May 30, 2009 - The Political Cesspool - James Edwards
43:35
20090530_Hour_1
|
Time
Text
Welcome to the Political Cesspool, known across the South and worldwide as the South's foremost populous conservative radio program.
And here to guide you through the murky waters of the Political Cesspool is your host for tonight, James Edwards.
And welcome to the Political Cesspool Radio Program, everyone.
I'm your host, James Edwards.
It's Saturday evening, May 30th, 2009, and here we are yet again from AM 1380 WLRM Studios in Memphis, Tennessee, broadcasting to you live throughout the local Mid-South listening area, and of course through our affiliate stations, courtesy of the Liberty News Radio Network.
And we're going out all over the world on the internet and satellite.
We are everywhere, and we're proud to be with you tonight.
It's been a, I tell you, we've been punching the clock a little extra in May.
There may only be four weeks in any given month, but there just so happened to be five Saturdays this month.
So here we are for fifth time.
And Bill Rowland, how does it feel?
It feels like the fifth time.
You know, what else can you say to that question?
It gets better.
It gets better every time.
You know, so the fifth time is a charm.
We're going to go out the month.
We're going to end the month of May with a bang-up show.
And so I think that's appropriate.
Well, Bill, you're not lying about that.
I tell you, I feel a very high energy level coming into tonight.
Very excited about tonight's program.
Not that I'm not excited about any show that we've done over the course of the last five years, some 1,000 odd shows we've done.
But tonight is going to be truly exceptional.
We've got two outstanding scholars on the program tonight, very well-known names within the paleoconservative and race realist movement.
Of course, we have promoted them heavily this week on our website and on our email list, and they have reciprocated in kind, promoting us on websites such as the American Renaissance website.
Jared Taylor will be with us this evening, the editor of American Renaissance magazine, a man who has made quite a few television appearances on behalf of our movement.
And Jared is always a bang-up guest following Jared Taylor in the third and final hour tonight, a little later on in the evening, will be Dr. Tomislav Sunik.
And Tom Sunic is a former Croatian diplomat and an official government figure over there.
He is also a former professor here at an American university, in addition to being an author and a columnist for the Occidental Quarterly.
So Jared Taylor and Tom Sunak, everyone, they are not going to disappoint you.
And they're going to be talking about some very, some very big issues.
So we're not going to give away the store just yet.
You'll find out about that as the program continues.
But just know that Jared Taylor and Tom Sunik are both on deck and happy to be with us tonight.
Two people who aren't here with us tonight, Eddie the Bombardier Miller and Winston Smith have the evening off as Bill and I said in the pilot and co-pilot seats respectively this evening.
You know, Bill, the Bombardier is up in New York City tonight.
Now, you can imagine that that probably mixes about as well as oil and water.
And Eddie is up there and he is in.
In fact, Eddie just called me not five minutes ago, just before the show started.
He is walking around Times Square as we speak right now in the Big Apple wearing his political cesspool t-shirt.
So I'm excited to see how that goes over with all of our fans up there in Manhattan.
The Bombardier Takes Manhattan.
The Bombardier is our billboard in Times Square right now.
You know, there's the big lighted billboard in Times Square.
I think it's in Times Square.
It used to be Coca-Cola or some other soft drink beverage sign.
And, you know, so Eddie's going to be our miniature billboard for Times Square.
And he's going to stand there and advertise the show.
That's what he's doing.
He'll probably have to push a Howard Stern guy off the curb.
You know, he's going to take this guy's curb and take it over and you know, pump our show and get some new listeners from New York City.
That's what he's doing.
You know, this is a guy, the bombardier.
He puts his money where his mouth is.
God love him.
I mean, and that we all do.
I mean, I think that's what separates this show from a lot of the pretenders out there.
We're not content just to sit in the radio studios and talk about the issues.
We back up our rhetoric with actions.
And tomorrow should be particularly interesting when Eddie goes back to Times Square in his David Duke for Senate t-shirts.
So we're going to have reports on all that next week.
He earned his nickname, Ed.
He earned his nickname, Bill.
He did earn his nickname, the Bombardier.
Maybe we should change his name to Eddie the Kamikaze.
