Judge Chutkan rejects a temporary restraining order sought by 14 states, including New York Attorney General Letitia James, clearing the Department of Government Efficiency to access federal data and cut waste. Citing Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 and the Supremacy Clause, the ruling denies claims of imminent harm while highlighting James's history of asset seizures against Donald Trump and her controversial immigration policies. The segment further exposes massive foreign aid fraud, FDA and Social Security resignations, and Ilhan Omar's clashes with Texas Congressman Brandon Gill, ultimately framing these events as a decisive shift toward executive efficiency over bureaucratic obstruction. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, Qwen/Qwen3-ForcedAligner-0.6B, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Judge's Telling Response00:14:13
Letitia defeated again.
And this one's a doozy, guys.
This one is a big, big deal.
Welcome to the program.
I am Trish Regan.
It's good to have you here.
Make sure you subscribe, like, share, all that good stuff.
Unbelievable.
Judge Chunkin just coming out, like within the last hour, rejecting the call from Democrat AGs all over the country for a temporary, temporary, temporary restraining order blocking Doge's access to federal data.
Now, this is different than actually what we saw yesterday.
It's coming in layers here.
This is pretty bad for them, okay?
This is pretty bad because, you know, she's out there, Letitia James saying, no one elected Elon Musk.
They can't have access to this.
And the judge is like, you actually really haven't shown us why he shouldn't have access.
I mean, he's an employee, right, of the federal sort of government.
Donald Trump has asked him to do this and lead this charge.
Therefore, how can you say this?
Here's Letitia, you know, grandstanding the other day, having this total, complete meltdown.
Just wait to what she's going to do now.
No one elected Elon Musk and his minions, and no one has allowed him to have access to this information.
This is a violation of the separation of powers.
The United States Congress, the United States Senate, has the sole discretion in having the power of the purse and not Elon Musk.
We are here today to seek a preliminary injunction to stand up against those forces who believe that they can unilaterally have power.
And have control all in the hands of the president of these United States.
So much for that, Letitia.
You know, maybe you should have actually refined your legal arguments a little bit more before you charged forward trying to present this one again.
Judge Chutkin, and this is to remind you guys, a Biden appointee coming forward and saying, no, you didn't prove basically that this was a problem.
There was no harm that you could really show.
I mean, they wanted to say, okay, there's no way. that Elon Musk can possibly access government information systems at the Office of Personal Management, the Department of Education, Department of Labor, Department of HHS, Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, I go on and on, Commerce, and they say, oh, you know, this isn't right, this is violation of our privacies, but guess what?
The judge said, you guys didn't show that you're going to actually suffer imminent, irreparable harm absence of temporary restraining order.
So they wanted this temporary restraining order because already, right, the judge, this happened yesterday, Had decided that she wasn't going to rule on this overall.
So they came back and said, no, no, no, we need this temporary, temporary restraining order.
This is what just went down within the last 24 hours.
This happened in the last couple hours, remember?
He's tasked with the Department of Government Efficiency, Doge, Elon Musk.
A federal judge has just declined to issue an order halting Elon Musk and Doge from accessing federal data and slashing personnel.
Attorneys general from 14 states are attempting to stop Musk and Doge.
From accessing data in seven federal agencies and from firing or putting on leave employees in those agencies.
U.S. court.
Boom.
Okay.
So that was about 24 hours ago or so.
And then this is like fresh, hot, off the presses, the latest and greatest.
I mean, my gosh.
You know, I will tell you this, you know, in some ways it's really, really good that Donald Trump had that time, that time, if you would, to be on the sidelines.
Because during that time on the sidelines, what we Found is that his team refined all their legal arguments and they're coming ready and prepared, able to do all this stuff.
And you've got Leticia James, who told us she was ready for this moment, right?
Did we not have to hear that over and over again?
She's not ready.
She was never ready because you know what?
She's not smart enough.
God, I won't say it.
With other Democratic AGs across this country to make sure that we would be ready to respond to any attempt to roll back our rights.
So here we are.
We've studied their platforms.
We've identified certain possibilities, fact patterns.
We've created contingency plans.
So, no matter what the next administration throws at us, we're ready.
Yeah, or so you thought.
Again, Judge Chuckin rejecting calls from Democrat AGs, including one Leticia James, to put a temporary restraining order on Doge, which means Doge can move forward with these mass.
Firings as they try and slim down the government to make it more nimble and ready.
And no, it's not against the Constitution, Leticia.
Payments to the state of New York and to states all across this nation.
