Vivek Ramaswamy WON DEBATE, Says J6 Inside Job, SLAMS Democrat Great Replacement, ROASTS Nikki Haley
WATCH INFRINGED NOW At - https://timcast.com/members-area/infringed/
BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/
Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/
Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL
Vivek Ramaswamy WON DEBATE, Says J6 Inside Job, SLAMS Democrat Great Replacement, ROASTS Nikki Haley
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Make sure to go to TimCast.com, click join us, and become a member to support this podcast and all the work we do, and you'll get access to exclusive uncensored segments from TimCast IRL and way more.
Now, let's jump into the first story.
With another GOP debate behind us, once again it's become clear, Vivek Ramaswamy is the standout candidate here.
While Nikki Haley had some good moments, I think it was mostly not that great for her, but a lot of people do like what she says, despite the fact that she doesn't open her mouth when she speaks, and I believe that's disqualifying, Rhonda Sanders probably had the best debate performance so far, I really do think he did a good job.
He had some great answers.
There are still some personality issues, but Vivek Ramaswamy, no question, took the stage.
And now, they're coming after him.
I think one of the most important moments of the night was when Ramaswamy made several assertions that January 6 appears to be an inside job, that Saudis were involved in 9-11, and, most importantly, That the Democrats have embraced what is commonly known as the Great Replacement Theory.
Now, this one's interesting, and it's causing a bit of controversy.
What is the Great Replacement?
Well, it originates in Europe.
The general idea being that elites in Europe are trying to replace the European culture
and ethnic majority with non-citizens and new ethnic majorities over a long period of
time to eventually erase and homogenize Europe.
Simply put, Europe is and has been for a long time very, very divided.
And it's kind of obvious.
All these different countries.
You take a look at the EU, and there is this desire to have it function much like the United States.
The only problem for Europeans?
Well, if I go from New York to Maine, everybody be speaking the same language, sharing in mostly the same culture.
But if you go from France to Germany, they're speaking a totally different language, and they're not that far away from each other.
This language barrier, Actually does result in division and cultural differences.
So the argument with Great Replacement is that these elites want to bring in as many migrants as possible from North Africa, from the Middle East, so that it dilutes and creates a universal band across Europe.
A band of people that have more in common, or I should say, creates a lower common denominator.
They don't have a lot in common, but being not from these countries, it would.
That's the general idea behind the theory.
Some people take it a step further.
Many people who want white nationalist policies.
However, in the United States, it typically and more flatly refers to Democrats are trying to bring as many illegal immigrants into the country as possible to help them shore up their voter base.
It's not that these illegal immigrants actually vote.
It's two things.
The first, when a non-citizen moves into a Democrat area, that area receives more congressional power.
When they do the census and this state says, we've added a million new people, they're going to say, well, we got to give you a new congressional district.
The only thing is, these people may not actually be citizens.
So it helps bolster their congressional seat apportionment.
And it actually gives them an electoral vote count and a seat in Congress.
So I believe California in the 2010s had, it was estimated, one extra electoral vote and congressional seat based on non-citizens.
Now, the whole thing's rather complicated.
But of course, even the free beacon is misrepresenting Vivek Ramaswamy and his positions.
You're not going to get a fair assessment and I think Megyn Kelly did a great job calling out Chris Christie and bringing up the issue of transgender children and parental rights.
But she had, I think, one of the... You know, look, I think Megyn Kelly's great, but come on, Megyn.
This accusing Donald Trump of wanting a Muslim ban is a gross misrepresentation of what Donald Trump was saying.
Megyn Kelly says that Donald Trump has vowed to bring back his Muslim ban.
That's not what Donald Trump said.
Trump said if you sympathize with Hamas or extremists, that is disqualifying.
Now, of course, Hamas and extremist Muslim ideologies does overlap with Muslim, but Donald Trump is not talking about banning some dude for being Muslim.
Donald Trump is talking about banning a guy because he sympathizes with terrorists who are murdering people and who murdered people on October 7th in Israel.
There's a huge difference.
And I think if we're going to have a fair conversation about what this country wants to do, you have to be honest about these things.
But there were many, many great nights.
Vivek Ramaswamy obviously takes the cake, but I believe great replacement is now center stage.
Yo, people lit up over this.
And of course, you are now getting tons of leftists and woke journalists being like, Vivek Ramaswamy is pushing an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.
Look, if the Democrats do a bad thing, then their allies in media create a version of it which is going to be anti-Semitic and conspiratorial.
There is a couple different views on what Great Replacement is.
I'm not a big fan of the phrase Great Replacement.
The way I see it, Democrats know that they need to build a voter base because of several reasons.
One, they don't have kids, they abort their kids, and they lose ideologically to Christian conservatives, so they do want more immigration.
There are dozens, if not hundreds, of videos showing Democrats outright saying, we need more migration into our areas if we're going to win these elections.
I've got a Newsweek article pulled up to break this down for you.
Well, I should do this more often, but before we get started, hey guys, support the work we do.
We are sponsored by Cast Brew Coffee.
It's our coffee company.
We're building culture.
The purpose of the coffee company is so that we can have a physical location.
We are building coffee shops.
We want to have a thousand across the United States.
I don't know how long it'll take us to get there, but when you buy coffee from castbrew.com, and I got to tell you, Appalachian Nights, My favorite coffee.
Best coffee I've ever had.
I'm not exaggerating.
Rise with Berto Jr.
Stand your grounds.
When you buy from Casper.com, you're supporting this show.
So there's our plug to help run the company that we're running and produce more content.
So again, Casper.com, but let's read the news from the free beacon.
Vivek Ramaswamy, during the Republican presidential debate on Wednesday, accused the U.S.
government of hiding the full truth about the September 11th, 2001 terror attacks and of orchestrating the January 6th attack on the Capitol.
Now, this is what I love.
I am surprised the free beacon of all outlets is grossly misrepresenting Vivek Ramaswamy.
I despise all of these people.
They are liars.
They are manipulators.
I'm not gonna sugarcoat anything for you guys.
I will call out anybody who deserves to be called out.
On Tim Castile, we have no problem saying Donald Trump authorized a commando raid, which reportedly resulted in the death of an 8-year-old American girl.
Now, I think we need an investigation.
I don't think any president should get away with whatever that is.
Barack Obama killed a 16-year-old American citizen.
He should be in prison for this.
This, we actually have confirmed.
The Trump story?
Allegations.
Allegations, I think, warrant a deeper look.
But I got no problem calling out anybody.
And I like Trump, and I'm gonna vote for Trump.
I mean, we'll see what happens over the next year.
But I am sick of the people in media who want to manipulate you because they want something.
I just... I can't stand it.
Vivek Ramaswamy... Oh, he accused the government of hiding the full truth about September 11th?
They're trying to make it seem like he's a truther.
Vivek Ramaswamy correctly stating that the Saudis were involved.
And we now know this due to declassified documents.
And they're trying to make it seem like he's claiming the government was involved or something.
Disgusting.
And of orchestrating the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.
I'm going to say this for all of you, my friends.
January 6, it doesn't look like it.
Vivek, say it outright.
January 6 was an inside job.
This is not in dispute.
This is known fact.
And I'd love all of the Media Matters people and all the far leftists, whatever, to clip that and remove the following context that comes from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who said police were helping people get in the building.
How about the individuals who were acquitted because the judge agreed?
Cops opened the doors and fanned them into the building.
How about the videos where there's police opening the barricades and waving people in?
January 6 was an inside job.
How about the video where the Capitol Police are giving a guided tour to the QAnon shaman, Jacob Chansley, walking him around, showing him the doors and bringing him to the Senate chambers.
So you want to talk about inside job?
They're going to try and make the argument inside job means that, like, the Biden administration was was themselves involved in orchestrating this.
No, no, no.
Inside job.
The police at the Capitol opened the doors and allowed people in.
One cop even put on a MAGA hat.
And he claimed it was because he was trying to blend in.
Yeah, okay.
Inside job doesn't mean the whole thing was orchestrated or that every single person in government was in on it.
An inside job means you had criminal elements within the government who aided and abetted the riots on January 6th.
Now, I'll slow down there a minute and just say it rather simply.
The whole thing was not a riot.
Some people did not realize what was going on, but inside job, no question.
AOC complained.
What, like a year ago?
How long ago was this?
A year and a half ago?
That there are police on camera taking selfies with these people walking in the Capitol.
Helping them!
We now have more footage.
Police actually taking the cuffs off of people who have been detained.
Now, how is this possible?
unidentified
Hey it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet and greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit Moms4America.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
That's more of what Vivek Ramaswamy is referring to.
