March 2, 2024 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
54:49
20240302_Hour_2
|
Time
Text
You're listening to the Liberty News Radio Network, and this is the Political Cesspool.
The Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populist conservative radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host, James Edwards.
And we're back as we are kicking off the 2024 installment of March Around the World.
And we did kick it off, in fact, in our first hour tonight.
You just heard live from Zagreb staying up into the wee hours of the morning in Central Europe.
Dr. Tom Sunich, our longtime friend.
And, well, we're all friends here.
No, we're more than that.
We're family.
Paul Fromm, his family, Tom Sunich, you know these guys 20 years.
You've been working with them.
They've been right on all the issues.
They've all been to Memphis here with us too.
That's right.
They sure have.
We've been all over the place with them, all over the country.
And these are just, these are the best men I know.
I mean, the people that we feature on this program are the best people in the world, as far as I'm concerned.
And it's just an honor to continue year after year.
Those roots run deeper and the familiarity and the familial bond only grows.
And March Around the World now moves from Croatia to Canada as we speak with Paul Fromm, of course, our old dear good friend, the director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression.
And if there was ever a need for him and his work and his organization, the time is now.
Paul, hello and hello to you from Canada.
How are you?
Oh, pretty good.
Your last guest, my friend Dr. Tom Sunik, lives in a country that used to be communist, but is now more or less free.
I live in a country that used to be more or less free and is now virtually Cuba North.
And I'm not exaggerating.
It's really bad what our present prime minister would like to lead us to.
Isn't that something, Paul?
You know, I marvel at that, that all of the countries that suffered under Bolshevism and communism and that were under the Iron Curtain, you know, as bad as it was, and those people were brutalized and killed by the millions, but they were also inoculated from Western degeneracy.
And now, who would have thunk it?
Here we sit now in 2024, they are healthier and better off and may be the key to white survival.
Whereas the once supposedly advanced people in the West are the ones that have to deal with all this degeneracy.
It's like the South.
There's advantages to being backwards, apparently.
Yeah, well, I mean, you know, however you want to, I think we're stabbing in the right direction.
Paul, how would you articulate that?
Well, you know, the advantage that Eastern Europe has and East Germany and Russia is that they are still watching the American South.
And they've not succumbed to the blandishments of diversity and multiculturalism and immigration.
And for quite a while, there wasn't a lot of, I should say, third world immigration.
There was not a lot to attract third worlders to Eastern Europe, unless they were being sponsored by the Communist Party.
The wealthier you are, the more likely you are to be inundated by third worlders.
I think that's a truism that everybody has to acknowledge.
That's why, for example, Croatia isn't as bedeviled with third world immigrants as other parts of Europe because they're not as prosperous as some of the other parts of Europe, to be blunt about it.
Yeah, and ironically, that's an advantage.
Well, what was dumped on us this week by our Ugandan, you got that right, Ugandan Minister of Justice, Arif Virani.
He was an East Indian or Asian whose family came from Uganda.
And he's a former employee of the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
And don't let the title fool you.
It is militantly anti-free speech.
And I was tangling with them going back into the, you know, almost 15 years ago.
Anyway, Bill 63, which is given the charming title of Online Harms Bill.
You know, you can put lipstick on the old whore, but you can't make her righteous.
Well, that's what they're doing.
Beautiful.
The bait here in the first part of the act deals with protecting people from trial pornography and attempting to seduce kids over the internet and so on.
Frankly, there are already laws about that.
And I don't mean to be hard-hearted, but I mean, you know, I'm a parent, you're a parent, but to a certain extent, that's the parents to keep an eye on this.
Well, why would this have the state do it?
But anyway, that's kind of the worm.
That's the hook or the worm.
Now, the rest of the act has to do with freedom of expression.
Now, there are only a couple of things in Canada that can get you life in prison.
One would be murder, first-degree murder.
Okay, under this law, advocating genocide could get you up to life in prison.
Now, they don't have to give you life in prison, probably wouldn't, but at first.
But that reminds me of what went on under Stalin.
Under Stalin, you could be executed for anti-Semitism, whatever that was.
Well, genocide, I don't know, maybe you and I all have a clear definition of it, but believe me, it's pretty murky.
The Jewish lobby up here claims that the protests that say from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free is a call for genocide.
Frankly, the words are not a call.
I was going to ask you, what is the Canadian government's position, Paul, on the genocide of the Palestinians by the Israelis?
Keith, that's a good question.
I was curious on that myself, because if they're going to put life imprisonment for someone who, quote unquote, advocates for genocide, I mean, where do they stand?
A lot of Jews are going to be in jeopardy.
I don't know if it's going to apply to them, Paul.