It is unacceptable, unconstitutional, ultra biased.
They have exceeded their authority.
And so it's important that attorneys general representing our respective states stand up and enforce the rule of law because Elon Musk, individuals at the Treasury, and the president of these United States is not above the law.
And we will continue.
Okay, you continue.
But, you know, I'm just going to point something out.
You're not above the law either.
And you know what?
There is a law.
There is a law that enables the federal government.
That would be Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution.
There is this little law that says the U.S. government, the feds, are in charge of the U.S. border.
And hey, you know, Letitia, just in case you had any doubt, any doubt whatsoever, just to remind you of this little thing called the Supremacy Clause, right?
The Supremacy Clause, which puts the federal government is the supreme law of the land, anything in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary, notwithstanding.
And by the way, the states can go on and on and on about all their different laws as they pertain to immigration, but it gets you right back to the fact that the federal power most definitely has the final say, if you would, the final say when it comes to immigration.
All of this really coming to a head.
I want to play some sound.
This actually is of Jonathan Turley, who's a really, really smart guy when it comes to constitutional law.
And he was talking about this issue as we got the initial wave of news on Fox just yesterday.
Let's listen in.
Where do you think this all goes next?
I mean, this seems to be the moment for Doge.
How will it go legally?
Well, I love the fact that one of these arguments occurred on President's Day.
It's a sort of reminder that we actually do have a president.
There's someone who is in charge of the executive branch.
And you have states and judges that is a few that have seemed to have forgotten that.
But you're now beginning to see judges.
I've been mystified by many of these challenges.
In my view, the president has this authority.
They can see these records.
It's a bizarre type of argument, Sandra.
It's sort of the Bernie Madoff approach to government efficiency.
You, you can go ahead and reform, but don't look at the books.
I mean, it, they obviously need to look at the receipts.
They need to look at where the money has gone in order to make these judgments.
And they seem to be finding a great deal of waste.
And I think that judges that aggressively try to prevent that are likely to be reversed.
And, Sandra, I think that when they got Judge Chutkin, who is viewed as not exactly supportive of President Trump, they thought this would be a slam dunk.
But even Judge Chutkin, they said, look, I don't understand.
Where's my authority here?
And where's the imminent harm?
I mean, it's incredibly telling the way the judge responded here.
Here's the words of the judge on the lawsuit from the 14 states, Jonathan, challenging Elon Musk and Doge.
Saying, quote, the building will be demolished and there will be something that can't be undone.
The things that I'm hearing are serious and troubling indeed, but you're saying these are things that we're hearing.
I'm not seeing it so far, Jonathan.
Right.
What she is seeing and what we're all seeing is what a president does when they come into office.
Now, it's true that President Trump is being more aggressive.
You know, most people run for this office about shrinking government and then forget once they become the government.
That's not the case here.
I mean, he went and got someone who is famous for downsizing.
He did that at X.
And they are proceeding along those lines.
What's curious about the protest of many of these members?
A lot of these voices were the same ones in the name of democracy that wanted to prevent voters from being able to vote for Donald Trump, who ultimately won both houses and a majority of votes.
And now, in the name of democracy, they're arguing that they should be able to slow down or stymie or even prevent some of the things that he ran on.
Think about that, okay?
I mean, what Turley said is absolutely spot on.
You have this team of people that are trying to basically suffocate Donald Trump and all his supporters.
They wanted to make sure that he could not get elected under any circumstances.
They failed over and over and over again.
And now here we are coming out on the other side.
And he's like, okay, I'm going to cut this.
I'm going to cut that.
I'm going to cut this.
I'm going to cut that.
And Doge is exposing every single bit of it.
And it's gross, right?
Like the spending is positively disgusting and gross.
And they're your tax dollars.
And we're finding this out.
And then they're standing in the way of it.
What a bunch of morons.
I mean, just think about it.
Politically speaking, even Stephen Miller, who's a special advisor, policy advisor to the president and a really bright.
Guy and understands this from a legal perspective and has spent the last four years understanding it and studying it.
He was on CNN today saying look, I realize you guys, you don't like it when the the government isn't uh, dare I say, like paying its bills to you.
I don't know.
I mean, everything's come out with usaid and I sort of wonder how much is CNN getting.
Is that why they were so perturbed?
That's why they were so concerned that Donald Trump not win, no matter what.
Here's Miller, I understand that a that even a temporary interruption In federal employment is a great crisis and catastrophe for you and for CNN.
What the American people see is a government that is finally delivering a promise of accountability under President Trump.
