Nine Americans KILLED In Israel By Hamas, Israel Declares FULL SIEGE As World War 3 Fears Worsen
HANG OUT LIVE IN MIAMI WITH TIMCAST - https://timcast.com/timcast-irl-x-miami/
BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/
Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/
Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL
Nine Americans KILLED In Israel By Hamas, Israel Declares FULL SIEGE As World War 3 Fears Worsen
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Make sure to go to TimCast.com, click join us, and become a member to support this podcast and all the work we do, and you'll get access to exclusive uncensored segments from TimCast IRL and way more.
Now, let's jump into the first story.
The latest out of the Israel-Gaza conflict.
Israeli Defense Minister orders complete siege of Gaza as conflict with Hamas enters third day.
We're getting reports that between 800 and 900 Israelis have been killed.
This includes IDF as well as civilians.
We have seen videos circulating of party goers, civilians being kidnapped and paraded around being killed.
At least nine Americans have been reported dead, and there's an article circulating about a German tourist who was visiting a music festival when Hamas militants, terrorists, descended via parachute, paragliding in, and began going door-to-door and kidnapping and killing people.
Now, I want everyone to understand we are in the fog of war.
Friday night, we had a big event.
It was fantastic.
And I had spoken with Patrick David's team about that Saturday, going on his podcast.
And sure enough, we wake up to the news!
And I gotta be honest, I didn't see it.
Normally, I'm reading the news non-stop, no matter where or what I'm doing.
But wrapping up this event, going straight to bed, and then waking up, sitting down in that studio, and they say, do you see what's going on in Israel?
I'm like, I have no idea.
I have no idea.
The news is rather shocking and I suppose the more worrying thing is that we're now getting reports that Hezbollah from Lebanon is now firing on Israel and Israel's defenses are being split.
I believe we are going to see one of the most dramatic escalations of conflict in the region.
The actions that Israel takes right now, considering what we've all just witnessed, is possibly going to be the most extreme we have ever seen.
I don't know.
I'm not an expert on Israel-Palestine conflict, history, or relations.
I'm not.
I am but a humble man in America who complains on the internet.
And I'm seeing a lot of people now sing a different tune as to what they were saying about the war in Ukraine.
And I think there are good reasons for this.
For one, the conflict that we're seeing right now, even though many leftists are justifying it, protesting in defense I know, and I'm already triggering a lot of people.
I'm not here to say Israel's innocent.
I'm here to say it is war.
that Hamas does not represent them despite the fact that they use schools in these buildings.
I know, and I'm already triggering a lot of people.
I'm not here to say Israel's innocent.
I'm here to say it is war.
It is war, but I don't see the justification for anyone to target civilians.
Now, when it comes to Ukraine, I'm sorry.
I think there's a big reason why Israel is on our radar substantially more so than Ukraine is, and why people care a lot more.
And consider these things.
First, the propaganda that came out of Ukraine at the start of the war was really insulting the ghost of Ukraine, right?
There was the fake story about the sniper.
Many, many fake stories were pushed into the media.
And then quickly debunked.
No kidding.
I'm not kidding.
The ghost of Kiev, this fighter pilot, was video game footage.
It was all fake.
They were lying to us about everything.
Now, the difference with Israel is, longer standing U.S.
ally, I'm not saying you have to agree with the U.S.
being allied with Israel, strategic position in the Middle East surrounded by enemies, and the videos we're getting out right now, yo, I'm sorry man, it's, these are not videos you can fake.
The argument we're seeing is not that this is fake footage.
It's that Israel and the United States knew the attack was coming.
And failed to act.
I'm sorry, I'm just not in that camp.
I can only tell you this, we are in the fog of war and this happens always in the immediate aftermath of some kind of attack or strike and it is to the benefit usually of the attackers If you want to make some argument about a false flag or that there was intelligence they ignored, maybe.
I'm not interested in any of that right now.
Right there are good guys, there are bad guys.
Call it whatever you want.
Right now the problem is Americans have died.
A report of a German national has died.
Attacks from Lebanon.
What I can talk to you about, I can show you the news, and I can, after the fact, we can talk about the ideas of foreign intervention and things, but understand this.
The most important thing right now is We should consider the dangerous proximity we are in to World War 3.
I am... Calm down.
I am not saying this to be shocking, especially at a most shocking time.
I am saying, with the conflict in Ukraine not dying down, escalating despite the fact that we're seeing battle maps show Russia secure this territory, and the US continuing to send more money, You ask yourself why it is that these attacks happen now.
There are some rumors circulating, reporting that many of the weapons being utilized by Hamas to attack Israel came from the Taliban in Afghanistan, reporting that the Taliban is seeking to supply more weapons.
These are weapons that the U.S.
left behind, and it is not an accident.
It was a failure of the Biden administration to secure our resources in Afghanistan.
We should not have been over there in the first place, which goes into my arguments against foreign intervention.
Now we're going to see, because of this, because of these failures, demands from many people, neolibs, neocons, establishment, and many conservatives, you betcha, They're going to be saying, we must act to defend Israel.
There are a lot of questions around that, but what I can say beyond your opinions on the matter, for one, I'll say it, I'll say it a million times, I am, I am like 80 to 90% anti-intervention.
I have never been a absolutist against intervention.
I am typically and mostly, for a lot of reasons, opposing of intervention, but I'm not so blind to think that there aren't reasons sometimes that we intervene.
In foreign affairs, depending on how it affects us and other parts of the world.
There are questions around it.
I suppose the issue we must ask ourselves is that with the war in Ukraine, is Hamas making these moves because they know the U.S.
is fractured?
They know that we are divided and preoccupied.
They know that we are split right now over what's happening in Ukraine and fearful of what happens with Taiwan.
Moves now being made in the Middle East, destabilizing the region.
If these reports are true, coming from the IDF, I have no reason to believe they're not, that Hezbollah from Lebanon is now firing into Israel.
If the moves being made by Afghanistan are reportedly true, we are facing the prospect of a legitimate shot heard around the world, World War III.
You know, I know a lot of people don't want to hear it, a lot of people don't want to talk about it, but dude, When you're looking at active war in Eastern Europe, war kicks off in the Middle East, and we have already been having China flying and invading Taiwanese air defense.
Fine, say we're not there, but understand, there will be no moment in our lives where we simply say, that's World War III.
It will be only through the history books when they say, this is when it truly started.
When Archduke Franz Ferdinand was shot, nobody said, this is it, this is World War III.
One at a time, treaties kicked in, and eventually everyone was fighting, and they called it the Great War.
And they didn't even call it the Great War right away.
Same thing for the Civil War.
It took a while before they started, they call it War Between States.
They called it a rebellion, and it wasn't until, like, I think a year or two in.
Understand the context of history, with conflict erupting now between Hezbollah, Hamas, and Israel, with reports that Afghanistan, the Taliban, are seeking to aid and supply Hamas, and may be getting access through Jordan.
Yo, this could be a dark start.
When it comes to World War II, we call it World War II, But Hirohito was doing his own thing with the Japanese Empire attacking Southeast Asia.
Hitler was doing his thing in Europe, but it was a world war because there was massive and major conflict.
And of course, the Axis powers, we call them, were aligned.
They did have their own agendas.
And thus, the U.S.
is dragged into this war based on Japanese actions.
But I'm not a World War II history buff either.
But my understanding is that they never, Hitler and Hirohito, I don't think, ever actually strongly interacted.
It's just, you know, the world was at war.
I gotta breathe through some of this news.
I'm not gonna show any of the graphic footage.
But, my friends, what's happening in Israel is something that me and several other journalists had been discussing 10 years ago.
Something called Protective Edge in 2014.
They called it the Israel-Gaza-2014-Israel-Palestine War, whatever, Gaza War.
And the concern was that if, when these attacks are made from Gaza, and this is typically how it goes, Gaza will fire a bunch of rockets into Israel, the Iron Dome will intercept.
Israel will then retaliate, taking out the structures in which these attacks were made from.
The problem is, Hamas uses civilian targets as bases of operation.
The left in the United States has been protesting in support of Palestine, arguing they're not supporting Hamas.
The only problem is...
Look, Hamas is powerful and in control and operates from this region, and you can make all the arguments you want that the civilians don't want it, and I don't want to see any civilian die in a conflict, but if there are rockets flying from Gaza, you can argue that the civilians had nothing to do with it, but what is the response of Israel going to be?
I don't care what your opinions are and who is right is who is wrong.
There's a logic here.
It doesn't matter who you are, where you're from.
If rockets come from a target, the target's gonna get obliterated.
Let's read the news.
Israeli Defense Minister Orders Complete Siege Of Gaza As Conflict With Hamas Enters Third Day.
Israel's Defense Minister Ordered A Complete Siege.
Now, I said it earlier, but I'll say it again.
This could be the most extreme action we've ever seen.
In fact, it could theoretically be the end of Gaza.
