Trish Regan reports a federal appeals court victory for Donald Trump over Governor Gavin Newsom regarding National Guard jurisdiction, citing the Supremacy Clause. She details Senator Alex Padilla's arrest at a DHS event, contrasting it with Representative LaMonica MacGyver's assault charges, while alleging Democratic "No Kings" theater involves Chinese funding and Christy Walton's Walmart boycott risks. The segment also covers rising global tensions between Iran and Israel, market stability despite geopolitical chaos, and speculates that legal figures may leverage the Insurrection Act amidst escalating domestic disorder. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, Qwen/Qwen3-ForcedAligner-0.6B, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Big Deal Court Ruling00:08:28
And we're live.
I believe.
Here we are.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is a big, big deal.
What did I tell you was going to happen?
About 24 hours ago, I said that there was no way that the court could actually rule that Donald Trump wouldn't have jurisdiction over that National Guard effort in California.
And it turns out, was I right or was I right?
Right?
I was right.
And I was right because, you see, we have this thing called the Supremacy Clause.
We have the Commerce Clause.
We have a whole variety of things that actually puts him in the lead.
Just letting everyone know we are live here on the Trish Regan Show.
If you haven't subscribed, do me that favor.
Make sure you subscribe.
We've got a big Friday and a big weekend coming up.
Oh my gosh.
Feds totally trumping.
Pun intended.
One Gavin Newsom, right?
Unbelievable.
All right.
And then you had that senator, a senator, mind you.
Like what is the world coming to?
Getting cuffed and getting dragged out at Christy Gnome's event, the DHS event.
It was a press event.
What's he doing?
Storming the stage.
We've got video of that.
Speaker Johnson now calling.
for him to be censured, possibly removed from committees, possibly kicked out of the Senate.
For goodness sakes, this is not how we behave.
Even CNN knows that's wrong.
Indeed, you get the Democrats getting all revved up for their big protest weekend.
No kings.
And you know who's in the crossfires for that?
Walmart.
Yeah, Walmart.
Ooh, boycotts are serious.
Don't mess with MAGA, right?
Welcome to the show, everyone.
Good to have you here on Trish, Trish Regan Show.
Make sure you subscribe, share, like, all that good stuff.
make a comment.
As I said, we are live here on this Friday.
And I got to tell you, the National Guard can stay.
That is the verdict of the appellate court judge crossing late, late, late last night.
Just unbelievable.
Really, really unbelievable to see.
And you know what?
It comes just as Gavin Newsom was trying to say, hey, you know, like I'm the only deal in town.
Hey, at 12 noon on the West Coast, you guys are going to have to all leave.
And guess what?
Not the case.
Meanwhile, you get some weird stuff going on out there.
I mean, the senator started storming Christy Noam's DHS event, right?
That she was having for reporters and for press.
And like, it didn't even make any sense.
Who would do this, right?
Why would you go up yelling at the stage?
Nobody knew who he was.
I mean, listen, I'm in the news business and I had never really seen this guy.
He had been appointed, okay, by Newsom.
So nobody knew who he was.
He wasn't wearing his Senate pin.
Dan Bongino.
Our friend Dan.
He's livid about it.
He's like, look, the FBI is just doing their jobs, Secret Service just doing their job, because when somebody does this it's kind of not okay.
All right, let's watch together.
I'm sender Alex.
I have questions for the secretary, because the fact of the matter is a half a dozen signing criminals that you're rotating on your, on your hands off.
How many of our ice agents See that?
Okay, so then they grabbed it.
We should watch it together again.
Let me put my camera up so you can see me.
Alexander, Alex, put it in.
I have questions for the secretary because the fact of the matter is a half a dozen.
Okay, so he's not really pushing back.
But you can see, you know, the issue here is that he's storming the stage.
She's up there speaking and nobody really knows who he is.
I mean, he did identify himself just a little bit there.
Let's go back for a moment and see what he says.
Here we go.
I have questions for the secretary.
Okay, let's see if he says who he is.
Okay, barely.
I am Senator Alex Padilla.
I'm Senator Alex Padilla.
I have questions for the secretary.
Because the fact of the matter is a half a dozen cyber criminals that you're rotating on your I mean, he's doing it all on stage.
Come on.
And so then you get the FBI there.
And then you see the FBI guys, they take him down and they handcuff him.
And the left is now going crazy.
But I'm looking at it and saying, who the heck storms the stage?
I mean, come on.
Like, time and place.
I mean, do we have to go back to that?
Like La Monica all over again out in New Jersey.
Really and truly, people, come on.
So they're all freaking out.
But I'm telling you that he was worried to be a security threat.
Okay.
And this is a DHS event.
Let's watch her reaction.
I would say as we were conducting a press conference to update everyone on the enforcement actions that are ongoing to bring peace to the city of Los Angeles, and this man burst into the room, started lunging towards the podium, interrupting me and elevating his voice, and was stopped, did not identify himself, and was removed from the room.
So as soon as he identified himself, you know, appropriate actions were taken.
But I would say that, you know, I had a conversation with the senator after this.
We sat down for 10 to 15 minutes and talked about the fact that nobody knew who he was.
He didn't say who he was until he was.
Already had been lunging forward, and people were trying to detain him for quite a period of time.
And that this, you know, we're leaders, we're public servants.
And if he had requested a meeting, I would have loved to have sat down and had a conversation with him.
That coming into a press conference like this is political theater, it's wrong, and it does a disservice to this country and the people who live here.
So we sat down, had a conversation.
We probably disagree on 90% of the topics, but we agreed to exchange phone numbers.
