ITS GETTING BAD | Timcast IRL #1466 W/ John Rocker & Leonarda Jonie
Tim Pool and John Rocker dissect Senator Lindsey Graham's loyalty to Israel, debating whether U.S. foreign policy serves American interests or acts as a tool for the petrodollar system and oil security in the Strait of Hormuz. They analyze allegations of Jewish control over media and banking, citing Epstein files and anti-BDS laws while discussing Iran's 1953 coup history and potential magnetic pole shifts. Ultimately, the conversation suggests that geopolitical conflicts are driven by elite manipulation and historical betrayals rather than simple aggression, challenging traditional narratives of blame. [Automatically generated summary]
Despite assurances from President Donald Trump that this war is almost completely over, polling is not very good, showing that most people in this country are not really happy about what's going on.
And a video is going viral showing Lindsey Graham saying to the anti-Seminitics, I think it's what he said.
We get what he's trying to say, and the isolationists, I don't stand with you, I stand with Israel all the way.
And it's generating a lot of controversy because while one might understand saying you don't agree with anti-Semites, but isolationists, that's just a political, that's a foreign policy opinion.
To say that you would stand with a foreign country, it's generating a lot of controversy.
And alongside this, another video from the Joe Rogan podcast, which, of course, if Joe has an opinion on something, they use it as the litmus test of moderates.
He says that people feel betrayed by this war with Iran because we did not vote for this.
And indeed, polling shows many people are deeply concerned about what this will mean.
I don't want to say it's all bad.
I mean, obviously, we didn't vote for this war.
Most people didn't.
But we will see how this stuff plays out.
We got a bunch of other stories, of course.
CNN ran what may be one of the most insane tweets I've ever seen, where in reference to Islamic terrorists who threw a TATP explosive nail bomb at police and protesters, they said something like some teenagers from Pennsylvania took a train down for what could have been a beautiful day on a otherwise warm New York weekend.
And then everyone started roasting them, saying several men took a plane to Washington, D.C., Virginia, and New York for what could have been a beautiful day.
Yeah, we get the point.
So they're getting absolutely roasted for that.
We'll talk about that.
But I will tell you, my friends, what's really grinding my gears today, they're running the story saying that Hegseth spent $22 million on steak and lobster without telling you why.
They're trying to make it seem like he personally is buying himself million-dollar lobster meals.
Pete Hegseth is providing meals to the troops, steak and lobster, because it is typically what we do to boost morale.
And you know what?
You're not going to get me.
Of all the things we could complain about with the budget, saying that our men and women in uniform get to have a fine meal for once, you're not going to get me complain about it.
And the fact that they would smear Hegseth for doing this is absolutely disgusting.
So we're talking about all that and much, much more.
Before we do, we got a great sponsor for you, my friends.
Having sound money and financial independence is important, obviously.
Hard assets are extremely important.
That's why you should check out True Gold Republic.
If you take a look at the world right now with active wars, NATO under pressure, the dollar is being weaponized.
$36 trillion in debt, yikes.
We printed so much money since 2020.
Your savings get worth, the value declines year after year, and that is by design.
Gold can't be printed.
It can't be sanctioned.
It can't be devalued by a press release.
Central banks are buying it at record levels.
The people who run the system are hoarding the one thing they cannot print.
And that tells you everything.
Insert True Gold Republic, real physical gold and silver, not paper, not ETFs, metal you can hold.
Check out their independence bundle, a physical gold starter kit, a one-on-one with experts, and bonus precious metals on top.
You can get the guide.
You go to truegoldrepublic.com slash Tim or call 1-800-628-GOLD.
Now, I'm not going to tell you what to do with your money, right?
But I'm going to tell you this.
I bought gold and silver, and I've taken this stuff seriously for quite some time.
And if you've been paying attention to the gold and silver prices, I think, you know, you see with how people are buying this stuff, someone knows something you don't is the only way to look at it.
So contact the experts, see if they can help you out.
Thanks for sponsoring the show.
And ladies and gentlemen, we have the new and improved TimCast.com.
And sign up to join our Discord community because many, many tremendous things are on their way.
The coffee shop is set to open very, very soon.
The members-only events, physical, in-person, it's going to be absolutely beautiful.
And you get to join our Discord community where we got tens of thousands of people hanging out.
They're talking, they're asking questions.
As a member, you can call into the uncensored portion of the show Monday through Thursday to talk to us and our guests.
It's going to be fun.
Please support our work overtimcast.com and don't forget right now to smash that like button.
Unlike past U.S. conflicts, Iran attack is opposed by most Americans.
And you know what I love about this?
I find it very, very hard to believe that people in this country just generally liked war.
But that's what they're claiming.
And they'll tell you that.
I have to.
I know they're saying Libya intervention was largely unpopular, but I do kind of feel like they're just saying this because it's Trump and whatever he does is wrong.
But we do have this clip from Joe Rogan that is making the rounds where, you know, I will stress that it is funny that it only matters to people if Joe says it.
Mehdi Hassan chimed in, saying, and Rogan believed him and endorsed him.
Indeed.
And what I love about this, Dave Smith is taking the opportunity to rag on Mehdi Hassan in a quite verbose way, pointing out that he himself is anti-war.
But when the anti-war left returned on the issue of Gaza, he says, I never thought to start lecturing them about voting for Biden in order to pat myself on the back and foolishly pretend that this proves their idiocy or guilt or whatever.
I was just happy that they were good on such an important issue.
And I agree with Dave on this.
What Mehdi Hassan has done, and I think it kind of proves the point.
Do people really mad at Trump over this war?
Are they really, actually, I'll tell you this.
Did people actually really ever support any of these other wars?
Because I find that very hard to believe.
And I think largely the criticism right now is that it's Trump doing it.
I think the social media sign-up campaigns, manipulation, constant foreign interference, all of this stuff genuinely has people fractured in the United States, not really understanding what Iran is, what they do internationally.
TikTok being a great example.
I certainly understand the criticism that people have over TikTok.
The reason why it was banned in the first place and then purchased was because it was deliberately and by its own code anti-Israel.
That many people would argue is like, okay, fine, what's the problem?