Yeah, what's the position?
Well, Trudeau dances back and forth.
Of course, the day after, he said that Israel had the right to defend itself, absolutely, and we're behind Israel.
Now, of course, he's got a large Muslim base.
So that quite gives him some trouble.
He has no one to thank for but himself.
Right.
So he several times called for a ceasefire.
Well, you know, I agree with that.
And he gave a little bit more aid to the United Nations refugee efforts in Palestine, a couple more, I think about $50 million.
So he tries to try to placate both sides.
He is not a militant Zionist, unlike many in the Conservative Party.
But, you know, what's going on in Gaza, I think, could be called a genocide.
I mean, when you deny these people food and water, you won't let the trucks in most of the time.
I think yesterday there was a food, people were trying to get it, food brought in by trucks, and the Israelis shot at them, shooting up a food line.
Gosh.
104 people killed.
100 poor Palestinians killed by the IDF, the Israeli Defense Forces.
Yeah, I think it would be fair to say, and many people do, that what's going on in Gaza is a genocide.
It gets even richer.
There was a truth and reconciliation report done on behalf of the Native people in Canada about the residential schools a few years ago.
And it was declared by them and agreed to by Prudo that the residential schools were a genocide.
This is bullshit.
The residential schools were schools set up between 1880 and about 1970 for Native students in areas where...
For Indians, in other words.
Pardon?
I was thinking that must mean whites, but I guess that means whatever small bands of Indians would have been on the Arctic tundra.
Indians, they're like your Negroes.
The official name changes every day.
I grew up with Indians.
Then they became the Native people.
Then they became aboriginal.
Then they became the First Nations, just like the blacks used to be called.
Well, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
We won't say what else they, yeah.
We'll leave it at that.
Then they were poor people.
And then they were African Americans.
And then God knows what they are today.
What are they called now?
I don't even know.
They're not indigenous.
But when you declare schools, residential schools set up to try to bring natives from the Stone Age to the edge of the modern age.
Trying to basically assimilate them into mainstream Canadian society, I'm sure.
Yes, and also give them the tools, you know, the basic reminiscent education that will allow them to pick me in.
When you call that a genocide, hold on right there.
We've got a definitional problem.
We're going to take a quick timeout, as they say in the sports world.
March Round of the World continues in Canada with its finest representative, Paul Fromm.
Next, we're going to be talking about the online hate crimes bill.
Totally Orwellian.
The Honorable Cause, a Free South, is a collection of 12 essays written by Southern Nationalist authors.
The book explores topics such as what is the Southern nation?
What is Southern nationalism?
And how can we achieve a free and independent dictionary?
The Honorable Cause answers questions on our own terms.
The book invites readers to understand for themselves why a free and independent dictionary is both preferable and possible.
The book pulls in some of the biggest producers of pro-South content, including James Edwards, the host and creator of The Political Cess Prew, and Wilson Smith, author of Charlottesville and Told, Arkansas congressional candidate and activist Neil Kumar, host and creator of the dissident mama podcast, Rebecca Dillingham, author of A Walk in the Park, My Charlottesville Story, Identity Ditches, Patrick Martin, and yours truly, Michael Hill, founder and president of the League of the South, as well as several other authors.
The honorable cause is available now at Amazon.com.
Have you ever heard of Loving Liberty Ladies?
Well, the Loving Liberty Ladies are here to help you learn our American heritage and the way it affects today's society.
The Loving Liberty Ladies also have a discussion guide called Proclaim Liberty.
And with this guide, you can start your own group in your hometown.
Get yours today on our website at lovingliberty.net.
Look for our lesson supplements too.
They're free.
To hear all the special offers and to join the fight for freedom and liberty, please go to lovingliberty.net.
The spirit of the American West is alive and well in Range Magazine, the award-winning quarterly devoted to the issues of the American West.
Each issue contains informative articles, breathtaking imagery, as well as the culture of Cowboy Spirit Today, and gift ideas like this year's Buckaroo Calendar.
Order online from RangeMagazine.com.
Loving Liberty Network salutes the spirit of the American West at rangemagazine.com.
We were just having a laugh, having a laugh here with Paul Fromm.
I was talking with him in queue during the break about my column in the American Free Press.
And the current issue features, well, actually, the current issue features an article from my time in Orlando with Steve King earlier this, well, earlier in February, I guess now.
And the next issue, which has already gone to press and which will be mailed out this coming up week, features an interview, a QA with Virginia Abernathy, which I've been doing many of those.
And Paul Fromm will be the next interview subject.
And we were just covering that.
And anyway, so stay tuned for that.
You'll get more Paul Fromm.
