Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

Aug. 1, 2024 - Tim Pool Daily Show

02:03:43

NEW Trump Assassination Video PROVES Secret Service LIED, THEY LET THE SHOOTER IN | TimcastNews

NEW Trump Assassination Video PROVES Secret Service LIED, THEY LET THE SHOOTER IN | TimcastNews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Participants

Main voices

tim pool

01:54:26

Appearances

donald j trump

02:27

Clips

josh hammer

00:30

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		assassination attempt in Butler.
		It is clear now.
		The Secret Service has been lying.
		Testimony that- I've pulled up testimony from C-SPAN, lying.
		Jack Posobiec calls out the acting director of the Secret Service, the new one, lying.
		And with the text messages that were released, the New York Times has got it, many other outlets have got it, the Secret Service says that the shooter entered the rally location with them.
		Of course, what the text messages say is that, oh, this guy followed our lead and came on in.
		He's got a rangefinder.
		Now, let me just ask you.
		If you're driving into a secure area, secret service, right?
		Like, highest level of security we're supposed to have, right?
		And a strange man drives in with you.
		Do you just go, well, that's odd.
		Off to work!
		Or do you do your job and say, excuse me, sir, you can't come in here.
		Why are you following us in and parking your car by us and sitting 50 feet from us?
		None of it makes sense.
		Why wasn't somebody on that roof guarding it?
		Why was the shooter allowed to fly a drone three hours in advance?
		Where did he get his gun from?
		Did he carry it around with him?
		I'm sorry, you'd have to be a fool to believe that this is some crazed 20-year-old who got lucky.
		Now, we don't have an official story yet, which is also very funny, and I've been begging for one for some time.
		What's the official narrative?
		Who's this guy?
		What was he doing?
		Why was he doing it?
		Why was he there?
		Why did he shoot?
		How did he get on the roof?
		No answers.
		None.
		Now I think, of course, as most of you know, after the shooting happened, a media report came out saying that Iran was planning an attack on Trump's life.
		So the theory is, they were hoping, powers that be, intelligence agencies, whoever's involved, that they would take out Trump, blame it on Iran, and then from there we can speculate what, Nikki Haley becomes the Republican nominee, then it's Biden v. Haley, or it's Harris v. Haley, and the media's like, no matter who you vote for, you're getting a woman of color!
		They both support war with Iran.
		Perhaps.
		Outside of that, we actually have, I believe it's United and Delta, a couple airlines.
		Maybe not Delta, it's a couple airlines shutting down travel to Tel Aviv and other parts of the Middle East, possibly Iran.
		I don't know which airline service, Iran, to be honest, due to the escalating tensions.
		However, I was torn, my friends, because this morning we got huge breaking news.
		In the Olympics, a dude Boom!
unidentified		Blasts this woman in the face.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Oh man, he punched her so hard, he knocked her out clean.
		Well, he didn't knock her out, he knocked her out of the fight.
		I mean, he knocked her out of the sporting event.
		She resigned.
		She said she got hit so hard, it was clear she was overpowered and she couldn't fight, so she resigned.
		Major scandal, and dudes, I said this a couple days ago.
		Alex Stein said, make the bet on the biological male in these boxing matches.
		But I got bad news for you, Alex.
		The odds had gotten to minus 3,000.
		What does that mean?
		It means if you wager $100, you win $3.
		What does that mean?
		It means if you wager $100, you win $3.
unidentified		Three, $3.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		$3.00.
		Dude, I guess it's still free money, but someone pointed out on X they were like, I don't know, you can invest in like the S&P or something and get a 5% return.
		And I'm like, yeah, but this is an instant 3% return.
		I suppose the real problem is if you were to actually bet on the male, you never know if they're going to throw the match.
		Because imagine this, dude.
		Biological male says, I'm a woman and I'm going to fight women.
		So everybody runs full speed to bet on you, the guy.
		Okay?
		And you get minus 3,000 odds.
		The woman, she had, what would this have been?
		It was like plus 5,000.
		I think a lot of places don't go higher than that.
		Plus $5,000, which I think like a $100 bet nets you like $5,000 or whatever.
		And you're this male, and you go, I'm gonna win, and then you throw the match.
		And then your buddy cleans up!
		So I don't know if I would trust betting on any of these things, so we'll talk about that.
		But the Olympics, just all around an absolute disaster.
		And then of course, Someone says they got in at minus 200.
		No, no, I did see you could bet on the guy at minus 150 two days ago.
		But then apparently people figured out, because odds are based on who's betting on who, people figured out, hey, wait a minute, that's a guy!
		Like, I'm gonna bet on him!
		But we'll also talk about Donald Trump at the National Association of Black Journalists, because that was a really funny story from last night.
		Before we get started, my friends, head over to Casperoo.com, buy Casper Coffee.
		Why, it's good coffee.
		It's the best coffee you'll ever have.
		We've got Alex Stein's Primetime Grind.
		Ian's Graphene Dream, we got Appalachian Nights, everybody's favorite.
		And when you buy Casper Coffee, you're supporting the show, but also head over to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member to support our work directly, and you'll get access to our members-only Discord server where you can hang out with like-minded individuals.
		There's a bunch of really cool stuff happening.
		There's, uh, they do workshops, pre-shows, after-shows.
		It's a lot of fun.
		And you can just, you know, hang out with people who will share stories and you'll learn a bit.
		But also, you'll get access to our members-only uncensored show, Monday through Thursday at 10 p.m.
		every day.
		So, once again, smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show right now, because everybody's saying I'm shadowbanned, and that is true.
		This channel is absolutely shadowbanned, far and wide.
		You can't Google search it.
		So, share this video on X, on Facebook, wherever you can, if you really do like the work that I do.
		But let's jump to this first story, and also don't forget, get those Super Chats in, because after I wrap up the first segment, about half an hour in, we're going to jump to your commentary, your questions in the Super Chats, see what you guys have to say.
		And we'll get started with this from Fox News.
		Video from Trump assassination attempt.
		Victim's POV shows figure moving on roof moments before gunfire.
		James Copenhaver was shot twice and critically wounded during the assassination attempt against Trump.
		And you can see here, this video's been circulating since yesterday, you've got this figure running around on the roof.
		I think when you take that image, combine it with the statements we've already gotten from the Secret Service Director and Acting Director, as well as witnesses, combined with the overall picture being painted from the news stories that have been released, This guy was allowed to be there.
		Let's start from the beginning.
		He was let in by the Secret Service.
		They knew who he was.
		Where he got his gun, we don't know, but come on.
		You don't let a guy in and then not have, like, what has he got?
		Was the gun dismantled and he put it together?
		How?
		Where was this weapon?
		In his vehicle?
		And they didn't check?
		They didn't do anything?
		They let him in.
		How was there no law enforcement on that roof?
		How did he get on the roof?
		Why didn't they do anything three hours?
		One hour?
		Twenty-six minutes?
		Ten minutes?
		Two minutes out?
	I think it's fairly obvious.
	Dude, you're not gonna sit here and tell me, well, it was an accident, a coincidence, an accident, an accident, an accident, an accident, and then the Secret Service lied, lied, lied, lied, lied, or it's, I can simplify it for you.
	They let him in and they knew what he was doing.
	Because, it's just at a certain point, you know, you guys ever see the beginning of the Pee Wee Herman movie?
	Where he's got the Rube Goldberg device that makes his breakfast for him?
	If you were to tell me, okay, I'm just gonna, I'll lay it out.
	If I walk into the kitchen and I see a guy with a couple of sunny-side up eggs and a pancake and some sausage, and I said, how did you make it?
	And he was like, well, it all started with a race car that fell from the ceiling and hit a marble.
	The marble rolls on a track, triggers a fan, hits a switch, which turns the fan on.
	The fan blows a sail.
	The sail then hits an egg.
	The egg rolls.
	I'd be like, shut up.
	Okay, I get it.
	You cooked eggs.
	I'm not gonna sit here and play some Rube Goldberg, Donald Trump assassination theory game with these people.
	Well, you know, when the shooter tripped and fell, right as the Secret Service agent was walking by, they didn't see him, and then he popped up.
	What a coincidence!
	Like, I'm not gonna buy any of these stupid games, okay?
	Let me see, let's play this clip.
	He's running around on the roof!
	We assume it's the shooter because no one else was up there.
	But you can see the dude running around on the roof.
	What is this?
	Let's read some more from this story.
	Looks like there's another story.
	A video from James Copenhaver, one of the victims, shows a figure moving across the roof of the American Glass AGR building just minutes before gunfire rang out.
	Considering the timeline, that was the shooter.
	In the video taken at 6.08pm on July 13th, the person appears on the roof of the building adjacent to where Trump is speaking and can be seen walking from the 1 second mark to about 2 seconds 50.
	Officials believe gunman Thomas Crooks, 20, began shooting with a collapsible AR-15 rifle.
	What does that mean?
	Like a folding stock or something?
	Counter-snipers fatally shot Crooks shortly afterwards, and law enforcement officials found eight shell casings near his body.
	In an attempt to assassinate the former president, Crooks killed 50-year-old Corey Compratore, a husband, father, and former fire chief of the Buffalo Township Volunteer Fire Department.
	Rest in peace.
	Crooks also critically wounded Copenhaver, 74, and David Dutch, 57.
	Both victims were shot twice, according to those familiar with the victims.
	Copenhaver was not filming when he was shot, said his lawyer.
	Joseph Feldman, at the Law Offices of Maxi Feldman, said Copenhaver stopped filming when everyone turned their heads to look at a projection screen.
	Interesting.
	Copenhaver was discharged from Allegheny General Hospital on July 26, but is still recovering in a rehabilitation center.
	The first injury Copenhaver sustained was to his arm, and the second to his abdominal area.
	Now, I'm hearing this.
	There's even more footage.
	That the FBI came and took people's devices.
	So we will see.
	Trump and his rally attendees turned their heads to look at the immigration statistics that had just been projected onto a large screen as the first shots rang out.
	He had almost seen or heard something whiz past him, which we're assuming was a bullet.
	He felt it on his arm, and he looked down at his arm and felt pain initially, but he hadn't even realized he'd been shot a second time at that point.
	It could have been shock.
	That's true.
	Most people don't realize when they get hit that they've been hit.
	It's the reality of getting shot.
	In the movies, it's ridiculous.
	A guy gets punched and he flips over and he goes down, he doesn't get back up.
	Nonsense.
	There are these videos, and this is why largely liberals have this fictional worldview about guns.
	You'll watch a movie, and the good guy goes, bang, bang, bang, and then they all just drop down.
	Yeah, no.
	There's a video of, there's like two cops, And there's a crazy guy with a knife, and the cops are like, back away, back away, and the guy's coming in with a knife.
	The cops are trying to de-escalate and back away, and then when he lunges at him, they shoot, and he keeps coming at them!
	They shoot him several times, he doesn't stop.
	And then, I think this might be the same video, it's been a long time, but he like, grabs the cop, and then the one cop screams and shoots him in the head.
unidentified		Hey it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
		Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet and greet experience for you.
		Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
		These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet and greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
		Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
		Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
		See you on the tour.
		Bye.
		See you on the tour.
		Bye.
		See you on the tour.
		Bye.
		See you on the tour.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Bye.
		See you on the tour.
		Bye.
		See you on the tour.
		Bye.
unidentified		See you on the tour.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Bye.
		See you on the tour.
		Bye.
		See you on the tour.
		Like, if you get shot in, like, your digestive tract, and it misses major arteries, your body is functioning.
		You've got damage to your digestive tract.
		If you get hit in, like, a major artery, then you're going down, because blood, you need that.
		But people have even survived getting shot in the head, so long as there's... I think there's one story of like a guy, a bullet went straight down in between the hemispheres, and he ended up like having minimal damage, like brain damage, but like alive and functioning.
		That being said, back to the story.
		Screaming and pandemonium ensued, and it took Kopenhaver some time to realize what happened to him.
		FBI officials told reporters during a press call on Monday that Crooks gained access to the roof of the AGR building
		by climbing HVAC equipment and piping.
		He then traversed multiple rooftops before he found his position on top of the AGR building, where he had a direct
		line of sight to the former president.
		Okay, let's play this game.
		Let's play this game.
		I'm still waiting for your official story.
		I like that they've pieced this.
		This is true.
		The HVAC story was almost from the day of, because I was watching Dan Bongino talk about it.
		We knew about the HVAC issue, like how he climbed on the roof, for a while now.
		But how did he get in?
		How was he not stopped?
		Where did the gun come from?
		No official story.
		I use 9-11 as an example quite a bit.
		You go back to 9-11 and they say almost immediately that day, Osama Bin Laden had planned this.
		He and several others had infiltrated the U.S.
		They'd taken flying lessons.
		They boarded these planes at these times.
		These are what they used, box cutters.
		We knew that within a day.
		Now some may say it's kind of weird we knew that within a day.
		Perhaps We don't know what this is.
		We don't know what this guy was doing or why he was doing it.
		Apparently he was pro-Biden on some social media accounts, but he was anti-Semitic, anti-immigration on other accounts.
		I wonder if the narrative was going to be the anti-Semitic posts they found, that they're claiming may have been his, they were going to say Iran supported him, provided him with funding or something like this, and direction.
		And that he was motivated by a hatred of Israel and Jewish people or something.
		And thus, you'd get your Cassus Belli for war with Iran.
		But it did not happen like that.
		Take a look at this.
		I pulled up the transcripts because I think this is important.
		This is Kimberly Cheadle being questioned by Rep.
		Byron Donalds.
		I've got the old transcript here.
		This was interesting.
		Here's his statement.
		What I can tell you is that when the individual was identified by the counter-sniper, they took one shot, second, neutralized that individual.
