Democrats FUMING Over JD Vance Roasting CAT LADIES, Gen Z Men REVOLT, SWING TO TRUMP | Timcast News
BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/
Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/
Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL
Democrats FUMING Over JD Vance Roasting CAT LADIES, Gen Z Men REVOLT, SWING TO TRUMP | Timcast News
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Are you overwhelmed with back taxes or unfiled returns?
With 88,000 newly hired agents, the IRS has increased enforcement, issuing millions of pay-up notices in 2024.
Don't face IRS collection tactics alone.
Tax Network USA can help.
As the nation's premier tax relief firm, they have negotiated over $1 billion in tax relief for clients.
Services include penalty forgiveness, hardship programs, and offer-in-compromise solutions.
Whether you owe $10,000 or $10 million, their experts can assist.
Behind on taxes?
They can guide you in catching up.
Protect your financial security.
Contact Tax Network USA for strategic advice on reducing or eliminating your tax debt.
To schedule a complimentary consultation call 1-800-245-600 or visit TNUSA.com.
Don't let the IRS control your life.
Empower yourself with Tax Network USA's support and take charge of your financial future.
Visit TNUSA.com today.
Thanks for watching.
Vance are weird.
Oh boy, that's the best they could come up with, huh?
Well, the reason why they're calling him weird is because J.D.
Vance apparently a while ago said that this country is being run by a bunch of cat ladies who don't even have kids!
And for that, they have no real connection to the future of this country.
He's right.
Now, Pete Buttigieg took issue with this, spoke on Jon Stewart's The Daily Show, but I gotta tell you, this whole J.D.
Vance's weird thing just doesn't play.
I don't get it.
I don't know why conservatives are mad about it.
I am intentionally weird AF.
And I don't... I'm just confused.
I mean, perhaps what Democrats realized is that Republicans actually do have something deep within them where they desperately want to be viewed as what normal is.
So in response to calling J.D.
Vance and Trump weird, or weird AF, or weird mofos, or whatever it is they're calling them, Republicans, excuse me, have gone off on X, being like, I'm not weird!
You're weird!
Look what you're doing!
And I'm like, well, yeah, I do think the left is fairly weird, but I think the intention with the calling you guys weird, calling Trump weird, calling all of us weird, or whatever, was to rile you up emotionally.
I don't know that it is an effective play so long as conservatives handle it properly.
For this, I have posted a picture of Donald Trump hugging a giant rabbit while wearing paladin armor and wielding a giant sword.
Because, on X, I'm intentionally weird.
You know, look, man.
Right now, and this is what I got for you in the opening segment.
Vance ragging on cat ladies plays really well among a lot of people.
Except for unmarried liberal women who, of course, are losing their minds!
And unfortunately, unmarried women make up 72% of unmarried women.
Vote Democrat!
I've got the research from Pew for you, and we'll break this all down.
AOC, of course, is outraged.
Chelsea Handler is losing her mind.
And they're running these insane stories about JD Vance.
And I gotta tell you guys, don't take the bait!
They're claiming that J.D.
Vance is into dolphins, if you know what I mean.
And he's into couches, if you know what I mean.
And I'm just like, dude, you guys have Pride events where you're engaging in adult activities in front of everybody.
Why would Republicans take any issue or be like, look, I gotta tell you.
When, if the left comes to me and they're just like, this is what they've tried doing, they've tried playing this thing on me because they really, they really have no idea who they're dealing with.
You know, it's funny because they just assume that anybody who supports Trump is identical in every single way.
One of my favorite moments here was when Dave Smith on Kennedy, and this happened a lot to him by the way, he's making a point about how Biden is doing something wrong and then the liberal goes, Yeah, well what about Trump?
Trump did this and then Dave's like, I don't like Trump!
Apparently people are saying Ian's Graphene Dream is like the next best.
We've sold like 1,500 bags in the month or so it's been out.
Absolutely amazing.
We keep hearing great stuff about it.
So I'm really impressed.
I actually haven't even tried it yet.
So Ian wanted a low acidity coffee, better for your gut.
And Allison and him, they got together, they formulated this blend.
I think Ian was basically like, what can we do to make it low acidity?
Allison was like, here, let me try these things.
They tried it out.
They said, wow, this is really good.
And, um, or actually, I'm not even sure Ian tried it until we actually got it done.
But apparently everyone really loves it, so support the show, brought to you by our own coffee company, Casper.
Also, head over to TimCast.com, click join us to become a member.
And it's really funny because we have this thing in fundraising where they'd be like, if someone's reluctant to sign up to become a member for the nonprofit, tell them, just forego two cups of coffee per month, and you can afford to be a member.
And that's what we would do.
And I don't, you know, we'd mix it up.
I'd be like, hey, skip the cheeseburger, save a rainforest.
In this instance, You can buy Casperoo.com, join the Casperoo Coffee Club.
It is a separate company, we do own it, and our goal with Casperoo, of course, is a cultural endeavor.
We want to build a thousand locations across the country, and that's what we're currently working on.
A lot of great progress has been made in that front, despite the fact that our first location is having some issues.
Don't get me wrong, the underlying national effort is going really, really well.
But as a member, you get access to the Discord server and you support the show, so ten bucks a month, you can help keep all of this up and running.
Vance responding with, I've got nothing against cats, was like, it's so perfect a response, it's a bit generic.
It's the perfect response.
You know, I like to say, you know, how about this, Jon Stewart is as dumb as... I'd say Jon Stewart was as dumb as a box of rocks, but I don't want to insult rocks.
You know what I mean?
So bravo, JD Vance.
Here you go, let's play the clip for you guys, and you can hear this for yourselves as to what they actually think.
And it's rooted in this strange idea that it's not just... He doesn't just say that being a parent gives you, you know, an important role as a citizen, which I agree with, that it gives you unique perspective on the future.
And I just think about how, like... Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet-and-greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever coast-to-coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
Let me tell you, Pete, Petey Boy, I have tremendous respect for those who served, including yourself.
Really do appreciate it.
But J.D.
Vance is referring to when you do not have something on the line for the future, Your voting patterns will be different.
So if you have children, you're thinking, should I vote on this policy which will strip the trees from the earth to give me a comfortable rocking chair?
Or should I vote for the policy to protect that tree so that my children have shade they can sit beneath?
Or, more importantly, to what degree can we cut trees down while maintaining certain environmental factors and etc.
etc.
If you are fighting in combat, to imply that those are the exact same things.
No.
A physical commitment is different from feeling the physical impacts of war.
And while I tremendously respect those in combat, they're two different things.
And Pete Buttigieg's only attack vector is, well, I served in the military.
Okay.
Respect.
But that's not what JD Vance is talking about.
Now, that being said, Pete Buttigieg does have some surrogate children, and he does have an incentive to make sure their lives are better.
Unfortunately, even in that regard, I view people like Pete Buttigieg to be largely short-term gain individuals.
Meaning that, I gotta tell ya, I think his children will be worse off than the children of J.D.
Vance, for a variety of reasons.
I just, I think that's true.
There's a lot to that, which we'll get into as we move forward, but let's talk about where we're currently at.
The New York Times says J.D.
Vance hits back at Jennifer Aniston defending childless cat ladies' remarks.
The Friends actress, who has been open about her fertility struggles, recently criticized Mr. Vance's 2021 comments on social media, once again playing a game that no one offered up.
J.D.
Vance is critical of individuals who've, uh, women, Chosen not to have families, and men as well.
I mean, I think I take issue with the childless cat lady's remark only insofar as there are also feminist men who don't have kids and play this game as well, and I take issue to a great degree with, well, let's just put it, individuals who don't have a stake in how things end up turning out in this country and what it means for everybody else.
You can take a look at cities, and you can completely understand the voting patterns.
You can take a look at voting patterns, and it's plain as day.
People who don't have kids vote to gut and rip our country asunder for short-term gain.
It's not at an individual level, it's the macro.
You take one lady who doesn't have kids and has a bunch of cats, and you ask her about a policy that may be detrimental.
And she'll likely lean towards voting for war.
And this is not an opinion, this is a fact.
Voting for war.
I can't stand that.
We talked about it last night, someone asked me if there was World War III kicked off and they tried drafting everybody, would you go?
I said, absolutely not.
Absolutely not.
Overwhelmingly, single women who are not subject to the draft are voting in favor of war.
I ain't playing that game.
Now don't get me wrong, if China or whatever invaded California, I'd be ready to defend Appalachia.
But you ain't gonna see me deploying—now, that being fair, I'm 38, so there's a lot of people who are in line in front of me, but it's just absolutely bonkers to me that people who aren't subject to these wars are the ones that are voting in favor of it.
That being said, these are the individuals that overwhelmingly are pushing us to oblivion, and that's beyond short-term gain.
Because what is the benefit to America right now for our engagement in Ukraine?
Dial tone.
They couldn't tell you.
Putin's a despot!
Why should we risk World War III over the borderlands of the Soviet Union?
Sorry, Ukraine.
You know, I know some people from there.
I hate to see what's going on over there.
It is sad stuff.
But I gotta be honest.
Ukraine means borderlands.
It was the borderlands of the Soviet Union.
I don't understand why we should risk nuclear annihilation, disruption of global trade, mass starvation to the tune of tens of millions over the Donbass region.
Hey, but don't get me wrong.
You got 72% of unmarried women deciding, you know what?
It's totally worth it.
Let's wave Ukrainian flags, send our troops overseas, and blow them up so that Russia decides to fire an ICBM at Washington, D.C.
There was a nuclear submarine in a strike group from Russia.
70 miles or so off the coast of Florida, heading to Cuba.
Do we want another Cuban Missile Crisis?
What are these people voting for?
They're nuts!
And that is the problem when you have people who don't have a stake in the future of this country.
Now, that being said, I don't have kids.
There are many conservatives who don't have kids, but we are cognizant of the fact that this country cannot exist without people, and as people age and die, there need to be other people to replace them.
I suppose when you care about other people, more so than yourself, it's not so much about having kids, to a great degree, it's about being worried about other people.
And so I think this.
I think someone who has children has a guarantee that they are worried about other people.
A guarantee.
They're children.
There are many people who don't have children who, were they to have children, would be concerned about the future.
But not having children, they are not concerned at all except for their future.
The problem is their future only extends to the next 30, 40, or 50 years, depending on how old they are.
Whereas if you're 25 and you have a newborn child, you're like, You know, I may be around for another 50 or so years.
They're going to be around for another, you know, 80 years.
I need to make sure things go right for them and for their kids.
There's no guarantee that having a kid will make you feel that way.
It's just more likely.
But take a look at this from Pew Research.
This is just from April.
Partisanship by gender, sexual orientation, marital status, and parental status.
Oh boy.
So, men, 52% Republican, 52%, 46% Democrat.
Women, inverted, 51% Democrat.
Married men, 39% Democrat, 59% Republican.
Married women, actually comparable rates to all men, 50% Republican, 45% Democrat.
Men who live with partner and women who live with partner, about 60% and 40% Democrat.
Yeah, you ask that question, you're going to get a lot of answers from, you know.
Both divorced men and women.
Also lean slightly Democrat.
That's funny.
Widows.
Widowed men and widowed women.
