Nov. 5, 2011 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
41:35
20111105_Hour_1
|
Time
Text
Welcome to the Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populous conservative radio program.
Here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host for tonight, James Edwards.
And welcome, everybody, to another live installment of the Political Cesspool Radio Program.
I'm your host, James Edwards.
It's Saturday, November 5th, and I'm on the road yet again broadcasting to you tonight, at least from my part of the presentation from Nashville, Tennessee.
Was I in Nashville last week?
Yes, I was.
This is not a repeat, not a repeat, not a replayed show.
I'm in Nashville again for another meeting, a different group, but an equally impressive one.
You just heard their commercial, the Council of Conservative Citizens.
It's their national board of directors meeting, the Council of Conservative Citizens, CFCC.org, one of America's most venerable conservative organizations.
Been around for 23 years now and still going strong.
And it's always an honor and a privilege for me to attend one of their meetings and have the opportunity to address them today, as I did a similar group last week, to bring them up to date on all of the great things that are happening with the Political Cesspool Radio Program, bringing them up to date on, well, all of the things that have gone on over the course of the last 12 to 15 months.
And it has been a busy year and change, to say the least, and the plot keeps getting thicker.
But before we get into that, we're going to have a party tonight, ladies and gentlemen.
Let me tell you.
Before we get into that, broadcasting, holding down the fort from our flagship studio there in downtown Memphis.
Keith Alexander is at AM 1380 WLRM Radio.
Keith, how are things down in the western part of the state?
Well, the natives are restless on Beale Street tonight, James.
I can tell you that.
But it's just, you know, the typical random arrests, beatings, beatdowns, and shootings down here.
So, you know, nothing special to report, just business as usual.
The natives are restless.
Indeed, you get alcohol in the natives down there.
And, well, as we said last week, bullets start flying through the windows.
Literally, just a couple of offices down from where Keith Alexander is sitting tonight in our station.
There is a nice Memphis signature bullet hole.
Yeah, that's one of the signatures of Memphis, Tennessee.
Right.
It's the, you know, diversity is our strength.
And there's no place on earth that demonstrates that quite as well as Memphis, Tennessee.
You know, and there's some truth to that.
Diversity certainly is our greatest strength.
I mean, if you were in Dubuque, Iowa, or Fargo, North Dakota, you would have regular windows.
You come to Memphis and you get to experience diversity.
You get to experience diverse windows and the windows in Memphis come with bullet holes.
Now, you can't get that in all white cities, you know.
And so I like a little flare and a little panache, if you ask me.
And, you know, frankly, if it gets too hot, you know, it's winter, you have built-in air conditioning.
Why pay for air conditioning?
Just shoot bullet holes in the window and the breeze comes in, the draft comes in.
You're all set, man.
I mean, it's great.
Well, what I can tell you, and I mean this from the bottom of my heart, if you want to know what diversity really is as experienced by people that live at ground zero, you can't do any better than talk to somebody that comes from Memphis because, you know, my father took the whole family up to Minnesota, and I was born in a county that had not two, but one black people in it.
And he said that didn't in the least bit hamper all the local white people up there from being instinctive experts on race relations who used to lecture him about how badly southern white people treated black people.
He said he would just shake his head.
He said it was like people that lived in the desert presuming to tell people to live in the jungle about how they should survive in the jungle.
He said it was crazy.
He said that, you know, see, that's one of the big problems with racial consciousness in America.
There are wide swaths of America where if people want to see a black person or a brown person, they have to turn on the television set.
We don't have to do that in Memphis, do we, James?
No, we don't.
And there's a big difference between the ones you find in real life and in most cases the ones that are presented on television.
And that's, you know, really one of the claims to fame of this radio program, is that we talk about it.
And we talk about it.
And somebody doesn't like us to talk about that, though.
And we'll get into that a little bit later in this show.
We had an interviewee last week that apparently did not share our insights on the issues of race and also Jewish power and influence.
