“What’s The Point of YOUR Boycott?” Trump State Visit | With Sir Ed Davey & Winston Marshall
State visits by world leaders are a ceremonial exhibition of the very best the British state can mobilise, with palatial grandeur, royal pomp, and military tribute, all capped by a glorious state banquet with the King to cement alliances and mutual respect. Trump this week is receiving the honour for a second time - but not everyone wants to get involved in such a historic occasion. Sir Ed Davey, leader of Britain’s third biggest party in parliament, the Liberal Democrats, has rejected his invitation - and joins Piers Morgan to explain why. Then Piers Morgan discusses the state visit with co-host of The Verdict with Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson, host of the Winston Marshall Show, Winston Marshall and former Conservative MP and Trump critic Louise Mensch. Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent and supported by: Ground News: Go to https://groundnews.com/PIERS for 40% off the Vantage subscription and find the truth mainstream media doesn't want you to see. Tax Network USA: Call 1-800-958-1000 or visit https://TNUSA.com/PIERS to meet with a strategist today for FREE Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Advocating for the King00:12:28
Isabel Brown.
The wait is almost over.
She's joining Daily Wire Plus with the Isabel Brown Show.
Cannot wait for you guys to see how hard we've been working.
I could not be more excited for this new adventure.
You can expect larger than life guests, deeper questions to the nerds.
Meeting the President of the United States and the Vice President and now meeting our new American Pope.
This is crazy.
Let's jump in.
Join me every weekday for the Isabel Brown Show on Daily Wire Plus or wherever you get your podcasts.
I have not stopped the king.
The invitation came from the king, right?
Let me take you through the natural difference.
Yes, of course it's...
So you have stopped the king.
Do you believe that women can have a penis?
I explained that I think the vast majority of people have the same gender.
Not people, women.
Well, there are men who want to change and women who want to change.
Can women have a penis?
What I'm saying is...
Well, can we?
Listen, I'm calling me.
State visits by world leaders are a ceremonial exhibition of the very best the British state can mobilise.
There's palatial grandeur, royal pomp, a military tribute, or cat by glorious state banquet with the king to cement alliances and mutual respect.
Well, Donald Trump's visit this week is steeped in historical significance.
He's the first leader to receive the honour twice.
You might wonder who on earth could possibly choose to miss out on playing a role in such a momentous occasion.
The answer is Sir Ed Davey, the leader of Britain's third biggest party in Parliament, the Liberal Democrats, who rejected the invitation and joins me.
Now, Sir Ed, great to have you.
Good uncensored debut.
Been a while since we had a chat.
You're boycotting the state dinner.
You're not the first Liberal Democrat leader to do it.
I think Vince Cable, one of your predecessors, did the same thing last time.
What's the point of your boycott?
Let's be clear.
I actually think the state visit of Donald Trump should have happened.
Indeed, I argued it.
I think that was the first British politician, even before that famous moment in the White House when the Prime Minister gave the invitation from the King to Donald Trump.
So I'm absolutely pleased that he's here because we need to influence him in any way we can with this the pomp and ceremony that you were talking about.
And I had every intention of going, partly because I respect the king so much.
And I've had the huge honor of going to these events on a number of occasions before.
But I also know from those events, you don't get to talk to the visiting head of state unless you're on the top table.
And here's a secret.
I've never been on the top table.
And what changed my mind was over the summer when I kept seeing what's happening in Gaza with the children who are starving and you can see their skeletons with the children who were killed tuning for water and indeed with the emaciated hostages paraded by the appalling Hamas.
And I just kept saying, I'm talking to my wife and saying, I've got to do something.
And I've been raising it prime minister's questions because I think our government's not done enough.
But Donald Trump is the one man in the world who could do something.
He could not only just ring up Netanyahu, but he could ring up the Qatari government and the other governments, the Gulf states, and say, get Hamas to release hostages.
Have you?
Well, I'm not President of the United States.
Have you rung them?
Well, I'm not sure they take my call.
I think you know the people.
Well, you were at the state dinner for the Emir of Qatar, right?
Yeah, but they have, but no, it's actually quite different.
What's the difference?
I'll tell you.
And I've been to a number of state banquets because I believe engaging.
As I said, I actually wanted him to...
So why wouldn't you want to engage with the most powerful one?
Well, as I said, you don't get to talk to them.
But why go to the others?
Well, because I support the king, right?
And I respect the king.
No, you don't support the king.
No, I've written to him privately.
I'm slightly struggling to follow your consistency.
So you know you don't ever get to talk to them.
Let me help you.
