How do you effectively combat the mass media and capitalize on the growing public anger for journalists?
Yes, that is a very good question by one of the truest, Liliam Mirin Fusik.
Now, first answer is to simply create our own culture in as many ways as possible.
So, the more quality content that is being available here in Demeterium on YouTube, for example, so for every time I post a cool training video, perhaps that will drive people away from content that emanates from Hollywood.
Now, obviously, there are a lot of good channels and a lot of good alternatives now, and if we continue to set the pace high in the culture war, we can wrest control from Hollywood, because as it is right now, I'm no film critic, but I think I speak for quite a few people at least when I say that Hollywood films are decreasingly bad.
And I'm not saying this from a political standpoint, it's just a casual observation that Hollywood films aren't as good as films were only 10 years ago.
And that is obviously good because then people will look for other venues of entertainment, etc.
And the more content we have with wholesome views, the better.
To the second question, how do we effectively combat the mass media and capitalize on anger against journalism?
Continue exactly as we are doing.
I can't thank Donald Trump enough for the injuries he has caused the mass media.
The fake news, it's a household term now, fake news to refer to the mainstream media.
And capitalizing on public anger, that's simple, it's just ignore what they say.
And I can feel this myself.
I am not particularly worried what the mainstream media writes nowadays.
But three years ago, two years ago, they had still more power.
So it's a so they are losing power and just continue on the path we are on.
And besides, they're doing most of the work themselves because people see for every day there are people waking up to the realization that the mainstream media are mostly lying.
Now, obviously, there are still people who believe in them, but I can just speak for the Swedish public because I've spectated the change in public relations to the establishment and the mainstream media and it's gone from bad to worse and it will continue to get worse.
Now obviously I don't encourage any angry acts against journalists.
I just recommend people to not take them seriously and mock them as often as possible.
So I hope that was a good answer, my man.
Next question is from my gallant man, ElessarMusik.
I know you don't view it as a sacrifice, my man, but could you elaborate a bit on when how you made a decision of committing to the struggle?
It is no secret that I am one of your biggest fans and I'm extremely proud to call you my friend.
I think this question may benefit a lot of lads as I am sure they feel guilty, as do I, at times that we remain anonymous in a time that require our unity, honour and unyielding courage.
You're a true beacon of light to us all in the dark times.
I personally owe you a lot and would like to thank you for all of your hard work, strength and honor.
Ah, thank you very much indeed for those kind words and yeah very heartfelt.
Now first and foremost you absolutely do not need to feel guilty in the least and obviously we've talked privately about this but I can elaborate for the for the public also.
You have a great and growing music channel and this is what I responded to in the last question creating culture of our own.
So to Lilliam's question you are the solution to that question.
You are also the solution to breaking the monopoly on the Hollywood culture because you create a venue for us to have culture in.
So, when you create music, you create a platform for true friends, you create a platform for wholesome values, and you always promote the good message with your music.
And we know, especially as an Irishman, you know that music is excruciatingly important when it comes to a cultural revival.
Ireland has kept its fighting spirit over a lot of centuries via their music.
So, yeah, definitely indeed.
And in terms of being anonymous, it doesn't need to be a bad thing.
Your work is perfectly fine just the way you are without you putting your name and face upon it.
It isn't needed.
And besides, since you are contributing to my work as well, so there you go.
And this is something, a message to everyone who supported financially this channel.
Like, look over the last half a year, the year, you've been part of creating these videos because without you, it wouldn't have been possible.
And if I'm gonna be a bit harsh here towards the rest of my subscribers, it's like 82,000 and I don't even have 200 Patreons.
Now, obviously, not everyone contributes on Patreon, so let's say it's 200 in total.
But there is still a lot of people I would aim criticism against first, and definitely not someone who is A contributing and B contributing to the culture war.
So no worries at all.
Keep up the good work, my man, and thank you very much for your continued support.
And also, if you haven't already subscribed to LSR, go and do so right now because it's good music and as I said, it's a good platform for culture.
For our culture.
Most of your videos are ended by a glorious XOXO.
Boom.
I made my best to watch most of your videos, but still don't understand this final sentence.
Can you please comment on this?
May your gains be glorious.
It is good that you watched the majority of my videos.
I recommend everyone to do so.
Even if they seem a bit old, even if the videos are from 2016 or 2015, there is still a lot of gems, even though in retrospect, some of them are a bit cringy.
But it is what it is, everyone grows and develops.
So anyway, no, it's nothing in particular that means it's just something I made one day and then it stuck with me.
It was sometime during 2014, I think, or 2013, and then I do it sometimes every once in a while.
So yeah, that's nothing in particular that means.
Just an outro.
In your ideal state, does welfare exist in any form?
Why or why not?
Yeah, most definitely it does.
I am not a libertarian.
I am for welfare when it's needed because you never know what will happen to you.
And in an organic society, you take care of each other.
So if a veteran has gone out and gotten his arm blown off by an enemy cannon, yeah, the collective obviously pitches in to make his sacrifices worthwhile.
I think it's absolutely barbarous to not take care of the individuals in your societies.
Now the problem is that this sort of society only works in a homogeneous society where you actually care about each other.
So we had a somewhat well-functioning welfare state in Sweden when there was a very harsh stigma against taking advantage of it.
Now obviously Sweden is an extreme case but the things I would like to see welfare on is still you know education, healthcare etc because a healthy population is a more productive population.
Now, keep in mind, I don't apply this to America, for example.
I would never have, you know, regular welfare, regular Scandinavian style, Scandinavian socialist style welfare in America because the demographics are so completely different, so it wouldn't work there.
But in Scandinavia's case, yes, most definitely.
You know, the society takes care of its unfortunate individuals.
And yet again, the key is to ensure that if something happens, the society will be there as a, you know, to catch you before you fall.
So yes, most definitely for some welfare, but it also depends on what kind of nation you are.
If I'd been an American, I would be much more libertarian than I am now, but that's because our societies are different.
And this is also something I want you to keep in mind whenever you partake in my teachings.
I try to say in the Swedish example or in the American example or in the British example, it's different for different nations.
Just as if we're talking about training, I say if you're a beginner, you can set this pace, or if you are an advanced lifter, you can set this pace.
So it depends on the situation at hand.
So I'm not saying that one size fits all.
So I hope that answers the question.
So that being said, I wish you all a prosperous week ahead.
