Trish Regan analyzes a CNN pollster's claim that the Trump administration is the century's most influential, citing an 18% tariff rate and 180 executive orders. She contrasts this with alleged bias against anchors like Jake Tapper and criticizes Democrats for avoiding Texas redistricting votes due to fear of Trump's consolidated power. The segment concludes with Trump threatening accountability for Hillary Clinton regarding the "Russia hoax," suggesting ongoing conspiracies lack a statute of limitations, implying a shift in political accountability mechanisms. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, Qwen/Qwen3-ForcedAligner-0.6B, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Texas Politics and Bad Numbers00:14:17
And we're live.
Good to be with all of you here today.
I have been traveling and traveling the countryside here, all the way from the southeastern part of Ireland up more towards outside Dublin.
Anyway, it's good to be with you here.
We got big news because Jasmine Crockett, I'm telling you, I mean, Texas may finally be rid of her.
Can you imagine that?
Wouldn't that be great?
Like to actually not have to have a representative?
Leslie, if you're watching, I know that you're all for that one.
Jasmine Crockett may actually find herself.
Redistricted out of Texas.
Is that a word?
Well, now it is.
Okay.
Gerrymandering coming back to bite them big time.
Meanwhile, an anchor on CNN is completely stunning everybody.
We're like, is he going to still have a job tomorrow?
I mean, wow, wait till you hear this sound by actually admitting the truth.
A CNN anchor.
I mean, we got to take a moment to pause, everyone, right?
You know, take a breath.
Remember this moment in time.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump has some choice words for Hillary Clinton.
I have asked him previously.
You know, Mr. President, like, why didn't you go after her?
And he's like, You know, I didn't want to at the time, but now, now I'm all in.
We got a big show live for you here today on the Trish Reagan Show.
Make sure you subscribe, share, like, all that good stuff.
And wow, we got to mark this moment in time because, hallelujah, CNN actually said something that was truthful.
I don't know if this guy's going to be able to hang on to his job.
I'm sure his colleagues are really just a little teeny bit annoyed with him because he keeps dropping these truth bombs.
But you know, I got to give credit where credit is due.
You got Harry Enton.
Harry Enton, ladies and gentlemen, remember that name.
He's the guy that does all the polling stuff and he's been looking at all the information as it comes in in real time.
And he actually went out and admitted, okay, like I said, mark this historic moment because we don't know if it'll happen again.
But mark it.
He admitted this.
Take a peek.
The Donald Trump administration is arguably the most influential this century and probably as well, dating back a good portion of the last century as well.
Love it, like it, lump it.
Trump is remaking in the United States of America.
Let's talk about tariffs first, right?
There's all this talk that Donald Trump always chickens out when it comes to tariffs.
Uh, uh, no tacos for Trump.
The effective tariff rate.
Get this.
It's 18%.
The highest.
The highest since the FDR administration in the 1930s up from, get this, just 2% last year.
From just 2% last year, we're talking about a level, an effective tariff rate level.
Get this.
Nine times as high this year than last year.
But it's not just on tariffs, which of course Donald Trump ran on, in which you're seeing a tremendously influential presidency.
What about immigration?
Of course, Trump ran and has always run on a very hawkish immigration platform.
Get this.
2025 net migration in the United States down at least 60% from last year.
In fact, we may be heading for the first time in at least 50 years in which we have net negative, net negative migration into the United States.
And last year, of course, in 2024, the net migration in the U.S. was 2.8 million.
This year, we might be talking about negative net migration.
My goodness gracious.
Now, of course, this is part of the larger story, as I was mentioning.
We're talking about immigration, net migration.
We're talking about the effective tariff rate.
But get this how is Donald Trump doing it?
Well, he is signing a ton of executive orders.
Get this 180, the most in a year since Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Oh, my goodness.
You have to go back to the first half. of the 20th century, the last century.
And to make a comparison, Joe Biden signed, get this, just 77 during his entire first year.
And we're only a little bit in August so far.
And Donald Trump making history with 180, 180 executive orders signed so far this year.
So that's why I said that in my mind, Donald Trump is the most influential president of this century and probably dating back a good portion of the last century.