But the only person you're not going to go to and you want to publicly boycott is the President of the United States, who by your own admission is the guy that can actually most affect change.
Yeah, because I'm on your show.
I don't think you'd have me on your show or would have had me today if I hadn't done that.
And that's because I want to talk about his power.
And he probably watches your show.
He's probably on British show that he watches.
And I think he, and indeed the wider public, and the pressure on this government is why I did this.
He doesn't know who I am, right?
I'm humble enough to know he's not thinking, oh, where's Ed Davies?
No, but you have snubbed the king.
No, I haven't.
Well, who does the invitation come from?
No, I've written to him privately.
Who did it come from?
The invitation?
The king.
And what did you say in your letter of rejection?
As you know, it's a private matter if you're in correspondence.
But was it specific to about Gaza?
Yes.
Okay.
And has he replied?
No, I wasn't expecting to reply.
Listen, I think he knows because I've been very privileged to have a number of one-to-ones with our monarch, first when he was prince, and then now he's head of state.
And I think he's someone who respects people's different views and is engaged in the politics.
I don't expect him to say anything publicly on this, of course not.
But I think he will respect my decision.
And, you know, I respect him.
But I do think the issue is this, Piers, question.
How do we get Donald Trump to do the right thing?
I think you will agree.
You may maybe disagree.
Well, I can tell you with the, and I've known Donald Trump a long time.
We've had ups and downs.
We've fallen out.
We've fallen back in.
I texted him with him this morning.
Very cordial.
I can tell you one thing.
The leader of the Liberal Democrat Party in the UK publicly boycotting his state dinner.
He won't care.
No, no.
The only thing he'll think when he sees it is, well, A, he'll say, who is that guy?
Then he'll say, he's boycotting me.
It's all about me.
He's whacking me.
Big negative tick against the UK.
That's all he'll think.
A top UK politician is trying to make a name for himself, getting on the media.
You've just said, you're on here because of this, getting on the media to make a point against me, Donald Trump.
You know what he's like.
Everybody knows what he's like.
I would have, absolutely, if you'd said to me, how should I do this?
I would have said, go to the state dinner, right?
Engage with him and his team as much as you possibly can.
You may not get to talk to Trump, but you can certainly talk to some of his team.
Well, that's an interesting point.
My experience of statement is certainly someone in my area doesn't get to even speak to the state.
I went to the state dinner in Qatar for Donald Trump, and I had a long chat with him, Elon Musk, Scott Besant, the Emir of Qatar.
I think it's a very good question.
You're very special.
Not really.
Everyone was having a chance.
But you've already told me that you've been a big mate of his for years.
I've never met him.
And the point is not being on your programme, lovely though that is, Piers, it's great to be on your programme.
Of course.
But the issue is Gaza.
And what I want to do is I didn't want him to come to this country and we talk about tariffs and other things and the pomp and ceremony and not know that British people, and I think there are very many, feel that he ought to act.
I mean, I think what's happening in Gaza...
What do you want him to do?
I want him to pick up the phone to Netanyahu and I want to say, stop the attacks, get the food in, get a ceasefire.
I also want him to...
I agree with you.
Yeah.
Well, I think most bright people would that he should make that call.
I think Netanyahu's abused the relationship that he's had with Trump, frankly, and in an outrageous way.
But I also think Trump has the power to influence the Qataris and other Gulf states who have a lot of influence on Hamas.
So he's uniquely placed in the world to talk to both sides, to get action on both sides of the country.
I don't disagree with any of that, and I don't disagree with what your view is of the current situation in Gaza.
I'm just curious why, knowing how thin-skinned Donald Trump can be, why would you want headlines, you know, Sir Ed Davy, leader of Liberal Democrats, snubs the king and Trump.
First of all, here.
The king, by the way, the king, who, by the way, is currently battling cancer.
So you've chosen a moment to snub the king when he's very sick, but he's still getting up there to go and do this.
And you're snubbing Donald Trump, and that's the only headline that's going to come out.
And I don't think it's going to have anything like the effect you think it is.
First of all, I'm humble enough to know that he doesn't know who I am, doesn't care, and the fact I've got Liberal and Democrat in the name of my party probably means he's not what he knows.
I'm not one of him, right?
So that's fair, fine.
But I have to question you on snubbing the king.
I have not snubbed the king.
But the invitation came from the king, right?
Let me take you through the process.
Yes, of course it is.
So you have stubbed the king.
But as you talk, as I told you, I've written to him in private, and I've had the real honour of meeting him on a number of occasions.
Did you apologise?
Let me say so.
I wanted to come, let's be clear, but for the reasons I set out that I didn't feel I could accept the invitation this time.
