparate impact on minority races.
	But I'm not racist.
	You're the racist.
	Okay.
	Okay, well, that was it.
	All right.
	Now, do we...
	Do I ask the stupid question or do we want to go see what's going on with the Johnny Depp trial?
	Do we want to see what's going on with the Johnny Depp live testimony?
	One for yes, two for no.
	Bearing in mind, I don't have...
	At some point, I'm going to have...
	Oh, geez, it's 2.22.
	I have to leave easily by 3 o 'clock.
	And then I've been neglecting my phone.
	Let me see if my wife...
	My wife has...
	10 text messages.
	Oh, my goodness.
	She sent me this picture.
	Wait, I don't want to...
	I don't want to dox my wife's number.
	She sent me this picture of the dogs.
	Look at...
	Come on.
	Oh, there.
	Look at that.
	Look at...
	That's when Winston was a little baby.
	What's your problem, Viva?
	Get the angle out.
	There we go.
	Look at that.
	Pudge and Barney.
	Winston.
	Pudge and Winston.
	What the heck is my problem, man?
	Yeah, all right.
	I'm not going to do this.
	I'm not going to do the Johnny Depp.
	There's no points.
	I can't do it the way other people are doing it.
	I don't want to.
	I just want Amber Heard's testimony.
	So is Amber Heard testifying?
	I don't want to bring up stuff that's going to potentially qualify as medical misinformation.
	Can't do it.
	Beth Neuers, seven.
	Well, if we add one plus two times two...
	No, okay, forget it.
	All right, well, let's see.
	Let's take some questions that will be non-super chat questions.
	We're not doing it.
	No Johnny Depp stuff.
	When Amber Heard is up, I'll do it then, but not before then.
	Those dogs were the cutest dogs on earth.
	Still are.
	Thank you, Viva No-Dep.
	I'm going to live with my decision, but when Amber Heard testifies, I will be live streaming that.
	Before COVID was a free country.
	During COVID, not so much.
	Now there are zero...
	Okay, but you see, here's the problem.
	This is not an attack on you at all.
	No but.
	This is a mentality that a lot of people have now.
	Well, they're easing up on the restrictions now, so stop complaining.
	No.
	And I don't care that Australia rescinds all of the measures.
	I don't care if they revoke all of the measures, and Australia goes back to being more free now than Canada now.
	I don't care.
	You will never live in a free society until measures are implemented to ensure that the government never has the...
	It never had the authority to do it in the past, as far as I'm concerned.
	That they never are allowed to do it again.
	And I don't want to use hyperbolic or offensive analogies.
	I'll just go with the dog that bit you.
	It doesn't matter if a dog never bites you again.
	If a dog bit you once, you are always living in the house with a dog that bit you.
	And you have to govern yourself accordingly.
	If you have kids, you have to live accordingly.
	It doesn't matter, well, the dog hasn't bitten anybody in the last week.
	Too bad.
	You can't leave your kid alone with that dog ever again.
	And you know, this may be a hyperbolic comparison analogy, but I think most people are going to agree with it.
	Our government now, it's not a rabid dog, but it's not far off.
	It's an unpredictable dog that has bitten a child.
	I know what some people might do to a dog like that.
	I know that we lived with a dog like that for two years, and it was two torturous years of constant stress and anxiety as to when the dog's going to bite again.
	Our government is a dog that has bitten.
	And they can never be trusted again not to bite.
	And I don't care that they haven't bitten for a week.
	I don't care they haven't bitten for a year.
	They can never be trusted again.
	So until you have measures implemented, a muzzle on the metaphoric government, until you have a muzzle on that government, you will never know that they can't bite you again in the future.
	And I don't care if they don't bite you now.
	They're an untrustworthy dog.
	That has bitten you in the past, and unless they're muzzled for the future, I will never feel comfortable around that dog ever again.
	It's actually a phenomenal, phenomenal analogy.
	If I may pat myself on the back.
	The other thing that infuriates me over the last two years was the politicians' blatant hypocrisy as they broke the rules they made for everyone else.
	Dr. Fi, or Derfi?
	Don't trust Derfi, people.
	Don't trust Durfi.
	Let's trust but verify Durfi.
	Let's go to...
	Go here.
	Let's see here.
	It's just...
	I'm just going to Google politicians who broke COVID rules.
	Let's just...
	I know there's a bunch.
	Share.
	Share.
	Chrome tab.
	Politicians who broke COVID rules.
	Let's just see which article.
	Hmm.
	I'll go with Sky News.
