President Joe Biden faces potential legal nullification of his Autopen-signed pardons and executive orders due to alleged cognitive decline and stage nine prostate cancer, prompting Representative James Comer and former ICE Chief Tom Homan to argue these actions were unauthorized. While Trump demands mass arrests for sanctuary city officials and investigates border legislation signatories, the scandal implicates figures like Hunter Biden, Anthony Fauci, and Liz Cheney, with accusations that "radical left lunatics" manipulated the process during a March 2024 appearance where Biden struggled with Super Tuesday questions. Ultimately, this developing crisis challenges the constitutional validity of recent presidential decrees and suggests a broader conspiracy involving elder abuse and unchecked executive overreach. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, Qwen/Qwen3-ForcedAligner-0.6B, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
The Auto Pen Scandal Explodes00:05:40
And we're live.
This auto pen scandal is taking on a life of its own right now.
I think Alina was the first one to bring it up, Alina Haba, back in March.
And now Comer says he wants a congressional investigation plus Donald Trump weighing in on it.
It's almost like Jake Tapper really did not only himself, but his party, his entire party in big time.
We're going to get into all of that plus Tom Homan.
He's out.
He's firing on all cylinders as only Tom Homan can.
And he's demanding.
More arrests.
He wants criminal prosecution for sanctuary city governors, lawmakers, mayors, you name it.
Donald Trump wants everything on short, including high-tech manufacturing.
So all those Apple iPhones, you better start making them here or else.
He's talking about a 25% tariff.
And oh, poor Michelle Obama.
My gosh.
I mean, this is just getting ugly to watch.
Okay.
Really, really ugly to watch.
That marriage, as far as I'm concerned, is basically over.
And I'm going to tell you why.
Welcome to the show.
Good to have you here.
Make sure you subscribe, share, like all that good stuff.
Guys, we're looking at an auto pen scandal that we've never quite seen in this country before.
Because you see, nobody ever did stuff like what Joe Biden did before.
This is just unbelievable.
And now it's caught the attention of the oversight committee in Congress.
And now James Comer, Representative James Comer is demanding an investigation.
And I'll tell you, I'm just going to tell you right now, if this actually goes through.
There's going to be some heads that really roll.
I mean, think about all those pardons.
Those pardons will be null and void.
Think about all the decisions that Biden made, a few too many, that maybe he didn't make, that would then be null and void.
We'll get into the legal complications of all this.
But first, here is Representative Comer speaking last night.
Say that, no, they just talked to Joe Biden, and he was tip-top.
He was in great physical condition.
He was at the top of his game.
Now they're coming back covering the track saying, yeah, it looks like he was in mental decline.
Well, we all know he's in mental decline.
What we need to know is who was calling the shots at the White House?
And one thing that was also mentioned on your show thus far is that when you sign a document that has legal implications, it has to be signed personally.
It can't be signed by an AutoPen.
You use AutoPen for proclamations and mass letters and things like that.
So I think that if we can understand more about the AutoPen and whether or not Joe Biden authorized it, I think this could lead to a lot of those executive orders being kicked out in court.
All right.
And when do you expect these subpoenas to go out?
Well, the letters have already gone out to the staffers as well as Dr. O'Connor.
So if we don't hear anything from them in a week, then I would expect to start seeing subpoenas.
And if they fight the subpoena, what do you do?
We'll go to court.
Jesse, they're going to try to plead executive privilege, and they're lawyering up, and we're ready.
That's why we're making sure every I is dotted and every T is crossed.
The best thing that's happened in the last week with respect to this is all the new books that are coming out.
and all the former Biden staffers who are trying to cover their tracks.
You're going to see people like Pete Buttigieg, who think they have political futures, come forward and say, you know, we didn't know anything.
There were gatekeepers.
They wouldn't let us speak with Joe Biden.
And the more that comes out, the easier it's going to be to get to the truth.
You better believe it, right?
I mean, all these books and all this information.
Unc Andy, thank you so much for your generosity.
You've been a member here on the channel for two months.
Florida loves Trish.
I love Florida, believe me.
I also love the fact that you guys have 0% income tax and really good weather.
Anyway, you saw that, right?
So James Palmer means business.
They're going to be sending subpoenas in a week or so.
And if they fight the subpoenas, they're lawyering up on the other side.
I mean, look, guys, I kept saying it over and over again.
I am going, I haven't played this one in like forever.
I am going to show you a soundbite that I played you maybe about a year and a half ago, which just, I think, said it all.