But we'll get into that.
And she was right about one thing.
It is nice when the opportunity presents itself to judge everyone as a quote-unquote individual.
Because certainly, you know, you can't cast a blanket over everyone.
There are always going to be exceptions to the rule.
But the thing about exceptions to the rule is that the exception is there to prove the rule.
The rule still exists.
So, yes, there are individuals that break the mold, and there are some great contributing members to American society.
Of that, there is no doubt, that are black.
But at the same time, when you're talking about crime rates, you know, these are backed up by the U.S. Department of Justice crime statistics are not something that has been tweaked by the Ku Klux Klan.
Well, that's absolutely right.
So then again, when you're talking about crime as broken down on racial lines, you're talking about IQ.
Well, there are some disparities there, and these are group disparities.
And so, again, you will have individuals that disprove this, but as a rule, it still exists.
And so whenever we encounter an individual of any race, color, or creed, we always give them the benefit of the doubt.
We always assume that they're as smart or smarter than we are, that they're as moral or more moral than we are.
Sometimes we're disappointed.
Other times we're pleasantly surprised that, you know, but on the other hand, there is nothing invalid about considering people as a group.
For heaven's sakes, every other racial and ethnic group in the world besides white Gentiles does it, is not only allowed to do it, but encouraged to do it, and they claim it as a right.
And see, that's what a lot of people like our guest last week don't seem to understand.
We are merely claiming for ourselves equal rights.
We want white Gentiles to have the same right to collective action and to have the same sense of racial and ethnic solidarity that every other race and ethnic group in the world has.
We're not asking, we're not white supremacists.
We're the grand egalitarians, James.
Well, there's a lot of truth to that.
And I will tell you, again, as I said, during the second hour tonight, you're definitely going to want to stay tuned because along the lines of what Keith was mentioning, you know, so often when we demand these equal rights for ourselves, we're shouted down as supremacists, bigots, and worse.
Well, for the first time since I've been doing this show, this show has now been defended by someone who hasn't been on it.
I mean, obviously, in recent weeks, we've been defended by Pat Buchanan and a man who very nearly became president, so it doesn't get much more high profile than that.
A very establishment conservative Beltway publication, Chronicle Magazine, Chronicles, has come out in defense of not only Pat Buchanan, but yours truly as well.
So we're going to be talking about that, and they draw many of the same conclusions.
The reason I bring it up right now that Keith just drew.
So we're going to talk about that in the second hour.
I'll come back after the first break here in a moment and maybe give you a little bit more of a teaser.
But of course, the first hour, Keith is always the star.
So we're going to find out what's on his mind as the political cesspool continues tonight.
James Edwards in Nashville, Tennessee.
The Council of Conservative Citizens annual board meeting here in Music City, USA.
We're right across the street from the Grand Ole Opry.
I mean, you can't beat that.
I was in downtown Nashville last week.
We get to see a different side of the city.
My wife and daughter came with me this time.
I want to show you right after this break.
I'm going to tell you what I'm doing.
I can't do the show from that room, that's for sure.
They do.
Jump in, the political says.
Pull with James and the game.
Call us tonight at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
All right, everybody.
Welcome back.
Settle in, settle down, and listen up.
Grab a bag of popcorn if you want.
Make a soft drink.
And we've got a great show for you tonight.
An informative show, as they always are.
But it's always exciting when you're able to talk about yourself a little bit, if I do say so myself.
And as I was alluding to just before the break, reinforcements have come in.
The cavalry is riding to the sound of the guns.
Unexpected help.
It was getting a little lonely there with Pat Buchanan and myself, you know, enduring all that artillery shelling we were taking there on the front lines.
But Chronicles magazine has finally come.
The French have finally arrived, if you will, if you're hearkening back to the American Revolution.
But I look forward to telling you about that.
