Elon Musk Vows To DESTROY Woke Cabal In NUCLEAR Lawsuit, Timcast & More Announce WE ARE GOING TO WAR
WATCH INFRINGED NOW At - https://timcast.com/members-area/infringed/
BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/
Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/
Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL
Elon Musk Vows To DESTROY Woke Cabal In NUCLEAR Lawsuit, Timcast & More Announce WE ARE GOING TO WAR
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Well, according to Musk and employees at X, formerly Twitter, Media Matters falsely created
a circumstance in which they could make it appear ads were appearing on extremist content
to then pressure advertisers to jump ship from the platform.
And that boycott is picking up steam.
For this, Elon Musk plans a massive lawsuit.
Now, many of you may be saying, I don't know what Media Matters is.
Well, Media Matters is a crackpot conspiracy website that just falsely frames people's opinions They falsely frame news stories to try and create an activist bent against their political opponents.
I'll give you a really simple example of what Media Matters is.
I was at an event called Politicon.
I think it was Politicon, this was a while ago.
And I think this failed, by the way, but it was a political convention that brought together everybody to have conversations.
The guy who started Media Matters, I think it was, I can't remember his name, was up on stage and he was answering questions and he was talking about how they're just trying to correct misinformation from the right.
In fact, one of the writers for Media Matters had gone on a Twitter tirade claiming that birds pooped on me and other stupid nonsense, which made no sense.
No, that's what Media Matters is.
A far-left activist organization that lies and pushes conspiracy theories in order to get their political opponents deplatformed.
In recent times, they've written a ton about Tim Kast, and anybody who actually watches the show and looks at these articles will know most of these are falsely framed and taken out of context.
Now, to be fair, often they just quote the show, and I really don't care when they do.
If I say something, fine, I said it.
But now we are seeing a massive lawsuit, and ladies and gentlemen, Tim Kast has announced We are going to war alongside Elon Musk.
Now, what does that mean?
Many individuals have announced a pledge to advertise on X to try and help push back against the fake boycott.
That doesn't mean we're gonna be able to actually stem the bleed of these massive advertising companies.
These massive companies advertising, leaving the platform.
I mean, they're losing a lot of money.
But, starting with the Babylon Bee and Seth Dillon.
Seth Dillon pledged $250,000 in an ad campaign on X. Following this, TimCast, I, went on Twitter and announced, we will do the exact same.
Now, hopefully.
We actually spend substantially more than that.
And I can break this down, but we'll get into that portion in a second.
Following this, many other prominent personalities pledged several thousand dollars, tens of thousand dollars, and Andrew Tate pledged one million dollars per month.
Will this alleviate the massive boycott being seen by Elon Musk?
No.
But I think we must stand up for a platform that we believe in, and I want you all to understand why this one matters to me so much.
It is only because of Elon Musk's actions, and I want to stress this, Elon Musk personally, personally aided me Okay?
What I mean to say is, his actions assisted me personally.
This is not even, this is not even the, I agree with free speech and Elon Musk saved free speech.
No.
The Twitter file's release proved that the government was colluding with big tech.
And then, following what we saw with the Weaponization Committee's release of the censorship industrial complex documents, we learned that I was personally targeted by the government.
A large component of this revelation comes from Elon Musk's efforts in taking over Twitter, converting it to X, and releasing this.
And for this, I will be eternally grateful.
And for this, I will stand by someone who's taken great personal risk to themselves to not only defend freedom of speech, despite several criticisms, for sure, but look, I can't deny it, I have personally, personally benefited from the actions of Elon Musk, and you know what?
I'm gonna put my money where my mouth is.
In the event, lawsuits are filed against the EIP, Election Integrity Partnership, and the U.S.
government for their illegal and unconstitutional collusion, Tim Kast stands ready and waiting to join any potential legal actions.
I hope everybody knows that.
We'll see how that plays out.
As for joining this war, we will pledge that money on X, which I'll break down in a second why it's a no-brainer.
A no-brainer.
But should Elon Musk expand?
Should he file a larger lawsuit?
I will tell you this.
We stand ready and waiting to file any amicus brief in support of Elon Musk's lawsuit against Media Matters for their lies, defamation, slander, libel, etc.
But let's read the news and we'll break down where this is going and exactly what Media Matters is accused of doing.
In fact, an AG, I believe it's Missouri, is now investigating criminal charges because what Elon Musk is alleging, as well as the staff at X, is that Media Matters essentially fabricated false information to trick advertisers.
That is a civil violation, tortious interference, as well as criminal fraud.
This is where it gets interesting.
From Politico, Musk threatens thermonuclear lawsuit as X ad boycott gathers pace.
Let me just, uh, let me pull up, let me see, uh, I have the tweet here from Elon Musk.
He says, the split second court opens on Monday, X Corp will be filing a thermonuclear lawsuit against Media Matters and all those who colluded in this fraudulent attack on our company.
And then I'll break down why Elon Musk is going to war.
What makes the ex-advertiser revolt different from other boycotts?
Now, not the first time we've seen this.
You may remember the ad-pocalypse on YouTube several years ago, for which there were many.
News organizations fearing competition from the likes of me and many others started waging false information campaigns in order to terrify advertisers.
Now, YouTube made the mistake of bending the knee.
And Elon has another option here that I hope he considers.
Back in the day, a bunch of ads like Toyota was being served... I'm saying Toyota as an example, I don't know if they literally served Toyota ads, but big companies had their ads running across all sorts of content.
Some of it was very politically, I don't know, pointed.
Anti-immigration, anti-LGBTQ, whatever.
News organizations then said, look at this, the ad served on a video that was anti-this or whatever.
And YouTube said, we're gonna pause advertising on a bunch of channels.
They basically shut everything down for a little bit.
Big companies were furious.
They were like, why are ads appearing on nasty stuff?
YouTube then created a system by which advertisers could say, don't put my ads on content we don't like.
Now, it's manipulative, and it shocked the whole system.
What we're dealing with now is something basically the exact same thing.
Here's what we're seeing.
As of the 18th, and this is, I believe it has expanded, Apple and IBM, Lionsgate, Disney, Comcast, NBC, Paramount, Warner Brothers, Discovery, and other firms paused their marketing.
This is a substantial amount of money, and it comes after Media Matters published a report on Thursday that highlighted Apple, IBM, Amazon, and Oracle As among those whose ads were shown next to far-right posts.
Let me just tell you my view on this very simply.
If there's a Coca-Cola ad in downtown Chicago, and a guy stands in front of it and waves a picture of an aborted fetus, is Coca-Cola gonna go to the advertiser and say, guys, you owe me money because a man stood here waving the sign?
No, of course not.
So how is it that these people are acting like it's a shock that because there was a post on X and someone received an ad at the same time, you see, this is work, it's weird.
With the YouTube Adpocalypse, it was kind of interesting.
A video would be titled, you know, Immigration Bad.
And before the video played, there'd be an advertisement.
Okay, that ad is appearing in front of this video.
Sure.
On X, the way it works is, ads appear in your feed.
Right?
So if someone posts something, and then the next post is something else, there's in no way an endorsement from anyone.