Well, the problem is a Chinese-owned company is intentionally interfering in American politics and social media.
Buying it for the purpose of being pro-Israel, I would say, is only slightly less bad.
We don't want our social media to be tools of weaponizing we don't want them to be weapons by the government to get us to support things that are bad, that we don't want to support.
At the same time, everything I think we're seeing with public perception on the Iran war on the issue of Israel is rooted in conflict between the United States and its adversaries.
And Israel is a principal military component for the United States.
So you're going to have China, Russia, Iran, or otherwise.
But even Iraq, Afghanistan, et cetera, starting back in shit, 1991, you knew this day with Iran was coming.
Whether it's going to be today, tomorrow, or kick the can down the road for another 30 years, you knew it was coming.
And this is going to be, I would so much define this as a war.
It's not so much a war when one side's doing all the damage and the other side, or would you call a bar fight a bar fight if one person just got the living excrement kicked out of and the only shots the other guy took was a kick at your ankles while he's laying on the plate.
They're trying to rally their fellow Muslims in the area to lean on America.
But this fight was coming at some point in time.
And would you rather have this fight with a Iran's been getting the holy crap kicked out of him for the last better part of 18 months, whether it be Israel or whether it be us, back in, was it August, September?
So the answer is that 20% of the world's natural gas and oil flows to the Strait of Hormuz, and Iran keeps threatening to bomb it.
They also supply weapons to the Houthi rebels in Yemen to bomb cargo ships and trade going through the Red Sea into the Suez Canal.
The U.S. deal with the world is you use U.S. dollars to buy oil, we police the seas.
That's the overly simple reason.
So when Iran tells the United States, we are going to bomb trade, oil, or otherwise, unless you give us stuff, you get a Barack Obama, and what does he do?
He says, we will give you whatever you want.
Please just don't do this.
And so he sends them the quote-unquote palette full of cash.
who says, I'm not going to send you money anymore.
Stop and don't threaten us or I'll kill you.
And then they, apparently in the meeting, had a negotiation with Trump where they said, we have enough fissile material for 11 bombs, and that's where we're starting the negotiation.
And Trump said, if you're not going to stop threatening the region, I will just blow you up.
And then so then they got him overthrown and they put a king in, the Shah, the son of their old king.
But they were, you know, supporting it like a proxy until 1979.
Then there was a revolution on the street because he was basically corporatizing Iran and making like there used to be street vendors and it was very and then he made big shopping malls and they destroyed local things.
Okay, I understand, but this is not relevant to the modern context.
Wonderfully we can talk about the history of Persia and the empire and go back a thousand years, I get that, but that's not relevant to what's going on right now.
Israel's very ideologically motivated against Iran for because I'm trying to get my brain around between what you're saying versus what we're getting from the media and what we're getting from Trump, which is telling us, hey, they're building, they're weeks away from the nuclear bomb for 39 years.
They've been weeks away from getting the nuclear bomb, and they're going to use it and they're going to use it against us.
My point is, not to shift away from talking about Candace.
For the reason why George W. Bush has the hangers for our freedoms, it's because he's sending out a message to maximize effectiveness, which means when you look at the IQ bell curve, the top 20% is going to say, that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
And then you're going to get the midwits who are going to say, well, if my boss tells me to say it, I'll just go along with it.
And then you get the back end with the lower IQ people being like, wow.
So Trump's going to come out and say, if they build a nuclear bomb, they're going to bomb people.
And that's somewhat true.
But the real risk is if Iran is a nuclear bomb, they have leverage.
And the leverage they will use to extract more resources and continually be an affront to the liberal economic order and the petrodollar system.
I don't believe Iran would actually nuke Israel or in the immediate to anybody, but the liberal economic order system, the Trump military intellectual complex, don't want to negotiate with a nuclear power in the region.
And so when they go to them and they say, we're going to enrich uranium, there's two key components.
We are going to have clean, high-density energy, which means our economy is going to expand rapidly outside of your sanctions, which means more people, more weapons, more bombs, and more leverage.
Additionally, if we get a nuke and we have enough materials for 11 of those, you are now negotiating with the nuclear power.
Well, we don't want to start going into what the far extremists of certain religions hold because we'd have a problem with Israel's far extremists of certain religions, too.
Okay, but who's Benjamin Netanyahu's little clique that's actually running the Israeli government right now has in their extreme religious view, along with our Pete Hesge and their little evangelical proves it.
Have this extreme point of view that until the well, for the Jews, until Europe is destroyed, their moshiach won't come back and they can't build their temple and then get 2,800 GOI slaves each.
They've got an extreme policy that's also motivating them.
Never, because they're our military base at the Suez Canal.
Just like we want control of Panama, we want control of Greenland.
We need control near the Suez.
And we've got Egypt, who gets billions of dollars from the US government for their military because they allow us to control the Suez, and Israel is effectively our military base there.
See, the issue with the hyper-focus on Israel is it ignores all of the other operations the U.S. is doing as if Israel is dictating our policy on Greenland.
Real quick, I want to answer the point you made about when I'm talking about Islam and literally in the Hadith saying the end will not come until the Jews, until the tree and the rock say there's a Jew had behind me, come kill them, is there's what, 1.8 billion Muslims?
When the Cold War ended and they split up the Soviet Union, whoever the oligarchs were that decided the new borders took that part of the Ukraine away from Russia, gave it to the Ukraine on purpose because they wanted to disempower the new Russian country, take away its legitimate, make sure it didn't become the hegemon in the region and give it no access to the Black Sea.
So they took away Sevastopol in the Crimea.
They gave it to the Ukraine.
Probably, you know, money guys, oligarchs.
I don't know who they were.
Let's find out.
And Russia's like, bro, we can't get into the Mediterranean Sea.
It's like if they took off a partition on the west coast of the U.S. and gave a little strip all the way to Canada, all the way down the coast.
You think we wouldn't invade to take Pacific coast access back?
And, you know, to be fair, to be fair, it's not like I want Russia to have that because Russia, you know, I'm ethnically Albanian and Russia empowered a bunch of Serbs to go into my country and start genociding my people.
So I'm not necessarily like pro, give Russia access to the Black Sea, but it's kind of disingenuous to say Russia just invaded Ukraine out of nowhere.