This is Joe Biden at some kind of gathering.
Where he's supposed to be talking about the economy and all of a sudden the reporters start asking him questions and you can tell the poor man is clearly struggling, clearly struggling.
I mean people are talking about elder abuse and all kinds of things at this point, because you watch this clip and you tell me if you think he knew what he was signing when he was signing watch, i'd better not start your questions, i'll get in trouble.
What's your message for super tuesday?
Voters everyone, people who decide super tuesday say, do you have a message for voters?
Thanks, see him, he's out of it.
He's absolutely positively out of it.
This was one of those clips that just really hit me and I guess it was from march 2024.
I mean I was like wow, this this poor guy is, you know, and unfortunately, like we've probably all seen it, you've had loved ones that have suffered from this and whatever you want to call it.
That was some kind of decline and everyone knew.
Now we know, hey thanks, Jake Tapper.
I mean you were too moronic and duplicitous to admit it to begin with, right over on CNN, just when you figured you can make a buck.
James Comer's Cognitive Decline00:12:37
After the fact, you decide to come out with a book, but everybody's having to admit it now.
Yeah, you know, the guy was not playing with a full deck of cards.
And if he wasn't playing with a full deck of cards and everything was being done by Autopen and it, it naturally leads you to the question, well, who was the Autopen?
And America did not elect the Autopen.
Therefore, are any of those things that he was signing even valid?
Here's Alina Hava.
She first brought this up in March.
She's now the U.S. District Attorney, of course, over in New Jersey.
And she was one of the first ones to come out and poke around here and say, you know, this may not actually even be legal.
And she's right.
They should have handed out more preemptive pardons, you're saying.
Listen, by the way, I wonder if those were auto signed as well, because I would challenge the validity of it.
You never know.
Listen, the guy didn't even know what he was doing, but I'll tell you, the pardons, he knew what he was doing.
I said it months before.
He's going to pardon himself.
And yes, I almost said to the president, listen, in the joint session speech, why don't you ask everybody that got a pardon to just stand up?
Just stand up and tell us why you got a pardon.
Well, you know, that was bizarre at the time, right?
I mean, all those pardons that they were doing were kind of bizarre because they were pardoning before the fact.
I mean, that had never been done before.
Why are you issuing pardons?
Like, these people actually haven't been accused of a crime.
So that was bizarre.
And now we learn that, like, he wasn't really the one doing the pardoning.
I mean, it was just the autopet, and therefore it was somebody else entirely.
Which brings you to this questions.
These questions, I should say, were Biden's orders and were his pardons actually illegal?
Because you see, there's this part of the Constitution, Article 2, that says the president must, quote, take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
That means the president, the person that we elected.
Now, I mean, if you want to put in the 25th Amendment and if you want to have Kamala take over, you could have done that, but we don't really know who was doing anything.
Because everything was on AutoPen and he was clearly out of it.
Quote, if Biden was not authorizing nor mentally competent to authorize orders that were signed by AutoPen, those documents, ladies and gentlemen, could be challenged as invalid and as unconstitutional.
Unconstitutional.
And this is what Trump keeps getting at, right?
Biden, look, it's a very sad thing what happened, but I really would have started looking into this whole thing with who signed this legislation.
Who signed legislation opening our border?
I don't think he knew.
I said, there's nobody that would want an open border.
Nobody.
And now I find out that it wasn't him.
He autopened it.
Who was operating the autopend?
This is a very serious thing.
We had a president that didn't sign anything.
He autopened almost everything.
He opened the borders of the United States of America.
And I kept saying, who would do such a thing?
Allowing criminals to pour in from all over the world, not just South America, all over the world.
They came in from Africa, they came in from Asia, they came from the Congo.
The prisons in the Congo, in Africa, these are rough people.
The prisons from the Congo are empty.
You know where they are?
They're in this country.
Who would sign this?
Nobody would sign it.
No sane person would sign it.
You know who signed it?
Radical left lunatics that were running our country, and the Autopen signed it.
And they didn't want him, and they were disappointed in getting him because they wanted Bernie Sanders.
And then after about two weeks, they said, wait a minute, this is a gift.
He'll do anything.
We're going to use the auto pen.
And they used the auto pen in everything.
He didn't approve this.
Wow.
So like if he wasn't approving these things, again, who was?
And I know the joke is it was Mr. Autopen.
O-T-T-O.
Keep talking about that.
Again, I think you have to ask these questions.
Pardons, treaties, executive actions.
All of this, ladies and gentlemen, could now be challenged in court.
