Dec. 12, 2020 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
50:45
20201212_Hour_2
|
Time
Text
You're listening to the Liberty News Radio Network, and this is the Political Cesspool.
The Political Cesspool, going across the South and worldwide, as the South's foremost populist conservative radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host, James Edwards.
It came upon the midnight clear that glorious song of old from angels bending near the earth to touch their hearts of gold.
Peace on the earth, goodwill to men from heaven's all gracious king.
The world insults still slay to hear the angels sing.
Ladies and gentlemen, we are hoping to help prepare your heart for the Christmas season now.
Just a fortnight away.
Christmas is coming.
We celebrate the birth of Christ.
And we remember that Christianity was not always this weak and ineffectual manifestation of itself that we see here in America, but it was once and still is at its heart a fighting muscular and masculine religion.
And that was certainly embodied by our featured guest of the evening, Reverend James Dowson, who stayed up late all the way in Ireland.
But Keith, I have just been fascinated by the number of guests who have made debut appearances on the show this year.
Last week, Liv Haida from Germany.
Tonight, staying up late, Reverend Dowson in Ireland.
And he is one of our Scotch-Irish brethren.
And what a fantastic.
It just was not enough time with him.
I tell you what, it's wonderful to strengthen our ties with the old sod over there in Europe.
That's certainly for sure.
And of course, as we do that, though, we strengthen our ties with our audience.
Keith, you received a book in the mail, a gift, a Christmas gift, a book entitled Christmas in the Confederacy.
And it was so generously inscribed by the giver, a couple of our royal donors here in Tennessee.
Merry Christmas, Keith.
We so appreciate you and the insights you provide on TPC.
And that's from some listeners here in Tennessee.
And we thank them for their gift, Christmas in the Confederacy.
Beautiful book, beautiful inscription.
I'm looking forward to reading it over the holidays.
That's exactly what he'll do, ladies and gentlemen.
Well, unfortunately, current events must intrude on the fantastic conversation, the riveting conversation we had with Reverend Dawson, Brother Dawson, as he told us to refer to him.
In the first hour, Congress, Keith, rather not Congress, but the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, has opted not to hear the state of Texas's attempt to look into the, let's just call it the election irregularities that we all know took place on November the 3rd.
Sean Hannity covered this, and I am not normally one to quote Hannity, but he is right on what happened.
The Texas suit challenging the election results in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin was rejected by the United States Supreme Court, although they do have original jurisdiction.
They have refused to even hear the case.
Now, remember, folks, a very serious, legitimate challenge garnered widespread support.
18 attorneys general, the president of the United States, 18 states with briefs in support of the case, which was originally filed by the Attorney General of the state of Texas.
126 members of Congress support the case, including minority leader Kevin McCarthy.
These are very real concerns.
It wasn't even considered.
It wasn't even considered, Keith Alexander.
So this is what I put on Twitter.
The Supreme Court refusing to even hear a case brought to it by nearly half the states in the Union to me is unimaginable.
And as we said in the last week of the week before, if President Trump does indeed have, in his opinion, evidence of voter fraud so rampant that it decided the outcome of the election, then he simply cannot allow a transfer of power.
Are there still plays he can make now that the Supreme Court refused to even hear a case brought to it by nearly half the attorney generals in the nation?
Yes, he does have other paths he can take.
We'll tell you what those are.
But the Supreme Court, Keith, Keith, the Supreme Court, aren't we glad that we have the Republicans who stocked the Supreme Court with these so-called conservative judges?
What a great difference they made.
But Keith, the Supreme Court says it has the right to allow women to murder their babies.
It has the right to force schools to integrate.
It has the right to mandate homosexual marriage as the law of the land.
Then I mentioned it has, in its opinion, the right to mandate the murder of babies.
I'll say it again as a point of emphasis, but they can't even value it.
They're not worried about sex change operations.
Yeah, Gorsik actually just found that in the civil rights bill that, you know, this transgenderism.
Who knows what's lurking in those old bills?
But they can't hear a case brought to it by nearly half the states of the union about election fraud.
They can't even hear it.
Look, you're not going to find any candidates on the Supreme Court who are candidates for a new edition of Profiles on Courage, okay?
Or Profiles in Courage, excuse me.
What you're seeing is you have total and utter mendacity on the part of the Democratically nominated justices, two out of three of whom are Jewish.