Now two weeks strong in this interview that we had is still making the rounds, still getting denounced and finally being defended by someone other than ourselves.
But first, we've got Keith here.
As I mentioned, I'm in Nashville at the council meeting.
My wife and daughter came this time.
And they weren't here last week when I was in Nashville for a separate meeting.
And so I was able to do the program, call into the radio network from my hotel room, and it was nice and quiet.
Well, you got a 19-month-old.
It's not going to be nice and quiet, let me tell you that.
And so I had to put on my vagabond shoes and go wandering up and down the hall finding somebody that would let me impose upon our friendship and use their room.
But thankfully, Paul Fromm came to the rescue.
And I picked the right room or the right guy to ask because Paul Fromm, who has been a guest on this show countless times over the years, is the director of no less than three conservative organizations up in Canada.
He heads up the Canadian Association for Free Expression, the Canadian Association for Immigration Reform, and there's one other.
And when I got here, Paul was going out to eat and he lent me the room to do the show.
But he's got all of this literature from his various organizations on the bed.
He's got a USA Today on the bed.
He's got the television turned on Fox News.
I'm able to watch the little ticker at the bottom.
If I run short on material tonight, Paul has got me covered.
He's even got a, it looks like he went to the cracker barrel today and brought a Statler Brothers C D.
So I could even put that on if push came to shove.
But anyway, I'm all set here.
Keith, what do you got on the agenda down there in Ventos?
Well, it seems like interviews are the order of the day.
We've had two hot interviews the last two weeks, and of course, a lot of the usual suspects, you know, come out bang for our, you know, coming after us like a pack of mad dogs.
So I guess that is, in one way, a measure of our significance.
You know, when you tune into this political cesspool, you're not going to get some ordinary casper milk toast interview that basically isn't worth the time it takes to listen to.
If you listen to a political cesspool interview, we don't shun controversy and we go right to the heart of the matter, and that apparently makes us a major irritant to people on the left.
Well, and at the same time, we don't actively go out and solicit controversy either.
We don't go looking for it, but there should be a venue on mainstream talk radio today where you can talk about the issues in the same way that they were talked about in the 50s and in the 60s when America still had a moral conscience and a rudder.
And you can echo the sentiments of your father and your grandparents and not be shouted down.
And, you know, that venue is this program, Keith.
Well, you know, that's what paleoconservatism is.
And if any of our critics are listening tonight, what is paleoconservatism?
You know, everybody has this vague idea of what conservatism is.
Conservatism is Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity.
We're certainly not that.
Pat Buchanan is a paleoconservative.
Sam Francis was a paleoconservative.
We're paleoconservatives.
What does that mean?
Paleoconservatism means that everything that was on the table in 1950 is still on the table as far as we're concerned.
There are no topics that we have moved beyond.
There is nothing that is taboo.
There is nothing that is radioactive that was an issue back then that we would not want to touch now because we have a little watch phrase here at the political cesspool, and it is that liberalism is the modern face of evil.
Every liberal project and enterprise over the past at least 60, 65 years has been detrimental to America.
It has led to the decline and will lead, if unchecked, to the ultimate fall of the United States of America and not only the United States of America, but the Western world, the European white world, which basically has led the rest of the world out of the dark ages.
Somebody pointed out in regard to our article on Columbus Day that white people aren't the only people that have first world nations.
They're Asians.
There are some people that claim that Jews aren't, you know, are a separate race, and they have a first world nation definitely in Israel.
But I would say in rejoinder to that, all of these other groups have first world nations because they have borrowed technology invented by whites and white nations.
They have taken, they've basically borrowed everything from us.
And unlike white nations, when they create a first world nation, they keep it entirely to themselves.
They don't let immigrants in.
Israel is famous for not letting anyone but another Jew in as an immigrant to Israel.
Same for Japan.
Same for Korea.
Same for Taiwan.
They let Chinese in, you know, same for Singapore.