		Question.
		But that was after the shooter all took a shot, uh, had taken a shot.
		Is that correct?
		That is correct.
		So what you're saying now is that the Secret Service did not see the shooter on the roof until after the shooter took a shot?
		Response?
		I do not have all of those details at this time.
		Question.
		If you don't have those details after nine days, Director, which, uh, are you, uh, the transcript's not very good.
		Telling is your guys didn't see it.
		You're telling us your guys didn't see it.
		I'm telling you I don't have all the details of the sequence at that time.
		Director, it's been nine days, we're still in the process, so hold on there a minute.
		This is the problem.
		I would just say this, and I'm a big fan of Byron Donaldson, but a lot of people, and I'm not a lawyer, maybe a lawyer would advise otherwise, but you don't need the follow-up.
		The follow-up often provides an out for the individual who told you the truth.
	And the truth is this, what I can tell you is that when the individual was identified, They took the shot.
	But that was after the shooter took the shot, is that correct?
	That is correct.
	Stop.
	Thank you for your testimony.
	I yield my time.
	And now what happens is, on the record, Kimberly Cheadle said, the shooter fired and then they saw him and returned fire.
	You didn't see the guy running around on the roof?
	The video just came out.
	That doesn't make sense, does it?
	Now, the narrative we've been getting is that he was behind a tree.
	Counter-snipers couldn't see behind the tree.
	It was the perfect position.
	He had crawled up in the prone position, hidden by this tree, so that nobody could see him.
	But now we can see that he was actually running around.
	So, how did they not see this guy on the roof?
	I mean, if you want to play this into the argument that they thought the guy on the roof was a friendly, Okay.
	Local law enforcement wearing a t-shirt and khakis without a badge and aiming a weapon at former President Trump.
	You want me to believe that?
	Jack Posobiec chimes in.
	He says, This video proves that the acting Secret Service Director lied yesterday.
	The shooter wasn't prone the whole time at all.
	He was running around.
	Yeah.
	What else is new?
	I almost, it almost feels, to be completely honest, I run into stories like this periodically where I'm wondering why I'm even talking about it.
	Because I don't understand how anyone could conclude anything otherwise that this was orchestrated and there was an attempt on Donald Trump from an official capacity.
	Tucker Carlson predicted this in September.
	Alex Jones, well before this.
	But the point is, for an individual like Tucker, to say, everything we're seeing is bringing us to assassination territory.
	When his prediction then comes true, do you dismiss all of the finer points that Tucker has brought up to lead him to this position?
	I think not.
	My point being, they've tried to imprison Trump.
	They've tried to strip him of his wealth.
	They've tried to do everything to stop him.
	Raiding his home at gunpoint.
	Threatening his family.
	Accusing him of sexual assault.
	Changing the rules to charge him 30 years later with liability for sexual assault.
	Dubious story at best.
	Trying to take away his properties in New York and then put him in prison in multiple states at the federal level.
	And then Tucker's like, look at what they're doing.
	They're not going to stop here.
	And then we get this story.
	So it's not just the context of what happened that day, how it makes no sense, and how their answers make no sense, and they seem to be lying or misleading us.
	It also seems to be that the context around Donald Trump itself As Tucker Carlson predicted, suggests, evil people will stop at nothing.
	And the New York Times says, some Republicans embrace conspiracy theories on Trump assassination attempt.
	You can't do that, New York Times, because there is no theory!
	There's no official story, so everything and anything said is going to be a conspiracy theory, because nobody knows.
	What's your story, New York Times?
	Crazy guy for no reason, with no known motive, shows up, slips past, every single step is identified but never called out, and with the threat, on record, they don't stop Trump from going on stage, and with a threat announced by the members of the public two minutes before the shots were fired, they did not pull Trump from that stage.
	Your story, your conspiracy theory, New York Times, is that members of the public Random people standing about provided better security than the Secret Service and local law enforcement combined.
	You sound like psychopaths.
	Some embrace conspiracy theories.
	You give me the official government theory?
	Or a story as to what happened?
	And we'll have a discussion about what a conspiracy theory is.
	But until that day, we will all be investigating and lining up the pieces to the best of our abilities to figure out what happened.
	And that means every theory is fair game because you don't have any answers.
	But we'll make it one better.
	Gunman at Trump rally was often a step ahead of the Secret Service.
	Lies.
	Framing.
	This is not the headline.
	That's an opinion.
	Whether or not the gunman was ahead of the Secret Service is an opinion.
	And I tell you this, it's the wrong opinion.
	The Secret Service was ahead of the shooter.
	We know this.
	They're lying.
	How do we know this?
	In your own story, New York Times.
	Let me just pause for a minute.
	If you knew he was there, how is he one step ahead of you?
	some law enforcement officers were aware of Thomas Crooks earlier than previously known,
	and he was aware of them.
	Let me just pause for a minute.
	If you knew he was there, how is he one step ahead of you?
	Hey, New York Times, who wrote this article?
	Hayley Willis, Eric Toller, David A. Farenthold, and Adam Goldman.
	Uh, let me just explain to you, like, logic.
	Because maybe you, maybe you never learned this.
	But if law enforcement knows the guy is there, he is not one step ahead of them.
	They're one step ahead of him.
	And then they did nothing.
	You see why this doesn't quite make sense?
	But go ahead, play your narrative games.
	This story, of course, is several days old.
	Here's the text.
	Someone followed our lead and snuck in and parked by our cars, just so you know.
	I'm just letting you know because you see me go out with my rifle and put it in my car so he knows you guys are all up there.
	He's sitting to the direct right on a picnic table about 50 yards from the exit.
	I say hogwash.
	I say outright hogwash.
	I have been to many, many, many Trump rallies with press credentials approved by the campaign and it was difficult to get in.
	Not the hardest thing in the world.
	You go to the press line.
	The dogs sniff you.
	They take all your stuff.
	They search through it all.
	The idea that they'd be like, some guy just drove in right with us and he's got a rangefinder.
	Guess we'll do nothing.
	Oh, right.
	I believe that.
	Unless it was intentional.
	Why the text message then?
	I don't know.
	Maybe this guy did not know what was going on.
	I do think it's kind of funny though.
	They say, uh, let me, let me, let me, let me read this.
	Nearly a hundred minutes before Donald Trump took the stage, a local counter-sniper who was part of the broader security detail let his colleagues know his shift was ending.
josh hammer ▲ ● ▼		Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
		Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
		There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating and affecting the 2024 presidential election.
		We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
		Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		It's America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
		The counter sniper who sent the text confirmed the New York Times that the individual he saw later was the gunman.
		So, uh, I just want to, you know, ask a simple question.
		Did you perhaps, I don't know, walk up to the person who was in an area he should not have been and said, sir, you need to leave?
		No.
unidentified		What's the, what's the, what's the, what's the, what's the reason here?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		At 510, the young man was no longer at the painting table.
		He was right below the countersnipers who were upstairs in a warehouse owned by AGR International.
		They say that one of the countersnipers took pictures of him, according to local law enforcement.
		Now, what I've heard is, you know, everyone just thought everyone else was gonna do it.
		That's not my job.
		I don't, I, sorry, I don't play that game.
		I'm pretty sure they mentioned that he had a rangefinder.
		Kid learning around building we are in.
		Lurking, I think he meant.
		AGR believed it is.
		AGR, I believe it is.
		I did see him with a rangefinder looking towards stage.
josh hammer ▲ ● ▼		WHAT?!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		At 538!
		You're like a guy who's not supposed to be here, who snuck in, has got a rangefinder.
		Everything's fine, I guess.
		I don't buy it for two seconds.
		Sorry, criminal negligence at the very, at the bare minimum.
		Yo, it is absolutely wild.
		Alright, let's talk about the conspiracy theories.
		This is where we're at.
		Some Republicans embrace conspiracy theories on Trump assassination attempt.
		Heavens me.
		What is this from yesterday?
unidentified		Rep.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Eli Crane, an Arizona Republican and former Navy SEAL, says he is no conspiracy theorist, but in the weeks since the attempted assassination of Trump, he has made the baseless suggestion that the suiting was part of a coordinated campaign by Democrats or shadowy government actors to try to stop the former president from reclaiming the White House.
		Not only did they try to try and bankrupt him, but they tried to put him in prison, Crane told Jeff Ordovitz, a right-wing radio personality.
		When that didn't work, they tried to put him in prison for 750 years, and many of us said the next step in the escalation is for them to try and kill him because they can't.
		They know they can't beat him fair and square.
		Well, to be fair, that's not him saying this instance was Democrats trying to kill him.
		In an appearance on the Glenn Beck Program, Mr. Crane, who traveled to PA site where Trump was shot to conduct his own investigation, said, I don't want to be a conspiracy theorist, but at the same time, I don't want to, you know, rule anything out because I don't put it past some of the people in our government to do anything necessary to hold on to power.
		I just, I don't care, guys.
		I'm not running for office.
		I never want to run for office.
		I don't care whether you think I'm right or you think I'm wrong.
		The idea, logically, does not make sense.
		They've given us no official story.
		And you know what really irks me?
		Rep Crane, just say it!
		Rational, logical thinking people agree with you.
		We do not need this tempered, well, you know, I just don't know, I don't want to sound crazy, with respect to Crane.
		I mean, I had him on the show, he's a good dude.
		I'm just saying.
		Here we go, look at this one.
		This from the 30th.
		Ted Cruz, Secret Service leader, tangled at Senate hearing over assassination attempt.
		Cruz accused the U.S.
		Secret Service on Tuesday of making a politically motivated decision to deny former President Donald Trump extra security.
unidentified		Just say it.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		There is no logical explanation.
		There is no rational explanation outside of at least one person in an official capacity wanted this to happen.
		Look, man.
		If, uh... How about this?
		How about this?
		Let's say there was an insurance company.
		And they're surrounding a building, in every which way, except the back door.
		And firefighters are there.
		And a man, carrying matches and lighter fluid, is walking around the building, looking around.
		And they're all just like, hey, look at that guy!
		You know?
		We're, you know, and we know there have been numerous threats in the building to burn it down.
		So no one's guarding the back door, and the guy hanging out by the back door, and law enforcement, everybody is watching him by the back door with lighter fluid, and they're just like, how about that?
		And then he walks in, and then he's running around the building, people are screaming, a guy with lighter fluid is in the building, and no one does anything, and the building burns down.
		The reason, it's funny because you don't even need the analogy.
		The story itself of the Trump assassination makes literally no sense.
		But I'm like, I want to give this fire, this building burning down analogy because if that were to happen, there's no question they'd be like, you guys let him do it!
		You let him do it!
		You had law enforcement counter snipers being like, hey a guy with a rangefinder just snuck in and he's by the building and he's staring, he's using it to gauge the distance between him and the stage.
		Well how about that?
		Roger that, buddy!
		uh he snuck in with you yep saw him and no one thought that's gonna nope
		i'll just i'll just i'll just drop it all and i'll say this regular people at the rally were
		screaming he's got a gun he's got a gun two minutes before he opened fire you expect me to
		believe that with all the counter snipers all the local law enforcement the fact that they'd already
		identified this guy hours earlier and taking pictures of him they did not identify the man
		with the gun on the roof and do anything about it or pull trump in
		I don't believe it.
		There are three questions.
		The three questions are, does Trump Derangement Syndrome exist?
		And let's get into a little bit more detail than I normally do, because, you know, the obvious answer is yes, but what is Trump Derangement Syndrome?
		Trump Derangement Syndrome is when a person cannot absorb information that would counter their negative view of Donald Trump.
		Derangement.
		Meaning, no matter what, Trump is evil, he's wrong, he's done bad, he's Hitler, etc.
		And no amount of trying to debunk the narrative will change their mind.
		They think Trump called Nazis verifying people.
		They think Trump said to inject bleach into your arm.
		Never did.
		Never happened.
		Trump condemned white nationalists and neo-Nazis.
		But someone with Trump Derangement Syndrome cannot see rationally.
		Okay, next question.
		Do any of the people suffering from TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome, want Donald Trump to die?
		That's an easy one to answer because following this, they all started posting online that they did.
		And many of them lost their jobs, but they're not the only ones.
		Several men in the street interviews show Democrat voters saying they wish that Trump lost his life that day.
		It's horrifying.
		And lastly, number three.
		Is it possible that someone suffering Trump Derangement Syndrome that wants Trump to die works for the federal government in the intelligence agencies?
		The answer is 100% yes.
		Why?
		Because McCabe said so.
		That members of the intelligence agency fear Donald Trump, think they'll be jailed, and are planning to flee the country.
		This is just... There are potential suspects.
		There's opportunity.
		There is motive.
		All of those things lined up.
		Now let's play the conspiracy theory game once again.
		The New York Times says the guy who was Crooks, a registered Republican, left few clues about his belief.
		He was a registered Republican anti-Semite who liked Joe Biden.
		Apparently that's it.
		Doesn't seem to make much sense at all.
		Unless the narrative was going to be that Iran, supporting a right-winger with a gun, who hated Israel because he was far-right, You see, that's the narrative that I think they were aiming for.
		It was a Nikki Haley Republican.
	Maybe not Nikki Haley, she likes Israel.
	It was a far-right.
	I wouldn't be surprised, to be completely honest, if they were going to try and frame Groepers.
	And I mean this legitimately.
	A young white male, right-leaning, hating Israel, and Donald Trump says he's going to support Israel.
