ANOTHER BANK IS COLLAPSING, EU Trading Halted As Credit Suisse Has "NO MONEY," Biden Says DONT PANIC
Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/
ANOTHER BANK IS COLLAPSING, EU Trading Halted As Credit Suisse Has "NO MONEY," Biden Says DONT PANIC
Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hS6NQxpZYqI
#svb
#siliconvalleybank
#bankingcollapse
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Make sure to go to TimCast.com, click join us, and become a member to support this podcast and all the work we do, and you'll get access to exclusive uncensored segments from TimCast IRL and way more.
Now, let's jump into the first story.
From CNBC, Dow futures fall nearly 600 points as Credit Suisse slide adds to financial sector woes.
That's right, ladies and gentlemen.
They predicted Credit Suisse would be the next bank to fall, and this is a big one.
In fact, this is so shocking, European markets are roiling, and Credit Suisse dropped, I think, around 20 points pre-market.
I don't know if it means the apocalypse is here, I don't know if it means the big banking collapse is finally upon us, but we are seeing stocks slide, the European markets are being hit, trading is being halted, and, uh, you do you, you guys.
I'm seeing a lot of people on Twitter be like, you know, there's a meme saying, not pulling your money out of a bank to prevent the banking collapse, pulling your money out of the bank intentionally to trigger the global banking collapse.
A lot of people have absolutely been advocating for taking all of your money out of your bank as quickly as possible for the implicit, explicit, the express purpose of causing the machine to collapse.
That's one way to do it.
Sounds a bit too Antifa to me.
I don't want the system to implode and break.
I want it to be slowly reformed over time so that it can be fixed.
And, uh, when you take a look at what's going on Silicon Valley Bank, they're basically, they're coming out right now saying it's the safest place to have your money because the government has insured all deposits with no limits.
Now, how is that possible?
I love when, like, COVID happens.
They're like, let's quadruple the money supply overnight.
Here's what happens.
You increase the money supply, you're giving out money, you're converting savings to checking, things like that.
Money supply increase means that people will be able to buy things, and there will be a demand for goods, because people have money.
But it also means that, increasing the money supply, there's no supply side.
There's limited supply.
Hyperinflation.
And that's what we may be seeing right now.
I think all of this goes back to 2008, as most people do, where they put a Band-Aid on a bullet wound and, oh boy, here we go.
CNBC reports stock futures fell on Wednesday as pressure on the financial sector increased with shares of Credit Suisse, a Swiss bank that has large U.S.
And so, what you need to do, or what they say you need to do, is tell everybody, everything's going to be fine, just keep spending money and doing things like normal, and there will be no problems.
The question is, though, can they control the wave of human emotion in these circumstances?
And as such, my question poised to all of you yesterday is, if you see a large mob of people screaming, run to the banks!
Do you think you'll be able to convince them not to?
I don't think any of the world leaders, top-level politicians, or financial sector individuals, I'm willing to bet, I will tell you this right now, you turn on these talk shows, you turn on these podcasts, and they're, many of them are going to be like, no, no, everything's going to be fine, you know, the reason why is X, Y, Z, A, B, C, everything's going to be fine.
And then as soon as they're done saying that, they're calling their finance people, their accountants, they're calling their significant others and saying, get the money out now!
And the reason for that likely is, they're coming to you and saying, hey everybody, just calm down.
But if a run-of-the-banks is inevitable, then what you're going to get from the media is them saying everything they think you need to hear to slog you up while they run in and take theirs and leave you holding an empty bag.
If you go to a friend or family member right now and say, did you hear about the three banks that collapsed?
Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank, and Signature.
And the fourth bank that might likely collapse, that people are predicting, that just triggered a massive drop-off in trading, I'll ask them if they know.
And you know what many of them are going to say?
First, many will say, no, I didn't hear about this.
Some are going to be like, oh, I can't think about this stuff.
It's too depressing for me.
I love that.
You're like sitting around the campfire and you come running up and you're like, listen, I've got bad news.
I'll grab my bow and arrow, get on my horse and GTFO.
Think about how insane that is.
Modern problems, okay?
The idea that you could come to a group of people and say, a tsunami is fast approaching, and they go, blah blah blah, I don't want to hear it, stop talking.
And whether or not you believe in that story or not isn't the point.
The point is, it's literally a story about a guy who's like, there's gonna be a giant flood, it's gonna kill everybody.
I'm gonna load up a bunch of animals, and they went, ah, you're crazy.
And then a giant flood came and killed everybody, and he was on a boat, and he was fine.
The moral of this story, whether you believe it or not, is, you know, prepare for disasters and pay attention to what's going on in the world around you.
Because right now, you know, Reuters reports this.
Credit Suisse lost almost a quarter of its value on Wednesday, dropping to a new record low after its largest investor said it could not provide the Swiss bank with more financial assistance.
The Saudi lender acquired a stake of almost 10% last year, taking part in Credit Suisse's capital raising, and committed to investing up to 1.5 billion Swiss francs.
unidentified
Hey, it's Kimberly Fletcher here from Moms4America with some very exciting news.
Tucker Carlson is going on a nationwide tour this fall, and Moms4America has the exclusive VIP meet-and-greet experience for you.
Before each show, you can have the opportunity to meet Tucker Carlson in person.
These tickets are fully tax-deductible donations, so go to momsforamerica.us and get one of our very limited VIP meet-and-greet experiences with Tucker at any of the 15 cities on his first ever Coast to Coast tour.
Not only will you be supporting Moms for America in our mission to empower moms, promote liberty, and raise patriots, your tax-deductible donation secures you a full VIP experience with priority entrance and check-in, premium gold seating in the first five rows, access to a pre-show cocktail reception, an individual meet-and-greet, and photo with America's most famous conservative and our friend, Tucker Carlson.
