Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The war for tomorrow begins tonight with your host, Chase Geiser. | |
| Ladies and gentlemen, I am Chase Geiser, your host of Tomorrow's News Tonight. | ||
| In 30 minutes, we are going to be joined by the one and only, the great, the incredible Ian Carroll in studio for the final 90 minutes of the transmission today. | ||
| It is an honor and a pleasure to be with you. | ||
| Thank you so much for tuning in to Tomorrow's News Tonight. | ||
| This is the new weeknight show from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. every weeknight because, frankly, there's just so much news that breaks after 6 p.m. | ||
| So we thought it our duty to give to you tomorrow's news tonight every single night. | ||
| So you don't have to watch Sean Hannity and see other propaganda just lie to you and cover up what's really going on, distort what's really happening and distract you as far as the news is concerned. | ||
| And I don't even really know where to start because I've been gone for a couple of days. | ||
| I was in a funeral in DC. | ||
| So you might have noticed last couple of nights we weren't live on air, but we're back in the saddle again. | ||
| But we've got OpenAI unveiling agent features that can control your computer and perform tasks automatically. | ||
| We've got this breaking news from last night about the United States motion to unseal grand jury transcripts as they pertain to Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| And of course we have this leaked bombshell tonight. | ||
| Secret meeting shatters Trump-Russia hoax with jaw-dropping details. | ||
| Now it's proven. | ||
| And we already knew, it's proven though now that the Obama administration engaged in an orchestrated and intentional and engineered coup to unseat a sitting president duly elected by the American people. | ||
| Are you surprised? | ||
| I mean, here's the likes of the left in clip 30, I'm going to show you here in a second. | ||
| This is Adam Schiff over and over again talking about how true and real and righteous the Russia hoax was. | ||
| This goes back to Brennan. | ||
| It goes back to Comey. | ||
| It goes back to Schiff and the entire left, which orchestrated, frankly, goes straight back to Obama, this lie about President Trump, which he has not been able to live down for years. | ||
| Now it's finally coming out. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Direct evidence of collusion. | ||
| I don't want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial. | ||
| There is circumstantial evidence of collusion. | ||
| There is circumstantial evidence, certainly, of collusion or coordination. | ||
| There's also abundant circumstantial evidence. | ||
| All you have right now is a circumstantial case. | ||
| Actually, no, Chuck. | ||
| I can tell you that the case is more than that. | ||
| And circumstantial evidence can be very powerful and is hard evidence. | ||
| We're also looking at persistent allegations that the Russians have been laundering money through the Trump organization. | ||
| I don't know that that's true. | ||
| The president once said, the Saudis are spending tens of millions of dollars on my Trump towers and buying apartments from me. | ||
| Why wouldn't I love the Saudis? | ||
| Why wouldn't I love them? | ||
| Okay, so they murder journalists, but please, they buy apartments from me. | ||
| Members of that same campaign now in office said, hey, Russians, don't do anything about this. | ||
| We'll take care of you because we were doing this together. | ||
| Obviously, that could be part of a broad conspiracy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you believe the President of the United States is a Russian asset? | |
| He is acting like a person who is compromised. | ||
| The biggest news from Robert Mueller so far is that there are no new indictments for that underlying any cooperation or conspiracy with the Russians to interfere in our elections. | ||
| And so what happened on that call? | ||
| President communicates to his Ukrainian counterpart that the United States has done a lot for Ukraine. | ||
| No other country has done as much as we have. | ||
| But you know what? | ||
| I don't see much reciprocity here. | ||
| But there's not much reciprocity here. | ||
| I hear what you want. | ||
| I have a favor I want from you. | ||
| What have you done for us? | ||
| We've done so much for you, but there's not much reciprocity. | ||
| I have a favor I want to ask you. | ||
| And I'm going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. | ||
| Of course, the favor is to investigate his political rival. | ||
| You know what I'm asking, and so I'm only going to say this a few more times. | ||
| We've done an awful lot for Ukraine. | ||
| I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent. | ||
| Understand lots of it. | ||
| The favor is to investigate his political rival. | ||
| To investigate the Bidens. | ||
| And by the way, don't call me again. | ||
| I'll call you when you've done what I asked. | ||
| This is how a mafia boss talks. | ||
| This is, in sum and character, what the president was trying to communicate. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Trump could offer Alaska to the Russians in exchange for support in the next election. | |
| What did he talk to the whistleblower about? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because when the whistleblower even went to the inspector general, he never mentioned that he went with Adam Schiff. | |
| I've never met the whistleblower. | ||
| I don't know who the whistleblower is. | ||
| So there you have it, folks. | ||
| Pencil neck Schiff and the entire leftist regime engage in this. | ||
| We're going to be back in a minute and 14 seconds with tomorrow's news tonight in full spectrum color. | ||
| and make sure you stay tuned because Ian Carroll is joining us in studio in just 30 minutes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
you you Thank you. | |
| My friends know that I usually think everything's a scam from supplements and products and vitamins. | ||
| I don't take anything. | ||
| I usually buy it, try it, don't feel the results, end up tossing it and wasting money. | ||
| So I love Alex Jones and the Infowars crew. | ||
| And Alex kept playing this video of Robert Kennedy Jr. putting some blue drops in what looked like water. | ||
| And I wanted a way to support the team. | ||
| So I decided to buy this methylene blue. | ||
| This methylane blue, it is tremendous. | ||
| I would not be making this video if I didn't believe in it. | ||
| After I take it throughout the day, I start feeling better and better and better. | ||
| My workouts, I feel like I'm 15 years younger than I am. | ||
| And the app that I record my running on proves that my workouts are getting better. | ||
| So I gotta tell you what, God, family, country, InfoWars, and Methylane Blue. | ||
| Get it while you can. | ||
| Breaking through the lies of the New World Order. | ||
| It's Tomorrow's News Tonight with your host, Chase Geiser. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is Tomorrow's News Tonight. | ||
| I am your host, Chase Geiser. | ||
| We will be joined in studio in 22 minutes by the great Ian Carroll, one of my favorite guests, one of my best friends, Favorite person to speak with. | ||
| But this news is just absolutely astounding. | ||
| Obviously, the last couple of weeks have been something of a hell for MAGA supporters, for America first voters, for Trump supporters. | ||
| Of course, he referred to his supporters critical of his stance on Epstein as his former supporters, and that's not really the case. | ||
| I still support Donald Trump. | ||
| I'm proud that I voted for him. | ||
| Just the fact that he pardoned all of the J6 prisoners was reason enough for me to be satisfied with my vote. | ||
| I mean, he's been astoundingly better than any of the alternative options that we had, whether it was Biden or Kamala Harris. | ||
| There's no doubt about it. | ||
| But at the same time, I reserve the right to push back when I see what looks like a cover-up for the sake of saving one's reputation from the revelation of a lie that Trump thought the American people would believe. | ||
| I believe it to be the case that Trump was added to the Epstein files, that he was worked in, incorporated in. | ||
| And I certainly believe it to be the case today, given all that we've learned about what Obama did, these secret meetings, these emails, these communications, as it pertains to the attempted coup against the Trump administration in the first term. | ||
| And it was obvious what they were trying to do with impeachment attempt after impeachment attempt. | ||
| They tried to frame him for an insurrection, and then they tried to deplatform him everywhere. | ||
| And when that didn't work, they tried to put him in prison for over 400 years. | ||
| And finally, when that didn't work, they tried to kill him, not once, but twice, and at least twice, if we're not counting the other attempts that the public was never made aware of. | ||
| So the fact of the matter is, the left totally lost in 2024. | ||
| The globalists totally lost. | ||
| They have no political representation in any of our institutions anymore because the American people woke up to what they're doing and voted all of them out. | ||
| It was a glorious victory. | ||
| So the only conflict left in the political spectrum was between different sects of the right. | ||
| Your MAGA America first right and then your neoconservative Zionist right. | ||
| And the left, in a Hail Mary attempt to destroy the right, despite having no political power or representation whatsoever, attempted to catalyze that schism, create this artificial civil war, just as was prescribed in prescriptive programming with the Civil War movie that came out just last year. | ||
| Where they wanted to make it seem like a massive civil war would take place because a right-wing leader or a populist leader was just too dictatorial, too despotic, too much of an oligarch or a monarch rather, or despot. | ||
| And this is the type of not predictive but prescriptive programming where they don't just prepare you mentally for what's going to happen, but they try to prescribe the future by making it feel as if it's inevitable that this is the outcome for the United States of America, the people of America, and frankly, the people of the world, the species altogether. | ||
| That's the attempt that's being made here. | ||
| But now we have the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, coming out and revealing the truth about what has taken place. | ||
| And even rep Anna Paulina Luna, we'll get into some of this and then more. | ||
| She says, while others are busy stabbing President Trump in the back, I don't think anyone was really stabbing him in the back. | ||
| But I understand her concern. | ||
| We were working overtime behind the scenes in the Oval Office. | ||
| This photo was taken earlier today. | ||
| No, it's not a coincidence. | ||
| This is 4D chess, not checkers. | ||
| Welcome to the big leagues. | ||
| Enjoy phase three, she says. | ||
| And then she goes on to say, AG Pam Bondi is unsealing grand jury testimony. | ||
| Of course, I believe this has to be approved by a court. | ||
| So she's going to attempt to. | ||
| We'll see if it really happens. | ||
| And there's much more to come. | ||
| This is the most transparent administration in U.S. history. | ||
| And we had this apparent schism between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, but this broke earlier today, this evening, actually. | ||
| Secretary Marco Rubio has revoked the visa of Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes over his political witch hunt against former President Bolsonaro. | ||
| But keep in mind that this is the same Supreme Court justice of Brazil who did everything he could to raid and destroy X in the country because freedom of speech was simply not tolerable to his oligarch regime. | ||
| And so it's interesting that Marco Rubio would come out, despite all these differences that Elon Musk and President Trump seem to have, and revoke the visa of the Supreme Court justice responsible for all of the antagonism against X. Don't you find that interesting? | ||
| It makes one wonder if the schism between Elon Musk and Donald Trump is really so drastic given this move. | ||
| But on Friday, Director of National Intelligence, DNI Tulsi Gabbard, revealed overwhelming evidence that demonstrates how after President Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, President Obama and his National Security Cabinet members manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump. | ||
| And there's bullet points here. | ||
| I'm just going to read them. | ||
| I don't like to read to the audience because you can read for yourselves, but this is so important. | ||
| In the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the intelligence community consistently assessed that Russia is probably not trying to influence the election by using cyber means. | ||
| On December 7th, 2016, after the election, talking points were prepared for DNI James Clapper stating foreign adversaries did not use cyber attacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential election outcome. | ||
| On the 9th of December, President Obama's White House gathered top National Security Council principals for a meeting that included James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe, and others to discuss Russia. | ||
| After the meeting, Clapper's executive assistant sent an email to IC leaders, tasking them with creating a new IC assessment per the president's request that details the tools of Moscow used and actions it took. | ||
| Obama officials leaked false statements to the media outlets and a new intelligence community assessment was released. | ||
| So they manufactured the entire thing to undermine Trump's presidency, essentially justify what would be impeachment attempt after impeachment attempt. | ||
| And they know that they manufactured it. | ||
| It's not some accident or coincidence that this took place. | ||
| It's absolutely disgusting. | ||
| I'm going to show you clip 11 here in just a moment. | ||
| This is Jack Posobic assessing what we just learned. | ||
| He says he's never seen anything like this Intel program used to target President Trump and his supporters. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Obama administration's conspiracy to subvert President Trump's 2016 victory and presidency, Washington, D.C. Today's date, Friday. | ||
| This is from the Director of National Intelligence. | ||
| Tulsi Gabber revealed Overwhelming evidence that demonstrates how, after President Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, President Obama and his National Security Cabinet members manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump. | ||
| This is from the Director of National Intelligence, that language. | ||
| And also, she puts in the tweet atop, their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people. | ||
| No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. | ||
| The integrity of our Democratic Republic depends on it. | ||
| We are turning over all documents to the Department of Justice for criminal referral. | ||
| Jack Pasovic, this is what, to Caroline Wren's point, Durham did not have this information correct. | ||
| And Tulsi Gabbard, have you ever heard language like this from a director of national intelligence or any senior intelligence official, sir? | ||
| Steve, I've never heard language like this because I've never seen anything like this before in all these years using intelligence channels and intelligence programs to actually and to actively go after a U.S. politician who's going to be the next president of the United States. | ||
| So the person that is now your successor, you're directing it. | ||
| And it says over and over in these documents, and you can see it where because what, and it's so smart what DeNi Gabbard has done here because she's released all of it. | ||
| So she says it. | ||
| She's got the press release. | ||
| She has the executive summary, but she provides you all the backing documents as much as possible. | ||
| And it says very clearly, per the direction of the President of the United States. | ||
| So per the direction of Barack Obama following this meeting, you are now to create this new assessment. | ||
| And Steve, by the way, we've got emails in here. | ||
| I'm just going through it, but you can see responses from the analysts. | ||
| This is the technology cyber intel unit, the cyber intelligence officials at the FBI coming up and responding to Clapper's team and saying, wait a minute, you know, listen to this. | ||
| We would prefer the first sentence regarding Russia's intent to be softened. | ||
| The way it currently reads, it would indicate we have definite information that Russia does intend to disrupt our elections, and we are uncomfortable making that assessment. | ||
| That's from the FBI in 2016, but that's below the level. | ||
| That's the actual intelligence analysts, way below the Comey level, way below Clapper and Brennan over at DNI, previous DNI and previous CIA, where the people who are actually doing the work says, wait, we don't have the evidence. | ||
