Trump WARNS Biden Will Start WW3, Biden FREEZES Israel Military Aid, TRUMP WAS IMPEACHED For Similar
BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/
Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/
Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL
Trump WARNS Biden Will Start WW3, Biden FREEZES Israel Military Aid, TRUMP WAS IMPEACHED For Similar
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Become a member at TimCast.com by clicking join us to support the work we're doing and to get access to the uncensored TimCast IRL call-in show Monday through Thursday at 10 p.m.
You don't want to miss it.
Now let's get into the news.
Angry Trump calls Biden admin the Gestapo and predicts World War Three and everything else.
And Donald Trump is not wrong.
The big news breaking this morning outside of Trump's comments at a fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago, it's that the U.S.
has frozen ammunition shipments to Israel, and we don't know why.
What I can tell you is, NBC News claimed it was illegal for Donald Trump as president to block congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine.
So here we are, ladies and gentlemen.
It is staring you in the face.
When Biden shuts down weapons to Israel, there's no big deal.
I mean, unless maybe in the next couple of weeks we see an impeachment of Joe Biden.
Maybe.
It is still young.
But when Donald Trump freezes military aid to Ukraine, that in and of itself, outside of the larger Ukraine scandal, they said was unlawful.
Now, how is this?
That Ukraine is getting more money than Israel?
That Joe Biden could actively be trying to harm the government of Israel?
They don't care.
The Democrats do not care because that's the double standard, I suppose.
That is in alignment with all of the wokeness.
And it's particularly fascinating, I suppose, that you've got these activists who are postmodernists, that they are, I should say, generally woke.
They also hate Israel.
Biden seems to march in lockstep with them.
And there's no harm, no foul.
At the same time, we're learning that the U.S.
pier being built off of Gaza, which is the U.S.
construction of a beachhead, has been suspended because of weather.
Well, it gives you some context as to the World War III fears and what it means politically and domestically.
But more importantly, I was actually there, and I heard Trump speak.
As I mentioned last week, on Friday I was going to Mar-a-Lago, and rather quite by accident found myself at this fundraiser.
I didn't even know was happening.
We actually were just grabbing dinner with Bill Pulte, who had recently been on the show.
Good dude.
I got to meet Trump.
They made me wear a suit!
They made me do it.
I'll tell you that story in a second, but let's read the news.
Excuse me.
Angry Trump!
Trump gave a frustrated and often obscene speech at a GOP fundraiser Saturday night before unleashing an angry Truth Social post on Sunday morning.
Okay, let me characterize this for my own experience, having watched Trump give the speech.
I didn't think the speech was all that big of a deal.
How many people?
Maybe 50?
I don't know.
No, maybe like 100 people?
I wouldn't call it frustrated and obscene.
He was making jokes the whole time.
He points up at the balcony.
What did he say?
He's like, we got a great club.
But he's like, look, there's two guys up there in the balcony.
And there are two guys and they were like talking and shaking hands.
Look, they shook hands.
Ten billion dollar deal.
It was funny.
And then he shouts out Corey Mills.
Who's got a big bus with himself on it.
This is Congressman Cory Mills.
And he's like, look at his bus!
He's like, that's marketing!
It was all just silly jokes and fun and funny.
I mean, it was serious when he was criticizing Joe Biden, but I love how insane the media makes everything.
Donald Trump unleashed his anger against Biden at a closed-door GOP fundraiser on Saturday, where he made a speech that was frustrated and often obscene, according to the New York Times.
In a Truth Social post the following morning, Trump attacked Biden as a very dishonest man, a Manchurian candidate, World War III, and everything else.
These people are running a Gestapo administration, Trump said of Biden, at the fundraiser hosted at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida, audio of which was obtained by the Times.
And it's the only thing they have, and it's the only way they're going to win, in their opinion, and it's actually killing them.
But it doesn't bother me.
Trump's had something to the effect of, um, that, uh, well, yeah, to that effect.
I'll just read more.
Trump basically accused the Biden administration of secretly masterminding the indictments against him in numerous jurisdictions.
Yes, but he's posted about that a million times, and he said that in front of TV cameras.
The former president espoused conspiracy theories about why he lost the election in 2020.
Without evidence, accused Democrats of cheating in elections and getting welfare to vote.
Quote, When you're a Democrat, you start off essentially at 40% because you have civil service, you have the unions, and you have welfare, Trump said Saturday.
And I don't underestimate welfare.
They get welfare to vote, and then they cheat on top of that.
They cheat.
Oh, you know, maybe they're talking about the earlier speech that Trump gave, because the one I saw later was particularly different.
But I suppose I should have to tell you the story.
So, OK, well, there you go.
The big news, of course, is that Biden is withholding aid to Israel, military aid to Israel, which was congressionally approved, which is shocking and illegal, they say.
The breaking news right now is that Trump unleashes on crooked President Biden as trial enters week three.
So I'll give you the quick version of what we were doing down at Mar-a-Lago for those that saw the photos, and I can tell you about just what I already said, I suppose.
We just went down there to have a meeting and talk shop and business, and I was actually sitting by the pool.
Swimming.
And we are watching Cody Dennison race on FS1.
And apparently J.D.
Vance and Mike Johnson and Burgum and all of these other people were just across the street having this big fundraiser that I did not know or care about.
I actually don't, I don't own any nice clothes or anything like that.
And so, uh, when I get a message that the president is there holding a fundraiser, I was like, ah, you know, whatever, whatever.
But we had dinner reservations.
And they were like, you're gonna have to, you know, get a jacket or whatever.
And I was like, well, normally I wouldn't do it.
But for Trump!
I don't know what you call it.
So we we drove down over to Worth Avenue, popped in, got a got a quick little sport
coat and suit ish kind of thing.
I don't know what you call it.
And I said, sure.
And then interesting left.
As soon as we walked in, there was the man himself, Donald Trump by himself.
And as we walked up, we had met up with Alex Brusewitz.
Shout out to Alex and Bill Pulte.
And Alex came over and, you know, he knows Trump pretty well.
And they introduced me and then they were like, you know, Tim's one of the biggest influencers on YouTube.
And then Trump looks at me and he's like, he's like, well, how could he not be?
Look at that face!
And then we all laughed and I was like, wow.
And probably the funniest thing ever was He says, you know, they asked me who the biggest influencer in the world was, and I was like, I don't know, Joe Rogan?
And then Bill goes, it's you!
And Trump's like, it is!
He's like, I didn't really think of it that way, but, and then I kind of thought of it, I was like, what a perfectly Trump thing to say, and he is right.
The dude posts anything, and everyone in the world is sharing it.
So, that was good fun.
Bumped into a lot of people we've had on the show here.
Had no idea the fundraiser was even happening, but we got to hang out with some interesting people.
And that's how I ended up there with Trump at Mar-a-Lago.
But let's read the news and talk about, of course, World War III.
The Biden administration puts hold on U.S.
ammunition shipment to Israel.
The Biden admin has put a hold on a shipment to Israel.
Two Israeli officials told Axios the weapons shipment was stopped last week, leaving officials within the Israeli government scrambling to understand why.