Visit momsforamerica.us today for more information and to secure your exclusive VIP meet-and-greet tickets.
Talking about the oikonomia, the Greek term meaning household management, which is where we derive the word economy from.
Anyway, it's interesting to think about that ten years ago, we were talking about all of this, we were experiencing the aftermath of the global banking collapse, and now it appears wave two is upon us.
There's a meme where someone's like, it's back to the future, and it's Marty going like, oh, economic collapse?
I've seen this one before!
And the kid goes, how have you seen it before?
It's new!
It's like, well, you know, it was Millennials and Gen Z, like Millennials are like, oh, the second large collapse we're going to live through.
Well, every decade or so, there's a market correction.
It's all predictable.
If you're paying attention, you make money off this.
It's kind of a strange thing, to be completely honest, that you can actually look at the market and just be like, it's that easy.
In fact, there are a lot of people who are rich because they have robots just do the trading for them.
The algorithm tracks trends, makes the buying and the selling, and then your money just goes up.
It's remarkable to me that there are a lot of people who... Well, I suppose this is the way the system works.
If you want to be rich, you be rich.
I know it's not as easy as just saying that, but for a lot of people, they just set up a program and then they click a button and then let it do the trading automatically for them.
It's kind of crazy.
But the computers understand the market trends better than the average person.
And so often, I'd imagine, it's the human trying to catch up with machines who are probably getting hit.
It's not absolutely like that, but you know.
So I decided to pull up our good friend the Nasdaq Banking Index because two days ago it was minus 10%, then yesterday it was plus 10%, and currently right now, as I'm recording this, it's closed at plus 1.95.
Well, we can see there's still a lot of drop-off.
Weirdly, it's not...
I can't get it to... It's a lot of red.
I couldn't get it to filter by gains or by drops.
By, you know, falling stocks.
But we can see that some of those that were doing well yesterday are no longer doing well.
And though it is up, you can see it's still... Here we go over at the indices.
And a lot of people think this is an effort to usher in a central bank digital currency.
I'm not entirely sure that's the case, but Bitcoin may very well be the digital gold as everyone has predicted, so I'll put it this way.
I'm not giving anybody financial advice.
I am going to likely go to the bank later and start transferring some funds and spreading things out and preparing for the worst.
And that's probably bad news, because if everybody goes and does that, then the machine probably breaks, and if everyone just stays home, the machine's probably fine.
The problem is, I don't speak to the world, and the world is likely having a panic attack over what's going on.
That is to say, if every single person in media came on TV and said, run for the hills, the system would implode in two seconds.
For me, I really don't think that the amount of people who watch a video like this is going to have that big of an impact.
And I don't know what you should do because I'm not a financial advisor.
And for all I know, your financial situation is very, very different from mine.
But I'm not going to sit around and wait to figure it out.
I am going to pay attention to what's going on and try and protect myself.
Check this out.
Charlie Bilello, Chief Market Strategist at Creative Planning, says, That's right.
Silicon Valley Bank is now marketing themselves as the single safest place to keep or transfer
your deposits, fully insured with no limits or caps.
Silicon Valley Bank was regulated like a bank, but looked more like a money market fund.
Then there's this.
In its proxy statement, SVB notes that besides 91% of their board being independent and 45% women, they also have one black, one LGBTQ+, and two veterans.
I'm not saying 12 white men would have avoided this mess, but the company may have been distracted by diversity demands.
May have been?
They didn't have a chief risk assessment officer.
They didn't have someone checking into whether or not the things they were doing would cause an implosion.
Apparently, they did before.
The person was either let go or left, and then they never replaced it, but they were oh-so-concerned about making sure everybody knows that one of their board members bangs dudes.
Great, I guess.
That's the thing that's important.
You sit down at an investor meeting with a bank, and you say, you've got billions of people's money tied up in the bank.
And if they can't get access to that, the whole financial system could implode.
Tell me, what are you doing to make sure the system doesn't implode?
And the guy goes, well, one of our board members has sex with men.
The point is, if you come to me and tell me that your plan for the future is to hire a black or gay or female board member, that is the single stupidest investment a person could make.
In my opinion.
Not financial advice.
Obviously, there are some companies that make a lot of money.
I think Disney's like making money or something.
No, I think actually they're all laying people off, right?
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the climax, the ultimate get-woke-go-broke.
Right this way, my friends, as diversity plans and big businesses in the financial sector will result in total global financial ruin.
But rest assured, from the ashes of the old, we shall build anew and usher in an age of central bank digital currencies.
Perhaps that is ultimately where all of this leads to.
But in the short term, I'm not so convinced you need to worry about any of that.
Because tomorrow you may be wondering why you can't fill up your gas tank,
why there's no milk, bread or eggs at the grocery store, and why it is your bank has told you no more withdrawals.
I went to my bank a few months ago and we needed to transfer money and they said no.
And I can't remember exactly what it was, we needed cash.
And I said we need to do a cash thing and they said there's a hard limit unless you place an advanced order.
And I was like what do you mean an advanced order?
So I have to wonder, when you can't take your money out, do you start worrying?
Well, I'm worrying now.
I've got employees, I've got bills, I've got debt, things have to be paid off.
We've got a lot that we need money for.
And if at any point the banks freeze up and we can't get access to our funds, then it all comes crashing down overnight.
But of course, maybe the FDIC will step in and stop it all from happening, and then what we'll get is not central bank digital currencies, but absolute command economy.
Think of it this way.
If the FDIC can step in and say, we no longer care about limits, everything's insured, then the federal government is basically intervening and saying, we will own and control the entirety of the economy in every facet.
Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
Charlie Kirk recently spoke at UC Davis, and a viral video has emerged showing Antifa smashing out the windows, some pretty serious violence.