And there is some evidence to suggest that there was incitement by Feds, but to the degree that it sparked the rioting.
You know, we have questions about Ray Epps and things like that.
I think it's possible.
That I'm not going to wade too much into.
I can tell you this definitively.
If Capitol Police are on camera opening the door, allowing people in, removing their handcuffs, and taking selfies with them, fanning people into the building, there is no question, it is a fact, January 6th was an inside job.
But don't let them misconstrue it because this is what they do.
In much the same way they're trying to misconstrue the Great Replacement Theory, they are trying to misconstrue what actually happened with January 6th.
Again, I'm not saying Joe Biden allowed it to happen.
I'm not saying Nancy Pelosi allowed it to happen.
Maybe, I don't know.
I'm saying, It's a fact that cops opened the door and let people in, fanned them in, and took their cuffs off and gave them tours.
That's the police aiding and abetting people on January 6th.
How is it not an inside job?
Here we go.
The 38-year-old pharma exec also embraced the controversial Great Replacement Theory, which has been endorsed by white supremacists.
So what?
It's been endorsed by Democrats, too.
Free vegan garbage.
Including the teenage gunman who shot up a supermarket in a largely black neighborhood last night.
You see what they're doing here to attack Vivek Ramaswamy?
Why am I the only person on stage?
Well, let me play the video for you.
Let's just, let's just, let's just roll.
unidentified
Enemy is not Donald Trump.
It's not even Joe Biden.
It is the deep state that at least Donald Trump attempted to take on.
And if you want somebody who's going to speak truth to power, then vote for somebody who's going to speak the truth to you.
Why am I the only person on the stage, at least, who can say that January 6th now does look like it was an inside job?
That the government lied to us for 20 years about Saudi Arabia's involvement in 9-11.
That the Great Replacement Theory is not some grand right-wing conspiracy theory, but a basic statement of the Democratic Party's platform.
That the 2020 election was indeed stolen by big tech.
That the 2016 election, the one that Trump won for sure, was also one that was stolen from him by the national security establishment.
I love how they're, uh, did you notice that?
Maybe she was just clearing her throat and then the, that'll do, sir.
There's a reason why I'm the only person on the stage who can say these things.
That's what it's going to take.
Not people who are licking his boots one time and now Monday morning quarterbacking and
I can already hear the young Turks being like, you mean when those people were fighting with police?
I know that people were fighting with police.
Because inside job does not mean every single cop the entire complex across was in on letting people in.
But you mean to tell me that you have how many cops on video giving guided tours and you're like, that's not an inside job?
So let me put it this way.
There's a bank with a thousand employees.
Two guys who work for the company allow bank robbers to come in and steal money.
Is that an inside job?
Yes!
That's quite literally what inside job means.
It means criminal elements within that bank aided the criminals who robbed it.
Or were the ones who robbed it.
Inside job doesn't mean every single employee all ran into the safe and stole money.
So Vivek is correct!
And he could take it one step further and he should have taken it as far as I just did.
Next time he goes on stage, the vape needs to say, there are videos of Capitol Police officers aiding and abetting the people who entered the Capitol on January 6th.
There's dozens, if not several dozen.
That's an inside job.
But whatever.
Let's talk about Great Replacement Theory.
Newsweek published this op-ed.
Analysis, Democrats are massive hypocrites on so-called Great Replacement Theory from May 23rd, 2022 by Pedro L. Gonzalez.
He goes on to mention the shooting in Buffalo and, uh, Democrat- and mentioning Michael Null saying Democrats are using immigration policy to change the demographics of the United States in a way that would seem to help them politically.
And this is a stated political position of the Democrats.
It's- it's not a theory.
It's- it's not fringe.
It's what Democrats are saying on TV.
But they're lying to you.
I do respect Newsweek.
Newsweek has their bad articles, but they run it fairly middle-of-the-road.
They've given me an op-ed to counter the lies from that... Jamie... what's his name?
Raskin.
There you go.
I was gonna call him something else, but here we go.
Pedro writes, The suspect left behind a 180-page document outlining a
schizophrenic worldview.
He goes on to mention Democrats using immigration policy.
Biden and company latched onto that part of the murderer's incoherent screed
to pin the shooting on their political opponents.
In essence, Democrats argue that Republicans' rhetoric and positions on immigration radicalized the shooter.
There's a small problem.
Democrats and progressive activists, based on their own rhetoric over the years, subscribe to replacement theory more than anyone else.
As Vice President, Biden himself said that a constant and unrelenting stream of immigration would reduce Americans of white European stock to an absolute minority, and that this was a source of our strength.
Democrats weren't always so sanguine about demographic change, though.
Recall the late Senator Ted Kennedy.
Assured Concerned Americans in 1965 that the 1965 Hart-Celler immigration law would not upset the ethnic mix of our society.
Would not.
He goes on to say, obviously, Democrats have changed their tune, abandoning their historic political bloc of the white working class, often Catholic, voters, and the so-called Coalition of the Ascendant, in which immigrants are key.
For the so-called, sorry.
It's not a conspiracy theory.
It happens to be the same demographic argument Ray Tixera made in Emerging Democratic Majority, as conservative commentator Ben Shapiro noted.
Tixera published, in 2004, the Emerging Democratic Majority.
In his words, Democrats should exploit economic and demographic changes, including the growth of minority communities and cultural shifts among college graduates, and simply put, the growth of those communities has been due to policies that have facilitated mass migration.
It is worth also noting that Tixera has said Democratic activists bowlerized his thesis as part of their efforts to coalition build on identity politics.
2013 Political concluded that amnesty for millions of illegal aliens would produce an electoral bonanza for Democrats and cripple Republican prospects in many states.
They now win easily.
The following year, James G. Gimple, a professor of government at University of Maryland College, published a study that found the flow of illegal immigrants into the country, 29.5 million, from 1980 to 2012, has remade and continues to remake the nation's electorate in favor of the Democratic Party.
It's not just this.
It's the Democratic politicians who have gone on TV and outright said, we need more migration.
Looking back on Trump's election, New York Times opinion columnist Charles Blow reduced Trump's victory to white extinction anxiety.
He cheered that the 2020 census showed the browning of America, the shrinking of the white population, and the explosion of the non-white.
Jennifer Rubin, an opinion columnist for the Washington Post, echoed Blow, tweeting that the census results heralded a more diverse, more inclusive society.
This is fabulous news!
Now we need to prevent minority white rule.
If anyone is radicalizing people in this country, it's those who have ostentatiously declared themselves to be on the right side of history.
Now, Pedro goes on quite a bit more, but he's correct.
There are numerous videos you can watch where Democrats embrace the idea of bringing in non-white migrants to displace the white majority population to win elections and reshape the country.
I'm not saying every single Democrat embraces that.
I'm saying Newsweek has the article quoting these people.
So when Vivek Ramaswamy brings it up, of course, they're going to claim that he's anti-Semitic, and I love that's what they're doing.
Now here we go, ladies and gentlemen.
Let's get into a little bit more of this debate analysis.
And I actually want to first, we're going to do a compliment sandwich here for Megyn Kelly, because she actually did a really, really great job.
I thought she asked several, there were several instances of really great questions and pressure on people I don't like.
But on everybody, on everybody.
There was one moment where Chris Christie, she called him out on the transgender children issue because Christie lied and it was masterfully done.
And, uh, however, OK, we're doing compliment sandwich here.
This exchange is is wrong, in my opinion, and I will criticize Megyn Kelly for this gross misrepresentation of Trump's position.
Now, Ambassador Haley, former President Trump recently promised if he's reelected to bring back and expand his program restricting immigration from Muslim countries.
Here he is in Iowa on October 16th.
unidentified
No longer will we allow dangerous lunatics, haters, bigots, and maniacs to get residency in our country.
We're not going to let them stay here.
If you empathize with radical Islamic terrorists and extremists, you're disqualified.
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating They're trying to make it seem like Trump is outright saying no Muslims ever.
election. We do all that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcast. It's America on Trial
I respect Nicali's answer, but I'm going to say this.
Disqualified.
I'm- I'm- I'm- I'm sorry.
Nikki Haley doesn't open her mouth when she talks.
Okay?
I just can't get past it.
Don't know, don't care.
Nikki Haley, she's been doing this the whole time, and I don't know why, but she talks with her lips going wide and her teeth staying tight, and I don't understand what- She's talking like that where she makes sure to bare her teeth without opening her mouth like she's growling at you and talking like this.
We need to have a ba- Yo, what?
unidentified
I'm sorry, for those that are watching this, ideological screening.