	Iran-backed, gave him intelligence and access to funds.
	Where'd he get the money for the weapon?
unidentified		Iran.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		They would have said that he was an anti-Semite Republican.
		We gotta ban the guns, and we gotta go to war.
		But Trump, for the grace of God, tilted his head.
		And the bullet hit him in the ear.
		It would have been very, very scary, should he have actually lost his life.
unidentified		But I'll tell you this, my friends.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		They're saying it's a conspiracy theory?
		Groundless claims!
		It's their political narrative.
		Time and time again, we've observed a disturbing feedback loop between lawmakers and online conspiracies, said Nina Jenkiewicz, a disinformation expert.
		Oh, we all remember her, don't we?
		Our elected officials should be holding themselves to a higher standard, sharing verified information, not dealing in speculation that could inflame and endanger more Americans.
		Perhaps you should have taken your own advice, and Democrats could have taken your advice, perhaps during Trump's first term, when y'all accused him of being a spy working for Vladimir Putin since the 80s.
		No joke.
		MSNBC ran a segment claiming that Donald Trump may have been a Soviet traitor.
		I'm not kidding.
		The Soviet Union's gone, but they're like, since the 80s, Trump may have been working with the Soviet Union.
		Yeah, maybe follow your own advice, but I'll tell you this, you're allowed to speculate.
		We've been given no official stories.
		Story.
		So, uh, speculate away.
		Speculate away.
		You know, I just feel like it's obvious.
		In an era where Ron Paul, RFK Jr., are publicly stating, it was the CIA that killed JFK and RFK.
		We're no longer playing this game where we're just gonna act like we're morons.
		And I will say this to all the Republicans.
		Respect to Eli Crane for actually asking the questions, but be a little more direct with it, because I will.
		I got no problem.
		The official story makes no sense.
		Within a day, we are like, this makes no sense.
		You've got no official story.
		You can explain away nothing.
		So I will say it one more time.
		What we think we know, based on the press, The shooter snuck in to a controlled area in full knowledge of the countersnipers.
		They did nothing.
		Countersnipers knew they had a rangefinder and was gauging the distance between where he's at and the stage.
		They did nothing.
		He flew a drone.
unidentified		What?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		They did nothing.
		Next question, where did he get the gun from?
		Well, we know they say he bought it from his dad, but where was it?
		It was collapsible, they say.
		So it was like a folding stock that he had hidden in his jacket, or what?
		Because he didn't seem to be wearing one.
		So where did it come from?
		Why did they claim that they didn't see him until after the first shot, when he was, now seen in video, running across the roof?
		And regular people saw him and were screaming, hey, that guy's got a gun.
		I'm sorry, but your official story, your official, I should say this, your conspiracy theory, coincidence theory I suppose it is, it's the Rube Goldberg of assassination attempts.
		Just like he's sitting down and the guy's like, hey that's weird, that guy's got a rangefinder and he's gauging the distance between here and the stage.
		It's fine to me!
unidentified		Huh?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		We're supposed to believe that?
		So Trump recently at a rally brought up the woman who saved his life.
		That's what he said.
		She saved my life!
unidentified		Come here!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		And then she comes up and this young woman is the one who turned on the display for Trump to look at and he turns his head and that was it.
		The bullet would have went straight into his eye but he went like this instead and tilted his head.
		Wild.
		Wild, man.
		I'm not going to believe any of it, but I will warn you guys of this, okay?
		Because we'll get into more of this a little bit later.
		Trump's going to be debating Harris.
		Kamala Harris's polls are going way up.
		Look at this.
		General election civics.
		Harris is beating Trump by four.
		Presidential election chance of winning.
		July 22nd, it was 64 Trump, 29 Harris.
		Now it's 54 to 44.
		Call it the honeymoon period.
		Call it whatever you want.
		Do not discount Kamala Harris.
		There is politicking afoot.
		So we will, uh, we're going to jump into the next story in, uh, just a little bit, but for now, we are going to read your superchats.
		This next one's quite a bit of a doozy.
unidentified		And, uh, let's talk evil, dude.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Did you guys see this one?
		The male boxer who just went BOOM right in the face of that woman, and she like, and then she immediately was like, I quit!
		I quit!
		You win!
		I can't do this.
		And then this guy is like, yeah!
		It's like literally the episode of South Park where the guy is boxing the woman.
		The woman cried, talked about the grueling training as she struggled to become an Olympic boxer.
		But it's okay, because you ain't gonna beat a guy in a fist fight.
		We were talking about this last night.
		It's Olympic domestic abuse.
		Watch a man pummel a woman.
		The funny thing is I got the betting odds pulled up for you, and I don't know, dude, sometimes you can only laugh at the absurdity, but we're gonna grab your Super Chats right now before we jump into that segment.
		So let's go!
		Do you guys have any comments?
		Super Chats?
		Super Chat away!
		Once again, smash that like button.
		You can follow me on x at TimCast as I post weird things and perhaps waste your time, but it's worth it!
		And also, share the show wherever you can on social media.
		Word of Mouth is the best way podcasts grow.
		The show is also available as the Tim Pool Daily Show on all podcast platforms.
		You can listen to it in full there at later dates.
		So, spreading the word.
		I was talking to... Podcast marketing is always the hardest.
		And it is wild to me that there are some people who just nail it.
		iTunes, Spotify, whatever.
		Timcast IRL and Timcast do, like, I don't know, mid-range well.
		I think Timcast IRL is, like, I think last week we were with 119th biggest podcast in the world.
		And it also depends on, like, which charting metric you're using.
		I don't think TimCast News, the Timple Daily Show, is.
		However, the Timple Daily Show, before I started IRL, was getting like three or four times the views, and then it split the audience with IRL, so that probably was a negative impact.
		But it was at one point like the 34th biggest podcast in the world, so that was cool.
		But it is a challenge.
		I guess when we do our show principally on YouTube with a video component, people just watch on YouTube.
		But, you know, it is what it is.
		Let's grab some Super Chats.
		Jason Dixon says, Please consider having Travis with Real Estate Mindset on as a guest.
		The economy is about to implode in the housing market.
		This guy knows a lot.
		I've been looking at it.
		We have properties out where we are that were $300,000 a year, a year and a half ago, and we were looking at them.
		We were like, You know, you get two acres of land and a 1,700 square foot house for $300K.
		Those houses, they're $500K to $600K now.
		And I'm just like, no way I am buying that.
		That's crazy.
		B-Man says, notice they showed no emergency vehicles taking the victims.
		Interesting.
		What have we here?
		Halo News says, Tim, will you watch the Skibbity Toilet movie and TV show when it comes out in the future?
		No.
		The Scooby-Doo Toilet Stuff is, like, weird absurdity, and I find it funny, but, like, I'm not gonna watch it, I don't know.
		The first one's funny.
		I'm Not Your Buddy Guy says, Sucks when the unfortunate reality kicks in, and you realize just how evil people can be, especially to cover up their misdeeds.
		One thing's certain, people will be locked up regardless of 2024 outcome.
		Only difference is who.
		You know what, my friends?
		The important lesson to understand is, the left figured this out a while ago.
		And that is that they believe there is no truth but power.
		And it's not a world that I want to live in.
		I want to live in a moral world with honesty and fairness.
		But you've also got to understand that that only applies to the people who also agree with you.
		As many people pointed out, the Founding Fathers believed that this country could function so long as people shared this moral framework.
		Predominantly Christian, though some of them were deist, but almost entirely Christian, of course it was.
	It is funny that a lot of us try to say, they weren't Christian, some of them were atheists, and I'm like, maybe, but like, this country was 90 plus, like, 99% Christian up until, like, only the past several decades.
	Secularism started to rise up.
	And even then, like, even Bill Maher's moral framework is Christian.
	But I will tell you this.
	Something you must understand.
	There is no world where you will unify the people.
	There is a world where evil can be suppressed, and there is a world where goodness can be suppressed.
	The Soviet Union is an example of when good people are suppressed, and evil reigns.
	And it's terrifying.
	The early days of the United States show you what happened when the good succeeds.
	We could see the expansion of civil rights, the end of slavery.
	Good was winning across the board.
	And what is good?
	It is what helps to expand life and organization.
	That's my view.
	Creation.
	Protection.
	Destruction makes sense only in some areas, like a building is about to collapse.
	The amount of destruction could be maximized if that building collapsed, so you collapse at first.
	You tear it down.
	The destruction serves a greater purpose.
	But what we're trying to do is produce more than we're destroying.
	Unfortunately, the reality is there will always be evil people, they will always lie about you, and the goal is to simply win the game.
	Be the honorable individual with integrity and capability.
	That's why I say, get fit.
	Exercise.
	By November, y'all should be in shape.
	Because the point is, you want to be the best version of yourself because evil cheats.
	And that's the game.
	Let me tell you, Let me tell you the quick story here about what's going on with where we live.
	Berkeley County, West Virginia.
	So, you know, I got like 1.2 something million subscribers.
	This news doesn't matter all that much.
	I was surprised when I made a video about the skate park.
	It got more than half a million views.
	Even old ladies are watching and being like, I'm an old lady and I have no idea what this is about, but I'm gonna watch it anyway.
	So we try to invest in a local skate park.
	We buy the land where there is a local skate park.
	Tell the skaters, like, do your thing.
	We were trying to buy land.
	Quick version.
	I offer $20,000 to skaters in my town.
	Martinsburg is where we have our coffee shop building and where we are looking to expand.
	And we offer $20,000 to an organizationless street contest.
	And they threaten violence against me.
	Physical removal if I try to skate in the city where I own property, where my employees live, and where we run our business.
	The reason, I don't live in it.
	I live just outside of it.
	We're in Berkeley County.
	It's like living in the suburbs, I guess, but it's a small city anyway.
	And so, we were trying to buy property.
	We get a guy coming up to us screaming at us, saying he's the sheriff, it's his.
	Crazy.
	It's like, I live here, right?
	And then, our employees live here and skate here every day.
	After we bought it, we're now finding out that some of those guys went and destroyed portions of the skate park on the property that I bought.
	And now you've got leftists going on YouTube, lying about it.
	You've got...
	Because they're evil.
	No question.
	They're saying things like I've banned them.
	Never banned anybody.
	They're saying, so, after he bought it, someone came and destroyed it.
	And then it turns out, they're like, well, actually, that was our friend who did it.
	They did it because they were mad at Tim Pool.
	This is it.
	You cannot deal with evil.
	You've got this guy on YouTube, Gifted Hater.
	This is the evil scourge.
	And there's only one way to win.
	There is no jumping into the mud with these people because they're just evil.
	The point is, succeed.
	Be stronger.
	Be better.
	Make more money.
	Build more influence.
	And that's it.
	And then they don't matter.
	But the problem is, they will always lie, they will always rally people behind them, and unfortunately, many of these people fall for it.
	In the bigger picture, we're talking about Republicans versus Democrats.
	We got a guy in Silicon Valley who just came out, he's like a PayPal guy, saying, I was duped by Democrats.
	I genuinely thought that they cared about people.
	They don't.
	They care about power.
	And the Republicans were the ones who were actually trying to help people.
	Surprise, surprise.
	Now, that wasn't always true.
	Certainly wasn't true in the 2000s.
	And then something started to change around the Trump era, when the populist influence came up around the internet.
	You will find that these people who align themselves with the left are lying, cheating, and stealing.
	It's really remarkable, too.
	I'm just like, why do they make this stuff up?
	For power.
	Just, that's it.
	That's it.
	Apparently, the funny thing is, they post online things like, if I ever see Tim Poole, I'm gonna do this, that, or otherwise, and then I'm like, I skate around all the time, and they're like, oh, hey, what's up?
	And they fist bump me.
	That's the craziest thing that'll blow your mind.
	That they go online, they go on like this YouTube guy, Gifted Haters YouTube channel, and they'll say things like, yeah, that guy's not welcome here, we won't skate with him.
	I see him in person, they walk up and they give me a fist bump.
	They're just all fake.
	You know, I think the big lesson for me around evil was when someone I had known for like 10 years, who I used to skate with every single day, and I consider to be one of my best friends, but I hadn't seen him in a few years, Realized, because he knew me, he could lie about me and attack me to get followers for himself on social media.
	It didn't work, but it was a really crazy thing to see.
	And I'm like, why is Homie attacking me?
	The last time I saw him, it was one of those sad things where it's like, we'll skate again, bro, I'll see you around.
	And then I ended up moving to the north side, and then, you know, you don't really see him.
	There's that meme where it's like, Sad meme.
	It's like, the year is, you know, 2005.
	You're hanging out with your friends.
	You just ordered a couple pizzas, some wings.
	You got a couple liters of Mountain Dew.
	You're playing split-screen first-person shooters.
	You play all night.
	You're laughing and joking.
	Pizza wraps up.
	It's about 1 or 2 a.m.
	You grab your stuff and say, alright guys, I gotta go to bed.
	We'll play again soon.
	And that was the last time you ever played with him, and you didn't even realize it.
	It's sad, right?
	There's another one where it's like, one day you picked up your son for the last time, and you didn't realize it would be the last time.
	That's true.
	And there's a funny story to that where a guy is like, my dad walked up to me, he's like, I'm 24, my dad walked up and lifted me up and then put me down.
	And I was like, Dad, what are you doing?
	And he's like, I just read this thing that said, one day you picked up your son for the last time, or your child for the last time, and you didn't realize it, so he decided to go pick him up.
	He just lifts up his 24-year-old son to be like, I'm the dad.
	But that story about playing video games with your friends, it's like, it's brutal.
	And then I tweeted it out, and people are like, oh!
	Like, my heart, my heart.
	The last time you and the boys got together to play some Halo or something, you know what I mean?
	And that's what it felt like.