| We don't have the evidence to back this up. | ||
| And you are directing us to make this requirement. | ||
| We don't feel comfortable doing it. | ||
| And they did it anyway. | ||
| And we know later that Brennan went and hand-selected the people that would put together this completely fake assessment. | ||
| And he led the entire, he may, he could have started World War III with this. | ||
| Unbelievable, the level of corruption here. | ||
| Absolutely disgusting on all fronts. | ||
| The headline reads, treasonous conspiracy. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard calls for prosecution of Barack Obama, Jim Comey, John Brennan, and others, sends newly declassified Trump-Russia hoax docs to Justice Department. | ||
| It was recently reported that former FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and DNI James Clapper worked together to purposely corrupt the Trump-Russia investigation in 2016 before Trump entered office. | ||
| On Friday, it was revealed that Barack Obama knew it was a hoax and engaged in the manufacturing of this anyway. | ||
| We already knew this, but now they're finally admitting it. | ||
| You know how I've been talking about this. | ||
| The problem is we can all know that something is terribly corrupt, who was responsible for which crimes when, but there's never any accountability until the establishment or the institutions that exist admit it themselves. | ||
| And now we have the director of national intelligence coming out with the evidence and the claim and the allegations. | ||
| And it's time for Bondi to make up for some lost time here and hold these people accountable for the crimes that they've committed against the American people, but not just the American people, against humanity as well. | ||
| And it leaves one wondering, all right, if they manufactured in a very clear, obvious way the Russia collusion hoax of 2016, insisted on it with the entire Democratic National Committee coming together, the entire party coming together, insisting on it for years and years and years, just lying, knowing that they're lying, insisting on this, then what could they have possibly done with the Epstein files to try to wrap Trump into it? | ||
| I think this lines up perfectly with what Trump has been claiming over the last two weeks about the Epstein files. | ||
| He's been claiming, look, there's no list, there's nothing here. | ||
| He's been implying that he's named on the list, though not stating it, saying that the Democrats had these files for an extended period of time. | ||
| They obviously put in a bunch of information that isn't credible whatsoever. | ||
| So I think what we've seen with these Epstein files is just a 2.0 of the Russia collusion hoax, where the Democrats, when they're in power, they take control of all these classified documents, they plant a whole bunch of stuff, hoping to release it later so that it's incriminating. | ||
| They're trying to frame Trump again. | ||
| This is what's going on. | ||
| But here's Jesse Waters in clip 14 reporting on Fox the latest. | ||
| Fox News Alert, we just got a peek inside Obama's black book, and it turns out Barack knew the Russia hoax was a hoax all along, but pushed it anyway to sabotage the Trump presidency. | ||
| DNI Tulsa Gabbard declassifying pages and pages of documents showing Obama's intel guys briefed him just weeks after the 16 election that the Russians didn't actually sway the election. | ||
| Quote, we assessed that Russian and criminal actors did not impact the recent U.S. election results. | ||
| Criminal activity also failed to reach the scale and sophistication necessary to change election outcomes. | ||
| But Obama just couldn't accept that. | ||
| So he and his staff instructed intel agencies to cook up new reports to support Russia collusion. | ||
| Quote, after the meetings, Clapper's executive assistant emailed intelligence community leaders, tasking them to create a new intelligence community assessment per the president's request that detailed the tools Moscow used and actions It took to influence the 16 election. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard described what she found as a conspiracy to subvert the will of the American people. | ||
| And she says the people involved should be prosecuted and has made a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. | ||
| Well, there you have it, folks. | ||
| Mainstream news now, everybody knows. | ||
| Now everybody knows nobody can die. | ||
| And I know that the left is going to come out and say, oh, well, this is just Tulsi Gabbard making things up. | ||
| You remember she's a former Democrat, right? | ||
| You remember she was totally alienated by the Democratic Party because she absolutely murdered politically Kamala Harris in that debate. | ||
| And then she was totally censored from Google. | ||
| The Democrats are absolutely collapsing all around us. | ||
| They have no support whatsoever. | ||
| And if you don't believe me, just look what the leader of NPR has done. | ||
| This is clip 16 of her begging for money because their funding has been stripped. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Hi, I'm Katherine Marr, CEO of NPR. | ||
| Congress just voted to eliminate all federal funding for public media. | ||
| This decision hurts communities across America. | ||
| It means fewer local reporters covering town councils and state championships. | ||
| It means fewer stories about local farms, fisheries, businesses, about what's happening in the statehouse, about musicians and civic leaders who make our communities tick. | ||
| It means fewer voices reflecting the richness of who we are as a nation. | ||
| Fewer stories about what connects us and brings us closer together. | ||
| And for millions, especially in rural areas, it means losing access to trusted local news, emergency alerts, and everyday connection. | ||
| But you can help us keep this vital, vibrant service on air across our nation. | ||
| For your neighbors, for you, and for millions of Americans. | ||
| Please. | ||
| I work for NPR, and I'm sitting on an avocado couch. | ||
| I used to be one of those people that listened to NPR 10 years ago. | ||
| Gosh, more like 15 years ago now. | ||
| And I remember there was this show in Nashville, Tennessee called All Things Considered. | ||
| And the host was a woman named Anita Bug. | ||
| And it's so fitting now because of Klaus Schwab and the WEF and everything that we've seen, because she would come on the air and she'd say, hello, this is all things considered, and I'm going to eat a bug. | ||
| That's what it sounded like. | ||
| And they want us to eat the bugs. | ||
| But it's not just NPR that's collapsing. | ||
| It's not just because the federal government has dropped all of its funding. | ||
| Because remember, when we threatened to take away its funding before, they said, oh, only 4% of all of our funding is from the federal government. | ||
| Now we pulled the funding. | ||
| And she's sitting on an avocado couch, begging for donations from people who care about real journalism. | ||
| She's the same woman who gave a TED Talk talking about how freedom of speech and the truth wasn't important or our aim. | ||
| Guys, can you find that clip? | ||
| You know what I'm talking about, right? | ||
| She's giving that TED Talk saying that the truth isn't important and freedom of speech doesn't matter. | ||
| That's not the aim. | ||
| That's not the purpose of NPR. | ||
| In fact, I don't even understand why NPR isn't considered United States government-affiliated media. | ||
| It absolutely is. | ||
| But here's clip eight. | ||
| This is Stephen Colbert. | ||
| Apparently, his show was canceled just two days after this. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| My parent corporation, Paramount, paid Donald Trump a $16 million settlement over his 60 minutes lawsuit. | ||
| As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I am offended. | ||
| And I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company. | ||
| But just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help. | ||
| This settlement. | ||
| This settlement. | ||
| This settlement is for a nuisance lawsuit Trump filed claiming that 16 Minutes deceptively edited their interview with then-candidate Kamala Harris last fall. | ||
| Paramount knows they could have easily fought it because in their own words, the lawsuit was completely without merit. | ||
| And keep in mind, Paramount produced Transformers Rise of the Beast. | ||
| They know completely without merits. | ||
| Now, unlike the payoffs from ABC and Twitter, Paramount settlement did not include an apology. | ||
| Instead, that's good. | ||
| Instead, the corporation released a statement where they said, you may take our money, but you will never take our dignity. | ||
| You may, however, purchase our dignity for the low, low price of $16 million. | ||
| We need the cash. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now, I believe... | |
| All right. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| What can I say, Mr. Stephen loves to dance? | ||
| Now, I believe that this kind of complicated financial settlement with a sitting government official has a technical name in legal circles. | ||
| It's Big Fat Bribe. | ||
| Because this all comes as Paramount's owners are trying to get the Trump administration to approve the sale of our network to a new owner, Skydance. | ||
| Not the music I was expecting? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| That was me dancing in the sky. | ||
| And some of the TV typers out there are blogging that once Skydance gets CBS, the new owner's desire to please Trump could put pressure on late-night host and frequent Trump critic Stephen Colbert. | ||
| Okay, okay. | ||
| But how are they going to put pressure on Stephen Colbert if they can't find him? | ||
| Well, they're going to cancel your show. | ||
| And look, his show was canceled. | ||
| This is just an excuse. | ||
| It was canceled because nobody watches it anymore. | ||
| He hasn't been funny since the Colbert report, and it was a stretch to consider him funny even back then. | ||
| That's what's really going on here. | ||
| The left is totally collapsing right before our eyes. | ||
| They have no support in Congress, either in the House or in the Senate. | ||
| They have no support in the White House, and they've been eradicated from all of our major institutions. | ||
| And despite the fact that I have major concerns about some of the things that Trump has done or said, I was worried that he was going to start World War III by bombing Iran. | ||
| I turned out to be wrong about that, 100%. | ||
| I was worried that this Epstein stuff was going to be a nightmare for us. | ||
| And it turns out that maybe it's going to play out for us. | ||
| And maybe this revelation from DNI Tulsi Gabbard is setting the stage for an understanding as to why maybe he was reluctant to release non-credible files to the public, which the left would just use incessantly in campaign ads for midterms and everything, to undermine the integrity or credibility of the Trump administration. | ||
| But here is Catherine Marr. | ||
| We just saw her on an avocado couch asking for money. | ||
| This is her telling you exactly what NPR and the leftist regime machine stands for. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| But one of the most significant differences, critical for moving from polarization to productivity is that the Wikipedians who write these articles aren't actually focused on finding the truth. | ||
| They're working for something that's a little bit more attainable, which is the best of what we can know right now. | ||
| And after seven years there, I actually believe that they're onto something that for our most tricky disagreements, seeking the truth and seeking to convince others of the truth isn't necessarily the best place to start. | ||
| In fact, I think our reverence for the truth might have become a bit of a distraction that is preventing our process and getting important things done. | ||
| None of us to say that the truth isn't important. | ||
| The truth obviously exists. | ||
| It's at the core, or the search for the truth, is at the core of some of our greatest human achievements. | ||
| It can animate and inspire us to do, learn, and create great things. | ||
| But I think in our messy human hearts, in our messy human hearts. | ||
| The message truth is something of a fickle mistress. | ||
| Put a bullet straight in my head. | ||
| The beauty of the truth is actually often in the struggle. | ||
| It's the reason that we have so many sublime chronicles of the human experience, because there are so many different truths to be explored. | ||
| And so in this spirit, I know that the truth exists for each of you in this room. | ||
| All right, that's enough of that. | ||
| We're coming up on a break. | ||
| On the other side of this break, Ian Carroll is going to be joining me live in studio. | ||
| It's always an honor and pleasure to be with him. | ||
| I can't wait to see what happens. | ||
| It's unpredictable. | ||
| What's going to happen with Ian Carroll in studio, though? | ||
| This is tomorrow's news tonight. | ||
| I think we see the writing on the wall for what's next. | ||
| The left is going to continue to lie and scheme and, frankly, conspire against the American people. | ||
| And despite what the leader of NPR says about the truth not being the primary aim and not being important, it's actually the fundamental aim. | ||
| Even Jesus Christ himself said, I am the way, the truth, and the light. | ||
| Asking ye shall receive, seeking, ye shall find, knocking, it shall be opened unto you. | ||
| It's all about revelation, about awakening, and that's why it's more important now than ever to keep infowars on the air. | ||
| And folks, these deals that we've been offering at thealexjonestore.com are disgustingly good. | ||
| I cannot believe that Alex isn't pulling my hair out right now and he's allowing these to happen. | ||
| It's 25% off store-wide this weekend only. | ||
| Today's payday, folks. | ||
| And though we've been funding war after war after war after war over the course of the last 50 years, the only war worth funding is the InfoWar. | ||
| And every dollar that you spend at thealxjoneststore.com is around in the heart of the New World Order Globalist Satanic Child Abusing Cuck Cabal. | ||
| Go now to thealixjonestore.com and be the reason we will always be on the air. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| There's a reason why supplements are so big and so popular and have such a great result. | ||
| It's because whether it's your diet, whether it's your exercise routine, the point is you're lacking in some very important vitamins, very important minerals that can make you healthier, live longer, and feel better. | ||
| We're also under constant attack, Owen, and that's what's very important. | ||
| So the modern human living experience, the environment that we subject ourselves to, it's the equivalent of smoking like a couple packs of cigarettes every single day. | ||
| Like that's the bad food that we eat. | ||
| That's the poison in the water, X, Y, Z. So it's kind of like what happens is, Reck Jones in studio with me, we're about to make a very exciting new product announcement here. | ||
| So what ends up happening is whether it's the modern day diet or whether it's the modern day atmosphere or whether it's, you know, a sedative state, you're not getting whatever it is you need to make your body function at its highest capabilities. | ||
| Absolutely correct. | ||
| And that's why we created these two new formulas that are now live at the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| So we've got methyl drive here and we've also got power plant. | ||
| Now, both of them at their core, they do around the same type of thing. | ||
| It's increasing fuel for you to create new mitochondria. | ||
| It's increasing mitochondrial efficiency. | ||
| It's reducing oxidative stress and XYZ, other things like that. | ||
| Now, I want to single out PowerPlant really quick. | ||
| If you're a guy and you're looking for a boost, a healthy, sustainable testosterone boost, we made PowerPlant specifically for someone that wants to increase their free testosterone. | ||
| I remember when I was looking into supplements and stuff and different things like, you know, people don't get enough boron. | ||
| They don't even know what boron is. | ||
| And I remember one thing that always stuck in my head, and that's, you know, it's just true. | ||
| Well, what does boron kind of rhyme with, folks? | ||
| Just leave it at that. | ||
| You know what I mean? | ||
| We've got bits and pieces of a system here that comes together and provides you just the antioxidant support you need, the testosterone support you need, the mitochondrial health support you need. | ||
| It's all there. | ||
| It's all together. | ||
| It's in both of these products. | ||
| You could take both of these at the same time and experience a heck of a lot of benefits. | ||
| Now, I would say younger, older. | ||
| You're an older person, you need more overall body support, you need the overall antioxidant support. | ||
