Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 29, 2024 - Tim Pool Daily Show

02:19:14

Armed Illegal Immigrant Gang TAKES OVER Apartments, Locals FLEE Failed Democrat Policy | TimcastNews

Participants

Main voices

tim pool

02:14:16

Appearances

Clips

scott jennings

00:43

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Tonight, of course, my friends, Kamala Harris, Harris's first interview.
		But of course, she's going to be bringing Tim Walz along with her in the tradition of dual interviews, which is not really a tradition.
		It's a tradition to have an interview with your vice presidential candidate after you've already given a bunch of interviews and then you're introducing your VP.
		But of course, Kamala Harris doesn't have the cognitive capabilities to handle an interview on her own.
		So she's getting she's getting roasted even by CNN.
		CNN contributors are ragging on her, so we'll talk about that.
		But of course, there is a very big story that is bubbling up.
		It's been around for actually a little bit.
		For the past month or so, there have been reports coming out of Colorado about armed Venezuelan illegal immigrant gangs taking over an apartment complex.
		And now I will say, while that certainly is a very important story, It's now reaching critical mass due to a collection of incidents that have effectively broken the camel's back.
		That is, of course, the viral video of armed men with rifles and pistols breaking down a door.
		The door gets replaced.
		They show up again.
		The people who live across from this unit filmed how they have to lock their doors.
		But there's more.
		Videos of a shootout.
		The car of these individuals who live here riddled with bullets from a shootout.
		And then we have a couple other stories.
		Migrants tried to hijack school buses in California.
		And now we are seeing, well, all of these things on their own are huge stories.
		We've now got a critical mass where the corporate press, viral videos have bubbled up with all of these stories coming into one.
		And, you know, all I can really say is, This is just a shocking moment in an ongoing story that has been around for a decade, when Donald Trump was talking about these crimes for quite some time.
		In fact, when Donald Trump said, you've got these criminal gangs, these traffickers, these cartels, they're not humans, they're animals, he said.
		Of course, referring to the violent criminal gangs that, you know, murder and behead people.
		And the media said he was calling all migrants, all migrants, animals.
		Which is a lie.
		So some would say, it's old news!
		Who cares about any of this?
		That's actually funny.
		Guys, the people in the chat were like, huh, I learned about this story a month ago.
		We all did.
		We all did, but this is just one of 800,000 stories that have been going on since Donald Trump started running for office in 2015, which is literally the point of why he wanted to build a wall.
		But now we have an issue where a sanctuary state is dealing with the political fallout, and the story is going massively viral.
		Not this one video, but numerous instances, and also affecting other areas.
		I think the story You know, I was contemplating which one to lead with, because illegal immigrants trying to hijack school buses, you'd think would be, wow, I mean, that's crazy.
		It is.
		But the corporate press, the viral videos, and the sentiment from individuals on average suggests that the more shocking scenario is when a bunch of guys with guns show up to your apartment and riddle your car with bullets, as opposed to trying to steal your children.
		They're both shocking stories, so we'll put them together in one segment.
		I can't say that I'm surprised.
		I don't think anybody else watching is surprised, but we'll talk about that.
		Then we've got World War III.
		Yeah, World War III is, you know, happening.
		Russia has issued another threat to the United States over World War III after Ukraine started bombing oil depots in Russia.
		Ukraine has invaded Russia.
		Russia has evacuated citizens, and wow.
		Can't say that I'm surprised that we're here.
		And then, of course, a nice, fun, cultural segment.
		Ah, yes, I saw this tweet from Carl Benjamin.
		A woman who went to Oxford who claims to have an IQ rivaling Stephen Hawking has decided to become a hooker.
		She's dropped out of school, and she wants to do OnlyFans instead.
		And, oh yeah, we'll talk about all that.
		Because, my friends, you can Google search, quote, Quits job to do OnlyFans, and there's probably thousands of stories of women who are like, I was a professional nurse, cop, doctor, teacher, et cetera, et cetera.
		I got one, it's kind of funny.
		She's like, I worked at Chick-fil-A!
		And now, you know, on OnlyFans.
		And it's just like, okay, well, you get the whole spectrum there.
		Some...
		You know, fast food jobs.
		I guess maybe a woman doesn't want to work the fast food job, she wants to do adult content on OnlyFans.
		But like quitting Oxford and being a doctor, Carl says that, what did he say, Stuart Mills is wrong.
		People will not entertain their, will not pursue their intellectual curiosity.
		They will devolve into their baser animal instincts.
		But I don't know that that's correct.
		Perhaps he was just speaking from a male perspective about what men would prefer to do.
	We'll definitely talk about that one.
	I love it because this woman who quit, they're like, she could be in Mensa, or like, she might be in Mensa.
	And then I pulled up the Mensa website, and it's like, to join Mensa and do the test, it's $60, or $99 for a personal exam.
	And I'm like, dude, if you paid $100 to have someone else tell you you're smart, you've already failed the test.
	But, uh, that'll be fun.
	Before we get started talking about this crazy story, my friends, head over to castbrew.com and buy Cast Brew Coffee!
	It's the best coffee you'll ever have.
	I'm allowed to say that because it's an opinion.
	Appalachian Nights, everybody's favorites, but I do recommend you guys try Stand Your Grounds.
	Mr. Bocas Pumpkin Spice Experience, 233 bags left, and when they're gone, they are gone forever.
	192 bags of the ground, so they are going.
	They are going.
	But, you know, a lot of people are just happy with picking up their Appalachian Nights.
	We sell that stuff like hotcakes.
	Apparently, hotcakes sell really, really good.
	That's the saying.
	Also, head over to TimCast.com.
	Click Join Us to become a member.
	Help us fight fake news.
	Support the show.
	We'll probably have pre-roll sponsors, because we've always done that.
	We've always done sponsor spots at the beginning of the show.
	It's a minute where, you know, we shout out somebody for...
	Helping make all this possible.
	But what we don't do is we don't do live reads during the show.
	In the morning or at night.
	And instead, I prefer just saying, become a member, we'll sponsor ourselves, and as we go through the show, instead of stopping to tell you to like buy a sponge or, I don't know, a UFO.
	There you go.
	Oh, you can't see the UFO in this video.
	Instead of telling you to buy some product, you say become a member at TimCast.com and that'll be the sponsor spot for us, ourselves.
	Smash the like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show.
	Let's talk about the news.
	We've got these videos.
	We'll play them for you.
	Armed crew flaunts guns inside Colorado apartment.
	Building overrun by Venezuelan gangs spilling out from Sanctuary City.
	Wild video.
	Well, you can't really make out what they're saying, so I'll just describe it.
	This is a door to an apartment.
unidentified		It says 301.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Let's get it going.
		This is reportedly illegal immigrants from Venezuela, a prison gang, now operating in control of this apartment complex through violence.
		Now I got a simple question for all of you.
		There are a lot of questions, but I got a simple one to start things off.
		Where are the police?
		Where are the police officers?
		No idea.
		I think this country is falling apart.
		I don't know what that means in the big picture.
		Probably not a lot.
		But I think this country is falling apart.
		You have communities.
		You have people who watch and protect those communities.
		It could be police officers or neighborhood watch.
		It seems like across this country, more and more, stories are emerging showing there is no social order.
		And it's not just starting with illegal immigrant gangs.
		It's starting with the far left in Antifa.
		Exactly what they wanted.
		Defund and destabilize the police.
		Now you have, you had in 2020, far leftists actually taking over portions of their, of these cities, with rifles, actually murdering people.
		It's not an exaggeration.
		In the occupation, in, I believe it was, was it Seattle?
		The Chazz Chop?
		They killed people.
		They killed several people.
		I think even a couple teenagers were murdered.
		Because they assumed, they said white supremacists are driving around, so they just gunned down a couple of black teenagers.
		Then there was one guy who was just standing around, he got shot and killed.
		They literally murdered people.
		Where has the accountability been?
		I'll tell you why I think there's none.
		There's no incentive for accountability.
		Communities are fractured.
		You can take a look at this phenomenon with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
		She represents this perfectly.
		The squad members, those that remain at least, the majority of their donations reportedly come from outside of their districts.
		So here's what we see happening.
		If you're on the internet, and let's say you're a big fan of, uh, what do we have here?
		Ooh, liquid death!
		I like liquid death.
		Liquid death's pretty good.
		Look at that.
		Ice tea, shout out.
		It says death to plastic on the can, but the cans are all lined with plastic, but that's, I guess, besides the point.
		It's a low sugar tea, so I do enjoy them.
		But, uh, let's say you're a fan of it.
		How many people do you know who live around you are going around talking about how much they love liquid death?
		Not very many.
		But online, every person who does can form a community and follow a page.
		So here's what happens.
		If you're AOC, and you've got crackpot psychopath political ideology as your worldview, most people who live in your district don't know or care about what you're talking about.
		I mean, she helped chase out Amazon, something like $30 billion in tax revenue to New York, and jobs, and she was like, yay, we did it!
		We saved the city!
		You know, like the SpongeBob meme.
		Here's the thing.
		When she goes online, Let's say there are 100,000 jurisdictions, each of them with a certain amount of people, but each of them has one person who's a psychotic individual like AOC.
		So she says something insane.
		Most people say this lady's nuts, but she finds that one crazy person in each different area to donate money to her.
		And that's how she ends up winning these elections.
		Massive spending in a district where her financial support comes from outside of her district.
		This was true for all the squad members.
		So you take a look at what's going on in Colorado.
		You take a look at what's going on with the Chazz Chop.
		You take a look at what's going on... This is a crazy story.
	I love how Fox 5 tries to report this.
	Migrants attempt to board school buses in East County.
	Are you serious?
	They stopped the buses from driving and then tried to force their way on.
	But the reason why these stories keep happening, and the reason why we are not getting any solutions here, partly, not completely, is because Democrat politicians, sheriff, police, whatever, they don't care about their immediate neighbors.
	They don't care about what the guy who lives next door to them thinks.
	If they want to win an election, they need to pander to the fringe of the Internet.
	So before the internet, if you went outside and there was a city block that was overrun by a criminal gang, the people who live there who vote are gonna say, solve this problem or you will be voted out.
	The sheriff and the council members and the mayor or whatever might be like, crap, we're in trouble.
	Everyone here is hyper-focused on this.
	Now we're in the internet era.
	Where the local council member or the mayor, their social media is comprised of people who don't even live in their district who are tweeting at them or emailing them saying things like, don't hurt the migrants!
	Don't hurt the refugees!
	I'll send you money!
	So I think, you know I was talking in the intro to the show about OnlyFans, I think a large component of what we're seeing is actually China.
	Iran, Russia, and other countries funding this kind of disarray intentionally.
	I would not be surprised if a large component of OnlyFans contributions comes from China.
	I mean it.
	Let's say you're a woman who's like a doctor.
	And I'll talk more about this later in the show because I have another segment for it.
	A doctor is good for society.
	A doctor is good for the economy.
	A doctor is good for the health of a nation.
	And then what happens is, you get convinced to start on OnlyFans, but you don't make a lot of money.
	So you're not going to quit being a doctor, but then all of a sudden you start getting a bunch of subscriptions, and now you're making a couple grand a month.
	How interesting.
	I certainly think there are a lot of guys who pay for OnlyFans, don't get me wrong.
	But I certainly also believe that our foreign adversaries would want to incentivize people to quit their jobs to do degenerate things because it destroys the fabric of this nation.
	That's why they target children.
	I would not be surprised if they're also providing money to many of these women to quit their jobs.
	And I also wouldn't be surprised if they quit their jobs, have these donors, and then seven or eight months later, the money starts drying up, but then it's too late.
	You're in.
	You're locked in.
	This is what we're seeing.
	The reason why we're not going to get resolution to the far left, Chaz Chop, to the armed criminal gangs taking over, engaging in shootouts, is because...
	Well, online contributions are probably coming from foreign adversaries and even domestic adversaries.
	A socialist, communist, or even a fascist in the United States, an accelerationist.
	Enemies of this country who want to see destabilization so that they can act some kind of political change have an incentive to finance people who are screwing things up intentionally.
	Now, domestically, I don't know how much of it is actually someone saying, I'm going to give money to the mayor because he'll screw things up.
	What it's more likely to be is, someone like AOC, some far-left crackpot, hears the mayor say, we will not condemn all of the refugees because of what these criminals are doing.
	They take lax action, they don't stop the crime, and then, these far-leftists in other parts of the country donate to those individuals who use that money to lie, cheat, and steal, and then of course, win elections.
	Then you get the corrupt media, which is supposed to hold politicians to account, and they're thinking, look man, These people online will complain to our laundry detergent sponsor if we say the truth.
	So just say whatever so our laundry detergent sponsor doesn't drop us.
	And now you have this fractured dystopian nightmare reality where armed criminal gangs of illegal immigrants are taking over apartment complexes, hijacking school buses, and all of these people in leadership are cowardly and scared to do anything about it.
	Now, to be honest, could a show like this exist if not for the same set of scenarios and circumstances?
	Most of you who are watching do not live in the same place.
	You live all over the country, and you all recognize this is a problem and we need some kind of enforcement.
	So in the same vein, you watch a show like this, you sponsor shows like this, you super chat, you become members at TimCast.com, and it allows a show like this to exist.
	But this show does not have powerful local influence.
	To be fair, where we live, the people around here are big fans.
	We're big fans and friends of Riley Moore, who won the primary and is likely going to be our congressional rep.
	Because we live in a more rural area, it's actually a lot easier to have influence in this local area.
	But so, it's a double-edged sword.
	If this show existed 20-30 years ago, it would be a radio show.
	The radio show is going to be highly local, and the issues we're talking about are going to be more about the new apartment complex and condos that are being built in Martinsburg, which wouldn't matter to any of you.
	Of course, there are nationally syndicated radio shows as well that talk about more national news and newspapers that do all the same, but we are in this hyper-nationalized reality.
	Where what's going on locally just doesn't matter.
	Let's take a look at what we got, though.
	So Fox News has the same story.
	Libs of TikTok has numerous videos of this.
	They say this has been going on for a while and the government doesn't seem to care.
	Well, they have no reason to care.
	They're not going to lose voters.
	We're in a hyper-polarized, far-left, far-right reality right now.
	There's no incentive in a sanctuary-safe blue... Look, this is really what it comes down to.
	There is no incentive for any politician in Colorado to do anything about this.
	None.
	They're not going to lose their elections.
	And that's it.
	Welcome to the dystopian reality of a broken electoral system.
	So long as we have universal mail-in voting, and I guess you can just call it these hyper-polarized districts and jurisdictions, this will not be solved.
	There is no more political competition, and that is the problem.
	Take a look at this.
	Venezuelan gangs are terrorizing the city.
	Venezuelan gangs took over the city of Aurora, Colorado.
	They took over apartment buildings, hold massive protests and gatherings, blocking streets, and crime is surging.
	The Deputy Police Chief Chris Jewell said, I don't think Venezuelan gangs are a big safety concern in the city of Aurora.
	You can't make this up.
	You wanna know why?