We'll continue to talk and share information.
And I think that's the way it should be in this country.
I wish he would have acted.
That way in the beginning instead of creating a scene like this.
Yeah, I mean, unnecessary, right?
I mean, he's feared to be some kind of security threat.
You get a cabinet secretary out there.
You get Secret Service, who, by the way, you know, they were already caught kind of asleep on the job.
Remember how they stole all the cash out of her wallet there in DC?
So they're under pressure.
And you get some guy yelling at her and marching towards a stage that nobody recognizes.
I mean, look, if it were Bernie Sanders, right?
Maybe people would know, but this guy nobody's ever seen.
I mean, listen, okay?
I'm in the news business.
I wouldn't have recognized him.
And I have a pretty good fluency, you know, in terms of who's a senator, who's not, et cetera.
So like these, these Secret Service agents are like, who is this guy?
And, you know, he could have been some measly state senator for all they knew.
All they know is they're in charge of protecting her.
He's yelling out and marching towards the stage.
What was he going to do?
Like boost her off of the podium and say, Hey, let me have the microphone and take over.
Come on.
Okay.
So they're doing their job.
And now.
You should hear the chorus from the left.
Oh my gosh, they are absolutely positively livid.
I mean, they're getting kind of cray cray on this thing, but you know what?
It's fitting into their narrative.
They're trying to use this as a political opportunity.
You know what I tell you?
This thing was staged.
He knew exactly what he was doing.
He knew that nobody knew who he was and knew someone appointed him.
Nobody knew.
So he walked in there into a press event deliberately to cause this kind of commotion.
And then they knew their script.
They knew their script.
They were going to say, hey, you know, like if they can do this.
Look, they can do it to you.
Blah, They're going after a sitting U.S. Senator.
Look what they did to La Monica MacGyver, who is now facing 17 years in federal prison.
Yeah, for assaulting an ICE officer.
At least he had the decency not to shove and push and all that kind of thing.
When you look at the tape, he's just kind of backing off.
But they're doing their job.
Let me see if I can get the statement from Dan Bongino.
I know you guys are mad at Dan right now because of the lack. of coverage of the Epstein stuff.
But Dan did actually put out a good statement, and he's a pretty honest broker.
I've known him a long time.
And I just want to share this with you because, you know, Dan's point was, what's the Secret Service supposed to do?
Thank you very much.
We're going to go to Cory Booker, you know, Spartacus over there in New Jersey, who's using this as his grandstanding moment.
He's like, wait a second.
Dan Bongino Statement00:07:49
Why is somebody else getting attention?
Why am I not getting every single bit of attention?
This should be me with this opportunity.
I'm telling you, they're trying to make it into some kind of George Floyd thing.
This is what, you know, this is what Ana Polina Luna. warned about on this show when she came on earlier this week.
She said they were trying to use this.
What they had realized is per all the new CNN data, they actually are losing ground significantly with Mexican Americans and people who are here legally.
And so in order to make up for that, they're trying some funky stuff and they want to turn this into some kind of George Floyd moment in California.
And they thought they could, right?
They thought they could because they thought as of yesterday that the judge was going to agree with them, but that is not the case.
The judge didn't agree with them at all.
And as a result of that, they've got to find a way to get back, especially ahead of midterms, some of these Hispanic voters.
And before we go to, you know, Spartacus and his craziness, I want to show you that even CNN, guys, even CNN cannot believe that the demographic that the Democrats are hurting the most with happens to be people who just came to this country legally and are immigrant voters.
So what do they do?
They turn this into a total circus in an attempt to win these people back.
Watch.
Oh, darn it.
But the Senate does.
Darn it, darn it, darn it, darn it.
For some reason, our friend over at CNN is not coming through for us.
But anyway, his point was a massive, massive uptick.
A massive uptick.
You can see it there in his graphic.
Plus eight points for the GOP when it comes to this group of immigrants.
And you know what?
Overall, overall, they are winning this demographic.
So people have just come to this country.
They've done it legally.
They don't want.
illegals here that are threats to their community.
So you can see strategically the Democrats really, really, really, really have a problem.
You know, it's funny because it didn't always used to be like this.
In fact, I can remember a time when a lot of Democrats actually felt quite significantly a different way.
You know, Bernie Sanders back in the day, Bernie Sanders, he used to actually believe, did he not, that migration into the country unchecked would actually be really, really bad for working class Americans.
I'm going to show you a tape from 2015.
Okay, this is important.
I want you to watch this because here he is in this interview and he's saying something that actually sounds a whole lot like the Trump camp.
It's like Bernie, you kind of are getting a little MAGA there.
Okay, so just remember this before we go to Cory Booker and see his big performance.
This is Bernie Sanders, 2015, you guys.
Open borders.
That's a Koch brothers proposal.
The idea, of course.
I mean, that's a right wing proposal.
Which says essentially there is no United States.
But it would make a lot of global poor richer, wouldn't it?
And it would make everybody in America poorer.
Then you're doing away with the concept of a nation state.
And I don't think there's any country on the world which believes in that.
If you believe in a nation state or in a country called the United States or UK or Denmark or any other country, you have an obligation, in my view, to do everything we can to help poor people.
What right wing people in this country would love is an open border policy, bring in all kinds of people who work for two or three dollars an hour.
That would be great for them.
I don't believe in that.
I think we have to raise wages in this country.
I think we have to do everything that we can to create the millions of jobs.
You know what youth unemployment in the United States of America today?