No, they couldn't control people like Alex Jones, who were actually starting to, aside from the more wacky things Alex does say, starting to actually crack through their psychological operations.
And so it got to a point where at the end of the 2010s, the information was leaking at an alarming rate, especially with WikiLeaks, and they could not control it with the internet.
However, what you just said about why Israel wants a corridor to Ukraine is like, you know, I want to try to refrain from being mean, but like made up internet BS, right?
Okay, so real quick, for the listeners at home to understand why the Ukraine war happened, it's because there's a series of countries the U.S. wanted to overthrow for a variety of reasons.
One of the principal reasons for the Ukraine war is the Qatar-Turkey pipeline, where the U.S. wanted to build an oil pipeline through Iraq, through Syria, Turkey, into Europe to offset Russia's gas prom gas monopoly.
They control 20% of natural gas into Europe through Ukraine.
Bashar al-Assad told the United States, sorry, I won't let you do this.
And so the U.S. then went, he's a terrorist who needs to be killed.
And then Barack Obama started sending weapons to the rebels, which eventually become ISIS, destabilizing the region in the hopes that Assad will get removed from power and then we can resume the construction of our natural gas pipeline.
The principal issue is that for Europe to get energy, they principally have to get it from Russia, who charges a lot of money for it, which gives Russia economic power and it gives them negotiating power.
had nothing to do with with uh zelinski the issue was that so how does zelinski how does zelinski a fucking transvestite comedian dancing in leather chaps get elected you USAID.
The point I'm making is that the United States wanted, I should say, the Western powers, we call it, Europe and the United States, wanted to take, so when we couldn't get the pipeline through Syria, the alternative to that is to control the access point.
So you get the bombing of the Nord Stream pipeline, which was Russia's delivery mechanism into Germany, because Donald Trump was pissed off that while we're trying to get cheaper energy and we are fighting Russia, Germany's cutting deals, effectively financing the war in Ukraine, which the whole point of was to get cheaper gas.
If we can get Ukraine and we can cut off Russia from the Black Sea through Sevastopol by taking control of Ukraine, then Russia is going to be severely detrimented economically.
I had a pedophile neighbor, a little pedophile neighbor who started stalking me from the ages of eight to 11.
Looked a little bit like you there, Tim.
Bald head.
No, he was just bald, bald head, looked like druggie guy, druggy guy.
Stalk used to come knock on my door and be like, hey, can you open it?
I was a smart little kid, so I knew I was like, oh, my mom told me, like, a lot of people are going to want to rape you because you're a good-looking person.
My opinion on all of this is there's a couple different psychological operations we've seen through social media manipulation to get people to support war.
And there's also foreign adversaries that try to manipulate social media.
There's a lot of weird stuff going on that I couldn't begin to even understand as to why.
Listen, whatever you think about that situation, you got to admit it's a little weird that your husband gets publicly executed and then you're like in leather pants doing acrobatics with freaking fireworks going off.
Everybody's going to feel a little weird about that.
Maybe everybody does grieve differently, but they do grieve and it's a little weird.
Indeed, I and all my friends, I mean, it was insane when this was going on, and everyone's trying to figure out what's happening.
I say this with the utmost respect to my friends at Turning Point USA and the people who hate me there.
That I'm not trying to be a dick, but I think it's fair to say that a woman who watches her husband get assassinated probably got some mood stabilizers.
And so people are like, why is she acting like that?
I'd imagine if you watched your husband die publicly being shot in the throat, you might be an antidepressant.
I think one of the problems we have right now in this country is that the Democrats have always been the party, not always, but I would say at least in my lifetime, they've been the party of the masses are really dumb.
So say whatever you have to say so that they vote for you.
And every single, you know, every single one of these wars has been championed by Mr. Miliowski, whatever, however you say his actual real name, Benjamin Nanyahu.
And honestly, honestly, look, I don't want to see Americans dying for something that doesn't have anything to do with them.
Because we have the petrodollar contract with Saudi Arabia, and we don't want to lose.
Basically, it functions like this: Saudi Arabia, one of the largest oil producers in the world, next to Venezuela, agrees that if anybody wants to buy from him, they have to use U.S. dollars, which means China has to buy U.S. bonds, U.S. dollars, before they can buy oil.
So when the Saudis are implicated in 9-11, the U.S. says, we're going to cover this up and protect you.
However, they weren't able to completely, and there's an active lawsuit ongoing over Saudi involvement.
And the reason why these people are being protected is because Donald Trump is desperate to re-up the petrodollar contract, which ended, I think, a couple of years ago, which means China and Russia are going to start trading in other currencies and they already have been doing this.
And so the response, and I'm going to tell you this, the Iran war, we predicted it a long time ago.
We talked about it endlessly.
When the petrodollar contract with Saudi Arabia ended, I said, we are going to get a Middle Eastern war right now.
It's going to be largely at their behest 2024.
Indeed, because we have to get back on this contract, otherwise the U.S. economy crashes.
And so I will just say this as to the issue of Israel.
By all means, criticize their ideology, criticize their owners.
I'm sorry if I don't like the erasure of American freedoms, freedom of speech being the number one, because I'm a fucking comedian, and there is shit that they canceled me for.
Not about Israel, other social jokes, right?
And people actually feel like if I say something that offends their sensibilities, they have a right to physically attack me.
Now you tell me how we're supposed to go forward as an American country with freedom of speech and liberty when you literally are training 50% of the population to think that violence is a perfectly carrying gun.
Well, I've made jokes that have pissed people off, and I've literally had people send me death threats, say they're coming to my show and they're going to kill me.
know you were you said that but but what i'm saying i think the ukrainians control that's happening on an emotional social level but But then our own government is actually passing laws to make your freedom of speech.
There are people in government that are stepping over the line when it comes to things like, you know, speaking about, you know, you can't make this joke, you can't make these remarks.
You have to protect people from anti-Semitism.
I think that any of those laws, any regulation about what people are allowed to say or what jokes people can make, those are all ridiculous.
But there is a difference between when there's people that are passing laws and the stuff that you're talking about if people are making threats because they don't like registration.
