Nov. 27, 2021 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
50:43
20211127_Hour_2
|
Time
Text
You're listening to the Liberty News Radio Network, and this is the Political Cesspool.
The Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populist conservative radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the political cesspool is your host, James Edwards.
But it's not like Christmas at all.
I remember when you had here.
You know what, Keith Alexander?
Donald Trump may not have been able to build his wall, but Phil Spector's wall of sound is still impenetrable.
And that is one hell of a pop song for Christmas.
Darling Love, 1964, you know, it reached its highest chart positions just a couple of years ago.
Can you believe it?
That's the staying power of some of that symphonies for the kiddies, as Phil put it.
You know, Phil just, if he could have kept that 38 special out of his hand, it would have saved him some problems.
Well, he was a victim of lawfare himself.
They came after him relentlessly.
Well, now, of course, he was convicted of murder, but his defense was the woman wanted to kiss the gun.
Well, look, okay, I'm not trying to defend Phil Specter.
We know Phil Specter's antecedent, so we don't need to go any further into that.
But he was probably the greatest record producer.
I mean, he was a madman.
Yeah.
But he was a musical product.
And sexually, he was a Harvey Weinstein.
But let me just say this.
He put Ronnie in a cage, you know.
He was married to Ronnie, Ronnie Specter.
Well, I know a lot of husbands wish they could have put their wife in a cage.
But let me just say this.
What Glenn said about proportionality.
I'm not Glenn Allen, first of all.
I'll give you one more word.
Look, he's really, you know, he's got the nuts and bolts down, and he knows what he's doing.
And his organization, what is it, Free Expression Foundation.
He also has a sister organization called Breathing Space for Dissent, but I think they're merging together under the free expression umbrella.
Well, the point I was going to make is that he was talking about the rubric of proportionality, that you're not trying to break the defendants.
You're trying to punish them.
Well, that is directly contrary to the rationale behind slap lawsuits.
And he wrote about that litigation against public participation.
They intend to break you.
And a lot of states, well, let me say a number of states have passed anti-slap laws, statutes in those states to prevent this.
Unfortunately, Virginia is not one of them.
But we've got to see, things are breaking down.
The trial by jury is part of our Anglo-Saxon heritage, and the fewer Anglo-Saxons you have on the jury, the more problems you have with it operating as intended.
Well, except for in Georgia case where there was 11 whites, again, so much for southern juries.
But then this whole thing.
But that whole thing, too, was part of our Anglo-Saxon legal inheritance, the right to a citizen's arrest.
I think we've had that, what, for a millennium?
Yeah, and more than that, think about the slap lawsuits that are brought just to harass and grind down the plaintiffs, drive them to despair.
And I don't, you know, the judges, as we said before, like the judges in your case, you know, due process is something I would want it to go into this with Glenn Allen, but basically.
We could have gone three hours with Glenn.
He's just a fantastic, brilliant mind.
But see, part of due process is that you're going to decide cases on appeal based on a certain rubric of policies and principles, like starry decisis, case preced, or legislative history.
In Brown versus Board of Education, they based the decision on a sociology project by a black professor, not on starry decisis, because the case president was obviously supporting the fact that segregation did not violate the 14th Amendment, and legislative history also worked against them.
So they just decided to come up with some fairy tale, just like they really did with you.
Aesop's fables.
I wasn't going to bring it up.
It's become embarrassing now.
We bring it up, but I don't know if there's any more ridiculous case that we could point to, except for the one that I had the misfortune of participating in.
So we always joke about, yes, the panel of judges wrote that precedent, case law, law history backs up my claim.
It was in the restatement of torts.
This is the textbook definition of libel.
And then they said Aesop's Fables, though, encourages us to rule in favor of the plaintiffs because we must judge Mr. Edwards by the company he keeps.
Now, that's where we normally stop telling the story.
But there's more to the story.
What company do I keep that they cited in that decision?
And it was Sam Dixon.
And the reason Sam, who is a great man by any standard of measurement, very intelligent lawyer, too, is good.
He is sturdy.
He is solid.
I mean, any favorable adjective that you could apply towards the worth and goodness of a man, you could certainly apply to Sam.
But the reason they cited Sam was because in the 70s, I think there was one time over the course of his illustrious 50-year legal career, one time where he defended a client who happened to be in the Ku Klux Klan.
And, of course, Sam talks about this a lot.
All the things that lawyers say every defendant is entitled to a robust and vigorous defense.
Well, they don't really believe that.
They certainly don't believe it at all anymore.
But Sam believed it.
And so he took on an unpopular client because the facts of the matter led him to believe that his client was, in fact, innocent.
