March 27, 2010 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
43:35
20100327_Hour_1
|
Time
Text
Welcome to the Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populous conservative radio program.
Here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host for tonight, James Edwards.
Welcome, everybody, to the Political Cesspool Radio Program.
It is Saturday, March 27th, 2010, last Saturday of the month, last broadcast of March.
We'll be back with you, of course, in April.
But before then, we have got one heck of a program lined up for you this evening.
I want to quickly tell you that there has been a change in the schedule for tonight due to a conflict, a scheduling conflict, and also the manifestation of certain political events, most notably the passage of Obamacare.
Tonight, we were originally scheduled to feature Dr. Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer, who are going to be coming on to promote the new conservative web scene, Alternative Right, or alt-right.com.
Richard and Paul, we're going to try to move them to next week so we can make room this evening for Dr. Stanley Monteith, a very noted conservative medical doctor.
He's going to be coming on in the third hour tonight to break down what happened earlier this week in Washington.
So just a quick programming note right out of the gates this evening, Richard Spencer, Paul Gottfried.
Next week, Dr. Stanley Monteith tonight.
And that being said, welcome again to the program.
I'm your host, James Edwards, Saturday, March 27th, as you listen to us from AM 1380 WLRM Radio in Memphis, Tennessee, and on the AM FM affiliate stations of the Liberty News Radio Network, LibertyNewsRadio.com and thepoliticalcesspool.org.
Joining me for the first night, as almost always, is Keith Alexander.
Keith, how are you?
I'm doing great.
I'm refreshed from a week off and ready to jump in with both feet into the cesspool.
I said almost always as you joined me during this first hour because as the listeners know, you were out last week after staying with me for two hours a couple of weeks ago.
So it just wore you out.
You had to regroup.
That stamina isn't built up for a whole program, is it yet, Keith?
Look, it's always great to be back on the cesspool.
There's so much to cover now.
You mentioned Obamacare, and I think you really nailed Obamacare perfectly in the blog entry you made, I guess it was about a week ago, where you said that primarily it's a wealth transfer from the white population of America to the non-white population.
And quite frankly, if you don't know anything else about Obamacare, that's the essence of it.
Am I right?
Yeah, that's it.
And we're going to, you know, there's just so much that's in this bill.
I mean, in fact, you could argue that most of this bill has nothing to do with health care or socialized medicine whatsoever.
I mean, there's so much snuck into this bill.
And we're going to be breaking that down a little bit in the third hour, as I mentioned, with not only Dr. Stanley Monteith, but also Eddie the Bombardier Miller, who, of all the hosts on this staff, does have a medical background.
Not only was he a combat medic in Vietnam, he went on to be a registered nurse.
He is a registered nurse.
So Eddie, the registered nurse of the staff and Dr. Stanley Monteith, we're going to try to make sense of it, and it's very hard to make sense of.
And because of that, I just put a tongue-in-cheek retort on the blog.
Well, it was pretty accurate.
I don't know if it was tongue-in-cheek.
But yeah, I mean, basically what you have is yet another mechanism for the wealth transfer from one group of citizens in this country to another.
And furthermore, there's going to be more emphasis on the younger generation, which is i.e. the non-white population of America, they're going to be getting a greater share of the health care in America.
And of course, the aging population, i.e. the white population, is going to get less.
In other words, they're going to spend a million dollars saving a crack baby on one hand, but then on the other hand, your father or mother is going to be denied a heart bypass surgery.
and just told to, you know, go gently into that good night, I suppose, James.
Well, you know, folks, if we've whetted your appetite with this little commentary here, you're definitely going to want to stay tuned for the third hour as we talk about this in much more detail with Eddie and Dr. Stan.
But I do want to say this before we move on to the other subjects of this, our first hour.
Once again, ladies and gentlemen, you've seen the futility in voting for the lesser of two evils.
Ever since the leftists and the so-called progressives began to deconstruct America, one institution at a time.
And of course, Keith, as you know, that day began back on the day that Brown versus Board of Education was passed in 1954.
Ever since that day, you know, voting for the Lesser of Two Evils, putting your faith in the Republican Party to preserve and protect the Constitution, putting your faith in the Republican Party to repel the liberal onslaught that comes on from the Democrats.
You know, they've never once won anything.