The White House has actually issued a statement criticizing Elon Musk.
Make no mistake, we know what this is.
The U.S.
government is upset they've lost control of the narrative machine.
They are attacking Elon Musk.
Leftist nonprofits, establishment nonprofits are doing the same thing.
They are functioning as an arm of the government.
And outside of a lawsuit, I hope Matt Gaetz, Jim Jordan, and everyone else investigate media matters for government collusion.
If you think the Election Integrity Partnership was bad, how much do you want to bet that Media Matters employees have interacted with the government in terms of who to censor and target?
And I'd be willing to bet what we're seeing now has government overlap in violation of the Constitution.
Elon Musk says, stand with X to protect free speech.
In a post on the 18th, with 50 million views, Elon Musk says, This week, Media Matters for America posted a story that completely misrepresented the real user experience on X, in another attempt to undermine freedom of speech and mislead advertisers.
Above everything, including profit, X works to protect the public's right to free speech.
But for speech to be truly free, we must also have the freedom to see and hear things that some people may consider objectionable.
We believe that everyone has the right to make up their own minds about what to read, watch, or listen to, because that is the power of freedom of speech.
unidentified
Despite our clear and consistent position, Hey it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet and greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever coast-to-coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet and greet tickets.
Accessing a number of attacks from activist groups like Media
Matters and legacy media outlets who seek to undermine freedom of
expression on our platform because they perceive it as a threat to their
ideological narrative and those of their financial supporters.
These groups try to use their influence to attack our revenue streams by deceiving advertisers on X. Here are the facts.
Elon Musk says, To manipulate the public and advertisers, Media Matters created an alternate account and curated the posts and advertising appearing on the account's timeline to misinform advertisers about the placement of their posts.
These contrived experiences could be applied to any platform.
Once they curated their feed, they repeatedly refreshed their timelines to find a rare instance of ads serving next to content they chose to follow.
Our logs indicate that they forced a scenario resulting in 13 times the number of ads served compared to the median ads served to an X user.
Of the 5.5 billion ad impressions on X that day, less than 50 total impressions were served against all of the organic content featured in the Media Matters article.
For one brand showcased in the article, one of its ads ran adjacent to a post two times, and that ad was seen in the setting by only two users, one of which was the author of the Media Matters article.
For another brand showcased in the article, two of its ads served adjacent to two posts three times, and that ad was only seen in that setting by one user, the author of the Media Matters article.
Full stop.
What does this mean?
Employees of Media Matters, according to Elon Musk, Signed up for Twitter with a dummy account, intentionally followed extremist accounts, and then spammed the refresh button until finally the system ran an advertisement.
That advertisement was beneath a post, not on the post, and they said, Aha!
We got you!
But guess what?
Of course, things fall through the cracks, but Elon Musk's system on X prevents this 99.9% of the time.
Eventually, you will see an advertisement appear, but appearing beneath content someone chose to follow is different from content being served with.
You see how they're lying and manipulating it.
Media Matters article also highlights nine posts they believe should not be allowed on X. Upon evaluation, only one of the nine organic posts would have violated our content policies and we've taken action under our freedom of speech, not reach enforcement approach.
Here's a summary.
X will protect the public's right to free expression.
We will not allow agenda-driven activists or even our own profits to deter our vision.
Everyone has a choice on X. User and brand control on X is superior than a year ago.
Data wins over allegations.
Media matters does not reflect the user experience on X.
As we've seen in some parts of the world, when free expression is taken away, it is very dangerous and hard to get back.
That's why people who came before us fought hard to protect it.
With or without freedom of speech, we lose the checks and balances critical to a thriving democracy.
If you're really in protecting free speech, then we need to protect it completely.
Stand with X to protect free speech.
Well, something quite incredible happened, and the first thing I want to do is... Well, we'll just jump here.
ALX on Twitter says, Update.
Companies and individuals pledging ad spends on X in support of free speech in the wake of the misleading Media Matters hit piece.
Cobra Tate, $1 million per month.
Babylon Bee, $250.
$250k.
Timcast, $250k.
TWC Health, $150,000 per month.
Look at that!
250k. TWC Health 150,000 per month. Look at that. Wow. That's absolutely incredible.
Benny Johnson, 50,000.
Censor.TV, $40,000.
Quartering.
The Quartering, $25,000.
Keith Gross, Florida, $20,000.
Hodgetwins, $15,000 per month.
Donut Operator, $10K.
Elijah Taper, $2,500.
And PragerU will continue their advertising spend heavily.
Benny's show, Timcast, joined the Babylon Bee in pledging X buys to fight cancel culture.
Let me start in the beginning.
I see this tweet.
The Babylon Beast Seth Dillon says we're going to spend $250K on X in advertisement.
Admittedly, it's not as much as these big companies.
I mean, they're pulling out millions of dollars per quarter.
But Seth Dillon said, this number, while low, combined with everyone else joining in, could be substantial.
And he's correct.
The first thing I want to point out, TimCast has already launched an ad campaign to the tune of $50,000 for our documentary, Infringed, on X. Admittedly, I think we're having weird issues with advertising on X. So, we've already announced we will spend, and this is before this, 50k.
And why?
That's for you.
That's for gun rights.
That's for the Second Amendment.
The Infringed documentary on TimCast, no better place to advertise than on X. Why?
X is a very political platform.
And what do we want to do?
We want people to watch a documentary about gun rights and gun culture called Infringed.
Where else am I going to advertise it?
Now, we did advertise on Facebook and YouTube.
Comparable amounts.
We've spent so far I think around $40k on YouTube advertising this documentary.
Many people have seen the ads.
Watch Infringed on TimCast.com.
On Twitter, same deal.
The Twitter ad is currently in a weird place.
Admittedly, I even tried launching another ad for it with another 50k, and something weird is going on with Twitter ads, but I want to make sure I'm totally transparent on what we're doing.
We will.
We absolutely will.
Maybe have to reach out to someone at X to help us figure this one out, but with YouTube it's fairly easy, and we've done YouTube ad spends before.
Now, why did we buy the ads on X?
For infringed well before this political attack on the platform, I knew.
There are a lot of people who follow me on Twitter, 1.9 million almost, like 1,880,000
people are following me on Twitter, and I guarantee you, all of them are not members at TimCast.com.
Okay.
10% are not members at TimCast.com.
How can I get 188,000 people who follow me on Twitter to become members of TimCast.com and supporters of $10 a month?
Could you imagine if we were making $1.8 million per month?
three hundred people sign up at ten bucks a month. Eight thousand three hundred. How many
subscribers does this channel have? 1.21 million subscribers. Eight thousand three hundred people,
if they signed up at TimCast.com at ten bucks per month, just ten bucks, that's $83,000 per month.
And do you know what that comes out to?
That's right, my friends, just about a million dollars per year.
A million bucks.
If 10,000 people who subscribe to this channel signed up, think about what we could do.
So, this is why When I see this battle begin, it's a no-brainer!
Dude, I got almost 2 million followers on X, okay?
So when we're like, we made this documentary, we want people to subscribe to become members at TimCast.com and watch the documentary, and if we can add 10,000 new users off of one documentary, we're pulling in 100k per month!
