Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

Jan. 31, 2024 - Tim Pool Daily Show

01:26:55

Man ARRESTED For BEHEADING Father, Declares WAR ON Federal Government In Unhinged Youtube Rant

BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/ Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/ Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL Man ARRESTED After Posting INSANE Video Declaring WAR On Feds Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Participants

Main voices

tim pool

01:24:15

Appearances

Clips

josh hammer

00:31

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Make sure to go to TimCast.com, click join us and become a member to support this podcast and all the work we do, and you'll get access to exclusive uncensored segments from TimCast IRL and way more.
		Now, let's jump into the first story.
		Last night, people became aware of a video posted by a man who had claimed to have taken the life of his father, who was a federal agent.
		He goes on to give this massive rant about the problems with the federal government, calling on people to take action, and it took YouTube six hours to take the video down.
		This is a tough story, but it has a lot to do with the upcoming problems we're going to see this year.
		So I think it needs to be addressed.
		The first thing, and first and foremost, y'all need to avoid anybody calling for violence.
		You need to tell people, no, and we're going to break this down because I genuinely believe while there are many crazy people who are calling for violence and want violence, That's how the left wins.
		I believe that the win condition for the left is starting a civil war or some kind of civil conflict in the United States.
		It may not be a full-scale war, but the fighting is a win condition.
		Some would say that if a national divorce were to happen or a civil war were to start, could the left win?
		Wrong question.
		The win condition is it does start.
		Because once the conflict begins, This will give the federal government carte blanche to suspend the Constitution, habeas corpus, etc., as we saw in the Civil War in 1861.
		Regular people will scatter.
		They'll break organizational ties.
		They'll say, do whatever.
		Not everyone.
		The point is they will be fighting.
		But this means in places like California, New York, Illinois, etc., all of a sudden you will find these places under Unilateral autocratic control by their executives and mostly the federal government.
		They'll say things like, we have a state of emergency, thus we can, under the law, suspend these certain inalienable rights.
		Funny they're called inalienable, right?
		So when this story comes out and this man, who's clearly insane, In this crazy video, makes these comments, I think it's important to, one, let's tell the story about what happened.
		I know, understand, guys, YouTube will absolutely suppress this.
		It took him six hours to get his video down.
		They are going to suppress this.
		I don't even know if this video will remain up, but the message must be expressed as we look at what's going on with the Texas border, the fighting in this country, and the message from this guy.
		You must resist all efforts to invoke violence or civil war.
		These things are how we lose.
		How do we win?
		En masse, calmly, peacefully, with smiles on their faces.
		The voters go out in November and overwhelmingly vote for Donald Trump.
		To such a degree, cheating will not matter.
		Screams and chaos and fighting and violence will not matter.
		And Donald Trump becomes president, and then we can secure our borders, end these foreign wars, and start working on rebuilding.
		Now, I'm not saying that will result in guaranteed victory.
		It may be that the left refuses to acknowledge they've lost in an election, and maybe things get crazier after that.
		But the win condition for us is absolutely not violence.
		During Donald Trump's administration, there was far-left extremism, and very little was done to stop them.
		The Trump administration, as we're told, was worried, or at least the presumption is, That if they were to invoke the Insurrection Act against the Summer of Love, that he'd be called a fascist or Hitler, and he didn't want to do it because he wanted to try to win again.
		It was a mistake.
		See, the problem is the right doesn't know how to engage in psychological operations the way the left does.
		And so right now, it is an uphill battle.
		It will be hard.
		It will not be easy.
		And stories like this, I believe, may be false flags, or could just be crazy people.
		And that's fair, I think the most likely outcome here is this guy's nuts.
		Obviously, a sane person wouldn't do what he did.
		But the fear is, how many people are gonna go on social media and advocate for violence or escalation?
		Let me tell you this.
		I think it is fair to say, you see that video where Ray Epps, on January 5th, is telling people to go inside the Capitol, and everyone starts chanting FED at him.
		I don't know.
		Many of these guys are actual feds.
		But I got absolutely no problem saying that in a sense as a derogatory term.
		Meaning, for too long, federal authorities have propped people up.
		That's why people say fed.
		You take a look at the Whitmer kidnapping case.
		Some of these guys got convicted.
		Some of them got acquitted.
		Because they were entrapped, basically.
		Federal law enforcement was trying to get them to do these things.
		We see it all the time.
		They call it law enforcement.
		I call it entrapment.
	Legally, they'll say it's not.
	But what they do is they go to some crackpot guy with no mission, no plan, no resources.
	They fan the flames of hatred and extremism and then supply him with the equipment to do something and then arrest him for it.
	It's crazy because had this guy never met these people, he'd be sitting in an alley somewhere ranting about how the aliens stole his cheese.
	But they find these crazies and they give them the means and they give them the motive.
	Here's the most important thing.
	Not all feds.
	I know, I know.
	And I know this because we have fans who work for the federal government.
	I have actually met with people who had worked in the intelligence agency.
	Yes, yes, I know.
	Heaven's me.
	And what was the context of meeting with some of these guys?
	I was hanging out in New York and a guy was like, oh, hey man, I'm a big fan.
	And it's like, I actually work for, you know, an intelligence agency.
	It's a private contractor, but they hire us.
	And he was like, listen, inside is the same as outside.
	A lot of people support Donald Trump.
	A lot of people are anti-woke and they're all scared to speak up.
	And the people running things and have control of the institutions are woke.
	What do we do?
	I'm like, that's a good point.
	I got asked yesterday, or two days ago I think, someone was saying that they work at DHS.
	And like, what do they do?
	They quit their job because of what CBP is doing.
	And I'm like, you know, this is an honest question.
	When Donald Trump gets elected, we need good people who are going to be working in these agencies to do their job.
	We just don't want the bad people there.
	Anyway, long story short, I want to read for you this news story instead of ranting about politics.
	This is big, and we've got some developments.
	Daily Mail says, Why did it take six hours for YouTube to take down deranged Justin Moen's gruesome video where he showed his own father's decapitated head as he railed against federal government in anti-woke rant?
	This is why a lot of people gained thousands of views in six hours that remained public online.
	This is why a lot of people are saying PSYOP.
	It's manipulation.
	Why?
	Okay, here's the gist of the story.
	The guy's crazy.
	He was calling on militias and people to take action, as it were.
	And he showed what appeared to be a head.
	The head of his father.
	He's been arrested.
	The breaking news is that we have this one.
	Please have arrested a man in connection with the video which remained online for several hours.
	Why?
	Why did YouTube keep it up?
	Listen, YouTube takes swift action.
	They have AI that can flag this stuff.
	There's no way.
	Maybe.
	I mean, look, never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to incompetence.
	Hanlon's Razor.
	Or maybe they wanted people to see it.
	Right now, according to News Nation, Democrats propose a bill to prohibit militia activity.
	Legislation would place federal prohibition on private militia activity.
	Congressman says groups used political violence during Capitol riots.
	Criminal penalties would increase based on severity of activity.
	So you mean to tell me, at a time when Democrats are trying to ban private militias, some guy goes online and calls for militia activity and attacks on the federal government and other psychotic nonsense?
	It reeks of a false flag, doesn't it?
	I don't know that it does.
	No, I mean, I gotta be honest.
	The reality is, crazy people do crazy things.
	There are PSYOPs.
	That's a fact.
	We don't know what is.
	I do think it's funny that the corporate press will attack anyone who speculates as to something potentially being a false flag operation by government actors, private security, or a PSYOP, considering there's quite literally a PSYOPs division in the military, so we know for a fact they do it.
	So it's not absurd to ask the question, is something a PSYOP?
	However, I will always default to, yo, this guy who posted this video, he's probably just psychotic.
	That's really it.
	Anybody who watches a show like mine, or anybody else's, nobody's watching Stephen Crowder or Benny Johnson, Sticks, Hex, and Hammer, or Tim Pool, and getting the message that violence works.
	Because all of us have been like, no way dude, that's the trick.
	It really is.
	You take a look at January 6th.
	This is what they're invoking.
	It's kind of brutal.
	That so many people got roped into it.
	Now I know a lot of people are saying it wasn't an insurrection, it was unjust, and they're targeting people.
	Yep.
	I certainly don't believe it was an insurrection.
	That's silly.
	A bunch of angry dudes with Trump flags?
	Come on.
	There were, I believe there's like one guy who had a gun.
	You can see it, there's a photo of it.
	But for the most part, this is an unarmed group.
	Many of them, I mean I think all of them probably own guns somewhere, didn't bring any of them.
	And what you got was a riot on one side of the building and people bumbling about on the other side.
	In fact, one guy got a pat on the shoulder by the cops and the cop waved him in.
	He actually got acquitted for that.
	But of course, they are going to use every opportunity and every instance.
	I'll give you an example.
	The far left tears down a bunch of statues of white men and even black men.
	Abolitionists, because they want to erase history.
	What are the criminal charges?
	Nothing.
	None.
	Columbus, Ohio, they removed Columbus.
	That was one of the funny ones.
	They tried removing Columbus in Philadelphia and a bunch of local residents stopped them.
	The guy who knocked over the satanic statue is being charged with a hate crime.
	So you see exactly what this is about.
	Anybody who's telling you to walk into the trap of the leftists and the machine...
	You're being set up?
	They need a reason.
	They need a justification.
	That's why I say this dude who posted this video, it's- it- it- whether he's crazy or a disciple or whatever, doesn't matter.