But the fact that Sam, one time in his career, defended someone who was in the Klan, that's the association.
That's the company he keeps there for.
Obviously, I have ties to the Klan through that.
That's double hearsay then, I guess.
But see, here's the situation is this.
Well, it goes to show, Keith, I'm sorry, but it does goes to show that with regard to what we were talking about with Glenn in the last hour where state law caps this judgment at $350,000.
And if you go back to the state forum versus Campbell, it could cap it just in terms of just a few dollars if it can only be X times the amount of the compensatory damages.
The compensatory damages in Charlottesville were nothing.
That's if they go by the established law.
But as we learned in my case, they don't have to.
It was the textbook definition of libel, and they didn't go by it.
So they don't have to go by law.
They can make up the law now as they want.
And if it's an unpopular client like I am, or like I was, and like these Charlottesville defendants are, they'll get away with it.
That's what we're talking about here.
Well, the legal question on that is whether they'll say that the liability is joint and several, which means you look for the deepest pocket.
If you can get, for example, if they could get $350,000 from Richard Spencer, you know, they'll do it.
And that's, and they'd go on their merry way.
But what we are really talking about here is let's talk about John Adams.
He was one of the founding fathers.
He was a lawyer.
He defended the British troops in the Boston Massacre because he was such a stickler for the responsibility of lawyers to represent bad people.
Save Glenn Allen and Sam Dixon and a handful of others.
We don't have lawyers like that anymore.
I mean, well, the thing is with Slat things, you'll money whip them too.
All right.
We got to take a quick break.
We'll continue.
We've got more to talk.
Okay, girls, about finished with your lesson on money.
Daddy, what is a buy-sell spread for gold coins?
Well, when you sell a gold coin to a coin shop that's worth, say, $1,200, you don't actually get $1,200.
But don't worry, we're members of UPMA now, so we don't have to worry about that.
Daddy, why is somebody seal that gold?
We don't have any gold at the house.
It's stored safely in the UPMA vault, securely and insured.
But the SP 500 outperformed gold.
Daddy, gold is a bad investment.
Some people do think of it that way, but actually, gold is money.
And as members of the United Precious Metals Association, we can use our gold at any store, just like a credit card.
Or I can ask them to drop it right into Mommy and Daddy's bank account because we're a UPMA member family.
Find out more at upma.org.
That's upma.org.
Why don't we say to the government writ large that they have to spend a little bit less?
Anybody ever had less money this year than you had last?
Anybody better have a 1% pay cut?
You deal with it.
That's what government needs, a 1% pay cut.
If you take a 1% pay cut across the board, you have more than enough money to actually pay for the disaster relief.
But nobody's going to do that because they're fiscally irresponsible.
Who are they?
Republicans.
Who are they?
Democrats.
Who are they?
Virtually the whole body is careless and reckless with your money.
So the money will not be offset by cuts anywhere.
The money will be added to the debt, and there will be a day of reckoning.
What's the day of reckoning?
The day of reckoning may well be the collapse of the stock market.
The day of reckoning may be the collapse of the dollar.
When it comes, I can't tell you exactly, but I can tell you it has happened repeatedly in history when countries ruin their currency.
You know where the solution can be found, Mr. President?
In churches, in wedding chapels, in maternity wards across the country and around the world.
More babies will mean forward-looking adults, the sort we need to tackle long-term, large-scale problems.
American babies in particular are likely going to be wealthier, better educated, and more conservation-minded than children raised in still industrializing countries.
As economist Tyler Cowan recently wrote, quote, by having more children, you're making your nation more populous, thus boosting its capacity to solve climate change.
The planet does not need for us to think globally and act locally so much as it needs us to think family and act personally.
The solution to so many of our problems at all times and in all places is to fall in love, get married, and have some kids.
One of the things I love about those 50s and 60s pop songs is a good arrangement.
If you listen to any of the Spectre recordings, I mean, he would put in a full orchestra in those recordings.
He was an innovator and he was a pro.
There's no doubt about that as far as a music producer.
Which is why we like his music.
I don't know about anything else, but he passed away about a year ago.
Yeah, I remember that.
In prison.
And, you know, getting back to Charlottesville and what Glenn Allen was saying, and we were talking about John Adams defending the British soldiers that shot the colonists at the Boston massacre.
Why did he do that?
Because he enunciated what, under Anglo-Saxon tradition, lawyers have been expected to do from time immemoriam, and that is represent people that are unpopular.
And that's what John Adams did.
And that didn't seem to stop him from being one of the leading founding fathers.
In fact, probably the most prominent founding father from New England.
Now, we've got a situation now where people are getting money whipped in court typically.
I remember when a law partner of mine bemoaned the day when the rules for civil procedure became part of the law of almost every state in the union.