And it will be challenged in court.
I have no doubt.
given what we just heard from Comer.
And again, so much from Donald Trump lately is speaking to this.
He spoke out about Biden's health and was making the point yet again that the man was not in the right state of cognitive ability in order to sign some of the things he was signing.
Do you want to respond to President Biden being diagnosed with cancer?
Are you going to call your processor?
I think it's very sad, actually.
I'm surprised at it.
Wasn't, you know, the public wasn't notified a long time ago because to get to stage nine, that's a long time.
I just had my physical, you saw that.
You saw the results of that particular test.
I think that test is standard to pretty much anybody getting a physical, good physical.
We had the doctors at the White House and over at Walter Reed, which is a fantastic hospital.
I did a very complete physical, including cognitive tests, I'm proud to announce.
I aced it, got them all right.
You proud of me?
Yes.
Your husband would be proud of you for getting them all right.
It's a little risk.
If I didn't get them all right, these people would be after me.
It would be not a good situation.
But I think, frankly, anybody running for president should take a cognitive test.
They say it's unconstitutional, but I would say in that particular case, having a cognitive test wouldn't be so bad.
But when you take tests, medical tests, as a male, that test is very standard.
I don't know if it's given to everybody, but it's given just about.
And it takes a long time to get to that situation.
Now, I think to get to stage nine, I think that if you take a look, it's the same doctor that said that.
Joe was cognitively fine.
There was nothing wrong with him.
Well, he said, if it's the same doctor, he said there was nothing wrong there.
That's being proven to be a sad situation.
And the auto pen is becoming a very big deal.
You know, the auto pen is becoming a big deal because it seems like that maybe was the president whoever operated the auto pen.
But when they say that that was not good, they also, you know, you have to look and you have to say that the test was not so good either.
In other words, there are things going on that.
The public wasn't informed.
And I think somebody's going to have to speak to his doctor.
If it's the same, or even if it's two separate doctors, why wasn't the cognitive ability discussed?
And I think the doctor said he's just fine, and it's turned out that's not so.
It's very dangerous.
Look, this is no longer politically correct.
This is dangerous for our country.
Look at the mess when you're talking about all these questions on Ukraine and Russia.
That would have never happened.
As an example of our president, it would have never happened.
The other thing is you have to say, Why did it take so long?
I mean, when you.
This takes a long time, it can take years to get to this level of danger.
So it's a look, it's a very, very sad situation.
I feel very badly about it.
And I think people should try and find out what happened because I'll tell you, the Walter, I don't know if it had anything to do with the hospital, but Walter Reed is really good.
They're some of the best doctors I've ever seen.
I don't even know if they were involved.
But a doctor was involved in each case, maybe it was the same doctor.
and somebody is not telling the facts.
It's a big problem.
In other words, you can't be getting to that kind of stage, I think his point is stage nine, where the prostate cancer is actually now in your bones, without having had some kind of attentive medical care along the way.
And so the question becomes either you didn't get the care you needed, and heck, you're the president of the United States, so you should have, right?
Because otherwise our national security is being put at risk if nobody's actually attending to his medical needs.
And if you did get the medical care you needed and people knew that he was this ill, then why were they lying to the public?
And so either way, you're in a bad situation if you were on Team Biden and you were part of this.
And moreover, the country's now been put in a bad situation because legally, this is going to turn into a total quagmire.
Again, going back to this question, were Biden's orders, were his pardons illegal?
If he wasn't actually signing them, If he wasn't cognitive and part of this, then you can challenge every single one of those in court.
So guess what, Hunter Biden, you're up.
Guess what, Anthony Fauci, you're up.
Liz Cheney, Adam Schiff, I'm looking at all of you.
And I'm also looking at all the policies that he signed and put into place and all these deals.
So it's going to be a mess.
And let me just say, Trump is willing to take that on.
Don't kid yourself.
And Comer's willing to take it on.
You know why they're willing to take it on?
Because of everything that they have been through and Donald Trump has been through and this country has been through.
They're willing to go there.
And so now all bets are off and you're going to see a lot of fireworks in the coming week or weeks, ladies and gentlemen.
And I think you also got to ask yourself this question.
Just exactly who needs to pay the price?
I mean, who in his inner circle was authorizing this?
Dr. Jill comes to mind, does she not?
You know, Dr. Jill, who is out there enabling him every step of the way, wanted him to keep running along with one Hunter Biden.
You know, it was so obvious.
I played you the clip earlier of him not being able to handle the incoming of the reporters questions.