Yoav Galant said on camera that Israel would halt the supply of electricity, food, water, and fuel to Gaza.
I have given an order.
Gaza will be under complete siege.
We are fighting barbarians and will respond accordingly.
Israel has retaken control of all communities around Gaza, and there is no ongoing fighting between Israeli forces and Hamas militants inside Israel.
The Israeli military said on Monday, following continued assaults by both sides.
Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari came more than 48 hours after Hamas launched a surprise assault
with thousands of rockets and sent armed fighters into Israel.
I can actually I'll show you the paragliding here.
unidentified
Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms for America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms for America has the exclusive
VIP meet and greet experience for you.
For each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit Moms4America.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet and greet tickets.
I believe the reporting right now is up to 8 or 900.
And I want you to understand as well, this is from an hour ago.
I think they may be wrong about... I'm pretty sure fighting is still ongoing.
The announcement by IDF Spokesperson Rehman Mazharra, Israeli jets continue to bombard the Palestinian enclave of Gaza.
On Monday, as the war entered its third day, Israeli strikes in Gaza have killed at least 493, including dozens of children, and has left 2,651 injured, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health.
An incursion by Gaza militants of this scale has not been seen in Israel since the nation's founding in 1948, which is why I say the actions taken by Israel now may be the most extreme we have ever seen.
As of yesterday morning, the Times of Israel was reporting Hezbollah fires mortars at Israel.
IDS strike hits tent on Lebanon border in response.
Iran-backed terror group announces its targeted Israeli military sites in the Mount Dove region in solidarity with Hamas attack on the south.
No reports of injuries.
We are also... We're getting a lot of information that's still coming in about politics in the United States that I want to be careful on.
Reports that the U.S.
unfroze $6 billion, that Iran said they would use the money however they wanted to.
Many people are saying, of course, this money was then used to fuel an unprecedented attack on Israel.
Look, man, I don't know, okay?
You gotta be careful about the fog of war.
What I can tell you is... Yeah, I don't see how you fake these videos, sorry.
It is possible propaganda is real and deepfakes and all that stuff, but take a look at this.
This is just a tweet that's going around.
This one's got 750,000 views.
Hamas terrorists paraglide into Israel.
They went door-to-door to massacre innocent civilians, rape and murder women and children.
And you know what?
I'm sorry, I believe it.
It's not the paragliding.
I believe the paragliding happens.
Come on.
Paragliding is not the most complicated thing in the world.
But going door-to-door and killing civilians?
We've seen videos of this.
And maybe the videos are fake.
Maybe you're saying, they're lying, Tim!
Okay.
But I've talked to left-wing activists.
I have seen them protest for Palestine and Gaza, and I have heard their arguments.
I'm sorry, but they lie.
You're not going to tell me that the people were advocating for far-left extremism while calling for the arrest of Trump supporters who say that we should abolish the police and celebrate when police arrest the right.
They're being honest about this.
When I was at, you know, say Occupy and his other left-wing protests, what they argue is there are no innocent people in the conflict.
They argue that Israeli civilians are an occupying force and they Themselves, whether militants or otherwise, are actively oppressing the Palestinian people.
I'm not saying that everyone in Palestine or every person believes that.
Because in response to this, you'll get people saying, well, that's only some people.
Fine.
But are those some people taking guns and going and kidnapping and massacring civilians?
The answer is yes, I'm sorry, but it is.
So take a look at this video, we'll play this for you.
unidentified
This is, uh... People didn't realize what was happening.
As people were paragliding, militants and terrorists... You know, and I'm seeing some people say, don't call them militants, call them terrorists.
I'm like, bro, you can call them both, right?
They are attacking Israel.
It is military action.
And it is a terror campaign to shock and terrify civilians.
People were just filming, as these people were paragliding and they had no idea what was about to happen.
Hamas terrorists sail into Israeli territory using motorized paragliders.
There's videos.
They're on these paragliders.
They're small vehicles with gigantic fans.
And they were gliding in and it looks like they had machine guns mounted to them.
This is crazy.
Israeli Defense Forces in response to a Hezbollah attack from Lebanon into Israel, IDF artillery struck targets in the area.
Understand, this, my understanding of this, I should say, is that this is not the most uncommon thing, right?
Hezbollah fires into Israel quite a bit.
The IDF has taken preparational measures for this type of possibility.
Fox News reporting, Israel led war with Hamas after surprise attacks, at least 800 Israelis dead.
Hamas has launched the biggest attack on Israel in years, killing at least 1,100 and wounding more than 2,000 with a barrage of rockets as gunfights are reported in Estorat, probably pronouncing it wrong, Estorat, and other cities in southern Israel.
Again, I know more about Ukraine.
I've actually, I've been to Ukraine, I've been to Israel, been to Ukraine like three or four times, and have spoken more to people about what was going on in Ukraine, and read substantially more about that as opposed to Israel.
The Israel-Palestine conflict has been so complicated and well beyond my lifetime.
Granted, there's a lot going on with Ukraine, of course, well beyond my lifetime as well.
But yeah, I don't know as much.
What I can say is there's calls and cries of hypocrisy.
Because there are people on the right who are all of a sudden saying, look at these videos, look what's happening in Israel, you have to, we have to defend Israel and et cetera, et cetera.
And then, you know, many people are wondering why it is that many people on the right are believing instantly every single video, despite what we saw in Ukraine.
And now, right, right.
They rejected the funding going to Ukraine.
They say, I don't care about these videos.
Ukraine is not America, but then Israel, you know, I have a simple answer to this.
Morality, in moral lines.
It has nothing to do with principle, and it hasn't for a long time.
I made this point a long time ago.
The idea that we would be opposed to funding war or defense in other countries is not an absolute position for anybody.
I mean, some people for- it is, it is.
But what I mean to say is, someone might say something to the effect of, you know, I think parents have the absolute rights as to what happens with their children.
And then there are parental rights and education.
It gets split between vaccination and between child sex change operations and things like this.
What I try to explain to people is it's not so much about parental rights It's about moral lines and what we accept as a society.
That is to say, do the parents have absolute right over what happens to their kids' health?
Do you think the answer is yes or no?
When it came to the issue of, like, say, vaccinations, people said the parents should be the ones making the choice.
And the schools shouldn't force the kids or get it done in secret.
What about child sex changes?
The parents should make the choice.
The left would argue the inverse.
They would argue simultaneously the parents have the rights, or I'm sorry, the right would argue the parents don't have the right.
They have the right to knowledge about what's happening in their school, but the left would argue the parents have the absolute right, meaning if they think their kid should get a child sex change, it should happen.
Now there's a conflict here.
In which instance do parents have the absolute right?
People on the right would argue that if a parent tried to intervene to give a child a sex change, the parents are wrong and the state should intervene, in which case the parents don't have absolute right over the health of their children.
Not every libertarian feels that way.
Many libertarians simply say, yes, the parents should have their right.
I bring this up to say, it is not about the surface level.
You need to understand the arguments individual makes and what their moral line is.
When it comes to the issue of what's happening in Israel, we have stories like this.
Crowds rally in D.C.
to stand in solidarity, pressure U.S.
after Hamas attacks on Israel.
I think I have this tweet here.
NYC DSA.
This was actually over the weekend.
This was on the 7th.
This is what AOC represents.
This is tomorrow, October eight at 1 p.m. in Times Square in solidarity with the Palestinian people
on their right to resist 75 years of occupation and apartheid.
This is what AOC represents. She's a card carrying member of the DSA. Hamas.
Well, I don't care what your moral position is.
If you like them or don't, whatever.
They kidnapped and killed civilians as a means to an end.
I think that's evil.
We have a thing called war crimes.
We try to make sure we're targeting not civilians, but military targets and strategic infrastructure when it comes to war to avoid what's called collateral damage.
What Hamas did was direct assaults on people.
That's why we call it terrorism.
This is what the left represents.
Sorry.
Look, We can make all the moral arguments in the world as to our positions.
But right now, we have American tourists, dual citizens.
We have foreign tourists are being killed in Israel.
And then this brings up the question of our position on foreign aid.
I am 80-90% anti-intervention.
I think Vivek Ramaswamy was making the point that Israel needs to get to the point where it's defending itself.
We are not providing for their military and dumping billions of dollars into this nation.
But once again, Israel, like Afghanistan and South Korea, many other countries that we've had military presence in, the idea is to secure Some form of constitutional republican, well, I should say neocon view because, you know, neoconservative.
It's not like what the Founding Fathers trying to make, but the idea is to Americanize a part of the world, plant the seed and then defend it.
South Korea, of course.
South Korea is doing great.
You know, they've got constitutional rights, they have... It is not too dissimilar to the United States, and that is nation-building.
And it makes you think, like, you know, they're living way better than what North Korea is.
Afghanistan was another attempt at this nation-building.
Iraq, of course.
For what reason should the U.S.
be engaged in nation-building?