Being in New York with a wearing these kind of wearing the t-shirts he's wearing are certainly going to put him in a whole new league as far as an attack plane.
Well, you know, as an airborne, as an airborne missile, Eddie is taking on an entirely more dangerous identity now, I think.
Well, hey, that's what he does.
That's the man he is.
And we're glad to have no one would I rather be in a trench with than Eddie the Bombardier Miller.
So I told Eddie we'd give him a quick plug at the top of the show since he called to remind me exactly what he was doing this evening.
And we appreciate that.
So that being said, I guess we're kind of starting off the show on a lighter note this evening.
But again, very serious matters forthcoming when we're joined by Mr. Taylor and Dr. Sunik, respectively.
But before we get into that, and of course, we're going to go behind enemy lines with our local correspondent Keith Alexander in a few minutes.
And we're going to be talking about Barack Obama's first and hopefully last Supreme Court nominee.
And all that is coming up.
But I want to quickly, since we're on the light side right now, go through a couple of things, Bill, that headlines that caught my eye.
And of course, these are documented on our blog at thepolitical cesspool.org.
But did you hear, Bill, right here in Tennessee, on the other side of the state, Knoxville?
I mean, if this isn't living up to the stereotype, I don't know what is.
There is a black fellow out there, a black gentleman in Knoxville.
And according to the Knox County Juvenile Child Support Court, this guy rolled into court last week with a record of having 21 kids with 11 different women, and he is not even 30 years old yet.
Here's the story: On paper, he has 21 children.
With a minimum wage job, he can't afford to support them all.
Desmond Hatchett, 29 years old, says he wasn't out to set a record, though he certainly holds it in Knox County.
Hackett's children range in age from newborn to 11 years old.
There are at least 11 mothers, but probably several more.
Constitutionally, there's nothing the state of Tennessee can do to limit him from having more.
On Friday, his name appeared on the docket 11 times, representing about 15 of his 21 children.
Desmond Hatchett spent part of Friday afternoon jailed while a child support referee decided how to split up the $400 he brought to court.
If he doesn't pay what he owes, he goes back to jail because he's on an automatic jail order.
The mothers of Hatchett's children, the article concludes, are supposed to get anywhere between $25 and to $309 a month in child support.
But after his paycheck is garnished amongst them all, some women are only getting $1.98.
So a bucking change in silent child support.
So there you go.
So, you know, now you know what's going on in Knoxville.
The $1.98 figure somehow has a sort of, I don't know, literary significance or something.
You know, $1.98 is all you get.
You know, a newborn and $1.98.
There you go.
That's first world living, isn't it?
Hey, that's it, man.
I mean, what can you say?
On our slow decline into the third world.
You know, that's pretty soon.
Pretty soon, you know, probably human rights and human aid organizations in India will be sending us their broccoli and their canned goods and, you know, clothing and used shoes.
You know, it'll all start coming from the third world to us so that this, you know, imbecile can get.
Well, you know, Bill.
The Learning Channel's missing the boat on this.
I mean, they've got John and Kate plus eight.
They've got 18 kids and counting.
You know, the Duggar family in Arkansas.
They need this guy to have his own show.
I mean, could you imagine the train wreck this drama would be?
Could you imagine what great television that would be?
Would you tune in?
Well, I mean, how many names can you get on the screen?
You know, it's John and 8 plus 8 and the Duggars.
What is it going to be?
Deshun in 21?
I mean, how are you going to title this thing?
I wonder what their names are.
Are they going to roll past him?
What is he going to get introduced each week to a new child that he didn't know he had?
I mean, is that the theme of the show?
Yeah, I don't know what the theme would be, but I'm sure we could, I mean, you know, listen, I tune into that one.
Of course, you know, I don't know.
But I got one better than that.
We only got a minute to break.
I know, I've got a name for it, the fugitive.
Oh, that was taken.
Well, yeah, I don't know if Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones have a copyright on that.
But at least you know where the future rapists and carjackers are going to be coming from.
So just watch Knoxville in about 15, 16 years.
One more.
I'm going to save this for after the break because this is opening up a whole other can of worms.
We're on the light side right now.
So we're going to stay on the light side.