All of these nations, none of them share the benefits of their knowledge like white nations do, and white nations are reviled as a result of their kindness.
So, you know, we need to be very clear that the decline of white nations and the decline of the first world, the decline of Western civilization, however you want to call it, is a major calamity.
And this seems to be the pet project of the left.
And we're here to stand in the breach like Horatio at the bridge.
We're going to fight them to the last breath, James.
Well, you know, you bring up an interesting point, Keith, and that is you look at Israel, you look at some of these Asiatic states, and it is completely homogenous.
There is no diversity whatsoever.
And I think that that's fine.
And I don't think that that necessarily means, and I don't know the people over there, but I know my heart.
You know, I want the same thing that they have.
And I know that I don't hate anyone else.
And I don't think that it necessarily means that they do either, even though they have a completely racially homogenous nation in those examples that you brought out.
But the thing is, you can still appreciate different cultures.
It has nothing to do with hatred of other people to prefer to be with your own kind.
Certainly, Israel, Japan, China, Taiwan, etc., they are not shouted down as racist states.
Only first world nations like America, despite the fact that we have open borders, despite the fact that we are increasingly becoming a minority, white people in this country, we are the ones shouted down as racist.
And that doesn't really add up to me, Keith.
Well, it's obvious that there's some type of double or maybe even triple standard going on here.
For example, let's look at the state of Israel, which is the, you know, basically the interviewee we had last week was Jewish and called herself a proud Jew at the beginning of the program.
And then about five minutes in, morphed into this individualist that has no collective consciousness at all and was recommending individualism to everybody else.
Her family escaped South Africa, even though they had been very vocal advocates, at least her father had been, for the anti-apartheid movement.
That's the South African equivalent of the civil rights movement.
But when things got hot, when things became bad in South Africa, it was kind of a replay of Edmund Burke's famous comment about the French Revolution.
He said, what all the wise men had predicted has failed to happen.
And what all the damn fools predicted has come to pass.
Keith, hold it right there.
We're going to have to pick it up there after the break, everybody.
You're listening to the Political Festival with James Edwards and Keith Alexander holding down the Fort in Memphis.
Wish him luck, my friends.
Say a prayer.
We'll be back right after the break.
To get on the show and express your opinion in the political cesspool, call us toll-free at 1-866-986-6397.
Welcome back to the show.
I got a lot to talk to Keith about.
You know, I've been on the road, Keith, and I keep hearing about Herman Kane being in a little trouble.
And I want to talk about that before you break off for the night, just to see what's going on there, because I know there's no question that could possibly be asked of you that you don't know not.
You don't only just have an answer, you have the right answer.
So I want to find out what's going on with Herman Kane.
I told you I'm up here in Paul Fromm's hotel room tonight doing the show, and he seems to be the topic of discussion on Fox right now.
We'll get into that.
But first, Keith was referencing back to the interview that he and Bill had last week.
If you'll remember, I was on the road last week.
I did manage to call in for the final two hours of the program.
But it was, of course, the first hour was the hour that Bill and Keith entertained our guest.
And, you know, I like the guest that we had on last week.
We have had her on before, and we had a great interview.
When I asked Bill at the top of the second hour how the interview went, and he said lively.
He used that adjective to describe it.
I knew there had to have been at least some crosswords.
But, you know, here's the thing.
You know, when you have discussions on the radio, you don't have to agree on every point.
But I do want to say this, and I want to get this out there.
We have received a lot of emails about last week's interview, some of them very positive, some of them not so positive, some of them down the middle.
And of course, inevitably, we always receive a mixed bag.
And I can tell you that I think we have found a formula for success for this program.
But when we have a guest on like the one last week, and this is basically across the board too, these emails will come in randomly, but some people will say, listen, you've got to go softer when you're dealing with issues pertaining to Jewish power and influence.
If you don't soften down a little bit, you're going to be labeled anti-Semitic.
