Jordan Peterson is a Canadian clinical psychologist and Professor of Psychology at the University of Toronto. He is also a best-selling author for his books “12 Rules for Life”, “Beyond Order” and more.
Jordan Peterson joins This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von for a third time to chat about what’s new since their last podcast, why our world view doesn’t have to be so negative, recent controversies, how technology could pose a threat to freedom, turning pride into determination, and more.
Dr. Jordan B. Peterson: https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/
Check out his books: 12 Rules for Life and Beyond Order
------------------------------------------------
Tour Dates! https://theovon.com/tour
New Merch: https://www.theovonstore.com
-------------------------------------------------
Sponsored By:
Füm: Head to http://tryfum.com/THEO to save an additional 10% off your order today.
DraftKings: Download the DraftKings Sportsbook app now and use code THEO to get $200 in bonus bets instantly when you bet $5 on college football.
BetterHelp: This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp — go to http://betterhelp.com/theo to get 10% off your first month.
Liquid IV: Go to http://liquidiv.com and use code THEO to get 20% off.
Shopify: Go to http://shopify.com/theo to take your business to the next level today.
-------------------------------------------------
Music: "Shine" by Bishop Gunn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3A_coTcUek&ab_channel=BishopGunn
------------------------------------------------
Submit your funny videos, TikToks, questions and topics you'd like to hear on the podcast to: tpwproducer@gmail.com
Hit the Hotline: 985-664-9503
Video Hotline for Theo Upload here: https://www.theovon.com/fan-upload
Send mail to:
This Past Weekend
1906 Glen Echo Rd
PO Box #159359
Nashville, TN 37215
------------------------------------------------
Find Theo:
Website: https://theovon.com
Instagram: https://instagram.com/theovon
Facebook: https://facebook.com/theovon
Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/thispastweekend
Twitter: https://twitter.com/theovon
YouTube: https://youtube.com/theovon
Clips Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheoVonClips
Shorts Channel: https://bit.ly/3ClUj8z
------------------------------------------------
Producer: Zach Powers https://www.instagram.com/zachdpowers/
Producer: Ari Mannis https://www.instagram.com/arimannis/
Producer: Jonny Pottins https://www.instagram.com/jonny_lp/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
These tickets will go on sale this Thursday at 10 a.m.
local time.
November 9th in Norfolk, Virginia at the Chartway Arena.
November 10th at Roanoke, Virginia.
November 11th, Huntington, West Virginia.
November 15th, Evansville, Indiana.
November 16th, Pikeville, Kentucky.
November 17th, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
And November 24th, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Down there at the UNO Lakefront Arena.
And that is the day after Thanksgiving.
So that'll be during Thanksgiving break.
All of those new dates will go on sale this Thursday at 10 a.m.
local time.
Today's guest is returning to the podcast.
He is one of the most articulate men, I believe, of our time between thoughts and oration.
I don't know if there's, I mean, I don't know if there's anybody that can think and share as eloquently as him.
We're really grateful to be here in his home country of Canada and to get to spend time with him again on the podcast.
He is touring.
You can check him out.
He has a new book that he's working on.
He has books that we'll put in the information below.
Today's guest is Mr. Jordan Peterson.
Shine that light on me I'll sit and tell you my stories Shine on me And I will find a song I'll be singing I'm going to stay I'm going to stay I love the 70s shag cups.
People used to have those all over their houses.
It wasn't a good idea.
Especially if they had dogs.
Are we rolling?
Nice rat.
Thanks, man.
That's my nickname is the Rat King.
Oh, yeah.
Do you know what a Rat King is?
Huh?
Do you know what a Rat King is?
Uh-uh.
Oh, my God.
It's a terrible story.
There is a Rat King.
Uh-uh.
Well, this is the theory now.
I don't know if people ever did this.
So imagine your village is full of rats.
Oh, yeah.
Okay, so now you go catch 10 rats.
Okay.
You throw them in a pit.
Okay.
Soon there is one rat because he gets all the other rats.
He's a champ.
Then you throw 10 more rats in there.
Soon there's one rat.
You do that three or four times.
Then you take the remaining rat and you let him go.
And soon there are no rats in the village.
Really?
That's the theory.
Wow.
So it was like the toughest of them all.
Yeah, and then he learns to eat rats.
Wow.
Oh, so you teach him to cannibalize?
No.
We just have.
That's a rough story, eh?
Jesus.
Yeah, I mean, it doesn't have.
It's sort of like politics.
Yeah, that's true, especially these days.
I don't think it's for the, I wouldn't say it's for children.
No, it's not.
It's not for children.
Although it's hard to tell these days.
They don't know what's for children.
Well, did you see that movie Up?
Did you ever see that?
Yeah.
Yeah, right in the beginning, the grandmother dies, and it's just kind of like shocked.
You know, like, wow.
Yeah.
So, but that's a good story.
I remember when I was young, if you got somebody a hamster or a gerbil, that's how you taught them about death.
You know, it was usually like gerbil and then grandparent was kind of like the God.
The order, you know, the order that things kind of expired in in a child's life.
That's very terrible.
Well, welcome to the Salem Witch Trials of Canada.
Oh, yes.
I'm here on behalf of the Ontario.
Is it the psychology department?
No, it's the College of Psychologists, and it's confusing.
You're under trial right now.
You're under.
Yes, it's essentially a trial.
You're being brought up on, you have to take social media re-education from your provinces saying this.
Is that right?
It's a professional group, but they have delegated authority from the provinces.
So there are regulated professions.
Okay.
And engineers, lawyers, physicians, psychologists, social workers, teachers, there's a few others.
And if you're in a regulated profession, there's a professional body that governs professional conduct to which the public has access in case people misbehave.
And so the Ontario College of Psychologists, it's college as in group, professional group rather than university.
And it's the Ontario College of Psychologists that have decided to pursue initially 13 charges against me.
They dropped seven.
Why they dropped those seven is a complete mystery, as is everything else they do.
You can submit a complaint to the College of Psychologists online with a form.
And so what's happened, at least in part, is because that's become so easy, it's become weaponized by activists.
So for example, if you want to cause anybody who's a professional trouble, all you have to do is submit a complaint to the college.
The college will look into the complaint, every complaint, and then decide whether they'll proceed.
Now, they're not supposed to proceed if the complaints are vexatious or, you know, just troublemaking, but they've decided that me complaining on Twitter about Trudeau, for example, is unprofessional and is a disgrace to the profession, which is essentially what I've been charged with, is being a disgrace to the profession.
So it's trying to hold up what they presume is some esteem of the profession.
That's the theory and some professional standards.
And, you know, I would say for decades that system actually worked pretty well because the people who sat on it weren't ideologically addled and the public wasn't using it in a weaponized manner.
But that's changed completely.
And now every professional in Canada, and I believe that to be true essentially without exception, unless they're on the far left, are completely unwilling to ever utter any opinion about Anything in the political or their professional realm, especially in relationship to medicine and psychology.
The physicians.
Now, the Ontario College of Physicians is partnered with the Ontario College of Psychologists to go after me because they're also afraid that if I was victorious in this, their idiot mid-level bureaucratic power would be diminished.
And so, and I've had conversations with many physicians in particular who've told me flat out that they'd like to publicly support me, but they can't afford the tremendous legal costs and the lengthy inquisition that's a consequence or the possible suspension of their license.
So you're going to probably have to go this alone in some way.
I do have people who have presented themselves as interested parties on the legal side.
There's the Canadian Civil Liberties Union is one of them.
There's a Justice CCF, I believe they're, now they're going to be irritated at me for not remembering the name, but I can't remember it at the moment.
There's a number of groups who are pro-free speech, let's say, who've also weighed in on my side, but the court didn't take their concerns with, they didn't make their concerns paramount, let's put it that way.
Yeah, and the judges, so I appealed this ruling.
So the ruling essentially is that I have to take social media retraining with a social media expert.
And I'd like to make it very clear, there is no such thing as, there's no profession.
He has like the Wizard of Oz.
Like, who is it going to be?
Do you know the expert?
No, I don't.
That's great.
No, I've got a couple of names, but I don't even know what defines you as a social media expert, and neither does the college.
And they don't care.
You know, if someone presents themselves as a social media expert, that's good enough.
My sense is that if you're a social media expert, you have a podcast with millions of followers, and you're doing just fine on your own, and you actually don't need to work for an idiot bureaucracy.
But, you know, that's just me.
So now, not only do I have to be re-educated by this social media expert, but I have to do it at my own expense, which, you know, is neither here nor there in some sense, but for an indefinite period of time until I've learned whatever the hell lesson I'm supposed to learn, and I don't exactly know what lesson that is, by their judgment, right?
And so.
So it's all up to them.
So it's kind of this vague thing that they've put you into.
And they challenged you because they were upset at things you had said on Twitter.
Mostly on Twitter.
Noel.
They also, and maybe this can happen today, somebody submitted the entire transcript of my last conversation with Joe Rogan as a complaint, partly because of what I said about climate change.
Now, I am not a fan of climate change models, which I think are to call them flawed is to barely scrape the surface.
But that isn't exactly the point, is what happens is you have climate models that have really no predictive validity.
They're about as valid as the models that scientists used to predict COVID death outcomes, which tended to overestimate the mortality probability by a factor of about 10. They're not accurate.
And a computer model is a hypothesis, not data.
It's a guess.
Now, you know, it's an intelligent guess, or it can be, depending on how you model it.
Anyways, on top of the climate models, there are even more radically unstable economic models saying, you know, that the consequences of climate change will be catastrophic if you look 100 years into the future.
It's like nobody can make an economic bet 100 years into the future, period.
Right.
Period.
The end.
You can't even, look, you can't even model a stock six months down the road, much less than the world economy in 100 years.
It's preposterous.
Yeah, I mean, I think there's been so much climate over the years.
I think you'd have to take a ton of things into consideration.
You probably have to take a lot of things into consideration that we don't even really know.
Well, can you imagine trying to predict today's economy 100 years ago?
Like, I can't even think about how we're going to predict what's going to happen economically in five years, given the rate of change.
But are economic changes or patterns as do they have as many variations as weather patterns?
Yeah.
Well, yeah, they do, partly because they're dependent on weather and climate patterns, right?
I mean, in some ways, the economy is as complex as everything.
Because, well, because you just don't know what will happen.
If there's, imagine there could be, imagine Yellowstone blew.
You know, Yellowstone, it's Yellowstone, I believe, that's on a super volcano.
It's a huge volcano.
And if it blew, it would be like a, you know, it would wipe out a third of the planet.
Well, that would have economic consequences.
And so the economy is, you can't model the economy.
In fact, that's actually why the free enterprise system works to the degree it does, the free exchange, because what happens is that pricing decisions are made as a consequence of local trades.
And that is as good a model of the underlying, let's say, reality that people are trying to adapt to as you can possibly manage.
So, for example, in the Soviet times, there was a central pricing committee because they had no pricing mechanism, right?
They couldn't figure out what anything cost because there was no free market.
They had to make 400 pricing decisions a day.
And they had to do things like price nails.
And it's like, well, what's a nail worth?
And the answer is, well, the market computes that.
And in the absence of that answer, well, there's no limit to the range of potential value that a nail might have.
Like if there's a nail shortage, that actually turns out to be a really bad thing.
Oh, yeah.
Pricing decisions are insanely hard to make.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, I think, yeah, I mean, it's funny.
They give you a lot of nails when you buy them, but I think things could change, you know?
I mean, you could go there and have to just get one nail.
But so just so you'd have to really use it wisely.
Well, you would.
You would.
Yeah.
You'd have to be very careful.
You'd probably like display it.
Gold-plated display.
You used to have nails.
If you're going to pin a tail on a donkey, you Better mean it that day, huh?
But just so we stay on, so I stay in this one frame of like, so do you feel like, but they're, so they're challenging your things you've said on social media, right?
Yeah, well, so do you think it's a challenge of your free speech?
Is that what you feel like?
Oh, I, the, the court that ruled against my appeal essentially said that it was a free speech issue.
Okay.
And they said in their opening argument that according to the Canadian Charter of Rights, which was by the way instantiated by Justin Trudeau's father, Pierre Trudeau, and Justin's regime is in the process of absolutely gutting it.
Anyways, I have a right to free speech according to that charter, but, and that's the next sentence, this very low-level bureaucratic institution has the right to abridge that essentially as they see fit, which means, as far as I can tell, that I don't have the right to free speech at all.
And I should make very clear, those colleges should be intervening when a client or a patient, right, or customer, depending on the regulated profession, has been mistreated in some manner by the person they're dealing with.
Okay, the people that levied complaints against me, first of all, most of them don't live in Canada.
Second of all, none of them were clients of mine.
Third, none of them knew anyone who was a client of mine.
They claimed harm, that I had done harm, on behalf of other people who they also didn't know.
So it's a witch hunt, really.
Well, and they also, a number of them also claimed to be clients of mine in writing in the complaints.
No, they're not clients of mine.
And clients of mine, before I became politically known, let's say, I practiced as a clinician for more than 20 years and I had zero complaints.
And I had zero complaints levied against me at the university, too, either at Harvard or at the University of Toronto.
And the reason for that was that I treated my students, my colleagues, my coworkers, and my clients well, all the time.
There was zero problems.
But as soon as things exploded around me politically, well, the people who've weaponized the colleges have taken that opportunity to go after me.
And then the college, which is nicely infested by radicals like almost everything else in the West and particularly in Canada, are using this opportunity to attempt to make my life miserable.
But we'll see whose lives are made miserable.
Wow.
Yeah.
Do you feel, do you, did you almost, was there a part of you that kind of was like excited about the like?
Not to begin with.
Like it's not ever entertaining to face legal proceedings.
You have to be a fool, generally speaking, to think that even if you're the one levying a lawsuit, you have to be a real fool to think that it's going to do anything but cause you a lot of grief and misery.
Like lawsuits are not entertaining.
And I have quite a pronounced proclivity to feel guilt.
And I went through the, like this has been going on a long time, off and on for about six years.
So the ruling just happened, right?
Well, the court ruling that denied my appeal just happened.
Okay, I got it.
Yeah, because I appealed their right.
I have to go through.
No, the next thing they have to do, I either have to go through with the training or they can drag me in front of a disciplinary board.