What a surprise.
Then on the other hand, what about the majority that were appointed by Republicans?
I'm quite frankly baffled as to why Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, have not actually come out and made their own assessments like a separate or dissenting opinion and said something about it.
It takes four justices, apparently, to accept a case.
Well, that shows that neither Brett Kavanaugh or Amy Coney Barrett is the real McCoy.
And we knew this from the beginning.
We've had too much experience since the Nixon administration when he tried to put a real conservative on there like what was the guy's name, Carlson from the Fourth Circuit.
Oh, he was a rube.
He was a knucklehead.
How did he even get into law school?
But they would eventually get somebody who was a closet liberal in there like Lewis Powell, and he would do the bidding of the left.
That's what we have here.
We have a bunch of spineless at best and surreptitious fifth columnist at work on the Supreme Court appointed by the Republicans.
Now what do we do about that?
Well, you've got to stop.
I, Paul Craig Roberts, said in an article we ran on the blog roll this week that there's.
You know, Trump had no idea of how Washington works.
He thought it was like a private business.
He thought it was a business where the boss's word rules.
That's not the way Washington works.
He doesn't know how Washington works.
The Washington establishment, to keep him under control, said you've got to take your advice about who to nominate from the Federalist Society.
I remember Sean Handy was crowing like a cock about that.
That's the worst thing he could have done, and that's what he did, and that's why we have a spineless, worthless Supreme Court at the present time on these issues.
They refuse to even hear the case.
What's next?
We'll tell you, our opinion at least.
We'll be come back.
James Edwards and Keith Alexander's the political session.
December 12th, Christmas is coming.
We're here for you.
Stay tuned.
As you all know, Roe versus Wade has resulted in some of the most permissive abortion laws anywhere in the world.
For example, in the United States, it's one of only seven countries to allow elective late-term abortions, along with China, North Korea, and others.
Right now, in a number of states, the laws allow a baby to be born from his or her mother's womb in the ninth month.
It is wrong.
It has to change.
Americans are more and more pro-life.
You see that all the time.
In fact, only 12% of Americans support abortion on demand at any time.
Under my administration, we will always defend the very first right in the Declaration of Independence, and that is the right to life.
As a parent, is receiving a faith-based, character-focused education for your children difficult to find?
Do you believe that godly principles should be a central component in your child's education?
Imagine a school where faith and integrity are at its center, where heritage and responsibility instill character.
For over 40 years, American Heritage School has been educating both hearts and minds, bringing out academic excellence.
This is the school where character and embracing the providence of a living God are fundamental, where students' national test scores average near the 90th percentile.
With American Heritage School's advanced distance education program, distance is no longer an issue.
With an accredited LDS-oriented curriculum from kindergarten through 12th grade, your children can attend from anywhere in the world.
American Heritage School will prepare your child for more than a job.
It will prepare them for life.
To learn more, visit American-Heritage.org.
That's American-Heritage.org.
Scott Bradley here.
Most Americans are painfully aware that the nation is on the wrong track and in dire straits.
Unfortunately, most political pundits only nibble around the edges when they claim to address the issues.
Even worse, many of the so-called solutions are simply rewarmed servings of what got us into the mess we currently face.
And the politicians think we're so gullible and naive that we'll buy their lies that they have reformed and now understand where they led us astray.
Unfortunately, the truth of the matter is that they simply wish to continue to hold power.
The solution to America's challenges is found in returning to the timeless principles found in the United States Constitution.
My book and lecture series will reawaken in Americans an understanding and love of the principles which made this nation the freest, most prosperous, happiest, and most respected nation on earth.
Visit topreservethenation.com and order my book and lectures to begin the restoration of this great nation.
Angels we hove on high, sweetly singing on the lands.
And the mountains in reply, echoing your strength and glory in Exenses Nihil.
To be continued...
Holland to Ivy next.
All right, ladies and gentlemen.
Well, let's get back to what happened at the Supreme Court just yesterday.
A lot of different ways to look at this.
On one hand, one gentleman that I retweeted this weekend wrote, now we can move on to something bigger, something better, and something actual.
It's an opportunity to dispense with the charade and play for keeps.
The conservative movement and the GOP deserves their fate, and now we are free to move on and build in our image and for our posterity.
Now, everything he says is entirely true.
No matter even if somehow Trump was able or is still able to pull this off, is that the long-term solution?