And I got another stereotypical story that's going to be hitting us from Phoenix in just a second.
So we're going to go from Knoxville to Arizona after the break.
And then we're going to settle into more serious matters when Keith Alexander joins us in a few minutes.
And then, of course, Jared Taylor and Tom Sunak still forthcoming tonight as well.
This is going to be an outstanding show tonight.
We're so glad you're with us, ladies and gentlemen.
Stay tuned for more as the Political Cesspool radio program rolls on tonight with James Edwards and Bill Rowland.
We'll be back with you in just a moment.
And listen, don't forget, by the way, by the way, you've only got till Sunday night.
Sunday night is it.
Tomorrow night, if you want to take advantage of our special offer to get the Craig Bottaker DVD, a conversation about race, go to our website, thepoliticalcesspool.org, and take advantage of it before time runs out.
We'll be back to tell you more about it in just a minute.
Don't go away.
The political cesspool, guys.
We'll be back right after these messages.
Jump in, the political says, pull with James and the game.
Call us tonight at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
Well, that was our producer, Art Frith, of course, and you really are going to want to jot down that phone number tonight.
1-866-986 News.
We will be taking calls live for Jared Taylor and Tom Sunik before the time runs out tonight.
So keep that number handy.
We'll go to the lines, open up the phones a little bit later.
In the first segment tonight, as I said, we're kind of starting off the show with the little more quirky and trivial headlines that I've found in perusing through the newspapers of the country.
Talked about the black fellow in Knoxville that has fathered 21 kids.
He's having them about, I would say, a kid a year.
Of course, he didn't start reproducing at the age of one, but he's got 21 kids after 29 years of life.
That's pretty efficient.
But to Arizona, we go, Bill.
Here's what I've got out there.
The actual headline in this newspaper article reads, nearly 50, that's a five and a zero, 50 illegal aliens found an apartment.
All right?
Here's the story.
Nearly 50 illegal aliens were found living in a one-bedroom apartment near 67th Avenue and Thomas Street in Phoenix.
Police were led to the apartment when a neighbor reported that a large group of people were being dropped off.
Yeah, I'd say that's a pretty large number of people.
I guess they must have rented a city bus to drive themselves around.
Nevertheless, a neighbor says he had no idea how many people could have been in such a small place.
Quote, I woke up this morning and it sounded like there was a little carnival outside.
You know, it's crazy to know it's in your neighborhood like that, end quote.
In all, 46 people were arrested.
So 46 illegal aliens living in a one-bedroom apartment.
They all get arrested.
They're probably free now or given awards for having their civil rights violated or whatever.
Bill, I mean, the story, I guess, needs no commentary.
The story itself says it all.
Well, you know why they were here.
You know why they crossed the border.
They're looking for their father in Knoxville.
Well, you know, be that as it may, I'm trying to still visualize 46 people in a one-bedroom apartment.
It must have been like human Tetris, you know, to get them all to sleep in that apartment.
I said, I can guarantee you there's, I don't know about human Tetris, but I can guarantee you there's tetanus in that apartment and probably tapeworms and a lot of, and leprosy and a lot of other things.
Well, I don't want to get vulgar on here, and, you know, just think of this as much as you can stomach.
But if it's a one-bedroom apartment, it stands to reason that it'll be a one-bathroom apartment, too.
And so you can just.
And they've never seen it.
I guess the bathtub doubles as a bunk bed, but I mean, if they're all sleeping, standing up, maybe.
But I don't see how they all lay down.
46 in a one-bedroom apartment.
That is absolutely outrageously insane.
That, well, that's, you know, if it wasn't for stuff like that, Bill, there'd be no political cesspool.
What can I say?
That's right.
These are the people that keep us in business, even though they're not listeners.
You know, that's one thing.
You know, if we could just get in four or five apartments like that, we'd have a gigantic audience.
I mean, we would double our audience overnight.
We just find these apartments and set them up.
What we need to do is we need to have a cesspool listener party.
We need to, you know, we need to do something like this and get our listeners to jam into a small confined place and just have like a rave or a mosh pit.
You know, they hear us coming on, they start jumping up.
I don't know.
That's kind of tribal.