That is because he is remaking the country in terms of tariffs.
He is remaking the country in terms Of net migration.
And he is remaking the country in terms of how much policy changes he's putting through and executive orders.
As I said, it truly is history making.
Love it, like it, or lump it.
Whoa!
I mean, Harry, hold on to your hat.
Gosh almighty, what's going to happen to that guy?
Did you hear that?
Love it, lump it.
What was that one?
I mean, but he did say, look, he is becoming, he will be the most influential president in history.
And those net migration numbers are so.
Staggering, right?
And then you look at what's happened on the tariff front, on the economic front, really kind of just reinventing everything on the economic front.
And what do we have?
We got a market.
Didn't I tell you to buy on Friday?
Listen to me.
Listen to me.
76research.com.
Look at this.
We got a market that's on a tear again today.
So, really, really good news to see there with the Dow up 1.3%, the SP up 1.35%, the NASDAQ up nearly 2%.
Quite a recovery after what we saw on Friday.
People weren't so happy with the jobs report.
But I'm telling you, by the way, That the whole other thing that we haven't talked about, I know he got rid of the woman who was in charge of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, but I'm just gonna say this.
She didn't always have the best numbers.
Even going back through Biden, like the numbers were really wacky.
These numbers are always wacky, actually.
They've been like for the last 20 years, as long as I've been covering them, pretty darn wacky, and they get revision after revision after revision.
But in her case, they were especially bad.
And I'm not the only one saying this.
I mean, aside from your politics, et cetera, she had kind of a history of bad numbers.
But this is wild.
So, Harry Anton, again, I just gotta hear that little bit in the beginning.
Was it love it?
Lump it.
I didn't quite get it.
Did you guys?
Let's take a peek.
The Donald Trump administration is arguably the most influential this century and probably as well, dating back a good portion of the last century as well.
Love it, like it, lump it.
Trump is remaking in the United States of America.
Let's talk about tariffs.
Okay.
That's pretty good.
Love it, like it, lump it.
He is the most influential president we have had in generations.
I mean, you've got to go back to FDR to see anything like it.
And I got to give this guy credit.
You know, this isn't the first time he's kind of come down and stunned people.
He came out recently when he was just talking about polling numbers, saying, look, you know, you guys may not buy it on the other side of the anchor desk, but here's where America is.
Watch.
At a particular point, the Democratic brand is in the basement.
It is total and complete garbage in the mind of the American public.
The Democratic Party's net favorable rating, record lows in all three.
Wall Street Journal, 30 points underwater.
CNN, 26 points underwater.
Gallup, 26 points underwater.
And that is being driven in large part by discontent within the Democratic base.
The Democratic base wants something different.
We'll ultimately end up seeing who they choose.
It will be quite the thing who ultimately gets the rose.
Yeah, this is fascinating to me because, again, this is CNN.
And you know what CNN did ever since you go all the way back to 2016, right?
They've been the broken record.
Very, very, very anti Trump, very anti Trump.
And then all of a sudden, we're getting a glimpse of something else.
And it has been questioning, like, what is going on?
It's one thing with this guy because he's new on the scene.
But then, did you hear Jake Tapper the other day kind of push Nancy Pelosi in a direction that she didn't like very much?
Watch.
Nancy Pelosi became rich.
I might have to read that.
We're here to talk about the 60th anniversary of Medicaid.
That's what I agreed to come to talk about.
Yeah, but I wanted to.
What that means in the election.
I wanted to give you a chance just to respond.
He accused you of insider trading.
What's your response to that?
Whoa.
I mean, again, this is like huge, right?
For a CNN anchor to challenge the grand and mighty Nancy Pelosi.
And she's like, hang on.
And, you know, I agreed to talk about this, that, and the other.
What are you doing going out in left field and asking me about something that we haven't previously discussed?
I'm telling you, the problem with all these Democrats is they go on to their little favorite networks, which they think are their favorite networks.
I mean, good thing she's not on with Harry.
He might actually ask her some really good questions, you know, like, why are you guys basically garbage right now?
Why is it that Trump is going to become the most influential president, perhaps in history, certainly in generations?
I mean, my God.