If you're a white kid, high school graduate, 33%, a Hispanic, 36%, African-American, 51%, you think we should open the borders and bring in a lot of low-wage workers?
Or do you think maybe we should try to get jobs for those kids?
So I think from a moral responsibility, we've got to do work with the rest of the industrialized world to To address the problems of international poverty, but you don't do that by making people in this country even poorer.
There's no doubt about it.
I mean, she was holding a press conference and doing a press statement.
He's not a member of the press.
It wasn't like a hearing where it was an open forum for senators to ask questions.
He clearly showed up to a public event to create a moment and do what you're saying, sort of show his constituents, not just Democrats, but that he's fighting from his perspective.
Fighting from his perspective.
All right, there you go.
There you have it.
Even CNN knows this was nuts.
This was just an actor doing his thing.
I mean, couldn't they have gotten Adam Schiff?
Oh, no, he's too recognizable.
like people would have recognized Adam Schiff.
This one nobody knew.
So he kind of could, you know, slide under the radar and get in there.
And then they say, oh my gosh, if they can take him down, they can take you down.
They can take anyone down.
And so this was Cory Booker, Senator from New Jersey's little moment of fame, you guys.
And it's wild.
It's wild because if you go back a few years, you know, look at, say, Bernie, they had a very different view on this policy, okay?
Very, very, very different view on this policy.
You fast forward today.
What's different?
Trump?
That's one thing, right?
So they have to stand in opposition to Trump.
So therefore they make immigration the issue.
But the other thing that's really alarming, and you can go back to what New York was trying to do, and we showed you the New York Times report 800,000 non-citizens that they were trying to make voters in the state of New York until it got all the way up to the appeals court.
And the appeals court was like, no, you can't do this.
They can't vote in state elections.
So you wonder, okay, one, do they want people to vote?
And two, do they actually want to change the demographics of districts so that if you have more people in a particular district, you count them in your population and therefore you can have more Democrats in there in Congress?
Right like?
I don't think it's conspiracy theory anymore to say that I think we know exactly what they were doing.
And by sending them to Texas and sending them to Florida, the idea is, okay, we're going to get more people there, and the hope is the hope is that we're going to have more people to vote blue.
And so there is a method to the madness that you know should have been called out, is being called out, but they're not willing to do so.
Instead, they're trying to twist this into something else entirely.
Okay, you ready, We're going to watch Corey get all dramatic on us like he deserves some kind of Emmy award.
Yeah, it would be an Emmy too, right?
For this performance, ladies and gentlemen, Senator Corey Booker from New Jersey, not to be outdone by Senator Padilla from California, he needs his three minutes of fame.
Watch.
And this son of Mexican immigrants who clean homes and serve food, this man with equal dignity in this body, Today was driven violently to his knees as if made to kneel before the authority of the executive because he was so called disrespectful.
That should offend the consciousness not just of the other 99 members of this body, it should offend the conscience of this country.
Because if you can make Alex Padilla forcibly kneel before this executive, when does it stop?
He's a United States senator.
And if you can force him to kneel to his knees violently, when does it stop?
What does it say to other Americans who want to speak up?
What does it say to other Americans that want to exercise their constitutional duty?
What does it say to other Americans this weekend when they want to peacefully protest?
Constitutional Crisis Explained00:14:44
What does it say to other Americans?
From humble backgrounds who know poverty, that if a United States senator who stands up to do his job could be made to heal, driven to his knees, violently handcuffed, what does it say?
What message does it say?
Okay, we get the picture.
We know where you're going with this.
We weren't born yesterday, okay?
We're astute political people too here on The Trish Regan Show.
And that was, ladies and gentlemen, a performance.
A performance by the senator out in California, a performance by Cory Booker, because you know what?
They've realized they're kind of.
They're kind of screwed okay, for lack of a better word.
They're kind of screwed because guess what the court just decided?
The court decided that yes, the federal government has the power that we always knew they did have.
So if you choose to violate the law and if you choose to actually say we're going to welcome everyone and refuse to cooperate with ice, even when we have people that are here illegally, that have committed crimes, then guess what?
You're going to be in trouble and you're going to be standing in opposition to the law, And that's exactly what's going on.
This is nothing about kings.
This is nothing about this or that.
I mean, politically speaking, yeah, that's how they're going to try and play it.
But here's the deal.
The judge yesterday had originally rejected Newsom's emergency request.
But guess what?
California is going to accept it.
They got to accept the National Guard.
So the way this all went down was Newsom's like, no, no, no, no, you can't come here.
You can't be operating the National Guard and the Marines and this and that.
He sent 4,000.
National Guard troops in.
Newsom's like, you can't do this.
You can't do this.
This is my state, our state.
Trump's like, yeah, but you're not taking care of things.
Look at Karen Bass.
I mean, it's a miracle she's there, right?
Usually she's off at some party in Africa.
Remember the fires?
We had that whole ordeal.
So they weren't doing anything.
They were allowing the chaos to spiral.
You've seen a lot of the protest video.
You've probably seen it on X. We've shown a little bit here, but suffice it to say, they have a problem.
And you can frame it however you want.
You have a problem in California.
And it's so bad that Karen Bass actually had to put in a curfew to try and control this problem.
Well, the president's like, I'm not going to allow this to get out of control.
These people are U.S. citizens, so I'm going to help.
Gavin Newsom doesn't want my help.
I don't care if Gavin Newsom doesn't want my help.
I'm sending in the troops.
And so originally he sent him in.
Gavin flipped out.
He took it to the court.
And the court came back and said, you know what?
You're fine to do it.
