Ghost of True Conservative Republican Radio addresses backlash on Martin Luther King Day, arguing the 1960s feminist movement corrupted society by promoting divorce and single-parent families, citing Australia's 75% divorce rate. He condemns "Trojan horses" like Ron Paul within the GOP for hijacking conservatism while excluding true believers like Duncan Hunter. Ghost asserts that open homosexuality and media influences normalize deviant behavior, claiming the justice system unfairly favors women in custody cases. Ultimately, he warns that abandoning traditional two-parent homes and God-centered values will cause societal collapse, urging listeners to purge social liberals from the movement. [Automatically generated summary]
And once again, you're listening to true conservative Republican radio.
Anyway, I decided to go ahead and do a show here.
It's Martin Luther King Day.
Wanted to acknowledge his contributions to our society, putting emphasis on racial equality and that sort of thing.
But this past weekend, I have just been completely bombarded.
I mean, completely overwhelmed with emails stating that I'm a chauvinist, obviously, because I'm Mr. Anti-Feminist.
And I've gotten emails from people that claim to be conservative that are somehow saying that I'm not a real conservative.
And we're going to talk about both of those issues this evening.
You can get back to us and go ahead and chime in on anything that you hear on the program this evening.
You can contact us live.
The number is 646-652-4869.
If you want to give us a call this evening, we want to hear from you.
But first and foremost, we need to get down to this feminist issue.
Now, I've been accused of being many things, and it's because I have a certain viewpoint on the feminist movement.
Now, I'm going to go ahead and say this one more time for everyone that's trying to misconstrue my particular beliefs, people that are trying to misinterpret my particular observations.
Once again, I acknowledge the contributions that the feminists at the turn of the 20th century, what they've done to aid the woman the right to vote, to aid the woman the right to work.
And I acknowledge that.
I believe that the feminist movement at the turn of the 20th century was definitely necessary.
But you see, women now can work.
Women now can vote.
Women now can pretty much do anything they want to do.
This is a free society.
But you see, it's that 60s feminist movement that has just corrupted every single American woman.
And it's not just limited to the American woman, folks.
I mean, this is a Western phenomenon.
You know, the feminist movement has hit all the Westernized countries.
I've stated previous that in Australia, you've got about 75% of marriages ending in divorce thanks to the feminist movement that has infected that poor country.
I've talked to people from Australia, males that are 20-somethings, intellectuals, that are very brilliant people.
And I've actually talked to these people and they have submitted themselves.
They've completely submitted themselves to the idea that they are not going to get married.
Not because they don't want to get married.
It's because they believe that marriage no longer exists thanks to the feminist movement.
And you can ask any Australian man out there this, unless he's already been pussified, because the situation out there in Australia is just absolutely unreal.
And you can look at other nations, westernized nations, that the feminist movement has just basically run rampant.
Germany.
Just look for yourself.
I believe Germany has 70% divorce rate.
Look at all the westernized countries and look at their statistics.
I challenge you.
Look at the divorce statistics.
Look at the single-parent family statistics.
Look at what used to be a social minority turn into the social norm.
And this is my point with the feminist movement, and yet everybody wants to misconstrue the things that I believe as some sort of chauvinist ideology.
As if I'm some sort of a chauvinist.
Everybody likes to misconstrue that, don't they?
Well, I'm here to lay it on the line, and I'm telling you how it is.
Do I believe that women should be subjugated?
No.
Do I believe that women need to be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen?
Absolutely not.
What I'm saying is, is that there's a phenomenon happening here, all right, and it has nothing to do with the feminists that basically aided the woman the right to work, the right to vote at the turn of the 20th century.
This has gone way overboard, folks, and that's my point.
And you see, you're going to have a lot of people who disagree with me because they don't want to hear it.
They don't want to see the reality that's happening.
And I've gotten email after email after email, people that are just misconstruing what I'm saying.
They're just sitting here trying to interpret what they feel I'm trying to get across.
And I'm telling you, folks, all I'm trying to get across is that we need to save the American family.
That's my point.
You know, the modern-day feminist movement, this completely warped ideology that has basically evolved up to this point, has turned the modern-day female in not just America, but in all Westernized countries.
And I challenge all of you.
Look at the statistics.
Look in Australia, 75% divorce rate.