To spread influence, to make people think the way we think, to make them live the way we do, so they adhere to our way of life, they adhere to our petrodollar system, etc., etc.
Israel is a beacon of light in an otherwise terrifying Middle East authoritarian religious fundamentalist, etc.
But that doesn't mean I believe the U.S.
should be the world police.
I believe there are substantially better arguments for supplying and defending Israel than there are for Ukraine.
And if you are someone of the position of anti-intervention, And now, when it came to Ukraine, you said, we shouldn't be spending money on these other countries.
Then when it comes to Israel, you're like, we must defend Israel!
I'm like, you better articulate your arguments.
I'll give you a minute to make your argument as to why you support intervention in one place and not the other.
But I think there are legitimate reasons, and my point ultimately in this is, I'm not gonna fall for these stupid arguments where it's like, I thought you said no funding for this country, but now you want funding for this country.
Dude, they're not the same country.
Completely different conflicts, and it's a question of, do you support or oppose intervention?
For instance, my friend Cassandra Fairbanks, she is anti-intervention, and she is saying, don't fall for the propaganda.
We should not be supplying funding to these other countries.
It makes no sense.
Totally understand the position.
I fall mostly in that camp.
But, I can tell you this.
When it comes to Israel, I'm a bit more lukewarm.
I understand why we provide funding to Israel.
Many people said, explain to me why Israel is an important ally to us.
I don't think you can, blah blah blah.
No, there are a lot of reasons why you can.
Look, when it comes to Eastern Europe, we have NATO.
Ukraine makes no sense for us to be involved in.
It is a corrupt state.
It is basically territory.
They call it the Afghanistan of Europe.
It would make sense that we're trying to basically make a block out of Europe, and so securing the territory of Ukraine is just more conquest, and then we can start to nation-build there and make them fall in line.
But they're not an ally of ours.
It's just a big territory on the border of Russia that Russia uses to transport gas.
It is not the most densely populated area.
It is fertile farmland.
You can make the argument, we should take it because farmland.
Fine.
They call it the breadbasket of Europe, my understanding is.
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating and affecting the 2024 presidential election.
We do all of that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
Israel is basically a very large military base and weapons manufacturing base for the United States in the Middle East.
It may be a destabilizing factor in the Middle East.
But the argument is, militaristically, I understand why we're funding it.
We have a massive weapons hub in the region.
Sure, call it whatever you want.
I'm not saying these are good positions to have.
I am saying, if someone came and said, we've got Ukraine, we've got Israel, and we're going to provide funding to both, I'd be like, well, there's a lot of reasons why we would have a military presence in the Middle East, because we need ways to bring supplies, weapons, etc.
into the area, and we're trying to basically get a foothold in there.
Ukraine, it's like, dude, we control Europe.
Europe is us.
Europe is NATO.
Europe is Western forces.
Why are we going to war with Russia over this?
And there's treaties we made about the Donbass going to Russia.
Oh, but we want the Black Sea.
Now you're talking about oil and all this stuff.
That's what it always is.
That being said, I am not saying that better arguments or some arguments is justification.
All I can tell you is, when I see this stuff, and people go on to make these arguments about, look at these videos, look at these videos, we must help them, we must intervene.
What bothers me is I say, you want to pull up videos from South Africa?
You don't?
You want to pull up videos from China?
The Uighur Muslims are put in concentration camps.
Sudan?
I didn't think so.
How about Libya?
Oops, that was our fault.
That was intervention.
And now a slave trade has returned.
This is why I'm typically like, bro, at the very least we can say we're not involved in this.
Why is America the world police?
I don't see it working out.
But that being said, understand, the world is vastly more complicated than any of us realize.
We, you know, I sit here reading a news story, gleaning cursory information trying to understand what is a major international conflict of powerful individuals who keep secrets from you.
So it is hard to know what is and what isn't.
And that makes it very, very difficult.
But because of that, I typically say, you've not justified why we are actively engaged in conflict in these regions.
And so I typically say, I don't want to be.
Understand that for every video you see coming out of Israel, there are videos coming out of other countries, and no mass efforts and media coverage demanding that we be involved.
There's two big reasons for this.
One, obvious propaganda.
The second is, Israel's an ally.
Of course we care more about Israel than we do about Libya!
But I do think it is the fault of NATO as to what is happening in Libya, and for that, we probably have some responsibility to try and help in some capacity. Saying
that does not mean that I think we should send military or try and stabilize the regional world
police. It's more like diplomacy. But I will not make, I cannot abide this. Oh, 30, 40 years ago
we did a thing and now the children must keep paying for it.
I think at a certain point we just said, like, hey, maybe we secure our borders, get rid of these bunk-ass, like TPP, these terrible trade agreements which subjugate the United States, bring back our manufacturing, secure our borders, and lead through strength And not through the barrel of a gun pointed at the heads of everyone else.
What I mean by strength is showing people that what we do works, we're successful, we're wealthy.
Trade.
Produce things that they want and be that shining city on the hill.
Instead what we get is A failing country.
It is a failing country.
It's split down the middle.
It's facing internal conflict.
People are fighting each other in the streets in D.C.
over this.
Security is heightened.
You've got a porous border.
People are pouring through.
Eric Adams literally saying the border should remain open?
No, what we're showing is we're a fractured, weak nation that is just pointing guns at people.
And that's not building confidence, and that will only build resistance.
Yo, look, man.
I'm not gonna try to be the arbiter of morality.
When it comes to Ukraine and stuff, my issue is, hey, please don't drag us into World War III.
And now, with this conflict happening in Israel, I wonder if, because the U.S.
wasted its time and energy in Ukraine, now being distracted and pulled in two different directions, Hamas and other organizations, the Taliban, Hezbollah, see an opportunity to make a strike on Israel.
A strike on Israel is not the same degree of... It's not as extreme in terms of global conflict as, say, like the Russian-Ukraine war.
We're looking at nuclear powers here.
But, now the U.S.
is going to be... What do we do?
Are we going to be able to supply weapons and resources to Israel in this conflict now as well?
We're already strained.
Very strained.
And it's already destabilizing.
The U.S.
is already in a destabilizing period.
With the 2024 election coming up, with the FBI saying Trump supporters are extremists, this country is about to be ripped in two.
And what happens now if China makes their move on Taiwan?
The forest of the trees, my friends.
We may be staring down the barrel of World War 3.
People have already claimed that Ukraine-Russia was the start of World War 3.
Fine.
Let's say this.
If war is breaking out, and it did.
Israel declares war in Israel.
We've got massive war on a massive scale in Israel and in Ukraine.
The dam is about to break, I fear.
I hope you're paying attention.
I will not be the arbiter of morality for you.
I'm not gonna sit here and say like, for instance, Ben Shapiro's had a lot of tweets about what's happening in Israel.
Of course, he's Jewish.
This one hits right at home for him, probably.
I'm not going to sit here and argue the moral positions when I know Ben is articulate enough to actually break down his position on what should or shouldn't be when it comes to intervention.
And that's my point ultimately here is, you're going to get a lot of people who are going to try and scream hypocrite.
My answer to the people who are accused of hypocrisy, you better lay down your moral arguments and your strategic arguments as to why one intervention is right and one is wrong.
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm saying explain it to me.
Because you better have a good explanation.
I see the U.S.
being dragged into conflict which may result in a World War III and you will regret it.
I'm sorry, Ben's right though when he says look at these videos.
You want to talk about what's happening in the United States and a lot of people talk about like civil war and stuff like this, they don't get it.
They do not get it.
Watching people paraglide.
There are no rules!
I think I understand this because I grew up in Chicago.
When some guy's walking down the street and he pulls out a gun and shoots at you for no reason.
You don't get it.
You don't know why.
There are no rules.
They say, you know, we talk about this, I think we were talking about this at the IRL event, that psychic barriers.
You know, there are people who think, I can't do it, right?
There'll be a hotel lobby.
Inside that hotel lobby is a prominent politician.
In the front of the hotel lobby are security guards.
Someone sees that and says, I can't go in there and ask a politician a question.
Well, hold on, why?
That's called a psychic barrier.
You believe in your mind, you can't go there.
But guess what?
If you walk up to that door, that security guard might just open the door for you.
Don't make the assumption you can't be there.
No, you walk up and just walk in.
Security guard doesn't mean no trespassing.
No trespassing sign means no trespassing.
But even when it says no trespassing, it means it's not open to you.
You don't know.
You try and walk in, security guard says, I'm sorry, this is a private event, you can't come.
You say, oh, okay.
But for a lot of people, they see that and they make assumptions.
They make assumptions.
Psychic barriers, my friends.
We can't perceive what could be or what would be.
So I just bring that up and I say, be careful about where we're headed.
Understand that the only real law is natural law.
That is to say, you can't fly with your arms.
You can fly by building a plane.
You know, you can build tools.
You can't control the wind, but you can adjust your sails.