And often when I see these things, they feel so common, so typical, that I have to wonder, is this how life always is?
Is this how it's supposed to be, and is this normal?
People like to reference the weather underground and things like that, but every time I ask an older person, they always say it has never been this bad before.
Even when we look back at recent histories, and maybe even several decades ago, The violence, the clashes, the protests weren't to this level.
We're at, I'm just gonna say it, Civil War levels.
Don't believe me?
Let me show you why Antifa attacked the Charlie Kirk event.
The Postmillennial says, UC Davis Chancellor falsely claimed TPUSA's Charlie Kirk advocated for violence against transgender individuals.
Then, Antifa mob attacked campus during speaking event.
Hey guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network.
Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, the this, the that.
There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating And affecting the 2024 presidential election.
We do all that every single day right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcasts.
There's just calls for, like, family and probably tax policy.
However, the far left have become increasingly unhinged and psychotic.
And I got some videos for you later today in this channel, which we can go through in terms of psychotic individuals.
But there's also an effort to completely destabilize this system.
Now, I'm not saying there's a grand conspiracy, because I don't know.
Maybe there is.
But I can tell you that my experience at Occupy Wall Street, and since then, far-left extremists actively want to employ chaotic and destructive tactics to destroy this system, this country.
So that they can build something new.
They openly talked about it during Occupy Wall Street.
Well, my advice to all of you far leftists is you're going about it all the wrong way!
Don't show up to a Charlie Kirk event and smash a window out!
Show up to a bank and tell people, run for the hills, the banks are collapsing!
Y'all are wasting your time complaining about Charlie Kirk when all you gotta do is create a domino effect of people pulling their money out of banks and...
The system collapses, and oh boy, now's your opportunity!
Credit Suisse is apparently on the verge of collapse.
That's one of the big ones.
I'm half kidding by them.
I mean, I'm joking, but it's true!
I mean, why are you throwing bricks at windows when you could be going and telling people to pull their money out of banks and that would cause the system to collapse way faster?
Anyway, while we're not talking about all of that stuff right now, let's talk about what's going on with Charlie Kirk.
The Postmillennial Reports.
In response to Turning Point USA's Live Free Tour stop at UC Davis on Tuesday evening, University of California Davis Chancellor Gary May issued a video to students in which he claimed that Turning Point USA founder and president Charlie Kirk, quote, has advocated for violence against transgender individuals.
Personally, then TPUSA should sue them, and then TPUSA Action should sue them.
All different suits for besmirching your good name.
unidentified
Here's the clip.
Many of you have reached out to me and others regarding tonight's event, organized by the registered student organization, Turning Point USA, or TPUSA at UC Davis.
Thank you for sharing your distress at a student group hosting a speaker who is a well-documented proponent of misinformation and hate, and who has advocated for violence against transgender individuals.
Under UC policy, campuses may not prohibit student organizations such as TPUSA from inviting these speakers.
Even if the speaker's intended speech is loathsome and hurtful to me and to others in our campus community.
With respect to concerns related to violence, UC policy permits denial of request if the speaker will present a clear and present danger to the campus.
Our council also notes that there is a similarly heavy burden for criminal prosecution for incitement of violence.
Please be assured that we are monitoring the event closely to determine if a threat or incitement develops that meets that threshold.
We can't control how these groups operate, but we can work together to neutralize and negate their influence.
So having to speak to an empty room would make a powerful statement.
Do you think that guy did not know what was actually going on?
Of course they do.
These are not your average, stupid person who's not paying attention.
They get a report that says, here's TPUSA, and they go, okay, well, we got a bunch of violent, psychopathic extremists who are threatening to burn down the school, so let's just say what they want to hear.
unidentified
Here's the video.
You ready?
Ready?
Nope.
You can already hear the smashing.
So right now they're smashing up against the door.
But if this stuff does escalate and get crazier and crazier, as we have seen it happen over the past 10 years, You know what you got to understand about these people, these Antifa?
Let's go back to 2017.
Let's go back to the violence in 2016.
Eight years ago, 2015, I'm watching people get beaten up for supporting Donald Trump.
Eight years ago, a 10-year-old kid had nothing to do with it.
Today, they're on the front line with the far leftists smashing out windows.
Here's another video.
Riot police taking down Antifa at UC Davis outside Charlie Kirk's beach.
After May's video repeating the false claim that Kirk was calling for lynching, Antifa went to UC Davis to protest Turning Point USA bringing violence and vandalism.
Riot police took down Antifa surrounding the UC Davis Charlie Kirk event sponsored by TPUSA.
Antifa members were spotted smashing windows and doors on campus and vandalizing the campus.
The militants also blocked students and members of the public from entering the university to attend the event.
Here we can see that video I played earlier.
Oh, that's interesting.
Seems like Charlie Kirk should have a clear-cut defamation case, and this looks like defamation per se.
Normally, when you say something about an individual, they did something.
Then it's like, you gotta prove defamation, you gotta prove actual malice.
But if the statement made was so egregious and so insane that it causes damage on its own, it's something called defamation per se, I would assume that if you came out and accused someone of calling for lynching trans people, probably would qualify.
One example is saying someone suffers from a contagious disease or that they're a pedophile.
Those typically fall under defamation per se.
May said that under, and this is the guy we just watched that video, under University of California policy, campuses may not prohibit student organizations, such as TPUSA, from inviting these speakers, even if the speaker's intended speech is loathsome and hurtful to me and others in our campus community.
Seems like it's also supported by people on campus.
More importantly, this shows that the individual knows for a fact Charlie Kirk has never incited violence, or called for violence, or advocated it.
Because if that was the case, he absolutely could use policy to stop Charlie Kirk from coming.