When asked about the report, a spokesperson for the White House National Security Council told Fox News Digital that it has supported Israel's defense since October 7th.
The United States has surged billions of dollars in security assistance to Israel since the October 7th attacks, passed the largest ever supplemental appropriation for emergency assistance to Israel, led an unprecedented coalition to defend Israel against Iranian attacks, and will continue to do what is necessary to ensure Israel can defend itself from the threats it faces.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to carry out a military operation in Rafah, a city in southern Gaza, where some 1.5 million Palestinians have taken shelter, and where Hamas maintains its last remaining stronghold.
The potential Rafah operation to root out Hamas terrorists comes despite warnings from Biden and other Western officials that doing so would result in more civilian deaths and worse in an already dire humanitarian crisis.
I don't think so.
I think it could not be any worse.
The war is what it is.
The actions of Israel are not going to be deterred.
So, when they say, doing this will make things worse, I tell you, I don't see the Israel-Palestine situation being worse than it's already been for generations.
Now, I understand, in the immediate short term, the bombing targeting a massive civilian refuge is going to be very, very, very bad.
What I'm saying is, it's a war.
And whatever happens today or tomorrow, you will see more and more and more human suffering.
That's my point.
Israel's not going to be deterred by this.
unidentified
Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet-and-greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
Here's how they phrase it, because they know what's coming.
Biden admin pauses one ammunition shipment to Israel.
They actually put one.
They actually wrote that in there.
But when Biden pauses one little old ammunition shipment to Israel, the reasons are unclear.
Really.
I take you back in time to January 16, 2020.
Trump administration broke law in withholding Ukraine aid, Watchdog says, as Senate prepares for impeachment trial.
Heavens me.
They say.
This is CNBC.
Sorry, CNBC.
The Trump administration broke the law by withholding congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine over the summer for a policy reason, a top government watchdog says.
The report by the Government Accountability Office came a day after the House of Representatives sent articles of impeachment of President Donald Trump to the Senate for conduct related to the withholding of aid to Ukraine.
Trump held back the funds while pressuring Ukraine's new vice president to announce investigations by that country of former Vice President Joe Biden.
The frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination.
A gross exaggeration, mind you, of what happened.
I'll give you the simple version.
A video was going viral of Joe Biden saying, I went to Ukraine.
I told the president, if you don't fire the prosecutor, you're not getting a billion dollars.
The prosecutor was investigating his son.
Well, I should say, the prosecutor was investigating Burisma, for which Hunter Biden was on the board of directors, to clarify.
I think that is an investigation that involves his son.
We now know, thanks to more information that's been released, that, and this is testimony from Hunter Biden's business partners, they actually reached out, that Hunter Biden reached out and said, you know, we need some help with this one.
Biden then a few days later flies to Ukraine and says, fire the prosecutor or else.
Trump says to the new president, can you look into whatever this is?
There's a video going around, I don't know what's going on.
But that's not what they claimed initially was the crime.
They claimed outright Trump did not have the authority to withhold congressionally approved aid.
Well, here we are, ladies and gentlemen.
Joe Biden has done just that.
Now, of course, there's a lot to go over.
Military Times, U.S.-led Gaza humanitarian aid peer.
Oh, I love it!
When the military builds a pier off the coast of hostile enemy territory for the purpose of humanitarian aid.
We all just believe it, right?
Now, I worry for the men and women in uniform who are currently under fire.
Lloyd Austin says U.S.
troops building Gaza aid pier can return fire if attacked by Hamas.
The U.S.
military pier for Gaza to shift construction because of weather.
Now this is interesting.
Around the same time, Biden says he's cutting this ammo shipment.
Shipments, who knows?
The pier is now shifting.
Temporarily pausing.
Because of bad weather.
And instead will continue building it at the Israeli port of Ashdod.
Very interesting.
So they're moving away.
Could it be that they were under fire?
And that's the real reason.
Well, my friend, it's hard to know for sure, but one thing I can tell you is this.
The U.S.
government has reportedly been upset with Netanyahu and wants to oust his government and install a new government in Israel.
There are people Who are absolutely obsessed with Israel and Jews to the point where they believe that this small nation in the Middle East actually controls the entirety of the Western powers.
And I'm sorry, I just think...
You know, we had this great episode with Elijah Schafer on Friday on TimCast IRL, and I went into this massive rant.
You know, rant is an unfair way to say it, basically, because it wasn't an opinion.
It was me breaking down a fraction of U.S.
foreign policy pertaining to the Qatar-Turkey pipeline, the expansion of energy, the ousting of Assad, the Arab Spring, and all of these things, and now they're interconnected.
U.S.
foreign policy, NATO foreign policy, and how Ukraine ties into all of it.
The Gazprom natural gas monopoly, controlling gas prices in Europe, trying to get them down to expand the economy because, so they report, they're concerned about the expansion of the Chinese economic bloc.
And then there are people who are saying, I was with him 90% of the way as he explained all of that until he said, the U.S.
needs Israel.
There are people who genuinely believe That our actions in Ukraine, our actions in Sudan, our actions in Yemen, assisting the Saudis, all of it is at the behest of Israel.
Well, I give you this one, and I welcome you to make your excuses now.
Let it begin.
Joe Biden has just cut military aid to Israel.
The U.S.
government is trying to oust their government.
They're trying to sink Netanyahu.
They don't like him.
But they are continuing the push into Ukraine.
Now, this is possible.
If the Jews in Israel really are, and I'm not saying at the same time, I'm saying there's some groups that believe it's all just Jews, Zionists, or Israel in some fashion.
If they're all really in control, why would they cut off their own weapons shipment from their vassal state, the United States?
Because the reality is, Israel, along with Ukraine, along with many other countries, are effectively vassal states of the United States.
Now, they exert influence back towards us.
Fact, of course.
AIPAC is massively influential.
But the idea...
That we, the United States, are controlled by Israel, and then we just cut the pier.
We're no longer going to build the pier in Gaza to assist the Israelis.
That Biden is threatening Netanyahu not to go into Rafah.
That the U.S.
just cut off, unilaterally and seemingly illegally, so they claim, a military, a congressionally approved military shipment to Israel, and they're maintaining it with Ukraine.
Okay.
My argument is that the U.S.
is a vassal state of Ukraine.
That's the only explanation.
That's right, ladies and gentlemen, Ukraine controls the United States!
That's why we give them more money than we give Israel.
That's why their president came here and demanded the money and we paid him off.
And that's why Trump was impeached when he sent them weapons, when he withheld their weapons.
When Trump withheld weapons to Ukraine, they impeached him.
But when Biden withholds from Israel, no harm, no foul.
You see?
It's because Ukraine controls this country!
The Ukrainians, they've been orchestrating everything!
I'm kidding, right?
No, of course not.
It's because the U.S.
military-industrial complex has priorities.
And those priorities right now are war with Russia in Ukraine to cut off Russia from the Black Sea and to seize control of the territory that transports the Gazprom gas into Europe that allows them to control a large portion of the market.
Russia controls through Gazprom around 20%.
They also blew up Nord Stream.
It's funny.
People live in this world.
And I tell you, look, there are these people online that want to scream Israel all day.