Goodness gracious, he might actually stick some real ones to her.
But the fact that she's getting real questions, it does suggest that CNN all of a sudden might actually be paying attention to what they should have been paying attention to all along, right?
I mean, Brendan Carter has talked about this.
Brendan Carr, forgive me, has talked about this from the FCC recently, saying, you know, all these networks, they were all out in left field, one after another.
I mean, the view, especially.
And so now, consequently, they are in trouble.
They're in trouble economically, they're in trouble in that their viewership.
Their base doesn't really trust them, and it's all coming back to haunt them in a rather significant way.
Here's Brennan saying this about The View and about NBC, ABC, NBC.
They've all got troubles.
Watch.
Let's go to The View, shall we?
Joy Behar yesterday said this.
First of all, who tried to overthrow the government on January 6th?
Right, let me think.
Who was that again?
That was not Obama.
The thing about him is that he's so jealous of Obama because Obama is everything that he is not trim, smart, handsome, happily married, and can sing Al Green's song, Let's Stay Together, better than Al Green.
And Trump cannot stand it.
It's driving him crazy.
Crazy.
Jealousy is not a pretty.
Green is not a good color.
That from yesterday.
Who knows what happens today?
The White House chose to respond to that.
And this is what they said Joy Behar is an irrelevant loser suffering from a severe case of Trump derangement syndrome.
It's no surprise that the View's ratings hit an all time low last year.
She should self reflect on her own jealousy of President Trump's historic popularity before her show is the next to be pulled off air.
Is the View now in the crosshairs of this administration?
Look, it's entirely possible that there's issues over there.
I mean, again, stepping back this broader dynamic, once President Trump has exposed these media gatekeepers and smashed this facade, there's a lot of consequences.
I think the consequences of that aren't quite finished.
And look, the view's got a lot of challenges there.
It wasn't that long ago, I think one episode, one show alone, they had to stop, interrupt the show, and read four separate legal notices to try to avoid legal liability.
So I'm not surprised to hear people saying that their ratings are struggling.
Wow.
Sir, where does this end then?
Look, I think we need a course correction.
You know, it's time for America's legacy broadcasters to return to promoting the public interest.
And just recently, you know, Skydance, which is looking to acquire CBS, wrote letters to the FCC committing to serious change, to trying to root out bias, to putting in place an ombudsman that would address these issues, to returning to unbiased, trustworthy journalism.
It's going to be hard for them, though, because I'll tell you, like, the newsrooms are so biased in and of themselves.
You walk into a newsroom, and by the way, I've worked in a lot of them at CBS.
At NBC, I was a guest contributor over on ABC on Good Morning America.
I worked at Bloomberg.
I've seen it all, right?
I know how the sausage gets made.
And for whatever reason, it attracts a lot of liberal people that come out of academia and have a very particular bias.
So, how are you going to populate these newsrooms with other kinds of folks?
I mean, you can go raid Fox News maybe or Newsmax, or maybe that's just also the reality that as we move forward in this new brave world, right?
A lot of people are coming over here.
Reminder, subscribe, share, like, comment here on The Trish Regan Show, here on YouTube.
Come over here, they're coming over here and they're seeking out alternatives, alternatives to that mainstream media bias.
And so we've been able, myself and others right here, been able to offer a different point of view, one that I think, you know, hopefully is always fair, does reflect my particular bias.
And my bias is, let's just say, more right of center than it is left of center.
Thank you very much, right?
And I'm proud of that and I tell you guys that.
But I do try to make sure that you see it all because sometimes seeing it all is part of the story.
I mean, you can't really fully understand all aspects of the story until you see how crazy the other side gets.
And believe me, they get crazy.
So now they're in a situation where they've got to fight for their survival.
Is that why CNN is allowing Harry Anton to get out there on the air and say all that he had said?
Is that, well, I have no doubt he's a survivalist of sorts.
Is that why Jake Tapper has suddenly taken on Nancy Pelosi?
And shall we say, is that survival the reason that Comcast cannot wait to get rid of one Rachel Maddow?
I mean, I heard the earnings call last week.