You want to have a conversation about transparency?
Let me ask you a question.
Do you have any idea where the $22 billion that the Department of Health and Human Services provided to illegal aliens under Joe Biden is right now?
$22 billion with a B. That's enough to provide a free house to every homeless veteran in America.
Where's the $22 billion?
I don't know.
You don't know.
Nobody knows.
Joe Biden just spent it and now it's gone.
Transparency begins with having an accounting of where every federal dollar is spent.
And God bless President Trump for leading this effort.
Like, why are they mad about that?
Think about it.
The only reason you'd be mad about it, right, is unless you're trying to protect some kind of corruption.
Alex Karp, who is the CEO of Palantir, a big, big tech company, he was on CNBC saying, Look, I'm really disappointed in my party.
I used to identify as a Democrat.
I don't anymore.
And this party, Like, can't get out of its own way.
They are on the wrong side of this issue.
Dead wrong.
Look, I what I don't like about what's going on.
Any of you really believe?
Look, I what I don't like about what's going on is I just view this as well, let's watch the Democratic Party commit suicide.
And like, I've been a Democrat most of my life, I would still, I kind of view myself as outside it, but I don't like watching the Democrats just commit suicide.
And what I see is Most of the country doesn't really, at this point, given the fraud, waste, and abuse we know is there, 90% of the country is like, get rid of that fraud, waste, and abuse.
And I just view this as yet another example of the progressive left boxing themselves in into a suicide dance.
Now, what the progressive left should be doing is saying, okay, Elon, you're clearly the most qualified person in the world to do something like this.
We want to dialogue with you about how you're doing and what are you doing.
I don't believe that's actually what happened.
And again, I probably like Elon.
I know, I think he's obviously the most important builder in the world.
And I just think, if you want to say my former side, I don't believe that they're actually engaging.
I think it's like another dance where I'm supposed to say, of course, like whatever.
It's like there's this one issue where I might, and then you get boxed into you cannot solve the problem.
And then I would say, what is the biggest problem in this society?
Biggest problem in this society, from my perspective, is the legitimacy of our institutions.
Why aren't they legitimate?
They're not legitimate because, okay, do any of you really believe that?
99% of your taxpayer dollars are being spent.
But last and not least, and probably arguably most importantly, there's two revolutions happening.
One is transparency and one is AI.
Okay, so why is it that we do not know where every penny of our money goes?
Like, how do you explain that to people?
And by the way, slightly more technically, what large language models do is they mean you can go into the contracts and see exactly what happened.
So in the past, we couldn't do this.
Now we can.
The right response is, We want this to happen.
We want to be involved in the dialogue.
The real response is it feels like the people criticizing Elon don't want it to happen.
Asylum Qualification Debate00:15:28
And this is going to destroy those people.
Yes, right?
Because if any of these people had a clue or were not corrupt, dare I say, they'd actually want all this exposed.
I mean, Elon's going to save the taxpayers a lot of money.
Why would you stand in the way of that?
Except it's TDS.
Right, Trump derangement syndrome.
They can't shake it.
It's all they got.
For God's sakes, this woman, Letitia James, has based her entire political existence on Trump derangement syndrome.
She doesn't know how to how to do anything else other than to attack him, and so she's going back to the well and guess what the courts are telling her again.
You know honey, you got no there there.
There's nothing there for you.
And yet She has only one playbook.
Under my leadership, my office sued Donald Trump over 100 times.
And the basis of all of that was Project 2025.
So he cannot distance himself from something that he has attempted to implement when he was president of these United States.
And we were successful 70% of the time.
We were the firewall, Democratic Attorney Generals.
Yeah, well, you were really not successful on this one.
And you had a judge that should have loved you.
Right.
She didn't like Trump.
She wants to help you out, Leticia.
And you're just on the wrong side of the law.
You got no basis for anything.
But you were busy there during the last administration filing hundreds of lawsuits.
And then when you had him leave office, you filed more.
Right.
Because you wanted to bankrupt the guy.
That was your mission.
You politicized everything.
And instead of taking care of your city, you just went after Trump.
Think of how messed up that guy is, guys.
I mean, and you know what?
This was not lost on Pam Bondi.
She's been noticing this for some time.
I think in New York, to specifically talk about New York and to talk about Attorney General Letitia James, instead of sitting in a courtroom going after Donald Trump on bogus civil fraud cases, she should be out on the streets of New York with all of law enforcement.
She's the chief law enforcement officer in New York.
She should be out there condemning this.
Stopping this, calling for the arrest of these people who are vandalizing police cars.
