July 23, 2011 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
41:09
20110723_Hour_2
|
Time
Text
Welcome to the Political Cesspool, known worldwide as the South's foremost populous radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host, James Edwards.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the second of three hours of tonight's live broadcast of the award-winning Political Cesspool Radio Program.
I'm your host, James Edwards.
It's Saturday evening, July 23rd, and we're coming to you live tonight from our downtown studios at AM 1380 WLRM Radio in Memphis, Tennessee.
We're also going out to our affiliate stations, courtesy of the Liberty News Radio Network, from St. Helens, Oregon, all the way down to Lakeland, Florida, and many ports to call in between.
We thank you for tuning in if you're listening on one of our AMFM affiliates.
And of course, we're catering to a worldwide audience tonight on the internet at thepoliticalcesspool.org and libertynewsradio.com.
I want to thank again my co-host, Keith Alexander, for his services during the first hour.
And now we're moving on to our two featured guests for the evening, and they join me right now.
First on the line is Nathaniel Strickland.
He is the owner and chief editor of FaithinHeritage.com.
He was born in Dallas, Texas, grew up in upstate South Carolina, and now resides back down in Southeast Texas.
He received both his B.S. in political science and a minor in economics and his MBA from Clemson University and now works in project management, SEO, and web design.
He has ancestors who fought with the Patriots in the American Revolution, with the Texans at the Alamo, and with the Confederacy in the war for southern independence.
You can reach him by email at editor at faithandheritage.com.
And we're also joined by his co-editor, Neil Desperandum.
And with a name like that, we had to have him on the show this evening.
Gentlemen, how are you?
Doing well, thank you.
Welcome, doing well.
Thank you very much.
Great to have both of you on this evening.
And let me tell you something, folks.
We've, of course, featured Nathaniel Strickland on the program a couple of times in the past.
But I say this in all sincerity.
If you are white and if you are a Christian and if you are an ethno-nationalist, as I am on all three accounts, you have got to bookmark in your favorite places faithandheritage.com.
It is a brand new website.
Well, I say brand new.
It's been around a little while, but relatively new.
It is sharp.
The presentation, the aesthetics are quite pleasing.
And the only thing better than the way it looks is the content itself.
And as y'all will remember, I guess it was about a month or so ago it was, we really tapped into a powder keg here at the Political Cesspool.
We were covering the grotesque pandering that the Southern Baptists were initiated in at the Southern Baptist Convention in Orlando back in June when they had elected to their vice presidency for the first time in the history of the Southern Baptist Convention a black vice president.
And if you have any knowledge of the Southern Baptist denomination, you'll know that there aren't five black pastors in the whole membership, but one of them now is the vice president.
In addition to that, they denounced racism as a sin, and of course, slavery was wrong and this, that, and the other.
All, you know, intended to cater to the minorities in hopes that they will join the Southern Baptist call.
So really reached out to illegal immigration as well.
Yeah, right.
They did denounce, right, they basically came out in favor for amnesty.
Yes, thank you for that.
That's something else that should be pointed out right now.
So, you know, all of this really reached a fever pitch, and we got into a pretty hard-hitting debate on whether or not, you know, Christianity was still the religion that our people should be adhering to, or should they go back to the ways that Europe was living before Christianity.
But first, Nathaniel, we've got to ask you just a basic question about the website.
Tell folks a little bit more about your work there at Faith and Heritage before we get back into the topic for the evening.
Well, sure.
There are a bunch of great sites on the internet that address Christian issues, and there are also a bunch of great sites on the internet that address race issues.
The goal of Faith and Heritage was to combine the two, was to address issues that were of interest and importance to our people from a distinctly Christian point of view through the format of daily or every other day blogs and articles from a number of different articles.
I provide a lot of material.
Neil provides some, and we have half a dozen to a dozen different other authors who provide stuff as well.
And we talk about topics from current events to politics, economics, books, history.
We even have some stuff on popular culture.
And it's just a great website, my humble opinion.
I'm a little bit biased.
It's just a great smorgasbord of interesting subjects that people can go to, can bookmark, can link to their friends.
And I've been very pleased with perception and how it turned out so far.