So breaking news, ladies and gentlemen, the Court of Appeals in California, Federal Court of Appeals, deciding late last night that indeed, Donald Trump has the jurisdiction.
This is a big deal.
Trump's National Guard stays.
So at 12 noon today, Newsom was hoping for a little bit of a victory run, right?
And he's not going to get it.
He's not going to get it.
Poor, poor Gavin.
Location for training exercises.
But there's the bottom line the police do policing, military, it's for the battlefield.
The idea that these unbelievably brave young men and women that I work with, that we have had the benefit of their extraordinary contribution all across this state.
I gave you three examples.
What more evidence do we need of the work they did during the wildfires in Los Angeles and all the work they did to secure? locations and keep property and personal lives safe over the course of the last few months.
These folks are now being commandeered to do ice raids.
You've seen the photographs.
That ends tomorrow at noon.
And the notion that the United States active duty Marines, these heroes, would be used to militarize the streets of an American city. is an abomination.
Founding fathers did not live and die to see that happen.
Okay.
Well, you know what, Gavin?
Nice little speech there.
Guess what happened?
You said it was all going to end at noon today, but the court decided otherwise.
The appellate court said, you know what, California, you're going to have to deal.
You're going to have to keep the National Guard there.
Because you see, legally, he has every right to do this.
I mean, you know, look, we hate to go back to 1963 in Alabama, but there was a time when you had to do exactly this because the feds have to come in in that case.
Because of integration, because you had some people the governor of Alabama at the time that did not want to integrate.
You know what that's when the feds stepped in?
Because the law was the law.
Well, guess what the law is here?
The law is that the feds have supremacy over the states when it comes to naturalization.
It actually was challenged in 2012 out in Arizona, and guess what they decided?
They decided that again, the feds had the jurisdiction.
So if the feds have the jurisdiction, if ICE has the jurisdiction and you are impeding law enforcement and not allowing them to do their job, then guess what?
I think you got kind of just a little teeny bit of a problem out there in California to which you seem to be defying federal orders, and you can't have a country.
Now can you?
Unless you have some semblance of organization and you are the United States of America, which means you're entitled to having a different opinion.
But until you actually change the law, Gavin Newsom, until Congress changes the law, by the way, it's not you, right?
It's not you.
It's not New York.
It's not California.
It is Congress that has to change this law.
And if Congress doesn't change the law, Then you're kind of up a creek without a paddle.
And guess what?
The president does have all the authority in the world to go in.
And you can plead and plead on MSNBC with somebody who looks just like Rachel Maddow because apparently they're cloning them over there and it's not going to do any good.
Just, I mean, where's your decency, Mr. President?
Stop.
Rescind this order.
It's illegal and unconstitutional.
And I said it.
I'll say it again.
It's immoral.
You're creating the conditions that you claim you're solving and you're not.
And you're putting real people's lives at risk.
Well, good news.
Those people's lives will not be at risk because the California federal judge in the appellate court just made the decision that Donald Trump and his legal team are right.
And you know why they're right?
It's because what I told you yesterday, power to call up the National Guard, Title 10, U.S. Code 12406.
Remember, 12406, U.S. Code 12406, Title 10.
Federal statute allows for the president to, quote, call into federal service members and units of the National Guard in such numbers as he considers necessary to execute the laws.
Of the United States.
All right?
Simple enough.
Now, their little sticking point over and over again has been oh, well, he's supposed to do this with the combination of the governor's support.
And there is something that suggests, okay, they're supposed to do this with the governors, but what do you do when the governors are not actually playing ball?
1963, Alabama, right?
You go in and you do what you gotta do, which means you got the power to call up the National Guard.
It exists for A reason, and so all these people that want to go on and on about state rights, okay, states have rights, but when it comes to something that is related to our border, and if there's one thing the federal government has jurisdiction over, it is the border and who's in the country that is all federal government.
You can't just be your own country, California.
I realize you'd like to.
That's when, yes, Trump and the federal government and Congress, okay, Padilla.
You have all these views.
Guess what?
You can change the law.
But if you don't change the law, then the government is in charge of enforcing federal law.
And so they're choosing to do so.
So this has nothing to do with state rights, as the ladies on the View would like to tell you and walk you off the cliff.
Right?
That's their whole thing.
Now, you know, is it warranted or does this sort of escalate the situation?
I mean, whatever happened to states' rights?
I thought that was what you do because you tell the state, this is what we're thinking of doing.
You know, you don't just send people in, you don't just send troops in.
But what do I know?
I've never run a state.
But I don't really, you know, when you come in and everyone is, when you go into the donut shop to look for people and you're dressed in tactical gear, you're creating an issue.
You're creating a problem.
You want people to come, you've scared them.
Even when people are supposed to be there, when they come to talk to the judge, you're arresting them right after.
What is going on here?
I think what really matters from sort of a long view here is the fact that he is militarizing and deporting.
Deploying the Guard for the purpose of policing Americans' protest activity, right?
Our freedom of speech, our freedom of assembly.
And there's a very big, stark demarcation between military troops and law enforcement, public law enforcement, civilian law enforcement.
And you are an army turned inside to police its citizens can cause chaos and fascism.
and fascism.
And so I think chaos and fascism?
Really?
I mean, it seems to me that the chaos is actually coming from the protesters who actually have turned violent.
You can't do that, okay?
Christy Nolan making that very, very clear.
By the way, they're making that clear in California.
Oh, there's a sheriff down there.
He's like, do not mess around because we're coming for you.
And like, we mean business.
He's really serious.