	Because this guy, right now, is looking at his neighbors.
	They don't care about him.
	They don't know who he is.
	He feels no repercussion from them.
	But if he comes out against the gangs, they will show up where he sleeps at night, and it will be very, very bad for him.
	This is the dystopia.
	Regular people in the communities are disorganized, and the gangs are organized.
	That's all that matters.
	Police come out and they think to themselves, as I have long warned, and I warn you again, What's our cost-benefit analysis?
	What's our cost-risk?
	Kopp says, if we defy the local population, what's the worst that's going to happen?
	Nothing.
	They're disorganized.
	They don't like each other.
	They don't talk to each other.
	So I have no real concern from them.
	Venezuelan gangs are organized.
	They will come at us.
	They will hunt me down.
	Now, I warned of this several years ago when it came to Black Lives Matter.
	And the point was, There was in Wisconsin, Black Lives Matter showed up to a house where they thought two girls had been kidnapped and set it alight.
	They set fire to the building.
	Emergency services put the fire out.
	They set fire to the building again!
	Emergency services put the fire out.
	Turns out the girls weren't even there.
	They apparently were like hanging out with a friend.
	But these people lost their minds.
	This same group, similar group organized by the same people, showed up to the home of a man who they were mad at, and they were protesting in front of his house, a violent mob.
	The man, feeling threatened, brandished a shotgun from within his own house, pointing it at his window and out his window.
	Well, the police showed up and arrested the homeowner.
	So a guy sees a group organized by the same people who tried to burn a house down.
	I don't know.
	You don't point a weapon at someone unless you intend to.
	He broke the rules, for sure.
	My point is simply this.
	The police were confronted with a violent mob that had committed arson before.
	But who do you arrest?
	An individual in that protest is not the one who committed an arson, and you don't know who did.
	So you can't just arrest a random person.
	But then you got a guy brandishing a firearm.
	First Amendment versus a guy brandishing a firearm with restrictions.
	Well, you know, they went in the guy's house and they arrested him.
	That's the first step.
	You may argue, hey look man, people are allowed to protest.
	Agreed.
	And there was no immediate threat to the guy.
	Also agreed.
	And he should not have pointed a weapon at people.
	That's absolutely true.
	That's a violation of one of the four rules.
	You don't point a weapon unless you intend to use it, unless you're intending to destroy something, and that guy broke the rules.
	The point I'm saying is, this is a step towards where we end up ultimately and what we're seeing now.
	There was a man in Portland.
	He had an American flag on his house.
	Far-left rioters were marching through city streets.
	They stopped, walked up to his house and banged on the door and demanded he remove his American flag or else.
	The police aren't going to do anything about this.
	They're not going to do anything about it.
	Where we end up next?
	Riders will show up to your house throwing bricks and stones.
	The police will arrive and they'll say, look, we've got a hundred people throwing rocks.
	We cannot stop them.
	We don't have the police force, the manpower.
	You would need special community relations and SWAT and armored cops to come and do a mass arrest of a hundred people.
	I'll tell you what we can do.
	We arrest the guy in his home, and it will maybe calm down the mob.
	I guarantee 100% this will happen.
	And I think it's fair to say we are already at the point where it has begun to happen.
	What we are seeing now in these cities, these criminal gangs, is very, very similar.
	Criminal gangs, doing whatever they want, and the police are like, there's no problem.
	No problem at all.
	Why?
	Same thing.
	Cost-benefit analysis.
	If we actually go and try to arrest the gangs, what happens?
	They show up to our officers' homes, they threaten us with violence.
	The damage and the danger exists not from the community members who would oust us, but from the gangs we can't control.
	And you know what the other problem is?
	The Democrat voters will side with the criminal gangs, as I'm sure they already are right now.
	So if you're a politician, you're thinking, if I arrest the criminal gangs, I'm going to lose votes!
	Then they're going to try and attack my family!
	So what's the point of doing anything about it?
	Weak men make hard times, my friends.
	We have this from Wall Street Apes.
	Illegal migrants are taking over apartment complexes and robbing gun stores.
	Quote, they have robbed 10 gun shops in Denver in the past month.
	There's been numerous reports.
	I don't know if I have this one.
	I don't think I haven't pulled up.
	Numerous reports of gun stores across this metropolitan area being robbed.
	Colorado Springs had a couple that were looted and robbed.
	Denver as well.
	Now most of these stories always try to mask what's really going on.
	Here's an example.
	Migrants attempt to board school buses.
	That's it?
	Board?
	Is that what they said?
unidentified		said.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I don't know who this guy is, local reporter.
		I look you in the eyes and I say you have a duty to tell people what's really going on.
		When you tell people that migrants tried to board a school bus, it sounds like the school bus stopped, opened up its doors, a bunch of kids were walking in, and then some confused refugees were just like, can I get on this bus?
		And they're like, no sir, this is for children.
		Oh, I'm so sorry, lo siento, lo siento.
		Not what happened.
unidentified		Well, yeah, there have been two migrant encounters in the past two days involving school buses and young children here at Humboldt-Zura USD.
		Now, no one was injured and all students are safe, but parents are angry.
		Your initial shock is you're helpless.
		It's practice night for Nicole Cardinale and her son, Apollo.
		It's the ordinary, but their learning certainly wasn't.
		20 illegal migrants tried to get on the bus today at one of our bus stops.
		Hours earlier, she got this email letting Nicole know her 8-year-old son was aboard his school bus heading to Hamel Elementary, when all of a sudden... Really confused.
		He said, these adults, they weren't kids.
		He said, but they had backpacks on, Mom, and they tried to get on our bus.
		He goes, and there was a lot of them.
		The district confirmed 20 migrants tried to board the bus Wednesday morning when it stopped to pick up students here along its B route.
		That's when parents and the drivers stepped in, keeping the migrants at bay.
		It was definitely really scary.
		It also happened Tuesday along Route A, shown here in orange near State Route 94.
		Three men walked along the highway trying to stop the bus to, quote, go around their group.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Migrants attempted to board a bus.
		Actually, one of the incidents was three men walking on a highway trying to stop the bus to get on it.
		That's called a hijacking.
unidentified		Naturally, the impulse might be, this will take me to a much safer area.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Oh, I'm sure.
unidentified		There you go.
		There you go.
		I'm sorry, ladies and gentlemen, this is it.
		border. He says, Well, it's unclear why the group tried to board Wednesday. Heat and mountain terrain can drive
		Okay.
		desperate response. First and foremost, there has to be an acknowledgement by the Biden administration that asylum is
		a human right.
		Demanding answer. There you go. There you go. I'm sorry, ladies
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		and gentlemen, this is it. Okay. You know, I view this this this
		poor country as but a soggy cracker. Yeah, I guess that's Brittle.
		And as more and more water seeps into it, it becomes soggy and starts just sloughing off and falling apart.
		I don't know.
		It's wet cardboard.
		That's sad, right?
		You've got these people saying, yes, three men who were walking on the highway tried to stop the school bus to get on it.
		Yo, that's crazy.
		I don't care what their intention was.
		I don't care what they want or don't want.
		I don't care if it's because they're desperate or otherwise.
		Hijacking a school bus is hijacking a school bus.
		Okay, fine.
		The three men who tried to stop a school bus on the highway to get on it, we don't know actually what their intention was.
		They just wanted to board school buses.
		Alright.
		Well, I tell you where I see this going.
		I think in the long run, it's going to be fractured communities.
		I don't see how a small town in, say, like Nebraska will tolerate something like this, and it's going to get bad.
		You know, in Jamul, California, perhaps these parents was like, wow, it's so scary that a bunch of strange men tried to get on my son's bus.
		Well, eventually they will.
		They will be on your son's bus.
		Eventually your kid won't come home.
		I don't know what to tell you.
		I really don't.
		So it's funny because, you know, conservatives talk about it all the time.
		The importance, the joy, the duty of taking care of your children, and the gift of children, etc, etc.
		Yet there are so many people in this country who do not agree, and that's what I find interesting.
		I genuinely believe that there is a massive, massive element in this country, I don't know if it's the majority, that do not feel anything for their children, and I genuinely believe that.
		I think that one of the defining characteristics of conservatives is a love for their children.
		It's what makes them conservative.
		It's what makes many of them care about the future of this country.
		Dave Smith is not a conservative.
		Dave Smith, big fan.
		He's a good friend of the show.
		He is a libertarian.
		But he was talking in an interview on a podcast and he said, you know, before having kids, if you came to him and said, do you care about the future of this country?
		He'd say, yeah, of course.
		You know, of course I do.
		Then he had kids and he says, yes, of course I do.
		And now he means it.
		He really didn't understand what it meant until he had kids.
		He has to care about the future of this country now, because he has children that he cares about.
		If you look at his politics, anti-war, he's pro-life.
		The Mises Caucus guys, we greatly get along, though the other libertarians, kind of wild.
		But you can see that there's a defining characteristic among the quote-unquote new right or right, where protecting your kids is a big, a big issue.
		Now you take a look at these liberal jurisdictions.
		They don't seem to care at all.
		They care more about themselves.
		Example?
		Munchausen syndrome by proxy.
		Mothers who are going to inflict upon their children sterilization and other surgeries because it makes them the center of attention and they fit in.
		You will never convince me that those people care about their kids.
		Never.
		You watch the Jazz Jennings show, where the mom says that she wakes Jazz up in the middle of the night and threatens to force an object inside of a surgical graft on this poor child's body by force.
		You will not convince me that mother cares about that kid.
		Not at all.
		So I take a look at these jurisdictions, and I think it's patently obvious.
		While many of them probably do care about their kids, of course, I think it's probable that in liberal jurisdictions, the majority of parents, the ones voting Democrat, do not care about their kids.
		They'll tell you they do, but they really don't.
		Look, man, there's child abuse, okay?
		Those people really don't care about their kids, and we know it.
		The people who beat and kill their own children, obviously, they're evil.
		Then you have parents who are indifferent.
	They had kids.
	They wanted to abort them.
	I think what I'm saying is easily exemplified by the abortion argument.
	They want abortions.
	They beg for them.
	They want abortion buses.
	They do not like their kids.
	And for this, they don't care about the future.
	They don't care about illegal immigrant gangs with weapons taking over these jurisdictions.
	They don't vote to stop it.
	That guy said the Biden administration must recognize asylum as a right.
	He cares more about sounding good on TV than about protecting his community.
	I think that greatly exemplifies it.
	Conservatives have a tendency towards altruism, and Democrats have a tendency towards narcissism.
	Tendency towards.
	There are certainly a lot of Democrats who are good people.
	They're just Ill-informed, they don't know better.
	Many of them think they're doing good, but they don't really know better.
	But it's also no surprise, my friends, that single, childless women overwhelmingly vote Democrat, as I will stress again.
	I believe that a large component of the bifurcation of politics in this country is whether you care about your children or you do not.
	You've got liberals, largely childless women, but also men, but less so men.
	Who vote Democrat and don't care.
	Then you have parents who have kids, but we have those kids sterilized.
	They don't care.
	And the parents who are more moderate don't really pay attention, who do love their children.
	Those are the ones who end up leaving these places.
	Unfortunately, in their ignorance, they leave these places, and then they continue to vote for policies that sound good, but they don't really pay attention.
	I don't know.
	I'm supposed to vote Democrat, right?
	I'm sure there's a lot of people who are going to say, Tim, you don't have kids.
	How would you know?
	Doesn't matter.
	I'm right.
	I'm completely right on this.
	People who care about their kids are going to lean conservative.
	People who don't care about their kids are going to lean liberal.
	They are going to sacrifice their kids so they look better in public.
	They're going to ignore the threats to their children.
	They're not going to care about this country, and they're going to vote, and they're going to say things because they want to look good for themselves.
	I'm not saying it's absolute.
	I'm saying it's a tendency.
	That's why there are a lot of people who become conservative when they get married and have kids.
	Both create circumstances in which people express more conservative views.
	Now, I will add, some argue that conservatives are more likely to get married and more likely to have kids.
	Therefore, they experience these things.
	It's both.
	An individual who is a moderate liberal living in a city who's not married gets married, and all of a sudden they have bills and they have someone to care about and protect.
	They're concerned about their health care.
	All of a sudden they start asking these questions.
	As single individuals, they simply just say, the government can pay it for me.
	Why can't I just have your stuff?
	But once you as an individual become responsible for someone else, Now you're concerned about what's being taken from you.
	Even if it's just marriage.
	You've got a man or a woman, largely men, and I'm not saying to be disrespectful to women, saying, I need to save X amount of dollars from my paycheck to make sure that my wife, the person I love and care about, is not going without.
	That we survive this.
	And then you have kids.
	And now you're really concerned.
	But then there are some people who don't care about their kids and they don't have those concerns.
	They just don't.
	Now, forgive me, I'm not saying the only issue at play, of course, is whether or not you have children.
	Certainly not.
	What I'm saying is that's a large component.
	There are also people who are just smarter than others.
	And I genuinely do believe that Today, reality has a conservative bias.
	It's funny because 10, 12 years ago, what was it?
	It was like 15 years ago, whatever.
	Was it Colbert?
	No, no, no.
	Or John Stewart?
	I can't remember which one.
	Reality has a liberal bias was the quote.
	It might have been Colbert.
	That may have been the case under the Bush years or whatever.
	Yeah, a lot of conservatives begging for the Patriot Act.
	They regret that now.
	But there was a shift.
	Republicans are winning now with a moderate candidate in Donald Trump and independents favoring the conservative worldview two to one.
	So there was this shift now where conservatives have truth on their side today.
	It's not absolute.
	Conservatives spread misinformation and get a lot of things wrong as well.
	But liberals are now the party of the cult.
	The economy's great, they say, as no one can afford groceries.
	Support Ukraine!
	They're our greatest ally, they say, as Ukraine blows up Nord Stream and invades Russia.
	It's psychotic.
	It's a cult.
	And now you've got our communities being overrun, people being killed, school buses they're trying to hijack, and these people live in these areas I don't know.
	They don't know they don't care.
	I suppose I'll add to this.
	There's probably a lot of individuals who care about their kids but are real dumb.
	And so that I can accept as well.
	Now I'll tell you this.
	This is funny.
	From the New Republic to say ex-advisor reveals Trump's insane explosive war on drugs plan.
	Yeah.
unidentified		H.R.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		McMaster says Trump wanted to bomb the drugs in Mexico.
		Okay.
		What am I supposed to say to this?
		Hillary Clinton tweeted this out.
		She's like, Trump wanted to bomb the drugs.
		So you mean armed criminal gangs who are murdering people and literally, in some instances have flayed them alive.
		And Trump wants to bomb them.
		And?
		I don't get it.
		You're saying Donald Trump wants to secure our border with military action against criminal invaders who are trafficking children into sex rings?
		Look, man, maybe it's insane to say bomb them.
		But I don't think bomb them literally means like a B-52 carpet bombing the border.
		If Trump's talking about surgical strikes against enemies of this country through mark and reprisal, what's the problem?
		Why are we at war in Ukraine?