Duh!
10 bucks a month times 10,000!
100,000 per month!
1.2 million per year.
Don't forget there's taxes.
You gotta pay a lot of those and it takes a lot of the money away.
So when they attack Axe and try to destroy this platform, which we use as a vehicle to try and build memberships where I have two million followers, I'm like, this cannot stand.
Not only did Elon Musk's efforts personally benefit me, providing evidence of a government collusion against me personally.
Aside from that, it's a platform that we engage with and we use and we like.
Because I'm not giving Elon Musk the money, I'm advertising my company!
It's really, really simple.
First, let's just lay it all on the table.
I'm gonna give you the 100% transparency.
When I announce, along with Seth Dillon, I'm not gonna speak to anybody else's motivations, whatever, you can be purist and you can believe in all the purity you want, let me just be as transparent as I can be.
Seth Dillon announces they're going to spend $250K on Twitter.
And I say, bravo, man.
Wow.
I wish I came up with that idea.
And then I thought, this dude is calling on us to join in the fight.
And while, obviously, we're sort of an activist company.
We have goals in the content we produce.
Political and cultural goals.
The first thing I'm thinking, like, understand this.
We just created a $50,000 campaign.
I don't know what's going on with it, but it's run its course.
So I guess I'm waiting for the bill.
Like I said, we need help with ads on X.
We launched a $50,000 campaign.
The tweet is pinned to my profile.
Watch Infringed.
Here's the link.
We want you, who follow me, to become members at TimCast.com.
This empowers us and expands our operation substantially, and allows us to make more documentaries about, like, gun rights.
I love it when people comment saying, this ad campaign is exactly why I'm a member.
Right.
It's not just about getting the entertainment, we have a mission.
And that mission is individuality, personal responsibility, the vision of the founding fathers, etc, etc.
So I think two things.
First, we already want to advertise on X. It's an excellent opportunity for our mission and for our company.
Now here's what I see.
If I announce that I'm joining the Babylon Bee in spending $250K, that tweet in and of itself got 6,600 retweets.
It is an advertisement!
By announcing I'm going to advertise, I have just advertised and shown people we will put our money where our mouth is.
Aside from the fact that when we spend $250k, those ad impressions will benefit the company, I just cut the cost of that ad campaign in half by announcing the ad campaign.
The announcement for me, for Seth Dillon, for the quartering, for TWC Health, for Andrew Tate, these are advertisements in and of themselves.
People are going to say, I'm on board now, this is an excellent move.
So I'm looking at, mathematically, If I can get, for the cost of, if I'm gonna spend $50,000 on X amount of impressions,
If I launch this campaign during this controversy, we will double our viewership with organic reach, and it'll make the ad runs even cheaper.
Get it?
I'm just saying full transparency.
Joining in the fray is good business, aside from the fact we agree with it ideologically.
Now let's talk about what this means.
Lance from the serfs reposts me and he's like, these people are pissing on a forest fire.
My dude!
He's like, they're giving the world's richest man money.
My dude, I'm buying ads, okay?
When I spend $250K on ads on X, all we need to do is sign up.
If we sign up 25,000 members in that ad campaign, which we're going to get tens of millions of impressions.
We've covered the cost of the ads in a single month.
Let's be real.
I say I want to spend $230,000.
Okay.
Let's say of that ad spend and the millions of impressions, all we get 2,500 new members.
It's low, right?
How many Twitter accounts have 2,500 followers?
Quite a bit.
Guess what?
In 10 months, we've paid for the ad campaign.
Yeah.
So if one user signs up at $10 a month, and we sign up $2,500, alright?
That's $25,000 per month, and let's say they stay signed up for 10 months, because it's just $10.
We've covered the cost of the ads.
I am not giving Elon Musk anything.
I am building my company, and we are putting our money where our mouth is, and selling ad- buying ads!
Like, we're buying commercials, dude!
Elon, we're not giving him- he's giving us stuff!
But I will add this.
Y'all should sign up for Twitter, Bluecheck, Verified, Premium, or Premium Plus.
You really, really should.
TimCast News does have a premium business membership because, once again, it's part of our marketing budget.
It benefits us.
We're not giving Elon anything.
We are going to Elon and saying, okay, if I give you X amount of dollars, I want this in return.
And it has benefited us.
So let's be real about what's going on, baby.
These advertisers can pull out, sure.
We will buy ads because it helps us.
Now, Andrew Tate said he's going to advertise X on X, quite literally giving Elon a million dollars to promote his own platform.
Okay, I think you'd be better off buying commercials on TV or other platforms to advertise X with a million bucks a month.
You can do an insane amount.
When Tucker Carlson was on Fox News, the biggest primetime show, he charged around $12,000 for a 30-second commercial on his show.
Fox News did.
I imagine for Jesse Watters, currently in a slot, substantially less.
For a few thousand dollars, you can buy TV commercials.
Yeah.
And others across the platform.
So I tell you what, my friends.
It may seem, simply, that Tim Kast and Benny Johnson and Andrew Tate and all these others are joining the fray Joining the fray and saying, we're going to stand with Elon.
We are, but let's be real.
We're buying stuff.
You know what I mean?
It's like, I'm going to support a company by buying their product.
I'm going to support Cast Brew Coffee.
Let me put it this way.
This is why we're winning!
You see that guy in Argentina, Javier?
He just won.
Good signs to come.
I'm going to talk about that one in the next segment.
We are winning, my friends.
We are.
And there's a lot of people who for some reason just don't want to wait a minute, but we're winning.
I'll tell you why.
Cast Brew Coffee, We're generating six figures a month in revenue.
I'm not saying profit.
Revenue.
Six figures.
The company just launched a few months ago, and instantly, we have a hard product, a consumable, with, you know, premium quality.
I gotta be honest, like, we formulated this coffee at castbrew.com.
You can buy it there.
Because we wanted good coffee, but it's for our coffee shops.
We're not trying to com- You know, everybody's got a coffee brand.
I'm not trying to just do an online coffee store.
We want to do physical locations.
Coffee shops are the easiest thing to do.
I drink coffee in the morning.
It's- It really was the easiest way to get started.
We want to do energy drinks and protein and things like this much, much, much harder.
The fastest way to getting physical locations where y'all can hang out, that we can build and make ubiquitous, coffee.
Seriously, burgers are hard.
Coffee is easy.
But guess what?
When you buy cast brew coffee, you're not giving money away.
You're getting coffee!
Like, you are buying a bag of coffee!
That's it.
This is the beauty of why we are winning.
This is the beauty of the parallel economy.
I am not asking you for a handout.
I'm asking you to buy a bag of coffee, and you get coffee for your money.
And guess what?
We use that coffee towards our business's ideological ends.
That is to say, we're going to do exactly what Disney does.
We're going to do exactly what these woke corporations do.
That's right.
Bud Light wants to hire Dylan Mulvaney to $180,000 for an ad campaign.
We are going to do ads that are beneficial to our worldview, the vision of the Founding Fathers, things that benefit the working class in this country, and oppose the woke cultist agenda.