Look in Germany, 70% divorce rate.
These are Westernized countries that are basically witnessing this ridiculous feminist phenomenon that equate woman liberation with women having multiple children from multiple different partners, multiple divorces.
It's disgusting.
Like I stated earlier, I know people from Australia, males, 20-somethings, or college-educated, they've already submitted to the fact that they're never going to get married.
And that's not because of their choice.
It's because they believe that the woman is just, they don't want to get married anymore.
And why don't they want to get married anymore?
Because the feminist movement has told them that they're liberated.
And these poor guys from Australia, and let me tell you something.
It's sad.
When I heard these Australian younger 20-somethings generations basically just saying, look, all I expect to have in life, because I know I'm not going to get married, and of course they want to get married, but they've already submitted to the fact that they're not going to get married.
And the only thing that they can hope for in life is hope that they can establish some sort of companionship with a female.
And hopefully that'll lead to a sexual relationship.
I swear that's what these poor, poor males in Australia have been subjugated to because of the feminist movement.
And that's my point.
But everybody wants to misconstrue it as like I'm some sort of a male chauvinist and all this ridiculous garbage.
And I'm here to set the record straight.
I just feel that when a woman gets married and a woman has children, there's a certain element of responsibility that these women need to understand.
They need to instill that instinctive nurturing instinct on the child.
At least during those formative development years until they go into school, it's ridiculous.
It's absolutely, utterly sickening to me that nobody wants to acknowledge this problem.
That's the reason why I'm bringing up feminism.
You see, in all these feminists and, you know, these males that have been asserted the absolute pussification on their mentality, and believe me, believe me, there's a lot of them out here.
They're not going to even attempt to understand what I'm talking about.
They don't even want to attempt to facilitate a debate on this subject matter.
You know, I had a feller last evening who's a supposed conservative call me up and say, you know what, Ghost, you need to get a hold of yourself.
You need to get a hold of yourself.
Well, get a hold of myself.
What are you talking about?
He was trying to take the defense of these feminists that were just basically bombarding my chat room last evening.
And you see, this is the mentality of the modern male, okay?
And I'm telling you, the mentality of the modern male nowadays is that what they need to do is, I guess, take up for the feminist cause because these males think that it'll win them brownie points to get in their pants.
I'm serious.
I mean, that's the motivation of these Nimrods that have been pussified.
They don't even want to talk about the subject.
All they care about is if, you know, they treat them the right way and, you know, kind of touch them and handle them with kid gloves that somehow they're going to get themselves a piece.
And it's absolutely sickening and disgusting.
If you've got an opinion, please give me a call.
And I don't want to hear a bunch of yelling and a bunch of garbage.
If you disagree with me, or you think I'm off my rocker, or you think that I'm prehistoric, or whatever the case might be, give me a call right now and tell me why.
And tell me that you are just going to completely deny the social ills that have become the social norm in society today.
I'd like for you to tell me that that is okay, what is happening, the social phenomenon that's not only happening in America, it's happening in every westernized country.
646-652-4869.
And of course, you're probably going to have a bunch of feminists call up.
Oh, you chauvinist lizard.
Oh, my God.
And you know what?
I usually don't have a show today.
I'm trying to limit my shows to just Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, 9 p.m. Central Time.
But I just had to, I had to get a show out here today.
I just had to do it.
I mean, my integrity is being besmirched.
I'm being made out to be a ridiculous guy or something because I want to save the American family.
As a matter of fact, it's not just limited to those on the left of the persuasion.
You know, it's also got people on the right that have been absolutely pussified that are sitting over here being subjugated by this garbage.
I got people that are so-called conservatives, you know, basically trying to point the finger at me and say, you know what, you're a chauvinist because I want to save the American family because I am acknowledging a social phenomenon that's crippling our American family, not only our American family, but every family in the westernized world.
I mean, the family was the foundation of every single civilized society.
It's what made people get up in the morning, go to work for 10, 12 hours a day.
It's the reason why people broke their backs going out and working, providing for their family.
It was the American family that made America successful during these world wars.
It was the American family, folks, and that's what I'm trying to save.
That's what I want to save, and that's what every conservative should want to save.
That should be the first thing on their agenda.
And as a matter of fact, I prepared a speech this evening, believe it or not.