	We need to- we need to reject anybody calling for violence.
unidentified		Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms 4 America with some very exciting news.
		Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms 4 America has the exclusive VIP meet-and-greet experience for you.
		Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
		These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
		Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
		Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
		See you on the tour!
		Let me explain what happens.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So here we go.
		Let me read a little bit about this preventing paramilitary action and then we'll talk about the narrative they're trying to build.
		They say three years ago, white supremacists affiliated with paramilitary organizations stormed the U.S.
		Capitol shattering windows, walls, and the families of five U.S.
		Capitol officers.
		Ed Markey said in a news release, Private paramilitary actors such as the Proud Boys and Oath
		Keepers pose a serious threat to democracy and the rule of law.
		We must create new prohibitions on their unauthorized activities
		that interfere with the exercise of people's constitutional rights.
		The forces of bigotry, hatred, and violent extremism must be stopped for the sake of our democracy.
		The First Amendment says otherwise.
		The Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys are allowed to operate.
		The Proud Boys are not an armed paramilitary faction.
		You see the game they're playing.
		They're trying to ban anyone on the right from forming any kind of organization.
		And if you do, they will plant a Fed or whatever you want to call it, an informant, and they'll destroy you.
		The way we win this is by passively, with smiles on our faces, speaking up about what we believe in when we want to.
		It's making money, having kids, protecting your family, and then voting!
		Convincing everybody to vote.
		Sit back and do not let them trick you into giving them what they need in order to justify their actions.
		For the regular people in this country, the reason why I say civil war is their win condition.
		Why is it that the federal government is getting away with arresting these J6ers in the way they are?
		Solitary confinement even for journalists.
		If you're a journalist, this is a true story, we had Steve Baker on the show a couple days ago.
		If you're a journalist and you went into the Capitol and you filmed it and then you said, the insurrectionists, you're fine.
		That actually happened.
		A guy filmed on his iPhone and he was just walking around and they said, yeah, he's fine.
		Why?
		Because his published story was along with the insurrectionists or whatever.
		It gave them the narrative they wanted.
		A guy who worked for a local news station who had a large local news camera who filmed it was criminally charged and given eight months in prison.
		His home was raided.
		You serve the machine and you're good.
		And everybody knows this.
		So they are looking for reasons To use government force against you.
		And so, they can't just come and arrest a random person.
		They can't come and shut down Tim Cass or whatever because we don't do anything.
		We just speak.
		If they were to take actions against people who have done nothing, without a pretext, they lose legitimacy in the eyes of the public and that can shatter confidence.
		They need a shield, a veil, so that the average person says, yeah, but those guys stormed the Capitol.
		Well, the people who broke in the front door did, and they should go to jail and they should be criminally charged.
		The problem?
		Under that guise, they arrest people who are walking around confused.
		And now, when I say something like, the people who walked in confused shouldn't be charged with trespassing because they were never given a warning, you get the young Turks saying, you mean the people who climbed through broken windows and fought with cops didn't know they weren't allowed in?
		Are you kidding?
		That's the manipulation.
		I think Cenk Uygur knows who butters his bread.
		That's why these people lie.
		They need you to slip up.
		Now, if Donald Trump wins in November, things turn around.
		Trump will have regained control of federal authority.
		They'll try to resist, but that once again restores the swing of legitimacy in the favor of Trump.
		At this point, not worrying about re-election, which I think was a big mistake, I believe Trump will likely make more moves to weed out the corruption.
		It will be far from perfect, and they may go nuts.
		I mean, in 2020, we had the Boston Globe story, where the Democrats had proposed Western states secede from the Union, unless given what they want by the federal government.
		I mean, it's crazy stuff.
		What we have to watch out for this year is the false flags.
		We have to watch out for this year is any crazy person, not a false flag, like this guy who posted this video, probably just an absolutely crazy person, You need to watch out for them.
		Say no.
		Right now we have this story from Military Times.
		Texas-bound convoy tries to recruit veterans for border protests.
		James Lindsay has been shrieking like a banshee.
		Go home.
		He said everyone headed to the border right now needs to go home quietly, peacefully, and immediately.
	And he says, I'm demoralized at how easy it was for them to do it again.
	Why?
	He's proposing that what we'll end up getting is another January 6th type event.
	I agree.
	Nobody should go anywhere near the Texas border, leave it to Texas law enforcement to handle through the proper channels, and do not interfere with the federal government's actions.
	And a lot of people are saying, but they're human smugglers!
	Yes.
	And the way it's handled is Greg Abbott has Texas National Guard there barring CBP from engaging in these actions.
	We need only wait.
	If you are on your way to Texas, stay away from the border.
	What's gonna happen is, worst case scenario, a group of American-loving patriots go down to the border, stand alongside Texas National Guard, because they're just standing around, I mean, you know, they're not interfering, and, uh, fight breaks out.
	Something bad happens, and the blame will be, will be, because the media's gonna lie, placed on militias.
	Or something like that.
	In fact, it may even be that an illegal immigrant, one of these criminal aliens, fights with one of these militia guys or veterans.
	Instead of the media showing the illegal alien attacking the veteran, they wait until the veteran defends himself, then they show the video.
	Imagine that.
	A veteran defending the border, shooting one of these criminal aliens.
	What's the media going to say?
	Refugee murdered by far-right extremist.
	Stay away because there's no upside.
	There is no benefit to being there.
	Greg Abbott's on it.
	By all means, if you're in Texas, lend your support.
	You know, whatever you might.
	But the worst case scenario is...
	Even if 10 right-wing, you know, Patriot veterans or whatever show up unarmed with smiles on their faces, it only takes one PSYOP-fed false flag to get the press exactly what they need to create the justification that the states are an insurrection or rebellion and that they're wrong.
	What happens when you get a viral video and mass confidence, this confidence is always the key, when regular people believe that it is the militias acting violently, you will shift the narrative from the criminal aliens are causing the problem and Biden's facilitating it, to giving the media the ability to say far-right extremists are attacking refugees and asylum seekers.
	And then, they're gonna run that propaganda far and wide.
	I'm not saying the propaganda works all the time.
	I'm not saying it always does.
	But, it grants them a legitimacy to make their moves.
	And, look at George Floyd.
	Now that we actually have all the information on George Floyd, we know that the whole thing's a farce.
	George Floyd shouldn't have died.
	I agree with that.
	I mean, nobody should.
	I'm opposed to death penalty.
	But we know that he was screaming, put me on the ground, put me on the ground.
	He resisted officers.
	He was chewing on a speedball.
	Wow, the narrative sure changed, didn't it?
	But even conservatives were saying, wow, this looks bad.
	Even I was saying like, man, putting his knee on the guy's neck for nine minutes, what are you thinking?
	We all were.
	Ahmaud Arbery is a really great example.
	The Ahmaud Arbery case is lied about incessantly.
	And these guys, the McMichaels and the other guy's name is, his last name was Brian, you know, and Brian.
	They're going to spend the rest of their lives in prison.
	Because a man who was suspected of felony burglary fought with one of them over a shotgun and was killed in the scuffle.
	The police were looking for the guy.
	They thought he was the guy.
	The McMichaels made a big mistake.
	The police told them not to pursue and they shouldn't have.
	But this is a guy who doesn't live in their neighborhood.
	They've had numerous burglaries.
	The police said we believe this is the suspect and someone said, hey look, there he is.
	In fact, he's on camera committing burglary.
	You can watch the video, it's online.
	I'm surprised.
	I was surprised when I saw conservatives saying, see, this proves that we believe in justice.
	That the McMichaels and Brian went to prison.
	Brian, the guy who filmed it, never did anything.
	He saw the McMichaels rushing out and chasing the guy, so he slowly started driving and filming what was going on.
	And then his lawyer released that information saying, look, this is what happened.
	So they put him in prison.
	And can anybody ever say why?
	There's no real reason.
	None.
	Yeah, you had conservatives cheering for it.
	That's my point.
	Conservatives don't play the game the left does.
	They want to be morally right.
	So if some right-wing group does something extreme, the right will fall in line in two seconds.
	Because, I mean, fair point!
	If a guy went down there and murdered somebody, no one's gonna be like, that was good.
	But will be propaganda.
	Are they going to give us Alien Floyd?
	Where you get a video of some militia guy kneeling on the back of a criminal alien because the alien robbed somebody or committed some crime.
	And the guy dies.
	And then you'll get mass riots again.
	And then you will get pushes from all the Democrats saying, we need laws to protect refugees and asylees from violent extremists.
	They'll charge a bunch of people with hate crimes and then create criminal alien protected status.
	In places like Texas and across the country, where you have people upset that there are criminal aliens in their airports and their schools, they will say, the Asylee Protection Act.
	Anyone who is seeking asylum in this country will be protected by us.
	Mark my words.
	The poor children of war-torn countries, we are supposed to be good Christians!
	And then, anybody in Chicago who has a problem is not committing a hate crime.
	That's the game they'll play.
	And Republicans won't resist Democrats when they do it.
	As we enter 2024 and things are getting absolutely crazy in every possible way, let's go over where we're currently at.
	A guy posted a video on YouTube claiming that he beheaded his own father and mother, I believe.
	YouTube left it up for six hours.
	Holy crap.
	Ben Shapiro is the number one rapper in the world right now.
	Holy crap.
	Taylor Swift is accused of being part of a CIA or government PSYOP to help the Democrats win.
	Lord have mercy.