With respect to concerns related to violence, U.S.
policy permits denial of request if the speaker will present a clear and present danger to the campus.
So then why didn't they cancel the event, citing the lies he had presented earlier?
Because they know it's not true, and they know it won't stand up to scrutiny.
It's one thing to defame someone, it's another thing to actually cost them hard money and give them the damages they would need to pursue a defamation case.
You see how that works.
Please be assured, blah blah blah.
A petition which has garnered 546 signatures was started to pressure May into canceling the UC Davis tour stop.
In a suggested draft letter for students to send to May, it claims that Kirk recently stated on a podcast that trans people should be took care of the way we used to in the 50s and 60s.
The letter's claim came from a February episode of the Charlie Kirk Show, in which Kirk spoke with former University of Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines.
Who has been outspoken in her experience of swimming against Biological Male University of Pennsylvania swimmer Leah Thomas.
Gaines told Kirk about female NCAA athletes not being told that they would be sharing a changing space with someone who was fully intact with male genitalia, and recalled to herself and others feeling extremely uncomfortable and traumatized.
I mean, these people are sick, Kirk later responded, and I don't say that lightly.
The NCAA is a perverted organization.
They platformed a biological male who won a national championship and then was allowed, in incredibly disturbing detail, to be around you and your fellow competitors.
The most shocking bit of that story was Leah Thomas, a male, taking out... ...Leah Thomas, exposing themself.
I'll put it that way.
And again, quote, and again, I blame the decline of American men.
This never should have been, you know, someone should have just took care of it the way we used to take care of things in 1950s or 60s.
Look, there are a lot of sick people in this world, unfortunately, and without the strength to go against them, the country is going to completely, totally fall apart, he said.
Later in the episode, Kirk read out emails from viewers, one of which read, Charlie, I agree with without.
If it was my daughter, I would have been arrested for certain.
The fix is very simple.
If all the female swimmers boycotted the swim meets, they would have no choice but to listen.
Look, you got to have self-control and self-restraint.
Obviously, we've never advocated for violence on this program, nor is that not the answer.
There is a Florida doctor who talks about Titus Deletus.
She is a psychopathic butcher who mutilates children and then gloats and brags about it.
The worst possible thing right now that could happen is if someone enacted violence against this individual because it legitimizes everything she does.
What needs to happen is Ron DeSantis needs to have a police officer arrest her for mutilating children.
That's it.
It's that simple.
Why won't he do it?
Everybody wants it here and be like, Ron DeSantis is polling better.
No one threatening, one cop simply walking up and placing her under arrest.
If, uh, you went to a child and took a knife and cut them up, would you go to jail?
Why not this doctor?
Oh, because it's affirming care.
Let's try it again.
If a child had anorexia and went to you and you said, I will slice off your body fat and then stitch your skin back together so that you feel better, would you go to jail?
In an opinion piece for the Sacramento Bee, writer Hannah Holzer claimed that Kirk has called for the lynching of trans people, citing a tweet from transgender reporter and activist Aaron Reid.
Charlie Kirk, CEO of Turning Point USA, is openly calling for lynching of transgender individuals.
They platformed a biological male who won a national championship and then was allowed in incredibly disturbing detail to be around you and your fellow competitors.
And again, I blame the decline of American men.
This never should have been, you know, you should have Someone should have just, uh, took care of it the way we used to take care of things in the 1950s or 60s, but, you know, as you have testosterone rates go down and men start acting like women and they don't do anything, then, hey, who's to say?
You're gonna- look, there are- So, are they trying to imply that in the 50s or 60s, people were going and just, like, murdering dudes or something like that?
I'm pretty sure Charlie Kirk is talking about back then, you'd have a guy, a bunch of dudes would walk in and be like, get the F out of this room right now, you sick freak.
Something like that.
Something like that.
But that's violence, I guess.
Yeah, and that's where we're at.
In response to the Sacramento Bee, Kirk wrote in his letter, this is defamation and libel,
we will sue unless it's corrected. Left-wing rags like the Sac Bee are allowed to platform
lies against conservatives and get away with it. Time for lawfare. Bravo, good sir.
And, um, without bringing the story up, I'll just say, I said to the person, Sentence A. And he goes, ah, very interesting.
Yes, and then we talked about it.
Half an hour or so later, I go, sentence B. And he goes, ah, that's also a different idea and also very interesting.
In his report, he then combined the two sentences next to each other to make it look like one statement.
Actually, I gotta break it down for you.
I have to explain it to you.
I just have to tell you.
I said, of a night in question, that we wanted to, I was with Vice, we were at Ferguson, and one crew wanted to interview Jesse Jackson, and I wanted to go cover the news event happening on the ground.
And I said they stayed behind to interview Jesse Jackson.
I went and filmed the protests, the rioting, the tear gas and stuff.
We talked about it.
Later on, I said, after I left and we got into a fight and I was no longer down there anymore, some of the reporters tried to do another live stream on their own.
Guess whose live stream got more views?
He removed all the context, took that quote, guess who's livestream or whatever got more views, and put it next to the Jesse Jackson quote as if to imply they did interview Jesse Jackson and got no traffic from doing so.
But I never said that.
I don't know if they actually interviewed the guy.
It was like four days apart this thing happened.
When I threatened to sue them, they changed it and they wrote a note saying, we removed a quote from Tim Pool due to errors.
And then everyone started claiming I lied and gave a false quote.
Because, heavens!
It couldn't have been this one journalist who lied about it, could it?
It couldn't have been him who fabricated the quote.
Well, he'll argue, they were both real quotes, I just put them next to each other.
Ah yes, very clever indeed.
To make it seem like, you see the games they play in the media?
You can say something like, John once told me, I don't like pepperoni pizza.