I mean, they might win Congress, they may win the presidency, but never did they curry us to victory on any of the issues that matter to the base of their support.
So, you know, it's just, it's really almost psychopathic, Keith, that after all of these defeats, I mean, the Republicans are absolutely impotent.
Well, they're not impotent because, of course, they're not trying to defeat the Democrats.
You see what I'm getting at?
People.
Well, what they're trying to do, James, is this.
You know, people keep, like to talk, a lot of fan sitters talk about a pendulum, you know, like political movements are a pendulum.
We're going to move to the left, but then not to the right, for example.
Well, let me tell you, it's, you know, it never moves to the right.
The cultural center gravity has been moving relentlessly to the left basically since the Roosevelt administration.
And that's the Franklin Roosevelt administration in America.
We never tend to move to the right.
If you get the Republicans in, you're going to hell in a handbasket just as surely as you are when the Democrats are in.
The difference is that when the Republicans are in, you're going in second gear, and when the Democrats are in, you're going in overdrive.
But that is, in fact, the only difference, Keith, and you put it together quite succinctly there.
That's the only difference.
But at no point will you ever turn back the tide.
Well, the best you can hope for is just total inertia that when the Republicans get in, things just stop.
They never move back to the right.
The Republicans aren't about moving to the right.
You've got the same type of socialist, left-wing globalists running the Republican Party that you do running the Democratic Party.
And Keith, let me say this.
Let me say this.
And I didn't even intend to devote the first segment of tonight's program to this matter, but because we're on a roll, I feel compelled to continue on with this thread.
I saw on television the other night, and I can't say it dropped my jaw because hardly anything does anymore.
But there you have, you know, see, people think that, well, you're right about the Republicans, but, you know, we got some people like Sarah Palin.
Man, if we could just get Sarah Palin in there, then the Republican Party would really, you know, then we'd start moving back to the right.
Well, there was Sarah Palin on TV the night before last, praising John McCain as a standard bearer of the Tea Party movement.
I mean, my God.
I mean, John McCain makes the Republicans look bad.
I mean, he's so left-wing.
Now, he was one of the most left-wing Republicans ever.
If you'll recall, he was a member of the infamous Gang of 14.
That was 14 Republicans that were going to help block real conservative judicial appointments under the Bush administration.
If there's one thing that the Bush administration did right, it was judicial appointments.
Everything else was a major disappointment for conservatives in the George W. Bush administration, just like his father before the George H.W. Bush administration.
But, you know, McCain is about as far left as they get in the Republican Party, and to see him now being worked into the Tea Party mix should tell you that.
The reason for that is because he's being challenged by a nominally conservative candidate in Arizona, J.D. Hayworth.
And here's Sarah Palin, Mrs. Tea Party, Mrs. right-winger, supporting one of the most Marxist Republicans alive of today, John McCain.
I mean, so there's Sarah Palin.
They're both in the pickpocket of the Jewish lobby.
Absolutely.
She's being packaged as an anti-establishment right-wing candidate, but, you know, she's not.
I mean, and she's not at all.
You cannot, you know, correlate conservatism and John McCain.
A conservative would not endorse John McCain as Sarah Palin has done.
She is just playing the game.
You know, she's just leading these anti-establishment conservatives down the primrose path.
And as long as we continue to play in their arena, we're never going to achieve victory.
Now, I do believe that we should have hope that we can reclaim America's destiny.
What I'm saying is it is never going to be done in the Republican Party, and it's never going to be done with people like Sarah Palin.
And her endorsement of John McCain as someone the Tea Party should rally behind is just absolute ironclad evidence of that.
I mean, if she had any amount if she was an authentic conservative by any stretch of the imagination, she would have to identify John McCain for what he is, which is a leftist.
He is, you know, he wants perpetual war in the Middle East to protect the interests of the state of Israel.
Unfortunately, Sarah Palin, being a fundamentalist, is bought into a peculiar heresy in Christianity known as Jewish dispensationalism.
That he who blesses Israel is blessed.
He who curses Israel is cursed.
Of course, that's totally contrary to the traditional Christian teaching on the subject, which is called replacement theology.
In other words, Jews were the chosen people until the coming of Christ, and after the coming of Christ, the people that accepted Christ, i.e. Christians, were the chosen people.
Keith, with that, we got to take a break.
