Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
In what may be one of the most significant stories in this nation's history, and I genuinely mean that, the director of national intelligence has accused a former president of treason and staging a coup against the incoming president. | ||
Now, many of you have seen this over the past weekend as the story has escalated. | ||
But with the ongoing investigations they've announced against many of these individuals, with Donald Trump calling for the arrest of Obama, a former president, Tulsi Gabbard also pushing prosecutions, the investigations are well underway. | ||
And dare I say it, perhaps just my opinion on the matter. | ||
But criminal investigations, especially of this magnitude, when the DNI and head of the FBI say that these former Intel guys were engaged in criminal conspiracy, with the investigations rolling forward, it does seem like there will be arrests. | ||
Now, that's hard for me to say because I got to tell you, after 2020, everybody said, no, no, no, sooner or later, Donald Trump's going to get in and there's going to be arrests. | ||
I remember Roseanne telling Michael Malis that there were going to be military tribunals. | ||
And we all said, no, there won't. | ||
Because there was no basis for any of these statements except now. | ||
We have public statements from the DOJ. | ||
They are going after these guys. | ||
Comey and Brennan, for instance. | ||
We have the director of national intelligence releasing over 100 documents that she describes as a treasonous conspiracy directed by a former president. | ||
Unprecedented. | ||
And of course, calling it a coup. | ||
Based on what we already know in the actions they're taking, I'm going to say this. | ||
I believe it was Steve Bannon who said that by late summer, we would begin to see some arrests. | ||
And to be patient, it has only been a few months. | ||
It now seems that is completely accurate. | ||
Arrest does not mean conviction. | ||
If they are publicly stating they have the evidence of these crimes while a criminal investigation is underway, it stands to reason we are very close to actual arrests and charges. | ||
What does that mean? | ||
It doesn't mean you're getting a perp walk. | ||
It doesn't mean a patrol car is going to grab them and put them in cuffs. | ||
It could be as simple as they issue an indictment and then he walks into court, call me Obama, whoever it may be. | ||
unidentified
|
Obama, I don't know if I believe that. | |
But some of these intel guys, absolutely. | ||
We got a lot to break down, my friends. | ||
So let's just get into the stories. | ||
Before we do, we get a great sponsor. | ||
It is Americanfinancing.net slash Tim. | ||
What if you could delay your next two mortgage payments? | ||
That's right. | ||
Imagine putting those two payments in your pocket and finally getting a little breathing room. | ||
It's possible when you call American Financing today. | ||
If you're feeling stretched by everyday expenses, groceries, gas bills piling up, you're not alone. | ||
Most Americans are putting this expense on credit cards, and there doesn't seem to be a way out. | ||
American Financing can show you how to use your home's equity to pay off that debt. | ||
You need to call American Financing Today before you get to a point where you can't make those payments. | ||
Their salary-based mortgage consultants are helping homeowners just like you restructure their loans and consolidate debt, all without upfront fees. | ||
And their customers are saving an average of $800 a month. | ||
That's like a $10,000 raise. | ||
It's fast. | ||
It's simple. | ||
Could save your budget this summer. | ||
Call now before it's too late. | ||
866-890-7811. | ||
That's 866-890-7811 or AmericanFinancing.net slash Tim. | ||
And one more thing, my friends. | ||
We are back, baby. | ||
Antifa tried to cancel our live comedy political shows, our debates, the Culture War Live, the DC Comedy Loft. | ||
They tried, they failed, and we won. | ||
The DC Comedy Loft has reinstated our events. | ||
They're all back up. | ||
However, they canceled everybody's tickets. | ||
So if you want to come this Saturday and listen to Matan Even, Tim Poole, Alex Stein, Gab McGinnis Plus, we do have some liberals lined up there coming. | ||
We have a couple that we don't know who exactly is going to be, but we will have those. | ||
And if you want to come on stage and debate us, get your tickets now, DCComedyloft.com. | ||
It's in the event section. | ||
Anti-faith, they tried to shut us down. | ||
They rallied the troops. | ||
They couldn't do it. | ||
And we are back. | ||
August 2nd. | ||
Also available on the website. | ||
We got Michael Malice versus Angry Cops, The Police Debate. | ||
But I do think it's all just so kind of funny to read this financing advertisement when it seems like everything's falling apart, my friends. | ||
All right. | ||
Here's the story. | ||
Tulsi Gabbard details bombshell claims of Obama-era Cabal's treasonous conspiracy against Trump. | ||
I want to stress. | ||
That's a bold statement. | ||
When Cash Patel was doing this interview on Comey, he said this man is responsible for the greatest criminal conspiracy. | ||
And that was shocking. | ||
Because if you're the head of the FBI and you're outright saying, I will say you committed this crime, you better damn well be able to prove it. | ||
Because when it comes to jury selection, they're going to claim the jury pool could be tainted. | ||
I doubt the intention with all of this is to do something like that. | ||
I think the point is they're going to war with a criminal investigation into Brennan and Comey already underway. | ||
And now these statements about a treasonous conspiracy and a coup against the government of the United States by the DNI. | ||
Holy crap, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Now, part of me wants to say, I will not be surprised if we are all let down. | ||
Seriously. | ||
But these are major accusations against Obama. | ||
Fox News reports, DNI Tulsi Gabbert detailed striking findings from declassified documents on Friday claiming to show overwhelming evidence that the Obama-era cabal laid the groundwork for what would be the years-long Trump-Russia collusion probe. | ||
Quote, the implications of this are frankly nothing short of historic, Gabbert said on Sunday Morning Futures. | ||
Over 100 documents that we released on Friday really detail and provide evidence of how this treasonous conspiracy was directed by President Obama just weeks before he was due to leave office after Trump had already gotten elected. | ||
This is not a Democrat or Republican issue. | ||
This is an issue that is so serious it should concern every single American because it has to do with the integrity of our Democratic republic. | ||
Documents shared by Gabbard's office claimed that before the 2016 election, there was no evidence showing Russia tried to directly alter vote counts. | ||
However, members of the intelligence community later suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help Trump win. | ||
Gabbard argues the narrative shift was politically motivated rather than based on new findings. | ||
Quote, creating this piece of manufactured intelligence that claims that Russia had helped Donald Trump get elected contradicted every other assessment that had been made previously in the months leading up to the election that said exactly the opposite, that Russia had neither the intent nor the capability to try to hack the United States election. | ||
So the effect of what President Obama and his senior national security team did was to subvert the will of the American people, undermining our Democratic Republic and enacting what would be essentially a years-long coup against President Trump, who was duly elected by the American people. | ||
Now we have this clip. | ||