	It is so crazy already.
josh hammer ▲ ● ▼		Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
		Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
		There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating Damn.
		and affecting the 2024 presidential election.
		We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
		Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
		It's America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Damn.
		The reason why I do this segment, guys, it's gonna get crazier.
		There will be false flags.
		I'm sorry, it's a reality.
		It will be.
		And you don't know who will pull it off.
		I mean, Antifa might dress up like Trump supporters.
		Trump supporters might dress up like Antifa, likely the other way around, but... And then Feds engage in psychological operations, and they have criminal informants all the time.
		Feds entrap people like we saw in the Whitmer case.
		You think, with the stakes at play this year, you ain't gonna see anything crazy?
		Man, I don't have all the answers for you.
		I can only tell you this.
		We are walking through a political minefield this year, and the most important thing you can do is be smart about how you navigate it.
		Anybody calling for violence, just, I just say fed.
		You know, and not in the literal sense that they're working for the federal government, but they're effectively someone trying to trick you and entrap you because they need to use that.
		It's how they justify their monopoly on violence.
		It's how they justify suspending your rights.
		And people fall in line.
		So what do we do?
		Voter registration.
		Yeah.
		Get as many people as you can to vote.
		Get poll watchers, get lawyers, and get ready.
		November's gonna be wild.
		I'll leave it there.
		Next segment's coming up at 1 p.m.
		on this channel.
		Thanks for hanging out and I'll see you all then.
		The Taylor Swift psyop making its rounds and becoming substantially more prominent.
		A post by Benny Johnson getting 3 million views.
		A video by Paul Joseph Watson titled, It's Real!
		Getting 330,000 views.
		And it pains me to say that I believe, if there is a PSYOP, the right is playing perfectly into it with their claims.
		Many of which are contextually wrong.
		Some of which are factually incorrect.
		And when you look at the data being spread by leftist organizations and the media, the right is playing perfectly into believing the fake news narrative.
		That is to say, my friends, Taylor Swift is a liberal.
		She is absolutely opposed to Donald Trump.
		She will be supporting the Democrats.
		What's happening now is there is a PSYOP theory, a conspiracy theory as it were, That Taylor Swift and the Super Bowl is this orchestrated plan so that when Travis Kelce wins the Super Bowl, Taylor Swift will then come out and say, and vote for Joe Biden.
		I'm sorry.
		I must tell you all, the narrative by the right, by friends of mine, Benny Johnson, Jack Posobiec, and I know Paul Joseph Watson.
		I wouldn't, I don't consider him a friend because I don't really know him that well, but he's a good dude.
		They're playing perfectly into a net negative for Donald Trump.
		Whatever it is they're doing, regardless of whether they sign up or not, will be beneficial to Joe Biden.
		And I'm going to break down the narrative, what they're saying about Taylor Swift, and why it is a misstep.
		But to clarify as we get started, the idea generally is that Taylor Swift is going to make a big pitch about abortion and use that to rally youth voters against Donald Trump.
		That being said, I certainly don't think her relationship with Travis Kelce is real.
		I believe it's a PR stunt.
		Publicists do this all the time.
		That's not shocking or news.
		There are TV shows that mock the trope.
		Publicists will bring together two celebrities and say, we want to do this celebrity mashup relationship.
		They do these things where they say stuff like, hey, we're going to have you be seen by paparazzi out at a club.
		So they start building speculation.
		This will get you in the press.
		It'll generate buzz.
		Q rating increase.
		But let's go through the facts.
		Let's start with what Variety has to say about the right-wing media frenzy.
		Then I will show you the comments made by right-wing personalities.
		And I want to tell you this as we get started, my friends.
		I don't know that this subject is the most important subject.
		I don't know that this will generate the most hits.
	And I have a lot of people telling me I'm wrong.
	In fact, I spoke with Benny Johnson on the phone and we argued.
	I believe he is wrong.
	I believe he has posted incorrect information and out of context information.
	And I believe the best pitch for whatever it is going on with Taylor Swift is not to make an enemy of someone so widely liked by the younger generation.
	But we gotta break down all the details first.
	Variety says, Only in 2024 could a chart-topping country singer's relationship with a star football player be viewed by major news outlets as a mission to control Americans.
	Really?
	In the U.S., Taylor Swift is nothing if not a monoculture, regularly breaking records with her Juggernaut Errors Tour, the theatrical version of the show, and her records, all of which were ubiquitous in 2023.
	Yet her fame permeated a whole new segment of pop culture when she began dating Kansas City Chiefs' Travis Kelsey, right before the start of the NFL season, I might add.
	Yet a bizarre branch of media coverage began in the weeks leading up to the Chiefs besting the Baltimore Ravens, earning a spot playing against the 49ers in the Super Bowl.
	Some posited that Swift's movement in the football world was proof of a political conspiracy theory connected to the government.
	Why are some media out speculating that Swift has become a government psyop?
	Fox News' Jesse Watters talking had played a clip from a 2019 conference organized by the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defense Center of Excellence, Per Politico.
	During the presentation, Swift is named as a powerful influencer and Watters connected several disparate dots from there.
	Around four years ago, the Pentagon's Psychological Operations Unit floated, turning Taylor Swift into an asset.
	He said, Days later, the Pentagon denied the accusation with a swift quoting statement.
	into an asset for combating misinformation online.
	Days later, the Pentagon denied the accusation with a swift quoting statement,
	as for the conspiracy theory, we are going to shake it off.
	Despite the rebuttal, water speculation kicked off a flood of posts about Swift
	potentially being a psyop.
	In fact, Jesse Waters did not start this theory.
	It's been around for a long time.
	I have made numerous defenses of Taylor Swift over the past year because there is misinformation about her.
	Now, she is a liberal.
	She does not like Donald Trump.
	She pushes woke talking points.
	I think that's all bad.
	However, making an enemy of her with false information is, if there is a PSYOP, that's the PSYOP.
	Let me put it this way.
	I don't want to bury the lead and I'll break everything down.
	If there is a PSYOP involving Taylor Swift, you believe there is?
	I'll tell you what it is.
	First, ask yourself this.
	What is the advantage of coming out and saying Taylor Swift is a PSYOP?
	In any way, what's the advantage?
	The argument I've heard is that calling out the PSYOP before they do it will weaken its power.
	That, in my mind, makes literally no sense.
	As if Trump supporters or Trump-leaning independents would be swayed by Taylor Swift.
	I don't believe that's true.
	It does, however, hyper-polarize MAGA against Swifties.
	What advantage do you have ruining any opportunity to convince young women to vote for Trump?
	If the argument is Trump can't win them anyway, then there's quite literally no point in saying Taylor Swift is a PSYOP.
	Because you are never going to convince these people in the first place.
	The argument, I suppose, is you may lose some Trump voters because Taylor Swift said so.
	Okay, I don't believe that's possible.
	I mean, is the argument that there are like moderate young people who might vote for Trump, but if Taylor Swift says so, they won't?
	I have data to prove that's false.
	Taylor Swift has no political poll, and you are being tricked by the leftist Democrat press.
	Let me show you some of this first.
	Why is the baseless speculation swirling that the Super Bowl will be rigged for the Chiefs to win?
	I wish!
	If I believed that, I'd go and put a big bet on the Chiefs.
	And maybe they will win, I don't know.
	I just don't trust any of it.
	Conspiracy theorist and one-time candidate Vivek Ramaswamy sure thinks so.
	In a now viral response to a tweet saying Swift came out as super liberal in 2020, he wrote, Is Joe Biden courting Swift's endorsement?
unidentified		He is.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		The New York Times actually says so.
		What does that mean?
		Here's what I think.
		there's a major presidential endorsement coming from an artificially culturally propped up
		couple this fall.
		Just some wild speculation.
		Is Joe Biden courting Swift's endorsement?
		He is.
		The New York Times actually says so.
		What does that mean?
		Here's what I think.
		I think this I'll put it this way.
		Here's what I really think.
		Taylor Swift is a Hollywood celebrity.
		Musician.
		Famous.
		Got a lot of support from Democrat-leaning groups.
		Is gonna endorse them.
		Same as, like, many other celebrities.
		She's bigger than they are.
		Okay.
		I don't know that it matters.
		This stuff happens all the time.
		You're not going to convince her to endorse Trump.
		Why is this news?
		Why is the New York Times writing this headline?
		Here's what I think.
		I think what's actually happening is that the left wants to play up this narrative because they know they are winning favor with Swifties and tricking Trump supporters into making enemies of Swifties.
		Let me pull up some tweets and we'll break this down.
		Let me first grab, I want to grab Benny Johnson's tweet here.
		Benny Johnson has this long tweet.
		He says, by now, everyone knows Taylor Swift is a government psy-op, and this is exactly why corporate media is having a meltdown about it.
		Full stop.
		Government psy-op.
		Benny.
		It's a very bold claim to make, that it's not Super PAC-related, private interest or otherwise, but to assert Taylor Swift IS a government psy-op.
		Four years ago, the Pentagon Psychological Operations Unit pitched NATO about turning Taylor Swift into a social influence asset.
unidentified		True.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I don't know if you've seen the video.
		There's a video where they talk about the potential use of Taylor Swift as a pop celebrity in psychological operations.
		In 2019, George Soros bought her entire music catalog.
		Full stop.
		This line has been used by many Trump supporters to make the false assertion that she is working for George Soros.
		Oh boy, let me break it down.
		Yo, Taylor Swift obliterated the Soros family investment in epic fashion.