Great start to the show tonight.
Stay tuned, everybody.
Much more to come.
Don't go away.
The political cesspool, guys.
We'll be back right after these messages.
Jump in, the political says, pull with James and the gang.
Call us tonight at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
All right, kids, welcome back to the show.
James Edwards here, along with Keith Alexander.
Great start to the program tonight.
Very free-flowing conversation there during that first segment.
And we are looking forward to bringing you more coverage on the passage of socialized health care here in America during tonight's third hour, again with Dr. Stanley Monteith as our featured guest.
Keith, you know, the last two or three weeks, we have Taking an interest in showcasing some of the great emails that we receive on the program.
We receive, in fact, we are absolutely inundated with a great number of emails and letters from across the country, indeed across the world, each week.
And they come in from such great professionals.
I was reading an email just the other day from a lady in Georgia who owns her own photography studio.
She's a Harvard graduate.
I mean, this is the kind of caliber of people that the Political Festival is honored to have as its base.
And I got a letter in the mail just this week from Australia.
So, again, this program serves not only as the flagship radio voice of the American right, we are indeed a growing voice in conservative circles all around the world.
And this letter reads as follows: Dear James, I write to you from Australia.
This letter serves several purposes, the main one being to thank you and congratulate you on such an exquisite and wonderful show.
I am sending you several pictures of things around Melbourne, Australia, that have caught my attention, and maybe you can comment on them in one of your programs.
I wish you the best.
You always sound professional and well-mannered.
Thank you for doing your part.
Hopefully, we can get the message out to all whites and free the ones that are brainwashed.
Be well.
And, Keith, what this gentleman from Australia sent me was a couple of pictures that he had taken and a pamphlet that focuses on a forthcoming conference that's going to be held there in Melbourne.
And right here, I'm holding in my hand.
I know you can't see it, ladies and gentlemen, listening at home or in your car.
This is radio, not television, but I'm holding in my hand a poster that can be found in Melbourne.
And it says, Human rights for all.
Let the refugees into Australia.
Protest and march.
And it has the date and time of when the scheduled march is supposed to take place.
So, once again, Keith, what we find here is human rights for all.
And in protecting someone's human rights, you must let all non-whites or all third worlders into white nations and only white nations, what the Australians are calling refugees, we would call immigrants.
It is, in other words, inhumane not to allow your nation to become a flophouse for those who don't share your same culture and history.
Well, you know, there is a guy named Garrett Hardin was a semi-famous writer, kind of a quirky writer on the American right back in the 70s and 80s.
And he wrote a great book or a great series of articles using a lifeboat analogy.
He said that the leftists always like to talk about spaceship Earth, and he likes to think of it in terms of a nation as lifeboat America or lifeboat Australia, for example, or lifeboat Europe.
And here's what he said: he said, Suppose you have a lifeboat that can handle 60 people, but the recommended capacity is 50.
And the ship has gone down and you have 50 people in the lifeboat, but there are 100 people floating out there wanting to get on the lifeboat.
What do you do about them?
Well, according to this person or person sponsoring this conference or this get-together in Australia, you let all 150 on board.
That'd be perfect charity and perfect disaster.
Everybody would drown, right?
That's what these immigration proponents propose, and that's what would happen to America, Australia, Europe, every other white nation in the world if we basically let everybody into America or into Australia or into Europe or wherever that wanted to come.
Because we can't sustain all the people in the world that want to come to, let's be candid about it, white nations.
White nations are the gold standard for the world when it comes to a desirable society, culture, and civilization in which to live and prosper.
There are a lot of prosperous non-white nations.
There are nations, for example, in the Persian Gulf area, Dubai and whatnot.
You don't see people rushing from the third world to go there.
You don't see people clamoring to go to sub-Saharan Africa or into Korea, Japan, China.
You know, all of those nations are, you know, either first world nations or getting there rapidly.
They want to come to white nations.
And that's because we are, like I said, the gold standard.
And we can't let everybody in without losing the prosperity that these people find attractive in the first place.
And, you know, of course we want all nations, all races, to be successful.
We want the third world to better itself, but not at our expense.
And I think that's all we're asking for is a chance.
You know, there's no way we can provide for the rest of the universe.
And that's just, it's absurd to think that we can, that we have enough resources, enough land mass to do this.