But here's the point.
I really, really wrestled with this one because of my respect for King Charles III.
I talked to my wife about it over the summer in detail.
I prayed.
I'm happy to be a Christian.
I prayed about it because it was one of the more difficult decisions I've made.
I don't rush to these sorts of decisions.
It's not the way I do politics.
I actually advocated for him to come, right?
So quite different from my first.
But that's what I don't quite understand.
Again, you're happy he's come.
Yeah.
You're happy that Keir Starmer arranged for him to have this state visit.
That's all right.
That's cool.
You're happy with all of that.
That's all correct.
Absolutely.
But when he comes, you, Ed Davy, your contribution to the UK welcoming the most powerful man in the world with all the machinery, as all the pompous ceremonies rolled out by the Royal...
I've never seen the Royals do this for anyone, quite the way they've done it for Trump today.
Your only contribution is to stick a massive two fingers up at it.
Well, let me take you through the argument again, if I may.
I know the argument is, but that's how it's going to be portrayed.
I've agreed with everything you've said, right?
Everything you said about my permission, but this one thing.
I know, having gone to a number of state banquets, that I wouldn't have had a talk with President, where I wouldn't have talked to his senior entourage.
I'd have had a nice time.
It's lovely.
I really enjoy them.
But I'm saying that I don't want to go to that because I want a debate in this country, debate with you, a debate in other media that I've had.
Can I throw a quizzical spanner into these words?
You're bound to.
In opposition, I remember Keir Starmer, 2018.
Trump does not understand the words humanity and dignity.
David Lamy, who is, you know, obviously was foreign secretary very recently, wrote in 2017, I will be on the streets protesting racist and KKK neo-Nazi sympathiser Trump.
Yvette Cooper, our new foreign secretary, said on X in 2019.
So appalled Theresa May has given this man a red-carpeted platform to do this.
Doesn't help Britain to be lavishing pomp on a president so determined to be divisive, childish, and destructive.
Now, last time I checked, Keir Starmer, David Lamy, and Yvette Cooper have been competing in a sycophancy competition that we're now looking at, grasping the evil man's hand and doing the complete opposite.
I mean, last night, Yvette Cooper, look at this.
I mean, 11 seconds with Yvette Cooper, fawning like Baldrick.
I mean, it was one of the most excruciating things I think I've ever watched.
Watch.
I mean, it goes on the watch.
Count.
This is the Yvette Cooper who said, I'm appalled Theresa May has given this man a red-carpeted platform, et cetera, et cetera.
So my cynical part of me says, all very well, Sir Ed, because you're not in power.
But if you actually were in power, would you just be another one of these turncoat toadies who would suddenly abandon all their thoughts about this and say, oh, President Trump let me grovel for you.
That's why I'm not here to defend the Labour government.
It was nauseating, didn't you?
Well, they can speak for themselves.
11 seconds?
Here's my point as a leader of the opposition party.
My job really is to influence the government of the day.
That's my job.
Right.
Because they're the ones who have the conversations, the meetings with President Trump.
And I want them to raise the issue of Gaza.
I want them to raise the issue of the hostages because he has the power to get the hostage release and to end the humanitarian crisis.
And therefore, this is my way if I put more pressure on the government.
I've done it at PMQs.
I've done it in Parliament.
I think in the media, coming on your show and other things helps racket that pressure on our own government.
That's the way I think opposition parties, responsible opposition parties, behave.
And to those who say it's just an opportunistic PR stunt, Sirad?
Well, I disagree with them entirely.
If they knew me and knew how hard I've wrestled with this, they wouldn't say that at all.
Do you like Donald Trump?
Supreme Court and Sports Law00:09:03
No.
What do you dislike about him?
Well, I don't know him as a person.
You're the one who knows him as a person.
The bits that I don't like are his policies.
Particularly, you know, I'm a British politician.
My job is to look after my constituents and our country.
Which policy don't you like?
Well, three major ones.
Well, let me just throw some at you.
Tariffs.
He believes in strong...
Well, hang on, I've got a lot of people.
Tariffs.
I'm giving younger you want.
Hang on.
I'm also giving Ukraine.
Let me give you a business giving guards.
I've got three major issues.
I actually like an American president who wants to forge peace, not war, personally.
But let me ask you that though.
Do you agree with strengthening...
Do you agree with strengthening a border?
Yes, of course.
Do you agree with fewer foreign wars?
Do you agree with fewer foreign wars?
I've opposed wars in the past, absolutely.
So you basically died on the state.
Did you agree on the Iraq war, by the way?