I'll just roll tape. | ||
Leading up to the November 2016 election, the intelligence community agreed that there was no intelligence that reflected that Russia was trying to hack the election in favor of either candidate. | ||
The evidence showed, the intelligence showed that, again, Russia did not have either the intent nor the capability to be able to impact the outcome of the United States election. | ||
So it was very striking when we look back again at the documents that I declassified and released that shows there was a shift in early December, the first week of December. | ||
Again, another document was produced by the intelligence community, a president's daily brief, that was consistent with every other assessment that was done previously leading up to the election. | ||
Russia was not, did not, this is after the election now, did not attempt to affect the outcome of the American election. | ||
That was never published. | ||
Hours before it would have gone into President Obama's President's Daily Brief, it was pulled by a senior level intelligence official saying that they had to pull it because they had received new guidance. | ||
The very next day, this meeting was called a National Security Council meeting, bringing together all of the senior leaders of President Obama's cabinet, and the topic that was put forward was a sensitive matter. | ||
The task that came out of that meeting was coming from President Obama directing the intelligence community, then Obama's ODNI director Clapper, to produce a document, to produce an intelligence assessment that detailed not if, but how Moscow affected the outcome of the election that had already occurred, electing Donald Trump to the presidency. | ||
This document that they published in January of 2017 was the foundational groundwork that they continued to reference over and over and over again to enact this years-long coup against President Trump. | ||
That's absolutely insane. | ||
Tulsi Gabbard openly accuses Obama of long-standing effort to overthrow Trump in a coup. | ||
We have the press release. | ||
Just a quick bit of the details, because for those that really care about the proof, what I will say is, none of this is proven. | ||
This is all just statements released by the government. | ||
Most of us know of this story from various reports that have come over the past several years. | ||
And I would say the preponderance of evidence suggests that it is true. | ||
But we don't know for sure. | ||
So I would like to see arrests, criminal charges. | ||
I'd like to see trials and evidence presented that we can actually, well, that'll actually confirm all of these things are in fact correct. | ||
So we know this. | ||
Tulsi just made all these statements, but here it is. | ||
I just display from the screen. | ||
I don't need to read it again. | ||
It'll be the third time we've gone over this. | ||
But my friends, the simple version is: Russia had some light meddling. | ||
That's what the Senate concluded. | ||
But there was no direct effort to alter the outcome of the election. | ||
That's not what they were claiming. | ||
They used this as a means to accuse Trump of being a traitor to his country when Trump had done nothing wrong. | ||
It's quite terrifying, isn't it? | ||
They said that Donald Trump may have been a Soviet, I should say, Jonathan Chade on MSNBC. | ||
So that Donald Trump may have been a Soviet asset. | ||
Soviet. | ||
I'm not. | ||
Soviet. | ||
Well, he didn't say Soviet, to be fair. | ||
He said a Russian agent since the 80s, which would imply the Soviets. | ||
That's how insane these people were. | ||
The penalty, of course, for this, as most of you know. | ||
So when they claimed Trump was secretly a puppet of the Russians to undermine his presidency, they were doing this for Congress. | ||
They were doing it for the midterms. | ||
They were doing it to undermine any agenda item he may have. | ||
When he called Ukraine legitimately wondering why Joe Biden was engaged in an illegal quid pro quo, they accused him of the quid pro quo and then impeached him for it. | ||
A years-long Mueller investigation, which is all fake, wasted taxpayer dollars, meant to undermine and overthrow Donald Trump's presidency. | ||
Now, I say this, my friends. | ||
This is very clearly, at bare minimum, a seditious conspiracy, an attempt by Obama, according to the evidence, that Gabbard is really so far. | ||
It was an attempt to stage a coup and overthrow this country with the use of force through the illegitimate use of law enforcement. | ||
I do love how I covered this in the morning. | ||
Our AI friends simply say, no, it's not seditious because as long as the force you're using to overthrow a government is disguised as law enforcement, it's legal. | ||
That's what Grok actually claims. | ||
Now, maybe it says there's some other crime like obstruction or witness tampering, but no, no, no conspiracy, no sedition. | ||
I don't care. | ||
Well, matters to the will of the people. | ||
And the question is, will the people actually get some criminal charges and indictments? | ||
Based on everything we've seen, it would be very difficult for the Trump administration to not have some arrests, to come out the way Tulsi Gabbard did saying treason. | ||
And then imagine if by the end of the summer, they're just like, yeah, we're not going after these guys. | ||
Talk about setting yourself on fire. | ||
Worse than the Epstein list. | ||
Check this out from Como News, former FBI special agent, extremely happy. | ||
Comey and Brennan under investigation. | ||
So this has all slowly been rolling out. | ||
About a week ago, we got word that Comey and Brennan, high-profile IC guys, were being investigated for corruption. | ||
Check this out. | ||
A new report claimed the DOJ might appoint a special prosecutor for a possible criminal grand jury conspiracy case as the investigation continues into former FBI director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan. | ||
It appears this may be the case. | ||
FBI Director Cash Patel recently called the Russian collusion hoax the biggest political criminal scheme ever perpetrated by portions of the FBI leadership and other elements of the intelligence community. | ||
Former FBI special agent in charge, Jody Weiss, said he couldn't be happier. | ||
The investigation into Comey and Brennan was launched. | ||
Quote, you look back at what was going on in the FBI starting in 2016 with these cases and the way they approached General Michael Flynn, Crossfire Hurricane, the Russian collusion case. | ||
Then moving to the raid on Mar-a-Lago, the law affair that came after President Trump, this is outrageous. | ||
And then you had the arrogance of these two individuals, Comey and Brennan. | ||
It was unbelievable. | ||
So I'm extremely happy that someone is looking into this. | ||
Weiss said Tuesday during a one-on-one interview with the National News Desk's Jan Jeffcoat. | ||
The investigation comes following a recent release of a review by current CIA Director John Ratcliffe, criticizing the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign. | ||
Ratcliffe said the original assessment was conducted through an atypical and corrupt process under the politically charged environments of former Director Brennan and former FBI Director Comey. | ||
Both Brennan and Comey are now under fire for allegedly making false statements to Congress about the investigation and the decision to examine claims in a steel dossier from a former British spy. | ||
The dossier alleged coordination between the Russian government and the Trump campaign. | ||
And then, of course, one of my favorite stories, Cash Patel, quote, you know, the FBI is bigger than any leader it's ever had or ever will have, Patel said about the post. | ||