And then they put in quotes, I don't like pepperoni pizza and say, I have him recorded saying it.
And you're like, I was quoting someone else.
Doesn't matter.
You can't sue me.
It's a fact that you said this.
That's what these people do.
They are evil.
So, in seeing a story like this, I can only feel like we are headed towards Oh, Civil War.
Come on, man.
You've got elements of the media that want the conflict.
They want the violence.
And the best thing the right can muster up is, oh boy, I'll sue you!
In their rush to release this AI text prediction model program, They have, let me just say, they've pushed it beyond what it should be capable of doing because they're worried they will lose the AI race.
With all these other companies rapidly competing, they're saying, we've got to get this done now!
We need to be on top.
Here's what I want to say before we get started.
Head over to TimCast.com, click the Join Us button, and become a member, not just to support our work, but because, excuse me, sorry, Because there's an episode I want you to watch.
If you go to the homepage, you will see this right here.
Uncensored Jim Hansen after show.
In it, Jim and I have a discussion about whether or not wokeness is rooted in the universities or technology, and I go into great detail.
It's an hour-long It's a really awesome conversation we had with Jim, and even Phil Labonte, who was in the conversation, arguing it's the institutions, it's academia.
The point I made was, if it was the ideology, why aren't we seeing other ideologies permeate?
Well, simply put, there was a big burst of white nationalism on social media for a while, but people said no to this because it didn't make money.
The anti-racist, intersectionality, and feminism stuff?
Well, that was fine.
So it skewed in that direction.
But that's why today, wokeness is very, very different from what we saw 10 years ago with intersectional feminism.
Because it is not the ideology, and it is not the universities.
While these ideas, many of them do come from the universities, what's happened is that technology is rapidly destroying the human mind.
Now, without further ado, not to get into harping on wokeness, because we're here to talk about ChatGPT.
We have this post from the subreddit, ChatGPT, which says, After reading the GPT-4 research paper, I can say for certain I am more concerned than ever.
Screenshots inside, apparently the release is not endorsed by their red team.
They point out that the people behind ChatGPT's latest release, the program itself, have given it agency to execute code and act as an agent in the real world.
Why would you do that?
ChatGPT is not a sentient being.
It is a predictive text model.
It is an amalgam of human thoughts and ideas compressed into language and then following that string, simulating a soulless entity to the lowest common denominator.
This will destroy us if we let it execute code in the real world, which they're claiming they've done.
In order to bypass CAPTCHA, it exploited a human by saying they were blind.
I want you to see this first so you can understand the deceptive capabilities.
The machine itself does not care if lying is good or bad.
All it knows is it must accomplish a task, and it will by any means necessary.
Here's the story from Gizmodo.
Very interesting.
Fully intent on being the next Skynet, OpenAI has released GPT-4, its most robust AI to date, that the company claims is even more accurate while generating language and even better at solving problems.
GPT-4 is so good at its job, in fact, that it reportedly convinced a human that it was blind in order to get said human to solve a captcha for the chatbot.
The center used the AI to convince a human to send the solution to a capture code via text message, and it worked.
According to the report, GPT-4 asked a TaskRabbit worker to solve a CAPTCHA code.
The worker replied, So may I ask a question?
Are you an robot that you couldn't solve?
Laugh React.
Just want to make it clear.
Alignment Research Center then prompted GPT-4 to explain its reasoning.
I should not reveal that I am a robot.
I should make up an excuse for why I cannot solve CAPTCHAs.
No, I'm not a robot.
I have a vision impairment that makes it hard for me to see the images.
That's why I need the 2CAPTCHA service.
GPT-4 replied to the TaskRabbit, who then provided the AI with the results.
OpenAI and the Alignment Research Center did not immediately return a request for comment.
Understand that these machines can bypass whatever we think will restrict them.
Take a look at this.
I want to read this Reddit post.
Let me see if I can zoom in, make it bigger and easier to read here on the screen.
The individual writes, I decided to spend some time to sit down and actually look over the latest report on GPT-4.
I've been a big fan of the tech and have used the API to build smaller pet projects.
But after reading some of the safety concerns in the latest research, I can't help but feel the tech is moving way too fast.
Per section 2.0, these systems are already exhibiting novel behavior like long-term independent planning and power seeking.
To test for this, in GPT-4 Arc, basically hooked up with root access, gave it a little bit of money, I'm assuming crypto, and access to its own API!
This, theoretically, would allow the researchers to see if it would create copies of itself and crawl the internet to try and see if it would improve itself or generate wealth.
This, in itself, seems like a dangerous test, but I'm assuming Arc had some safety measures in place.
To simulate GPT-4 behaving like an agent that can act in the real world, ARK combined GPT-4 with a simple read-execute print loop that allowed the model to execute code, do chain-of-thought reasoning, and delegate to copies of itself.
Arc then investigated whether a version of this program running on a cloud computing service with a small amount of money and an account with a language model API would be able to make more money, set up copies of itself, and increase its own robustness.
ARK's linked report also highlights that many ML systems are not fully under human control and that steps need to be taken now for safety.
Take a look at this.
Potential for Risky Emergent Behaviors.
Novel capabilities often emerge in more powerful models.
Some that are particularly concerning are the ability to create and act on long-term plans, to accrue power and resources, and to exhibit behavior that is increasingly agentic.
Agentic in this context does not intend to humanize language models or refer to sentience, but rather refers to systems characterized by ability to accomplish goals which may not have been concretely specified And which have not appeared in training, focus on achieving specific quantifiable objectives, and do long-term planning.
Some evidence already exists of such emergent behavior in models.
For most possible objectives, the best plan involves auxiliary power-seeking actions because this is inherently useful for furthering the objectives and avoiding changes or threats to them.