They're crackpot views.
How many times have I said crackpot so far today?
Three?
So when you buy a product from us, when you download Public Square, the app, which shows you a list and a map of all the businesses that share your values, that's activism right there.
I don't need you to give me money in hopes that you'll be donating to a non-profit that may fight for your cause.
I used to do that for a living.
I used to go on the street and say, hey man, you wanna help save the rainforest?
Give me $10 and cross your fingers!
We used to joke that we were selling hopes and dreams on the streets.
Quite literally taking money for nothing!
But a good feeling.
Let me tell you what.
You want a good feeling right now?
Become a member at TimCast.com.
Go to TimCast.com, click join us for 10 bucks a month.
You get a lot.
You know what you get?
Access to all of our premium content which costs money to produce.
That's the product you're buying.
You get more than that.
The Infringe documentary.
The Game of Money documentary.
Watch Game of Money if you want to understand fractional reserve banking and how they're ripping you off.
When you become a member at TimCast.com, you're actually just buying a product, same as anything else.
But there's more.
You get access to our Discord server.
You can sign in and hang out with people and build community.
This is the point.
We want to build culture.
The money you spend is being used to invest in things like Cast Brew Coffee Shop in Martinsburg, West Virginia, and our plans for an anti-Times Square.
There is major ideological benefit when you become a member at TimCast.com.
But I'm not asking you to give me money for nothing.
It is not a non-profit where I say, if you give me $10, we will fight for you.
I'm saying, if you give me $10, you get a whole bunch of awesome stuff.
You know, as an aside, trust me, we're going to win this culture war, and the money is being used towards these ends.
We had a great time the other night skating, hiring pro skateboarders, expanding this, calling out the woke people who are trying to take over major sports, over video games.
It's all part of the plan.
Maybe what we should do, what we should do is do some kind of launch.
Maybe we'll do this.
We are investing a million dollars into a skate facility, a sporting facility, it's going to be all action sports, for entertainment content, and to... This is going to be amazing.
Pro skateboarders, pro scooters, pro BMX, rollerblades, all that stuff.
We want to inspire young people, and we want to take back action sports.
We've seen the success of people pushing back in comics, in video games.
Action sports is next, and we're right there.
Follow me on Instagram, at TimCast.
I've been posting more skate clips than I've ever posted in my life, and I'll tell you why.
I hate filming skateboarding.
I've been skateboarding for 20- 25 years almost.
I got my- my fair share of tricks, I've got my NBDs, never been duns, and I never film.
Because I don't care.
Skateboarding for me was never about a career or proving myself.
I filmed some stuff sometimes.
But then the woke people tried to destroy the industry, and they've been taking over.
Just like with video games, just like with comic books, just like with movies.
And I said, you know what?
We're taking it back.
So I started posting clips of pro-level maneuvers on a skateboard.
I just posted one of the most difficult tricks I can do.
And you may not know anything about skateboarding, but it's a hang ten, hard flip, late flip.
Complicated trick.
I may be the only person who's ever done it.
I don't know for sure, but I believe it's possible.
Many pros are saying, wow, never been done before.
It's a flat ground trick.
It's nothing crazy.
It's not like I'm jumping off a building or anything.
And I posted it for one reason.
I've done this trick eight years ago.
But I did it because we are going to take over.
We are going to tell those who want to destroy what we love, you will not.
We will win.
Maybe what we should do is a big opening event where we do a fundraiser to launch.
I think we're gonna do this.
I think we're gonna do it.
I think we're gonna do a goal fundraiser and maybe sell tickets for like $100 and create an opening event at the private facility one time.
One time.
Something like this.
We'll have to figure it out.
We'll have to figure it out.
Where we'll try to raise a large amount of money to fund, uh, to help fund this.
We've already announced the investment just now.
We're working on the contracts, the construction plans.
Already done.
This park is going to be amazing.
And we are going to be creating one of the most prominent East Coast facilities for skateboard and action sports content anyone has ever seen.
And it's going to be huge.
And maybe what we can do to help kick off this project, our line of professional equipment, yep, pro skateboards, and we're probably going to expand into many other areas, probably rollerblading for sure.
I want to bring that one back, I really do.
We are not just about skateboarding, we're about everything.
We want to take back this culture and push the woke people out.
We should figure out our launch campaign, where we can raise a substantial amount of money into the initial investment, because not only are we building a coffee shop in Martinsburg, we're putting up a skate shop.
That's right.
And maybe we can do something really, really fun.
Maybe it'll be like a hundred bucks a ticket to get access to this one-time only VIP event and facility.
We'll have to figure this one out.
A lot of security concerns, but my friends, we stand alongside Elon Musk.
I am personally, I will say this again.
Let me end by saying this.
The most important person on the planet right now is Elon Musk.
It's a fact.
We just saw the launch of Starship.
Elon Musk's efforts to make humans a spacefaring people.
That is the number one priority for me.
It is not about overpopulation or anything.
It is about spacefaring.
We need to advance technology.
Elon Musk is doing that.
I don't care about anything else.
Okay, I do.
But that's my top priority.
After that, Elon Musk took great personal risk in purchasing Twitter.
And his net worth took a hit because of it.
And they're trying to destroy him.
Elon Musk must succeed in these efforts.
It's not just about him, but he's leading the charge here.
His efforts to preserve a culture of freedom and personal responsibility and free speech, along with his efforts to make us a space-faring people.
Elon Musk is probably the one person on this planet that I actually I actually would, in many ways, look up to.
I'm not as big a fan of Neuralink, that freaks me out, but Neuralink's efforts to cure the blind and heal the paralyzed?
I'm like, this dude's doing tremendous work.
All of my life, I've never cared for anybody.
People have said, Tim, when you grew up, who did you look up to?
Nobody.
I had nothing but disdain for people.
Very few people have I ever looked at and said, I need to figure that out.
Most of my life I've looked at people and I said, they're doing it wrong and I can do it better.
Probably why I'm where I'm at.
Look, for real, people who are arrogant become successful because they're like adamant of being in charge.
Adamant that they must.
There are only a couple people I've ever been like, man, they figured something out.
Elon Musk is one of those people.
I look at what he's doing and I'm like, That dude's figured it out.
There are certainly things I think I could, I could do better.
Always.
This is why I sat down with Vijay Agade and Jack Dorsey on the Joe Rogan Podcast.
I'm like, dude, Joe didn't understand as much as anybody else, and Joe asked me to come.
There are things I think I'm good at, and there are very few people I think, well, let's be real, I'm not a race car driver, I'm not an astronaut, I'm not a rocket scientist, I know there's a million, you know, a billion, two billion people who are better at everything else than I am.
I'm not even a carpenter, I'm just saying.
When I look to helping humans, Elon Musk is hitting the L&L with a hammer.
I gotta leave it there.
Otherwise, I'm gonna keep ranting.
But I hope you all join us, and everyone else, in helping fight for X. So what you can do, go to TimCast.com, click join us, become a member.
If you don't care for that, sign up for X Premium, spend that 8 bucks a month.
Let us not allow these liars and manipulators, the evil corruption and government collusion, do not let them win.