And I tell you, I think the real reason is they want to deflect and keep you disoriented so you're not paying attention to what's really going on.
Quick version!
There's a lot.
We can go way back to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the U.S.
support for the Mujahideen, but we'll just go straight to, let's say 2009, when it was reported that Bashar al-Assad's government refused, I don't know if Bashar was in power at the time, but the Syrian government was, I think it was Assad, refusing to allow the construction of a pipeline, the Qatar-Turkey pipeline, into Europe to offset the Russian Gazprom gas monopoly.
The U.S., and this is through various reports, you can read about this, and I hope someone writes a book explaining it all, The U.S.
is trying to reduce the cost of energy in Europe so they can maintain economic expansion.
It's always about that.
Now, the reason they give is that they want to compete with the expanding Chinese economic bloc.
I don't know that I believe them, but that's the argument.
When the populations start to decline, what do they say?
They say, they don't care how, just get more people in, and then you get the mass migrant crisis.
They don't care.
They want more people.
The U.S.
goes to Syria and says, we want to build a pipeline, Qatar through Turkey into Europe.
Syria says we are allied with Russia and that would negatively impact their gas sales, so we say no.
It then gets reported in the Guardian that around this time the CIA made the decision we will remove the Assad government and install a favorable government.
At the same time, There was, uh, Iran and Syria and Russia were proposing a pipeline built through Iraq into Syria into Europe to strengthen eastern control of gas prices in Europe.
The U.S.
got very angry and then, whoops, civil war happens in Syria.
Who knows how that happens?
Maybe it's just good luck or otherwise.
The end result, the U.S.
saying Assad is a war criminal.
Now, while this is going on, The U.S.
clearly losing the effort to offset the gas prom monopoly.
You get, as we move into 2014, the Euromaidan protests in Ukraine, which I was physically present for.
And why is it happening?
Well, the people on the ground say that we want to join the EU.
We don't want to be a part of the Russian Trade Federation because the Soviets have a bad history.
You know, holla no more.
And so, ultimately, Western groups using soft power support the ouster of Yanukovych, the president, the installation of Poroshenko, I believe it was Poroshenko after this, a president who's more favorable to Western forces.
Russia realizing that they've lost the soft power battle, decides to start building up for a hard power battle, which is the invasion of Ukraine.
Surprise, surprise!
The Burisma Energy Company has Joe Biden's son on the board and a former CIA director, I believe, of counter-terrorism on the board.
Why?
If you're not going to get the gas pipeline through Syria, your next best option is to control the single gas pipeline Russia already has running through Ukraine.
I shouldn't say single, but I should say one of the largest and most powerful.
Of course they had Nord Stream.
Hey, guess what?
We blew that one up!
Like anyone believes, Russia blooped their own pipeline.
Well, the purpose of taking control of Ukraine is to take control of Russia's sale of gas into Europe.
If they cut off Russia from the Black Sea and take control of this pipeline, Russia, which is effectively an icy gas station, they call it, It's a gas station with nukes, that's what they say.
We'll be in a dramatically weakened position with no access to the Mediterranean, and Russia ain't gonna have none of that.
So Russia says, we will take the eastern Donbass and secure a land bridge.
The West is freaking out, saying, we have to control this land and shut off Russia's ability to get energy into the Mediterranean.
It is how they are funding their operations.
Why?
From SCNR.com.
Russia, China conducting joint exercises in relation to Taiwan, DNI says.
Beijing will continue to use its military forces to intimidate.
Plain and simple.
Russia is a large energy and market vector for the BRICS nations in opposition to NATO.
The US, taking control of Ukraine, shuts down their oil exports, shuts down a major naval hub they have in the Black Sea, which through the Bosphorus connects to the Mediterranean.
This is massively damaging to Russia's ability to sell energy to the West, giving us the advantage and saying, sorry Russia, if you want to transport your energy into Europe and North Africa, you're going to have to pay a premium.
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating And affecting the 2024 presidential election.
We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
This is why right now, Biden is willing to go to Israel and say, shut your mouth.
You're not getting the bullets.
You're causing problems for us.
Ukraine gets everything.
This idea that Israel is secretly in control of what the U.S.
military is doing is laughable and absurd.
Every step of the way you can watch, you can see the pieces lining up and you can see what the plans are for the U.S.
military-industrial complex.
I don't know for sure, because I don't have access to any classified information.
I'm just some dude reading the news.
But I can tell you this.
If it were true that we were under the boot of Israel, they... Okay, here's the cope.
The cope is, Israel's actually ordered Biden to suspend ammo shipments to throw people off their trail.
That's right.
Uh-huh.
Meanwhile, you have all these universities funded by Soros.
Now they're saying it's like Pritzker and Soros and these families that are big Biden donors that are helping fund these anti-Israel protests.
Sorry, I don't buy it.
Where's the anti-Ukraine protest?
Laughably insane.
I give you this one.
We're actually under the control of Saudi Arabia, because the U.S.
dollar is backed by petroleum.
The petrodollar, they call it.
And so when Saudi Arabia threatens to dump oil into the world market, it will damage our buying power.
So we have to beg them, please, please, we'll do whatever you say!
And then the kings and the princes come to us and say, we want weapons to bomb the Yemenis.
And then the U.S.
says, I will do anything you say.
Of which, over the past ten years, Islamophobia!
Has been a bannable offense on social media.
And, of course, we know that there was a Saudi prince who owned a portion of Twitter at the time, while Twitter was censoring the right.
Are we going to sit here and argue that Saudi Arabia controls the United States?
No, but we can argue that these countries, all of them, exert a counter influence as the U.S.
seeks to earn favor and maintain relationships that it can use for various reasons.
The U.S.
wants Saudi Arabia to be in line with its petroleum mission.
and standards. So it says, okay, Saudi Arabia, you don't do this and screw up our game. And we're
going to give those weapons to go bomb the Yemenis, the Yemenis of which a hundred thousand children
are dead. Same thing with Israel. AIPAC comes here. They say, here's what we're going to,
or AIPAC is here. They lobby.
And the U.S.
says, here's what we need of Israel, so fine, we'll give you something.
And then you have Ukraine, a newcomer to the game, which is getting more money than any other country.
And when Donald Trump suspends military aid, they impeach him over it.
And when Biden suspends Israel, they do nothing.
We'll see.
Maybe Congress will come out and they'll impeach Joe Biden over it.
Okay, then fine.
We'll see.
The month is young.
The year is...
Getting close to half over, actually.
So we'll see.
But I tell you this, my friends.
We are close to World War III, and Trump is not wrong.
I don't know why Biden did this, but it has been reported quite a bit that the U.S.
hates Netanyahu's government and is trying to oust it.
We'll see.
I do believe it's true.
We are on the path to World War III.
It may already have begun.
And Donald Trump may be our only hope at avoiding it.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 1 p.m.
on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
The challenge with doing a show like this is that everybody who watches a show like this already knows what is and isn't for the most part.
Now, we get things wrong, that's true, but you, dear viewer, are an interested person who has listened to enough news to be able to surmise and often correctly see the patterns in what's happening.
And I say this because this story probably will leave you going, uh-huh, yeah, Tim, we get it.