	This dude and I were skating.
	You know, um, I remember I'm riding up, gnarly nose grunt, fist bump, boom, he backs out when I do the stair set.
	I'm like, this guy, man.
	We go skate together.
	And then I was like, alright dude, hit me up later, we'll skate.
	And then, uh...
	Time gets away from you, and you've got other priorities, and you get a job, and you're busy on the weekends, and then you're focused on your relationship, and then you just didn't see the guy, and then he's on the south side, I'm on the north side, and we just didn't skate, and then one day, 15 years later, he goes online and starts making things up, insulting me, attacking me, lying about, and I was just like, I've only ever had fun with you as one of my best friends, but that's evil.
	And then I realized, this guy was never really my friend.
	It was just a convenience for him.
	And that's probably why we stopped hanging out.
	And that's the nature of evil, man.
	That's the nature.
	Alright, let's go.
	Eli Bedejkovic.
	Hey Tim, did you hear yesterday that there was an appeal deal?
	It was a, um...
	It was a plea deal for one of the 9-11 terrorists.
	I believe it was more than one, wasn't it?
	What happened to not negotiating?
	That's right.
	And I think the funny point people are making is like, you got these January Sixers in prison, some without charges for years, and you're cutting deals with 9-11 terrorists?
	But I think the wild thing is that there's a lot of people now in the voting age, they don't know it.
	They weren't alive before 9-11, they don't know what it was like during, and that's the reality of life and always will be.
	That the lessons of the past are lost on the young.
	They don't experience it.
	And experience, uh, goes a long way.
	Let's grab a couple more.
	Excuse me.
	What have we here?
	JRG Project says, in the Secret Service, add the Secret Service to the list of agencies that need to have severe, excuse me, reform.
	If allowed, they could plunge this nation into another Venezuela.
	That nation is currently on fire after their election.
	Indeed, it is.
	Daniel says, collapsible stock is just a typical adjustable stop.
	It's a non-point, I believe, that will be used to push for the gun control point, i.e.
	bump stock.
	Right, right, right.
	So, you just, like, the adjustable stock, you can grab it, pinch the lever, and pull it out and push it in.
	Is that what it is?
	I'm not a big gun guy.
	I've got guns, but, you know, I'm not a big gun culture guy.
	You gotta defer to Brandon Herrera or Hickok45.
	Good channel.
	I love that channel.
	Some say it's the best!
	That's just what I've been told.
	All right.
	What do we have here?
	Alec Morales Ortiz says, Hey Tim, saw reports of American aircraft carriers allegedly going nearby Venezuela and that Venezuelan government flew foreign forces in Wagner.
	Could that lead to something or fake news?
	There's been some budding conflict with Venezuela for a while now, but hard to know for sure, man.
	The one thing I will tell you is that it's entirely possible the narratives we're getting from the media that we even think are counter-narratives are in fact not.
	That all the stuff we're getting out of the Trump assassination story may be intentionally released to create the narrative of government involvement because it destabilizes government.
	Who knows?
	I will tell you this.
	What I think makes more sense is that you can't plug every leak.
	And we see the corporate press trying to push false narratives, but they can't plug every leak.
	So, discerning individuals are able to piece the truth together by checking the sources, watching videos, and when you look at how they lie about Trump with edited video, and then you get the full video, you know the corporate press is lying and you have the truth.
	Let's jump to this story.
unidentified		We're gonna have fun with this one.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		On the Telegraph, female boxer has nose broken by opponent who failed gender test During brutal 46-second fight.
		What I really love about this story is that I was checking the sports betting pages after this happened.
		And this literally happened just this morning because, you know, they're further ahead in Paris.
		And they really tried to avoid saying it was a male punching a female.
		I'll give you the quick version.
		Karini, female, fighting Imane, or Imani, I don't know how to pronounce it.
		Female versus male.
		The fight starts, the male, boom!
		Right in the face, and she immediately goes, nope, nope, and she goes back.
		She goes to her corner.
		The story as I understand it, because the video doesn't show it, it clips it, she talks to her corner.
		They say, go back and fight.
		She goes back in and then immediately stops, turns around and says, no way, I can't do this.
		She gave an interview where she basically said, I've never been hit so hard in my life.
		I'm clearly overpowered and I'm going to be mature and say this fight is over.
		Congratulations to the male.
		Bravo on slugging that woman in a boxing match.
		Wow, you really proved how great you are at fighting by punching a woman in the face and winning whatever amount of money you're going to win.
		Apparently Alex Stein, who's been advocating that people bet on the men in the sporting events, said that if Iman wins gold, he's gonna get paid.
		But I got news for y'all.
		The betting odds.
		So I saw this yesterday, okay, two days ago, because I was actually, I covered this story before the fight happened, and the betting odds were minus $150.
		That meant that if you bet $100, you'd win $66 on top.
		You'd get a total payout of $166.
		That ain't bad!
		But eventually the odds dropped down to minus 3,000 when sane, rational humans were like, I think the guy's gonna win!
		And the guy won.
		Granted, it's a forfeit, so I don't know.
		Some people may have bet on forfeiture.
		That's also a good bet.
		Here's the story from Telegraph.
		Female boxer has nose broken by opponent who failed gender test.
		Oh yeah?
		The controversial fight between Imane Khalif, the Algerian boxer who failed a sex test at last year's World Championships, and Italy's Angeli Carini has been abandoned after just 46 seconds after the Italian suffered a suspected broken nose.
		I do think I've got the video for you here, a couple videos.
		Let's see if I can play the, here's her statement.
		Here's a picture of her crying after she was punched in the face by a man.
		Let's play this clip for you guys.
		I don't think her nose is broken.
		So there you can see that she got hit by the guy, raises her fist.
		Boom.
		And then she's just done.
		She's like, no.
		Plobbered!
		Hearing her tell her story is really, really sad.
		Because she's saying, like, the training was incredibly difficult.
		She calls the match, she forfeits.
		I... I'm disgusted.
		I'm disgusted.
		I know you're disgusted, but I'm disgusted with their coach.
		Are you kidding me?
		You know what, man?
		Maybe it's all one big experiment.
		Like, did anybody think, and I want to stress this too, the Algerian boxer, I think this is important, is reportedly not even trans.
		Okay?
		This is not a story of a trans woman boxing women, which is the typical thing.
		This is a story of a biological male, who is in every way male, but got a female passport to compete in the Olympics as a woman.
		And that's the only distinction so far that I've seen reported.
		Maybe I'm wrong.
		But my understanding is this is not a trans woman, in any traditional capacity.
		It's literally just a guy who says, I'm gonna box as a woman.
		And they said, you got it.
		Good to go.
		Did Carini's coach really think that, she's six inches shorter, did he really think she was gonna be able to box a man and win?
	Did he really think that?
	They say this fight had already denoted ferocious controversy with the International Olympic Committee under mounting pressure to explain how a woman could be allowed into a boxing ring unsure of the sex of the person she was facing.
	Unsure?!
	Khalif was banned from competing in a gold medal bout in Delhi by the International Boxing Association who said the fighter's elevated levels of testosterone failed to meet the eligibility criteria.
	And yet, she was still permitted by the IOC to fight at these Olympics, and the difference
	in power was clear from the beginning, with the Italian taking a punch to the face and immediately
	walking to her corner to signal she would not carry on.
	Do we have this, uh, oh yeah, that's right, the Italian Prime Minister has spoken out.
	Gracious in defeat.
	Continuing, Karini said the following about her controversial opponent.
	I wish her to carry on until the end and that she can be happy.
	I am someone who doesn't judge anyone.
	I am not here to give judgments.
	Khalif has spoken briefly herself, saying, I'm here for the gold.
	I fight everybody.
	Okay, so what had happened was this Imani Khalifa Imane, whatever the name is, had undergone gender testing at the World Championships and they were like, this is an XY chromosome individual and not a woman.
	So you cannot box women.
	But the Olympics were like, I don't know, it says F on the passport, so it's a she.
	I didn't have fear.
	I don't fear the ring.
	I don't fear taking the blows.
	But this time, there's an end for everything.
	I wasn't able to finish the match.
	I felt a strong pain to my nose, and I said to myself, for the experience that I have, and the maturity as a woman that I have, I hope my nation won't take it badly.
	I hope my dad won't take it badly.
	But I stopped.
	I said, stop for myself.
	It could have been the match of a lifetime, but I had to preserve my life as well in that moment.
	I want to express my utmost disdain for this woman, for saying I wish her to carry on and that she can be happy.
	Dude, people come to me and they say, Tim, Tim, it's not her fault.
	Why are you... What do you mean?
	I hope her happiness and I hope she carries on.
	Why?
	So that she... Okay, look, man.
	It's not like I've actually done any gender testing on this stuff.
	I'm telling you about what the reports are.
	The reports are, it's a male.
	It's a biological male.
	You keep saying she.
	There's no reporting to indicate this individual is transgender.
	And I mean that sincerely.
	And I'm the guy, I'm getting criticism from the right because I'm friends with Blaire White.
	They're like, Blaire White's trans and we don't accept that.
	And I'm like, well I like Blaire.
	Blaire's cool.
	Blair gets all my respect.
	She hear pronouns the whole shebang, because I'm a liberal, I guess.
	This is a story about a biological male who is by no means transgender in any discernible way according to any reporting.
	It's literally just a male who says, I'm here for the gold.
	I'm going to fight everybody.
	And you're like, she, uh, hope she does well.
	Okay, well then I'm, I'm glad you lose.
	I am glad that you lost, Carini, and I revel in your tears because if you support this, Then I've got nothing to say.
	I will say it now, I will say it again, and I will say it tomorrow.
	To the people that are like, Tim, no, you can't.
	Listen.
	I'm for equality.
	If a female boxer wants to fight a man, she is allowed to do it.
	And if she supports this in Olympic boxing, then I'm not going to feel sorry for her.
	Oh, I'll pity her ignorance.
	I'll laugh when she loses.
	But come on, let me tell you this.
	If there was a woman Who came out and she was like, women are just as strong as men.
	I could beat any man.
	And then a guy came up and said, I'm a man.
	I'll fight you.
	And they fought.
	Are you going to be like, that poor woman, I'm so sorry for her.
	You'd be like, of course she was going to lose.
	She chose this.
	That's what I'm talking about.
	When Venus and Serena Williams said that they, there was like a famous story where they were like, we could be any man ranked 200 or lower.
	And then some guy who was ranked like 230 or whatever was like, I'll beat you as in tennis.
	And then he shows up drunk and drinking beer and smoking cigarettes and he beat them both.
	Are we like the poor Williams sisters?
	No, I'm like, well, okay.
	Well, they wanted to do this.
	I'll criticize the IOC.
	They should not be allowing this, but she is coming out saying, I support you.
	Please continue.
	Some other woman who doesn't want to fight is going to get punched in the face.
	Not for any woman in general who goes through this.
	My first reaction is, this is wrong.
	They shouldn't allow it.
	But now I'm being told, after Carini praises the male for beating her, punching her in the face, I'm supposed to defend her?
	Why?
	She got what she wanted!
	This is what I don't understand.
	Conservatives gotta stop doing this.
	I was talking about this last night, and here we go with a perfect example.
	Democrats vote for crime.
	I'm not being cute.
	I'm saying they literally vote for crime.
	A Democrat comes out and says, we should be releasing criminals from prisons.
	And they go, yeah, I'm gonna vote for that.
	Then the criminal gets released, punches a woman in the face in New York, and then I'm like, am I supposed to feel bad?
	I don't get it, okay?
	I do not understand.
	If a guy came to me and says, I'd like to juggle, and I went, okay, and then he started juggling bowling pins, I'd be like, congratulations.
	I wouldn't be like, oh, I'm so sorry for you that you juggled.
	You did exactly what you wanted.
	You got everything you hoped for.
	I'm so sorry for you.
	Conservatives always do this.
	I feel bad for you that the thing you wanted happened.
unidentified		What?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		The thing you wanted happened?
		Okay.
		Let's read some more, and then I'll go through the betting odds, because the betting odds are the best part of this story.
		Viewers left in the dark.
		Our man on the ground, Oliver Brown, was keeping us well informed, but for the TV viewers, there was absolutely no mention of why Imain Khalif's presence is so polarizing.
		It's a guy!
		Georgia Maloney reacting to this fiasco so quickly really demonstrates how contentious it is.
		Follow her reaction, blah blah blah.
		Let's see, they say, we're going back in time here with these updates.
		The fight between Angela Carini and her Algerian opponent shows what happens when gender ideas are taken to extremes, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Maloney said.
		I've been trying to explain for years that when taken to the extremes, some of these risks impacting women's rights.
		I think that athletes of male genetic characteristics should not be admitted into women's competitions.
		Not because we want to discriminate against anyone, but in order to protect the right of female athletes to be able to compete on equal terms.
		46 seconds into the fight, she quits.
		And I'll tell you this, Carini was probably told to say, I hope her happiness and I hope she continues, I wish her to carry on until the end and that she could be happy.
		Yeah, but if you actually watch the video, which I'm wondering if they have, Carini pulls her hand away from the ref, The Khalif comes over and tries to pat her on the back and she like nudges her away.
		Clearly upset.
		She knows she's fighting a guy and she's pissed off about it.
		But publicly, she would throw everyone else under the bus.
		Gracious in defeat.
		I won't judge someone.
		I won't judge someone.
		Okay?
		Everyone's telling me stand with Angela Kerrini.
		She's gotta stand with herself first.
		When she pulled her hand away from the ref, I was like, yes!
		Make that statement.
		Reject this.
		Say, I refuse.
		And then what?
		She comes out and says, no, no.
		Khalif should keep fighting.
		Alright.
		Well, I'm taking a look at the betting odds, and, uh, I don't know.
		3% is 3%, right?
		That's the betting odds.
		lives of tiktok posts try to cry angela karey talks about competing the olympics for her
		late father she just quit her boxing match of being forced to compete
		against a man allowing men and women's competitions is evil democrats
		support it in this video
		she says that uh... it was her dad and uh... he was cheering her on
		and she's crying She was talking about how the training was so intense, and it was so difficult, but she had to do it.