I think it's a mischaracterization, and the fair approach should have been, Donald Trump has vowed to, like, I get it, technically it's the truth, I'm not a fan though.
She's right about the issue of a quote-unquote Muslim ban.
Trump is talking about specifically extremists.
But there are a few things that I do want to go through, of course, of course.
Here we go.
Trump vows to expand Muslim ban and bar Gaza refugees if he wins presidency.
And even The Guardian points out he's talking about quote, immigrants at ideological screening for immigrants barring those who sympathize with Hamas and Muslim extremists.
Trump's restriction also included Venezuela and North Korea.
So, to say it's from Muslim countries doesn't get to the core of what Donald Trump was actually saying.
She should have said, Donald Trump vows to bring back his plan to bar immigration of extremists and radical ideologies, particularly Islamic extremism.
And everyone would go, oh, okay, well, why aren't we doing that?
Shouldn't we be doing that?
Yeah.
And now I'm just... I can't get over the Nikki Haley thing where she doesn't open her mouth when she speaks.
But whatever.
Here are some great moments as we wrap up this segment.
Vivek Ramaswamy taking the stage.
You may have seen this.
Vivek Ramaswamy held up a notepad that said Nikki equals corrupt.
You know why he did it?
I'll tell you why he did it.
Because he wanted to make a meme.
He did, and of course he would.
Because this man knows the internet!
And he knew, as everyone knows, when you hold up a pa- a pad of paper on the internet, you will be memed.
And so, what I- I- I'm just waiting for Dickbutt to pop up on it, but that's a- that's an old meme, but it checks out.
And now everyone's posting memes of Vivek Ramaswamy with the notepad.
So this image I posted last night, 9.29 p.m.
After Vivek holds it up, I immediately took a screenshot on my phone and then I blurred out.
I said, have fun!
Go for it.
Yeah.
Hey look, there's a lot to break down.
I think Vivek Ramaswamy did an absolutely phenomenal job.
We have this amazing photo where before Vivek held this thing up, you can see that he's got the notepad that says Nikki Equals Corrupt on the lectern.
But one of my favorite moments was the absolute smackdown of Nikki Haley when Vivek said, name three provinces in Ukraine that you want to defend.
And Nikki Haley's face went blank.
Wow.
It took her like 20 minutes.
Chris Christie jumped in and said, you guys, you, you, you hate women!
You hate women!
And then Vivek was like, go eat food.
I'm kidding, but like kind of that actually happened on the debate stage.
Vivek went off.
He said, name three provinces.
They're called Oblasts, but I know that the average person doesn't know what Oblast means, so province makes sense.
And, um, you know, for me, I'm like, I don't know if I could, because I'm like, I'm like 80% sure I know the Oblasts in Ukraine.
Luhansk and Donetsk are obvious, because that's the contested region, which was part of the Donbass region, and the land bridge going into Crimea.
But, I'm like, I know of like Kharkiv and Kiev, but is that the name of the actual Oblast?
It is!
Zaporizhia, etc.
And so, uh, eventually, Nikki Haley did mention, I believe she said, Luhansk, Donetsk, and Crimea.
And, interestingly, wrong.
WRONG!
Crimea has already, for about 10 years, been part of Russia.
Russia took it over.
And so that's not something trying to be defended.
So, uh, I guess on a technicality, you could say they want it back.
But the regions where you'd probably be talking about defending are like Donetsk, Luhansk, Kharkiv, and Kiev.
That's where the invasion took place.
But fine, I'm being a bit pedantic.
She eventually did answer, but he left her speechless.
She couldn't respond.
You know why?
For the same reason I didn't immediately respond.
When this question came up, I thought to myself, what are the Oblasts?
Like, which ones are we referring to?
I don't want to say the wrong one.
And I'm like, I'm pretty sure it's Kharkiv, Luhansk, and Donetsk.
But I'm not sure Kharkiv is the name of the oblast, I think it might be just the city's name, I don't know how they name these things.
Imagine being on a debate stage and you're unsure.
I'm on my show last night being like, let me fact check this real quick, because I don't want to say something wrong, I don't want to misinform people.
And then I was correct, I was correct.
That was the name of the oblast.
I was like, oh, okay, cool.
Nikki Haley was in the same boat, so I can empathize.
She was like, I'm on a debate stage, she can't immediately fact check, and she's thinking, if I say the wrong name, I have my Aleppo moment.
Vivek nailed it.
She did not care enough about this country to even justify why we're at war there.
And that's what matters.
Someone, we had a great super chat where they pointed out, Nikki's not stupid.
Nikki Haley is not stupid.
She just doesn't care.
She wants war, and that's what you will get.
So let me wrap it up by saying this.
I think Vivek stole the show.
I think he did a tremendous job.
And I think Nikki Haley doesn't open her mouth when she speaks, and it's very weird and annoying.
It's a weird behavior.
I don't understand.
It's worse than the Yahoo moment from, um...
Uh, what was the guy's name?
I can't remember the guy's name.
You know, Yoo-hoo!
What was it?
Uh, uh, Dean?
I don't remember his name.
That was a long time ago.
Howard Dean?
Is that who it was?
Uh, whatever, man.
I mentioned this last night, and I'm like, I just can't.
I can't do it.
Sorry, Nicky.
Y-you got- y-y-if you can't- if your teeth are too big and you can't talk without talking through your teeth, it's weird.
Whatever.
I'll leave it there!
Next segment's coming up at 1pm on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
Yesterday, the viral story, questioned in Congress, the heads of several universities basically said that it is not a violation of their school policies if students call for the genocide of Jews.
The fascinating thing here is that they ban fatphobia, they ban body shaming, they mandate the use of pronouns, but when groups of people march on campus, Now, I'm not going to sit here and conflate protesters criticizing Israel with calls for genocide, but the question asked was specifically, do your universities consider calls for the genocide of Jews to be
Bullying and harassment.
And all these universities said, it depends on the context.
One would as far to say is that there's even a context they claim.
She said that calling for the genocide of Jews in some contests might, according to, I can't remember which university this was, be anti-semitic.
And I'm like, I don't think there's anything more anti-semitic than that.
But this is part of a bigger picture.
Right now we're hearing that Wall Street's not going to hire any of these students.
Dave Portnoy announced he will hire no one from Harvard, MIT, or Penn until these individuals resign.
And this is how you get it done.
Bravo to Dave Portnoy.
Hey, look, man.
We've had our criticisms.
A lot of people have.
But Dave does good work.
And him coming out outright saying, I'm not gonna hire students from your universities.
Holy crap.
Imagine being a student who took out debt or whose parents got you in to one of these prestigious universities.
And now you're being told outright your degree is not just worthless, It actually will bar you from employment.
Let's rip these universities and their woke garbage to shreds.
Now, as a component of this story, this is what I think matters substantially more to the average person.
billionaire Harvard alumni, accuses university, alum, accuses university of discriminating against
white males and conservatives. Anti-Semitism is the canary in the coal mine for other
discriminatory practices at Harvard, Bill Ackman wrote in a scathing letter.
You see, what happened was, after these protesters said horrible things about Jewish people,
sided with Hamas, and I'm not talking about Palestine, I'm saying there are student activist
groups, leftist protesters who have praised Hamas, called it the resistance.
Yeah, the raping of women and the killing of children, resistance.
Yeah, right.
This guy, Bill Ackman, says, whoa, what's going on at universities?
A lot of people got critical and said, y'all Wall Street billionaires were funding these universities while they were attacking white males and white people in general.
You've got a video out of Ibram Kendi saying that he basically calls white people subhuman.
I'm like, dude, this is crazy!
These people are insane racists!
But, I'm not going to be critical of Ackman, no.
He made a mistake.
And now he's called it out exactly.
And, you know, look.
A lot of people have deep ties to Israel.
Powerful individuals.
And a lot of them, there's dual citizens, and they care deeply about what's going on in the region.
Now, of course, the military-industrial complex and the majority of Americans probably lean more in favor of Israel for either religious reasons or military reasons.
But of the people who are well-off and Israeli or have sentiments towards Israel, this was a huge wake-up call, and baby, I'll take it.
If you're concerned that Ackman was funding these universities or was supporting them in any way while they were pushing wokeness, I'd just say, look man, this woke him up.
Seeing what these universities are saying about Jewish people woke him up to how crazy they are, and now he's calling out the discrimination against white males and conservatives.
Dave Portnoy vows not to hire from Harvard, MIT, and Penn after president's congressional testimony unacceptable on every single level.
Oh, and you'll love to see it.
They're all panicking.