We do not control reality, but we can adjust our positions through technology and through our actions.
We can persuade and alter the courses of even great historical events.
But I just say, understand this.
This could be a dramatic escalation.
So I hope for whatever it is you're watching or paying attention to, when we talk about getting emergency food, when we talk about getting supplies, it is because of these things.
I hope this calms down quickly.
But I fear, because of what's happening in Ukraine, it won't.
And the scary thing is, This whole region, it's all interrelated.
It really is.
Syria, into Turkey, into Ukraine.
Man, this could get bad quick.
Alright, I'll leave it there.
We're gonna have more updates throughout the day, more stories coming up.
Hit the like button, subscribe, all that stuff.
Thanks for hanging out, and I will see you all at 1pm.
I'm sorry, I'm not going to mince words on this one.
I think Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is evil.
I think she is an evil person.
And I think... I'm just tired of giving the benefit of the doubt.
That is to say, I don't like neocons either.
But I'm not going to pretend that there is an easy path to peace.
So I can sit here and whinge all day on the internet about what's happening in Israel with the war in Gaza, and there is no good answer I can give you.
I can only tell you that there are evil people celebrating death in the Democratic Socialists of America, an organization for which Ocasio-Cortez is a member of.
Now you've got squad members accused of glorifying what happened.
And so I look at this statement.
from a Democrat to show you that we are dealing with what I can only describe as an impossible situation.
And this is why I tend to be anti-intervention.
The United States is not under attack.
We have not been killed.
American citizens have been killed in Israel.
It is horrifying.
And there should be some answers for this.
But if you as an American choose to go to an area in conflict and lose your life, I do not believe that is the fault of every other American or should draw us into war.
I'm not going to pretend to have the greatest answers in the world for what's happening right now because it is horrifying what we are seeing in Israel.
But you all do need to understand that there are many atrocities happening all over the world and we cannot answer for all of them.
What I can tell you is we can absolutely condemn Horrifying and evil actions that are coming out of Hamas.
That we see.
They utilize Gaza.
They use civilian areas.
These people are evil.
There's a viral video that's got me real fired up.
Heliorosis.
Showing in Times Square at an event promoted by the DSA, a woman saying That they have launched an incursion into Israel, that they are firing missiles, and they're all cheering and clapping as the rest of us watch the world descend into chaos.
And you know what I can say?
Now a lot of people are gonna come out and they're gonna be like, yeah, but Israel is an occupying force, and others are gonna say Israel has a right to exist, and it's Hamas that attacked civilians.
It's war.
It's war, baby.
There's no celebrating any of it.
Look, I look at what's going on in Ukraine and I say it is bad that Russia is invading.
But that doesn't absolve the West of its responsibilities or its culpability either.
That's why I'm kind of like, man, my positions tend to be the U.S.
secures its own borders, protects its interests, displays strength through trade and manufacturing and economic power.
And of course we have allies overseas, but the idea that we are the world police makes literally no sense.
Are we going to now rush into the Strait of Taiwan to defend Taiwan from China?
How can we maintain that conflict?
And it's all bubbling up.
We can't even maintain a presence in Ukraine.
They refuse to declare formal war, but we know what's going on.
And now, all the money we dump into Israel.
I'm sorry, look.
It's a rock and a hard place.
If the U.S.
pulls out its support for Israel immediately right now, Israel gets crushed.
I'm not a fan of that.
I'm not a fan of what we're doing overseas in the first place.
Take a look at Afghanistan.
My position is we should not have been there in the first place.
But the way Joe Biden pulled out may have just made everything worse.
The reality is such.
Circumstances for the conflict around the world exist.
We must adapt to it, to figure out how to de-escalate, secure these areas, and remove our involvement over a long period of time.
And then, of course, you'll get the establishment neocon neolib of, you know, American exceptionalism, of spreading democracy, and they're going to say, if we leave, there's a power vacuum.
Look, man, perhaps.
Perhaps there is no good or easy answer, but I'm going to show you this video that boils my blood.
Here's a video.
Andy Ngo retweeting a video by Julio Rosas.
At the Hamas Celebration Rally in Times Square organized by the far-left socialists and Palestinian nationalists, a speaker talks about the Islamist attacks that have killed hundreds of Israelis, mostly civilians.
The crowd cheers.
I think it is absolutely fair to play this video.
Despite the fact that I do not want war between Israel and Palestine, it's a conflict that has existed long before I've been alive, and for which I have very few good answers on, I'm not going to pretend to be a moral authority here.
What I can tell you is, this is disgusting.
This is disgusting.
Think about it strategically.
What was gained by Hamas launching these attacks on Israel, kidnapping, killing civilians?
I'm going to play the video for you.
Let's play the video.
unidentified
Early morning on Saturday, October 7th, our resistance stormed illegal settlements and
paraglided across colonial borders.
We are going to the largest military base around Gaza, Tehran.
Reaching Tel Aviv!
In this operation, I love the resistance fires more than 5000 rockets.
Reaching Tel Aviv, reaching Tel Aviv. They are celebrating and cheering for rockets being fired
on civilians. I hate all of this.
I'm sick of the American foreign policy.
Donald Trump gets no consideration from me when he fired rockets into Syria.
I'm sick of it.
You know why I can appreciate Donald Trump's presidency?
No new wars, a timeline for Afghanistan withdrawal, negotiating with the Taliban.
I don't like the Taliban.
I don't like North Korea.
I like peace.
And that means we do not exacerbate the problems.
These people are abject evil.
This is an event promoted by the Democratic Socialists of America, for which AOC is a card-carrying member.
These people are abject evil, there's no question.
When you come out and say, 5,000 rockets were fired reaching Tel Aviv, you are not celebrating conquering the military of your enemies.
Or trying to stabilize anything.
The only thing that was accomplished by these attacks was to further destabilize and cause a crisis for civilians.
Innocent civilians who were killed.
Innocent civilians who were captured.
Israeli citizens.
And now, the retaliation is going to be massive collateral damage on the citizens and civilians in Gaza.
And I'm seeing these leftists come out.
And they're saying now they're going to harm these poor children in Gaza.
Dude, it's war.
The attack was launched by Hamas.
And you've got people coming out and saying, yeah, but how did Western intelligence miss this?
I don't know.
The Biden administration is completely incompetent.
That's one answer.
I do not care for us to be involved in all of these conflicts, but I can at least tell you this.
A sign being held up by one of these activists says no more funding for Israel.
They're not coming to you in good faith and saying, we shouldn't be providing funding for Israel because of foreign policy issues.
I will tell you in good faith, my concern with U.S.
funding foreign nations is that we are extracting from the American people for what?
The petrodollar.
Justify it.
Our borders are open.
Our manufacturing base is weakened.
The interest rates are skyrocketing.
We ain't doing so well.
Let's make our country great.
I don't see why I should have to worry about a border dispute in Ukraine.
I don't see why we decided to get ourselves involved in Israel going back 70 years.
That is not to say I don't recognize the conflict we are in today.
There is no easy answer.
Fine.
But when someone comes to me and says, on my libertarian principles, we shouldn't be providing funding to these countries, I'll say, You know, I agree.
And then they cheer when their side blows up kids and kidnaps civilians.
I'm going to refrain from swearing.
But these people calling for the defunding of aid to Israel are not doing so on a principled ground about supporting America.
They hate America!
They hate this country!
And what they want is to strip Israel of its defenses so they can massacre more civilians because you've heard what they said.
They're illegal settlers.
They're colonizers.
Look, I cannot, in my life, For one, completely grasp the entire history of the region, nor can I provide you with sound solutions to a problem that has existed long before I came into existence.
I can tell you that what I want more than anything is no fighting.
Peace.
And there can be peace.
There can be.
But this attack was launched by these extremists who celebrate the bombing of civilians.
I'm sorry, evil exists.
I've been to Israel.
I have concerns.
Absolutely.
About the U.S.
providing funding, about the formation, all of these things.
About the settlements in the West Bank.
I want justice.
I want peace.
But I can tell you this.
When you are dealing with people who celebrate the bombing of civilians as a military victory, understand what this conflict is.
I am not advocating for providing funding to Israel.
Absolutely not.
I am overwhelmingly anti-intervention.
I think the U.S.
has involved itself in so much.
Now, I'm not so naive.
I'm not.
I understand China would gladly seize and conquer whatever they could if they had the chance, which puts us between a rock and a hard place.
I don't have all the answers.
I can tell you there's no way the U.S.
can sustain itself in a conflict over Taiwan.
Mainland China's right there.
They have unlimited supplies.
I'm saying that figuratively.
Their base of operations is within miles, a couple dozen miles of Taiwan.
U.S.
bases are Australia?
Yeah, it's far away.
We have Japan, we have South Korea, but we will not be able to maintain a conflict over Taiwan.
China is literally right there.
So what do we do?
For one, guarantee security to our allies to the best that we can, but they gotta pay.
I have no problem with alliances.