		Okay, and the opportunity here is for conservative dads to connect with their young daughters over the shared hatred that Taylor Swift and they have of the Soros family.
		Did George Soros buy the entire catalog?
		Yes, in fact, he did.
		Let me pull up this story.
		This is an update.
		November 16th, 2020.
		Scooter Braun sells Taylor Swift's Big Machine Masters for a big payday.
		So, I should clarify what I was saying when I said that it was from 300 million to zero.
		In fact, it may have been a larger number, or they may have cashed out and run off.
		In 2020, the investors, this is Ithaca Holdings, which received funding from the Soros family, as well as the Carlyle Group, sold the master recordings.
		They say the buyer and investment fund is as yet unknown, but the deal is believed to be worth north of $300 million.
		So a correction on my part.
		It wasn't from 300 to 0, it was whatever they bought it from went to 300, they ditched the investment.
		Why did they bail on this investment?
		Taylor Swift slammed the Soros family.
		Actually, I don't know if I have this one pulled up, I might.
		No, I don't have one pulled up.
		She was critical.
		Of George Soros, of the Soros family for having funded this, October 27, 2023 update, an article from 2021, why is Taylor Swift re-releasing her old albums?
		Simple version.
		Scooter Braun, with help from the Carlisle Group and the Soros Family, bought her master recordings, but they did not own the right to artist composition.
		There's a difference.
		Taylor Swift was upset they outbid her to buy her life's work.
		She publicly slammed them several times.
		She then was advised, my understanding was by Kelly Clarkson, to re-record everything.
		And then, deprecate anything held by the Soros family investors, destroying their investment.
		It would appear that they sold out, cashing out as much as they could, to an investment firm.
		Taylor Swift has nuked those previous recordings by re-releasing everything.
		Now, she owns it all outright.
		Do I believe the Travis Kelce thing with Taylor Swift is not real?
		Yeah, I don't believe they're actually in a relationship.
		I mean, they might be, I just don't believe it.
		I think it's great PR for the NFL.
		It's getting young people.
		The big news is that, you know, 24% bump in Gen Z viewership of the Super Bowl.
		And what I think they want to do is they want to get young women to watch.
		They're telling their boyfriends, hey, we want to watch the Super Bowl.
		And the boys, the guys are like, OK.
		And they're trying to get new viewers in the Super Bowl.
		That's probably the big PR pitch.
		Taylor Swift is going to promote, you know, Joe Biden or whatever.
		So here's the story.
		Basically, to reclaim the lost asset and spike what was stolen from her, she's re-recorded everything.
		There have been slight changes or whatever, but this is basically her taking back her life's work.
		Let's go back to Benny's tweet here.
		In 2020, she came out as a raging liberal Joe Biden supporter after previously being politically neutral.
		Incorrect.
		In 2018, she had already made comments about Marsha Blackburn and being opposed to Republicans.
		2023, her heiress tour ranked higher in revenue than the GDP of 50 countries.
		That's probably true.
		Here's another incorrect post in Benny Johnson's tweet.
		In 2023, she helped register over 35,000 new voters with a single Instagram post.
		Absolutely incorrect.
		And I want to highlight this from Joy Reid.
		The Post Manual posted, Joy Reid explains how Taylor Swift has been a Democrat operative since 2018.
		Then she gets triggered by Jack Posobiec saying that she's a Democrat operative.
		In this story from September 21st, 2023, Joy Reid highlights a headline which is false.
	Taylor Swift snags 35,000 new registered voters.
	In fact, while the headlines are true, many outlets reported this, it's fake news.
	I can prove it.
	The actual reality is, at best, Taylor Swift registered 8,107.
	However, it could be substantially less than that, we don't know.
	Axios reported this.
	Taylor Swift snags 35,000 new registered voters.
	And you may be saying, but Tim!
	The headline says it right there!
	Oh yeah?
	Did you read the article?
	Let's read.
	By the numbers, Axios says 35,252 people newly registered to vote on Tuesday, a 23% jump from last year's National Voter Registration Day, and the largest since the 2020 general election year, according to Vote.org.
	There was a 115% increase in 18-year-olds registering compared to last year.
	an 18-year-old's registering compared to last year.
	157,041 eligible voters visited the site.
	Have you caught that?
	you You see, this is the trick.
	The game they're playing.
	Vote.org registered 35,252 people, which is 8,107 more voters than the previous year.
	The most we could attribute to Taylor Swift is that number.
	Now, to be fair, we don't actually know.
	Based on what they're saying, Taylor Swift made a post to 272 million people, told them to go to vote.org and register on National Voter Election Day, Voter Registration Day, and they saw a 23% increase.
	Now it's possible that, you know, let's say 27,000 people registered to vote in 2020.
	This is 2023, so 2022. Let's say of those people that registered to vote for whatever reason,
	next year only 10,000 actually wanted to register to vote.
	And because of Taylor Swift, she bumped that number way up by 25,000.
	That could be true, too.
	So it's possible she did register more.
	But she did not register 35,000, and I think it's fair to say a 23% jump Likely due to Taylor Swift.
	That being said, the number's probably less than that.
	Why was there a jump to 23% from year over year in 2023?
	Election season began to increase.
	In fact, you've got more people talking about Donald Trump, the elections, the primary, in 2023 than the previous year.
	So likely, a lot of people, perhaps, National Voter Registration Day being September, the midterm saw people register.
	The number went down and Taylor maybe got 10 or 12 thousand.
	But you mean to tell me, out of 272 million people, that's all she got?
	What's happening?
	The media is attributing every single person who registered to Taylor Swift.
	That makes no sense.
	Look at what else they said.
	157,000 eligible voters visited the site.
	That has nothing to do with Taylor Swift!
	I mean, maybe 8,000 of those people did.
	Maybe more, and then they didn't register.
	There was a 115% increase in 18-year-olds registering compared to last year.
	Oh boy.
	Let's break this one down.
	Where's that?
	Here we go.
	No lie with Brian Tyler Cohen.
	This dude is a lefty.
	He's a liberal guy.
	Here's what he posted.
	Taylor Swift's post urging her followers to register to vote led to record-breaking voter registration numbers.
	False.
	I don't even know where that assertion comes from.
	It seems to be made up.
	At least 157,041 eligible voters visited the registration site in one day,
	including a 115% increase in 18-year-old registrations.
	Conservatives and liberals have fallen for this, and I just...
	It melts my brain.
	157,000 is the total number of people who went to their website.
	There is no correlation between that number and Taylor Swift making that number go up.
	It is just the traffic of the website.
	Perhaps we can attribute a 23% increase based on how many people chose to vote instead, but let me just break it down for you.
	Even if every single person who went to that website came from Taylor Swift, think about what that means of her poll.
	That means of 280 million people she has now, at the time 272 million, only 157,000 decided to even go to the website she asked for.
	Okay, big number.
	And out of that Only 35,000 actually registered to vote.
	Her poll is microscopic.
	But let's correct the record.
	She is not responsible for 187,000 people visiting the website.
	That is their actual number that they probably got similar numbers last year.
	It's not relative to any other day or Taylor Swift.
	So in no way can we attribute any of that number to Taylor Swift.
	The best we can do is say, If there was a 23% bump in voter registration that day, at most, that's what it's fair to attribute to Taylor Swift.
	Which would mean, looking at what?
	She convinced 30,000 people to visit a website where you register in seconds for free, and at best, 8,107 did.
	Why the manipulative headlines?
	It gets better.
	The article linked was Billboard.
	Taylor Swift voter registration posts result in record-breaking registration numbers.
	So perhaps that's where he got the word from.
	I'm sorry, the statement.
	The organization reported 35,000 new registrations after her message on social media, as if to imply she did it.
	But they've already stated people register already without Taylor Swift's endorsement.
	Here's where it gets really fun.
	Vote.org says 187,000 voters showed up on the site after Taylor Swift's message on Tuesday, but that's the entire number of all their traffic, marking the largest national voter registration day since 2020.
	The organization also experienced a 72% increase in 18-year-old registrations compared to 2019, and a 115% increase in that age range compared to 2022.
	115% increase in that age range compared to 2022 Okay
	First thing I noticed right away Was
	those percentages imply that Less young people voted last year than the year before
	Going down.
	So the percentage increase being bigger means the base rate is lower.
	Time and time again, young people are showing up and demonstrating they care about their rights, blah blah blah.
	During the day on Tuesday, we saw a 1,226 jump in participation, the hour after Taylor Swift posted.
	Our site was averaging 13,000 users every 30 minutes, a number that Taylor Swift should be proud of.
	Okay.
	1,226 jump in participation, the hour.
	They... It is one big manipulation, guys!
	She does not have the poll!
	These people on the right are claiming she has!
	Why then the narrative that she is working with Joe Biden and the claim there's a PSYOP?
	It's pointless.
	But I can tell you the worst case scenario.
	Those who watch my videos already know where I'm going with this.
	But let me address this.
	A 1,000... Oh, they make it so easy!
	Come on!
	A 1,226 jump in participation in the hour after Taylor Swift posted.
	Our site averaged 13,000 users every 30 minutes.
	That means, we can base on their numbers, 26,000 people visiting the site in the hour after she posted.
	That's it?
	And they called that a 1,226% jump.
unidentified		K?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		So that means maybe 22,000 actual people visited the site based on her post of 272 million.
		maybe 22,000 actual people visited the site based on her post of 272 million. And yet Joy Reed,
		even Benny Johnson share the same narrative.