Anyway, Gavin Newsom's argument is that, okay, well, you have to go through the governors of the state.
Well, guess what?
The appellate court judge said, nope, that's not the case.
And the federal government does have this power.
So this is a big freaking deal, ladies and gentlemen.
And you know what?
It's a good thing.
It's a good thing.
And I'm telling you, he's got a good legal team.
He's got an excellent legal team.
And they had four years to study this stuff, okay?
Four years on the sidelines to figure out just exactly how they would manage a situation like this.
And you go back to 12406.
And here we have it.
The United States or any of the territories, commonwealths, or possessions is invaded or in danger of invasion by a foreign nation, whenever this happens, quote, there is a rebellion.
If there isn't a rebellion or danger of rebellion against the authority, hear that?
Against the authority of the government of the United States, or the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws in the United States, which he's unable to, right?
Because he's got ICE, he's trying to detain people with DHS, and they're not letting him do it.
The president may call into federal service members and units of the National Guard in any state in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion.
Or execute the laws.
Now Gavin's like, well, wait a second, but don't they have to do this with and I put this in red here it shall be issued through the governors of the states.
Okay, so that's where it got a little bit sketchy, but again, there's precedent.
You got to go all the way back to 63 in Alabama, but there's precedent.
This through the governors thing it may not always work because you may have governors, like you do in California, that are on another side of all of this, that don't quite get it right, that actually feel that they're their own country onto themselves.
I mean hey, if you guys want to secede, Be our guest right, and we don't have to deal with the liability.
Everybody's moving out.
Businesses are moving out of California anyway.
Nobody wants to be there anymore.
You guys are like a sinking ship everybody's moving to Texas or Florida or places where they can conduct business with a little bit less onerous a taxation system and hopefully a more pleasant environment because they're not dealing with all the stuff that you guys have put in place Which is again why you cannot have this kind of lawlessness and it's amazing to me they This guy, one Gavin Newsom, is so clueless he doesn't get it.
I realize, I realize he wants to run for president.
He's seen this as his big opportunity.
But you know what?
He's never going to be president because he can't control his state.
And if you can't manage a state, you certainly can't manage a country, Mr. Newsom.
On that note, I'm really confident that you guys, the president and Secretary Higgs, will honor this order.
And then you've also mentioned that you would try to work with the president in the past.
Of course.
Has this situation changed your dynamic with the government?
Because I will work with anyone to advance the interests of 40 million Americans that I happen to represent here in California.
And so I've always maintained an open hand, not a closed fist.
But I also am going to stand firm and tall and push back against lawlessness, against someone that does not believe in the rule of law, does not believe in constraints, does not believe in the Constitution, who is threatening judges, that threatens not to abide by orders, and Donald Trump better abide by these orders.
Well, we have a constitutional crisis, the likes of which we haven't seen in our lifetime.
Wow.
Wow.
Okay.
Oh, wow.
So he thinks we're going to have a constitutional crisis.
They got this no kings thing going on.
He thinks it's a constitutional crisis.
And guess what?
Within like two hours of him saying that last night, it was all turned around.
The appellate court said, you know what?
Donald Trump does have the power.
So now the question becomes, in all seriousness, If Gavin Newsom does not play ball now, if he continues to tell his local law enforcement to not cooperate with the feds, then he is fully standing in violation of the law.
Then he is the one creating the constitutional crisis.
You see how that works?
But I think this is kind of what they want, sadly.
I mean, it's crazy because it's stupid.
It's, you know what, like a lot of this is being.
imposed upon us from the likes of China.
China Imposed Influence00:04:29
We had Anapolina Luna on the other day talking about that.
We've gone through some of the research that suggests there's a guy in China who's an American who spends most of his time in Shanghai, but he is a billionaire who contributes to all these communist efforts and pro-China efforts all over the world.
And he's behind these protests.
Literally, the communist movement, the Communist Party of America is behind this stuff.
Yeah, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, they're the ones.
And this guy, Neville Singman.
You know, he's the money behind it.
New York Times did an article on him just two years ago.
Global web of Chinese propaganda leads to a U.S. tech mogul.
So you see what China's trying to do.
They're like, oh, you know what?
We think the U.S. had a hand in Hong Kong.
U.S. may have had a hand in Tiananmen Square.
We think we're going to have a hand in these protests and there's no king stuff in the U.S. of A.
And we've got a situation just ripe for the picking, right?
Because everybody's on edge.
Democrats are seeing this as an opportunity for themselves.
It's coming off of the heels of just another big event.
Don't.
forget what we saw going down in New Jersey.
You know, La Monica.
You know I have to say that, guys.
I'm sorry.
I just can't believe her name is La Monica.
La Monica.
La Monica MacGyver.
Yeah.
She's facing 17 years.
Where are her friends now?
Where's AOC when you need her?
Oh, she's going to be running to Padilla's defense because, you know, she's less competitive with him.
I have a feeling she's a little competitive with La Monica because La Monica is kind of rising up on the scene because she's willing to do 17 years, right?
After AOC said, do not touch my people.
If anyone's breaking the law in this situation, it's not members of Congress.
It's the Department of Homeland Security.
It's people like Tom Homan.
And Secretary Christy Null, you lay a finger on them, we are going to have a problem.
John Luna, thank you.
Oh my gosh, super generous.
You're so sweet.
Thank you, thank you, thank you, John Luna.
He's worried about my taxes with you too.
Thank you.
I appreciate it.
You know, look, I have very, very, very generous people here on the channel and I appreciate it.
But you know what?
You know that I don't, I mean, look, I want to be successful, but I'm not necessarily doing this for the money.