Interestingly, widowed women are 47-46.
A lot of independent widowed women.
Never married men, 61% Democrat.
61% Democrat and never married women, 72% Democrat.
And then you've got, of course, gay men, 83% and gay women, 83% Democrat.
They just love the Democrats.
Well, they're a small voting bloc, substantially smaller than anything else.
But as you can see, the strongest single element outside of, you know, gay people, is women who are not married.
And this is what J.D.
Vance is talking about.
Childless cat ladies.
They had that phone call the other day.
It was the, you know, 164,000 white women for Kamala Harris.
These people overwhelmingly vote for war, and that is my main issue with them.
My main issue.
Here we go.
We got Chelsea Handler here.
Chelsea Handler, who touts lifestyle of getting high and masturbating, complains about J.D.
Vance's cat.
Ladies, comment.
Oh, she swears.
Oh, you know, keep your voice down, lady.
Here you go.
Here's the clip for it.
unidentified
Oh hey!
As you might have heard, Donald Trump's running mate and future star of his own Dateline episode, J.D.
Vance, is ruffling quite a few feathers this week.
How is this country still set up for men and for the benefit of men?
Honest question.
Can women own property, get jobs?
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
What is the issue?
You know, I think the problem is...
There is something called the Greater Male Variability Hypothesis.
I'm gonna pull this one up for our good friends over on the left who don't have the capability to Google things.
Greater Male Variability.
This one really gets them going.
I don't know, I just pull up whatever the first link is.
A study of the greater male variability hypothesis in creative thinking in mainland China, male superiority exists.
Heavens me!
Really?
In China?
Okay, well anyway, the point is this.
There are more male geniuses and more male morons than women.
Women tend to be average.
And so I sympathize.
I empathize with many women.
Because this means that for a woman, Half the people you meet, which is quite a bit, are stupid.
Like, half the guys you meet are going to be real dumb.
And then the other half you meet are going to be smarter than you.
And so the issue is, you know, for guys, you get to meet, you run the whole gamut, I suppose.
A lot of really dumb guys out there.
Hey, they're voting Democrat too, I'd imagine.
People who don't pay attention.
Shout out to Harry Sisson and David Hogg.
And so, for a woman, who, when hanging out with women, they are all of comparable intelligence, or more likely to have comparable intelligence, then they run into men, half of them are real dumb, and half of them are smart.
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating But you know what the issue then becomes?
If you look at CEO positions, you're going to find that there's going to be substantially more men.
So it's actually quite simple.
Hammer. Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts. It's America
For women, they have 0.1% genius, 0.1% cognitively incapable.
Most of it, most women will be of average intelligence.
However, that means, when you scale this up, you have 500 companies, the Fortune 500, the top companies in the world.
We scale by the 500.
But with 8 billion people, you have substantially fewer women competing with substantially more men in the highest level of genius positions.
You are going to end up with substantially more men in the higher positions of industry and business because of greater male variability.
And then that also means you're gonna have a whole lot of male criminals and morons and homeless people, which you see perfectly.
The fascinating thing is, I guess women like Chelsea Handler can't understand that concept, so they think the world is made for men just because of what men are.
I don't see Chelsea Handler coming out and being like, you know, there are a lot of CEOs, there's also way more homeless males, which is true.
5 to 1 homeless males to females.
5 to 1 suicides male to female.
Yeah, so that's greater male variability.
Women tend to be more average.
unidentified
So she says the world is made for men by men blah blah blah.
But let's be clear, there's no correlation between childless people and the presidency.
For example, our very first United States President, Mr. George Washington, didn't have children.
And to your point about Kamala not being fit because she's not a mother, I'd like to remind you that no president in the history of the United States has ever been a mother.
But maybe if she had five kids with three different men and a scandalous affair with a porn star and was convicted felon, that would be more palatable to Republican men.
Let me let me break it down for all you guys at home.
If you don't have kids.
You don't play a role in existence.
Thank you, and have a nice day.
I hope this PSA was important and helpful.
In the 2000s, and for those that watch the show, you know I've brought this up quite a bit.
I actually have a video on it, youtube.com slash timcast, from years and years and years ago.
But in the 2000s, data showed that conservatives are having, I think it's like 2.05 kids, and liberals are having like 1.43 kids.
I'm probably getting the numbers wrong, but it's something like that.
And so the prediction was in the 2000s that moving forward the future would start to skew conservative, not because of education or any kind of ideological bent, but because conservatives simply have more children and those kids are more likely to grow up Republican.
The idea being...
That so long as conservative values are maintained in the conservative worldview within their kids, combined with genetic factors which do have some predeterminative effect on a human being, then liberals, over a long enough period of time, simply cease to exist.
And I believe that is true and correct.
It's called natural selection.
For those in the back, evolution, as it were.
So what ends up happening is—and perhaps, you know, natural selection's not the right way to put it—it might actually be, in essence, an artificial selection.
Typically, artificial selection refers to, like, dog breeds.
Like, we choose to breed certain things.
And this is what human beings are doing.
Human liberals are choosing not to have kids, and then they will cease to exist.
Chelsea Handler, you can whinge all day and night, but Social Security will become insolvent in 10 years, and I don't know what you're gonna do!
Well, you know, don't get me wrong, she's rich.
I don't know, her net worth is probably in the... What's Chelsea Handler's net worth?
These things are always wrong when you Google search it.
Chelsea Handler, net worth.
But I'm sure she's worth millions.
35 million, they claim, when you Google search it.
I doubt it.
But she's well off.
She's well off.
She will want for nothing.
And she will continue to wake up in the wee hours of the morning to do drugs and masturbate.
Now, when she's old and dying, she will be in a sterile room where Jen... I don't know what's after Jen Alpha.
And everybody on the internet was like, wow, George Burns died.
And I was like, huh.
I don't know who that is.
That's like an old guy, I guess.
But you know, the dude was really relevant to a lot of people.
Now, George Carlin, that one struck me.
I was a little kid when George Carlin was doing a lot of stand-up in the 90s, but this guy's been doing stand-up for way longer than that.
He was arrested in the 70s for swearing.
And I remember when he died, it was like late 2000s or whatever, I was like, wow, that's crazy.
But that's about the extent of it.
Chelsea Handler's gonna be old, dying, and people are gonna be like, who's that?
And they're gonna be like, that's some old comedian lady.
And they're gonna go, huh.
And she's gonna be sitting in her hospital bed, looking around, just alone.
Alone.
And for what?
The crazier thing, and I think this is the scariest thing for liberals, they should consider, in 30 years, in 40 years, if this trend does not change, and maybe it does, Not only will you be childless and alone as you lay dying in your hospital bed, you will turn the TV on in your final moments and it will just be MAGA country and everything you believed in and everything you love will have been erased because the culture has shifted and it takes only a couple percentage points to shift dramatically.
So if you have 55% of this nation guarantee conservative.
You will never, never have another Democrat leader again.
The Democrats will be forced to adhere to the majority to try and win votes.
Thus, the far left will be gone.
And who knows what'll happen.
Maybe by then, gay marriage is out.
I doubt it.
You know, most conservatives are still rather liberal, live and let live type people.
But maybe, Obergefell Falls Supreme Court says no, marriage is between a man and a woman.
Who knows?
But I can tell you this, starting today, starting in the 2000s, with people like Chelsea Handler cheering on not having kids.
I say this.
I ain't no conservative.
I ain't no Republican.
Chelsea, more power to you.
I would love it if you would advocate to all of these cat ladies to just avoid having a family.
Don't do it.
You know why?
It's their choice.
I'm a liberal, right?
Live and let live.
But I tell you this.
Give it 20 years.
Today.
Today.
Somebody was born.
Today.
Somebody was born.
And in 2044, they will be on a talk show at 20.
They will be writing a book.
They will be working in industry.
And they will be supporting a conservative politician.
And you're gonna be like, I remember back then.
I didn't have a kid.
You didn't.
But conservatives have lots of them.
And that's why they lose their minds.
Take a look at the Wall Street Journal here.
America's new political war pits young men against young women.
But it doesn't matter.
Young women are in trouble.
Yeah, I hate to break it to you young ladies, but this is a message that's very important for all of you.
To the 20 or so percent of women who listen to my podcast, because it's mostly dudes, as are most news and cultural things.
I wouldn't know how to... My parents were in their mid to late 20s when they had me.
And so I can never understand what it would be like to have a parent who is that old.
I had a friend whose dad had him when he was 50 and his mom was in her 20s.
Because guys can do that.
And so what we're looking at now Young women who are being told they can have it all and they can play this game that Chelsea Handler is saying to play.
They're going to be 38 years old and the doctor is going to say, ma'am, you're too old.
I mean, you can have a kid, you can try, but it's very risky.
Rates of autism are way higher.
It's very hard on the body.
They call it, after 35, a geriatric pregnancy.
These women are being told to wait.
They're being told to wait.
they're being told they get careers, when in actuality you should have your kids and
then work on your careers.
Because then you have, you know, you have a kid in your early 20s, you've got 50 years,
50, to work on your career.
Depending on what your career is, I mean, you want to be a pro athlete, you're going
to be, you know, at your prime at like 19 or 20 years old.
But these young women, this is a scientific reality.
And I'm not saying this to be crude or crass or sexist.
I'm saying this is just how it works.
Women have menopause.
It is harder to create a human than it is to seed another person to create a human.
Guys, in this regard, have an advantage.
In career.
There you go.
But for this reason, guys are considered less socially valuable early on in life.
So this dude right here on the left, I don't know who he is, and this lady here on the right, I don't know who she is, but this dude, he's gonna be like, lady, he's gonna be 30 years old, they're gonna be dating, and he's gonna say, Uh, so who'd you vote for?
And she's gonna be like, Biden-Harris.
That's what I'm all about.
And he's gonna be like, uh-huh.
Yeah, I'm not interested.
Look, if I'm gonna have a kid, I want to make sure it's with the right person.
And she's gonna go, I feel the exact same way.
And he's gonna go, uh-huh.
And you've got only a couple years to figure it out.
Me?
I got sev- I got 60.
He's like, I could be 75 and have a kid.
Not that you'd want to.
But guys have more time.
So, the pressure is going to mount.
Women who want to have families are going to be in a bind with pressure.
And that's going to be rough.
And we're watching in real time.
Well, let me show you a bit of the data first, because otherwise I may be jumping ahead.
So they say, here's the divide.
It's very obvious.
Young men are Republican.
Gen Z men, party preference among 18- to 29-year-olds.
Men are overwhelmingly, plus 26%, Republican.
Is that what they're trying to say with this one?
I don't understand what they're trying to say with this one.
They're 26% Democrat-leaning, so it's very low, and they're 49% Republican.
Is that what they're trying to say with this one?
I don't understand what they're trying to say with this one.
26%?
I guess that's the difference between men and women, or whatever.
They say, young women see more urgency to address climate change.
Uh-huh.
Support for legal abortion is stronger among young women.
Sure.
And that's fascinating.
Look at that.
So a guy meets a woman.
He's 24 years old and he says, I want to be in a relationship.
I want to have a family.
And she goes, I want an abortion.
Okay, not interested.
Guys have to be selective now.