And I'm going to get to that a little later because I want to stick to this feminist thing.
But I wrote a speech on what's a real conservative because there's a lot of people out here claiming that, you know, they're putting the conservative on their name, and yet they're going against the very principles that created the movement.
You know, and this is no joke, folks.
You've got a lot of people out here claiming that they're conservative when they're not.
You know it, and I know it.
And that's all I'm saying.
And we got somebody calling in.
978 Area Code, you're on the air.
Yeah, this is Stephanie.
Stephanie, are you talking about from I Got My Reason show?
That's right.
Well, how you doing?
Fine.
I'm glad you called in because I know you have very opposition viewpoints to what I'm saying here.
Opposing?
Opposing?
I think that's the word you're looking for.
Yeah, well, what's going on?
Do you have something to chime in about, or are you just going to accuse me of being a show of mister?
I'm just trying to understand your logic and where you're coming from because it really, I think that you're getting so much shit from both sides because you truly are a caveman.
A what?
A caveman.
Oh, well, look, the reason I'm getting supposed heat from the other side, which is the right side, these are all social conservatives, or excuse me, social liberals that are posing as conservatives that are basically trying to use me as, oh, well, he's an imbecile.
I mean, no, absolutely not.
Because I'm acknowledging a social phenomenon that's crippling our society.
There's nothing crippling our society except for people like you.
How am I crippling society?
I mean, provide substance.
Don't just name call.
I mean, honestly, if you believe that, give me some substance, please.
Defending Women's Rights00:07:22
Because there's no reason for anyone in this day and age to think that women should not have equal rights.
I've never claimed women should not have equal rights, man, with all due respect.
That's exactly what you're claiming.
No, I'm not.
And I've just stipulated that here in the beginning of this show.
I acknowledge the fact that there was a social problem at the turn of the 20th century and previous that suppressed women.
I acknowledge the fact that the feminists at the turn of the 20th century were true patriots that accorded the woman the right to work, that accorded the woman the right to vote.
I've acknowledged this.
I'm not trying to suppress women.
I don't want women like I've been suggested in every one of these emails that I get that I want women barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen.
That's not what I'm suggesting.
What I'm saying.
That's certainly what it sounds like.
That's not what I'm suggesting, ma'am.
What I'm suggesting is that you've got the feminist movement of the 60s that has completely corrupted the average.
I'm not just saying American.
It didn't corrupt me.
It didn't corrupt me.
Well, I understand, and you told me that you've been married for a long time.
You've got a husband who's a soldier.
And let me tell you, I commend you.
I give you much credit for that.
Because let me tell you, the American family is becoming extinct, ma'am.
And that's the only thing, that's the only reason why I bring up the feminist movement is because it has corrupted the woman mind into believing that they can basically...
It hasn't corrupted anything.
It actually helped a lot of women.
Corrupting them.
So you think it's okay to just be, you know, casually married, go in and out of divorce?
You think it's like woman liberation for women just to go ahead and have children at will with multiple different partners?
I mean, this is the social norm.
I think a woman should do whatever is best for her family and herself, whether that be stay married to someone or not.
So you're saying to me that it's okay for the social phenomenon of single-parent families to just be socially acceptable.
I mean, have you submitted to that?
I mean, because I haven't.
I mean, I don't like the fact that, you know, children are being raised by one parent that's usually at work, and then they're dumped off on a boob tube or a violent video game or the internet.
And these are the technological innovations that are raising our children today.
I mean, that's all I'm saying.
I mean, you even got them raising them at the formative years from age zero to about five.
They're in front of these ridiculous.
I'm sorry?
Three.
Well, I just.
I'm sorry?
Zero to three is their formative years.
That's when they are developing the most.
Okay.
Well, I mean, I just extended it to five because you learn a lot as well.
I mean, don't get me wrong.
I acknowledge the fact that the formative years are zero through three.
But, I mean, I extend it to five because you've got a corrupt world out here that you've got to shield these children away from.
And that's all I'm saying.
And you're not going to be able to shield them by just dumping them off on a television set.
I mean, I've got a granddaughter.
That's the parents' responsibility.
What you're doing is you're blaming a few bad eggs in the world on all women.
Well, it's not a few bad eggs.
It's become the social norm.
I mean, if this was just a minority.