Because I opposed the Iraq war.
I opposed it.
Well, I'm glad we agreed on that one.
Absolutely.
So I'm not being inconsistent at all.
What I do disagree, as a British politician looking after people who vote for me, is a President of the United States who, unlike any of his predecessors, Republican or Democrat, has put tariffs on our country and hit our country economically.
Surely, Piers, surely, it's my right to speak and my duty to speak up for my country.
So that's why I don't like him.
What do you feel?
What would you feel about the issue of trans women in women's sport?
Because he's banned it.
Yeah, I think it's up to the sporting bodies.
What do you feel personally?
Yeah, I think it's up to the sporting bodies.
Would you agree with it?
Well, I can imagine some sports where it's very, very difficult.
Can you imagine a sport where it isn't difficult?
Chess.
That's what a sport.
Well, it's a ball game.
Can you imagine an Olympic sport?
Let me ask you.
But I will leave.
This is my answer to you.
I will leave it to the sporting bodies to make their decisions.
I think politicians who get involved in all that sort of stuff are arrogant for that.
Well, in May 2023, you told LBC that women quite clearly can have a penis.
Well, actually, I didn't say that.
What did you say?
I was responding to a question.
What I actually said was that the vast majority of people identify with the same gender they had at birth, but there are a few who don't...
So do you believe, for the record, do you believe women can have a penis?
For over 20 years, we've had a gender recognition act which has said that people who want to change their gender can do so.
And that's been cross-party.
And I think this is a difficult issue.
It's actually not that difficult.
I think there's a lot of toxicity.
I'm sure there is, but do you believe that women can have a penis?
I explained that I think the vast majority of people have the same gender.
Not people, women.
Well, there are men who want to change and women who want to change.
But can women have a penis?
So what I'm saying is...
Oh, can they or not?
Listen, I'm asking.
Why do you like squirming?
I'm not squirming at all.
I'm giving you the answer that I actually gave on LBC.
And the answer I gave on LBC was this.
That if you have a different view of your gender from your biological sex at birth, then the gender recognition that gives you that right.
But the vast majority of people, as you know, Piers, have the same gender.
But I don't think as a biological...
I don't believe that any women can have a penis.
You seem to think that some can.
Well, I go back to what the law says.
The law is really clear.
It's one of the reasons why when the Supreme Court made its ruling, which some people didn't like, I said we accept that ruling.
So you now accept women can't have a penis?
I accept the ruling of the Supreme Court really clearly.
I expect that it's a very important thing.
Notwithstanding what you feel about Trump, do you understand people watch this kind of exchange and they go, what is he talking about?
And they understand.
It's about a law.
And Trump just goes, actually, men are men, women are women.
And you know what?
No more trans athletes in women's sport.
That's it.
And they think, if you were running the country, what would you do?
Ed David.
I don't think politicians should get involved in such a lot.
So you do get involved in it.
Well, listen, I think there should be debates on the laws.
And one of the things I've said after the Supreme Court, which I've ruling, which I've said, is because of some of the issues that are raised in that, because it actually says transgender people's rights should be protected.
I've read the 80-page ruling of the Supreme Court.
Do women in your family agree with you that women can have a penis?
Listen, people in my family agree with the law and the law, whether it's the Gender Recognition Act, the Equalities Act, or the Supreme Court's ruling on how those two acts relate together.
My wife's a lawyer and she believes I'm holding the law.
Have you ever met a woman with a penis?
No.
Oh, there we go.
What does that tell you?
But the point I'm making is, as a legislator who makes the police.
My only point to you for doing this.
I'm not trying to law.
I'm not trying to got you.
It's just, I just feel like this whole woke thing about particularly on the trans issue.
And I support trans people's rights to fairness, equality, safety.
So do I.
I mean, we're in total agreement.
100%.
So you have to start from a position of understanding biology and basic science, which is men are men, women are women.
Women don't have penises.
It's interesting you say that because actually that's the answer I've given you.
I've said you start with the bio.
So why can't you just be bold enough to go, you know what?
I've thought about my answers.
My Sakir.
Sakir went from saying the same kind of stuff as you, then he went to 99% of women don't have penises.
And eventually he agreed none of them do.
You seem to be still hesitant.
There's no exact percentage of women who have penises.
Quite the contrary.
What I'm telling you is...
What percentage do you think do?
What I'm telling you is the law of our country.
And I uphold the law of our country.
It's one of the reasons why some people didn't like it.
The law of the country is now that men are men and women are women.
The law of the country is what the Supreme Court says on the basis of the Equalities Act and the Gender Recognition Act.