And that is, pro-Palestinian protesters are backed by a surprising source, Biden's biggest donors, says Politico.
Unfortunately for you and for I, no one is surprised here.
The Politico readers are like, oh my God, Democrat donors are funding communist protests?
My word, how could this be happening?
Well, listening to Fox News, there was an interesting point made.
I can't remember who made it.
They said, why are the protests still happening?
Why is it being funded?
Why is it happening?
Because it's working.
Fair point.
Joe Biden just suspended military aid to Israel.
They have just temporarily suspended the construction of the pier that was going to beach in Gaza, and it's now moving to Ishtad.
So it sounds like Joe Biden is panicked over this widespread protest.
And he's giving in.
Well, here's the news from Politico, and then we do have more information.
Big breaking news.
Columbia's cancelled its graduation ceremony.
Look at this.
Columbia cancels university-wide commencement.
I'm sorry, not graduation, commencement, after weeks of protests on campus.
And we have the polling data coming out.
Biden's trailing among minority voters and young voters.
This is his panicked moment.
He can't lose a single voter, but unfortunately... Welcome to the rockin' the hard place, Joe Biden!
Because older people support Israel.
Whether that's good or bad is irrelevant.
I don't see Biden winning.
I think Trump's gonna win.
You know, I'm somewhat reluctant to give a prediction outright.
Because in 2020, you know, I was looking at all the economic factors, and all the data, and everything in the mainstream press was suggesting a Trump victory.
Recently got back from Mar-a-Lago.
Had me a might conversation with the people that were there.
Nothing privy.
Just the people who were there and what they thought.
And I've come to the conclusion that Trump's gonna win.
I don't know what the probability is.
Maybe I'm aiming at like a 73% probability that Trump wins.
But it's not so much, and I'll stress this again, I talked to no one about any secret information or anything like that.
I'm not talking to any insiders.
I'm saying just literally Trump supporters as I'm down there.
And I'm like, what do you think is going to happen?
And they're like, well, we don't really know.
Like I said, I wasn't even at the fundraiser in the morning.
I was at the beach hanging out with some people.
But I really do think that Trump is, he's working on deals behind the scenes.
I'll get into it a little bit later, but I think he's going to win.
Politico says, President Joe Biden has been dogged for months by pro-Palestinian protesters calling him Genocide Joe.
Wow.
But some of the groups behind the demonstrations received financial backing from philanthropists pushing hard for his re-election.
The donors include some of the biggest names in democratic circles, Soros, Rockefeller, and Pritzker.
Two of the organizers supporting the protests at Columbia University and on other campuses are Jewish Voice for Peace and If Not Now.
Both are supported by the Tides Foundation, which is seeded by Democratic megadonor George Soros, and was previously supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
It in turn supports numerous small non-profits that work for social change.
Soros declined to comment.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which has previously funded the Tides Foundation and other groups, said it no longer has active grants to Tides.
It also does not support Jewish Voice for Peace, or if not now.
Another notable Democratic donor whose philanthropy has helped fund the protest movement is David Rockefeller Jr., who sits on the board of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
In 2022, the fund gave $300,000 to the Tides Foundation, according to nonprofit tax forms.
Tides has given nearly $500,000 over the past five years to Jewish Voice for Peace, which explicitly described itself as anti-Zionist.
Several other groups involved in pro-Palestinian protests are backed by a foundation funded by Susan and Nick Pritzker, heir to the Hyatt Hotel Empire, and supporters of Biden and numerous Democratic campaigns, including 6600 to the Biden Victory Fund a few months ago and more than 300,000 during the 2020 campaign.
The trail of donation shows a series of blurred lines when it comes to liberal causes in democratic politics.
Often those missions are aligned, but they also sometimes have different, and particularly when it comes to Gaza, conflicting agendas and tactics.
And a small group of wealthy heavyweights are often playing an outsized role in funding many of them.
You know, I'm going to bring this up again.
We've brought it up several times.
Over the past few weeks, but considering this news, I did not have it pulled up.
I'm going to show you.
Right here.
Democrats overwhelmingly disapprove of the military action in Gaza by Israel.
Surprise, surprise.
Joe Biden says, do not move on, Rafa, and we are cutting you off from your ammunition.
Because the Democrat donor said so.
Let's talk about the glorious rock and hard place.
Democratic members of Congress moving to ban TikTok.
It's hyperbolic, it's not really a ban, but basically, let's just say, functionally ban.
These are the moves they're making, TikTok, because TikTok allows anti-Israel content, but at the same time, as Democrats overwhelmingly criticize Israel, Biden gets on his knee to these donors and says, so be it.
I'm loving it.
I'm having a good time.
You think I care that we're suspending ammo transfers to Israel?
I will put it the hypocrisy of Trump suspends military aid to Ukraine, they impeach him and call it illegal.
That was it!
Outside of the whole calling Zelensky or was it Poroshenko?
I think it was Zelensky, wasn't it?
No, I think it was Poroshenko.
Fact-check me on that one.
Trump calls the President of Ukraine and says, what's up with this Biden video?
They say, aha!
But they claimed in all these news reports it was the suspending of aid.
That was the impeachable offense and illegal.
Biden's doing it now to please his donors.
Here we go, baby.
This pro-Palestinian protest stuff, it's not going to be able to... Joe Biden's not going to be able to withstand these protests.
He's going to be bleeding supporters.
I don't know if this is true.
I know Michael Rapoport's been talking about voting for Trump being on the table, but someone told me that Rapoport said he was going to vote for Trump, and I'm like, maybe.
There's like a video, apparently.
I don't follow him enough, apparently.
Why is the Rockefeller Fund giving significant grants to Jewish Voice for Peace, which blamed the October 7th attacks on Israel and the United States rather than Hamas?
Said Elisha Weisel, a Democratic donor who chairs the Eli Weisel Foundation, an organization that supports anti-genocide work.
Jewish Voice for Peace, which did not return a request for comment, has been a leader in disruptive protests against Biden, including shouting genocide supporter at a glitzy fundraiser at Radio City Music Hall.
The complex funding system in the non-profit space sometimes means that groups are funded by grants or even sub-grants.
So let's put it this way.
We'll skip over it.
We get it.
We get it.
Democrat donors hate Israel.
Fine.
I'll tell you what I think is happening.
I think that they've been subverted.
Democrats, of course, are uniparty.
They love Israel.
But what happens?
Well, when TikTok becomes prevalent and dominant, the young people working these organizations hate Israel.
The older people funding it weren't paying attention.
Bill Ackman, great example.
Wealthy man.
Defending universities.
Notably, on the liberal side of things.
Until the Israel stuff happens, and then he realizes, uh-oh, perhaps he's been funding all of this.
Many of these Democrat donors may not have realized what they were doing.
And I said this last week.
Many of us have been screeching like banshees to the high heavens.
The woke stuff hates Israel.
And Jews.
And it will come back to haunt you.
And I draw that distinction.
Notably with the Women's March, that story from Tablet Mag that was shocking to so many liberals, that the women who organized it actually were deeply anti-Semitic.
And I'm not talking about Israel.
These are people who are pushing conspiracy theories about Jews as a whole.