If hearing him isn't enough, we'll compliment that with a Q ⁇ A, a print Q ⁇ A, stuff coming out in the Barnes Review with Sam Dixon and Kevin McDonald.
I mean, we're all over the place, Keith.
We're growing like a sponge.
We're growing like a weed.
We're growing like Topsy, as I said, on Uncle Tom's cab.
We're just doing what we can.
But anyway, Paul, we got to talk a little bit more about this.
This is what it's called, the Online Harms Bill.
And this is actually, this isn't just parochial Canadian news, folks.
This is worldwide, really.
It's a worldwide news story with global repercussions.
So this.
So what hate speech means now, if someone says something and you hate it, then it should be actionable and prohibited by the government.
It is entirely Orwellian and absolutely misnamed the Online Harms Bill.
Jared Taylor at American Renaissance posted a headline, Liberals Online Hate Bill contains $70,000 fines for speech and life in prison for hate crimes.
I'm just going to read the first couple of paragraphs here in a move aimed, and this is not Jared's column, by the way.
This is just how they do the daily news feeds where they get from so-called establishment sources their headlines.
In a move aimed at curbing the spread of what it terms online hate, the Liberal government of Canada has revealed its plan: hefty fines for online speech and stringent punishment, including up to life imprisonment for hate crimes, which whatever that is.
The centerpiece of this initiative is the proposed Online Harms Act, details of which were unveiled during a technical briefing released to reporters just last week.
So, anyway, Paul, I think we get the gist of it.
So, if you say something that the powers that be and our overlords don't like, you can face fines to the tunes of tens of thousands, if not prison time.
How likely is this to pass?
And how does this differ from other such measures we've seen time and time again?
Well, this puts us on a par with the repression in places like Germany and Austria.
A couple of important things here.
Right now, the maximum penalty for willful promotion of hate against privileged groups-that's race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, sexual confusion, etc. is two years.
It's going to be raised to five.
So, if you're willfully promoting hate, and that could be up to five years in prison.
Hate is truth, of course.
Hate is truth, but hate is something that they hate.
I mean, yeah, continue on, Paul.
Sorry for the interruption.
Okay, that's the criminal part.
Then, what they've done is bring back what was called used to be section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, and that was really a mischievous, time-consuming, resource-consuming thing.
It was not criminal, it was civil.
A person can make a complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission that something you posted online was likely to expose a privileged group, you know, again, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation.
And when I say race, that doesn't mean white people, um, to hatred or contempt, whatever, whatever that was.
Okay, they could fine you, give you a $20,000 fine and prohibition.
Like you'd have to remove the post and not post again.
Okay, there was no defense other than I didn't do it.
You know, if it was your post, and because it was very loosey-goosey, if it wasn't hatred, well, it was probably contempt.
It was if it was at all negative.
Well, that's we're going to go back to that.
There's a slightly more stringent definition of hate, but now the fines could go up to $70,000.
Then, there's an even more mischievous thing.
If you feel that somebody has spread hate and you might be endangered, you can go to a judge and you say to the judge, I feel nervous, I feel uneasy.
And you know, the minorities, particularly the Jews, are always feeling nervous and afraid and blah, blah, blah.
You know, the minorities are champion victims in waiting.
So, you could go to a judge, and if the judge is convinced that I or you might pose a threat, he can get us to sign a peace bond.
Okay, that means I won't say anything about so-and-so.
But it might be again about so-and-so's group, but they could go further.
They could order you under order house arrest for you, or they could order prohibition of arms, and the Canadian courts love to do that.
Or they could get you tested, your blood taken.
You could be forbidden to take anything that isn't, any drugs that are not medical or alcohol.
You could be tested from time to time at their whim, but they just come in and take your blood and make sure you haven't been violating that.
It could also be house arrest.
Now, you haven't committed a crime, but you might.
Now, that's all up to a judge.
And this is a police state.
And this law, this bill, C63, has to be stopped.
Now, will it be, I think you sort of asked that question, but will it be?
Well, the liberals will probably vote for it.
They have to.
The conservatives, we don't know, probably will vote against it.
The socialist NDP, who are in bed with the liberals, the liberals have a minority, but with the NDP, they have a bare majority.
Will the NDP support it?
I'm afraid, well, let's see how things shake out, but there's a very good possibility this could become law.
And this is Stalinism.
And it will take years of appeals to the court to get some of it ruled unconstitutional, which I believe will happen.
But many people will suffer in the meantime.
And that's the point.
What it is, Paul.
Paul, what it is actually is right out of Alice Carroll's Alice in what I mean, Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland, where Humpty Dumpty said, words mean what I say they mean, nothing more and nothing less.