		She registered 35,000 people.
		I don't know, man.
		Maybe it's because I'm Asian.
		I can see the numbers and be like, this math is off.
		I'll take credit for that one.
		I'm allowed to be proud that I'm good at math.
		But the math is not absolute.
		We don't know exactly for sure how this breaks down, but I can say with the numbers they've published, her pull is not very strong.
		Let's go back to what Benny Johnson had to say.
		He says, now she's dating a Pfizer and Bud Light agent in the NFL, the most watched live sport in America.
		Sure.
		Even the New York Times wrote a story on how Biden is courting her for an endorsement and how he wants her to appear on stage with her.
		Yes.
		You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to put it all together.
		You just have to be paying attention.
		My question then becomes, my friends, what is the point?
		What is the purpose of all of these claims?
		What's the point?
		A big story pushed by many on the right is this.
		Taylor Swift could sway 2024 election outcome, new poll finds, with a fifth of voters likely to back a candidate endorsed by Singer.
		Clickbait false news headline.
		You know, I gotta be honest.
		If there was a PSYOP, the PSYOP is the PSYOP.
		I don't believe there's a sign up.
		I believe there's a PR pitch by publicists who are like the biggest thing ever.
		Super Bowl plus Taylor Swift will be one of the biggest PR campaigns ever done.
		And she is a liberal, so she will endorse Joe Biden.
		Let me show you this first.
		According to the story from the Daily Mail, the reason why it's fake news, they say Taylor Swift could heavily influence the way that Americans vote in the presidential election with a fifth of voters saying they're likely to back a candidate she endorses.
		That's a lie.
		Okay, I guess.
		It's a nebulous statement.
		What does it mean to influence the election?
		According to a poll conducted by Redfield and Wilton Strategies, 18% of voters say they're
		more likely or significantly more likely to vote for a candidate she endorses.
		However, if you scroll down past the buffer and the photo of Taylor Swift, it says, however,
		17% said they would be less likely to vote for a candidate backed by Swift, which could
		bode badly for Democrat Joe Biden.
		In other words, the poll only found a 1% poll factor.
		So how and why are so many people going nuts over this?
		You know, Paul Joseph Watson made this Media Still Claims campaign, Biden campaign, Taylor Swift plot as a conspiracy theory.
		He made this video called, It's Real.
		I want to address this too.
		MSNBC is a thing he posted in his video.
		News viewership of MSNBC in the month is 10 million.
		And Taylor Swift's streaming reach is 100 million.
		Tim Katz's streaming reach is like 60 to 70 million.
		That's just us!
		Human events, and Post Millennial, Paul Joseph Watson, all of these people combined, substantially larger, but guess what?
		They're all pushing the same narrative.
		Why is that?
		I don't know.
		I don't get it.
		If there is a PSYOP, because it is true that there was this Pentagon, there was this NATO meeting where they were like potential assets like Taylor Swift.
		I don't think they said she was.
		I said she's a great example of how they could recruit her.
		And what does that mean?
		It means they go to her and say, hey, we will pay you, you know, a million dollars to make this post opposing misinformation or something or correcting the record on vaccines or things like that.
		I don't know that they did.
		If there's a sigh, I want you to imagine this.
		First, let's address the steps at play.
	Axios false headline, 35,000 new voters.
	I've already debunked that.
	Joy Reid says it, Benny Johnson says it.
	They both have the same narrative.
	Why believe these numbers without fact-checking it?
	Why are so many news outlets saying 35K over and over and over again?
	I went through the numbers with you guys.
	At the very least, we can say the numbers are substantially lower than they claim to be, though we don't have absolute numbers.
	Let's say that Taylor Swift, without the Super Bowl, posts, I hereby endorse Joe Biden.
	What will that do for Democrats?
	According to the data I showed from this Daily Mail article, it will result in a 1% poll factor, meaning she will actually hyperpolarize the voter base.
	She may encourage 18% of people to vote for Biden, but 70% would vote against Biden.
	It does not have a net benefit greater than 1%.
	Why would the Pentagon or any government, Benny Johnson says a government psyop, need to have her go to the Super Bowl?
	She's already a superstar with 280 million followers.
	What does the Super Bowl accomplish for them?
	What does Travis Kelce accomplish for them?
	Nothing!
	If she goes to the Super Bowl with Travis Kelce, and he proposes to her, a lot of press coverage, and then she turns to the camera and says, I do, and I also do intend to vote Joe Biden.
	Wink.
	Sure, that would be a huge moment.
	It would generate more press, and perhaps that's the play.
	I really doubt it.
	Doesn't make any real sense.
	If you take a look at the data, she could barely get people to register to vote.
	Fact, even if we think it was 35k, out of 272 million, she could only get 35k?
	Microscopic.
	Yo, I sell more bags of coffee than that.
	We sell about that many singles of our song.
	She couldn't even convince people to do something for free.
	But let me tell you what I think really is the real psych, if there is one.
	The real PSYOP is weaponizing Taylor Swift by creating an enemy.
	I was talking to Benny Johnson about this, and I was saying, look, I think you're helping Joe Biden.
	But he's a good dude.
	You know, we got no beef.
	I just disagree with him on this one.
	He did post things that I believe are factually incorrect, but we can talk about it later.
	I respect his work.
	That being said, I used to work for these nonprofits.
	And we would do... You go out on the street, or you go door-to-door, or you make phone calls, but we would do the street stuff.
	And you need to convince someone to join your ideological cause.
	Be it Greenpeace, Environment America, the ACLU.
	What else did they have?
	HRC, for instance.
	Gay Rights.
	Y'all know the HRC.
	And these are part of a big network called the Public Interest Research Group.
	Pergs, they call them.
	As well as, you know, Greenpeace, for instance, wasn't there, their own thing, and Children International, Save the Children, ACLU, they were through different companies, and I worked for many of them.
	I even worked for a homeless shelter.
	Okay.
unidentified		101.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		When we're training people to sign up new members, the most important thing in legitimate sales and membership training is rapport.
		You have to be the person you are trying to sell.
		I explained this quite a bit.
		That is to say, if you approach a man in a suit, and you got dreadlocks, and a baggy shirt, and you're like, my dude, and you try to fist bump him, strong possibility, not absolute, that he's going to be like, buddy, I don't got time for this.
		I don't know what this is all about.
		You approach the guy quickly, shake his, walk up, reach out for his hand.
		Don't say a word.
		The first thing you do is you reach out to grab his hand.
		He will shake your hand.
		You grab his hand and say, Sir, one minute.
		You and I, we're gonna fix the problems of environmental catastrophe.
		You're a good guy.
		I know you're a good guy.
		That means while you're busy fighting the good fight, protecting your family, and helping make the world a better place, I'm doing the same thing.
		I want you to spend 10 bucks a month.
		You join me in that fight.
		I don't want you to think one wink about it.
		Don't waste your time worrying about the fight we're engaged in, but understand.
		With the problems the world is facing, we need each other.
		You give me that 10 bucks a month, I will work on your behalf to clean up the environment, make the world a better place.
unidentified		Bang!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		That's how you do it.
		I walk up to a hippy-dippy guy, and I go, My bro, fist bump!
		What are you doing out here, man?
		And they're slow, they're chill.
		You gotta be slow and roll with it.
		He's like, bro, I'm chillin'.
		And I'll be like, chillin's great, man.
		But you know how bad things are getting, right?
		And he'll laugh, and he'll be like, I know what you're doing.
		Yeah, but look, dude.
		You hang out at the beach, I hang out at the beach.
		We wanna have bonfires, you wanna have bonfires.
		But you know those people are throwing trash.
		They're polluting.
		I walk down the beach, dude, it pisses me off, man.
		I just wanna chill with my friends.
		And then somebody throws a can or whatever on the beach, we're gonna clean that stuff up.
		You're gonna help out.
		You go hang out with your friends, light one up on me, but give me 10 bucks a month, and we will make sure we're cleaning up so that you guys have that beach to go to.
		That's how you do it.
		Why approach them as an enemy?
		You'd see a guy in a suit and think, I can never sign that guy up, it's a foregone conclusion.
		Yes.
		So what do you do?
		Ignore.
		What do you think would happen if these non-profits sent out campaigners, and they see a guy in a suit, and the first thing they do is, you're working for the government man, you're a bi- Why would you do that?
		Why would you create net negatives for your cause?
		It doesn't make any sense.
		The argument I suppose here, that's been made to me is, Taylor Swift needs to be called out, and the PSYOP needs to be exposed.
		Why, I ask.
		Well, because there are some people that will be convinced to vote for Joe Biden because of Taylor Swift.
		My question then, do you think those people could be convinced to vote for Donald Trump?
		If the answer is yes, then you need to approach them as friends.
		If the answer is no, you're wasting your time screaming about Taylor Swift being a psyop, because you were never going to get them in the first place.
		If the answer is yes, we need to assess what is our plan.
		How do we convince those malleable voters to vote for Donald Trump?
		It's easy.
		It's called rapport.
		The first thing you have to do is walk up to a Taylor Swift fan that you genuinely believe would vote for Donald Trump if given the right information.
		You need to then create conflict and urgency.
		It's so easy.
		If I saw a Swiftie walking down the street and I'm here to campaign for Donald Trump, woo!
		That's a big gap to leap, isn't it?
		I'll make it simple for you.
		I see her and I say, Oh my god.
		You're a Swiftie.
		And then she'll laugh and be like, yes.