We'll figure out something.
We'll leave that to our promotional team.
We'll come up with a parody of this and set something up for Memphis.
We'll figure it out.
So stay tuned for that, folks.
That's just an idea.
Nothing concrete there.
But the bottom line is the story is, and it still stands, 46 illegal aliens.
I mean, that cop had to do some major.
Whoever reported on scene to that call was doing some major paperwork if he had to write up 46 tickets or 46 arrests.
That's some big business in Phoenix.
That guy's going to get some overtime.
Anyway.
I've got some interesting things here real quick.
Okay, go ahead.
Right now, and this is from the Washington Post, 12% of all mortgage loans are delinquent or in foreclosure right now.
12%.
More than one out of every 10 houses is either delinquent or in foreclosure right now.
So, you know what?
That means we'll have to be looking for an apartment.
And gosh, I don't know if I can move in with 46 Mexicans.
I just don't know where my family would stay.
But, you know, that's what we're looking at.
We all need to take a cue from the Mexicans and crowd into an apartment together, you know, once our mortgages go out.
Because, Lord knows these people who are getting the stimulus money, the first-time homebuyers getting their $8,000, are going to be looking for houses.
And, you know, it's going to be a buyer's market.
Meanwhile, those of us who struggle to make a living and pay for our homes are, you know, going to need that one-bedroom apartment with every relative and friend we have.
I tell you, this is a depression-style economy.
It'd be interesting to know, and I don't know, and I'm just asking here, what was the foreclosure rate, so to speak, unemployment rate during the Great Depression compared to what it is now?
Oh, I don't think it was that high.
According to this report, it's the highest since, and this survey has only been conducted since 1972.
And it's the highest they've ever recorded, and that's 37 years.
So I don't know if the foreclosure, what the foreclosure rate was during the Great Depression, but it would be hard to imagine it was much higher than that.
Exactly right.
I don't think the Great Depression was all that bad.
I mean, you know, people have this fantastic, horrific notion of it, and it certainly wasn't good.
And obviously, a lot of people suffered.
But when you come down to sheer percentages, I don't think it was much greater than what we're suffering now in terms of foreclosures and unemployment.
So either way, just another thing to keep your eyes on.
And you know, 12%, that's the national average.
Cities like Las Vegas and Orlando, for instance, are upwards of 50%, Bill, if you can believe that.
If the statistic that I read was true and it was on AOL news, so they're, I mean, they're not going to tell you the truth, but when it comes to actual statistics on something like this, you know, you might as well believe them as much as any other that I guess they're credible.
That sounds outrageous, does it?
50% of the homes in the Las Vegas area are in foreclosure?
Is that even imaginable?
Well, it is when you consider that people were buying homes by, you know, getting loans that they couldn't afford to begin with.
But, and I know people who are experienced in the housing business and experience making loans.
And the problem was, of course, that particularly minorities would come in seeking a home loan, and the loan officers and the mortgage originators would know that they could not afford the note.
And yet there was always that looming cloud of a discrimination lawsuit, a housing discrimination lawsuit floating over their heads.
And so many times, these people were buying houses based on paying 50% of their income just for their mortgage.
Well, you know, many of them were already racked up on high car notes and high credit card interest and credit card payments and all these other things.
Well, of course, you know, they went in to fail.
Essentially, they were doomed to fail from the start because of greed, because they thought that they did not use wise budgeting in selecting a house or selecting a house they could afford.
They want the big house on the hill, and you're going to get it to me because if you don't, you're a bigot.
And that's the thing, Bill.
That's the damned if you do, damned if you don't type of scenario.
If these banks went into it, you know, of course, it's discriminatory to do a credit check on a minority or anything else or hold them to logical standards of measurement when it comes to qualifying them for a loan.
We're about to have to go to break, but the thing is, you give them the loan outright, they're not going to pay it, they can't afford it, so you're going to lose, you're going to go out of business because of that.
If you don't give it to them, they haul you before the Equal Rights Commission and you lose your job because you're a racist for not giving them a loan out of pocket with or without cause.
So, you know, I don't know.
And a lot of these banks, you know, a lot of these banks deserve to go down because they were all for this anyway.