I mean, I love it.
Thank you.
Oh my gosh, why is it all crooked?
Sorry, John.
Something's going on on the computers today.
But I really do appreciate it.
I want to help all of you guys.
It's partly why I started 76 Research.
Code word dollar, get it, dollar a month.
I want you to start investing.
The MAGA economy is for real, and I think it's going to be great.
And I know today is a tough day in the markets, and we can talk about that in a little bit.
It's tied to obviously what's going on internationally.
But I still have really, really good feelings about all that's coming.
And I appreciate everything you guys do to make this channel exist.
I appreciate our advertisers, I appreciate your support.
It's win, win, win.
But you know what?
I think I'd be doing this anyway.
My kids joke, you know, when mom gets old, we're just going to, we're just going to put her in the studio and we'll let her think the cameras are on and she's talking to everyone.
And we'll just let her do it anyway because she loves this so much.
And it's like, what else would I do?
Because it is so important to me.
And I have all this conviction.
So I think their joke is, you know, when she starts to really lose it, we can just put her in the studio and she can keep doing her thing and we just won't let her go live.
So John, thank you.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
She writes that, you know, it's 100% carrying the water for the opposition to participate in this collective delusion.
The Democrats, for some reason, need to answer for every teen who throws a rock rather than hold the Trump administration accountable for intentionally creating chaos and breaking the law to stoke violence.
They are in charge.
I mean, this was a wild one.
So you read between the lines and AOC is trying to tell you it's totally fine, perfectly fine to engage in whatever you need.
Throw a few rocks or two.
Why not?
Because we hate Trump so much.
Woo!
Okay, lady, you know, you might have stayed at the bar.
That would have been better for all of us.
But nonetheless, she's in Congress, moving up in the world and causing more problems.
Okay?
So that is a very, very bad attitude.
And like I said, she was not there to help her friend LaMonica in LaMonica's moment of need.
Detention Facility Out of Control00:07:19
The lady in red, one of you guys in the chats.
kept saying, I think this was on the Spotify channel actually.
By the way, if you're not subscribed to me on Spotify, do so.
It's free.
If you wouldn't, it's the picture of me in the red dress and the blue background.
And we put some of the clips up there too.
And I think I only have like 43 reviews.
Or 43.
We're getting a lot of it like, do what you can to leave a nice review.
Five stars only, please.
Anyway, we put this up and one of the people on Spotify, I read all my comments, YouTube, Spotify, said the red coats are coming, which I found kind of funny.
Watch.
The lady in red.
So, like, somehow this is okay.
Did you see that?
She kind of looked like she was pushing him to me.
It's a federal law officer.
I mean, come on.
And apparently, DHS has more video where that came from.
So, yeah, La Manica has been hit with assaulting, impeding, interfering with law enforcement for which she could face 17 years.
violating title 18 u.s code section 111 a1.
I mean, you just don't do that.
But somehow it's all being justified under the name of, okay, we're going to rise up against Trump.
I mean, this is crazy town Usa, ladies and gentlemen, and you know, Alina actually gave her a chance to plead her case.
It's kind of like Padilla DHS secretary Christy Nome sitting down with him and saying okay, you know, tell me your thoughts like, why were you here, why are you doing this?
And he agreed that it was kind of not so cool for him to just show up unannounced and barge the stage.
Well, this one, La Monica, she refused to say that she was impeding law enforcement or that she was doing anything wrong, right?
Because in her head, in some twisted world where, you know, AOC is saying what she says, like, hey, you know, it's okay if you throw a few rocks because we're doing this to defend ourselves from Donald Trump's tyranny.
La Monica thinks that she was doing the right thing.
Well, Haba said you had declined every opportunity to come to a resolution.
You said they wanted you to admit to something you didn't do.
What did they want you to admit to?
I mean, there was a lot.
We've had a week of back and forth with them, and I will say that I did not waver.
You know, I showed up there to do my job, and she wanted me to admit to doing things, all of these different lists of things that she said that I did.
Like what?
I mean, from things of impeding, you know, there were some other things in there that she put in there, but I can't remember exactly what it was, but she wanted me to admit to these things, sign an agreement to them.
Like impeding, impeding, Monica, because you can't actually do what you did.
You can't just run over and.
Push yourself up against everyone, quite like that.
I mean, you even had the president of the United States, for goodness sakes, calling you out, did he not?
That woman was out of control.
She was shoving federal agents.
She was out of control.
The days of that crap are over in this country.
We're gonna have law and order.
Yeah, law and order.
Did you hear that?
So um, even though we're shooting for law and order, i've got some news to share with you right now.
This is just breaking, ladies and gentlemen.
We have learned that four detainees have escaped From an immigration center.
There, the immigration center, I believe this is Delancey, the one where you saw La Monica out there, you know, red coats coming, pushing her weight around.
Four detainees have escaped from an immigration detention center in New York.
Again, this news just coming to us right now, just breaking.
And this is of some concern, shall we say, because now you have to ask, are the inmates really and truly running the asylum?
In other words, did someone actually encourage them to escape?
Did someone allow for this?
Four detainees, I'm just putting this up on the screen for you.
Again, we're getting this to us in real time, have escaped immigration detention.
I mean, this is, I think what you're going to have questioned here is whether or not there was any help.
And that is of great concern.
Great, great concern because it would once again suggest that there is this breakdown between federal and state law.
It was indeed Delancey.
I can report to you now, ladies and gentlemen, four detainees have escaped from an immigration detention center in Newark, New Jersey.