And see, that's what, see, hate speech is speech that the left hates to hear, but unfortunately, that type of speech is the type of speech that the conservatives love to hear.
So, you know, it's what is one man's hate speech is another man's love song, you know, and that's what we need to really hammer that in because this is just a matter of who's in charge.
The left is going to be so much in charge that you can't even speak.
The other side can't even speak its opinions without violating law and opening themselves up to ruinous fines and litigation.
And as we found, as we found with the Human Rights Act, Section 13 was still in place a decade ago.
The process is the punishment.
You know, if you were charged, the complicit media will smear you and say so-and-so charged with hate.
Human Rights Commission will hold a hearing.
So already you've been smeared.
You either on your own or with an attorney, you fight the case.
You're out of money.
And even if you win, and only one person ever won.
The old human right, the Section 13, which was internet censorship, had a conviction rate that would rival that of North Korea.
It's lawfare.
It's lawfare, which is not related to welfare, but to warfare.
They use the law as a way to make war upon their enemies, and we're their enemy.
And I think every conservative person in the world needs to realize that all of these laws are not abstractions.
They are directed at you with no ambiguity about it.
You're the enemy of the state.
Here is Another provision of any hearing before the Human Rights Commission.
You will not necessarily know who complained or who are which individual or group.
If it's decided that the revelation of this knowledge to you as the defendant or to the public might cause put them in danger of harassment or other problems.
Well, you know the crybabies of the woke, they're always in a state of fear.
They certainly are up here.
I do.
And also, that would be up to the decision maker.
They ironically call him the member of the member, but okay, but the remember the member, the judge, let's just say the judge.
Now, they're all they are appointed for the human rights tribunals are appointed because of their special knowledge and sensitivity to human rights.
And that's an important freedom of the speech.
Hold on right there.
Hold on right there.
We're talking with Paul.
Canadian Association for Free Expression Cafe.
If ever a hero by the name of Paul From was needed in Canada, it is now.
We're talking about the Online Harms Act, so-called.
A cafe you do not want to patronize.
We'll be right back.
Proclaiming liberty across the land.
You're listening to Liberty News Radio.
USA News.
I'm Corey Myers.
Soon, thousands of hours of security footage from the 2021 Capitol riot will be made public.
USA's John Schaefer has the details.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has announced the release of 5,000 hours of video from the U.S. Capitol grounds.
The speaker has changed course from the original plan to blur the faces of rioters, citing logistical challenges.
The initial batch of footage is now accessible on the video platform Rumble, with more expected to be released over the next few months.
For now, the risk of a government shutdown has been averted.
Again, President Biden has signed a government funding bill, extending the deadline further into the month.
In the following weeks, lawmakers will need to reach an agreement, though, to pass several appropriations bills.
That legislation extends one funding deadline to next Friday and another to March 22nd.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has rejected a bill designed to redistrict children's access to social media platforms.
As much as I think it's harmful to have people on these social media platforms for five or six hours a day, a parent can supervise a kid to use it more sparingly.
Despite overwhelming support in both the House and Senate, DeSantis said he has a discomfort with its wording.
Lawmakers will revisit the issue on Monday with a revised bill.
Two leading pharmacy chains in the U.S. said to commence sales of abortion pills possibly this month.
Walgreens and CVS will offer Mithopristone at select pharmacies in states where it's legally permissible.
Both chains have received FDA certification to dispense the pill.
That's according to separate statements.
This is USA News.
I'd like to introduce you to our new sponsor, Get the Tea.
Get the Tea carries all natural, non-GMO organic teas and supplements made in the USA.
Get the Tea's ingredients are the purest available.
My favorite is Life Change Tea.
Life Change Tea is a gentle daily cleanse containing 12 herbs that, when combined, really keep things moving.
I drink it every day, and my energy has never been better.
I'm feeling great.
Life Change Tea comes in three delicious flavors, natural, peppermint, and pomegranate.
It's an easy and delicious way to keep your digestion on track.
And for those on the go, try D365.
D365 is life change tea in a capsule.
Drink the tea or take D365 capsules and keep your digestion running smoothly.
Go to getthetea.com and enter discount code USA to get 10% off any size order.
That's getthetea.com, discount code USA for 10% off your order.
Hey there, TPC family.
This is James Edwards, your host of the Political Cesspool.
Folks, I want you to subscribe to the American Free Press, America's last real newspaper.
Against all odds, AFP has and continues to publish a populist, independent print newspaper with an unparalleled track record.
Founded by a dedicated group of experienced patriots, AFP pulls no punches and tackles the most controversial and pressing issues facing America from an America First perspective.