You're going to be labeled a neo-Nazi.
You're going to be labeled this.
And then I'll get people listening to the same interview, I'll get equal number of equal amount of correspondence saying, listen, you've got to be harder on these guys.
What are you?
Are you a plant?
Are you a massage agent?
Are you a mole?
People listening to the same interview, and you get vast and varied critiques from one extreme to the other.
But the fact of the matter remains, folks, and this is what I have to say about this.
You know, obviously we are a pro-white show, but there are many people out there who are not white that do agree with us.
Obviously, we're always going to cater to the demographic that we're here to represent.
But there are certainly some Jewish guests that we've had on in the past that we have a great working relationship with.
Dr. Paul Godfrey, Brother Nathaniel Kappner, and others.
And including last week's guest, although last week's interview was, as Bill Rowland said, lively, Keith.
So what was so lively about it?
Well, really nothing was lively about it.
We were very polite.
We tried to find common ground, as one of our commenters on the blog said.
But on the other hand, we weren't shying away from issues or telling our guests when we didn't agree with one of her points.
And the two major points were racial consciousness.
She believes that racial consciousness is a bad thing for white people.
Like everyone else, she's not going to address that racial consciousness is, if it's bad for whites, why isn't it bad for blacks?
Why isn't it bad for Jews?
Why isn't it bad for Hispanics?
Why isn't it bad for Asians?
Yada, yada, yada.
Well, the silence is deafening about those other groups, but it's definitely bad for white people.
And furthermore, she said, you're never going to sell it to white people of today in Europe and America.
Well, she may be right.
Liberalism is fashionable, but we're not doing this radio show to be popular.
We're being like Old Testament prophets.
That's an analogy that she may appreciate.
We have a calling.
We have a calling.
We're here to be truthful, okay?
Yes.
Okay.
No, I mean, we have a calling, and that's what we intend to do.
And What we're going to do and what we're going to continue to do is to call things balls and strikes like the good umpires we are.
And, you know, I think that it's absolutely absurd to ask white people not to have a racial consciousness.
Every other group does.
When we don't have one, that's like disabling your immune system in the culture war.
And one way that they do that is her other big point, which is individualism.
Individualism is a subtle poison pill that encourages white people not to have a racial consciousness, not to have a sense of racial solidarity, not to coalesce together to try to promote their interests with the government, with the legislature, with the executive, whatever, and not to speak in terms of group consciousness publicly.
Well, basically, it's like, you know, I don't care how good of a soldier you are, if you come up against an army of individuals on the other side, you're going to lose.
Well, people that urge us to be individualists are basically trying to assure that we're going to lose the culture war.
And we need to understand this as the snare and the pitfall that it is, James.
Well, Keith, I certainly don't disagree with you, my friend, and I'm glad you're able to clear the air on the air, if you will.
I tell you, I really wish you could be up here, Keith.
You know, I don't want to change the subject too drastically, but while it's on my mind, and my mind does get scattered when I'm not in the studio because I'm not just sitting there confined.
I'm in a hotel room.
There's a lot going on around me and outside the door.
But, you know, I really wish you could have been here tonight.
I wish everyone listening could be here tonight.
It's such a familial bond that you share with the folks at these meetings.
And it's, I guess, heightened and accentuated for us, Keith, because, you know, when a host of the Cessboard walks in the room, you know, obviously we're well known, especially in a meeting like this, a CFCC meeting.
And, you know, I had a guy come up.
He had to be 80 years old if he was a day.
And this guy's been a great guy.
I don't want to call him out by name, but when he listens to the show in the archives, he'll know I'm talking about him.
He's from St. Louis.
And he donates $25 to the show a couple of times a year and has been faithful in doing so for, well, since our inception, really.
And he came up and he sought me out of the crowd today and he shook my hand.
And he said that, you know, he's so happy to be able to do that because we provide him.
He says he's never missed a show.