However, however, I would rather see Trump in there than Biden.
It's just that simple.
Now, beyond Trump, moving beyond Trump, whenever that day may come, the statement that we just read is valid.
The GOP is certainly not the solution.
I couldn't help, when I saw the Supreme Court's decision or lack thereof to even hear the case last night, Keith, to pull up the quote from the last American president, Jefferson Davis.
The principle for which we contend is bound to reassert itself, though it may be at another time and in another form, President Davis once said.
And certainly that's true.
The GOP in the state of Texas, the state GOP in Texas put out a statement in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, which reads, perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a union of states that shall abide by the Constitution.
All but calling for secession, Keith.
You know, I'll tell you, the Confederate States of America has a really nice ring to such a nation.
I do think America may very well balkanize over the course of the next decade.
The sooner the better, as far as I'm concerned.
But this whole thing with the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, this criminally corrupt legislative body that believes that any form of perversity that could be laid at its feet, it can take up and decide and mandate, but it cannot take up and even hear a case brought to it by nearly half the states of the Union involving what we all know to be election fraud.
It can't even hear it.
Well, you're absolutely right.
And you said, I don't know if it's a Floridian slip or not, a legislative body.
No, no, I meant it.
Yeah, I know you did because that's exactly what they have become.
But now they have even ducked and shirked their responsibility to act as a judiciary.
What they have done basically is tell the Democrats they have committed the perfect crime.
If you have fraud in an election, a big election, and it is consequential, that they will not stop the wheels of progress or the wheels of dispossession or whatever wheels they are from turning for the purpose of having a trial or an investigation into it.
Basically, they have, on the other hand, I'm sure that if some conservative group had cheated and Donald Trump had been the beneficiary and Joe Biden had been the loser, I mean, all of the world, all the universe would have ground to a halt then.
See, this is all, I'm glad that Trump is doing what he's doing.
He's basically playing patiently every card that there is.
But it's not going to work, but now he will be able to demonstrate, look, I tried every other option there is.
The thing about that Texas case was it didn't involve any proof of fraud.
It just demanded, it hung solely on the fact that the mayor of Milwaukee and the governor of Pennsylvania unilaterally, without authority from the legislature, changed election laws right in the middle of an election.
They said, well, why didn't you do this before, Mr. Trump?
Or why didn't you Texas bring this type of suit before?
Well, you can't anticipate fraud.
You have to wait for fraud to manifest and develop and to show itself before you know that there's an action in court.
So that, again, didn't have any more effect than the so-called allegations of fraud that supposedly are too nebulous and too minutia-like to involve the court in deciding.
Well, this leads us to the Insurrection Act, which is always there as an ace in the whole, but it also leads us to the fact that Texas is taking a leading hand in this business, and I think that's wonderful.
Because Texas, out of all the states in the Union, has a provision in its admission to the Union that says that they can at any time, for reasons sufficient to themselves and not needing validation from any source, secede from the Union.
So basically what I would like to see the governor of Texas say, it's obvious that there's no justice to be found in the federal government, not in the judiciary, which is supposed to be the, you know, the referee of things like this and to try to work out these differences.
They have basically, they're missing in action.
And so we are going to invoke our right, which was established as a condition of our joining the union to secede.
We are seceding from this union.
We're not going to be governed by these ratfinks any longer.
And then people could either move to Texas or like the 16 other states or 17 states that joined Texas in their motion to the Supreme Court, they can say we want to be joined the new state of Texas because the state of Texas will then exist.
All they have to do is utter it into existence.
It doesn't say that you have to have a vote of the people.
You know, you have representatives in the Texas legislature.
They represent.
It's a representative republic just like the United States.
They have been elected.
They can vote on it or the governor can decree it.
There's no condition precedent that you have to achieve or have to meet in order for Texas to be able to secede from the Union.
They need to do it.
They need to lead the PAC.
They need to defend their borders.
They need to make sure that third worlders and whatnot do not get in.
They need to be very careful about who they do let in and check their political past to make sure that they're going to be good, solid people that would support the Republic of Texas.
And then other states can ask to join that group.
Now, what's going to happen?
Is there going to be an armed response?
Well, basically, what they should do is what the South should have done.
They should have not put together an army and fought like gentlemen against a bunch of scoundrels, which is what the Yankees were in the Civil War, face it.