I've worked with the American Free Press since even before the beginning of TPC.
Now that's something.
You can subscribe to the print edition by visiting AmericanFreePress.net today or simply pick up a handy digital edition subscription.
However, you do it, subscribe to the American Free Press, America's last real newspaper, by visiting AmericanFreePress.net or by calling 188-699 News, AmericanFreePress.net.
Hello, TPC family.
It's James, and I've got to tell you that I sleep better at night knowing that there are organizations like the Conservative Citizens Foundation.
The purpose of the Conservative Citizens Foundation is to promote the principles of limited government, individual liberty, equality before the law, property rights, law and order, judicial restraint, and states' rights, while at the same time, exploring the dangers posed by liberalism to our national interests and cultural institutions.
The Conservative Citizens Foundation also seeks to educate the public on the dangers of extremist ideologies like critical race theory and cultural Marxism.
I've worked with the good people at the Conservative Citizens Foundation for many years, and their work comes with my complete endorsement.
For more information and to keep up with all the latest conservative news headlines, please check out their website, MericaFirst.com.
That's M-E-R-I-C-A-1ST.com.
americafirst.com.
We're back now, ladies and gentlemen, with the pride of Canada, Canada's favorite son, Paul Fromm, and certainly our favorite son from Canada.
Paul has endured a lot of inconveniences, hardships for our people.
He has been right on all the issues all of his life.
We have known him since before the show began.
I met our favorite son from the land of the Neverending song up there.
The Great White North.
I met Paul, one of the few people I could say this about.
I met Paul even before the show started.
It was in the spring of 2004, the first time Paul and I met, and we have been fast friends ever since.
That is 20 years now, Paul.
Does it seem that long?
That's one-fifth of a century.
Yeah, that's pretty – just before we leave that topic, you know, you wonder – I think we hear hate or hate speech.
Yeah.
Normally, it means speech that the accuser hates.
Well, here's the definition: hatred means the emotion that involves detestation or vilification and that is stronger than disdain or dislike.
For greater certainty, the communication of a statement does not incite or promote hatred for the purposes of this section solely because it discredits, humiliates, hurts, or offends.
I don't know.
Hatred means detestation or vilification, but it's stronger than disdain or dislike.
And it has to be more than discrediting, humiliating, hurting, or offending.
I think you could go around in circles trying to figure out: well, does this create the detestation or vilification?
Well, vilification means to portray somebody as a bad person.
Well, what would you call a child?
What would you call that Venezuelan degenerate who battered to death that young nurse in Georgia last week?
Yeah.
Well, look, it comes in the courts now.
You know this.
We talk about this all the time.
It comes down to whose side are you on?
If you are a black who says, as we saw in the Waukeshaw Christmas parade massacre, you're looking for victims to kill because they're white, you're not going to catch hate crimes charges.
They don't want to charge you with anything, but if they have to, they're not going to give you a medal.
They're not going to give you the hate crimes enhancement.
That only exists for people like us.
And when it comes to all of this stuff, it's going to be selectively and arbitrarily applied.
It's not going to be applied equally.
We know that.
I'm going to ask you this.
I mean, your guess is more informed than ours.
And you said you don't know exactly how it's going to land, but there's a chance that it could pass.
What we're talking about now is not yet law in Canada.
Although, if it becomes law, I guess we'll have to begin to communicate with Paul Fromm with carrier pigeons and smoke signals because he already can't travel to the United States.
And at this point, I don't even know what we would do.
But if you had to put a percentage on it, how likely is this to pass?
50%, 50-50, 75%, 25?
Where do we stand here?
Well, it's coming in already.
It's only being public for, I think, four days.
It's getting a lot of criticism.
And there may be enough pressure to get them to back off.
The other thing that could work in our favor is the parliament is very much backlogged.
And it may not get debated for a long time.
It may even die on the order paper.
A previous bill along the same lines trying to deal with so-called internet harms never did get voted on in 2021.
So, you know, I don't want to hold out false hope, but it's something we are going to absolutely have to fight.
I must say, I feel a certain resentment at the fact that that murdering degenerate got into your, from Venezuela, got into your country, was twice apprehended, and twice let go.
And I can't go to the United States.
There is something seriously wrong in the United States.
Exactly.
So, I mean, you know, for years now, we used to get together all the time, Paul, for events.
And you still have books that I bought at your get-together at the Shones.
I've been everywhere with Paul Fromm, including the backroom meeting private venues at Shones.
Yeah, I mean, wherever people would gather, he would come and he toured extensively across the United States back.
Yeah, it is offensive.
It absolutely is offensive.
This isn't a joke that an upstanding man like Paul, a man of honor like Paul Fromm, cannot travel into the United States.