This was hysterical because, you know, they're talking about how much revenue that they generated for Comcast, not from advertising revenue.
In fact, ad revenue was down 7%.
They did see a little bit of an increase at Peacock, but no new subs, 41 million subs.
That's not so great.
Heck almighty, we're dealing, I'm starting to sound like Harry, aren't I?
We're dealing with nearly a million here.
And it's just little old Trish Reagan right here talking to you live every day from no matter where she is in the world.
Mike Kavanaugh, Comcast president, pointed out how Love Island was doing so well and that they've had these record breaking numbers, and they're so excited about NBC Universal.
They are so excited about NBC Universal.
And then this was the quote.
This was the quote of all quotes.
Basically, after Versant is spun off, it's actually Versant, but I kind of like going with the French thing, right?
Versant.
It makes them sound a little more fancy schmancy, which is what they're all trying to be anyway.
Well, guess what?
They're going to be left with NBC broadcast Bravo, Telemundo, as well as Peacock.
Which he says are completely symbiotic, leveraging the strengths of the entertainment business, which is both scripted and reality entertainment as well as sports and news.
Oh, except that in terms of news, guess who's not there?
One kind of big news person or somebody that they used to tout as a big news person, and that would be one, Rachel Maddow.
But Rachel, she's been worried about losing her job for a while, along with the ladies over the view, right?
I mean, they've been talking and talking and talking about how Trump was going to get rid of them.
Here's the reality, folks Trump isn't getting rid of you.
No, The industry is getting rid of you.
The NBC Media Conspiracy00:03:44
And you know what?
If you're not making money on The View, if you're not making money, Rachel Maddow, you're costing them plenty 25 million reportedly a year then guess what's going to happen?
They're going to actually cut the cord, so to speak, right?
You're going to lose your job.
I do believe that this is something that happened to what our little friend over at CBS, the guy that had the comedic show that wasn't so comedic.
I mean, Stephen Colbert lost his gig, not just because he was annoying and political and politically annoying, but because he was losing $30, $40 million a year.
And so they're going to try and blame Trump.
But let me tell you, this has nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with them.
When you are so overtly biased and yet try and pretend and gaslight people to think otherwise, oh, no, no, we're the good journalists here.
We're the ones that know what we're doing.
We're the ones that, da, da, da, da.
No, no, no.
You just lie.
And it's catching up with you.
I mean, it's really, really catching up with you.
Let me show you how they're fretting over there.
This was right before the election.
Rachel Maddow, who's trying to twin with that other guy, what's his name?
Chris Hayes.
I get them confused sometimes.
Anyway, here she and Joy Behar are talking about how life is going to be H double L for journalists like them, except they're not journalists.
After Trump comes in, watch.
So, you said recently that you thought that you, as an outspoken critic, could be a target yourself.
Some people think that sounds overdramatic, but I'm right there with you.
I think that he is so vindictive that he will go after however he has to, through the IRS maybe, or even through sponsors to get us off the air maybe.
Or you.
How seriously should we be taking that?
Well, so I was asked, Am I worried about me?
And my answer was, I'm worried about all of us.
I'm no more worried about me than I am worried about everybody in the country.
I think it's bad to have somebody saying, give me as much power as you can in this country so I can use it to go after other Americans, so I can use it to go after these subhuman internal enemies and I'll destroy them.
Yeah.
Like that's just not a good system for anybody.
And I don't think anybody's safe if that's the sort of basis on which he wants to get more power.
Well, remember when Nixon had an enemies list?
That was a proud moment for a lot of people if they were on the enemies list.
Maybe we need to turn it around like that.
Well, I don't, I mean, I think that if he decides that he's going to go after you or me or anybody who's well known, you know, we have resources, we'll likely be fine.
But I think there's a pattern where he picks out individual people and effectively terrorizes them.
Yes.
I mean, there's Stormy Daniels wearing a bulletproof vest to get into the Ford House.
Yeah, it's ridiculous.
You have political violence, you have fascism following that.
So it's like they don't even hear themselves, guys.
I mean, it's like they literally have no clue how they sound.
And all the garbage, frankly, that was fed to us.