One northern town was burned by Southern troops in the entire war.
That was Chambersburg, Maryland, I believe, or maybe it's Pennsylvania, to protest Sherman's March of the Sea.
43 towns were burnt down to the ground by Yankee troops in Mississippi alone, and Mississippi wasn't even a major theater in the war.
So let's, rather than trying to play things, you know, like third generation warfare where two armies all dressed up go fight each other, we basically just need to say, we're sanctuary city.
You have sanctuary cities.
We're going to have sanctuary states.
Our sanctuary state, I don't care what type of laws you pass up there, we will decide on a law-by-law basis whether we will obey it or not.
And if we don't obey it, that's the end of it.
And then they can come in and try to enforce it, but they will be met with massive resistance from the people of the state and the authorities of the state and the National Guard of the state.
All right, here's the thing, as the music begins to play.
What card or cards does Trump have remaining in his pocket or in his deck?
Well, there are a couple, increasingly unlikely to be deployed, but as of tonight, as we broadcast live, Trump is still refusing to concede anything on his Twitter.
And he says the fight continues.
What does that mean?
And when he gets down to the end of it, it doesn't matter if he's pursuing corruption.
Basket or not, it's in Texas governor's rapper.
You're listening to Liberty News Radio.
USA Radio News with Dan Deraki.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at the Centers for Disease Control has added its approval to the emergency use authorization for Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine.
The CDC committee voted Saturday to recommend the vaccine for use for people 16 years of age or older.
Now that the COVID vaccine has received authorization, the task of getting it out to millions of Americans is underway.
Speaking at a Saturday press conference, Operation Warpspeed Chief Operating Officer General Gustav Perna says his group's mission still has a long way to go to be completed.
So while today we applaud everybody who's been a part of the team, part of the collaboration, part of the success that's brought us here today, we know that we are not done.
We are not done until every American has access to the vaccine.
To every American that wants it receives it.
This is USA Radio News.
Do you have an idea for an invention or new product?
Do you think companies would be interested in your idea?
Do you want to try to get a patent?
Then call InventHelp Now.
InventHelp keeps your idea confidential and explains every step of the invention process.
We create professional materials representing your idea and submit it to companies who are looking for new ideas.
We have more than 9,000 companies who have agreed to review ideas in confidence.
If a company shows interest in manufacturing your invention, we can negotiate on your behalf.
We have helped over 10,000 clients receive patents.
We also offer services including 3D modeling and animation demonstrating your idea, prototyping services, and we use state-of-the-art technology to show Invent Help client ideas to additional companies.
Join the thousands of people just like you who chose InventHelp to pursue their idea.
We are experienced.
We are working for you.
We are Invent Help.
Call us for free information at 1-800-460-1663.
That's 1-800-460-1663.
Again, 1-800-460-1663.
A woman has been charged with reckless endangerment after running her car into a group of protesters in New York City.
Kenneth Burns has more from the USA Radio News East Coast Bureau.
The Friday afternoon protest was against detentions by federal immigration agents in Midtown Manhattan.
The incident was caught on video, according to witnesses and the police.
The footage shows the vehicle stopped with protesters in front of the car seconds before the driver floors it, plowing into protesters.
Six victims suffered non-life-threatening injuries.
The driver was taken into custody a block later by NYPD from the East Coast, the USA Radio News Bureau.
I'm Kenneth Burns.
And President Trump's legal team lost a federal suit Saturday that sought to have Wisconsin's legislature name him the winner of the presidential election in that state.
As that suit was dismissed, the president's lawyers were also arguing a similar case at the state's Supreme Court, challenging votes in Wisconsin's two most populous counties.
That effort awaits a decision from the court.
The holly and the idea, when they are both so brown, of all the trees that are in the world for the holly bears the crown.
The rising of the sun and the running of the deer.
Molly Bear Blossom Just white Whitest lily flower and merry boar, sweet Jesus Christ, to be our sweet savior.
The rising of the sun and the running of the deer.
The bring of the merry organs, sweet singing in the wild.
Well, it's weeks like this that we should be reminded and are happy to be able to remind you that we still live in our father's world, even in a day and age which you have just such rampant lawlessness and criminal corruption at the highest levels of government.
And of course, the Supreme Court as well.
The Supreme Court's been criminally corrupt all of my life, all of your life too, Keith.