He used to do that a lot.
He'd zone out.
You saw the clip, right?
I've played it for you before of the Italian prime minister having to guide him away from the parachuters because they're about to take a picture at G7.
And all of a sudden, he's like a little kid.
He starts wandering off to look at the parachuters.
And she brings him back and he tries to put on his sunglasses and he's moving so darn slow.
And the whole thing is obvious, right?
Everything is so obvious.
But as much as we would play these clips, and I would tell you that here on the show, and I tried to warn the Democrats, you probably shouldn't be running him.
They wouldn't.
Listen, and instead we were told these were nothing but cheap fakes.
We were cheap fakes for running them and that somehow we were the ones wrong.
I mean, like, this is gaslighting on steroids.
And then, of course, America saw this.
I've changed the law, what's happened.
I've changed it in a way that now you're in a situation where there are 40% fewer people coming across the border illegally.
That's better than when he left office.
And I'm going to continue to move until we get the total ban on the total initiative relative to what we can do with more border patrol and more asylum officers.
President Trump, I really don't know what he said at the end of this sentence.
I don't think he knows what he said either.
Look, we had the safest border in the history of our country, the board.
All he had to do was leave it.
All he had to do is leave it.
He decided to open up our border, open up our country to people.
Yeah, I mean, that wasn't even the worst of it right happening.
They're in a situation where they in fact, pay 8.2 percent in taxes.
If they just paid 24 percent, 25% either, one of those numbers.
They've raised $500 million, billion dollars, I should say, in a 10 year period.
We'd be able to wipe out his debt.
We'd be able to help make sure that all those things we need to do child care, elder care, making sure that we continue to strengthen our health care system, making sure that we're able to make every single solitary person eligible for what I've been able to do with the COVID, excuse me, with dealing with everything we have to do with.
Look, if we finally beat Medicare.
Thank you, President Biden.
President Trump?
He's right here.
Oh, it cut off at the best time.
Remember his line was, he's right, he sure beat Medicare.
He beat it to death.
This was unbelievable, right?
Jill Biden's Role Revealed00:02:14
And yet, there were people, believe it or not, the next morning on Morning Joe that were trying to make excuses, like one Douglas Brinkley, who's the go to Democrat presidential historian, who actually had the audacity to say this.
If you read the transcripts of Trump and Biden, you'll see a coherency to what Biden was trying to get across.
Okay.
Oh, yeah.
If I just read the transcripts, I'll be able to read through the lines and figure that one out.
I mean, not, I don't even know as the people that were transcribing it could figure it out because some of the words were just like mumble jumble.
I mean, he was giving Kamala a run for her money on the word salad, for goodness sakes.
And yet, and yet, you want to talk about enablers?
I mean, this was like Lady Macbeth style.
You had Jill Biden.
I'm just sorry.
You know what?
I'm a wife, I'm a mother.
I'm a daughter.
I'm a sister.
If one of my loved ones, if my husband had anything going on like that, do you think I'd be propping them up saying, hey, buddy, go, No.
I'd say, let's exit stage left.
In their case, stage left.
And let's ride out into the sunset and let's enjoy our time together and our grandchildren and try and have a nice life.
But not Jill Biden.
Right after that debate, she got up there, and of course he was toast, so she had to get the crowd going with this.
Joe, you did such a great job.
You answered every question you knew all about.
And let me ask the crowd, what did Trump do?
Yes.
Mine!
Okay.
So now the question becomes what role did Jill Biden have in all of this enabling?
Was she the autopen?
Was she the one getting stuff done?
Was it her chief of staff that was running the show?
Meanwhile, what was she doing to her poor hubby?
Enabling the President00:10:46
This is something that came up.
Take a look at this.
I want to share with you one of my former colleagues actually over at Fox, a guy named Leo Terrell, who's now, I think, at DOJ.
And he tweeted this out.
So he's a member of the administration, and they're looking at this.
Elder abuse criminal charges?
In other words, she most likely knew about his health problem.
She knew something.
I mean, she had to have known something.
Again, we don't know the timing on the prostate cancer.
We don't know, as you heard from Donald Trump earlier, I mean, it's kind of a shame either way.
It's a shame because clearly he should have had better medical care.
He's the president of the United States.
Thank you very much.
So that calls into question just exactly what was going on with his doctor.
But if his doctor did know and they were hiding it, then that becomes a problem.
And on top of it, you got to say, what was she doing, you know, putting him out there?
It was like weekend at Bernie's, right?
Like it was hard to watch at times, really, really hard to watch.