And he predicted that it was going to lead to money whipping and avalanches of paper that nobody could dig themselves out from under.
And he was prescient in that regard.
That's part of the slap lawsuit project.
If you have reams and reams of discovery, if you have rounds and rounds of depositions, things like this, all that costs money.
Somebody has to respond to those requests for production and interrogatory.
Somebody has to attend and prepare for those depositions.
And when judges won't put a cap on the ability of the litigants to do that, the most well-heeled litigants can just grind their opponents into the dirt.
Here's another thing to consider about this, and this was mentioned.
The Charlottesville trial is over, except...
It ain't over.
Yeah, right.
Because here's a couple of things that will happen.
Again, we have to mention the state caps on punitive damages.
So you would think that that would be a technicality, although we've learned that courts don't go by the laws anymore either.
Yeah, we'll have to consult Aesop's fable.
We'll see if there's something in there perhaps that can change this.
And then, of course, if they go by the guidelines, and Glenn was right, it's a guideline, not necessarily a rule.
And I'm sure they won't go by it in this case.
But that Supreme Court case that we cited earlier would limit the punitive damages to just a few dollars, no more than 10 times the amount of the $10.
$10 of punitive damages if $1 are your compensatory damage.
That's right.
That was the precedent said in that case.
We'll see if they go by precedent or just do what they want to do as they did with me.
Although, so the plaintiff's attorneys can bring the charges back on the federal conspiracy charges where you had the hung jury on those first two charges.
I would expect that they would.
And, of course, the defendants can appeal the other charges, notwithstanding the restrictions that we've been talking about here with regards to how much money is exactly going to be doled out.
Of course, you could always bring things back.
I was thinking about the case of Byron Della Beckwith, who was convicted of murdering Medgar Edward Evers.
You know, they just kept bringing him back into court.
They finally got him in 94.
They brought the first murder charge in 64.
They kept trying him.
It took all the way, took 30 years of trials.
They finally got him.
They wheeled him in there on the oxygen tank and finally got the jury to convict him.
I think that's Edgar, what was his name?
Byron Della Beckwith was.
Byrd Beckwith was the guy with Evers, and then there's another guy from Neshoba County, Mississippi, where Philadelphia, Mississippi is, that had some peripheral role in the killings of Schwerner and Goodman and Cheney.
Well, that's what they do.
They continue to bring suit after suit.
And as Yogi said, it ain't over until it's over.
Well, with the left, it's never over.
They have basically rewritten the law on Double Jeopardy so that they can keep doing things like this.
And they had gotten a not-guilty verdict.
That's where Double Jeopardy.
They got a non-guilty verdict.
It was the Hung Times on Edward, whatever his name, or Edgar something.
I'm trying to remember.
Well, with Della Beckwith, it was hung juries every time, and they kept bringing it.
They did get it.
Yeah, well, they can do that.
And then, on the other hand, with the other Edgar Ray Killen, that's a guy's name.
Excuse me.
I knew if I thought long enough, I would remember it.
They brought about five different cases against him.
They lost four of them.
They finally got a conviction on the last one, and he was the guy coming in on a walker with an oxygen tank attached to it, and he went to jail and had to live for the rest of his life in a metal cage when basically any, you know, Double Jeopardy, as understood by the founding fathers, would never have allowed what happened to him.
But again, if they had gotten a not guilty, that's where Double Jeopardy, I don't know if hung juries.
I mean, hung juries, they're going to keep coming back until they literally.
The thing is, they just, they don't really care on the left whether it's a hung jury or whether it's a mistrial or if they get, you know, they will continue to bring suits as long as they can bring suits.
And that's an ominous foreboding for the defendants in this case.
You know, same thing for Kyle Rittenhouse.
You know, Kyle Rittenhouse isn't out of the woods, folks.
I hate to tell you this, but the Department of Justice under that great American Merrick Garland has been instructed by Joe Biden to look into federal charges against Rittenhouse.
And, of course, they can have civil suits against him, just like O.J. Simpson got off from the criminal case, but then Ronald Goldman's survivors brought a civil suit and they prevailed against O.J. Simpson.
Well, see, he's facing, Rittenhouse is facing civil litigation and possible federal criminal litigation on this.
And that may be, you were asking why he would say, I'm a BLM supporter.
I knew exactly why he was saying it.
Yeah, he was saying that because he doesn't want to sandpaper a Wildcats ass, okay, as a say out here.
Well, but here's something that he'll learn, as all of us have learned all too well.
You are not going to cover favor with Merrick Garland's department.
Curry favor, right?
Curry favor with Merritt Garland's Department of Social Justice.