		She did it for her dad.
		So I felt tired.
		I felt tired.
		But I had to do the last kilometer.
		We say the last mile.
		And then I tell you this, by all means, empathize, sympathize, whatever you want to say, but she is now defending the male boxing females, who will do it, because I've got the, uh, I believe I have the, uh, where is this?
		Do I not have it pulled up?
		Oh, I guess I don't have it pulled up.
		The, uh, the next fight.
		Oh, there it is, there it is, I do have it, yeah.
		Uh, Khalif, to be determined in the Saturday, August 3rd quarterfinals.
		So, uh, basically what we're seeing is Karini condemning the next woman.
		Sorry.
		I, I, I'm not going to support you in this one.
		You will condemn the next woman to be battered by a male, in public, at the Olympics, and suffer what you suffered.
		Y'all could protest.
		Every... You know, I'll tell you what I would do.
		You wanna know what I'd do?
		I'm not a woman.
		So... This circumstance could never happen.
		But if I was Carini, and they said, go into the boxing ring, the fight's gonna happen, I would put my hands behind my back, and I would stand perfectly still, and I would not move.
		I would not guard.
	I would not put my hands up.
	Or, I think they might require you to before the fight starts.
	I'd immediately put them down, and I'd put them to the side.
	Put my hands behind my back.
	I wouldn't fight.
	I'd say, no, no, no.
unidentified		No, no.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		You can win.
		Yeah.
		But you're gonna have to beat me defenseless.
		You know, I'll tell you this too.
		Um, if you don't believe me, I was on Tucker Carlson several years ago because when I was in Boston, an Antifa guy started threatening me.
		I quite literally did that.
		Now granted, I was filming, so I kept one hand up and I just tightened my abs and said, okay, as the guy was swinging at me, trying to make me flinch or whatever, but he didn't, he didn't hit me.
		And I was like, come on, do it.
		I don't play these games.
		For her to come out and say, the, the, she should keep going.
		Um, dude, I'm not playing that.
		Not interested.
		As she sits here crying, I feel for her.
		I saw this.
		I feel for her.
		But for her to come out later and be like, no, no, I... This is a story that went viral yesterday.
		Female volleyball player, 17, left paralyzed with brain damage by transgender opponent who cackled with delight after knocking her to the ground.
		It's an old story from a couple years ago.
		Yeah.
		She still suffers brain damage.
		She has frequent loss of balance, so she can no longer compete, because a male player spiked a volleyball, full force, I believe they said it was maybe about 70 miles an hour, hitting her directly in the face, knocking her back, shutting her down, leaving her paralyzed.
		Partially, partial paralysis on the right side of her body.
		Why would anyone, why are women saying, no, no, no, no, no, keep competing?
		Well, this woman's not.
		Riley Gaines is not.
		Taylor Silverman is not.
		They're the ones that are actually speaking out.
		I support them 100%.
		But Kareena's gonna come out and say, continue.
		Go for it.
		I don't judge.
		Condemn the rest of women, why don't you?
		Alright, my friends.
		Well, take a look at this.
		This is OLBG.com.
		Most of the—oh, this is so funny.
		This is the best part of the story.
		So, two days ago, I pulled up the betting odds for Kareena Khalif.
		And it was minus $1.50.
		And I'm like, really?
		Minus $1.50?
		I put $100 down?
		I could clear $66?
		That's crazy!
		And I mentioned this the other night.
		And a lot of people were saying that in reality, once people figured out it was a guy versus a woman, the betting odds went down to minus $2,500.
		Oh, man.
		Well, so take a look at this.
		This is OLBG.com.
		I'm not familiar.
		When you try and pull up the odds for that fight on all the other sites, it's gone.
		People are now reporting that future betting has disappeared, and you can't make bets.
		I don't know if that's true, though, because they've not determined who Khalif is going to be fighting.
		So, it could be anybody, and they're not going to give out until they know for sure.
		But look at this one.
		This one's really funny.
		This individual, Tipster, I'm going to give Imane Khalif the edge here.
		She made the quarterfinals in the last Olympics 2021.
		Angela Kerrini got knocked out in the eighth.
		What is that?
		Eighth finals?
		I don't know.
		Octo-finals?
		Look at the odds.
unidentified		1.03.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Now, those are not the odds we use in the United States.
		We use the American odds, which is negative odds or positive odds.
		What does it mean if the odds are 1.03?
		It means that if you bet $100, you will win 3!
		You risk $100 to win $3.
		Is it really worth it?
		It's not worth it.
		It just isn't.
		Alex Stein makes the joke, he's like, you gotta bet on these men to win and you're gonna get money.
		Come on, man.
		A hundred bucks wins me a three dollars?
		I'd have to bet one hundred thousand dollars to try and win three grand!
		It's just not their 3% return.
		I'd rather just put the $100,000 into stock, because you're likely not going to suffer that much of a loss.
		Look, you bet $100,000 on Iman Khalif, and then let's say Khalif is just like, what are the odds at?
		Minus $3,000?
		Whispers to their friend, put $100,000 on me to lose.
		And then they lose.
		Cha-ching, baby!
		What is this one?
		I think they had, um, Karini was at $10,000!
		Wow.
		That means if you bet $1, you won $10.
unidentified		$10.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		You bet $1,000, you won $10,000.
		Now that's a heck of a return.
		Minimal risk for a lot of reward.
		I just love it.
		So we pull up these other odds, and you can see like odds typically like 1.83.
		I think the way that works is basically you bet $1, you win $1.83.
		$4.33, you bet $1, you win $4.33.
		And you can see, there are, uh, some odds are just no good!
		No good!
		France, women, you win $0.05 on the dollar.
		Some things are just, woof, real bad, real bad.
		They really, really don't give you good odds because we expect these teams to lose.
		But welcome to, um...
		Welcome to the modern sporting arena, I suppose.
		So I'm trying to figure out when the next fight's going to be, because I actually think I want to make the bet, because it'll be funny.
		Because I'll bet $100 and win $3, and then I'll screenshot it and be like, hey, I won $3!
		Then you've got the idea of the value bet.
		Like, $1 wins me $10?
		It might be worth betting $100.
		Like, yeah, you only lose $100.
		But you might win $1,000.
unidentified		That's not bad.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		As soon as we get Olympic Boxing, let's go!
		What are the odds?
		Um, bets?
		No, I don't know that they have it up just yet, because I think this is relatively new.
		So we'll see.
		I'm going to take a look into this, and then we'll see if we can make that bet.
		Oh, I just want to stress, guys, for the Fs in chat, that is not on my end.
		But I am recording this.
		For those that are watching live, the stream just went down, but once again, That's on YouTube's end.
		Did they get mad at me?
		I wonder if YouTube took the stream... YouTube may have taken the stream down.
		No, I don't know.
		I don't know what the deal is.
		But anyway, I suppose we'll just wrap this segment up there as...
		You know, the livestream is stuttering.
		But for everybody who is watching this clip, smash the like button, subscribe to the channel, share the show with your friends, head over to TimCast.com, join us, become a member.
		The next segment will be coming up at 4 p.m., and thank you for hanging out.
		You can follow me on axe at Timcast and we'll see you all then.
		And in the meantime, People are saying that it's back.
		I wonder if there was a Yeah, I don't know.
		People are saying, you're still here, we're back.
		Not on my end.
		My, uh, studio monitor shows that we are completely collapsed.
		And it's not working.
		But, uh, here's what I will do.
		Let's, uh, jump over here and see if we can, uh, get an update on this one.
		And see if the, uh, show has begun to work again.
		Uh, looks like people are saying we are back live, and we are back live, ladies and gentlemen.
		My, uh, my studio monitor is, uh, not working.
		There we go, we got it, we got it, we're back.
		Alright, so we have this, uh, this cool system that we set up, and I guess it's been around for a long time, but you can actually make it so that if YouTube goes down, The show stops, and for all of you watching at home, as soon as the connection restarts, it actually saves the whole video, and you don't miss a beat.
		So this actually happened on IRL, we went down, and I was like, oh, we're down, we'll have to figure it out, because normally, that show just erases.
		Like that portion.
		And, uh, this time, what ended up happening was our buffer system worked, and so when the show dropped, it picked right back up without a miss.
unidentified		So.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Still says live.
		Still says live.
		Yeah, I took a look at the upcoming odds.
		You know, we'll see.
		We'll see what we can get to.
		And we'll get ready for the next story here.
		Look at this.
		This one's all good fun, isn't it?
		Let's see what we got next up.
		Now, just as an aside, you know, this is when is the next fight.
		I'm gonna check the odds as soon as I wrap.
		I wanna...
		Oh yeah, I didn't mention this one.
		Olympic triathlon athlete vomits after being forced to swim in the polluted River Seine.
		I'm not gonna play the video, but the dude just... Dude, the Paris Olympics are turning out to be a disaster.
unidentified		An absolute disaster.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		What it's really like to swim in the sun.
		I want to talk about what's going on with Trump at the National Association for Black Journalists, because he absolutely roasts them.
		We've got this masterclass, Trump effortlessly handles hostile questions from black journalists at the Conference in Chicago, and they're so mad, but we're gonna grab your Super Chats right now.
		Let's go.
		Alright.
		Super Mercer Bro says, my dad dated a chick who tried to game over herself.
		She still had good function, just missing an eye.
		Can see exit wound too.
		Joked about it in many ways.
		Crazy, man.
		It's something people should consider when you're dealing with these stories about assassination too, because you'll get a story where it's like a man was found dead of suicide with two gunshots to the head.
		And people are like, how is that possible?
		Because... Let's just say you can miss.
		Probably don't want to get too much into detail because we want to keep it family friendly.
		But not every attack on someone lands in the brain.
		I'll put it that way.
		Let's go.
		Grab some more Super Chats here.
		What have we here?
		The Text Vet says, No question.
		Easily.
		the view is from the ground, the higher up angle of Secret Service makes it that
		we didn't see him narrative absolutely insane. And his movements that fast would
		be 100% grab attention and focus on to him. No question.
		Easily. Let's go.
		Oh, let's see.
		What do we have here?
		Common Sense Fishing says, Tim, use your own logic regarding 9-11.
		Building 7, molten steel, and all the facts prior to it being an inside job, 9-11 led to the Patriot Act, which led to all of this.
		9-11 was an inside job just like this.
		I completely do not agree.
		That being said, I'd fall into the category of 9-11 is more so, not sure, don't know, but there's a big difference between what we saw with the Secret Service and what happened on 9-11, and I've had this conversation 50 million times.
		What I will tell you is this.
		The government's lied about the official narrative of 9-11.
		That is completely obvious to anybody with two brain cells to rub together.
		Why?
		Well, you can start with the actual official government narrative outside of 9-11.
		The idea that the U.S.
		government would literally write a book explaining how our security was bypassed, leading to a major catastrophe, is silly.
		That being said, there's a lot of suspect issues pertaining to 9-11 where individuals did benefit.
		So the question of inside job, I feel, is interesting, but the statement is too direct.
		I do not agree with the idea there's an inside job because we don't have enough information pertaining to how it actually went down.
		I do think it's fair to assess or to speculate as the percentage probability of someone within the government allowing this to happen, certainly.
		I don't like the inside job narrative because It's too speculative, and what I would say is, if I was going to gauge the broader possibility of someone within the government being involved in 9-11, it could be as small as a single individual, and it could be as high as the presidency, right?
		Which I do not believe.
		I don't think makes sense.
		In which case, the most likely inside job scenario is going to be probably the smallest percentage of individuals' involvement, and so you're casting a really, really big net for a very small story.
		I'd prefer to say there's a decent probability of an internal criminal element, to some degree, involvement in 9-11 that we don't know.
		But ultimately, I don't know.
		Ultimately, I don't know.
		I just don't like the blanket statements.
		Anybody who comes out, and I know the media on the left will lie and say, Tim Pool is a truther or whatever.
		No.
		What I'm telling you is, if you really believe that the government told us 100% of what happened on 9-11, I got a bridge to sell you.
		They literally can't.
		It's called classified information.
		That's just basic facts.
		So we don't know.
		I certainly don't trust their narrative, and I think something's fishy about everything that went down, but I don't like going so far as to be like, 9-11 was an inside job.
		Nah, nah, nah, nah.
		I don't play that.
		That one's tough.
		Maybe in 70 years we might learn, maybe we never will.
		Maybe we never will.
	The thing about Trump and the assassination attempt is that it involves very, very, very few actors.
	And there is no official story.
	It's not set up very well at all.
	And so, they have nothing.
	Let's go!
	Let's read some more.
	What have we here?
	The McGlone Code says, Tim's Trump impression has gotten better over the years.
	Haha.
	Well, I will tell you this.
	I used to, like, it was really hard for me to figure out, and then I got to a point where I think I had a really good Trump impersonation, but I've intentionally, uh, caricaturized it to make it different.
	You know, there was a period where I was, like, trying really hard to nail the Trump impersonation, impression, uh, not impersonation, impression.
	Since then, I've actually tried to make it more cartoony to differentiate.
	The point being, when I do an impression of Trump, it's meant to be silly.
	So make it a little sillier than it needs to be, as opposed to just try.
	Because Trump doesn't always talk like that.
unidentified		Trump might talk like this and say, well, quite frankly, eh.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		You know what I mean?
		But there's several keys to it.
		The exhaling, the, uh, nasally portion of it, the RASMIC VOICE!
		And, uh, we do.
		But I'll- I'll- I'll overdo the nasally, and, um, you know.
		That's just it.
		Alright.
		Uki says, Hey Tim, have you seen Sorcery TCG cards?
		Awesome.
		I haven't.
		I'm just not a fan of most of the new, like, card games.
		I just don't think they understand.
		I don't think they understand.
		Magic got something really correct, and they've tried to fix it, and it's a great system.
		It's the first trading card game ever made, and they've done a pretty good job.
		BarelyMillennials says apparently the Italian government tried to get the IOC to stop this farce.
		Wonder how this will affect the Winter Olympics due to being held in Italy.
		Oh, dude, yes.
		They're gonna be like, nope.
		Ain't happenin'.