Well, folks, if you want to get your political daily bread from a pro-Western and pro-Christian perspective, faithandheritage.com, it couldn't be more easily remembered or easier to remember than that, faithandheritage.com.
And I appreciate you, Nathaniel, for giving a little more background information for those who perhaps are learning about your work for the first time this evening.
So, Neil, over to you.
I guess this is the base question we were tackling during that series that stretched a number of weeks, I think three or four weeks consecutively.
We dedicated quite a bit of time to this question.
And we ended up on our final show of the series having Reverend Ted Pike and Hutton Gibson on the show to answer some questions about it.
But I guess the question is, can you be a racial realist and be a Christian?
Are the two compatible?
A lot of people would say no these days.
Certainly, I think they are, but what's your take?
I think not only is it consistent to be a racial realist and a Christian, but to be a consistent Christian, one must be a racial realist.
A lot of times when the subject's approach, people just assume what they've been taught about race and brainwashed about it and just assume all these automatic responses that racism is sinful and then any type of white pride is obviously wrong.
But what the subject really needs to be addressed with, I think, is commitment to the Ninth Commandment, where they command us to not bear false witness against our neighbor and so doing it puts a real big premium on truth.
A lot of times Christians, I think, are much more about, I guess, prototype the truth than actually just coming up and saying it.
But I roughly said the truth at all and want to speak the truth in season, but really you know, it was without question, in my opinion, that as late as the 1950s, there was no contradiction at all in being a devout and steadfast Christian and also being a devout and steadfast paleoconservative or white ethno-nationalist, whatever you want to call it.
You saw it all across the country, particularly in the South.
And I say this in a very complimentary way.
And obviously, to say the least, over the course of the last 40, 50 years, now Christianity has been synonymous, or at least mainstream Christianity has been synonymous, these megachurches, with capitulation and groveling towards the false gods of political correctness and this, that, and the other.
We're going to get into why that is, and then we're going to do a little pagan versus Christian ta-da-ta and see where our guests stand on a couple of questions that have been posed to me by listeners in the political cesspool broadcast audience.
But first, we're going to take a commercial break.
Got another segment with our guests, Nathaniel Strickland and Neil Desperandum of faithandheritage.com.
You're not going to want to miss it, folks.
tuned.
Don't go away.
There's more political cesspool coming your way right after these messages.
Welcome back.
To get on the political cesspool, call us on James's Dime, toll-free, at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
All right, we've got to cut right to the chase, ladies and gentlemen.
Our time is limited with our featured guests this evening, editors of FaithandHeritage.com web zine, Nathaniel Strickland and Neil Desperandum.
They are both actually at a previous engagement this evening, which is why our time is limited.
And so we want to get right back to the question at hand.
Nathaniel, over to you on this one.
I was asking a question right before we ran into that commercial break.
50 years ago, it was not conflicting to be manly, to be a Christian, to be outspoken on issues of racial significance.
Now, if you rely on the mainstream churches to give you your biblical message, they would say that that is the epitome of evil.
Where do the churches go wrong?
Well, like many institutions of the West, the church has fallen under the sway of cultural Marxism.
And so the views that we're getting out of the church today are not the views of historical Christianity.
It's the views of the Frankfurt School out of the 1930s and the views of a very anti-Christian ideology.
So when we hear the church speak today, unfortunately, we're not hearing the church.
We're hearing the church of Marx instead of historical Christianity.
And so I don't want to spend too much time on this because, as I said, last month we really spent a lot.
But there is one thing I want both of you to chime in on before we go.
But you would say, and I guess you are saying that to maintain racial integrity is a biblical mandate.
And the Bible backs us up on that claim.
Is that accurate?
That's correct.
I mean, we have a whole commandment about it, the Fifth Commandment.
The Fifth Commandment doesn't just refer to our immediate father and mother, but to all our forebears and to our relatives as a whole.
And so, yeah, maintaining our family and tribe and ethnicity and race is not only positive, but it's biblically commanded.
And I know that this is obviously questions y'all explore at great length on your website, which is why I'm being repetitive in mentioning it in the brief time that we have with you tonight.
FaithandHeritage.com, folks, I know that matters of faith and our politics go hand in hand.
And it's sad that, like so many of our institutions, as Nathaniel just mentioned, the church has become coerced and perverted to an extent.