If he thinks he can go on Tucker Carlson and pledge fealty to BLM and dodge these charges, he's got another thing coming up.
You're going to find yourself having Stockholm syndrome.
That's what you do.
You know, once they keep coming, they keep coming, keep coming.
Eventually, they break down, I'd say, 99% of the people because they just can't, you know, they will confess to anything just to stop the immediate pain they're suffering.
Here's what Brad Griffin wrote about that.
Brad is such a great commentator, and his takes so often align with ours.
often go to his site and just lift them because it saves us time from having to call him and say it on the on the air.
But we like Brad and his work at Oscinal Descent.
But he wrote, I feel sorry for the kid who came across as exactly the sort of person who I expected him to be.
Kyle Rittenhouse is a naive normie do-gooder who wanted to protect his community, who found himself in one of these now familiar volatile situations.
After the Jacob Blake shooting, the anti-fun BLM mob had given permission to ride and terrorize Kenosha by Governor Terry Evers and local Democratic officials.
Kenosha police stood down and allowed their city to descend into anarchy, which is why Rittenhouse had to turn himself in back in Antioch, Illinois.
He wasn't detained after killing two people that night.
Here's why I am not offended by Kyle's pro-BLM comments.
He is still a hostage.
He's in a hostage situation where these people are still threatening to kill him.
The bloodthirsty mob is incensed that he was acquitted, and these people are still out to get him.
Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Department of Social Justice are undoubtedly working on assembling their federal case against Rittenhouse and Kyle will undoubtedly be sued in civil court and he will have to pass through that ring of hell.
Mainly, though, I thought Kyle redeemed himself in the interview when he made these remarks to Tucker about the FBI, which is the American version of the Stasi.
Tucker asked him, are you confident the government will protect you from these threats?
Because that's the government's job.
And Kyle Rittenhouse said, I hope so, but we all know how the FBI works.
So, yes, we do.
We'll stay tuned and see what happens with Kyle Rittenhouse, but I think it's predictable.
Stay tuned, everybody.
We'll be right back.
Your daily Liberty Newswire.
You're listening to Liberty News Radio, USA Radio News with Lance Pryde.
South Africa's health minister announced Thursday the discovery of a new coronavirus variant that appears to be spreading rapidly in parts of that region.
The WHO is meeting today to discuss the new variant as UK officials announce that it has blocked flights from six African countries from landing.
Executive Director over at the World Health Organization, Dr. Mike Ryan, this week.
When you use a drug, there's loads of virus in the system because the person is very sick.
And now you introduce the drug into the body, and there are trillions of viruses.
And amongst those trillions of viruses, there may be one or two that have some resistance to the drug.
A methane gas leak and explosion at a Siberian coal mine in Russia Thursday killed over 50 souls, including six rescuers.
Russia's worst mining disaster in more than a decade occurred at the Kamarovo region in central Russia.
USA Radio News.
Hi, I'm Wayne Alarut for Patriot VPN.
Patriot VPN is a virtual private network service that uses military-grade encryption to protect your internet connection on all of your devices.
With Patriot VPN, your data and internet privacy is secure anywhere in the world.
Why do you need Patriot VPN?
Cyber criminals, government, even your own internet service provider collect and use your private information without your knowledge.
Examples in the news recently?
Remember all the companies that have been hacked?
Cuba censored the internet to kill protests?
Here in America, conservative groups are being actively targeted.
Your personal information and internet history is being sold by your ISP.
It's all happening every day, but not with Patriot VPN.
With Patriot VPN, your internet activity and history is protected from prying eyes forever.
Patriot VPN is a veteran-owned business right here in the USA for business or your family starting at only $6.95 a month.
Use code WAR and get three months free with an annual subscription.
It's all at patriotvpn.com.
That's patriotvpn.com.
An actor has been arrested by the mostly partisan January 6th committee.
He was ID'd by a special jacket he got from over the years.
Authorities have arrested a Broadway actor who allegedly marched on the U.S. Capitol with the Oath Keepers on January 6th after identifying him by a Michael Jackson tour jacket that he was wearing at the time of the riots.
James Speaks was charged with obstruction of Congress and a misdemeanor charge of unlawfully entering a restricted building.
Beeks was arrested in Milwaukee where he was performing the role of Judas in a production of Jesus Christ Superstar from the USA Radio News Pacific Northwest Bureau.
I'm Wendy King.
President Biden taking time away from his stay at a billionaire's home in Nantucket to celebrate Thanksgiving and tell NBC's Today show that America is back and right where she should be.
America's back.
There's nothing we're unable to overcome.
Santa is coming, Mr. President.
I'm waiting for Santa.