And James Comey is a private citizen, and he can walk around the beach and talk about seashells and Krayla Crayn's for all I care, for all I care about, and talk about how we're the conspiracy theorists. | ||
But I'll remind the American people of one thing. | ||
When that man was the leader of the FBI, he perpetrated the largest criminal conspiracy, packaged political information from overseas, took it to a federal FISA court, and illegally surveilled a political opponent. | ||
So I won't be lectured on how to run this FBI from that man. | ||
Let's go. | ||
This is what we want to see. | ||
Now, I can already see the comments. | ||
Everyone's saying, Epstein. | ||
He's covering up Epstein. | ||
I'm going to say a couple things. | ||
I want the Epstein files, right? | ||
Not the evidence released, okay? | ||
The files that they're not prosecuting. | ||
I want to know how this story came to be and why they've taken the path that they've taken. | ||
But I will say this. | ||
Right now, we've got two different major criminal conspiracies, two of them. | ||
Democrats would give you neither, right? | ||
They would perpetrate both of them upon you. | ||
The Obama treasonous conspiracy, as Tulsi Gabbard called it. | ||
And of course, the Epstein conspiracy. | ||
They covered that up all the same. | ||
Under the Trump administration, we're not getting answers on Epstein. | ||
We may. | ||
Trump has ordered the release of certain files, grand jury testimony. | ||
And we are getting a look into Crossfire Hurricane and the scam and the criminal conspiracy from Democrats. | ||
So I will not be derailed from one of the Most serious political conspiracies in the history of this country and the efforts we are making right now. | ||
I'm not going to abandon the Epstein story. | ||
I recognize what people are saying with distraction, but guys, I'm also not going to get distracted from this. | ||
It's a coin toss, right? | ||
Both stories are extremely important. | ||
And right now, I want answers as to either of them. | ||
So if they're focused on this and it benefits them, I guess that's too bad. | ||
I'm not going to try and sink the administration when they're currently investigating something that we want to happen. | ||
Now, you may say, this is smoke and mirrors. | ||
They're never going to arrest these guys. | ||
Okay, we'll give it a few months. | ||
If we don't see the results, then we just keep applying the pressure as we always do. | ||
The Epstein story has never gone away. | ||
It's always been there. | ||
It's bigger now than ever. | ||
Good, and we'll make sure that's the case. | ||
And at the same time, I want to see arrests of these criminals. | ||
Molly Hemingway had this post on the 20th. | ||
It's really fascinating. | ||
She tweeted, I missed this from Brennan's book, Good on Senator McConnell for sensing what was up during his private briefing from Brennan. | ||
Here's what Brennan wrote. | ||
McConnell entered the conference room with his usual poker face and sat down at the table. | ||
Okay, what's up, he said. | ||
I walked through the same points I had used in my other sessions, highlighting the fact that Russian activities were ongoing and that the CIA, FBI, NSA were attempting to uncover the full range of Russia's intelligence operations. | ||
When I concluded, McConnell stared at me and said dryly, one might say that the CIA and the Obama administration are making such claims in order to prevent Donald Trump from getting elected president. | ||
I was completely gobsmacked by this comment. | ||
Here was the Republican leader of the Senate dismissing intelligence delivered personally by the director of the CIA about Russian interference in a presidential election that was only two months away by suggesting that the CIA was part of a plot by the Democrats to win the presidential election. | ||
McConnell showed his own strongly partisan political instincts. | ||
I could feel myself getting mad, but I suppressed a very strong urge to tell him in very colorful terms what I thought of his offensive comment. | ||
He got mad because the jig was up. | ||
Brennan thought he could walk in, walk up to these members of Congress, tell them whatever he wanted them to hear, and they would just agree with him. | ||
But the jig is up. | ||
It didn't work. | ||
And you know what? | ||
He got angry about it. | ||
Because of that, we get to see what was actually going through his mind. | ||
So, you know, all right. | ||
All right. | ||
This is what they were engaged in. | ||
And this is where we currently are. | ||
Tulsi Gabbard calls for Obama to be prosecuted over 2016 election claims. | ||
That's right. | ||
There's more. | ||
Not that one. | ||
Where's the other? | ||
Is it this? | ||
Nope. | ||
I got the story pulled up somewhere. | ||
Ex-FBI lawyer spared prison for altering Trump Russia probe email. | ||
This is just one example I wanted to highlight about what they did. | ||
I talked about a little bit this morning. | ||
They fabricated evidence against Carter Page, who was working for Trump's campaign, so that he would be criminally charged. | ||
He's not the only one. | ||
Papadopoulos? | ||
Flynn? | ||
I wonder about Manafort. | ||
Did you know that Politico reported that Ukraine was feeding documents to the Democrats that they leaked to get Manafort criminally charged and booted from Trump's campaign? | ||
And then, of course, my friends, this video, which I bring to you to enjoy, Donald Trump. | ||
Did Trump have Barack Obama arrested? | ||
unidentified
|
Here's the video. | |
No, he didn't. | ||
It's an AI video. | ||
Showing Obama get arrested while Trump laughs. | ||
unidentified
|
No one, especially the president, is above the law. | |
No one, especially the president, is above the law. | ||
No one is above the law. | ||
Nobody is above the law. | ||
No one is above the law. | ||
A hyper-realistic shot of Obama being arrested in the same office he once occupied as commander-in-chief. | ||
Now, maybe. | ||
Maybe it's all a distraction. | ||
Maybe they do nothing. | ||
Maybe it's all one big family tree, son, and you ain't never going to see anybody tried for treason. | ||
The post-millennial says, President Trump calls for prosecution of thief Adam Schiff. | ||
It does seem like we are not going to get a seditious conspiracy charge or a smoking gun. | ||
Maybe smoking gun is not the right term, because there certainly is evidence put out by Tulsi Gabbard, and I think most of us can conclude based on the preponderance of evidence so far, criminal charges are warranted. | ||
But they've gone after Letitia James on mortgage fraud. | ||
Adam Schiff now is facing charges over mortgage fraud. | ||
Brennan and Comey, perjury. | ||
None of these are related to seditious conspiracy. | ||
That is an effort to overthrow this country. | ||
It's fascinating. | ||
I remember the story of the business plot, they called it. | ||
Is that what it was? | ||
Let me see if I can look this one up. | ||
The business plot. | ||
Indeed. | ||
Old Smedley Butler was approached by several prominent businessmen, the White House Putsch, and they said, we want you to help us overthrow this country. | ||
And he said, no, and he reported on it. | ||
The business plot, as it was. | ||
It's a political conspiracy, they say. | ||
Well, what does that mean? | ||
Were there any charges? | ||
Did anybody go to jail? | ||
I was talking to my friend Grak at AI, and it told me that this is not a seditious conspiracy. | ||
And so did ChatGPT. | ||
Because there was no use of force. | ||
Because overthrowing the government through phony law enforcement, manipulation, coercion, and fabrication of evidence doesn't qualify as use of force. | ||
Not to the AI. | ||
Maybe. | ||
It's all about willpower, though. | ||
Does the Trump administration have the willpower to actually shut down this criminal conspiracy? | ||
Now, Tulsi called it treason. | ||
As I disagree, as I often do. | ||
