May 5, 2018 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
50:10
20180505_Hour_3
|
Time
Text
You're listening to the Liberty News Radio Network, and this is the Political Cesspool.
The Political Cesspool, going across the South and worldwide, as the South's foremost populist conservative radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host, James Edwards.
Okay, back for the third and final hour.
We had such a robust discussion between myself, Sam Bushman, and Eddie DeBometer Miller during the break that we forgot to get our guest, but I hear she's with us now.
Yeah, no, no, Sam's got her now.
And it's Courtney from Alabama now.
Courtney's sort of like our mascot in some ways, and a lot of people know her.
She's been around.
You see her at Amerin.
You've seen her at our conferences, and she's been on the radio with us a few times.
And she's starting her own family now and doing a great job at that.
How are you, Courtney?
Oh, I'm great.
How are you?
I'm doing good.
And Eddie's doing good, and he's here with us tonight as well.
And so Courtney emailed us a few days ago, and there's a situation that's happened in Alabama.
And she's not called Courtney from Alabama for nothing.
That's where she lives.
And she thought it might be a southern drawl, Courtney.
She thought it might be an interesting story for the program.
And so she's going to tell us all about it.
So as you know, ladies and gentlemen, the month of April was not a very good month for Waffle House.
There was a couple of incidents at Waffle House that made news.
Of course, the one in Tennessee that you know about, there was a mass murder at a Waffle House, and I believe it was near Nashville.
A guy walked in and just started shooting up the place and I think killed a handful of people.
But there was also, yeah, it's almost as bad as Chuck E. Cheese now, but there was also an incident, a lesser-known incident, but it still made national news in Alabama.
And that's what Courtney is here to tell us about.
Courtney, what happened at Waffle House in Alabama?
Okay.
Well, yeah, I thought I would cover this since I live not too far from this.
I won't get too specific, obviously, but it's kind of in my neck of the woods, this Waffle House in Sayerland, Alabama.
But anyways, I've never seen a story so misconstrued by liberals despite obvious evidence.
You know, other, well, I'm probably stretching things a bit by saying that.
There's other examples like Charlottesville was a much bigger deal, obviously.
But this is just one of those stories where despite the evidence, liberals are just going on and on with their narrative of what happened.
And so basically, Chikesha Clemens in the early morning hours of April 22nd, 2018, her and two other black friends, well, you can tell from her name she's black.
I don't have to say that.
But her and two of her other black friends, a male and a female, I'm pretty sure one of them was a male.
I know the other was a female.
They brought alcohol into Waffle House, and that's against the rules.
And they were drunk.
And, you know, this is based on multiple witness accounts.
There's other reports that say that she, you know, everything started because she complained for being charged 50 cents extra for plastic utensils.
You know, I don't really see why that's a huge deal to, you know, make an issue about in a restaurant.
You know, something like that, I would just either leave or just go with their rules.
It's not that big of a deal.
But, you know, I don't really understand why do you need to request plastic utensils?
And I mean, you usually don't take, I mean, unless you're taking your food on a long car trip, you know, it wasn't necessary to have to even walk out with plastic utensils.
And, you know, this was early in the morning.
So anyways, she made a huge scene over it.
But either way, you know, I think, you know, the main thing is that she brought an alcohol with her two friends that came in drunk.
She was asked to leave by the staff there, the people who weren't there.
She responded by making threats and saying she was going to come back and shoot the place up.
And again, this is based on multiple witness accounts.
Some of the people who were witnesses were black.
Three white male cops were called, you know, as they're supposed to do.
She would not leave.
And then right then and there, right when the cops were there arguing with her, and that's when her friend decided to start rolling her camera.
And, you know, in a lot of these videos that are involved blacks getting arrested, you don't see what happens before the confrontation.
You know, that's something to keep in mind.
So anyways, her friend starts rolling the video.
The cops stood there a while asking her to get up and leave with them.
She wouldn't leave.
So they try to grab her arm.
She still wouldn't get up.
So the natural thing is that they end up wrestling on the ground.
You know, that's what happens if you resist arrest.
So anyways, obviously they're making this into a huge racial angle.
Groups like, you know, or they're making a huge racial issue out of this as usual.
You know, groups like BLM, local liberal activists in my area, Al Sharpin, etc.
He made a visit down here Tuesday.
But the thing that's the most absurd about this story, other than the racial angle that's being brought up, is the sexism angle.
They're talking about how she was sexually assaulted by the cops because she was wearing this sweaty.
Excuse me, I'm sorry.
No, Eddie said it is preposterous to believe that a cop would sexually assault her at a waffle house.
Someone is sexually false to black.
I'm sorry, Courtney.
It's okay.