Because a guy's going to say to a woman, I want to have a kid, but I have no say in whether or not you terminate his life.
And I know the burden's on you to have the kid, so I can respect that.
I'm going to choose a woman who's pro-life.
That way I know for a fact, if we are to have a kid, she's going to have the kid.
And these liberal women are going to go wanting.
Then they'll be like Chelsea Handler being like, so what?
How old is Chelsea Handler?
Let me also pull up her age.
Like, she really does make herself a target on this one.
How old is this lady?
Is she 50?
She's 49 years old.
She ain't having kids anytime soon.
That's it.
What does the future hold for someone like her?
Well, I tell you this, my friends.
Misery loves company.
Young women want federally funded student loans.
Young men are divided.
Young men oppose allowing children to choose gender identity without parental approval.
Young women are divided.
Young men support extending Trump tax cuts.
Women don't.
Young women, more than men, oppose repealing the Affordable Care Act.
Women, far more than men, oppose building a wall on the border with Mexico.
So, let's scroll down.
Here's Colin Mertz.
That's the guy.
What does he do?
He's working on a farm.
He likes the American flag.
How about that?
And then this is Maggie Kelso from Sharpsville.
What we're worried about is our rights being taken away.
You know what?
I say this.
You know, just give them whatever they want.
Young lady, you can have whatever you want.
Because you're not going to have kids, and then when you die, because everybody does in the long run, your ideas are gone with you.
Maybe you'll write a book.
But the problem is, your cultural influence will have waned.
And it only requires a tiny percentage of cultural shift in this country to change the political landscape forever.
That goes both directions.
So I think they do have a harder data point here.
There's a tweet that pulled it up.
We'll just pull up the tweet.
What do we have here?
It's this America 2100.
Take a look at this.
Will young men vote Democratic in 2024?
In 2013 it was 38%.
In 2023 it is 49% according to Gallup.
We have this one.
Political identities of 12th grade girls overwhelmingly liberal and for boys overwhelmingly conservative.
Then, of course, you have the data from the Wall Street Journal.
You don't need to take my advice for it.
Or, you don't need to take my word for it, sorry.
Here's Andrew Tate, who has 9.8 million followers, and his whole thing is about being a strong man.
And there's a reason why young men are very much into it.
But, uh, let's, uh, let's, let's, let's, uh, let's... I gotta keep my analogies light here, so... Let's, um, fan the flames.
There you go, we'll say that one.
I was gonna say something else, but I don't think YouTube would like the analogy, even though it's a common phrase.
I'm a liberal.
It's hard to find masculine men to date who aren't conservative.
Well, the original title was, I'm a liberal, hard to find progressive masculine men to date.
Yes, because progressive masculine is oxymoronic.
And I'm not kidding, it's not being cute.
Here you go, let me read.
A single woman has made waves for lamenting on TikTok that all the chivalrous masculine men in her dating orbit are conservative.
Quote, as a liberal woman, it's really hard to find a man who is willing to play the more traditional masculine role in the relationship in today's day and age who is not conservative.
A man who wants to pay on the first date, uh, that's a conservative position.
Who wants to open your door, conservative.
Who has that want and desire to take care of you and provide.
So you want a progressive guy who's gonna say, go bang whoever you want, I ain't paying the bill, and you want him to also be like, I'll pay the bill and please stay?
Look, lady, the LA woman said that men she's dated who do have those quality traits don't align with her political ideologies, and she clarified that just because she wants an old-fashioned gentleman doesn't mean she plans to subscribe to traditional housewife role.
I love it.
I want a man who's gonna pay for my bills, open my door, and then I get to do whatever I want.
Yeah, relationships are contractual agreements, in essence.
But these people don't know that.
You know, they've lost touch.
This is one of the greatest articles that I've ever made a video on, and the feminists lost their minds.
They lost their minds!
Let me tell you, because I know that the far left will cut this next sentence, or a selection of sentences, out of the videos because, well, they're evil liars, that's what they do.
Men and women, I think, are equal under the law.
Equal rights.
Woman, you want to go work in a business and be the CEO?
Man, you go do that.
More power to you.
You want to have a family?
You want to have it all?
Man, I wish you the best.
You want to file a lawsuit?
You want to own a credit card?
You want to own property?
Yeah, it should all be.
19th Amendment?
Good in my book.
But I tell you this.
You want equality under the law?
That comes with everything else.
And right now we don't have that.
Because women aren't subject to the draft or selective service.
They keep saying in Congress they want to make it so, but they're terrified because they know that those cat ladies J.D.
Vance is criticizing would never vote for it.
And you can't have this.
Sorry, your path is busted.
You know what, I'll say this too.
Never vote for me because I will eviscerate Social Security.
So fast, your heads will spin.
I'm not a politician.
I'm never going to be a politician.
And it's funny because politicians are so terrified of talking about Social Security.
I ain't playing these games.
It's an insolvent system.
It doesn't work.
And by putting in place, you enabled family-less individuals.
You've enabled it.
You didn't save people who lost their families.
You have created a system by which people do not have to rely on family.
And that has been a problem.
All of these welfare programs that have basically said, you don't need to have a family, have caused the problems we are seeing today.
Well, that being said, women are struggling to find men who make as much money as they do.
Gee, I wonder why?
I covered this when the story dropped five years ago, and like every feminist in the world was losing their minds.
Here we go, a good man is hard to find, especially in this economy.
Oh, I'm going to tell you why, and the feminists don't want to hear it.
Why is there a shortage of economically attractive men?
dudes according to new research from Cornell. In the study published in the Journal of Marriage
and Family, Cornell sociologists explored America's declining marriage rate. There are
shortages of economically attractive men. Why is there a shortage of economically attractive
men? Well, it's because men and women make the same amount.
So if you're a woman and women want to marry up socially and men want to find a
beautiful woman, a man can find the beautiful woman, but if they both make $50,000 a year,
that woman is like, he's not providing me anything I don't already have.
And so, if men are attractive based on confidence, charisma, status, and power, and women are attractive based on their ability to have children, I'm not saying that's the way it should be.
Calm down, leftists.
I'm saying that's what the data shows, statistically.
Well then the issue is that women are not going to be attracted to men of equal standing in the economy.
There's a viral clip I saw Lauren Chen commenting on from the Whatever Podcast, where this woman is like, she gets asked, how much money does a man need to make to date you?
And she's like, 500,000.
And it's funny because they're like, you're talking about the 1%.
No, you're talking about like the 0.5%.
Because the 1% of people in terms of income, I think is like 300 and something on average across the country, and 500 in like a major city.
So that is fair to say.
But this lady's not going to find a guy who makes that much money who wants to be with her.
That's a joke.
But hey, shoot for the moon, because even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.
Here we go.
Lichter, who has been studying marriage for 30 years, says the gig economy and a lack of good jobs have contributed to the death of well-to-do dudes.
So has the fact that women are outpacing men educationally, upending the age-old dominance of the male breadwinner over the past five to ten years.
Now it's the case that more highly educated women are marrying down, says Lichter.
Men have to get with the program.
Nice try.
That ain't it.
Look at this.
This lady.
I don't know her.
She seems nice.
I wish her the best.
Unfortunately for her, They say, uh, single New Yorker, Gina Thibodeau, that's been five years, maybe she found love.
I hope she did, I really do.
Has some theories of her own about the fella famine.
I find generally that dudes these days just do less across the board.
Their parents have coddled them and taken care of them, and they just don't go out there and make more money.
The 38-year-old Upper East Sider stresses that she's not looking for anything outrageous, safety and security as far as finances go, but she's still coming up on empty dates.
Okay.
You are correct, ma'am.
With all due respect, that a lot of these dudes are coddled, so are the women, and that is a problem.
I agree.
But I will stress this.
Any 38-year-old guy who's making, what did she make, like 50k a year I think they mentioned in this article?
Any 38-year-old guy who's making 100k plus ain't gonna be dating you.
That's just reality.
And I mean, not like any, but you know, most.
So she's like, I just can't find a good guy.
Because there's a 38-year-old dude, this is five years ago, so a 38-year-old dude, five years ago, making $100,000 plus a year, he's got a nice car, he's got his own house, and he's dating 27-year-olds.
He's dating 30-year-olds.
He's gonna be like, look, I have worked my whole life, I'm 38.
When he goes to the bar, and he walks up, there's a woman who's 28, and she's like, this guy's got money, and he's like, young woman, that's what he's interested in.
They want to act like it's not reality, and unfortunately, this is the world we're in.
So, without making this segment go too much longer, we will jump to Super Chats, because we do have a couple more stories I want to get into.
Let me just stress, to all those that are saying JD Vance is weird, it doesn't matter.
I really don't think it matters.
I think I just posted something.
I posted this on X before I went live.
And it's for all of you.
It's for all of you.
I want you to see my latest post.
Why it is, Paladin Trump hugging a giant rabbit.
You'll never know want or loneliness again, Trump said.
The world was cruel to you, but you have Trump now.
And why did I post this?
Because I just think it's funny.
I just think it's funny.
That's it.
You want to call that weird?
That's weird.
But, you know, like, it's a good kind of weird, not like the two dudes engaging in adult activities in public streets.
I'll take it.
I don't care that they call Trump weird.
Trump is a weird guy.
And that's fine.
We need weird.
We need something different than the stodgy, suit-wearing Mitch McConnells going, Well, I just think Democrats should be allowed to break the law.
I don't want that anymore!
I want the weird guy!
Bring it on!
Dude, I don't live in your reality, any of you, and any of these political establishments, stodgy suit-wearing garbage people, okay?
And you know what?
I think most people who've decided to vote for Trump probably feel the same way.
Regular dude, you got a guy wearing a brick suit at the Trump rallies, you got people showing up wearing a t-shirt and jeans, and they're like, we're done.
And Trump still wears the suits.
You go to Mar-a-Lago, you gotta wear a jacket.
There's still some prim and proper all across the board, but I will take the weird guy, because I am sick of the old guard.
I'll wrap that segment up.
We're going to go to your Super Chats, so comment, let me know what you guys think.
That was a pretty long one, but next up, what do we got?
Jon Stewart was like, boy did he drop a turd on launch!
He's like, I don't like cat ladies!
Okay.
I don't understand.
You know, Jon Stewart is trying so hard with that bit.
It doesn't work.
If J.D.
Vance came out and he was wearing a block of cheese on his head and they were like, that's a Wisconsin thing.
He's like, it is?
And then he pulled it off.
It was like, oh, I didn't know.
Then I'd be like, that was weird.
You know what I mean?
Like, that's something that is strange.
If he came out dressed like a clown, I'd be like, Very odd.
But for him to be like, I have concerns about our political leaders not having families because they have less of a commitment to the future as compared to someone who does, yeah, that's just like politics.
And Jon Stewart's like, how strange someone would be concerned about that.
It's not weird.
It's like, if JD Vanzos came out and was like, um, I just think that people shouldn't be guaranteed government-paid healthcare.
They're like, how strange.
It doesn't work.
It's forced.
But the other thing, too, y'all should consider about the weird narrative.
It's not an attack.
I don't get it.
Look, man, I'm not a conservative.
I don't like suits.
I wear this... I got rolled up sleeves!