He hadn't missed a show in years, Keith, listening in over the internet in St. Louis.
And he listens live every night, every Saturday for three hours.
Obviously, he's not listening live tonight because he's on the road.
But, you know, and he gave $25 and he said, that's the least I can do.
It's the most I can do.
I feel as though that's not even enough for you to keep the lights on at the studio, but you give me three hours every week, and I look forward to it every week.
And there's so many people out there that are like that.
You know, a couple of weeks ago when we celebrated our seventh anniversary from 2004, October 26th through October 26th of this year, seven years on the air, we did a little money bomb on our birthday, a little birthday money bomb.
And Keith, we had some people from all over the world contribute to that.
We were able to raise a little bit of money to help keep the bills paid.
And I received an email from a guy in Kentucky who said that he only had $7 in the bank, but he was donating $3 of it to us.
And sure enough, there was a donation that came in online for $3.
And I'll tell you, God bless these people.
It's the most meaningful donation we've ever gotten.
That could have been it.
We have such great salted earth people who support us on this show.
And I don't want to take a round of the parable of the widow's might.
at the Bible, isn't it?
You know, the widow that gave the one penny that she had, the only cent, only money she had, and Jesus said that she gave everything.
Well, that's how we feel about our listener from Kentucky that you were just talking about.
God bless him.
His name's Josh.
I won't give out his full name, but if he's listening tonight, he'll know we're referencing him.
And I'll tell you, you know, that's the kind of audience that we have.
And when you look, and again, Keith, I didn't mean to cut short your commentary and chase a rabbit, but it was on my mind.
And so I took an opportunity to jump on it while you were here to opine as well.
But you look at all of the people who hate this show, all of the resources and just barrels of ink that have been expensed by the left to try to shout us down.
I mean, these are the people that they're shouting down.
Good, Christian, hardworking people, worked all their lives to provide for their families.
In the case of this gentleman today that we've met and so many people here at the council meeting.
Again, soft of the earth people, taxpaying people, hardworking people, truly the kind of people who put this country on their back and carved it from a wilderness.
I mean, these are the descendants of those people.
And these are the people, if they hate us, they hate these people.
And they hate America if they hate these people.
Well, they do, James.
They do hate America.
We provide the one voice for these disenfranchised people, and we're not going quietly into this good night, okay?
We're going to fight the dying of the light, as Dylan Thomas said in his famous poem.
And we're trying to bring people out of the darkness.
Now, this guest we were talking about needs to be, you know, last week that was complaining about how badly she was treated.
She wasn't treated badly.
She thinks she was treated badly with us.
She needs to go with her fellow tribesman, Donny Deutsch or Susan Estridge for an interview.
And she'll be yearning for the halcyon days when she was on the political cesspool because they are going to carve her a new one.
Hang on, Keith.
We've got to take another break.
They're playing our song.
Okay, buddy.
Stay tuned, everybody.
We'll be back.
We got another segment for what's coming right after this.
We'll be back right after these messages.
We got to get out of the space.
If it's the last thing we ever do, we got to get out of the space.
Welcome back to get on the political cesspool.
Call us on James's Dime, toll-free, at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
You're going to want to stay tuned to the second and third hours, although I know you were already planning to do just that.
But I will be in the second hour catching you up on a couple of new attacks still.
Two weeks later, still new attacks spawning over the interview that I had with Pat Buchanan a couple of weeks ago.
We're going to talk to you about that.
And finally, reinforcements have arrived in the form of Chronicles Magazine, an article that they printed, published this week.
And so we'll talk about that in the second hour.
And then I'll catch you up on some other news items that we've been tracking on our website this week, thepolitical cesspool.org.
In the third hour, I may even bring a couple of surprise guests on from the Council of Conservative Citizens meeting that I'm currently at here in Nashville, Tennessee.
But back over to my Confederate in Memphis at the studio at the flagship, 1380.