Let me just say like, The View did its share, but Rachel is the one that created that crazy rabbit hole that she would take you down every single night if you actually watch that show every single night.
I used to sometimes watch that because we had these, what they call competition monitors, at when I was at Fox Business.
And there was always like a screen up.
She wasn't on.
Maybe she was on actually at the exact same time.
No, forgive me.
She was not on the exact same time as me.
She was on after.
And sometimes I catch parts of the show and I'm like, oh my gosh, like, what is this about the right wing conspiracy that everybody keeps talking about?
Like, that is the conspiracy theorist right there.
Like, she's living, breathing proof of it over there at MSNBC.
And so I think finally now this is coming back, not because of Trump, but also not because of Trump.
I mean, I don't think it helps that they've been caught.
Redistricting Efforts in Texas00:06:12
Sort of with their pants down.
I mean, having to pay out millions and millions and millions of dollars in libel suits.
That doesn't help.
But really, what's going on is that the industry has changed so much and it has become so fractured because you have the opportunity to actually find truth and find real commentators that don't work off of prompters.
Thank you very much.
That are speaking extemporaneously and that have more transparency in their product, i.e., you know, again, me, remember, subscribe, share, like.
So this is a very different world, if you would, that we're living in right now.
And hallelujah that we've got a chance to do this.
Meanwhile, Jasmine Crockett may be living in a very different world in the very near future.
Jasmine Crockett preparing to be kicked out of Congress.
You see, there's some fireworks going on down there in the Lone Star State.
This is the letter that Greg Abbott sent.
He's kind of ticked off because, you know, they're supposed to vote on some of these redistricting issues.
And instead of actually voting, what do these guys do?
They actually decided to take off for a whole other state.
They just decided to leave and they decided they would just be, you know, absent.
Well, Gee, that really works, right?
You're not going to participate in the vote because it's take my ball and go home kind of thing.
They don't like the fact that there is some redistricting efforts going on.
She's calling it a power grab.
She says you're trying to silence voters.
It's really fascinating to me because I will say this it's fascinating in that whenever it is the Republicans that are trying to make any changes to the rules, it becomes, shall we say, a power grab.
It's racist, it's this, that, you know, everything you can imagine.
Versus when it's the other way around, think about it, when it's the other way around and you actually have the libs out there trying to change things, as they are, keep in mind, as they are, ladies and gentlemen, in California right now, then this becomes kind of, well, I'll let Hakeem say it, Hakeem Jeffries say it.
Suddenly, when it's California getting redistricted and there's a chance that maybe Republicans, or forgive me, Texas being redistricted, and there's a chance Republicans might succeed from it, it It's somehow really, really bad.
We do have the sound, but I want to play this for you before we go on to Jasmine.
Here we are.
Hakeem Jeffries.
We have to make clear to the people of Texas what's taking place.
Because it's unacceptable, unconscionable, and un American.
And as elected officials, we have that responsibility.
That's not something we can just brush aside.
There are 50 states in America.
I'm here in Texas for a reason.
Because these legislators are standing up.
These members of Congress are standing up and communicating to the people of Texas what's occurring right now in the middle of the summer at a special session.
We will make clear that we're going to do everything possible to support the Texas legislators as they consider the best ways to push back.
It's an all hands on deck moment, and all options should be on the table to protect the people of Texas.
But Texas Democrats are going to be the ones to decide that.
We will fight them politically, we will fight them governmentally.
We will fight them in court.
We will fight them in terms of winning the hearts and minds of the people of Texas and beyond.
The Texas Democrats are going to show up and stand up and speak up for what's right for the people of Texas.
And they're showing courage and conviction and character.
Except that they're not actually showing up.
They're not actually showing up to help the people of Texas because they're not even showing up to vote.
I mean, this is what is driving Governor Abbott so crazy.
So there's this.
New map, basically, that well keeps Jasmine out.
So she would not be able to run in her district again.
And she's pretty upset about it, as clearly Hakeem Jeffries is as well.
Now, again, you flip the tables and they'll lose it all day long.
And yet, here we are in this day, at this moment, listening to Jasmine go on about her address.
Take a listen.
I know that this legislature did ask us as members of Congress to confirm our addresses.