But, you know, don't judge the Christian faith based upon the mainstream churches that you see today, the apostate churches.
If you really want a good handle on what it was all about or what it really is all about, go to faithandheritage.com.
Now, another thing, Neil, this one over to you.
And of course, Nathaniel, I want you to chime in on this as well.
Because Christianity has become so watered down on issues of racial significance, a lot of good people, a lot of people that would certainly be in our camp on the political spectrum of things are beginning to shun the faith of our fathers and go back and embrace forms of neo-paganism, saying that, after all, Christianity was forced on our pagan ancestors at the point of the spear.
This is their argument, not mine.
Is that true?
You know, was King Olaf, the great Viking king, was he converted by coercion?
What about Charlemagne?
Give us your take on that, Neil, and then Nathaniel.
Right.
There might be certain sparse cases of forced conversion, but on the whole, I really think there's just a lack of evidence to say that people were pagans were converted at the end of the spear.
And even when there are cases of forced conversion in earlier church history, what we see actually is not a mandatory individual conversion, but basically telling the pagans that now that they've been conquered, I guess, if there's a war or a battle, now that they've been conquered, then their culture now and the objective cultural manifestations will reflect Christianity, and they will reflect biblical standards and not reflect pagan standards.
And this difference between the objective cultural manifestation of Christianity and the individual conversions, I think, is very big when we talk about the conversion of pagans from Europe.
Nathaniel, I want to ask you to chime in on that as well.
But another follow-up question to that for you.
Have our people, Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian, you know, Western European people, a lot of people now say that Christianity is unhealthy for people of the West in the modern world.
Were we better off living as pagans, or were a lot of the scientific and technological achievements and breakthroughs did that happen under the European banner of Christianity?
I don't think that our peoples were better off under paganism.
I think that if you look at history, Christianity has been the great uniter of Europe, that we've achieved our pinnacle of civilizational greatness under and because of the Christian religion and not in spite of it or that it's been kind of holding us back in the glory days were when Europe was broken up into little warring tribes,
that the unification of the great European nations, our technological advances, our explanation, our exploration and conquering the world, that happened, it all happened under Christianity.
If you look back at the great European heroes of Robert E. Lee or Charles Martel or the Serbs at Kosovo or the Russians that held back the Mongols, these men were Christians and they saw no contradiction between their Christian faith and bettering and defending their race.
So, yeah, and I appreciate you bringing up the example of Charles Martel, certainly the farthest thing from a weak and feminine man, which, again, is what a lot of the paleoconservatives who have become disenchanted with Christianity try to paint Christian men as.
And again, I can see where they get that idea if they've been into a church in recent years.
But at the same time.
It's only in the past 50 years that Christian men of the West have become so pansified that they view invasion as a ministry opportunity instead of a necessity to pick up the sword and defend their people in the homeland.
Yeah, and I appreciate you bringing that up.
Again, folks, this is such an in-depth and complex issue to only give it broad strokes in a cursory interview tonight, a half-an-hour interview with these two outstanding gentlemen, is to do it a disservice.
But we want to revisit this from time to time.
And of course, tonight is one of those times.
And I guess another reason I wanted to bring it up just in passing this evening was to have a reason to bring to your attention this phenomenal website.
Folks, I can't overembellish the need for a website such as faithandheritage.com.
I really want you to go check it out.
I want you to be supportive of their work there.
And I want you to contribute to them in any way that you can.
I believe it's very important that websites like this exist for our people.
And that being said, gentlemen, we have about a minute and a half, two minutes left.
If that, Neil, final parting thought from you?
Perhaps anything we didn't cover that you wanted to express to the audience this evening?
Yes.
Actually, I would probably say, going back to the, can you be a consistent Christian and be a racial realist?
Oftentimes when I think of that, I think if we think of that with respect to gender, it can also become clear.
We don't need a Bible verse to tell us that male and female exist.
And we only need a Bible verse to tell us that male and female matter and that they have social and practical implications.
But even if we want to, we can also see that there are Bible verses that wish to back that up.
And I think it's the same thing with race.
It shouldn't just be obvious before our eyes that race exists and race is relevant and it's a God-created reality, just as gender is.
But also, if we wanted, we can go through scripture and find out that there are people groups that exist or ethnically related nations, tribes.