Keith, you wanted to wrap up something before we move on to a discussion of Herman Kane, which will be an ignorant discussion on my part because I don't really know what's going on other than the headlines.
Maybe you can fill me in along with the rest of the listeners tonight.
But first, Keith, what's on your mind?
Well, let's get back to the interviewee of last week.
You know, you had the Pat Buchanan interview.
I had this other interview, and we're not naming this person because this person wouldn't name me in their blog, but they had plenty of negative comments to make.
This person was supposedly an advocate for the poor people that are suffering, the white people in South Africa, but she tries to gloss over the fact that her father, who was a rabbi, was a vocal advocate for the anti-apartheid movement, worked hard to make it a reality, helped beat down the white resistance.
Then when it actually came to pass in South Africa and he saw what a deadly mess he had helped create, he and his family took the first jet out of Pretoria to Tel Aviv and immigrated because as Jews, they're always welcome to emigrate to Israel.
On the other hand, what about all those white Gentiles?
They're not allowed to emigrate to Israel.
They're not allowed to emigrate anywhere.
What happened back in the anti-apartheid, when the anti-apartheid movement started gaining all sorts of international adherence, one of the first things that happened was South Africa lost its Commonwealth status.
Commonwealth status is very key to understanding what happened because if South Africa had remained in the Commonwealth, the whites, when they saw what black rule was going to be like and how deadly it was, and if you want to have an idea of how deadly it was with farmers being chopped up with machetes and whatnot by roving black gangs, just check it out on the internet.
It's gruesome.
Well, these people had nowhere to go.
They had no resource or refuge because of the revocation of Commonwealth status.
They were unable to go to England.
Every person from British Guiana, the former British Guiana, the former British Honduras, can go to England, emigrate anytime they want to.
But, you know, they can't do that from South Africa.
So these people were left holding the bag while the merck by the family of this person whose interview we took was able to get away.
But of course, there's no apologies for this.
But quite frankly, her father had blood on his hand, in my opinion, because of this.
And there's no acknowledgement of this by this particular person.
They've written, she's written this book, and she apparently thinks it's invalid to draw any negative conclusions about black people from the transition from white rule to black rule in South Africa.
Well, quite frankly, I don't see how you can read that book and not come away from it with that being your primary reaction and conclusion from the book.
You know, it's generally things go better when white people are in charge.
That's the lesson of Zimbabwe, the former Odesia, and South Africa.
They are extreme cases.
That's what happens when this multiculturalism that is being urged upon every white nation in the world comes to fruition.
But, you know, and the fact that she somehow wants to deny that shows me that the truth is not in her, James.
And let me just say this last week.
He's stored enough black in the last two weeks, so he helps us stir the pot a little more here in the political festival.
But you know what?
I defend Keith and his certainly entitled to his opinion.
And for all of those who perhaps are curious as to what exactly he's talking about, I would direct you back to the Political Festival Broadcast Archives of last week.
And you know, again, as I said a couple of segments ago, Keith, it was a little peculiar that it went down the way it did.
And I wouldn't say it was, you know, vicious in any way, but certainly not as agreeable as the interview that Bill Rowland and I had with this guest back earlier in the summer.
Well, the thing that a lot of our guests need to understand, and this one in particular, is that we're not an infomercial.
We're not a free advertising agency.
reason we interview people is because they're of an interest to our audience.
And we have always carved our, you know, we've cut our teeth on being the one mainstream radio station in the nation that is willing to tackle two taboo topics.
The first is race.
The second is Jewish power and influence.
And you better be prepared to talk about those two topics if you get on this program.
Now, you had Pat Buchanan on.
Let me read you something from page 247 of Pat Buchanan's book, Suicide of a Superpower.
He says, do Israelis seek to build a multi-ethnic society or do they wish to preserve a land where Jews alone are welcome to come and settle?
Do they welcome the return of the Palestinians who once inhabited the land?