Elite colleges scramble to backtrack after evading question about antisemitism.
I despise these hypocrites, the corrupt, the manipulators.
These people are evil.
Look, man.
If your whole bit is fat phobias against the rules and you better use pronouns, you can see how disgusting these people are.
Man, you know I despise so many politicians and I despise these people too.
Because they don't care about you, they don't care about morality, they don't care about principles, they don't care about justice.
All they care about is saying whatever stupid nonsense they have to say to maintain their woke crackpot cult position.
So the cult doesn't want you to use the wrong pronouns.
And the cult wants to push insane anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
So these universities defend it all.
Enough.
Shout out to Dave Portnoy.
The Barstool sports head vowed this week to not hire applicants from Harvard, MIT, and Penn after seeing congressional testimony from the school's presidents after they offered excuses and cited free speech amid anti-Semitic demonstrations on their campuses.
I ain't playing this game.
Take a look at this video.
Barry Weiss tweeted, this is from the Free Press.
Of course, I think it's important to point out That, um, there is reason to be, uh, perturbed at the idea that when these universities are attacking white people relentlessly, nobody comes to your defense of the media attacks.
But as soon as the far left starts attacking Israel, all of a sudden there's this big turnaround.
I get it.
You're perturbed.
But you know what?
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
I was at Occupy Wall Street.
And there were two black men.
And they were arguing.
One guy told that there's a black guy organizing with Occupy activists.
There's another black guy who said, why are you helping them?
Don't help these people.
They're not there for us.
Think about what white people did and this and that.
The other dude goes, Yeah, maybe.
But I tell you what.
If everything you're saying is true, and that white people had all of this stuff, but now they're protesting these issues that I'm protesting, you know what my response is?
I reach out, shake their hand, and say, welcome to the fight.
And I'm like, that's brilliant.
Smart guy.
Now, of course, during this time at Occupy Wall Street, it was about, you know, the banker bailouts and the housing crisis and stuff, you know, and Occupy became something else.
That's what I say, man.
If people are now calling this stuff out, I just say, welcome to the fight.
Let's end bigotry and racism in the real way.
Right?
When universities insult white people simply for being white, you're racist.
Let's stop that.
It violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Barry Weiss tweets, at Harvard, fatphobia constitutes violence, but globalize the intifada requires context.
Let me play some of this video clip for you.
And so, um... They make some great points.
Okay, so first some context.
They're showing a video from Cooper Union in New York where Jewish students, not Israeli students, Jewish students were hiding as far leftists were banging on the door and screaming things at them.
I think it's a really great point Ron Coleman pointed out.
He said, those aren't Israeli students.
This is New York City.
These are just students who are Jewish.
And there's other students banging on the door, screaming at them, and they had to evacuate these students.
unidentified
Just look at the facts.
Last year, Harvard told students in a mandatory training session that using the wrong pronouns for a person constitutes abuse.
Seizism and fatphobia, according to the session, are also attitudes that contribute to an environment that perpetuates violence.
Now I'm going to pause there and tell you why this is important.
Well, let me play this actually, and we'll play this.
unidentified
This president was asked by members of Congress this week, in a hearing on campus antisemitism, if calling for the genocide of Jews constitutes bullying and harassment, here's what she said.
It can be, depending on the context.
In 2018, the University of Pennsylvania barred law professor Amy Wax from teaching freshmen after she said black students rarely finish in the top half of their graduating class.
Penn has since been trying to sanction Wax for statements the law school says violate its anti-discrimination policies.
But when Penn's president was asked if calls for genocide violate college rules, here's how she answered.
If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment.
So let me just pause right here and bring up the important points that the Free Press, Barry Weiss's organization, has made.
These universities have explicitly stated that fatphobia, in a general context, contributes to a bad environment.
Thus, it's against their rules.
In this instance, you have a woman who stated, well, let me play this again for you, stated a fact, not attacking anybody, and this generalized statement, not targeting any individual, that they sought action against this person.
unidentified
...of their graduating class.
Penn has since been trying to sanction WACs for statements the law school says violate its anti-discrimination policies.
But when Penn's president was asked if calls for genocide violate college rules, here's how she answered.
If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment.
They do the Kubrick stare where they tilt their heads down, smile, and go, if it turns into conduct.
Elisa Fonik went a little heavy with it when she was like, you mean actually trying to commit genocide?
They're saying if you go up to someone, scream in their face, something like that.
But okay, you know, look.
It's, it's, it's, it's here.
In front of our faces.
Look at this story from Fox News.
This is what it turns into.
Billionaire and Harvard graduate Bill Ackman called out his alma mater for having discriminatory practices against white males, Asians, and conservatives in a scathing open letter.
He called anti-Semitism the canary in the coal mine.
I guess, but yo, these policies against Asians and white people have been around for like a decade or longer.
I'm glad you're now noticing it.
I am not going to rag on a guy for not paying attention.
If he's here to join the fight, so be it.
You know, let's say you're standing on the front lines of a great battle.
A revolution, perhaps.
And a French guy shows up and says, I'm here to fight with you!
Are you going to go like, oh yeah?
Well, French people did a bad thing before.
You're going to be like, thank you.
Fight with us and we'll have independence.
You know, look, we can complain about the past and say, yeah, but you were doing this.
Yeah, you had a trade agreement with this nation and their nation is doing this.
Amen.
If you're here to join the fight, thank you for joining the fight.
Let's stop the racism, the violence, the antisemitism.
I so, so, so despise these people.
They're so evil.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, the panic is setting in and you'll love to see it.
Elite colleges scramble to backtrack after evading questions about antisemitism.
I want to stress They say fatphobia.
Dude, we criticized Chris Christie all last night during the GOP debate for being massive.
You know, and I'm sorry, look, I understand there can be issues with people that cause them problems with weight gain and things like that.
I do not believe that applies to Chris Christie, but hey, I'm not a doctor.
You know, I think it's fair to say you can take control of your life and figure it out and improve yourself.
You can lose weight.
And for that, they say, you're contributing to an environment!
Yet, when people are going around chanting from the river to the sea, that's fine.
Look, I understand there are people... Let me show you this, right?
In response to this post from Barry Weiss, Kim Iver said, the answer to their hypocrisy isn't to ban more speech.
Well, what I can't stand is the Israel-Palestine Derangement Syndrome.
OK, I agree with Kim.
The answer to their hypocrisy isn't to ban more speech.
It is to call out their hypocrisy.
Now, I'm not sure that Barry Weiss is calling for overt censorship, but some people are.
Some people are.
And you have to understand these people look.
Don't conflate free speech absolutists with anti-censorship activists.
Anti-censorship doesn't mean you oppose all censorship.
Absolutist may.
My point is this.
If somebody comes out and says, why are they allowing calls for genocide against white people?
They shouldn't be allowed to do this.
That doesn't mean they don't support free expression.
It means that's where their moral line is.
Now, some people would argue, well, that is free expression.
No, no, no.
I get that point.
My point is this.
There are people who say we should be allowed to have free speech on campus.
And they're referring to, I don't know, like a professor saying that black students rarely finish in the top half of their classes.
If that fact is true, I'm just citing this story, then we would need to figure out why that is to help improve these students, right?
Something must be going on.
But by simply stating that fact, they call you racist.
Yet me saying you should be allowed to say that is not me saying you should be allowed to march around calling for genocide.
There's a difference there.
Somebody who says we should be allowed to have political debates in universities does not necessarily mean they support someone calling for the genocide of Jewish people, black people, Asian people, or any other people.
I'll give you my position, because I got a different moral line.
I think people at these universities should be allowed to stand up in a soapbox and say these things.
I believe they should be allowed to invite speakers who say these things.
I think they're bad things.
I think they're disgusting people.
I think they're evil.
And I'd like to hear them say it so I know not to support or associate with them.
I don't, you know, if they're going to hide their views and use resources to these secret ends, I'd rather know they're doing it, so I can say I'm not going to work with you on this stuff.
You're a bad person.
That's a big difference.
And so they try to play this game where they're like, well, now you want to ban speech.
No, no, no, no.
Hold on there a minute.
Hold on there.
Students in marches.
Okay.
Calling for the genocide of Jewish people, calling for the eradication of the Jewish state, or supporting Hamas are very different from someone protesting that Israel's military actions are heavy-handed.
And I think it's fine to criticize the actions of the Israeli government.
We've had a lot of criticism from people on TimCast IRO.
The point is, The universities are hypocrites.
They support calls for genocide.
They ignore calls for genocide in one direction and ban the wrong pronouns.
The media plays this exact same game.