Next segment will be at 1pm on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
The madman's done it.
In a viral video, Javier Mele, who was running for president in Argentina, goes off!
On leftists.
And he uses a very great Spanish word.
Now, I don't know YouTube's rules for certain words in other languages.
I know English.
And I know what words YouTube has a problem with in English.
But before I explain this, let me just say, Javier Millet is described as a libertarian, as an anarcho-capitalist, as far-right as anti-communist.
And in this viral rant, he is saying, do not give these awful leftists an inch.
In fact, he uses a different word for it, which I want you to see.
But the reason why this is important for us, and we're not Argentina, come on, but take a look around the world.
The far left is losing.
There was just a massive protest in Spain against socialism.
Now, some people are saying, just like with Brexit, signaling the election of Donald Trump, the victory of Javier Millet in Argentina signals that in the United States, Donald Trump will win, and the polls are showing it.
The only options Democrats have, you know, it's going to be to bring in someone other than Joe Biden and hope, hope this person can win a narrative war against Donald Trump when the Republicans are already winning the narrative war.
Now a viral video showed Javier Mele saying Merda over and over again about leftists.
And you know what that word means in Spanish?
I don't know if I'm saying it well enough, but it means let's just go for it because we're gonna play the video in Spanish, but warning for your kids, I'm about to swear.
It means shit.
Dude, I love this guy.
It's yet to be seen exactly what he will accomplish for Argentina.
But while many of you may say, I don't care about Argentina, understand the global phenomenon that is occurring right now.
In a tweet from EndWokeness, he says, Some reasons to be optimistic.
Argentina just elected anti-socialist economist Javier Mele in a landslide.
Trump beats Biden in all recent polls.
The right-wing AFD is surging in Germany.
Finland just formed its most right-wing government in its history.
Anti-immigration party is part of the government in Sweden for the first time ever.
Anti-WEF farmer party just pulled off a huge upset in the Netherlands and is surging.
The PEN's party is surging in France.
Hundreds of thousands in Spain are marching against the socialist coup.
Bukele has 90% approval after his crackdown on crime in El Salvador.
And they came after him!
They came after Bukele.
It was absolutely amazing.
They claimed that when he started arresting all these gang members, he was filing the constitution.
It was unjust.
I don't know exactly what went down, but some people have been critical, saying some people got criminally charged, arrested just for having gang tattoos.
I don't know what to say, man.
I think innocent until proven guilty is very important, but I can tell you this.
I was hanging out at, where was I?
This was MGM, National Harbor.
I was playing poker.
Guy to my left.
We're playing.
We're having a good time.
And conversation strikes up.
I mentioned something about not being here for much longer.
I said, where are you from?
He says, El Salvador.
And I was like, oh, really?
He goes, yeah, we're going back.
And I was like, you're going back?
I was like, what do you think about Bukele and everything?
And he said, it's amazing.
So my family was here.
Now we want to go back to El Salvador.
Not only that, there are a lot of people in the United States who also want to go to El Salvador.
That's how great things are becoming.
You know, look, there are questions about how do we ensure the constitutional rights of good people?
The problem is, the problem is this.
It's not so simple as to say that there is one line and it is absolute, because that's not the case.
While we believe in innocent until proven guilty, there is an inverse problem to consider.
That if you allow violent criminals to roam your streets, then people will be equally as victimized.
And what we're trying to do is find a balance between stopping criminals, whether they be in the government or the private sector.
My point is this.
If you go too hard in the authoritarian direction, you may create a future where the government becomes the criminals.
And we've seen it time and time again.
And they'll just arrest their political opponents.
Now, now again, I have a very rudimentary, my understanding of Spanish is probably kindergarten.
I can have very limited conversations.
I'm sorry, let me clarify.
I can't have a conversation at all in Spanish, but I know a decent amount of words so that I could...
Go to the store, I can buy things, I can ask directions, things like that.
And so there are some things I heard in this and I'm like, it doesn't seem like the subtitles line up perfectly.
So I reached out to one of the TimCast crew and asked them.
He said, well, you know, it lines up pretty much.
But the idea is basically there.
This guy is saying these leftists are shit.
They are shit and they will kill you.
Wow.
Well, in the comments, there are people asking about why this is.
And one of the comments says this.
For clarification, Millet's opponent is our current Minister of Economics, Sergio Massa.
And this is what he has achieved.
56.6% child poverty.
Record high inflation since the 90s.
The dollar reached 1,000 pesos.
He is printing 2 billion pesos a day.
There's a videos of his militants replacing opposing ballots with their own to commit fraud.
Pensioners are getting like a hundred USD each month.
Price controls everywhere.
Recently, we've had problems with gasoline supply because in a move to win votes through bribing consumers, he froze the prices of gas.
This obviously resulted in shortages that lasted like two days.
Massive social programs and subsidies, expansion to bribe people so they voted for him.
Because we have import restrictions and a restricted access to the dollar, importing anything is hard as F, as this includes medical supplies.
Recently, many big hospitals had to reschedule or cancel surgeries, had to postpone cancer treatments, and some medicine isn't coming into the country.
I could go on, to be honest, but I don't think it's necessary.
Source for all this, me, a tired and very worried Argentine.
Interesting.
Very, very interesting.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you The Meme.
My lord.
Jack Hadfield says the Libertarians actually did it for once.
And there's a meme.
And, uh, I love this meme.
It shows a guy in a libertarian shirt, and he says, hmm, today I will vote for a third party.
He then votes, and the results, typically in the meme, show a landslide for collectivists and leftists, and then the guy with the smug face smiling.
In this one, it actually shows the libertarian winning!
Wow, that's hilarious.
You know what's always funny about this meme, though?
For those that are familiar, where the Libertarian smugly votes for who they want, and this results in the Democratic Party winning.
I gotta say this to the Republicans who made this meme.
Libertarians don't like you, dude!
This is the funniest thing.
I always hear from, like, a Republican being like, if the Libertarians just voted Republican, then we would have won.
Like, bro.
Libertarians don't want to vote for you.
What don't you get?
That's just it.
Like, what don't you get?
They're not gonna vote for you.
If you take away the Libertarian vote, they're not gonna vote for you.
The argument is, enough of them might.
Just to preserve, say, gun rights or whatever.
But I don't think they're fans of the neocon warmongering, so.
That being said, a lot of libertarians coming around to Donald Trump.
Unsurprising, to say the least.
So here's a video from Reuters.
Argentina elected the right-wing libertarian Javier Mele.
It's new president as voters replace their hopes in a political outsider to fix an economy battered by triple-digit inflation, a looming recession, and rising poverty.
I want to show you this.
This is leftists in Argentina are crying and sobbing as their 40 years of rule has come to an end.
Yeah, not all of them are sobbing.
Many of them are sobbing.
These people are insane.
They are dangerous.
They are evil.
They are no different from Nazis or fascists.
Do not let them take power.
Congratulations to Argentina.
Now, there's a mixed parliament or a legislative body.
I think they're parliamentary.
In which case, it will be a challenge for... I think they might have a congressional system.
I'm not sure.
It's there's no clear majority, which means he will have to negotiate.