		And we can't defend our own border.
		It is infinitely more logical to bomb the cartels invading and attacking this country than it is to send our weapons to Ukraine.
		Not that I'm a fan of either.
		Ultimately, the point is, why are you complaining about Trump saying, bomb the drugs, when you're literally funneling hundreds of billions of dollars into Ukraine, the Middle East, dumping what, 20 plus billion, only in the past couple of months now, because it's been way more than that, into Israel for their war and conflict.
		Israel, of course, now invading the West Bank, and I don't know for what reason we're involved.
		So anybody who wants to go and criticize Israel and attack them, I'll be like, that's great!
		They're not us.
		We shouldn't be funding that or any of these other wars.
		And they criticized Donald Trump for saying we should bomb the drugs in Mexico.
		Criminal cartels who are sending drugs to this country, who are trafficking children, are a bigger threat to this nation than anything Russia could be doing right now.
		But here we are.
		Democrats seem to enjoy it.
		The migrant crisis drained $150 billion from taxpayers in a single year.
		Think about how much money we'd save if we didn't spend $200 billion in Ukraine and we spent even a modicum of that on our border.
		We could save an additional $150 billion.
		Think about the prosperity this country would experience.
		That's where we are right now.
		California lawmakers ripped after approving a $150k down payment handout to illegal immigrant homebuyers.
		This is crazy.
		Well, you know, look, man.
		I'll tell you.
		I'll tell you.
		I don't know where this country is headed.
		I hope that Donald Trump is a net positive presidency.
		He's certainly far from perfect.
		There's no such thing as perfect.
		But it's the first time in my lifetime that I've seen a president do moderately good.
		That's it.
		A lot of bad things.
		Bad hires.
		Bolton, we can always just agree on that.
		I loved that Buchanan when he said, fire Bolton, hire Tulsi.
		Seems like Trump got the memo this time around.
		Tulsi is part of the transition team, along with RFK Jr.
		RFK Jr.' 's team says they want to make America healthy again, and I am like, yes!
		Yes, I have been begging Trump for this.
		RFK Jr., focus on health, and, you know, put him in charge of the CIA or something, or the FBI, I don't know, whatever.
		Director of National Intelligence, ooh, that'll be fun.
		Very fun.
		Tulsi Gabbard advising on national security, securing America's interests, which is our border, our jobs, our trade, and not foreign incursions.
		That's the dream, baby.
		So I hope Trump wins.
		Because a Trump victory, in my opinion, is salvaging and stabilizing this great nation.
		What I see from the Democrats and the Uniparty is, I got a big story coming up in a segment, not just right away, but for the 3rd segment, so next we've got Kamala Harris, but BRICS wants their own currency, the BRICS Nations, and there are 126 countries, I believe it's 126, meeting to dump the U.S.
		dollar.
		There's nothing Kamala Harris can do to make that stop, except for World War III.
		A vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for World War III.
		The liberal economic order wants to maintain its stranglehold over the planet.
		Donald Trump's worldview is make America strong.
		I like Trump's worldview.
	I like that one.
	I'll wrap this segment up there.
	Next up, of course, we'll be talking about Kamala Harris, what it means if she wins, is she going to win, and where we're currently at.
	Even CNN's contributors are roasting her over when she does this interview with CNN, she had to bring in Tim Walz, her emotional support animal.
	That was actually pretty funny.
	So we'll talk about that.
	Take a look at the polls.
	And the reason why I want to do this one next is because Kamala Harris represents World War III.
	She is a deranged psychopath.
	She's actually more of just like a moron who's a puppet for the deep state that thinks we are on the last vestiges of the liberal economic order that can only be salvaged by blowing up our enemies with a massive show of force.
	I don't think that's correct.
	And I don't think that ends well for anybody.
	There are no winners in a nuclear war.
	There are only survivors.
	So we'll talk about that.
	But for now, we'll grab your Super Chats.
	So smash that like button, my friends, if you have not already.
	One like equals one fight, fight, fight.
	And I love that.
	I love that Trump said fight, fight, fight.
	It is the simplest way to explain that we will not give up this great nation, that we believe in our friends and family.
	We believe in a moral way of life.
	And we believe in free speech and the Constitution and the right to bear arms.
	Fight, fight, fight means no matter what, we do not give up.
	So smash that like button and also become a member at TimCast.com to support our work by clicking join us and follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.
	Let's go.
	We've got some super chats.
	We got U.P.
	Schutt who says, yesterday people must have been glad for Ian on the show.
	I bet many did not know what a grand jury is, me included, but I am German, so may not count.
	This is the funny thing.
	You know, Ian's on the show, and he's like, I'm a noob here, what's a grand jury?
	And there were people in the chat, I'm not saying everybody, but some people were just like, why is Ian on this show?
	Why doesn't he research these things before coming on?
	Blah, blah.
	My friends, let me tell you, the premise of Timcast IRL As it has been for some time.
	And even my show, what I try to do, I recognize politics for which I am deeply entrenched.
	Well, it's not the most, but it is esoteric.
	It is information pertaining only to a select group of individuals who have paid attention for a long time.
	This is why it's very difficult to book liberals, and it's why young people vote Democrat, because they don't know what they're doing.
	So, what I try to do is, if we have a guest who says something that I believe is a bit too entrenched, I'll say, no, no, explain what that is.
	What do you mean by that?
	The purpose of Ian has always been a guy who does not pay so heavily attention so that when he is confused or asks a question, that can help individuals who are not involved as heavily in politics to understand what's going on, as evidenced by the grand jury question.
	Some people are like, Ian should know this already!
	For example, the first segment, of course, I opened with is the armed migrant gangs.
	And there are literally people who are saying, old news.
	Why are you talking about it?
	Yeah, sure.
	That one story is a month or so old, I believe.
	And now it's exacerbated by these bus attempted hijackings and shootouts.
	And there are a lot of people who don't know about it.
	It's about prioritization of the news.
	So we're trying to inform people.
	Ian being on the show, and the reason why he was invited on the show in the first place, so I'll tell you what the origin of TimCastIRL is.
	First, it was I was going to get a van, drive around, do the morning show in the van, and then do a live podcast with random people, like a man on the street.
	That's why it was called In Real Life.
	In Real Life, because of the COVID lockdowns, turned into doing a live show and then bringing on guests.
	Initially, we didn't have a lot of guests because of the lockdown.
	A few came in.
	But the goal was, I will have these conversations, and I will also have a co-host who is not as familiar, doesn't read the news all the time, so that they can ask questions if they don't understand.
	Like, well, what do you mean?
	Who is Trump's Secretary of State?
	Like, what are you talking about?
	And I'll say, ah, well, you had Mike Pompeo.
	I think he was Secretary of State, right?
	I could be wrong.
	But anyway, that's my point.
	is one of four people who appear on the show, and when he says, what's a grand jury, there are a lot of people watching who don't know what a grand jury is.
	I also am not an expert on what a grand jury is, other than they look at the evidence to determine if there's a preponderance of evidence, probable cause, for which an indictment can be delivered, a person can be arrested, and then face a criminal trial to prove their innocence, and so that's basically it.
	Ian asks about it, a lot of people may have just been like, I don't know, I can't understand this, and they leave.
	So that's the point.
	There you go.
	Let's go!
	All right.
	Danker Supreme says, oh no, letting anyone in who said they were seeking asylum, let in criminals.
	Who could have seen this coming?
	Anyone with two brain cells to rub together, that's who.
	Oh, and by the way, first, incorrect, good sir, you were second, but nice try.
	Let's go.
	Pickle for sanity says, Tim, what do you feel is the likelihood that they will have to send in the military to liberate Aurora?
	Very high.
	And it will only be if Donald Trump gets elected.
	National Guard will go in and lock this place down for sure.
	S. Hobson says Trump has to do the Fox debate on September 4th.
	He should show up with two stands, one for Harris, and if she doesn't show up, do a town hall.
	Everyone should call her out on it and pressure her into doing it.
	Love you, Tim Kast, appreciate it.
	I agree, that's a great idea.
	Trump should go to Fox and say, set the debate up, call it the debate.
	Then Trump shows up, Stand at the podium.
	There's a moderator.
	And they say, Vice President Harris was invited to this debate and she declined to show up.
	For that, it will be with Donald Trump.
	We'll ask questions and give you an opportunity to speak to the American people.
	Harris has the same opportunity.
	She can arrive at any time if she would so desire.
	And she won't.
	And that would make a huge statement.
	That would be really great.
	Let's see.
	In the regular chat, Cox says, Ian will ask questions and be humble.
	Is the plan to do this with Hannah?
	It doesn't work when she just repeats what others say and says, I think, I think it's ridiculous.
	Worst co-host on TimCast ever.
	I completely disagree.
	I think Hannah Clare is fantastic.
	She knows exactly what she's doing in co-hosting a show.
	She writes news for SCNR all day.
	And people are always complaining about someone on the show.
	People complain about me on the show.
	You know what I mean?
	But humbly disagree.
	If I should thought the show was not working and often sometimes it doesn't always doesn't always I'll tell you this my friends there was a one show like three or four months ago where I almost just cut the show at 830 and got up and left the room my my biggest pet peeve There have been days where everyone, including the guests, are just sitting and they're just on their phones.
	And I'm talking, being like, here's the story, Donald Trump did a backflip today and he landed in a superhero pose.
	And then I look around and everyone's on their phones and they're not talking.
	And I'm like, dude, I am not monologuing for two hours.
	Like, this is a conversation show.
	And so, for those that are savvy may catch this, at some point I just stop.
	Then I'll just sit here.
	And then I'll wait for someone to say something, and then someone will put their phone— Oh, what's going on?
	Like, oh, all confused.
	And there was one point where it was so bad, I literally was on the verge of being like, guys, I'm not doing this.
	If you came to this show without— and did not have the intention to have a conversation, I don't understand why we're here.
	Thank you all, and have a nice day.
	But I think we didn't get to that threshold, and we narrowly averted the shutdown.
	But I was getting pissed off.
	We have guests who don't talk and then complain!
	We had one guest who didn't talk, and we're like, begging the guest to talk, like, ugh.
	And then afterwards, they wrote an angry letter complaining, like, emailed booking being like, I'm furious about how this went down, and it's just like, what is going on?
	You wouldn't talk.
	And we'll try, like, we have guests where we try to ask them questions, and Hannah Clare will try to ask them questions, like, so what do you think?
	What about, you know, your view on this guest?
	Sometimes they just don't wanna talk.
	And it's rough, but we try.
	We try to get good guests, you know?
	Let's grab some more.
	Let's go!
	Matt Saman says, Tim, as someone who also works roughly 16 hours a day between two jobs, I totally get it.
	Catching up with you like you said last night.
	Always take the rest you need.
	It's not worth burning out.
	I think I was dehydrated.
	It's happened to me before where I got dehydrated.
	There's nothing you can do.
	I have no idea.
	I'll tell you this.
	I had, I have these sports drinks, I have electrolytes.
	We've got smart water.
	I, I know about dehydration.
	You can't just drink regular water.
	Regular water doesn't have the salt in it.
	Your body needs to retain fluids.
	And so, I had two protein shakes of the day.
	I ate, uh, what did I have?
	I think I had grilled chicken with onions and jalapenos and fresh made guacamole.
	No cilantro, by the way.
	Extra lime juice.
	That's how I do it.
	Uh, drank as much as- plenty of fluids, before bed, had a- a protein shake, with coconut, uh, coconut water, coconut milk, and, uh, uh, jocomo, 16 ounces, and I still woke up dehydrated the next day.
	It was nuts.
	I don't know.
	Just happens, man.
	I was still dehydrated.
	And it's because you need certain vitamins, whatever it is.
	And so what I ended up doing was, I was wiped out.
	I had a headache.
	I think I was just dehydrated.
	And so I had, I got a vitamin IV drip.
	I suppose something that the average person could not do.
	Actually, no, it's not that difficult to do.
	It's, you know, to get an IV, an emergency IV drip.
	They have these services all over the cities, actually.
	So take that back.
	But had a nurse come, I got an IV drip and instantly rehydrated, felt instantly better.
	And I'm just like, dude, it's brutal.
	I don't, I don't, I, I suppose a combination of Doing the morning show, doing the night show, and skating for two to three hours, hitting a lot of VO2 max every day is burning the candle at both ends, and sooner or later I'm gonna be just like, and collapse and fall apart.
	And then I'm going to ask medical science to pump me full of saline so I can keep going.
	That's apparently what happened.
	Let's go.
	I did not say that, indeed.
	the other day that allowing only landowners to vote would solve voting issues.
	Dems could just give people a one-by-one plot of land to vote so the solution would work.
	I did not say that, indeed.
	I did not say only landowners voting would solve the issues.
	I said that's how we used to do it.
	We used to have it be that you had to be a landowner and you had a land deed to prove that you were a member of the community.
	But that doesn't make sense anymore because not everybody owns land and they do live places.
	There are many people who rent their homes and rent rooms and rent apartments but have lived in a city for a decade plus.
	They've never owned.
	And they have a right to what goes on in their community more than someone who bought land and lives in Germany.
	So land ownership doesn't quite make sense.
	There has to be a tie to the community.
	But I can solve all the voting problems like that.
	No more ballots.
	When you go to vote, they say, here's your paper.
	Fill it in.
	Have fun.
	They don't even tell you who's running for what.
	I do not understand this reality where they're like, here's a list of the things that are available to vote on, and here are the people you can vote for.
	That makes literally no sense.
	And I think that should be abolished.
	I believe the Founding Fathers should have known this.
	But back in the day, we did not have voting this way.
	Voting was not, you received a ballot from the state with a list of candidates.
	Voting was, you went in and you wrote the name down and you voted for it.
	And so I guess the founding fathers could not have predicted this.
	We need an amendment that says, in all election processes, no name, party, or information on the election shall be provided to the voter.
	The only instructions that can be given is, what must be done to properly vote.
	And that is, the name must be legible, It must be spelled correctly, and you must know their position that they're running for.
	You'll receive a blank piece of paper, and it will have a grid on it, and you write in the position and the name of the individual for whom you vote, and it must be legible and spelled correctly.
	Thank you, and have a nice day.
	Voting problem solved.
	Members of Congress will all of a sudden just start getting 7,000 votes in districts of 750,000.
	And I don't care.
	I'm fine with that.
	Because only the most well-informed and the most passionate individuals will actually cast their votes or vote properly.
	This idea that someone who doesn't know what the position is... Do you know what a comptroller is?
	Okay.
	Tell me, in chat, what a comptroller is.
	Or how about an ombudsman?
	And then explain to me why you voted for Joe Smith or Jane Doe for that position.
	You don't know the person is, you don't know what they're running on.
	And it is insane that you go to Chicago and they're like, here's your ballot, who do you want to vote for?
	Comptroller.
	And then people go, Democrat.
	Check.
	Meaningless.
	And then you get people who run unopposed, and their their name is the only one.
	And they they're guaranteed a win.
	They're guaranteed the slot.
	Insanity should not be allowed.
	So my friends, what's a comptroller?