Thanks for listening and a happy holiday to you and yours.
We are USA Radio.
God's Federal Snowman was a happy, jolly soul.
With the foreign cup pipe and a button low, then two eyes may not occur.
God's been the snowman is a fairy tale, they say.
He was made of snow, but the children know how we came to that one day.
There must have been some magic in that holds the band of nights on his head.
He began to dance around.
God's faith is no man with a lively heart.
And the children say the man and bring just the same as the way they are.
Folks, as you know, the last month we have been mired in covering these three trials that all started at the same time and all ended at the same time, approximately, even though they were separated by years in three different states.
Of course, we're talking about Charlottesville, Rittenhouse, and the R. Bury McMichaels trial.
We'll wrap that one up in the third hour.
And then it really reminds me a little bit, Keith, about last year.
Last year, we had just suffered through the election trauma and the claims of impropriety and the counting of the votes.
And coming through all of that, we really reset everything and had a very enjoyable December where we focused on improving ourselves and our communities.
We had done a remote broadcast in South Carolina, I think, about a year ago this week, that really kicked that off.
Then we had guests like Sarah Dye of Schooner Creek Farms and Liv Haida of Whitedate.net.
And we'll do that again in December as well.
It'll be buoyed by this fantastic Christmas music, which always lifts spirits.
But we're going to focus on the positive over the course of the month of December as we lead into Christmas itself and we celebrate the birth of our Savior Jesus Christ.
So all that's coming up, but we are wrapping up our coverage of each of these three trials tonight.
And if I do say so myself, Keith, I think we're doing a pretty banged-up job.
Glenn Allen did a great job.
Well, there's plenty of ground to be plowed in this.
And I wanted to step back just a moment.
You know, the Charlottesville civil trial was in federal court, okay?
And that is something.
Hold on a second.
You got to get back on your mic as that phone rings.
It's live radio, and this is our.
Scam likely is what it says.
I know it's true.
Likely is on Keith's caller ID.
Just let me say this.
This is Alexander Hamilton, writing under the assumed name or Nom de Plume, if you will, of Brutus in Federalist Paper No. 74, described the federal court system as proposed as the weakest and least dangerous of the three branches of the proposed federal government.
He said it had neither power nor will, only judgment.
And that was not only the idea for the court, for the federal government, but also for the courts in states and localities.
And what we've seen beginning with the civil rights movement with Shelley versus Kramer and Sweat versus Painter and Brown versus Board of Education, now the Supreme Court, now the court system and the judiciary generally are the strongest and most dangerous parts of the government.
Why?
And why did the left choose the judiciary to funnel through so much of their agenda of change?
Because it's the least democratic, at least subject to the will of the people branch of the government.
And that's what, see, they're unaccountable.
You have to, for example, if you want to, if you think that a federal judge has not conducted himself properly or is guilty of severe misconduct or malpractice, the only way to get them out of office, they have a lifetime tenure is impeachment, which is a long and drawn out and very difficult procedure to follow.
There's never been a U.S. president impeached.
You know, he never got the, you know, Nixon jumped ship because he thought he was going to be judged to be impeached or to be removed from office.
But, see, you've got to understand that the left doesn't have any respect for the founding documents or the founding principles of this nation, much less Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence like trial by jury, things like this.
They just want to use the judiciary as a convenient stick to beat their opponents with.
And that's why you need in every state to have anti-slap lawsuits.
Of course, you find some judge that tries to find a way around it.
We had written into the U.S. Constitution a prohibition against double jeopardy.
And as we were talking about right before this last break, that was ignored by the court system to advance the civil rights movement.
And the Supreme Court would not reign them in.
The Warren Court, the Earl Warren Court, which presided over most of this change in the civil rights movement.
Everything tracks back to that.
What you're seeing is just the flowering of seeds planted back in the civil rights movement.
All of this has been done before.
And it's basically when lawyers talk about a particular thing being a judge or a court system being arbitrary and capricious, they talk about a star chamber, which is one judge kind of hidden, even his face is hidden, and he tells you, he just makes summary judgments.
He can have you executed on the spot.
And that's the exact opposite of what the founding fathers intended or what traditional jurisprudence countenanced.
But now what we're seeing is that it's commonplace, that the courts are used as a vehicle to grind down law-abiding citizens.
Kyle Rittenhouse abided by the law, but you would think that he was Jack the Ripper based on what you hear on MSNBC, CNN.
Same thing for the McMichaels in Georgia and for the Charlottesville defendants in this civil suit.
You know, we've got to find some way out of these woods that we've been led into.
We're deep in the forest and we can't find our way out with the judicial systems that we have today.
And again, I think so much pressure is put on the juries in these cases.