They were all for this, you know, affirmative action lending and giving it to people who didn't deserve it.
You know that you know the whole thing here.
I'm not telling people anything that's not news, but it's all come, it's all come back.
Now they're paying the piper, and we're all suffering because of it.
We've got to go to break.
We're going behind enemy lines with Keith Alexander right after this.
as we'll be back right after these messages.
On the show and express your opinion in the political cesspool, call us toll-free at 1-866-986-6397.
All right, everybody, settling down now and getting into our groove, hitting our stride, so to speak.
Welcome back to the Political Assess Bull Radio Program.
We've had a little bit of fun during the first half hour tonight.
Now we're going to zero in and talk about some really pressing affairs of state.
Keith Alexander joins us now, local attorney, good friend of ours, local political accessible correspondent.
We go behind enemy lines with Keith during the 6.30 to 7 o'clock p.m. Central Time segment each week.
And Keith is on tonight to give us a debriefing on a very big, perhaps, I don't want to use the word historic.
Everything's historic when it's related to a minority.
If you're relying on the media to give you your daily bread, but this could be a very historic nomination because of the sheer fact that this woman might be legislating from the bench for the next 30 to 40 years.
And that's something we absolutely can't afford to have.
Keith, tell us what's going on with Barack Obama's first Supreme Court nominee.
Who is she and what's she about?
Well, Sonia Sotomayor is a Hispanic woman who, like the person who nominated her, Barack Obama, is a poster child for the advantages bestowed upon minorities unfairly through affirmative action.
She was born into poverty, but nonetheless, since she showed some academic promise at some point in her life, she was put on the fast track to govern the rest of us by our elite.
And she went to Princeton, undergraduate, graduated summa cum laude, which I think is probably more a testimony to the great inflation that pertains in these highly rated schools like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, other Ivy League schools than any real accomplishment on her part academically.
Then she went to a top law school and she was, like so many minorities, immediately fast-tracked onto the bench, this time by none other than that traitorous Republican, that pseudo-conservative George Bush, who put her to the district court.
That's George Herbert Walker Bush, the father of the most current Bush president.
Then she got onto the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
She was a favorite of the Jewish senator from New York, Chuck Schumer.
And throughout her career, she's kind of left mouse-droppings of her cultural Marxist training, which are kind of alarming.
Well, Keith, I think it goes without saying, and I'm not saying this to be grandiose or sensational, but the woman obviously hates European Americans, which is, of course, why Barack Obama wants her on the Supreme Court to begin with.
You know, we were talking about last week, and we're going to be talking about in just a few moments when Jared Taylor joins us about the white firefighters up in New Jersey who have been in the news lately because they passed the promotions test only to have the city throw out the test scores because no blacks passed.
Now, this is a case that's before the Supreme Court right now.
And I'll give you and everyone listening one guess as to who ruled against these white men in the lower court.
And of course, it was Sonia Sotomayor.
And when I say that she hates European Americans, of course, now this is something that has come up, honestly, a little bit to my surprise.
I was surprised that it ever scratched the surface within the so-called establishment press.
But a quite now famous quote that she issued in giving a lecture at the University of California Berkeley School of Law, hardly a small venue, she says that white men are inferior as judges because they don't have the experience that Hispanic women have.
And here's what was her exact quote.
I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion as a judge than a white male who hasn't lived that life.
So this is who Barack Obama chooses to make his first Supreme Court nominee.
The Republican Party right on cue has said that they will not try to stop her confirmation.
They will not engage in filibuster because they want to be a party of a big tent as well.
So Keith, what do we make of this?
Well, the reason that particular quotation is getting so much play, first of all, she made it at some conference involving La Rossa, the La Rossa Legal Law Review or something, which is some subsidiary law review that they have at Bolt Hall.
That's the name of the law school at California, Berkeley.
And it reveals her to be a proponent of a particularly pernicious theory called critical legal studies, which is an offshoot of another equally pernicious theory that a lot of people outside of academia are scratching their heads about and never heard of called critical race studies.
Now, all of this goes back to cultural Marxism.
You know, just to quiz you, James, what is the primary technique used in cultural Marxism?