	Managing budgets and stuff.
	Yeah.
	A budsmith.
	That's right.
	Comptroller.
	Yeah, I remember seeing billboards for Comptroller and for Ombudsman and things like this, and I'm like a teenager, and I'm like, I don't know what that is.
	And I was told by people, well, just vote Democrat.
	And I'm like, I don't know what these people do.
	Insane.
	You know, but I gotta be honest, the first time I voted, I think it was a Chicago election, and I was told by my family, Come vote with us, come grab dinner, and then we'll go vote.
	And this is really crazy.
	I was told, hey, why don't you come over and we'll have dinner, and then we're gonna go vote.
	And I was like, okay, whatever.
	And I showed up, we had a delicious dinner, and then we walked down the block, went to the voting place, and I said, who do I vote for?
	And they're just a Democrat for all of it.
	And I was like, okay, I did.
	I did that.
	Yeah.
	And this was, I believe this was before Obama.
	And then when Obama came around, I was deeply interested and excited for Ron Paul.
	It was like this weird internet thing.
	I didn't know a lot about him.
	I didn't really understand.
	I knew a little bit.
	I had been on the internet for a long time, so of course I knew President Planet and stuff, but I wasn't listening to it all the time.
	And then my friends were just like, dude, just vote for Obama.
	And what they had me convinced on was, Hillary Clinton was supposed to be the Democrat nominee.
	She's this rich old white lady.
	She's Bill Clinton's wife.
	It's a dynasty.
	We don't want Bush Clinton, Bush Clinton.
	That's what they're trying to do.
	We can't allow that.
	And the narrative was Barack Obama was this revolutionary upstart who stormed his way into the system and usurped power from the corrupt establishment.
	And I was like, whoa.
	I don't know a lot about it.
	All I know is people are like, dude, Barack Obama was not supposed to win.
	This is crazy.
	And I was like, really?
	And they're like, dude, it's Hillary Clinton.
	She's the first lady.
	She's Bill Clinton's wife.
	It was supposed to be dynasty.
	And then Obama showed up, started winning in the polls, and they couldn't stop him.
	And he won over the media.
	Like, we gotta vote for this guy.
	It's our chance.
	And I was like, wow.
	All right.
	And I voted for him.
	And then he blew up a bunch of kids.
	And I was like, you lied to me!
	I was lied to!
	Obama did worse.
	Worse things.
	Whatever.
	That's why I didn't vote Trump in 2016.
	I was like, dude, I'm so over this, okay?
	You're not tricking me again.
	And then Trump actually did the things!
	No new wars, timeline for withdrawal, getting our troops out of Syria, trying to make peace in the Middle East, Abraham Accords, trying to make peace with North Korea, and I'm sitting here watching and being like, dang, this guy's doing what they told me that Obama was gonna do.
	Crazy, isn't it?
	It's funny because if you look at the World Trade Organization protests, the battle for Seattle in 1999, each and every one of those people must be a Trump voter, right?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, right.
	All right, I'll grab one more super chat, and then we'll jump to this next story about CNN and Kamala Harris.
	Triox says, in 1967, the LBJ admin soft-rigged the Electoral College, creating delegation like in New York and California.
unidentified		Hmm.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Interesting.
		Interesting, indeed.
		UltraBlackSheep says, try LMNT for hydration, and it's an awesome company.
		We use, uh...
		I don't actually know the name of it.
		Drip Hydration, I think?
		Drip Hydration, I think that's what it's called.
		And they're awesome because they're very nice to us.
		And I'm pretty sure I was dehydrated.
		I went snowboarding a year ago.
		And so, and this is like, where did we go?
		In West Virginia.
		So it's high elevation, higher.
		I don't know the exact elevation, but I think it was pretty decently high.
		West Virginia doesn't have like the best snowboarding.
		It's East Coast.
		What are you gonna do?
		Man, I went snowboarding up in, I think it was Seattle.
		And it was a crazy mountain.
		We were super high.
		That was fun.
		And it was like white out and I went on double black diamond, but it was all fresh powder.
		So it's like not that difficult.
		But I went, we went snowboarding this year.
		High altitude.
		I had like a single Gatorade.
		And so I'm doing physical activity, getting super tired.
		I got super dehydrated.
		My head was throbbing.
		I felt really sick.
		I tried drinking sports drinks and water so I didn't think I was dehydrated.
		I went up to the doctor and they were like, yeah, you were dehydrated.
		And I'm like, I don't get it.
		I'm drinking a lot.
		And they were like, it takes a long time.
		You get dehydrated.
		It doesn't just snap back.
		So I got an IV drip and then I was all better.
		And then so then the other day when I woke up and I was like, I am clearly really dehydrated and I, you know, I need something for it.
		Very dehydrated.
		Dehydration is huge and I think a lot of people don't recognize how often a lot of the ailments or what they're experiencing may literally be dehydration.
		Because you can't just drink water.
		You need electrolytes, and you need the proper combination of electrolytes.
		And then, you know, Ian was pointing out the other day, he was like, are you getting enough zinc?
		And I'm like, damn.
		He's right.
		I think I haven't been getting enough zinc.
		Honestly.
		I've been taking magnesium.
		Getting this balance right is not super easy.
		Let's jump to this story, my friends!
		So today, of course, you all know Kamala Harris.
		This is the day she'll be doing her interview with her quote-unquote emotional support animal, Tim Waltz.
		She'll be appearing on CNN while Donald Trump has some questions, and these are really good ones, that you know are not going to be asked.
		And if they are, I would be surprised.
		But the Postmillennial highlights how CNN's own Scott Jennings slams Kamala Harris for bringing emotional support animal Tim Waltz to first interview.
		When CNN is mocking you for being unable to do an interview, yeah, things aren't going to wells for you.
		But that's Kamala Harris.
		So here we go.
		Let me play the clip for you.
		Weak sauce for Kamala Harris to demand an emotional support animal for her first interview shows an extreme lack of confidence for Thursday night event on CNN.
unidentified		Is the line now going to be, well, why isn't she doing it by herself?
scott jennings ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I do think people are going to bring that up.
		Look, I have great confidence in Dana and CNN to do this.
		I think it's incredibly weak.
		Weak sauce to show up with your running mate.
		the fact that they don't have enough confidence in her to let her sit herself, the actual top of the
		ticket, and do a single interview. In fact, I think the hand-wringing and the gyrations over
		this over the last month show a troubling lack of confidence in her political ability, which also
		makes you wonder as a voter, well, what kind of president would you be if this kind of a small
		time decision, can we do an interview or not, what does that look like for your decision-making
		process, so on. So yes, I think Republicans are going to think it's pretty weak to show up
		with effectively someone to take up half the time. Yeah, but I'll tell you this, right?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		If I jump over to Civics—I love Civics, by the way.
		It's a polling website.
		If we just jump over to—I can't believe Joe Biden's job approval is still here anyway.
		Let's take a look.
		How is Joe Biden's job approval among Democrats?
		Look at this!
		His job approval went up!
		Yo, what is this?
		Is this when he dropped out?
		Okay, so when Joe Biden does the debate, his approval rating actually stays the same.
		And then you have him dropping out, it goes up.
		These people are nuts.
		Okay, I'm sorry.
		And there was a minor change.
		Joe Biden's disapproval dropped by... Okay, well, it moved slightly down, but not even a full point.
		Republicans, 95% disapprove of Joe Biden.
		among independents, disapproval declined after the presidential debate.
		His approval actually went up.
		Oh, no, actually, it was going up, and then it went down a little bit.
		But then it went up again.
		And then once he drops out, why don't we have this highlighted?
		Oh, yeah, President Biden exits.
		Wait, wait, what?
		Yeah, exits the race.
		There we go.
		Yeah, so the point is, it is Democrats who are largely blindly in favor of whatever it is the machine says.
		Do we have a Kamala Harris in here?
		Donald Trump favorability rating.
		Kamala Harris favorability.
		The media says she's running.
		All of a sudden, Democrats like her.
		Hey, look at that.
		Biden drops out.
		She steps in and she gets what a 13 point bump.
		Amazing.
		Well, Donald Trump has some questions.
		Trump campaign proposes 10 questions for Kamala's first interview since taking over the Democratic nomination for president.
		It's no coincidence that Kamala's first interview is scheduled for the Thursday night before Labor Day weekend.
		They already hope it gets lost and isn't even aired yet.
		Correct!
		So we're doing a show this Friday morning, tomorrow morning, and it's going to be a religious conversation.
		We've got a simulation theorist, a Christian, and Ian.
		I don't know what Ian is, but I think it'll be fun.
		I wanted to get an atheist.
		We couldn't get one.
		That's not fair.
		We reached out a little bit and were unable to get an atheist.
		We probably could have tried harder, but the issue is that I felt it would be unfair to bring on an atheist with I felt like it would be bullying a person who didn't know what they were talking about.
		Cue all the atheist anger, but we are still open absolutely to having an atheist on the show tomorrow.
		The concern was the people that we had some moderate interest from or could have gotten are not well-versed enough, and I thought that it would be Probably unfair, but ideally we do have an atheist on the show for the debate, because I'm not gonna pretend that we know everything.
		I just felt like the individuals that we had been talking to actually aren't well-versed in, like, theology and moral philosophy and physics, to that extent.
		I digress.
		So we're gonna be having that show tomorrow.
		But anyway, back to—I don't even know why I brought that up—back to Donald Trump's proposed questions.
		Oh, right, right.
		Of course, of course.
		The reason I brought it up is because a lot of people that we wanted to book can't do it because it's Labor Day weekend.
		That was the point.
		So we were reaching out to a few people, and they were like, dang, I really would want to come, but I'm going to leave in the afternoon for Labor Day weekend, so I can't make it.
		And so we got what we got.
		Trump is correct on the Labor Day weekend thing.
		People aren't going to be paying attention on the Friday for Labor Day weekend, okay?
		Everyone's going to be counting down the hours until they can leave.
		I'm going to be doing the same thing.
	We're going out for Labor Day weekend.
	We have no show on Monday.
	It's Labor Day.
	Everyone should be relaxing with family, enjoying a nice barbecue, cheeseburgers, whatever it is you want to do.
	I will be enjoying lobster roll.
	Probably not the roll, but the lobster indeed.
	And so Trump's right.
	They're burying Kamala Harris's interview.
	So Trump's team publishes 10 questions.
	Let's go.
	Ten questions for Danabash must ask Kamala Harris.
	Last night CNN announced that Kamala has mustered up the courage to sit for a joint interview after 39 days of hiding from reporters.
	It's no coincidence that Kamala and Walt's first interview is scheduled for the Thursday right before Labor Day weekend.
	They're hoping it's lost.
	Here's the ten questions.
	One.
	If you are capable of lowering prices for Americans, why haven't you done it in the three and a half years you have been in office?
	Let me try and give the argument.
	Let me try to answer these four Kamala Harris.
	If I were a Democrat, how would I answer these questions?
	All right, let's go through them first, and then I'll give you the Democrat answers.
	Two, you say housing affordability would be a day one priority.
	If you were elected, why is it not a priority now?
	Housing isn't affordable for the average American in 99% of the nation.
	Three, you co-sponsored Medicare for All and the Green New Deal.
	Do you still support these multi-trillion dollar takeovers of the American economy?
	Ooh, these are brutal!
	Four, you talk about freedom.
	5.
	President Trump didn't need a border bill to secure the border.
	Why did you support executive actions like stopping construction of the border wall and halting deportations that intentionally unsecured the border?
unidentified		6.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Trump was the first president in decades to start no new wars.
		Under your watch, wars are popping up in Europe and the Middle East.
		Why is that?
		Not a good question.
		Not a good question.
		I gotta be honest.
		Not a good one.
		I'll come back to them.
unidentified		7.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Why did you conceal Joe Biden's cognitive decline from the American people?
		8.
		You supported the Defund the Police movement and have said more that police doesn't mean more safety.
		Why do you want fewer police officers?
		That's a good question in the end because it's loaded.
		The implication is that she is lying and she can't answer the question without refuting the question itself.
		But let's answer these.
		You have sent anonymous aides out to claim you've abandoned the radically liberal positions
		that you've held for decades.
		Do you think lying to the American people is the best strategy?
		That's a good question in the end because it's loaded.
		The implication is that she is lying and she can't answer the question without refuting
		the question itself.
		But let's answer these.
		Let me tell you what I think the Democrats can offer up.
		These are not impossible to answer questions.
		And these are the questions.
		You need to war game this out.
		When these questions are being proposed, you need a strong, smart, and honest individual to answer them so you can craft the best questions you can.
		1.
		If you are capable of lowering prices for Americans, why haven't you done it in the three and a half years you have been in office?
		To our eye, running as a Democrat, here are my answers to this one.
		First, as vice president, it's not so much that I have the same leeway as the president in asserting these positions.
		And I do think that President Biden, while I can speak to him and speak in his ear, has different priorities that may or may not have worked out the way Americans have wanted to.
		And it's a fact that prices are way up.
		Well, the first thing is, we are trying to lower these prices, but a large component of this election is winning Congress and taking control of the Senate, for which, as president, my priority will be to maximize efforts in reducing these prices.
		But that means we need to win Congress, and right now, we're fairly weak.
		The Republicans have a majority in Congress, and we're barely breaking the tie in the Senate, and especially with the tumult we're experiencing politically with being near 50-50, and now Republicans having a slight majority.
		I don't know that we have the abilities on our own.
		This election is not just about the president.
		It is about winning back government, too.
		You say housing affordability is a day one priority if you're elected.
		Why is it not a priority now?
		The answer is, of course, it's a priority.
		But for the same answers to number one, Democrats stepping outside of the steel man of the answer, Democrats aren't going to do anything.
		So while I can certainly say it is silly for Kamala Harris to be like, we'll do it once we get in.
		It is actually the policies they've implemented.
		So, again, while I can steel man these questions for her, I'll also rebut with, you're the ones who passed the Inflation Reduction Act.
		You succeeded in that.
		Okay?
		So, it's your fault.
		Moving on.
		The answer from Kamala Harris should be, in this regard, she needs to back away and go more moderate and respond with, you know, we have big dreams.
		And we believe in a clean environment.
		We believe in clean air, clean water, clean drinking water, especially.
		We believe in people who get sick not dying because they have, say, the flu.
		And perhaps these plans went about it in the wrong way.
		And we need to find a more moderate solution and compromise with those in this country.
		And so while our goals and vision are still the same, the question can be answered very easily.
		You talk a lot about freedom, about the freedoms of Lake and Riley, Rachel Morin, etc., etc.
		Kamala is easily going to deflect this and say, the actions of criminals does not reflect our efforts to help refugees.
		That will play well with Democrats.
		President Trump didn't need a border bill.
		I'm not going to go through every single one of these questions.
		My point is, let me go to the one where it says, this one was a bad question.
		Trump was the first president in decades starting a new wars under your watch.
		Wars are popping up in Europe and the Middle East.
		Why is that?
		Easy response.
		Russia invaded Ukraine.
		We didn't start that war.