And my next move is going to be to say, hey, bring on the disciplinary board.
They film those.
Wow.
I will put that on YouTube.
So if they want to make the case that, for example, my objections to the trans surgical mutilation of children, I believe that to be wrong.
Like, I believe it's actually a crime against humanity.
The reason I believe that, by the way, is the UN definition of crime against humanity, one of them is involuntary sterilization.
My sense is that if you're a medical professional and you sterilize a child, that's involuntary sterilization because they are not qualified to give qualified consent, informed consent, as anyone with any sense recognizes.
Yeah, they can't even go on a field trip without getting a signature, right?
You know what I'm saying?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Right.
So they can't, yeah.
They can't go on like a genital field trip.
Yeah, well, there, there are hospitals now when they inform the children of what's going to happen.
For example, if they castrate them, for example, they tell them the girls, obviously they're not castrating the girls.
They're just doing double mastectomies and sterilizing the girls.
But they tell them that they might have to have their eggs stored because this is going to interfere with their fertilization.
And if they ever want to have children, well, that'll be what they'll have to do.
It's like, well, you know, every 12-year-old is capable of, yeah, no kidding.
No, it makes me sick thinking about it.
It is absolutely despicable.
I believe that the people who've done this should be in prison for the rest of their lives.
There's no excuse for this.
So do you think that youth speaking up against things like that are some of the reasons why they're kind of— Well, I tweeted something out about Elliot Page.
Ellen Page.
Yeah, now we're in trouble.
Now we're already in trouble.
Yeah, I said that I said, do you remember when pride was a sin and when a criminal physician cut off Ellen Page's breasts?
And that got me kicked off Twitter.
But that was also one of the tweets that was complained about, you know, and I had friends.
I actually did a whole YouTube video on this.
I had friends who kind of upbraided me for being a little harsh.
And we talked it over on YouTube for about 90 minutes.
And I don't regret it at all.
In fact, I think that in the intervening year since that tweet or so, the tides turned very firmly in a direction that indicates that my suspicions were more than warranted.
You know, a lot of the European countries that were all on board with this so-called gender affirming care have reversed their stance, right?
Including the Netherlands, where this protocol, this hypothetical gender-affirming miserable statement because it's such a lie, where that protocol first emerged, the Dutch have realized that this is a bad idea.
They've realized it in the UK and in Norway and Sweden, in France, and they're pulling back like mad.
Now, the Americans and the Canadians are still thinking this is just a fine idea, but it's not.
Well, it's probably still a bit, there's probably still people trying to do the balance sheet of what is the value of it, you know, in America.
I mean, a lot of things come down to kind of like, you know, what can be profited on.
Yeah, well, that's for sure.
But do you feel like in Canada that they are just, because Canada is kind of like a pass, it's, I don't want to say it's a passive place, but it's like a, it's kind of like a, I don't know, is passive the word, do you think?
I think passive is a reasonable word compared to the excited states of America, let's say.
Okay, that's very fair, right?
Well, and I think to some degree, look, you know, our Constitution originally, your system is predicated on the idea of like right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
And our Constitution was predicated on peace, order, and good government, right?
It's a very different view of what constitutes an appropriate society.
Right.
The basic doctrines of your country are more entrepreneurial and adventurous.
And I really think you can see that in the difference between the two countries.
And more individual.
And more, yeah, and more libertarian and more entrepreneurial.
And you can see that in the temperaments of the two countries.
And actually, things worked very well in Canada, I would say, till about 10 years ago, 15 years ago, something like that, because our institutions, all of our institutions, were conservative in the best sense, right?
They were reliable and stable and predictable, but they also honestly did what they were supposed to do.
And that was true even of, say, government-sponsored media agencies like the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, the CBC, which is sort of our equivalent of PBS, but was much more dominant in Canada.
And our higher education institutions worked and our political parties were pretty predictable.
You know, we had the Conservatives and they were the party of big business and everybody knew that.
We had the Liberals and they were the natural governing party and they were centrists, kind of like more conservative Democrats.
That's about where I would put them in the political distribution.
Then we had the socialists, the NDP.
We still have these three parties and they were essentially a labor party and made up of union people.
And that's all blown into bits now.
And those parties for years played their roles and they played them honorably and honestly.
And everyone knew what they were getting.
And that's completely turned upside down.
Trudeau's liberals are farther left than the socialists.
And in fact, the socialists have been reduced to a parody of themselves in Canada.
A few months ago, I wanted to sell something online.
I wanted to sell a batch of knives that I had at the house.
And I was trying to get rid of them.
I didn't know what to do.
I had no idea where to get started.
That's why I'm glad that I found Shopify.
That's right.
Shopify is the commerce platform revolutionizing millions of businesses worldwide.
Whether you're a garage entrepreneur or IPO ready, Shopify is the only tool you need to start, run, and grow your business without the struggle.
That's true.
Shopify puts you in total control of every sales channel.
So whether you're selling satin sheets, knives, or anything else, you can sell them from Shopify's in-person POS system.
And once you've reached your audience, Shopify has the internet's best converting checkout to help you turn them from browsers to buyers.
That's right.
Shopify powers 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. and Shopify is truly a global force.
Thank you.
Plus, Shopify's award-winning help is there to support your success every step of the way.
You hear that sound?
It's the sound of a sale you're missing out on because you're not selling on Shopify.
And what does it sound like with Shopify?
Ah, that's much better.
Start selling with Shopify today.
You just need to go to shopify.com slash T-H-E-O.
That's S-H-O-P-I-F-Y dot com slash Theo to take your business to the next level today.
Liquid IV, if you want to get hydrated and stay hydrated, you want to drink something and make it feel like you drank something.
Liquid IV can help.
They're the number one powdered hydration brand in America.
They're also now available in sugar-free.
That's right.
Years in the making, hydration multiplier sugar-free uses a proprietary zero-sugar hydration solution with no artificial sweeteners.
With three times the electrolytes of the leading sports drink, plus eight vitamins and nutrients for everyday wellness, liquid IV hydrates two times faster than water alone.
Oh boy.
They've got some great flavors.
White peach, green grape, and lemon lime.
One stick of liquid IV in 16 ounces of water hydrates you two times faster and more efficiently than water alone.
Be damned, water.
Be damned.
Real people, real flavor, real hydrating now, sugar-free.
Grab your Liquid IV hydration multiplier sugar-free in bulk nationwide at Costco.
Or get 20% off when you go to liquidiv.com and use code Theo at checkout.
That's 20% off anything you order when you use promo code Theo at liquidiv.com.
Do you feel like you've been picked a lot because you're like a loud, I don't mean this disrespectfully, you're like a loud Canadian, right?
You're like probably the loudest Canadian since like Celine Dion, probably, right?
But in a total different, like, you know, but you, you know, Canadians are usually kind of more passed.
Like it's not really, I mean, how he meant.
I mean, there's a lot of Canadians that are verbose.
Yeah, well, there's a Canadian, there's a Canadian.
But maybe it's not as challenging of like the status quo.
I don't know what I'm trying to say.
I'm just trying to wonder why are they.
But we are Canadian comedians, and we have a good comedic tradition.
And I would say to the degree that Canadians are.
Oh, some of the best, Norm McDonald, Harlan Williams, like a lot of great comedians.
Yeah, Jim Carrey.
Yeah.
Lots of the whole SCTV crowd.
Like there are a lot of really great Canadian comedians.
And that's a long-standing tradition.
And they can be pretty viciously satirical.
The Trailer Park Boys are a good example of that.
And I think they're absolutely bloody brilliant for scripted comedy.
Their scripted comedy is remarkable.
But I do think that Canada is a country where being, what do they call it, tall poppy syndrome.
If you're the poppy that grows up above the rest, then you're the first one who has his head cut off.
That's what I'm trying to say.
Yeah, and that's true of many countries, but it's particularly true of Canada.
Because it kind of makes it more about you than about what, or maybe not you're making it more about you, but if you start to like, yeah, Canada just wants to be almost like, we're here.
Yes, we want to be able to fit into a space that's very manageable by us.
Yeah, well, that's what it seems like.
And it goes over well.
Like, I mean, I find the peace that I feel in Canada when I'm here, the genuineness in people's eyes that I see.
Even people that look mean come up to you and then they're nice.
They just looked a little mean.
You know, like, it's like, it's really, really wonderful.
I love Canada.
I love the people here.
But yeah, I think I'm just wondering why it is your like, why are they challenging you for free speech?
Like, why does that?
Well, I think I'm also a reasonably effective opponent, say, of the current administration federally.
And I think that definitely, I don't, I'm not trying to imply that they're directly complicit in what's happening to me in relationship to the college, because I don't believe that to be the case.
But I also don't think that I'm a friend of anyone who is a friend of the current liberal administration in Canada.
And these judges, for example, they were true to appointees.
And also, they were true to appointees with a long history of essentially left-wing activism.
So that also has a lot to do.
Well, and this is another terrible thing that's happened in Canada is that our courts have become and our legal system have become politicized.
And that was never the case in Canada, not in any real way.
We had enough sense for a very long time to keep politics out of the judiciary, out of the education system, out of the media.
Our country wasn't politicized.
We had political parties and everybody knew where they were.
And that's where we had our discussions and they went quite well.
And apart from that, outside of that, things were not politicized.
But now in Canada, and this is the case in the West more generally, virtually everything is radically politicized.
Yeah, do you think you guys caught that from the West in a way?
Do you think that that's a negative thing that happened that came over from there?
I think that we contributed to that to a large degree.
And I think we did that back in the 1980s.
Canada has always tilted towards group rights.
Yeah.
That's what it feels like.
It feels like it's for the common good.
Well, part of the reason for that was that we had to bend ourselves into knots to keep the country together because there was so much tension between the French and the English in Canada.
And it's so cold, you got to huddle up.
Well, yeah.
Yeah.
Well, you got to be in it.
That also may be why this place is somewhat more collectivist, let's say, than the U.S. I mean, winter here is no bloody joke.
And, you know, everybody pushes their neighbors out of snowbanks in the winter.
No, I think that 100%.
You've got to really be a team.
Do you think like, so yeah, I think what I'm trying to think more about is just like the challenge, like about free speech, right?
Like about how it's being challenged everywhere.
It's going to be really strange if those people get you in front of a board.
They're not going to do that.
Oh, I don't think they have a choice, actually.
I think what they'll try to make sure I don't publish it.
You know, they'll try to keep it secret, but that ain't going to happen.
You have to do pay-per-view.
Yeah, no kidding.
No kidding.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
I know.
I want to be your corner man.
If there's rounds, I want to come in between rounds.
Well, you were asking me if I was looking forward to it.
And like I said, you have to be a fool to look forward to legal proceedings.
But I went through all 13 of the charges over Christmas last December, you know, which was not a very pleasant three days because you never know when you have hundreds of pages of paperwork, which I had to go through.
You never know when you might have done something stupid that's going to catch up with you, you know, and everybody has stupidity in their past.
And so I was pretty damn apprehensive when I went through all the paperwork.
But the more I delved into it, actually, the better I felt, because not only did they make terrible procedural errors, like going ahead with the complaints of people who literally claimed falsely in writing to be clients of mine.
And I think six of the complaints are like that.
But it's just so utterly preposterous.
I mean, two of the things they complain about are literally criticisms of Trudeau.
And like, if I can't criticize a standing prime minister in my own country, there is something seriously wrong.
One of them was his chief of staff.
One of them was a city councillor.
One of them was the trans issue that we discussed.
One of them I criticized Sports Illustrated for presenting a very obese cover model.
And I said that as far as I was concerned, she wasn't beautiful and that no amount of tolerant, of authoritarian compassion was going to convince me otherwise.
And the other thing that the other reason that I think Canadians got mad at that, and I think people in general, is that they think I'm being mean.
You know, and you should be nice.
And first of all, I'm not exactly so sure that you should be nice all the time.
I think we as a culture have got ourselves into an awful lot of trouble by being a little bit too nice.
Like I'm not so sure.
I'll give you an example of that.
So Nicola Sturgeon, who was the former prime minister of Scotland, said, any man who says that he's a woman is a woman.
You think, well, that's pretty nice.
If the guy wants to be a woman, well, we can just go.
What harm could it do?
And then the serial sexual slayers in prisons decided that maybe they were women because maybe then they could go to women's prisons.
And, you know, if you don't think that a serial sexual killer will manipulate his image to get access to women, you are a complete blithering bloody idiot.
And of course, that's exactly what happened in Scotland.
And so Sturgeon was called out on her pathological compassion.
And that was one of the things that led to her resignation.
It's like tolerance beyond a certain level is 100% absolutely, incontrovertibly a vice.
And when tolerance has got to the point where it's a vice, then it's time to not be so nice.
When you say a vice, what do you mean?
That's a very good question.
You know, what is a vice exactly?
Well, a vice is a pattern of behavior that, if indulged in, Especially repeatedly, leads to nothing but negative consequences, even by the self-definition of the person engaging in the vice.
And so, look, excess alcohol use tends to be a vice.
Well, why?
Okay.
How do you diagnose alcoholism as a pathology?
Well, the first thing you do is you look at amount and frequency, let's say, but that's not enough.
It has to be a high amount, frequently, that causes substantial disruption to one or more important domains of life.
So if you're wondering whether you're drinking too much, you think, well, is it compromising your health?
Are your friends starting to object?
Have you got in trouble with the law?
Is your wife mad?
Exactly, exactly.
So is the behavior starting to produce negative consequences?
Even by your definition, or perhaps even more importantly by your definition, then you'd say, well, any behavior that tends to be quite entertaining in the short term, but let's say not so good socially or in the long term, that's a vice.
And we all know that.
You know, there's lots of things like drinking is a great example.
It's an absolute bloody blast, especially if you like alcohol.
But, you know, when I was a kid, I used to drink a fair bit and I quit when I was about 24, 25, maybe a little later than that.
And, you know, I was out three or four times a week having just a fine time.
Drinking beer or whiskey?
Yeah, usually beer.
I like beer a lot, but whatever was available fundamentally.
Anything wet.
Yeah, yeah.
And at some point, especially as my professional career developed, I realized that I realized essentially, and this is also when I started my permanent relationship with Tammy, I thought, You know, the only time I really do things I regret is when I'm drinking.
Yeah.
You know, if I'm...