	Boris Johnson lockdown party accusations.
	The politicians and officials who have had to resign for breaking the COVID rules.
	I don't know if this is only British.
	Boris Johnson broke the rules.
	This looks British and therefore not so interesting to me.
	Let's just go back here and go back to America.
	America!
	Anger high when politicians break Corona.
	See, I don't only want Democratic politicians because there's been, I think, a few Republicans in Canada.
	There have been, I don't know.
	14 prominent Democrats stand accused of hypocrisy for ignoring...
	You know what?
	I don't even need it.
	Whitmer.
	Wolf.
	Lightfoot.
	Schumer.
	Pelosi.
	Gavin Newsom.
	Justin Trudeau.
	Doug Ford.
	That guy in Quebec, a liberal, what's his name?
	His brother's on the radio.
	Doesn't matter.
	Let's do Canada.
	I don't want to do the Democrat versus here we go.
	This is going to be the good one.
	Okay.
	List of politicians who broke COVID travel advisories continues to grow.
	Oh, there's so many.
	There's so many.
	It's actually, it's impossible.
	Oh yeah, so here's...
	On Sunday, the list of politicians.
	Let's just see what happens here.
	Rod Phillips, that's the one.
	Rod Phillips, I believe, is the one who...
	Look up Rod.
	I don't need to do that.
	Who pre-recorded a video about how we had to celebrate Christmas differently.
	Pre-recorded it, posted it while he was in St. Bart's Island, I believe.
	Rod Phillips.
	When Rod Phillips jetted off for a sunny Caribbean vacation on December 13, he touched off a political storm that engulfed him when he returned to Ontario.
	Phillips resigned as the province's finance minister on December 31, hours after returning from a two-week trip to St. Bart's.
	Phillips, who will remain a member of the provincial legislature, called the decision a significant error in judgment.
	No, it wasn't.
	It was a gosh-darned lie, because you're a gosh-darned liar.
	But it wasn't just a lie.
	It was pathological manipulation and dishonesty.
	This guy...
	Can we see the tweet?
	I'm not going to go through the other ones.
	This guy...
	That's the guy I was looking for.
	Joe Hargrave.
	Tracy Allard.
	Jeremy Nixon.
	And the big ones.
	The big ones.
	But we've got to do this.
	What was his name?
	Rod Phillips.
	Yeah, there you go.
	Tweet.
	Video.
	You got to see this.
	You got to see this.
	Let me see.
	Will this be it?
	I want the video.
	Thank you.
	Is this it?
	...in terms of being able to make their digital piece work, and it was great to see them work so close together, but it's just an example.
	This isn't it.
	Hold on.
	This is classic.
	It says, this isn't the one I was looking for, but this is...
	According to the tweet, I haven't verified this, but it's a blue checkmark, so it might be true.
	This video was just shared by the Ontario Liberal Party.
	It appears to be from a Zoom meeting held December 16, three days after Rod Phillips departed for St. Barts.
	There are claims you can hear the sound of waves in the background.
	...have had support in terms of being able to make their digital piece work, and it was great to see them work so close together, but it's just an example.
	I hear it.
	I hear it.
	But I want the original video when he tells people that they're going to have to celebrate Christmas differently this year.
	Where he says, we're going to have to celebrate Christmas differently this year because we all have to work together.
	I'm not going to find it, but whatever.
	We got it.
	We got the idea.
	Oh, here we go.
	Let's see.
	Okay, okay, okay, okay, okay.
	Where's the video?
	Where's the video?
	Here we go!
	Hello everyone, it's Rod Phillips, the MPP from Ajax.
	On this Christmas Eve, I want to wish each and every one of you a very Merry Christmas.
	Now I know that this Christmas is a bit different than Christmases in the past.
	We're meeting virtually and online and not able to be in person with as many family and friends as we'd like to.
	I'm turning it off, I'm sorry.
	That was a pre-recorded video that he published while vacationing in St. Bart's.
	It's the most egregious example, but they all did it.
	Justin Trudeau, when there was inter-provincial travel restrictions, when I couldn't see my family in Ontario, he crossed the border to go to his vacation home in Quebec.
	Doug Ford, when we were all being told we can't celebrate holidays with our friends and family, he met with his daughters, had an unlawful illegal gathering.
	Jagmeet Singh.
	He broke the rules and was caught breaking his bubble not wearing a mask shortly after calling people who were against the mask mandates right-wing selfish extremists who don't care about neighbors, don't care about community.