There are cameras all over New York City.
They can catch these people.
Look what Mayor Giuliani did to clean up New York, Manhattan when he was May.
Okay, but Leticia didn't want to, right?
Because all she could do was think about and salivate over going after Trump.
And this is the ABC News clip where she was like, I'm going to take his assets.
If he doesn't have the money with $500 million, she wants to charge the guy half a billion dollars.
For something that is not illegal in any way, shape, or form.
In fact, I'm still waiting on the appeals court, for goodness sakes.
Court of Appeals, you know them, out of New York.
Unbelievable.
Judith Vail, who was representing Letitia James, they told her before she even spoke that she had no case.
So where are they?
May it please the court, Judith Vail, for the New York Attorney General's Office.
All of the defendants repeatedly violated.
Ms. Vail, can you identify any previous case in which the Attorney General sued under Executive Law 6312?
To upset a private business transaction that was between equally sophisticated partners, where the supposed victim had the ability and legal obligation to discover the allegedly misrepresented matters by conducting its own due diligence,
where the supposed drug doer advised the supposed victim through written disclaimers to conduct its own due diligence and to draw its own conclusions, where the alleged misrepresentation almost entirely concerned inherently subjective valuations.
Of properties and businesses.
Yes.
And where the victim never complained about any fraud in the transactional losses from it.
Because I've gone through the cases which you've cited, and all of them always involved the consumer protection aspect.
It involved protection of the market.
And I want to add to his question, and little to no impact on the public marketplace.
Okay.
So she had no case.
She had no case.
We're still waiting on the Court of Appeals in New York to throw that one out.
But Leticia James was going forward with everything she had.
She wanted to seize his assets.
$255 million for a decade of fraud.
New York Attorney General Letitia James says she's prepared to do everything she can to make sure the former president pays his fine, including, she told us, seizing the buildings that bear his name.
If he does not have funds to pay off the judgment, then we will seek, you know, judgment enforcement mechanisms in court, and we will ask the judge to seize his assets.
That's what she wanted to do, seize his assets.
She wanted to go run into Trump Tower and take it over because this is all she had, right?
Think of the campaign.
He's called me venomous.
We will fight back to your attempt to bring Trumpism to New York City.
He's called me disgraceful.
Of the fact that they stumbled a Supreme Court seat.
An illegitimate president and an illegitimate member of the United States Supreme Court.
He's called me radical.
Listen.
We know he's crazy.
We know he doesn't have a sound mind.
Well, now your days are numbered.
Letitia James getting a big defeat along with all the other attorney generals that joined her as Judge Chuckin rejects calls from these Democrat attorney generals to get a temporary restraining order.
She already had said, you know, I really can't rule on this overall in terms of Doge coming in and shutting down all your funding.
She's punting on that one.
So then they say, okay, can we get a temporary restraining order so at least they're not firing these people, et cetera?
And she said no.
I mean, unbelievable.
And Letitia's sitting there going, but wait, wait, wait.
They can't turn off our funding?
Like, that's New York funding.
This is unconstitutional.
How can they do this?
Payments to the state of New York and to states all across this nation.
It is unacceptable, unconstitutional, unchrevious.
They have exceeded their authority.
And so it's important that attorneys general representing our respective states stand up and enforce the rule of law.
Okay.
But here's the problem.
You don't have any backing now from any court.
And, you know, I'll tell you, Letiche, Tish, we should call this segment Trish versus Tish.
You don't have a leg to stand on because here's the evidence.
I mean, you're no better than Ilhan Omar, who they're looking to deport.
Maybe that's a little bit of a misnomer.
We'll talk about that because Brendan Gill, the congressman from Texas, is all over this with Ilhan Omar because she's trying to give these seminars and webinars showing people how you can ice out the feds.
Letitia James is doing the exact same thing.
Okay, the exact same thing, which puts her in violation of federal law.
Here she is.
New York has laws that protect immigrants and limit cooperation with federal enforcement efforts.
Those laws should be followed by law enforcement officials in our state.
So she's telling her law enforcement officials to do that.
And yet if they do that, they are directly in violation of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4.
The federal government's trying to come in and shore up this whole immigration thing.
That is what Donald Trump was put in office to do.
And he has the authority to do it, courtesy of one, the Constitution, and second, well, the supremacy clause.
In the Constitution.
Okay, so this is not that hard.
This actually isn't a constitutional crisis of any sort.
The law is really clear.
Letitia just apparently doesn't understand it.
I think she went to Harvard Law School.