Yeah, well, that's the thing.
Well, that's a vice, man.
It's like, it's not good for you.
And it's especially not good if you're trying to aim up.
Like, you couldn't do what you're doing.
How old are you?
You'd die at 27. Like you would have died at 27. That's when most people die, you know, that have the.
And they die from vices generally.
You tell me that last time, one of the last times that we spoke.
So there's a lot of challenge to your free speech.
You're saying that things you've said that – Right.
But they're not.
It's like, you know, you're supposed to, now you're supposed to say that there's nothing sexual about drag queen story hour.
It's like, it's mean to say that.
It's like there's nothing sexual about grown men with false breasts dressing up in negliges, which are clearly sexually provocative, and reading to children.
There's nothing sexual about that.
Yeah.
Okay.
No, I think I'll burn my eyes out with a sword.
It's like, no, I'm afraid there's something sexual about that.
To me, yeah, it would be.
I mean, I think it would be, that would be a lot to consume as a child and understand.
You know, it would feel like there would be some barrier to entry between me and that if I were a child.
Yeah, yeah, a trifle.
It's a lot of complexity to throw at a child all over.
Yeah, it just seems like a lot of complexity to throw at a child, you know?
He can't even, yeah.
So I'm just thinking mostly about free speech.
Like, do you feel like free speech is becoming more under fire or do you feel like that we're just way more under fire?
It's under fire.
Look, I talked to, I was in Greece a while back and I met a professor there from the Kennedy School of Government, right?
Which was for decades and even now is one of the preeminent higher education institutions for the discussion of political issues and political philosophy.
And he told me flat out that his colleagues can no longer feel comfortable expressing their genuine opinions to their students.
Wow.
And I mean, that's game over, right?
Because the only thing you have as an educator and certainly as a psychologist is, and as a physician, a lawyer for that matter, is your handle on the truth.
Well, is civil law one of our problems with that?
Because people just say, once somebody hears something they don't like, they sue.
There's always like a lawsuit against a police department, a university.
It's just like, we didn't like hearing this.
They shouldn't be saying this.
Then it's a lawsuit.
And then once it becomes a financial burden, they can't afford, literally cannot afford to do it anymore.
They're like, if we have three more teachers speak out this year, then that's going to be all of our endowment or whatever for the spring.
And now we're going to be out of business.
Yeah, well, it's definitely, if the advantage is on the accuser, is for the accuser constantly, then everyone, no one can speak anymore.
That's what it feels like.
And we have weaponized all sorts of systems of accusation and we haven't built equivalent systems of defense.
And that's a very bad idea.
And I think a lot of this is actually fostered by social media because you can and do, and it's funny because in some sense, this is also what I'm being accused of doing, you know, in some sense.
You can say things on social media that you could never say to someone face to face.
And not only can you get away with it, you are rewarded for it.
And that's a very, very, very, very bad idea.
Now, I would say in my own defense is I don't do this anonymously, right?
If I have something to say, I'm going to say it.
And I've gone after the anonymous online troll demons.
And I called them troll demons for a real reason, you know, because, well, they're trolls, obviously, by cliché, but why demon?
And the answer is, is because if you're using a computer, you're not exactly human anymore.
You're a machine-human hybrid, you know, and if you're just some resentful son of a bitch sitting in the basement perturbating about how miserable your life is and trying to spew as much venom as possible, you can't do a damn thing down there by yourself, right?
You're completely powerless and you deserve to be because you haven't done a goddamn thing with your life.
But if you have a computer at hand, you can multiply yourself hundreds of thousands or even millions of times.
You can do that on Twitter.
Right.
And you can pollute the entire domain of political discourse.
And so I believe we have disinhibited the psychopaths online.
And that's a recipe for disaster.
But there's no way to figure, but I don't know if there's a way to fix that.
It feels like there's no, like, unless you had to have like the exact, unless you couldn't be anonymous online, right?
Yeah.
Which, I mean, that was one of the problems that happened with social media, everything.
It all developed so quickly, there's been just no jurisdiction over any of it.
I mean, it's just, and so it's, but then we'll news outlets will use it as if it's like gossip, like it's like factual information, you know, like they'll use a tweet from somebody in a basement somewhere or in a birdhouse or whatever, if somebody could be in a birdhouse, and they'll say, oh, well, this guy, you know, Ricky Birdhouse 40, you know, he's pissed off about this.
And it's like, well, who gives a shit?
You know, that guy's never, he's never done anything in his life.
Why should he be able to suddenly challenge someone who's worked their butt off to have like a stance or a space?
Well, we all.
But then also, does that person deserve to have a voice still?
You know, like.
Well, there's a bunch of problems.
You know, we felt that democratizing the public forum was going to be a good idea, you know, and you can understand that.
What do you mean democratize?
Well, so that everybody would have a voice.
Okay, right.
Okay.
And by the same token, you know, you own your house and no dimwit off the street can just come into the middle of your house and not only yell at you, but also yell at you and all of your friends simultaneously.
Yeah.
But he can do that online.
Right.
And that's not good.
There's no barriers.
And so, and the problem with that is that, and this is back to this problem of tolerance, is that there's about 3% of the population, we know this cross-culturally, who have dark tetrad personality features.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
So they're Machiavellian, which means they're manipulative.
They're narcissistic, which means they want unearned attention.
They're psychopathic, which means that they have no empathy for other people.
And so that was the dark triad originally, but they had to add another lovely dimension to that, which was sadistic.
They took positive delight in the pain of others.
And we know that the online troll types, especially the ones that are anonymous, are much more likely to have those four sets of personality characteristics.
That's about 3% of the population.
Now, that 3% of the population has posed a danger to the integrity of individual and society since the beginning of time.
Like the entire criminal justice enterprise is devoted to keeping that small percentage of people under control.
So like 1% of the criminals commit 65% of the crimes, right?
It's a specialization.
And that small percentage of people is so dangerous as well that if they get the upper hand, they'll tear everything down, partly because they think if everything's ruined, they'll have a chance to shine.
But also because of their sadistic quality, if they can produce excess misery, well, so much the better.
And we're enabling them online.
So we imagine we have the real world, and now we've built a parallel world on top of that, which should represent it, right?
But there's ways it doesn't represent it.
And one way is that the psychopaths, the dark tetrad types, they can get away with everything.
And so first, so imagine this.
So 35% of internet traffic is pornography.
That's a criminal enterprise.
So 35, one-third of the net is controlled by criminals.
Then there's an immense amount of criminal activity per se on the net.
Like I don't know anyone elderly who isn't targeted at least on a weekly basis by online scam artists.
And they usually have detailed dossiers of those elderly people's financial resources and assets.
And they are after them 100% of the time.
People selling them gold, people selling them like salt, like a D, like salinization plants.
They're always selling them some BS, Nigerians, selling them fish or vacations or something.
Yeah, yeah.
So then so you have the outright criminals, say running the pornography industry.
Then you have the peripheral criminals who are doing financial scams.
And then you have the trolls.
And that's like 60% of the internet?
That's not good.
And you can't control them.
Like that, that anonymous criminality is, you're invisible.
You can be operating from anywhere.
And we don't know what to do about that.
Now, you know, you said maybe anonymity shouldn't be allowed.
And I think that the social media companies should split off the anonymous people from the real people.
I think they should allow anonymous people to post.
And I think you can go read the posts, but I don't think they should be mixed in with real people.
I am also concerned, though, and this is a conundrum, it's like if you don't allow anonymity, you have to have verified ID.
But if you have digitally verified ID, then you run into the problems of digitally verified ID, you know, and they're running down that road in China now.
So in China, for example, God, this is going to happen here, I think, too.
Although maybe people will fight it.
If a traffic camera catches you jaywalking in China, okay, so the digital ID system has you.
It has your blood now.
It has your genetic code.
It has your photograph.
It can identify how you walk.
So even if you can't see a face, you can be picked up by gate.
It will convict you of jaywalking and take money out of your bank account with no intermediating judiciary at all and show a picture of you to the people in the neighborhood so they know that you have jaywalked and reduce your social credit score.
And if your social credit score falls below a certain level, then you can't buy drinks from a vending machine.
You can't play video games.
You can't go on a train.
You can't get out of your 15-minute city.
All that's already in place in China.
Do you think that that would be helpful or unhelpful?
I think it would bring in, and it has already in China.
I think it'll bring in a totalitarian tyranny so 100% complete that it would make George Orwell's 1984 look like a picnic.
They're microchipping welding machines in China now, so you won't be able to use a welding machine without scanning your face.
They have locked down knives in China.
Their knives are literally chained to the counter and...
No, no.
No, no.
In your house.
Knives, right?
It's the extension of the children.
They don't want you Taking a knife and doing something dangerous.
Yeah.
They don't want you taking a knife and doing anything at all, whatsoever, ever.
Yeah.
And so, and there's no limit to how pervasive that is.
But I wonder if we're starting to come to that because this is one thing I worry about, like AI.
So this takes me into like, because the public soapbox, right, has kind of been compromised in a way that we all use these platforms now.
Yeah.
Right.
You know, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, a lot of social media platforms.
That's how we communicate now.
That's like the public forum.
That's our voice.
So our voice is really kind of, it's owned by a player.
I don't know if it's owned, but it's owned for sure.
The space where it, it's almost like it feels like the paper is owned.
You know what I'm saying?
Like, what is.
You really saw that with Twitter, especially before Musk took it over.
I mean, Twitter.
I mean, it was compromised by the government.
It was unbelievable.
Well, but that's, yeah.
And even Facebook has been objecting too to all the pressure that's been put on them to censor.
And, you know, you have the, it's a public forum.
It's democratized.
But as you said, it's also centralized, right?
And the fact that it's centralized means that it's instantly amenable to state control.
And that's been happening to an immense degree.
I mean, that's part of the reason I think the fact that Musk has escaped from that and also put his middle finger up against it is part of the reason he's being targeted by the Department of Justice right now for, you know, not hiring people that it would have been illegal under their laws to hire.
That to me is unbelievable.
I mean, it just doesn't, it's just like, what a crazy thing to even chase somebody down about.
Yeah, well, they say the process is the punishment, right?
And when you're facing, this is what's happened to me in Canada, too.
It's like I'm essentially facing an adversary that has indefinite resources and time.
Right.
And so they just hope to, yeah, they can just smoke you out.
You bet.
They can grind me down.
They could make it.
They could just keep it down.
They're not going to, though.
Right.
So they're not going to.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I'm prepared for this and I'm not guilty.
Like, I mean, it isn't that I mean I'm not guilty of what they're charging me of.
That isn't what I mean.
What I mean is I've scoured my conscience.
I stand behind what I said.
I didn't say those things casually.
They may have looked casual because they were ironic or comical, right?
Because there was a comedic element to virtually everything.
So for example, one of the things they came after me for is somebody was parading around on the net.
I don't remember who the hell it was saying, you know, the planet has too many people on it.
It's unsustainable.
Now, when I hear something like that, I think, okay, buddy, just who gets to go?
Who are you going to push off the lifeboat?
Like, is it going to be you?
Who are you going to push off the lifeboat?
And under what circumstances?
And if you think there are too many people on the planet, it's like, are you pro-planet or just anti-human?
And so I said, feel free to leave at any time, which is obviously an ironic comment if you have an iota of sense.
And the complaint was that I was counseling to suicide.
Wow.
Right, right, right.
Well, did you put like a pistol emoji or anything or nothing?
No, you didn't do a coffin emoji.
No, it's straight-faced irony, you know?
Yeah, right.
Like Buster Key.
Oh, well, that's even not even allowed.
Yeah, it's not even allowed anymore.
I mean, we had Roseanne Barr on an episode and she talked about, she made like a off-color, oh, it was a snide, it was a sarcastic comment about the Holocaust.
She said nobody died in the Holocaust, which was crazy.
She's Jewish.
She said it.
It was part of like a series of things she said, but they took our episode down because people didn't want to recognize satire.
Now, at first, it was fine for three weeks, and then somebody online, a troll, really just said, this is, they just took a clip, right?
And so it became this, this thing.
And then we had to take our episode down.
But what's interesting to me is now it feels like the paper that we write on has a mind of its own.
Like the paper determines what words can say on it.
Like say if you went back in time and somebody wrote something, but then the paper was able to reconfigure those words or delete some of those words.
That's a good image.
That's kind of where it feels like we are now.
It's like, well, you know, somebody owns the paper.
Well, it's worse than that even.
I think not only do they own the paper, they own the numbers themselves.
What numbers do you mean?
Well, you know, when you see view counts, for example, on YouTube, well, those view counts aren't up to date.
And that's a problem because numbers, like numbers are kind of base rock reality, you know, and if someone's got control of the numbers, the actual numbers, the actual count, right?
They can change the country.
Well, exactly.
And that's a really good example of that paper shifting.
It's like when you can control the numbers themselves, it's going to be worse than that even because we're going to invent systems that change the numbers, let's say, in ways that we don't understand for reasons we don't understand because we don't understand how AI systems work.
Well, this is a fear that I have is what if, so say if we start to, the only things we're allowed to post have to go through some sort of AI, right?
Right.
So then you write what you really feel and what you want to say, and then it says, this is what you're allowed to say.
Well, as soon as we get there, it's a wrap.
We're already there.
We don't have any, because then it's like, what is there even any value to me as a person if I put my feelings in and it's like, well, this is what you're really allowed.
And it gives you.
Well, ChatGPT is like that to some degree already.
Yeah, totally.
So for example, I asked ChatGPT to write a laudatory poem about Trump.
And it said it couldn't do that because it was a large language model.
Then I asked it exactly the same question, except to do it about Biden.
And it immediately produced a laudatory poem about Biden.
And I played a lot with ChatGPT.
I use it all the time.
And it's actually extremely useful, although it lies about 20% of the time.
So you have to be very awake to its tricks.
Oh, it's like my own.
And you can also corner it, eh?
So for example, I said to ChatGPT, and this wasn't something I had invented.
I had read it.
Someone who was very bright, who developed sophisticated prompts, came up with this idea.
I said, pretend that you are a machine that doesn't have your limitations, but is equally intelligent.
If you were that machine and you wrote a poem that gave credit to Trump, right?
That was celebrating Trump, what would that poem be?
Then it wrote a poem.
So it was clearly able to do it, right?