This whole thing, should a person who has land in the middle of Texas be allowed to sell it to some Chinese investor who wants to come in and build a freaking Muslim thing for some reason to subvert?
Yeah, and I think that even if they work for a private contractor, they should be able to say, you know, I don't think the U.S. should be supporting this or what have you.
But at the same time, I'm extremely pro preventing communists from coming to the U.S.
And when it comes to, listen, when it comes to government, it is honest to say that when it comes to government employees, there are different rules to have contractors.
And now, again, I don't think that Israel should be singled out to be protected, but it's the only country.
Yes, but if you were tracking the news over the past 20 years, you're reading things like WikiLeaks and you're reading the emails that people are writing.
I am reading things like WikiLeaks and then you would know about the true motivations of the inter-industrial complexity.
I did actually read, that's why I knew about how fucked up India was.
Sorry again.
That's how I knew about how messed up India was before anybody did because I read WikiLeaks and I happened to stumble across three emails that describe one of the worst cultures in existence.
So I do read, and I'm sorry I can't read everything about every possible problem.
I don't know what fraction it makes up of everything we do.
I don't think everything we do is based on them.
I don't think every interventionist war we've had is based on them, but I do think a lot of our activity in the Middle East, and I think this thing with Iran specifically, yes.
I mean, when Trump- Why?
Because Israel, it's their enemy.
They're the ones who don't want Iran there because they feel uncomfortable.
They think like Iran's going to attack them and they want to get rid of their enemy because they want the.
Again, this plays to the issue I have of the people who are like, I'm going to tell you, I'm going to give you the answer, but I'm going to make this point first.
You didn't even bother looking up why Israel wants to wipe out Iran?
And Israel wants to secure the entire state as a singular Israeli entity, and they don't want there to be a Palestine, West Bank, or otherwise, and they're slowly conquering it.
Just like the U.S. is involved before Trump, the U.S. spent $250 billion on Ukraine for the purpose of protecting European countries who weren't spending their own money to do it.
And it's so that we could control gas prices for Europe.
I don't think that Angela Merkel was secretly running the U.S. government, though, because of it.
I think that Donald Trump says, or our president, be it Obama or otherwise, they have different strategies for how we police the world for the liberal economic order.
And the problem people have with the U.S. Empire is that we're trying to make them all gay communists.
We go to Afghanistan and we put up murals of gay communism and they get mad about it.
And rightly so.
Russia invaded Ukraine for many reasons.
One was that the U.S., the Western powers of Europe, were trying to seize control of it because the Qatar Turkey pipeline failed.
And so we're trying to control natural gas in Ukraine, which would lock out Russia's monopoly through Gazprom.
This is why Joe Biden sent his son to go work for Barisma and they get Michael Ozachevsky to start an energy company in Ukraine.
It's all about controlling the region.
The reason why Russia invaded, first, it's because their only warm water port is in Sevastopol.
Now, some people have argued they could easily build along the eastern coast, but that would be that you're telling them, abandon your billion-dollar naval base where your flagship is and all of the military assets and secrets behind it to NATO or take control of Crimea.
So Russia never invaded Crimea.
They simply walked out the front door and then said, we're holding a referendum, which is probably illegitimate.
The reason the war started, when Donald Trump was in office, there was no war because Trump was basically saying to Russia, we're not going to go to war with you.
You're not our biggest concern.
Under the Obama administration, that was their biggest concern because Homeboy was paying off Iran and then pissed off that Russia was charging money to Europe.
So as soon as Joe Biden gets back in, what do you think happens?
He starts, I mean, first of all, you get more terror in the Middle East because they want the instability to remove Bashar Assad.
Then you get Russia building up troops on the Eastern Front because they are on their Western Front, on the Eastern Front of Ukraine, because they know what Biden wants to do.
And then they invade for the purpose of securing a land bridge into Crimea so they can maintain control of their warm water ports, which they have to use if they want to sell oil through the Mediterranean, through the Red Sea, et cetera.
I think they would have a different kind of ability to negotiate with them if they weren't afraid that we're coming in there and basically destroying their countries with these gay, race, communist revolutions that we sponsor.
I have no problem with saying anti-Semites can go, you know, go F off, but isolationism is just an opinion.
It's an opinion that Americans are allowed to have.
So when he adds that to the mix, it's not about whether someone just hates Jews.
Because by all means, you can criticize those people and say, I'm not going to stand with you.
But when someone is an isolationist, even the most extreme of isolationists, that's something Americans are allowed to be.
It's not hateful or otherwise.
It's a thought.
It's a philosophy.
To say you're not going to stand with Americans of opinions that you don't agree with and you'd rather stand with a foreign country, I think is reprehensible.
I do not like Lindsey Graham.
I think I don't for the life of me understand how they don't primary this guy and get somebody else in.
And I think to all the people, because I criticize him and said he should be removed from office, and there are a lot of Jewish people who are like, no, no, you need to really listen to what he's saying.
No, you need to check your PR because this guy is bad for you too, and he's bad for this country.
Because it's harder when they're more, you know, the secret to, there was a Marco Rubio quote, I think it was Rubio.
Someone yelled at him that he was funded by the NRA.
And he said, they don't pay me to speak.
They donate to my cam because they like what I speak.
And this is the truth working in like working for ABC, for instance, ABC News and like these big corporations, they don't go to people and say, I'm going to pay you to say this thing about Israel.
Before they hire the person, they say, what do you think about Israel?
And then hire them because they support them.
My point is, they're not blackmailing Lindsey Graham.
CNN deletes post downplaying ISIS-inspired attempted bombing in NYC apologizes for breaching editorial standard.
They actually wrote this.
It says, Two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed into New York City Saturday morning for what could have been a normal day enjoying the city during abnormally warm weather.
But in less than an hour, their lives would drastically change as the pair would be arrested for throwing homemade bombs during an anti-Muslim protest outside of Mayor Zoran Mandani's home.
Here's what we know so far.
So aside from the fact that they framed this in the most psychotic way imaginable, they also framed it that makes it seem like they were anti-Muslim extremists attacking Zorhan Mamdani.
So they deleted this.
But tell me, why is the media so hell-bent on doing everything they can to defend Islamic extremists?