Maybe she skipped her constitutional law class.
Here's the thing Tish, they don't qualify for asylum.
All these people that have come into New York that you're handing out $350 checks.
Oh, the mayor put an end to that, you see.
And they're really mad at him about that.
And the hotels where you get daily maid service?
Come on.
$200 million going to a hotel that's actually owned by Pakistan?
That would be the Roosevelt Hotel there in Midtown.
Look, you have to qualify for asylum, okay?
And if you don't qualify for asylum, then guess what?
If you came into the country and you overstayed your visa, or if you just came into the country illegally, then you're here illegally.
And that would make you in violation of the law because it's very clear-cut.
I've talked to you guys about this before, right?
These are the qualifications for asylum.
This is all spelled out.
Unless you're going to change that, Letitia, you don't have a leg to stand on.
Like you have nothing to stand on.
And yes, Pam Bondi can cut off all the money and Treasury can cut off all the money because you are not following the law.
In the U.S., asylum is defined under 8 U.S.C. 1158 and aligns with the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967 Protocol to qualify for asylum.
You must be able to prove that you've been persecuted or you have a fear of persecution and that you are on protected grounds.
In other words, that persecution needs to be based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or you're a member of a particular social group.
So you can't just come here because you're seeking a better economic future as much as some of these people there in New York City like Tish James would like to believe.
No, it works a whole lot differently than that.
You have to actually qualify for the asylum program.
Quick shout out to 76 Research, my company, financial research company.
I encourage you to check it out.
Code word dollar.
D-O-L-L-A-R, go to 76 Research.
We get lots of pics, lots of information.
You can subscribe to the 76 Report and get that for a dollar a month right now for the first two months introductory offer.
I encourage you to check it out.
All happening as Ilan Omar is increasingly in bigger and bigger and bigger trouble.
And it has a little something to do, well, with her going out and offering some instruction, much like AOC, to the illegals.
In her community, and she's doing this in her language.
I'm just going to show you a quick clip.
Okay, so she's saying if ICE attempts to question you, then you are not obligated to answer their questions.
Just state that you are advised by a lawyer not to answer questions.
She says, and she goes on here trying to instruct this whole room full of people disclosure of your name, immigration status.
and the mode of entry is not mandatory.
So this just happened a couple of weeks ago.
Learn the laws and prepare yourself, says Ilhan Omar.
Well, this has kind of created a little bit of a commotion, right?
I mean, you have people that are kind of concerned that you have lawmakers that are basically flagrantly flaunting their disregard for the federal law.
So it caught the attention of one congressman from Texas, newly minted congressman, Brandon Gill, who you may or may not know happens to be the son-in-law of a good friend of mine.
Dinesh D'Souza, wonderful podcast.
Anyway, here is Brandon Gill, Congressman Gill from Texas on CNN.
And there's been some commotion with people saying, oh, he wants her out of the country because she allegedly married the brother or something.
And that apparently hasn't been proven.
And he's like, no, I actually just want her to stop doing what she's doing in that little seminar that you just saw.
But somehow the CNN anchor is kind of confused.
This is an unbelievable clip, absolutely unbelievable.
I have to show you.
I just want to follow up with this post that you had on X. You said that Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, U.S. citizen, should be deported to her home country of Somalia.
Omar became a naturalized citizen at 17.
Why did you do that?
Listen, my colleague Ilhan Omar, she is an American citizen.
She is a member of the House of Representatives.
I didn't call for her to be deported, but I did say that America would be better off were she deported.
I think that there is a serious problem, particularly given after the past four years of open borders, of Democrats facilitating the invasion of our country by illegal aliens.
My colleague Ilhan Omar was advising illegal alien Somalis on how to evade ICE detection.
That is as un-American as you can possibly get.
It's unbecoming of a congressperson.
What evidence?
Where are you getting that from specifically?
Where are you getting that from specifically?
We have the audio of her doing that.
But do you think that she is a duly elected member of Congress?
Her duties and her duties and her duties.
Okay, I'm just sorry.
I have to jump in because this anchor person.
I think she's replacing Acosta, Jim Acosta.
She's really not all there, right?
Like she's confusing.
I think she's confusing.
Where's the proof?
She wants the proof about the alleged marriage with the brother, right?
This proof of Ilhan Omar giving the instruction, the webinar, that's like everywhere.
That's been out there, but she may be confusing the issues.
She may just be incredibly ill-informed, whatever you want to call it.
She's no match for Brandon.
She kind of freaks out, and she's just like, okay, the interview's over.