The only reason I move your mic around is because if it's facing me, it has an echo.
Is the narrative shapes so much.
And so the narrative put forth by this Christ-hating and godless media who would lie, would lie when it's 10 times easier to tell the truth shapes, I think, some of these ultimate verdicts.
But the greatest example perhaps that I've seen in my life, and that's saying a lot, ladies and gentlemen, is the contrasting nature with which the media covered the Waukesha Christmas massacre at that Christmas parade last week.
We don't know if it's, I said it was Waukesha.
Keith says it's Waukesha.
We'll go with Keith on Waukesha.
Waukesha.
Waukeshaw?
Okay.
Well, up there in Waukesha, up in Wisconsin.
Let's go back to Brad Griffin one more time on this.
Great take.
If a white male had run over a Christmas parade and killed a bunch of black children in Wisconsin for whatever reason, premeditated or fleeing from the scene or just having a bad day, what would have been the result?
Would the so-called journalist have waited for the facts to come in before blaming all white people, declaring it domestic terrorism and inciting a race riot?
Would Wisconsin have gone up in flames?
In Charlottesville, the media narrative was instant and unequivocal.
James Fields was a domestic terrorist.
He was a white supremacist, and it was because of that that he brutally, premeditatedly killed Heather Heyer.
He intentionally drove his car into a crowd of peaceful protesters.
There was zero interest in getting his side of the story.
The incident also reflected on the entire alt-right at the time.
The narrative was swift and built around James Fields.
It was impenetrable in the media.
In Wisconsin, the police didn't even announce the name of the subject hastily.
We still don't know the motive.
We do know that Darrell Brooks was a Black Lives Matter supporter and that he had explicitly, listen to me, ladies and gentlemen, he had explicitly posted on his Facebook page in favor of car attacks against white people.
He was a Black Lives Matter supporter.
He threatened violence and murder against whites.
He killed and injured more people than James Fields.
Why should we care about nuance?
Why should we care about the facts?
Why shouldn't whites just perceive this as a racially and ideologically motivated attack and roll with their anger, even if it turns out that Brooks was a common criminal who was fleeing the scene of another crime?
But this is incredible.
incredible, Keith, that this would happen right as the Charlottesville trial was coming to an end, and in light of what happened in Georgia, that this guy who was everything they alleged James Fields, nobody knows James Fields, okay?
Nobody had ever met him.
Nobody ever talked to him.
Nobody knows what he really thinks.
I've never even heard an interview with him from the media.
I've just heard they've called him all these names.
That's all I know about him.
This guy, actually, we know posted threats of violence against whites and who pledged loyalty to Black Family.
And the silence is deafening, as they say.
See, contrast and compare the treatment Daryl Brooks, the black guy at Waukesha, the suspect or the alleged murderer in Wisconsin gets compared to James Fields.
Also, look at the circumstances.
We'll talk about the circumstances in more depth after these words from our sponsor.
Let's hang on and come back to the political session right after these messages here on the Liberty News Radio Network.
The Foundation for Moral Law is a non-profit legal foundation committed to protecting our unalienable right to publicly acknowledge God.
The Foundation for Moral Law exists to restore the knowledge of God in law and government and to acknowledge and defend the truth that man is endowed with rights not by our fellow man, but by God.
The Foundation maintains a twofold focus.
First, litigation within state and federal courts.
Second, education, conducting seminars to teach the necessity and importance of acknowledging God in law and government.
How can you help?
Please make a tax-deductible contribution, allowing foundation attorneys to continue the fight.
You may also purchase various foundation products as well at morallaw.org.
Located in Montgomery, Alabama, the Foundation for Moral Law is a non-profit, tax-exempt 501c3 founded by Judge Roy Moore.
Please partner with us to achieve this important mission, morallaw.org.
The spirit of the American West is live and well in Range Magazine, the award-winning quarterly devoted to the issues affecting the American West.
Each issue contains informative articles, breathtaking imagery, as well as the culture of cowboy spirit today, and gift ideas like the 2021 Real Buckaroo Calendar.
Order online from RangeMagazine.com.
Loving Liberty Network salutes the spirit of the American West at rangemagazine.com.
Decades after Jimmy Carter, Joe Biden picked up where he left off.
With America surrendering to terrorists, Biden's foolish spending is causing inflation, which means more pain of the pump, higher prices on groceries, devaluing your retirement savings when you need it most.
Once was a mistake.
Twice is a disaster.
America needs strong leaders, not weak ones.
Save America JFC is responsible for the content of this advertising.
I really don't want to talk about this, but I will.
I'm just so mad.
I didn't get asked to the junior prom and it's raining, which means by the time I get to school, I'm soaking wet.