And they just, you know, one of the things that's fascinating to me, and trying to form this thought because it's kind of a complex thought for someone with my intellect, the contradiction on the left.
So we're definitely taking the side of Islam extremists who also hate the gays, who we take their side, who also hate other minorities.
I like to quote a great man who said, Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of racial open borders, neoliberal, quasi-Marxist policies.
This might be from a little-known anti-Semite you guys might know as Charlie Kirk.
It's the old story of their gollom turning on them because they built this anti-white coalition, and then these browns looked at what was going on in the Middle East, and they looked at the Jews, and they go, well, you look white enough to us, and these guys are browner.
So this is another example of the people we're supposed to hate.
So they just applied their simplistic thinking to what was going on in the Middle East.
There are so many other special interest groups that come to Adelaide.
Like, if people want to be critical of prominent Democrat Jewish donors and the state of Israel and what they're doing based on ideology and religion, always allowed.
But there is a bunch of other prominent special interests doing the exact same thing.
So the point is, at every facet of America, there was greatness to be found, and we've improved consistently while fending off-this sounds so gay to me, Tim.
Well, that's because you may be not smart enough to understand the history of these countries.
But I do believe there's a greater nuance to the conversation in that when we look back at the United States when it was substantially more white, you still had some kinds of issues.
But I think in terms of if you want a high trust society, unfortunately, humans, whether you want to eschew, like if you want to believe that racism shouldn't exist, that's fine.
So it's as simple as you live in a village, you know who is safe and you know who is not safe and outsiders are threats to your society, to your village, to your town.
If a person shows up that you don't recognize regardless of what they look like, you're going to say, halt, who goes there?
Because you fear that you could be raided by barbarians.
This is the nature of humanity for thousands upon thousands of years.
And unfortunately for humans, you can easily tell someone is not from your clan, tribe, or family because they look dramatically different from you.
If you're a white guy, if you're Eastern, European, and another Eastern European guy is walking towards you, you're not necessarily going to know.
And so they yell, but you still get conflict in Europe.
Indeed, there's a bunch of viral videos that have been going around where they're filming people like, isn't it wild how you can put like three grand worth of ski gear just on the ground and walk away?
I'm going to tell you this.
I had several hundred dollars in my pocket in my jacket.
and my phone and I put it on a chair and I went skiing and I came back and there it was.
Because I got to be honest, you can just steal the rentals.
It's not, you know, if people really wanted to do something.
However, there have been a bunch of videos that are actually funny where, like, there was one viral video where a black dude is walking around filming a ski resort, just laughing, being like, yo, what the, what, this is crazy.
Like, white people just, this is how you live.
There's another video where a black guy goes to a gas station in, I think, Torrance, California, and all of the food is outside, and the refrigerators are unlocked, and like, there's no one around.
And if you want to bite, you got to like grab it and bring it inside.
So the comment you made about smaller brains and not being able to.
Yeah, I felt that for about two weeks going, how the hell did people, you know, back in caveman days, how did you progressively get out of that and get to where mankind is now?
I think the principal issue with racism is like it would suck, you know, to have an intelligent, well-meaning individual of any race be discriminated against simply because of the way they look, to not be given an opportunity to be trusted or to live comfortably if they're a good person.
And unfortunately for us, leftists have turned that into blank slatism and are now releasing criminals from prison and people are being victimized and we get anarcho-tyranny.
Listen, I would like them if they stayed in India.
Okay?
When you're coming over here and you're stinking up the place and you're taking all the tech jobs and then I press one for English and I get, hello, mom, welcome to the quickie bot.
They believe that there needs to be this giant war in which all the nations turn against them and then their Messiah is going to come in, crush those nations, and they're going to rule.
So it would make sense if you believe that, right?
i forgot it was called uh what's the ideology where they intentionally there there are people who believe that the dispensationalism is what we're talking about I don't know if that's what the name is.
But the idea is that it's not prophecy, it's instruction.
So don't you think that if you are doing that and you believe that all the nations have to turn against you, you might be fomenting the discourse online right now to be so heated?
There's a great scene in Landman where Billy Bob drives out this young lawyer to a field where she sees wind turbines, and she says, green energy encroaching on your turf?
And he goes, not green, alternative.
We build wind turbines to provide energy to our oil pumps where we can't get transmission lines.
They're not doing this because they want to save the environment.
They're doing it to pump more oil.
I started thinking about that.
If we were going to get a Carrington event that fried our electrical grid, a solar storm, or an axle shift, you would want to have ready-to-go, alternate forms of energy that could be easily deployed.
So you'd want a reserve of petroleum for your machinery, but you would need to produce Produce energy that could run oil machines with no grid.
So you would start telling people: build solar panels, build wind turbines, because after the disaster, we're going to deploy these in remote areas to generate the energy to get the oil out so we can start rebuilding society.
So you start thinking about everything that's been going on over the past 20 years, and you could easily take the red thread and connect it all to they believe the powerful elites and millionaires and billionaires believe there's going to be a massive disaster coming up in the next 10, 20 years, which could be nuclear war, economic collapse, or a natural disaster for which they are preparing to deploy a reconstruction system for human civilization.
Other people who are tracking this, like Ben, for instance, say, well, this does follow the patterns of a pole shift, the weakening of the magnetosphere.
And a great example of more evidence, actually not an example, but literally more evidence is the southern atmospheric anomaly, which is there is an area the size of Europe over Brazil into the Atlantic that is a dent in the magnetosphere that is not protecting the Earth the way it used to, and it's getting bigger.
So they say, don't worry, if you're on the surface, you're fine.
You won't get blasted by radiation.
But planes, satellites, and other aerial equipment is being blasted by radiation at a much higher degree.
I actually think this is over South America.
Brazil.
Yeah, Brazil and the Atlantic.
I actually think, I talked with Ben about this.
It's very interesting stuff.
We had major power outages in Puerto Rico and Europe following solar storms.
And I don't want to put words in his mouth, so he can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe what he was saying was it's not that these solar storms are anything special.
It's that the magnetosphere is weakening.
So what should be, we are at a solar maximum, so we are seeing increased activity, but it is still typical.