It really hasn't.
It has, ma'am.
I disagree with you.
Just look at the statistics.
I mean, this has become the social norm.
I mean, if you're a woman that's 25 years of age and you don't have at least two children, other women are going to look at you and look at you cross-eyed.
Like, what's wrong with you?
That's not true.
That's not true.
A friend of mine is 28 years old, and she just had her first child, and nobody thought anything about it.
I'm sorry, go ahead.
Nobody looked at her.
You know, people are having children later in life these days.
There's nothing wrong with that.
Just for the simple fact that they want to be able to be there for those kids.
There's been a study.
It's fact.
People are not having children as young anymore.
Where are you getting this from?
Piss you off to where you believe that everybody in the world is like this because they're not.
I'm in Virginia.
Well, look at the statistics.
Well, you're in Middle America, and you see, this is why you haven't seen it.
I mean, Middle America is a very important thing.
I've been all over the country.
I have family in Massachusetts.
I have family in Louisiana.
I have family in Michigan.
I have family all over the country that I do go and visit all the time.
So are you not acknowledging that there's a social problem?
Are you just saying that everything's okay?
Is that what you're just trying to tell me here?
That everything is okay.
I think that we live in a wonderful country right now where we don't have people like you in power who hold women down.
How am I holding women down?
Can you explain to me things that I have stated where I have advocated the subjugation of women?
For example, just because you're a little ignorant about it, children are not born.
Women don't shit children out.
They come out of the vagina, okay?
That's okay.
No, no, no.
I didn't ask you that.
I didn't ask you that.
I asked you, what did I say?
What have I ever said where I've advocated the subjugation or the suppression of women?
Now, I understand that maybe you disagree with some of the rhetoric that I spout off, and that's more than you're right.
But I'm just simply stating, what have I stated ever where I've said I want women subjugated?
I've been told that I've advocated violence towards women, which I never have.
That I want them in the kitchen barefoot and pregnant, which I've never stated.
I mean, what have I said where I'm basically suppressing women, or I'm advocating the subjugation of women, please?
Everything that comes out of your mouth.
But you see, that's a blanketed statement.
There's no substance behind that.
All you're doing is just...
Fed the kettle.
I'm sorry?
I said, said the kettle.
You're talking about me making blanket statements and generalizing.
That's exactly what you're doing.
You're generalizing every single woman out there.
You're saying that they're going to have five kids, that they put them in front of the television or they put them in front of whatever.
They do, ma'am.
It's a social norm.
It's the social norm.
There are 500 friends I can show you that don't do that, that are more concerned about anything in their world.
It's hard enough in this country for a woman to make it.
And then there's people like you who turn around and say they get exactly what they deserve.
That's not right.
That's why people from both sides of the fence think you're a nutball.
Well, I am not a nutball, okay?
I'm just acknowledging the social ills of society, and everybody just wants to turn a blind eye to it.
I mean, the statistics prove you wrong, ma'am.
And, of course, you hung up because you don't want to debate anymore.
And I don't blame you.
True Conservative Principles00:14:36
But, you know, since we're on this subject matter, because, you know, I have been taking a lot of heat, you know.
I've been taking a lot of heat, not only from people of the left, but people that are so-called conservative.
And I'm going to go ahead and give a little speech that I wrote about the conservatives, because I have a lot of conservative people that don't come into this chat room that just listen to me via another source.
And I thank them for faithfully listening.
I thank them for continuing the conservative fight.
I thank them for all that.
So here we go.
Go something like this.
And then this is to all the conservatives, the true conservatives out there.
My fellow conservatives worldwide, we are witnessing the systematic dismantling of the conservative movement before our very eyes.
The conservative label has been hijacked by those who are in direct contradiction of what the movement was intended.
These same individuals who've hijacked the conservative label have redefined the principles, changed the direction, and crippled the foundation of our very movement.
These same Trojan horses have utilized the methods of agitation ranging from the spread of logical fallacies to reverse psychology with one goal in mind, social liberalism.
We as true conservatives must organize ourselves to combat this infiltration of our movement.
We must not let ourselves be induced into acceptance through the propaganda that these Trojan horses utilize.
We as true conservatives must understand that there are hidden forces who disguise themselves as fellow conservatives which are trying to turn us against one another.