	Pierre Arcand, I don't know what his...
	They're all a bunch of hypocrites.
	It's over the top.
	But that was it.
	I absolutely agree with you, Viva.
	Unfortunately, we have no constitution to enshrine our freedom.
	We had one, in theory.
	Oh, sorry.
	I'm sorry.
	You in Australia.
	Yeah.
	Apparently, Australians don't even have...
	A charter of rights that the government can violate.
	So they're one step behind us.
	Did I miss that super chat?
	Hold on.
	So let me get to that one.
	It's an orange chat.
	I don't know if I was down or up.
	Thank you very much for the super chat.
	And where was the orange one, people?
	If I can't find it...
	Oh, here it is.
	Here it is.
	Okay.
	Oh, Durfee.
	When we had that state funeral in London, Ontario, for the family where Ford and Trudeau stood shoulder to shoulder with thousands, I believe the rule here was still you couldn't have more than 8 to 15 people attend a family funeral.
	Yep.
	And by the way, when they were doing that, and by the way, I'm not saying they shouldn't have been able to do that.
	I'm saying they should have been able to do that.
	But while they were doing that, they were literally, and I appreciate it's a different province, but that doesn't mean it makes sense, Maxime Bernier for holding an outdoor political rally of 30 people in Alberta, Manitoba, I forget which one.
	The whole point is, a virus does not trump certain constitutional rights, certain constitutional freedoms, certainly not one that we knew was the way it was at the time that they were doing this.
	They had thousands of people gathering in Ontario to remember the family of that.
	Horrible incident.
	While they were simultaneously arresting their political ideological adversaries for an outdoor political gathering of 30 people.
	And while they were denying the humanity of Canadians in limiting how they can grieve the loss of their loved ones.
	I think they had the same issue with Ruth Bader Ginsburg when she passed away.
	She got, you know, people could congregate to mourn her loss, but they couldn't congregate to mourn their own depending on their state.
	Denying the humanity of humankind, what do you think that's going to do?
	Psychological stress, psychological devastation, social stress, social devastation, social upheaval, social discord.
	But hey, the more of that, the more the government gets to come in and say, we can solve this problem that we just caused.
	Thank you.
	Okay.
	Yeah, okay.
	So I think we touched on this and I'm not sure.
	I'll ask.
	We'll talk about it next Sunday.
	I'm not sure that there's anything to be done about that.
	So that's that.
	What else?
	Let's see what we got in the...
	Oh yeah, McKinney.
	We got Kenny who had his...
	What was it called?
	It's called Skygate where he had a outdoor...
	No.
	Oh yeah, it's right there.
	The Skygate.
	Hold on, guys.
	That one was pretty shocking as well.
	Hold on.
	Just wait for this.
	Wait for this.
	Skygate.
	It's not just that they were having an unlawful gathering by their own standards.
	They live like freaking kings.
	Skygate.
	What was it called?
	Here we go.
	There's the image.
	Where's the image from?
	I'm just going to get the article here.
	Look at these flipping people, man.
	It's good to be king.
	It is good to be king.
	Why?
	This is from the star.
	Why a Sky Palace photo of Alberta Premier Jason Keighley has hit a nerve.
	In a province where public health restrictions have been particularly polarizing, it's the photo location that has hit a particular nerve.
	Yeah, it's also the fact that there's a freaking bottle of Jameson.
	On the table.
	There's a bottle of Jameson right here.
	That looks like it might be bigger than a 750.
	That looks like it might be a 1.15.
	There's two bottles of wine by my viewing here and three bottles of San Pellegrino carbonated water.
	Nothing but the best for the king.
	While Albertans...
	Is this Alberta?
	I keep getting confused here.
	What the heck's my problem?
	Yes, Calgary, Alberta.
	While Albertans are being...
	Locked down and locked away.
	No masks, a bottle of Jameson, two bottles of wine, three bottles of San Pellegrino on a sky terrace.
	These boys, they need their downtime.
	Jason Kenney with a bottle of Jameson Irish whiskey on the patio of the Sky Palace.
	Anyhow.
	It's, let's just go put this one here.
	You guys go read this.
	The problem is, there are people who don't even know about these things.
	There are people who don't know that the politicians actually did this.
	And then they think, they call me, you know, I'm angry.
	I'm a conspirator.
	I'm focusing too much on the bad.
	There are people who don't know about this.
	And they sit around like they deserve to be abused.
	Like, yeah, like...
	We have to do it for each other.