Has the religious and ethnic diversity of Lebanon, Christian, Muslim, Sunni and Shia, Arab and Druze, been a blessing?
Or does that diversity pretend the breakup of Lebanon?
See, we're not saying anything different from what Pat Buchanan says or what other paleoconservatives say.
And apparently this guest that took such umbrage at her supposedly bad treatment doesn't know a thing about paleoconservatism, but is willing to take the free advertising that she thinks she's going to get by being on our show.
If she wanted to buy an info commercial, I'm sure that Liberty Radio would have been glad to grant her one for the proper price.
But don't come on and expect us to just sit back and not address the type of topics that are the trademark of our show.
Well, you know, we certainly have frank and candid conversations about, you say taboo subjects.
They certainly weren't taboo a couple of short decades ago.
In fact, the national gods of political correctness have deemed them to be.
But, you know, we have discussions, adult, grown-up discussions without name-calling about these issues on our show in very much the same manner that Pat Buchanan would speak of them.
Very polished, very genteel.
And if anyone's wondering why Keith is referencing last week's interview so much on tonight's show, let's just face it.
Our guest called Keith the White Al Sharpton, which I would take as a compliment in some regards.
I wish we had Al Sharpton's money.
Let me just say that.
I wish I had an MSNBC news anchor gig like he does.
Yeah, that's right.
Al Sharpton, it's certainly much more sensational and much more, you know, he goes out in attempts to insert vitriol into the commentary.
We just try to have an adult conversation with him.
Well, what you see.
He gets a nationally syndicated television show that pays him.
We have a nationally syndicated radio show that we're very thankful, but we're still volunteers.
And I guess that's the difference between the White Al Sharpton, which is Keith, and the Black Al Sharpton, which is Al Sharpton.
Yeah, and what you said earlier is just absolutely, you know, absolutely true.
And we need to say it time and again.
The topics we talk about were the same topics discussed in depth by the National Review in the 1950s and early 60s before the takeover by Jewish neocons that has been complete and totally transformed the National Review into a neocon organ since then.
We are talking about the same topics that William Buckley spoke about in great detail back in the 50s and 60s.
So consequently, we're not apologizing for continuing to talk about those topics.
We think they were invalidly taken off of the table by liberals that want to censor speech and censor thought, just like George Orwell predicted in 1984, his great book.
So consequently, we're not going to back down.
We're going to continue to bring these topics up because, like we say, liberalism is the modern face of evil, and you can't give a pass to any part of the liberal agenda since 1950.
And if you do, you'll never prevail against liberalism.
As I say, oftentimes there would never have been a Roe versus Wade if there hadn't been a Brown versus Board of Education decision.
There would never have been a successful gay rights or radical feminist movement if there had not been a successful civil rights movement.
Well, Keith, right you are on that, to be sure.
Precedent setting, the precedents that were set in Brown versus Board and the so-called civil rights movement certainly laid the foundation for much more radical egalitarian movements to come.
And it doesn't look like we're going to have time to get into Herman Kane with you, but I'm glad you were able to have a we were able to have a therapy session together.
Both had lunch with Keith midweek, and he didn't appreciate the critique of our guest last week.
So he's here, and now he's got it off his chest.
And it needed to be said, and I'm glad he said it.
So, Keith, thank you for your contributions to the program tonight, my friend.
We will talk to you again.
I'll talk to you again in a couple of days, and everyone else.
Say hello to all of my good friends out there with the Council of Conservative Citizens.
They are the real deal people, and you need to support them just like you support us.
Well, we'll be talking more about them, and I certainly will, Keith.
Stay tuned, everyone else, for the second and third hour.
I'm coming back at you this minute.
Some thought he had religion, others thought he had a demon, and Harrow thought he had a weed eater loose and disproved the blues.
He fell to his knees to plead and beg, and the squirrel ran out of his britches' leg unobserved to the other side of the room.