And much to my disdain, they have been successful at doing just that.
The conservative movement is not political, but rather a social value system that personifies integrity, liberty, and family.
And these Trojan horses that claim to be conservative have correlated the conservative label with political rhetoric.
To call yourself a conservative, you must faithfully believe in the following.
Conservatives believe that there is a God regardless of your religious beliefs.
Conservatives believe that marriage is the most sacred of all traditions between a man and a woman.
And such liberal concepts such as divorce, adultery, and open sexual perversion cannot and should not be tolerated as a social norm in any society.
Conservatives believe that the family is the foundation of every society and that broken families are a social ill that should not be accepted as the social norm.
Conservatives believe that all men should pledge an unconditional oath to their families and country.
Conservatives believe that females should be respected and loved based on their character and loyalty, not based on their sexuality or social exploitation of their gender.
Conservatives believe that abortion is the purest form of murder and should not be tolerated, period.
Conservatives believe that females and males who have multiple children from multiple different partners is a social ill and should not be tolerated as the social norm.
Conservatives believe that children should be raised in a two-parent home and should be shielded from predators and propaganda that will that will corrupt their developing minds.
The youth is our precious resource for perpetuating conservative values, and they should be commended and embraced whenever faithfully following this value system.
Conservatives believe that we must abide by the laws of the land unless the laws infringe or suppress our value system.
Conservatives believe in racial equality.
Conservatives believe that open Remember this, conservatives believe that open homosexuality and lesbianism should not be tolerated as the soci that core principles to being a true conservative and anyone who doesn't faithfully coincide with every one of these principles are not a conservative.
We as the true conservatives must take direct action against those who use the conservative label to masquerade their true hidden agenda.
These Trojan horses all must be exposed for who they are and what their true agenda is.
We as the true conservative movement must demand that those who utilize the conservative label and don't abide by our principles must completely stop using the word conservative to describe themselves.
The true conservatives of the world must stand up against those who are corrupting the message and changing our principles.
All those who wish to join us just have to abide by our principles to be one of us.
And together, we conservatives can heal the social damage caused by those who've made the social ills the social norm.
I thank all those true conservative patriots who still believe in these principles, and I despise those Trojan horses who are attempting to cripple our foundation.
Long live the American family and the world family, and long live the conservative movement.
And that's my speech on that.
That is my speech on that.
So all these people that are sitting over here calling themselves conservatives and that aren't abiding by the principles I've stated previous, these are the people that need to be shown for who they are and they need to take the conservative out of their name.
All of you.
And you know who you are.
Some of you are listening in this chat room here.
You're sitting over here, you know, trying to utilize the conservative label when you're not conservative.
On the contrary, you are embracing social liberalism.
Anyway, give me a call right now.
646-652-4869 is the number to call.
I'd like for somebody to chime in.
All right, I mean, we're confronting the feminists this evening.
We are confronting the so-called want to be conservatives this evening because this is, I mean, this has got to stop.
This has got to stop.
People that are utilizing the conservative label for their own gain so that they can be a part of some ridiculous little blogger clique so they can.
Oh, look at me I'm, I'm a conservative, when in actuality, they're in direct contradiction of these principles I've just stated, and that's my point.
That's my point.
So all you conservatives that are out there that don't abide faithfully by the principles I've stated previous, stop calling yourself a conservative, because you are not a conservative.
You are the Trojan horses I speak of.
You are the people that are trying to utilize reverse psychology so that you can implement your social liberal agenda, and they've been successful folks.
They've already infiltrated the Republican Party.
They've already infiltrated the Republican Party and there's nothing we can do about it.
And every time I try to pose this as a suggested debating point in any of these ridiculous shows on BTR, they ignore me, you know, and it's a shame, because it's just like liberals.
So I I d.
I hope that most of the conservatives that listen to my show, I hope that you stand up against these Trojan horses and demand that they stop using the word conservative to describe themselves, because they're not conservative.
They are absolutely not conservative.
Anyway, 646-652-4869.
We're talking about fake conservatives and feminists and how these people are not only corrupting society and making the social ills of society the social norm, but they're redefining the conservative principles, and I'm not going to let them do it.
I will not let them do it.
So they can sit over there and play with their pecker shafts all day long calling themselves conservatives, but I know who they are, and they knew who they are.