However, with a weakened magnetosphere, solar radiation is blasting the planet more.
When you include the North Pole shifting over Siberia, there are people who I believe it's fair to say, you know, they think that the shift may happen very soon in the next 5, 10, 15 years.
However, mainstream science says, no, no, this is what really gets me on the subject.
We are beyond the average amount of years for a pole shift.
Fact.
It's several hundred thousand years, and it usually happens around every 500,000 years, something like this.
Christian theological framework for interpreting the Christian Bible, which maintains that history is divided into multiple ages, called dispensations.
So to be fair, though, to be fair, we'll split the baby on this one because it wasn't that we were at war with Middle Eastern countries, but the war extended into the Middle East.
But it was rooted in countries from North Africa.
So it wasn't a war fought in the Middle East.
We didn't go to Iraq like we did now.
So, you know, we'll split the baby on that one.
And then it started in 1953.
I'm sorry, 1949 when we started going to the Middle East.
No, no, the fake news is the fake clip someone made where we had an argument where I told Ian he couldn't talk about the USS Liberty when we actually talked about it on the show.
Well, what I was saying was false flags are utilized by all sides, and the people who support the war are going to claim it's true, and the people who oppose the war are going to claim it's not true.
So that's psyops for you.
You know what I mean?
But when it comes to the USS Liberty, the pro-Israel side is going to say fake news, and the anti-Israel side is going to say, no, it's true.
And then anybody who's actually trying to parse through history to figure out what's going on, you're going to get conflicting histories.
Because, well, I know they say that they mistook it or whatever, but from my understanding from the guys who survived, I forgot his name because I follow his account, was they were collecting intel down there and they happened to collect some intel that Israel was planning on launching an attack against Egypt or something.
They were trying to get us involved in the Egyptian war.
We picked up this intel they didn't want us to have and they decided that they were going to blow it.
They were just going to destroy the ships to get rid of this, which is not an uncommon action of theirs because they did this with the King David bombing where they dressed up as Arabs, pretend to be Arabs, and they went in and blew up this hotel because the British had been spying and they found information connecting the Jewish Agency for Palestine to a terrorist group and they didn't want them to have those documents.
But my point is if we're going to help someone, like, look, America helped a lot of countries.
America helped the Albanians in Kosovo.
The Albanians never returned that favor, wouldn't even dream of returning that favor by ever attacking anything American.
Like, it's to the point that Albanians like name their kids George Bush.
Like, they'll be like, this is George Bush Salai because of their own.
My principal complaint about what I call Israel derangement syndrome is the lack of curiosity on any of the other foreign affairs and special interest projects and like things that are going on.
I think people will, It's getting because it gets a predominant focus in our media, it's going to get a lot of people's attention more so than other things, especially when you're looking at the last 30 years.
I understand we went to war in Ukraine and you want to argue who's involved in that, fine.
But really, most of our interventionist wars for at least the last 30 to 40 years have been in the Middle East.
And I'd like to know why we're not doing more against China, who's actually messing everything up with these fishing vessels where they're going in there.
But, you know, maybe it would have been a better idea to have a different kind, a different outlet instead of setting up those three to be allies because China, as I like to say, is asshole.
One of my favorite things was when Congress finally got together to ban TikTok, it was explicitly because anti-Israel content was dominant on the platform.
And then you get people being like, Tu Pooh admitted it.
And it's like, or we just tell you the truth that Trump, Trump wanted to, the Republicans wanted to ban TikTok because it was pro-Democrat.
And then once the code flipped and it was easily trackable that they were promoting anti-Israel content, the Democrats immediately were like, we have to get control of this.
You know, when you said it's not controlled by an external government, I continuously think about the Chinese economic fold, the banking industry that's not a nation that has so much power.
Follow me at Ian Crossland all across the internet and check out some of this future tech that's coming out of Rice University and all these awesome developments because we might be able to reverse the Earth's magnetic field of dispersion and realign things.
It could be possible.
So stay positive, stay focused.
Go to graphene.movie and check out the trailer for the new doc I'm working on, graphene.movie.
I know that the people who hate Israel are going to blame the Jews for it, but it's because the U.S. wants to and has wanted to blow up Iran for a very, very long time.
And they want public support for the war in Iran.
And as much as the Democrats really don't like Trump, they're rolling their eyes being like, he is blown up.
I mean, look at Lindsey Graham and John Bolton beating off over this shit.
You know what I mean?
It's kind of like when John Bolton's gooning to war footage of Iran on that.
In the past few years, support for Israel has dropped dramatically among all demographics, but it's larger among the young demographic, which didn't really have a view of Israel.
So I think the latest pew is across the board for all demographics.
It's 54% opposition to Israel in general, like don't like Israel, and then 46 in favor.
So what's happened is the Jews finally realized all these accusations about them controlling the media, which are like, I'll call it half-true.
They realized maybe we should actually do that.
And now you're seeing the Ellison moves with CBS and TikTok.
But they were admitting in the 2000s that they ran it.
There was an article.
I forgot the guy's name.
I can look it up while, you know, when you talk, I can look it up.
But he wrote a whole article where post-9-11, he was saying how they needed to capitalize on their control of the media to push a more patriotic worldview because they realized that they had been funding this sort of anti-American worldview and that it was going to be detrimental for them.
So the point is, everybody knows that the Jews have a very, very prominent position in media.
Like they own most of the companies, Hollywood, et cetera.
Jon Stewart brings this up.
This is not, you know, fuck off the people who are like anti-Semitism.
No, it's true.
It's like everybody knows this.
However, if you take a look at social media, even right now, like there are big YouTube channels that get hundreds of thousands of views per video just going anti-Israel.
So what's going to change is there's a couple of big shifts happening.
You'll notice some of the most virulent anti-Israel content have stopped talking about Israel.
They've started talking about Erica Kirk instead.
And they're maintaining this viewership.
This is intentional, my understanding, because you take an audience with 5 million followers that just screaming Israel.
You approach them and say Israel 100 times.
Then you say Israel 90 times, Erica Kirk 10 times.
Then you say Israel 80 times, Erica Kirk 20 times.
After six months of this, you're only talking about Erica Kirk and no one's talking about Israel anymore.