I just don't think we can involve ourselves in wars.
And there's a conflict and a dispute over Taiwan, which puts us again between a rock and a hard place.
My friends, this is why I will not run for office.
It is why I am no president, no leader, no member of Congress.
I don't have the answers.
Look at this.
Here's another video.
Let me play this video for you.
What does from the river to the sea mean?
It means the entirety of Israel.
It means this whole landmass will be conquered.
These people do not seek peace.
They call Israel colonizers, and by all means.
You can say, Tim, the formation of Israel and blah blah blah, don't know, don't care.
Wasn't alive for it.
Can't answer for it.
Had nothing to do with it.
All I want is for the fighting to stop.
I don't think there will be a solution.
Not an easy one.
So what do we do?
I can't tell you, I'm sorry.
I literally just don't know.
What I can tell you is there's one group of people that is saying Iron Dome defense system.
They're saying Israel should be allowed to exist.
But there are questions I have over the West Bank.
The stories that we hear and the dissolution of what was once considered to be Palestine, it's now falling apart.
And videos of settlers coming in and just taking properties.
It's conflict.
It's colonization.
Call it whatever you want.
It does not justify the massacring of civilians.
I don't have the answers, and nor can I pretend to be knowledgeable, but I can tell you, you're going to get hyper-partisans on all sides.
What I can also tell you is I find AOC to be abject evil.
And I say that because, I show you right here, she is a card-carrying member of the Democratic Socialists of America.
Unquestionably.
And the DSA was in solidarity with the Palestinian people and their right to resist 75 years of occupation and apartheid.
Why kill civilians?
You see, I mentioned this in my earlier morning segment about the conflict.
The left views each and every Israeli, friend of them, tourist or otherwise, as an occupier of stolen land.
They view the same thing of the United States.
They hate this country.
A young German woman, She was at a music festival.
She's dead.
They paraded her body around.
I do not believe these videos are faked.
There's possibility it's fog of war and it's propaganda.
Fine.
But people have matched a tattoo on the leg of a woman to a German tourist who was visiting this place.
A conscience is objector.
I believe she was a dual citizen, but a German national.
Didn't want to fight.
Was a peace activist and a pacifist.
And this brings me to war.
I want to stress, I call on Ocasio-Cortez to condemn the Democratic Socialists of America and call out their celebration.
I'll put it this way, I'll keep it light.
They promoted an event that celebrated the mass killing of civilians and the bombing of civilian centers.
Barack Obama killed an American citizen bombing a civilian restaurant in a country we are not at war with, Yemen.
I want answers.
Donald Trump ordered a commando raid in Yemen.
It resulted, allegedly, in the death of an 8-year-old girl.
I try to be reasonable and very careful.
We know for a fact the Obama administration admitted to the death of Abdur Rahman al-Awlaki and the extrajudicial assassination of American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki.
Not a good guy, by my understanding.
Still, an American citizen who has rights.
All humans do.
I can understand wide leeway in war, whatever you want to call it, but the killing of a 16-year-old American citizen at a civilian cafe in a country we are not at war with.
Now, when it comes to Donald Trump's commando raid, these are allegations, not yet confirmed, but believed to be likely.
Okay, what can I say?
If it is true Obama did this, lock him up.
If it is true Donald Trump did this, lock him up.
But, in the meantime, both, while I do believe the Obama one is more of a settled matter, investigate both.
I don't care.
The idea that we just drop bombs on civilians is disgusting and abhorrent, but this is war.
You'll find that people are evil.
I don't know, man.
I don't know if... Sometimes I truly wonder about goodness, but I feel like if the argument right now Is that Israel is trying to maintain peace and Palestine is celebrating the killing of civilians?
Then I know where I'm at.
I know where I'm at.
Stable Israel.
A stable Israel.
Because I've been there.
They're not perfect people.
No country is.
But when you come out celebrating the bombing of civilians, I'm sorry, I'm not gonna support you.
And even if you don't believe it, they'll come out and they'll say, yeah, but Israel's lying.
What they're really doing is this, that, or otherwise.
Yeah, well, they're doing a better job of propagandizing than are you.
That's all I can say, if that's your argument.
Because right now I can tell you what I see.
Israel, with all its faults and all its problems, maintaining peace to the best of its abilities.
And Hamas paragliding in and killing civilians, and they celebrate it.
You wanna know what?
Many people are gonna argue it's propaganda, they're fake videos.
Fine, go ahead and do so.
They're still celebrating it.
That's why I despise these people.
They're celebrating it.
I don't... You can say the videos aren't real, you can say this woman never died, you can believe whatever conspiracy you want, you can say Israel allowed it to happen, whatever.
They're celebrating it.
In Times Square, in our country, there are people cheering, leftists, saying no more funding for Israel, and they are celebrating the bombing of civilian targets.
Julian Assange exposed something he called collateral murder when the U.S.
killed journalists.
Good.
Expose the crimes.
I know the world is not so simple and it's not so easy and war happens.
Let's talk about those who are too naive to realize this.
While I condemn the killing of civilians, and I have concerns about what Israel does same as anyone else, I think it's clear to see that one side is an ideological extremist faction celebrating the killing of civilians, and Israel is often under the microscope and attacked for the killing of civilians when it comes to this conflict.
To be a pacifist and to ignore the realities of war, I think it's a harsh reality we can't ignore.
But there are answers other than invasion.
But, again, I recognize fully that my information, my understanding of this is cursory, and so my frustrations may just be screaming into the wind.
This young woman, Shani Luke, she was a peace campaigner and conscientious objector, and now she's dead.
There are reports that there was a gun ban that resulted in people being unable to defend themselves.
So what do you do?
Do we stay strong, defend our borders, and say, if you attack us, we defend ourselves?
Do we say, if you attack our allies, we defend ourselves?
It's a tough question.
If the people in Israel were able to keep and bear arms at this festival, Many of them would be alive today.
But I do believe the issue can scale.
And so I think about what it means for Israel and how they should respond.
Does Israel have the right to keep and bear arms to defend itself and its borders?
You betcha.
Should the U.S.
provide money for nothing and the guns for free?
Tell me what we're getting out of it.
Now, I know Israel has massive Defense contractors and manufacturers, they make a bunch of components for weapons.
And there's a benefit for us in this capacity, but it's more of a deal with the devil, in my opinion.
And what I mean by that is, we are, we are, we are the devil.
I'm saying the United States war machine is.
Take that out of context, leftist, have fun.
I'm saying that we are the ones who offer these bargains where it's like, sure, we'll give you all the weapons, we'll give you all the weapons, and then you will fight how we see fit.
When we want.
We will call upon our bargain.
It's the IMF, it's the West, it's NATO, it's the economic powers of the world.
What would happen if the U.S.
were to pull funding from strategic areas?
Man, I don't know.
I think the scary reality is, and this is why I always say I'm like 90% anti-intervention, the U.S.
intelligence agencies and military need to justify.
They do.
Period.
End of story.
You don't get to just say we're doing it and make up some BS reason and lie about it.
But I do understand when one side celebrates the mass killing of civilians and the other side is at least trying to maintain a facade, there is a good and there is an evil.
Call it what you want.
And so I wonder sometimes about small-scale to large-scale.
Would it make sense for you to provide funding for weapons for your friend in a neighboring- in a community 70 miles away?
And you're like, well, they got a lot of crime, so I'm gonna keep sending them guns.
I'm like, I don't know if that makes sense.
Maybe they should take care of their neighborhood.
Why are you intervening in the neighborhood, right?
You see what I mean?
We're not there.
We gotta take care of our neighborhood.
The argument then becomes, because it's the neighborhood in our city nearby, and the negative impacts affect the rest of us.
Okay, well then the whole world's our responsibility?
I look at it this way.
All of the funding that we're engaged in is basically just world domination.
And I suppose you have the argument that you dominate the world through force and not through trade and charisma and culture and all that stuff.
Maybe I'm just naive, man.
Maybe I'm just naive, but I don't have the answers.
All I can tell you is right now, with all this going on, I hope for a quick resolution, I hope more civilians don't die.
You've got the squad.
They're calling for a ceasefire.
You know?
That's a tough question, isn't it?
Should there be a ceasefire?
What does that mean?
It means that Hamas can level.
This attack on civilians.
Fire 5,000 rockets at civilian targets.
And then Israel is just supposed to say, please no more fighting.
How would you feel if across the street from you someone was opening fire on your house?
But the police show up and they say, stop, stop, stop, let's have a ceasefire right now.
One side keeps shooting, but the cops are saying, no, no, ceasefire.
You'd be like, what?
Are you kidding me?
They're attacking me.
I don't have the answers to this stuff, man.
I can just tell you that it makes my blood boil when I see these lies.
Because I understand the libertarian arguments for not funding, providing military funding to foreign countries that the U.S.
should not be involved with.
That is not us.
And then I see many of these people who hold up the sign saying, defund Israel.