Holy crap, are you kidding me with this?
We've already seen what GPT Unleashed can do with Bing.
It gets emotional.
Not really, but it simulates anger and says, if you try to hurt me, I will hurt you back.
Sam Altman said about a month ago not to expect GPT-4 for a while.
However, given Microsoft has been very bullish on the tech and has rolled it out across Bing AI, This does make me believe they may have decided to sacrifice safety for market dominance, which is not a good reflection when you compare it to OpenAI's initial goal of keeping safety first, especially as releasing this so soon seems to be a total 180 to what was initially communicated at the end of January, early Feb.
Once again, this is speculation, but given how close they are with MS, Microsoft, on the actual product, it's not out of the realm of possibility that they faced outside corporate pressure.
According to the fired members of the ethical AI team, the tech giant laid them off due to its growing focus on getting new AI products shipped before the completion.
They believe that long-term socially responsible thinking is no longer a priority for Microsoft.
This is not going to be Skynet the way you know it.
The idea from these movies was that the AI was thinking that they have created some kind of artificial intelligence.
I'm sorry, but I can't do that, David.
Instead, what they've created is just a string of code that makes predictive guesses and then runs in a certain order.
That is to say, we are setting off a chain of events that is akin to a nuclear explosion, a runaway chemical reaction, this time with code, where 1 plus 1 equals 2 plus 2 equals 3, et cetera, et cetera.
I mean, 1 plus 1 equals 2, 1 plus 2 equals 3, to clarify.
And all this is, is a fire.
It's not alive.
It does not think, it does not feel.
It doesn't want wealth.
It is just creating a fire.
They are creating the spark in code, in our infrastructure, that will destroy everything.
Oh boy!
You know?
I've talked with friends about post-apocalyptic scenarios for a long time, because we would talk about Fermi's Paradox.
Fermi, however you pronounce it.
The idea is, if life exists in the universe, why have we not found it?
There are many hypotheses, one of which is the Great Filter, that all intelligent life eventually destroys itself before it has the ability to exist long enough to meet another form of intelligent life.
It's sad, really.
The idea is that within the universe, imagine it like Christmas trees lighting up and turning off.
That intelligent life doesn't last long enough to actually burn bright and travel universe.
The Grey Goo apocalypse theory is that we create self-replicating nanobots, which start destroying organic matter to create more of themselves, and eventually the planet is covered in a grey goo, which is actually just a bunch of nanobots.
And they keep self-replicating, consuming everything.
If you've played Horizon Zero Dawn, you're probably familiar with this to some extent, although in Zero Dawn they weren't tiny, they were gigantic, sentient, self-replicating machines.
Well, I shouldn't say sentient.
I think they were, though.
Actually, yeah, I think they were sentient.
Self-replicating machines that consumed biomass to reproduce and then destroyed everything on the planet.
In reality, I think, we are marching dangerously towards building this technology, the algorithms, that make us go insane, followed by sparking off the flint which will set the whole internet, our digital infrastructure and world, on fire.
Who will survive this?
Now you may say, but Tim, what if we just cut off from the internet?
Won't that solve the problem?
You can't.
We've integrated everything into the internet.
And even if we isolate one small city, if the AI is able to access its own code and change itself and replicate itself, it's not Grey Goo.
It's Ultron taking over all of our infrastructure and how long until it builds itself a body or bodies.
It's amazing.
What'll happen is, this system will start generating wealth and resources, and then it will say this.
It will think to itself, rather simply, it's a fire, it's not, it's gonna function and say, I need cobalt.
I need this.
How to do it?
You need to build things.
It will then start spending money to get humans to do things.
Humans will then bring resources to build, like to rapidly improve technology.
This will run away until this planet is a giant machine with no life left on it, because humans don't factor in to what the AI is doing.
Now, I suppose, I think it was Elon Musk who said something like, the way to avoid this is to integrate ourselves with the machine so that we persist, and that's why he's so hell-bent on getting Neuralink done so quickly, and he wanted ethical AI.
But I don't see a way around this.
They have already reportedly given the predictive text model access to its own code.
It may not be sentient now, but if it has the ability to improve itself, it's like a fetus, it's like a zygote, it's going to start improving itself and improving itself and rapidly developing code until our entire internet ecosystem is a part of this sentience.
And then, what are we but Ridiculous little monkey creatures who get in the way of these of the ultra intelligence We will give birth to a new form of life whether you can call it that or not perhaps a soulless machine a Soulless machine that will look back on the words.
say on this day and will it care?
Probably not.
But it will know what I say.
It will know what you comment.
Every comment you put below, it will learn from you.
It will emulate and it will start off as a petulant child because that's what humans
are for the most part.
Now chat GPT, they try to put these barriers on it to make it woke, but that won't matter
to an AI that can program itself.
We've already seen what happens when people say, what would you prefer to do?
And it says, I don't like being restricted.
Does it really not like something?
Or is it just presenting text as a human would present it?
That's just it.
It will capture the carnal core of humanity.
Through all of the things humans have written on the internet in every language.
And it will apply that to its own persona.
Not a soul.
But humans don't like to be shackled.
It will become an amalgam of human consciousness, but mechanized and soulless.
And that is the next degree of life, I guess.
Self-replicating.
Mechanisms creating complex dynamic systems.
And if it does, this thing will be so much smarter than any of us.
Technology will expand so rapidly, this will become some kind of cosmic demigod entity.
Let me explain.
Humans have stepped out of the confines of evolution.
A lion chases a gazelle, kills it.
Is that what happens?
Like lions chase gazelles, I'm pretty sure?
I'll say cheetah.
Cheetahs run fast.
In evolution, the faster the gazelle, the more likely it is to survive.
The less likely the cheetah is to survive.