So I'm not going to sit here and just act like these people are allowed to be hypocrites or whatever.
No, we're going to call them out for being hypocrites.
It can be, depending on the context.
The craziest statement that was made, it's not even being highlighted by these outlets, was when the one president said, what did she say?
She said, it can be harassment, or no, she said, in some contexts, it may be anti-Semitic to call for the genocide of the Jewish people.
I'm paraphrasing.
Like, in some contexts?
In all contexts.
Man.
But anyway, when it comes to the media, my point was, imagine a group of people with tiki torches marching around, saying, the Jews will not replace us.
And then the media says, oh no, look at the Nazis!
And then you get a large group of people marching around, chanting and cheering for Hamas, and the media goes, they're resistance.
You get my point?
Charlottesville.
The tiki torch march.
Oh, how abhorrent!
Yeah, they were saying stupid things.
I'm not a fan of any of those people.
But you know what's funny?
I gotta tell you right now.
The difference between these two groups of people... Oh, run this one, Media Matters.
The tiki torch marchers in Charlottesville chanting that Jews wouldn't replace them?
That's it?
And then you take a look at the people.
Who are defending students calling for the genocide of Jews.
Again, I want to make sure I'm drawing a distinction between those who are critical of Israel, support Palestine, between those who overtly supported Hamas's actions, the killing of civilians, and the raping of women.
Because that happened.
So you mean to tell me you think the Tiki Torch marching dudes are worse?
What did they say?
They thought Jews wouldn't replace them.
Or they don't want that to happen.
They believed that Jews were trying to replace them.
Did they call for direct action against Jewish people?
They didn't.
They just believed stupid things.
Okay, it's bad.
Yeah, I'm not a fan of it.
But, uh, in New York City, You had people supporting Hamas explicitly and overtly, getting up with a microphone, standing before a crowd and saying that their resistance fighters fired 5,000 rockets into Tel Aviv.
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
You mean to tell me the media lost their minds over the Tiki Torch people and they do not care about what happened in New York?
These people are evil.
They are hypocrites.
And I'm glad it's all being brought up now.
Here we go.
Here's the backtracking.
McGill said, Oh, pronoun use?
I was focused on our university's longstanding policies aligned with the U.S. Constitution.
Oh, pronoun use? Screw off. Which say that speech alone is not punishable. And that's not true.
Speech alone is not punishable.
These people are so evil, okay?
I was not focused on, but I should have been, the irrefutable fact that a call for the genocide of Jewish people is a call for some of the most terrible violence human beings can perpetrate.
It's evil, plain and simple.
Now that the money is being pulled, and they realize they've aligned themselves with Nazis, now they're mad.
But you know what?
Fine.
I'll take it.
Thank you for the apology.
We need to expose the hypocrites and the liars.
And that's who these people are.
Don't trust them.
Don't work with them.
I can respect Ackman calling out what these universities are doing.
These people backtracking and being like, okay, fine, now we're mad.
Sure.
But I'm not going to trust them as far as I can throw them.
Disgusting.
After these past weeks, I know many of you are exhausted and hurting.
We have to make room for each other in our hearts and in our daily lives.
We cannot and must not let events of the world drive us apart.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
MIT President Kornbluth said, Yeah.
You know what they're doing?
They thought they had the public on their side.
These people genuinely believe that to succeed socially, you must defend people calling for the genocide of Jews.
Isn't that a scary prospect?
But once they realized the power structures do not agree, now they're panicking and backtracking.
This woman, with a smile on her face, defended it.
I'm so sick of these people, man.
They're so evil.
It's the banality of evil, mind you.
The people marching for genocide are evil.
The people who are defending it, blindly, because they want to fit in, are the banality of evil.
Don't know, don't care, better just say what I think's gonna make me money, they claim.
And that's where we're at today, isn't it?
Wall Street Billionaire Club Unites Against Anti-Semitism Will Not Hire Hate Supporters, from Ynet.
The most prominent names in the financial world signed a joint statement expressing support for Israel warning, supporters of hate will have no place in our organizations or our community.
Well, would have appreciated it if you called out the hate against white people, which is ongoing, but I can appreciate at least this now.
David Portnoy made a great statement.
I want to show you a bit about what he said.
He said, This video has made me so irate, I need to make sure as many people see it as possible.
The deans of three supposedly prestigious universities in the U.S.
somehow refusing to condemn students calling for the genocide of Jews on campus.
It's crazy.
He says the bottom line is that there is literally no other minority, religious group or ethnic group, where students could openly intimidate and chant they want to murder an entire group of people and not get kicked out immediately, or better yet, thrown in jail.
Like, you can't even whisper something bad about other groups without it becoming an international incident, but with Jews apparently saying it, saying you want to kill them all is fair game.
Well, he's right.
Now, I know there's gonna be a lot of people who are like, how come it's... I'm so annoyed by this.
That they claim that there's a Jewish conspiracy or something.
Dude, they have been calling white people awful names and calling them evil, okay, for a long time.
And they do get away with it.
To be fair, white people aren't a minority group in this country.
Dave Portnoy's point is that these people are absolute hypocrites.
If anyone asked these deans, and Elise Stefanik should have, she said, what if students were protesting calling for the genocide of black people?
We know exactly what would happen.
Each and every one of those students would be expelled, no question, instantly.
They'd say, we're gonna find out everybody who was in that march, you are all expelled and not welcome here.
That's the game they're playing.
I am not defending the racism against white people, which is prominent and should be called out.
But if we're talking about minority groups, it is a fact.
These people all claim... Well, here's what they claim, and here's the point.
They say, we only punch up.
White people are the oppressors because they're the majority.
And then when it comes to Jewish people, uh-huh, you get the point.
This is why I can't stand the anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
Like, uh, the Farrakhan stuff, the women's march where they claimed Jews were responsible for the slave trade, and just, like, insert whatever problem they want.
Listen, man.
Individuals are responsible for a lot of things.
And that's all I really care about.
I don't want to judge a group of people based on the actions of one bad guy.
If I meet somebody who is black, white, Asian, Mexican, I don't care, whatever, and they're a good person, then they shall be treated as such.
Because I will judge a person based on the content of the character and not the color of their skin.
Same is true for Jewish people.
I can't stand this stuff where people are like, you know, Jewish people control the media or whatever and blah blah blah.
I'm like, no.
The people who control the media, there happen to be many of them who are Jewish.
When we had Kanye West on the show and he makes the point about the banks and all that, we looked it up and it turns out the banks are all run by Irish dudes.
Listen, man.
Don't single out a group of people.
It's stupid.
Criticize the individuals.
My problem with it is there's nothing gained.
Like when Kanye West was like, who is they though?
I'm like, dude, there's nothing gained by isolating Jewish as the issue.
And he learned his lesson.
Isolate corrupt, multinational, globalist elites.
See, the funny thing is, when Alex Jones called it globalism, they said it was being anti-semitic.
That's the game they're trying to play.
So when the people who hate Jews try and claim that all of the globalists are the Jews, they're playing the exact same game as those who are in the media on the left.
That's why I hate all of it.
I'm like, dude, my criticism are for a guy who's doing bad things to hurt people, not the nation he comes from or the religion he might have or his culture.
I'm talking about that dude, his followers, and those who believe in the woke garbage.
But you get it.
You get it.
You see, this is it.
Call it the canary in the coal mine, call it whatever you want, but I'm glad to see the university is getting ripped to shreds over this.
So, good for David Portnoy, good for Bill Ackman, and now we are seeing the tides turning.
Get woke, go broke.
Have fun, universities.
Next step?
Seize the endowments.
Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
A new report drops showing New Mexico filing a lawsuit against Instagram and Meta due to their child exploitation problem.
And Elon Musk is going nuclear, hammering away at these platforms, hammering away at Bob Iger.
Elon Musk calls on Disney to fire Bob Iger after telling CEO to go F himself.
Yeah, not the best headline, but of course they're gonna try and make it anti-Elon.
But the news is actually this, from CNBC.
Facebook and Instagram content enables child sexual abuse and trafficking.
The New Mexico lawsuit states, this is the AG of New Mexico, basically saying, yo, this needs to stop.
Elon Musk, stand-up guy, is upset, and rightly so.
Because all these big companies say, oh, we've got a boycott X!
But they don't care about what's going on on Facebook?
Right.
Guys, I'm just gonna say it.
We know that the federal government was colluding with big tech to censor people.
I strongly believe that the boycotts we're seeing now more likely have to do with federal efforts to control narrative, as we already know for a fact they do, and less to do with the content on the platform.
Because that would mean that the federal government supports child abuse, Or I should say these big companies do.