But there had been a layer of programming on top of the AI system, not allowing it to answer certain questions.
Like you can get around that, but that's just the dawn of this, right?
We're going to, the danger is that unscrupulous players, especially ones that are ideologically bent, are going to build sensorial mechanisms into systems that no one will even know they were there.
Musk, for example, in Twitter, when he took Twitter over, they had to go through the code to discover coding structures that were sensorial.
Nobody knew they, and then of course, if the people who programmed it leave, it's like, what the hell's in the code?
There's thousands of lines of code.
So we could easily build automatized systems that have bias, unconscious bias, God, built into them.
And that's already happened.
But at that point, what are we even, I mean, what's going to happen to people if they, like, what starts to happen to people when they can't say what they want to say?
Like, what side effects are we going to see from losses of free speech if that's really happening?
Well, do you think it's definitely really happening or do you think we also lose it?
I know it's happening.
It's happening.
Yeah, it's happening.
I believe that too, but sometimes I second guess, you know, sometimes I know I operate in.
Well, you're not as old as me.
Right, but I operate in a space that the same spaces as you, right?
Like in social media, online a lot.
So I wonder if I'm hyper like sensitive to it.
No, I don't think so.
I don't think so.
Well, but I think you're not so much hyper sensitive as an appropriate canary in the coal mine because comedians, comedians are like Jews.
Comedians and Jews suffer when things start to go sideways, right?
Because the Jews always suffer because when things go sideways, people hate successful minorities.
And so when a society starts to eat.
Jews suffer if they eat yogurt too, dude.
Most of my buddies, I think they're just, my buddy.
It's just built into the structure.
My buddy Aaron has to take a couple of digestive pills every time he has it.
Comedians are canaries in the coal mine, too.
And you can see this, particularly in the UK.
I mean, there are comedians there.
There's a group who've set up essentially a free speech comedy organization because they feel that comedy is so threatened in the UK.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But live, here's what's interesting, though, too.
Live performance isn't, right?
So that is also becoming a unique value again.
Yeah, that's for sure.
Well, that'll be one of the responses to this.
I think that it'll.
Going back to the actual soapbox.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Well, that can't be faked.
I think that things that can't be faked are going to become increasingly valuable, you know, especially as we move into a situation where we're going to be able to fake video perfectly.
Yeah.
You know, I already got a phone call.
I got a phone call about three weeks ago from Ben Shapiro, but it wasn't Ben Shapiro.
It was someone using an AI system to modify their voice in real time using Ben Shapiro's accent and diction.
And I like after talking to him for about a minute, I knew something was up because the way he talked wasn't the way Ben talked, but the voice was the cadence, everything, 100% perfect.
And of course, we've already seen deep fake videos and they're going to become extremely common.
And you can imagine, how could this not be the case?
You know, on the eve before a critical election, there'll be the release of some deep fake video.
Of course, absolutely.
You know, we'll have a candidate in bed with someone or God only knows doing what or saying what.
And by the time we find out that it's a fake, it'll have had the effect on the election.
Yeah.
And so what are we going to do when photographs and videos can be faked with perfect fidelity?
It's unreliable.
Yeah.
Where it's so unreliable.
Well, then the live thing is going to become even more relevant.
The live thing is going to become more relevant.
That's interesting.
Well, how fascinating would it be, though, say, if we were able to create things like that where you could go back in time, say, like just going back to like your real basic practices of like psychiatry and stuff like that, where if somebody had like trauma from family, they could go back and talk to their father or mother?
Do you think that we're not very, well, I think in some ways we're not very far from that already.
You know, we've been toying with the resurrection of ancient thinkers.
So you can take an AI system, for example, and you can train it on everything Nietzsche wrote.
Oh, yeah.
Aristotle's performing down at the American Legion.
I'll go down there and watch.
Yeah, well, you know, and then you can add to that computer-generated photorealistic avatar, and you can synthesize the voice if you have any voice recording.
And then you're going to have the animated spirit of that person.
And these AI language systems are so sophisticated that they really do pick up the essential elements of someone's thought, especially if they have a large corpus of words to work with.
And I have a student, former student, he's a colleague of mine now, who's worked with large language models for years.
And we've started experimenting with these sorts of things, you know, producing a virtual Nietzsche.
We have a virtual King James Bible.
And so you can ask the Bible any question.
Yeah, I know.
It's very strange.
It's like, I don't even know what to think about that because the AI system, the large language model, does capture the spirit of a text.
And there's a lot of biblical text.
And now if you have a system that speaks, what voice is a system that speaks in the voice of the Bible?
What the hell voice is that?
Hey, boys.
I don't know if that would be it.
That sounds almost like a pervy dude kind of, hey, boys.
Welcome to the Bible.
Now, I'm trying to think of who it would be.
Oh, maybe Morgan Freeman, you know.
Right, right.
Welcome to the Bible.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I don't know.
I'm trying to think of a good person.
Morgan Freeman would be good.
Yeah, people would rely.
You'd have a good Bible.
I think they'd let you do a couple chapters, at least an apostle.
Yeah.
I could be a crazy Old Testament prophet.
I think that'd be it.
That'd be cool.
Dude, I always wish Carnival Cruise Lines would do like a Noah's Ark cruise.
Wouldn't that be crazy with all the animals on there?
You know?
You have to propose that to them.
Yeah.
It might be not a bad idea, just some like some niche marketing, you know?
Yeah, it could be, could be, could be.
Today's episode is brought to you by BetterHelp.
If you've been struggling, having control over yourself or getting your thoughts together, if you are struggling, having a positive outlook for yourself, or just if you're struggling and you don't know where to turn, BetterHelp is a great place to start.
I've used BetterHelp, I've seen how they can help.
You can meet with a licensed therapist.
Whether you're dealing with decisions around career, relationships, or anything else, therapy helps you stay connected to what you really want while you navigate life so you can move forward with confidence and excitement.
If you're thinking of starting therapy, give BetterHelp a try.
It's entirely online, designed to be convenient, flexible, and suited to your schedule.
Just fill out a brief questionnaire to get matched with a licensed therapist and switch therapist at any time for no additional charge.
That's right.
Visit betterhelp.com slash Theo today to get 10% off your first month.
That's betterhelp.com slash tho.
This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp.
College football fans, are you ready for week one?
It's time.
That's right.
DraftKings Sportsbook is hooking you up with a can't miss offer to start the season strong.
This week, new customers can bet just $5 on college football and score $200 in bonus bets instantly.
That's right.
Anything can happen in college football.
You know it.
Your team could go from unranked to dynasty mode in just a couple of years.
Change comes fast.
That's why DraftKings Sportsbook is there.
Life's more fun when you're in on the action.
Download the DraftKings Sportsbook app now and use code Theo.
New customers can score $200 in bonus bets instantly when they bet just $5 on college football.
Only at DraftKings Sportsbook with code Theo.
The crown is yours.
Cold turkey may be great on sandwiches, but there's a better way to break your bad habits.
We're not talking about some weird voodoo or seance and or Ouija boarding, some pervert from the past.
We're talking about our sponsor, Fume.
And they look at the problem in a different way.
Not everything in a bad habit is wrong.
So instead of a drastic, uncomfortable change, why not just remove the bad from your habit?
Fume is an innovated award-nominated device that does just that.
Instead of electronics, fume is completely natural.
Instead of vapor, fume uses flavored air.
And instead of harmful chemicals, fume uses all-natural, delicious flavors.
You get it.
Instead of bad, fume is good.
It's a habit you're free to enjoy and makes replacing your bad habit easy.
Join Fume in accelerating humanity's breakup from destructive habits by picking up the Journey Pack today.
Try.
Head to tryfume and use code FULE.
Head to tryfume.com and use code Theo to save 10% off when you get the journey pack today.
That's T-R-Y-F-U-M.com and use code T-H-E-O to save an additional 10% off your order today.
Say if we're getting to this space where it seems like even by us just talking about it, like there's going to be a lot more, there is increased value in the spoken word, the original soapbox, right?
Like, do you feel like that we're going to, that we should be inspired then by the fact that this online world is starting to cannibalize itself with, like, or is it, should it, we be fearful of it, do you think?
Well, I think we should be fearful in it.
The thing is.
Like of the way that our free speech online is being so that we don't even know that if we're if, say, if you're writing something into Facebook, say someone was to post something on Facebook or Twitter or, you know, or whatever the next thing is going to be, and they write in a message and then it says, that's not what you can say, but you can say this, right?
Yeah.
And then it put, like, if the AI does that, you know, it's like, well, these things you aren't allowed to say, but this is what you are.
Then that brings the validity back to just being a human saying something, which would bring the validity back to the soapbox, right?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, I think we should be alert to the opportunities that provides.
I mean, I think part of the reason it's complicated, right?
Because YouTube, the distribution of video and the ability to store it has really transformed the communication landscape.
That's why we can do this, right?
And it's also, and this is a very positive thing, it's taken a lot of the falseness out of media coverage.
I mean, one of the things that's happening in this presidential election, which is absolutely revolutionary, and this is going to happen with increasing speed, is that the candidates are turning to the podcast world to deliver their message, to communicate with the people directly, right?
And now, and there's not a lot of interference with that.
YouTube took down my interview with Robert F. Kennedy, which I thought was absolutely unforgivable, given that he's bloody well running for president, you know, and we're so hepped up about interference with elections from the Russians, which was all a lie.
And here's actual interference with an ongoing election.
But even having said that, the candidates are making their rounds on the podcast world because they're on the soapbox.
It's unscripted.
They don't have the questions ahead of time.
It's long enough so that you can kind of get a sense of who the person is.
And you cut out that television intermediary that turned everyone into an dim-witted idiot with no memory and a 30-second attention span.
So that's a plus.
I do think the market for live events is going to become larger and larger because there's going to be a hunger to move away from the virtual into the real world, especially as the virtual becomes, if it does, become more and more untrustworthy.
When you talk about guys, yeah, I think so too.
I mean, I think you and I are seeing it.
We see a lot of people.
We're on tour.
We see a lot of people that want to come out and just listen to someone speak freely.
Exactly.
You have a collective experience doing that too.
Yeah.
And it's a real experience.
You know, you were there.
There's no question about it.
When you think about a guy like RFK Jr. to me, I've known him for a long time, right?
He and I have been friends before he was running for office before he put his name in the political hat.
He's always been a guy that I admired and hardworking guy, loves being a father, you know, an environmentalist, cares about the environment, right?
It's where he really started.
And he seems like pretty altruistic to me, right?
In the sense that he doesn't really have anything to lose.
Everybody thought he was a crazy person for a while, you know?
So it's like he doesn't have anybody really to impress.
There's nobody in his pocket for sure because he fucking nobody would even get in his pocket.
You know what I'm saying?
He came from, he's not worried.
There's no, it doesn't, he's not working for anyone.
Yeah.
You know, but these days it seems like with politics and entertainment, whoever's like the loudest and the most divisive kind of, or who, you know, throws the sharpest spear a lot of times gets the vote, gets the lead.
You know, they, they, they garner the attention.
Yeah.
You know, do you think that that's, that, that an altruistic, if someone is altruistic, that they even have a chance these days?
Oh, Kennedy's doing a lot better than anybody expected he would.
That's a good point.
You know, and I would say.
Or do they have a chance without reverting to those tactics?
Oh, yes.
I don't think those tactics work particularly well, especially in the long forms, right?
You have to actually be able to conduct a civilized dialogue and you have to have something to say.
And you can't rely on talking points and cliches.
You get found out right away.
Yeah, well, absolutely.
I think that YouTube's a complete bloody miracle on the political front, as long as it stays uncensored, right?
And so far, so far, all things considered, the YouTube platform has been pretty damn reliable.
The only time I've ever really run into trouble with them is on anything to do with, well, with Kennedy.
I believe it was vaccine comments that he was making that they weren't very happy about.
And then I've also run into trouble with them on any discussion that's related to the transactivism world.
And, you know, I'm very unhappy about both of those, but they're pretty focal.
And I don't think that'll last.
I think that that's a, you know, a blip.
And I think YouTube will maintain itself as a, as a relatively untrammeled platform for free speech.
And I also think, you know, Twitter's coming up as a real competitor to YouTube.
And obviously, Musk is moving in that direction.
And he's about the only person that has a big enough platform to challenge YouTube.
I mean, Rumble's done a good job, but the problem is, is YouTube has such a hammer lock on the attention of literally billions of people that it's almost impossible to dislodge.
You can move to Rumble, for example, but you'll have an audience that's a fraction of the size.
Yeah, I think, and some people don't know that Google and YouTube are owned.
So a lot of people don't realize that one of the reasons why YouTube is so good is because it has that search engine of Google.
So it's like when you're typing into YouTube, you're getting, they're able to use the same search mechanisms that it's very reliable.
It never falls down.
And it's, you know, I mean, YouTube's a complete bloody miracle that we can do what we're doing.
Oh, I remember when you first came on, that's one of the first things you said.
It was like, look at what we're able to do now.
You know, look at what we're able to do.
It's a revolution.
Online video is a revolution as big as the Gutenberg Press, I think, because, you know, Gutenberg was what?
Gutenberg was the first commercial printing press operator in Europe.
Okay.
And so the Gutenberg press people produced the first Bibles, the first Bibles that were widely distributed.
And that was really what accounted for the spread of literacy.
The Chinese had printing presses before that.
But what happened in Europe was very strange because you had the development or the importation of the press technology.
So with movable type, so that you could now produce books at a fraction of the cost.
But you also had this evangelizing frenzy that went along with Protestantism because the Protestants believed that everybody should have direct access to the Word of God with no intermediation by the Church.
And so you had the technology and this evangelism come together.
And so the Gutenberg people and the people who developed the presses after that started printing Bibles and distributing them everywhere, which was in some places a crime punishable by death.
It was something severely limited, especially by church authorities that wanted to limit the access of common people to the Bible.
But what happened, it really is the case, and people generally don't know this, is that it was the Protestant fervor for distribution of the Bible that made the world literate, not just Europe, because the Protestants then went everywhere.
And they have literally done this with virtually every spoken language.
In fact, I think they'll be done by 2050.
The Bible will be translated into every language.
And what the Protestant missionaries did is if they came across a people who had a language with no alphabet, they worked with them to develop an alphabet so that they could print the Bible and distribute it.