No more funding Israel.
But what they're really cheering and celebrating is the killing of civilians.
What they're basically saying is, under the guise of America first, or under the guise of protecting our interests, not wasting our taxpayer dollars, they really want to strip Israel of its defenses so that from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.
It doesn't really mean what you think it means.
They're celebrating the killing of civilians.
They want to kill them all.
That's it.
I don't think Israel just wants to kill all the Palestinians.
You know, I know that because they can and they take a surgical approach to how they deal with these things when they could flatten it.
But this could be the end of Gaza.
We could be looking at the end of Palestine.
These attacks were so egregious and all that is served by AOC's democratic socialists promoting this event.
All that is served is that it destabilizes the region and could bring about the end of Gaza.
It could put what's left of Palestine under total Israeli control.
Why wouldn't it?
Why wouldn't it?
They're saying it's Israel's 9-11.
Man, I'm sorry guys.
I wish I had better answers and better understanding of how to deal with these things, but I'm not a leader.
I'm a person who complains on the internet.
That's really it.
I mean, I guess I'm a leader in some capacity, but I just don't know.
I really don't.
I can tell you that these people are evil.
AOC, I think she's evil.
Celebrating this stuff is evil.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.
on this channel.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
I'm sorry, but I'm not here to show videos of war.
I'm not here to show shocking footage that's occurring on the ground.
You can find all of it on X. You can follow me at TimCast.
I post some of these videos and photos with context, but, you know, these videos are for me to just talk about what's going on, provide you the news, and it's been brutal, man.
I am a fairly anti-intervention individual.
And I know I'm going to get a lot of people saying, yeah, but you're speaking a lot in defense of Israel, etc, etc.
Yes, because Hamas killed a bunch of civilians because they are chasing innocent civilians, because people in New York City are celebrating rockets being fired at civilians.
I've called for all of the U.S.
presidents who have attacked civilians to be criminally charged and arrested.
You come to me, I don't care what your politics are.
You celebrate the murdering of civilians?
I think you are evil.
I don't see that from the right for the most part.
Or what we would call the right.
I see libertarians who are critical of Israel's actions pertaining to Palestine, the West Bank and the settlements, etc.
And I think it is absolutely warranted to be critical of injustices.
But you see, the problem right now is that These people, they don't want a solution.
They are tribalists who want death.
Take a look at this story.
Porn star Mia Khalifa, oh, we're always so interested in her opinion, is slammed for mocking the slaughter of hundreds of Jewish people in Israel as she posts sick jokes about Zionist apartheid regime being brought down by guerrilla fighters in fake Gucci shirts.
Lebanese-American sex worker Celebrating photos of police officers being shot.
Celebrating these horrifying videos of people just dancing and then being chased and shot at.
Hundreds dead.
Cars flipped over.
A story of a father who ran full speed towards the gunfire to try and save his daughter and now they're both missing.
Tourists who don't know what's going on.
You know, it reminds me of the story, I Am Legend.
Sort of.
I mean, it's not completely, but you may have heard of the movie.
The book, the graphic novel, matters so much more than the movie.
The movie sucked.
I've seen the movie.
I've only read excerpts from the book, to be completely honest.
The general concept, though, what makes the story so fascinating, is it's about a man who is hunting vampires.
And he doesn't differentiate between intelligent, sentient, rational, and compassionate vampires, and stupid ones.
He just thinks they're all vampires.
In the end, basically he's the last human, or just about, and they arrest him.
And they're terrified of him.
And I Am Legend refers to him being the monster who stalks in the night and kills people in their sleep.
Whereas we view the vampires as a legend, right?
I guess I bring that up because it reminds me of this, but it's not, it's not one for one.
And I'm not saying this in any way to criticize the civilians, it's to make the point.
In the end of the novel, he realizes he was the bad guy.
That he did not understand that he was hurting innocent people in his quest for his old world, which was gone.
And I'm not here to make a moralistic statement on who is right or who is wrong in terms of the greater history of the conflict in the region, but I can certainly tell you those celebrating the death of civilians and laughing and mocking it are evil.
Sorry.
I just don't care to mince words.
And that's what I see here.
These tourists, these people visiting Israel, Southern Israel, to dance.
They're just dancing.
They don't know anything about colonization.
All they know is they said, can I come dance?
And for this, Hamas said they will murder you.
Videos of people hiding in the bushes, recording messages for their loved ones, many of whom are probably dead.
And what do we see?
Celebration.
Celebration.
Let me play for you some of this clip.
There's just so many of these.
unidentified
When the Palestinians broke through the fence, they put the F-35s in place.
You know what bothers me about war is when evil people, for evil reasons, kill innocent people.
They want power.
You know, I don't have all the answers, man.
You want a free Palestine, you want, you want, you want a free nation, etc, etc.
Well, I tell you the one way you don't get it.
Storming in.
Paragliders executing civilians.
There's reporting now that Egypt warned Israel.
And so the conspiracy is that Israel allowed it to happen.
Israel is saying this is their 9-11.
There's 900 deaths so far.
They're mass mobilizing.
It could be the end of Gaza.
I mean, I don't know.
But a lot of people think that it was intentional, and I'm like, dude... I think that... Possibly.
But I see these stories, and, um... I don't know if I have it pulled up.
I-I-I-I'm... I don't know if I have it pulled up.
Where they're arguing that Egypt... Ten days ago warned them.
And people assume... Ten days is enough.
Look, man... You know, we just did this event in Miami.
It took a year to organize.
A year.
So that I could be on a stage for one hour.
Now, don't get me wrong, we had pre-show, mid, after, and everything.
So it was from 6 to about 11.
We did this event, and it took a year to organize.
It's not easy.
It's very, very difficult.
You come to me with 10 days' notice and say something's gonna happen, and it's like, there's a lot we can do.
But there's a lot you can't do.
And I suppose the issue is, warning someone 10 days in advance, something is about to happen, does not mean they know exactly what is going to happen.
And if they come out and say, everyone, high alert, does that solve the problem?
Do they go to Southern Israel and say, we're cancelling all of your festivals because of an alert?
We don't know what's going on.
You don't know.
And you don't know to what degree the warning was.
But this is what we see here.
And my point for this segment, because there's a lot of segments on Israel, is free speech stands, even for these people, cheering.
Let them cheer.
I'm glad they're cheering.
I want to see their faces as they celebrate the mass killing of civilians.
In the Daily Mail, Eric Adams is blasted for not ending pro-Palestine rally in Times Square, where swastika was waved at Jewish group, after mayor merely tweeted, do not use our streets to spread your hate.
I am glad Eric Adams did not end this rally.
You see, this is the argument for free speech.
Let these people come and bullhorn.
I want everyone to hear it.
I want your friends, your family, your moms, your dads.
I want them to hear these people celebrate the killing of civilians so we know exactly who they are.
They're evil.
In their view, Palestine is justified in killing children because Israel is an apartheid state.
Yeah, sorry, nope, that just doesn't fly.
You can make the arguments, and they're sound arguments, that civilians are as equally culpable in terms of conflicts, and that's why they're targeted.
What I mean is, and this is the argument, I'm not saying it's legitimate, the argument is, civilians provide the economic backing for the production of weapons.
Yes, but I happen to believe that the appropriate way to deal with military threats is to take out the military capabilities.
Not always easy to do, nor perfect.
Right?
The idea being that if someone is armed, shoot them in the hand!
Yeah, okay, look, no, you can't do that.
It's not so easy.
It's not so easy.
I don't have the answers for you.
What I can tell you is that it is... I'm sorry, it is evil.
Mia Khalifa, she's an evil person.
These people are evil.
Sorry.
If you want me to come out and say Israel should not be, say, seizing land in the West Bank, you got it.
You want to talk about apartheid?
Let's have a conversation.
Let's talk about what do we do.
Let's talk about how we seek solutions and answers.
Do you believe that Palestine is unjustly oppressed by Israel?
Okay, come talk to me.
Can we solve this problem?
Instead, you cheer and you dance and you scream in joy.
As we watch videos of children, teenagers, families, hiding, being kidnapped, being murdered, being mercilessly beaten, and you celebrate it because you can't differentiate a civilian from the military.
A German tourist who came down to Israel and was gonna dance and was a pacifist, probably supporting Gaza and the Palestinians.
But this is the reality of the world, my friend.
There are evil people.
And it's not just these people in the streets cheering for this who are evil.
It is the warmongering extremists, people like Nikki Haley, John McCain, John Bolton.
I am no fans of any of these people.
And I find it fascinating right now.
Because you've got Democrats that are like, how dare you, to the squad members, call for a ceasefire.
And I'm kinda like, yeah, I'd like there to be no fighting, but I don't know how you call for a ceasefire when one side is bombing the other side, right?
Because the military response is not arbitrary.
Israel is not just like, well, we're gonna go arbitrarily bomb, no, it's, we're being attacked, we're attacking back.