And that's the, you know, where whites are demonized, where the oppressed are everybody except whites.
Yeah.
It is.
Well, yeah, exactly.
Double standards and hypocrisies, and of course, the disconnect.
Could you imagine, and this is just elementary type of question here, but could you imagine should Barack Obama, had he nominated a white judge, and the white judge said, well, I'm obviously more qualified than, say, a Hispanic female to serve as a judge because of my experiences.
Bill, I got to turn over to you very quickly, and then we'll get back to Keith.
Are you surprised, Bill, before we move on, because there are more important issues related to this subject than the one I'm harping on right now?
But are you surprised, Bill, that the media has at least made references to her statement as a so-called racist statement?
Well, let me follow up what you just said.
Let me recommend right now that to give an example of where the media stands on Sotomayor, go to www.cfcc.org, and there is a link to a video clip from MSNBC on the Edge Show, where Tom Tancredo brings up Sotomayor's association with La Raza and actually says that La Raza is the Latino version of the KKK.
Yes.
And there are two commentators on the show who are clearly bent out of shape about what Tancredo says.
And he challenges them to research Sotomayor and say, would you be willing to find out if she's a racist?
And both of these commentators dummy up and flat out say, no, we will not.
No, we're not going to look at her record.
We're not going to look at her statements.
You know, we're going to rubber stamp her and we're going to carry her on our shoulders.
And we are going to make sure her nomination goes through without a blip on the screen about her views, her anti-white views, her bigoted views against white people.
And if this was, consider, I mean, just go back and look at Judge Robert Bork's nomination.
And, you know, few people can even remember why he was refused a seat on the Supreme Court and how his nomination was held up over a technicality that no one, I can't even remember myself.
But here you have this radical Latina La Raza member who has publicly made statements that are anti-white, anti-white male, and yet she's going to breeze through the process and the Republicans aren't even going to put their noses to this thing at all.
All right, we're going to go back to Keith after the break in a couple of minutes here and talk about her record, talk about his predictions on how bad she may be, because as we know, the Republicans aren't going to do anything to stop her.
I would at least feign opposition to at least make it look as though I'm doing something to stop the march towards communism that's going on, at least for the few people that still vote Republican in the country.
But Bill, I mean, I don't guess it surprises you that the Republicans are going to go along with Obama on this one because, you know, to oppose anyone that's not white would be racist, even though at the same time, this woman is making overtly bigoted statements.
But is it surprising to you that Republicans, other than Tom Tancredo, who's not even in Congress anymore, are doing no more than this, or is this pretty much what you expected?
I'm not a bit surprised.
It's exactly what I've expected.
What I call the panty notch squad of the Republican Party, which includes Lindsey Graham, they are determined to go after the least likely voter and to reach and scrounge around for the lowest common denominator they can find, find some sort of issue which will appeal to Latinas, homosexuals, any minority, and they're absolutely going to dynamite their base to do this.
They're absolutely in a death spiral, and whatever they do from now on is only going to help to wreck their party.
So don't expect any positive outcome from the Republicans.
Don't expect any sort of stand on this because they're going to run and hide like the silly little sissies they are.
All right, we've got to go to break.
Going to talk more about the Barack Obama nomination of Sonia Sotomayor, the radical leftist La Raza member to the Supreme Court when the political cesspool rolls on right after these words from our sponsors on the Liberty News Radio Network.
We'll be back right after this.
Don't go away.
The political cesspool, guys.
We'll be back right after these messages.
We gotta get out of this place.
If it's the last thing we ever do, we gotta get out of this place.
Welcome back to get on the political cesspool.
Call us on James's Dime, toll-free, at 1-866-986-6397.
And here's the host of the Political Cesspool, James Edwards.
We are live on the air this Saturday evening, May 30th.
We will be taking calls for Jared Taylor and Dr. Tom Sunik a little later on in the program this evening when they appear as our live guests on the Political Cesspool.
Jared Taylor will be addressing in part this very subject that we're discussing now.
We have a few callers on the line as we stand, and we're going to try to get to a couple of those before Keith Alexander leaves us this evening.