Watch.
Member of Congress, her constituents put her in office.
Foreign illegal aliens who shouldn't be here to begin with.
And I think that that raises serious questions.
She's helping people understand what the laws are.
But listen, to whom is she most loyal?
Illegal?
How is she helping people understand the laws?
No.
The law is you can't be in the country, thank you very much, unless you filed for asylum.
And by the way, you're supposed to do that from your own country.
And if you don't qualify for asylum, then you're here illegally.
She's not helping people understand the law.
She's helping people avoid the law.
She's representing her constituents as a member of Congress.
Congressman Brandingale, I really appreciate your time.
I appreciate this conversation.
I think it's really important.
Protecting Illegals Over Legals00:10:53
So do I.
And I think our viewers appreciate it as well.
Thank you so much, Congressman, and look forward to having you.
She's representing her constituents?
People who are here illegally?
Are Ilhan Omar's constituents?
CNN anchor lady?
I don't think so.
No, no, no.
Her constituents should actually be the legal people that live there legally in her state, not a bunch of people that came in here illegally and are trying to avert ICE.
I mean, you wonder what they're really trying to do here?
You saw the headline in the New York Times a little while back.
They were trying to get 800,000 non-citizens to be able to vote in local elections.
They've done that in Berkeley, California.
There's a method to the madness, you see, and it's got to actually stop.
And by the way, Ilhan Omar is not the only one, okay?
She's not the only one.
Incidentally, Ilhan Omar had quite the comeback for Representative Gill.
I mean, it's unbelievable to me.
This is all they got.
I mean, you've got Anderson Cooper calling Sununu, Chris Sununu, former governor of New Hampshire, a, well, he used the D word on him on set when Sununu was like, hey, you know, it's like kind of good that we're finding out where all the doge money's going.
And this woman, Ilhan Omar, is resorting to calling Brennan Gill a dumbass, okay, because he talked about how basically America would be better off without one Ilhan Omar here.
Quote, how stupid you have been or you have to be to be a member of Congress and think your colleague who is a member of Congress can be deported, she said.
Quote, what a dumbass.
I'm not a Nepo baby.
I had to crawl my way into Congress and I think these idiots who buy their seats have no idea what a privilege it is to be a member of Congress and what it takes.
Wow.
That's all she's got, okay?
So they're resorting to silly name calling, whether it's Anderson Cooper calling Chris Sununu, the D word, or whether it's Ilhan Omar trying to say that Brandon Gill is a dumbass because he's pointing out that, hey, maybe she ought not to be advising people on how they can get out of the ice situation, out of the Fed's hands, should they be caught.
That's really messed up.
But again, it's happening over there with AOC.
She's been doing the exact same thing.
We are on the eve of an authoritarian administration.
This is what.
21st century fascism is starting to look like.
No, it's not.
I mean, fascism, authoritarianism, that was actually what we were seeing for the last four years where you guys just would go after anyone that you felt was a threat to the status quo.
And now we have somebody who's come in.
And by the way, he's fallen through on all his promises, right?
He said he would secure the border and he said he would slash government spending and shore up the economy.
And you guys just don't like it.
So guess what?
Tom Holman's looking at whether or not he can have her arrested.
Pam Bondi's looking into this.
Tom Holman has asked her.
This came out just a few days ago.
Watch.
But Tom, you got AOC out there, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Congresswoman, putting out a webinar, doing a webinar to help illegals avoid, I guess, apprehension, giving tips about how to continue to remain in the country and ultimately gain the system.
And I sent an email today to the Deputy Attorney General.
At what level is that impediment?
Is that impediment?
I'm not an attorney.
I'm not a prosecutor.
Is that impediment?
Is that impeding our law enforcement efforts?
If so, what are we going to do about it?
Is she crossing the line?
So I'm working with the Department of Justice and finding out where is that line that they crossed?
So maybe AOC is going to be in trouble now, but I need the AOG to opine on that because there's impediment, it's impediment, in my opinion.
I'm not a prosecutor, but we need some further guidance on that.
But again, If we have to take every federal dollar out of the city, we're done.
You hear that?
Leticia's going to take all your money away.
AOC, your constituents aren't going to have their fat checks from the federal government.
All those federal government programs gone.
Pam Bondi has cut them off, and they're going to keep slashing if you guys don't get with the program.
He spoke to Pam, and listen to Pam, because Pam has now put letitia James, Kathy Hochel, and the head of the DMV on notice.
They are being sued by the Attorney General, one Pam Bondi, for their green light laws, which are in total violation of federal laws.