We will see.
From inside paper, President-elect Millet vows end of Argentina's decline.
The self-described anarcho-capitalist has pulled off a massive upset, ousting the populist Peronist coalition, which has long dominated Argentine politics.
56.7 to 44% a landslide.
Now Jack Posobiec and several others are pointing out that Buenos Aires got rid of paper ballots
because electronic voting machines were causing problems.
This allowed them to pull in the results very, very quickly and instantly see he won.
Now, my friends, this guy is endorsed by Donald Trump.
Trump congratulates Javier Mele on his win in Argentina presidential race.
This is a guy who is anti-woke, anti-communist, Supported by Bolsonaro and Donald Trump and Bukele, this is going to be very interesting.
Now I don't know what's going to happen.
I simply say, good luck, good sir!
Save your country.
In the meantime, this may be indicative of something much, much bigger.
As I pointed out early on, some people are saying that, like Brexit, this is a sign that Donald Trump will win in 2024.
Well, Joe Biden's floundering and failing.
It's apocalyptic for him.
We don't know what the Democrats have in store, and it's not just about winning an election.
I think it's fair to say That Donald Trump won the election but lost the vote.
And that seems contradictory, but what I mean to say is, Donald Trump convinced the American people to support him, but Democrats convinced more default liberals to cast votes.
Thus, Joe Biden wins.
Simplifying it again, Donald Trump and Joe Biden on stage, ain't nobody voting for Joe Biden.
Door-to-door activists asking people to fill out ballots, everybody voting for Joe Biden.
unidentified
And that's what really bothers me when people are like, you really think Joe Biden got 81 million votes?
Just three years after Democrat president held 26 point lead over MAGA rival ahead of the 2020 election.
Donald Trump is leading among young voters?
How is this possible?
Donald Trump is beating Biden with voters under the age of 35.
The new survey conducted by NBC News shows Trump leading Biden by two points, 46 to 44, in the latest in a series that have shown Trump pulling into the lead.
But it is among voters 18 to 34 which are the biggest shock in the survey.
Because if you go back, Biden won young voters by 26 points in 2020 over Trump, according to the New York Post.
Part of the problem may be Biden's handling of the Israel-Hamas war, which has seen young people take increasingly radical anti-Israel stances, where 70% of 18- to 34-year-olds disapprove of Biden's stance on the issue versus 20% approval.
Similar to the overall results, voters over the age of 65, yeah, they're basically in line with, um, are the only group to majority approve of Biden's handling of the conflict.
I said this before.
Israel-Palestine has ended Democrat.
There's three parties now.
I'm gonna put it that way.
The Democrats had their progressive coalition.
The Democratic Party welcomed Democratic Socialists.
But with Israel-Palestine, it's done.
And we saw this with AOC when she first got elected back in 2018.
The left criticized her for walking back her Israel stances.
She was very much free, free Palestine.
And then once she got elected, she was like, well, you know, recently she said the solution for Israel is targeted strikes.
Why?
Probably a lot of Jewish people live in her district.
And now she's concerned about whether or not she will face very serious opposition, should she take the pro-Palestine position.
This means young Democrats will not vote Democrat, and we're seeing it right here.
They're not going to vote for Joe Biden.
They were holding rallies where they said outright they will not vote for Joe Biden because of Israel-Palestine, in which case 10 percent of the Democrat voting bloc is 18 to 29, not even 34, 29.
If Democrats lose 10% of their supporters, let's say 5% in the general, what, Trump's going to win 55 to 45?
A five-point swing in both directions?
That would be bonkers!
That's kind of like what we saw with Javier Millet.
Let's say Democrats only lose half.
46% actually agree, I'm sorry, disapprove, with, oh no, I'm sorry, it's 44% for Biden.
So let's say young people are split and they only end up losing 2.5 in the general, giving Trump a 2.5 advantage, a five point swing.
Donald Trump wins.
And you know what else?
Here we go.
Michael Rapoport.
Oh, I love, I love this story.
It's from last week.
Michael Rapoport says voting for Trump is on the table.
Now, I want to say this.
I will welcome anybody who wants to do the right thing.
I don't care what their reasoning is for the most part.
Rappaport wants to support Trump because he's pro-Israel.
But understand this.
Anyone who claimed Donald Trump is a fascist who will destroy the United States But it's now saying they will vote for him because he supports Israel.
It's saying they care less about the U.S.
than they do about Israel.
Okay, I guess.
That's messed up.
I'll just put it this way.
I don't care.
Michael Rappaport could say he's voting for Donald Trump because Donald Trump is an a-hole.
unidentified
He could be like, I don't care if this guy destroys this country!
The far left, if you go to Oakland, for instance, you go to Berkeley, seeing all the businesses with signs saying, please don't hurt us.
I'm not kidding.
They literally say, please don't hurt us.
Now, most businesses just put leftist stuff in the windows so that they don't get attacked by the far left extremists.
But some of these businesses, there was a Burger King saying, please don't hurt us.
That's the future the left wants for you.
These are evil people.
Javier Mele is correct.
They are evil people.
A Trump supporter don't care if you've got a BLM flag in your window.
BLM will smash your windows out if you don't have a BLM flag in your window.
Don't believe me?
Look at Hamburg, Germany several years ago.
There's a photo where all the businesses are destroyed, and then one right in the middle is fine.
Why?
They put a leftist communist red salute in their window.
That's right, the red salute, the communist symbol, much akin to the swastika, in their window, symbolizing all the death and the murders.
In their window.
And you know what the leftists said?
Okay, we'll leave you alone.
Who wants to live in that reality?
Who wants to live in that world?
Guy Benson says, can they screw this up?
Fox News poll.
Issues the GOP handles better than Democrats.
Border security up 24.
National security up 20.
Terrorism up 18.
Inflation up 12.
Foreign policy up 12.
Crime up 12.
Spending up 11.
How could Republicans lose when you've somehow convinced Michael Rapaport to consider voting for Donald Trump?
This dude's whole thing is walking around and filming himself talking about how he hates Donald Trump, and now he's like, I'm gonna vote for the guy!
Okay, he's considering voting for the guy.
It's on the table.
Michael, I tell you this.
I respect it.
But these leftists are not going to give you an inch.
So you call them out for their support for Hamas, which they're doing, and they're going to give you the middle finger.
Your only option, if you oppose them, is Donald Trump.
Nothing else I can tell you, man.
But if Michael Rapaport wants to join the fray and have a conversation about... I welcome this.
You know, we're reaching out to his team to get him on the Culture War podcast.
Check it out.
Friday mornings, 10 a.m.
on Tenet Media on YouTube.
Some people have asked, what is Tenet?
It's a supergroup, as it were, right?
You know how sometimes a bunch of different musicians come together and form a band and you're like, wow, look at all... like the Traveling Wilburys?
That's basically what we're doing with Tenet.
Independent company, but it brings together a bunch of different voices that are, you know, doing their own thing.
But now we can cross-promote between each other with this massive opportunity.
I'm super stoked on it.
But we want to bring him on the show.
Why?
Bro, Michael, I welcome you.