Treason Is when you actually, to be fair, I think levying war against the United States might qualify as treason. | ||
Let's pull up treason and compare it to seditious conspiracy and have this conversation. | ||
Treason. | ||
Whoever owing allegiance to the U.S. levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere is guilty of treason. | ||
Let's pull up seditious conspiracy. | ||
So you can be charged with both seditious conspiracy and treason. | ||
If two or more persons in any state or territory in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States conspire to overthrow, put down, or destroy by force the government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent or hinder, but you get the point. | ||
I'd argue that we are dealing with right now a seditious conspiracy. | ||
Levy war, I think, means to raise arms against the government. | ||
Obama didn't necessarily do that. | ||
I think what we saw was an attempt to take this government down, to put it down. | ||
And the AI, all of them argue it's not a seditious conspiracy because force is required. | ||
But let me clarify here. | ||
And if the courts disagree, the courts are wrong. | ||
The law says, conspire to overthrow. | ||
That's it. | ||
Comma, done, end. | ||
Conspire to overthrow. | ||
It doesn't say how. | ||
It says conspire to overthrow. | ||
unidentified
|
Next, put down. | |
So if two or more persons, any state, let's do this. | ||
The reason you use commas is to isolate each individual clause, right? | ||
So we will read it as though it's an individual clause. | ||
If two or more persons in any state or territory or in any place to the jurisdiction of the United States put down the government of the United States, conspire to overthrow the government of the United States, or to destroy by force the government of the United States. | ||
The reason why I say it reads like that is because the next clause puts by force in every individual clause, meaning of the clauses that are listed, let's see, there's conspire to overthrow, put down, destroy by force, levy war, oppose by force the authority, by force prevent or delay the execution of any law, by force seize, take or possess. | ||
That's 10. | ||
They all have force in front of those statements. | ||
That means conspire to overthrow. | ||
Seditious conspiracy. | ||
If we could not prosecute this as such, what are we doing as a nation? | ||
We literally have evidence now presented by the DNI and a statement from our government that a former president sought to overthrow these United States. | ||
You know, people say Tim Pool talks about civil war. | ||
He does, he does, does he indeed? | ||
But my friends, I don't know what we're living through, what we're dealing with. | ||
But let me just take the time travel test, as I love to take. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's go back to 2015. | |
And you're going to tell people that Donald Trump is going to get elected. | ||
He'll be accused by the intelligence apparatus under the Obama administration of colluding with Russia, for which he will face a years-long investigation and accusations that he was secretly working with the Russians going back to the 80s. | ||
Eventually, these will be thrown out, but he will be impeached after being accused of leveraging a quid pro quo and U.S. resources to Ukraine to get dirt on his political opponent, Joe Biden. | ||
Then, in 2020, when he loses after a massive pandemic erupts and there's widespread riots, the worst we saw in 50 years, about 1,600-plus people will storm the Capitol building, 600 or so violently and 1,000 or so mumbling around, but they will storm into the Capitol to shut down the election. | ||
We will then get four years of criminal investigations as Capitol police hunt down these seditious conspirators, with several being charged and receiving 20 years in prison. | ||
Then, Donald Trump will win the popular vote and uncover evidence that Barack Obama engaged in a criminal conspiracy to fabricate the evidence against Trump to steal the 2016 election and undermine his administration. | ||
Lord, have mercy. | ||
Tell someone that 10 years ago and they'll say, nice movie. | ||
Are we still playing this game? | ||
If you went back to 2016 and said nine years from now, Barack Obama will be accused by the director of national intelligence of engaging in a treasonous conspiracy to overthrow the government, they would say, no, he won't. | ||
Are you nuts? | ||
Yet here we are. | ||
So you tell me where we're at. | ||
I don't know. | ||
You tell me where we at. | ||
Whatever this is. | ||
Whatever is going on. | ||
Maybe there's no civil war because we won. | ||
We got our event back. | ||
They tried canceling us. | ||
It didn't work. | ||
Colbert got canceled. | ||
You guys see this one? | ||
I got to record on this one. | ||
He was losing $40 million a year. | ||
How did they keep this show up and running? | ||
Why were they losing $40 million a year in a show with crappy ratings? | ||
Could it be that the propaganda apparatus was worth it? | ||
I don't know. | ||
It's political. | ||
But I'll tell you this. | ||
When they sink $40 million a year losses into a show that is clearly anti-Trump every single day, and they give up now and say we're canceling the show, sounds to me like the narrative machine is done. | ||
It's cooked and we've won. | ||
My friends, we're going to be joined by Mike Davis of the Article 3 Project to break this down in a more legal sense and get his thoughts on this. | ||
That's coming up at 4 p.m. at rumble.com slash TimPoole and youtube.com slash Timcast. | ||
So smash the like button. | ||
Share the show with everyone, you know. | ||
For those that are watching live, we'll keep going. | ||
For everybody else, thank you so much for hanging out. | ||
We'll see you all in the next segment. | ||
As for everybody else, let's get into it. | ||
The Guardian reports, Tulsi Gabbard calls for Obama to be prosecuted over 2016 election claims, saying this was a treasonous conspiracy. | ||
My friends, to better understand what is going on, we're going to be bringing in Mike Davis of the Article 3 project. | ||
So let's boot that up right now. | ||
unidentified
|
Get it rolling. | |
Let's see. | ||
Loading up. | ||
Takes a couple of seconds. | ||
unidentified
|
Takes a couple of seconds. | |
There we go. | ||
And look at it. | ||
It's giving me some hiccups. | ||
unidentified
|
Uh-oh. | |
Thank you. | ||
Let's try this again. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's try this again. | |
Alright, here we go. | ||
Booting it up. | ||
Hopefully it works this time. | ||
There we go. | ||
We got Mike. | ||
Mike, can you hear me? | ||
I can hear you. | ||
Thanks for having me back on. | ||
Absolutely, sir. | ||
So Tulsi Gabbard, it's being reported, is pushing for prosecutions. | ||
Donald Trump is posting these AI videos. | ||
We've got this reporting of an investigation into Brennan and Comey. | ||
Can you break down for us how deep is this? | ||
What's the general idea? | ||
And do you think we'll actually get prosecutions? | ||
Yes, we will get prosecutions. | ||
I feel very confident of that. | ||
And I've been saying that for the last three years since the Mar-a-Lago raid, 4,500 media hits, over 4,500 media hits, including on your show. | ||
And it's very clear when President Obama and Vice President Biden and then President Biden and Hillary Clinton and her campaign and her lawyers and James Comey and Clapper and Brennan and Susan Rice and Lisa Monaco and so many others, | ||
when you politicize and weaponize law enforcement and intel agencies to go after your political enemies for non-crimes, that is a criminal conspiracy against rights under 18 USC Section 241. | ||
And this is an ongoing criminal conspiracy. | ||
And the statute of limitations has not even started to begin because it's an ongoing criminal conspiracy with a conspiracy in order. | ||