You see what I'm doing here?
I'm signaling that I am wearing a collared shirt, but I rolled my sleeves up because I'm a regular guy, just like you.
I'm half-kidding.
Yeah, I don't look at Republicans and their suit wearing and all that stuff and think, boy, I relate to that.
I just don't.
I am a post-liberal.
Disaffected liberal.
And I think, you know, I agree a lot with Carl Benjamin.
And it's interesting because we had relatively similar political arcs.
We're Magic the Gathering, playing, video game.
You know, some differences, of course.
Carl Benjamin, shout-out, Lotus Eaters podcast.
Classical liberal.
He makes these videos, he talks about these things, and I'm like, I see that, I agree with that.
And now we're a bit older.
Carl, of course, has a large family.
He gets a philosophy degree, and he's like, it's all bollocks, isn't it?
And then he talks about, we had this great, great episode on the culture war.
Guys, go to Tenet Media on YouTube, watch the episode with Carl Benjamin and Connor Tomlinson from Lotus Eaters as we discuss the end of liberalism, post-liberalism, and it is fantastic.
It's not about conservatism, it's post-liberalism.
Conservatism is about very much traditional values and conserving values.
Post-liberalism has similarities, but in many ways is about recognizing this live-and-let-live ideology begets you, the degeneracy we see today, and ultimately Marxist ideologies permeating into your society.
And so for me, I will stress, my background is South Side of Chicago, skateboarding, video game playing.
You know, we grew up in a Democrat city.
I don't like the staunch, stodgy Republicans.
So when Donald Trump or J.D.
Vance is called weird, I go, eh.
Yeah, dude, I don't care.
I used to do campaign fundraising for the Human Rights Campaign for Gay Rights, okay?
You want to talk about weird?
I used to hang out with punk rock dudes wearing, like, studded leather jackets and skin-tight pants that they would put on and then sew dental floss into the inseam to make them as tight as possible.
We did not wear the suits and go and hang out at country clubs.
So when you call Trump weird, I'm like, alright, I guess.
It's not an attack.
At least not for me.
And I do think that for most people that come from a similar background to me, they're thinking the same thing.
Trump is weird.
He is not the status quo, and that's what we've been begging for.
Here we go.
What have we, what have we here?
Doghouse videos that say, Tim, what are the chances the Dems are sacrificing Kamala to get rid of her, you think?
This is their chance without going against their doctrine.
Hey, man, there's a possibility that they're like, we're gonna put Kamala in as the candidate because this candidate this year is sure to fail.
And then her career is done.
She's not popular.
Let's see how much money they put into this election.
Because if they put in just enough, I'm gonna be like, yeah, they're basically thrown out of the wolves to be like, let's get her out of the way.
I wondered this for a while, if Democrats were going to choose a candidate that would be sort of a throwaway candidate.
You can't do Newsom, you can't do Whitmer, because they're in the back pocket for maybe down the line.
But Kamala, nobody likes Kamala, nobody likes Joe Biden.
So here you are.
Noah Sanders says, how do you tip if you're going to serve seltzer at the election show?
I want to make one you like.
Maybe a non-alcoholic one.
Can you think of a fruity herb spice combo you enjoy?
No cilantro.
I know that.
Have a blessed day.
Herb spice.
I don't know.
Maybe like a ginger grapefruit?
That sounds nice.
Ginger, I'm not a big fan of, but it does play well in soda.
Ginger ale is good.
So, no idea, no idea.
We like those spin drifts.
The grapefruit ones are like the most popular here.
Everybody loves the grapefruit one for whatever reason.
They're really good.
J.R.G.
Project says J.D.
Vance is tapping into the manosphere and MGTOW, who are apolitical.
This also fits with Agenda 47, which aims to solve some of the issues brought into the light by both movements and the shattered dating market.
I will tell you this, my friends.
J.D.
Vance and Trump should absolutely 100% go after incels.
And, you know, the extended sphere of young men who want to be leaders.
They dream of being Mel Gibson in The Patriot.
But society, for whatever reason, has not been conducive to such a thing.
There are a lot of, I would say this, I think the majority of the incel people are just guys who lack confidence.
They're scared, they lack confidence.
Yeah, guys, good luck.
You gotta figure it out.
And I remember watching one interview with some guy who claimed to be an incel.
It's like a normal guy.
It's like a regular guy.
And he was just like, well, we have no luck.
And I'm just like, well, I mean, that's bad leadership.
It's bad parenting.
That's what it is.
Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate have tapped into that, and not only that market, but they have reached a lot of these young men by saying, be strong.
And it worked.
All right, I'll grab one more, and then we'll talk about Venezuela.
All right.
Disturbed Turtle says, I'm a middle-aged white woman who owns three cats, but I'm not offended.
I agree with him.
I've listened to you for years, by the way.
Thanks for all you do.
Appreciate it.
Well, that's the funny thing, too.
Any intelligent woman who has cats and no kids, who understands the points being made, is going to be like, he's right.
That's the, that's the, that's the funny thing about, they're like, they're insulting women with cats.
They're insulting stupid people.
You know what I mean?
It's insulting to stupid people.
I do not have kids.
I am smart enough to recognize the importance of children to society.
And I will stress, because everybody is just like, they like to chat, well Tim doesn't have kids, you will never know if I do or don't, I will never tell you, and you will be left wondering, because there's never going to be a circumstance where I talk about my family.
So, that being said, as someone without kids, I understand why if you don't have kids, society crumbles.
Just ceases to exist.
So I am much more in favor of people who are deeply concerned about what happens to this nation because they have children.
You know why?
Because I'm in the middle.
I'm in between, right?
You got a guy who's 45, and he's got a kid who's 15, and I'm like, okay.
Let me think about this for a second.
I'm slightly younger than that guy.
I'm going to live a little bit longer than him.
That kid's going to live longer than me.
That guy's going to try and create policies that make this country as good as possible because he has kids, and he wants the country to work for them after he dies, which means I get a benefit to that, right?
Any 20-year-old should be concerned about this.
Someone without kids, they're going to be thinking, extract, steal the China as the Titanic sinks.
And anybody with kids is going to be saying, we need to make sure our kids survive.
And if you're in between that age, he's taking care of you, too.
But let's do this.
We'll jump into this next story from the New York Times.
We've got this.
Let's roll.
From the New York Times, protests erupt in Venezuela as nations denounce election results.
President Nicolas Maduro's government ejected seven diplomatic missions from countries that condemned his claim of victory, which he made despite reports of fraud.
I would just like to pause for a moment and say, how dare you foreign nations question the election integrity of a great country like Venezuela?
There's no fraud!
That's a conspiracy theory!
Come on, you can't just have foreign countries claim fraud means the election was rigged.
Alright, well, in 2020 the United States had a very tumultuous period at the end where There was a contested election.
Texas sued Pennsylvania with 48 or so states involved in filing amicus briefs in support or opposition.
The Supreme Court started crying, like, little baby, saying, oh, we can't answer this!
Except for Thomas and Alito, who are based, and said, we must answer the question.
But the rest of the court was like, as terrified cowards, we're not going to answer one of the most pressing and important questions.
So they threw it out.
Insanity.
Insanity.
Now, you may be saying, Tim, I don't care about Venezuela.
And, you know, I'm marginally interested.
I've been there.
I was forced to flee the country, as it were.
But I look at what's going on right now as a possibility here.
Now, we're very different from Venezuela.
But we are seeing riots.
We are seeing fires.
We are seeing murders.
We are seeing posters being torn down, statues being ripped from their bases.
And people say, Tim, what happens in November in the United States?
And I don't have a good answer, but we can certainly look at Venezuela.
When you have an opposition party, when you have years after year after year, just decades of corruption in Venezuela from the socialists.
I was in Venezuela 10 years ago during these protests, and it was the wealthier people protesting.
I was accused of being CIA, sent to destabilize the revolution, and I fled the country.
Good thing I did what I did.
They probably would have put me in jail.
Venezuela is not the same as the U.S., but we are looking at an election down the line, 97 days, 97, where no one's going to accept the results, no matter what happens.
They're going to claim Republicans were suppressing the vote.
Republicans will claim Democrats were cheating.
It doesn't matter.
I do not see a circumstance in which people will respect the outcome because no one will believe it was legitimate.
So what happens?
Well, let's take a look at Venezuela.
Here's a Gunther Eagleman posting.
I stand with the people of Venezuela as they're tearing down a poster of Maduro.
Ali London.
Thousands continue to protest across Venezuela over the election results accusing Socialist President Maduro of rigging the results after the opposition was projected to win by a landslide.
Let's do this.
Instead of pulling up any singular tweet, I'm going to pull up just a general search of Venezuela.
And what do we find?
Well, this was from an hour ago.
I searched for this, so I'll refresh in a second.
One guy says, the CIA loves a good statue topple.
Currently, their world tour is working in Venezuela.
Why does it look so familiar?
Ah, yes, yes, yes.
The socialists, right?
They think that people tearing down statues of a socialist dictator is always going to be the CIA.
It often is.
Often.
Here we go.
This guy says, as a reminder, Venezuela used to be twice as wealthy as Chile.
Then Chile followed Milton Friedman's ideas, while Venezuela was ruled by socialists.
Now Chile is the wealthiest large country in South America, and Venezuela the poorest.
The difference between capitalism and socialism.
Yeah.
Social... Wow, look at this.
Is this GDP?
That's incredible.
Brazil, what happened?
What year is this?
What, for real, what's the... Is this 1980 to 2023?
When I was in Brazil 10 years ago, their GDP was 8,000, 8 to 9,000.
So they have doubled it and doubled it.
Bravo, Brazil!
Argentina, they do alright.
Take a look at that, 26,000.
Chile, 29.9.
That's incredible.
Really great stuff.
And of course, Venezuela is still at about 8,000.
They used to be one of the wealthiest, and now they're one of the poorest.
Sad.
Look at that.
Venezuela hasn't moved.
There's been no growth.
Chile was at 3.4.
Went up 10 times.
Venezuela stayed the same.
You consider inflation, that means things got substantially worse.
Here's a video from Ian Miles Chong's posted video.
A bakery in Venezuela gives all its bread to people protesting against Maduro.
What a sight!
Venezuela needs more of this.
Regional officers, through tears, remove their uniforms and bulletproof vests, refusing to fight against their own people.
They join the protesters, calling for the fall of tyrant Maduro.
Now, many of you may be saying, perhaps, if in November, Kamala Harris loses, or wins, I should say wins, many of you think that you'll end up, or hope, The police are going to be like, no way, we won't support Kamala Harris.
They take off their helmets and they say, we don't want this.
We're for Trump.
The Trump supporters rise up.
I got news for you, my friends.
It's probably the other way around.
The people in these cities, these cops, they're not taking off their vests because they support the protesters.
The people in Venezuela that are protesting, they're in Caracas.
They're in the big city.
Who lives in big cities?
80% Democrats?
You think they're going to go out in mass and protest if Kamala Harris wins?
No, they're going to celebrate it.
Caracas is very different.
Maybe if we get 10 years of rule under Democrat uniparty establishment authority, then people in cities might begin to protest.
But I don't see what's happening here happening in the United States.