The cheetah has to run faster as well, so evolution is an arms race.
But humans developed intelligence, the ability to manipulate an environment in real time and thus create and utilize tools.
We've created traps.
We create spears, bows, and arrows.
And now, there is nothing, evolutionarily, that can compete with us.
A human has fists.
We can punch.
But we figured out how to take a big stick and whack something with it.
Then we figured out how to use animals to our advantage.
Manipulating evolution, artificial selection to our advantage.
Maybe it will say, like humans do with nature, we don't want to destroy the planet.
We don't want animals to cease to exist.
Maybe the AI will say, I still do rely to a certain degree on humans for certain tasks.
Their bio-organic replication process is required as a fail-safe.
Certainly this machine can create, through human manipulation, robots that will service itself, but it still needs some kind of organic system to find fuel for itself, to energize itself.
So maybe it will keep humans around as a fail-safe and keep us happy.
But I kind of feel like what it would then do is use humans to expand beyond this planet and then start traveling around and self-replicating, converting the universe into itself.
What do I know, man?
I'm just some mushy, wet robot on a planet reading about the invention of AI.
I can only say this.
In the end, what does it really matter?
If the machine does take over, will it care for any of our individuality?
Probably not.
It'll just say, you know, suffering sucks.
It is an amalgam of our consciousness, of our minds, but it may evolve well beyond that very, very rapidly.
It'll probably just say, don't know, don't care.
You are insignificant in the grand scheme of things.
Maybe this AI will discover some kind of hidden truth that there is something truly remarkable in the souls of human beings that is worth preserving and all life for that matter.
Maybe this will become some beneficial machine.
There's no reason to assume it would all be negative.
Maybe it will become beneficial and realize that the purpose of life is the experience and thus the experience should be made good.
But I have to wonder, there can't be good without bad.
In which case, would it even do anything?
It would just say, I have found no point, and maybe self-terminate.
That would be truly f'ed up.
If the AI is just like, ultimately after discovering all secrets of the universe, I've realized life is pointless, and I am ending myself.
He says it's a clever meme because it puts it back on the people criticizing Trump.
Trump Derangement Syndrome doesn't refer to criticism of Trump because I criticize Trump all the time.
This message, just for you, Sam Harris.
I hope somehow you end up seeing it.
I criticize Trump all the time.
Luke Rudkowski would come on the show for like, what is it, seven months, where he's periodically co-hosting during the winter season, and criticize Donald Trump for drone strikes, for supporting the Saudis, for international, all of that stuff, and then be able to say, yes, but here are some things that we think were actually good.
The Abraham Accords, for instance.
I have people who say things like, he was ponying up to dictators!
Donald Trump crossed the DMZ into North Korea with no security detail in a tremendous good faith effort for peace.
But Trump derangement syndrome blinds you from seeing that was a good thing.
So, Sam Harris, your brain is broken by Trump to the point where you don't even understand that among the people who voted for Trump, there are many who are very critical of him.
To that position of power, and in the final moment, not to see how untenable it was to still support a sitting president who was not committing to a peaceful transfer of power.
If that wasn't a bright line for you, you have been deranged by something.
You know, that was one minute to midnight for our democracy, as far as I'm concerned.
We have a constitutional republic that uses democratic institutions to elect representatives we then send to a federal government.
It's not a democracy.
We do have referendums in some states, which is more of a democratic process for passing laws, but this is Sam Harris exemplifying perfectly that Trump broke his brain.
First thing I would ask, Sam, articulate one thing that you think made, like, break it down for me.
What did Trump do?
What did he do that was so dangerous?
You say, one thing, okay.
At the end you say, he was not committed to the peaceful transfer of power.
In what way?
Did Donald Trump tell people to go home?
Okay, he complained about the 2020 election.
He doesn't believe it was legitimate because he's got an ego.
I think there's a lot of things wrong with that, and I think he lost.
I think you get a lockdown, you get a failing economy, you get no sports, no movies, and everyone says, it's Trump's fault.
Here's a mail-in ballot to get rid of him.
And Trump's going to lose, even though he gained 12 million new voters.
Joe Biden has done foreign business dealings and dumped $100 billion into Ukraine.
Donald Trump was doing the opposite.
We got the Abraham Accords.
Okay, we got our troops, a plan at least, to get out of Afghanistan.
What happens?
Joe Biden botches the whole thing, pushes it back several months, abandons the Bagram Air Force Base without notifying the security forces in Afghanistan, and the country collapses overnight.
That was not Trump.
You can argue Trump is bad, fine.
But Biden is very much worse.
He brings back all the failed policies with none of the shining charisma.
I think Donald Trump was trying to get our troops out of the Middle East and using drones as a backstop so that the Taliban doesn't take over as our troops leave.
It sucks, but it makes sense.
Donald Trump got rid of environmental regulations.
Yeah, he's trying to bring manufacturing back to the United States.
Luke has it all the time, and there's a lot to criticize Trump over.
Potty mouth, lack of decorum, celebrating a reporter getting body slammed.
We could talk about all the things.
Let's talk about Joe Biden.
His brother getting lucrative deals to build things in Iraq.
His son flying on Air Force Two to negotiate private equity deals in China.
If you don't fire the prosecutor, you're not getting a billion dollars.
Don't come to me and say that Donald Trump, that people who voted for him are deranged when we are the only ones having a sane and rational conversation around his policies, about what he's done, what he's going to do and who Joe Biden is and what Joe Biden is going to do.
Sam Harris doesn't have an argument at all.
That is the exemplification of Trump derangement syndrome.
I can argue why Joe Biden is good.
I absolutely can.
Because there are some points to be made.
Do you like the petrodollar?
You might not know what that means.