And so if we can't and we shouldn't, then it should be forced upon the other people to better their lot in life, just as we were forced to better ours.
But Keith, I got another thing here that I want to get your opinion on.
Again, this was sent in the envelope from the listener in Australia who was kind enough to write us.
And apparently, they are having a big conference there in Melbourne, Australia.
And the title of it is Marxism, Ideas to Challenge Capitalism 2010.
And this is going to be taking place actually this Easter weekend, coincidentally enough, the first week of April.
And it features a couple of avowed communists.
And some of the things they're going to be talking about is the crisis of capitalism.
They're going to be sharing some lamentations about the fall of Marxist Russia and what they can do to revive the dream.
You know, they are, they hate capitalism, Keith, but it does cost you $100 to get in and hear these speakers go on about the horrors of the West.
But nevertheless, a little more, they hate capitalism, but they love money.
So those are some things taking place in Australia, which of course, you know, these are some things you can find in any white nation.
Although, I do see a little glimmer of hope here.
He has also, this listener has also taken some photographs of some posters around Australia that you certainly wouldn't see in America.
One of them saying stop Israel's war crimes in Gaza.
The other one saying boycott apartheid, boycott Israel.
But unfortunately, I believe these are left-wingers opposing Israel for the wrong reasons rather than constitutionalists opposing Israel for the right reasons.
But nevertheless, it might be right twice a day.
James, what do we say here in the South?
Even a blind hog will find a good acorn every once in a while.
Apparently, the left has stumbled upon a few issues that they're right on, but they're wrong in the overwhelming majority of them.
You know, what we're seeing here is Marxism has already crossed this threshold.
You know, this person that's yearning for the triumph of Marxism, I hate to tell them, but Marxism is triumphing both in Australia and America at the present day.
Just not classical or traditional Marxism.
Cultural Marxism and Trotskyism are both prevailing, and let's break those down, tell people what they are.
First of all, Trotsky was the Jewish alternative to Stalin among the early Bolsheviks.
And Stalin, of course, failed Trotsky.
Hold that thought on Leon Trotsky.
We're going to let you right after these words.
We'll be right back.
Be back right after these messages on the show and express your opinion in the political cesspool.
Call us toll free at 1-866-986-6397.
All right, everybody, James Edwards and Keith Alexander here with you for the first hour of tonight's live broadcast of the Political Cesspool radio program, Saturday, March 27th.
Just before that last commercial break, we were talking about a letter that we had received from a fan in Australia, and included in that letter were some pictures that he had taken of some different posters around town.
And he also took the time to include a brochure of a forthcoming conference that's going to be held in Melbourne.
It's going to be showcasing all the wonders of Marxism.
And Keith, before that break, was providing you a little more background on both Marxism and Trotskyism.
Keith?
Well, our message was not for the leftists to worry.
Marxism not only can prevail, it is prevailing, unfortunately, for conservatives in both Australia and America.
And it's not classical Marxism, not as Marx understood it, but cultural Marxism and Trotskyism both were born of disappointment that Marxists, true believers, felt at the aftermath of World War I, where they thought that Marx and Engels had predicted this generalized European war in which the proletariat, the working class, would be armed.
And once armed, it'd be a small matter to convince them they had more in common with themselves and with the bourgeoisie officer corps.
They'd turn their guns on the officers and we'd be off to the races for the revolution.
Well, this is what happened in Russia, but not in Germany, France, England, or anywhere else.
And Hungary had a very brief six-month hiatus of Marxism, and people in Hungary were so appalled at it, they threw it out immediately, the Bellacun government.
But cultural Marxism and Trotskyism both focused on race eventually.
Trotsky in particular said that the white bourgeois, the white working class has proven themselves unsuitable to be the spearhead of the revolution.
They just are a bunch of bourgeois wannabes.
He said, on the other hand, non-whites outnumber whites in the world even back then, and all of them have a chip on their shoulder towards the white race because they've either been defeated militarily or dominated economically by them.
and that you can turn this racial animus into what he called revolutionary zeal very easily.
And therefore, we need to put these marginalized non-whites at the spearhead of the revolution and cultural Marxists, which believe that you needed to infiltrate the culture, convert the culture, and then you would convert the people gradually by taking over things like churches, universities, news media, entertainment media, all of that type of stuff.