He is banned from traveling to the United States.
For what reason?
For no reason.
What they're actually doing is they are banning differences of opinion because one man's pleasure is another man's poison.
No tolerance for the diverse.
They're not tolerant.
They don't even like to, you know, they're not tolerant of the diversity of opinion.
We say that time and time again.
Yeah, what they want to do is they want to stop, you know, what is hate speech to somebody is love speech to someone else.
Well, it was serendipitous that we had Paul on tonight because we had booked him right on the cusp of this becoming such a big global story.
And so here we are now.
And I'm looking again at the map.
We're talking about the online harms bill.
I want to transition in the final segment we have, and time is fleeting, Paul.
But I do want to talk, at least touch on, we can't talk about it as comprehensively as we've talked about the online harms bill, which has taken up the first three quarters of this hour.
And rightly so.
This is global news.
This is big news, folks.
This is a terrible precedent.
Censorship is the big issue in America and in the world right now.
If they're able to, right now there's a bill, there's a case in front of the U.S. Supreme Court where they are basically trying to do away with a Texas law that says that the Internet is a free speech zone and they want to be able to censor everything.
They want to control it just like you do your daily newspaper.
They don't want it to be like the U.S. Mail where you can send anything you want to to anyone else without penalty.
All right, let me ask you this, Paul.
Well, go ahead and respond to Keith.
Yeah, well, not exactly your response, but I think what really drove the government around the ban, first of all, extensive pressure from the Zionist lobby for more control of online speech.
But they're still reeling from the Truckers Freedom Convoy.
The fact that working class Canadians, whom they have nothing, white working class Canadians, for whom they have nothing but contempt, managed to organize so amazingly.
They brought thousands to Ottawa and they stayed.
They couldn't believe this.
And a lot of that was organized over the internet.
So they want to crack down on freedom.
It has nothing to do with protecting vulnerable minorities or whatever.
Well, what they have done, Paul, they have basically been unable to cope with the internet.
Back in the days, like James was saying to someone just the other day, when you just said ABC, NBC, CBS, and we were reduced to putting flyers under windshield wipers on people's cars.
They love that.
That was a wonderful free speech situation.
But then on the other hand, now you can have a medium-sized blog or podcast that has more of an imprint or more of an influence on people than the New York Times.
And they don't know how to cope with that.
And they're trying to shut it down because we now, with the internet, have true, you know, a democratic freedom of speech type of regime in which we can operate.
And they just, and we can basically, based on the popularity of your ideas, not the size of your pocketbook, you can control public opinion and they just absolutely will not tolerate it.
For once, we in the patriotic movement weren't two technologies behind times.
A lot of people with our views caught on quickly to the power of the internet.
And a good friend of mine was among the first up in Canada to have a, I think it was called a message board 20 years ago.
It's called the Freedom Site.
Mark Lemire, he's one of the ones who is persecuted by the Canadian Human Rights Commission, and he won.
He's the only guy who ever won.
But, you know, we, you know, we not necessarily me because technically backward, but they are just livid over, you know, because ordinary people can do the, can work on the internet.
It's not the days where you had to have a couple million dollars to start a little newspaper or whatever.
You exactly are right that, you know, 25 years ago, if we objected to something, okay, we mimeograph some leaflets and go and hand them out.
And, you know, I mean, that did some good, but it's very labor intensive and not always that great.
Not very effective.
No, you know, the best we could do, but, you know, the times have changed and they hate that.
Not reaching it as many people.
It's on the other foot now, and we've got the upper hand.
Not reaching it as many people as we're reaching tonight.
And thank God for that.
And thank God for people like Paul Fromm and the people we're featuring as our March Around the World 2024.
My favorite month of the year on TPC.
I love this series.
From Croatia to Canada.
We're in Canada now with Paul Fromm.
We'll be back with you in one more second.
Rapid fire.
Find your inner rebel at Dixie Republic, the world's largest Confederate store, located in Traveler's Rest, South Carolina.
The anti-white, anti-Christ, anti-Southern world ends at the asphalt.
Welcome to God's Country.
Log on to DixieRepublic.com to view our Southern merchandise from flags to t-shirts to artwork.
At the store, browse through our extensive collection of belt buckles and have a custom-made leather belt handcrafted in our Johnny Rebs gun and leather shop.
That's DixieRepublic.com where you can meet all of your Southern needs.
While you're waiting, drop by our Confederate corner for a free cup of coffee and good conversation.
Remember, there are no strangers here, just friends who haven't met yet.
Dixie Republic, we're not just a roadside attraction.
We're a destination for our people.
For more information, visit DixieRepublic.com.