		And Hamas attacked Israel.
		We didn't start that war.
		Next question.
	That's it.
	Why did you conceal Joe Biden's cognitive decline from the American people?
	Kamala Harris will just say that she didn't.
	It only became apparent after he was struggling in the debate how serious this was.
	We actually thought he was doing fairly well up until that point.
	These questions are relatively easy to answer.
	They're good questions.
	They should be asked.
	But my friends, I tell you, a good politician is going to dodge all of these.
	Let's go through the realities here.
	Kamala Harris absolutely could help lower prices.
	She cast the tie-breaking vote on the Inflation Reduction Act.
	Inflation Reduction Act basically worsened the economy.
	Joe Biden as president has a lot of control, and she, of course, as vice president, also does as well.
	The reality is they will have answers to these.
	This is why a debate is more important.
	Trump can counter.
	But CNN says, Harris's CNN interview is the latest highly anticipated twist in a wild presidential race.
	What?
	I love this!
	What do you mean, twist?
	She's supposed to give interviews!
	What is this?
	Dude, I despise these people, okay?
unidentified		Let me tell you why they're saying this.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Harris will be helping to extend momentum.
		The highly anticipated twist, dude, I despise these people.
		Let me tell you why they're saying this, why they're calling it a twist.
		Because it's actually extremely abnormal for a presidential candidate to behave in the
		way she is.
		The swapping out of Joe Biden is nonsense.
		Doing the first interview as a joint interview is nonsense.
		And so they're saying it's a twist, as if to imply her action in doing this interview is abnormal.
		They want you to believe the normal scenario is the president doesn't do interviews.
		But you know what?
		That's going to work for the Gen Z voter.
		You know why?
		Because in 2020, First-time voters, let's say they were born in 2002.
		Their president they voted for, Joe Biden, if they did, he didn't give any interviews.
		He hid in the basement.
		Called the lid.
		Did nothing.
		Kamala Harris is doing the same thing.
		So now for these people, it's their second election.
		It's normal for presidents not to give interviews, not to give campaign positions, and to just hide in the basement.
		That's normal.
		It's a twist that she's actually going to talk to the American people.
		Well, my friends, I got bad news for yous.
		I got bad news for yous.
		Where's the post here?
		Benny Sarlin says, Democratic excitement about voting surges to 2008 levels.
		Gallup poll finds.
		We'll pull up the story from Semaphore.
		Democratic excitement about voting surges to 2008 levels.
		It's Obama territory.
		Now, I gotta wonder, though.
		It's currently resting at around 72%, and it is bad news for Trump.
		High excitement means larger turnout.
		But hold on there a gosh darn minute.
		It's comparable to the same Gallup polls from 2020.
		I don't think that's going to be enough.
		If Democrat excitement is comparable to 2020, and they call it 2008 levels, it's actually 2020 levels.
		You're not going to muster up the win.
		It's not enough.
		It is good for Democrats that they're seeing this enthusiasm for sure.
		The problem is voter turnout is everything.
		You see, with these polls in the Trump v. Harris, Harris is up 1.7.
		A lot of these Democrats don't vote.
		And so that's why Democrats have started doing the, they've started the ballot harvesting initiatives to an extreme degree.
		They've always done it, but they've ramped it up extremely because they know their turnout is bad.
		The bad news is, there have been key defectors who have jumped ship from Biden to Trump.
		That seems to be the more average thing for moderates.
		Republicans are closing the gap in many states, registering more Republicans than Democrats.
		Polls indicate, actually the data indicates, first-time registrants lean Donald Trump.
		That's why Democrats have been saying, stop registering people, which is bad, bad news for them.
		Republicans got to crank it up.
		Enthusiasm being comparable to 2020 ain't gonna cut it.
		Worse still, the real clear politics average has Harris up 1.7 points.
		The same time in 2020 Biden was up 6.9 percent.
		Hillary Clinton was up 5.9 percent.
		Hillary Clinton was up 5.9 and lost the election.
		So we'll see.
		We'll see.
		But I don't think, uh, I don't think it's all good news for Democrats and they should be absolutely paying attention to this.
		Now what I love is the big question about young men who have been shifting heavily towards Donald Trump.
		And I gotta tell you, my friends, the reason why they attack people like Jordan Peterson, now Andrew Tate, and Tristan Tate, and by all means, criticize both of these individuals.
		I know certainly the Tate brothers have substantially more criticism.
		They've said rather horrible things in the early 2010s about, I don't know what they were talking about, pimping or whatever.
		A lot of these things, many would say, are unforgivable.
	Talking about, uh, what are you talking about?
	Getting with 16-year-old girls?
	Now look, the argument they make is it's legal where they were, whatever jurisdiction.
	I still don't think that's defensible.
	That being said, my point is not to make a video attacking the Tate brothers over bad things that they had said in the past, and whether or not we should forgive them for it.
	My point is, right now their audience is largely young men who are apolitical.
	And that is apocalyptic for Democrats.
	There's a video of, like, a dude wearing a Top G sweater, like, riding a motorcycle.
	There's videos of people I saw a video of a guy who's like a DoorDash guy and he's wearing a Top G shirt or something and someone posted it online and Andrew Tate like retweets him or something like that.
	These guys, these young guys, don't care about politics.
	They want to know how they can be cigar-smoking, ripped dudes driving Bugattis.
	That's it.
	Regular, run-of-the-mill guys just want to be successful, cream-of-the-crop, best of the best.
	They just want to be high status.
	Well, Andrew Tate's telling them things about pushing back against the establishment, telling them to be strong men.
	Guys who behave this way lean right.
	They may not be Trump voters or whatever, you may not like Andrew Tate, but Jordan Peterson falls in a similar camp.
	Jordan Peterson has certainly not said these horrible things in the past.
	Jordan Peterson just gets criticized for saying seemingly nonsensical things.
	You're a chimpanzee full of snakes!
	And people are like, what?
	But he does.
	He's a brilliant guy.
	He's really smart.
	How to purchase things.
	And he long said, find the heaviest thing you can carry and carry it.
	Telling young men to take responsibility.
	Clean your room before trying to save the world.
	And young men found a father figure.
	Someone who told them to be better and be responsible.
	And that means more Trump votes.
	So of course the corporate press and the media, they're worried about it.
	They're worried about it.
	Donald Trump is converting young men to the right.
	And it's not just Trump.
	It's not just Andrew Tate.
	It's not the Tate brothers.
	It's also young men who want to have families.
	You know what I think?
	I think women are more susceptible to social pressures, so they adhere more to the social media algorithms.
	Young men want what young men want.
	I think there's a lot of young guys who want a wife.
	They want to go out, they want to go on adventures, they want to conquer the world.
	Figuratively, some literally.
	And then they want to come home to someone that loves and cares about them, that they love and care about, that is attractive, and they have children with.
	That's what guys want.
	Not every guy, but a lot of guys.
	It's like a biological imperative for many people to have a family.
	Women being more agreeable and prone to social pressures, and I'm not saying to be mean to them.
	There's a lot of benefits in women being more agreeable and social than men.
	Many of these women are told by social media not to do these things, not to have families, not to have kids, to be a girl boss.
	And they don't want to have families.
	So now you have young men, whether you agree or disagree, I don't care if you're a feminist or not, you don't like what I have to say.
	The reality is this, young men are looking for wives, they're looking for good women who they can love and trust, will have their back, and what they're finding is, many of these women doing OnlyFans.
	And you know what, a lot of guys buy from them.
	They don't want to marry them, but they'll buy from them, and that's a bad thing too.
	A lot of these guys are finding out that women today aren't interested in these things.
	They want to be the girl boss.
	They want a career.
	A lot of women don't, and feel pressure to do so as well, but young men are getting angry about this, and that's why they're moving towards Donald Trump and the right.
	Because the right is saying things like, we want a society where men can be men and women can be women.
	And there are young men... I'm talking about Gen Z guys.
	Dude, someone...
	There's a funny meme where someone said, they're like 30, and they're like, I feel like I got the last helicopter out of Nam in the dating market.
	I can't imagine how horrifying it must be to be dating as Gen Z or younger.
	Oh yeah.
	It's kind of wild, I gotta tell you.
	You know, when I was a kid, it was all physical reality.
	You knew the people you knew.
	You went to parties.
	You'd go to parties, you'd meet friends of friends, and that's how you made friends.
	We've met people through people.
	Or work.
	Usually school.
	Now it's all dating apps.
	Dating apps have made it so that even if you're in high school or college, you're able to meet people online who live far away.
	It's kind of crazy.
	So it must be brutal for these young guys.
	And so they are absolutely shifting right.
	They say it's Trump's subversive media strategy.
	And they talk about Trump getting roasted and the shock content.
	It's appealing.
	It may just work.
	Blah blah blah.
	But that ain't it.
	Democrats represent a party where young men are not going to be able to have a family.
	And there are men who want to have families.
	There are women who want to have families too, but again, women are more agreeable than men.
	So men are going to be more single-minded, more centrally focused, not necessarily self-centered, but more focused on their desires and what they want, whereas women are going to be more susceptible to social pressures on social media.
	That is, women saying, you know, You want to be independent, you got to take care of yourself, and they'll pursue that.
	That's reality.
	This is going to result in a lot of young men voting for Donald Trump.
	And that's apocalyptic to Democrats.
	These are factors that I think will contribute largely to a Donald Trump victory.
	However, none of that matters.
	As if arguing, having an argument about the political debate matters.
	It's procedure.
	The polls are so close, the only thing that matters is who's ballot harvesting.
	That's it.
	Turnout's meaningless.
	You walk up to a guy and say, who are you voting for?
	And he goes, I'm voting for Trump.
	You go, prove it.
	Where's your mail-in ballot?
	Fill it out.
	That's it.
	That guy probably doesn't know or care.
	I believe ballots should be blank, but so long as we're in the system, that's how you win power.
	So tonight, my friends, should be fun.
	We'll see what ol' Kamala has to say.
	We'll see what she has to say.
	I'll wrap it up there.
	Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
	World War III, ladies and gentlemen, is afoot!
	Russia issues that warning.
	And, uh, oh boy.
	BRICS.
	126 nations want to dump the dollar.
	Oh yeah, we're getting apocalyptic here, my friends.
	We are dangerously close.
	If Donald Trump loses, the Democratic Uniparty establishment, neocons, etc., they are not going to allow this to happen.
	Smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, go to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member, support our work directly to keep the show going.
	Thanks for hanging out.
	We'll see you all at 4pm.
	And of course, for everybody else, we will read your superchats.
	We'll get a couple of these in before we jump to this next segment about World War 3.
	Alright.
	Uncle Shane says, Tim, I thought you were exaggerating about it being shadowbanned on YouTube.
	It took me 20 minutes searching for this livestream to find it.
	Wow.
	Indeed!
	Shouldn't it just appear on your homepage?
	The other thing, too, is I took out an ad on Google.
	We have a budget for running an ad for TimCast IRL.
	The ad that we've been running, it's really simple, it's me saying, for the best show in culture, news, and politics, check out TimCast IRL.
	Click the ad, subscribe, and we'll see you there.
	And it's been very effective, actually.
	I think we're seeing a tremendous return on it.
	So I'm glad.
	And TimCastIRL's viewership subscriber has been growing.
	I think it's the only way to bypass the censorship.
	Based on the viewer count that we get, based on being the top live show every night on YouTube, it's crazy.
	There are periodically other shows, but they're, like, not English.
	So, like, for the United States, we typically have the largest live audience.
	The algorithm should be recommending this.
	It's in YouTube's best interest.
	But they don't, because it's politics.
	So we take out ads.
	I took an ad for this show, because if we're doing a morning show, same thing, right?
	This is different, it's a monologue.
	Four segments, monologuing in Super Chats.
	And they declined it, saying it was an election ad.
	BS!
	I know exactly what's up.
	I blurred the image of YouTube, so you couldn't make out any of the words or pictures, but you could still see the channel and the art.
	And I said, for the best show and news, check out, you know, Timcast Mornings, 10 a.m., blah, blah, blah.
	And they said it was an election ad.
	And I had to dispute it.
	They finally approved it, but it's barely running.
	That being said, the ad we're running for IRL has 90 million impressions.
	90 million!
	That's crazy.
	Which means a lot of people see it multiple times, and they probably just ignore it.
	But, works for me.
	Cultural ubiquity.
	The thing about these ads people don't realize, and I really can't say about advertisers, they're bad at business.
	Okay, let me tell you something.
	Ads serve two purposes.
	One, a direct sale.
	Two, ubiquity, I suppose.
	Knowledge.
	Brand awareness.
	A lot of companies don't get this.
	And so I take issue with a lot of these sponsors.
	They come to us and they're like, Tim, we want you to do an ad for this thing.
	And I'm like, you give me a prerecorded ad and I can run it.
	No, no, no.
	We want you to read the ad.
	Oh, you want me to endorse your product.
unidentified		Okay.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Now you're talking about a third factor endorsement.
		Whether I endorse your product, I have to actually use your product.
		I've had companies say, Tim, will you say, like, they give us a script for the product.
		And I'm like, I'm not reading that.
		And they're like, why not?
		I'm like, because I haven't used your product.
		And they're like, oh, but if you want me to read your product and explain what it does, I'll do that.
		If you want me to say something like, it's my favorite, I actually have to believe that.
		I won't just claim something that's not true.
		So when I do these ads and I say something like, it's my favorite or I do trust it, that's legit.
		And we've had companies where they've said like, can you promote our product?
		I say, yes.
		Say these things.
		And I was like, no, I've never tried your product.
		I will promote it.
		I'll explain what it is.
		Then they send us the products and we say yes or no.
		I gotta be honest though, like we've never had a bad product.
		Like we've had like meat delivery services and I'm like, I've never tried your meat.
		I don't know.
		They sent us burgers and they were like legit the best burgers.
		I was like, dang, company's good.
		Yeah, like Good Ranchers, we did a promo for them.
		They sent us, I think they sent us a couple packages, and I was like, I don't want to promote a company that says it's good food, unless it is.
		And it was like, legit, the beef they sent us was some of the best burgers I've ever had.
		So, absolutely amazing.
		Anyway, Shadowband for sure.
		What could I do?
		What could I do?
		Running ads is good.
		The idea for running ads on the show is just making more and more people aware of the show, hearing about it.
		The more people who hear about it, the easier it is to do bookings.
		So for us, if we do an ad and someone hears about Timcast IRL, Later on, when we're doing booking, they'll go, yeah, I've heard of that show.
		What is that one?
		Oh, they're pretty big.
unidentified		Hmm.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		There you go.
		One thing we want to do is run a longer commercial that actually includes some of the guests that we've had on.
		Um, but then we got to get permission from all those people.
		So I just kept it simple.
		It's 15 seconds.
		Let's go.
		Josh.
		Oh my gosh.
		As Tim had already happened.
		Massachusetts is funding buses for migrant children and kicked 100 kids off the buses and forced the American kids to walk like cheese.
unidentified		Wow.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		The Critical Pigeon says, please watch Destiny's Schizo arc by Datamosh.