I implore you to come on the show and just do nothing but rag on Trump and tell me exactly why you don't like the guy.
And then explain why it is you think you got to vote for him.
I mean it.
I mean it sincerely.
I want this dude to say, Donald Trump did this, Donald Trump did this, Donald Trump did this.
I'll be like, wow, those are all really bad things.
And then he'll be like, but these leftists are pro Hamas!
And I'm like, wow.
All of these things you hate about Trump, that you're angry about, and you recognize the far left is a bigger threat.
That's kind of crazy.
That's kind of crazy.
But I accept it.
And I'd love for you to state that.
Why?
I want more people to hear it.
I want everybody who's in that same position as Michael Rapp.
You're allowed to not like Trump.
You're allowed to not want to vote for him.
You're allowed to vote for somebody else.
But this dude's at the point where he's like, the left is so bad, I gotta consider voting.
Trump's on the table, baby.
Really.
I'm glad he's figuring that out, because I feel so similarly.
I think Trump is bad in a lot of ways, but I think he's the best we've got.
There's no such thing as a great president.
Trump has done some bad things, worthy of criticism, but he's better than the rest.
Shout out to Javier Millet, to Argentina for your victory.
Let's see how we play this one in 2024.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
According to a new documentary, The original cause of death for George Floyd, the medical examiner's report, did not mention asphyxiation.
And the argument now is that the FBI altered this in order to secure a conviction.
Derek Chauvin speaks out from prison in new George Floyd documentary, The Fall of Minneapolis.
The whole trial was a sham.
Now, why would they do this?
I want you all to understand something.
The government does not care about justice.
The government cares about function.
Most people do.
And I don't blame humans for being this way.
But we must understand the importance of rights, even to the detriment of society.
What I mean to say?
There may be a circumstance where an individual may be the catalyst for massive riots.
And if that person is innocent, the innocence must be upheld.
George Floyd.
Derek Chauvin.
I have my opinions, we'll talk about them, but I'll put it this way.
The FBI, the federal government, and local government's view of this case, as well as cases like Ahmaud Arbery, is it is better that innocent people suffer than we get riots.
Why did the McMichaels go to prison over Ahmaud Arbery?
Why did they arrest the man who filmed it and put him behind bars for the rest of his life?
The man who filmed it, going to prison, proves the point.
Let me stress this for you.
Ahmaud Arbery, the left claims he was jogging.
Not true, that wasn't even an argument in court.
In court, the question was, we know he's the suspect in a felony, but does that give the McMichaels the right to engage in citizen's arrest?
The jury decided no, and thus they were convicted.
But why arrest the man who filmed it?
For obvious reasons.
That video footage created the possibility of national unrest.
And so, so be it.
I'd be willing to bet the way the machine worked when they saw that, and I think this is proof.
Guys, these guys are going to prison for the rest of their lives.
Nothing else matters.
Because if they are acquitted, you will have national widespread riots and instability.
And the government doesn't care about you.
They care about maintaining stability for themselves.
And I believe the Ahmaud Arbery case proves it.
Now, as for the story of Derek Chauvin, this one's interesting.
I think anyone who looked at the body camera footage and went through all the details would conclude, well, Derek Chauvin should be responsible in some capacity.
Going to prison, getting charged federally, everything we saw.
In fact, the cop who simply held people back also got convicted.
Why are they sending the tangentially related individuals like the guy who filmed or the cop who held back a crowd?
Is the argument that if a crowd wants to intervene in an arrest, you must let them do it?
No.
It's because you are, I should say, your suffering is politically expedient.
Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis cop serving 21 years to the death of George Floyd, has described his trial as a sham in his first comments to the media.
Oh, it was.
Unquestionably.
I'll tell you why.
There were riots outside.
The jury was being brought in by armed guard, police with rifles.
When asked for a change of venue for a fair trial, the judge said, you can't get one.
No, just not even.
They said outright, there is no jurisdiction in Minnesota where you can receive a fair trial.
So we'll do it here.
If that's the case, you must release the person.
If the argument is no fair trial can be had, then you are innocent.
Have a nice day.
My view is, if this results in widespread rioting and billions of dollars in damages, so be it.
So be it.
That is something for us to deal with, to preserve innocents and protect the innocent.
Sometimes crazy people will do crazy things.
But simply because the criminals, the rioters, are scarier, does not mean we can put innocent people in prison.
Now, as I said, Chauvin probably has some responsibility in death.
When you take action that results in someone's death, you are typically, you know, punished because you did something wrong.
21 years, excessive.
And what's interesting, I've got a lot to show you.
I think the case debunked itself.
Here we can see the use of force, the escalation of force continuum.
In the trial, you can see two things are highlighted.
Unconscious neck restraints and conscious neck restraints.
In the middle, the most important thing.
Taser.
In the trial, the prosecution's own witness argued that Derek Chauvin was justified in escalating the use of force to a taser.
What did Derek Chauvin use?
He used what's called a conscious neck restraint.
That is, kneeling on the back of George Floyd with his knee... Look, the fact is, his knee was on his neck.
You can see it clearly in the camera.
And sometimes, on the upper back.
A conscious neck restraint is defined as a restraint on the neck that does not incapacitate.
An unconscious neck restraint is when you choke hold someone, blocking blood flow to the brain intentionally to incapacitate.
The maneuver used by Chauvin would be classified as a conscious neck restraint.
This was in the trial.
They said, yes, actually Chauvin, based on the actions of George Floyd, Chauvin could have escalated beyond this.
Now, I want to be clear.
This photo is arguing the inverse.
They're arguing that Chauvin was using an unconscious neck restraint.
That's not correct.
Conscious neck restraint is kneeling on their back.
That doesn't block the flow.
You're holding their neck down with your knee.
It doesn't block the arteries in the neck.
But let's read.
They say...
Her crowdfunded documentary, let me make sure I get this, journalist Liz Collin, they say her documentary gives weight to the suggestion that the FBI altered Floyd's autopsy to make it appear as though Chauvin had killed him by kneeling on his neck when it originally made no mention of any asphyxiation.
It also highlights multiple Minneapolis officers who all say Chauvin was using a technique he'd been trained to use when restrained, when he restrained Floyd, and accuses prosecutors of ignoring and overlooking evidence that would have exonerated him.
I think so too.
If he's trained to do it, it's not intentionally, it's not his fault personally.
It means the system is broken.
It means the system must be held accountable.
But here we go!
The government doesn't want to get in trouble, so they will throw Chauvin under the bus.
Take a look at this from Reuters.
No evidence drug overdose was main cause of death for George Floyd in 2020.
No evidence?
What do you mean no evidence?
There is evidence.
Proof?
I don't know about that.
I'm not a medical examiner.
The cause of death was publicly released as lack of blood flow asphyxiation due to pressure taken by the officer.
Actually, by a homicide.
And that's fine, whatever.
They can say what they want.
The argument is the FBI altered it.
Sure, fine, whatever.
I don't know.
Choose who to trust.
That's up to you.
I'm not telling you who was right or who was wrong.
But I can tell you this.
If it literally says in it that he had meth and fentanyl to a large degree in his system, that certainly is evidence a drug overdose was the main cause of death.