	While the kings don't even follow their rules, which means, and it's not a question of like a set of rules that they don't have to follow.
	If it's for safety, then they are basically saying these rules are actually not for safety, or we don't care about putting other people at risk, or we don't believe it ourselves.
	Sitting there on presumably taxpayer dollars, just like gluttonous pigs.
	Sorry.
	Like gluttonous pigs.
	The other thing is this.
	I was going to say this as a joke.
	I drink tap water when I go to a restaurant.
	I drink tap water.
	I like carbonated water.
	I can't stand paying $4 for a bottle of carbonated water when I know it costs a buck at the Depeneur.
	Depeneur is Canadian for 7-Eleven.
	Punish me.
	I can't stand overpaying for the stuff that you know how much it costs.
	I was in Vegas back when the world was free.
	I was at a place.
	They were going to charge me $9.
	No, I'm sorry.
	It wasn't Vegas.
	Sorry.
	I'm going to get angry there.
	It was San Diego for one of my wife's neuroscience conferences.
	And we were in the convention center.
	And these convention centers, they're very, very far from stuff.
	So you can't just run to a grocery store.
	The convention center wanted to charge me.
	$9.
	U.S. for a Red Bull.
	I couldn't.
	I have $9.
	I would rather.
	Well, I have $9.
	I could not do it as a matter of principle.
	It's like a $5 shake out of Pulp Fiction, except that seems cheap now.
	But I saw a chat that I should not have seen, and now it's going to make me angry.
	My husband had a heart attack two years ago, and I wasn't even permitted to visit or to be his medical advocate.
	We had neighbors who delivered their baby, and the husband couldn't be in the delivery room.
	I think one was allowed to be in the delivery room.
	Others were not allowed.
	Others were not allowed to go attend the ultrasounds with their wife.
	You deny...
	I don't know that there's any greater transgression of morality than denying the humanity of humankind.
	Who said tap water's bad?
	Well, it was $5 for a shake in 2000, so multiply that by three.
	That's like a $15 shake now.
	A one-liter bottle of Jameson costs $80 at the SAQ, or the liquor store.
	The dog just made a noise.
	If you get a bottle, At a restaurant, they charge you three times the amount because they have to go through the provincial liquor board.
	And they've got to pay twice, two times that bottle.
	So you order a bottle of Jameson at a restaurant, you want your bottle service because you're an opulent king who gets to do whatever the heck he wants, you're paying three or four times the price of that bottle at one of the liquor commissions, which is already overpriced because they already have a government monopoly.
	So there's that.
	Okay, what else?
	What else is going up in here?
	Did I have anything else in my to-do list for the day?
	I got the injunction, Johnny Depp, Monday.
	What else was it that we wanted to talk about?
	I think we did good.
	Gonna have to go catch up on some non-lawstream work.
	Yeah, so by the way, so we'll call it here because I think we've covered the essential.
	We've covered the hypocrisy.
	We've covered everything.
	Did someone say tap water is bad?
	What can we do to push back these laws on vaccinated travel?
	Too many go, it's not limiting you to cars.
	You're not entitled to planes or trains.
	You've got to get the public has to be outraged to the point where they manifest their disagreement with this.
	It's a known fact, by the way.
	And it's a known fact that governments, at least in Quebec and in Canada as well, they say trust the science and they say they're following science.
	They are going by polling.
	They are going by focus groups that tell them what they think the general population wants.
	You have to vocalize your disagreement with this so that they know nobody likes it anymore.
	The problem is, too many people think they're safe for now.
	Too many people think, well, I'm fully vaccinated, so it doesn't affect me until they say, oh, you've got to go get this booster now.
	It doesn't matter that you had COVID in January.
	You've got to go get the booster, otherwise you can't take a train or plane.
	Nobody cares until it gets to their front door, and then oftentimes by the time it gets there, like the old saying goes, it's too late.
	So an injustice is an injustice regardless of who it affects and regardless of the degree to which it affects them.
	Because injustices are like festering wounds.
	At first, they might only affect people you hate.
	And you're like, there's some part of you that likes you to see people you hate experiencing injustice.
	It doesn't stop there.
	And it's a festering wound in that it doesn't stop with one element either.
	It spreads like necrosis.
	It's constitutional necrosis.
	And it spreads and it rots and it will consume everything eventually.
	A friend's father was left alone in the ER waiting room for hours while having a stroke.
	He couldn't talk to say what was wrong.
	Frederick von Rundsch.
	Future governments will be apologizing for the wrongs and the damages that the current government has committed.