But to recap what we've been talking about for the last few minutes, Sonia Sotomayor, this is the woman who displayed sheer contempt for the white New Jersey firefighters by writing a one-paragraph opinion, dismissing their claims without even addressing their arguments or the facts of the case.
Now, this sort of thing, Keith, you're in the legal profession, is unheard of.
And even a fellow judge criticized her for her contemptuous treatment of the white firefighters.
And then, of course, she was quoted as saying essentially that as a Latino woman, she is better suited and, in fact, I guess a greater asset than a white male for what reasons she didn't really elaborate on.
But, you know, again, to say that any white male would be instantly banished from polite society as a racist and a sexist for making such an such a claim of ethnic and gender superiority is a no-brainer.
So I guess, Keith, my question is two parts, and then we'll go to the phone.
Do you have a feeling that the grassroots populists out there, my God, it takes so much to rile them up because they are working people.
They're disconnected a little bit because they value bread and circus a little bit too much.
But on the other hand, they work, you know, 40, 50, 60 hours a week to make ends meet.
And do you think that they're waking up seeing these sort of overtly bigoted remarks from a Supreme Court nominee?
And after you answer that, how bad is Sonia Sotomayor?
Is she about as bad as you could have expected Obama to nominate?
Well, let me say this.
Yes, she is what you would expect because the revolution is no longer trying to hide its intentions.
It has been thrown into high gear with the Obama election, and he's throwing it further into high gear by nominating to the court a person who is an unabashed cultural Marxist.
You know, whenever they use critical as an adjective before some type of academic program like critical race studies or critical legal studies, that is an offshoot of the primary strategy of cultural Marxism, which is critical theory.
Criticize everything about the existing order.
Unrelenting criticism that sees nothing good in it.
Well, see, that's what she is doing to the legal establishment.
That's why she's saying that I don't have to worry about thinking like a lawyer.
She's the first one we've had that has been appointed or has been nominated for the Supreme Court that's had the gall to say, I don't have to follow a president.
I don't have to be, you know, even to show the appearance of impartiality or fairness.
I think I should decide things based on being a racial partisan.
Well, and that's just it, Keith, that's just it.
I mean, she has made it clear with this pretty substantial ruling out of the New Jersey case that she believes that the white man has no rights that the law is bound to respect.
And when you hate white people, the laws, arguments, and facts of the case are of no importance whatsoever.
And that's how she has apparently been ruling, not just on the bench, but within her rhetoric and public engagements.
Let's go to the phones very quickly.
Robert.
Robert, are you on the line with us?
Hello.
Hello, Robert.
Yes, how are you doing?
Doing well, sir.
How are you this evening?
I'm doing just good.
My son and I are together.
He's in from college, and we're just listening to the program.
But I did have a few comments to make.
It's your dime, your dance floor.
Okay.
You know, we do this so often.
We sit in our little huddle.
And I'm not accusing you of this.
I'm just saying this is what the conservative movement does so often.
We sit in our little huddle and bemoan how bad things are.
Now, would you agree with me that this lady is going to be confirmed?
Yes.
Okay.
Would you also acknowledge that our attorney general called us a nation of what?
Cowards.
Race cowards, right?
Yes.
So I need to repent, don't you?
No.
Well, I don't want to be a race coward anymore.
I'm going to repent of that behavior and not be a race coward anymore.
And instead of bemoaning this, I think this is a great opportunity for us.
All right, how's that?
Is that she is going to be confirmed as a racist.
She's a racist.
So what it does, how can anybody who wants to maintain any credibility in the public domain criticize racism anymore?
You know, they take it to the limit and push it in their face because it's obvious, obvious hypocrisy.
And not that I care that I ever win their soul, but I want to win the souls of the people who are listening.
That's it.
They don't care.
Because it will resonate with them.
Yes, this is racism.
Because most Americans, I would say, are fairly even-thinking people.
They will realize that this is sheer hypocrisy, that they want to have their racism, but that we can't have our racism.
Well, I guess that's what social Marxism is all about, Robert.
Well, I know, I know.
I understand your argument.
And I understand that this, you see, there's nothing we can do to stop them from doing what they do.
They do what they do.
But what we can do is now say, well, listen, I, what's the next time when somebody says, well, listen, I don't want to have blacks moving in my neighborhood.