		He hit something big you need to see.
		I mean, if you want to super chat and give an explanation of what that is, I'm not going to watch that video.
		Like, dude, I'm sorry.
		Guys, let me explain this again.
		Destiny is an irrelevant figure.
		He's relevant to the people who follow him.
		He's relevant in his own right.
		What I'm saying is, So, I have no problem talking about anybody in passing or whatever.
		I'm talking about Volodymyr Zelensky, Russia, the invasion of Kursk.
		I don't really care to watch a video about some low-tier, angry guy who brags, who gloats over death and insults people.
		I'm just like, why?
		Like, why does it matter?
		Rarely do I care to talk about some dude on Twitch or whatever who's got a couple hundred thousand subs or whatever, and he complains about people.
		This e-drama stuff is so dumb.
		Like, dude, let me give a shout-out again to our friend Sam Seder.
		Like, bro, you can do whatever you want, and the people who like his show are allowed to, but talk about lowbrow.
		Like, making clips of me doing a show, bro, it's just so laughably absurd.
		But I appreciate it.
		Like I mentioned, brand ubiquity really does help.
		And so if you want to talk about me all day, I find it fascinating.
		But I'm just like, there are people who live in this tiny world.
		Where they're like, the most important thing is random internet people.
		Now if I was a policymaker, sure.
		If I was like, as big as Joe Rogan, perhaps I'd understand that.
		But like, Sam Seder's channel, I'm pretty sure has more subscribers than this one.
		It's like, why does he keep talking about me?
		It's just so weird.
		I don't know.
		Because he gets clicks and it makes him money.
		But it's lowbrow, you know what I mean?
		Uh, same thing's true for Destiny.
		So, why don't you guys super chat, explain what it is, and I'll read it, but I'm not interested in watching a video about some guy who's not relevant to, say, like, World War III, or, you know, whatever.
		We'll grab a couple more super chats before we jump to the next segment.
		Halo News says, Hey Tim, can you please explain your morals and what you believe is good or evil in good detail?
		Like what you believe is the most important righteous thing to do and what you believe is truly evil.
		I have explained this on a great deal of occasions.
		Tomorrow morning on Culture War.
		Go to Tenet Media on YouTube.
		Subscribe to the channel.
		That's where we do the Culture War podcast.
		Fridays at 10 a.m.
		And I'll give you the simple version of it.
		There is good and there is evil.
		There is the surface level within the human experience of what is good and what is evil, and then there is the greater good and the greater evil.
		And I view it largely, but this is an oversimplification which would require much longer to break down, is that good creates and evil destroys.
		That being said, sometimes in the service of good you can destroy and sometimes in the service of evil you can create.
		If you take a look at yin-yang, you will see that there are, uh... It's black and white, they're swirling, and there are two dots within each.
		It's not just to represent the balance of all things, but to represent that within good there is evil, within evil there is good.
		That there's a little bit.
		Let me explain.
		I'll try to make it fast.
		If you track what all energy in the universe is doing, it is, to a lesser degree, organizing itself.
		It is moving, it is a tendency towards greater disorganization, but within it, there is somewhat a degree of organization.
		We are ever fighting the greatest disorganization, the chaos of the universe, in entropy.
		All things flow towards a state of entropy.
		You cannot resist it.
		There is negative entropy, but only so long as it is creating more entropy around it, which is seemingly paradoxical, but is still correct.
		We see that mathematically.
		We could be wrong about all of this.
		Humans are certainly fallible.
		But you can take a look at gravity, the fundamental forces of nature that we believe to exist so far.
		We are still trying to find the unifying force or whatever.
		But you take a look at all these things and there is a tendency within what life is towards the organization of free energy into complex systems.
	This is what humans are.
	We are negative entropy.
	Though entropy is created more so by what we do, in the long run we still try to have some organization within this.
	Things that are good create, protect, preserve, and expand.
	Things that are evil destroy and dismantle.
	Evil people are self-interested.
	They benefit themselves to the detriment of others.
	They kill children for their own earthly pleasures.
	But if humans were to pursue all earthly pleasures and abandon creation and protection, humanity would cease to exist.
	That is a force of entropy.
	I believe that is evil.
	What is good tends to be creating and protecting.
	That being said, if you destroy evil, you are destroying.
	But within good, there is the capacity to destroy.
	Within evil, there is the capacity to create.
	I can get into this.
	It would take several hours to break down physics.
	I don't know.
	We can talk about quantum physics, fundamental particles.
	We can talk about how they coalesce into elements, what that ultimately results with, self-replicating proteins.
	I've talked about it before.
	We'll talk about it more tomorrow.
	But I believe that a lot of these things break down into the simple question of, are you creating things, protecting things, and preserving things that will create And organize more and develop and expand, or are you simply destroying for the sake of destruction and to your end?
	Ending life is wrong.
	Creating life is good.
	But, you know, there's a lot more to it than that.
	Let's go, I'll grab one more here.
	After a delicious drink, a drink of NUMA.
	Today I have Mango NUMA.
	Delicious.
	Alright.
	Yeah, well, you know what?
	That's crazy.
	is asking Trump not to use their songs now.
	Yeah, well, you know what?
	That's crazy.
	The Critical Pigeon says Destiny found an AI rabbit hole.
	That's crazy.
	His politics are dogish, but you need to watch it.
	Once again, if somebody wants to write what it is again, Like, I don't understand the, it's big!
	Watch!
	No.
	And the, it's crazy!
	Dude, just super chat.
	Destiny said X, Y, and Z. If it's interesting, I'll check it out.
	A clickbait?
	No.
	Let me explain what clickbait is to you guys.
	Clickbait is not when I make a title that says Donald Trump threatened with arrest by Democrat over thing.
	Everyone goes, oh, clickbait again.
	That's not clickbait.
	If Jamie Raskin says they're going to use the powers of Congress to block Donald Trump, and I say, Democrat threatens to block Trump if he wins election, that is not clickbait.
	I am literally telling you.
	Clickbait is when I would say, you won't believe what this Democrat threatened to do to Donald Trump.
	That's clickbait.
	It's when you don't tell someone what the story is.
	Click rage bait.
	You can certainly call the headlines up about rage bait where it's trying to elicit an emotional response or you see it and it makes you feel something so you pursue it.
	Rage bait is usually when you make a headline that is intended to make someone angry so they click it.
	But click bait is when you omit information requiring someone to click it to then try and figure out what the story is.
	Benedict Meatball says I was a stout atheist up until about this time two years ago.
	I held and hold more conservative values and treasured the value of life.
	I thought logically with life and instinct at the center.
	Every single argument I've ever had with an atheist always fundamentally breaks down to, I don't believe in fairy tales.
	To which my response is, whether or not God exists has no bearing on what humans believe and what stories they tell each other.
	If you are an atheist, And your response is, I just don't think religions are correct, or Jesus was not the savior, or the prophet is not the prophet, or whatever it is you want to believe.
	You are talking about human stories and history, which has zero bearing on the existence of God.
	If you say deity, once again, it is so impossible to explain this to people who lack the capability to understand these things, and there's nothing you can do about it.
	When we are talking about the fundamental structures of reality, what is or is not, It is impossible to explain to someone God if in their mind they can only fathom that the word God represents man in the sky.
	And they might get a little bit beyond that and say, no, no, I understand what you're saying, but there's no deity.
	Deity is also a reference to a theistic figure in human stories.
	The word God, or as Michael Knowles more aptly puts it, the Logos of the Universe, is probably a much better way to describe it, but heavens help me if you can't explain it to someone who doesn't have the perspicacity.
	And it's funny when they get mad when I use those, I don't know, the shrewdness to observe reality, I suppose.
	I want to offer up one more thought on this because I'm going to enjoy talking about it tomorrow before I go to this next story.
	I want you to imagine in your mind right now a grid, seemingly infinite.
	Each and every grid, there is a number between 0 and 9.
	Each of these numbers represents a fundamental aspect of reality.
	Certain groupings of these numbers, and they're all different numbers, they're constantly changing as well, represents components of reality.
	As you zoom out, the only thing that you will see is a grid of more and more and more numbers, 0 through 9.
	That's it.
	So it could be 700 billion by 700 billion, and the more you zoom out, there's just more and more numbers.
	Each of these numbers have different values.
	These different values interact with objects around them.
	Now, you're going to need to imagine that it's not just a grid, but a cube of expanded into the third dimension.
	Each and every one of these numbers represents a fundamental aspect of reality.
	Once they reach certain points where those numbers equal, and the numbers actually aren't 0 through 9, I'm just dramatically trying to simplify this perspective.
	Once one cube hits a 1, and the other one hits a 1, then they interact in some way, and then they change and they stop interacting.
	Expand that now into the fourth dimension, if you know how to do that in your mind.
	We can only do that with 3D representations because our mind can't fathom four dimensions.
	Rinse and repeat until you get into multiple dimensions.
	Take a look at Google search E8 Lie Group.
	The point is, trying to expand your mind into understanding rudimentary functions of reality, and then growing them into larger and more complicated functions to the point where your brain just literally can't comprehend them.
	And that is so far beyond this idea that people have about atheism, where they're just like, I just think fairy tales are wrong, and I'm like, oh man, I really cannot help you conceive of these ideas.
	If you can't do it, you can't do it.
	And it's no disrespect, some people do not have the ability in their minds to see and calculate certain things.
	It's not a dig at people, some people can't do it, okay?
	But there are people who, so I tweeted this the other day, that the problem with many atheists is that they can't separate the concept of God from human history and human stories.
	To which the response from many atheists was, no, we just don't believe in fairy tales.
	And I'm like, that's exactly my point, dude!
	When I say God, Now, don't get me wrong, there are a lot of people who are really dumb who do envision God as a guy in the sky, and that's just a different story.
	Just because stupid people may misunderstand or misinterpret doesn't mean that atheists are right if they can't fathom fundamental elements of reality.
	I am a zit on the ass of a mosquito in the universe, in terms of what I can think and fathom.
	The idea that consciousness exists and exists in a gradient which is observable to humans, the idea that it would end with humans is an absurdity.
	It certainly does not.
	And consciousness is a component of reality itself, in which, under the laws of physics, our consciousness is connected to reality and exists within its code.
	Therefore, higher consciousness literally exists.
	It's an observable fact.
	Man, I can't even get it.
	I'll save it for tomorrow because I'm going to go off.
	It's just frustrating sometimes because the reality is you can't explain to someone who can't fathom how to fathom.
	Either they can or they can't.
	I have my limitations as well.
	As I mentioned, I am but a zit on the acid mosquito in the universe.
	I wish there's that scene in that Indiana Jones movie, The Crystal Skull, where the woman, she looks into it because she wants all of the knowledge, but her brain can't handle it and she explodes.
	That's what we are.
	We're not the smartest beings in the universe.
	We are a component of the universe.
	Our consciousness is a microscopic speck in the universe.
	And the smartest of us are still the stupidest of the universe.
	As Dr. Manhattan said, the world's smartest man poses no more threat to me than its smartest termite.
	The gap in consciousness between us and the locus of the universe is so vast, would be to describe, would be to say, that a termite and a human have comparable intelligence.
	But anyway, I digress.
	Let's talk about World War Three.
	We have this story from Newsweek.
	Russia issues a warning.
	World War Three.
	A World War Three warning to the U.S.
	You know why they're doing it?
	How about this?
	Ukraine says it struck at two oil depots inside Russia.
	So using Western weapons, Western training, Western resources, Western intelligence, and Western volunteers.
	They call them volunteers.
	That means U.S.
	boots on the ground.
	There has been an invasion of Russia.
	Russia has threatened to use nuclear weapons if facing an existential threat.
	But perhaps they need not blow us up.
	From Watcher.guru, BRICS.
	126 nations meet with alliance to discuss ditching the US dollar.
	My friends, the deep state will not allow that to happen.
	The liberal economic order will not allow that to happen.
	So perhaps Russia will say, we don't need nukes, we're getting off the petrodollar, and you are done.
	And what do you think the response from the United States is going to be?
	It's going to be war.
	Our only hope, in my opinion, is a Donald Trump victory.
	Trump wins, secures the United States, protects it, and then pushes for security in this country, and lets these other countries trade as they see fit.
	It could lead to global conflict and competition, but it'll avoid nuclear annihilation.
	First, from Newsweek.
	Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov issued a World War III warning to the U.S., saying the West was asking for trouble by even considering Ukrainian requests to use supplied weapons to conduct strikes deep within Russian territory.
	Discussions about using Western-supplied missiles to strike Russia are tantamount to playing with fire, Lavrov told reporters in Moscow on Tuesday.
	The U.S., despite requests from Ukraine, has remained steadfast on its position that its long-range weapons may only be used on Ukrainian soil or to defend the country from Russia cross-border attacks.
	Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly asked Western allies to approve the use of their weapons to strike targets inside Russia, insisting that doing so could turn the tide of war.
	Lavrov warned the West against entertaining Kiev's request.
	We have long been hearing these speculations about allowing the use of not only storm shadow, but also American long-range missiles, by the way.
	Some anonymous source in Washington said that such work is being done.
	Ukraine's request is being viewed in a generally positive light.
	I'd like to add they've already used U.S.
	weapons to strike Russian territory.
	This is blackmail.
	This is an attempt to pretend that the West wants to avoid excessive escalation.
	But in reality, this is deceit.
	The West does not want to avoid escalation.
	The West is asking for it.
	And it seems to me that this is already obvious to everyone.
	We are now confirming once again that playing with fire, that, that, that, again, that playing with fire, and they are like small children playing with matches, is a very dangerous thing for grown-up uncles and aunts who are entrusted with nuclear weapons in one or another Western country.
	The edit.
	Americans unequivocally associate conversation of the Third World War as something that, God forbid, if happens, will affect Europe exclusively.
	Pentagon Press Secretary Major General Patrick Ryder told reporters during a press conference, during a news conference on Tuesday, that Washington's policies on Ukraine, Ukraine's use of American-supplied missiles, has not changed.
	You've heard us say the Ukrainians can use U.S.
	security assistance to defend themselves from cross-border attacks.
	In other words, counter-fire.
	But as it relates to long-range strikes, deep strikes into Russia, our policy has not changed.
	We're not seeking conflict with Russia.
	We are simply supporting a democratic nation who was invaded two and a half years ago and enabling them to protect themselves.
	I'm gonna go ahead and say lies, but anyway.
	Look at what's happening to Ukraine.
	They're surging into Russia.
	You're going to have World War III.
	This is Donald Trump.
	Speaking Tuesday about the invasion in Detroit.
	Responding to Trump's remarks, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said many Western countries are already up to their ears in this conflict.
	To put it simply, they are directly involved in this conflict.
	Such forays like the one in Kursk Oblast are, of course, acts that escalate tension to the limit.
	Therefore, there is cause for concern.
	And in this case, one can treat such an alarmist statement with understanding.
	There are no winners.
	in nuclear war.
	Only survivors.
	Ukraine says it struck at two oil depots inside Russia.
	Why are we tolerating this?