Generally, under federal law, federal felonies have a five-year statute of limitation. | ||
So if you committed a federal felony more than five years ago, they generally can't charge you for that because of the statute of limitations. | ||
With conspiracy, the conspiracy statute of limitations does not start ticking until the conspiracy ends. | ||
And that means you have to disavow the conspiracy. | ||
And more than that, not only do you have to disavow the conspiracy, you can't affirmatively keep concealing the conspiracy with perjury. | ||
And there's evidence that in 2022, they continued to perjure themselves in Congress to conceal this conspiracy. | ||
So I would say to President Trump and President Biden and all these other Democrat lawfare co-conspirators, lawyer up because nobody's above the law. | ||
But a lot of people think it's just a distraction that it's looking too good to be true. | ||
There was crimes committed against. | ||
It's not about Trump, in my opinion. | ||
I mean, obviously he's the center focus of these smears, but the American people who voted for him now twice, this was a crime, a conspiracy against the will of the American people. | ||
So a lot of people are deeply offended, angered by what they've learned, but they do feel like it's always too good to be true. | ||
Yeah, I get that, but this is not the Trump 45 administration. | ||
President Trump had four years. | ||
He had never run for office. | ||
He had never served in office before he won an upset victory in 2016. | ||
He had four years at office. | ||
He had four years in the wilderness where he faced four years of lawfare, unprecedented Republicaning lawfare. | ||
He's had four years to reflect. | ||
He is ready to govern and govern decisively on day one. | ||
Susie Wiles, his chief of staff, who's fantastic, has ice running through her veins. | ||
She's bold. | ||
She's fearless. | ||
She is running a very tight ship. | ||
I know that a lot of people want to criticize the Trump 47 Justice Department on Epstein. | ||
I understand some of the criticism, but I'll tell you this. | ||
I work very closely with Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche and Amel Bovey and Chad Meisel and Harbeet Dillon and Cash Patel and Dan Bongino every day. | ||
These are bold and fearless people. | ||
I promise that there is going to be accountability because I'm going to make damn sure it happens. | ||
I have spent the last three years on this mission and I will spend the next four years on this mission until it's done. | ||
So you said conspiracy against rights. | ||
Are those the charges you believe are coming? | ||
Yes, that's what I very publicly advocated for. | ||
I am not having discussions with the Trump Justice Department officials about this case. | ||
I am very public with what I'm saying, and I have been very clear that this is a criminal conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. Section 241. | ||
The Democrats are very well aware of 18 U.S.C. Section 241 because they brought this charge by Jack Smith brought this as one of his four charges against President Trump for the non-crime of objecting to a presidential election, which is allowed by the Electoral Count Act of 1887 and the First Amendment. | ||
Otherwise, Democrats would be in jail for objecting to Republican wins in 1968, 2000, 2004, 2016. | ||
I don't see Al Gore and Hillary and John Kerry in jail for objecting, but we could see Hillary in jail for Crossfire Hurricane. | ||
And that is my hope and that is my mission. | ||
Why not seditious conspiracy? | ||
That could be one of the charges as well I've heard about the issue of treason. | ||
The issue of treason, generally under our Constitution, you have to be working with the foreign governments. | ||
There is evidence that with the Steele dossier that they worked with foreign intel to make up the steel dossier. | ||
Let's just back up and remind your audience what this is all about. | ||
In 2016, Hillary had her illegal home server with our nation's most classified secrets, which is espionage. | ||
More problematically for Hillary, she had her Clinton Foundation pay for play foreign bribery schemes. | ||
She's taking millions And millions of dollars from shady foreign actors. | ||
And maybe, just maybe she's doing official acts as the Secretary of State. | ||
The Clinton Foundation is underfunding her lavish lifestyle with Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and Chelsea Clinton, private jets around the world. | ||
They're living like billionaires. | ||
And maybe, just maybe there's some foreign bribery and corruption where she's doing official acts as the Secretary of State. | ||
She gets caught with her illegal home server. | ||
Congress subpoenas it. | ||
What does she do? | ||
She bleach bits the server, destroys it, obstruction of justice. | ||
She takes a hammer to the phones, obstruction of justice. | ||
But guess what? | ||
Maybe, just maybe because this was a non-secured server in her bathroom at her home, that the Russians and the Chinese hacked it. | ||
And maybe, just maybe she's worried that this is going to come out before the 2016 election. | ||
And that's why she had her lawyers like Mark Elias at Perkins Cooey make up the Steele dossier, the Russian collusion nonsense. | ||
They lied to the federal FISA court. | ||
They spied on presidential candidate Donald Trump and his aides and his allies. | ||
They continued to spy on Donald Trump when he became the president. | ||
They hobbled his presidency. | ||
And the reason they did this is when this pay-for-play foreign bribery and corruption came out before 2016, Hillary wanted to say, you can't believe this. | ||
This was a Russian disinformation campaign. | ||
This was a campaign dirty trick with Trump. | ||
This is Russian collusion. | ||
And you say, Mike, that sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory. | ||
And I'd say, yeah, maybe. | ||
But you go to 2020 and they did the same damn thing with Hunter's laptop. | ||
51 former Intel officials worked with the CIA and said Hunter's laptop of the Biden family corruption had all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign. | ||
They de-platformed the New York Post, America's oldest newspaper. | ||
They de-platformed. | ||
They worked with Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple to deplatform anyone who posted the link to the story. | ||
That story, they know would have made sure that Trump stayed in the White House. | ||
But because they blocked that story from being shown, Biden was able to rig and steal the 2020 election, right? | ||
unidentified
|
And so that's what this is all about. | |
There are theories, I'll keep the language a little light, about the Clinton Foundation and their global initiative receiving lots and lots of money while she was Secretary of State and while her family was deeply connected in government. | ||
And so I'm just going to say, I don't know if any of that's true. | ||
Just, you know, funny thing, people noticed all the money stopped coming in once she lost the election. | ||
But I wonder if the issue with the private server and why she deleted is, I wonder if this is kind of what you're suggesting, that she has this private server in her home, which is illegal. | ||
And when subpoenaed, she destroys it. | ||
Could it be that the reason she had it was to communicate illicitly with individuals for, let's just call them, off-the-books contributions? | ||
Of course. | ||
And she knows that evidence is in there. | ||
Of course, that's what's in there. | ||
That's why she destroyed the evidence. | ||
And look, that is the whole point of the law affair. | ||
Remember, they ran this Russian collusion hoax, Crossfire Hurricane, against President Trump, against a presidential candidate, against the president of the United States. | ||