As a parent, is receiving a faith-based, character-focused education for your children difficult to find?
Do you believe that godly principles should be a central component in your child's education?
Imagine a school where faith and integrity are at its center, where heritage and responsibility instill character.
For over 40 years, American Heritage School has been educating both hearts and minds, bringing out academic excellence.
This is the school where character and embracing the providence of a living God are fundamental, where students' national test scores average near the 90th percentile.
With American Heritage School's advanced distance education program, distance is no longer an issue.
With an accredited LDS-oriented curriculum from kindergarten through 12th grade, your children can attend from anywhere in the world.
American Heritage School will prepare your child for more than a job.
It will prepare them for life.
To learn more, visit American-Heritage.org.
That's American-Heritage.org.
Back with Paul Fromm here as we kick off March Around the World for the entirety of this month.
We'll be talking with the West's finest leaders, elected officials and representatives to the very best tonight, Tom Sunich, Paul Fromm.
And it will continue next week when Nick Griffin rejoins us from England.
He is in Italy tonight.
I was texting with Nick earlier today.
He was denounced just this week by the sitting prime minister of the UK, this East African Indian Punjambi.
I thought he was from the subcontinent of India.
Well, his parents were born.
They are, but his parents were born in Africa.
And anyway, they seem to have really found a foothold over there.
The mayor of London is another guy from the subcontinent of India.
Anyway, he'll be on next week.
He is in the news in a big way, and we'll talk to him about his visit to Italy this week, next week when he appears live from London and why he was denounced by the sitting prime minister.
What's that all about?
You know, Nick Griffin may have to be the white people's, what will you call it, Mahatma Godney.
Go, Paul.
I'm not sure he would appreciate that.
We'll keep telling that next week when he's on.
But no, Nick's great.
I love Nick.
Nick and I talk pretty frequently.
Anyway, let's play some rapid fire with Paul Fromm right now.
Paul, we got to make it rapid because we don't have a lot of time.
And there's a couple of issues I want to get to.
Let's put a pin in the so-called online harms bill.
We've got about eight minutes remaining.
We've got a ton of ground to cover.
I would like to mention, by the way, that we are coming up on the one-year anniversary that yours truly, Paul Fromm, Tom Sunich, our guest in the first hour of tonight's show, and our mutual friend and a friend to all here at TPC, Kevin McDonald, our one-year anniversary of being banned from Twitter.
It happened to all of us at the same time on the same day.
Paul, give me 30 seconds.
You're still banned from Twitter one year on.
Yep, still banned.
And we did retain a lawyer in Los Angeles, a very high-powered man who tried, reached out to Twitter and tried to talk to their legal department.
But long story short, nothing happened.
Nothing worked.
We're still straight from the top.
I mean, obviously, that was something, you know, they say deep state.
I don't know what that was, but I had never, I don't know about you, Paul, but I assume it's true for you as well.
I never got a warning.
I'd never been suspended.
I never quarreled with other users.
This was a hatchet job big time.
Yeah, I tell you what, Paul, you were public enemy number one.
And James was number two, and Canon was number three.
And Tom Sunich.
Number four.
Frankly, what happened is all five of us, I think there were at least five of us, maybe more, were on some sort of hit list handed to Twitter by the usual suspects, probably the ADL.
And we just got banned on that basis, as you say.
Remember when the Chinese had the gang of four?
You guys were the gang of five.
I'll tell you what.
There's no company I'd rather be in.
And I'll tell you this, if they send us to prison, just let us be cellmates.
That's my only request.
That way we can enjoy it.
But let's talk about this.
I'm looking, again, I'm fascinated by maps.
I was looking at the map of the Balkans when Tom Sunich was on in the first hour, and I'm looking at Canada now.
And, you know, Tom shared with us an interesting fact, Paul, that even I perhaps I should be embarrassed to have not known this, but he said, even after Germany surrendered in World War II, Croatia still fought for the cause of the Axis, and I did not know that.
They fought on a little longer even than Germany, and that that's magnificent in a way.
But I was looking at the map of the Balkans, and I'm looking now at the map of Canada.
And it was interesting to read that 90% of the Canadian population lives within 100 miles of the American border.
And you're looking at all of these provinces from Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia, British Columbia, up to the Yukon and the Northwest Territories and on.
There's a couple of others.
Are there any provinces that stand out above the others in terms of they're doing the right thing as far as our people or the native Canadian people are concerned?
The white Canadian people.
Obviously, when I think of Canada, I think of whites.
Are there any provinces that are doing a better job than the others?
Are they all being brought down by Ottawa?
What's going on here?