And if that is the case in scripture, then it also should be the case that we don't deny them or really deny that we're part of the white race as white people.
Folks, again, if you want to explore this question in more detail, you have vast resources at your disposal at faithandheritage.com.
Folks, we're out of time with our guest this evening.
And as I said, they are previously engaged at another function.
So I want to thank Nathaniel Strickland, editor of FaithandHeritage.com and his co-editor, Neil Desperandum, for joining us tonight on the Political Cess Poll radio program.
Check them out at faithandheritage.com when we come back, and we will have them back on in short order.
Again, we're just scratching the surface with these fellows.
When we come back, we're talking about the bombing in Oslo, Norway.
Tuned on the show and express your opinion in the political cesspool.
Call us toll-free at 1-866-986-6397.
You'll have to pardon me, folks.
My wife just stopped by the studio.
She brought me a big old sweet tea from Sonic.
And you know, it's got that little rabbit pellet ice.
And I'm an ice eater.
I got to admit, I love to eat ice while I'm bringing something and had a mouth full of it right when we came out of that last commercial break.
But welcome back to the show.
I got a phone call this morning from my friend and co-host Bill Rowland, and it was early.
He was right on top of it at about 8 o'clock on a Saturday morning.
James, you've got to talk about the bombing in Oslo, Norway.
You've got to talk about it tonight.
I was like, well, you know, I had read the headlines about that, but I was embarrassed to admit to Bill.
And Bill knows that we're working on a couple of very big projects behind the scenes right now here in Memphis, you know, with the political cesspool.
I said, Bill, I really don't know what happened there.
I knew that there was a bombing, but I don't know who did it.
I don't know the story behind it.
But Bill knew the story behind it and much more.
Bill, tell them why it's so important that we talk about the bombing in Oslo tonight.
James, this is a very important story.
When you take into account the way that the Western nations, the United States and Europe, have reacted to Muslim attacks in, for instance, England and Spain, and then the targeting of cartoonists in Denmark and in the Scandinavian countries for simply portraying the Prophet Muhammad in cartoons.
You know, they have killed people over these slights and over these insults to Islam.
That is, cartoonists and people have to go into hiding if they criticize the Prophet Muhammad or dare to mock him with a cartoon.
Of course, the same rules don't apply to Christians.
Jesus can be mocked anywhere in the world, and it's just a big joke.
However, the important thing in this case is that the Muslims, after they commit these attacks, rather than being profiled and rather than being under suspicion as a community for these attacks, and the mosques,
which even many people who have studied Islam say are the basically the incubators for Muslim extremism, instead of actually going and doing putting these people under surveillance and investigating them, instead, new laws are passed and new policies go into place to protect them from profiling, to protect them from investigation, to assume that they're really good at heart and that there's nothing wrong with Islam.
It's a religion of peace and so forth.
And instead of going to the rightful source of Islamic extremism, which are the mosques and the religion itself, instead the people are put in given special protection category, in a special protection category, and are untouchable.
That is, we're not going to judge them by their religion.
We're just going to look for the extremists, which, of course, is a rather bizarre way to view Muslim extremism, is to ignore it as a religion.
Well, the interesting thing that I noticed, one of the first things I noticed about the suspect in the bombings in Oslo and on this resort island was that the press immediately identified him as a blonde-haired, blue-eyed white man.
Yeah, yeah, because they normally do that when minorities or so-called minorities are associated with crime, right, Bill?
Right.
You know, meanwhile, in Oslo, virtually 100% of the rapes in Oslo, which has rape, which has become an epidemic in that almost crime-free city, are universally and completely committed by blacks from Africa and North African or Middle Eastern European Muslims.
These are the people who are committing these attacks against white women in Oslo.
And it's become a much worse problem recently.
This is also, you know, again, we go back to they'll kill a cartoonist for mocking Muhammad.
You know, this is all ignored as a factor in the behavior of Muslims.
But in general, but in any case, he's immediately identified as a native, a blonde-haired, blue-eyed white man, and almost immediately the speculation begins that he's a neo-Nazi, number one, that he is a Christian extremist, number two, and then, of course, he's a nativist and a nationalist.
And all of these are very well-directed smears for someone who has, you know, admittedly committed a heinous act.