Well, at least since May the 17th, 1954, when they disregarded all appellate rules for decision-making in the Brown versus Board of Education, in the situation with Brown versus Board, they saw fit to at least hear that case, much less make a decision.
Yeah, and then they made a decision not based on law, but based on sociology, and it was even dishonestly presented sociology at that.
So it was the beginning of the erosion of the standards of Western civilization, which they have basically been throwing wood onto the roaring fire of ever since.
And, you know, now we have a constitutional right for a minor child to decide that he wants to change his gender.
But we can't have a court that could even hear such a case as this that was brought to it by the state of Texas.
Originally, Texas suing Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at the Supreme Court level over the election results.
It was later signed on by 18 other states, but the Supreme Court says, hey, we can't hear that.
That's not within the city.
That's like a professional boxer going down on the first punch or something.
He's in the tank.
The Supreme Court is in the tank on this with the cultural Marxist left.
The Supreme Court conservatives have kept their unblemished streak of failure intact.
And again, it's just so interesting as we go back to our Confederate heroes, how prophetic and prescient they were.
We mentioned President Davis's quote a moment ago.
The principle for which we contend is Brown to reassert itself, though it may be at another time and in another form.
Well, now secession is in the wind again.
And it's not just the Texas state GOP, Keith, who basically all but called for secession last night.
Even Rush Limbaugh.
Rush Limbaugh is saying that liberals and conservatives cannot coexist.
It is time we are trending towards secession.
That's what Rush Limbaugh said this week.
And then, of course, you had the all-time great quote from R.L. Dabney, the Confederate chaplain and chief of staff to Stonewall Jackson about conservatism.
He had that figured out in the 1800s, and his words are especially prescient tonight.
I won't read his entire quote, but he talks about how conservatism is merely the shadow that follows radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition.
R.L. Dabney wrote, it remains behind it, but never retards it.
He then went on to say, and I love this, the only practical purpose which conservatism serves in American politics is to give it enough exercise to radicalism to keep it in wind and to prevent radicalism from becoming lazy from having nothing to whip.
That's what he said the 1800s.
He had it figured out in the 1800s.
Absolutely.
Basically, what he's saying is that America and conservatism then, as now, is basically like a sparring partner to the liberal heavyweight champion.
We're there to keep him in shape.
That's it.
That's all there is to it.
Now, why the good thing about Texas leading the pack is we can get the camel's nose in the tent.
One, it's the biggest state, except for Alaska, and it's also a very populous state and a very key state.
And they alone have the right written into law that they can secede at any time without requiring the permission of the Supreme Court or any other group.
And then with them leading the pack, others can join them.
That is a real, see, if you go to the Supreme Court, if you go to the legislature, if you go to the media, you're going to hear no, no, no, a thousand times no.
You're never going to, and you're going to be treated as if you're a retarded child for even asking the question of whether or not you will please let me get out from under your tyrannical rule.
And that's exactly what we're facing.
We're facing utter tyranny under the program that the Democrats have in mind for America now under Biden and Harris.
Well, that's why that is a very important option.
That's one in which Trump doesn't even have to get involved.
I would not want really to see Trump to be the president of the new state of Texas.
I think we do a lot better than Trump.
We know all about Trump's shortcomings and how basically he didn't get any of the important things done that he said he was going to do when he ran for president.
So that's a possibility.
The other possibility is that there's no one that has more to lose by a Biden presidency than Donald Trump.
And he needs to understand that.
They're going to come after him, hammer and tongs.
They're going to come after him with a lynch mob and a bonfire and burn him at the stake.
They're going to make sure that he is punished, that he is prosecuted, that he goes to jail.
And once in jail, I would not at all be surprised if he didn't wind up like Jeffrey Epstein.
Okay?
That's the future.
He can pull his punches and be polite, and that's going to be his reward for doing it.
All right.
So he has lost case after case.
I think upwards of 50 cases now in different state, appellate, federal, and Supreme Court level.
What cards does he have left as the president of the United States?
Now, here's one thing to consider, Keith, and your thoughts on this.
The Supreme Court rejection of the Texas lawsuit, which was, of course, signed on by nearly half of the other states as well, does not have to be the end.
The Republican legislatures in the disputed states simply need to exercise their power to either appoint their own electors to tip the Electoral College of Trump or refuse to send electors and send the election to the House.
Now, that's something that could happen.
Are these states that signed on willing to play hardball or not?