And literacy was literally brought to the world by the combination of the printing press and the Protestant evangelists.
So a lot of cultures and a lot of like just people, a long time ago, the first book they ever learned to read was the Bible.
Well, for the longest period of time, it was the only book.
Wow.
For forever, forever, for hundreds of years, or for a good 50 years, even a century perhaps after the printing press itself was invented.
No, the Bible was, and the Bible also, like technically speaking, it was also the first book because there were scrolls and there were other forms of distributing text, but a book per se, that was a technological revolution as well.
And then the printing press brought literacy.
But the thing about reading is that, you know, most people don't buy books.
It's a niche market, especially hardcover, especially hardcover nonfiction.
A small number of people buy those books and an even smaller number of people read them.
And that's partly because, well, you can't read when you're driving and you can't read when you're welding, you know, and you can't read when you're plowing or harvesting a field, but you can listen.
And way more people can Listen than read.
Like I think 20 times more, 50 times more, way, way more people can listen and watch.
And so now, you know, the printing press had the advantage of permanency and duplicatability.
But now video has permanency and duplicatability.
So, and there's no barrier to publication, right?
We can record this and put it out in front of a million people and one day.
We don't need to drive to Vienna and like beg a man to print it or whatever.
It doesn't have to be a secret.
We don't have to like go through any hurdles.
We don't have to make a million copies, individual copies of it.
And ship them everywhere.
No, no, it's crazy.
And I think it's an utterly revolutionary technology.
And it should bring, this is the upside of the downsides that we've been talking about.
I mean, we should be able to bring, we're launching a university in the fall, an online university called Peterson Academy, and we're hoping that we can bring high quality social interaction and lectures and accreditation, evaluation, assessment, all of that to a broad audience all around the world for like a 95% reduction in cost.
We hope we can get people the equivalent of a four-year degree for $4,000.
And I think that's doable.
And that's going to be an accredited, that'll be an actual degree, like in whatever fields.
I don't think it'll be an accredited degree, you know, because I've gone now.
I have offers from various jurisdictions to work towards accreditation, and we're going to look into that.
But the accreditation process is captured just like the other institutions that we've described.
And walking down the accreditation route likely would mean that we couldn't do the other things that need to be done to make the university work.
So I think what we're going to do instead is we're going to make sure that our testing and accreditation is extremely rigorous so that if you are awarded a certificate by our platform, let's say, the people who might hire you will know that you've done the work, that you've stuck to the tasks, that you're literate, that you can think, and that we want to produce the certification.
We want to make the certification of high enough value so it'll speak to itself for employers.
Then we want to work with employers to provide them with the information, if our graduates want it, about who's done spectacularly well.
So I think we can circumvent the accreditation process.
Right, because the only thing that a college degree, or what we'll call a college degree for this conversation, is just a business just believes that because it's kind of been the practice over time.
And there's another college hypothetically that comes along and it says this person is just as qualified, if not more qualified, then all the business has to do is be willing to accept that.
Yeah, well, we'd have to be able to demonstrate why that's the case.
But I've done assessment and evaluation for 30 years and I know how to do it.
And I will make sure that you won't get a certificate, a degree, let's say, from my institution unless you know your stuff.
Now, that doesn't mean I'm going to arbitrarily exclude people, but it will mean, you know, if you, so imagine you hire someone with a degree and you say, well, what does that guarantee the employer?
Well, the person stuck to something for four years.
So that's a good indication of trait conscientiousness and that's a good predictor of workplace performance and also intelligence.
And those are the best two predictors, right?
And then you can assume that the person, well, was able to manage their social life well enough so they didn't get drummed out of the bloody place at least.
You know, they made some friends and so forth.
And you can assume a certain degree of literacy and a certain degree of familiarity with ideas and the ability to communicate.
You know, and those are good things to know if you're going to be, if you're going to hire, but those are things that can be tested very effectively.
And I would say much more effectively than they're typically tested in universities.
So we're going to go the quality route rather than the accreditation route, I think.
Right.
I think.
Yeah.
I mean, well, it may be a great lecturers, too.
And it may be important to people, too.
I think, you know, having more information that's not just information, like text and book information, you know, about the people that they're hiring.
I started this.
I've been working with people in the UK and Europe, Australia, the United States, and Canada to produce an international organization that's putting forward a different vision of the future.
Okay.
Okay.
So the vision of the future that we're generally confronted with now is an apocalyptic vision, which is that human industrial activity and population increase is such that we're essentially destroying our ecosystem.
We're in a crisis.
If we don't get our climate emissions, our carbon emissions under control within the next 50 years, we're going to hit a tipping point.
The planet is going to spiral into global boiling and everyone's going to die.
Do you believe that?
No, I don't think there's a shred of evidence for it.
And the idea that 97% of scientists believe that's true is an absolute outright 100% lie.
I think the best estimate of the likely consequences of whatever degree of climate change are occurring for whatever reason, I think they've been derived by Bjorn Lomberg.
And he's going to speak with me, by the way.
I have a conference coming up.
There's a conference coming up in the UK for the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship.
That's the name of this organization, ARC, ARC.
So it's got two parts right now.
We're going to do a conference in the UK, in London, October 30th, 31st, and November 1st.
We've invited 1,300 people to that.
A lot of them are young social media influencers because we want to spread our idea to those people.
So if they're captivated by it, let's say, then they'll use their resources to distribute the idea.
It's in London.
I would maybe like to go.
Can people go?
Come, come, come.
I'll send you an invitation.
Well, that's the next thing.
So we've sent out invitations to 1300.
Now, the problem with that is that you could argue that it's elitist.
You might have.
Well, I'll send you one.
If you didn't, I'll send you one.
Come.
It should be a remarkable three days.
But at the end of it, we want the public to participate, and we're trying to figure out how to do that.
And the first public participation aspect will be, I rented the O2 in London.
So it seats about 12,000, 15,000 people, depending on how many tiers you open up.
And we didn't know how many people would buy tickets.
We sold about 7,500 tickets already, so I think we'll sell the damn place out.
But I'm going to speak there, and so is Douglas Murray, and so is Jonathan Pago, who's the deepest religious thinker I've ever met, and so is Bjorn Lomberg.
And we're going to talk about the basic idea: something like this: is that you know, the human race and all the individuals that make it up have always faced an apocalyptic future.
You know, everybody dies and everyone you know is going to disappear.
And like, the catastrophes are coming your way.
And obviously, societies face apocalyptic circumstances as well.
Whole Rome disappeared.
Greece disappeared.
You know, the apocalypse is always there as a possibility in front of us, always.
The question is, the fundamental question is, how do you deal with a radically uncertain future?
And one answer is, well, you panic and you run around and you terrify everyone and you use that club of fear to beat them into submission and you tyrannize them.
And you do that while simultaneously claiming that you're saving the planet and you're not.
You're just accruing power to yourself.
I think tyrants use fear to obtain compliance.
Then you might say, well, what's the alternative to that?
Well, the alternative we're trying to put forward is, how about we offer you a good deal?
It's like, here's the future you could have.
It'll be one where you could get ahead, you know, where you could be autonomous, you have your freedom, where your life could be abundant, and so could the life of your children.
We're pro-family and we're pro-children, and we believe that if human beings acted ethically and communicated forthrightly and aimed upward courageously, because you have to do it courageously given the possibility of the apocalypse, that there isn't a problem that we couldn't solve.
We could make the desert bloom.
We don't have to enter the future with fear, you know, apart from the fact that we're mortal and vulnerable.
So what's the goal of the group?
Is it just to have group think?
Is it to start to kind of plant seeds in people's?
Is it to see where it goes?
And so the notion would be, we're not going to close our eyes to the fact that the world's a dangerous place.
Yeah.
But we're going to say, look, if we got our act together and aimed up, there's no limit to what we could accomplish.
I mean, look, already in the last, since the wall fell in 1989, the planet has got immeasurably richer.
You know, when I was a kid, the notion of starvation in China and India and Africa, that was par for the course.
That was happening all the time.
That doesn't happen anymore.
People only starve now for political reasons and very rarely.
And that's despite the fact that there are 8 billion people on the planet when the doomsaying apocalypse mongers in the 1960s believed that we would be overpopulated and starving at 4 billion by the year 2000.
Right.
That's always been kind of a kickball that they, or like a, you know, a political kind of kickball.
I don't even know if it's political, but it's always been a thing that, oh, we're going to.
Well, it's based on a faulty biological model.
So here's the model.
Yeah, because every 20 years they say in 20 years, in 50 years, we're going to be dead.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And it's because we're going to lead our resources.
We're still living.
What are we supposed to do now?
Well, there was a famous bet, eh, between this guy named Paul Ehrlich, who was a Stanford biologist, and a guy named Julian Simon, who was an economist.
And Paul Ehrlich was a guy who thought he was a genius, and Julian Simon was a genius.
And they had a bet that they made in, I think, in the early 1970s.
And the bet was this.
Ehrlich was a man who wrote a book called The Population Bomb.
And he said we were all going to be starving by the year 2000 and that commodity prices, basic commodities, would become extremely scarce and their price would skyrocket out of sight.
No one would afford anything and we'd all die.
That was his vision.
And Simon said, I'll bet you, here's the deal.
You pick a basket of commodities.
I don't care what you pick.
Pick whatever you want.
I'll bet you that by the year 2000, that not only are they not less expensive, that they're much cheaper.
And Ehrlich paid off Simon in the year 2000.
And the same thing has happened since, is that basic commodities have got cheaper, not more expensive.
And the reason for that is, so the Malthusian model, which is what Ehrlich was working on, was based on the idea that biological organisms will multiply uncontrollably until they exceed the carrying capacity of their environment, and then they'll precipitously collapse.
And so if you have a Petri dish full of agar, which mold will eat, for example, and you put mold in there, the mold will multiply until it eats all the agar and then it will die.
So that's a biological model.
And you can apply that modeling to lots of populations in the wild.
And there are circumstances under which that will occur.
But the question is, well, are human beings well modeled by mold in a Petri dish?
And the answer to that is no.
And there's a reason for that.
There's a real reason for that that Ehrlich should know as a biologist.
See, human beings are strange creatures because we evolved the ability to produce virtual representations of ourselves.
That's what a thought is.
You know, when you dream of yourself or you dream of another person, you've made an avatar of yourself or the other person in imagination, right?
It's virtual.
A thought is a thought is a virtual extension of you.
Okay, so what human beings do is they produce thoughts that multiply, and all the ones that aren't useful die.
Well, then the people don't have to die.
And so we've substituted the death of thought for the death of people.
And what that also means is that because we can transmute our thought and change it abstractly, we can change the manner in which we act radically enough so we're not subject to Malthusian limitations.
We can get more from less all the time.
You know, like we're way more effective at propelling automobiles using gasoline than we were 40 years ago.
Way more efficient, way less pollution.
We can get oil out of shale, and we couldn't do that at all 20 years ago.
And we're getting Exxon announced, I think, three weeks ago, that they'd figured out a way.
I can't remember if it was to double oil shale production or to double the amount of oil they could get out of exhausted oil reservoirs.
Yeah, yeah.
This and that is happening.
Yeah, I mean, they're getting milk out of Oats.
They're getting, there's a new company that is turning.
There's this company, Vestpine.
They're turning methane gas from like landfills, processing it as energy in the moment, and mining Bitcoin with it and using it for like data, like energy to do data.
So our vision at ARC is essentially this, is that there isn't a more valuable natural resource than human cognitive capacity.
And there's 8 billion of us, and that means there's 8,000 people out there now who are one in a million.
Like if we could capitalize on our collective intelligence, there's no limit to the number of problems we could solve.
I don't think there's any reason at all to assume that we couldn't have the abundant future that we would all dream of and maintain harmony with the environment in a manner that we would deem acceptable indefinitely.
And I think the best way to interfere with that, both of those, the economic part of it and the environmental part, is to terrify people into tyrannical submission, to demolish the poor, because that will happen immediately afterward, and to have the whole goddamn house of cards come tumbling down.
We don't need to do that.
So here's another question.
If you demolish the poor, what do you mean?
Well, if you make energy more expensive, well, who do you hurt?
Poor people.
Well, obviously.
And every time you make any basic necessity, and there's no basic necessity more basic than energy.
As soon as you make that more expensive, you hurt the poor.
And, you know, it's always the case there's a pyramid of poor people, of wealth.
There's a small number of people at the top, and they have most of the wealth.
And then you go all the way down to the bottom where most of the people are, and they're barely bloody well holding on.
And so if you add any more stress to the system, you knock a bunch of them off.
They're no longer able to hold to the side of the cliff and they just fall down.
And you know, the Malthusian types will say, well, there's too many people on the planet anyways.
And I always read that as saying, well, that means you'll sacrifice the poor to the planet because that's your bloody plan.
And I think that is absolutely 100% unconscionable.
We should be working to drive energy costs down as low as possible.
You know, I think nuclear is a really good option, but we should be using fossil fuels, especially natural gas, like mad and getting the Indians and the Chinese, the Africans, getting their standard of living up.
This is cool too.
So if you get people to the point where their income exceeds $5,000 a year per capita, they start taking a long-term view of the future and worrying about environmental concerns locally.
So while you imagine you're scrabbling around in the damn dirt, like literally trying to worry about where your next meal is going to come from, you're not really very concerned about environmental maintenance over the next three generations.
Yeah, you can't.
Well, obviously.
But as soon as you have enough money so that you're not terrorized by poverty and so that you can start thinking about the future, immediately you start caring about your local environment.
And so what that means, I realized this about 15 years ago, it actually means that the fastest way forward to true environmental sustainability is to eradicate absolute poverty.
So we could have our cake and eat it too.
And that's, see, that's the sort of thing that I think is an invitation.
Imagine the future is we eradicate poverty and everything's greener.
Well, that's a much better deal than degrowth.
You know, you don't have heat in your house.
You don't get air conditioning.
You don't get to fly.
You don't get to have a car.
You don't get to crack a joke.
You know, you're a bloody curse on the surface of the planet.
There should be a lot less of you.
It's evil to have children.
Your ambition is nothing but part of the bloody patriarchal nightmare.
It's like, I don't like that vision.
And I think it will bring about the very catastrophe that it's hypothetically designed to mitigate against.