	Democrat voters who are supporting this are either abject malicious evil or the banality of evil.
	I will say it again.
	Ukraine has invaded Russia.
	They've evacuated 130,000 civilians.
	They are bombing oil depots.
	I do not like Russia.
	I do not like Ukraine.
	Let them have their war.
	I don't care.
	Russia should not have invaded Ukraine.
	The U.S.
	should not have tried to interfere in Ukraine and tried to induct them into NATO.
	There is no innocence here, only escalation.
	And the people in this country that are supporting the Ukraine flag-waving Democrat psychopaths and neocons are going to destroy this planet, they're going to destroy this country, and they are going to wipe out large portions of humanity.
	They need to stop.
	I don't know that Donald Trump averts the crisis.
	I can certainly tell you that it's the better option, and heaven help us.
	Russia at any moment could begin using nuclear artillery or tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine to stop the incursion into Kursk.
	I'm hoping they don't.
	I got a few hopes.
	One is that Russia is just pathetic and cowardly and just gives up.
	It's all over.
	They get invaded and they just cry and whine about it.
	Not that I like what's happening with the war and the conflict on either side.
	The point is, whatever ends the war, Maybe Donald Trump gets elected, tells Ukraine it's over, and Russia and Ukraine stop.
	But so long as Democrats are in power, they are going to exacerbate this problem.
	Russia will eventually retaliate.
	There's no reality where Russia sits back and says, ladies and gentlemen, we've lost.
	Pack it in, boys, we're fleeing.
	Heading east.
	No way.
	There's no reality in which Ukraine continues the incursion and Russia just says, guess we lose an oblast, basically like a state.
	No, if it comes down to the point of true desperation, Putin says low-yield nuclear artillery, flatten them, send a message.
	Low-yield nuclear artillery.
	This means they're launching them from ground-based artillery.
	Firing weapons with a large blast radius but not quite near what we're going to see with ICBMs, Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles.
	And that begins, my friends, the nuclear escalation.
	Heaven help us if Russia actually feels like Moscow would fall if we ever get to that point.
	Because then it's ICBMs.
	Europe will be a pancake.
	I hope it doesn't go there.
	A lot of people have optimism bias and normalcy bias.
	They don't believe it's possible.
	They think that it'll never happen.
	Putin will never use these weapons.
	You do not get to go on the media every day and say Putin is a despot psychopath tyrant.
	And then try and tell me the man will not use nuclear weapons.
	Pick one.
	Because it can't be both.
	Either he is a psychopathic tyrant who will do anything to stay in power.
	Or he's a pathetic spineless coward.
	Which one?
	If he is the despot you claim him to be, he will absolutely say, I will not give up power, and you will not pry it, unless you do from my cold, dead hands.
	Vladimir Putin, to me, comes off as a person who would absolutely use nuclear weapons.
	We may get there by other means.
	126 nations meet with alliance, the BRICS nations, that's Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.
	Around 126 nations will attend a BRICS municipal conference, all showing interest in joining the bloc and ditching the US dollar.
	The queue to join BRICS is getting longer.
	Developing countries are expressing their interest in joining the alliance.
	The BRICS countries' 6th International Municipal Forum, IMF, that's funny how they're calling it IMF, will take place in Moscow between August 27th and 28th, which was already long past.
	Mostly developing countries hailing from Asia, Africa, South America, and Eastern Europe shared initial interest in joining the bloc.
	The newfound ambition is to strengthen their local currencies and not be dependent on the U.S.
	dollar for trade, as they have been for some time.
	The event will include more than 70 business events and a large-scale exhibition showcasing the annual international exhibitions Digitech and Mechanical Engineering Strategies and Technologies.
	Almost half of the world shows interest in joining BRICS and dethroning the U.S.
	dollar.
	That's the end, man.
	Let me break it down for you.
	What is the U.S.
	economy based on?
	It's called the petrodollar.
	If you want to buy oil, you use U.S.
	dollars.
	We had an alliance, an agreement with Saudi Arabia.
	I should say we had an agreement with them on the petrodollar deal where they would only accept dollars for oil for 50 years.
	That deal ended.
	They're now trading in other currencies.
	We forced other countries, literally forced, to use the U.S.
	dollar to buy oil.
	So if you are, let's say, let's call it oil land, A small Middle Eastern nation, and you produce oil.
	If you want to sell it, first ask on the international market, available to all, and you can only trade in dollars.
	That means, because of what the U.S.
	demands, you're accepting U.S.
	dollars for this, or else.
	Oh, we know what happens to countries that try to get off the dollar.
	Gaddafi or Saddam Hussein said we want to trade elsewhere, euros or dinars.
	We saw what happened.
	Let's say you're a small nation called Silverland.
	You don't make a lot of oil, but you got a lot of silver.
	So you need that oil to get the silver.
	What do you do?
	Well, your country first must buy U.S.
	dollars.
	You need to trade your currency for U.S.
	dollars so that you can buy oil.
	So you go to the U.S.
	and you say, we're going to do 100 silver coins in exchange for $2,000.
	That way we can buy oil.
	Random number, right?
	Then with the dollars they buy oil.
	The U.S.
	then has silver land currency that they can spend in silver land and buy whatever they want.
	What did the U.S.
	do to get access to this currency?
	Nothing.
	They printed the money.
	There's inflation, interest rates, they just They just make it and say, okay, give us your currency and we'll let you have the oil.
	For Silverland to have money to actually get the oil, they must export something of value so that their economy is strong and you have something that is worth buying, other people have, that's worth buying.
	If your country produces nothing, the U.S.
	is gonna say, your currency is worth nothing.
	Why would we give you any dollars?
	You're gonna have to give us everything you got.
	The United States has no such limitations.
	When the U.S.
	wants to buy oil, it just makes the money and buys the oil, just because we can.
	We produce a lot of oil, too, don't get me wrong.
	When the petrodollar ends, what happens now is, Silverland trades in whatever they want.
	Probably Chinese yuan, or a BRICS currency.
	The U.S.
	then says, hey, we need oil, too.
	And the rest of the world says, what are you going to give us for it?
	And they're going to say U.S.
	dollars, and they're going to say, what does that get us?
	You don't export anything, and no one needs your dollars to buy anything.
	That means the U.S.
	economy will start to crumble.
	Mostly imports.
	Goods that are produced here will remain stable based on the local economies and how much people expect to get paid.
	The problem is, Of the goods that we import, which is like basically everything now, are vegetables?
	Why are we importing food from China?
	What's going to happen then is China's not going to need any of our dollars to buy oil, and they've been dumping dollars.
	So that laptop you bought for a thousand bucks, $10,000 is easy.
	Imagine if right now you wanted a laptop, but they all were lowest price, $6,000, $7,000.
	Because they're all imported, and you've got to pay for the actual cost of that labor.
	You wouldn't be able to.
	Now don't get me wrong, your cheeseburger's only gonna be 30 bucks, but that laptop's gonna be way more.
	When you're talking about what really gets impacted by this, it's imported goods.
	We can trade amongst ourselves however we want.
	We have a labor standard between each other.
	But the resulting impact at the end of the petrodollar means labor won't be cheaper overseas, we'll be forced to return to local labor.
	I believe Donald Trump's view is strengthen the U.S.
	economy so we have strong imports, strong standard economics in terms of like unemployment rates are low and Wage growth is high, inflation is low, things like that.
	That way, when the petrodollar falls, and it will, America will still have a footing for trade.
	Kamala Harris, Biden, the others, their view is no.
	Keep the guns pointed on them and threaten to annihilate the world unless they give us the oil.
	It will not end well for us.
	I'm gonna wrap it up there.
	Next segment's coming up at 6pm on this channel.
	We'll be talking culture and women quitting their jobs to do OnlyFans.
	Smash the like button, subscribe to this channel, share this video if you did enjoy it, follow me on X at TimCast.
	Thanks for hanging out, and we'll see you all in the next segment.
	Let me, uh, grab a drink real quick before I get to the next one.
	Danksy says Cast Bar, not Tim Bar.
	Cast Bar's actually the name that we considered.
	Tim Bar was a joke.
	Like, Tim Bar!
	But the working name we have now for our protein bar is our Cast Bar.
	Because it's short, simple, it's on-brand, and it would apply to a general audience who just sees a protein bar and says, Cast Bar.
	Easy.
	And the flavors that we have coming are Birthday Cake, Vanilla Coconut, Double Chocolate, and Sweet and Salty.
	Sweet and Salty's probably gonna be my favorite, to be honest.
	I was like, dude, just give me Peanut Butter.
	Peanut butter, coconut oil, bang, it's all I want.
	It's like, okay, we'll put whey protein in it, but the bars that we got so far were chocolate, and they were awesome.
	Low sugar, high fat, high protein.
	All right, next up, ladies and gentlemen.
	There you go.
	Woman dropped out of Oxford to become a sex worker.
	Ooh, despite having an IQ higher than Einstein, they claim, but we'll read some superchats first.
	All right.
	Fragosis says, have you heard Tom McDonald's new song, Twist Fire?
	I did not, I did not.
	Tim Crespi says, Tim, I think you may think that all atheists are opposed to deism.
	We are opposed to theism, or that a specific named deity currently is involved with us.
	Then you are an agnostic.
	Atheism means a lack of, well, let's get specific here.
	Let me literally just pull it up.
	Disbelief, or lack of belief in the existence of a god or gods.
	So, my point ultimately is, you're not going to be a deist if you're an atheist.
	I'm not saying that atheists are opposed to deism.
	You cannot conflate lack of a belief or disbelief in God with organized religion.
	That doesn't make sense.
	But this is what the word means to many people.
	And so, typically when you're talking to someone who says they're an atheist, they're conflating, I don't believe human stories about God with, I don't believe in God.
	They're conflating that.
	And my point always is, separate these concepts.
	You can question the fallibility of human stories any day of the week.
	Have fun.
	Humans are fallible.
	But to say then that you don't believe in God, and the limitation is that God is an artistic story figure, It's like saying, you really believe in God?
	Like, an alien from Krypton came here and can shoot lasers out of his eyes?
	Like, dude, you're talking about a comic book somebody wrote.
	Some people do believe in religious scripture.
	They're allowed to do that.
	But if you don't believe in scripture, then I would say that you're opposed to theistic religions, or organized religious structures, and that's different from saying there's no God.
	But my point ultimately is.
	Most atheists, in fact all of them I've had conversations with, look at my Twitter thread, cannot disassociate the concept of believing in God with organized religion.
	And that's why when I tweeted...
	Many atheists are stuck in lower-ordered thinking and believing that God is human belief as opposed to existential questions of existence and reality.
	And the responses are littered with, I don't believe in fairy tales.
	And then other people, you literally think a guy lives in the clouds?
	And I'm like, exactly my point.
	And so I've actually had conversations with prominent atheists, with large followings, and they say the exact same thing.
	Well, I'm really just criticizing organized religion.
	Then stop saying you don't believe in God and call yourself an agnostic.
	Don't conflate the concept of God with an organized religion.
	Organized religions believe in God in their own way, and you can say I disagree with that particular organized religion.
	But the concept of God outside of this, or the logos of the universe, is something well beyond this.
	Man, allergies, I think.
	Alright, let's read this year's story.
	Here we go.
	What is this?
	It's a story from the Daily Star, and oh boy, do I have a whole bunch of other stories to pull up for you.
	Woman dropped out of Oxford to become a sex worker, despite IQ higher than Einstein.
	Not.
	There's no way I believe it.
	Not that I value the concept of IQ in this regard.
	What does that really mean?
	Although I do think IQ is important.
	Melissa Todd's life took an unexpected turn when she took up a summer job and she dropped out of Oxford to make 600 bucks a night and enjoying lavish sex parties.
	Dude.
	Sure.
	Check this out.
	A sex worker who went to Oxford with Liz Truss is said to have an IQ that rivals Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein, but gave it all up for 600 pounds a night.
	A night?
	A sex?
	Hertfordshire-based Melissa Todd dropped out of the prestigious university to pursue a career in the sex industry.
	Her controversial decision was hotly debated as she Mensa-tested when she was 12, joining the world-famous High IQ Society.
	I love Mensa so much.
	I pulled this up right away.
	us.mensa.org join.
	Take the Mensa admission test.
	Okay, like, I'd like to join a society of people who are very smart.
	What must I do?
	$60 for local group testing, or private testing for $99.
	That's the test.
	If you're willing to pay money so that someone can certify you as smart, you've failed.
	Good job, Mensa.
	Dude, I gotta be honest with you guys.
	I know people who are in Mensa, and they're as dumb as a box of rocks.
	IQ is an interesting thing.
	Intelligence Quotient.
	There are different intelligences that make up your intelligence quotient.
	Someone may be very, very good at spatial reasoning, but boy, can they not comprehend real simple math.
	In their mind, they can image a tetrahedron and unfold it in every direction, each with a unique symbol, and fold it back up, and then use that visual prowess To easily solve puzzles.
	And then you ask them something simple about, like, reading comprehension, and they're like, huh?
	That's why we have idiot savants.
	It's why you have autistic savants.
	There are many people who are ridiculously good at math.
	There are people who are autistic, can solve math problems like that, but they can't comprehend anything else.
	And so they need assistance in living.
	Yeah, Mensa is... I'm sorry.
	I just think it's a bunch of nonsense for people who need to feel good about themselves.
	There's a lot more to life than paying money so that someone can tell you you're smart.
	Melissa originally wanted to get into economics and was even named Brain of Britain decades ago by the Hertz and Essex Observer, but her career path took an unexpected turn.
	In an exclusive interview, she said, it seems like a very long time ago now.
	I heard a piece on the radio.
	I think, like on Jeremy Vine or whatever, the equivalent was then, and it sounded interesting, I like tests, really.
	Yeah, I got a lot of A-levels and passed the Oxford entrance exam, and I went to Oxford briefly, but then I went mad and dropped out, which is not uncommon among undergraduates.
	I was doing PPE, philosophy, politics, and economics, with Liz Truss, although we were different colleges, so I don't remember her at all.
	Although Einstein and Hawking reportedly never took Mensa tests, many sources speculate their IQs were around the 160 mark.
	For context, an average IQ is somewhere between 85 and 115, and the base is 100.
	So IQ changes as time goes on.
	If you give an IQ test to a man in 13th century Wales, he'd probably score an 80, based on the things that we do today.
	However, documents shown in the mirror suggest Melissa's IQ averaged at 178, making her exponentially gifted in the eyes of testers.
	She was the first person in her family to attend university, but it wasn't a natural fit.
	She continued, I took a year out because I was going completely mad and annoying everyone sobbing over lectures and stuff.
	So I thought I'll take a year out, and I saw a job advertised in the evening standard for table dancers at a bar.
	And I really didn't have any ideas on what to do, but thought that sounds fun.
	And they say you'll make 600 bucks a night, and I really desperately needed money, and I like dancing, so why not give it a go?
	Well, I'll tell you two things.
	I don't believe her IQ is 178.
	Perhaps it is.
	I also have to say, if your IQ was on 178, and they really did think and really do claim you're that smart, making money is easy.