And if you don't comply with federal law, we will hold you accountable.
We did it to Illinois, strike one.
Strike two is New York.
And if you are a state not complying with federal law, you're next.
Get ready.
And the great men and women of law enforcement are standing behind me today.
We have FBI, DES, DEA, ATF agents, they put their lives on the line every single day to protect us.
And what New York has, they have green light laws, meaning they're giving a green light to any illegal alien in New York where law enforcement officers cannot check their identity if they pull them over.
Law enforcement officers do not have access to their background.
And if these great men and women pull over, Someone and don't have access to their background.
They have no idea who they're dealing with.
And it puts their lives on the line every single day.
Violent criminals, gang members, drug traffickers, human smugglers will no longer terrorize the American people.
And that is why we are here today.
You will be held accountable if you do not follow federal law.
It's over, it ends, and we're coming after you.
Boom, okay?
And she's got the backing.
of the federal courts.
And she's got the backing, if it needs to get this far, of the Supreme Court because the feds have the power here.
I mean, why do you think Texas was going through everything it was going through?
Governor Abbott was tearing his hair out because he wanted the wall up and Biden wanted the wall down.
And because the feds have control over the borders, Abbott didn't have a leg to stand on.
And that was not fair for Texas right at the time.
But that's the law, guys, okay?
And guess what?
The other team is in charge now.
We're here today because we have filed charges against the state of New York.
We have filed charges against Kathy Hochul.
We have filed charges against Letitia James and Mark Schroeder, who is with DMV.
This is a new DOJ, and we are taking steps to protect Americans, American citizens, and angel moms, like the mom standing right behind me, who you're going to hear from in a moment.
Yep.
Okay.
So they are trying to protect the citizens of New York, and Letitia James only wants to protect the illegal citizens of New York.
I mean, They are on the wrong side of everything here.
They don't want to save taxpayers money.
They want to protect illegals rather than legals.
This is adding up to a giant catastrophe for the Democrat Party.
A new poll just published shows that Donald Trump has a 53% approval rating.
That is massive, okay?
That means more than half the country loves what he's doing.
And guess what?
70% of the country said, hey, he's following through on his promises.
That matters, right?
Imagine a politician following through on the promises.
And so what's happening?
Oh, you got all kinds of officials dropping like flies.
Look at this.
The Social Security head has resigned because it seems they're finding out that the Social Security Administration did not do a very good job keeping its roles clean.
Elon Musk was tweeting yesterday about people who were clearly vampires, 150, 160, 180, 300 years old that were still within the system.
So they're trying to clean up all that and she's resigning saying that she doesn't want Doge having access to all of this information.
On top of that, you got the guy who was in charge of food.
A lot of good he did us, right?
We had all those and still have all of these horrible preservatives in our food.
Don't get me started.
I was just over in Europe.
Whole different ballgame there, okay?
They don't have all this junk in their food.
And you know what?
They have better health as a result.
So why do we have all this junk in our food?
Well, guess who's going to fix that?
RFK Jr., Mr. Healthy himself, right?
Make America healthy again.
And the guy who's in charge of food at the FDA, Jim Jones, he's resigning.
He does not like what's going on.
It's a whole new ballgame.
And then you get Danielle Sassoon, who's there in New York, and she's this ambitious look at the headline in the New York Times.
Danielle R. Sassoon, Manhattan's interim U.S. attorney, built a life of conservative values and amassed a daunting resume.
So she is a never-Trumper.
And she is quitting, they say, an ambitious prosecutor.
quitting rather than doing Trump's bidding to which I say good.
You know what?
Let the trash take itself out.
Bye bye.
Bye.
All right.
We're not going to miss you because people actually need to care about protecting the citizens of America and saving the citizens and taxpaying citizens of America from this graft.
And if you can't do that, why don't we want you there in the first place?
You can all retire.
Okay.
You're going to retire or get fired.
So take your pick.
You can't sit there and fly in the face of the law, okay?
You just can't do it.
So this is a good thing.
And the Democrats are continuing to look like fools.
It's just sort of rather amazing.
Donald Trump saying today that it's got to end.
This abuse has got to end.
I want to go to some sound of him just coming into us now.
Massive Voter Funding Scandal00:04:35
Where's the money being spent, right?
Let's go into that for just a second.
$520 million for a consultant on the environment.
It's called Environmental, Social, and Governance Investments in Africa and Mobilize Private Sector Resources.
$520 million.
Somebody got $520 million for an environmental study.