I agree.
She was wearing this sweaty tube top with no straps.
And it was a very, it was a dress, strapless dress, very short at the bottom, very low cut at the top.
It looked like something that would fall off of her at any minute.
I mean, she didn't seem like a very modest person.
You can go to her Facebook page and see how she always dresses.
But anyways, her top slipped down during the scuffle, which is going to happen if you're going to resist arrest.
They're claiming that, and it was an accident, obviously.
They didn't intentionally pull her top down.
They're claiming this is sexual assault.
And this is so ridiculous for a number of reasons because, you know, first of all, like I've said, why resist arrest if you dress like that?
If you go to her Facebook page and look at how she normally dresses, she looks like the type of person who probably, you know, if she was dancing at a club in an outfit like that and her top fell down, you know, she probably wouldn't care then.
And then if you watch the video where they're wrestling her, she had a, there's one part where she obviously has a hand free, you know, to fix her top, but she does not.
And then towards the end of the video, a cop was nice enough, a cop was gentlemanly enough to ask her friend who was filming, can you please come over and fix her top?
Her friend did not.
She just continues filming.
And rumor has it, I don't know if this is true, but rumor has it that the reason this all started, the Suffolk War started, is because her friend posted the video all over Facebook, you know, before it was even sent to her.
All right, hold on.
I mean, Courtney, Courtney, we're coming to a break.
I know we just have you for a couple more minutes at the top of the next segment, maybe five more minutes after the break.
And we're going to cut.
You've done a great job of explaining this story, but we're going to cut to the chase and get to the final, the last full measure when we come back.
Live report from Alabama with Courtney.
You run Alabama.
Yes, he does.
Okay, girls, about finished with your lesson on money.
Daddy, what is a buy-sell spread for gold coins?
Well, when you sell a gold coin to a coin shop that's worth, say, $1,200, you don't actually get $1,200.
But don't worry, we're members of UPMA now, so we don't have to worry about that.
Daddy, why somebody seals that gold?
We don't have any gold at the house.
It's stored safely in the UPMA vault, securely and insured.
But the S ⁇ P 500 outperformed gold.
Daddy, gold is a bad investment.
Some people do think of it that way, but actually, gold is money.
And as members of the United Precious Metals Association, we can use our gold at any store, just like a credit card.
Or I can ask them to drop it right into Mommy and Daddy's bank account because we're a UPMA member family.
Find out more at UPMA.org.
That's upma.org.
Each week, the Political Cesspool, known worldwide as the South's foremost populist conservative radio program, hits the airwaves to bring you the other side of the news and to report on events which are vital to your welfare but are hushed up or distorted by the mainstream media.
However, to continue doing this, we need your support.
Go online at www.thepoliticalcesspool.org and make a safe and secure donation.
If you prefer not to make an online donation, you can send us a check or money order to the address on the website.
No matter which way you choose, the political cesspool needs your support.
Go online to www.thepoliticalcesspool.org and make a donation today.
We fought.
We learned.
We struggled.
We won.
Despite Obama's best efforts, the newspaper of the human resistance survives.
We have lived only to face a new nightmare, the war against the machines.
Read about our struggle in The Sovereign, newspaper of the resistance.
The Sovereign is a 24-page monthly tabloid newspaper about the war between man and machines.
We've tried reason.
We've tried legislation.
We've tried every peaceful means imaginable.
And all it's gotten us is shut out.
So now we fight the machines.
Order online today at thesovenews.com or find the sovereign at select newsstands.
Remember to read the sovereign, newspaper of the resistance.
The human resistance's battle against the machines will be everlasting.
This is Mercy.
It was never our destiny to stop the age of Obama.
It was merely to survive it.
together together to get on the show and speak with james and the gang call us toll free at 1-866-986-6397 And now back to tonight's show.
All right, back with Courtney from Alabama.
She's talking to us, giving us information about an incident that happened in Alabama at a Waffle House.
And last month, of course, we saw this at Starbucks as well, these get-rich-quick schemes.
And we were talking about it during the break.
You've got these blacks with chips on their shoulders, and they've been told all their lives that anything that goes wrong in their life is the responsibility of whites.
The whites were the ones that made it happen.
Society just rage against the machine, act any way you want.
And if it doesn't go your way, it's racism.
And now, of course, we saw at Starbucks where these people were obviously being menaces, obviously being nuisances.
And the police got called on them in two separate incidents at Starbucks last month.
And that was very profitable for them.
I believe, I'm not 100% sure.
I believe that Starbucks made an undisclosed settlement with them.
So maybe that played into it.
In addition to the chip on your shoulder situation, this woman probably thought she'd go in there with alcohol and behave boorishly.