Dad picked me up just after I left and I was so mad I got out and he said, wait, your mom said to give you this.
I forgot my lunch money and then I dropped it in the water and I was late for history.
And so at lunchtime, I had to find something on Jon Stewart Mill, which of course our library didn't have.
So I had to walk all the way down to the office to call my mom and she found something on the internet and call me back.
And Karen, she wouldn't even help me.
And that's a whole nother story.
But dad helped me conjugate nouns or whatever on the way to the swim team workout.
And then he read my history paper while I was in the pool.
And of course, I forgot the bibliography.
So I had to do that with my mother when I got home.
And it made me totally forget that I put my jeans in the washer that morning.
And I hate it when they sit wet like that all day and smell like mildew.
But my mom said she put them in the dryer while I was at the swim team.
And you know, I'm just not going to go to the prom no matter who asks me.
I just want to stay home with my mom and dad and just hang out.
Isn't it about time?
Unless Dustin asked me.
the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We're going to have a good time together, folks, over the course of the remainder of our broadcasting calendar this year.
We're looking forward to spending the Christmas season with you on these airwaves.
Very thankful for you.
It's still Thanksgiving weekend, but boy, I'll tell you what, about an hour after Thanksgiving supper's over, we all start putting it.
The Christmas tree is up.
We started doing it.
My wife was changing the set in the house, taking down all those dark orange, those burnt orange and brown color decorations that we had over Thanksgiving.
And it's all red and green at my house now, that's for sure.
And it started the night of Thanksgiving.
We've put on the Christmas music.
I mean, we hadn't even digested Thanksgiving.
Screen everywhere except inside his wallet.
Anyway, Keith, yeah, so we're talking now about this Christmas massacre.
And, you know, Barack Obama.
Christmas Parade Massacre.
Christmas Parade Massacre, yes, which they had even in advance of Thanksgiving.
Christmas does start earlier and earlier every year, it seems.
But it's a tragedy.
Barack Obama was saying if I had had a son, he would have looked like Trayvon Martin.
Well, I do have a son.
And he looks, and I showed it to my wife, and she was, you know, gasped.
There was a young boy who was murdered by this white-hating zealot.
It looks like Henry.
It looks just like my son.
Even missing the same teeth.
I mean, boy, that was something to see.
That was disturbing.
And obviously, the media's response to this is predictable.
The race of the perpetrator does not factor in.
His beliefs do not factor in.
Now, again, compare and contrast that to everything we know in the very limited instances where the situation is inverted or reversed.
And we know.
Now, pointing this out for the millionth and first time doesn't get us anywhere, but yet still we must.
Still we must.
The media has gone so far.
David Cole wrote something.
We like David Cole.
We're actually working on a project with David Cole, and you're going to hear a lot more about that when you receive this week.
David Cole asked to write it, and you're going to be getting that in the mail before our next show.
So you're going to be hearing more about him.
But he wrote on Twitter, I thought that this was parody at first, but my God, they really are going with the car did it.
There's no bottom to the media's low, Keith.
They are writing that this was an automobile accident.
The SUV killed these people, that the car killed people, not the people that pulled the trigger on the bottom.
The car drove itself into these people.
not mentioning the race, not mentioning the politics of this individual.
He said he wanted to kill white people with cars.
Just pull out that media narrative chart that you gave me years ago.
When you have a white shooter and a black victim, the cause is racism or the Confederate flag.
If you have a black shooter shooting a white victim, the problem is guns.
That's what they will say.
The gun did it.
And if you have a black shooter and a black victim, forget the story, run a story about the Kardashians instead.
And this wasn't this guy's first rodeo, Keith.
He has a rap sheet that's a mile long, disorderly conduct, domestic abuse, battery, second-degree reckless endangerment, three or four domestic abuse, bell jumping felony, resisting or obstructing an officer, on and on and on and on we go.
This guy just can't get out of his own way in the criminal justice center.
It's like that song, Good Old Boys from the Duke's Hazard, and been in trouble with the law ever since he was born.
Yeah, that's him.
And of course, that's because of systemic racism, I'm sure.
But he had written on his Facebook account, run them over, keep traffic flowing, and don't slow down for them.
Black Lives Matter supporter, the alleged murderer, the suspect Darryl Brooks, that's what he wrote.
Daryl Brooks Jr.
With regard to Donald Slander's father.
Right.
To the murder of these white people who were participating in a Christmas parade, watching a Christmas.
A family-friendly, supposedly episode where families, they do it in small towns throughout the South.
I know that.
And all the families get their children out.
And down Main Street, there's some floats.
There's some high school bands playing.