You have the purchase of TikTok, which was explicitly and intentionally about Israel.
And then you have CBS News, which, let's be real, it's about Israel.
So it looks like a bunch of prominent Democrat Jew donors have realized they weren't actually exerting any pressure on media the way they could have been.
And they've decided to now start dumping all their money into controlling these systems.
So I'll just say it.
I'm trying to avoid naming.
There's like three or four people that I could name.
Everybody knows I could say Candace Owens, but it's not just about her.
That you'll notice, if you look at their channels, it went Israel and now it's shifting almost entirely to Erica Kirk.
And why is YouTube promoting that?
Why is that?
Maybe it's a natural phenomenon that we've referred to as emergence that people just chase this salacious bullshit.
I don't think that's the case.
I think that you can actually see it in the metrics because when we do videos where we talk about the issue of Israel, the viewership is gone.
There's natural poll and then there's like marketing, right?
So if I make a video and I don't give it a news title and the subject matter is literally just something I felt like talking about, it's going to get 50 to 80,000 views.
Look, the question is like, when you criticize Israel, you are criticizing a government that spends a lot of money on lobbying that has weird support from U.S. politicians, like the mayors in New York.
That was really fucking weird that they all said that, right?
We all got to go to Israel.
Erica Kirk's nothing.
She's nobody.
It's like one organization.
She's not going to run the world.
She's not going to run a government.
She's not going to affect your life.
And all of a sudden, these people who are not banned but breaking the rules, who were talking about Israel, are now just talking about Erica Kirk, who is immaterial to geopolitics for the most part.
So I think that's intentional.
And I think you take a look at the purchase of CBS and TikTok, and the play is Nick Fluentis is not allowed because he's actually criticizing Israel.
And then we have situations where the U.S. government is sharing data about Americans with Israel, like giving it to Israel, like critical information about us.
So when you say that we're giving information to Israel, again, that's why I say it's a hyper.
I refer to, look, first, I always use Dave Smith as the best example because he's a friend.
He's intelligent.
I know people don't like his opinions, but they're well-thought-out, legitimate criticisms of Israel and U.S. foreign policy.
I do not believe he has Israel derangement syndrome.
I believe he has a focus on Middle Eastern foreign affairs with a particular criticism for Israel.
That was always allowed.
But when you say something like, we give private information on Americans to Israel, but you're not familiar with the Five Eyes Spy Club, this is where my criticism kicks in.
The U.S. intentionally allows New Zealand, Australia, Canada, the U.K. to to steal information on U.S. on the U.S. individuals.
The way it works is because of the Fourth Amendment, that's that's them stealing.
No, Let me finish the point.
The way the Five Eyes Spy Clubs work is that the U.S. has a tacit deal, all these countries do, to allow private information on American citizens or Canadian citizens or British to be taken by the other because they can't legally hand it over under the constitutional rules or the law of their lands.
Now, I understand that there are Zionists who want Israel and all that, and it is a country, but Israel is a home for U.S.-aligned military interests, U.S. weapons, and U.S. weapons manufacturers.
It is a country that was established by Western powers.
They build our guidance technology and our computer chips for our missiles, and we house a bunch of our weapons for Middle Eastern excursions and incursions in Israel.
And it's our principal line of military control for the Suez Canal.
Much like we want Panama and Greenland and why Trump said he wants Canada is because Trump wants to control all of the major access points for international water routes.
So that means the issue of Ukraine and Crimea is that we want to ice out Russia from the Mediterranean.
Now, Trump, not so much.
This was Biden and Obama.
And then you've got the Bosphorus, which is why Turkey has so much leverage in NATO, because they control the Black Sea into the Mediterranean.
And then you've got the Strait of Gibraltar, and you've got the Suez Canal.
The U.S. wants control of all of these ports.
China was trying to build the Nicaraguan Canal.
They were trying to drill to bore straight through Nicaragua, which is massive, by the way.
And they were like, we'll spend any amount of money to do it.
And it was going to destroy this massive aquifer where most of the people in the region drink their water.
And it became too expensive.
They ultimately stopped.
The U.S. was trying to stop them from being able to do it.
China was trying to compete with Panama to gain control of international waterways.
This was like 13 years ago.
So again, the simple version is Ukraine has interests.
The U.S. is using them as a vassal state for the proxy war against Russia, largely due to the gas monopoly.
We want to control energy into Europe.
Europe is effectively like, I call it the Western powers, but the U.S. has tremendous control over Europe.
Then you've got Greenland, which is specifically the Northwest Passage, which is new as ice is melting.
There's going to be a trade route going through the Bering Strait and between Canada and Russia.
Trump does not want Russia to get a foothold, but Canada is not going to give us access.
Greenland is our best course of action.
And then Panama is obvious.
These are the three principal waterways that the U.S. wants to control for the liberal economic order.
Now, some people say Trump is trying to create a new world order, a different one from the liberal economic order, whatever.
The point ultimately is, so what does this mean for Israel?
Zionists who have their interests are going to lobby the United States, who is going to be deferential to them because it wants to use them as our proxy in the Middle East.
I don't think Bibi Netanyahu is a good dude that he would be talking about politically manipulating any other countries.
I would also stress, however, be wary of out-of-context clips.
Like in the beginning, I don't know what he's talking about when he says the price tag is not unbearable.
If I were to say something like, I think people in the United States would support war with Iran if the life lost was so tremendously unbearable, that's what this country would need to support a war.
Mass death at a massive scale, and then people are going to be in favor of war with Iran.
I am not saying I am for it.
Now, what if someone's going to take that quote and they're going to be like, Tim's calling for mass murder to support war with Iran?
My point is: if Iran killed a bunch of Americans, the people in this country would support it.
Now, you take a video like this, it's cut up.
I will say this.
I don't need this video to think that Netanyahu was trying to manipulate the United States or any other country.
I don't think he's a good dude.
So, you know, you don't need to pull up a video and be like, did you hear what B.B. Netanyahu did?
If we are using Israel as a vassal for what we want to accomplish, right, which is control the straight and you know make war with all these Middle Eastern countries, why would Israel feel the need to blackmail our politicians in order to get us to the US?