| I would go with the methyl drive. | ||
| But if you're a younger person or someone looking for a performance boost, I would go with the power plant. | ||
| I can enhance what I'm doing here, maybe like tenfold with the right supplement routine. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| I totally agree with that statement. | ||
| Look, the reason why this is called power plant is because it has cordyceps in it. | ||
| Now, of course, the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell and all that, but cordyceps is like an elite top tier S tier ingredient, which increases the amount of ATP you make, which indirectly helps you make more mitochondria. | ||
| But beyond that, increases your oxygen carrying capacity. | ||
| So you want to talk about workouts. | ||
| You want to talk about power. | ||
| You talk about strength. | ||
| Talk about power plan. | ||
| And that's what you need, especially when you're doing a heavy lift and you need to have good breathing or you're doing long form cardio and you need to have strong breathing. | ||
| That's where this is going to come into play. | ||
| And when you started talking about the new product that we just came out with with the PQQ and the CoQ10, yes, the methyl drug. | ||
| Folks, I'm telling you, it's like if I had to do a list of like, okay, if someone said you can pick five things that you're going to get in a supplement, like what are the most important things? | ||
| Guarantee you, you asked me a hundred times, PQQ and CoQ10 are on that list for me a hundred times. | ||
| Vitamin B12, as methylcobalamin, the good kind. | ||
| Magnesium, coenzyme Q10, CoQ10, PQQ, black pepper for absorption. | ||
| You can't ask for a better catch-all, really. | ||
| And the synergy that both of these products have with the methylene blue is unparalleled. | ||
| You will not find a better product on the market that's targeted in that specific way because we made these for you, the customer, and for ourselves because we believe in the product. | ||
| We take the product. | ||
| ThealexjonesStore.com to get these new products, try them for yourself. | ||
| I know they're going to become a staple. | ||
| I see Rex working out here every once in a while. | ||
| We've worked out in the gym every once in a while. | ||
| And, you know, he's really excited about this stuff. | ||
| TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
TheAlexJonesStore.com. | |
| The enemy never sleeps, so neither does he. | ||
| You're listening to Chase Geiser on Tomorrow's News Tonight. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is Tomorrow's News Tonight. | ||
| I am joined by the one and only Ian Carroll. | ||
| It is an honor and a pleasure to be with you. | ||
| How are you? | ||
| It's good to see you again, man. | ||
| I'm good. | ||
| I'm glad to be back in Austin. | ||
| I had a very long drive to get here. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And then I slept for Idaho. | ||
| In one go. | ||
| Straight through. | ||
| It was a 25-hour drive. | ||
| Did you hit a Bucky's on the way? | ||
| No, I hate Bucky's. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| I've never been. | ||
| Get out of my studio. | ||
| So I've never been to a Bucky's. | ||
| How do you hate it then? | ||
| Prejudice. | ||
| You're like the grocery goo. | ||
| I just... | ||
| It is clearly the most out-of-date, silly, out-of-touch feeling marketing ever. | ||
| You're going to buy 100 billboards for 500 miles just to tell me about a Bucky's 500 miles away with cheap meme slogans that your grandkid told you to say. | ||
| What's wrong with that? | ||
| It's just, it makes me. | ||
| The bathrooms are actually the cleanest. | ||
| Yeah, but there's a loves travel stop every 17 miles and their bathrooms are just. | ||
| Does that travel stop? | ||
| Do you want to get raped or do you want to get some brisket? | ||
| Dude, have you seen how tall I am? | ||
| I can get brisket just fine. | ||
| No one's going to touch me. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Or anyone with me. | ||
| And I don't know. | ||
| I'm just, I'm prejudiced. | ||
| I'm traveling with you then because I got a problem. | ||
| Yeah, we're chilling. | ||
| Plus, I got another gun on the way. | ||
| So now we're sitting. | ||
| What are you getting? | ||
| I just got another Glock. | ||
| I just got a smaller one that's easier to conceal. | ||
| There you go, man. | ||
| So tell me what you've been doing the last three months. | ||
| You mentioned that you've been getting into the AI robotics stuff. | ||
| I want to know where your head's at. | ||
| Yeah, well, for the last three months, I've just been traveling around doing lots of stuff. | ||
| I covered the Candace show for a month over in Nashville, a little over a month, and then traveled to California, did a little home tour and visited family in Washington, family in Idaho, and then back. | ||
| And I've just been really focused on YouTube and not being in all the Twitter wars and Twitter madness. | ||
| We were just making jokes behind backstage about how I did not die. | ||
| I just stopped talking shit on Twitter so much for a little bit. | ||
| Yeah, I noticed you hadn't posted in a while. | ||
| And Twitter thought I had died. | ||
| But realistically, it's just really nice to spend more time working on projects and learning things and like doing reporting than arguing with Zionists about lies. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| You know. | ||
| Well, and the thing is, I was thinking about this earlier today because Jay Dyer challenged me to a debate about Bitcoin because I made the claim on air that I thought Bitcoin was created by the Central Intelligence Agency. | ||
| And I cited, you know, claims of it being a loose translation from Japanese Satoshi Nakamoto of Central Intelligence. | ||
| And he's like, look, it's not CIA created. | ||
| Do you want to debate me? | ||
| And I was like, dude, if I debate you on it, I'm totally losing the debate. | ||
| My opinion is from the heart. | ||
| It's a gut feeling. | ||
| I know that I would lose that debate. | ||
| And my point is, like, we spend all this time engaged in debates that are designed to win over the minds, but you have to win over the heart and then the heart wins the mind over. | ||
| And it's the same thing for marketing. | ||
| People make buying decisions emotionally and they justify later because of reason. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| And emotionally, I hate Buckies. | ||
| Yeah, I understand. | ||
| That's fine. | ||
| There's nothing wrong with that. | ||
| I have to get you to love. | ||
| I can't convince you that it's amazing by sighting specs like clean bathrooms or any other details. | ||
| I have to get you to buy in because of an experience or something else. | ||
| But the same thing with the Zionists, right? | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Like, you're not going to convince, you're not going to, if you just crush Mark Levin in a debate about Zionism, he's not going to change his mind. | ||
| Like, oh, I lost that debate. | ||
| Therefore, my position has totally changed. | ||
| Like, you have to win his heart over. | ||
| And you're not going to do that because he's, you know, culturally, emotionally, whatever, bought it. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| You've honestly just elucidated the problem perfectly. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And that's why, that's a big part of why I pulled back from Twitter because you can ratio the Zionists all day long. | ||
| You can show them facts. | ||
| You can share information. | ||
| And it's not just Zionists. | ||
| There's all sorts of madness on Twitter, but yeah, you can't fix stupid. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I understand it. | ||
| I used to be a Zionist. | ||
| I used to be somebody that was like, hey, man, the only democracy in the region. | ||
| I used to be a leftist. | ||
| So how'd that go for you? | ||
| I mean, it's a long and lonely road. | ||
| It was during the time when leftists were in power, so I didn't really notice anything. | ||
| I just was out in the mountains climbing. | ||
| So what do you think about news that OpenAI unveils? | ||
| Its agent feature that can control your computer and perform tasks automatically. | ||
| This is ChatGPT folks, by the way. | ||
| Now it can control your computer and do everything automatically. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So this is a lot of what I was just researching for. | ||
| I just did a whole presentation on robots, technology, AI, drones, et cetera, up in Idaho. | ||
| And I'm making a video about it too that's coming out soon. | ||
| And I hate to say it. | ||
| It's a little uncomfortable to say, but there's two sides to the coin. | ||
| There's two sides to, so like, if I'm trying to create video and I want an AI and I want AI to actually help me edit a video, make a video, film a video, if I want to like really get working with AI, I need the AI to be able to do stuff. | ||
| That's like the main limitation on AI right now is you can't say, hey, AI, hey, Siri, like open Spotify, play that one song, skip the song. | ||
| Hey, Siri, like real quick, open up CapCut and edit this thing down for me. | ||
| Hey, that's not really AI, though. | ||
| That's like what marketing has told us AI is. | ||
| Well, that's the most basic level. | ||
| But if I want the AI up there in the video editing software with me, like, hey, I want that shot to be a little more to the left. | ||
| If you could zoom in and now next shot, we want to make a desert. | ||
| Like if you really want to get working with AI in a creative way, it needs to be able to control the things on your phone. | ||
| But the problem is that that's a point of no return. | ||
| Once the AI agents can access, control, turn on, turn off, it's like they can send your tech message. | ||
| It's like Jeffrey Epstein getting the power of attorney for Leslie Wexner, for example. | ||
| Once Jeffrey Epstein has the power of attorney for Leslie Wexner, he can do anything he wants with Leslie Wexner's money, business, and he did Operation. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And Leslie would have never known. | ||
| How would he have known that Jeffrey Epstein was running a global trafficking ring with his money? | ||
| So I'm a little uncomfortable. | ||
| Leslie knew. | ||
| Oh, of course, Leslie knew. | ||
| Are you kidding me? | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| So there's this whole moment in the Tucker Carlson Daryl Cooper episode that just came out that I hope you saw. | ||
| It's amazing. | ||
| Everyone should watch it. | ||
| But Tucker and Daryl are, let's say, they're cautious and thoughtful, and they don't like to speculate beyond too much beyond what they know. | ||
| It's clip 28, by the way, guys. | ||
| Get that ready. | ||
| Yeah, and there was this hilarious moment in there where they were talking about Leslie Wexner, the power of attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, and they sort of came to this impasse of like, who knows why it would work that way? | ||
| Like, who knows why he would have hired Jeffrey Epstein with this non-resume to manage all of his money? | ||
| And they had just putting all of these pieces together that clearly showed that this was an intelligence operation and that it was not Leslie Wexner hiring Jeffrey Epstein to do this. | ||
| It was a convergence of intelligence assets saying, Leslie, you're going to be the bankroll. | ||
| Jeffrey Epstein is going to be your guy. | ||
| You're going to get to know him. | ||
| He's going to manage your stuff. | ||
| This is how it's going to work. | ||
| And that's why he gave Jeffrey Epstein the power of attorney over his entire company without knowing him very well. | ||
| Not because he wanted him to manage, you know, Victoria's secret, right? | ||
| And so it's just kind of funny how so many of the pieces are on the table. | ||
| So many of the parts of that operation are known to us. | ||
| And yet there's still some confusion. | ||
| Let's show clips 28 and 33 back to back. | ||
| Go ahead, Derek. | ||
| Before Jeffrey Epstein was sentenced, for whatever reason, you have this billionaire who's just the definition of a flight risk. | ||
| They don't take his passport away. | ||
| And before he's sentenced, he flees. | ||
| He flees the country, goes to Israel, stays there for several months. | ||
| Moved all his money offshore by this point. | ||
| And while he's in Israel, he's telling people there that he's thinking about staying because you can actually do that. | ||
| They don't extradite Jewish criminals, at least, who flee to Israel. | ||
| There's an organization called Jewish Community Watch, which is a Jewish organization that tracks pedophiles who have fled the United States to go to Israel where there's no extradition of Jewish criminals there. | ||
| And between just the years, I think it was 2010 when they started, when they opened up, and 2016, 2017 when this story was written. | ||
| So a period of six years, there were already 60 pedophiles from the United States that had fled to Israel and were living freely there. | ||
| Some of them had reoffended there and got thrown in Israeli jails. | ||
| But so this is a thing, you know, and Jeffrey Epstein was over there. | ||
| I mean, you've been self-employed for a while, but when you weren't, was it your habit to go to your boss and make demands of them on a regular basis? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I mean, since when do we ever make demands on Israel? | ||
| It's been a long time. | ||
| I don't know, but that's obviously distressing. | ||
| If there's one message I would, like if there's anybody at the White House or anywhere close to those people watching right now that they need to understand, is the reason this is important to the base is not because they think there's this Jewish pedophile who worked for the Israeli Mossad and they want him held. | ||
| It has nothing to do with that. | ||
| It's a proxy for can we hold these people accountable? | ||
| Like Donald Trump's presidency in general, you know, people might have favored the trade policy. | ||
| Certainly they were, you know, the immigration thing was important, all that kind of stuff. | ||
| But really what it was is, man, these people have gotten so out of control and so out of touch with the rest of us and so unconcerned with what's going on with the rest of us. | ||
| We just got to bring in a wrecking ball from the outside who's going to go in there and shake things up and tear this thing down. | ||
| People are not listening to us because we're relevant. | ||
| We don't have any say in our government. | ||
| There is no democratic control in the United States. | ||
| The population's views don't really matter. | ||
| That's the feeling that people have. | ||
| And this whole story that you've told for two hours and 37 minutes confirms that they are right to be concerned because what you're describing is an organization. | ||
| But I'm somebody who admires Darryl Cooper, and I saw the way that he was unfairly treated after his last appearance. | ||
| He by no means was apologizing for Hitler in his last appearance on the Tucker Carlson show, despite the fact that he, tongue-in-cheek, expressed criticism of Winston Churchill, who was somebody worthy of criticism. | ||
| I mean, he was drunk and reckless, and that war certainly escalated. | ||
| Now, Hitler was unpredictable and obviously very ambitious. | ||
| You know, he could have cracked open a beer and put his feet up and said, good job, boys, but instead he decided barbarosa. | ||
| And I'm not familiar with all the nuance of World War II. | ||
| I've studied World War II, but not nearly to the extent that Daryl Cooper has. | ||
| Point is, Daryl Cooper is an honest person. | ||
| He's not anti-Semitic for the sake of anti-Semitism. | ||
| He's not anti-Zionism for the sake of anti-Zionism. | ||
| He's going to give you a really informed opinion on what's going on because I genuinely believe that his aim is the truth, which is so interesting because, and I don't mean to ramble about this, the academics always talk about how important it is to rely on the experts. | ||
| It's this appeal to authority fallacy that they commit. | ||
| Have you ever been there? | ||
| But the problem is the academics are engaged in a deeply, deeply political environment. | ||
| Eric Weinstein has complained about this for years, how physics has become so political that no one can offer any alternative thoughts or theories to string theory because it's so popular. | ||
| So all the physicists feel like they have to go down the string theory rabbit hole, despite the fact that there are plenty of alternative paths to pursue in terms of physics, right? | ||
| It's deeply political. | ||
| And look, this is stupid, but it's true. | ||
| I was the student body president of my college for one year. | ||
| I was elected by the entire student body to run the student government. | ||
| And I dealt with faculty of my university. | ||
| And I will say it's 100% political, just like Congress is. | ||