And we, me and many other anti-social, anti-SJW, whatever you want to call it, Critic, uh, the critical of the woke.
Let's call it woke.
It's easy to understand.
We're saying, like, guys, you do realize these people are racist and anti-semitic, and they believe insane things, like, similar to the Nazis' beliefs.
You had the late David Graeber saying that certain factions of the left have adopted the fascistic tenets of, there is no truth but power.
And they did not listen.
Well, surprise, surprise, y'all funded this!
And now you will reap what you have sown.
Here we go.
From the New York Post, Hems and Herz, CEO, walks back praise
for anti-Israel protesters after stock drops.
Oh, mercy me.
Good sir, what is this?
The CEO of buzzy healthcare company Hems and Herz walked back his praise for anti-Israel student protesters
after his firm's stock value plunged nearly $210 million in a single day after declaring he had other execs
who were eager to hire them.
That's right.
Andrew Dudum took to Twitter on Sunday to clarify his prior comments.
The last few days have been a disheartening reflection of just how divisive a time we live in.
I'd like to clarify a few things because my words have been misconstrued by some.
I in no way condone nor support acts of threats or violence, antisemitism or intimidation and there is absolutely no justification for violence on our campuses.
Every student deserves to feel safe without fear of harm, etc.
etc.
etc.
His apparent about-face came after the online sexual health and pharmaceutical company saw its stock plummet 8% from an opening price of $12.24 to $11.26.
The market cap of the company opened at $2.62 billion, closed at $2.41 billion.
After the initial drop, the share price at HIMS and HERS continued to slide in the after-hours trading.
Let me tell you how this breaks down.
had declared that companies would be happy to employ the disciplined protesters and encourage
them to apply at him's and hers. Moral courage greater than a college degree.
Oh, let me tell you how this breaks down. First of all, he basically was like, everything you're doing is great. We'll
hire you.
I'm being, I'm speaking, I'm being hyperbolic, of course.
He wasn't saying literally everything they do, but he was praising the protesters.
The protesters stand arm-in-arm with people chanting things like, death to Zionists.
There is a video going around, which is basically the black and blue, golden white dress phenomenon of, Did they yell Zionists or Jews?
And everyone's arguing about what they really yelled.
Some are saying they said the Arabic word for Zionists.
Some are saying they said something like Yahadiyim.
I'm probably getting it wrong.
This is not my area of expertise, meaning Jew.
And I don't know.
I don't know.
But let's just say they meant Zionists.
Let's just say, at the bare minimum, they really were chanting death to Zionists.
But I'll tell you the real reason, the bulk reason.
Moral courage is greater than a college degree.
Well, college degrees aren't particularly valuable in my opinion.
They at least represent some kind of work you did.
Moral courage?
So a guy comes into my store, and we make coffee.
And I say, we need a barista who's gonna make a cappuccino, a latte, a mocha, a chai tea latte, a macchiato, you name it.
We got all these drinks.
We got Americanos.
We got decaf.
We got cold brew.
What's your qualifications?
And one guy goes, I have a college degree in coffee making.
And I say, Okay, the next guy comes in and says, I have no degree, but I worked as a barista for four years, the same amount of time that person was in college.
Okay, well it's kind of obvious there who I'm gonna hire, right?
But wait!
According to this Dudum guy, the next person walks in and goes, I've not done anything with coffee, but I don't like Israel.
My guy, if you're gonna hire that person, Don't be surprised when people sell your stock.
They're like, dude, putting somebody in a position who has no experience but has moral courage means you're gonna hire a guy who can't make a cup of coffee to make a cup of coffee because he screamed about Israel.
That's insane.
Now, don't get me wrong, I'm sure what he's actually saying is they still expect some experience, but I gotta be honest.
If someone came in and said, went to college for coffee making.
The next guy says, worked at Starbucks for four years.
The next guy says, I worked at Starbucks for a couple years and I protest Israel.
I'd be like, I have no idea what that has to do with anything in coffee.
And quite honestly, it's weird.
So I'm going to go with the guy who knows how to make coffee.
I absolutely love this timeline.
Well, you reap what you have sown, good sir.
Here are the people that you supported.
Portland state activist at Gaza camp threatens to burn more police cars, saying that 15 cars got torched and they can do it again, MF-er.
Okay, well.
In the end, I think what we're seeing is fairly obvious.
Biden is worried, CNN says.
Biden's young voter problem keeps getting worse.
Does it really now?
Is this why Biden is bending the knee to these protesters?
Probably.
Unrest on college campuses is driven in part by an opposition to an unpopular Democratic president's support for Israel.
Add in the fact that Democrats are holding their national convention in Chicago this year, and it's not hard to hear echoes of 1968.
Trump leads Biden among young people.
Young voters are part of Democrats' natural base of support, but Biden is actually 11 points behind Trump among young voters, 18 to 34, in a head-to-head matchup in a CNN poll conducted by SSRS and released over the weekend.
Among all Americans, about half, 47% of registered voters in CNN's poll, said they were satisfied with the candidates they have to choose from for president this year.
That figure was dragged down by the fact that just 37% of younger voters said they were satisfied.
Younger voters don't like their choices in 2024.
Take a look at this.
Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the candidates you have to choose from for president in this year's election?
18 to 34 year olds, 62% are dissatisfied.
65 plus, 57, they're actually very satisfied.
Let me tell you, my friends.
unidentified
Let me tell you a story of a man named Donald J. Trump.
I mean, for a residential private club, it's a big place.
But it's not really that big.
It's weird that it was once someone's house, I guess.
I don't know how you'd live in something like that.
But there is a road that cuts in half, but there's a tunnel that connects them both.
And so, you know, Saturday morning we're hanging out at the beach, you know, Allison and I, and we're swimming and just chillin'.
We were watching Cody Dennison race Arca Racing on Fox Sports 1, rooting for the TimCast car.
He did decently well, despite some issues, but, you know, we're cool.
We're having a good time, and we look forward to seeing the next race.
And they had that big fundraiser going on.
So that evening, when we had dinner scheduled, I didn't know there was a second fundraiser.
Trump was going to be speaking for Ronny Jackson, I believe his name was.
And so we went out and actually picked up a suit.
You can see it on Instagram.
I actually have some nice clothes, and I buttoned the bottom button.
Everyone's mad at me for it.
Whatever.
And set the trend, huh?
Don't care.
But so the next day we were going to grab lunch with Bill Pulte and we were in the patio at Mar-a-Lago and sure enough Trump was there.
He's walking out.
He looks very tired.
He was heading to the F1 and there was a guy sitting down on the bench next to me.
And as the president walks by, you know, I just give away, the guy next to me says, Mr. President, can I get a photo?
And Trump stops and looks at him and goes, do you have to?
Oh, come on.
I'm so late.
Let's get it.
And I was just like, this guy.
He looks so tired.
He's running late.
Somebody asked him for a photo.
Trump takes the time out to get that guy the photo.
He says, come on, let's go get that photo.
And he actually took the time out to talk with Bill Pulte as well as, you know, Trump's a good guy.
He's a funny guy.
His speech at Mar-a-Lago that we saw, it's comedy.