I mean, he set off a bomb in front of the Labor Party building, and then he goes to this resort island and kills, I think, 80 people, I guess, with handguns and firearms.
So this is a dreadful occurrence.
However, immediately he is identified, and Christians are guilty by association.
Conservatives are guilty by association.
Nationalists are guilty by association.
And it's the media witch hunt has begun.
And, of course, the Labor Party is very liberal, as in most countries, the Liberal Party is left-wing.
And, of course, the Liberal Party is responsible for allowing these Muslim extremists into the country and allowing these women to be raped in Oslo by the immigrants that they have encouraged to come to their country.
So aren't they guilty by association of crimes themselves because they have put these policies in place?
Aren't they also guilty of endangering the nation?
Of course they are.
But naturally, these people are going to be made into martyrs.
They're going to be, you know, that the Labor Party is the party of compassion and so forth.
So interestingly enough, I was reading some blogs on the Daily Mail in London, the newspaper, their blog.
And one man wrote that this morning when the news came out about the attack, he visited Anders Brajevic's website, the name of the suspect in this case.
And there was nothing on there about him being Christian or conservative.
It mentioned that he was a Freemason.
It mentioned, I think, that he had been a member of the Progressive Party and some other things.
But there was no mention of him being a Christian or a conservative.
Later in the day, something had been added.
Now, this is, I believe after the shootings, something had been added on his Facebook page that said he was a Christian and a conservative out of nowhere.
You know, after he's committed these acts, he's going to go back on his Facebook page and change information?
I don't think so.
But nevertheless, the information changed, and then the Facebook page came down entirely after he was caught.
So, you know, very, very interesting how, you know, the Facebook page, which, of course, anyone finding that name would go to immediately to see if he was on Facebook, goes from being this member of the Progressive Party, a member of the Masonic Order, and becomes a Christian conservative.
So the bloodlust is up among the leftists.
And, you know, I want to find out if, in fact, the government in Norway is going to extend the same protections and the same considerations to Christian conservatives and right-wing groups that they've given the Muslims.
Yeah, I mean, you know, you look after the 9-11 attacks, and everybody was up in arms that Muslims might be facing additional scrutiny as they make their way through airport metal detectors.
And God forbid, you know, that be the case.
And that's always the case when minorities are suspects or proven to be guilty of heinous crimes.
Yet in one of the extremely rare manifestations of a so-called terror attack being perpetrated by a European, a legitimate European, well, then all the rules go out the door.
You know, with the attack on Gabriel Giffords in Arizona earlier this year, you know, one of the first things you heard about Jared Lofner was that he might have visited the website for American Renaissance, as if, you know, going to American Renaissance's website one time somehow, you know, they were implying that that had an effect on him.
Well, I'm sure, you know, Jared Lofner ate at McDonald's at one point in his life too, you know, as McDonald's responsible for the shooting there.
This is the crazed mentality that the left will employ against and only against European American or European criminals and tried to paint all whites with that brush, with that broad brush when the inverse is true, as it almost always is, or when the inverse is in play, that rule never holds true, Bill.
Well, exactly, James.
The point is that white left-wing Europeans, there's a word that I'd only heard recently, are oikiophobic, which means the fear or hatred of one's own people and one's own race.
And this is the psychological abnormality that these people possess, is a hatred of their own kind and a willingness and, in fact, an eagerness to destroy their own kind.
And so, you know, however heinous the crimes are that Anders Breivik committed or allegedly committed, certainly he can't be said to have hated himself or his own people the way these Labor Party members and these governments run by leftists in Europe behave in absolute hatred and contempt for their own people's safety and well-being.
And this is proved by the fact that the Labor Party encouraged the immigration from North Africa of third world savages, essentially, who have no love nor compassion for Western Europeans, white people, or Christians.
They encourage them to come there.
They say nothing or do not condemn as a people the Muslims and black Africans who are raping Norwegian women in Oslo at an astonishing rate.
And yet, you know, now this blonde-haired, blue-eyed man has been arrested.
Of course, they never identify the perpetrators of rape in Norway.
You know, never at all.
That's always one of those little silhouette pictures they cut out.
Yeah, but in this case, there's no doubt about it.