And if they did call the police, then she's writing her own check.
Do you think that's what was going on there, Courtney, or was this just another example of, well, just typical behavior from the usual suspects?
Yeah, it's just, you know, typical behavior from this group.
They just, you know, with everything going on in the news, you know, the way stuff gets blown out of proportion, you know, between blacks and cops and these news stories over the past few years.
You know, cops are always bad.
You know, blacks are innocent in every situation.
I think they're just starting to think that they can just act however they want to.
And yeah, and to retract just a little bit, I'll go through it quickly, but to retract just a little bit to what I was going into before the break.
You know, it's just to call this sexual assault because her top accidentally slipped down, it's ridiculous for a bunch of reasons.
You know, she had a, there's one part of the video where she clearly has a hand free to fix her out that she does not.
You know, one of the cops even stopped and asked her friend who was filming, you know, to fix her top for her, and she did not.
And then she proceeded.
I haven't really seen this written in an article, but I've heard rumors about it.
I've seen comments on it.
Apparently she posted the video unedited, uncensored, all over Facebook.
And Shikija approved.
So obviously, this is not a modest woman who cares about her breast being displayed to everybody.
And that's obviously not her issue here.
And the other thing is, even if, let's suppose in the rare event that a white male cop would purposely pull down a black woman's top while arresting her, let's say that word happened.
I still think, I mean, it would be wrong.
It would be inappropriate, but I still think sexual assault is way too strong of a term or a phrase to use to describe that.
Sexual assault to me is a woman getting beat up and then raped.
You know, it's just, it's ridiculous.
And then another thing that Has been blown out of proportion is at one point during the video, he says, I'm going to break your arm.
And they're making a huge deal about that.
And it's been explained over and over again by the police department, these local liberal activists, BLM, Al Sharpton, in press conferences down here.
It's been explained over and over again what the cop meant by that.
That standard protocol, if you're struggling with the cop too much, he needs to tell you, I can break your arm.
You need to stop.
I mean, he wasn't threatening her.
And so that's another thing they're making a huge issue out of.
And if you look at the Facebook pages of some of the local liberals down here who are staging some of these protests, it's like one of them posted a cartoon showing white slave masters, the standard cartoons you see where they're chaining, where they're holding or they're forcing their intentions on half-naked black slave women and their breasts are exposed.
And it's like, you know, that so that whole idea is getting passed around relating this to that.
And so we have, you know, we have DLM protesting.
Al Sharpton came down here for a press conference.
She was interviewed.
I believe it was MSNBC.
She was on there crying and talking about how she can't sleep.
And, you know, and as I said at the beginning, despite such obvious evidence, just from watching the video, these liberals are just going on and on with their view of, you know, their agenda of what happened.
It just shows how evil these people are, how dangerous they are.
And, but the good thing is, is that unlike Starbucks, Waffle House and the Steriland Police are not backing down.
So if you want to get a cup of coffee somewhere, don't go to Starbucks, go to Waffle House.
Amen.
Hey, I'm glad that's a great, that's a great report.
Did she not do great tonight, Eddie?
Fabulous, fabulous, fabulous.
Courtney, I know this is totally off the topic, but your baby at the Political Success Pool Fambo Union was the most beautiful baby anybody would ever want to see.
It just warmed my heart.
Seeing you there warmed my heart.
Good old Courtney from the old days.
He brought us peanut butter cookies.
Well, listen, Courtney, I have a question to ask you.
I have two questions.
Now, how long after this incident took with the police and this woman thug, how long did it take Al Sharpton to get down there?
He was Johnny on the spot.
Let me ask you this.
I'm so sorry.
I had a very hard time hearing anything Eddie just said.
I'm so sorry.
How long, Courtney, how long?
Can you hear me okay now?
Yeah.
Okay.
Now, how long?
James said that Al Sharpton was Johnny on the spot.
How long did it take Al Sharpton to get down there after this Waffle House incident?
Because I'm asking that for a reason.
I think, I believe it was approximately 45 minutes.
Actually, surprisingly, it was a little over a week, but it was probably the very next day from when it happened.
Yeah, it was.
I can confirm that.
It was the very next day after the incident happened.
That local liberals were already, you know, putting their stuff up on Facebook, staging protests and, you know, crying about the police and everything.
And so, but I'm surprised it took him as long as it did to come down here.
Well, the reason I asked that question, Courtney, I was going to ask you, do you think that the whole incident could have been planned?
I wouldn't be surprised.
I mean, it's interesting that her friend there with the camera.
I mean, I know everybody has cameras on their phones now, but it's just so interesting that she shows up in that outfit.
She acts the way she acts.