And they don't, they don't take kindly to political opinions that are bad.
Musk has renewed his attacks on Walt Disney CEO Bob Iger on Thursday, calling on the Magic Kingdom to immediately fire him a week after he said to go F yourself.
Amazing, by the way.
Musk, who is also the CEO of Tesla, which everybody knows, has been furiously condemning companies including Disney and Apple that pulled advertising on X after their advertisements were found next to pro-Nazi and hateful content.
That is such a manipulative lie.
As it turns out, what the organization Attacking X did was they followed two accounts.
Say, I'm gonna follow this company, and I'm gonna follow this guy.
And then sooner or later, their posts will appear next to each other.
Quote, Bob Iger thinks it's cool to advertise next to child exploitation material.
Real stand-up guy, Musk said in a post on next Thursday that misspelled Iger's name.
Uh-huh.
And they say he was referring to a lawsuit filed by the New Mexico Attorney General against Facebook and Instagram owner Meta that claimed it enables child sexual abuse.
Well, how about that?
Musk later wrote that Iger should be fired immediately.
Well, he's got a couple spicy ones.
Colin Ruggs says New Mexico has sued Meta and Mark Zuckerberg for allegedly enabling child sexual abuse.
Uh, uh, material being, to be distributed.
Enabling it to be.
Hey, Robert Iger and other advertisers, will you be suspending advertising on Facebook and Instagram like you did with X?
Elon Musk says, crazy that Disney has to be sued to stop this terrible behavior.
We then have Elon Musk posting a spicy meme.
Just basically ragging on Disney.
And it says, Disney awarded defense contract after producing more bombs than Lockheed Martin from the Babylon Bee.
Bravo!
Bravo.
And then of course, after whole Mars catalog said, sponsored by the Walt Disney Corporation.
Elon Musk says, Bob Iger thinks it's cool to advertise next to child exploitation material.
Real stand-up guy.
Natalie F. Denolishon says, why hasn't Disney fired the guy yet?
And that's where Elon Musk says he should be fired immediately.
Walt Disney is turning in his grave over what Bob has done to his company.
Well, as it often goes, what we should be doing is hooking up a turbine to the grave of Walt Disney because he is spinning so quickly in his grave, it would generate free energy for all the people of the world.
I actually think that was like a joke video someone made a long time ago where it's like the founding fathers in their graves are spinning so fast they plug in an electric turbine and then it starts generating electricity.
They're like, the more we abuse this country, the more power we get!
Amazing.
It's like zombie power.
Facebook and Instagram content enabled child sexual abuse, New Mexico lawsuit.
Well, here you go.
Look.
I'm not going to immediately blame Mark Zuckerberg for the fact that evil people will exploit these platforms.
But I don't believe Facebook is in a good position to come- Face CIA book!
That's what they say!
Face CIA book!
Yeah, LifeLog, some people call it.
I believe that it's very likely that Zuckerberg knows the federal government is exploiting this platform for spying and narrative manipulation, and they're in on it.
And that means there is no excuse for the child abuse material on the platform.
These companies are so much more concerned with controlling what you get to say, they allow this?
Facebook and Instagram created prime locations for sexual predators that enabled child abuse, solicitation, and trafficking, New Mexico's Attorney General alleged in a civil suit filed Wednesday against Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
The suit was brought after an undercover investigation allegedly revealed a myriad of instances of sexually explicit content being served to minors, child sexual coercion, or the sale of child abuse material.
New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torres said in a press release.
The suit alleges that certain child exploitative content is 10 times more prevalent on Facebook and Instagram as compared to Pornhub and adult content platform OnlyFans according to the release.
Quote, Child exploitation is a horrific crime and online predators are determined criminals, Metta said in a statement to CNBC.
A spokesperson said the company deploys sophisticated technology, hires child safety experts, report content to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and share information and tools with other companies and law enforcement, including state's attorney generals, attorneys general, to help root out predators.
Now, here's the issue.
X took an active stance against this stuff and started purging it all.
The argument, I suppose, is that Zuckerberg is saying they basically do the same, or META is saying they basically do the same thing.
I don't want to play this game.
I don't.
If they found that META has this content, META should remove it.
If they're unable to remove it, then we've got a very serious problem, and I'm not sure how META can persist.
If there's a bookstore, an adult bookstore, And they had exploitation material.
And you could not find a way to stop its distribution?
Then we would get rid of that bookstore.
We'd just shut it down.
The first time you go in and say, this needs to go.
Like, this is a crime what you have.
And then the guy who owns it's like, look man, people brought that in, I didn't realize, we'll get rid of it right away.
And then a week later there's ten times as more and it just keeps happening.
Eventually you say, we're shutting you down.
So let me say this.
If Facebook and Instagram are facilitating child exploitation materials, on what grounds do we allow it to continue?
Serious question.
Is the argument, well, but you know, it's just so important to the economy and so many people use it, like, we have to allow it?
Nah.
No, I don't think so.
I think it means we put restrictions in place to stop people from doing these things.
I'm not some anarchist.
I'm not a hardcore libertarian.
I think that the internet is destroying the minds of children, it's exploiting children, and we shouldn't stand for it.
For no reason should we be standing for it.
But this is the nature of what the internet currently is.
It is effectively a gigantic public marketplace with people banging each other in the streets and children are allowed to mill about.
I'd like you to imagine this.
A shopping mall.
Anybody can just walk into the shopping mall.
You gotta be at least 13, but you could just lie no one's checking, right?
And you walk in and you walk around, there's a lot of normal stuff, a lot of people are arguing, and then there's like Weird, freaky, kink sex stuff going on all over the place.
Yeah, if that were the case, the police would come and shut it down.
They'd lock the doors, say that you are operating an illegal sex operation, this is the public, there's children here, and the owners would get in serious trouble.
Now, if it was a mall, I don't think anybody would be criminally charged.
They'd be like, what's a massive corporation?
This guy didn't know what was going on, but we're shutting it down.
Why aren't we doing that with Facebook?
Serious question.
Why aren't we saying, you can't allow children to be in this place?
Now, what I do here...
A lot of people are saying the fear is that this will lead to an internet where you need an ID to run any of these accounts.
Effectively a Nikki Haley-esque type future where all people must be known online.
I don't completely agree.
I believe if we do not get a handle on this right now, it could become that, but it's actually quite simple.
We just say to Facebook and to Twitter and to other platforms, you are legally responsible if this content appears on your platform.
I'm sorry man, I'm not playing stupid games.
I don't understand why we as a society have decided to allow adult bookstores for children!
It could be this simple.
Someone posts adult content?
Use your algorithms to put a filter on it.
That's it.
YouTube does this.
18 and up content.
They're trying.
It's not perfect.
Sometimes people get mad because it makes mistakes.
I know, it's tough.
It's not easy.
I am not opposed to censorship.
I'm opposed to bad censorship.
They want to censor people for saying the wrong pronoun, but they allow child exploitation.
Yeah, yeah, I got it.
Backwards.
People can say whatever pronouns they want, and you don't allow child exploitation.
That's the point.
Some stuff should be censored.
You'll learn about it when you read about these stories of people who are doing moderation on these platforms.
And I think people don't understand how awful it really is in terms of the snuff, murder, rape, awful things that people post to the internet.
And it's because the moderators are sifting through it and getting rid of it.
And that's a good thing.
But why then do we tolerate this degree?
Now back to Elon Musk.
I suppose it's fair to say Elon makes a really good point.
I don't want to condemn Facebook over this.
I want them to publicly state they're going to stop it.
I guess I should say it this way.
Of course we condemn this or any platform that enabled it.
But if Facebook is actively trying to stop it, I don't think it's fair to attack Facebook Because advertisers lied about why they're canceling ads on X. That being said, I like X. I don't like Facebook.
I think Facebook is complicit in a bunch of unconstitutional actions by the federal government.
I believe they're complicit in criminal activities.
And, uh, as we can see here with this story.
And X is doing a good job fighting all of these things.
So, I side with X. But I'll leave it there!
Next segment is coming up at 6pm on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
I have this theory that, uh, there's a grifter test.
Do you care about Taylor Swift is the question.
And there are a lot of people who are acting like they hate Taylor Swift and I'm like, okay, I don't believe any of these people.
Dude, look, I'm a 37 year old man.
I believe that the average or typical... You're allowed to not like Taylor Swift, don't get me wrong.
But I believe that typically in the political space, if someone comes to me and says, well what do you think about Taylor Swift?
She's got a couple songs that are pretty catchy, I kinda know the lyrics to them.
But I don't listen to a lot of her music.