And somebody calls you a racist.
What do you do at that point?
Well, wait a second.
Okay, if I'm a racist, what about this?
And we use this because something needs to wake European Americans up to the point that we will be bred out of our own nation if we do not stand up.
And the very fact that they're really pushing it in our face now, we can have it, but you can't.
We can be a racist, but you can't, I think is not going to sit well with the average American people.
That's the million-dollar question.
And if it does rile our people up, then how do we apply that fervor into some sort of tangible action that can deliver results?
But you're on the right track here.
I agree with you.
This is the thing.
I mean, the double standards and hypocrisies of cultural Marxism and the right to be proud of one's cultural heritage and this, that, and the other have been there.
There's been tens of thousands of examples you could pull from a hat at any given day over the history of the world.
But nevertheless, because they know she's a racist.
She's a blatant racist.
And they are going to accept her with open arms.
So the next time somebody says something, then we have to call them to the carpet and say, listen, which form of racism then do you accept?
Is it okay to accept this form of racism, but not this form of racism?
Where's the racist handbook that shows us that this is the okay racism to accept and this is not?
And to answer your question, I would say this.
The way we get it to the average American person is the same way the cultural Marxist gets it to them, by just repeating it over and over and over again.
It has to be put in their face so that it wakes them up out of the Novocaine in their brain so they can start to think again and realize, yes, that is wrong.
We can't have, if you want it both ways, that's not right.
You know, for these firefighters to be discriminated against just simply because they are white, even though they did better, how can you say that that's wrong?
That's okay to do when the other thing isn't okay to do to discriminate against putting a black man in a white neighborhood.
I mean, if you want it both ways, you know, let's put it in their face over and over and over again.
And eventually, that's the best way to do it.
This is one of the most, I think, blatant forms of the double standards we always talk about on this program that I've ever seen.
I mean, this will, you know, if they wanted to be consistent and keep the monopoly that they have on thought crimes, they should expel her from.
That's what I'm saying.
This woman is really, because the march continues, and unless they had something to galvanize and say, listen, it's at the point they're so bold, they think they can get away with this.
And it remains to be seen if they can or can't.
But, Bill, Robert is making some very astute and articulate points.
What do you say, Bill?
Well, Robert's right, of course.
And where we have to go from here is to also say that the only way that we can exercise our race consciousness as Soda Maiora exercises hers is through empowerment.
And we should say, obviously, we are in a post-empowerment age for white people, and so we need to reconsider our position.
And we need to realize that the so-called white privilege that makes everyone else suffer actually does belong to us, and we have a right to white privilege.
And explain why.
Say, yes, we want white privilege because it gives us safe neighborhoods.
We want white privilege because it gives us better educations.
We want white privilege because it gives us better jobs and make it an empowerment theme.
But again, you look how they did it in Soma.
They did it by getting in your face.
And they did it in a peaceful manner, not in a violent manner, but in a peaceful manner.
Quasi-peace.
No, they promote violence.
They promote humanity rights.
Quasi-peace.
You're absolutely right with that.
But the fact is, is that they did it by continually repeating it over and over and over again.
We want equality.
And until they really want this colorblind society that we've been told all of our adult lives, colorblind, colorblind, colorblind, until we get there, then we need to be in their face.
The best man or woman should get the job.
Well, hey, listen, listen, Robert, we're running short on time.
You are echoing a thing that Keith has said for as long as I've known him.
We have got to begin to mimic the tactics of the left because they were affected by the people.
That's what they've used.
Listen, we've got to get active like they did.
But listen, Robert, we've got to go to break, and we've got to go to the national news.
I want to thank you and your son for tuning in.
God bless you, and thank you for being listeners.
That's what it's all about.
God bless you.
Family, and thank you for being a family that listens to this program.
We're going to be back with the second hour of the political accessible radio program right after these words from our sponsors.
We are on fire tonight, boys.
We'll be back.
after these messages.
Some thought he had religion, others thought he had a demon.
And Harve thought he had a weed eater loose in his proven balloons.
He fell to his knees to plead and beg, and the squirrel ran out of his britches' leg unobserved to the other side of the room.