And, you know, and then her friend starts rolling as soon as the police are about to, you know, tackle her, which was inevitable based on her behavior.
You know, she wouldn't get up out of her seat after they politely asked her to leave a bunch of times.
You made another great point, Courtney.
And, you know, and this is after the oh, go ahead.
Oh, I was going to say, you made another great point that goes back to the civil rights, the so-called civil rights area, like in during the Birmingham riots.
You know, as we all know, that the liberal press would hold they would not film anything when the blacks were throwing urine and sticks and cursing police and spitting on the police.
And there was an area of camera rolling.
But once the police started trying to enforce a discipline, once the dogs got unleashed and the fire hose on us rolled, then it all happened.
And of course, even the Rosa Parks thing, I don't think this is even controversial.
It's just a matter of fact, all that was staged.
Right.
And she was like the third or fourth actress that they had for that part.
But anyway, a fantastic report, Courtney, from Alabama about a situation in Alabama.
And Eddie was saying, you said you had a problem hearing Eddie earlier.
I want to make sure you heard what he said about your baby.
Oh, Courtney, did you hear what I said about your baby?
I'm sorry I didn't.
Okay, I said that it was an absolute delight seeing your baby at the Political Success Pool Franby Reunion.
That's the most beautiful baby anyone could ever want to see.
And you were just glowing over that baby.
Warm my heart through and through.
Thank you.
You're welcome.
Hey, Courtney, thanks for calling in tonight.
I know you got to get back to that baby this evening, and we're going to let you do just that.
But we appreciate it.
Always good to talk to you.
Always good to hear from you.
Thank you.
We'll be back with more right after this, ladies and gentlemen.
Across the land.
You're listening to Liberty News Radio.
The first time I ever truly took a drink was the summer before my freshman year of high school.
When I was 12, I went to a party and everybody was drinking, and so I just grabbed me a beer and started drinking.
The first time I drank, you know, it was fun.
Find a game, see if we can do it without getting caught.
I didn't know that I was going to wine up more.
I wasn't drinking beer.
It took too long to get drunk and I didn't like the taste very well.
You know, it got to the point where I was drinking so much, I was getting bored with the feeling of, I was getting bored with the price.
That's all that goes through your head is when am I going to get wasted again?
You know, I started in slowly, you know, with pot, then you just slowly move up the scale.
And it's the typical story of a drug user.
Bear's the easiest thing for teenagers to get.
And so they take one beer, which is like your first step.
Don't even do it.
It's not worth the ticket from somebody who knows.
A public service message from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
The word vigor is defined in the dictionary as health and strength in body and mind.
Do you have enough health and strength in body and mind?
Would you like to pursue life with passion?
Would you like to know where you stand when it comes to your vigor score?
That's right.
There's a free scientific test you could take now that'll help you find out what your vigor score is.
Then you can do things to improve that score.
Did you know that?
It's absolutely free, F-R-E-E free.
All you got to do is get a hold of Kurt Crosby.
You can do so, C-U-R-T.
That's Kurt.
C-U-R-T at libertyroundtable.com.
Or call Kurt at 801-669-2211.
That's 801-669-2211.
Would you like to learn about the scientifically proven vigor test?
It's free.
How would you like to improve your vigor score?
Again, inexpensive solutions are available now.
Call Kurt Crosby at 801-669-2211 or Kurt C-U-R-T at LibertyRoundtable.com for your free vigorous court test today.
I'm Michael Hill, president of the League of the South.
I and my compatriots are Southern nationalists.
We seek the survival, well-being, and independence of the Southern people, our people.
The League wants a South that enjoys the sweet fruits of Christian liberty and prosperity, but our current situation won't allow it.
We must have our independence from Washington, D.C. and the globalists.
The present system cannot be reformed.
Without independence, we will continue down this path of destruction.
To us, this is not acceptable.
I'm asking you, Southern man and woman, to join us today to free the South.
Call us at 256-757-6789 or see our website at www.leagueofthesouth.com.
God saved the South.
Welcome back to Get On The Show.
Call us on James's Dime at 1-866-986-6397.
Okay, another delightful show this evening.
In fact, our time has gone by so quickly with our guests, I don't feel as though we really covered everything I wanted to cover.
I mean, every minute we had with him was fantastic and nothing was really rushed, but we could have kept Joe McCutcheon on for an hour or two and not covered at all.
Joe McCutcheon, I want to say this about Joe, getting back to Joe very quick, because we had to go straight to Jack Ryan at the end of the second hour.
And Jack was going to be on at the end of the first hour, and we bumped him midstream, and so we didn't want to do that again.
But what I wanted to say about Joe was, and I mentioned it for a moment while he was on, but Joe really is the exact kind of person that I would point to as an example of why I decided to start the Political Accessible Radio Program.