		And I'll be like, yeah, I'm a big fan.
		Shake It Off, of course, is like her biggest song.
		But I really do think I knew you were trouble when you came in.
		Like, one of the best ones.
		I love the Poppy stuff.
		Okay, I'm not literally a big fan of Taylor Swift.
		I like her music.
		It's Poppy.
		It's fun.
		But you build rapport.
		You say, oh, I love Taylor Swift stuff.
		Shake It Off is so good.
		It's a great message, too.
		Fist bump.
		Swifties.
		Oh!
		Do you remember?
	What was that thing?
	Um... She had posted on Instagram about like all of her life's work was stolen.
	And then the Swifty is gonna say, yes, like Scooter Braun or whatever.
	Yeah, didn't Taylor say, like, the Carlisle Group and the Soros family had funded that?
	And then she's gonna go, yeah.
	And then Taylor had to, like, re-record everything.
	Dude, that's so dirty.
	Why would someone want to steal her life's work like that?
	That's wrong.
	Now you are not only friends, you are completely in alignment.
	How dare someone attack Taylor Swift?
	And then you say, You know, I've heard some crazy stuff about Soros and his family and the stuff they're funding, you know?
	But that's why I'm voting for Donald Trump, because he's basically fighting against these people.
	I mean, I would love it if Taylor Swift got all our music back.
	And apparently they sold it to some investment firm.
	I think these people are just so awful.
	And now you've created an opportunity for the person who you did not think would vote for Donald Trump to open the door and say, we agree, we are friends.
	And now she says, you know, I never knew any Trump supporters.
	I didn't know anything about the Soros stuff until Taylor brought it up.
	But you make a really good point.
	And then you can be like, yeah, look, the Soros, like they're doing all this stuff.
	I can't believe they would go after Taylor like that.
	I will repeat it.
	If you think the answer is these people, these Taylor Swift fans, would never vote for Donald Trump, why intentionally make any enemies of them?
	It's pointless.
	And if you think there's a possibility they could be convinced, then you need to convince them!
	But I'll tell you what I think.
	If there's a PSYOP, let me break it down for you.
	Travis Kelce is about to propose to Taylor Swift when a fat MAGA guy in a hat— I talked about this the other day, but I'm doing it again because there's a lot of people who just don't get it, and I hope you guys can share this.
	Taylor Swift has no poll.
	Politically.
	Her posts are meaningless.
	They don't do anything.
	She's not registering that many people to vote.
	She is not convincing people to vote for Joe Biden.
	Why?
	As I mentioned with non-profit work, you need urgency and you need conflict.
	There's no conflict!
	Taylor Swift has no conflict!
	She's opposed to George Soros.
	If anything, the conflict benefits Trump.
	Until...
	Benny Johnson, Paul Joseph Watson, Jack Posobiec, hammered down this narrative that she is the enemy.
	Begin making posts claiming that she's a government psyop.
	Benny did.
	That she is going to push for abortion.
	She's the abortion queen.
	I'm not saying that they said that publicly.
	I'm saying people are saying that.
	I don't want to put words in their mouths.
	You have given.
	You have given them their conflict.
	And now, they have everything they need to do exactly what I described.
	A Democrat leftist will show up with voter registration forms to an heiress tour event and they'll go, Swifties!
	And then they'll hug the girl or whatever.
	And then they'll be like, have you guys registered to vote?
	And they're going to be like, no, I don't know if I care.
	I'm like, you should because Donald Trump is attacking Taylor Swift.
	Oh, no.
	Yup.
	Look at this from Benny Johnson, Jack Posobiec and Paul Joseph Watson.
	Paul, of course, is British.
	You get my point.
	You have given them, excuse me, the conflict.
	So when Taylor Swift says, vote Joe Biden, and the poll shows it actually resulted only a 1% poll factor, it's negligible.
	It's meaningless.
	What do you think happens then when MAGA goes to war with Taylor Swift?
	Now Taylor Swift comes out and says, I am being mercilessly attacked by all of these Trump people and I don't know why.
	I don't work for the government.
	I am just a singer.
	Now the Swifties are rallied and offended.
	So when someone gives them the pitch, Do you want to help Taylor Swift?
	They say, yes, I'll do anything for Taylor.
	Well, Taylor's being attacked by Trump supporters right now.
	We need your help.
	Please vote Joe Biden.
	Now they have a reason.
	Don't give them one.
	But that's too late.
	I'm just some guy on the internet.
	Okay?
	I just wonder why it is several things.
	One, people have not fact-checked the math behind the claims made about Taylor Swift's poll.
	Two, people have not asked themselves for what purpose would there be a PSYOP?
	I mean, seriously?
	Taylor Swift already has nearly 300 million followers.
	She doesn't need to go to the Super Bowl to endorse Joe Biden.
	She could just do it.
	But the data shows it doesn't work.
	The data shows it's a 1% poll.
	They're loving it.
	The Democrats are ecstatic that they can run MSNBC, CNN, Rolling Stone and Daily Beast segments and clips and articles about how MAGA hates Taylor.
	Because what would have happened is the Super Bowl.
	It's the 11th, right?
	The Super Bowl.
	It's going to be fun.
	I look forward to it.
	Maybe it's rigged, whatever.
	I don't really care for football that much.
	What would have happened is 45-year-old conservative dad sits down with a beer.
	And yo!
	His young teenage daughters come in.
	Maybe they're 18, 19.
	And he's like, oh, what are you guys doing?
	And they're like, we want to watch Super Bowl with you.
	And he's like, you do?
	Really?
	Why?
	You don't like football?
	And they're like, no, Taylor Swift's going to be there.
	And he goes, Oh yeah, yeah, Taylor Swift.
	And it's like I mentioned, he then says, yeah, did you guys, uh, you follow her stuff.
	You should, you should post it on Instagram about the Soros stuff.
	And they're going to be like, yes.
	And then he's going to say Soros bad.
	And then they connect.
	At least a little bit.
	It opens the door for rapport, so that conservative dad can bond with his daughters, and he can say, hey, you need to understand what these Soros people are doing.
	You know, I watch these podcasts.
	George Soros is funding a whole bunch of really awful stuff, and he's even attacking Taylor Swift.
	I mean, this is why you guys should take a look at this stuff here, and then you can show an article to him.
	Opens the door.
	I'll tell you what happens now.
	Dad's watching football.
	The girls come in and he's like, you want to watch NFL?
	I'm like, yeah, Taylor Swift is going to be there.
	And then dad goes, oh, she's working for the government.
	You know, she's, it's a psyop because she's going to tell everybody to vote for Joe Biden.
	And his daughter's going to go, oh my God, dad, you're crazy.
	Taylor Swift does not work for the government.
	She's just a singer.
	And that creates animosity.
	It's not absolute.
	I don't think every circumstance will happen that way.
	There are a lot of conservative women who like Taylor Swift.
	There are a lot of liberal women who like Taylor Swift, no matter what, would never care about any of this stuff.
	I'm just saying, we're talking about the soft middle.
	If you genuinely believe that you could convince the soft middle to vote for Trump, do not make enemies.
	And if you genuinely believe they would never vote for Trump anyway, Then why bother even addressing it as a PSYOP?
	It's only a negative.
	They were never going to support you, so there you go.
	You can never convince them.
	I think it is laughably absurd, the idea that a Trump supporter would actually be like, you know, I was going to vote for Trump because the border is a big issue, but Taylor Swift, she brought up abortion.
	Some people maybe.
	Some people maybe.
	If Taylor Swift has the confidence, or if people have the confidence of Taylor Swift.
	You will not convince them by being their enemies.
	If they're genuinely as a person who's like, I like Donald Trump, but Taylor Swift is bae, then you, or boo, or whatever, I don't know what the word is, then you need to go to that person and say, we're friends.
	I'm not your enemy.
	I don't hate you.
	I like Taylor Swift too, but please don't vote for Joe Biden.
	If you think they can be swayed, making enemies of these people will cost you the election.
	Oh my God, I can't believe this Taylor Swift stuff has gotten as crazy as it has.
	It's just wild to me.
	But I hope that's informative for you, and I hope that works.
	I'll leave it there.
	Next segment is coming up at 4 p.m.
	on this channel.
	Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
	I can't say that I'm surprised.
	The Christian veteran who beheaded the satanic statue at Iowa Capitol has been charged with a hate crime.
	Now, I understand it, on the surface, why he was charged with a hate crime.
	I don't agree with the idea of hate crimes, but I understand it.
	The argument, of course, being that this is a religious symbol.
	He went in and he desecrated it for religious reasons and explicit religious reasons.
	Imagine if this was any other religion doing it to any other religion.
	The issue, however, is that there have been numerous instances where the far left have desecrated statues, destroyed them, and they do not get charged with hate crimes.
	In fact, they go through the procedure of having them formally removed, even when people vote against it, because the machine is set in one direction, and we all know.
	Now, I gotta be honest.
	I disagree with the destruction of the satanic statue.
	It's what they wanted.
	They want to be able to accuse the right of all these things.
	They want you to be the violent ones because they have the institutions right now.
	We have to win control of the institutions and we have to win confidence through culture and make it unthinkable that this man could be charged.
	Now perhaps that's the plan.
	Perhaps that's the direction we're going.
	I'm not a fan of vandalism.
	I'm not a fan of someone destroying someone else's property because they disagree with the message or the ideas behind it.
	Though I do disagree with the satanic attack on Christianity and wokeness and all of that stuff.