	Do you know what Evian water is?
	Spell it backwards.
	And there's also some discussion about drinking water that comes out of plastic bottles.
	But tap water is good, man.
	The only reason I miss winter is because the tap water is so darn cold in Quebec and Montreal.
	Magnificently cold.
	Gloriously cold.
	In the summer, you can't really get it that cold.
	Art Vandelay says, Viva, can you please give a shout-out to my mother, Phyllis, in Cave Creek, Arizona?
	She really enjoys your show.
	You provide her hours of entertainment.
	Phyllis, I have to go see where Cave Creek...
	Hold on, we're going to do it in real time.
	This is going to be the ultimate shout-out to Phyllis.
	Where is Cave Creek, Arizona?
	Because I'll tell you one thing.
	Arizona is one of my Cave Creek...
	Town in Arizona.
	Let's get it on a map.
	Let's get it on a map.
	78 degrees in cave.
	Oh, God, it's beautiful.
	It looks beautiful already.
	Arizona is one of the most beautiful places on Earth.
	I'm in Arizona by Scottsdale.
	I was in the Saguaro National Park when my grandmother-in-law used to have a place there, a tiny place on one of the...
	The Saguaro, and I went jogging.
	Oh, my God.
	This is...
	Cave Creek.
	It looks beautiful.
	I want to see where it is on a...
	God, it's beautiful.
	It's a magic that can't be described for anybody who has not been there.
	At least, Saguaro National Park.
	It's the only place on Earth where you have...
	Where is...
	Where is Saguaro National Park here?
	That's it.
	Oh, okay.
	Cave Creek National Park.
	Okay, I'm not sure anybody wants to see this, but let's just go here for one second and let's just get a blast from the past.
	Viva Fry Saguaro.
	Oh, you're going to see me back when I was young.
	Can I even find my old stuff?
	It's Saguaro.
	Hold on one second.
	This has to happen.
	Viva Fry Saguaro.
	Come on, man.
	Give me this.
	I can't even find my really old stuff.
	Sora, Arizona?
	I'm not going to find it.
	I'll have to find it later.
	It was from Arizona.
	It's the most beautiful place on Earth.
	Tied with all the other places that I say are just as beautiful.
	Remove.
	Okay.
	Remove.
	So, Phyllis.
	Enjoy the beautiful weather.
	Enjoy one of the most beautiful places on Earth.
	And happy Monday.
	Never stop.
	Hold on.
	Science and the law always wins.
	I didn't even mean to bring this up, but full of rattlesnakes.
	I saw a rattlesnake.
	They're beautiful.
	It would be nice if the jab also boycotted travel, but many of them say it was your choice not to get jabbed.
	Coercion is not a choice, but wait until...
	You know?
	Wait until they are the targets where now they have to do something.
	But I already did it.
	I thought I did my part away.
	Well, you got to do your part again.
	But I don't really want to.
	I feel fine.
	Okay.
	College was an expensive way to delay growing up.
	Learned more in a month on the job than in four years of college.
	There is Party Store University.
	There's no question about that.
	I learned more in my first three months of...
	Well, I would say I learned more in my first...
	Year of practice as a lawyer than in all of my law degree, but some training you need.
	Some training is just training for no better purpose than training you how to think and how to function.
	But if universities are actually training people how to think badly or corrupting their thought and corrupting their functionality, corrupting their ability to actually deal with the real world, then university ceases being any form of training and it actually starts becoming...
	Toxic?
	I don't like that word, but you know what I'm saying.
	Viva, we are Commonwealth brothers.
	Let us share in our connected and enshrined misery.
	God bless the Queen, because God has abandoned us.
	Well, our Charter of Rights is based on the supremacy of God, Mr. Wonderful.
	We enshrined the Charter of Rights in our Constitution.
	Now we just need to get politicians to respect our constitution.
	Fight the good fight, knuckle deep.
	I don't know what that means.
	I'm going to assume that's about picking your nose.
	Okay.
	So that's it.
	That's where we're at.
	So this week, people, the schedule.
	Tomorrow, I made a mistake.
	It wasn't last week.
	It's tomorrow.
	I'm going to be on with Eric Duhem on his channel at 5.30 in the afternoon.
	He's going to be on with me Thursday.
	And now I'm hoping that Amber Heard testimony doesn't happen on Thursday.
	Friday.
	I have Roman Baber on.
	So we've got a full week.
	And Wednesday, to be determined, but Wednesday evening, we've got a good sidebar with...
	Oh, geez.