These are the people that should be getting mainstream, well, we're mainstream here on AM Radio, but I'm talking about establishment, you know, corporate, Fox, CNN.
Joe is a guy with his wisdom and his intellect and his ability and his courage.
These are the people that should be highlighted as the experts on these issues.
And so that's one of the services we provide.
We seek out and find and befriend and work with the very best people that we think that this country has to offer, and we make them available to a wider audience on this program.
And if you appreciate what we do here on this show and you appreciate the family-friendly nature that we've got here, please remember that, of course, our work is listener-supported, 100% listener-supported.
And we would appreciate your support this week and every week and always, thepoliticalaccessible.org, and you can make a contribution, and we would appreciate it.
Also, with Jack Ryan, there was something Eddie wanted to make mention of with Jack at the tail end of his segment, and we ran up on a hard break.
But this is very good.
Eddie, remind the audience what the discussion with Jack was about and what you wanted to add to it before we ran out of time.
And I told Eddie we'd give him some time in the third hour to bring this up because this is interesting, and it's historical, and it's something that should be remembered and restated tonight.
And you know, James, as always, as many times, I wish we could tape the discussion you and I and Sam had between the breaks.
But Jack Ryan, with all due respect, he was wrong about the Constitution.
I submit to Jack Ryan, he needs to study the Constitution more.
What he needs to do is go back and study this Federalist Papers.
Anytime you hear a Supreme Court justice or any justice say, well, we have to decide what the intent.
How many times have you heard that term?
We've got to decide what did they intend.
Well, you don't have to do that because there's a manual that tells you every word that they explain in black and white that any school child can understand what they intended.
It's called the Federalist Papers.
And like I told Jack on the air, I said, Jack, you need to go back and read John Jay's Federalist number two.
John Jay was the very first chief justice of the very first Supreme Court in this country.
And here's what John Jay had to say.
And he also was signed with the Declaration of Independence.
He was one of the three authors of the Federalist Papers, along with Madison and Hamilton.
Okay, here we go.
He says in Federalist number two, I'm skipping down where he says, Providence has been pleased to give this connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs.
This country and this people seem to have been made for each other.
And it appears as it was as if it was divine providence that an inheritance so proper and convenient should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties.
And I will stop there because I think that's not all the entire commentary there, but that should, that sums it up in a nutshell.
Well, yeah, but I think you misinterpreted what Jack was saying.
I think I agree with what Jack was saying in that if, and I think this is what I took out of what he said.
We'll talk to Jack about it again next week if we want to, but and I really appreciate what Jack brings to the show.
But I think what he was saying is you just can't bring anybody over here, make them recite a phony pledge to the flag and pretend to be, obey and defend the Constitution, and they become Americans.
And that's what he was saying.
He was talking about constitutionalists, not in the term that you're a constitutionalist or saying Bushman is a constitutionalist.
And he's talking about these radical libertarians where if somebody comes over here, they're instantly an American when they stand on our soil and recite a few magic words.
And of course, none of us believe that.
Of course.
And I think that's what he was getting at.
That's what I interpreted him saying.
Not that the Constitution in and of itself is a bad thing.
Obviously, the Constitution is a very good thing.
I wonder if we'll ever be able to restore the intent of the founders.
I mean, the founders, I mean, I don't like to use the term white nationalists.
I think it sounds militant.
I think it sounds confrontational.
And certainly we need to be confrontational.
We need to stand up ardently and defiantly for what we believe in and to be very bold in that action.
And certainly we always have here.
But when I think of the term white nationalists, it just sounds a little too militant for the people we're trying to reach.
So we could say we're advocates, unapologetic advocates on behalf of European Americans or whatever you want to call yourself, a paleoconservative, whatever.
What other term could you use, though?
Because, you know, I mean, if you go to Europe, you go to Germany, France, but back before they had the EU, people used to take pride, James, in like, well, I get that.
I'm just saying, whatever a white nationalist is, the founding fathers were certainly that.
They restricted, in their own words, they restricted immigration to free white men.
I mean, boom, final.
That was in the original.
That was in all of the original documents.
That was in the original document.
So the original Immigration Act, I believe, what was that, 1795, maybe, something like that.
And it was restricted to free white men.
So if I'm a white nationalist because I don't hate my ancestors and I'm proud of the way God made me, what in the world were they?
And if I tell you something, I'll tell you what they were.
They were great men.
And I don't think that's, I think that was a very sound advice that they had.
James, you pricked my memory.
You brought something to my attention.
If you think that's militant or whatever, or if people think that it's so, we're so evil because we want free white men, white men to come here.