	I'm not a fan of people destroying other people's property.
	I think you're allowed to have a Satan statue.
	That being said, there is a clear double standard here.
	We'll go through the news and we'll talk about some other instances.
	Now there have been statues that have been destroyed by the far left, and they have gotten jail time, so we'll talk about that, but let's read the news.
	Michael Cassidy has been charged with a hate crime for beheading a statue of Satan at the Iowa Capitol.
	Cassidy drove up to Iowa after the satanic display was erected in the state capitol and took it down.
	He'll be arraigned on February 15th.
	Polk County prosecutors charged Cassidy with felony third-degree criminal mischief, saying that he acted in violation of individual rights under Iowa's hate crime statute, the Des Moines Register reports.
	You see, the issue here is, the reason why the Satanists want the statue there, is that Christian conservatives have been trying to get the Ten Commandments at courthouses and other places or outside of them.
	And the argument became, if one group can have their ideology represented, so can anyone else.
	So they bring their statues of Satan as a direct challenge to Christianity.
	Cassidy has been charged with misdemeanor fourth-degree criminal mischief the day after the beheading, but has been informed that he may be liable for further charges.
	Spokesman for the Polk County Attorney's Office, Lynn Hicks, said that evidence shows the defendant made statements to law enforcement and the public indicating he destroyed the property because of the victim's religion.
	This is what resulted in the hate crimes charge.
	Hate crimes are stupid.
	The idea that we would say, it's a criminal action to destroy a statue, but the reason behind it changes everything.
	You did the thing.
	Okay, that's it.
	We should just have a uniform code on this one.
	Hicks further elaborated on how much it would cost to replace the statue of Baphomet, constructed by the Satanic Temple, which would be between $750 and $1,500.
	$1,750 and $1,500.
	The extremely litigious Satanic Temple had filed their own damage estimate, saying that
	it would be $3,000 to replace the statue.
	Cassidy, a former military officer who ran for Congress, pushed over and decapitated
	the statue of Baphomet, which had been put up by members of the Satanic Temple of Iowa.
	The city of London is a great place to live.
	The Satanic Temple had been given permission for the display.
	Cassidy discarded the head of Bethlehem in the trash.
	My conscience is held captive by the word of God, not to bureaucratic decree, and so I acted.
	Cassidy said at the time.
	He has raised $84,000 for his legal defense on his Give, Send, Go, and Turning Point USA pledged $10,000 to help.
	Cassidy spoke at Turning Point USA's AmericaFest in Phoenix in December 2023, saying that the statue was an abomination.
	He said that people need to wake up to what is happening in the world.
	They may think it's a joke, that they triggered us, but the devil is real, and we have to be ready.
	This one's tough, isn't it?
	While I think property rights are important, I have questions about whether or not we should be putting up religious displays in courthouses as it is.
	The fascinating thing, however, Is the shift this country has gone through where it would have been unthinkable 20 years ago to put up a satanic display.
	My friends!
	I was listening to this song by Panic at the Disco.
	What's it called?
	I Write Sins, Not Tragedies or whatever?
	I chime in with the haven't you people ever heard of closing the goddamn door?
unidentified		No.
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		You know that song?
		On YouTube, they censored the word God.
		This is like, how long ago was that?
		15, 20 years ago?
		20 years ago probably, 2004.
		You could not say goddamned in a YouTube video!
		Now, I apologize to my Christian friends for, you know, they don't like it when you say the Lord's name in vain and all that stuff.
		I'm not a Christian.
		However, I am conflicted.
		The world is not free of ideology and morality.
		The United States is founded on Judeo-Christian moral values, mostly a Christian moral framework.
		With those things, we grew prosperous.
		I don't believe in the Bible or anything like that, but I do believe in God.
		And I do respect the good things that have come to our, uh, to humanity because of these moral values of Christianity.
		I'm not ignorant to this.
		And so the challenge I'm faced with is this.
		There is no simple world where we can all hold hands and everyone can be a multicultural utopian, where Jews, Muslims, Christians, and everybody's holding hands and singing songs.
		I don't believe in that.
		I believe that even though most people may lose fervor with the Reformation, Christians have never been the most brutal of the Abrahamic religions.
		That's true.
		I think Islam has been substantially more brutal if you look at the Jihad and you look at even today.
		I just don't see a world where even with Reformation, Satanists and Christians are going to hold hands and sing songs.
		They may stop fighting at some point.
		But herein lies the challenge.
		There are certain things that are morally beneficial, factually, logically, and socially beneficial from Christianity and Judaism that you don't see with wokeness in the far left.
		The ideas represented by the Satanists, they try to play it like it's libertarian, but they've gone full woke.
		And now they entertain authoritarian crackdown.
		And that exemplifies the idea of evil so much.
		Offering you freedom, free will, choice, pleasures!
		And in the moment you say yes, they beat you to a pulp and become full-scale authoritarians.
		Whereas the inverse has happened with Christianity.
		The idea was, you were given free will, do what you must with it.
		And so, some people choose to be evil.
		And that's what I was taught when I was growing up Catholic.
		God gives you free will.
		You must decide whether or not to be a good person.
		Whereas, it seems, Satanists tell you they will let you be free and responsible for yourself, but then immediately adopt authoritarianism.
		And therein lies the challenge.
		We will not create a country that is free of ideological influence.
		And if that is the case, what must you choose?
		Satanism?
		Christianity?
		Or any Hellenistic religion?
		Odinism?
		Odin, the one true God of... King of the Gods?
		I don't know.
		My point is simply this.
		We watch evil people do evil things every day and they get away with it.
		This guy does what is no different than what the far left has done, tearing down statues of, say, Frederick Douglass.
		For ideological reasons, he damaged a statue.
		To be fair, this was a temporary display that doesn't cost all that much money.
		The far left has torn down substantially more important statues and stripped them from our cities and without due process, without voting on it.
		They just unilaterally do it.
		Why should this guy first?
		Let's just start here.
		The guy shouldn't get a hate crime charge.
		I think he should get a ticket.
		I think they should be like, you destroyed someone's property, you gotta pay for it.
		Like, that's fair.
		If they want to argue it's $3,000, I think it's a civil issue.
		And that's it.
		Dude, you destroyed someone's stuff.
		You gotta pay for it.
		The idea that we're at this point where this guy's gonna get a hate crime charge for it.
	Man, dark days indeed.
	If I had to choose, and I'm oh so waiting for the lefties to go nuts over this, between Satanism and Christianity, it's no question it's Christianity.
	If there was going to be a state religion, I would pray it would not be Satanism.
	These people are manipulative, they're deceivers, they're evil.
	Christians have proven themselves to be, I'm sorry, weak.
	I'll take it.
	You take a look at what a Christian nation has gotten us.
	Free speech.
	The right to peaceably assemble.
	Innocent until proven guilty.
	All these really great things that protect us from evil.
	From despotism.
	And at the same time, it has tolerated the rise of evil.
	Which is unfortunate.
	So I look at it this way.
	You may get, in the end, evil.
	But if you start with Christianity, there's going to be bad things, and you'll have this period where you work through bad things and things become very good, and then it gives rise to leniency, which results in the rise of evil.
	As opposed to supporting evil, where you instantly consolidate all of the bad things, and life sucks.
	I view it like capitalism versus communism.
	Capitalist systems tend to monopolize.
	Free market capitalism, I believe, absolutely does see power coalesce in the hands of a few.
	And you hope that competition, real competition, can combat that, but eventually some corporations get too powerful.
	Now, of course, people say, yeah, but government gets in the way, and they're the reason.
	Nah, that's BS.
	The East India Trading Company wasn't beholden and locked down by government.
	They grew massive and powerful, big as you can.
	An organization's an organization.
	Now, I would still choose capitalism over communism any day, even knowing capitalism does result in power centers forming.
	Why?
	Communism is like saying, I'm going to snap my fingers and condense authority into one point where they will oppress everyone.
	Capitalism is, let's let the system do its thing.
	It may tend towards monopolistic control and oppressive systems.
	We can always break those systems after 100 or 200 years.
	I take a look at Satanism versus Christianity and I'm like, Satanism will lie to you, trick you into destroying yourself, sacrificing morals, Sacrificing logic and the future generations for short-term pleasure, and then, before you know it, you are a slave to the machine.
	That's what it is, right?
	The devil offers you the deal.
	I'll give you whatever you want.
	What do you want right now?
	And you're like, pleasures!
	And they're like, you got it!
	And then you've sold your soul and you're a slave.
	That's literally what this is.
	The woke left, Satanist temple, espouse these beautiful things about being responsible for yourself, being your own god, having free will, And then when you say yes, all of a sudden, now they're like, oh by the way, here's the vax mandate, here's the lockdowns, do as you're told, shut up or else.
	That's not a world I want to live in.
	Again, to go back, hate crime over this?
	That's wild.
	I hope this guy beats this.
	That's a stupid charge.
	He should get, it should, like honestly, he should be charged.
	Civil disobedience warrants, in my opinion, a criminal charge.
	And that would mean 20 hours of community service and restitution.
	I think that's the charge being appropriate for the crime.
	But of course, in today's day and age with the bias system, you ain't getting it.
	I'll leave it there.
	Next segment's coming up at 6 p.m.
	on this channel.
	Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
	You know, maybe the best thing for Ron DeSantis was getting the F away from the presidential race.
	You see, we all talked about how much we liked the guy before he decided to run, and I'm not talking about when he announced he was running, when he decided to run.