They both were working in unison to turn what had been a working class versus upper class phenomenon into a non-white versus white phenomenon.
And that's what is happening.
That's what your fan in Australia is complaining about.
That's what illegal immigration is all about.
They've basically despaired of making these changes with the indigenous non-white population in America and Australia.
So, like Bairthold Brech said, after World War II, if you don't like the results of the election, replace the electorate.
They're going to swamp us with non-whites who they will then pump full of revolutionary zeal to take down the white civilization that is responsible for the prosperity of both Australia and America.
Well, Keith, thank you very much for that offering.
Always well spoken, and anything that comes from your mind is.
And before we move on from what's happening in Australia, indeed what's happening around the Western world, I want to share with you an article that we had posted on our blog, thepoliticalaccessible.org.
It talks about the mass immigration that is destroying Australia, that is destroying Europe, that is destroying America, that is destroying Canada, so on and so forth.
And, you know, while my first loyalty is to the state of Tennessee and then to the United States of America and then to Europe and then to the rest of the West, you know, I do take concern with some of the things that are happening to our brothers and sisters in Australia.
And here is what the article reads.
Traditions based on heritage, sporting culture, and common language are threatened by mass immigration, a leading demographer has warned.
Monash University population expert Dr. Bob Beryl has said the large influx of people with few or no English skills has created social problems in Melbourne, Australia.
It's not a pretty picture, he said.
Social divisions are becoming more obvious and geographically concentrated, and certain areas are being overlained by an ethnic identification.
Dr. Beryl made the explosive, those are explosive comments, Keith, don't you forget, explosive comments in an article for Policy, a magazine published by the Center for Independent Studies, a right-wing think tank.
In a plea to the Rudd government to slack the current immigrant intake of 180,000 a year, Dr. Beryl warned that the predicted population of 35 million in Australia by 2050 would be a disaster for urban living and the environment.
Quote, one would have to wander deaf, dumb, and blind through the Australian capital cities not to notice how urban congestion has already reduced the quality of life, he said.
The intake dominated by people from non-English speaking backgrounds was transforming Australia.
We are losing core elements of what we once shared.
Almost all could once aspire to a house and land and to sharing a common language and heritage, said Dr. Beryl.
So there, Keith, we have obviously one ally left in Australia, Dr. Bob Beryl of the Monash University in Melbourne, Australia.
So we're not the only ones thinking like this, but what we need to have happen is our people come together as a unified fighting force in order to address these very legitimate concerns.
In fact, these are absolutely concerns intimately connected to our survival, to our life and death.
Well, you know, Canada and Australia conservatives are at a disadvantage because they have apparently some version of hate speech codes which are used to stifle the decimation of or dissemination of conservative thought and principles.
Luckily, we don't have that yet in America, although they do a pretty good job through the soft tyranny of political correctness.
But, you know, you had Virginia Abernathy on last week, and she was mentioning an article by a Harvard professor named Putnam who said that the more diverse any locale gets, the less civic-mindedness there is, the less fellow-feeling, the more people assume a bunker mentality, not only towards the racial and ethnic strangers in their midst, but even to people that are like themselves.
It's basically, it becomes an every man or woman for himself situation.
And of course, that takes apart the ties that bind us together as a nation.
So that's, you know, you're looking at the dismantling of Australia and America and Canada also by allowing non-traditional immigrants into the nation, particularly in large numbers.
Well, Keith, you're exactly right.
What's our problem is the problem of Europe and the problem of all of these first world nations, and it's problems that we need to address as individuals and as collectivists, because this is one instance where we have a common problem, and we need to have common solutions.
And one of the greatest solutions we could have is one of the simplest.
An absolute moratorium, as Dr. Abernathy suggested last week, on all immigration, both legal and illegal, of course the illegal, but also legal.
And then an absolute, you know, an absolute revamping of Operation Wetback, Operation Wetback 2, if you will, which was, of course, the first one implemented by Eisenhower, if I'm not mistaken.
But it would not be hard.
It would certainly not be.
It would be willing to do it.
But unfortunately, our leaders are traitors.
Well, they are traitors, but you look at it, it wouldn't be costly compared to the costs of all the benefits that these illegal aliens are receiving.
And furthermore, it wouldn't hold a candle to the cost of the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan.
Well, absolutely.