And having read their ruling, I think we should stick to their ruling.
So what does that mean, though?
But it does actually leave a number of issues which the regulators are going to put right.
I've actually said we should have a full debate about this in Parliament because the Supreme Court is...
What's the debate, Ed?
Well, in how you make sure that the transgender people and people, women and men whose biological sex is the same as the gender they have, that their rights should be debated to make sure we uphold all people's rights.
One thing I'm sure you agree with is we want a society where we don't have toxic debate, where we look after all people fairly.
Just as you said, and I completely agree with what you said about Trump.
Do you know what creates toxicity, though, when you think that it's okay for biological men to compete in women's sport or go into women's faces?
Well, I think it's...
That is toxic to many women.
Women are like, hang on, no, hang on.
But I also think you should bring in the sporting bodies, don't you?
No, I think you just do.
Why do you think we separate the sexes in the Olympics?
Well, I think the Olympic authorities with the sporting bodies should make this.
But why do you think we separate them?
The sporting bodies do, and I uphold that.
But why is the Olympics men and women?
Because they have different attributes.
And the point is...
So do you accept that men have a superior physical advantage?
Of course they do.
Well, isn't that the answer?
Well, but sporting bodies sometimes say in their situation.
But if you were Prime Minister, why wouldn't you just tell the sporting bodies, this is what we're doing?
See what people want and why people gravitate to Trump.
They may not like him personally.
They may not like the way he says things, but they quite like Trumpism in the sense of the common sense kind of view he has of these things, where he just goes, this is obviously ridiculous.
Men are men, women are women.
And no, you can't have trans athletes in women's sport.
And people voted him.
But here's the thing.
People, having thought about Trump for four years out of office, then voted him back in bigger numbers.
Because actually that kind of went, yeah, that makes sense.
And I look at you and I think, here's a guy, a career politician, desperate to be prime minister one day, or why bother?
And when I just ask you a basic biology question.
I talk about the law.
I'm flandering over it.
No, I'm not flattering at all.
I'm just talking about the law.
And I thought, surely that's what you would expect a lawmaker to do.
But the law is clear now in this country.
It's settled.
Yeah, and I've said I'd be supporting the Supreme Court judgment.
But when I say to you, can women have a penis, you should just say no.
Well, the Supreme Court judgment actually has different interpretations, and we need to make sure that in Parliament we just started.
So the interpretation I make from your refusal to say that is that you think they probably can.
No, I think that's wrong to draw that conclusion.
So they don't.
It's wrong to draw that conclusion.
What I have said is the Supreme Court has explained how the Gender Recognition Act and the Equalities Act work together.
And I think that's right.
But as I'm sure you also accept, because of your support for transgender rights, which I applaud you for, that we should have that debate in Parliament.
So can they?
Have the debate in Parliament.
Can women have a penis?
Last chance.
I want them to have a penis.
Last chance to answer.
I think I've answered.
I think your viewers will see I've answered that.
I don't think the viewers have got a clue what you think.
Well, let's see.
We'll see.
We'll have a poll.
Hey, David, good to see you.
Lovely to see you.
Come back soon.
The Viewers Have No Clue00:02:08
It's not just how the news is told, but what's left out, which concerns me.
And when a friend in the business recommended I try Ground News, I gave it a go.
Quite honestly, I was impressed.
It does something brilliant, which most news platforms are afraid to do.
It's an app and a website that lines up coverage of the same story from across the spectrum, left, right, international, and lays it all out side by side.
That kind of transparency is increasingly rare and is vital.
Ground news helps you to dig in and find the facts by showing you who owns each outlet, what their bias is, and which stories are being buried.
It has an especially revealing blind spot feed, which services stories being reported almost exclusively by only one side of the political divide.
I want to hear every side before making up my mind.
Ground news makes that possible and easy.
It's independent, funded by subscribers and not corporate interests, just like my show.
And it's a tool that puts the power back in your hands.
Go to groundnews.com slash peers to claim your 40% discount for the unlimited access vantage plan and see what everyone else is missing.
That's groundnews.com slash peers.
If you're stressed about back taxes, miss the April deadline, or your books are a mess, well, don't wait.
The IRS is cracking down.
Penalties add up fast, 5% per month, and up to 25% for not filing.
Tax Network USA can help.
They've assisted thousands of Americans from employees to business owners and people who haven't filed for years.
They have direct access to powerful IRS programs and expert negotiators on your side.
Tax Network USA knows how to win.
You'll get a free consultation and they may even be able to reduce or eliminate what you owe.
So don't wait for the next IRS letter.