	The point at which we all knew he had made moves to run for president is when things started going salty.
	And then his supporters just, man, they went nuts on the internet.
	Really soured things for him.
	But now you take a look at what's going on in Florida, and you're like, Ron DeSantis is based!
	Very based.
	Check out this story from NBC News.
	Florida bars transgender people from changing the sex on their driver's licenses.
	State Rep.
	Anna Eskamani, a Democrat, said the move is another example of state agency being weaponized to attack trans people.
	First, I ask.
	For what is the purpose of putting your biological sex on your driver's license?
	It helps identify you.
	Why?
	Well, I'll give you the easiest attack vector in the argument.
	Medical issues.
	A person is collapsed on the ground and they're... And the doctor says this person is suffering from a male-specific issue.
	Prostate cancer!
	Okay, I'm kidding.
	Medications affect people differently.
	Men and women are affected by medications in very different ways.
	Talked about this a couple years ago in a SCNR video where we interviewed Dr. Deborah So.
	There was actually a bill passed, a law was passed in the 90s.
	When they used to do tests on painkillers, they would only do clinical trials on dudes.
	And then, when women were in pain and given the painkillers, they'd go, it still hurts!
	And they'd be like, these women, they can't handle anything.
	We know the painkiller works.
	And turns out, the painkiller wasn't working.
	Because women and men experience pain differently.
	And then all of a sudden they were like, hey, I got an idea.
	If women are saying this painkiller's not doing anything and it still hurts, why don't we try a different one?
	And then they try a different one, and women are like, I don't feel pain anymore, and they're like, interesting.
	Drugs affect men and women differently.
	There's also a bunch of other issues related to if someone is suffering from something, and, like, who made this example?
	They were like, a person goes, oh, my abdomen!
	And they fall down, and they're like, help, please!
	If the doctor doesn't know the sex of the person, then they're going to be guessing at what may be causing the issue.
	Perhaps it's a kidney stone.
	Anybody can get one of those.
	Perhaps it's a uterus issue or a prostate issue.
	Well, you know, men don't have uteruses and women don't have prostates.
	So that could help them break things down.
	The doctor can say, it's not going to be any of these issues.
	He wouldn't even think of it.
	He'd be like, we're clearly dealing with a male or a female.
	Now, what if there is somebody who looks female or looks male, but is actually not?
	Well, that's why they'll check your identification to figure out who you are, to figure out as much as they can about you, to properly medically treat you.
	But more importantly, it's about identification.
	If someone showed up with an ID that was wrong, you'd be like, this is not you.
	We're trying to figure out who you are.
	In some contexts, I think IDs are authoritarian.
	But in many contexts, I think they're appropriate.
	NBC News says, Florida will no longer allow trans people to change their sex on their state driver's license to reflect their identity.
	A policy change that muddles whether trans people who have already updated their documents could face fraud charges for misrepresenting their identities.
	You know, that's an issue.
	I don't think they should be criminally charged for it.
	But I do believe that they should be, they have to go and correct it.
	Imagine there is a women's only privacy issue.
	Let's say there's a sporting event or something like that, which Florida says, you know, no men and women's sports.
	And someone who looks female says, here's my ID.
	They go, you're male.
	And they're going to say, yes.
	Okay.
	You can't enter the contest, the competition.
	You can't go in the locker room.
	You can't do these things.
	We created these spaces to protect females, typically, mostly from males.
	And so that's why we need to identify you.
	Robert Kynok, Deputy Executive Director of the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, wrote in a memo to the department's executive director on Friday that the department would rescind a provision on gender requirements in the Driver's License Operations Manual that allowed Floridians to change their gender marker on their licenses.
	The department doesn't have the statutory authority to enforce provisions that allow someone to update their gender marker on their license, according to Kynop.
	Florida licenses can now only be placed when they are lost or stolen, be replaced, or when a licensee changes their names, edges, or restrictions.
	Kynop added the term gender in the provision on gender requirements does not refer to a person's internal sense of his or her gender role identification, but has historically and commonly been understood as a synonym for sex.
	Which is determined by innate and immutable biological and genetic characteristics.
	A driver's license is an identification document.
	As such, serves a critical role in assisting public and private entities in correctly establishing the identity of a person presenting the license.
	Permitting an individual to alter his or her license to reflect an internal sense of gender role or identity, which is neither immutable nor objectively verifiable, undermines the purpose of identification record and can frustrate the state's abilities to enforce its laws.
	Why can I not identify as 200 pounds of pure muscle?
	I want my ID to say, Tim Pool is 6'3", ripped, 27 years old.
unidentified		I mean, what?
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		I love this about the argument.
		For what reason does my ID have my age?
		If I can just identify as I wish, my ID should say Vociferon, Herald of the Winter Mists.
		Yes, that's right.
		A 3,726-year-old ice spirit manifest on Earth.
		If I feel that way, who's to stop you?
		The absurdity knows no bounds, my friends.
		The purpose of an ID is to say, here's when you were born, here's where you live, here's your weight, your eye color, your height.
		You get pulled over, they can say, I believe I am.
		Correctly look at the individual who is driving this car.
		That's the other issue, too.
		It's like driving a car.
		Most people's IDs... It's a driver's license!
		A driver license.
		Oh, it depends on where you're from.
		You say driver's license or driver license.
		Whatever.
		Yo, if a cop pulls you over, we want to make sure that you have that.
		Driving is not a privilege.
		I mean, I'm sorry, driving is not a right.
		It is a privilege.
		It is a privilege.
		And so, uh, you have to pass the driving test if you'd like to.
		You give me an idea, it's got the wrong weight, eye color, height, sex, I'm gonna be like, this ain't you.
		But it looks like me, and it ain't you.
		That's the point of an ID.
		The provision that governs how the department establishes gender for newly issued license won't change according to a memo from Molly Best.
		Blah, blah, blah.
		Eskamami described the change as another gross example of how every state agency has been weaponized.
		Dude, because you don't get special treatment does not mean it has been weaponized against you.
		Instead of addressing the property insurance crisis, this is what our state is doing shameful.
		It's unclear how the advisory will conflict with current Florida law and federal law.
		For example, the state allows trans people to change their sex on their birth certificate if they submit an application to amend it.
		Fill out an affidavit attesting to the amended birth certificate and receive a letter from their physician stating they have received appropriate medical care for their gender transition.
		I... I oppose all of it.
		Look, man.
		I got no beef if you're trans.
		You live your life.
		You do your thing.
		Keep the kids away from it.
		But I think it is imperative to point out.
		We have these identifications not because of how you feel, but because of how we operate society, which is bigger than you.
		They say, under the new policy trans Floridians who already have driver's licenses would be unable to receive a replacement license with their gender identity rather than their birth sex even if they change sex on their birth certificates.
		It's also unclear whether someone will be able to receive a replacement Florida license with an updated gender marker if they've already updated their U.S.
		passport.
		My question to the left, there's like seven people, so why are you so concerned about this?
		There's basically no trans people, so why is it such a big deal for you to change the entirety of the system?
		That's the argument they make.
		Why do you care so much?
		There's only a few hundred.
		Why do you care so much to completely overwrite our laws for what you describe as a small group of people?
		Does not make sense.
		In which case, we shouldn't.
		Misrepresenting one's gender, understood as sex according to Kynox's memo, constitutes fraud.
		Which could carry criminal and civil penalties, including the cancellation, suspension, or revocation of a driver's license.
		Ah, they said driver's license!
		They used both.
		The policy doesn't specify whether a trans Floridian who already changed the sex on their driver's license would be committing fraud by continuing to use the license.
		In Florida, tens of thousands of people have legally updated their gender marker on their dr- I'll tell you, I'll tell you.
		It will.
		You will get charged with fraud.
		You will be charged with fraud.
		Why?
		They're not going- Well, it's- Okay, here's how it could work.
	Driver's licenses, IDs, show when it was issued.
	And so, if you get pulled over, or stopped, and he says, let me see your ID, and you show it to him, and he goes, okay, you're not male.
	You're female.
	That's apparently clear.
	This says male.
	That's fraudulent.
	However, this was issued in the period where it was allowed, hence, no criminal charges.
	However, there's a possibility that they're going to say, don't know, don't care, I don't care when you did it, I don't care why you did it, it's illegal to do this now.
	You needed to go and get it updated.
	That's the question.
	Personally, I don't know.
	I think a lot of people would call for it to be made immediately illegal.
	Maybe a grace period of one week.
	Go to the DMV, fix your ID right now.
	Otherwise, you are using a fraudulent ID with bad information.
	There's a reason why they say it's fraud.
	If you go to the DMV with a fake address or a fake name, you're committing fraud.
	Falsifying a government record, they'll get you on fraud.
	They go to mention a stupid BS and don't say gay, which is a fake thing that never really happened.
	And I just want to say, yo, Ron's getting crazy with it!
	Calls for Ilhan Omar's deportation, denaturalization, and expulsion from Congress.
unidentified		Like, wow!
tim pool ▲ ● ▼		Jeez, Ron.
		A little too much for me.
		I mean, I get it.
		Ilhan Omar came out, basically said pledge allegiance to Somalia.
		So Ron DeSantis has to strip her of her citizenship.
		That's Florida for you.
		Look, man, Ron, you're doing better not running for president.
		I'll leave it there.
		Next segment's coming up tonight at 8 p.m.
		over at youtube.com slash TimCastIRL.

▲