Sounds like an environmental study.
I've always been.
one that paid a lot of money for my environmental studies, but I paid like $50,000, not $520 million, $520 million for ESG.
$25 million to promote biodiversity conservation and promote licit livelihoods by developing socially responsible behavior in the country of Colombia.
Well, that's nice, $25 million to go into Colombia for something that nobody ever heard of.
$40 million to improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants.
$40 million.
$42 million for Johns Hopkins, a great place to research and drive social and behavior change in Uganda.
$42 million.
What about us?
What about social change in our country?
$70 million for a center at Purdue to research university sourced evidence based solutions to developmental challenges.
I mean, these are massive numbers on things that nobody ever heard about.
$10 million for Mozambique voluntary medical male circumcisions.
$10 million for circumcisions in another country.
$9.7 million for UC Berkeley to develop a cohort of Cambodian youth with enterprise driven skills.
In other words, let's teach them something about enterprise.
What about our people?
Can't we teach them about enterprise?
$2.3 million for strengthening independent voices in Cambodia.
Wow.
$32 million to the Prague Civil Society Center, which is a very liberal group of people.
I wonder how much of that money came back to the people that approved it.
$14 million for improving public procurement in Serbia.
$486 million to the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening, including $22 million for inclusive and participatory political process in Moldova.
And $21 million for voter turnout in India.
Well, why are we giving $21 million to India?
They got a lot of money.
They're one of the highest taxing countries in the world in terms of us.
We can hardly get in there because their tariffs are so high.
I have a lot of respect for India.
I have a lot of respect for the Prime Minister.
He just left, as you know, two days ago.
But we're giving $21 million for voter turnout.
It's voter turnout in India.
What about voter turnout here?
We've done that, I guess.
We did $500 million, didn't we?
It's called the lockboxes.
It's great.
$20 million for fiscal federalism in Nepal.
Listen to these numbers.
This is all fraud.
$19 million for biodiversity conservation in Nepal.
$1.5 million for voter confidence.
We want to give them confidence.
In Liberia, $14 million for social cohesion in Mali, $2.5 million for inclusive democracies in South Africa, $47 million for improving learning outcomes in Asia.
Asia's doing very well.
They're doing a lot better than we do in the schools, aren't they?
$2 million to develop sustainable recycling models to increase socioeconomic cohesion among marginalized communities in Kosovo.
And Eskali, and in Egypt.
We're talking about hundreds of billions of dollars.
I could, by the way, I could read this all day long.
I could go on all day long, and you'll see hundreds of billions of dollars.
Right?
I mean, he could, this is outrageous, you guys.
And think about what the left is doing.
They are trying to stand in the way.
Letitia James.
Treasury Secrets Exposed00:02:06
Saying that he can't do this, that somehow we don't have a right to know where all of this money is going.
This was her deal.
No one elected Elon Musk and his minions, and no one has allowed him to have access to this information.
This is a violation of the separation of powers.
The United States Congress, the United States Senate, has the sole discretion in having the power of the purse and not Elon Musk.
We are here today to seek a.
And she went on and on about how he didn't have the right to look at all of our data.
M4Tune, thank you.
I'm going to get to some of your comments.
Chris, thank you very much.
Yes, we should have gifted memberships, I guess.
Flyy, thank you as well.
Judge Chuckin rejects the call from Democrat AGs for this temporary restraining order.
So guess what?
Doge is having a party and we are finding out where all our money has been going.
And listen, they're not stopping with that.
Mary Carol, thank you so much.
They are not stopping with that, you guys.
They're moving on.
They're moving on to Fort Knox.
I mean, Donald Trump's like, there's all this fraud.
Elon's like, okay, so, you know, the U.S. is supposed to be the biggest holder of gold.
I want to know where it is.
I want to see it.
And he's joined in this effort by Ron Paul and son, Senator Rand Paul.
Listen to Rand.
Well, you know, I've been trying to go down and see the gold, make sure it's all there for about 10 years.
During the first Trump administration, I got permission.
You have to get permission all the way up to the Secretary of Treasury.
And then the Secretary of Treasury said, Well, I want to go down there too.
And then he said, I want to go down there when there are the eclipses coming through Kentucky too, so I can see the eclipse and the gold at the same time.
But they came when I wasn't there.
So I tried for 10 years.
I set up the appointment.
And then because they wanted to see the eclipse, they changed the appointment.
I didn't get to go down.
But the Secretary of Treasury and the Senior Center from Kentucky did go down and attest that they believe they saw the gold down there.