Call 800-958-1000 or visit tnusa.com slash peers.
That's t-n-usa.com slash peers for expert help on your taxes.
Well, joining me with an alternative view of this historic state visit, I'll Ben Ferguson, the co-host of the verdict with Ted Cruz, Winston Marshall, host of the Winston Marshall Show, Louise Mensch, former Conservative MP and Trump critic.
Free Speech Requires Accountability00:15:30
Welcome to all of you.
Ben Ferguson, let me start with you.
This is a man who wants to be the next Prime Minister of the UK.
What do you think?
Oh, you're on mute, Ben.
You're on mute.
Skeleton free man right there.
That's what you just witnessed.
The guy that's like, I don't believe in anything.
Just elect me to something and then we'll debate it in parliament instead of giving you my opinion on it.
I've seen squishy leaders before, Piers, but that's got to be the squishiest leader I've seen in 2025 in the UK.
So congratulations, golf clap for that guy.
Like, we debate if they have a penis or not.
Like, I was waiting for you to ask him, like, would you make out with a chick that has a penis?
Like, I just like, I don't know how much more you got to be blunt with a guy like that, but the idea that we have to wait till we get to parliament to give you my opinion, isn't that what elections are supposed to be about?
And this is the demise of the left, not just like in the US where I am, all over the world.
If you can't define what a woman is, and then you say when you're pressed on it, well, we have to have a debate.
Well, I'm going to defer to the court system.
Then why are you a politician?
Like, what is the point of voting for you?
And also, I do think, and I'll bring Louise in here as the, I believe, still self-identifying woman.
You know, that was sort of fascinating to watch Ed Davy squirm so much and just still refuse to just come out and say it, even though it's now settled law in the UK.
And this guy, you know, he does want to be prime minister.
What did you make of it?
Well, this is the Liberal Democrats, Piers.
No fence left unsat on.
You gave him five minutes to answer a simple question.
Do you believe it?
I almost was sitting there going, for God's sakes, man, say that biological women can't and trans women can, if that's your position, but just tell the truth.
Of course, women do not have a penis and men don't have a womb.
And I'm always struck by how close we are to Monty Python's life of Brian, where some going, Stan can't have babies, but he can have the right to have babies.
I really hope President Trump wasn't watching that part of your show, because what is he going to think?
I was cringing, to be quite frank with you.
Well, and also, I mean, Winston, when I was talking him through the U-turns that all the Labour government top people have done on Trump, I mean, it is quite entertaining because they've all trashed him for years in opposition, exactly as Ed Davy.
Actually, he was a bit more circumspect about Trump, but they all do this in opposition.
But the moment they get a whiff of power, actual power, the genuflecting knows no bounds.
And I thought Yvette Cooper's 11-second hand clasping last night at Stansted Airport was really quite something.
What should we make of this?
Well, I mean, I make of it that none of these people had any principles and that we shouldn't actually take their word for anything.
Although, I will say, I was a little pleased that they actually acted like adults finally when they came to power.
And there's not much support for the Starma government at the moment on many metrics or any, although it seems that maybe on his behavior at the world stage, he's been a little bit better.
But I've got to talk about Sir Ed Davy.
That was absolutely hilarious.
And I think that why is it that we only hear about this guy and indeed the Liberal Democrats when he's making a total prat of himself on the national scale?
He actually was dishonest with you.
He said that he didn't say quite clearly women have penis, but Nick Ferrari and LBC did ask, so a woman have a penis.
Well, actually, you know what?
We've got the clip now, which I wish I'd had at the time because it was right.
Let's play the clip.
I think we need to manage this and think about it and debate it with a bit more maturity and a bit more compassion.
Well, that's what Sir Kirstama once said to me.
And he never did answer the question, can a woman have a penis?
Well, I've just answered that question.
They can.
Listen, I've made it really clear that if people, The vast majority of people will have the same gender as their biological sex, but a small number won't.
So a woman can have a penis.
Well, quite clearly.
Quite clearly.
Yeah.
I mean, literally, he literally said it and then sat here and had the brass neck to say it.
I never said it, which is the other great trait of politicians.
You know, you really actually, the key thing in this whole situation is that he snubbed the king.
It's not that he snubbed Trump.
He snubbed the king.
I agree.
And that's the really, that's the thing why this is so embarrassing and actually a little bit humiliating for him.
There's another dig he made in your interview where he sort of implied that Trump was neither a liberal or a democrat.
I remind you and your listeners that this Ed Davy campaigned against Brexit.
He campaigned for the EU to have more sovereignty over, or rather for Britain to have less sovereignty.