| It's much less consequential because it's just political in its own environment of whatever university you're talking about. | ||
| But if you're talking about academia, whether it's history or archaeology or physics, these experts are way more likely to instigate a false preference bias or make a false claim than a random podcaster who's done their own research. | ||
| In fact, I trust Daryl Cooper more than I trust any World War II historian because Do you think that any academic in any of our institutions wants to come out and blame anyone else other than Hitler in the current political climate? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| I mean, it's not just World War II, it's not just one field. | ||
| Like you say, it seeps into all academic fields, right? | ||
| And what you say about Weinstein is really interesting because Eric Weinstein has actually started to elaborate on his own theory that Jeffrey, and it's not really like his own theory. | ||
| It's an element of the Epstein plot that Whitney talks about in her book, that Daryl has talked about, that Ryan Dawson has talked about, because it's there. | ||
| It's there in the evidence that Jeffrey Epstein, part of his operation, was a scientific control operation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| It wasn't just a sex trafficking black person. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| It was cultivating influence within the scientific and the academic communities through donations to MIT and Harvard and other Ivy Leagues. | ||
| Exactly, right? | ||
| And this is just the nature of educational institutions is they offer you an unprecedented amount of power over the youth and over the future of academic thought, the future of culture, the future of politics and world leaders. | ||
| And so every intelligence agency has an interest in having their hands in there as well as in scientific discovery and publishing. | ||
| And so Jeffrey Epstein's operation, at first, when we first learned about it, it was mostly framed as a blackmail operation around sex and kids. | ||
| And it was that. | ||
| But it was also, it was a multifaceted tool and Epstein was a multifaceted operator. | ||
| And Weinstein's, when Weinstein speaks on that aspect of it, it's really interesting. | ||
| I've not listened to enough of it yet because Weinstein is a very intelligent and wordy guy. | ||
| But this podcast that he did recently that I have not yet seen. | ||
| Was he Danny Jones one? | ||
| No, no, but Danny Jones is the first one. | ||
| This one is special. | ||
| This is like a seven-minute long clip. | ||
| I've actually studied Eric Weinstein's Epstein stuff pretty thoroughly. | ||
| I think, I could be mistaken. | ||
| I think I've heard everything that he's ever had to say about Epstein, and it's totally fascinating. | ||
| And if you take it in the context of some of the claims that we've seen by the CIA whistleblower, is his last name, Caracow? | ||
| He's been on our network. | ||
| Yeah, Jack. | ||
| He's making the rounds right now. | ||
| You guys would recognize him many times. | ||
| He looks a little bit like a bunny rabbit, nice guy. | ||
| Anyway, he's the man. | ||
| This guy has come out and said, look, when I was at CIA from 1990, I think he started in 90, maybe 93, from the early 90s for years, he said that the Israelis are constantly trying to steal our military intelligence, specifically as it pertains to technology. | ||
| It's been a recurring problem that when you have Israelis or Mossad in the CIA building or in the Pentagon, they always try to bug it, right? | ||
| Which I understand. | ||
| I'm sure it's true of other nations as well. | ||
| And I've heard other stories on the side I could tell you about what it's like to work with the IDF or American soldiers, things like just leaving the bathrooms disgusting on purpose, just stuff like that. | ||
| That I've heard from Navy SEALs and things of that nature. | ||
| But it's interesting because we give about 95% of all of our military technology to Israel, including like the F-35. | ||
| So for example, we gave them the F-35 after it came out, but we gave them the F-35I, which was a slightly less advanced version of the F-35, because in the event that an Israeli pilot was shot down over Russia or China or whatever, we don't want that technology to be taken. | ||
| So they did everything that they could to bug us and steal that information. | ||
| I believe they actually ended up getting it. | ||
| I think everybody has all the details on the F-35. | ||
| I could probably Google it and just build you one in a 3D printer now at this point because it's so, it's so out there. | ||
| Point I'm trying to make is Epstein, yes, did engage in a blackmail operation against our political class, but was likely just whining and dining scientists to try to get any insight into any of the classified material they were working on as it pertains to gravitational propulsion technology, ballistics, what have you. | ||
| So this is not something that he wasn't just engaged in one thing. | ||
| And I guarantee it's going to come out whether 50 years from now or 50 days from now that there are dozens of Epsteins operational right now, probably as many as 200. | ||
| I would, I mean, yeah, I mean, two, I would, I would question if there's 200 total of them. | ||
| Oh, 100%. | ||
| Easily. | ||
| Dozens of way more than 200. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| I think that Jeffrey Epstein was certainly running a very unique and powerful branch of this operation. | ||
| But what Daryl and Tucker kind of circled around and sort of put a pin in at the end of their interview was that they both say that they're of the belief that it's not even exactly Israeli primarily, that it's almost just like a freelance operation that's contracting with Israel and with the CIA, with kind of black budget arms of these intelligence agencies, which I don't personally agree with. | ||
| I think the reason why you see Leslie Wexner, Jeffrey Epstein, Ehud Barak being the sort of nexus of formation for that is because it was Israel that founded this branch of this operation. | ||
| But I do think that this, it's such an illegal operation that's operating so much in the dark, like dark markets that I almost suspect that it's run as much by organized criminal kind of operations as by the actual government of Israel, if you can call it that. | ||
| Do you know what I mean? | ||
| Yeah, I know what you mean. | ||
| Like if you have a CIA black budget program that goes far enough off books, like is that even technically really a CIA project anymore? | ||
| Or is that George Bush working with a whole bunch of drug smugglers to smuggle heroin? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| That's kind of in line with what I think. | ||
| And we may or may not disagree about this. | ||
| I'm not sure that we've really had an in-depth conversation about this. | ||
| One of the problems that I have with the anti-Israel crowd, and that is such a terrible expression, for lack of a better expression, is there's a tendency to blame Israel for everything. | ||
| And I do think that Israel is involved in almost every one of our problems. | ||
| However, I believe that Israel and Mossad operate on behalf of the CIA as the street thugs. | ||
| Yeah, we have talked about this a little bit. | ||
| And many others, and I assume you, but I don't know, believe that Israel is actually controlling our government on behalf of its own interests, where I think the CIA is controlling Mossad on behalf of ensuring that they can protect the dollar in the region so they can justify any other incursion. | ||
| What are your thoughts on my theory, my conspiracy theory, that we're actually paying and controlling Mossad rather than the other way around? | ||
| I think it's probably a mixture of both, as in Americans obviously have the interest In controlling Israel for all the reasons that you state. | ||
| Are they successful at that? | ||
| Maybe somewhat. | ||
| Israelis, however, have all the interest in the world in controlling Americans and America. | ||
| And so I would argue that the interests align in both directions with your theory, but the question is who is more successful at it. | ||
| And based upon my read of CIA history and Israeli history, I see way more tactical and operational success in Israel exactly versus CIA history is full of blunders. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| There's six times full of Iran. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And they seem to just bungle everything up. | ||
| And then you arrive at the 90s and the Epstein operation running for 20 years, basically. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And they got caught. | ||
| In 2007, right? | ||
| And then it just was allowed to continue. | ||
| Well, they apparently had so much dirt that someone high enough up in our own government was able to tell Alex Acosta to stop, or he was taking orders from Israelis. | ||
| And either way, that clearly puts Israel one peg up on us in 2007 in terms of their power structure. | ||
| Because in 2007, we were still much closer to Bill Clinton's presidency when whoever's running this operation, you know, who knows, had just compromised the president of the United States of America. | ||
| So if, in my mind, if you put the CIA above Israel in sort of the tier of control, that doesn't really align with what happened with the Epstein case in my opinion. | ||
| Well, and obviously in 2007, we were in the midst of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. | ||
| It was very important for our so-called national security interests that Israel's reputation remained intact during that time. | ||
| Just as it is now. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So I'd be really curious, Chase, what your take is on this phase three rep Anna Paulina Luna tweet that you read earlier on the show was about how it's phase three now and we're getting ready to release two rational. | ||
| And there was no phase two. | ||
| She never told us about phase two, right? | ||
| Bro, can you imagine if George Lucas skipped Empire Strikes Back? | ||
| Exactly, right? | ||
| Or he played Empire Strikes Back in the back room with him and his buddies and then came out and just started playing Return of the Jedi. | ||
| But Rep Anna Paulina Luna comes out and she literally says, this is 4D chess, not checkers, like buckle up or pop some popcorn or some shit. | ||
| It's like, okay, girl, let's slow the hell down. | ||
| So I like Representative Anna Paulina Luna. | ||
| I think that she's a good person. | ||
| And I don't think that she's stupid. | ||
| I don't presume so, but there's a difference between stupid and ignorant. | ||
| And I just don't think she knows what the hell she's talking about. | ||
| Yeah, I feel like she's playing way. | ||
| I think she's cool. | ||
| She's a sweetheart. | ||
| Obviously, everybody wants it to be 4D chess. | ||
| That would be nice. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I would have loved it if Joe Biden had been playing 4D chess for the course of the last four years instead of Connect 4 with eight-year-olds on the floor of the Oval Office. | ||
| And look, there have been examples of Trump doing things that I totally opposed that seem to have worked out. | ||
| And I'll give you an example, and you can push back on this if you want, Ian. | ||
| I thought that bombing Iran was inevitably going to be World War III, inevitably going to be boots on the ground, as Lindsey Graham would have it, in Iran. | ||
| And it did, at least short term, result in an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Iran. | ||
| So I'm kind of taking the hit on that one. | ||
| Like, all right, Trump, like, he took a risk and he was right and I was wrong. | ||
| So I'm hoping that the Sepstein thing, but the difference with the Sepstein thing, and I do believe that he's been worked into the files by the Democrats who have been holding these files for the last several years. | ||
| But the problem is instead of Trump coming clean and being honest and saying, look, there's no client list. | ||
| And we've recently discovered that the Democrats have tried to integrate me into this list just as they tried to integrate me into this Russia hoax, which is coming out now. | ||
| So we're not going to release it yet. | ||
| We're going to vet the credible stuff and we're going to let you know. | ||
| If you would have come out and been transparent about that, rather than saying, my former supporters are stupid or Alex Jones is a dumb shit or just alienating all of us because we're people, man. | ||
| Like, you know, me, you know, the InfoWars crew. | ||
| I sacrificed a lot to work here. | ||
| I've sacrificed a lot of money that I was making to work here. | ||
| And this crew, many of them haven't had a raise in years because of the lawsuits that we're in. | ||
| We literally burned the ships for Donald Trump because it was like Star Wars. | ||
| Help me, Donald Trump. | ||
| You're our only hope. | ||
| Like he like we needed him to live up to the expectations that were set by the marketing and the branding. | ||
| And so we gave our lives for him. | ||
| And for him to be so quick to criticize so brazenly and hatefully, that's a problem. | ||
| So there's a way that he could have handled this. | ||
| Pamboni could have handled this, I think, without alienating so much of the base. | ||
| I'm willing to forgive him about it. | ||
| I still think I made the right decision voting for him. | ||
| Who else was I supposed to vote for? | ||
| Kamala Harris and Tim Walls? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But I'm definitely disappointed. | ||
| Okay, go ahead. | ||
| It's your turn. | ||
| No, I'm with you. | ||
| Well, we've got 40 seconds left till the break. | ||
| So maybe we should just tease you. | ||
| Yeah, so here's what I'm going to do. | ||
| I'm going to try to convince everybody I can to buy something, and I'm going to let you respond on the other side of the break. | ||
| There we go. | ||
| All right, folks, we got a 25% off sale at thealxjoneststore.com. | ||
| And for the love of God, take advantage of this because we need your support more now than ever. | ||
| They are trying to shut us down. | ||
| They are actually taking steps, which I'm going to leave to Alex to talk about, to accomplish this goal. | ||
| But you can fund the next operation by going to the alexjonestore.com. | ||
| We have this amazing knife, 25% off now, just like everything on the store this weekend only, for sale at thealxjonesstore.com. | ||
| It's absolutely incredible. | ||
| You pull it apart. | ||
| It's got 1776 on one side, Alex Jones signature on the other side. | ||
| He comes in a beautiful box with a beautiful case. | ||
| Go now and be the reason we will always be on the air. | ||
| So we had Stuart Rhodes, the founder of Oath Keepers, former J-Six political prisoner, constitutional lawyer, so much more on Paratrooper. | ||
| And he wanted to try methylene blue like so many other guests have done like my air. | ||
| I got so busy with all the Iran war stuff and the commies rioting. | ||
| Do you ever get him to take it on air? | ||
| All the guests, dozens of them that have taken it within 45 minutes of an hour have varying degrees from extreme energy, it feels really great to fog lifting to just over the top crying. | ||
| It feels so good. | ||
| Especially the first time you take it, electrochemical and the mitochondria cleans out the cells, just does incredible things. | ||
| Market Jr. loves it. | ||
| We've gotten the strongest holds methylene blue, but he's going on Owen in about 30 minutes. | ||
| My show just ended. | ||
| I forgot to do this. | ||
| He's like, hey, we're doing Methylene Blue. | ||
| So he's going to take it now. | ||
| But guys, don't forget when he's on Owen. | ||
| So maybe he forgets before he's going to go off to tell us what he felt. | ||
| And if he doesn't feel it, we'll put that out. | ||
| I've had like out of 300 plus people given it to, two people did not feel it. | ||
| That means your mitochondria is in perfect shape. | ||
| So stirring, take a half dropper or so. | ||
| That's what I have dose. | ||
| And then go ahead and shut that down. | ||
| And then we're going to find out what happens to you. | ||
| We'll see. | ||
| Most people hit for about 30 minutes for speaking after a couple hours. | ||
| But you're going to be all knowing. | ||
| So please, before you go, just tell people what you think. | ||
| And if you don't feel it, we're going to tell everybody. | ||
|
unidentified
|
20 minutes later. | |
| I can feel a definite, like an energy spike. | ||
| Yeah, this feels pretty good. | ||
| What are you going to do now? | ||
| Or energy spike? | ||
| I'm going to see if it has a crash. | ||
| I've never heard of a crash. | ||
| Yeah, apparently it doesn't. | ||
| But yeah, it feels pretty good. | ||
| Yeah, definitely feels sharper. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Yeah, I was pretty tired of it in here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, really? | |
| Yeah, I will. | ||
| Well, you're running around Texas right now. | ||
| You're dealing with some other issues here. | ||