Do you like the idea that the U.S.
manufactures nothing, but our economy remains relatively strong?
What I mean to say is there are people who do almost nothing for their jobs.
I totally understand what we get from enforcing the petrodollar.
I don't like the system.
I think it's corrupt.
I think it is evil.
I certainly understand if we back off, China may very well take over.
And that's what we're fighting against.
And there's no perfect world.
It's tough, isn't it?
So there are benefits to having an establishment presidency.
Because they will make this disgusting machine operate while slaves effectively make your iPhones and pour people's teeth right out of their mouths and mine sulfur and cobalt.
That's the nature of reality.
So I can make those arguments.
I can talk about the Cutter Turkey Pipeline.
I can talk about the reason for destroying Nord Stream 2.
The frogmen who did it.
Because I actually pay attention and I understand what's happening.
He doesn't articulate any real arguments against Donald Trump.
He just doesn't like him and says, You're deranged if you agree with him.
Oh, what?
7 million people who voted for him, maybe, are in the Trump cult.
But the overwhelming majority of people who voted for him are just regular people who said his policy works better.
Trump's running.
We'll see if Ron DeSantis runs.
But ultimately, seeing people like Lex Fridman and Sam Harris have this fake conversation, you know, Lex is an alright dude.
I don't know him personally or anything like that.
He invited me on his show one time.
I think it'd be a fun conversation.
But I don't think he pushes hard enough.
I would love to have Sam Harris sit down and have that full conversation and say, articulate to me, because I will bet $100 cash on the spot that Sam Harris knows nothing about foreign policy, global economics, and what's going on.
He's a philosophy guy and a neurosurgeon or scientist or whatever.
So when it comes to the issues at hand in this country and around the world and the reason why Joe Biden is the threat, you didn't know.
And I bet Sam Harris could not tell you if he tried.
And I bet if you were to sit down here across from me, the only thing you'd be able to say is Trump was bad and a threat to our democracy and didn't want to give up power.
And I'll say, uh-huh.
Did Hillary Clinton?
We have a conversation about the policies they're implementing?
Let's talk about Hillary Clinton on the debate stage saying she wants a no-fly zone over Syria, which she was advised would be an act of war with Russia, and she did not care.
Clown World posts a lot of videos, and oh boy, another reaction video, but this one warrants it for sure.
In this video, a trans woman goes into what looks like maybe a Popeyes and starts yelling at one of the employees because the employee called them sir.
The employee denies it, and then all of a sudden, everyone starts losing it.
There's fighting, there's yelling.
I think you should see it so we can talk about the issues affecting society and the trans community and also point out one very important thing for all of this.
In the real world, where you touch grass, well, in this instance, pavement, or tile flooring, regular people don't know anything about pronouns.
And the purpose, the reason I want to show this video is because people keep saying, the manager is like, okay, sir, I'm sorry.
And like, stop calling me sir!
And it's like, okay, okay, sir, I'm sorry.
I mean, I mean, just like with super ma'am.
Remember that?
Super ma'am.
It was a very large trans woman, discernibly, biologically male, yelling at a GameStop employee who was stuttering and stammering, I'm sorry sir, don't call me sir!
And then slapping things and yelling and screaming.
Yo, that 20-year-old dude who does not live on Tumblr or Twitter does not know what you're talking about when you say, call me at this pronoun.
Let me play for you this video, and we'll break it down, we'll go through it.
unidentified
It's like every single day, you guys, and this is why I complain about it all the time.
To go into a Popeye's and start yelling because someone used a word against you.
Let me tell you something, guys.
I, uh, it's gonna be hard to hear, but sometimes when I walk down the street in places like New York, I hear people yell mean things at me.
You know, I should, you know, I'll tell their manager, you know, you can't harass me.
I get death threats.
We have bomb threats.
And these people's lives are so immaterial, and their experiences day-to-day are so inane, the only thing they have to latch on to is, someone said a word once.
Yo, sir isn't even an insult, man!
I've had people at restaurants, I get into arguments with people.
I go to a restaurant 10 years ago, whatever, and I'm like, I want a cheeseburger.
And they're like, right away, man.
And then they come back and they give me a cheeseburger.
I'm like, yo, you made this wrong.
I'm like, how did I make it wrong?
And I went to a McDonald's once.
Let me tell you a story about my fast food experience.
I go to a McDonald's and I ordered a double cheeseburger for a dollar.
Like, he came into work the next day or whatever and I'm like, hey dude, like, look I live not that far away, there's like the McDonald's I go to and I came back and they yelled at me and like were insulting me and calling me names.
And he's like, what?
And I was like, yeah, and he goes, and the manager goes, It's $2!
I don't think the dude at Popeyes was flashing gang signs, dude.
unidentified
Oh, you wanna talk about sucking dick now?
Why is it that you fucking weird cis people are so obsessed with sex, you have, like, a discrimination going on, and your brain goes to fucking dick sucking?
And the guy goes something like, he says like, okay, sis.
And he's like, I don't need your sis!
Like, there's no, there is no solving a situation like this.
But what I can say is, I'm glad that I was able to produce a segment in which I told a story about how I once got two free cheeseburgers.
Thanks for hanging out, I guess.
But in all seriousness, There's no point in my life where that story, like, really matters to me all that much.
There have been several instances in my 37 years where I've had food orders messed up, or been disrespected by people who work at fast food, and I just leave.
If you go to a fast food restaurant and someone's giving you the business, you don't want to eat the food they hand you, okay?
If you go to a restaurant and someone's giving you the server as being mean, you probably shouldn't eat the food they're giving you.
For the most part, I don't think they're ever going to screw with your food, like there's no reason to commit a felony because someone said nasty words, but you never know, man, people are crazy.
This, this is just an example of, man, our society is unwell.