Well, they could play hardball, but again, then the Supreme Court would step in and find some picky unish reason why they couldn't do what they obviously can do.
That's why you need an option that does not require you saying mother may I to any group in the federal government or in the blue states of America.
You need to say, we're pulling this card.
It's our Trump card as the state of Texas.
We are seceding.
And when they secede and give very reasoned, you know, rationale for doing it, I guarantee you, more than a few of the other states that were among the 17 that joined them in that motion to the Supreme Court will join them too.
And then the fat's in the fire.
Okay.
Texas has an irrefutable right to secede.
It's there.
It's like nobody wants to acknowledge it.
It's like, you know, the 800-pound gorilla on the couch.
They have that right to do it.
They didn't start out in the Civil War as the first state to secede from the Union.
If they had, it might have been somewhat different.
Instead, South Carolina did, and Texas was one of the last states to secede.
And they didn't use that as a rationale.
So this is what it is.
We need to do it.
It's there.
It's part of the law.
Let's see the Supreme Court, once they do that, will have to come at least step forward and say something other than we're not going to hear it.
I'd love to hear the Supreme Court say, we're not going to hear that case.
That means Texas wins.
All right.
Well, I guess we'll wait and see.
But in the meantime, what is Donald Trump saying on Twitter tonight as we do broadcast live here on the Liberty News Radio Network?
The Supreme Court had zero interest in the merits of the greatest voter fraud ever perpetrated in the United States of America.
All they were interested in is standing.
He said we will fight on.
We have just begun to fight.
Now, what does that mean that he's going to run again in 2024 that he's really going to dig his heels in?
Well, he's raised $200 million with all this.
Now, what's he going to do?
Okay.
I'm sitting back at this point.
No more money required, please.
No more requests for money.
Let's see.
You know, it's like Elvis said too much conversation, not enough action.
We need to see somebody now take a decisive stand against the federal leviathan that is going to tyrannize all of us.
Okay.
And you can see now that these Federalist Society endorsed and validated so-called conservative Supreme Court candidates weren't worth a bunch of money.
To the mantra of the last several decades, we have to continue to hold our nose and voting Republicans so we can win the solution.
Well, I remember that nincum poop, that junior college dropout, Sean Handy, telling us, oh, it'll be a different day now because we're just going to get judges that are validated by the Federalist Society.
Oh my gosh, you know, God has spoken from on high or something.
No, he hadn't.
They're just another bunch of federal Leviathan swamp creatures.
Gotta take a break.
We'll be back.
What about martial law?
We'll ask that question when we come back.
Okay, girls, about finished with your lesson on money?
Daddy, what is a buy-sell spread for gold coins?
Well, when you sell a gold coin to a coin shop that's worth, say, $1,200, you don't actually get $1,200.
But don't worry, we're members of UPMA now, so we don't have to worry about that.
Daddy, why is somebody seal that gold?
We don't have any gold at the house.
It's stored safely in the UPMA vault, securely and insured.
But the SP 500 outperformed gold.
Daddy, gold is a bad investment.
Some people do think of it that way, but actually, gold is money.
And as members of the United Precious Metals Association, we can use our gold at any store, just like a credit card.
Or I can ask them to drop it right into Mommy and Daddy's bank account because we're a UPMA member family.
Find out more at upma.org.
That's upma.org.
Why don't we say to the government writ large that they have to spend a little bit less?
Anyone ever had less money this year than you had last?
Anybody better have a 1% pay cut?
You deal with it.
That's what government needs, a 1% pay cut.
If you take a 1% pay cut across the board, you have more than enough money to actually pay for the disaster relief.
But nobody's going to do that because they're fiscally irresponsible.
Who are they?
Republicans.
Who are they?
Democrats.
Who are they?
Virtually the whole body is careless and reckless with your money.
So the money will not be offset by cuts anywhere.
The money will be added to the debt, and there will be a day of reckoning.
What's the day of reckoning?
The day of reckoning may well be the collapse of the stock market.
The day of reckoning may be the collapse of the dollar.
When it comes, I can't tell you exactly, but I can tell you it has happened repeatedly in history when countries ruin their currency.
You know where the solution can be found, Mr. President?
In churches, in wedding chapels, in maternity wards across the country and around the world.
More babies will mean forward-looking adults, the sort we need to tackle long-term, large-scale problems.