So they're going to launch an investigation.
The Auto Pen signatures may be declared null and void.
There is certainly a legal argument to be made for that.
Meanwhile, people that were pushing him are also going to be investigated for what they were doing.
In other words, this thing is going to blow up in a big way.
And you know, you heard it here first because nobody's talking about this just yet.
And I have a feeling it's going to get bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger.
And I know because Donald Trump is a dog with a bone and it's the right thing to do, right?
You don't prop up somebody with a freaking auto pen and decide, okay, we're going to put all this stuff into law and we're going to pardon all these people.
That is not the way the US government works.
The American people elect the president of the United States and the president.
Is responsible per the constitution for actually governing and you can't have somebody else with him not knowing what's going on.
I mean, that's when you have to invoke the 25th amendment.
If you're choosing not to, we've got problems.
Folks, this is huge, absolutely positively huge.
Okay, you know what else is huge, what's going on on the immigration front and our friend Tom Homan Reminder subscribe, share.
Like we're growing big time here.
I think we're coming up on 800 000.
We're going to have to have a party when that happens, right?
Okay, so Tom Homan, he wants action.
He is really, really, really upset about all of these sanctuary cities.
And he's like, you know, you guys can't have these sanctuary cities here in America because that is a direct violation of federal law.
And by the way, there is that little thing called the Supremacy Clause.
We've been through it here on the show that says you can't have these sanctuary cities.
Or if you're going to have them and the feds decide they're going to come in and they want to arrest people, guess what?
They can.
Because they Trump, no pun intended, whatever's going on on the local level.
He wants action.
He wants criminal arrests.
Watch.
Well, that wasn't day one.
We'll move to the congressman, but just to finish the point here, when you look at the investigations, it's a lot of critics of Donald Trump and Democrats.
Can you think of or name any public official or individual who's in these crosshairs other than those folks?
I've got some up on the screen.
It goes from Cuomo to Comey to Springsteen at this point.
Those who break the law should be prosecuted.
And I don't know if any of these people have been prosecuted.
That list, I'm looking at the screen now, if any of them people have been prosecuted other than the congresswoman and other than two judges that impeded ICE and tried to harbor and conceal and go alien and impede their enforcement efforts.
So, no, that list shows I can't see everybody on that list, but.
Are you telling me everybody in the list has been indicted?
No, it says investigations.
They've been indicted or arrested if they violate the law.
No, it's investigations, but the fact that so many in these first 110 days, some of them which are announced on social media or other avenues before the defendants or even read their rights and given information, raises the question that it looks like to some that this is political targeting.
The ACLU says it's autocratic targeting.
And you respond tonight by saying, well, they did it.
The Democrats did it.
Well, if they did it, that's your view.
Does that make it okay?
That's what I'm asking.
I find it shocking that they were accused of the Trump administration of weaponizing against their opponents when they did the exact thing during the Biden administration.
I'm not making any comparison.
I'm just saying I find it shocking for them to make that claim when they did it for four years.
I'm not making any claim we're weaponizing anything.
I don't think President Trump is weaponizing anything against his political opponents.
We're enforcing the law, we're investigating crimes.
If there's evidence that crime has been acted upon, then they need to be charged.
The last four years we heard no one's above the law.
Well, either our members of Congress, either our judges, and either our other people.
You cross the line, you violate law, you should be indicted.
You should be charged.
So I know you brought up Congressman McIver.
I said I'd give you time on that.
The reports here are that part of the narrative like, how is that so hard to understand, right?
Like, if you have laws and you break them, why should you not be prosecuted for them?
I mean, there are things that are coming up.
The president has called into question, for example, Bruce Springsteen, Oprah Winfrey.
Beyonce, in terms of some of the fees that they were paid, he's alleging Beyonce got $11 million from the Kamala Harris campaign.
The New York Times has reported that Oprah Winfrey's company got $2.5 million for that little, God knows what, that little seminar that they had with Meryl Streep and a few others.
And Springsteen was paid a lot of money.
And so the president is questioning whether that was a violation of FEC rules.
And so if it is, then obviously that's a problem.
because if you're doing something illegally, and I'm not suggesting they are, but if they were, then they should be prosecuted for that.
Just like, for example, La Monica.
You know I had to go there.
La Monica.
I mean, if you're La Monica MacGyver and you decide the representative from New Jersey to go show up unannounced at the Delancey Detention Center outside Newark, New Jersey, and you see her there in red, and then you start fighting with ICE officers who tell you to go home and that you can't be there, and then you all of a sudden start, you know, pushing yourself up against them as you're about to see in this videotape.