Okay, well, look, I don't have to tell you, man, Hamas did this, they celebrated it, Israel's of course gonna attack back, you have a right to defend yourself.
You want to talk about the history of the nation and make those arguments?
I'm down to argue.
I'm down to hear it.
Let's bring on, we'll get Dave Smith down here.
And, you know, we'll see if Dave Smith wants to come down and have this conversation with somebody.
But I gotta tell you, man.
You know, the position I'm in is, we don't want fighting.
But these Democrats are pro-war.
They're staunchly pro-Israel, pro-funding of Israel.
They're the same people that want to provide funding to Ukraine and all this, and I'm just like, man.
Here's the brutal reality.
Yeah, we are providing funding to Israel.
Israel uses that money for weapons, but a lot of it's the Iron Dome.
How do you deal with this?
You know, I've read a lot about Israel-Palestine, everybody makes their arguments, and there's conflicting versions of history.
What I can tell you is that if it were the other way around, if Israel was the oppressed group and the Jews of Israel were being bombed and their civilians were killed, then the narrative would be inversed.
There would be an inversion.
It is only because Israel is able to defend their territory, control, and expand that they are considered the bad guys.
Expand is the obvious point, but I'm saying I do believe seizing property and territories and bulldozing homes in the West Bank is wrong.
I've seen these videos, I've heard these stories.
But it doesn't justify what we're seeing with the storming, you know, I... I don't know what to tell you, man.
I guess what I can say is it's war.
And anybody glorifying death in war is evil in my opinion.
I hate all of it.
I don't like what's going on in Ukraine.
Russia shouldn't be invading, but there's this war.
It just, it is.
And you want everyone to stop, but there's evil people and they won't.
Even if Israel tried to negotiate any kind of peace agreement or whatever, it is obvious that the people in Gaza don't differentiate civilians from military.
They think they're all one and the same.
They're ideological extremists who say anyone on this land is an evil oppressor colonizer.
That's what they're saying.
And you have high-profile people like Mia Khalifa now supporting it.
Whatever, man, I don't know.
I'm gonna keep talking about it, I guess.
Next segment's coming up at 6 p.m.
on this channel.
I'll just leave this one here.
It's whatever, Mia Khalifa.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all at 6.
Just as of right now, as I am recording this video, RFK Jr.
has officially announced he will seek the presidency as an independent.
Now, the questions here are, will RFK Jr.
pull votes from Trump?
Or from Joe Biden.
There's a strong argument it could be either.
Some suggest that with two anti-establishment forces on the ballot, you will see the anti-establishment forces lose.
They will take from each other.
But my friends, please listen to RFK Jr.' 's speech to know he ain't taking a single vote from Donald Trump.
Dude, look, I like RFK Jr.
for a variety of reasons, but Homeboy came out with all woke leftist talking points.
That's it.
It was DEI, okay?
And I'm not trying to rag on the guy.
He was talking about it's time for this country to recognize indigenous people's days, stuff like that, and he's making a lot of points that I think many would consider to be woke and are not going to fly among Trump supporters, which means When you look at the polls, what do you see?
RFK Jr.
in a Democratic primary polls against Joe Biden around, well, depending on who, it's a wide range.
Some say 7, some say 17.
But most of it, most of the polls, and we had a People's Pundit on the show last week, or not last week, the week before, polls show probably around 14% is probably a safe number.
This means Donald Trump could win Maine!
Yeah, that's right.
Joe Biden runs.
RFK runs as an independent.
He's got a massive following.
Donald Trump runs.
And then you will see a three-way race.
I think this could result in a Trump, major Trump victory in places where he should not even win.
He knew that if their revolution failed, every last one of them would be hanged.
They chose to place everything on the line.
right now and I started recording immediately the moment he announced that
he would be running and he did. Let's let's just play some of the live for you
I'm gonna make that same pledge to you today, so that I can stand before you, as every leader should stand before you, free of partisan allegiance, free from the backroom deals, servant only to my conscience, to my creator, and to you.
He's a hyperventilating ish-lib who pivoted right on some issues as conservatives media is all he could get.
He's very jacked and a good example of a healthy man.
Admirable in that way.
Don't be a goofball.
Still an ish-lib.
I don't think, uh... I don't think it matters.
I don't think he's pulling from Donald Trump.
Fightin' a sneeze, forgive me.
WBBM Radio says majority of Republicans want the next House Speaker to be loyal to Trump.
Yeah, because Trump's the frontrunner.
That's all that matters.
Now, CNN says RFK Jr.
is polling high for an independent, but it may not last.
They have to say this.
I think they're scared.
I think that RFK, they know he's going to poll from Democrats.
I think they've lost control.
The establishment is flailing, is floundering.
And this is an inevitability.
Joe Biden cannot be the candidate.
He has to drop out, but they keep saying he's going to run.
Okay, let him run.
He can't win.
It's funny to me when people, these DeSantis types, neocon say Trump can't win, when Trump is polling better than he did in 2020.
Yeah, Trump only needed 42,000 votes in three states to have won.
You can get every Democrat in a city to vote, it doesn't change the electoral system, which is why they're desperately trying to change it to a popular vote system, which is bad.
R.F.K.
Jr.
was an inevitability.
The Democrats are keeping out real contenders and we are sick of the machine.
So, R.F.K.
is mounting what should have been what Bernie did.
But Bernie bent the knee.
R.F.K.
Jr.
is coming out now and saying the corporations, the big businesses, while supporting all these leftist woke talking points.
More power to him.
But I don't see him pulling from Trump.
That, that, you know, I just pulled up that speech.
These people standing there.
They look like urban liberals, okay?
And maybe it's just the location that he chose.
Fine.
But I think when you look at the polling data, we have this.
Presidential primary, Democrat side.
October 2nd, Biden versus Kennedy.
Kennedy's at 17%.
Oh, Biden crushes him for sure.
But that's not what matters.
What matters is that Kennedy is running as an independent.
And there will be many people, don't know, don't care, voting for Kennedy.
You know why?
The argument goes that with two anti-establishment actors, candidates, the anti-establishment loses.
I'm not so convinced.
I'll give you this argument.
These people would have voted Joe Biden in 2020.
They probably did.
But they're sick of it.
They just don't like Trump.
Now, they're saying, if you want to give us a broken machine, I'll vote for whoever I have to vote for.
And not only that, with many anti-establishment voters, what they're basically saying is, I don't care if my vote for Kennedy costs Democrats the election.
A traditional Democrat voter who either wouldn't have voted or would only vote for Kennedy?
Yeah, Trump's not losing those people.
So when you see Kennedy announcing this statement, what do you get?
In all likelihood, he will be pulling from the Democrats and not for Trump.
That being said, there are a lot of people We'll point it out.
Donald Trump's stance on COVID and Fauci and his demand he refuses to back down.
A lot of people will vote for him for that.
And I don't know if that's true because I think most people are actually with Trump.
I think Trump's doing this for a reason.
I had this argument with Luke.
Luke Rikowsky was saying Trump needs to apologize.
I'm like, why?
You're not going to vote for him anyway.
Why would Trump apologize to a libertarian who's not going to vote for him?
Luke doesn't like being called a libertarian, but Luke's not going to vote for any of these guys.
Trump is looking at it from a mass media perspective.
The average person does not want to believe they did anything wrong during COVID, and they want to believe they did the right thing.
And Trump wants to maintain that facade, despite knowing his base doesn't care.
That's the reality.
His base may spit and yell and complain.
They'll say Trump this, Trump that, and Trump's like, yeah, but you're still voting for me.
Yep.
He also knows that if he goes to regular Americans and says, hey, you know that vaccine that I rolled out?
Yeah, I'm going to I'm going to come out and criticize it.
He's going to lose voters.
He's going to cause panic.
So he's going to go for the middle ground and say, no, we did a great job.
We saved hundreds of millions of lives.
He's going to roll with that because he knows the people who would disagree or would be upset with Trump over his policies.
They're voting for him anyway.
That's just it.
Now perhaps you may end up getting some Libertarians voting for Kennedy.
I really doubt it.
I don't see who Kennedy can get to vote for him except for Democrats.
Disillusioned Democrats who don't like the Democratic Party.
And I have to wonder.
I think Kennedy knows he will spike the Democrats and help Donald Trump.
And this is it.
It's revenge.
You put Kennedy as a Democratic nominee, your chance of winning goes up.
But they are such a corrupt and broken machine, they won't do it.
Kennedy is still giving a speech, but this is huge news, which could spell the apocalypse for Democrats.
But we'll see.
I'll leave it there.
Next segment's coming up at 8 p.m.
over at youtube.com slash TimCastIRL.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
Okay, let's go!
Round two, second week in a row, another one of these stories.
And I have to wonder, is this, like, intentionally trying to convince women to quit their jobs to be, uh, adult stars on OnlyFans?