		The McGlone Code says, Not in the roster of segments, but so glad you brought it up.
		There's not much more to say.
		It's a prisoner swap, and they're going to be releasing these individuals, and the left is cheering on Joe Biden for having done it.
unidentified		Okay.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
		Credit to Biden.
		I don't know the finer details.
		I got no problem saying that the Biden administration was able to get this guy back.
		That's cool.
		Trump said he'd be the only one who could do it.
		Clearly not.
		But I don't know that it matters all that much.
		Glad to see.
		Alright, let's go.
		The text fed says she's not American, she's Italian.
		You are calling for her to make the statement, but what happens to these people if they make that stand in Italy?
		Prison?
		Money stolen?
		Unalive by someone?
		It's not the same.
		You're American.
		Don't know, don't care.
		I'm not running for office.
		And I'll say it again and again.
		I'm not here to pander or make friends.
		I would say shove off.
		I just... I don't know, man.
		Riley Gaines did.
		And I know Italy's got these things.
		Look, she doesn't need to come out and say, I despise these people.
		They're all bad.
		She could just say, it's unfair.
		I reject this outright.
		And the Prime Minister did!
		So just say it!
		Or say nothing!
		Man!
		But to be like, no, no, carry on.
		I wish you the best.
		Keep fighting.
		Spare me.
		Adam says, Tim, you should invite Kevin Ham, CEO of the Ark Encounter and Answers in Genesis in Kentucky for Culture War.
		For Christianity and Science, there's only two genders, God-created male and female.
		That'd be really, really awesome.
		I would love to have him as a simulist.
		This is what we gotta do.
		I gotta hit up Lisa and say, I'm gonna do this right now actually.
		Let's get a Christian theologian and a simulist.
unidentified		Simulation theory.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I'm actually texting this right now.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		We need a Christian theologian.
unidentified		Theologian.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Is that the word?
unidentified		And a simulist.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		No, it doesn't.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Let me put in simulist because it doesn't know that's a word.
unidentified		Change it to simulist.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Simulist is a person who believes in simulation theory.
		Which is funny because it's basically just like rudimentary Christianity.
		There is an advanced race of powerful individuals who created this universe through computer code, and it's for a purpose.
		They have simulated us because they're trying to see how we- Ah, hold on.
		I don't see the difference.
		I don't see the difference.
		Alright, let's grab one more and then we'll start reading about Donald Trump effortlessly handling the NABG.
unidentified		N-A-N-A-B-J.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		James Johnson says, Tim, you should have on David Schweikert on our rally.
		He's a bit older, but is a congressman that really knows what's going on with our economy and what needs to be done to fix it.
		We are talking to members of Congress for a big show coming up in a month with a bunch of members of Congress, so this should be really, really fun.
		Uh, let's see.
		Uki says sorcery is magic the other hand of checkerboard.
		Classic MTG artist.
		Wasn't there also, um, a card game?
		A digital card game that used a board with terrain?
unidentified		What was that game?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I can't remember.
		It's pretty fun, but it didn't last very long.
		I don't know.
		Let's jump into this story, ladies and gentlemen.
		Masterclass!
		Trump effortlessly handles hostile questions at Black Journalists Conference in Chicago.
		And I think this segment, you know, we talked about it last night on Tim Castile, but it needs to be brought back up because there is some context that needs to be said as it pertains to Donald Trump's appearance at the National Association of Black Journalists.
		I want to start by playing the opening clip.
		Now, I really do recommend, I think it's about 40 minutes long, Recommend everybody listen to the full thing.
		I have not yet listened to the full thing.
		I've listened to portions of it.
		And apparently it's so good, Trump doesn't pander.
		He has no problem pushing back, insulting people, and I respect it.
		Not everybody will.
		Some people want to be pandered to.
		In this, the opening question insults Trump, and there's a lot of context as to why Trump responds the way he does.
		And there's very important context.
		You need to understand Trump is completely correct.
		These people were horribly rude to him, and it goes beyond just the question.
		So I will stress this again.
		I'm going to play the opening question for you.
		Trump gets offended by it and then speaks, but I'm going to explain to you exactly why Donald Trump was correct.
		And give you the context as to his answer.
		Because a lot of people are like, oh, Trump should have responded to the question.
		He should have used the opportunity.
		No, no, no, no, no, no.
		We're going to play the clip.
unidentified		Listen to this.
		You have told four Congresswoman women of color who were American citizens to go back to where they came from.
		You have used words like animal and rabbit to describe black district attorneys.
		You've attacked black journalists, calling them a loser, saying the questions that they ask are, quote, stupid and racist.
		You've had dinner with a white supremacist at your Mar-a-Lago resort.
		So my question, sir, now that you are asking black supporters to vote for you, why should black voters trust you after you have used language like that?
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Well, first of all, I don't think I've ever been asked a question so, in such a horrible manner, a first question.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		You don't even say, hello, how are you?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Some people are laughing.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		I think they're a fake news network, a terrible network.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		They're wooing!
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		I think it's disgraceful that I came here in good spirit.
		I love the black population of this country.
		I've done so much for the black population of this country, including employment, including Opportunity Zones with Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina, which is one of the greatest programs ever for black workers and black entrepreneurs.
		I've done so much and you know when I say this, historically black colleges and universities were out of
		money.
		They were stone cold broke and I saved them and I gave them long-term financing
		and nobody else was doing it.
		I think it's a very rude introduction.
		I don't know exactly why you would do something like that.
		And let me go a step further.
		I was invited here and I was told my opponent, whether it was Biden or Kamala,
		I was told my opponent was going to be here.
		It turned out my opponent isn't here.
		You invited me under false pretense and then you said you can't do it with Zoom.
		Well, you know...
		You know, where's Zoom?
		She's gonna do it with Zoom and she's not coming.
		And then you were half an hour late.
		Just so we understand, I have too much respect for you to be late.
		They couldn't get their equipment working or something was wrong.
		I think it's a very nasty question.
unidentified		I have answered the question.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		I have been the best president for the black population since Abraham Lincoln.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		So Donald Trump has impressed a lot of people.
unidentified		I mean, I'm not going to speak for the black population.
unidentified		I don't know.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Me, how I see it is, I respect that he's not going to try and pander like, oh, I'm so sorry.
unidentified		I'm so sorry.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		period, especially when you're 35 minutes late because you couldn't get your equipment
		to work in such a hostile manner.
		I think it's a disgrace.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So Donald Trump has impressed a lot of people.
		I mean, I'm not going to speak for the black population.
		I don't know me how I see it is.
		I respect that.
		He's not going to try and pander by God.
		I'm so sorry.
		I'm so sorry.
		But let me give you the context here.
		Donald Trump was supposed to appear at the National Association of Black Journalists
		with Joe Biden.
		They were both going to be there, and it was going to be almost like a debate.
		Biden, of course, has gone, doesn't come.
		Then Kamala, they say she's going to come, and then it doesn't happen, so it's nothing.
		Not a debate, just Donald Trump showing up.
		They can't get their equipment to work, they're a half an hour late, and Donald Trump stayed.
		I would not have.
		I gotta tell you guys.
		I would not have.
		Not only that, but as Trump pointed out, the greater context, they said it's not possible to do this over the internet.
		We want to do this in person.
		And he says, okay.
		Kamala Harris is now apparently going to satellite call in to the NABJ.
		But I told Trump he couldn't do it.
		So I want you to understand this.
		I have a rule in business, and maybe you don't have this rule.
		Maybe the rule that I will tell you now is simply just about power dynamics in negotiating process in business.
		If I set a deadline, if we have a schedule, and I will give you five minutes, because I approach this logically.
		People make mistakes.
		Pencils have erasers.
		But I give you five minutes.
		If we are supposed to be set up at 9.58 a.m.
		So, prior to this, you're setting up, you're getting microphones ready, everything's supposed to be working.
		At 10 a.m., I'm gonna be sitting down in front of a bunch of people talking.
		If by 10 a.m., you have not sorted out, I will go to them and say, five more minutes, and I'm gonna leave.
		Now, hold on.
		I'm not unreasonable.
		If they say, it might take us 7 to 10 minutes, I'll say, okay, I'll give you 10.
		In most instances, when I have a business phone call or a meeting, if I show up to a restaurant, and I sit down, and it's a 10am brunch meeting or something, 10 a.m.
		comes around, nobody's there.
		I say, okay.
		The countdown begins.
		Because if you don't have the time to commit, then neither do I. I understand pencils have erasers.
		That's why, if I'm supposed to meet someone in person at 10 a.m., and I get a phone call, and they say, I'm really sorry I'm running late.
		So, so sorry about this.
		Traffic.
		I will be there as soon as I can.
		I say, okay.
		And then I will wait 10 minutes.
		Just try to be reasonable.
		But I tell you, most of the time, I'll have someone say, hey, we're gonna do a meeting at noon, and I'll say, you got it.
		At 12.05, phone's back on silent, I'm back to work.
		I'll explain why.
		I record, we do this show two hours in the morning, which before I would record throughout the morning with different segments, but now I'm doing the live show, which increases the amount of recording time from a minute, from an hour twenty to two hours.
		After this, we've got other shooting schedule, I've got to exercise, I've got to eat.
		Very little time in the day, we're working on all these projects.
		The idea that I have time to spare is just non-existent.
		Now imagine Donald Trump.
		That's just my context.
		Call me a dick, call me whatever you want.
		I think this works out well for me, but by all means call me a dick.
		Donald Trump, frontrunner for the presidency, has places to be, has secret service on American taxpayer dime, and agrees to come to this event, and they're a half an hour late, they lied about his opponent being there, they're gonna let her Zoom in, and they can't get it to work, but Trump stayed.
		And did Trump complain?
		No.
		So you know what I would have said?
	First question, if it were me?
	If Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, if I invited Kamala Harris to TimCast IRL, who I do not like, I think she's a bad person, got a lot of complaints about her and the things she said, all that and more, if I invited Kamala Harris to TimCast IRL, and I said, Trump will be here, it'll be a huge show, and she shows up, And she's like, okay, what's the plan?
	I say, I'm so sorry, Donald Trump has canceled on us.
	But if you still want to do the show, we've got a seat right here for you, and we will give you the time to speak your mind.
	And then the cameras break.
	And she's sitting here for a half an hour.
	And then finally we're like, we're good to go, we're live.
	The last thing I'm going to do is insult her right off the bat.
	The first thing I'm going to do is I'm going to say, You know, Madam Vice President, obviously I have very strong disagreements with you.
	I've said disparaging things about you in the past, but I want to thank you and offer my respect for you dealing with our problems.
	That was our fault, and I respect it.
	That's what they should have said to Donald.
	And that's important context, I think.
	I mean, it's like...
	A lot of people are acting like Trump was bad to be hostile in this way, but to be as gracious as he was, with his time and energy, and then to open up by insulting him, and here's the important thing to consider.
	Let's play these opening statements again.
unidentified		And that is a statement that requires tremendous context.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		He's basically saying you've got... I don't think he's saying... I don't think he referred to all four of them.
		I think he was talking about specifically Ilhan Omar.
		And he was saying something to the effect of, you don't like it here, you don't like the things that we do, there is a home country that you could have stayed in.
		The point is not to say, leave, the point is to say, it's clearly better here.
		But let's carry on.
		And for that matter, by all means, tell Trump he was wrong to have said it, but to open this way.
unidentified		You have used words like animal and rabbit to describe black district attorneys.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So what?
		So what?
		Am I immune to being criticized or insulted because of my racial background?
		That's an absurdity.
		In my response, if I were Trump, was to say, is there a reason why I'm not allowed to insult someone because of their race?
		I'm not going to insult someone based on their race.
		But, is there this rule that says you're allowed to be a bad person and I'm no longer allowed to criticize you because you are a certain racial background?
		That's an absurdity.
		I don't care if you're... You give me a guy who's white, you give me a guy who's black, you give me a guy who's Asian, and a guy who's Hispanic, and they all come into my house at the same time and steal my TV, I'm gonna call all of them animals.
		And then you're gonna come and be like, how dare you call the black man an animal?
		I'm like, I called the white guy, the Asian guy, and the Mexican guy too.
		I don't care.
		You're a criminal, you're a criminal.
		That's what Trump should have said.
unidentified		You've attacked black journalists, calling them a loser, saying the questions that they ask are, quote, stupid and racist.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Now, you see what she's doing here?
		She's saying you attacked black people.
		No, Trump insulted bad journalists.
		This idea that you're allowed to be... This is the diversity argument.
		This is the diversity hire argument.
		You see what they're saying?
		You're not allowed to criticize someone if they're black.
		But what if they're bad at driving cars?
		What if I hire a race car driver who's bad at it?
		Should I not be able to say, like, you're a terrible driver?
		How dare you call a black driver terrible?