According to DHS, more law enforcement partners have been brought in, according to the AP, in order to find out the details of just exactly who's missing from Delancey Hall.
A DHS official is saying that they are not identifying them at this point.
And they're also not identifying which agencies are going to be involved with this.
They had a 1,000 bed facility there, ICE does.
And this is all part of the crackdown on illegal immigration.
These were people that are believed to have committed crimes that are there being held in the ICE detention center.
And U.S. Representative LaMonica MacGyver was there just earlier this month alongside Menendez's relation.
I think it's his son.
who was also there along with one other congresswoman, and they were protesting alongside the Newark, New Jersey mayor.
He, however, played ball with Alina, and he got off the hook.
They had arrested him there at that event.
And, you know, yet this woman decided to kind of go all in, literally and figuratively all in.
And as a result of that, And with it being caught on tape, she is now facing 17 years, 17 years in federal prison.
So unbelievable, unbelievable.
Now you have four that have escaped.
And so a lot of questions will be raised.
Did people with a certain political bias have anything to do with the escape?
And if they did, well, then they are going to be facing prison themselves, much like the woman in red.
Not that woman in red.
That's another woman in red.
You know the woman in red.
The woman in red being La Monica MacGyver.
Thank you.
WAAAAAAA And again, I want to point out that DHS has more video, but this is out of control.
And this is so unnecessary.
And this is so wrong.
And this is so not becoming, shall we say, of somebody who is a member of the U.S. Congress.
I realize that, you know, she's new and new on the gig and new to the job.
And maybe, you know, this is, you know, how she's used to doing things.
But can you imagine?
Like, can you imagine?
Peaceful Protests vs Craziness00:03:03
Like, if that were me, if that were me, first of all, you know.
I wouldn't be there.
Unless I was reporting on it.
But do you think I'm like physically going to push myself?
No, like you extricate yourself from the situation so that it doesn't heat up in that kind of way.
Like you don't get into a fist bite, for goodness sakes.
Right?
This is not what we do.
This is not how we operate.
This is the United States of America.
So in Trump's words, you know, the days of that crap are over.
So you also can't just let people go from the detention facility if in fact.
That was deliberately done.
And given the climate that we're dealing with right now, you know what?
I wouldn't be surprised if it was deliberately done.
I wouldn't be surprised at all.
I mean, they're gearing up for their big shindig.
Their big shindig.
They're going to have these little protests going on all over the country, the No Kings Day.
And they've actually started using verbiage.
If you listen to all the cable channels, if you listen to what these people are saying, if you listen to even Gavin Newsom's speech there last night, they're trying to push this No Kings, No Kings, No Kings.
Donald Trump, I think he said it well.
He's like, look, hey, you know, if I were a king, I wouldn't be having to sit here fighting all these laws out now, would I?
I mean, I really wouldn't have to do that.
And then they're questioning whether or not they're going to be allowed to protest.
Here's some liberal reporter asking Caroline Levitt about that.
We got into this a little bit yesterday.
I mean, it's kind of a stupid question, obviously.
Obviously, the president believes in freedom of speech.
What do you think true social is about, right?
Freedom of speech, because he got shut down from everywhere.
So he created truth.
He's a big believer in the First Amendment, but there's a difference between a peaceful protest and, oh, shall we say what we just saw La Monica doing out there in Newark, New Jersey?
Here's Caroline.
Thank you so much, Caroline.
The President warned that any protests on Saturday would be met with force.
Can you clarify what kind of protest President Trump does support or find acceptable?
The President absolutely supports peaceful protests.
He supports the First Amendment.
He supports the right of Americans to make their voices heard.
He does not support Violence of any kind.
He does not support assaulting law enforcement officers who are simply trying to do their job.
It's very clear for the president what he supports and what he does not.
Unfortunately for Democrats, that line has not been made clear, and they've allowed this unrest and this violence to continue, and the president has had to step in.
So if there were peaceful protests on Saturday for the guillotine parade, President Trump would allow that.
Of course the president supports peaceful protests.
What a stupid question.
Rick Help.
Stupid question.
Forgive me.
I think I said dumb question, but it was a stupid question.
Of course he supports. peaceful protest, but you don't support the craziness that we have seen out in Los Angeles.
Okay.
Like that's not okay.
That is not cool.
And for the Democrats to sit there and say like, well, I don't see anything.
I think Maxine Waters was trying to tell us because nobody had actually died that these things were peaceful.
Stupid Question on Protests00:04:52
And I'm like, wow, you got a low bar.
Okay.
Like that is a really low bar.
But again, don't forget what's going on and all the money behind it.
Don't forget about the Communist Party.
And the guy sitting over there in China that they are now subpoenaing and trying to bring into the U.S.
And if he doesn't answer the subpoena per Ana Polina Luna, she talked to Comer.
We had her on the show just the other day, by the way.
Holly's all over this, too.
Guess what?
They'll put a warrant out for his arrest and he will go to jail should he enter the United States of America at any time.
He sent in hundreds of millions of dollars for the New York Times, allegedly to all of these different programs to fight for China and to push communism on Americans.
He's literally contributing to this thing, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, literally the Communist Party in America.
So yeah, we have a problem.
And yet you know what else?
Walmart is all over this.
Walmart's like joining forces or at least someone who has a 1.9% stake in Walmart.
1.9% stake in Walmart, that would be, oh, Ms. Walton, Christy Walton.
She is the widow of John Walton.
You know, the founder, of course, being Sam Walton.
So she's got a 1.9% stake in the company.
So you can imagine that, you know what, her portfolio might be suffering just a bit.