Having a police state on the border of every country but our own has to run up quite a bit of a price tag.
But what I'm saying is, immigration spawns a lot of problems.
It's not just a problem with immigration in itself is a problem, but it is just one of many problems that comes with this influx of third world rabble into the finest countries that civilization has ever produced.
But to solve that problem would take probably a couple of months.
I mean, I think if you got serious on immigration and you got serious in enforcing your laws, you got serious on closing the border and getting rid of people who don't come here legally, don't want to become a part of the fabric of the American experiment, you get serious about solving that problem.
I think it could be done by the new year.
I think it could be done by January 1st, 2011.
Building that fence along the southern border of the United States, even to the extent of the fence that they have in Israel between the Palestinians and the Jewish state, it would be a fraction of what we're going to propose to spend on Obamacare.
It would be a fraction of what we are spending in Iraq and Afghanistan now.
It would be a fraction of the expense it costs to keep them all here.
We've got to take a break.
We're going to come back with more in just a minute.
Welcome back.
To get on the Political Cesspool, call us on James's Dime, toll-free at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the political cesspool, James Edwards.
As the fastest three hours in talk radio continues on, I want to take this moment to remind you that this is your last chance to take part in our quarterly fundraiser that is going on right now.
It's a fundraiser, fundraising opportunity that concludes on March the 31st, just a couple of days from now.
Remember that if you donate $100 or more to this radio program between now and the end of March, just a couple of days away, you will receive an autographed copy of Hutton Gibson's book as Mel Gibson's Dead.
And he wrote the book, The Enemy is Still Here, which talks about the leftist invasion and leftist infiltration of the church, just another one of the institutions that the left has seemingly captured.
Hutton Gibson appeared on our show a couple of months ago and was very impressed with our work as we were impressed with his.
And he offered these books to our listeners if they would help us out.
So Hutton is cutting off that generosity, as it were, on March 31st.
So keep in mind, this is a listener-supported radio program.
It takes the generosity of those in our audience to keep us on the air.
You've kept us on the air for six years.
God willing, we'll be here for 60 more.
But we do need your help, and if you donate between now and March 31st, you get the autographed copy of Hutton Gibson's book.
You can donate online with your credit card at thepolitical cesspool.org, or you can mail in a check.
Our mailing address is also there on our website, but you've got to have it postmarked by the 31st.
So that being said, Keith, I received an interesting phone call yesterday from a good friend of mine, Mark Weber, who is the director for the Institute of Historical Review, a very renowned organization.
And he was commenting on an article that I'd written about Stephen Crowder and his assessment of what is wrong with Detroit.
And I was scratching my head as I listened to the voicemail because I wrote that article back in December.
So it was interesting that Mark would be calling me just yesterday to tell me how much he appreciated it.
And then I come to find out that Western Voices World News, a very great website full of information, had reposted the article just a couple of days ago.
And Keith, you wanted to kind of resuscitate the conversation here pertaining to that article on the program before the clock runs out of this first hour.
What do you make of it, Keith?
What was that article all about?
Well, the article was one of your stellar works, James, one of his blog entries in which he said, Stephen Crowder is a racist.
It was on December the 22nd of last year.
He said, no, not the KKK kind.
The patronizing black people's problems are all white people's fault kind.
He's also someone who would rather make a complete fool of himself than face reality because he's afraid liberals might call him a racist.
In other words, he's a neoconservative.
He wants to take the race question out of the debate between liberals and conservatives.
And of course, you can't do that without gutting conservatism because the conservative position has always had a racial component to it.
In the Civil Rights movement, for example, the conservative position was the anti-integration position.
That's what the National Review and Bill Buckley and all conservatives of any stripe back then recognized clearly.
Well, here's what you said in that little article.
You said, if you want to know why the Republican Party is dying and will soon be extinct, just watch Crowder's latest video, which is all about how the once great city of Detroit became a wasteland.
Crowder says he had to make the video because all Americans need to see what happened to Detroit and, more importantly, to understand why it happened, before it happens to the entire country or, as you just mentioned in the last segment, Australia too.
So far, so good.
Certainly, Detroit should be a warning to all of us but, as you might have guessed, with a PC neocon like Crowder on the job, things quickly went downhill from there.