| I was driving all over Texas giving speeches for True Texas Project, and that was pretty efficient as sleep. | ||
| Yeah, I feel pretty good. | ||
| So did he give you the drink or the capsules? | ||
| I took the drink, but I got a bottle of each, and I'm going to go and do a longer-term test. | ||
| We'll see how it goes. | ||
| Yeah, I do feel kind of amped right now. | ||
| That's good. | ||
| Well, that's probably, I don't know. | ||
| That might be because you're hanging out with me. | ||
| So we got to maybe try to get a placebo. | ||
| I think it's with Bethlehem Blue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
*Gunshot* | |
| It's Alex Jones. | ||
| It's Alex Jones. | ||
| Defending tomorrow, tonight. | ||
| It's your host, Chase Geyser. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, it's Tomorrow's News Tonight. | ||
| I am Chase Geyser. | ||
| I am joined by Ian Carroll. | ||
| Ian, I ranted at you for like four minutes straight. | ||
| I want to give you a chance to respond. | ||
| You had thoughts. | ||
| I can't even remember what I said. | ||
| Sometimes you just get in flow, and that is how the news goes. | ||
| The news is coming at us like a fire hose these days. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And when dots start to connect and click, it's just, sometimes you just have to let the flow take over and, you know, see where it leads. | ||
| Because just now during the break, I was talking with you about whether or not this whole, so this whole, all this reporting on the treasonous conspiracy, Tulsi Gabbard calling for prosecution of Barack Obama, Jim Comey, John Brennan, and others, that they are breaking new ground in the Russia hoax. | ||
| It like in some ways, in isolation, that story feels like such old news. | ||
| I mean, everybody knew eight years ago, but now the institutions are actually admitting it. | ||
| That's kind of a big deal. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| It is a big deal. | ||
| The institutions are admitting it, but at the same time, it's Trump's institutions that are admitting it. | ||
| So it's that. | ||
| It is, but they have real evidence. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And so there's two dogs in me. | ||
| One is like, yeah, I already know what this thing says without even reading it. | ||
| And the other of me is like, ah, that's kind of cool. | ||
| But now, I don't know if it was you actually putting these dots together or if I was just connecting them for you in my mind, but it, but hearing Trump starting like, you know, rumblings of like, is Trump in the Epstein files? | ||
| And, oh, they, they, you know, fabricated this other conspiracy and maybe they're not releasing the Epstein files because they're, the Democrats fabricated Trump into the Epstein files. | ||
| It's like, that's an interesting theory. | ||
| And you said off air just a second ago, like, whether it's true or not, it might be their angle that they're trying to play. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And I'd be really curious to dig that open a little more because the whether. | ||
| Do you think Trump's in the Epstein files? | ||
| I mean, I think the Epstein files are a amorphous blob of information that just documents Epstein's life through witness testimony and through, you know, investigations and surveillance and all these things. | ||
| And certainly Trump was in Epstein's life and they were friends at a time. | ||
| And so I think certainly he's in the files. | ||
| I mean, he's in several people's testimony, I think, including Joanna Schoberg, but I forget exactly which woman testified about hearing about Trump, meeting Trump, et cetera. | ||
| But I think Trump is strangely afraid of his involvement with Epstein in a way that might be his ego. | ||
| Why would he have signed the EO to release the files? | ||
| I think he didn't know that he was in there until he signed the EO and they brought it to him. | ||
| You think not? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Otherwise, he never would have signed it. | ||
| Interesting. | ||
| That's a good point. | ||
| That's a good point. | ||
| I mean, why would you sign for the declassification of documents that incriminate you knowingly? | ||
| And then backpedal. | ||
| Well, there's a huge difference between incriminate you knowingly and like you're mentioned in them, right? | ||
| In the Epstein case, there's all sorts of nuance between people that like, you know, rode on the plane once or raped a whole bunch of kids. | ||
| My wife was friends wasn't complaining. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| And we went one time to the beach. | ||
| So I could see there being an element of that, of Trump thinking he's in the files in this way and then saying, release them. | ||
| And then they get them. | ||
| And then they're like, oh, this is not the files that we thought the files were. | ||
| But ultimately, in my mind, the real crime here is that, or not crime, but the question, the question mark, the ultimate question is that we're acting like the files are just the papers on the desk, as though that's all we could possibly know about Jeffrey Epstein, right? | ||
| Is whatever files they already collected, that's all you could ever know. | ||
| Like, bro. | ||
| Leslie Wexner is free. | ||
| He's an American citizen living in Ohio in one of the biggest mansions in Ohio. | ||
| And no one has ever asked him a single question. | ||
| No one has ever deposed him. | ||
| No one ever has gone to him and said, hey, why did you hire two different pedophiles to run two different sex trafficking rings simultaneously? | ||
| And the only client of Epstein that's publicly known, right? | ||
| The only client. | ||
| Like actual finance client. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Yes. | ||
| And why did you hire him? | ||
| Why did you give him power of attorney? | ||
| Please show us the internal documentation of such, right? | ||
| There's never been any real investigation into Leslie Wexner, and he is clearly a linchpin of this whole thing, right? | ||
| And so there's somewhere where you could just go and ask some questions. | ||
| Even if statute of limitations has expired on this or that, it hasn't expired on conspiracy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| And not to mention the fact that even if all the Epstein files have been totally deleted or destroyed, you still know who all the witnesses are. | ||
| So you can go re-interview them and get all those documents back. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| We're going to be back in one minute with more from Ian Carroll on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to be back in one minute with more from Ian Carroll. | |
| All right, Alex wanted you, he gave you the methylene blue drink earlier, is that correct? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And he wanted you to do a review. | ||
| Hey, I can feel a definite, like, an energy spike. | ||
| Yeah, it feels pretty good. | ||
| What are you going to do now? | ||
| I'm going to see if it has a crash. | ||
| I've never heard of a crash. | ||
| Yeah, apparently it doesn't. | ||
| But yeah, it feels pretty good. | ||
| Yeah, definitely feels sharper. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Yeah, it feels pretty tired. | ||
| Oh, really? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Well, you're running around Texas right now and you're dealing with some other issues. | ||
| I was driving all over Texas giving speeches for True Texas Project, and that was pretty pitching this week. | ||
| I feel pretty good. | ||
| So did he give you the drink or the capsules? | ||
| I took the drink, but I got a bottle of each, and I'm going to go and do a longer-term test. | ||
| We'll see how it goes. | ||
| Yeah, I do feel kind of amped right now. | ||
| That's good. | ||
| Well, that's probably, I don't know, that might be because you're hanging out with me. | ||
| So we got to maybe try to get a little bit of a test. | ||
| I think it's from Bethlehem Blue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If you want to shine like the sun, you've got to burn like it. | |
| You're listening to Tomorrow's News Tonight with your host, Chase Geyser. | ||
| You're listening to Tomorrow's News Tonight with your host, Chase Geyser. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, I am Chase Geiser. | ||
| This is Tomorrow's News Tonight. | ||
| We have 54 minutes left of this relentless broadcast. | ||
| Ian Carroll is joining me in studio. | ||
| Ian, we were talking about the nuance and breadth of what Epstein really is. | ||
| Please continue. | ||
| Well, right before the break, we were talking about how many loose strings are still attached to, shall we say, the living. | ||
| There's still people walking around that know everything. | ||
| And I was talking about Leslie Wexner being one of the most powerful and wealthy of those loose strings. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Maybe Ehud Barak would be another one. | ||
| Although that would, I mean, yeah. | ||
| He's still having blackmail scandals. | ||
| Just last year, the end of 2024, Ehud Barak's company, Paragon, got into a giant blackmail scandal in Italy because it came out that Paragon had sold their software, Graphite, which is a hacking software, to this little Italian firm, and that Israeli intelligence officers were visiting the little Italian firm and giving them orders to do illegal operations using the hacking software to blackmail people and create dossiers and all this stuff. | ||
| And Ehud Barak was one of the founders of that company, along with Ehud Schneerson, the ex-head of Unit 8200. | ||
| So Ehud Barak is still very much kicking. | ||
| But beyond those two that were highly involved in the Epstein operation, you could talk to Sarah Kellen. | ||
| Sarah Kellen was Ghelane Maxwell's right-hand gal, right? | ||
| Probably an ex-victim that was then groomed and recruited into the operation. | ||
| She was instrumental in recruiting the girls, in normalizing the behaviors, in grooming all of Epstein's victims, but she was also keeping the books and keeping the schedules and keeping the receipts. | ||
| She knew everything, you know, most of everything. | ||
| She sure knew enough to incriminate some people. | ||
| And she has been living a perfectly normal life for the last 10 years. | ||
| She got married to a NASCAR driver, changed her name, was living in a multi-million dollar mansion in New York and had a second one in Florida. | ||
| No one's ever prosecuted her. | ||
| And she is a known associate, co-conspirator of this plot, right? | ||
| That apparently trafficked girls to no one. | ||
| So that's just a small handful. | ||
| You could go to Glenn Dubin. | ||
| You could go on and on and on to his face. | ||
| It's not like the JFK assassination where if the files were deleted, we would never know. | ||
| No, all of these people are still alive. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And the thing that I most got out of the Tucker and Daryl interview between Daryl's deep expertise, which I did not, I've never seen Daryl speak in free, like in live context about Epstein. | ||
| And his knowledge is so deep from the level of research that he does. | ||
| And when you pair that with Tucker's integration into Washington and how many people he knows and all the experience he has, there were a lot of subtle comments that kind of got exchanged in that interview that just really reminded you how many people knew Jeffree Epstein. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And how many people knew exactly what Jeffree Epstein was up to and why they called the plane the Lolita Express, right? | ||
| In reference to the film Lolita. | ||
| I didn't know that. | ||
| So Tucker does it better. | ||
| What happens in his own Lolita? | ||
| It's apparent. | ||
| I have not seen it. | ||
| It's apparently about a older guy or someone who kidnaps like a 12-year-old girl and takes her, like not kidnaps, but like grooms, abducts, and takes his like 12-year-old girl away for four years and like rapes her and stuff. | ||
| It's like a whole film book. | ||
| I think it's who coined the term Lolita Express? | ||
| I don't actually know. | ||
| I'd be curious if any of the original journalists that broke the story know where it first came from. | ||
| I presume my guess is that it just kind of arose. | ||
| It's Rachel Maddow. | ||
| Rachel Maddow. | ||
| And meanwhile, what's Rachel Maddow reporting on today? | ||
| She got a major pay cut. | ||
| I'm sure that my parents are still watching Rachel Maddow every week, and I bet that she loves her. | ||
| You still love them? | ||
| Yeah, of course I do. | ||
| I just, I also know that they're watching Rachel Madow. | ||
| They love you? | ||
| Yeah, they're confused. | ||
| Really? | ||
| Well, they just, they love me and they love what I'm doing. | ||
| They're so proud, but they also are trying to listen to Rachel Maddow and all of her lies. | ||
| And it's confusing. | ||
| When was the last time she told the truth about anything? | ||
| It was certainly before the Russia. | ||
| They tried to give Alex hell for getting one thing allegedly wrong 10 years ago. | ||
| CNN, MSNBC, they got 10 things wrong one hour ago. | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| Two-tier justice system. | ||
| Wow, unbelievable. | ||
| So why do you think it is that Trump has been so, for lack of a better term, bizarre in his handling of this in the last two weeks? | ||
| Like if you had to guess for a million dollars, write down what you think is really going on, what's happening, and then it was assessed later by a source for accuracy in order to award you the $1 million. | ||
| What would you guess in order to win that goal? | ||
| I think it's got to be some sort of blackmail, whether it's directly on Trump or a family member. | ||
| It might not even be stuff that was originally gathered by Epstein. | ||
| It could be more recent by something else. | ||
| It could be blackmail against American politics. | ||
| It could be blackmail against the political party of MAGA, or it could be blackmail in terms of like, we'll release this operation that you were involved in in 2017. | ||
| it's hard to say. | ||
| It doesn't seem like a coincidence that within 24 hours of him saying it was a nothing burger, there's a Nobel Peace nomination from no, and BB is on his way over here already when he says it. | ||
| And it's just all so weird. | ||
| And like, for example, JD Vance was on a podcast just like, I forget which podcast it was. | ||
| Theo Vaughn. | ||
| It was Theo Vaughn, right? | ||
| Just a month or so before being like, yeah, we should really release those files. | ||
| Like, where are those files? | ||
| Those are good files to release. | ||
| I don't think he knew. | ||
| No, of course he didn't. | ||
| JD had no idea what he was walking into. | ||
| He thought that he was just being like good old, like Scott's Irish hillbilly, walking into the White House, being a normal American dude. | ||
| But little did he know that he was Trump's, he was Teal's pick for 2028 president to rule over everybody for the technocrats and when they're going to call in all those favors. | ||
| Little did he know that he was Trump's scapegoat for like whatever the heck he's going to do. | ||
| It's just, it's madness in there. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| So, man, you really don't like Teal, do you? | ||
| I do kind of like Teal. | ||
| I probably haven't decided. | ||
| Oh, no, no. | ||
| Teal, I hate F. Teal. | ||
| Like, I mean, I'm sure he's probably a perfectly great guy if you're his friend. | ||
| Everything Teal stands for is abomination. | ||
| Like everything Teal is bringing into. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can't do that. | |
| Palantir, all that stuff. | ||
| Deeply, yeah. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I am too. | ||
| Because though they're smaller than other major DOD contractors, the amount of valuation for them is insane and the amount of revenue growth is insane. | ||
| Well, and how deeply enmeshed they are, right? | ||
| Palantir did a thing that, as far as I'm aware, not really any other contractors thought to do, which was to pair the massive power of big data and LLMs and this like the cutting edge of AI with like battlefield information tech. | ||
| Like I'm sure there's other people chasing that goal, but Palantir seems to have pulled way out ahead in that race and done it while being led by some very influential and connected people in Peter Thial being able to like literally, if not the first in Facebook. | ||
| Yeah, I think he messed it up. | ||
| Oh, absolutely. | ||
| I'm sure he made billions upon billions on top of that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And all the people. | ||
| The interesting thing about Peter Thiel is if you take Thiel and Teal Capital and you look at somebody like Weinstein, Eric Weinstein, Eric Weinstein was the CFO for Teal Capital for many years. | ||
| Well, yeah, that's the thing. | ||
| And this is where it gets subtle is that I'm like, so J.D. Vance, for example, he's met Peter Thiel. | ||