Check out the immigration policy of Mexico people.
If you want to talk about something harsh, check out that.
Check out the immigration policy there.
Check out the immigration of where else, you know, Red China.
In a healthy nation where you have people who don't hate themselves, they're not going to allow people who would come in and fundamentally undermine and change their identity.
No healthy, rational, sane country would allow that to happen.
How many Syrians, how many Haitians, how many Ethiopians have been taken into China, into Red China, into Taiwan, into North Korea?
I mean, check that out.
And see, that's another thing.
We're not saying, and I'm all for black nations being black nations and Asian nations being Asian nations.
We're not here on the radio advocating that white men go into all these countries and undermine and fundamentally change the identity of these nations.
All we're saying is we don't want it to happen to ours, the nations that traditionally belong to Western culture and Western heritage.
We want those to remain as well.
I think if you really look at it, we are the proponents of true diversity because we don't want to be extinguished into a mocha-colored mass of humanity.
We want to exist just as everybody else who is alive and rationally thinking and well-minded wants to survive.
But of course, they're all allowed to do that.
But when we do that, we're white supremacists.
We're bigots.
We're hate-filled.
It's hatred to want to live and want to survive.
If you love your children, James, and I think you must be guilty of this.
You probably love your children more than you do the guy's child over in West Memphis, Arkansas.
You know, here's another point.
We here in the political suspicion, we're not the one advocating nation building.
We're not advocating of destroying a natural people with a natural, well their common religion, a common familial bond, you know, coming from a common culture.
We're not the ones doing that.
The United States government, our federal government, we're the ones that are, I said, now we, they are the ones that are constantly over in God, God knows where, Afghanistan, Ubekistan, Iraq, Iran.
Now they're on Syria.
They're trying to bust those nations up to split them into the thousand pieces and bringing in thousands.
Let me tell you what I just heard.
I was telling James about this the other day.
Bomb the world, invite the world.
That's our following.
Foreign policy.
Do you get this?
The European Union just announced about 10 days ago that they're going to, against all the wishes of Germany, France, Italy, Portugal, they're going to bring in, in 13 years, they said they're going to bring in from 150 million to 200 million migrants from the continent of Africa into our breeding grounds of northern Europe.
That's what they're going to do.
So you see, it's not us here in the political suspool that are advocating busting up nations or trying to destroy someone having a black nation or brown nation, whatever.
Absolutely, James is totally right.
I'm all for Mexico having Mexicans.
I'm all for Ethiopia having Ethiopians.
I'm all for Japan having a pure Japanese people.
That's what God, God made the different races.
God made the different races.
It's man, just like in the Tower of Babel, when Nimrod, I think it was, was trying to make a one world order.
He's been given credit for creating the, trying to create the first one world order.
And I say, look at what God did to him.
I say, and then go fast forward into Sodom and Gomorrah.
And if you will see God's urban renewal plan, look what he did at Sodom and Gomorrah.
And if you, see, that's what our government here, James, is trying to do now.
They're out bombing every country in the world that won't go along with their With the one world order, with the one world government.
That's absolutely right, but that's what we're talking about.
We'll be right back, and we'll wrap up this week's show in just about three minutes' time.
As a parent, is receiving a faith-based, character-focused education for your children difficult to find?
Do you believe that godly principles should be a central component in your child's education?
Imagine a school where faith and integrity are at its center, where heritage and responsibility instill character.
For over 40 years, American Heritage School has been educating both hearts and minds, bringing out academic excellence.
This is the school where character and embracing the providence of a living God are fundamental, where students' national test scores average near the 90th percentile.
With American Heritage School's advanced distance education program, distance is no longer an issue.
With an accredited LDS-oriented curriculum from kindergarten through 12th grade, your children can attend from anywhere in the world.
American Heritage School will prepare your child for more than a job.
It will prepare them for life.
To learn more, visit American-Heritage.org.
That's American-Heritage.org.
Liberty is not free.
Its costs are innumerable.
Without monetary funding, the valiant efforts of freedom-loving Americans become diminished or outright defeated.
We present a solution, the Give Me Liberty Fund.
The plan is quite simple.
Invite individual Americans to contribute less than a dollar a day.
These monetary funds are used to promote liberty-minded media, organizations, events, candidates, movements, and speakers.
In the spirit of transparency, all expenditures are published.
Patriotic business owners provide discounted products and services to Give Me Liberty Fund members.
Our greatest strength is in numbers.
Go to GiveMeLibertyFund.com and become part of the solution today.
GiveMeLibertyfund.com.
Participate in the peaceful restoration of the greatest and freest country in the world.
Getting the kids to school, cleaning the house, doing the laundry.