I don't know how many of us actually still reside in the districts that we represent.
I do not currently reside in my district based upon the plan that has been drawn, which is another red flag in addition to courts consistently looking at how many people have been moved.
How many people have been moved?
Apparently, she's gonna get moved.
So, Governor Abbott is look, you know, this is politics, folks, okay?
Welcome to the real world.
And this could actually mean that she's going to lose her current district.
Which means she's probably going to lose her seat.
It had to happen sooner or later, right?
It had to happen.
Anyway, she's calling this a power grab to silence voters.
It's a sham.
She says it targets minority voices.
She's arguing that it undermines fair representation, you know, the whole kit and caboodle.
But if you think about what she has an opportunity to do right now, it's to actually vote against this.
But they're not doing this.
Instead, they're actually leaving the state.
They want to actually break quorum, as it's called, and prevent the Texas House from advancing this redistricting bill.
And it's like, you know, take my ball.
And go home, kind of thing.
Like, I'm just not going to show up because I don't like what you guys are doing.
And they've tried that before, actually.
And it's really kind of a lousy thing to do, right?
I'm sorry, you don't have the votes and this is becoming an issue.
And instead of actually staying and trying to work through this, your idea is that you're just going to leave altogether, leave.
Supreme Court Legitimacy Crisis00:03:22
And that's, in fact, what they've done.
So all the Democrats are leaving.
And guess what?
Abbott's like, listen, you guys are actually going to be out, period.
Like, we're going to really, really be done with you.
We're going to fine you, too.
You're going to be paid a lot of fines, and you're not going to be able to use any political money for those fines.
So, Jasmine, we hope you have deep pockets.
So, that's where we are right now.
He's made it very clear that they're not to do this.
And so, we'll see how this works out in the coming hours.
Actually, we'll probably learn more information tonight.
I'm curious to see what you guys think about this because it's really pretty bad that they just would get up and leave and have that be the solution as opposed to coming and trying to work with people and vote on stuff.
That is not the way to do things.
But you know what?
I'm not Jasmine Crockett.
And Jasmine has her own, shall we say, way of doing things.
Look, they're afraid of Trump in every way, shape, or form right now.
And they figure if they can just stack the deck, and that's what they're talking about doing in California, they want to get five more seats.
If they can stack the deck, they can then have a shot at impeaching him and stopping him from all the success that we started the show with, right?
That Harry Anton was talking about.
He's got all of these legislative orders, he's got all these executive orders that are going through.
And by the way, this is.
The Supreme Court is actually confirming so many of them.
So, even though you have federal judges trying to like muck it up, you've got the Supreme Court saying, No, you know, he has this authority.
And so, this terrifies Democrats, really terrifies them.
As this one MSNBC contributor basically led on, they are freaked out by the amount of power Donald Trump now has.
Because you see, when the people are with you and you hold the Oval Office and you got Congress and you got Senate, you got a lot of power for sure.
Oh, and you get the Supreme Court.
You get more conservatives than you have liberals on the Supreme Court.
You got it all, baby, right?
Listen to her.
They see all this power that President Trump has amassed, and they're very shaken by it.
And they're not also really understanding how not only did they lose it, yes, it was a close election, but they lost every battleground state.
And that's something that I think Democrats are still trying to wrap their heads around.
Trying.
You lost it all, guys.
You lost it all.
And now, this time around, oh, gosh darn it, you can't say what you said before.
You know what they said before.
I know what they said before.
They went right back to the well, right?
Why did they lose it before?
Oh, it was Russian interference.
That's why.
Well, you know, you can only try that so many times.
And by the way, cat's out of the bag.
You guys might be going down, like in history and like really going down.
Like, we might actually be going down to Georgia, so to speak, right?
Like, you're going to the slammer for some of this stuff.
I think I'm going to get to what Donald Trump's saying on this in just a moment.
But remember, they don't have this narrative anymore.
Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016, he lost the election and he was put into office because the Russians interfered.
Trump knows he's an illegitimate president.
Elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate.
I don't see this president elect as a legitimate president.
You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the election.
I do.
We have a president.
Okay, so you know the drill.
They did this over and over and over again.