American babies in particular are likely going to be wealthier, better educated, and more conservation-minded than children raised in still industrializing countries.
As economist Tyler Cowan recently wrote, By having more children, you're making your nation more populous, thus boosting its capacity to solve climate change.
The planet does not need for us to think globally and act locally so much as it needs us to think family and act personally.
The solution to so many of our problems at all times and in all places is to fall in love, get married, and have some kids.
Oh, come all ye faithful, Joyful and triumphant.
Oh, come ye, oh come ye to birthlam.
Come and behold him, for the king of angels.
O come, us adore him.
O come, us adore him.
Of course, what we're talking about right now is not just a handful of Trump sycophants, Rudy Giuliani and some of the others, Sidney Powell, Robert Lynn, or Lynn Wood, rather.
I don't think Lynn Wood or Sidney Powell deserve to be tarred with that brush.
I don't think they're sycophants of Trump.
But on the other hand, Trump comes up with one idea after another.
And you've got to understand it's not Trump's fault.
It's not Rudy Giuliani's fault.
It's not Janelle, whatever name is fault.
It's not Sidney Powell's fault or Lynn Wood or anyone else.
Janelle, etc.
The fact is, nobody could deliver that message that would not be hooted down in derision by the leftist media and blithely ignored by the snobs on the U.S. Supreme Court.
What we need is somebody that says, I don't need your permission to do this.
I'm doing it.
Now, if that's Trump invoking the Insurrection Act, or if it is the governor of Texas seceding from the Union, whoever it is, we don't need to be asking Mother May I anymore.
Well, that's the thing I was saying, Keith, is that this isn't just Trump's cheerleading squad anymore.
When you have the state of Texas plus, what was it, 18 others that sign on to this thing?
That's not just a handful of his hand-picked attorneys or attorneys representing him on his behalf.
This is much bigger than that.
You have nearly half the states of the nation saying we need to look into this.
But let's talk about martial law.
Now, you were right in the debate with Brother Nathaniel about the Amy Barrett question.
But Brother Nathaniel did put up a provocative video this week about martial law, what that would mean, how it would come about, et cetera, how it could play out.
What is most likely to happen is what has happened over the course of the last five years.
Trump will huff and puff and blow our houses down, rhetorically speaking, but he won't actually do anything.
What will happen at the end of it?
He'll have 200 million in a war chest in case he decides to run again or for other purposes.
That money is there.
How many times a day do you get an email from the hundred and a thousand percent matching?
But you know, running again in 2024, it'll be a one-party state by then.
It may already be.
It'll certainly be by then.
But let's listen to Brother Nathaniel.
Okay.
Could Trump invoke martial law?
It's worth asking.
For with the broad election fraud, scant signature validation, zero proof of U.S. citizenship, the Dominion voting system retaining foreign investor China, and collusion by state officials, the prospect of martial law draws nigh.
A basis for extraordinary action is at hand.
As president, I have no higher duty than to defend the laws and the Constitution of the United States.
That is why I am determined to protect our election system, which is now under coordinated assault and siege.
Coordinated assault and siege are the key words.
It means a coordinated collection of traitors.
George Soros, with his stake in Dominion Systems.
Mark Zuckerberg, who gave $350 million to a leftist group providing funds to election administrative bodies.
Joshua Shapiro, PA Attorney General, and Kathy Buchvar, PA Secretary of State.
All Jews who've laid siege to our constitutional election process.
And that spells conspiracy.
Conspiracy was the constitutional basis for Jefferson's move against Aaron Burr and Lincoln's action against the southern states so as to invoke the Insurrection Act with subsequent martial law.
The constitutional process must be allowed to continue.
We are going to defend the honesty of the vote by ensuring that every legal ballot is counted and that no illegal ballot is counted.
Trump saw it coming.
He warned against an onslaught of mail-in votes primed for the election months ago.
Once the fraud kicked in, Trump fired Pentagon Chief Mark Esper, who publicly rebuffed Trump's intent to invoke the Insurrection Act so as to send in troops to cities where BLM and anti-fur riots were running amok.
I do not support invoking the Insurrection Act.
But Trump does.
What are you going to do?
Let's say there are threats.
They say that they're going to threaten riots if they lose on election night.
Assuming we get a winner on election night.
What are you going to do?
We'll put them down very quickly if they do that.
We have the right to do that.