		I don't care about your race, dude.
		You don't get special protections from criticism.
		Is that the world that they want to live in?
unidentified		You've had dinner with a white supremacist at your Mar-a-Lago resort.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Who Kanye West invited and Trump didn't know.
		Come on, spare me.
		It's ridiculous.
unidentified		So my question, sir, now that you are asking black supporters to vote for you, why should black voters trust you after you have used language like that?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		And then it all comes down to the second statement where Trump is asked about black jobs.
		And I think, I don't know if they have the video, I think this is it right here.
		Let me play this clip for you.
		This is on Post Millennial's website.
unidentified		I mean, it is not lost on us how to divide the lines of race.
		You come here.
		What is your message today?
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		My message is to stop people from invading our country that are taking, frankly, a lot
		of problems with it.
		But one of the big problems, and a lot of the journalists in this room I know and I have great respect for, a lot of the journalists in this room are black.
		I will tell you that coming... coming... It's so good!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I don't know if that was like...
		I don't know if that was intentional.
		I don't think it was.
		But Trump said a lot of the journalists in here are black.
		He's at the National Association of Black Journalists.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		From the border.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		They all start laughing.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		There are millions and millions of people that happen to be taking black jobs.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		You had the best.
unidentified		What exactly is a black job, sir?
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		A black job is anybody that has a job.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		That's what it is.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I would respond with, what's a black journalist?
		And one of the great things Trump did was she said, the lady asked Trump, you called Kamala a diversity hire, and he goes, define it, define it.
		She goes, I did.
		And he goes, no, no, no, define what diversity, equity, and inclusion is.
		And she's like, I said it, it's diversity, equity, and inclusion.
		And he's like, define it.
		And she's like, I did.
		She didn't.
		She didn't.
		But more to the point.
		She says, what's a black job?
		I would just go, what's a black journalist?
		A journalist who's black, okay.
		A black job is a job held by a black person.
		What are you saying?
		What is this?
		You want to be offended at everything for no reason?
		Dude, I like how Trump performed here.
		And maybe it's not good politics, whatever.
		The issue at hand is Donald Trump's not going to earn the votes of most of these people.
		Uh, many of them, and I'm talking about journalists, but also Trump doesn't poll well with the black community, the black population.
		They're saying maybe he's at 24%.
unidentified		I doubt it.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		But Trump's thinking, I'm gonna go talk to him.
		And you know what I respect?
		He didn't go there and put on a fake accent.
		He didn't go on there and pander and say, you know, you're completely right.
		Wow, I shouldn't have done that.
		And he just said, what?
		Don't talk to me like that.
		You know, this guy gave them the time of day.
		And for what?
		You don't owe it to them.
		I respect Trump.
		I like his attitude.
		I like that he basically says, you don't get special treatment based on race.
		Thank you and have a nice day.
		He's going to insult you if you're a white guy.
		He's going to insult you if you're a black guy.
		Because Donald Trump is an equal opportunity hater.
		When he needs to be.
		And he's a very nice guy.
		Now, I will tell you this.
		As many of you know, I am a second generation mixed race individual.
		Hmm, yes.
		And oh boy, oh that Donald Trump had dinner with a white supremacist and boy was I so upset.
		I could not believe it.
		I was banging the table screaming, ooh Donald Trump.
		And so I interviewed him.
		And I interviewed him and Trump said I was great and he really enjoyed it and he was looking forward to a longer form interview in the future.
		If we organize it, we could set it up.
		And I tell you why.
		It's because when I interviewed Trump, I respected the things he had done that were positive.
		I viewed Donald Trump as a net positive president during his time.
		And when I was at the Libertarian Convention, there were key questions that we were focused on pertaining to Julian Assange.
		We were talking about, I think the big questions were, of course, war, Julian Assange.
		And when I talked to a bunch of these Libertarian guys, Who do not like Donald Trump.
		I said to them, I really think it's important we highlight the North Korea, the crossing of the DMZ by Donald Trump.
		And the Libertarian guys all said that was actually one of the best things he had done.
		I agree with the Libertarian guys.
		Donald Trump crossed the demilitarized zone into North Korea with no security detail in an effort to bring peace.
		I say it was because of his ego, I don't care.
		He did it!
		I asked him about it.
		Trump appreciated being asked questions like that.
		But I'll tell you why I asked it.
		It's not to butter him up.
		It's because he did it!
		And more people need to know he did.
		If we want to encourage good behavior, we highlight the good behavior and say, this is good.
		And I pushed him on Julian Assange.
		Will you pardon him?
		Julian Assange is now free.
		I'm glad the narrative got out there, and I'm glad it was, for whatever reason, whoever did it, it happened here.
		And I think the Biden administration made the move to release Julian Assange for two possible reasons.
		The first, they wanted to undermine Trump's talking point, that he would consider pardoning Julian Assange.
		More importantly, though, I think they wanted to make sure that Donald Trump could not leverage intelligence.
		Intelligence Assange will give you a pardon, but you've got to give me some information.
		They wanted to get Julian Assange out of there before Trump could get in, because they're worried he's going to win.
		But I respect it, man.
		Libby Emin said, a black journalist attacked Trump for saying black jobs at a black journalist conference.
		You can't make it up.
		Yeah, they're just trying to be mad.
		They're trying to be mad about it.
		Now, I do think conservatives are making a big mistake with the Kamala.
		Well, maybe not.
		A lot of people are saying that Kamala Harris was Indian, but now she's black.
	And the left response is, yeah, she's biracial.
	Well, I'll tell you this.
	Factually, I would say that conservatives are wrong in attacking Kamala Harris because she's talked about being Indian, but now she's black.
	However, politically, it probably plays well.
	You know, so I can't tell them that they're politically wrong to do it.
	Kamala Harris has a video with Mindy Kaling, and people are like, Tim, show the video with Mindy Kaling!
	And Mindy Kaling and her are cooking, and she's like, I'm Indian, you're Indian, let's cook food.
	It's like, okay.
	And then everyone's like, aha, see, she's not black, she's Indian.
	Well, she's both.
	And she's certainly going to entertain both.
	So my view of this is, I don't care.
	Like, I get that some people are saying Kamala isn't actually black, that she's Indian, and that her family were Jamaican by nationality, but were part of the British, you know, colonies.
	They weren't actually Jamaican black.
	I don't care.
	I think the political play from the right may actually work, because what they're saying to many people in the black community, that she never embraced this until it became politically advantageous, and the narrative long espoused was that she was actually focused on her Indian heritage.
	As to the she-went-cooking-with-Mindy-Kaling thing, and I'm like, dude, let me tell you.
	I eat cheeseburgers, okay?
	I'll have a shepherd's pie.
	I will enjoy tea and crumpets.
	I love the British breakfast with the beans, the mushrooms, the tomato, the blood pudding.
	I also like Bulgogi.
	And it would be, like, the stupidest thing if there was a video of me and I'm, like, cooking some bratwurst or something.
	I'm also part German.
	And, uh, and British.
	And then everyone's like, look, Tim's acting white!
	And then in another video I was like, oh, Bulgogi!
	My mom used to make that when I was little.
	And then they're like, aha!
	He's only pretending to be Korean because he was white before!
	And it's like, I am both!
	I don't care about Kamala Harris and entertaining Indian food and also being black.
	That being said, Politically, it may actually work.
	So, you know, far be it for me to say, don't play the game, I guess.
	There's a strong possibility there's going to be a lot of people in the black community who are thinking, she's just deciding to plant this identity right now to pander, and she didn't do it before.
	And they say, they're like, no, she always identified as black.
	She did.
	I agree with that.
	But I think the political play is, there's going to be a lot of people being like, as someone who is biracial, she plays whichever card she needs, so she doesn't fully relate to someone.
	This is something the left says.
	When you pass, You have a choice, whereas people who don't pass do not have a choice.
	The argument made by the left in terms of identity politics is that there are people who are black, discernibly, and they can't choose otherwise.
	And they experience the world as a black person.
	Kamala Harris is not one of these people.
	She could come out and be like, no, I'm Indian, actually.
	And then she could pass.
	That may actually play.
	Whatever, though.
	Shoutout to Donald Trump for actually going into hostile territory with journalists who are being rude to him.
	I respect him for doing it.
	I like this guy.
	Far from perfect.
	There's better candidates.
	I don't know that Vivek is as funny as Trump, but Vivek's a good guy.
	And we'll see where things go with 2028.
	I wonder what's going to be.
	Is it J.D.
	Vance?
	You know, I thought maybe, like, Vance Ramaswamy, but Vivek's not a VP kind of guy.
	Maybe?
	I don't know.
	We'll see.
	I'm gonna wrap it up there, my friends.
	Next segment will be coming up at 6 p.m.
	on this channel.
	For the rest of you watching live, we'll grab your Super Chats.
	So, Super Chat now!
	Follow me on X at TimCast and Instagram.
	And also, go to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member, and support our work directly.
	But next segment will be up soon, and we'll see you all then.
	Let's grab those Super Chats, ladies and gentlemen.
	I think we only have a couple more.
	Johannes Schmidt says John Cooper of Skillet would be a great guest.
	Great guy.
	Skillet actually just played out here at the Charlestown Races a couple weeks ago, I think.
	And I saw the flyers for him and everybody had the shirts on, so I should have hit him up at the time.
	Azayla Primrose says the event was hilarious.
	He only mocks the one woman who insulted him.
	The other two he is nice to, at least.
	Also, do you think Public Square should ask all shops to close on Election Day so employees can vote?
	I don't know.
	I don't know if Public Square should do that.
	Hard to say.
	Here we go.
	White Dudes for Harris raises $4 million.
	We have, uh, oh, and you know I was gonna show this, I should have showed this, because as they were talking about the black journalists, you have this dude point out that the economy's not going well, inflation has outpaced wages, and these people just lie about it.
	They lie about it.
	CNN opinion permanently shutting down.
	Ooh, boy!
	Yeah, got a bunch of stories we could go through.
	What do you guys think?
	Should we talk about, uh, CNN shutting down its opinion section and make fun of CNN?
	We could also talk about the, uh, the UN and Delta and United shutting down flights to Israel.
	Big political news.
	Uh, I don't know.
	So, whatever you guys—or an athlete vomiting.
	Yeah, what do you guys think?
	We also have white dudes for—for—for Harris, but, uh, CNN opinion shutting down is big.
	Uh, I don't know.
	Chat, let me know what you think, and I'll read—I'll read a couple more Super Chats.
	Bryce Modlin.
	First time I've ever super chatted.
	I just saw something on Instagram that had Kamala saying that she wants to remove the Second Amendment within the first 100 days of her presidency if Congress doesn't act.
	Do you know anything about that?
	That was, I believe, from the primary in 2019 or so.
	She said that she wanted to curtail gun rights.
	Not like literally, she's like, I'm gonna do something about gun safety and we're gonna have gun control.
	If they don't act, I'll take executive action.
	So I don't know that she literally said removing the Second Amendment.
	That's a little too brazen.
	Oh, let's see.
	CNN, CNN.
	No, UN, UN.
	Looks like more people are saying CNN opinion.
	Some people are saying UN.
	Talk about civil war.
	Alright.
	ThatOneGamer says, I think you'd prefer a chat with Inspiring Philosophy on a Culture War episode.
	He argues for Christianity based on science philosophy.
	Easy to reach on X. Best Christian on YouTube, hands down.
unidentified		Let me see what we got in the old... Let's see.
		Uh, let's see.
		Simulist.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Uh, I'm trying to book a simulist.
unidentified		Is someone who thinks we live in a simulation.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		That'd be interesting.
		467 Sprite says, Heyo, the Huntington Beach Republican HQ was vandalized.
		Check out Amy from San Diego running against Todd Gloria.
		She's a Patriot prioritizing the border.
		Wow, crazy.
		Sopia Nima says, Vivekan Lake, 2028.
		I'll also check out the card game Lorkana.
		It's like Magic Light.
		Yeah, it's Disney.
		It's Disney's card game.
		And the interesting thing about it is that one of the challenges to Magic the Gathering is that you have resource cards and abilities.
		So lands and spells are basically how it's described.
		If you shuffle your deck and draw seven cards throughout the game and you get no lands, you lose.
		So you have to do what's called a mulligan.
		Let's try again.
		Every time you mulligan, your percentage chance to win diminishes because there's a penalty for doing so.
		It's called being mana-screwed.
		There's also mana-flooded.
		You draw seven cards, it's all land, you're like, I'm gonna lose.
		Because if you don't draw, like, cards to do things with, you lose.
		Lorkana, apparently, the cards are all, like, things, but some of them can be flipped over to be used as resources, which is clever.
		That way, um...
		There's, like, it's harder to get screwed up.
		But Magic the Gathering introduced flip lands.
		And there are cards that can be, are double-sided.
		So if they're in sleeves, like most players play, you can flip it over and use it as a resource, or flip it over and use it as an ability, which is interesting.
		Alright.
		Eric says, CNN is shutting down their opinion section.
		Sad to see them completely shut down.
unidentified		Haha!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		That was a good one!
		Fair point.
		Fair point.
		James Jarvis says, Tim, it would be great to see you use your voice against the abhorrent violence against women in the Olympics.
		I can only defend those who ask for defense.
		If a person comes out and says they want to bungee jump, I will say, OK.
		If a person comes out and says, please, God, help me, I'm being forced to bungee jump, I'll say, hey, leave that person alone.
		Don't force them to bungee jump.
		This woman fought a guy.
		Forfeited the match, and I said, that was wrong, they shouldn't have done this, I stand with her.
		And then she came out and said, no, no, I want this man to keep fighting, and I wish him the best and happiness.