It's stand-up.
It's ad-lib off the cuff.
It's funny stuff.
And I was just, I'm thinking, You know, here's this guy.
He's busy.
Anyone could be.
Surrounded by Secret Service.
And some guy at his club just says, I'd love to get a photo with you.
And Trump says, come on.
You know why?
Because Trump knows, for this guy, it may be one of the only times in his life he'll ever get to get a picture with Donald Trump.
Trump knows that.
I talked to the employees at Mar-a-Lago.
They love him.
I talked to the employees in 2015 at Trump Tower when Trump was running.
The first thing, I go down to the employees who work there.
And I asked them, uh, what do you think of Trump?
And they're like, we love him.
Why?
Trump notoriously at his properties comes down, calls up the employees and hands out hundred dollar bills to all of them.
He just, here's a hundred bucks.
Thank you for what you're doing.
Everybody loves it.
You were going to Trump property.
I'm like, the joke is when they're hiring you, they're like, now it does pay $20 an hour, but when Trump shows up, he will hand you a hundred dollar bill.
So it's just like, Trump takes care of his employees.
The reason I bring this up is that the media portrayal of Donald Trump versus who everyone sees him as when he's walking around, when he's at a club, when he meets you, it's night and day.
Night and day.
If you read about Trump, it's this crazy guy who hates everybody.
When you see him in person, he stops, he tells you how handsome you are, he shakes your hand, pats you on the back and says, keep up the good work.
And then he hands his employee a $100 bill.
It's remarkable.
Go to Mar-a-Lago.
And I'm talking to the people who work there.
And they said, many of us have worked here long before Trump.
They get paid well.
They're like, we've worked here long before Trump was running.
And he's been the nicest guy ever.
They absolutely adore him.
And I'm like, isn't it fascinating?
You know what I saw when I saw Trump take this picture with this guy when he took time out of his day?
I was like, Trump seems like the kind of guy who's just doing it for you.
He's an important guy.
Everybody wants to be around him.
And I thought to myself, why is it that so many people want to run up to Trump and they want to say, Mr. President, Mr. President?
And the way I see Trump respond to people is that it seems like Trump is a guy who's got great influence and charisma who's going to help you out.
That's how it felt in person.
And I'm not saying that's true for little everybody.
There's conflicting interests all over the world.
But when you meet him in person, that's kind of the vibe you get.
That Trump's the kind of guy who, not literally, but he's going to help you change your tire, push your car, he's going to help you move.
And again, not literally.
Trump's the kind of guy who's going to be like, he's going to look over at one of his dudes and say, hey, go help him take care of that thing.
But in terms of stopping, take time out of his day when he's late because somebody wanted a photo with him, I felt like this guy's doing this for him.
Because Trump knows, for all these people who love and adore him, or who respect him and want to see him win, someone says, I want a photo, it's their one chance probably in their life to ever get a photo with the president.
And so Trump took his time out to do that.
Trump's not a perfect guy.
He's, you know, he's like many other people.
But there's a reason why people love him and love his name.
Take a look at this.
The reason why I bring this up.
Are you satisfied or dissatisfied?
I think if more 18- to 34-year-olds went to a Trump rally, and this is why his rallies are so effective, their attitude would change.
I saw Trump's rallies numerous in 2015 and 2016, and I knew exactly what was going on.
And I saw it.
I talked to people.
Trump's hilarious.
He's personable.
After his rally, he's late and they're like, you know, like before he was president, they were like, Mr. Trump, we need to go.
And he'd be like, hold on.
He walks down to the barricades and he's shaking people's hands.
You know what the craziest thing is?
Is that Trump like security must be an issue for this man who's president, former president.
But he takes the time to walk up to people standing at the barricade and shaking all their hands, asking who they are, what do they do?
You know, what he what he can do for them.
Signing hats.
This guy gets it.
Joe Biden walks away.
Stops for no one.
He doesn't even show up half the time.
This is the distinction.
Trump is doing things for you.
Biden is doing things for the deep state.
That's why they wanted to destroy Donald Trump.
That's why they supported Biden.
But here we are right now, bringing it all full circle.
I think Trump's going to win.
And I'll tell you why.
I think Trump already won.
Winning the election is different from winning culturally.
I think Trump made concessions in his first term.
I think he will make concessions again.
But I think now what's happening with these protests, with these donors, many of these donors are saying, no, no, no, we're not donating anymore.
We're realizing what they've been funding.
Joe Biden now suspending aid to Israel is creating a lot of problems for the military-industrial complex, for the deep state.
Mike Johnson's overwhelming support for Israel and funding for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.
And Donald Trump working alongside him.
The people that Trump had at his fundraiser, some have suggested may be the auditions for VP.
That was on, I think Trump, I think it was Benny Johnson said it's Trump's VP pick on the stage and then Trump re-truthed it or something, so that's the rumor that's going around.
I'll tell you what I think.
I think Donald Trump goes to a uniparty establishment figures and says, look, We don't want this country to fall apart.
This cannot continue.
The Trump base will never back down.
And the Democrats are now opposing Israel.
Trump says he's the most pro-Israel candidate there is.
And ever will be.
And so now the deep state has a choice.
Concede to Donald Trump.
And take what you can get.
Or stand behind the collapse.
I think they had a negotiation.
This is all speculative.
I think you got deep state uniparty guys, they go to Trump and they say, Trump, here's what you absolutely cannot do.
And Trump says, fine.
I get to do these things, though.
These are things that we must accomplish.
These are things we must do for the American people.
We must secure our border.
We must have peace arrangements, blah, blah, blah.
And then I will give you Ukraine.
I will give you Israel.
Because now with Joe Biden, what happens is Trump's off the hook.
I mean on the surface level.
Trump gets into the office and says, I did not start this conflict, it was Joe Biden and I will work to end it.
I believed, I said this a year ago, that if Trump gets elected he ends the war in Ukraine overnight.
I'm not so convinced now because I think Trump may have cut a deal.
And I'm not blaming him for it.
No, I still think Trump is the right choice.
I think that likely what we get is you're going to see a certain degree of capitulation from Trump.
On foreign policy, you're going to see him choose a candidate that people are going to groan over because this is the compromise.
Trump wins in certain areas that we want to win on, probably cultural issues, domestic issues, and the deep state wins on foreign policy issues, at least to a certain degree.
Speculation, I don't know for sure, but based on what I'm hearing, what I'm watching with Joe Biden and all this, I think the deep state has no choice but to hand it over to Donald Trump.
We'll see, my friends.
Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
Backfired.
That's the only way I can explain it.
New York City poll says law allowing rape suit against him was unconstitutional despite voting for the legislation.
Oh boy, ladies and gentlemen, this is how it worked.
They passed this law that says, even if your claim is beyond the statute of limitations, you can sue someone who assaulted you.
Oh boy.
All of a sudden, then Donald Trump gets accused, gets sued, and this 30-year-old story gets believed by everybody, despite being rather unbelievable.
And I mean that in a literal sense.
Like, it's not worth believing.
But here we are.
Now this guy here.
This guy, Kevin Parker, he agreed with it, and he supported the bill and voted for it, and then almost right after, he gets accused of rape.