We have the power to do that if we want.
Look, it's called insurrection.
As in Insurrection Act, Trump fired deep stater Esper on November 9th and replaced him with ex-Green Beret Patriot and Trump loyalist Christopher Miller as Secretary of Defense.
Miller quickly elevated U.S. Special Operations, Department of Defense Special Office in rivalry with CIA's mercenary forces to report directly to Miller and a step away from President Trump.
Miller then promptly appointed Ezra Cohen Watnik, a staunch Republican and proven patriot, as Under Secretary of Special Office, answerable to Miller and Commander-in-Chief, President Trump.
It's a game changer.
Yes, Watnik's a Jew, but a glitch in Jewry.
His mother is Colombian, not Jewish, and he identifies as Hispanic.
He's a Mike Flynn loyalist and an American firster.
It all adds up to Trump's post-election reform, which would make JFK's heart warm over.
As we enact these reforms, we follow the vision of John F. Kennedy, who predicted the rise of special operations nearly 60 years ago.
He foresaw, quote, another type of war.
There is special ops, an overriding rival to the CIA's mercenary forces, subject to the CIA Mossad's clandestine operations.
Replacing the special ops.
All right, Keith.
Well, we're having a little bit of a difficulty playing that particular clip, but basically, Brother Nathaniel is talking about that there is still a path forward for the Insurrection Act, for Trump to declare martial law, for Trump to do something.
Well, he better do it quickly because his authority as president will at the earliest expire on Tuesday when the electors are in or at the latest, January the 20th, before Biden is sworn into office.
He's going to have to do it then, and the sooner the better, in order to have the authority to invoke the Insurrection Act.
Only the president has the right to do that.
And we only made it about halfway through that clip, and I wish the problem was on my local end here at the local studio and not at the network.
But in any event, we posted the entire seven-minute clip at our website, could Trump Invoke Martial Law.
Thoughtful presentation by Brother Nathaniel there.
We didn't get to hear the end of it, but you should go and listen to that for yourself.
But the fact of the matter remains, along with what we were saying about the state law.
Yes, there are some options still.
Trump is still not considering.
He's still saying he's going to fight on, whether that means immediately or with some hypothetical go-nowhere run for election in 2024.
And if he doesn't do it, if he doesn't pull the trigger on the Insurrection Act, the joke is going to be on him because he's going to be the one in the striped suit behind bars who is going to wonder why he didn't pull the trigger on it when he had the chance to do it.
Doing the Insurrection Act is just saying, just like Brother Nathaniel said, that you have a group of traitors conspiring against the government and trying to change the course of the government.
That's exactly what has happened in this election fraud.
And you see that no one else is willing to take up the cudgel and fight in the battle.
The Supreme Court isn't.
State legislatures haven't done it yet.
Maybe won't ever do it.
You know, who is going to do it?
It's either Trump or the wild card is the governor of Texas.
But somebody needs to do it or else we're in a mellow hess, as my father used to say.
Bottom line, Joe Biden goes in on Inauguration Day.
Trump goes on and continues to contest the election results.
And then he's going to be mightily surprised when they start serving those arrest warrants on him and perp walking him out of his home at Mar-a-Lago into a helicopter.
Never to be heard of again.
A moment ago, yeah, helicopter rods, right?
But with Trump, this is if passed his prologue and you can judge a person's future behavior based upon their past behavior.
A lot of bluster, but not a lot of action when it gets right down to it.
I mean, if he went hardcore and balls to the wall on this one, it'd be the first time.
Well, not only that, though, this is the only time where the consequences of not doing it are real.
As real as a little jail cell like the one Jeffrey Epstein was in.
Just as real as being cut off incommunicado from the outside and then the next morning, oh, we're so sorry.
These prison guards fell asleep at their post and Trump is hung from his jail cell like Jeffrey Epstein was.
Now, I certainly don't want that to happen.
I certainly hope that Trump wakes up, though, and realizes that that is a possible endgame for this whole situation.
It's not like he's going to go back to Trump Tower, and it's going to be just like it was in May of 2015.
You're not that anymore.
You can't put the toothpaste back in the tube, that's for sure.
Well, whatever's going to happen, I guess as we said last week, how this is for an incredible prediction, we'll find out.
Something's going to happen or it won't, but we'll find out for Inauguration Day.
We got more thoughts, though, and it's coming in the third hour.