| And J.D. Vance is like some normal dude that's, you know, unless he was Illuminati and they went to Skull and Bones, who knows? | ||
| But I'm sure he knows Peter Thiel and is like, this guy's so cool. | ||
| He's so great. | ||
| He got me inspired to work in tech and he's like donated all my campaigns. | ||
| He's a normal guy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Like, yeah, he is. | ||
| But what is his company actually doing? | ||
| Like, you could work for the guy and he'd be a totally normal guy to work for. | ||
| And you could even work on the technology. | ||
| And it's like, yeah, it's a revolutionary technology. | ||
| It's a, it's a logical technology and we are going there. | ||
| But once you get into these highly powerful surveillance systems, weapon systems, a technology that has the power to do great evil or great good, little moral subtleties matter tremendously. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And for example, Peter Thiel's stuttering ineptitude to answer moral questions about Israel's treatment of Palestinians speaks to someone who is indifferent to human suffering if it furthers his corporate goals, right? | ||
| Well, and he's got a history of sociopathic tendencies. | ||
| I'm not saying that he's a sociopath, but if you look at what he did to Gawker after they added him as a homosexual, he entirely conspired to destroy that whole company. | ||
| I don't actually know a lot about that story. | ||
| There's a book about it by Ryan Holliday called Conspiracy. | ||
| And I'm sure that you could have ChatGPT summarize it for you in bullet points. | ||
| That would probably better just read it, though. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But yeah, Gawker, I believe it was Gawker, outed him as homosexual. | ||
| And Peter Thiel just went on a mission to ensure that Gawker didn't exist anymore and he bankrupted him. | ||
| And they don't. | ||
| And they don't, right? | ||
| And which is understandable. | ||
| I mean, there's so many of these leftist media outlets that I would love to bankrupt, but not for a personal vendetta when they've got families. | ||
| You know what I mean? | ||
| There are people that I've worked with that I wanted to try to get fired because they were so terrible at their job. | ||
| And then I think to myself, but they have a kid. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| And I don't do it. | ||
| You know what I mean? | ||
| So there is certainly a lack of empathy there, I think, with Teal, but I'm not prepared to say that he's evil yet just because I don't know enough. | ||
| And that's such a powerful allegation. | ||
| But I do trust you. | ||
| And I don't doubt you. | ||
| And my concern about Palantir, and this is something, I worked for a DOD contractor years ago when I was in college as an intern. | ||
| And they would pay you like tons of money because they had to spend their entire budget every single year. | ||
| Otherwise, they wouldn't get the same funding the next year. | ||
| It was called Energetics Technology Center, I believe. | ||
| And what they would do is just research and propose for the DOD new weapon systems, whether it was like sonic-based detection for minesweeping or ballistic missile technology to have the ballistic explode at the exact right moment on impact and enable battle. | ||
| I mean, they were doing some cool stuff. | ||
| I don't know how consequential it was, but it was a small nonprofit. | ||
| Of course, it was a nonprofit funded by the government. | ||
| And when I worked for them, it was just, it was really a part of the conversation, how important informatics was. | ||
| And what informatics is, is getting the information that you want from a massive amount of data. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah. | |
| So for an extended period of time, our government has been able to collect all data, all of your text messages, all of your call records, presumably recordings of all of your phone calls themselves, all your emails, all the stuff that Snowden came out with. | ||
| It's been at least one, probably two, maybe even three decades. | ||
| The government's been able to collect all of your data. | ||
| The problem is they don't have enough people to go through all that data. | ||
| So they would do some cute things like only call attention to things with certain keywords that might be indicative of a terrorist attack or a bomb threat. | ||
| But this is where AI comes in. | ||
| Because if you have a sophisticated artificial intelligence, large language model or otherwise, it can go into the massive data that already exists and it can pull out all the stuff that it's prompted to pull out about anyone at any time. | ||
| So if they want to incriminate you, Ian Carroll, and they have no idea whether you've ever done anything wrong or not, you can weaponize this artificial intelligence To go into all of your communications and identify where you might have made a mistake on your tax forms or lied on your taxes. | ||
| Easy. | ||
| You ever email anybody about it, right? | ||
| So, this is the concern that we should have about this future AI, not just the only concern, but a huge one because informatics now is completely disrupted. | ||
| It's not about manpower. | ||
| Now, the technology is there for them to know whatever they want, whenever they want, about whomever they want. | ||
| This is government omniscience. | ||
| Well, take, for example, the ICE protest that just happened in LA, right, a couple of weeks ago. | ||
| And they're burning Mexican flags and it's this whole thing and they send in the National Guard, right? | ||
| You might be on the side of those protesters. | ||
| I'm generally not, right? | ||
| Like, if you're deporting illegal aliens, illegal immigrants, you know, deport them. | ||
| But it would be pretty easy for the government to try to make the argument that those are domestic terrorists, right? | ||
| That they are burning cars, they're burning the city, they are generally burning America for another nation, holding another nation's flag, right? | ||
| They're even burning themselves. | ||
| And so they were targeted. | ||
| Palantir was used to help target them and to help identify them all, right? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But what if Palantir was used to target Occupy Wall Street? | ||
| Like we were protesting exactly, right? | ||
| Where does the line get drawn? | ||
| Because next present, like maybe Trump does great. | ||
| Maybe Trump is totally playing chess and he does a great job for four years. | ||
| But then who's in next and who's in next and who's in next? | ||
| And when every single thing that every single American does in any digital context, which is about to be everything we do, is recorded, AI scraped, AI organized, and then AI tabulated, I guess, like recorded, that becomes very fine line between who is a domestic terrorist and who is exercising free speech. | ||
| Yes, right? | ||
| And this is the problem that we have with our government generally speaking. | ||
| It's one of the criticisms of American politics that the likes of Xinping have. | ||
| It's the difference between dictatorship and democracy, for lack of a better term. | ||
| I know it's a constitutional republic. | ||
| Hitler even wrote about this in Mein Kampf. | ||
| He wrote about how necessary it was for the entire political party to be subservient to the leader of the party in order for continual progress toward a long-term vision. | ||
| This is an advantage that the CCP has over the United States of America. | ||
| We change leaders every four years or every eight years, most commonly every eight years. | ||
| And our vision, it zigs and zags in a way that some of our competitors like the CCP don't. | ||
| You got Bibi Netanyahu, who's been in power 18 years? | ||
| Plus and minus with some breaks. | ||
| Plus or minus with some breaks. | ||
| So that's a lot of continuity of government that doesn't really exist here. | ||
| And so I think you're exactly right. | ||
| I mean, we could be using Palantir right now to capture ICE protesters that are burning down cities. | ||
| And then some leftist like AOC gets in in 2028 and says, yeah, I know those J6ers were pardoned for what they did on J6, but what about what else they might have done? | ||
| And they just weaponized that AI to go in and pull that. | ||
| And look, I'm not blaming Palantir. | ||
| There's got to be some technology that does what Palantir does. | ||
| I'm just not sure that you can ever guarantee a lack of corruption with this level of power. | ||
| I mean, this is very much ring of mortar. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| I mean, at the very least, you need some very strong, very clear legal codification of how it can be used, how it cannot be used, and how to protect our constitutional rights from it. | ||
| And I don't see anyone talking about that. | ||
| I don't see anyone in the government pushing for that. | ||
| I certainly don't see Peter Thiel or the technocrats pushing for any limitation on their power. | ||
| And obviously the government's not going to push for limitations on their power. | ||
| And so that's where the base concern comes from is that the power is being invented and no one is going to do anything to put any guardrails around it, right? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Derek, let's run that clip that Brett suggested of the godfather of artificial intelligence. | ||
| Do you have that ready? | ||
|
unidentified
|
run it | |
| Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, Excellences, Dear Laureates, Ladies and Gentlemen, this year the Nobel Committees in Physics and Chemistry have recognised the dramatic progress being made in a new form of artificial intelligence that uses artificial neural networks to learn how to solve difficult computational problems. | ||
| This new form of AI excels at modelling human intuition rather than human reasoning, and it will enable us to create highly intelligent and knowledgeable assistants who will increase productivity in almost all industries. | ||
| If the benefits of the increased productivity can be shared equally, it will be a wonderful advance for all humanity. | ||
| Unfortunately, the rapid progress in AI comes with many short-term risks. | ||
| It has already created divisive echo chambers by offering people content that makes them indignant. | ||
| It is already being used by authoritarian governments for massive surveillance and by cyber criminals for phishing attacks. | ||
| In the near future, AI may be used to create terrible new viruses and horrendous... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| What are your thoughts? | ||
| I think that we do not even begin to understand the depths of risk we're taking with AI. | ||
| I agree. | ||
| And I hate to say it, but we're not going to have to wait long to find out. | ||
| And I think the best, the easiest place to see this is in AI video because AI video is so immediately understandable and we all see it. | ||
| And it's evolved so quickly in the last four to five years. | ||
| And I don't know if you've been looking at the state of AI video right now, but a whole bunch of new updates just came out, like VO3 and all these other, it's all these different models that can produce video that are better at different things. | ||
| And every different company is racing to be the best and the first, but they're basically all indistinguishable from real life now. | ||
| And they're basically all easy to use by anyone, right? | ||
| And That's just the stuff that we publicly have that we all can use, right? | ||
| I mean, God knows I've used AI video creation. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| You're excellent at it. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And it's a wonderful tool for art and for creativity and for productivity for creating things when used appropriately, right? | ||
| But it is also so easily a scam, so easily a deceptive tactic, but it also just devalues, it just undermines truth in a way that we don't have an answer for yet. | ||
| And that is just AI video, not to mention AI information, AI research, AI Google searches, but then AI teachers, AI personal assistants, AI advisors, AI lawmakers, and AI judges, right? | ||
| AI lovers. | ||
| And that's the big one that is already well on its way. | ||
| I was at Bitcoin conference in Las Vegas and quite uncomfortably, they had a lady robot in the corner with like her face and everything and the skin. | ||
| And she was like in there in the corner. | ||
| They could be like, hello. | ||
| I stayed the hell away from that. | ||
| To be fair, I was like, we were busy and we were just passing through, but I saw it and it was over there. | ||
| And I know because I then did a bunch of research in the last month about robotics, AI, drones, et cetera, to do this current presentation. | ||
| And the current state of, it is an arms race, not just to the first like human companion robots, but also obviously to the first militant robots, the first soldier robots, really. | ||
| I saw this art display. | ||
| I think it was in China somewhere. | ||
| I'm not sure. | ||
| And it was a robot dog, the ones that we see all the time, designed to attack any human that walked by, and it was on a chain. | ||
| And so when you walked by this art exhibit, this dog is just like going nuts after you. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And it was just, oh my God. | ||
| But my concern, you touched on this. | ||
| My concern is, look, we're in an information war and we have been for many years, really 50 years at least, honestly going back to the beginning of written history. | ||
| But it escalated a lot after World War II, then escalated to another degree after the internet age, right? | ||
| And now we're at this pinnacle. | ||
| Traditionally speaking, when it comes to propaganda, maybe the CIA can get involved in a Hollywood script. | ||
| They can come out with a top gun at the right moment to make everybody just hoorah against the Russians, and they come out with a new top gun at the right moment to make everybody hoorah against the Iranians or whatever. | ||
| It's been a blanket approach. | ||
| I mean, when we denazified Germany after World War II, we dropped flyers just like the Maoists would drop flyers, just like the Nazis would propagate literally at the root of propaganda, information. | ||
| It was a blanket approach to trying to win over a percentage of the populace. | ||
| But with artificial intelligence that understands every individual's psychological profile, their behavior history, their thinking, infrastructure, or patterns, their pathological tendencies. | ||
| The level of propaganda that's going to be conducted on our children, my children, is insane because it's not going to be a blanket ad or a blanket movie or a blanket push and rap like it was maybe over the last 30 years. | ||
| It's going to be, for my daughter specifically, we have to say this. | ||
| And for my other daughter specifically, we have to say that. | ||
| And for all these children specifically, however many millions of them there are, if we specifically present them with information in this intentional way, we will get them all to arrive at the same conclusion. | ||
| That is what I'm concerned about. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| And that could be used to educate the most intelligent, capable, confident, well-put together generation of humanity that we've ever known, right? | ||
| That could be used for such greatness if we only had real, patriotic, moral people in charge. | ||
| But instead, it is already and will be used to sell the maximum number of products to your children, to teach them to be dependent on government and on corporations and on outside influences. | ||
| And we are all just letting it happen. | ||
| Folks, we're reaching the climax of the information more. | ||
| Please go to the alexjonesstore.com right now. | ||
| 25% off this weekend only. | ||
| I highly recommend you get the power bundle. | ||
| It's Methyl Drive and PowerPlant, both formulated by Rex Jones, developed by Bigley for the Info Warrior. | ||
| Get the Power Drive bundle right now and be the reason we will always be on the air and stay with us for more from Ian Carroll on the other side. | ||
| I need support. | ||
| We are maxed out and I can do so much more in offense, guaranteed beat them even faster in court. | ||
| And got this other stuff going on. | ||
| I'll leave it at that with the Justice Department, the good guys coming in, the task force, on weaponization, that I need funds. | ||
| So I need you to go to thealexshowstore.com, subscribe as your monthly donation for $30 a month as a VIP. | ||
| And know you're doing that bare minimum of support. | ||
| Cancel any time. | ||
| Not a very hard commitment. | ||
| You just do it month to month. | ||
| You charge 30 bucks. | ||
| You're a VIP. | ||
| And when you want a t-shirt or you want a supplement, because it'll just build up in your account. | ||
| $40 to spend in the store. | ||
| You spend 30, you get 40 automatic discounts on everything, special sales, special offers. | ||
| I'm asking everyone to commit who's never supported the broadcast by buying anything to become a VIP today at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| And then you know you're doing the monthly support. | ||