You'll love to see it.
You all get to reap what you have sown, and I will sit back and put my feet up and laugh as you are dragged down to the depths of political hell because of your own decisions to pervert the system for political gain.
Poor baby.
Good luck, sir.
I hope you figure this one out as you're being now credibly accused.
The New York Post reports, a Brooklyn State Senator claims the law allowing a rape lawsuit against him to move forward was unconstitutional, even though he actually voted for the legislation and then bragged about it.
Aw, but now it's coming to bite you in the behind and you're upset, huh?
In court records filed this month, notoriously hot-headed poll Kevin Parker formally denied the rape allegations against him.
But he also went a step further, asserting that the Adult Survivors Act, which allowed the related lawsuit against him to proceed, was unconstitutional.
The now-expired act permitted alleged victims to file civil lawsuits against their accused attackers within a certain window, even if the state's statute of limitations had run out on their claims.
Well, let's just pull up this here fellow's ballotpedia and see if we can find some information on this here fellow to make sure we got our key details correct.
Here he is.
Kevin Parker of the Democratic Party.
He's a member of the New York State Senate representing District 21, assumed office in 2003.
His term ends January 1st, 2025.
Oh me, oh my, look at this.
His salary is $142,000 a year as a New York State Senator for the Democratic Party.
This year, Democrat, is credibly accused of being a rapist!
You gonna cry about it?
You voted for it.
Good luck.
Parker was accused of the 2004 alleged attack in November 2023 in a claim that made it just under the wire.
The state senator, along with every other member of the state senate, had voted for the legislation in 2021.
Parker even touted his support of the law in a statement in which he denied the rape charges against him shortly after they were levied in November.
I voted in favor of the Adult Survivors Act to ensure all New Yorkers can seek justice and be heard, Parker wrote of the legislation, which was also passed by the Assembly, signed into law by Hochul in May 2022, and expired in November 2023.
These allegations are absolutely untrue.
My work and advocacy will continue, Parker said.
Olga Jean-Baptiste says she was working with Parker on relief efforts for Haiti in 2004 when he grabbed her by the wrists and forcibly raped her at her home.
Allegations that Hochul has called deeply disturbing.
Heavens me, look at him!
Geez.
Neither Parker, a Senate rep, nor his lawyer returned Post's request for comment about his latest legal filing in the case.
This isn't Parker's first run-in with the law.
In 2005, he got slapped with misdemeanor assault charges after slugging a traffic cop who wrote him a ticket.
Wow, really?
A few years later, Parker lashed out at a post-photographer and smashed his camera as the shutterbug was snapping pics of the pole outside his Flatbush home.
They say pole.
Why don't—this is annoying—the Democrat?
Parker was found guilty on misdemeanor criminal mischief charges and forced to attend anger management classes.
The same lawyer who represented Parker in that case, Lonnie Hart Jr., is defending him against the sexual assault charges.
Well, unfortunately, he has been credibly accused.
Concerned Citizen on the Post writes, Slaps a cop, destroys a post office for his camera, and gets anger management classes?
How about every employee of the Post and every NYPD officer make a trip to his home and slap him and the judge who sentenced him to anger management?
That's ridiculous.
Let's see how quickly the slapped judge and this excuse for a man... Let me just put it this way.
People commenting on this, they're not too happy with this guy's history.
Well, I can certainly just say this.
I don't know what this man did or did not do, but he's in a world of a heap of trouble, isn't he now, of his own making, and I'm not going to defend him.
You know, there's a big challenge here in that people keep saying, they say, you're not for free speech unless you defend the free speech of those you don't like, even those who oppose free speech.
And I'm like, think about the math of such a fluid dynamic system.
Put it this way.
You have two tanks of water.
And one is set to not allow any water for anyone else.
Free speech, right?
The other tank is set to grant water to any other tank in its system.
What ends up happening?
It's easy.
Over a long enough period of time, if fluid can only flow in one direction, one tank fills up and the other tank drains.
It's really that simple mathematically.
If we as free speech advocates continually defend those who are calling for the eradication of our rights, while they do not extend the same courtesies, it's fairly obvious, isn't it?
We are now in a system, a two-tiered system of justice, three-tiered, depending on how you want to break it down, where Donald Trump is being indebted for the classified documents case that no other president's been charged for.
They say, well, this one's special.
If you continually say, everyone deserves rights, even those who oppose rights, well then they will, when it comes, when two people are then espousing free speech, and one side says no free speech for anybody, and the other side says free speech for all, the police, the government, the system says, what do we have to do to stop the conflict?
The anti-free speech people are getting violent.
The pro-free speech people are defending the anti-free speech people.
It's simple.
Shut down the people who are in favor of free speech.
Let the violent ones win so you can get them to stop fighting.
Get the point?
Here we are, questioning whether or not we can maintain a system that provides protections to people who would strip protections from others.
It's the Karl Popper meme the left loves to share so much.
Here's a guy who voted for a bill to allow post-statute of limitations lawsuits, and Trump gets sued.
Am I going to defend this guy from these accusations?
No.
I'm going to cross my fingers and hope That he actually gets sued into oblivion.
He's being sued.
I'm just saying I hope it goes into oblivion.
Why?
You know, I've amended my views on these things.
And perhaps there's no... Liberalism is for the liberal.
That's it.
Illiberals, you can't extend to liberalism because they'll destroy it.
And as I see it, if this man came out in 2021 and said, this law is ridiculous, how are we going to open up the statute of limitations on old things 30 years old?
We can't do that.
Then he got accused, I'd say, look at this, they're coming after him.
Now, he's getting exactly what he wanted.
He should be proud, nay happy, that this is finally happening.
Justice will be served, good sir Kevin Parker.
You are getting exactly what you voted for.
You know, I'm not convinced it'll be a lesson to others.
I'm willing to bet there'll be many more Democrats who will simply say, yeah, well the next time this happens, it won't happen to me.
Maybe this guy's innocent.
Did nothing wrong.
He's being falsely accused because someone sees an opportunity to go after him.
That means there'll be many Democrats.
In the future, they'll say something like, you know, red flag laws.
And there'll be a Democrat with a Ruger 1022.
Nah, let's not keep it so simple.
Ruger 1022 is a small weapon, right?
Let's say they got, uh, what do I like?
Well, you know, let's say they're hunting, right?
So they're gonna have something like, uh, let's say they got slugs.
Let's say they got a 12-gauge shotgun with buckshot and slugs.
Not loaded, but that's what they have.
Just for hunting.
As they claim.
One day, there's a knock on the door.
And the guy says, your neighbor says that you've been saying violent things and there may be something wrong with your brain.
We're taking your guns from you.
And this guy's gonna be like, what?
Well, you reap what you've sown.
Am I gonna come out and defend you when you are trying to strip the rights of other people?
Can't do it.
We have to make sure that we maintain the standard of If you want to live outside of this world, then do so.
But we will protect the rights of those who believe in it.
Now, the argument then is, this will just lead to the erosion of rights.
There's a challenge.
You cannot extend resources to your enemies.
I'm for free speech.
They are against free speech.
Why would I give them an opportunity to destroy my free speech?