And apparently, according to DHS, they have even more videotape of this.
If you're seemingly like body slamming people or being extremely aggressive in some of your words, then you know what?
You're going to have a problem.
Here we go.
I think this is the particular scene.
If you're listening on Spotify, thank you for that.
Yeah, take a look.
Okay, so she's getting kind of into it.
It's getting physical.
Like, that's not okay.
All right.
Like, I don't know in which world that is ever okay.
And so to Tom Holman's point, like if you're doing something illegal, this is law and order, ladies and gentlemen.
Well, Hava said you had declined every opportunity to come to a resolution.
You said they wanted you to go back to that in a second.
Okay.
So law and order, law and order.
Tom Holman, that's all he's asking for.
I don't think that's asking for much.
I think that's kind of just basic, basic stuff.
Alina Hava, in her case, she followed through with charges on La Monica and potentially she's apparently talking to Bonnie Coleman.
We'll see what happens there.
With the other congresswoman.
We did not see Bonnie Coleman, however physically, you know, moving her body up against the ice agent.
She was charged with violating title 18 U.s Code, section 111 a1 for assault, and also for impeding and interfering with law enforcement.
Now, by the way, this carries up to seven years in prison and penalties of well up to somewhere around 250k.
If she is indeed found guilty of this, she she seems to think again that she's she's doing nothing wrong.
She's just doing her Job.
And I think this is why you need sort of the voice of reason, whether it be a Donald Trump or just a Tom Homan out there saying, hey, you know, you do something illegal.
We're going to actually follow up on that.
And this is what these people, some of them on the left, simply do not understand.
Well, Hava said you had declined every opportunity to come to a resolution.
You said they wanted you to admit to something you didn't do.
What did they want you to admit to?
I mean, there was a lot.
We've had a week of back and forth with them.
And I will say that I did not waver.
You know, I showed up there.
To do my job, and she wanted me to admit to doing things, all of these different lists of things that she said that I did.
Like what?
I mean, from things of impeding, you know.
Yeah, like impeding, which is what you were doing.
Well, there were some other things in there that she put in there, but I can't remember exactly what it was, but she wanted me to admit to these things, sign an agreement to them, and I'm not doing that, you know, because it's not true.
I mean, there was a lot of back and forth and just tenseness, you know, all week from her and from her office.
And so at the end of the day, once again, showed up to do my job, and I don't need to apologize for doing that.
That is what the people of New Jersey expect me to do, the 744,000, almost close to 800,000 people I represent.
And why should we apologize about doing our job when ICE and Homeland Security created that environment?
I'm sorry.
How is this doing your job?
I'm going back to what Tom Homan's saying because like how, again, how is that doing your job?
That is not doing your job.
Doing your job would be calling up, making an appointment, acting in an orderly fashion, not doing this, not starting some kind of riot.
That is not doing your job.
That is not what the people of New Jersey expect from you.
Okay.
And this is, yes, why you're being charged. with violating Title 18, U.S. Section Code 111, A1.
You know, the president said it.
He knew what she was up to.
I'll give me a break.
Did you see her?
She was out of control.
Those days are over.
The days of woke.
Law and Order Returns00:01:32
No, I didn't.
The days of woke are over.
That woman, I have no idea who she is.
That woman was out of control.
She was shoving federal agents.
She was out of control.
The days of that crap are over in this country.
We're going to have law and order.
Law and order, okay, which is why Alina's going after her.
This is all, mind you, about the Delancey Immigration Detention Center, where they're mad because they're arresting people that they believe to be criminals that are also here illegally.
And so they don't want that to happen.
And this is disturbing in and of itself, right?
Like, how do you, why is it that you guys want people that are criminals here running around illegally?
Again, I go back to Holman.
First of all, how many illegal aliens I think in the United States?
At least 20 million.
Here's where'd you come with that number?
We've been speaking about 12 million for 20 years.
We know we got 10.5 that we know of came to the border.
How many don't we know of?
I talk about known gotaways at 2 million.
How many unknown gotaways do we have?
Like between the Big Bend sector in Texas where there's no technology.
How many thousand people dig across there?
We wouldn't know.
We would know now.
But, you know, so I would venture over 20 million.
But your question is, last count, we got last I looked, there was about 700,000 illegal aliens with criminal charges walking the streets of this country.
700,000.
And that's what we're looking for now.
That's what we're prioritizing, them and national security threats.