And after Brexit, nearly 10 years since, he has campaigned against the democratic will of the British people.
So he had quite some ghoul there to accuse Trump of being neither liberal nor democratic.
And I'd also like to point out his point about the tariffs.
Now, it is the case that Trump has given Britain a very favourable deal in the tariffs.
He gave us a deal before he's, he hasn't even finished a deal with the Europeans yet, the EU yet.
And he gave us a 10% deal, which is far more preferable than nations around the world.
And if Ed Davy took the care to understand why Trump was putting in the tariffs, the whole objective was to help the working people of America to reindustrialize America to bring onshore back jobs.
He might understand that the same problems we have in Britain, the same problems we have in Britain, there are working people in Britain that over the last 40, 50 years have had their jobs taken away from them.
We've offshored a lot of manufacturing, a lot of jobs.
If he understood that, he might actually think that such a policy might be suitable here.
You know, it's interesting, Louise.
I mean, I think you're not in favour of Trump getting all the pomp ceremony of a second state visit.
Is that right?
Not at all.
That is completely wrong.
I'm a dual citizen.
I've got two hats on here.
As an American, I find it frankly offensive that Ed Davy thinks he can tell us who we elect as a sovereign choice.
And let me say that I voted for Carmel Harris.
I am not a Trump supporter.
I'm not trying to rewrite history here.
But really, that's a sovereign choice of the American people.
Keep your nose out of our business, Mr. Liberal Democrat.
As a British citizen, I am ashamed and embarrassed that the leader of one of our still major parties thinks it's a good idea to boycott the president of the United States.
This is a state visit.
He has his presidential head of state hat on.
It is rude.
I don't agree with you that the important thing is that he's snubbing the king.
The king will get over it, quite frankly.
I think the important thing here is that he's snubbing President Trump on a visit which is very, very important to the UK for the reasons that your other guest just gave.
The king exercised soft power so well when he wrote to President Trump and continued that correspondence while President Trump was out of office.
That was a massive exercise of soft power, which has paid huge dividends for the United Kingdom.
And if President Trump is watching, you are so welcome here, Mr. President.
And I would say that about any president of the United States.
If people could just wind their neck in and keep their toys inside the pram, that would be great.
In terms of Yvette Cooper, I think you're a little harsh.
Look, time, great healer, lousy beautician.
Like JD Vance, she's really got to understand that she is in government now, that she's changed her opinion.
And what we don't need is British politicians insulting the president.
Well, I agree.
I don't disagree.
It was the scale of the sycophancy, the 11-second hand-clasping and slight genuine flannel.
Ben, my apologies for misrepresenting you at the start there, Louise.
I thought you were going to be critical, but you weren't.
Ben, you know what's interesting, Ben, about the Trump state visit.
Very few protests.
I mean, literally, just a handful of people running around with silly black yards, right?
Last time, Mayhem, when he came in the first term.
So I think there's a definite change of attitude towards Trump in the UK.
Interestingly, The Economist magazine came out this week and said that whilst UK people generally don't like Trump personally very much, they are gravitating more and more to Trumpism.
And that's why I went through some of the issues with Ed Davy.
You know, 36% of Britons actually think that Trump's Trumpism, you know, his policies, the way he sees the world, they agree with it, which is significantly higher than the number who like him personally.
And this goes to my general held belief.
You don't have to like Trump personally to like what he does.
Yeah.
Look, I think now he's also a very different man than he was in 16.
You were around him in 16, so is I.
I think he's looking at the world differently.
I think he's got the right people around him that are helping him.
I think he generally wants to make sure that we're not starting wars, but we're making sure that people are safe and people are free and that people can say what they believe in and disagree with and have a grand debate.
I also think that he understands that you need to have great relations with countries like the UK.
I go back to your guest a moment ago and look, real leaders show up and they lead.
Fake leaders try to make a moment that they should be in the room, a moment about themselves and try to raise their name ID.
He did that, but I'll make a prediction here.
He will not be the man who leads the UK moving forward if this is all he has to offer, because great leaders understand that if you want to be in the room with other great leaders to get deals done that are great for your country and you show up for work, you don't run away from work.
This is, I would argue, one of the biggest nights of work for both countries.
You get in that room, you talk to each other, you build foreign relationships with one another, and then you have the groundwork and the foundation for other great things moving forward.
And by the way, we don't know when the UK and the US are going to have to be like this on a national security issue again, like we were after 9-11.
The leaders in that room, they're the ones that can trust each other.
And the ones that aren't there, they're putting their national security at risk as well.
So be a Yahoo, but great leaders show up, whether you're a liberal or a conservative, when things need to get done.