And I see right through them.
I see right through them like a transparency.
And I'm going to demand every one of these, not only on BTR, I'm going everywhere.
I am going to write congressmen, senators, everybody who doesn't abide by the social conservative principles.
I'm going to demand that they either acknowledge us and understand that what we stand for is just saving the American family, saving the corruption of our children, saving the corruption of our society.
That's what social conservatives stand for.
Not some political rhetoric.
I mean, politics.
I mean, that's why I say conservative, Republican.
Republican describes the politics.
Conservatives describes the sociology.
646-652-4869 is the number to call.
We got a couple of people.
Well, of course, every time I mention feminism, everybody and their mama gets on the phone and starts calling.
And, of course, I'm going to hear the same logical fallacies and blanketed statements that I've been hearing.
I mean, I've been challenging people.
Look, if you disagree with me, let's talk about the issues.
Let's not just, you know, you're a chauvinist, you know, you're dangerous, you're a pig.
I don't want to hear that garbage.
I mean, I get enough of that in the emails.
I mean, look, I get emails all the time.
I mean, look at it.
Here's an email from Deborah from California.
I can't believe that there are people like you that still exist in America.
Voices like yours are more dangerous to our society than drug pushers.
How are you going to compare me to a drug pusher?
I hope they pull you off the air to stop your old-fashioned thinking, you piece of blank.
Deborah from California.
And there's more where that came from.
This is my favorite.
This is my favorite right here.
It says, Ghost, you are a wife beater that probably has your wife in a cage right now.
It's a woman's world.
Get used to it, pig.
That was Jennifer from Seattle.
Well, she's from Seattle, so that pretty much says it all right there.
But I mean, this is the mentality.
This is the mentality I'm talking about.
So anyway, folks, I'm going to go ahead and take a few calls here.
646-652-4869 is the number to call.
717, you're on the air.
Dan from Grillin Is Radio.
How's it going?
How are you doing, man?
All right.
Those are some pretty rude emails, I have to say.
Well, I'm used to it at this point.
It really doesn't phase me very much.
I mean, I know that, you know, social liberalism is alive and well.
As a matter of fact, it's dominating both parties.
That's why I've suggested all true conservatives, I mean, not to vote because we've been isolated, especially by the Republican Party.
How the Republican Party can allow a absolute just lunatic like Ron Paul, how they can give this man the public forum, the Republican public forum, to spew off his borderline liberal garbage and isolate a true conservative man like Duncan Hunter is beyond me.
And I've already come to the conclusion that Republicans are social liberals, and they've accepted that, and that's all there is to it.
Do you really, yeah, yeah, sure.
Do you really think they're giving him a platform?
Because, I mean, he can't even get on a debate.
He's been on all the debates, sir.
He's been on every single debate there is.
They've isolated Duncan Hunter from debates.
And I don't know if you're familiar with Duncan Hunter, but this is probably the last man that's running for the presidency that's a true conservative.
I mean, I'm not going to, you know, I actually don't know a lot about Duncan Hunter because there wasn't a lot to know about Duncan Hunter as far as, in other words, I didn't go to his website and research him or anything.
Of course, and I stick with the party myself.
But as far as the Ron Paul thing goes, I've watched the debates.
As soon as, you know, like in New Hampshire, I know he wasn't invited to those debates.
You know, he hasn't been in one ever since.
So I've been in the earlier ones, but not in these last ones.
But anyway, that's you know, I guess that's neither here nor there.
But, I mean, can't you agree?
Are you a Republican, Democrat, left-wing, progressive?
What are you, sir?
I'm not excluded.
I don't label myself.
I guess I used to be, I used to be registered Republican.
Now I'm independent.
And what made you pull away from the Republican Party, if I may ask?
Media Suppression Tactics00:09:06
Sure.
They don't have I feel like they left me.
They left me.
Hey, join the party, pal, because believe me, I think they left me too.
I mean, is it based on any kind of political persuasion?
I mean, have you are you one of these because a lot of criticism on the Republicans at this point has been the the fiscal responsibility of the modern Republican Party.
Is it based on that, or is it based on a social ideology or something else?
Well, you know, we'll look at our leaders.
You know, I kind of try to balance everything.
You know, the platform, most of it I don't have a problem with.