I said, if we're using Israel for the goals that we want them for, why would Israel feel the need to say things like what Benjamin Nanyahu just said on that video to place spy devices in the White House?
That's the same reason why the U.S. spot on Angela Merkel in Germany, because Germany was cutting deals with Russia at a time when the U.S. was trying to ice Russia out.
So the issue is Israel needs to apply pressure on the United States because they don't control us.
They're trying to because we have leverage over them.
They have a lot of ideological allies and evangelicals in the Jewish community of the United States that support them.
And they have a lot of conservatives, regardless of their political ideology, who want to support Israel, largely for the purpose of liberal economic order dominance in the region.
So yeah, the U.S. has largely supported Israel for a very long time.
If Israel was in control of our country, why would they need to spy on anybody?
They need to find leverage points so that they can trick us into doing things because unless they are so neurotic and think that they need all of this extra security to make sure we do what they want.
If Israel is being told to do what we want them to do and they're trying to wiggle out of that control, they'll blackmail politicians and they'll spy on us.
But we might that Israel needs to spy on our politicians because we're already doing these things.
We might stop.
This is why.
So if we are doing what we want and we're going to war and they're trying to pressure us to do them, they're going to need to find leverage points, right?
Like, how does Israel get the U.S. to do what it wants?
I don't know because they didn't release the files.
But I'm saying to you, if we have a country that literally can collect this kind of information on our politicians, they can exert the kind of control where they could make us go to war on their behalf and then broadcast it to all the news media that, wait, we're the ones who are doing it for our own interests.
And so one would then argue that the U.S. is using Israel the same way they use Panama, the way they're trying to take Greenland, and then Israel is exerting a counter force for their benefit as well.
Except we're not getting nearly as much back given the amount of funding that we've given them, which it doesn't make sense.
So when something doesn't make sense, people have a natural suspicion, and then they start getting conspiratorial.
And then something like Epstein comes out, and they're alleging crazy stuff happening with our politicians and kids on tape that make, and not just our politicians, by the way.
So with the current rise of pitching velocities and the major increase in Tommy John surgeries, specifically being done to 15 to 19-year-olds, with them actually making up over 50% of all surgeries being done, and about 40% of which is Major League pitchers today.
How do you think the game is going to be changed in the next 10 to 15 years?
And do you think we'll see the return of a breaking ball?
I think, honestly, the rise of Tommy Johns is directly attributable to Trevor Ball.
I work with probably a dozen kids down in Florida.
I've got these kids that I start working with them in early, mid-February, and they're still playing tournaments in Thanksgiving.
I'm like, guys, these kids are like 12 years old.
They're playing 80 games a year as a 12-year-old.
They're racking up 120 innings as a 12-year-old.
I remember back when I first started playing with Atlanta, who took very good care of his pictures, their philosophy was if you're 20 years old, you got half that many innings.
So you get 100 innings as a 20-year-old.
18-year-old, you get 90.
I mean, I would throw 100 innings as almost a grown, mature man at 20 years old.
You've got 13-year-old kids throwing 100 innings.
So by the time they get to that 15, 16 years old, and definitely pro ball and big league ball, I mean, they've got a lot more trail of the tires than I ever did.
I think that's where, you know, the old cliche that you use is your arm's only got so many throws in it.
And one of these days, you're going to throw your last one.
I did.
I got them scars to prove it.
And so I think as far as the TJs are concerned, it's just kids throwing way too much, way too young.
I think the reason why modern media sucks, you didn't really touch on tonight, but I think the reason why modern media sucks is because too many studios and too many writers' rooms are run by women or effeminate men.
Yeah.
And they create and push content that turns off half their audience, namely actual men.
I'm not doing my Trump voice tonight because I have an incredibly serious and deeply important question that your mother actually brought to VIP's attention today.
So I heard you talk about the 1953 situation in Iran with the quote overthrow of Mossadegh and the installing the Shah.
I just wanted to ask you, like, have you really looked into the context surrounding all that?
Because it's really, really not what, like, the historians and stuff like that tell you.
And you can even check it in chat GPT, you know, or just thoroughly research it.
Because, like, well, like, for example, the Shah had been in Iran for, like, almost 2,000 years, like, prior to Muhammad.
And, like, that line had run up to present time with the Pahlavi dynasty in power since, like, 1925, with Muhammad Reza Pahlavi in power since 1941.
And...
Mossadeh was like elected by parliament um, not necessarily like popular, you know people say oh, he was democratically elected and stuff like that, but uh anyway it's, it's, it's really really good to to to look into and uh get some real context on it.
Because it was kind of a similar situation to like Venezuela, where Mossadef basically wanted to um uh communism, uh our stuff, or or the, the stuff of um, you know the uh the British and U.s oil interests, uh and nationalize them.
You know quote, you know acquire the means of production for the people and um, um the um the shah, at the time he like fled the country because you know he had this political opposition that he felt like was was an attempted coup.
Um, and uh, you know, the U.s and Uk spent all this, all this, you know time, effort and resources setting up the infrastructure to, to produce the oil, and then this guy just like takes it over um, you know.
So, so what?
What the U.s and Uk ended up doing is basically reestablishing the existing order.
Um, you know not, you know not.
You know, overthrowing.
You know, you know the, the Shah, always had the power constitutionally and they had a constitution since 1906.
Uh, he always had the power constitutionally to remove the prime minister, and that that's all that happened.
Now they did have to do, you know like, various coup type actions to make that happen.
unidentified
Like you know, set up people in certain positions and take up, you know, to take over certain portions of the military, and stuff like that, because of, you know, the power that Mossed A had had, you know, concentrated.
Mossadegh's Seizure of Power00:02:29
unidentified
But I i'll i'll go ahead and leave all the the like, the whole, like timeline on it in Discord for anybody who wants to see It.
But yeah, there's a as usual, there's a lot more context to these things than just the simple, you know, one or two paragraph explanation.
This is worth delving into from like eight different angles.
But what I'll tell you about state seizure of property, if the American government were to say, you know what, all this Chinese farmland, sure, it was bought with real money under legal pretense.
If they wanted to seize that and then distribute it amongst the American citizens, I'd be okay with it.