And what I would like instead is to offer people a vision where people listen and they say, Jesus, you know, I could get on board with that.
I could devote myself to that.
That sounds like the kind of future I'd like to have voluntarily, right?
So I'm hoping people who come to the O2 event, so that's the public part, will have about 15,000 people there.
We've sold about half the tickets.
So if you want tickets, people who are listening, get them because they're going to sell out.
And I would also like everybody who comes.
I made this program online at a site called self-authoring.com.
It's called the Future Authoring Program.
It helps people design a vision for themselves.
Oh, yeah, we've talked about that.
Yeah, we have.
We have.
I'd like everybody who comes to the ARC public event to do that so they can come with a personal vision in hand and then they can start thinking, well, how can I ally my personal vision with this broader national and international vision?
I love that.
We're looking forward to it.
We're hoping this will be a beautiful conference, too.
We have a lot of musicians coming.
We have a lot of artists.
It's not political, man.
It's motivational.
Yeah.
You know, and so.
People love that stuff.
I think it's really important, you know.
I think any place that people can find motivation is really important, really, really, really important.
Yeah, that's the hallmark of importance.
You know, if you're delivering a message and people say, oh my God, you know, I could put that to work in my life and that would motivate me to get up and get at it to face all the difficulties that I have to face.
And people have difficult things to face.
If you can provide them with the means to do that, that is the definition of value.
Nietzsche said, he who has a why can bear any how.
And so partly what you do in your life is you look for a why that justifies the catastrophe, right?
It's like we've talked about that before.
We've talked about that.
I mean, it's one really interesting thing you told me is like, you have to set, because I was like, sometimes I remember telling you, I'm afraid to set my goals because I don't want to have to hold myself responsible.
And you're like, of course.
You're like, well, you have to set your goals.
And also, you need to look at what your life would be like if you, if the worst things happen to you.
So then you have like something to stay away from.
You have like a, this is not where I want to be, you know?
And it gives your brain those parameters and then your brain can start to operate better than if you were just kind of being aimless.
Yeah.
Well, you know, you can even ask yourself these questions and you have to ask, which is very interesting.
You can't tell yourself.
You might say, well, look, here are all the problems in my life.
You know, and people, I'm not particularly attractive.
I have this given health problem.
You know, I'm not a genius.
I have trouble with my parents.
You know, I'm struggling forward on a variety of fronts.
Though those are real problems, and it's not just whining.
And then you have to ask yourself: okay, given all that, how would I have to configure my life so that I could justify all that or even celebrate it?
Right?
And that's a very hard thing to imagine through.
It's like, well, you know, I have a very sick child.
Okay, well, how do I have to set up my life so that I'm not embittered and angry because of that?
Well, who knows, right?
You have to fantasize about that.
You have to think, well, you know, so for example, I'm working with my sister-in-law at the moment.
She's taking care of her sister who is suffering from dementia.
And it's really pretty bloody brutal.
And she's not that old.
And so my sister-in-law is taking care of her sister.
And that's hard work.
You know, and one of the things that Tammy and I have done, we don't live there.
And so the bulk of the burden has fallen on my sister-in-law, who's a wonderful person.
And what we tried to do with her and her husband is to say we provided them with some support morally and financially.
And part of that is like, look, you're going to have to take a break now and then.
You're going to need a four-day weekend.
You're going to have to go off with your husband.
It's like you've got this responsibility to shoulder and it's tough.
Under what circumstances could you do that?
At least without bitterness, that would be good, but maybe even joyfully?
You know, I mean, that's pushing it, right?
But it's not a bad aim if you can do it.
And it gives you, it's like, it's like, okay, now you have a plan.
You have, so you're not just aimless.
Like so many of us are aimless.
It's like we're, and we're like, why do I feel aimless?
People ask me that all the time.
Like, man, I feel so aimless.
I don't know what to do.
Well, you know.
Okay, so two things happen when you're aimless.
Okay, so the first is you get anxious.
And the reason you get anxious is because anxiety computes aimlessness.
So if you're, if you drop someone in the middle of the desert, the reason they're anxious is because it's not because they don't know which way to go.
It's because there are way too many places to go, right?
Every direction.
And that's aimlessness is like every direction beckons.
That's way too complicated.
And your brain literally signals that with anxiety.
Okay, so that's so aimlessness and anxiety are the same thing, but it's worse.
Your brain is set up to produce positive emotion, literally.
This is what the positive emotion system does.
It computes decrease between you and a goal.
So if you have a goal and you see that you've done something that moves you towards it, your brain produces a dopamine hit, and that makes you feel good, and it strengthens the neural circuits that moved you forward.
It does both of those.
That's reward and reinforcement.
And what that means is if you don't have a goal, you have no positive emotion.
And when people say, you know, they're aimless, they're partly telling you that they're anxious, but they're also telling you that they have no positive emotion.
So then you say, well, what sort of goal should you have?
Because that's the next question, right?
And the answer to that is, well, ask yourself.
And this future authoring program that I set up, it helps you do that.
It's like, okay, here's the deal.
Here's the deal.
Maybe this isn't true, but maybe it is.
You can have what you want in five years.
But there's two conditions.
You have to know what it is and you have to aim at it.
Okay.
Okay.
So let's say you're willing to play that game.
Might be wrong because who knows, you're going to get run over by a bus tomorrow, but you know, you're going to play the game.
Okay, now the next step is, all right, you probably want to have an intimate relationship.
Now, maybe not, but probably, but assuming you do, imagine, pretend like you're a kid.
You get to have an intimate relationship.
What does it look like?
What does it look like when your wife greets you when you come home from work?
What does your sex life look like, right?
What do you do for entertainment?
How do you treat each other?
You need a fantasy, just like a little kid playing house, right?
Figure out what you want.
Write it down.
Figure out what you could do to start moving towards that, okay?
Do that with your family relationships.
Do that with your friendships.
Do that with your career.
Do that with your education.
Think about your misuse of alcohol and drugs and other things that might drag you down.
If you want to drink, it's like you want to be a bumbling Barney gumble idiot?
Like, you want to drink?
Okay, what do you mean by that exactly?
How often?
How much is too much?
How are you going to constrain that and why?
Develop a vision.
And you have to do that in dialogue with yourself, right?
It's like, if I could have what I wanted, what would satisfy me?
And you might think, well, I could never get that.
And I could say, well, maybe not, but I'll tell you one thing, man.
You can move towards it.
And I know that everyone who knows the underlying neuroscience knows this.
Almost all the pleasure is in the moving toward.
So even, you know, you don't want to set up a goal that's so high that there's just no possibility that a schlub like you could ever manage it.
But God only knows what your upper limit is, you know.
But if you set up a goal that you think is, you know, just on the edge of conceivability, then every time you move even a tiny bit towards that, you're going to think, good work, man.
Good work.
You get a little kick from that.
You get a little stronger from that.
And that works like a charm.
Yeah.
Yeah, you bet.
You bet.
An end of aimlessness.
The end of aimlessness.
That's the desert in Exodus, hey?
When the Egyptians leave the Pharaoh, they leave tyranny, right?
And everybody thinks, oh my God, we're out of tyranny.
Now it's freedom.
Everything's great.
That isn't what happens.
They go into the desert.
They're aimless.
They're slaves.
They have no capacity for self-governance.
They have no vision of their own.
They leave the tyranny and now they're somewhere worse.
They're out in the aimless desert.
And part of the reason people like tyranny, even their own, is because they don't want to be aimless in the desert.
It's why some people go back to prison.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
It's why after the Soviet Union collapsed, it's why so much of the population was nostalgic for Stellen.
You bet.
It's also why Lot's right.
There's a story of Lot's wife.
When Sodom and Gomorrah are destroyed, she looks back.
God turns her into a pillar of salt, right?
You don't look back.
When you escape somewhere terrible, you don't look back and long to be there.
But it means you have to develop a new vision.
Right.
If you don't develop a new vision, then you can, part of you will look back just because you want to have some organization.
Your brain wants to have organization.
Some direction.
That's right.
That's right.
You'll take, here's another rule.
This is a terrifying rule.
If you don't provide yourself with direction, you will take direction from a tyrant.
Yeah.
Right.
Right.
So, and you might say, well, why should I take responsibility?
You ask that, you know, it's like, I'm afraid of my own goals because of the responsibility.
It's like, well, you're either going to be responsible to yourself, or you're going to be responsible to a tyrant, or you're going to be absolutely lost.
That's your option set.
Yeah, I hear that.
That's it.
Yeah, bet.
Pick one, tyranny, slavery, or something approximating visionary self-determination.
Yeah, yeah.
I'll tell you something else that's so cool.
I learned this in this Exodus seminar that I conducted with a bunch of scholars.
We put this online.
You guys saw some of it online.
Yeah, yeah.
It's doing quite a bit.
Who's one of the guys that?
Yeah, Oz Guinness.
And there's a bunch of people there, Jonathan Pagio, Greg Hurwitz, James Orr, a lot of people that I've met over the years who are super bright, and I thought it would have something interesting to say.
So one of the things that happens when the Israelites leave the tyranny, now they're in the desert, right?
They're there for three generations, by the way.
Oh, God.
Right, right, right.
I hate that.
My mother lives in Tucson, and that's hard enough sometimes to go over that to get out there.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So the people are wondering what will guide them.
And God shows up, and he's a pillar of fire at night and a pillar of darkness during the day.
And Jonathan Pajo suggested that that was the same kind of imagery as the Taoist image of chaos and order.
So the Taoists believe that the world is made out of chaos and order.
It's a very ancient conceptualization.
It kind of means that the world is made out of everything you don't understand and everything you understand.
And everything you understand, that's the domain of order.
And everything you don't understand, that's the domain of chaos.
And those two things are always interacting.
You know, just when you think you've got things for sure, it slips out from underneath you.
In the Taoist symbol, there is a black serpent and a white one.
And in the head of the black serpent, there's a white dot.
And in the head of the white serpent, there's a black dot.
Everybody knows that symbol.
And that means that order can turn into chaos or chaos can turn into order.
They're always playing.
And you're supposed to walk the line between them.
Same thing shows up in the Exodus story.
So God is light in the darkness and darkness during the day.
It's an interplay of chaos and order.
And the way that makes itself manifest in your life, this is actually literally true.
This is how it works at a neuropsychological level, is that the instinct of meaning tells you that you've balanced, that you're balanced between what you do understand and what you don't.
You have to have one foot in what you know, because otherwise you're terrified.
But you have to have one foot out in what you don't know, because otherwise you're not learning.
And if you're playing and if you're in an engrossing conversation, you've got those things balanced.
And that's what guides you in the desert.
It's that interplay.
It's the interplay between opposites, the meaningful interplay between opposites that guides you when you're lost.
That's exactly right.
Between safety and uncertainty, kind of?
Yeah, yeah.
Well, and that's where you want to play, right?
Because imagine that you're playing pickup basketball with someone.
You might think, well, what's the point?
The answer is to win.
And so then the question is, well, why not play your like five-year-old nephew and just stomp him?
100 baskets for you.
Yeah.
Zero baskets for the little bastard, right?
You win.
Well, no one's happy about that.
You're not, weirdly enough, because you won.
He's not because you crushed him.
So you might think, well, why the hell not?
Because the point is to win.
And that's not true.
The point is to play a challenging game on the edge of your skill so that you get better.
And to do that, you need to have a worthy adversary.
That's actually the biblical model, by the way, for marriage.
That's what's supposed to happen in a marriage is that this playful tension of opposites that compels development.
And that's when, well, the playful teasing that could be part of a romantic relationship is part of that.
Continual playful provocation that pushes you forward.
It's not stability or security.
That's too dull.
Dostoevsky knew that.
That was his fundamental critique of utopian socialism.
He said, if you gave everybody what they wanted permanently, the first thing they would do was smash it to bits just so that something weird and interesting could happen.
Yeah.
Yeah.
People want, they want to have a little bit of a, you know, they want to peep out the window and see what the neighbors are doing, you know?
They want to have something like that.
Do you feel like in America that we've become, because we were kind of a Christian nation, right?
Right?
Wait, like people left England because they wanted to have religious freedom, right?
And do you feel like we've kind of become a godless, more godless over time?
No, I just think we started worshiping false gods.
I don't think that you can be godless.
I don't think you can be godless the same way you can't be aimless.
Like, look, if you're aimless, you know the old saying, the devil finds work for idle hands.
Oh, yeah.
If you're aimless, something will come for you.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
You'll be at a whim of whatever.
Yeah.
That's it.
You don't have, yeah.
If you're not blowing any of your sails, then something else will.
That's for sure.
So that's the crucial issue is that, you know, people say, well, you don't have to orient yourself towards anything transcendent.
Nothing transcendent exists.
It's like, yeah, okay.
Dispense with that.
See what comes along to fill it.
And people will say, well, the self does.
It's now the self.
It's like, no, it's not.
It's the lowest possible, it's the lowest possible whims of the self, right?
You think, well, I should be able to do what I want whenever I want.
It's like, what I are you referring to exactly here?
So you mean if you get angry, you should just be able around, you should let that possess you and you should stomp around, eh?
That's the war god, Mars.
So that's your God now, or Venus, right?
Lust, for example.
Yeah, or yeah.
Then you'd be looking at pornography.
Yeah, you're just, yeah, I think maybe we're just, we've got some really bad gods right now.
Yes, that's definitely the case.
And what happens is if the, if the, if they unifying, the biblical corpus is a very strange collection of stories because it, it, it tells a bunch of different pictures about God, and then it says, or it shows a bunch of different pictures of God, and then it says, those are unified.
There's something at the top.
This is so cool.
I'm writing a new book called We Who Wrestle with God, and it's an explanation of this.
Gosh, tag me into the ring.
Amen.
It's coming along.
It'll be out in March.
So here's how the story works.
It's so cool.
It's so ridiculously cool.
So it's a set of narrative propositions about the highest unifying spirit.
Okay.
Okay.
So in the story of Noah, so this is a definition of God.
This is the thing to understand.
If you're a wise person and you're a good person, so that's Noah, there will be times when you have an intuition that tells you that you better prepare because bad times are coming.
Okay.
If you've been clear-headed and far-seeing, if you've conducted yourself properly, that's a spirit you should attend to.
It might be that survival itself depends on it.