And tariffs right now, this is the most important thing, I think, in the UK.
It's also extremely important in the US.
Why would you not want to be in that game?
I agree.
I agree.
Get in the damn game and quit your job.
The other thing, Winston, I think I'm really exercised about, and I hope this comes up during this visit from Donald Trump, but also Kierstan, is free speech.
You know, it seems to me.
I've got a problem in the UK right now.
Well, there's a problem in America too, Ben, with respect.
You've just had Charlie Kirk murdered for his speech, right?
We had a comedian arrested by armed police for cracking jokes on social media.
That was appalling.
But what happened to Charlie Kirk is immeasurably more appalling.
And Winston, it goes to the heart of what a democracy is.
You know, you either believe a democracy is based on a bedrock of freedom, freedom of speech and freedom of expression in particular, or you don't.
And it seems to me people have, they've lost that ability to understand what free speech actually is.
Well, the famous example here, I think, is referring to Attorney General Pam Bondi, who said over the last couple of days that there's free speech and there's hate speech.
Now, I will note that almost everyone on the American right has come out and criticized Bondi for that comment.
She walked it back on social media as well.
She did.
Trump himself gave a pretty woolly response, actually.
I didn't think it was a very good one, but it might be that it didn't land either way.
Her talking about hate speeches is exactly why Britain is in the mess that it is.
We have had basically 60 years of hate speech laws accreting, which have culminated, as you say, of Graeme Linehan arrested upon arrival for three jokes that he posted on X.
I would say generally the Trump administration have been better on free speech, Britain's free speech woes than our own government.
And not only has JD Vance called out those who have been arrested in Britain for silent prayer, but they sent a secret delegation.
The Telegraph reported on this.
They sent a secret delegation to Britain to investigate the silent prayer issue that we've had.
You remember at the various meetings, like Trump's, it wasn't a state visit, it was a holiday visit up to Scotland about two months ago.
Again, that came up.
It came up when Bev Turner of GB News was on the Air Force One return flight.
They had a conversation that came out about Lucy Connolly, the woman who was sentenced to 31 months for tweets after the 2024 writes.
It does seem that the Americans understand Britain and Europe's free speech issue better than we do here.
This whole issue of free speech is incredibly important, isn't it?
Yes, it is.
Absolutely.
Look, as I've said before, Charlie Kirk, obviously, I did not agree with his views, but nothing bad should have happened to him.
And it is so sad that when he was killed, he was there under the slogan, change my mind.
He was advocating for debate, and that is what is so important.
And Trump is, to be fair to him, a real champion of free speech.
And hopefully he can influence us in a good way during this state visit.
I'm sure that he will bring it up and he'd be right to do so.
Nigel Farage is right to bring this up in the United States.
We always used to have free speech in this country.
We should not have laws that criminalize hate speech.
If I were in government, I would repeal them.
They have been nothing but trouble.
We have the armed police arresting a comedian, Graham Linehan, for jokes, by the way, about trans issues and taking him off a plane with guns drawn.
And yet we cannot get the cops to come round and police shoplifting, which is at an all-time high in the United Kingdom.
We're talking about...
Political speech.
That's the problem is the political speech.
These laws have been abused.
And this is where I think the president is...
And what we really need is a wholesale reform of the law.
We need to get rid of the law that criminalizes hate speech.
In the United States, racism, although bad and condemned, is very specifically protected by the First Amendment.
If you want to be an idiot, go ahead and be an idiot.
Unless you are inciting violence...
That's right.
Unless you're inciting violence and citing murder, that's not covered.
Apart from that, all speech ought to be legal and then let your ideas condemn you.
And by the way, that doesn't mean you're not accountable for what you say.
So if you're a teacher, if you're a teacher and you want to glorify in the murder of a young man, it may be that your school board decides you should not be a teacher.
And most people would agree with that.
That's called accountability.
Free speech is about accountability for your actions, but that applies not just to your speech, but to your general behavior and actions.
My panel, I thank you all very much.
I'm glad you were here to witness the interview with the man who would be our next prime minister.
It was...
And Piers, I just want to be clear.
You do know that women don't have penises, right?
I just want to make that very clear.
You're a Brenda Czech.
We're all clear, but I'm fairly sure that the leader of the Liberal Democrats is a little confused.
Thank you all very much.
Piers Morgan Panel Conclusion00:00:24
Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent.
The only boss around here is me.
You enjoy our show.
We offer only one simple thing.
Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.
And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate, and entertain.
And we'll do it all for free.
Independent on centre media has never been more critical and we couldn't do it Without you.