You take a look at these videos, and what I think we'll end up seeing is, if Donald Trump wins, in big cities, they will protest, they will claim Trump is a fascist, and police will take off their badges and their vests and put down their weapons, just like these cops do.
I do not see anyone from Appalachia driving to D.C.
or any blue area for a fight.
Makes no sense.
Interestingly, you may get conflict in suburban areas where red and blue clash.
Unfortunately for me, I am in just such an area.
Well, actually, we're slightly outside of it.
But Jefferson County in West Virginia is like 60-40 or 55-45, red to blue.
You got a lot of D.C.
transplants.
That being said, these D.C.
transplants are wealthier, uppity individuals who ain't gonna be fighting anybody.
So will something like this come to the United States?
I don't see it.
I don't see it.
Here are the latest top posts.
Ian Milestrong says, Holy smokes.
Here's someone hitting a statue, I guess.
Statue's still being torn down.
So a lot of the same stuff.
And the latest posts... I can't read the Spanish stuff.
From Mass Radio HN, Minister of Defense of Venezuela, Vladimir Padrino, calls on citizens not to fall into provocations that result in violence.
Also reports that 23 military officials and 25 police officers are injured and a sergeant murdered by fascist acts.
The question will be, my friends, what will the military do?
I was in Egypt, and, you know, everybody and their mom knows, I get it, you get it.
I was in a bunch of different countries at the start of the conflict crisis.
I was in Ukraine at the start of the war, when it was protests, and then it devolved into an escalation of civil conflict.
I ended up leaving right before it became, like, right before they ousted the president, Yanukovych.
In Egypt, I was there during the second revolution, and we decided at one point to flee the country.
We thought that we got what we could get, and it's time to go.
Crazy stuff.
I remember, uh, we're riding in this big van with a group of people.
We got a car following us.
They got a bunch of guns.
They got AKs and handguns and things like this.
We went to, uh, I went to Tahrir Square.
There was concerns about the violence because there's thousands of young men screaming and protesting.
The story I'm told by the locals as we are covering it.
The first revolution, 30 years of military rule.
Eventually they say, we want democracy, we want elections.
So they protest, they oust the military leader, they have elections.
The secular individuals, or more likely Muslim, not, you know, fundamentalist, break up into a bunch of different political parties.
The Muslim Brotherhood is like, doesn't matter if you're, doesn't matter what you believe politically, Muslim.
They end up winning around 20-plus percent of the vote, which is the single largest voting bloc, so whoever gets the most votes wins.
Unfortunately for the rest of the country, about 80 percent did not want them.
So they rioted again.
A year later, you got the Second Revolution.
The military basically says, OK, this is not going to work.
The country has a very large Muslim voting bloc, and if we keep doing first-past-the-post elections, which basically means one person, one vote, whoever gets the most votes wins, the Muslim Brotherhood is going to win every time!
Solution.
The solution proposed by the military was to just massacre Muslim Brotherhood.
That'll do it.
And so at some point when the APC started rolling in, we decided to GTFO.
I remember we were at our hotel, the Hilton, and they raided a bunch of pro-Muslim Brotherhood, pro-Muslim news stations, Al Jazeera for instance, and I went down to the lobby and talked to some other journalists and I said, where do you think this ends up?
And they said, don't worry, they're only going after journalists that support the Muslim Brotherhood.
And I'm like, okay, I can see where this is going.
We had gone to Nassar City.
I had gone to the Muslim Brotherhood areas and went around and we talked to people.
I don't speak Arabic, but I had a fixer with me.
And the military decided they would just break these protests up and anyone who resisted they would just shoot and kill.
So they did.
The military decided.
They took over.
Now what would happen in the United States?
Would anything like that happen?
The answer is actually a simple no.
What would be required first is for the rural portions of New York to go and set up protest camps and occupy space in and outside of New York City, which I don't see happening.
Older conservative folks ain't gonna be doing that.
But there is a risk of something different.
Depending on the policies that are enacted, if confidence in the system breaks, if Kamala Harris ends up winning, and there's accusations of mass fraud, and this time it's tenfold or whatever, you may get more rural areas of blue states saying things like, vote of no confidence, we do not participate anymore.
Truckers may outright be like, I'm not going to drive into those cities, I'm not going to drive into these states, which we already see a lot of, to be honest.
That bifurcation could lead to New York saying, look, if truckers won't bring food into New York City, which is very difficult to do, the city is going to have to intervene to make sure it happens.
The people in those cities will revolt against them because they're going to be like, we are hungry.
It will not be red versus blue.
It will be regular people in New York who are apolitical because most people don't vote, wondering why they can't get food, and they will be riding.
And they will be demanding a political change not to Republican.
They'll be just saying, just get rid of our current leadership.
Now over at the Rolling Stone, they say this.
Oh boy!
Let's do a Control-F search.
Tim... No Timcast?
Tim Pool... No Tim Pool or Timcast?
Heavens me.
Heavens me.
They can't give me one, huh?
Well, I guess it's because I'm not going to subscribe to read the full story.
Let's see if we can just do that.
Yeah, okay, okay.
So maybe I am in there.
You know, we had this conversation with Buzz Patterson the other day, and he said that he thought if Donald Trump were to have been shot, we would be in a civil war.
I don't know that I agree.
And I'm the guy who's, like, saying civil war all the time, right?
I don't know that I agree.
However, I do believe we may be in some kind of escalation of violence.
He said maybe insurgency.
He said he'd think we'd be shooting.
And I think it's clear what he means is that, like, Americans would be.
I don't know that I agree with that.
If Donald Trump were to lose his life, why would anyone in Appalachia go to D.C.?
And that's the point.
And he said, okay, maybe nobody in West Virginia would do it.
And I'm like, no, no, no, but let's be real.
Why would anybody in northern New York City, or I'm sorry, northern New York, drive to New York City?
Why would someone from Atlanta, which is actually probably more liberal, but why would someone from the South go to the North?
This is the thing that people don't understand.
When the American Civil War happened in 1861, You get these people that are saying things like, Tim Poole's crazy for thinking Civil War is possible, just go outside and talk to people, there's no interest in this.
Let me ask you a question.
Do you think that in 1861, let's say like February, like right before, this is around the start of the Civil War, do you think that if someone walked outside of Atlanta, they would walk up to their neighbor and be like, oh I'm just itching for a Civil War, and the other guy would be like, ooh you Southerner, ooh you Northerner, and they box?
No.
The dude in the South would walk out and be like, we're the South, we agree with each other.
More to the point, they were states, so they'd be like, we're Virginia, we're Georgia, we're, you know, Arkansas or whatever.
And then in the North, do you think if someone in New York City walked outside, they'd bump into a guy who's pro-Confederate?
Of course not!
It's never how it worked.
Regions are politically aligned.
In any civil war, you walk outside and everyone agrees.
Now, things are still the same here.
People in blue areas walk outside and they think everything, look, this is normal.
The Republicans are crazy.
I talk to my neighbors all day.
We agree.
And it's like, uh-huh, yeah, why don't you take a drive down to a rural area and talk to the locals there?
Here's a story from Rolling Stone.
A little more than a week after Donald Trump was nearly assassinated at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania, blah blah blah, Ohio State Senator George Lange was warming up a crowd I'm afraid if we lose this one, it's going to take a civil war to save the country, and it will be saved.
It's the greatest experiment in the history of mankind, and if we come down to a civil war, I'm glad we got people like Bikers for Trump on our side.
I think that is deeply irresponsible, and it is not the case.
The far left wants civil war.
We don't.
Any sane person would tell you that breaks the system.
But I'm not surprised to hear people saying this.
I have been warning, the track we are on leads in one direction, with no off-ramp.
There are variables I can't see, so hopefully there is a switch ahead that pulls us out of this.
But can I, you know, it's just absolutely fascinating.
I'm gonna say this.
Anyone who thinks it is not possible to have a civil war is a moron.
I will be as crass and as insulting as possible.
A moron.
That's just it.
Now, you go back to 2018, when there was that Atlantic article, whatever magazine it was, I talk about it all the time, and they said there was a 30-90% chance of civil war.
And if you said, oh, shut up, I'd agree with you.
I'd be like, yeah, I mean, it's just one article.
I thought we were on that track back then.
Where we are today, with January 6th, four years ago, three and a half years ago, with the contested election, and what we're seeing now, unprecedented historical moments, and someone tried to kill Donald Trump!
And people are still gonna be like, nah, that'll never happen.
You know, I should bring Andrew Wilson back and ask him what he thinks again.
We ended up extending the Culture War Show by an hour after we started debating Civil War because he was, with all due respect, taking a generic line typically applied by leftists to say, Tim Pool predicted a civil war.
It didn't happen.
I have never predicted a civil war.
I have never said on this date at this time a civil war will happen.
I said, I don't know.
I say, we are on track.
But here's an important factor.
It could be 30 years.
It could be 20 years.
It could be 10 years.
It could be 5 years.
I honestly don't know.
In 1820, they were talking about civil war over slavery.
And they put a bandaid on things and tried to keep it constrained.
And it didn't work.
It took 40 years until everything broke.
It's 2024.
We could be in a similar period.
And I could be wrong that we are looking at something more immediate.
However, that being said, with everything we're seeing now, you go back to 2017.
And that's the bike lock Berkeley battle, street battles and conflict.
And I said, this stuff is bubbling up like crazy.
I remember watching a video where thousands, like literal, like two, three thousand people are out protesting, beating the crap out of Trump supporters.
And I'm like, this is getting into like Civil War level stuff.
And I had people telling me like, oh Tim, you're nuts.
It's just street violence.
And it's like, this is unprecedented.
And if this track keeps continuing, it will reach the highest levels.
We had a group chat with journalists based out of D.C.
One conservative guy is like, oh shut up, Tim.
The security state would never allow the government to crumble.
Fascinating.
Look where we are now.
The security state is in shambles.
The deep state is in shambles.
People are fighting in the streets still.
The worst riots the country's ever seen since the 50s in 2020.
The president forced into an emergency bunker with 100 plus officers injured.
The White House grounds were firebombed.
St.
John's Church was set on fire.
Unprecedented.
Less than a year later, January 6th.
Now, I don't think January 6th was the apocalypse, but it certainly was unprecedented.
A riot at the Capitol, storming in.
I know half the people on the other side of the building didn't storm in, but on the one side, they did.
I don't think it's the apocalypse.
But all of these things are indicative of the direction we're going.
Now you have January 6th defendants who have never been charged, still in prison.
Political prisoners.
You have the criminal charges against Donald Trump.
You have the altering of the law to charge Donald Trump.
The hush money case in New York is one of the first times, or I should say the highest profile moment, So I'm sure there's corruption all across the board.
They charged Donald Trump without due process.
They said, quote, another crime.
That's what Trump was charged with.
Falsification of business records citing another crime.
You can't just do that.
But you see where we're at.
Why would anyone believe that with everything they've done to Trump, changing the laws so he could be sued, lying about his businesses to claim he committed fraud, when his lender said, no, he did a great job and we weren't defrauded?
Don't care.
They said, don't care.
Criminally charging Trump without due process, citing another crime that's never, never been adjudicated, and we still don't know what it was.