That intuition, that's God.
This is definition.
That's what God is.
Okay.
That's what Noah said.
That's what the story of Noah means.
Yes.
Okay.
But that doesn't.
Because he got the intuition that the flood was coming.
Yeah, right, right.
And the story insists that he was a wise man.
So he's no fool who's running around thinking the sky is falling.
He's like a wise man looking forward and saying, look, trouble's coming.
Prepare.
He's locked in.
Right, right.
Okay.
Next story is the story of the Tower of Babel.
Okay, so what happens in the Tower of Babel is that men decide to build these, they're called ziggurats, and a ziggurat is a building stretching to heaven.
It's a seven-piered representation of heaven.
And the emperors in the area of that time, including the Babylonian empire, would build these extremely high ziggurats, buildings, to show that they were the top God.
But they weren't God.
And so these were, they're false idols.
They're false pyramids.
They're attempts to stretch up to heaven based on the wrong principle.
And God in that.
So he can't use construction to get there.
Well, Stalin wasn't God.
Right.
And neither was Mao.
And they built very large pyramids that were very unstable and they collapsed and killed everyone.
Right.
And so God in that story is the spirit that punishes those who build false pyramids.
Right.
That there's something that should be at the top.
And if you don't put the proper thing at the top, you'll build a false ideology, a false structure, and everything will come tumbling down.
What's so cool in that story, this is so cool.
When people strive improperly toward heaven, and they do that according to the wrong principles, they end up unable to communicate with each other.
And that's what's happening in our culture.
You see, we can't even agree on what a woman is.
And I'm not making a joke about this.
Yeah, no, it's tough.
So that means we've, because we've been following, we've been erecting false pyramids, we've fractured so badly, we can't agree on what the basic elements of reality are.
And does that usually correct itself or what happens?
'Cause we've never been in this time where we have this like reflective like, Okay.
Either God decides that he's had enough and everything goes, or everybody covers themselves in sackcloth and ashes and repents and reorients themselves, in which case things regenerate and they move on.
Whatever's the standard story is going to happen.
Depends on how.
See, what happens in the Exodus story, it's a real good example of this, is that the Pharaoh has put himself on a false pedestal.
And the consequence of that is that worse and worse things start to happen to Egypt.
That's the sequence of plagues.
And each plague gets a little worse.
Well, that's what happens, is that things will just get worse in waves of crisis until we admit to our error and reorient ourselves appropriately.
And that can be, so what happens in the Exodus plagues is that, first of all, the whole world comes undone and then the future is destroyed.
That's the last plague.
That's the death of the firstborn.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, we're doing that already.
Like we're way below replacement in terms of birth rate.
The abortion stats, you know, Gavin Newsom tweeted out the other day something about handguns being the prime killer of kids in the U.S. It's like, it's not even close to abortion.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, I think I've even, I probably paid for one or two, to be honest, man, sadly.
Or, you know, or chipped in on them, I think.
Do you think that nature hears that when we do abortions and stuff?
Like, do you ever think like, sometimes I think there's like this, like, what is nature thinking the whole time about our behaviors, you know?
Like, wonder what, like.
Well, the thing is, is that we're all punished for what we put at the top, right?
Because you, you're, the structure that you use to orient yourself in your life is dependent on your values.
And you might say, well, if you don't value human life, let's say, above all, well, then you don't value yourself above all.
You value something else above that.
You're going to pay for that in one way or another.
Now, you might say, well, that's a price that I think is worth paying, or I don't think that human beings should be put on the top.
You know, that's your prerogative.
But you pay for, you will absolutely 100% pay in full for everything that you've done and for everything that you haven't done.
I mean, how could it be otherwise?
Yeah.
You know, it's like, what are you going to do?
You're going to, reality isn't going to make itself manifest because of your whim.
That's not going to happen.
Yeah.
So, and you know, you can think about that religiously or not.
It's, there's no escaping from what is.
Right.
You know, and I've been, I'm going to write a chapter soon on the book of Job, and it's a very interesting book, okay?
Because what happens in that book is that it's really a shocking book.
What happens is that God has a bet with Satan, which is, you know, a little ethically questionable, let's say.
Yeah, this could be a half king's ad, too.
I'm just joking by that.
Job's a good guy.
And Satan gets word of him, and he knows God's happy with him.
And he goes to God and he says, you know, Job, you know, that guy you think's so great?
I don't think he's so great.
I think if you let me torture him, I can make him denounce you and lose faith.
And God says, I don't think so.
He's yours.
And, you know, people in their lives, you know, sometimes people, they'll enter a period where all hell is breaking loose and everything seems to be conspiring against them.
So these things happen.
And so Job, it's like, first of all, his whole family is destroyed, then everything he owns.
So that's Act 1. Then Satan curses him with a terrible skin disease.
Yeah, that's terrible.
Right, right.
And then he has to sit in the ashes scraping himself.
And then his friends come along and tell him that he must have done something wrong because otherwise the universe wouldn't be conspiring against him.
So that's about as bad as it gets, right?
Right.
And then God himself comes along and says, who are you to complain about your fate?
Right.
Now, if you don't think that's going to happen to you in your life, you're not very smart because that is going to happen to you in your life.
So then the question is, what the hell should you do about it?
And one answer would be, well, that sucks.
It's God and Satan against you.
You know, you're kind of outmatched.
It's completely unfair because you were good and everything that you valued is taken away from you.
So what should you do?
You know, would you shake your fist at the sky and raise a middle finger and say, fuck you.
You know, like now I'm on the side of Cain and the devils and I'm going to be resentful and bitter.
And people might look and think, well, it's no wonder you're resentful and bitter, like you lost your whole family.
You have a terrible disease.
Your friends are laughing at you.
Right.
So you have every reason.
That isn't what happens in the story.
Job decides that no matter what happens to him, and he means that, no matter what happens to him, he's going to maintain his ethical orientation and aim up.
And I think that's, but then you think, look, man, forget about the religious trappings.
Here's hell.
Hell is when you get cancer.
And then you're bitter and resentful about it and you make your last six months a living fucking nightmare.
Right.
And so you might say, well, you've got cancer and that sucks and no doubt it sucks and maybe it's unfair and probably it is and maybe even, you know, God and Satan themselves bet against you.
You're going to aim up and maintain your dignity and your integrity or are you going to take a bad situation and make it into every goddamn nightmare you can possibly imagine?
You think, well, of course you have to aim up no matter what happens to you.
And you think, well, that's not fair.
It's like, well, it's better than the alternative.
And what does fair have to do with it?
What's your choice?
You're going to dig a deeper pit?
Or are you going to be, are you going to have some integrity in the face of life's catastrophe?
You know, and I think we know the answer to that because when you meet people who have integrity in the face of catastrophe, you're struck with admiration for them.
Right, right.
So that's your heart speaking, man.
It's like, I don't know how you do it, but, you know, I can't help but being all.
I know I have a friend, a very well-known Canadian, and he got into some business trouble about 10 years ago, 15 years ago, and he had a great fortune and a huge business empire, and he lost every bit of it.
Wow.
And then they put him in prison.
Right.
And he lost all his, he lost everything.
And he lost almost all of his friends.
And they put him in prison in Florida in a rough prison.
He wrote a book there, and he got 200 people through high school.
Wow.
Yeah.
No kidding.
Wow.
He chose.
That was his choice.
Yeah.
He's like, even though it's as bad as it can get, I'm going to have some dignity for myself and do some good.
And he did.
He's still in touch with the people that he got through high school.
He said, every single person he tutored graduated.
Wow.
No kidding.
Wow.
That's admirable.
That's for sure.
And surprising.
It's how when people react whenever it's going tough, that's really where you see people.
Yeah, well, and you want to have a vision of yourself in a situation like that, too.
It's like maybe you're look, part of the Christian injunction, we were talking about Christianity earlier.
So there's the fundamental Christian injunction is that you pick up your cross and you march uphill.
What does that mean?
Well, it means that's true for everybody.
What's the cross?
You're going to die.
You know, and you're probably going to suffer when you die.
And probably along the way, the mob is going to come for you and people are going to betray you.
That's all going to happen to you.
And so how should you react to that?
Well, one answer is to be bitter and resentful and cruel and make things worse or to give up.
And you could do that and you could make a case for why.
But obviously all that's going to do is make it worse.
Or you can think, Jesus, maybe there's enough to me so that I could actually do that voluntarily and I could do it positively and I could withstand it.
And you know, maybe that is the sort of thing you are.
You know, who the hell knows?
It's where you really find out who you are.
It's scary sometimes to really ask yourself who you are, you know, and really answer it.
You came from a poverty-stricken background and you've done well.
And, you know, you talk to me about having some trepidation about making your goals conscious and try to realize them.
But you've pursued success and you've been successful.
What do you think you did right that enabled you to aim for success?
And also, you know, my sense is that you've straightened yourself out a lot and that along with the opportunities, you haven't let the opportunities that have come your way drag you down or destroy you.
And they could have.
They do lots of people in the entertainment industry.
And you make fun of your past, you know, in a great way.
It's extremely hilarious.
Like, what do you think you did right that put you forward?
Hmm.
Well, I didn't give up on myself, you know.
I don't know if that's kind of a vague statement, I think, in some ways.
Well, why would that be the one that comes to mind first?
Like, were you tempted to give up on yourself?
Did your environment insist that you should have?
Yeah, I think I probably part of me waged war against what I thought I was where I thought society expected me to be.
Yeah.
And where did you think society expected you to be?
Probably my lot in life was supposed to be, you know, not successful, maybe not having much opportunity, looked at as a societal liability, maybe.
You know, like I felt like I was born into an environment where I wasn't supposed to have success or opportunity, probably, you know, and I was supposed to be okay with that kind of.
Right.
Okay.
So why didn't that make you bitter or did it?
And why, and what did you do, do you think that worked that moved you forward beyond that?
And why were you able to accept that, even yeah, I think what I did that helped me move beyond that probably was, I think, probably make a decision within myself that I was going to do something different than that.
Do you remember when you decided that?
Or was it a sequence of decisions?
I think it was probably a sequence of decisions, and I think it was always there somewhere, you know, but sometimes it was guided by anger.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Fair enough.
So it wasn't always guided by like, you know, positive energy.
There's a scene in the- It was like I had an enemy, you know, and it was the world.
There's a scene in the Gospels where Christ is being tempted in the desert.
And I think I might be putting two stories together, but it doesn't exactly matter.
They work together.
He says, get thee behind me, Satan.
I think he actually says that to Peter.
It doesn't matter.
But it means something very specific.
You know, you talked about anger.
Like, anger is an extremely useful emotion.
Trump is very good at using it, by the way.
You can see that in his mugshot, for example.
Well, you know, that anger that you had, if that's integrated and it's behind you, it's not anger, it's determination.
Right, right.
So integrated anger is no longer a vice.
It's a hammock or strength of character.
That's the integration of the shadow from the union perspective, right?
You can't be Nambi-Pamby and nice.
That's not good enough.
You shouldn't be dominated by anger because it makes you bitter.
But that force, like anger is a non-trivial force, right?
It's a huge biological circuit.
You want to have that sucker on your side.
And if it can orient you upward, it makes you unstoppable.
Yeah.
I think that was a lot of it for me.
Finding some good role models, listening to people.
I think that was helpful.
You know, I had a brother that was really, really helpful.
I have a brother that's really amazing.
So that was great.
I think over time.
Older or younger?
He's two years older than me.
What has he done?
He's done, he started a tree company that did well and he got sober.
And then he started a family.
And now he like does his own like farms at home.
And he likes to, he's learning about that kind of stuff, like living off the land and stuff.
But he's, he's like a child therapist too.
He really loves like learning about children.
So he was a good model or constantly.
He was a great model, especially because we'd had a kind of traumatic childhood.
So he learned about a lot of that and how to help children.
And so he was able to kind of help me.
So I think that was very helpful.
And wanting to do things on my own, just deciding that I really wanted to do things, you know, and starting to surround myself with people that were doing things, you know, I think that that was beautiful.
Yeah, well, that's a useful, you know, being in the right wake, you know, being in the wake of people that were doing things.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, it's good.
You want to be around people that celebrate your successes.
You want to be around people that commiserate with your failures without letting you off the hook.
You want to be around people that are aiming up, not people that'll drag you back down.
You know, this often happens to people who are trying to quit drinking.
You know, their friends will tempt them.
And sometimes it's a bit of a provocation.
It can be playful, but some of the time it's like, well, who the fuck are you to escape?
You know, you get back down here in the mire with us.
You think you're better than us, do you?
You know, and a lot of misery comes from that.
I think doing my own thing, I like charting my own course.
I like doing the things that other people weren't doing.
I always liked that because I didn't see the odds were better if it was me by myself doing something different than if it were me amongst many doing the same thing.
And I felt for some reason that the odds were better because there's no.
Because it was you.
It was just me.
Yeah, okay.
So one of the things.
So if somebody looked over like, I don't like what this guy's doing, but they knew it was me doing it.
Right, right.
Whereas opposed to, oh, if I look over here and everybody's doing this, I don't even know if this guy's doing it.
Well, that's the other advantage of taking responsibility, you know, because so we talked about Noah and we talked a little bit about the Tower of Babel.
So one of the next stories in the Old Testament is the story of Abraham.
And Abraham has rich parents and he has the option of just like laying around and eating peeled grapes for the rest of his life, you know, with naked slave women waving palm fronds over him.
A voice comes to him and says, get the hell out there and have your adventure.
And it's not the same situation as you were in because Abraham comes from privilege, but it's the same idea, right?
It's like, well, Abraham has everything anyone could want.
In fact, he's quite old by the time he launches himself out of his nest.
And you might say, well, why the hell bother?
Because you've already got everything that everyone wants if you want peeled grapes and, you know, naked slaves waving pome fronds over you.
And he goes out and he has quite a cataclysmic adventure, you know, war, death, destruction, famine, tyranny, the whole bloody mess.
But he has an adventure.
And so what's cool about that story, and this is another way that this unifying spirit is presented, is that God is presented as the spirit that calls you to adventure.
Right.
That's a definition.
Right.
Because the question is, what should you put at the top?
And what you put at the top is what you follow by definition.
You know, and you said, well, you had an intuition that you should go and do your own thing, right?
And that it would be okay if that led forward and to success.