It doesn't mean the medical examiner ruled that it was or proof that it was.
Evidence does not mean proof.
I love going through this.
I'm gonna go through it again for all the skeptics.
A man is murdered a block away that there are bullet casings found on the front lawn of a home that match the gun that was used to kill this guy.
Evidence.
Hey, we found this.
You take it, you put it in baggies, you label it evidence.
Does it prove the owner of that home did it?
No.
Does it prove anyone in that home did it?
No.
It could have been in the murder or through the shell casings in that lawn.
But it is evidence that could be used to secure a search warrant.
So when you say there's no evidence, that's incorrect!
There was meth and fentanyl in his system, and they found a speedball.
That is evidence.
You could pursue it further.
Maybe.
You ultimately conclude that it wasn't the cause of death.
That's totally fine.
But this is how they lie.
Take a look at this one from the AP.
I love this fact check.
They say George Floyd's autopsy report is not new.
In a D plus 27, Biden being up by 10 points suggests he's actually down by 17 points.
It gets better.
What if I were to tell you it also oversampled Democrats?
Uh-huh.
So one of the responses from the polls, let me see if I can find it here in the replies, pointed out that it's actually substantially worse than this because it was 50% of those surveyed were Democrat.
We'll just give you the general numbers.
50% of those surveyed were Democrats, or like 48%, followed by like 24% and 22% Republican and Independent.
That means an oversampling of Democrats should give you more.
So if it's a D plus 27 and 2 to 1 you're surveying Democrats, Joe Biden should be up by 40.
Instead, it's 10.
You know what this means?
To be fair, the sampling might not matter that much because it is a D plus 27.
They're probably trying to get, you know, how many people here are Democrat, how many are Republican, and then match those who they ask based on this.
It's probably worse.
Joe Biden is probably doing even worse in New York than this, than this says.
We got a new one.
Post Millennial says big day to poll.
Trump would defeat Biden in PA even in three way race, including RFK.
39.9% of Pennsylvania voters said they would cast their ballot for Trump, compared to 36% who said they'd vote for Biden, and 7.7% who said they'd vote for Kennedy.
Now the question is, who is Kennedy stealing the votes from?
Because if you want to make the argument that Kennedy's stealing from Trump, then Trump is in for a landslide.
If you want to make the argument that he's stealing from Joe Biden, well then he's spiking the election and helping Donald Trump win.
Pick one.
Don't know, don't care.
The fact is, the celebrity statements.
Michael Rapaport.
Shout out, Michael.
Funny guy.
Saying that he actually would consider voting for Donald Trump.
That is the bigger red flag.
You give me all the polls in the world, but when the guy who makes a career of ranting to his camera about how he hates Donald Trump is now saying, I'm gonna do it!
Voting for Donald Trump is on the table!
I'm like, wow.
This is a big shift, my friends.
I don't know what Joe Biden could do in the next year to save himself.
Now let's entertain the idea that maybe, maybe, the Democrats are going to pull in Gavin Newsom.
I think that is a fair bet.
I wonder what the odds are in Vegas.
Can we make a bet on that in Vegas?
I don't know.
There's probably some way to do it.
I guess just predict it.
I don't recommend gambling, okay?
I'm just saying for myself, for myself.
Gavin Newsom.
Let's say Joe Biden bows out in whatever way possible.
What can Gavin Newsom do to prove himself?
Nothing.
Yeah, nothing.
The only option they have right now is not allowing Trump to run.
There's a very real possibility they put him in prison.
Do you think these Democrat jurisdictions are going to allow Donald Trump to be acquitted?
Do you think a New York jury will acquit Trump?
Well, I think the New York one is civil, but they're going to come after him.
Do you think a federal D.C.
area jury is going to?
No.
These liberals are going to convict Donald Trump.
The question then becomes what kind of imposition will he face?
I also want to say I think it's all backfiring.
You know, we talked about we talked about this last week.
I said there is one thing Donald Trump could do that would guarantee his victory in a landslide.
I don't know if I should say it on public YouTube, but I think I'll say it.
It's whatever.
Let me just say it this way.
Whenever a politician faces a threat upon their life, their polling skyrockets.
For whatever reason, don't ask me why.
If Donald Trump's life really was in danger, and these leftists actually went after him, he'd be unbeatable.
The smartest thing any leftist could do is ignore Trump, let him do his thing, and just try and win traditionally.
This is why I say to all of the people on the right and the left, Violence is not the answer.
It'll hurt your cause, no question.
Black Lives Matter, look at this.
They were enjoying plus 50% net support.
Or over 50%, it was at like 26% net support.
Their approval rating was over 50%.
Then the riots happened, the George Floyd riots, and it tanked.
All of a sudden, everyone said, we don't like these guys anymore.
And now, they're lower than they've ever been.
Amazing.
Who'd have thought getting violent would piss people off?
If right-wingers go out and cause problems, then these leftist politicians are going to see their support increase.
Well, for several reasons.
There's a sympathy factor, but a lot of these politicians would say, see, this is what we're fighting against.
That's why I say, like, to these leftists, man, if anything happens to Trump, he is going to win in a landslide.
It's already bad.
And the reason why I bring this up, they're desperate.
With these kind of numbers, how could Donald Trump lose?
So what are they going to do?
Well, everyone keeps saying they're not going to let Trump be president.
I think it was probably Alex Jones.
I think it was Alex Jones said Trump.
He fears they're going to try and take his life.
Well.
Short of that, you know, you gotta, it's a huge, huge, nah.
I'm not so convinced.
I mean, there's a possibility, but let me just stress this way.
If anyone did try to hurt Trump, and did hurt Trump, and they brought in Trump Jr.
or, I don't know, Vivek, you're gonna get Trump 2.0.
It's gonna be a landslide for whoever is next in line to be the heir to the MAGA throne.
I gotta tell you, man, things are looking good.
Cardi B's roasting Eric Adams for brutal cuts to NYPD.
Says crimes will go through the roof.
There's no denying it right now, man.
People are tired of the way things are.
They're tired of the crime.
I heard that in Brooklyn.
A local borough, just a district, flipped Republican in New York City.
I don't know enough about it.
Maybe I'm getting it wrong, but that's what someone said to me.
I should check on it.
My point is this, man.
I was talking to my friend about this.
I said, look, you get these uppity areas that are very nice, and they have low crime.
So the people who live there start voting for these reforms, being like, look, I don't see a lot of crime.
Why are we putting people in jail like this?
And then crime skyrockets, and you go, oh, that's why we were doing it.
They forgot.
They forgot why they implemented these rules and these laws in the first place.
The collapse results in people waking up and saying, you know what?
That was a bad idea!
So yeah.
Eric Adams, because of immigration, is cutting resources to the NYPD.
Crime is already skyrocketing.
Costs are already up.
I can't imagine people want to keep living this way.
But there is one man.
Donald Trump.
Far from perfect.
But let's just admit it.
2019, the economy was great.
And I'm not talking about mass spending, that was bad.
But unemployment numbers were record lows across the board.
In the black community, in the Hispanic community, in general.