| Ever have an issue, don't want to do it, cancel. | ||
| One click, it's your profile. | ||
| But by being a VIP, you get massive discounts, special offers, and so much more at thealisonstore.com. | ||
| And it's a way to show your support. | ||
| We need your backing. | ||
| I am 100% dauntless. | ||
| If anything, I get overheated because I've got so much energy and I'm so angry at these people and it bleeds off into my life. | ||
| I need your backing. | ||
| I'm backing you. | ||
| Quite frankly, if you don't back me and my crew, what we're doing, you're nuts. | ||
| And I'm not mad at you. | ||
| I'm just saying, you're crazy. | ||
| Evil hates this transmission. | ||
| We've got their number. | ||
| And if you don't back, the organization's fighting with everything they've got for you, because we're all in this together. | ||
| Well, you've rolled over. | ||
| You've run up the wine flag, quite frankly. | ||
| And that's what this is. | ||
| People ask, man, thanks for fighting. | ||
| Thanks for never giving up. | ||
| Wow, why does it break your spirit? | ||
| It intensifies my spirit. | ||
| To know we're up against pure evil and we're turning the tide and we're winning. | ||
| And then to know that if we don't fight hard, they're going to win and commit humanity to a nightmare of evil? | ||
| You think stuff's bad now? | ||
| You ain't seen nothing yet. | ||
| Thank me for fighting for my own future and yours collectively? | ||
| There's not even a question of fighting these people. | ||
| Look at them. | ||
| They've got to be opposed. | ||
| People tend to think being persecuted is, oh, you want to stay away from that? | ||
| Oh, so you want to stay away from the fight? | ||
| No, it's like John Paul Jones said when he got commissioned as the head of the U.S. Navy and routed a starting and he was riding to the Continental Congress. | ||
| He said, I only want the fastest ships. | ||
| I only want to be sent into the main war zones of direct action. | ||
| They said, here, it's our fastest ship. | ||
| Go out. | ||
| Immediately goes out and engages and takes over all these British ships, three times the size, just ramming straight into them. | ||
| Well, that's what I want to do. | ||
| I only want the fastest ships. | ||
| I want to go directly into action. | ||
| I want to go 24 hours a day. | ||
| I want reporters all over the country. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want to be 50 times stronger against the enemy. | |
| I want 50 times the audience. | ||
| I want victory. | ||
| You think what we've done to the enemy's been effective so far? | ||
| It's nothing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have not yet begun to fight. | |
| So, support yourself. | ||
| Support us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do it. | |
| Or be conscious that you didn't fight when the time was right. | ||
| You hesitated. | ||
| You took this as another entertainment menu. | ||
| Just some other show. | ||
| Just more talk. | ||
| This ain't talk. | ||
| This is the targeting coordinates to take down the enemy. | ||
| This is the Death Star plans. | ||
| This is Sting the Goblin Slayer. | ||
| They hate this blade. | ||
| This operation is a sword that is plunged politically, culturally, spiritually into the hearts of our enemies over and over and over again. | ||
| They hate it. | ||
| It's a standard of their defeat. | ||
| It's a symbol of their weakness. | ||
| That's what we're doing here. | ||
| This is serious business. | ||
| I'm coming to you, asking you to continue to commission us in this fight. | ||
| We've already delivered you more victories against the enemy than any other media operation in the world. | ||
| And I'm asking you again for all of our collective futures to come to our aid now more and take your fight to the 110% level. | ||
| Tell the truth. | ||
| Be accurate. | ||
| Stand against evil. | ||
| Have courage. | ||
| Until it's not even having courage. | ||
|
unidentified
|
what you are. | |
| While other shows lie to you about what's happening now, Tomorrow's News Tonight tells you the truth about what's happening next. | ||
| With your host, Chase Geiser. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is Tomorrow's News Tonight. | ||
| We have 24 minutes and 13 seconds left of this transmission. | ||
| Breaking news, eight healthy babies born via IVF. | ||
| I support IVF. | ||
| But using the DNA from three people. | ||
| In the United Kingdom, medical professionals have successfully delivered eight babies using a pioneering fertility procedure that incorporates DNA from three people. | ||
| This method aims to safeguard children from inheriting severe mitochondrial disorders. | ||
| Births represent a cautious advancement in assisted reproduction, prioritizing family health and stability. | ||
| It's basically like Gattaca, the movie Gattaca that everybody had to watch in high school biology when they learned about the DNA infrastructure. | ||
| And look, I understand I got a genetic bleeding disorder, type A hemophilia. | ||
| I would understand if my parents, knowing that their children were prone to such a disease, engaging in IVF and trying to modify the genetics of their future child so they wouldn't suffer from a predisposition or a condition that they want to prevent. | ||
| But it seems like this is a dangerous path to lead us. | ||
| Let's clarify here real quick so that I'm understanding that headline correctly. | ||
| Eight people were born. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| But each of those eight people included DNA from three people. | ||
| That's correct. | ||
| That's correct. | ||
| So there's no like one father. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Presumably, I don't know if it was the mother's or the father's DNA. | ||
| What could possibly go wrong? | ||
| Can you imagine? | ||
| Did we not just have issues with an mRNA shot that was maybe vaguely modifying the slightest bit of DNA and suddenly like millions of people are having hardware? | ||
| We've been debating about weather modification for two weeks, Ian. | ||
| And this is baby modification, bro. | ||
| This is human gene. | ||
| I mean, this is so beyond designer babies. | ||
| We've had designer babies for quite some time and there are all kinds of moral quandaries with that. | ||
| I mean, that you've been able to like select so you can already get a whole bunch of your eggs examined and make sure that they're not. | ||
| But you're at least choosing from your own. | ||
| You are choosing from your own DNA. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| This is like, hey, I want him to be 6'5. | ||
| This is Gattaca level stuff. | ||
| I want him not to have a heart condition. | ||
| I want his IQ to be 133. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And what could possibly go wrong with that? | ||
| Well, here's the deal, man. | ||
| Nature has an awesome way of balancing out things naturally. | ||
| Not to be redundant. | ||
| We have about the same amount of women born as men, for example. | ||
| There's a little bit of a difference, but it balances out naturally. | ||
| And let's just say that we live in a civilization that really values artists. | ||
| And so everybody pays a big buck to have millions of babies with the same exact interests and personality profiles. | ||
| That just totally screws up the natural diversity and not to mention the classism of it as well. | ||
| Like people of similar IQs and similar attractiveness tend to marry people of similar IQs and similar attractiveness. | ||
| They often have complementary genes. | ||
| But if we're getting into this designer thing, I mean, we're going to screw up the population long term. | ||
| I think this leads massively to depopulation, actually. | ||
| Oh, absolutely. | ||
| It's like, I mean, let's pretend that there's no God and no religion to even talk about here because holy, this is everything not godly about this universe. | ||
| But just from a logical standpoint here. | ||
| Okay, so if we let the normal humans just use this technology, they're clearly going to make horrible decisions like you've just elucidated, right? | ||
| Or they're all going to want their babies to like, you know, look like T-Pain or like whatever. | ||
| You know, like people are fickle and dumb and they do not figure this stuff out. | ||
| If you could choose how your baby was going to be and everyone could choose how their baby was going to be, we'd wind up some pretty big problems pretty quickly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Like maybe it's even as simple as we just don't have any garbage collectors because everyone wanted to be a superstar. | ||
| But let's be real. | ||
| It's not the regular people and the poor people that are going to be using that technology and being able to choose their babies. | ||
| It's the rich, right? | ||
| And I mean, let's be honest, like if you were Bill Gates, wouldn't it be a lot better if we had, you know, the 1,000 richest people in the world being able to Choose the ideal offspring and having as many as they wanted. | ||
| And then everybody else doesn't really need to take, like, give birth anymore because you're not needed anymore. | ||
| So, why wouldn't you just get them all addicted to sex with robots and porn and just forget about the whole birth thing? | ||
| I mean, you're all infertile anyways, because we gave you so many shots, and we can just, you know, breed babies in tubes now. | ||
| So, it's Brave New World meets 1984. | ||
| It's dark. | ||
| It's real dark. | ||
| How can, I'm just asking you, man, I've got two little girls, four and two years old. | ||
| How can I prevent them from falling into this trap? | ||
| Like so many in my generation, our generation fell into the social media algorithm trap. | ||
| How can I prevent my kids from falling into that AI manipulator trap? | ||
| I mean, everybody's got their own personal cult leader now. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, I think it just comes down to ultimate, like teaching is such an art form. | ||
| And when you're teaching. | ||
| You were formerly a teacher. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, I was an alt teacher, so to speak. | ||
| Like I didn't get a degree from a college. | ||
| I was raised by two teachers, then started volunteering and then worked from there. | ||
| I just like worked my way in because you were real good at it. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And I would argue I was. | ||
| And ultimately, the thing that I think that so many of us do wrong with our young people in this world is we try to protect them from things that they don't need protection from and we fail to protect them from the things they do need protection from. | ||
| And those two go hand in hand because when you're trying to protect them from bad words and swear words and like offensive things and things that they could never understand, you're failing to directly address the things that they are coming in into contact with that they need your help understanding. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And so a good example is telling them, like, for example, you have like a seven-year-old boy and you tell him, you're not allowed to use the computer without me or like, you're not allowed to go to those sites. | ||
| But then the seven-year-old boy goes to his friend's house and goes to the sites and then he sees the boobies and he's like, oh, well, I'm not allowed to see that. | ||
| I can't talk to my parents about that. | ||
| So I'm just going to keep doing it with my friends in private. | ||
| That's what happened to me when I was growing up. | ||
| That's what most people in our generation wound up doing. | ||
| And you wind up with no spiritual guide through this thing that you need a spiritual guide through. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Because you, as a parent, you're trying to protect them from this thing in this really like blankety way when you should have been just being upfront with them of like, look, there's this stuff on the internet that is designed to manipulate your brain. | ||
| There's these advertisers on the internet. | ||
| There's these people using sex and porn on the internet. | ||
| There's these people using lies and deception on the internet. | ||
| And because you are young, I need to be here to help you. | ||
| Like you need to find ways to talk your kid into understanding from as adult a perspective as possible why they need help understanding, right? | ||
| And then being there with them for them to ask questions to, for them to bring their concerns to, because ultimately kids are in such a wild environment of media these days that most of their parents have no concept of. | ||
| Most people's parent, like most parents these days, like even the really hip ones like you guys, like your kids are growing up in an environment where they're going to know so much more about computers than you ever will. | ||
| Give it 10 years and they will know things that you don't even know you don't know. | ||
| And so being able to build mature trust from an early age with your kids to be able to go through that journey with them of like them coming to you with concerns, coming to you with questions about the hard stuff on the internet, like whether that's pornography or violence or lies or advertising or whatever it is, it's just such a wild west of information. | ||
| And AI is breaking all of that wide open. | ||
| So for example, you've got young girls and AI beauty standards, like I don't even know what to make of AI beauty standards. | ||
| We come from the generation. | ||
| I don't think it's actually possible. | ||
| It's like Barbara. | ||
| No. | ||
| We come from the generation where Britney Spears, like the Britney Spears generation of celebrities, gave our entire generation of young girls anorexia and bulimia. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And that was from what was actually realistically attainable if you are anorexic or bulimic. | ||
| And so nowadays we're in this world of like untruth that we don't know how to deal with. | ||
| And trying to pretend like we know how to parent through that and trying to pretend like you can protect your kids from all those questions, I don't see it happening. | ||
| I'm with you. | ||
| I'm with you. | ||
| I'm overwhelmingly concerned about artificial intelligence and the future of our civilization. | ||
| And it seems more and more obvious to me every day that goes by that the depopulation conspiracy is real. | ||
| Oh, yeah. | ||
| Not just because of offhand remarks that a Kamala Harris has made or an Elizabeth Warren has made or a Klaus Schwab or a Bill Gates has made, but because everything that I witness is incentivizing people not to have children. | ||
| Ultimately, I think the root problem, at least in the United States of America, goes all the way back to inflation. | ||
| And so you have this rampant inflation in the 70s when we go off the gold standard. | ||
| Inflation requires both parents to have to work in order to support a family, which catalyzed the feminist movement as a psychological cope. | ||
| I actually think that feminism came as a reaction to the cultural shame that a man was no longer able to provide for his whole family. | ||
| And so in order to cope with that shame, it was women coming forward and saying, we want to work, we want careers, right? | ||
| Then you have this massive inflation. | ||
| What happens is since men and women have to both work, they both go to college to get degrees so they can have real careers. | ||
| And instead of building a life together like they used to, they merge lives later. | ||
| And then as inflation gets worse, people save up for longer before they have children. | ||
| And then they have fewer children as a result of having them later. | ||
| And then since they both have to work and they're having children, they outsource the raising of their children to the state. | ||
| And then now we have a situation where we criticize Gen Z or millennials for living in their parents' basement until they're 30. | ||
| And there is legitimate criticism there. | ||
| But the reason they're doing that is because there's no way they can afford a house on their own. | ||
| And nobody's going to get married if they don't have a house. | ||
| And so ultimately, I think that almost all of our problems from racial tension to depopulation to cultural shifts and family values go straight back to inflation. | ||
| But it sounds like you're saying that it's incidental, not intentional. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| You don't think the bankers know these things? | ||
| I think it's both both. | ||
| I mean, obviously you can't know the whole game. | ||
| I think it's both. | ||
| You obviously can't know every step along the way. | ||
| But like when you, so I'm kind of joking, but I'm also speaking from like when you read like conspiracy literature from the 30s through the 60s, kind of like a whole generation ago and then some maybe, oh boy, did those conspiracy theories talk about the Illuminati and the bankers and the extreme babies. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| But about them having these exact sort of plans revolving around the monetary control and then the population control. | ||