And Trump declassified Crossfire Hurricane. | ||
He had to have Rick Rinnell, Cash Patel, the current CIA director, John Radcliffe, who was the DNI director at the end of the Trump 45 administration. | ||
Those three guys were the heroes who got crossfire hurricane evidence found and declassified the day before Trump left office. | ||
He declassified it. | ||
The spooks in the Intel community and the Justice Department ran to the White House chief of staff and said, you cannot release this. | ||
This is a criminal violation of the Privacy Act. | ||
So the chief of staff said, okay, the day they left office in 2021, do the Privacy Act review and get out CrossFire Hurricane. | ||
This is declassified. | ||
They didn't do the Privacy Act review. | ||
They did the Mar-a-Lago raid. | ||
That's the point of the Mar-a-Lago rate was to get back Crossfire Hurricane. | ||
And maybe they didn't get back Crossfire Hurricane because Trump had it somewhere else. | ||
And so that's why we saw the four indictments, trying to take him out, trying to take him out for non-fraud, bankrupt him, try to throw him in prison for life four times, trying to throw him off the ballot, tried to take off his head twice when Biden underfoot. | ||
This is all coordinated by Biden. | ||
All of that welfare was coordinated by the Biden White House. | ||
Well, I don't know that I argue Biden was coordinating it, you know, but the administration, I get your point. | ||
Most people would just assume that Biden was sitting there in a chair sleeping half the time and someone else was giving those orders. | ||
But man, when you put all these pieces together, should the puzzle pieces fit, this is not just a conspiracy against rights. | ||
This is crazier than any movie plot we've ever heard. | ||
This is a near decade-long conspiracy, probably longer, because if we're looking at Hillary Clinton or whoever else, you know, there's a great story from Politico magazine called Biden Inc., where they say that the Biden family fortune curiously tracks alongside his political ambitions. | ||
That is, when he was put in charge of Iraq, his brother gets all of these lucrative construction contracts. | ||
His son is flying with him on these equity deals, ends up on the board of Burisma. | ||
I think what we're looking at is the pay-for-play scheme that's been going on for a long time, and they got caught, and Trump, they didn't think Trump was going to win. | ||
And now these criminal elements of our government, it appears, have tried everything in their power to stop Trump and failed. | ||
So now the question is, how far is Trump willing to go? | ||
One thing I find fascinating is we've gotten numerous reports from both DHS and the DOJ that they're administering lie detector tests on agents. | ||
How, I mean, if there is this conspiracy, which I, again, sounds crazy to say if because of the preponderance of evidence, but we know there is wrongdoing. | ||
How deep do you think this goes in our government and in our intelligence community? | ||
I think it's very deep. | ||
I think it's all of the top ranks of the DNI, CIAs involved, certainly the FBI, Maine Justice, the National Security Division. | ||
There are a lot of people who are involved in this criminal, ongoing criminal conspiracy against rights. | ||
And let me just make this very clear. | ||
This is the biggest scandal in American history by far. | ||
By far. | ||
This is a criminal conspiracy started by President Obama and it continues to this day. | ||
And they are trying to, like you said, subvert the will of the American people three different times, three different elections, 2016, 2020, 2024. | ||
They try to change the outcome of these elections. | ||
They were successful in 2020, and we had four years of disaster for we the people. | ||
It was a disastrous four years with an open border, 20 million people flooding in to our country, including fighting-age men from the worst trouble spots, people who do not share our values, particularly in the Middle East. | ||
I mean, it's this, this is, I don't think people understand that today's Democrats are not liberals who love America and just disagree with us on the best way to get there. | ||
These are Marxist. | ||
They hate America and they're trying to destroy America from within. | ||
They are trying to subvert America. | ||
And the number one leader of this subversion is Barack Obama. | ||
What do you think happened in 2020? | ||
Do you think that this was through the Hunter Biden laptop story, the fake news, the lies? | ||
Or do you think there was something more nefarious like actual manipulation of ballots or fake ballots or something like this? | ||
Both. | ||
Look, this is how I think Joe Biden was able to rig and steal the election. | ||
They used COVID as an excuse to illegally change state election laws in violation of the elections clause. | ||
State legislatures must set state election laws. | ||
They ignored that. | ||
They blamed COVID. | ||
And then they mass mailed raw live ballots out to old list, including college students who have moved 10 times during their college careers. | ||
These live ballots pile up. | ||
You can gather these ballots. | ||
You can vote them. | ||
And then the only way you stop voter fraud when you have mail ballots like that is through signature verification, where they take your signature that you have on file when you register to vote with your signature when you mail in your ballot. | ||
And they have machines that compare those. | ||
But they turn down those machines where it was meaningless because apparently COVID changes your signature according to these Democrats. | ||
And then that's how they were able to rig and steal the election. | ||
Now, you know, I brought this up quite a bit with Texas v. | ||
Pennsylvania in 2020. | ||
Even if we step outside of fraudulent ballots or ballot harvesting or whatever, I mean, we saw that report that came out through, I think it was Chuck Grassley's efforts that China did manufacture fake IDs so they get their citizens mail-in votes. | ||
But in Texas v. | ||
Pennsylvania, Texas made that argument at the Supreme Court that the states had unilaterally altered their elections in violation of the Constitution. | ||
Why didn't we get a Supreme Court willing to at least answer the question yes or no as to how we handle this? | ||
I clerked on the Supreme Court for Justice Gorsuch, and I have helped confirm a record number of judges for President Trump in his first term. | ||
I've worked on judicial selection and confirmations for the last 20 plus years. | ||
These are, oftentimes these federal judges are politicians in robes, and they're not bold and fearless like they should be. | ||
They have lifetime tenure. | ||
They have pay protection. | ||
They're supposed to just follow the law wherever it leads. | ||
And they don't because they're politicians in robes. | ||
And unless you change the politics and make the politics right, it is very hard for justices, particularly the Republican appointed justices, to follow the law when there is tremendous public pressure. | ||
That is why, again, I did 4,500 media hits over three years from the Mar-a-Lago raid to change the politics so President Trump could make the novel presidential immunity arguments and then the Supreme Court could rule for the presidents on that argument because the politics were right. | ||
So right now, the institutional view is that Tulsi Gabbard has made outrageous claims that are conspiracy theories and they're unfounded. | ||
You know, I went to a handful of these large language model AIs. | ||
They're supposed to aggregate the news, right? | ||
And the attitude they all seem to portray is, if I ask of these search engine AI things, did Obama engage in a treasonous conspiracy or coup? | ||
It will say no. | ||
It will say the director of national intelligence has revealed certain documents that she claims makes the case for treasonous conspiracy. | ||