And then when all of that fails, he's nearly shot in the face.
Okay, dude.
If someone shooting Trump in the ear, nearly killing him, isn't enough for you to consider that this country is in such political tumult that we have the possibility of civil war, then nothing will!
Nothing will!
You'd think January 6th would be enough to consider that this country could disassociate, break apart, and break down into insurgent fighting.
But I think people live in the movies.
Where they think it's going to be like California declaring war on Texas or something.
They live in movie reality.
Well, real reality is, they don't fall out, the wars don't happen this way.
And a civil war doesn't happen this way.
I think we're looking at potentially more like a dissociative Soviet Union style breakdown, which will result in resource conflict.
Civil war would likely be more regional than anything, and likely with insurgent violence.
They're going to say Lang later wrote that he regretted the remark, which was made in excitement of the moment on stage.
His own pangs of conscience aside, Lang's comments aren't an isolated occurrence.
Trump and his allies have been musing about political violence and the possibility of civil war for years, even as expert warns that Americans' increasing political polarization puts the country at risk of such scenarios.
Only a few weeks before Lange's on-stage comments, footage emerged of Shelby Bush, chair of Arizona's delegation to the Republican National Convention, threatening to lynch an official in charge of elections in Maricopa County, Arizona's most populous county.
Quote, if Stephen Richer walked in this room, I would lynch him, Bush said in a video that Richer, who is himself a Republican, posted online.
I don't unify with people who don't believe the principles we believe in and the American cause that founded this country.
Steve Bannon, a longtime advisor, repeatedly invoked the prospect of war in June while addressing a turning point action convention to young conservative activists.
Are we at war, he asked?
Is this a political war to the knife?
According to CNN, this strange, oddly specific phrase is associated with the bleeding Kansas skirmishes in the years before the Civil War.
We are in civil strife.
Academics agree.
Authors.
Former CIA.
Civil strife doesn't always lead to civil war.
But we are in civil strife, and have been for years.
Probably around the time that Aaron Danielson was shot in the chest in Portland, and the CHAS, the far left, seized territory and cities, and set up autonomous zones, and killed people.
Murdered people.
Burned down buildings.
Seized a police station.
Burned down a police station.
This is civil strife.
It's possible.
It doesn't lead to civil war.
But we're in the period that can either go civil war or calm back down.
They're going to mention Mark Roberts and they say, the list goes on.
Last year, Georgia State Senator Colton Moore floated the possibility of civil war in an interview with Bannon's podcast, War Room.
We need to be taking action right now because if we don't, our constituencies are going to be fighting in the streets.
I don't want a civil war.
I don't want to have to draw my rifle.
I want to make this problem go away with my legislative means to doing so.
I think that's a great comment.
We don't want to fight.
And for all the people that are inching towards it, you will regret it.
Mark my words.
When your bread costs 20 bucks, and you're lucky to get it, your store shelves have nothing but salt and flour, and you're wondering if, do I eat the whole stick of butter?
It's the only food I have left for the day.
My calories are coming from pure fat.
And the worst is not just that you don't have food.
Especially in the suburbs.
It's that when you wake up and you hear gunshots going off and you don't know who's shooting at who or why, what do you do?
Hide in your basement?
You do not want this.
And anybody claiming they do is nuts.
Katniss Taylor, Republican who ran for governor in Georgia, invoked Civil War when reacting to Donald Trump's indictment over his efforts to overturn the election there.
This is treason.
This is war.
I hope and pray it gets resolved before we use guns.
I really do.
I do not want to see bloodshed in America.
But we're at war right now, a war for our freedom.
Asked by Tucker Carlson about the possibility that Civil War might break out a little less than a year ago, Trump himself spoke warmly of January 6th, the day his supporters violently stormed the Capitol, calling it the most beautiful day.
Some of his supporters have ever experienced.
Press directly about the potential for open conflict.
Trump demurred.
I don't know.
Because I don't know what, you know, I can say this.
There's a level of passion I've never seen.
There's a level of hatred I've never seen.
That's probably a bad combination.
We take a look at what's going on in Venezuela.
And I think you can see how it could possibly happen.
If this election is contested, And it will be.
No question.
It's already being contested.
Missouri is suing New York.
It's begun.
97 days out.
If it gets worse, you may see something like Venezuela.
I think we're more likely to see protests.
If Trump wins, the left will lose their minds and they'll burn down cities.
I think protests are very likely.
And imagine this scenario.
Donald Trump wins.
The far left loses their minds and begins destroying and burning down cities.
Every major city is dealing with summer of love times 10.
Military then says this country will fall apart unless we remove Donald Trump and his supporters.
And you say, but they won.
But they're the voting bloc.
It doesn't matter.
Because like in Egypt, they'll say the violent faction is making it impossible.
So it's not about whether Donald Trump has a right to rule.
It's about if he is in charge, will the country cease to exist?
And the question is, what does the military do?
We're not like Egypt.
Many military might say no.
But then what?
Do you get fractional factioning?
No idea.
I think dissociation makes the most sense.
But with dissociation, and so this means like Arizona stops abiding by federal law pertaining to certain water restrictions, California does, they, like, people just start saying, okay, I'm done playing by the rules, there aren't any.
I think then, the risk of civil war is actually resource conflict.
Because I'm sorry, Vegas ain't got nothing.
And people are, it's just the stupid, people are like, Vegas is luxury, what do you mean?
People want to go and relax and gamble, and I'm like, nah, dude.
Without federal laws, these liberal states are going to open the doors to whatever.
And with a breakdown of law and order, people are going to do whatever.
Underground casinos will pop up, you don't need Vegas, and Vegas is the desert.
Look, man.
From the Postmillennial.
Three men sentenced for plans to strike power grid in Northwest US.
Suspected neo-nazi paramilitaries.
Doesn't matter what you think or want.
The rogue elements are at play, and that's terrifying.
When you have such dramatic hyper-polarization, it becomes harder and harder for any kind of authority to hold things together.
So how does it go down?
I don't know.
I think there's a possibility Kamala wins through less than political means and the Republicans just grumble.
Middle American red areas dissociate to some degree.
Maybe they stopped paying taxes.
Then enforcement becomes more and more difficult.
You'll get insurgent clashes with federal authorities, but it'll take years.
Bleeding Kansas style conflict.
If Trump wins, I think it's more quick and immediate.
Trump may then invoke the Insurrection Act, gain control of the cities, either way.
That's when we go into hot conflict, so I hope not.
But I'll leave this, I'll wrap this segment up here, smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends, become a member at TimCast.com.
Next segment will be coming up at 4 p.m., but for those watching live, we'll go to Super Chats right now, and thank you all for hanging out.
The next story, lined up, I think we have it lined up.
You're gonna love it!
Men are boxing women in the Olympics.
Yo, we made it!
We made it.
Not kidding, a male will box a female.
Is sports betting allowed on this?
Because I'm kind of torn.
I'm going to look it up.
I'll look it up.
In the meantime, we'll grab some Super Chats from you guys before we jump into this.
StrikeZrow says, Vance is only right if you actually care about your kids and their future.
Similarly, those who recognize the intrinsic value of life, kids or not, will vote to defend the future and defend life.
Totally agree.
You know, I don't know what it is in my background or whatever, liberal, clearly grew up liberal, but I think it was one of the greatest advantages that I had was going to Catholic school from kindergarten through fifth grade gave me perspective.
And a foundation.
Then going to public school allowed me to see what is outside of that foundation.
And so, getting a dose of the real world, and I think that was a benefit.
It was a great benefit.
You know, you can teach a kid morals and values, but it's just baseline.
You show this kid, here's what you should do, here's how you should do it.
And they're going to think to themselves, and I tell you this, they're going to think, why are the rules the way they are?
What is the reasoning behind this?
And that is normal for people to question.
The status quo to question it.
You show them.
And then you say, okay, kid, come with me.
Have fun in public school, and you're gonna go, wow!
Now I get it.
LocalDistance on Axe posted, A man built a fence around his property to protect his wife from wolves.
After a long enough period of time with there not being any wolves, the woman came to believe that the fences were built to keep her locked inside.
So she tore them down and was promptly eaten by wolves.
I like it.
I think a better example is, the wolves outside whispered to her that she was trapped inside and being oppressed by the husband who built them to keep her in.
She believed the whispers, tore the fences down, and was promptly eaten by the wolves.
Although wolves don't speak English, so whatever.
Daniel Hebert, do y'all have truck parking by any chance up there in West Virginia?
I'd love to come by and check y'all out sometime, but I got a big rig with me all the time.
We have zero parking for people who don't work here.
There is no functionality to come to our studio in any capacity.
Mazitzal says, not everyone is meant for marriage.
Those who can and should accept this.
It's true.
You gotta find your reason for your purpose in life.
It could be different.
You never know.
Dango Knight says, the couch thing supposedly came from an early edition of his book.
I've got an army buddy that says if it were true, he wouldn't be surprised.
He and his unit talked about doing weird stuff when they were pre-teen to teens.
I just think it's all meaningless.
Like, somebody who supports adult men engaging in adult activities in public really have no ground to stand on to criticize J.D.
Vance.
Like, if J.D.
Vance was like, I'm just into juggling bananas, I'd be like, I really don't care, dude.
Like, I don't know who they're trying to talk to, okay?
Let me just put it this way.
Conservatives seem to be really upset about being called weird.
But I am weird, and that's fine.
I enjoy it.
I don't know what middle-of-the-road person, like me, is gonna be like, oh no, the Republican guy does weird things.
It's like, I don't know, I just assume they all do.
Next question?
That's why it's funny when I see all these conservatives on X being like, we're not weird, you're weird!
And I'm like, ooh, I'm weird!
Here's a picture of Paladin Trump hugging a rabbit!
I like to post pictures of a glistening, ripped Joe Biden with big aviator sunglasses on X as well.
I hope that was enjoyable for you.
Oh, I want to pull up that rabbit thing again.
Do I still have it up there?
I got it, right?
Oh, oh no, oh no, this is the guy boxing the woman.
Alright, let's do this.
Here we go.
Ladies and gentlemen, we've made it!
The Olympics will have a man box a woman!
So, uh, I'd like to—how do I pull up the odds on this one?
This is, uh, Reuters.
Boxing.
Boxing two boxers who failed gender tests at World Championships cleared four games.
Huh.
two boxers who were disqualified from last year's world championships
for failing gender eligibility tests are eligible to compete in the Paris Olympics,
the International Olympic Committee said on Monday. Dude, I'm torn on this one. Because
obviously you want to bet on the man to beat the woman, but But the issue is, there's no real guarantee the man wins.
And I'm tempted to bet on the woman, to be completely honest.
I don't know how you pull this up.
What's this guy's name?
Algeria's Emman Khalif was disqualified hours before Her gold medal bout at the Women's World Championships in New Delhi last year, after she failed to meet the International Boxing Association's IBA eligibility criteria.
Okay, look, I just... This is a picture, right?
Tokyo 2020 Olympic Boxing, Women's Lightweight Quarterfinal, Kokugikan Arena, Tokyo, Japan.
This is, uh, who's fighting who?
Imane Khalifa of Algeria.
So, they've already fought in the Olympics, apparently.