	From The Revolver.
	Is it Warren Beatty?
	It's not Warren Beatty.
	That's the actor.
	Darren Beatty.
	From The Revolver.
	We're going to have an amazing foreigner.
	God hasn't abandoned.
	So this was a great thing.
	When I was at the rally and I was talking to Big Bear from...
	He's from Alberta.
	And a number of the speakers were talking religion.
	I said, I appreciate what they're saying.
	I just don't have that same religious view of things.
	And Big Bear says to me, the term God is just a different manifestation for all of us, but we're all ultimately talking about the same thing.
	You know, Christians...
	Who see it in Jesus and who see it in God.
	Jews who see it in God.
	Muslims who see it in God.
	And other people who see it in the cosmos.
	Ultimately, we are ultimately describing the same thing.
	Some greater force.
	I won't say higher being, but something higher to which we have to, even if it doesn't exist, that we have to use as the measure to guide our own actions here.
	And I like the way he said it.
	We're talking about the same thing.
	And if it inspires you to be better, you cannot possibly criticize it.
	So that's that.
	The great creator.
	Because the Big Bang, the Big Bang to some, the idea that we went from a moment of singularity to an exponentially growing universe, that's God in the scientific sense.
	And it's an amazing thing just to think about that.
	At one point in time, everything that ever was was concentrated in one point of singularity.
	That's if you believe in it.
	So, that's it.
	That is it.
	All right, let me see if I missed anything on the rumbles, and then I'm going to have to get back to catching up on stuff that's not so much fun, but we'll see.
	If I missed any rumble rants on the rumbles, I apologize, but I don't see any.
	People, stay tuned for what's going to be a good week of fun.
	Okay, the shout-out to Phyllis I got.
	I just was pulling up another chat.
	Viva is holding out so hard to be agnostic.
	I'm telling you, see, I know people say, everyone who has found their embodiment of God says the same thing.
	You think I don't have members of the Jewish community trying to get me to see the light, so to speak?
	That's not going to happen.
	I do believe, even if it's only in our own minds, that there has to be something that guides our conduct, lest we just fall prey to the temptations of life, like those soulless politicians who are only governed by the lust for power and people don't think I'm not well aware of hashtag confession through projection.
	I know what does not guide me.
	But don't be, just don't be miffed if when it doesn't happen.
	I enjoy discussion with everybody, but I believe I know my own psyche and my own stubbornness.
	My uncle had a ranch in Buckeye, Arizona years ago when there was nobody else around.
	Oh, that's a beautiful photograph that you have there.
	Mountain kayaker.
	Beautiful.
	God is within your...
	I think you meant heart, but I think you meant within your heart.
	It is what you believe in, but not to physically exist.
	Enjoy the wonderful day.
	Vicky Henyon.
	Okay, so let's do it.
	Let's do it.
	God bless you, Viva.
	Thank you very much.
	Thanks, Viva.
	Nature lover.
	Good to see you again.
	Seize the day.
	It was fun.
	I ran into seize the day.
	And who else did I run into in real time?
	Oh, I forgot the avatar now.
	It's like crazy.
	But running into people who you've known from a history of commenting on live chats.
	Live shoots is amazing.
	Nice.
	Yeah, I got some sun.
	To donate to cancer, it has to be 10 inches long.
	And I don't think they want gray hair.
	I got a lot of gray in here.
	But yeah, I got a good tan this weekend.
	It's nice to get some sunlight.
	Vitamin D. Okay, peeps.
	Agree to disagree does not mean that all are forced by consensus that only one is correct.
	Agreed.
	Viva!
	Mob gnarly.
	Thanks.
	Okay, let's do it.
	Let's do it.
	I'm winding it down.
	Everybody, thank you all.
	See you tomorrow.
	I'm going to go out and...
	I saw some of the texts to which I must respond immediately.
	So we'll do it.
	Guys, ladies and gentlemen, guys in the non-specific aggregate term, I actually had an argument with someone that guys was not gender-specific, was actually aggregate.
	These are the discussions we have to have in modern times, people.
	Enjoy the rest of the day.
	Get out there.
	Exercise.
	Sunlight.
	And when I say it, I mean it.
	Unlike Justin Trudeau, Gaslighting you.
	Talk to people in real life.
	And remember that there's a world beyond the screen and people in real time, they have a feel.
	They have an energy because real life interaction cannot be substituted for by Zoom meetings.
	So there's that.
	Okay.
	Go.
	Enjoy the day.
	Talk soon.

▲