He's blonde-haired and he's blue-eyed, and his picture is everywhere in the world right now.
Bill didn't mean to run into your commentary there, but we've got to take a break.
We're going to come back with Bill Rowland and more thoughts and commentary on the attack in Oslo, Norway, right after this.
Jump in the political cesspool with James and the game.
Call us tonight at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the political cesspool, James Edwards.
All right, everybody.
Welcome back.
As I mentioned about an hour and a half ago, and as you can tell as this program continues to progress, very fast-paced show tonight.
No time to waste.
Bill Rowland on with us now to bring you the important aspects of the attack in Norway and what it means for paleoconservative whites, both in Europe and elsewhere.
Bill did a great job of setting the stage as he opened his remarks in the last segment, but I've got a quick synopsis that's provided by alternativeright.com tonight.
It's written by a gentleman who actually lives in Norway and sees things the way we do.
And he writes this, Needless to say, the terrorist attacks in Norway, a bombing directed at the Norwegian government's headquarters, which killed seven, and a shooting at a Labor Party youth gathering, which took more lives, were horrific and came at a great shock to the nation.
But for me and the rest of the Norwegian non-aligned right, the attacks also spell bad news for another reason.
They were, it seems, not the work of Islamic terrorists, but of tall and blonde Anders Bering Brevik, according to the media, a quote-unquote conservative Christian and quote-unquote a self-declared nationalist with links to anti-Islamic groups.
This is how the media is instantly referring to the attacker.
The commentary from this Norwegian nationalist continues, I take it for granted that Norwegian authorities, media, and activists will use this excuse to come down hard on so-called right-wing extremists.
And I won't be surprised if the establishment in the rest of Europe follows suit.
Bill, obviously, this is the very dangerous circumstance that could manifest itself.
The left is certainly going to use their usual sorcery to transform this man into, well, they've already started by saying he was a loner.
He didn't have any friends.
He was living with his mother.
In other words, to portray people like him as weird, as outcasts, as undesirables, as somebody who doesn't belong, and so forth.
And that's to make people on the right feel the same way, you see.
So you've got to go after the people who are living without many friends, people who seem to be isolated.
These are the people they are also stereotyping as right-wing extremists.
And, of course, they're like that all over Europe.
But people who are living alone are living with their parents.
So now they're going to be suspected of being on the right by the stereotyping that the media makes of people like Anders Breivik.
So he's going to be clearly made into the image of hate and of terror in Europe.
The United States is doing the same thing, James.
The Department, the DHS, Department of Homeland Security, has come out with a video, or the government, we'll just say the government has come out with a video, that is a training video that portrays white Christian Americans as the real domestic terrorists.
These are the people you really got to watch out for.
It's not the millions of aliens streaming into this country from Mexico.
It's not the Islamics that we're letting into this country from Ethiopia and all over the Middle East.
It's good old apple pie America that harbors the real terrorists and threats to this country.
Yeah, you know, Bill, if I could interject, you were so right about that.
And I'm sure you've seen the same document that I'm holding in my hand right now.
I know you're actually calling in tonight.
You didn't have time to come into the studio.
Of course, the segment you're commenting on right now wasn't something that was planned until this morning.
But Eddie Bombardier Eddie Miller is with me right now.
He's going to be co-hosting during the third hour.
And he actually has that in my hand now.
Department of Homeland Security, they've come out with a new $10 million promotional video entitled See Something, Say Something.
It's a program that encourages Americans to report suspicious activity, quote unquote, which, of course, Bill, in every case throughout history, has been a trait of an oppressive and dictatorial regime.
But it characterizes white Americans, particularly white middle-class Ron Paul supporters, you know what I'm talking about, as the most likely to be a terrorist.
Right into it.
Well, Anders Breivik has also been linked and tied and associated with the Tea Parties in America.
You know, he probably visited a Tea Party website or communicated with somebody.
And, you know, so automatically now he is an agent of the American Tea Party in Europe.
And that's going to be the kind of sensationalism the press is going to use against this man.
Now, his political beliefs, he's really the equivalent of Eric Rudolph in this country at this point.
Of course, Eric Rudolph was able to hide in the mountains of North Carolina for years before he was caught.
But he's going to be made the equivalent because Eric Rudolph was also a blonde-haired, you know, striking man in appearance.