	It's very easy.
	Let me tell you.
	Let me tell you.
	Perhaps the issue is that she lacks perseverance.
	Let me tell you the issue is she's lazy.
	Perhaps the issue is that she's very horny.
	I don't know.
	She prefers to do sex work.
	But I can tell you this.
	Here's some advice that was given to me by a very wealthy man.
	He said, being rich is easy.
	Write a 20-page book.
	Compile statements from health experts on losing weight.
	Put it into a 20-page book.
	The key notes.
	20 tips for losing weight fast.
	You run the ads on Facebook and YouTube.
	And Google or whatever.
	You figure out what your cost per sale is.
	He says, I think it averages maybe $5 in advertisements.
	We'll get you one sale.
	And you sell the book for $6.
	You find that happy medium. Congratulations, you're rich.
	Then what you do is you write another one. 20 tips for dating. 20 tips for doing x, y, or z.
	20 tips for financial success. It's really easy. You find 20 experts in the field.
	You take a quote from each of them.
	You put it into books where you said, I saw this great quote from so-and-so who said this.
	It's sound advice.
	But perhaps this would help you better.
	Turn the page.
	These simple books could be digital or physical.
	Amazon can auto print them.
	And people will buy them.
	Now I'm not saying this is a guarantee in the literal sense.
	I'm saying you understand the simplicity of creating a basic product that literally would take you 20 minutes And you understand why people would buy.
	The idea that someone with an IQ of 178 lacks the capability to navigate a basic system as such to make money, I find to be laughably absurd.
	I think the reality is she just likes sex.
	That's it.
	She became a sex worker.
	Well, where did she go?
	They say she found herself thoroughly enjoying the job, captivating in glitter balls.
	What is this?
	She needed money.
	She liked doing tape.
	What is it?
	Go-go dancing?
	It was really just meant to be a summer job, but you get used to being happy and rich.
	And you meet interesting people who say, why don't you do this?
	Why don't you make porn?
	Why don't you go into a peep show?
	And here I am 20 years later thinking, I'm probably not going back to Oxford, am I?
	Celebrating her 48th birthday with an IQ of 178.
	And she chose to make a small amount of money.
	Forgive me if I don't believe she's smart.
	I really don't.
	I'll say this.
	Don't get me wrong.
	Maybe she just really loves this line of work.
	And that's fine.
	Follow your passions.
	But she could do that stuff and be rich at the same time.
	New York Post.
	A Florida woman quits Chick-fil-A job to become OnlyFans model.
	Now she earns a whopping $14,000 a week.
	ICU nurse ditches scrubs for big money making content on OnlyFans.
	Veteran police officer, 61, retires to focus on frisky online modeling career.
	Hmm.
	Unilad.
	Woman, 41, who left job earning six figures to start OnlyFans, hits back at claims she made a terrible decision.
	Seven questions I get asked all the time since I quit my job to work on OnlyFans, says Charlie.
	And then we have a Reddit.
	When did you decide to quit your job to do online content?
	Look, man, the reality is there are a lot of women who don't want jobs.
	There are a lot of women who want to be sex objects.
	I'm not saying all women.
	I'm saying many women took jobs because they needed them and have found they would be much happier not being a nurse, a police officer, or working at Chick-fil-A.
	That I get.
	Or maybe you don't even want to be an Oxford prodigy with an IQ of 178.
	You'd rather just be a hooker.
	And if that word offends you, I don't know what your problem is.
	Because that's what you are.
	You know, it's funny.
	It's like, no, sex worker.
	Hooker means sex worker.
	What are you talking about?
	Calm down, hooker.
	Like, hooker means sex worker.
	They're so offended by it.
	I love it when I called OnlyFans models hookers and those women were like, how dare you call my friend a hooker?
	And there's nothing wrong with being a hooker, but how dare you?
	You're selling sex for money.
	Selling sex.
	Let me tell you, man.
	I, I, this is why I don't trust this whole like high IQ stuff.
	I will first preface it by saying, I'll have a picture of Einstein here.
	I'll preface it by saying, uh, she may be extremely intelligent and just loves sex work.
	Okay.
	For sure.
	But I really do think if your IQ was that high and it really did imply you were smart, you would just make yourself rich.
	Cause I gotta be honest.
	If you are smart, you can make yourself rich.
	Seriously, like I explained with the selling the books online, the purpose of that story is actually quite simple.
	A lot of people think in order to be rich, you gotta be like one of those guys on Shark Tank, where the guy walks in and he's like, I love this story, the guy's like, it's this device you mount on the front of your house, it's a doorbell, and you can connect to your computer or your phone and actually watch a camera, and the sharks were like, get outta here with this crazy idea!
	And that was the Ring Doorbell, and now that guy's a billionaire.
	And the Ring Doorbell's actually pretty awesome.
	And then, uh...
	He ended up becoming a guest shark later on and they all gave him a standing ovation because he was originally pitching them the idea and they turned him down.
	I think they turned him- I'm pretty sure they all turned him down.
	You don't need it!
	You don't- I mean, it is kind of funny that he was like, a doorbell with a camera on it.
	It's like, oh.
	I guess that kind of makes sense.
	Put a clock in it, right?
	That's what they used to say.
	You don't even need to do that!
	You could make a t-shirt.
	This is the craziest thing.
	Like, seriously.
	Your IQ is 178.
	Perhaps the issue is laziness, okay?
	You make four t-shirts.
	You make a website called Funniest T-Shirts Ever.
	And you just take some old joke...
	One liner, and put it on the shirt.
	And then you advertise the shirt on Facebook, Instagram, and you will sell those shirts.
	There's better products and better ways to do it.
	And you're going to be doing work.
	You're going to be checking to make sure that your ad costs are lower than the selling point.
	Otherwise, you're in the red and you got to be in the black.
	But you will effectively automate a system.
	It's simple.
	If you're really, really smart, then you wouldn't You wouldn't need to do anything else.
	But I suppose.
	You can also be lazy.
	Well, that is what it is, my friends.
	That's OnlyFans for you.
	Some women just really want to do... I don't think she's doing OnlyFans or whatever.
	She's doing porn or something, I guess.
	I don't know.
	But a lot of women just want to... They want sex.
	And they want to get paid for it.
	I'm sure a lot of guys do, too.
	I'll leave it there, my friends.
	Smash that like button, subscribe to the channel, share the show with your friends if you do like it.
	Follow me on Axe at Timcast.
	Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all next time.
	And we went a little bit over, but I can grab another super chat for you.
	Let's go!
	Curtis B says, Tim, you are mistaken.
	I've been trying to tell you.
	Crooks wasn't walking around with Pew.
	There's a still from footage and 100% just a shadow.
	Look up the vid.
	I'm scoping out AGR.
	Scoping out AGR?
	Well, there you go.
	Desperate Desperado says, Tim, you're conflating there is no God and I don't believe in God.
	Those are two different stances.
	One's a claim, the other is a response to a claim.
	Indeed, I am not.
	As I've pointed out time and time again, atheism is either a lack of a belief or disbelief.
	There are many people who assert and who are atheists who say there is no God.
	And that's an assertion of a fact without evidence.
	I think that's silly.
	So at the very least, you'd be an agnostic.
	But my point is not that atheists either don't believe in God or think there is no God.
	It is that they conflate the concept of God with a story told by humans.
unidentified		Wrong.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		If you can't conceive of certain concepts, you can't conceive of certain concepts, and there's no giving someone the ability to do it.
		Let me do this.
		Pull something up.
		Oh man.
		Let's see.
		Aphantasia.
		A mind's blind eye.
		This is a stupid image.
		It was drawings all the way around.
		This is a better image.
		Aphantasia test.
		Here you are, my friends.
		When someone tells you to picture an apple in your mind, which do you see?
		1, 2, 3, 4, or 5?
		For those that are just listening, I'll explain.
		Number 1 is a photographic apple.
		Number 2 is a lightly detailed image, like a cartoon of an apple.
		3 is more a black and white cartoon apple, shaded.
		4 is a light white outline that resembles the shape of an apple.
		And 5 is nothing.
		Aphantasia is five.
		You cannot picture things in your head.
		And there are a lot of people who are like, wait, what do you mean?
		You can see pictures in your mind?
		You can think pictures?
		Some people can't do that.
		Perhaps you're one of them.
		Me?
		I would put mine well above one.
		In my mind, not only can I picture a realistic apple, I can visualize the tree.
		I can picturize a black nothingness.
		The explosion of the Big Bang, every single planet forming in rapid succession, a planet emerging.
		I can picture a time-lapse of volcanic eruption, the water forming, chemicals being birthed, life getting proteins in the water, bonding together, and I can envision all of that up to the point where there's grass and a tree grows, and then apples sprout from the tree, and a man walks up to the tree, grabs the apple, takes it in his hand, takes a bite of it, cuts it open, and then starts juggling a dozen apples.
		I can just envision all of those things in my head.
		I don't just see an apple.
		I can envision and imagine literally anything and I can describe those in great detail.
		A lot of people can do that.
		I'm not special.
		But a lot of people can't do that.
		Beyond this, it is the comprehension of concepts for which certainly I am not the smartest person in the world, but I can conceive of certain concepts such as first, second, third dimension, which we can visualize in our minds because we exist in three dimensions, we perceive three physical dimensions.
		Interestingly, actually, our vision is two-dimensional.
		And that's why we have two eyes, so that we can, our brain can interpret the data, but we do see in two dimensions.
		Our brain, however, can't fathom four dimensions without some kind of three-dimensional facsimile.
		In which case, you get what's called a tesseract.
		Let me pull up a tesseract for you.
		Let me see if I can find a gif of it.
		Because, uh, yep, easily.
		Because a tesseract has to be moving.
unidentified		All right.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		There you go.
		That's a fourth-dimensional object.
		That's the best we can conceive of it, because we can't perceive four dimensions.
		But I do believe there's another simple way to explain the fourth dimension, presuming that that dimension is time.
		And that is to imagine... We do it visually with this.
		It is kind of annoying watching a Tesseract.
		I'm not really... We'll go back to the apples.
		So... Imagine frames in a movie.
		Now imagine all of the frames layered on top of each other at once, instead of appearing and disappearing in sequential order.
		If a man walked from the left side of the screen to the right side of the screen, the way the camera works at, say, 29 frames per second, is that frame 1 appears and disappears.
		When frame 1 disappears, frame 2 appears.
		Each of these frames appears and disappears like a wave, showing the man taking steps and walking forward.
		To perceive the fourth dimension as time, have all frames appear at the exact same moment.
		The man would appear as a long snake, I guess, with every frame merging from point A to point B. That's one way to perceive the fourth dimension, presuming the fourth dimension would be time.
		If you zoom out and you're looking at the movement of the Earth, everything would just be these strange shapes.
		I'm not going to go into much more of this, because I'm going to wrap things up.
		My point is this.
		There are basic concepts in philosophy, in physics, and moral philosophies, quantum physics, theoretical physics.
		That a lot of people just can't fathom, not because they lack the capability, but because they haven't read a lot of these things.
		There's a lot of things I have not read, and so my understanding is severely limited, the same as anybody else's.
		But certainly, there are a lot of things I have read, and a lot of things that I understand beyond what many other people who haven't do.
		That is to say, I'm certainly not the smartest person in the world, but it is frustrating when you try to explain to someone whose ego has blinded them from trying to learn these things that they could be wrong.
		Certainly the presumption of my reality is, we're probably wrong about everything, which is why I preface all of my statements with, this is what humans believe.
		So when I say things like the fourth dimension, and I talk about quantum physics, I say currently this is what humans believe, but humans of course are fallible.
		Based on the current evidence we have, we can surmise a few things.
		One, let me just stress this as I wrap things up, consciousness is an observable fact.
		I think, therefore I am.
		You can perceive your own consciousness.
		Now, what we can't do is we can't perceive other people's consciousness, but we can perceive similarities between our behaviors and other behaviors.
		If we were to simply say that only our conscious mind exists, you would presume to be God, I suppose.
		You are the entity of the universe and no one else exists.
		I think it's probably unlikely.
		That being said, we can perceive how other forms of life act.
		Bees, squirrels, they all have varying degrees of consciousness.
		We see it as a gradient.
		It is not that you are sentient or you are conscious or you are not.
		There are varying degrees.
		If that is true, then it is likely there are greater consciousness beyond ours.
		But likely is not observable proof.
		I'll tell you what is observable proof.
		We live in a universe.
		The universe is governed by laws of physics.
		The laws of physics are observable, and we can replicate things that react within the laws of physics.
		By doing so, we've been able to control the flow of energy and create computer screens and transport my visage and voice to you across the planet!
		How amazing is that?
		It's because physics is a code of the universe that is observable, and by tracking it and mapping it out, we can replicate certain behaviors, and by knowing what happens when if A plus B equals C, then we can make predictions that ultimately result in outcomes we desire.
		That is, because I know that glass is brittle, and I know that my phone is heavy, I can surmise that throwing my phone at a glass will result in that glass breaking.
		I can create outcomes that I desire.
		To put it simply.
		The human mind, as any mind, exists within the same code of that universe as a function of it.
		That is to say, there is no distinction between gravity as a function of the universe that exists within it, and consciousness as a function that exists within the universe.
		That is, your consciousness is a component within the confines of a universe.
		A grand consciousness literally exists and is observable.
		That's it.
		Now whether you believe in a God that interacts with reality as a sort of supermind or you believe in more of an Einsteinian God that has no interest in human activities is besides the point.
		I'm going to wrap it up there.
		That discussion will continue tomorrow.
		And one last thing.
		Nyblade says, what the F is a GIF?
		A GIF is a graphic, I believe it's graphic interchange format.
		I believe it's called, I could be wrong.
		And it was created by a man who literally said it's a soft G and pronounced GIF.
		I do not understand why there are people who live in crackpot reality where you think a guy can invent something and you can call it something else.
		It's been named.
	That's it.
	Just because you want it to be GIF is weird.
	By all means, call Timcast Gymcast.
	Fine.
	That's weird.
	I didn't name it that, and you can call it whatever you want.
	But if a dude invents a thing, like, this is the automobile, I'm gonna call it an automobile.
	You're like, okay, I guess.
	You could do that if you want.
	I'm gonna call it an auto car instead.
	Well, the guy invented it, called it an automobile.
	Why are you calling it something different?
	Do what you wanna do.
	That's fine.
	But I do love that fake meme where someone's like, it's not pronounced Jeff.
	What am I going to talk about?
	My, my Dodge, you know, my, my Dodge wants to go for a walk.
	I mean, come on, man.
	And it's just like, what does it say?
	My Jolden Retriever, my Jolden Retriever wants to go for a walk.
	And it's just like, bro, there are so many words with soft G's.
	What are you talking about?
	The magic giant giraffe.
	Like, we can go on.
	Anyway, that was fun.
	Thanks for hanging out.
	We'll be back tonight at 8pm.
	Smash the like button, subscribe to the channel, and we'll see you all tonight at TimCast IRL.
	And, uh, yeah.

▲