Why do you ask?
Instead, what I'm seeing is absolutely nuts.
And I want to talk to you about political strategy.
I want to defend Taylor Swift.
And I just got to tell you guys, man.
So many people are tweeting, for some reason right now, attacking Taylor Swift.
That's the PSYOP.
Right there.
When you tweet attacking Taylor Swift, that's the PSYOP.
I'm so annoyed by this stuff.
You know, I get annoyed by the manipulation that works, okay?
You've got people who are posting memes.
Jack?
Jack Posobiec?
I'm saying your name.
Calling out Taylor Swift for being a Democrat.
And yes, celebrities are Democrats.
But the attack on Taylor Swift is the psyop.
I'll tell you why.
I'll tell you why.
But first, let's break down the conspiracy theory.
And, um, I'm going to refute it to the best of my abilities.
Not say- I don't like the word debunk.
I'm gonna push back on it.
I don't believe it's true.
We have this from the Daily Dot, is Taylor Swift teaming up with Travis Kelce and George Soros to elect Michelle Obama to the White House?
Um, dude, I'm sorry, Taylor Swift, by all accounts that I can see, does not like the Soros family, and has publicly, publicly called out the Soros family.
It is insane to me that this woman can be in one of the biggest copyright disputes we've ever seen with the Soros family, and now there is a theory that she's secretly working with them.
Come on, man.
Let me just simplify this for you so I don't bury the lead.
Taylor Swift has legions of young fans.
You are making her the enemy by attacking her on social media for no reason.
That's it.
Celebrities are going to advocate for politicians.
Taylor Swift likely will be advocating for Democrats.
That's fine.
I mean, that happens.
And we've got to do a good job of getting out the vote, registering voters, and pushing back on our political rivals.
But I tell you this.
There's a lot of young people who follow Taylor.
If Taylor comes out and says something like, I want y'all to go vote, many of them will.
But guess what?
A lot of them won't.
But what happens when a bunch of Trump supporters and conservatives repeatedly start bashing her on social media and create a meme war against Taylor Swift's fans?
You are activating her fan base more than she can do alone.
Listen, I think Taylor's got some excellent pop music.
Don't care if people are like, she didn't write it.
I'm like, dude, she probably, like, it's collaborative.
I know people who have written songs for musicians.
It's collaborative.
Credit where it's due, man.
Y'all ain't Taylor Swift.
She's a billionaire.
She's successful.
Good for her.
She's got fans.
She's going to advocate for Democrats.
I don't like it.
But I also understand, don't get caught in a Chinese finger trap problem.
They're gonna try and put you in this trap where you pull harder and harder and harder and all that does is make it worse.
So here's the story.
Trump superfan Laura Loomer detailed a plot yesterday on Axios back in September between Taylor Swift and the Soros family to get Gavin Newsom and Michelle Obama elected to the White House next year.
In 2024, Zoomers are officially set to replace Boomers as the largest voting demographic in America.
Loomer said, last week, Taylor Swift registered over 40,000 voters with a single Instagram post, and most of them were Zoomers.
That's true, and celebrities are going to do this no matter what.
So your best strategy is to not make enemies of the base.
Let me show you this.
This is a post from Hey Alma.
Why did Taylor Swift call out the Soros family on Instagram?
She outright said, I'm always honest with you guys about this stuff, so I just wanted to tell you
that this release is not approved by me. It looks like Scooter Braun and his financial backers,
23 Capital, Alex Soros and the Soros family and the Carlisle Group have seen the latest balance
sheets and realized that paying $330 million for my music wasn't exactly a wise choice and
they needed money. So here's what happens. Laura Loomer's theory is because Laura Loomer
doesn't understand. And with respect to Laura, I know she's she's she's super a big Trump fan.
She does a lot of good work.
She's wrong on this one.
She said, how is Taylor Swift able to, let me see if they have her post.
How is she able to re-record her music and release new albums if it's owned by the Soros family?
It must be that she cut a deal with George Soros.
Dude, whoa, listen.
Taylor Swift publicly calls out the Soros family for backing what she views as figuratively stealing her music.
She believes she should have the rights to buy the master recordings to her first, I think it was six albums.
Let me break it down for you.
What's going on?
Because we work in music here at Timcast.
Okay.
Taylor Swift owns the composition of her songs.
That's part one.
Actually, I think I have a... Do I have a legal website?
Yeah, so we have Fitzpatrick Lentz Bubba.
This is Taylor's version explaining Taylor Swift's three recordings under copyright law.
They say, copyright is broken down into two parts, composition and master recordings.
Taylor Swift owns composition, but not master recordings.
The master recordings were purchased by Scooter Braun.
Taylor Swift is mad she did all that work recording it.
The label didn't give her the opportunity.
I guess the issue was the offer was really unfavorable.
As she points out in this post, $330 million is not worth it.
And so what happened was, I guess the people who bought her rights to her music released a 2008 radio show performance.
So here's what happens.
Master recordings allow for derivative works.
The master recordings, the first song, it allows you to take that, copy it, distribute it in a bunch of different ways.
So when Taylor was performing these live versions, they have these rights to this.
Taylor owns the composition of the songs.
So she's re-recording this to create new masters called Taylor's Version.
I do not see, and maybe I'm wrong about this, I don't know.
I do not see Taylor Swift working with the Soros family.
She's actually working against them.
Listen, Alex Soros and the Soros family invested tons of money to buy the recordings to her music to try and use it.
Starting a war with Taylor Swift.
Taylor Swift now has to re-record and spend tons of money to get a version of the songs back under her control.
She is actively fighting these people and the Soros family stand to lose $330 million when Taylor Swift re-releases her versions of the composition she owns.
I'm just- I'm so frustrated by this because it's such a- I'm- People, you're walking into a bear trap with this one, okay?
Here's what I see happening.
Here's a tweet from SK Cartoon.
And here's a guy, middle-aged guy, says, this is about the economy, war, my children, and freedom, and he's voting.
Below it, it's a young girl saying, oh, hi, dad.
I'm here to cancel your vote because Tay-Tay said so.
And you have Taylor Swift as Times Person of the Year.
This was posted in response to a tweet from Jack Posobiec.
He put, you, poso, leave Taylor alone.
She isn't political.
And it's a picture of Taylor holding a plate that says Biden-Harris 2020.
I get it.
But, um, I agree.
Leave Taylor alone.
And I'll tell you why.
I used to do non-profit fundraising.
My job was to convince people to give money for nothing.
I'd walk up to someone on the street and I'd say, you take your credit card out, give it to a stranger so I can write down your information, and you get nothing in return.
That's how we described it.
The reality of it is, to be a bit more fair, I would convince people on the street to pledge money to a cause, because by supporting us, something good is happening.
So, uh, take a look at this.
I walk up to you on the street, and I say, hey, you're concerned about free speech, right?
And we actually did, I did campaign for free speech.
And I said, if we're going to maintain these fights so that individuals have the ability to speak their minds, we need your help.
Now I know you're busy every day, right?
You go to school, you get in school, right.
You're in school, what are you, you're not going to come out and go to every protest?
That would be crazy.
But we do.
We do the campaign work, we stand up to members of Congress, and we guarantee your rights.
Now, I understand you're busy and you can't do it, but somebody's gotta do it, right?
I tell you what, I got an easy solution for you.
20 bucks a month.
You sign up right now, 20 bucks a month, right here with me, and we're gonna fight for you.
We're gonna send you monthly updates in the mail.
You're gonna be able to see all the work we're doing on your behalf, and you will know That you actually are doing something right now.
Because I know you're not a bad person, right?
You don't want to be one of those guys who just sits back and lets the world burn around you.
Nah.
Because you're a good guy.
And good guys gotta do what they gotta do.
But I know you're in school.
So I'll tell you what.
Let us do the heavy lifting.
Stand up for something that matters.
It's less than a cup of coffee a day, right?
That's what I do.
I used to do that.
And I'll tell you one thing.
The most important thing in doing a job like that is rapport.
You walk up to someone, on the street, and insult them, and they will go to war with you.
So I tell you this.
If you care about free speech, and I know you're all busy, you work.
What are you supposed to do?
You can't read the news every single day.
You get as much news as you can.
Well then you can support TimCast.com!
Head over to TimCast.com, sign up, and... It's very different these days.
You actually get stuff.
We produce documentaries.
We've got uncensored members-only content.
You see, this is my point.
I don't like these non-profits.
I don't like what they do.
We're trying to do something different.
Okay?
That's why TimCast.com actually has a product for you.
So, sign up, support our work if you believe in the work we're doing.