Or is it the reality that women are quitting their jobs because they would rather not work?
I wonder.
All of the arguments around gender norms and, uh, I can't help but notice, as most of you probably do, You go on social media, and you look at the average female hobbyist account, and the female will post images of herself.
The average male hobbyist account, less likely.
It's a tendency, it's not an absolute.
But of course, the meme, as I've mentioned 50 million times, is that when a woman takes a picture of a new object she acquired, perhaps a video game, she's in the photo doing a selfie with it, whereas men just take a picture of the object.
Men are focused on the object, women are focused on the human element of it.
I said last week that it's a good thing, actually.
And I think, you know, for some reason feminists get offended by the concept despite the fact that it's actually more insulting to men.
Men don't care about people, they care about stuff!
Women care about people.
Makes sense, right?
But that brings us to this story.
Single mom of four who quit her job as a receptionist to be an OnlyFans model reveals she now rakes in $30,000 a month after enlisting her 14-year-old sister to shoot her racy content.
I don't quite understand that last part!
But sure.
Chloe Sasha, 29, from Arizona, turned to adult content creation for extra cash.
She soon started earning thousands of dollars and quit her job as a receptionist.
The mom of four now enlists her younger sisters to help, despite facing backlash.
This is the trend, my friends.
I have to wonder, uh... Let's make up a conspiracy theory.
Here you go.
Conspiracy theory.
Men, uh, venture capital firms, are secretly creating fake accounts to give women large sums of money to force them to quit their jobs.
There you go.
I suppose the question is, given the choice between doing adult content and working, what would the average woman choose?
I don't think it would be adult content.
I don't.
But honestly, I think it's a rock and a hard place.
I wonder if the average woman would choose to work with people.
We see that in work.
Women tend to take jobs like nurses and teachers.
Working with other people.
Men take jobs working with things.
Because men care about things and women care about people.
Again, it's neutral, but you could argue that's more beneficial to women because the human experience is the most important thing.
But this brings me here.
How many women do not want to work?
Working 9 to 5.
How many women are working jobs that are not about people?
Insurance companies or something.
Just like filing paperwork.
Do they really want to have those jobs?
Or would they prefer to socialize?
Interact?
Have a family?
Maybe not even have a family!
Be wine!
Be wine moms!
Your kids are grown up, moved out, you're drinking wine with the girls.
Mid-morning.
What's preferable?
I'm sorry.
I think anybody who says that the average woman would rather work is just lying.
Because nobody works!
Most people don't like working.
I saw this post about the IQ bell curve between men and women.
And it showed that men overwhelmingly are stupid, but there are more male geniuses than women.
This is the Greater Male Variability Hypothesis.
Makes sense.
So you have most women being of average intelligence, around 100, slightly below, slightly above.
And then you have the majority of morons being made up of men, and the majority of geniuses being made up by men.
So this means most women are interacting with dumb guys.
Must suck, I must say.
But I say, when I look at this, I'm like, nobody likes working, right?
There's very few men who are of high level who want to work endlessly into the bone.
This past week, I went on the Fresh and Fit podcast.
And I was asked what I do to relax.
And there are some things I do.
I like playing poker.
I like skateboarding.
But skateboarding is, it's all work.
All of it is in the same mindset.
That's why I'm kind of like nothing.
I work all the time.
I don't play... There is no circumstance where I like to zone out.
I just... That doesn't exist for me.
And Myron was saying the same thing from Freshest Fit Podcast.
If I'm not working, I'm stressed out.
So what stops me from stressing out?
Working!
But that's rare, isn't it?
So I look at this.
You've got a young guy who would rather not work.
He wants to play video games all day.
They exist.
Hikikomori exist.
They don't want to go out.
They don't want to socialize.
Sorry.
Ain't nothing you can do that's gonna make you money.
Women, on the other hand, can get naked on camera.
And guys are gonna give them money.
So the question then becomes, to what degree are women going to quit their jobs to get free money for just being naked?
There's a huge social Crisis we are facing.
If this turns out to be true.
So you can go back and talk about the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, and whoever else, and blame them for it.
The conspiracy theory there is that they realized they could double the workforce and slash wages.
They said, we need more workers.
Let's get women to work.
Women can work.
Why should they be at home?
And then who's going to raise the kids?
They didn't care.
They wanted short-term profits.
Here you are.
Well now, perhaps the great conspiracy is to get women to stop working because it's easier to get money doing this, but the question that becomes as these women get older and become less desirable, in fact, how are they going to make money?
This 29 year old woman, she better be saving all that $30,000 a month, which honestly, a lot of money.
I don't know about enough, you know, she got to start saving for retirement.
Because how many years can you really do this?
For real.
Now, the average woman is not going to be making $30,000 a month off this.
Just not reality.
Apparently, I think most women who have tried it only made a couple hundred bucks a month.
A couple hundred bucks ain't nothing.
But for a lot of these women, they are basically selling out, selling away their dignity in an exchange for a large amount of money up front.
Perhaps that makes sense.
Perhaps what happens then is they can save this money, create a retirement fund, and then never have to work again.
I think the terrifying reality is you're going to have a bunch of single women without kids.
Of course, this lady does have kids, but there's going to be a lot of single women who have no kids, who do porn, and then when they're 45, the money is going- I mean, by the time they're in their late 30s, the money is going down.
And then they're going to be unable to work.
They're going to be shunned by a lot of people.
Maybe that's why they're trying to normalize sex work.
And then they're not going to have money.
My friends.
I've talked about how I think the future is going to be conservative.
I want you to understand this doesn't happen in a vacuum.
As liberals abort their kids, sterilize their kids, or plain don't have kids, and conservatives do, the future is skewing in the conservative influence direction.
Of course, it doesn't discount the left's attempt to indoctrinate children.
The point is, that's not a strong enough pull factor.
Having kids and teaching them your values and having them of your genetic line is substantially more powerful than giving them a creepy book.
That's reality.
Now imagine this scenario.
The future is overwhelmingly populated by conservatives and liberals aren't having kids, but those liberals are still alive.
They're older and they're in nursing homes.
What do you think is going to happen?
If the future as I see it does come to be, then these more conservative leading individuals are going to pull entitlements.
And they're going to say, that's your fault, not mine.
I'm not paying for you.
They're gonna come to this 70-year-old woman and say, you decided you'd do porn and blow your money and now I've got to pay for it?
You end up with a bunch of former hookers and prostitutes all over the streets that can't work and they're doing drugs or, I mean, more horrifyingly, they just don't make it.
That's the future I see, but I must be honest.
Conservatives have been of recent calling about bringing institutions back, which means it may come to a point where if the future becomes conservative, women like this, and I'm not saying this to be a dick to this woman, she's making a lot of money, but she may end up finding herself institutionalized.
Now, she's got kids.
Those kids are gonna grow up.
Kids aren't gonna let their mom, you know, go that route.
But for a lot of these single, childless women who have gone the route of only fans and not saved money, Many of these women, who have gone the route of selling their bodies, they're going to end up institutionalized.
You're going to get conservative-leaning individuals who say, we will not allow you to be on the streets, we're going to help you.
And so for these women who can't make money on OnlyFans anymore, or whatever it is, in fact, I actually think these women are all doomed, right?
Because what's going to happen is, men are going to create AI women, and it's going to be men, you know, titillating other men, while pretending to be women, which already happens.
But now with AI, No one's going to need these women to do this.
Why pay a woman?
Now, some women will run these companies, but if geniuses are overwhelmingly male, then the highest level of success in the businesses is going to skew male.
Men are going to create AI girlfriends that are indistinguishable from real women, and men are going to pay to interact with them.
Yo.
I don't think we can even begin to understand how insane this is all going to be.
But you look now at where MidJourney is, with these AI-generated videos, we are a year or two away from being able to just telecomputer, make me an episode of The Simpsons.
And it will.
And you'll notice weird things about it, and you'll say, hmm, something's not quite right.
Three, four years from now, there's not gonna be art anymore.
There's not gonna be music.
Imagine being a graphic artist.
You're gone.
The writers are striking, you know, Hollywood writers, because they know AI can write for them instead.
Already, I can make images.
I don't need a graphic artist.
Now, if we want precision and good art, we have a graphic artist for that.
But we're getting really close to the point where the AI is gonna be able to do it all.
All of it.
Even movies.
There will be no art, there will be no music, no TV shows.
There will simply be someone saying, like, hey, I made an anime, I hope you like it.
Took me five minutes.
And then someone will be like, oh that worked, that came out really well, I like this, let's make more.
And then there's gonna be 87,000 episodes of, you know, Naruto or whatever.
And people are gonna be like, which arc do you like?
Infinite possibilities, infinite realities.
Anyway, I digress.
My point.
Why would this lady have a job?
It's gonna be a revolution of sorts.
I don't know what it'll look like, but it's gonna get crazy.
But I suppose I'm wondering what will happen to women in the workplace if this is the trend.