He makes a complete jackass of himself by blaming everything he can think of, tossing out every conservative platitude we've he's ever heard to explain the nightmare in Detroit.
He says basically that it's all liberalism and leftists and he never mentions the fact that Detroit is almost 89% black and that the ways and folk ways of black people have a lot to do with the decline of Detroit from first world to third world status.
Now, that's what the article is about.
Now, let me say that I take a little exception to that, James, because in my mind, liberalism and race are co-equal partners in the decline of the West.
It's like love and marriage.
You can't have one without the other.
You're right that race is a big factor.
But on the other hand, who put the black race in charge of Detroit?
It was Lyndon Baines Johnson, President Lyndon Bain Johnson and his great society programs and a lot of white liberal race traders in the American government and in positions of cultural authority among our elite that basically arranged things so that we got first white liberals,
then black liberals in charge of the government in Detroit and things started to go downhill.
See, liberalism uses race.
That's what we were bringing up in the last segment, how Trotskyism and cultural Marxism both use non-whites as the proletariat, the true proletariat, the spearhead of this new revolution that's transforming places like America, Detroit, Melbourne, Australia, Europe, everything else.
And quite frankly, they use immigration because they can't seem to get enough indigenous non-whites, that would be blacks in America and Hispanics in America, or blacks and Muslims in Europe, or a variety of veritable dukes mixture of non-whites in Australia.
So they have to open the floodgates to let these immigrants in.
And of course, they again plead to everybody's benevolent instincts that you've just got to do this because it's the humane thing to do.
Now, What occurred to me the other day talking with a good friend of ours, Bill Fox, who I'm sure you recall, James, we were talking about what's happened in America.
And we said, you know, you have a tendency to think of this as, you know, liberals, liberalism is the ideology.
And, you know, a lot of conservatives and a lot of racially aware conservatives seem to shy away from the framing the debate in terms of liberalism versus conservatism.
They want to say it's all race, for example.
But liberalism includes political correctness.
It includes cultural Marxism.
It includes everything.
And that's basically what the average person in America perceives the fault line to be, to be a conservative liberal fault line.
And I think it's basically a correct analysis, James.
I think that what's going on is liberalism started the Civil War.
You know, the South didn't want to be subjected to a tyrannical federal government, but the people that moved the nation towards the Civil War were liberals.
And at that time, there were hardly any Jews in America.
So you couldn't really blame Jewish liberals.
We had another cohort of liberals in America at the time, the abolitionist, transcendentalist, Unitarian New Englanders.
And we had a Civil War, and it basically took the South 12 years, that was from 1865, the end of the Civil War, until 1877, which was the end of Reconstruction, to write the ship.
And basically, we came back to a conservative type of government as a result of that.
Now, since then, in what is often called the second Reconstruction, which would be the American Civil Rights Movement, it's now been, I guess, over 40 years since that change was wrought.
And we haven't been able to write the ship like we did after Reconstruction.
And the question is why?
And I think the reason is ask yourself, who's here now that wasn't here during the period of Reconstruction?
And the answer is the Jewish population.
Well, Keith, you know, I know we're running short on this time, and certainly I can't find exception with anything that you're saying with regards to that post.
And of course, as always, you said it quite well.
And with regards to that post, you're right.
I mean, you know, they are co-equal conspirators in the downfall of America or in the subsequent downfall of America, whether it was planned or just happened to happen.
I mean, you can find and point to where it happened.
And it is true that liberals had a hand in the downfall of Detroit.
Of course, you have to take charlatans like Stephen Crowder to task when he blames the current makeup of Detroit, what it looks like.
It looks like a bombed out.
It looks like Japan during the end of World War II.
It looks like Hiroshima after the bomb dropped.
Well, and obviously, that's not the fault of liberals because you have very liberal cities like San Francisco that still look like that.
It still looks like a legitimate city.
So, yeah, I mean, they do go hand in hand.
But, you know, listen, the final line is, folks, we've got to go to break, but check out that article at Western Voices World News or go back to September 22nd and find them on the Tesco blog.
We'll get back to the second hour right after this.
We'll get back to the second hour right after this.
Some thought he had religion, others thought he had a demon, and Harv thought he had a weed eater loose in his fruit and loose.
He fell to his knees to plead and beg, and the squirrel ran out of his britches' leg unobserved to the other side of the room.