Well, on the very, very vital immigration front, as you know, I have two major issues: free speech and immigration, not enough free speech and too much immigration.
The only problem that's making any headway is Quebec.
They've basically said we're full, we're being swamped.
It's mostly by the so-called refugees.
We can't take anymore.
Most other provinces, well, most other provinces have not done very well.
One of the things, you know, you think that a nation as big as Canada might have many problems, but it wouldn't have a housing problem.
Well, we do.
We have absolutely out-of-reach housing prices.
And the major reason, and that's even coming across now in the mainstream press, and mainstream commentators from the economists from the big banks and so on are saying, well, Trudeau kind of went overboard with immigration.
We took in over a million people last year.
Half of them immigrants.
The other half, people with temporary rights to be here, students, people on students' visa and people called temporary foreign workers.
And they're just simply maxed out the housing.
Housing is absolutely unaffordable.
I'll throw out a figure.
I'm in a smaller city.
It's not Toronto, not Vancouver, but a one-bedroom would start at a rendezvous, would start probably at $1,500, maybe $1,750 a month.
Paul, that's incredible because you look at the landmass of Canada, it may be huge.
Yeah, it's huge.
I mean, there's no shortage of land, but there's a shortage of housing.
Cold weather up there either.
Maybe that's why.
Our own major government body estimated at the current rate that we're building houses, it would take us decades to make up the deficit.
And yet they keep bringing more and more people in.
I mean, this is seeping through even through a fair number of mainstream people, but this is madness.
But our federal government is addicted to several things.
One of them is repression.
Another is mass third world immigration.
And the third is Greta Tunberg's hatred of the carbon industry.
I've got the solution for you.
I've got the solution to your immigration problem, Paul.
Allow free immigration, but you have to go through the North Pole into that big red area.
They're called Alert up there.
I don't even know.
I've never even heard of this province.
It's orange on the map we're looking at here in the studio, but it goes up to the Arctic Circle and hugs Greenland.
You can settle there to your heart's content.
Well, in any event, hey, folks, if you want to know more about what's going on in Canada with regards to immigration, stay tuned to the American Free Press.
You know, they are a publication that is very closely connected to TPC here.
And Paul Fromm and Tom Sunich are going to be forthcoming features in American Free Press.
We just interviewed Virginia Abernathy, Sam Dixon, Kevin McDonald, going to be in the Barnes Review in the next couple of issues.
So we are saturating that with fantastic content with regular guests and friends here on TPC.
But with only a minute remaining, Paul, we didn't cover immigration nearly enough.
Let me ask you this: just five seconds on this.
America, 60-40 white, maybe.
What portion of Canada is white?
What percentage?
Just a quick answer.
78 to 22.
Okay.
Well, to us, that sounds like the cold weather saves you.
Well, that sounds like heaven to us, but I know that's not nearly good enough.
But falling fast.
Yeah, that's the key.
That's the key.
All right.
We'll talk more about that with Paul in the American Free Press.
Paul, with a minute remaining, a little bit of good news, although it's a bit of morbid good news.
Passing of former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney.
Why do we not accept him?
Celebrate him.
Yeah, why do we not celebrate him?
Okay, well, he, you know, there are different points of view on this.
He brought the free trade agreement.
But as a white nationalist, what I detested him for was that he was the main instigator of the attack on South Africa beginning in 1992.
He was ahead of being his bond on this.
And apparently, at least according to the people up here, he persuaded Mark Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, with whom he had a great relationship, to really turn on South Africa, demand the release of that arch communist, Nelson Mandela.
And he just hated white South Africa.
And apparently, I only learned this the other night when they were doing a lot of recaps of his life.
The Queen was also in on this.
The Queen, you know, supposed to be a head of state above politics, but she hated South Africa too.
So she and Mulrooney got on well.
And they apparently, according to what's being told up here, persuaded both Maggie Thatcher and Ronald Reagan to join the Root Party against South Africa.
And for that, I will always detest him.
There you go.
I mean, this is a guy who honored and celebrated the international terrorist Nelson Mandela.
He has passed.
It's like John McCain.
John McCain had like 13 funerals.
I think Rosa Parks had that many state funerals.
The worse you are, the more funerals you get.
And so, look, I don't, I'm not like the left.
When one of our heroes dies, they say, rest in piss, rotten hell, all of that stuff.
I don't do that, but I don't mourn either when a traitor to his people, a traitor to his nation passes away.
Meanwhile, let's try to boost immigration to Ellesmere Island off of Greenland.
I'm all for that.
All right.
Hey, listen, folks.
Subscribe to the American Free Press.
We're going to have a print interview with Paul Fromm.
And the very next issue, Tom Asunich, after that, we got to go.