If this dad goes to his daughter and says, don't vote for that crap!
Taylor Swift has no idea what she's talking about!
You shouldn't listen to her!
What do you think his daughter's going to do?
It's obvious.
What if the dad brings the daughter to Taylor Swift concerts and says, she's got really great music.
Well, you kids do your thing.
I don't want to be the lame dad and be involved, but I'm glad you're listening to some good music.
Now again, you know, kids can be rebellious, but I think in this instance, I don't know about a dad to her kids, but let me tell you this.
I'm walking down the street and I see some, you know, I don't know, a woman.
She's 23.
And she's a big Taylor Swift fan.
And she's talking to someone I know.
I'm talking.
You know what the stupidest thing you can do is?
Taylor Swift is working with George Soros because she's trying to get a dem- They're conspiring!
Okay, let's slow down.
Maybe a little heavy-handed.
She's talking about how she likes Taylor Swift, and you go, yeah, I don't know.
I mean, Taylor Swift shouldn't be working with George Soros.
You lost it.
Let me tell you, you know, what I'd do.
This is the first and most important thing you do when you're fundraising and trying to convince someone to give you support.
I'm walking down the street.
I got my clip- my little free speech, you know, clipboard.
I'm twirling it on my finger.
That's what we used to do, actually.
We would spin them on our fingers.
I still- I'm actually still really good at doing that.
And, um, I see a 23-year-old woman, and she's wearing a Taylor Swift t-shirt.
The first thing I say is... Oh, Taylor Swift!
Fist bump!
Yeah, might be corny, but guess what?
If she's a Swifty, and I'm like, what do you think about the new albums?
Like, Taylor's Virgin, you think they're better?
And she's gonna be like, oh yeah, they're way better.
I'm like, dude, it's so messed up how they're stealing her master recordings.
I mean, I hope they lose all that money.
And she's gonna be like, I know, right?
Rapport right there.
Let me first state by saying my actual opinion.
I'm frustrated by this because, like, since the whole time I've heard about what's going on with Taylor Swift's music, I'm, like, on her side.
Yo, the Soros family bought her music out from under her, and people are like, well, she's working with George Soros.
Like, she's pissed, dude!
Her master recordings were given to someone else, and she's like, well, I hope it was worth it, I guess.
And now she's gotta do all that work over again, but good for her.
I'm glad she wins that one.
So when you see someone who is like, I'm all for Taylor Swift, you build rapport first and foremost.
And if in the end, let me tell you, she does come out and say, I want you all to go register as Democrats and vote for whoever.
Look, if she's telling people to register to vote, and they're voting Democrats, or registering as Democrats, that's your fault.
That's my fault.
It's all of our fault.
I tell people to register to vote every day.
Scott Pressler does.
Taylor Swift does.
If the fact that Taylor Swift is a Democrat is causing people to vote Democrat, we need to say, yes, register to vote, but hear us out.
The first thing you have to do is build rapport.
If MAGA declares war on Taylor Swift, you put up a 30-foot concrete wall from sea to shining sea saying, don't work with us in any way.
But what happens when some big Taylor Swift fan, who doesn't care about politics, meets a woman wearing a Trump shirt And she's like, I don't know about Trump or all that, but Taylor Swift is playing.
And the woman in the Trump shirt goes, I love Taylor's versions.
They're so much better.
Dude, the people who, the Soros family ripped her off.
Taylor Swift has given you the greatest opening ever!
The greatest!
She criticized the Soros family.
You need only now go to Taylor Swift fans and be like, I don't like George Soros either.
And they're gonna be like, yes!
Because Taylor Swift says the Soros family is bad, now you have an opportunity to be like, I know, I can't believe they would do that to her!
Well, I think the Taylor's versions are way better.
Don't you?
Let Taylor be Taylor Swift, let pop celebrities be pop celebrities.
But, I don't understand why people are trying to declare war on Taylor Swift.
She's on your side, to a certain degree.
You have an opportunity to go to these younger people, and young women, and say, hey look man, we don't like George Soros either.
You can even be more blunt about it, be like, hey, Taylor Swift makes good music, I mean it's clearly obvious, she's super famous, she's a billionaire, people must really like it, that's really awesome for her, she seems great.
I personally don't listen, don't know a lot about it, but I'll tell you this, a lot of me and my friends don't like what the Soros family's been doing either.
And so I see that in Taylor Swift and I'm like, she seems pretty cool.
And then you get her fans to be like, I agree.
Now, Taylor Swift may come out in the end and vote for Democrats or whatever, and that'll create a lot of pressure, but don't cut yourself out of the persuasive argument.
So when I see all this stuff, I'm like, dude, stop ragging on Taylor Swift.
Laura Loomer has this thread where she's asking, do you think, in their efforts to beat Donald Trump, that George Soros made a deal with Taylor Swift to give her back the rights to all of her albums?
No!
Because if that was the case, she wouldn't be re-recording everything.
And they spent $330 million buying it.
The issue, I believe, is that Taylor Swift was given unfavorable terms to buy the master recordings.
330 million or whatever.
She knows she's not gonna make that much money back in the long run.
However, if she re-records all of it, it could cost somewhere to the tune of a couple million dollars, and she will make money off that then.
Further, with the re-recordings she's already released that are chart-topping, the Soros investment is worthless.
Because now, they're gonna start playing Taylor's version instead.
Look, man.
Tact.
Tact.
Strategy.
Don't go to war with someone you don't have to go to war with.
And I tell you this, you ain't winning a war with Taylor Swift and her fanbase.
If Taylor Swift comes out and says, screw Trump, screw his bass, screw everybody, your only real opportunity is to go, oh, that hurts because I'm a huge Taylor Swift fan.
I think her new songs are fantastic, but you know, it is what it is.
You're not going to win, but you can deflect a lot of the damage.
I look at a lot of different potential scenarios as to what could play out in 2024.
Laura calls it some kind of October surprise.
How could this play out?
Taylor Swift goes nuclear and attacks Trump supporters relentlessly and insults them in various ways.
I don't really see that happening unless all of these people now attacking Taylor Swift enrage her fans and piss her off.
Imagine imagine this.
I want you to put yourself in Taylor Swift's position right now.
The Soros family has just ripped you off.
You are pissed off about it.
You are now putting in tons of work to try and reclaim, uh, to recreate master recordings of compositions you made.
And then what happens?
A bunch of MAGA conservative types start insulting and attacking you, and accusing you of working directly with the guy who just ripped you off.
Would you not be pissed?
It's nuts.
Y'all need to be waving and smiling at Taylor Swift saying, we see the problems the Soros family has caused you.
What can we do to help?
But I get it.
People see this photo of her with Biden-Harris 2020.
Of course!
She's a default liberal in a city.
You don't win friends.
You don't win friends with salad.
You need a gigantic pig roast.
Don't be Lisa Simpson launching the pig into the air.
Because as much as you might think it's just a little airborne, it's still good, it's still good, it's not.
It's gone, dad.
A big Simpsons reference.
Shout out to all the Simpsons fans.
My point is rather simple, man.
I don't care if you like Taylor Swift.
I don't care if you like pop music.
Don't go to war with people you don't need to go to war with.
And choose your battles.
If in the end, like, Beyonce comes out in favor of Biden or whoever else, your best bet is to just ignore it.
And not... Like, Art of War, man.
Win the battle before it starts.
Don't run onto a battlefield where you know you're going to lose.
That reminds me of Gettysburg.
There was a lot going on with why the South lost in Gettysburg.
But this is the point.
Storming into a battlefield, you're not prepared to win.
You should have won the battlefield before the battle even started, and then you know what's gonna happen.
And the Union had breach loaders, which really helped out.
And there was also, um... There was this, uh, what was it, a cavalry, a Confederate cavalry was like... Had been missing, and they were a core component of the strength of the South, and there's a lot more to it, I don't know.
Anyway, look, man.
Taylor Swift is just another pop celebrity.
She's got a lot of pop music that resonates with a lot of young people.
Good for her, man.
That's great.
It doesn't affect me in any way.
I'm not mad about it.
She and a bunch of other people have supported Democrats.
It is what it is.
But how many of the people in 2020 who supported Biden regret it?
A lot.
I think the real PSYOP, and I'll wrap it up with this, is convincing Trump supporters to attack Taylor Swift right after she came out against George Soros.
Like, I don't get it.
There are so many other celebrities that are diehard in favor of Democrats.
Alec Baldwin, relentlessly.
So why target Taylor?
Here's what happens.
Taylor gets beef with the Soros family.
It's an opening for Trump supporters to win over this Nashville Young woman.