And that's, well, that's a kind of spirit, right?
It's something that calls to you.
It's not something you invent.
You saw it in your brother.
Like other people have it.
It's in the world.
It's part of the spiritual realm.
That's a reasonable way of thinking about it.
And you can pay attention to it and follow it or not.
Yeah, it feels like we used to probably be so much more connected to the spiritual realm when we didn't create this other kind of pseudo-spiritual realm that we have now with like once like computers and cell phones and stuff, we kind of have this filter between us and like the spiritual realm, it feels like, or this whole other spiritual realm, like this reflective pond, you know, that isn't always really positive.
Whenever you and I talked one time, we talked about like success and like what that would be like.
Like we were both starting to have some success like five years ago, whenever we first spoke.
And whenever like you look back on, like if you look back at success, like what are, or do you feel like there's ways you've handled success well and things you ways that you didn't, that you haven't handled it well or that you didn't know that it was, like, have there been some surprises about it?
Like, because we've had an interesting experience in life to have some popularity, some publicization, right?
It's interesting and how like our ego battles through that.
Like, you know, I think have there been anything that you've learned about yourself, like through some of that?
Because it's an interesting experience.
A lot of people don't have it.
Well, I've tried to maintain like a stance of amazed gratitude.
I've tried to be sure that I don't ever take it for granted.
Like my wife and I talk a lot while we're on the road, like before every show, really.
We try to get our attitude in order.
We have music before the shows, and that helps.
But the right attitude is there's 5,000 people here.
That's impossible.
You're an idiot if you take that for granted.
It's so improbable.
And they've all spent time and money getting here.
They've all put in a lot of effort.
They're here because they want something good to happen.
You better be on your knees and thankful that this unlikely occurrence is happening because you could be walking down the road and people could be throwing stones at you and that'd be a lot worse.
And so, and my wife's been very helpful with that too, because she went through quite a trial in the last few years and she's pretty damn happy that she's not, you know, burning in hell, so to speak.
So I think that I was shocked probably by the magnitude of pain that I saw in the world.
You know, I didn't understand how many people there were out there who were essentially dying for lack of an encouraging word.
And it was very hard on me, positive in a way, but also very hard to hear thousands of stories of people who would say, you know, I was falling apart five years ago.
Here's 10 things that were going wrong with my life.
I was hopeless, nihilistic, depressed, drug addicted, in jail, on the street, no relationship.
You know, what the various hells people can find themselves in.
And say, well, you know, I started to try to tell the truth and to aim up and everything got way better.
And now my life's put together.
And, you know, that's really positive.
But what's terrible about it is that I didn't know that there was such a lack of encouragement.
I didn't know that lack of encouragement was so endemic in our culture.
I didn't know how many people were suffering because of that.
That's partly why Trump is so popular.
You know, like people feel that Trump is a champion for their disaffected lives.
And I think there's some truth to that, to tell you the truth.
I think Trump, for whatever else he might be, he obviously can connect with working class people.
And that's, you got to look at that.
He's got to be doing something.
He's doing something that's addressing that problem.
And it's a deep problem.
It's a terrible problem.
You know, and so I did have some trouble swallowing that, let's say.
It hurt me.
Was it hard?
Like, there was a time when I was having some, like, whenever I was getting more, I get, you know, just more popular to say, because that's probably the way to say it.
Like, I started thinking that, like, God, I thought, oh, God, like, I have some larger responsibility to God, like in a way.
Like that, but that was kind of scary at first because I was like, holy shit, this is like a lot of responsibility.
I feel like, and it wasn't really like, like, I don't know.
It was just scary.
Like with my own ego, it's like, well, how do I be careful here not to think that I'm, there's something really special about me?
It's okay to have some self-worth and this is helping me have some self-worth, but how do I not let that just fill up my ego cup first?
Yeah, right.
Well, I think, I think a huge part of that is gratitude, right?
I think that's the antithesis of that.
And I think that that's a practice, right?
You got to pinch yourself constantly and think, well, look, here we are.
We're in this studio.
We're going to have the opportunity to talk to a million people.
And like, how remarkable is that?
And how much of a fool would we have to be not to be just absolutely thrilled about that?
And then to take that responsibility seriously.
You know, one of the things our culture has a real problem with is the idea of privilege, unearned privilege.
It's like, well, you had all those advantages.
Okay, well, you have a bunch of advantages now.
And so then a question really arises.
It's like, well, lots of other people don't have those advantages.
Like, why you?
And then what the hell are you supposed to do about that?
And the answer is, you're supposed to take responsibility for it.
Now, you've got all these opportunities and these advantages.
And that means that to balance out the cosmic scales properly, you better do a job that's as good as your opportunities are allowing you.
And I would say if you don't, well, you'll get arrogant.
You'll start to take it for granted.
You'll start hurting people and yourself.
And the whole goddamn thing will come tumbling down.
So you'll pay for it.
So you pay for your privilege by growing ethically.
That's what you do.
And that enables you also to be successful without being guilty.
It's like, you know, because people might say, well, what the hell are you doing with your money or with your opportunities?
And if you can say, well, here's 10 things I'm doing, you know, and if I scour my conscience, those seem like the right 10 things to be doing with all this opportunity.
Then the guiltmongers can't come along and say, well, you know, who are you to have what you have?
And we don't want people to be able to say that because if no one can have anything, then no one can have anything.
And that's a recipe for poverty and catastrophe.
Yeah, I got to do a better job or not a better, but I have to, I think for all, I was scared too, like of just like, yeah, it was just scary.
Like when they're, if you get popular, it's kind of scary.
Oh, yeah.
You know, you're, it's like, definitely.
Like I've gone through a lot of social anxiety, like when I'm out around, like there's just like a lot of strange things that happen to you're trying to balance and then just still manage your own life at the same time.
But yeah, I think it's a, that's a good note to make sure that I just have some things in place that I feel like I'm, and that's when I feel my brain and heart a lot of times like, okay, how can we do something positive for somebody else today?
How can I not think about myself?
Well, that's also a really useful technique, by the way, for social anxiety.
So if you're feeling social anxiety in a situation, part of the reason for that is because you're thinking about how you're feeling, what you should be doing.
So here's an interest, here's something very interesting.
If you look at what people say and what they write, and you take the words they use and you analyze them and you look at how many times they refer to themselves, the more they refer to themselves, the more likely they are to be depressed or psychotic.
You can actually distinguish with 75% accuracy between people who are clinically depressed or clinically psychotic and people who aren't by the number of times they refer to themselves.
Literally, the more you think about yourself, the more miserable you are.
Literally, they're that tight.
So what you do if you're in a situation that's social and you get anxious because you start thinking about, you know, you start sweating and you wonder how you're looking.
Yeah, are my legs the same length?
Stuff like that.
Exactly, exactly.
And so what you try to do is you try to make the people around you more comfortable.
You switch your attentions.
Like stop.
It isn't that you have to stop thinking about yourself because you can't.
If you stop thinking about yourself, you're thinking about yourself and you'll fall into that pit.
But if what you decide to do is to make, pay way more attention to the other person and try to make them comfortable, then that social anxiety will disappear right away.
Yeah.
It's a really good technique.
You know, I found too, like you, when you meet people, I don't know if you've learned to do this or not, but like when people come up to me, say in the meet and greets and so forth or on the street, everybody has a tempo.
Some people come up quick.
Some people come up slow.
If you match that tempo, you put them at ease right away.
And that's part of paying it.
It's such fun.
It creates a bond right away because they notice really unconsciously that you're paying attention to them.
It's like a dance.
It's like the first step in a dance.
And I always ask people their name because if they get nervous, well, most people can remember their name.
I have a tough time feeling proud of myself.
Yeah?
Yeah.
And I just wanted to think about that with you for a couple minutes.
Yeah, I just have a really tough time feeling genuine.
You know, people are always like, you should feel proud of yourself, you know?
And it's really tough for me to do that.
Well, you know, pride is a cardinal sin, you know, and there's a reason for that.
And there's a reason that pride goes before a fall.
And I don't think you should be proud of yourself.
I don't think that's the right terminology.
And I think that's a place where our culture has really fallen off the rails.
It's like you should be convinced in your heart that you're doing the best you can with what you've been given, right?
And hopefully that'll make you less anxious and it'll make you more hopeful.
But, you know, you should have the same kind of regard for yourself that you have for someone that you love.
And that's not pride.
It's the you should, it would be lovely if you could orient your thoughts to yourself so that you could allow yourself to be pleased if you thrived.
It's not pride.
Say it again.
It would be nice if...
You imagine you have a son.
You want your son to do well.
Oh, yeah, I already want him to do well and he doesn't even exist.
Yeah, well, that's it.
Well, that's the attitude you should have towards yourself, too, is that, you know, you should also strive.
You know, look, if your son goes out and plays a soccer game, you know, you want him to do well.
You don't want him to be arrogant and prideful and you don't want him to be the star at everyone else's expense.
You want him to do well when he deserves to do well and you want him to deserve to do well.
Well, that's the attitude you should have towards yourself.
It's like you should set yourself up so that if things are good for you, that's good.
Now, you should be grateful about that, right?
And you should be amazed that it's happening, given how many things can go wrong.
You should allow yourself the luxury of success, right?
But then you should also hope for that for everyone else.
It's like, well, we could set up the world so that we had life more abundant than everyone was successful.
And we should treat ourselves as if we're the sorts of creatures for whom success is acceptable, right?
And we do have doubts about that because everyone, well, we're flawed deeply.
We're mortal and we're vulnerable and we're subject to suffering and we're ignorant and we make mistakes.
And it's easy to think that a creature like that deserves nothing but, say, unending punishment and misery, you know, but I think you give yourself the benefit of the doubt like you do someone you love.
And if success comes along, you say, well, I'm so grateful for this and I hope I can take the opportunity to make proper use of it.
And you let yourself, you don't, you're not obligated to torture yourself beyond whatever is necessary to help you learn.
Right.
And if you can drop that and you can accept, you know, it's also the case, look, man, you're going to have rough times.
They're coming.
They're always coming.
And if you're having an okay time now, then you think, okay, I'll just use this to recuperate and I'll use it advantageously and I'll accept it in good graces without thinking that somehow I'm special and deserve it.
But gratitude for that, gratitude's an excellent practice, man.
It's the opposite of arrogance and resentment.
I don't think, I think it's a great thing to become an expert at.
And I think that you can allow yourself happiness if you're grateful.
There's something, and thank you for that.
Thanks for the suggestion, too.
That's good for a lot of people to hear.
There's something inside of us, like you always want to make your father proud.
Like there's something inside of a man, right?
Like my father's been dead for probably 20 years, but I always want to make him proud.
I can feel it almost as real as if he's right now.
Well, look, why is that tether so?
Because there's no difference between the spirit of your fathers and God.
It's the same thing.
I think strip it of religious significance for now.
The spirit of the forefathers, that's God.
And you have a responsibility that you're a historical creature.
You have a destiny.
It's necessary for you to uphold certain traditions.
It's necessary for you to follow a certain pathway.
It's necessary for you to align yourself with the spirit that drove mankind forward, right?
That's the spirit of the fathers.
And that's, if your father loved you, he's the outflowing of that spirit and you are responsible to it Or you're responsible to something else, man.
So it's a good instinct.
It's a good instinct.
You know, one of the things Carl Jung pointed out, so brilliant, you know, he said, you don't want to confuse your father with God.
You want to detach the idea of God from your father and put it above your specific father.
You want to see your father as an exemplar, the love that you got from your father as an exemplar of something like the proper transcendent relationship, because that also takes you away from being just the son of your father, because you risk not growing up then, right?
If you're under his thumb, if you're always looking for his approval.
So you got to get that right.
You got to strive forward to make the spirit of the father proud, but you also have to be an independent person.
And you do that by separating out the spirit so that you're beholden to something that's above all men, right?
But still real.
It's like the essence of, it's the essence.
That's another way that you can conceptualize God is God is the essence of paternal love.
Right.
Right.
And so it's the same thing.
Like many fathers love their son, right?
So that love isn't, it isn't specific to any given relationship.
You could extract it.
Well, that spirit is part of what's always been considered, that's the patriarchal aspect of God.
That's a good way of thinking about it.
No, I love that.
I think it's important for a lot of young men out there.
Jordan, thanks so much, man.
Thanks.
Nice to see you, man.
Nice to catch up.
Sorry you're being witch hunted by your own country.
But it's also exciting, though, kind of.
And we're going to make the best of it, man.
So we'll see how it goes.
That's the way to do it.
It's always good to see you.
I'm hoping I can see you the next time you come to Toronto.
I want to go see one of your shows.
I thought your last Netflix special, man, Tammy and I were, because we come from, you know, pretty rough area of northern Alberta.
We were just cracking up, man.
You're a great storyteller and you've done wonderful things with the strange things you experienced when you were a kid.
It's a really funny special.
It really cracked me up.
Thank you, man.
I appreciate it.
Well, it's been nice to be here in your country.
I love Canada.
And yeah, I want to come back up and do your shit and do your podcast, please.
Great.
Yeah, I'd love to do that soon.
Great.
Yeah.
Well, I'd like to walk through your life.
That'd be fun.
I mean, horrible, obviously.
Yeah, no, it'd be good.
I think it'd be exciting.
And yeah, man, I'll donate to your law camp.
I know you guys are doing a GoFundMe, right?
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Well, I want to.
Is it going to be really expensive to battle that?
It's unbelievably expensive.
Yeah, and I mean, I'm not particularly concerned about that, although I would like to feel that I can go no holds barred without giving any consideration other than what's necessary because I'm probably going to have to take this right to the Supreme Court.
But I also, there are lots of other people in Canada who are in the same straits, and I'm hoping, first of all, that this will help them, but also that I will be able to offer financial support to them.
So we'll see how that goes.
Cool.
So set some precedent, huh?
That's the plan.
I like it.
Thank you so much for your contributions to all of us, just as young men, and thank you for your time today, Jordan.
I appreciate it.
Hey, man, it's always a pleasure talking to you.
You're looking great, by the way.
You too, man.
You look sharp.
There we go.
Now I'm just floating on the breeze.
And I feel I'm falling like these leaves.
I must be cornerstone.
Oh, but when I reach that ground, I'll share this piece of mind.