Trump's Illegitimate Presidency00:09:26
And so they don't have that to fall back on this time.
So yeah, they're kind of freaked out that he's got a lot of power, but they gave it to him.
And gosh darn it, they're going to still give it to him.
Oh, I got a great soundbite.
I got to play you a little bit later on of JD Vance.
Talking about Sydney Sweeney, and he's like, Listen, if you're gonna jump all over Americans because they think she's kind of hot and she looks good in a pair of jeans, and you're gonna accuse them of being racist or god knows what else, even worse, because of that, you keep doing that, guys.
We're gonna keep winning elections, all right?
We're gonna win them all day long, and that's what's happening.
Meanwhile, they are in trouble.
They are in trouble.
Hillary Clinton is in real trouble.
I mean, serious trouble.
I'm gonna get to that in a second, but first.
A little shout out for one of our sponsors here on the show, Balance in Nature.
We love our friends at Balance in Nature.
You know, they've been great.
And I just have to say, it is wonderful to have such terrific sponsors like Balance in Nature.
I'm just going to say that because I come on here every day and this show is totally for free.
And I love that it can be for free.
I mean, it really is a special bond that we've been able to build together.
And look, we're building a channel, I'm able to build a business.
And so, just a very special shout out to these guys because they have helped to make all this possible, really and truly.
They've got great stuff, great, great, great, great stuff.
So, I'm a big believer in taking your vitamins and drinking enough water and exercising, all these things, eating right.
But I get it, it's not easy, especially right now.
Like I'm traveling, it's not always easy to eat as well as I'd like.
It's easier in Europe, although I will give RFK Jr. a lot of credit.
Hopefully, it's going to get easier to eat well in the USA as well.
But I would say that this is a big part, for me anyway, of healthy living, balance in nature.
They have a lot of things on their website.
Go check it out.
You get 35% off with code word Trish, T R I S H.
And you can call them directly, 1 800 2468 751.
It's 1 800 2468 751.
Use that code word Trish.
It helps me.
It helps the show.
You're helping yourself.
You get the 35% off, plus you get the free shipping, plus you get money back guarantees.
So if you don't like it, no harm, no foul.
Okay, we got to get.
To what Donald Trump is doing on one Hillary Clinton.
This is incredible.
Trump is not kidding this time around, okay?
Trump is not kidding.
And this is a whole different ballgame, shall we say.
This is a different kind of administration.
He's coming in eyes wide open.
He knows what happened before.
I've talked to him about what happened before.
You had a chance with Hillary.
Why didn't you take it?
And you know what?
He said something that I thought was really noble.
He said to me, and by the way, he said this to other people, and he actually mentions it in the interview clip I want to show you, but he said, Directly, me.
He's like, Look, you know, she was the wife of a president.
I ran against her.
I just didn't think it was a good thing to do.
It felt kind of, you know, banana republic.
Like that's what they do in other countries.
It's not what we do here in the U.S.
And so he opted not to take that opportunity.
There was no sort of revenge that he wanted.
He's not a vengeful guy.
He actually just wanted to do what he could to get the economy right and do this, that, and the other.
But they turned on him immediately from day one.
And they tried to undermine, frankly, the will of the American people by not allowing him to succeed.
He succeeded anyway.
I mean, you looked at the best.
Rise in median wages that we had seen up until March 2020 of any administration going all the way back to JFK.
So there were a lot of things that were very good that he did, but that was all in spite, in spite of them and in spite of the situation that they were presenting.
And so now he's like, okay, you know what?
The gloves are off.
I'm back, second time around.
So listen to what he says in this Newsmax clip.
I think this is with Finnerty.
Let's listen in and hear what Trump is saying because Hillary, you're on notice.
Two emails, Mr. President, suggest essentially that Hillary Clinton personally approved the Russia hoax.
With Obama.
With Barack Obama.
And my question is, is she finally going to pay for what she did or does she get a pass again?
So, you know, we had her and I had her right under the sights and I told the people, look, you can't do this to a president's wife, an ex president, and she was secretary of state, but you can't do this to the wife of.
a president.
And if you remember, if you, well, I'll tell you how I feel about it in a sec.