And so this is who you've got to vilify.
This is who the government is going to naturally target as the real terrorists in this world, even though dark-skinned, kinky-headed Muslims and Africans are coming to this country and destroying it as a first world nation incrementally.
And brown Mexicans are coming up from South America and Mexico and destroying our economy and sucking our welfare system and public services dry.
None of that is terrorism in the eyes of our government.
We're the terrorists.
The taxpayer is the terrorist because we're not doing enough to ensure that these people prosper.
We're the ones that are a threat to their freedom and their security and their feeling good about themselves.
And they hate us.
So again, it's the sick disease of oikiophobia, the hatred of one's own race, that are guiding all of these policies.
They're all coming from the left.
And even, of course, mainstream conservatives are beginning to take on this disease too and see white America as the real enemy of the idea, the propositional state, the imaginary utopia of America that the left has in mind.
Well, Bill, you know, again, I know you wanted to use our form and pulpit tonight to get ahead of the media to the best that we could on this issue.
Without a doubt, though, they're going to use this isolated and very rare occurrence of someone like this fellow, you know, committing an act of terrorism and use it to come up with even more suppressive laws that target conservative whites.
Well, James, I'm going to call on the European Union as a citizen of the world, because we're all citizens of the world now.
I'm going to call upon them and even demand that because of this attack, that white Christian Europeans should not be singled out and profiled and stereotyped as terrorists.
And we demand extra protection and extra consideration because of our race and our beliefs.
And that we just demand the same sort of preferential treatment that is given Muslims and the same sort of colorblind compassion that are given Africans that are invading Europe and again, destroying the civilization there.
We just demand the same protection and the same compassion.
And how can the compassionate lovers of humanity and the Labor Party in Norway possibly say no to that?
We just want the same compassion that they've given the invaders of their country.
You know, it's funny that when the Germans, people who looked exactly like the Norwegians, invaded Norway and even spoke a language similar to them and had first world manners and behavior, you know, it was an absolute affront, a disaster for Norway.
And they celebrated when the Nazis were driven out.
But, you know, here aliens come in, rape their women in the middle of Norway, and they celebrate diversity.
I mean, yeah, this is the self-hatred of the people in Europe.
And, you know, I think that all that Andres did was go along with their program.
He just killed a bunch of white people.
And that's what the Labor Party is trying to do anyway, is get rid of all the white people in Norway.
And so what can they say to Andres Breynik except he is also pursuing the same agenda?
Yeah, you know, I guarantee you, this program is the only broadcast entity in the world, mainstream broadcast entity, where you're going to hear frank and accurate commentary like that.
But, I mean, you make a point.
And I know it was kind of tongue-in-cheek, but at the same time, there was a lot of truth to it.
But seriously, how can these oikaophobics who hate their own race and hate their, how can they call him a monster or call him anything?
Because they hate themselves.
And he simply carried out an agenda in a violent fashion that they're doing in a passive fashion.
They're simply allowing the people that they've let in to destroy their own people.
And here, Anders steps forward as a killer to do the same thing and kill white people.
What stand are they going to take?
Well, you know, of course.
He didn't kill any Muslims.
I guess the difference is, Bill, in this case, unlike the other cases, which are far more occur far more often, they can use this as a hammer to drive more nails into the freedoms that whites enjoy.
And, of course, that's what they're going to do.
And as far as the double standard, well, it certainly wouldn't be the first time that double standards and hypocrisy have been put into play by the left.
Well, you know, the irony of this is that early on, right after this bombing took place and somewhat before the massacre on this resort island was connected with the bombing, some Islamic group called in and claimed credit for it and actually wanted the credit for blowing up a building when they actually had nothing to do with it.
So that again points to the hatred that these Islamics have for Europeans.
They're even willing to take credit for bombings they had nothing to do with.
So once again, I don't know how the Labor Party can afford a quandary on this issue, the Labor Party in Oslo.
And certainly the tragic loss of any number of white Europeans like that is, in my mind, and always will be a terrible disaster.
But people who have twisted minds and have created a monstrosity in their own country.
We're out of time, my friend.
Thank you so much for coming in and doing a little overtime co-hosting this week and providing great opinion and analysis on a very important story.