It seems that the work routine as a stay-at-home mom is never ending.
And even though I'm the prime grocery shopper in our family of four, I simply don't have time to scrutinize all the labels on the countless food products I buy.
Oh, sure, I've noticed all the latest certification seals, organic, non-GMO, gluten-free.
It definitely seems to be the latest craze.
But it was only recently that kosher certification seals caught my attention.
You see, my husband had me download an app called Kosher Certified, and it shed light on a century-old certification industry that slipped under the radar screen from the majority of our public.
I also noticed a question mark at the end of the app name.
And that makes great sense as there's far more questions regarding this industry than answers.
In fact, the developers refer to this as the kosher question.
Sure, I'm a busy mom and didn't pay attention to our food culture, but now I have transparency, a convenient grocery list feature, and the ability to eat in favor of my family's best interests.
and you can discover it too at thekosherquestion.com.
Welcome back.
To get on the show, call us on James's Dime at 1-866-986-6397.
Okay, last segment of the night.
As you know, I was involved in a libel lawsuit last year.
We were the plaintiffs, and the liars were the defendants.
And after a year and a half, one of the most blatant miscarriages of justice in the history of American jurisprudence was handed down and then enshrined in the annals of Michigan case law.
Everybody remembers that story, but just basically I was alleged in the Detroit news to have been a leader of the Ku Klux Klan.
Now, the restatement of torts provides as the textbook quintessential illustration of what constitutes libel to be.
For example, if you allege someone is a member of the Klan when they're not.
And of course, they did much more than that.
They said I was a leader.
So it was an open and duck-slam duck case.
I had a great attorney, Kyle Bristow.
Of course, we lost because the courts were rigged.
I mean, how else could you explain it?
And you have judges now who are activist judges, and they're going to rule based upon their personal political beliefs, and not what the rule of law states.
And there has been no clearer example that this is the situation.
There could be no clearer example provided than what I went through.
Well, why are we bringing this up again?
We certainly talked about this off and on for the last really almost two years now.
It was actually two years ago.
It was in the spring of 2016 when we filed the lawsuit.
It took a year and a half for it to be decided.
We went through the trial court and then the Court of Appeals, and we were defeated.
The decision was handed down on Halloween Day.
And it was a published decision.
And it was a decision that made national news.
It was a decision that rewrote defamation law in the state of Michigan.
National Public Radio talked about it.
Jesse Jackson actually held a gala at which he presented the liar who wrote the article an award.
I mean, I understand that.
It's incredible.
And the newspaper wrote at the time that in citing why the winners for this particular Martin Luther King Day gala earlier this year were chosen, the organization pointed to the columnist's assertive and sometimes controversial writings.
Van Cole Thompson was his name.
It says, Thompson's work has drawn the ire of his leading ideological opponents, culminating, culminating in an important First Amendment victory before the Michigan Court of Appeals in 2016 and a lawsuit filed against him by white nationalist James Edwards, don't you know?
So that's remarkable.
Being able to falsely write that I'm a leader of the Ku Klux Klan and get away with it appears to be the culmination of one liar's career, according to the official awards program, the official ceremony that was emceed by Jesse Jackson.
So anyway, it goes to show just how much stock the enemy put into the outcome of that contentious lawsuit, and they knew how important the decision was going to be.
And they certainly know who they're, well, what did they call me?
Leading ideological opponents.
That's exactly what we are.
Anyway, why aren't we talking about it again now?
That's all settled.
Well, it is settled, but just last week, the Michigan Court of Appeals now published its updated version of all of its published cases.
It is published in the Michigan Appeals Reports in the 322nd edition, the 322nd volume that has come out.
Our case can be found now on the front page, the first page of all published decisions in the state of Michigan is what I understand this to be.
Page one of this entire volume.
And I don't know how these reports were organized, but I imagine that someone felt that we should have been merited on the front page.
So anyway, there you have it, folks.
PPC, always in the news, always making news, always under attack, but certainly always loved by our audience and by our families.
And that is what gets us through these things.
Again, ultimately, these injustices and these reckless and debased defamations are, they're never pleasant, but we're men and we face these things like men, and we ride to the sound of the guns and we stand up and we take the heat because so few people will, and that's why for whatever, if anybody could ever call us to be heroes, and that's probably too strong of a word, but I will tell you this.
So we have the courage of our convictions and we have the courage to stand up and take our losses, and then, of course, our victories as well, which we always take pride in.
But this is what a life experience.
You know, we've told a lot of stories tonight.
We've told the story.
We always like to tell stories.
But this was certainly one life experience.
I don't think I could forget it if I wanted to, and it was a wonderful experience.
I'm really proud of the work that Kyle Bristow did.