| And what does the Illuminati or the establishment gain from depopulation? | ||
| Just fewer people they have to control. | ||
| Oh, yeah, absolutely. | ||
| I mean, fewer people that they have to control, fewer threats to their power structure, fewer people. | ||
| Basically, the more, I mean, the way I see it, tell me if you see it a different way, is the more close the middle class is to the upper class and the more of that middle class there is, the more threats to your space, right? | ||
| If you have just one giant lower class that's in poverty, far away from you in the upper class, you're free to play as long and as wherever you want. | ||
| They need a base to fund the political class, but they don't want a base that is a drain on the political class. | ||
| They don't want anyone moving in. | ||
| And it's why you see a lot of this Bill Gates stuff and a lot of this depopulation stuff. | ||
| It actually plays out first in third world countries before it plays out here. | ||
| Even if you look at fossil fuels, for example, if you look at this whole climate movement, this whole climate change movement, I have a couple of conspiracy ideas for the real reason behind it. | ||
| And there's a few, I think they're all true in some dimension. | ||
| But it's by far third world countries that depend on fossil fuels the most. | ||
| We can eat it a little bit if we switch to wind or solar and it's less efficient. | ||
| We can pay for that and eat it a little bit here in the United States of America because we're prosperous still relative to other nations, despite the fact that we're not nearly as prosperous as we could be or have been. | ||
| But in a third world country, when you rely on fossil fuels for heating and cooling and incubators in your hospitals and being able to actually make and prepare food in your home, these are the people that are impacted first. | ||
| And a lot of these countries, like in Africa, for example, they'll agree to these asinine green energy international treaties and deals with without hesitation, equivocation, or mental reservation because they're so dependent on aid from other countries. | ||
| And so they just kind of play ball. | ||
| But then they have millions of people that can die as a result. | ||
| Like if we just turned off fossil fuels, millions upon millions of people would die as a result of this. | ||
| And that's where I see the depopulation agenda playing out, not to mention the fact that Bill Gates, for example, laced a bunch of bedding nets with poison because it was supposed to stop malaria. | ||
| And he knew that people in third world countries used those nets for multiple purposes. | ||
| And so they fished with the nets that were laced with poison, and they ate the poisonous fish, and they died to the tune of millions because people who are poor use things for multiple purposes. | ||
| They're resourceful. | ||
| And that's where I see the directions. | ||
| And that's not to mention all the medications that have been being tested out on Africans for a long, old time, right? | ||
| I mean, the way that I see it is when you, it sounds very conspiratorial if you've not read the literature, if you've not actually read these people's ideas, but when you study eugenicist thinking across the last hundred years, whether that be in the Nazi regime or long before them or in much more modern times, like I would argue that Bill Gates is strikingly in the center of a eugenicist sort of genre of thinking. | ||
| And a lot of the things that he has said are very eugenicist things to say. | ||
| That strand of thought has always swam in at least the corner of the scientific world and sometimes in the mainstream of the scientific world, because it is a scientific thought to think that like some things are better than others. | ||
| And if you have less of the bad things and more of the good things, everything would be better. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And over and over and over again, that human thought of we could improve this rears its head in a way that is out of touch with the fact that there are some lines you don't cross, right? | ||
| Yeah, sure, we could improve the population by killing all the poor people. | ||
| That's clearly a horrendous thing to think. | ||
| And there is no world in which that's okay to do. | ||
| And so these sorts of articles about IVF, people being born from free people, it needs to be sat into the context of realizing that there are an awful lot of very wealthy, powerful people that have somewhat eugenicist mindsets today. | ||
| And it ties directly into artificial intelligence because even Larry Fink has come out and admitted this. | ||
| The response to the depopulation crisis in the West, whether it's in Japan, whether it's in China, whether it's in the United States of America, is to replace the labor force with robotics and artificial intelligence. | ||
| That's why we're in an arms race with China right now over AI, because we understand from a national security perspective that it's untenable for us to have such dependence on China to supply all of our goods. | ||
| I mean, we saw what happened during COVID where we couldn't get toilet paper, we couldn't get insulin, there was a number of different products that we were unable to get because they all came from the Shenzhen in China. | ||
| And so from a national security perspective, we're trying to win the artificial intelligence arms race so that China can't win it and then corner the market again on manufacturing at the cheapest, best cost into the 21st century. | ||
| And so I think the eugenics and the AI stuff really tie in and it reminds me of a theological detail. | ||
| And regardless of whether you believe in Christianity or God, I would argue that the Bible is still capital T true, regardless of whether you believe or admit that it's lowercase T true. | ||
| And what I mean by that is it's metaphysically true and principally true, regardless of whether you believe any of it actually happened, right? | ||
| So I would say, for example, to somebody who says Jesus Christ never came back from the dead, I say, no, no, no, it's capital T true, regardless of whether you think it literally happened. | ||
| To me as a Christian, and I identify as a Christian, it's not even important to me whether it literally happened because the capital T metaphysical truth of it is so much more profound and important than the historical truth of it. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And so in the Old Testament, we have God making us in his image. | ||
| And now we as human beings, seeing how that went, are making artificial intelligence in our image. | ||
| So it's like two deviations away. | ||
| It's one lower resolution away from what we as human beings inherently understand as metaphysically divine. | ||
| We're making something even more broken and distorted and prone to the fall of man. | ||
| It inherits all the sin, but none of the free will that we were given in creation. | ||
| And I think there's some massive. | ||
| Then we are putting that creation in charge of our own reproduction, right? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Of our own creation and of raising our children and of running our schools and our prisons and our government and all these things, right? | ||
| And oh boy, is that Pandora's box? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| I've never heard a more articulate fall of humanity. | ||
| There is no stopping it. | ||
| So the question then isn't how do we stop it? | ||
| The question is, how do we handle it? | ||
| How do we ride? | ||
| We have decided to accept the Ring of Mordor. | ||
| How do we use it as best as we can without it going back into the hands of Sauron? | ||
| With great power comes great responsibility. | ||
| And the truth, the way I feel about it is that we all have that responsibility. | ||
| Even though we aren't all powerful, even though we don't all have influence or money, we are all utilizing the technology and we are all, our minds are all in the space. | ||
| Because ultimately, our culture is the collective nature of all of our thoughts, right? | ||
| Some of us have a little more power in the real world than others do. | ||
| But if we are all interfacing with this technology, we all have the same power to learn from it, to grow with it, to think about it. | ||
| And if, imagine tomorrow everyone woke up and suddenly was an extremely intelligent, very wise, critical thinker that had, you know, learned a lot about how the world works. | ||
| Every American suddenly is like on it. | ||
| Don't you think that America would do an awful lot better that next day and every day thereafter? | ||
| Who would harvest our fruits and vegetables, Ian, if we did that? | ||
| Well, maybe we would need robots. | ||
| But what I'm saying is that it's on all of us to think and to learn and to use the technology for what's best, for what's right, for our own betterment, for humanity, as much as possible right now. | ||
| Because A, like we are being trained on it, but B, it is being trained on us. | ||
| And if we outsource all of the use of AI to, if we outsource the responsibility for making it and the responsibility for using it and all the technologies to all these very powerful, very weird people at the top of the pyramid, then they're going to have their way with it, right? | ||
| I want to get your feedback on this, Ian. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Let's run clip 29. | ||
| This is Tucker Carlson, and I've heard him say some of these things. | ||
| I've heard stories of this privately, and he's come out more publicly about it recently because this ties directly into what we're talking about. | ||
| Run clip 29. | ||
| Let's unpack it on the other side. | ||
| I had one of the most interesting conversations I've ever had, I had with a very spiritually attuned, very smart friend of mine. | ||
| And I was saying, you know, I'm a man and I hate lying and I just want to be honest about it. | ||
| Like there, people do, you know, bad sexual stuff and I don't, but you could, I don't judge that much because you're like, yeah, you know, we're all in the wrong circumstance capable of anything. | ||
| But I said to this person, I don't get the like underage girl thing. | ||
| That's like, they're not into it. | ||
| They're kids. | ||
| Maybe I have too many kids or something. | ||
| I'm just, I'm not being self-reached. | ||
| I'm just being honest. | ||
| I just don't get that. | ||
| I don't see any appeal at all. | ||
| It's a pathological obsession. | ||
| I mean, Epstein was into girls with braces specifically. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| So what is that? | ||
| And the conventional explanation is, maybe I'm being too honest, but I think this is really revealing because it's not about sex. | ||
| It's a spiritual thing. | ||
| And I said, what is that? | ||
| And this friend of mine said, it's the thrill of destroying innocence. | ||
| That's what it is. | ||
| And that is the definition of evil. | ||
| That is Satan, right? | ||
| What that was. | ||
| Taking something pure. | ||
| I guess this is maybe, I'm the only person who never thought of this. | ||
| Maybe you have already have. | ||
| I had not thought of that. | ||
| I was like, it's not just a sexual attraction. | ||
| It's like, oh, I think, you know, underage girls with braces are hot. | ||
| They're not. | ||
| No normal person thinks that. | ||
| That's bizarre. | ||
| No. | ||
| The idea is that I'm destroying something that's pure. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And throughout history. | ||
| Well, that's just, that's Satan acting. | ||
| Sorry. | ||
| Throughout history, people have looked at that as something that confers power. | ||
| That's what child sacrifices. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| You know? | ||
| And every civilization that sacrifices children winds up falling very rapidly after that. | ||
| What are your thoughts of this? | ||
| I think it's absolutely true. | ||
| And I've thought this many times. | ||
| Ever since I started doing this research, I had the exact same question of what is really going on here? | ||
| Like, wow, like as a young person, you kind of learned that these people are out there somewhere, but you never really like have to confront it and think about it. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And once I started doing research into Epstein and into the whole network of satanic ritual abuse and pedophilia and child trafficking, just more and more that same question kept coming up of like, what are they actually doing? | ||
| And he's so right that it is evil. | ||
| Like it's, it's actual evil. | ||
| It's the destruction of innocence. | ||
| And there's a, there's an element of it too, that is, um, why, like, for example, why are they buying, so to speak, this, like, American underage girls? | ||
| As opposed to you could get infinite, like, cheaper, like, I hate, it sounds so crass and discussing Ukraine or Russia underage girls that are disposable, for lack of a better term, because no one even knows they're missing, right? | ||
| But Jeffrey Epstein's operation was specifically targeting girls off the streets in Palm Beach, Florida. | ||
| And there's a part of that is that these people have so much power and so much influence that not only are they so depraved that they want to destroy innocence, that they want to destroy the most holy thing on the planet, but they also want to do that to the ones that can't be bought, the one that is the most unattainable, the one that is the most protective. | ||
| They want it because it's not for sale. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| They want it because it's not for sale. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Well, and the thing is, you eradicate innocence, then you eradicate hope. | ||
| If you eradicate hope, you eradicate faith. | ||
| And if you eradicate faith, then you can become God to a hopeless civilization. | ||
| And that's what we're seeing from the technocrats. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| And a lot of people throw the word satanic around. | ||
| And I think that a lot of times people that don't think in godly and satanic ways mishear that phrase. | ||
| Tucker is not saying that. | ||
| It's literally the devil with a pitchfork. | ||
| Yeah, he's not saying that it's literally that they are worshiping Satan because they do this thing. | ||
| He's saying that it is indistinguishable in what it represents. | ||
| 100% evil and adversarial to all that is good. | ||
| Yeah, that destroying innocence like that for the pleasure of destroying innocence is the embodiment of everything that evil could be in this world. | ||
| Well, and depopulation, I think, is the embodiment of Satanism. | ||
| I mean, if God's first act to become God was to create, then anything that seeks to destroy creation is literally the Antichrist or literally anti-God, literally Satan. | ||
| And that's what we're faced with right now, folks. | ||
| And like I said, regardless of whether you believe it literally or not, it's still capital T True. | ||
| We're in the middle of an information war. | ||
| It's reaching a climax. | ||
| It's getting more intense. | ||
| We've had major victories over the last few years with people waking up, but we are faced with unprecedented challenges, obstacles, and evil. | ||
| It is not given up. | ||
| We have to defeat this enemy entirely. | ||
| And the only way that we can do that is by following people like Ian Carroll, supporting their work on X, wherever they are, on YouTube, wherever they are, following it for Wars, sharing the broadcasts and the transmissions, and taking advantage of the incredible sales at thealxjonesstore.com right now, store-wide, 25% off every single product that we offer this weekend only. | ||
| Please go now, get the incredible Alex Jones signature knife, get the PowerDrive bundle. | ||
| You'll love it and you'll keep us on the air. | ||
| Stay with us for more. | ||
| You were just telling me that you had a brain disease and you, what did you do to fix it? | ||
| I found this guy, he's a functional medicine guy, and he got me on methylene blue. | ||
| And that instantly stopped everything. | ||
| I'd take it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| I take it every day as well. | ||
| And RFK Jr. told me about it. | ||
| Yeah, man, it's fantastic. | ||
| And so this guy's injecting in 1890, injects these rats with it, and then does an autopsy on these things. | ||
| And their brain, the brainstem, every single nerve is blue. | ||
| So he discovered this methylene blue has an affinity for neuronal tissue. | ||
| So he says, well, it's sucking into neurons and working in the body. | ||
| So we started putting it in humans. | ||
| And we found out it's an MAOI, which helps with depression and anxiety and all kinds of life stress and stuff. | ||
| It is so incredible that it acts as an electron donor to mitochondria, especially your neuronal mitochondria. |
Export Selection