However, none of it is proven and it's all political conjecture, blah, blah, blah. | ||
Clearly, at the institution, and the reason why they do this is because they are aggregates of news reports largely weighing the New York Times, Washington Post above that of independent news outlets. | ||
So that reflects the institutional view. | ||
So the spicy question I have for you is, in the event Trump does have his DOJ arrest Barack Obama and these former Intel guys, do you think there is a fear that there will be resistance in any way from this clearly powerful and malevolent political faction? | ||
Yes, of course. | ||
This is the deep state. | ||
And everyone thinks that the deep state is a conspiracy theory. | ||
And we see the lawsuits where when President Trump tries to fire the deep state, somehow the deep state that it was a conspiracy theory six months ago is suddenly filing lawsuits with plaintiffs in the deep state. | ||
So yes, they will absolutely viciously fight this. | ||
I would say this. | ||
My advice would be to start, instead of going right to seditious conspiracy or even treasonous conspiracy, let's start Our grand jury probe under the theory of conspiracy against rights. | ||
You open up a federal grand jury, say in Fort Pierce, Florida, where they did the Mar-a-Lago raid. | ||
You'd have the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida bring this special grand jury in Fort Pierce, Florida, and then you follow the evidence wherever it leads methodically, quietly. | ||
You're calling in witnesses. | ||
You're gathering evidence. | ||
You're not going to have indictments immediately. | ||
So people need to understand this is going to take several months to gather this evidence and present it to a grand jury and bring these indictments, right? | ||
So it's, you're not going to see indictments this week. | ||
You're not going to see indictments next week. | ||
This has to be methodical. | ||
This is the most important thing that the Trump administration is going to do along with immigration. | ||
So it's immigration and rooting out this deep state welfare, this conspiracy to subvert the will, to overturn the will of the American people in the last three presidential elections. | ||
This is it. | ||
Our sovereignty as we the people depends on picking our leaders. | ||
They subverted that in the last three elections, and it also means picking our populace. | ||
And Biden destroyed that with his open border and bringing in 20 million people illegally, unlawfully mass paroling these people into our country. | ||
These are the two most important things for our people, for our sovereignty. | ||
We are the sovereign. | ||
And we have to protect this. | ||
We have to defend this. | ||
We have to win this fight over our sovereignty over the next four years. | ||
The challenging conclusion I have logically is if they've engaged in this conspiracy, they're certainly willing to break the law and use illicit law enforcement against their political opponents. | ||
They raided Trump's home. | ||
They sought to put him in prison. | ||
They arrested and charged his lawyers at the state level, falsely accused him of fraud. | ||
This shows a willingness to go to the most extreme ends. | ||
You left off one. | ||
You left off one. | ||
Joe Biden tried to get President Trump killed twice when he underfunded his Secret Service protection twice, said he's the gravest threat to American democracy and to put a bullseye on Trump's side. | ||
Oh, that's the one you left off. | ||
Oh, I think actually, if we went to the full list, it'd probably take two or three hours of all the things they've done. | ||
But my point is, if we know what they're willing to do and have done over the past 10 years, and Donald Trump is seeking to lock them up or get accountability, and we assume based on the actions they've taken, they will resist, is it not unreasonable to conclude that they would resist eventually by force, if need be? | ||
Not just an illegal situation. | ||
There's no question. | ||
They use deadly force when they raid it Mor-a-Lago. | ||
They raided Mar-a-Lago with deadly force with shoot-to-kill orders if they resisted. | ||
They were willing to, Joe Biden was willing to kill the former president of the United States with an armed raid with shoot-to-kill orders to get back Crossfire Hurricane. | ||
Now, who are these people telling me I'm crazy for suggesting we may be facing civil war? | ||
Look, I hope it doesn't get to that point, but let me just say this to the Marxist. | ||
We have a hell of a lot more guns than you guys do. | ||
Well, I will stress, right? | ||
And so obviously, I feel like this is where you go no matter what. | ||
And, you know, I call it the time travel test. | ||
If you went to 2015, 2016 and told your average person, 10 years from now, you will have the J-Six pardons. | ||
You will have Obama being accused of treasonous conspiracy against a president. | ||
You would have had the worst riots in 50 years. | ||
You would have former intelligence guys being investigated for perjury. | ||
All of these, plus a pandemic, nobody would believe you. | ||
And so I'm looking at this, and I don't know how anyone can conclude anything other than what is the logical pathway by which the Obama machine, whatever this was, comes out, puts their hands up and says, guys, guys, Trump's not a fascist. | ||
We lied. | ||
He didn't actually do these things. | ||
We were covering up our crimes. | ||
Please arrest us and take us to jail. | ||
0%. | ||
And so when you look at even these no kings protests and what are they, good trouble protests, I think they called it. | ||
They've only ever tried to escalate the street-level violence to the point now where over the 4th of July week, we had three shootings against law enforcement. | ||
Now, some have pointed out, Tim, cops get shut at all the time, and we've seen this in 2020. | ||
I suppose, you know, just that, sure. | ||
But when you combine this with the accusations of a treasonous conspiracy, I don't see a plausible reality where the Democrats simply just say, you're right, we did it. | ||
Please arrest us. | ||
We'll go to jail and we'll stop resisting. | ||
I see them saying, mobilize. | ||
Trump is a fascist. | ||
He's doing what we've always feared. | ||
And now he's going to arrest his political opponents. | ||
And the only way to resist now is in the streets. | ||
That seems 100%. | ||
Look, I have always thought this. | ||
Barack Obama is a Trojan horse. | ||
He is a Marxist. | ||
He hates this country. | ||
He is trying to destroy our country from within. | ||
He is trying to subvert our country. | ||
He is the puppet master for Joe Biden. | ||
Barack Obama and his people that he placed in the Biden White House have been running this country for Joe Biden over the last four years. | ||
This guy is a subversive Marxist who hates America. | ||
He's trying to destroy our country from within. | ||
He's been trying to do that since he burst onto the political stage in 2006. | ||
This guy, there are three forces of Marxist evil in this country, President Barack Obama, George Soros, and China. | ||
And those are the three-legged stool of this Marxism that are trying to subvert and destroy our country from within. | ||
You know, one of the weirdest things to me is being from Illinois, I remember when Obama got elected and he was asked almost immediately, will you run for president? | ||
I thought it was weird that right when he gets elected to the Senate, within a couple of years, he's basically vacant and running for president. | ||
And now he was the frontrunner. | ||
It just seemed very strange to me. | ||
So I don't know if the idea that there's a force behind Obama that was propping him up for whatever this conspiracy is? | ||
I mean, look, he was raised by Marxist. | ||