The police are going and clearing out these protests, okay?
And they're saying, haha, free speech, bro, was never for free speech in the first place.
And I say, aren't you the guys who argue that hate speech is not free speech?
Aren't you the ones that are arguing that free speech should be limited?
Then your words mean nothing to me!
In the words of a great, great joke Justin Roiland had in Rick and Morty, your booze mean nothing!
I've seen what makes you cheer!
These people are going out celebrating the death of free speech, then demanding I defend them?
I'm like, why?
You're getting what you want.
Don't, don't interrupt your enemy when they're making mistakes.
So as for this good sir, how unfortunate for you, you've been accused.
But thankfully, you signed the law that allows the victim to seek justice.
Good luck.
Next segment's coming up at 6 p.m.
on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out.
We'll see you all then.
What if I were to tell you that the Biden administration has no idea how modern monetary policy works?
And it's a fact.
We've got a couple stories for you.
The first, of course, is a reporter stunned by a Biden voter's comments on the economy.
Nostalgia for Trump years.
Really shocking to me.
Non-stop, I heard about the economy, NPR reporter says, about her time on the campaign trail talking to voters.
It's true.
President Biden is facing his uphill battle to convince voters this November that the election is a referendum on Trump because even Democratic voters have nostalgia for the Trump years.
Yeah.
I want to show you this clip that's gone viral.
We have this repost from Arnaud Bertrand.
This is absolutely priceless and probably the most frightening clip you'll ever watch on the people in charge of the U.S.
economy.
Jared Bernstein is literally the chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, the main agency advising Biden on economic policy.
And when you hear what he has to say about the economy, you're going to, well, you're probably going to laugh and cry a little bit.
unidentified
The U.S.
government can't go bankrupt because we can print our own money.
It obviously begs the question, why exactly are we borrowing in a currency that we print ourselves?
I'm waiting for someone to stand up and say, why do we borrow our own currency in the first place?
Like you said, they print the dollar.
So why, why does the government even borrow?
Well, um, the, uh, So the, I mean, again, some of this stuff gets, some of the language that the, some of the language and concepts are just confusing.
I mean, the government definitely prints money, and it definitely lends that money, which is why, the government definitely prints money, and then it lends that money by selling bonds.
Is that what they do?
Yeah, they sell bonds.
Yeah, they sell bonds, right?
Since they sell bonds and people buy the bonds and lend them the money.
Yeah, so a lot of times, at least to my ear with MMT, the language and the concepts can be
kind of unnecessarily confusing, but there is no question that the government prints money
and then it uses that money to...
So, yeah, I guess I'm just, I can't really talk.
I don't, I don't get it.
I don't know what they're talking about.
Like, cause it's like the government clearly prints money.
It does it all the time and it clearly borrows.
Otherwise we wouldn't be having this debt and deficit conversation.
So I don't think there's anything confusing there.
They can now create a $900,000 debt while still holding the $1,000,000.
So they create the $900,000 debt.
Someone uses that to buy a house.
The person who sold the house clears $800,000 from that transaction.
So they have the cash now.
There is now $1.9 million floating in the market.
The guy who sells the house goes to the same bank and says, here's $800,000 into my account.
I just sold a house.
Now, they have 1.8 million and they can issue a 90% debt creation upon that.
Sounds weird, doesn't it?
That's basically how the money system works.
The purpose of taxes is to pull money out of the system because the U.S.
government just manifests it whenever they want.
That is, Congress raises the debt ceiling, creates more money to be lent out to Americans.
So when we say there's a national debt and we owe X amount of dollars, it's mostly To Americans.
Invoices, bills, contracts, loans, etc.
It's effectively to manage that system.
I could be wrong about a lot of this, because I only have a cursory understanding of the purpose of how these things work, but I do think it's surprising this guy couldn't even get anywhere near what I'm saying.
Because, I'll tell you this, and I'll stress this again.
This guy, Jared Bernstein, should be saying, well, let's say I was the chair of the Council of Economic Advisors.
First thing I would do is I'd read a book on it and try and know as much as I could, instead of being someone on the internet who's read a few news articles, watched some documentaries, and read about the basic functions from some websites.
And I'd say exactly what I just told you.
The general idea is to control for spending and inflation, most importantly, Congress will, with raising the debt ceiling, the money they produce is a debt that will be owed to the people who are doing these jobs.
That money will have to come from the U.S.
budget to be paid back to the people that we're basically saying we can borrow money from.
Put it simply.
There's one way to think about it outside of monetary policy and monetary theory, because I'm sure it gets more complicated than this.
But let's say we here at TimCast need someone to clean the floors, and we don't have any cash.
So I, being the sole... let's say the...
What's a good word for it?
The Chancellor of TimKest, with sole authority, I decide we can tolerate an increase of $100,000 in our debt spending.
What does that mean?
I have no money, bank accounts are at zero, but I need a janitor.
So I call a cleaning service and I say, I have now been cleared to spend $100,000.
The company comes in, cleans everything, and they say, industrial corporate cleaning, $10,000.
Nowhere near my $100,000 cap.
Hold on, there's a problem.
I actually don't have any money.
How did I just spend money I didn't have?
I told them I had the money, they did the work, and now I'm sitting here crossing my fingers that I'm going to receive income.
So then, the company generates some revenue, money comes in, and that was me issuing a debt, basically.
Spending money, then when the company says, you now owe me X for the cleaning, we have that national debt added to our rankings, right?
So the company has accrued liabilities for the service, and we're hoping that money will come in, and then what a lot of businesses do is they'll float the debt.
So, uh, I make, you know, $5,000 and I say, okay, here's $1,000 towards the 10 I owe you.
We'll pay you another installment next month.
And then I give $1,000 to a bunch of different vendors.
Everybody is satisfied.
And as long as the money keeps coming in, I can keep paying them.
And so then what happens is I'm paying these people.
Not generating enough money and I need a new service, a new camera.
So I decide we're going to spend against the debt limit we created.
Eventually we hit the debt ceiling and I'm like, yo, we cannot accrue more debt because we're not bringing enough money in.
So everybody here at the company, just me, we vote, we're going to increase the debt again to $200,000 because we need the money.
We're not making it, but we need it.
Then I hire another company.
Now I need more money.
So what do I do?
I go to wherever my money sources are and I say, It's gonna cost you more.
We tell all the members, we're increasing the prices, sorry, we have to do it to make this machine work.
That's basically how the government does this.
Money is created upon the issuance of debt.
That's how it works.
So, in the sense of a legitimate system without modern monetary theory, it could function the way I described, but often what we see in the U.S.
is much different in that they actually just Create the money.
And so when you use a credit card and you swipe, money is created.
It's not coming from an account.
It's created.
And then you pay it back.
This is the funny thing.
So, you paid down that credit card with that $50.
There's now $100 floating.
I'm gonna be honest with you.
I don't really understand all that much.
And I think it's probably pointless for me to even try to explain it.
I can give you a rudimentary understanding of debt spending, but that doesn't even explain a lot of what's going on with taxes and all that.
What I can tell you is, the Biden administration doesn't know how the economy works.
So, if you're worried about how you can afford gas or anything else, good luck.