If you remember, it was at a rally and it was after the election and they said, lock her up, lock her up.
And I said, no, no, no, look, we won, just relax.
And I didn't do what other people would have done, what they would have done.
And then they went after me and they meant it.
I said, you know, it's amazing.
I felt, always felt that you shouldn't be doing this stuff.
And I let Hillary off the hook.
I totally left her off the hook.
And then I let her off the hook, you know, for what?
And then I come in and they did the same thing to me.
The difference is they actually meant it.
And they drove, they hurt a lot of people, a lot of people.
And it was all a hoax.
And now they have it in black and white.
No, I think they should pay a price.
How?
By the way, it's a very big price.
It could be the biggest scandal in the history of our country, but it continues onward.
And that continues onward.
You know, that scandal has continued from the beginning.
They have everything they do as a hoax.
They're no good at anything other than some forms of nasty politics.
So it does seem to me he's putting Hillary Clinton on notice.
That was pretty clear.
He said they should pay a price.
He wants them to pay a price.
So he's demanding this accountability, including from the likes of Hillary Clinton.
And this is him the other day saying the Russia hoax is totally undisputed.
The facts are in there, it's black and white, it's the biggest scandal in American history.
Must pay a big price.
This can never be allowed to happen in the country again.
He put these out on social media.
So he's been very active on this.
And then, of course, you heard what he said to Newsmax.
So he's demanding some accountability, right?
He wants some accountability.
And it's important, frankly, for America that we get that accountability.
Reminder subscribe, share, like, all that good stuff, because it's very important.
We need to be able to continue having a voice here so that you're able to demand, frankly, accountability too.
It's all about transparency and knowing what's going on.
I want to go to Kash Patel.
Some of you saw this the other day.
He actually recently was talking about those berm bags, some things that he's found in FBI headquarters, something that Tulsi's taking very seriously.
And if you think about this, and I'm going to show you something else, a little preview of it.
Radcliffe over at the CIA saying, We're going to unclassify more stuff.
Listen, this is not going to be good for these guys.
Me, as the director of the FBI, the former Russiagate guy, when I first got to the bureau, found a room that Comey and others hid from the world.
In the Hoover building, full of documents and computer hard drives that no one had ever seen or heard of.
Locked the key and hit access and just said, No one's ever going to find this place.
What?
Yeah.
So my guys are going through that right now.
What's in there?
A lot of stuff.
I mean, that's the thing.
People are like, Well, okay, go arrest them.
And I'm like, okay, well, how about you let me run a methodical investigation?
So at this point, it does sound like there's going to be some accountability, right?
So he's got these quote unquote burn bags.
They are saying they're going to release more intelligence.
And some of the things that have come up is the question of whether or not there's a statute of limitations that would come into effect.
And I want to show you a clip from a guy who's very, very smart, right?
He's his big advisor to the president, Stephen Miller, former attorney.
Very, very sort of skilled on a lot of these legal issues.
It's one of the reasons why they're having the success that they're having right now.
I want you to hear what he has to say about Statue of Limitations.
I would be very nervous right now if I were Brennan, Comey, Hillary, the whole kit and caboodle of them, all of them, all of them are in jeopardy.
Hour and the moment for accountability so that we can reclaim this democracy, Maria.
Well, do you believe we will actually get accountability?
We've been demanding accountability now for a decade.
Our audience is well aware that this is the biggest political scandal we have ever seen and an effort to undermine and take down a duly elected president.
But now we want to see the tricksters face the consequences.
Will they?
I have complete confidence in the Department of Justice to follow these facts, to follow this new, further avalanche of evidence, and to take all the necessary legal steps to ensure.
That the wrongdoers, the coup plotters, the schemers, and the insurrectionists are held fully accountable under the laws and constitution of these United States.
Yes, Maria, I believe that.
Now, last weekend, John Ratcliffe, CIA director who is a former prosecutor, former DNI, told us that the statute of limitations, the five year statute, does not apply when it comes to conspiracy.
And he says the conspiracy is ongoing because they still won't admit it.
The conspiracy is still happening.
So what is your take on what Radcliffe told us last week.