He was a community organizer. | ||
His parents were Marxist. | ||
Valerie Jarrett was his, you know, was his mentor. | ||
He brought in Valerie Jarrett to help him run his White House, run his administration. | ||
This guy's a Trojan horse, right? | ||
And people fell for it because as a country, Americans thought, oh, we can elect the first black president. | ||
He can heal the country. | ||
This guy has done more to divide and destroy America than any political figure in recent political history. | ||
So just last question, I suppose with these developments today, you know, I know you mentioned indictments could take a year. | ||
It could take some time. | ||
What do you think the next move is going to be from the Obama cabal or whatever you'd call it? | ||
I think they're going to try to destroy as much evidence as possible. | ||
I would say to anyone who witnessed this crossfire hurricane criminal conspiracy, don't go swimming in Barack Obama's pools or ponds. | ||
You may not make it. | ||
So, but I would say to these, I would say to that, and I say that kind of joking, and I would say this to the lawfare Democrats, like I've been saying since the Mar-a-Lago raid, when you thought I was crazy, I might be crazy, but I'm almost always right. | ||
And lawyer up because justice is coming, and I'm going to make damn sure that happens. | ||
Right on. | ||
Mike, thanks for hanging out and explaining this to us. | ||
Where can people find you? | ||
Article3project.org. | ||
Article number3project.org. | ||
And thank you, Tam. | ||
Thanks for joining me. | ||
I really do appreciate it. | ||
And we'll see you next time. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
Take care. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
And of course, once again, that was Mike Davis of the Article 3 Project, who's been talking about this for a long time and breaking this down. | ||
And as he's been saying, relentlessly, especially since the Mar-a-Lago raid. | ||
But he brings up a really great point. | ||
You know, look, I read all day, every day, and sometimes it's kind of crazy. | ||
There was a video I saw where someone said, I can't remember what it was. | ||
He said, I forget about COVID sometimes, but then I play this video to remind myself. | ||
And it was a guy doing a musical about being locked in his home and needing to get his fourth vaccine. | ||
And it's important to remember that we pass over so many stories, we forget about them sometimes. | ||
For instance, when Trump's home, Mar-a-Lago, was raided, they were armed and authorized to use lethal force. | ||
For those that don't know, Mar-a-Lago may be Trump's home, but it is public. | ||
That is, you can walk onto the property. | ||
You can walk up to the gates. | ||
You can say, I'm here for lunch or dinner. | ||
It's not so easy. | ||
It's a club. | ||
You got to be invited. | ||
My point is, it's a private club, but it is public in the sense that when I was invited there, here's how it worked. | ||
Trump's a very open guy and he's very nice, magnanimous. | ||
I got invited there a couple times, showed up and walk up and just say, howdy. | ||
And you walk in. | ||
Your car pulls up. | ||
They say, what are you here for? | ||
You say, we're getting dinner. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
They have fundraisers. | ||
They have events. | ||
Now, it's private, okay, in the formal legal sense, but it's public in the sense that the security is very reasonable and lax. | ||
That means there are regular people who walk in every day. | ||
They order food and you sit on the terrace and it's beautiful and the food's delicious. | ||
So when they raided this place with guns, authorized to use lethal force, there were people here who were just swimming in a pool at a beach house. | ||
It's a fun hangout. | ||
Expensive. | ||
You got to pay a big one-time fee to go, but once you're in, you know, you get invited. | ||
You're in. | ||
You can invite people. | ||
And then you rent out a room. | ||
They got like 70 rooms, I think. | ||
So it is a private club. | ||
But my point is there's people on the grass playing croquet. | ||
There's people walking the grounds. | ||
I think there's probably golf somewhere. | ||
I don't know. | ||
It's insane to think they were prepared to kill anybody who got in their way. | ||
My friends, we are going to be back tonight at 8 p.m. | ||
Timcast IRL. | ||
Don't miss it. | ||
Smash that like button. | ||
Share the show with everyone. | ||
You know, follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. | ||
Russell Brand is going live. | ||
So let's get that raid going for him. | ||
Shout out to the Rumble Morning lineup. | ||
Don't forget the DC Comedy Loft events are back, baby. | ||
And we want you to come. | ||
Especially now more than ever. | ||
I want to say this. | ||
My friends, go to DCComedyLoft.com. | ||
In the event section, you'll see us down there July 26th. | ||
If you're in the area, if it's easy for you to come, please get tickets now. | ||
Get those tickets. | ||
Okay? | ||
It's a full kitchen. | ||
They got drinks. | ||
It's a 3 p.m. show. | ||
So it's an afternoon, easy dinner show because it's like a pre-tape. | ||
It's more like a studio event. | ||
We did this at a studio before. | ||
We're now doing it as a hybrid of a public event where you can buy tickets and come because we want to get more people to join the debate on stage and have fun and be funny and be a little bit more entertaining than Jubilee. | ||
I mean, people love Jubilee. | ||
They love that surrounded thing. | ||
But I'm like, everybody talks as fast as they can, scared they're going to get voted out. | ||
Nah, we don't want that. | ||
You come up on stage, you're going to be like, what's your point? | ||
You got no point? | ||
Okay, you can go, right? | ||
But anybody can come up. | ||
We got security, don't get me wrong. | ||
But considering they're trying to shut us down, let's send a message. | ||
And here's a message you can send. | ||
You want to send a message to these antiphotypes? | ||
Buy your tickets. | ||
Come. | ||
Let's sell this out. | ||
We had already mostly sold out, but then they canceled on us. | ||
And now we're kind of concerned. | ||
We know what's going to happen. | ||
As, you know, the Michael Malis one we announced earlier. | ||
So when you go back to August 2nd, you can see our preferred seating is now sold out. | ||
I'm glad because what has me deeply concerned is that they canceled and refunded all the tickets. | ||
And there's going to be a lot of people who don't know. | ||
And they're not going to buy those tickets again. | ||
And if that happens, Antifa is going to say, we win because we got the venue to nuke all of your tickets. | ||
Now, we're told we'll be taken care of in That event. | ||
But we want people to come to our events so we can build community and bring people closer together. | ||
Do not let them shut us down. | ||
We may have gotten the events back up, but the canceling of these tickets has been basically a knife in the gut. | ||
So show up, dccomedyloft.com. | ||
It's in the event section. | ||
I want you to be serious about buying the ticket. | ||
I want people buying the tickets just to buy them. | ||
I want you to be serious. | ||
That's what I'm not going to post the link. | ||
If you want to come, you go to the website, you go down there, you buy those tickets, you join us and say, we will not let these fringe, far-left lunatics stop the conversation. | ||
Because I'll tell you this, some of these fringe, far-left lunatics, we want to come and sit down and join the show, and they intend to. | ||
Peacefully and rationally, and I respect it. | ||
So these people who want to try and get us canceled, ain't no way. | ||
Ain't no way. | ||
Thanks for bringing it, everybody. | ||
Follow me on X and Instagram. | ||
We are back tonight at 8 p.m. |