Santa Claus comes as a grand finale in a sleigh with a bunch of little elves wearing short skirts and whatnot.
We go to one of the things.
That's what happens.
And you talk about an innocent group.
This is not a Klan meeting or something like this.
This is just people trying to get their children into the Christmas spirit and targeting people like that.
That is ultimate evil.
And notice we actually have, if you can stand to watch it, ladies and gentlemen, and it's difficult to watch, but we have at our website, thepoliticalcessible.org, the actual footage, the footage.
This wasn't the Charlottesville situation where this guy, and we'll never know the real truth of what happened that day, but where he was surrounded by anti-fund BLM type people who were in violation of the state of emergency.
They shouldn't have even been there.
They surrounded the car, and we know what happened.
But this is what an actual premeditated car attack looks like.
And it's very different from the James Fields incident.
And it involves trying to run over a ton of people.
And he did that.
He did that in this parade.
And Matt Parrot, who was one of the co-defendants in Charlottesville, wrote this week, any word on whether the parade organizers in Wisconsin are going to get hit with conspiracy charges on account of a random car driving through their permitted event.
It's a good point.
It's hard to joke about something like this, but it's a good point because that's exactly what happened to those guys in Charlottesville.
But this whole thing, the media's coverage of it, the fact that it involved a car at the same time the Charlottesville situation was coming to an end.
This is what actual murder looks like.
Very different than what we had, and we're going to cover this in the third hour in Georgia with a Mott Arberry.
Well, I would get you.
I invite you to get your friends and neighbors who are normies and are not really awakened to the problems of the white advocates like we have.
Contrast and compare the James Field case with the Waukesha Daryl Brooks Jr. case.
And the template should be set by the Nice France murders by a Muslim terrorist some years ago, where the guy got an industrial, you know, one of these.
Yeah, well, that was actually in 2016.
That happened during the Trump Clinton campaign.
Well, he got up on the sidewalk and started mowing people down, okay?
He was definitely trying to kill people, just like Daryl Brooks Jr. appears to have been, got up.
See, James Fields' car never got on the sidewalk.
It was where it was supposed to be in a lane of traffic on a road.
The road was blocked unlawfully by these BLM antifa protesters at Charlottesville.
And nothing, then they started to try to break in the windows of his car.
And he realized that if he stayed there, he's probably going to be pulled out and killed.
And the police certainly weren't going to intervene.
They hadn't intervened in anything else that day on behalf of the protesters that were there for the protesting removal of the Robert E. Lee statue.
So he backed up.
He didn't floor it and run over people wantonly.
He was just trying to get out of Dodge.
Now, on the other hand, Daryl Brooks Jr. was doing everything he could to travel at a high rate of speed and hit people.
And he went up on the sidewalk, I understand.
So point that out.
And let's see how the court system treats Daryl Brooks Jr. as opposed to the way they treated James Fields.
We'll see.
It'll be interesting to see, number one, if he even gets convicted, if they just say, well, you know, and this is the way it always is, too, in a case like this, it's not racial hatred, even though you could point to things that he said that really spells it out.
No, it's a turkey.
But if James Fields had said stuff like that, we would have heard all about it.
You know, nothing he said was as inflammatory and as hate-filled as what Daryl Brooks put on his Facebook page.
And I guarantee you will see he's mentally ill or he's been the victim of systemic racism.
Yeah, right.
The devil made me do it, as Flip Wilson said back in, you know, with Geraldine in the 60s comedy show that he had on television.
He killed and injured far more people than James Fields.
I will be very interested to see if he gets sentenced at all, if it's as stiff a sentence as Fields received.
Look, we're seeing the differential justice we have.
We're playing a game where the rules are heads I win, tails you lose.
It doesn't matter what crime was committed or not committed.
We're supposed to have a court where a law of the rule of law, not the rule of people.
But who you are is the biggest factor in American justice today regarding how you'll be treated by the court system.
It's a sad situation.
And I guarantee you, Alexander Hamilton and the founding fathers are spinning in their graves right now thinking about what has happened to judicial honesty and fairness.
This is, you know, I want to really see, I'm going to watch and see what happens and compare and contrast that with what happened to James Fields.
Because, you know, I will be surprised if Daryl Brooks, who has much greater body count, goes to jail for 417 years like James Fields.
I think it was life plus 417.
Yeah, right.
They're going to keep him in that cell for 417 years after he dies, I guess.
Oh, God.
It's just awful, but you laugh to keep from crying.
Anyway, hey, when we come back, we're going to break down what happened in Georgia, and then we're really going to focus on Christmas and good things.
At least God was merciful enough to let these trials in before Christmas season for our mental health.
We can abandon hope and be gloomy all season long.