Given the tariffs with China, I mean, she needs all those Chinese goods coming in super cheap, right?
So that everybody can buy them at Walmart.
I mean, I'm not saying she's motivated by money or anything.
Maybe she just purely cannot stand one Donald Trump, but she is a big backer, if you would, of this whole No Kings thing.
She even took out a big ad in the New York Times.
Do you shop at Walmart?
Carrie Lake would like to know.
Do you guys shop at Walmart?
Maybe not anymore, right?
So this is the risk now that they're going to face a Target style.
Bud Light style Disney style boycott.
I mean, I guess you can get your stuff on Amazon probably just as cheap and then you don't even have to leave this you don't have to leave your couch, right?
You can just do it on Amazon and Bezos is smart.
He's not carrying on like this, but she's a family member and I think that this is very risky actually for the company and Probably something that she should have stayed out of unless she's just really concerned about how much money it's gonna cost the family overall Concerned just like the Chinese are concerned and thinking oh maybe we can do a little you know what to kind of stir things up.
I mean, again, I would direct you to this New York Times piece because they did an excellent job explaining how this gentleman, alongside his wife, who is the founder of Code Pink, and they're the ones that, you know, cause all the ruckus in a lot of the congressional hearings.
She used to be very anti-China because she was all worried about the Uyghurs there in China, and obviously it's a humanitarian disaster what's going on.
But then, you know, she met Neville, and he gave her millions of dollars for Code Pink, and suddenly, what do you know?
They're pro-China.
Money talks, even for communists, apparently.
So we'll see what happens with Walmart.
I do think that people are kind of fed up, shall we say, fed up with the whole thing, are they not?
You know, I think we're going to have coverage over the weekend.
I want to make sure you subscribe, share, like, all that good stuff.
But stay tuned.
One of our team members is actually going to be down in D.C. for this shindig.
And if it's interesting, we should make sure to go to him.
I think that, you know, the reality is they're trying, they're looking for some kind of problem here, and we don't want them to get it because we want peace and we want to make sure that everything is as peaceful as possible, just to what Caroline was saying.
We support the First Amendment.
We support peaceful protests, but we do not support what we've seen in, you know, look, places like, places like Newark, New Jersey, or places like California.
And we don't want to have to get into the Insurrection Act, but you know what?
He'll do it.
He'll do it.
And he's already got one judge that said, you know what?
You got Title X, U.S. Code 12406.
So if things get too out of hand in New York, Letitia, oh, this could be her big moment, right, guys?
Letitia's probably like salivating.
She's like, oh, you know what?
If I can just, if I can sue him for this, I mean, I'll tell you, you've already got Eric Adams, who's on the side, if you would, of the president.
So I have a feeling he would be working with him.
But again, he's the mayor.
He's not the governor.
So Kathy Hochul, AG Letitia James, they're thinking this is our moment in the sun as well.
Market Reacts to International News00:03:09
What are these people trying to do, really?
I mean, they really are trying to sow a lot of chaos, all in the name of hating on Donald Trump.
Again, I remind you how we started the show with Bernie Sanders.
And Bernie Sanders used to be really anti-open borders.
You had Barack Obama sending home.
More migrants than any other president had in history.
And then all of a sudden, just because it's Donald Trump, we're going to stand in the face of this?
It's very strange.
But it's very selfish and it's very politically motivated.
And I think you can't get away from any of that, unfortunately, in this environment.
You know what?
We got a market that's reacting, of course, to some of the international news going on.
Lots of international news going on, of course.
You saw the news between Iran and Israel last night.
As such, you can anticipate that gold prices rose overnight and we saw oil prices rising.
Donald Trump is warning of perhaps more attacks if we do not see some kind of nuclear deal with Iran.
We have a market.
Actually, you know what?
I would say that they're taking it in stride.
I spoke earlier with Rob Horton, my partner at 76 Research this morning.
And one of the things that Rob pointed out was that, you know, look, in the light of everything, the markets are taking it extremely, extremely well.
76 Research.
Code word dollar.
I just want to point out, yeah, we got a Dow that's off 1%, S&P off 4 tenths of a percent.
You're heading into a weekend.
So you would think normally that would cause people to have even more concern, but they seem to be okay with it.
Why?
Because I think they actually think that this is all being managed.
We have a dollar that is still relatively strong.
We've got crude oil trading up 5.7%.
That's a reflection of concern, ladies and gentlemen, about oil prices.
And don't forget, one of the keys to lower inflation, right, is lower oil prices.
So that's, you know, something to watch.
Of course, we've got gold prices rising 34 48, nearing their again all-time record on gold, silver prices.
Going alongside for the ride bitcoin, of course.
Um, really interesting to watch because bitcoin had been trading off as this news unfolded last night between Israel and Iran, and we're continuing to see bitcoin trade.
Actually, it's covered a little bit.
It was down to like 103 or so, I think, last night.
It's 105 804 dollars per coin right now.
So Bitcoin kind of weathering the storm in an interesting way.
We just had a piece on that the other day there at 76 Research.
I encourage you to go there.
Use my code, code word dollar.
And again, I'm going to be back over the weekend.
Make sure you subscribe if you would.
Do your part.
Make a comment.
I mean, what do you think?
Are you shopping at Walmart?
One, under the circumstances.
And was that okay for Padilla to storm the stage?
I think you're with me on that one.
But let me know.
I'm curious to hear your thoughts.
I read them all.
I really do.
Thank you all for being here and we will continue the discussion live again right here on the Trish Regan channel tomorrow.