		I said, oh, okay.
		Well, then we're good.
		No beef.
		No fighting.
		You got what you wanted.
		Now the next woman who fights has your blessing.
unidentified		Okay.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Who am I supposed to defend?
		Nicholas Canada says, bring on Jeff Berwick, the Dollar Vigilante, and Raphael Laverne, the Crypto Vigilante.
		Uh, I know Jeff, that would be fun.
		He's good friends with Luke, I think.
		We should bring maybe Luke, Jeff, and someone else on the Culture War.
		Prince L. Lien says, VP Harris doesn't have any black ancestry.
		I'm a black man in my family, and I find it appalling how Dems keep lying that she's black and forcing it on us.
		Wow!
		There you go.
		Alright!
		Well, let's talk about CNN.
		I don't know how much there is to say about this.
		CNN permanently shuts down its opinion section just a moment ago on the live portion of the show.
		We got a great joke where someone mentioned, oh, I'm so sad to see their entire operation shut down.
		Yeah, because CNN is literally just opinion.
		They do these things, all the corporate press does, where, like, earlier in the live show this morning, We had a story about the shooter at the Trump assassination.
		And they wrote a story saying, shooter was often one step ahead of Secret Service.
		But that is an opinion statement.
		Whether someone's ahead or behind is an opinion assessment.
		The actual story was, text messages released revealing law enforcement knew of shooter's presence early on.
		That's a fact statement.
		But the New York Times writes, shooter was one step ahead.
		If the text messages show...
		That they knew he was there.
		Weren't they one step ahead?
		That's the game.
		They masquerade opinion as fact.
		That's the game they play.
		So it's actually surprising to see CNN shutting their opinion section down, especially considering opinion tends to be the most lucrative portion of any business.
		TimCast News and TimCast IRL are opinion shows.
		We show you the news, we try to fact check it, but then we give our opinions.
		And guess what?
		Opinions tend to be wrong.
		Sometimes we're right, often we're wrong.
		Because we're just giving our opinions.
		But opinion shows make money.
		Here's a story from the Postmillennial.
		CNN's opinion section will be permanently shuttered on August 9th.
		A number of writers were informed on Wednesday via email that the decision had been finalized.
		The move was first revealed earlier this month with journalist Claire Atkinson noting on Substack that contributors and the team working behind the scenes together to edit, publish, opinion pieces had been told they'd be let go in the coming week.
		So do we have the actual... Do we have the actual Substack right here?
		Claire Atkinson, CNN staff told current operations are winding down.
		It's actually from earlier in the last month actually.
		Just a quick note to let you know that, unfortunately, CNN has decided to shut down the opinion section.
		Opinion editor Hilary Krieger sent in an email per The Hill.
		I hope our paths cross elsewhere.
		In a statement to the outlet, a senior executive at the company added that it had made the decision at the beginning of the month to sunset the opinion vertical on CNN.com.
		As a result, we will no longer have a standalone opinion section.
		Actually, I'll pull this up.
		Let's pull up CNN.com and see where they're currently at.
		Ooh, they're talking about Paul Wellen being released.
		Let's shrink this down so we can actually see the website.
		And, opinion.
		And what do we have here?
		Let's see what CNN has graced us with as of recent.
		Project 2025 is coming for our kids, too.
unidentified		Why?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		The director resigned.
		It's over.
		There's no Project 2025 anymore.
		Thank you.
unidentified		Bye.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Have a nice day.
		When did they write this?
		Before or after the dude resigned?
		They wrote it yesterday morning.
		Uh-huh.
		Some jobs should never be done by kids.
		Project 2025 sees things differently.
		They're evil.
		They are mother evil people.
		This is a lie.
		And they want to lie to you.
		What a disgusting, disgusting individual.
		Okay, so there's the news.
		They're shutting down.
		And I want to go back to them lying real quick.
		They say we'll no longer have an opinion section.
		The opinion section currently includes articles with titles such as Project 2025 is coming for our kids too and it's time more horror films push back against queer stereotypes.
		It's full of pieces that skew left, however, amongst the affirmation pieces are those with titles such as why can't we give up on capitalism and the downside of raising the minimum wage.
		Let's read this.
		What does she mean, they want kids to work?
		Across the country, some officials, overwhelmingly Republicans, are looking for ways to usher underage workers into potentially dangerous jobs.
		The far-right playbook, known as Project 2025, goes as far as propose the Department of Labor rollback regulations, restricting underage workers from taking regulated jobs.
		On Tuesday, Paul Danza, director, stepped down.
		Really?
		So they know this?
		The extreme policy agenda proposed by the Heritage Foundation argues that underage teenagers offer an opportunity to fill labor shortages in these hazardous workplaces.
		These efforts come after years of lobbying.
		Let me, uh, let's, let's, let's, let's, let's dive deep.
		Diabetes.
		Dive deep.
		Okay.
		Um, where does it say that?
		Where does it say that underage, uh, uh, workers?
		I'll tell you what I saw.
		I saw a portion of this, the Mandate for Leadership book, that said young adults.
		Adult means not underage.
		So, are they gonna link to that?
		What is this?
		They say they want to, uh, American projec- uh, here we go, let's pull this one up.
		This is from American Progress.
		Project 2025 would exploit child labor by allowing miners to work in dangerous work conditions.
		Really?
		I mean, show me where it says that.
		I mean, and if it does, I'll say, wow, that's interesting.
		Uh, federal labor laws, blah blah blah, coal mines, illnesses, okay, we're- Uh, let's see, despite strong evidence, Project 2025 proposes eliminating protections against hazardous work for children.
		Specifically, it calls for the U.S.
		Department of Labor to amend its Hazard Order Regulations to permit teenage workers access to work in regulated jobs with proper training and parental consent.
		In plain English, revising these Hazard Order Regulations means letting teens work in hazardous jobs.
		Exploiting child labor sounds extreme because it is extreme.
		Okay, where does it say that?
		Parental consent?
		That's interesting.
		That's evidence to suggest they do mean underage.
		I agree.
		However, the snippet, uh, do they have it?
		Mandate for leadership, because I'm pretty sure it said young adults, which would mean older than 18.
		But let's do this.
		Can we control F here and do... Let's type in young adult.
		Young adults.
		There's two, five... Let's see.
		Physical education.
		Hazard order regulations.
		Some young adults show an interest in inherently dangerous jobs.
		Current rules forbid many young people, even if their family is running the business, from working in such jobs.
unidentified		Uh-oh.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		This results in worker shortages in dangerous fields and often discourages otherwise interested young workers from trying the more dangerous job.
		With parental consent and proper training, certain young adults... It keeps saying adults!
		Where- Okay, hold on.
		What?
		Should be allowed to learn and work in more dangerous occupations.
		This would give a green light to training programs and build skills in teenagers who may want to work in these fields.
		Is that 18 and 19 year olds?
		DOL should amend its hazard order regulations to permit teenage workers access to work in regulated jobs with proper training and parental consent.
		Workforce training grant program.
		The federal government spends more than a hundred- Hold on.
		So they're lying.
		It says young adults every step of the way.
		Eighteen-year-olds, they're talking about.
		Parental consent?
		Because their families run the business.
		These people are such scumbag liars.
		Can we... Can I... Is that it?
		Congress should create an employer grant of the $10,000 for a pro-rated portion thereof of worker engaged in on-the-job training to qualify... Where does it...
		It doesn't say anywhere about underage.
		They literally just made that up.
		It's talking about 18-year-olds working in the family business with the family's consent.
		It does not say underage workers.
		Well, there you go.
		Good riddance to CNN.
		They're lying.
		But I'll tell you what they're really doing.
		CNN is writing an opinion piece based on progressive propaganda.
		It does not say anywhere underage.
		What do you expect?
		That's the game they play.
		It's crazy, isn't it?
		America's child labor, the goal of child labor laws, research shows that adult jobs can cause health issues, blah blah blah.
		Wow.
		That's the information laundering game.
		Project 2025 says, there are certain jobs that young adults, which would literally mean 18 and up, can't do based on regulations, even if their family owns the business.
		If they have the proper training and parental consent, they should be allowed to work those jobs.
		Agreed.
		Yeah, uh, you're allowed to go to war.
		So long as they're saying young adults, I don't see the problem.
		That being said, I got no problem saying 16 year olds.
		If you're 16 and you want to work a certain job with the right training, what's the problem?
		I don't think children should be working in mines or factories, but 16-17 is different.
		And there should be restrictions and regulations.
		But I think it's fair to say, I would be okay with assessing which dangerous jobs, the degree of danger, the rate of bodily harm per industry, and then say, yeah, we're not going to have 16-year-olds work in certain fields.
		But like, I don't know, forklift operator maybe?
		Wherever they're regulated and they can't do, so long as they know how to do it and they have the training, they're capable of doing this.
		I don't see why not.
		More importantly, nowhere did it say children.
		It said, young adults every step of the way.
		But rest assured, CNN and others will still lie to you for political reasons.
		And that is the nature of the game.
		Now, why are they shutting down?
		I don't know.
		Maybe because they lie too much.
		What Gen Z's Happily Ever After looks like.
		The freedom embedded in my family's dream became real 60 years ago.
		I just gotta be honest.
		I don't know why anybody would click any of these things.
		They are not interesting.
		Why can't we give up on capitalism?
		My teenage son had an influencer in his class.
		This is what it was like.
		This is actually interesting.
		And I'd be like, nah, I would not, I would not, well, I wouldn't put my kids in public schools, that's an entirely different story, but I would not have them around an influencer.
	If I, if my kid was...
	Friends of someone who started gaining tons and tons of followers, I'd just be like, uh, no.
	Sorry, we're not playing that game.
	And, you know, I think, I think the reality is, like, my kid ain't gonna be having no cell phone, ain't gonna be on the internet, it's not gonna be going to public school, uh, private school, um, Private tutoring, limited access to internet, but, you know, it'll be there, but none of this unfettered access.
	Children have access to, like, the most vile elements of the human psyche.
	Kids gotta, you can't do it.
	Giving your kid a cell phone with the internet is like going to a kid and saying, go walk around Las Vegas by yourself.
	They're gonna see things they should not see.
	And I gotta be honest.
	It's worse than that.
	It'd be like saying, walk into any building anywhere at any time for any reason, by yourself, and they'll let you in.
	And that can be criminal buildings, it can be like buildings where crimes are happening, watching women get abused, you know, you can't do that.
	You've got to restrict some of that, so.
	Anyway, whatever.
	I'm not going to go off on CNN's opinion piece in that regard, but just point out that CNN's trash, and they lie.
	Thank you for watching this segment.
	You can follow me on X at TimCast.
	Become a member at TimCast.com, and we'll see y'all tonight at 8 p.m.
	for YouTube.com slash TimCast IRL.
	And for everybody else, we're about ready to wind things down, but I'll grab a couple Super Chats.
	Sparky says, the underage workers narrative is part of the war on small business.
	Yep.
	It's interesting how it says young adults several times.
	And adult means 18 and up.
	And 18 and 19-year-olds are teenagers.
	It's ridiculous.
	Hammer says young adults already qualify for hazardous jobs.
	Well, then they're writing nonsense.
	If they're saying young adults should be allowed to have hazardous jobs, then the response is, they already can, thank you, Nevin, I stay.
	If you want to argue that children or underage teenagers can, you gotta write that down.
	But that's not what they wrote.
	They wrote young adults.
	And I think it's reasonable to assume there are certain jobs that don't allow... I'll tell you one.
	You can't rent a car if you're not 25.
	Not a government regulation, typically a policy.
	But that means if you're 23 and you work for a company, you can't go and drive around and do insurance or whatever because you can't rent a car.
	How about that one?
	Arjun says, 17-year-olds can enlist with parental consent.
	I did years ago.
	But heaven forbid working a dangerous job, according to these journalists.
	And they didn't even say underage.
	They made it up.
	All right, my friends.
	I'm gonna wrap it up there.
	We'll be back tonight at 8 p.m.
	at youtube.com slash TimCastIRL.
	Follow me on x at TimCast and follow me on Instagram.
	Also, don't forget to go to BooniesHQ on Instagram.
	Follow, uh... Go to Instagram.
	Follow BooniesHQ.
	Subscribe on YouTube to BooniesHQ as we ramp these things up.
	Let me see what the latest BooniesHQ stuff we got is.
	We have, uh... Watch the second video.
	How many views does it have now?
unidentified		33,000.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		It should have way more than that.
		Wesley getting hit square in the nuts by a 2x4 on accident, I might add.
		Should have way more views than 30,000, but things are going pretty well.
		Our last several videos have been ramping up and getting a lot of views and getting lots of followers on Boonies HQ on Instagram.
		We're going to be producing the idea for Boonies HQ, so again, go to YouTube.
		You're on YouTube, search Boonies HQ, and subscribe to the new channel as we're beginning to ramp things up.
		The goal is, it's not just going to be... I was talking to this guy at dinner, we were having a business meeting, and I said, if I went to you and made a video, I said, I got a video for you, you want to watch?
		It's called, uh, Nollie360 Flip Crooked Grind, Nollie Flip Out.
		Want to watch it?
		He'd be like, I guess, I don't know.
		But what if I said, here's a video of a dude getting hit in the nuts by a 2x4, you might chuckle and be like, alright, I understand that.
		So the goal of what we're doing with Boonies is to create cultural content that is entertaining with skateboarding as a backdrop.
		So, young people will learn about skateboarding, they'll get involved in skateboarding, but the videos they're gonna watch are gonna be just more fun and funny and interesting.
		I explain to people like, dude perfect, but probably a little bit more sports-focused.
		We want to do things like kickflipping through the ring of fire.
		Anybody will watch that, you understand.
		It's a guy jumping through a ring of fire.
		But we put a skateboard in.
		Because we want to get more people interested in skateboarding and help expand that culture.
		So, follow Boonies HQ on YouTube.
		And for everybody else, just, we'll see you all tonight.

▲