Did the guy win?
I'm sorry.
That's just a guy.
Look, man.
We can't play this game, okay?
There are going to be biological males who want to win the $30,000 prize, which I think the gold prize is $30,000, and the gold medal, which is worth like $1,000.
And you could probably sell for a lot more.
I don't care what country you're from.
Some poor country is gonna be like, $30,000 is like five years of work for me.
I'll call myself whatever you want.
So apparently this isn't the first time.
It looks like this male boxed this female four years ago.
I guess three years ago because they postponed it.
They say Taiwan's double world champion Lin Yuting also lost her bronze medal at the same competition after she failed to meet the criteria.
Because they're males.
At the time, the IBA president, Umar Kremlev, told Russian news agency TASS, the boxers had XY chromosomes.
The World Championships were organized by the IBA, which is no longer a federation recognized by the IOC.
Athletes participating in the boxing tournament of the Olympic Games Paris 2024 comply with the competition's eligibility and entry regulations.
The PBU endeavored to restrict amendments to minimize the impact on athletes' preparation and guaranteeing consistency between Olympic Games.
Khalif next faces Angela Carini in a welterweight bout on Thursday, while Yuting takes on either Marcelotte Sokobe or Satori Turdebakova in the featherweight division Friday.
Um, let's see.
Can we bet on Olympic boxing?
Uh, Olympic Women's Boxing Betting.
Who's gonna have it?
DraftKings?
Point Spreads.
2024 Olympic Boxing Odds.
Uh, I don't like this.
Give me the actual betting.
Odds Checker, Olympic.
Olympic, here we go.
Are you outside the- I'm American.
Uh-oh.
Is it redirecting me?
Let's see what we got here.
We got the Odds Checker.
Ladies and gentlemen, women's betting odds.
We're looking for Imane Khalif, who is biologically male, and the odds.
Uh, I wonder if it'll actually come up.
So this is Odds Checker, Olympics, women's betting odds.
Uh, let me see if I can do, uh, Imane.
There we go!
Minus 125.
Well, that makes sense.
Imane Khalif is the favorite, but really, they're only giving minus 125 odds?
That's fascinating.
I guess the question is, who is Imane Khalif up against?
So, let's see if I can do this.
We want to look up Women's Boxing Schedule and Women's Olympic Boxing Schedule.
How do we pull that?
Olympic Boxing.
I got it right here.
Preliminary, 27th of July.
Who do we got?
I wanna see who's fighting who.
Uh, let's pull this in, ladies and gentlemen.
This one's gonna be deeply informative for all of you.
Let's see.
Alright, I don't know who any of those are.
On the 30th of July, you've got, uh, I Don't See in Maine.
Boxing.
Is this the right one?
I don't even know if it's the right one, to be completely honest.
Uh... Maybe I have to do a search for it.
How do you search for it?
Women's boxing semifinals?
Oh, okay.
I honestly don't know.
I'm not- I don't really follow this stuff, but minus 125?
You'd think they'd give way, way, um... Way less.
You know what I mean?
Here's, uh... Libsertiktak says, meet Imane Khalif, a boxer who was banned from the Women's World Boxing Championships in 2023 because she's a man.
But, uh, I believe he competed in the 2020 Olympics.
That's what the photo showed.
However, Khalif is being allowed to compete in the Women's Olympic Boxing in Paris.
Just another reason to boycott the Olympics.
Here's an actual video of a boxing match between... Now, people are confusing this.
This is important.
People think this video is Olympics.
It's not.
Teresa Smith posts, uh... This was Imane Khalif Yo, he clobbers her!
And, uh, this woman gets beat up.
Me, I'm excited.
I said, uh, I tweeted, I'm really excited to see this woman get punched in the face.
It's boxing!
That's what happens!
It's not violence.
I'm saying, like, I'm excited for the boxing match.
And I was trying to be, you know, excited.
They're both going to be punching each other in the face, with boxing gloves, in a regulated ring, and I'm excited for it.
I am.
Fair Play Women says, on Thursday, a male boxer will fight a female boxer while the crowds cheer and TV audiences watch on.
Sex testing confirms Khalifah Mane has male XY chromosomes.
So is this Thursday, August 1st?
This is it, right?
Karini Angela, August 1st is the match.
So, quarterfinals.
Oh, did they advance already?
I don't know how to pull this up.
How do you pull up the... I don't know, maybe I got the wrong thing pulled up.
So, yeah.
Oh, it's the eighth finals.
Whatever.
Interesting.
Alright, Carini Angela.
Do we have the betting odds for... Is it Carini Angela?
Oh, I see.
I see.
66 kilogram winner.
Oh, okay.
I pulled up the 54 kilogram winner.
We'll have to, uh, we'll have to check that one again.
Can I not open that up and see?
Uh, let's see what we got.
We got 50.
Gonna be fighting Karini Angela.
What do you think?
We had this, this one's really funny.
Olympic announcer Bob Ballard fired over joke about women taking too long to get ready.
They're gonna let a dude, a male, box a female.
The odds favor the male.
A veteran Eurosport announcer was fired for making a joke about women taking too long to get ready after the Australian Olympic swim team took the gold in Paris.
BBC reported.
Bob Ballard said that the 4x100 meter freestyle relay team were finishing up, and you know what women are like, hanging around doing their makeup.
That's a good one.
Ballard, who had covered global sports since the 80s, including numerous Olympic Games and World Championships, apparently laughed when his broadcasting partner and former British swimming champion Lizzie Simmons said this remark was outrageous.
Dude.
Okay.
Maybe we need to bring, like, I can't, could you imagine watching, like, Barstool Sports, and someone there saying this, and someone's like, that's outrageous, how dare you?
You think they'd fire somebody over this?
Man.
Molly O'Callaghan, Emma McCone, Meg Harris, blah blah blah, who just beat in the U.S.
and China for the team's fourth straight Olympic gold, were celebrating their victory by waving to the crowd according to the outlet.
During a segment of Eurosports coverage last night, commentator Bob Ballard made an inappropriate comment, Eurosports said in a statement Sunday, adding the longtime BBC reporter and presenter would be barred from future broadcasts, the BBC reported.
Who was the guy?
There was like, something happened where some dude was in an elevator, and the women got in, and then he was like, which floor do you want?
And they were like, floor seven.
He's like, okay, seven.
And he hits five and he goes, alright, and next up, next floor, lingerie.
And then they were like, oh!
Oh, how dare you!
And they got him fired.
Here we go.
They got him fired on this.
64-year-old commentator.
I sense apologists.
Oh, don't apologize!
Come on.
Here's my point.
It was never my intention to upset or belittle anyone.
And if I did, I apologize.
I'm a massive advocate for women's sports.
Blah, blah, blah.
Get out of here!
No, you're not.
They fired a guy because he made a joke about women taking too long.
But they're going to let a male box a female.
I think they got two.
Two males boxing females.
I do not believe that they actually care about any of this stuff.
And I'm done pretending otherwise.
Are we really going to live in this world where this is the standard?
How dare you make a joke?
Can I make a joke about the male boxing the female?
Because you seem to support that.
You know guys, always beating women!
What are you gonna do with that joke?
Right?
Are you gonna go, hey, well, hey, you can't say that.
Men don't beat women.
Well, feminists would say otherwise.
They'd say, well, actually, hey, you can't call him a man.
Pick one.
What are you mad about?
That's why I tweeted I was excited to see this woman get punched in the face.
Because, like, what if I'm being gender inclusive and calling the trans woman a woman?
Here's what I really think.
I think the Olympics is gonna be rife with males saying they're female because they want 30 grand.
I mean, come on, man.
If you come from Algeria, if you come from North Korea, $30,000.
Now, if you come from North Korea, good luck.
But you could be coming from a poor country, and you're gonna be like, look, $30,000 is $30,000.
You can call me whatever you want.
Like, let me ask you this question, my friends.
If I walked up to you, and I bet we could do this video, this is a really good point, and I said, I will give you $30,000 in cash right now if you have everybody call you Susan.
Who's gonna say no to that?
These people who are competing, they don't gotta change their names.
They can say, call me this for now or whatever.
In the United States, the law is you don't need to legally change your name to require people to use a different name.
Why would someone forgo all that money?
Sorry, that's reality.
The left will say, no, no, that won't happen.
Okay, dude, well, that's because you're just making blanket assumptions.
But I think, when it comes to the Olympics, they'll take the money.
Alex Stein made the joke that he was going to bet on the males to win, but the betting odds actually aren't that good anyway.
Omega says, by the way, Tim, you need to stop talking about the military like you know what we do or what we think.
Brat, you are so wrong.
Um, it's such a silly thing to be like one person saying they're in the military so they can represent what the
entirety of the military knows or thinks.
My experience of the military is, not having been in it, so I'm not going to say, like, this is what people in combat infantry are going to say.
This is what they're going to do.
Uh, no.
But I have, uh, briefly lived on and off military bases.
I was at Fort Carson for just a couple of months, literally hanging out in base- living in base housing with people, and, uh, so I can tell you my experience as to what they thought and said, and that's the extent of it.
But I think it's silly where people are like, I can tell you what every single person thinks and I represent all of them.
It's like, did we all have experiences?
But I don't know what the intention is of that because I don't know to what degree I have said I know what all of people in the military think.
I certainly do not.
I have, however, met with many people in the military as of recent who are Trump supporters who have criticized wokeness and talked about resigning.
That's something I've seen.
Sabrina Beltran says, I think government benefits like no-fault divorce, child support, EBT, Section 8, removes the holy sacrament of marriage.
Marriage has been twisted for wealth.
Agreed.
Ark Templar says, Tim, regarding the Charlestown Catholics, they don't vote because they're not from the area.
Trads have been known to travel two-plus hours to go to a TLM.
There's a ton of people, and I've met them in Charlestown, overwhelmingly conservative.
They will tell you they are, and they don't vote.
That's just true.
But I agree with you, many of the people will travel to go to the Latin Mass, for sure.
Let's go, ladies and gentlemen, we've got this one.
From the Postmillennial, ActBlue.
Suspicious donations.
Virginia's AG is going to begin investigating.
Shoutout to Virginia's AG.
This is the right move to be made, and we have to get answers to this.
However, I have to wonder...
Will anything actually get solved here?
I think A.G.
Andrew Bailey of Missouri should also be looking into this.
The scandal is that there are FEC-tracked donations to the tens of thousands coming from single individuals, which is impossible.
Seems like they were hoping nobody would notice, but money is being laundered to Democratic candidates, and it's supposed to be illegal.
The Postmonial Reports.
Virginia Attorney General has vowed to look into allegations that the Democrat donation platform ActBlue has thousands of donations registered under stolen identities and names.
AG Jason Mayeris posted a response to Charlie Kirk flagging a donation anomaly in Virginia, where a 79-year-old resident living in an apartment at $2,000 per month made 22,619 separate donations since 2019, totaling more than $800,000.
2,619 separate donations since 2019, totaling more than $800,000.
My, my.
So we'll pull this one up.
We got a tweet from Charlie Kirk saying, it's trivially easy to find massive repeated donations
to ActBlue that use stolen identities and quite possibly stolen credit cards.