I'm proud that we tried to fight for our rights.
We tried to fight for what was right.
But even if I did want to forget that ordeal, which I certainly don't, I don't think I would ever be able to because it's still making news even six months after it was decided.
What a wonderful life.
You know what?
The reason I hate it most of all, James, that you lost, because I already had me a 16-foot polar crap picked out with a 9-8 Mercury.
And I thought James was going to win.
James won big time.
He was going to compensate all the guys in the cesspool.
He told me, yeah, man, go out and he said, this is a slam dunk case.
Man, go out there and get you that crappie boat, get you that good crappie bass and put fishing poles and stuff.
So I tell you what, James made that promise, and I just cried my eyes out when he lost that case because I was going to get me a fishing boat out of that money.
He's going to give me a multi-million dollar lawsuit, man.
Yeah, well, we didn't even sue him for very much money.
It was all about the principle and to write a wrong and to write an injustice.
But I tell you, now you know the media is reckless, and you know that the press is just completely out of control.
Now, they can falsely label us as white supremacists and Nazis and all of these other scary people.
Who we ought to sue them?
Well, we wrote the, I wrote the book on it, Racism, Schmazism, how they've weaponized the word racist, and I gave our people the keys on how to unlock that socio-political nuclear bomb.
But no, I mean, with regard to law, and I learned all this, you can't sue them for lying about you and calling you a racist or a white supremacist or any of these other things because that's rhetorical hyperbole.
So based on law, that's not an actionable case.
But what you can sue them on is for them violating the textbook definition of what constitutes libel, and that is exactly what they did in my case with labeling me a Klansman, a Klansman, because Donald Trump gave me press credentials.
You know, this was all happening when we were in the news incessantly in 2016.
And this one enterprising journalist thought he'd go, you know, white supremacists just wasn't getting the job done.
So he just called me the leader of the Klan because, hell, one lie is as good as another.
And what's the difference?
Legally different.
It's legally different because that took it beyond rhetorical hyperbole and into the realm of libel.
But I guess the law is only what a corrupt judge says it is.
You know, that's the point I was going to make.
We've had some of our people, some of our friends, some of our insiders say that what's lacking with our movement is money.
But the Lord knows that's true.
But they say that one of the solutions is we need to get a super fund to have a super high-powered law firm with attorneys ready to go when the flag goes up in the North Tower.
But, you know, what James's case proved, what we've been harping on here forever, it doesn't matter how good an attorney you have.
It doesn't matter how right you are.
It doesn't matter what the law states.
It's that judge, that communist left-wing whacko judge.
He just, if he just, I know I'm preaching to the preachers, but it's whatever political beliefs he has, whatever religious beliefs he has.
That's what rules, you know.
And also, another thing is they don't go by, and I hate to kick the Constitution in the ground, but and you know, nowadays they don't rule like in the old days until the 1920s, all the attorneys in the United States used to study a thing called Black's Commentaries on the Laws of England.
And a great barrister in England who wrote pretty much the laws that were, you know, they were the gold standard for American law, European nationalist law, British law for a long time.
Our forefathers studied them.
But they don't teach that in law schools anymore.
They don't even teach constitutional law anymore.
They teach what they call is precedents.
And, you know, I'm not a lawyer.
We need a lawyer here, but I'm 90% right, I'm sure.
So it doesn't matter if some judge comes in here and says, well, I've been guilty of having an impure thought or James, and we get convicted of that, having an impure thought, even no one could prove it.
Well, then from now on, the president they set is, well, if you say someone who's right wing has an impure thought, then they can do time.
Well, Annie, it makes sense.
And I'll wrap it up with this.
12 years ago, right now, we were at the after party of my wedding.
12 years later, I'm here with my extended family here on the radio and with you.
And we're about to go home and go on a little vacation with my wife.
And I'm looking forward to that.
And, of course, the show will be back next week.
Next week, though, Winston Smith will be anchoring.
I'll still be out of town.
We're going to take a little week-long trip, and it's our first trip in eight years without a kid.
And so it's going to be fun.
They're going to be staying at Mama and Papa's house.
And we're going to have a good time reconnecting.
You got to have a furlough from time to time.
And we're going to do that.
And so next week, though, still going to be a great episode of the Political Cest Pole.
I'll be back the week after that.
I'll be actually back next Sunday, but we won't be quite back in time for me to do the show.
So Winston Smith has been planning for weeks now.
My anniversary didn't sneak up on me.
I knew it was coming.
So we made these plans.
We made these plans a couple of months ago.
Winston Smith will be anchoring the show next week.
And Sam Bushman's celebrating his 26th anniversary this weekend, ladies and gentlemen.