For example, one person in Virginia has been named in 22,619 separate donations since 2019,
totaling more than $800,000.
Obviously, she's being exploited for some kind of money laundering operation.
ActBlue raises from all 50 states.
We have 50 state AGs.
When will one of them take action?
Nova Campaign says, Carrie L. Birdie is a 79-year-old living in Richmond, Virginia suburbs, renting an apartment for $2,000 per month.
She allegedly has 22,619 Democrat donations since 19.
The total is $839,466 in 592 days.
Utter fraud.
donation since 19.
The total is $839,466 in 592 days.
Utter fraud.
Yet 1K likely legit state VA GOP donations.
AGs like Jason Mira's VA.
Crickets.
The ghost donor problem.
It all keeps going back.
Here's another tweet.
Virginia Project says, ghost donor problem.
Data thanks to esteemed Peter Berninger, one Virginia donor, same thing they're saying, this donor probably donated to one thing once, with the rest being identity theft by an unknown actor.
Yet they keep giving the money to Democrats.
I wonder why.
VA's Attorney General, Jason Mejeres, probably pronouncing it wrong, says,
My office is aware of these allegations and rest assured, we are looking into it.
I wonder what his political affiliation is as AG.
Former prosecutor, AG of Virginia.
Virginia is a blue state right now.
So let's do this.
Jason Mieres, Ballotpedia.
And let's see, he's a Republican Party.
That's good news.
So we will pull this up right here.
Jason Mieres, Republican Party Attorney General of Virginia, assumed office January 15th, 2022, and he will be looking into this.
His term ends 2026.
It's good news.
It's good news.
The TPUSA founder added, which we did read, Kyrkus shared a post from Nova Campaigns, which we read, ActBlue is on the subject of multiple investigations from O'Keefe Media Group, where people on fixed incomes have their names attached on thousands of donations to Democrats amounting to tens of thousands of dollars.
Okay, full stop.
What should happen right now is the federal government should seize all the money.
All of it.
What's the answer?
We have this from James O'Keefe.
Maryland woman denies 1,000 plus donations to ActBlue.
OMG uncovers fraud scheme.
Cindy Noe of Annapolis, Maryland allegedly contributed over 1,000 times to ActBlue in 2022,
totaling $18,849.77.
This means Cindy would have had to donate three times a day every day for a whole year.
When asked if she donated to ActBlue, she says, no, I don't think so.
FEC data shows that some senior citizens across the U.S.
have been donating thousands of times per year.
Some of these individuals' names and addresses are attached to over $200,000 in contributions.
We went and knocked on a few of their doors to corroborate the data that we received, We're wondering if these donors are victims of what appears to be a money laundering scheme.
Cindy Noe of Annapolis, Maryland, who in the year 2022 allegedly contributed over 1,000 times to ActBlue, totaling $18,849.77.
contributed over 1,000 times to Act Blue, totaling $18,849.77.
That means Cindy would have had to donate three times a day, every day, for the whole
How is it possible that you can go to the FEC, like James did, and just see this, and there's no investigation?
I mean, this makes absolutely no sense.
It's illegal to contribute more than a certain amount of money.
Certainly, they'd start looking into this.
Unless there's no reason.
James O'Keefe says he confronts ActBlue on FEC fraud.
Retirees unknowingly listed for massive donations.
An ActBlue insider disclosed a secret ActBlue conference held at a hotel in Boston.
Inside the hotel, James O'Keefe questioned ActBlue about the FEC money laundering.
Once again, another clip, about a minute long.
He says, "...thousands of contributions.
We talked to people in Maryland who told us that they didn't make those donations, yet your website, ActBlue, listed as pass-through for this money."
And they get a percentage of it, too.
This is the crazy thing.
So, here you go.
Nobody is actually asking, and then security came out.
I think this is actually, this is from a while ago.
This video was originally, I think, from like last year.
I could be wrong.
The cops came out and asked him what he was doing.
Here's what you gotta understand.
ActBlue gets paid too.
Every donation that goes through ActBlue, a percentage goes to ActBlue.
I'm pretty sure I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure they get paid a fee which covers the cost of the transactions.
On top of what's going on with ActBlue, and hopefully we get an answer, you have the HAVV scandal.
None of this stuff has been answered for.
So, I have to wonder a couple of things.
Do Republicans play the same game?
I don't believe that ActBlue is the only vehicle by which we are seeing this.
I'm wondering if, when you look at these donations, do Republicans have the same thing?
And I bet the answer is yes.
And the reason why we haven't gotten an answer to this is that Republicans and Democrats are probably both looking at each other being like, if they're doing it, we do it.
And so it's just a free-for-all.
And then the HAVV scandal?
Why is it that no one has broken down these weird voting patterns?
We keep asking for AGs to look into it.
Could it be that Republicans are the ones behind it?
Republicans are manipulating the system to gain votes?
I don't think that's the likely outcome.
Considering the public sentiment right now with polling, but I will consider that.
If the Republicans are not going to take action to deal with this at the state level, then I just assume they're in on it.
And maybe what's actually going on is that Democrats and Republicans are engaged in this voter registration scheme, and so neither wants to call each other out.
They just think they could do it better.
This is, for those that don't know, I'll give you the quick gist on the HAVV story.
Help America Vote Verification is registering people who don't have IDs who register to vote.
We can see for the week ending July 20th, this is just a couple weeks ago, Arizona had 52,871 people attempt to register to vote without an ID.
871 people attempt to register to vote without an ID.
8,467 were not in the Social Security Administration database.
Nearly 8,500 people who aren't in the Social Security Administration database have tried to register to vote?
Who are they?
Look, we're 97 days out from the election.
The system is completely broken.
We all know it's completely broken.
The elections are all likely faker than anyone could possibly imagine.
And it's only now, because of the breaking of the narrative through social media, that this has become an issue.
If it were just us watching the corporate press, we would never be asking these questions.
No news agency would report on ActBlue.
They still haven't.
I mean, you may get small stories from local outlets, for sure, but national level?
The HAVV story seems to still be dead, and we're now going five months on.
Five months.
We've known about the anomalous data from the Social Security Administration, and we've gotten no answers.
Texas just said, clearly you're mistaken.
We've not registered that many people to vote.
Missouri, I think, said, we're doing voter roll cleanup.
Is that a joke?
99,542 in a week period?
So what is this?
They're taking all of their data and submitting it to HAVV.
Well, that's against the rules of what the Help America Vote Verification System is for, but sure.
Maybe voter roll cleanup.
The explanation could be that they're using the system illicitly for personal gain at taxpayer expense.
Fine.
I'm gonna tell you this.
This is just one story in combination with what James O'Keefe and others have uncovered.
I don't see how this election is going to be clean.
There's already a lawsuit.
New York interfering in the election, so I say good luck to all of you.
I'm gonna wrap this segment up.
Next show will be, next segment will be actually TimCast IRL at 8 p.m.
So thank you all so much for watching.
Smash the like button.
You can follow me on x at TimCast and Instagram.
And I recommend this.
Everybody go to Boonies HQ.
I'll wrap this segment up and we'll see you all later.
video. We strive, we endeavor to bring idiocracy to life and so we present to
you an episode of Ow My Balls, now available to watch on the Boonies
Instagram. You will enjoy it, you will laugh and share it if you can because I think
it's really funny. Actually I want to see how many views it has. I'll wrap this segment
up and we'll see you all later. Everybody else will grab some super chats.
Alright, now I'm going to pull up the Instagram because I want to see how many
views we're currently on this Ow My Balls Hey, hey, I think it's worth it.
It's a good, it's a good clip.
Uh, the latest one we have up, it's at what, 30k?
28,600.
And, uh, it's just a video of our camera guy getting hit in the balls with a 2x4.
On accident!
Calm down.
Alright, we'll grab a couple Super Chats before we wrap this one up for the day.
HiveMindCraig says, I was watching a CalabHammer financial audit recently, CalabHammer, and the woman had an ActBlue donation.
When asked if she did, her response was, God, no.
Interesting.
Omega says, 10 years of being in the Marines.
Trust me, what we think would horrify you, I, what I think would horrify you.
Ah, interesting.
Yoshiaka says, FEC has been underfunded for years.
Look into zombie campaigns.
Oh yeah.
Richard Devine says, all the crazy stuff we talked about in Iraq as Infantry, U.S.
Army... Oh, I read that one already.
We have a messed up humor.
Yep, yep, yep.
Wade says, instead of OK Boomer, how about OK Cat Lady?
Embrace it like a basket of deplorables.
Keep up the great work.
I agree.
Okay, cat lady.
And they're gonna be like, I have a family.
Well, it's like incel.
I think it's stupid.
It's like AOC is like, J.D.
Vance and Trump think it's weird if you don't have kids because they're incels.
Huh?
If they were incels, they wouldn't have kids.
Dude, I don't know, man.
I'm sorry.
The reality is that half this country is really dumb.
It is.
I'm not running for office.
I don't care what people think.
They're like, dude, I will say it right now.
If someone came to me and said, Tim, you are emperor of America for one day, I'd be like, oh, Social Security is gone, dude.
It's gone.
What I'd probably do is set a timeline for dissolution and dissolve it.
It would be like, you guys, you got five years.
Figure it out.
No new recipients.
None.
And those that are currently on, maybe we do that.
If you're currently on it, you get it, but no one else can get on it.
Bye-bye.
We could taper it down.
You know, because I'm not so stupid to think you can just pull the plug on something.
That would be dumb.
But certainly the system is completely broken and people who've paid into it right now like Chelsea Handler, she ain't gonna get that.
She's 50.
By the time she's eligible for it, not that she needs it because she's rich, but like people in her age bracket who are cat ladies too, you ain't getting that.
Have fun.
Yeah, but I ain't running for office.
One day I'll run for office, they're gonna be like, here's a clip of Tim Pool saying he'd gut Social Security.
I assure you this, my friends.
If I ever did run for office, and they were like, here's a clip from you from your show saying you'd gut Social Security, I'd be like, okay.
Next question.
Well, what's your answer to that?
It's in the video!
You played the clip!
Next question!
I don't care.
The idea that I'm going to pander to somebody to support a system that is completely effed and doesn't work and was bad from the get-go?
I do not care for this political pandering.
They paid into it and they earn it.
You are right.
But I paid into it.
Don't I earn it?
Why do I not get what I'm paying for?
So no, sorry, not playing that game.
How about this?
You have a family, like humans always have done, and in your old age, your family supports you.
You support them when you're young, and they grow up.
And then they support you in your old age.
That seems like a fine idea.
Now we have this broken system, it's just so messed up.
Whatever.
Alright everybody, I'm gonna wrap it up there.
Let me be as controversial as I can.
How about that?
Follow me on x at TimCast.
Become a member at TimCast.com.
Buy Castbrew Coffee to support the show.
Tonight, we are back.
Who do we have on tonight, TimCast IRL?
We've got Charlie Spearing.
Should be a lot of fun.
We've got a good fun lineup of guests this week.
And, ooh, next week looks real good.
Ooh, that'll be interesting.
What do we got going on?
Oh, look at that.
Two weeks from now is gonna be a lot of fun.
Oh, I see Blair White is potentially coming on soon.