I don't agree with amending the Constitution to protect marriage or anything like that.
I think in this day and age, if you open the door to, you know, that letting these guys, these present guys, change the Constitution, you're opening a door to a lot.
Because, you know, in an amendment, a lot can be put into that than just what they're saying.
So, you know, I just don't trust these present politicians with the Constitution to be changing it.
But, of course, I don't believe any amendment would actually pass the Mustere of the States anyway.
So it's really neither here nor there.
But personally.
But don't you think you're talking specifically towards the ban on gay marriage?
Excuse me, correct?
I mean, is that what kind of set you off?
That's just one thing I have a disagreement with, but that's not the big one.
I mean, there's actually probably too much to, you know, I'll fill up your show.
But basically, I feel like, in a nutshell, I feel like just, you know, a lot like you, but in a different way, I feel like, you know, the party has become what the Democratic Party was maybe 25 years ago.
Exactly.
And I just don't, you know, i if one if one guy is going to get me there to the same place, only, you know, I just don't think that that's the way they should have went.
Fiscally, socially, immigration, there's a whole lot of things that I disagree with.
Exactly.
And what's lost me with the Republican Party is the blatant social liberalism.
I mean, you've got candidates that are open, unapologetic social liberals.
And that's the majority of the Republican Party.
I remember that social conservatism was the root of the Republican Party.
And now we've been isolated, in my view.
I mean, you've got Duncan Hunter, like I've stated, he is the only true conservative Republican candidate.
And you were just stipulating to me that you don't even know the man because he hasn't gotten any press coverage.
And I think that is a deliberate attempt at suppressing the conservative movement, in my view.
And as a matter of fact, you have a lot of conservatives on BTR specifically that are claiming to be conservative that go completely against the conservative ideology or the conservative principles.
And you see, this is what's getting me.
And this is why, I mean, I'm not only hated by people on the left, I'm now getting garbage from people supposedly on the right because they know that I see right through them.
I mean, these people have made it socially acceptable to go ahead and just kind of redefine the conservative principles and put a conservative label on themselves so they can sell their blog, you know, or sell their, you know, a little political persuasion.
I mean, they're disguising themselves as conservatives.
Well, pundits are a diamond dozen.
You know, that's the truth.
You know, and that's why, you know, with what we do, we don't even get into it as far.
You know, you have a very serious show.
You talk about important things, you know, things that are important to you.
And, you know, what we do is a little bit more lighthearted, but we get salient now and again.
I heard your show many times.
I like it.
I mean, as a matter of fact, and that's all we wanted to do was just have some fun.
You know what I mean?
Absolutely.
And there's, you know, the three of us on there, we all come from different points of view.
And, you know, so we all get our digs in.
But, you know, as far as you and the complaints you're getting and the, you know, and the attacks and stuff like that, I just have one thought.
You really, you know, there's a lot of people out there because they don't know.
They don't understand what you mean by, you know, social liberal or even feminist.
You know, the idea that the ideas that you're trying to convey, at least from what I've heard, that you seem to be blanketing, you know, in other words, painting with a broad brush.
Well, you know why I do that?
Because it's the majority.
So I think that every group is defined by their majority.
And I mean, as much as Steph, who just called in and tried to deny the fact that there's a social problem.
Listen, I grew up in a very conservative home.
My parents were fundamental Baptists.
And this was back in the 70s during that basically revival time in early 80s.
And so I know exactly where you're coming from.
I really do.
I understand what you're trying to say.
But I think maybe a good idea is that if you have a show where you explain what you mean when you call some you know what what is a feminist?
You know what I mean?
What type of feminism do you have a problem with?
Things like that.
I mean, if you would explain yourself, I don't think you'd get all of the hate rhetoric aimed right back at you.
Well, it's not so much the message, in my opinion, as your delivery.
You know what I mean?
So it sounds very angry.
You know what I mean?
It is angry, sir.
I mean, I'm witnessing the demise of the American family, and I'm witnessing the social norm, the social norm of what used to be outcasted not too long ago.
I mean, you were shunned back in my day when you had a child out of wedlock.
Now it's okay to have like three or four or five of them.
And I live in Texas, sir, and this is a big, big epidemic where I'm at.
And I know it's a big epidemic in most dense metropolis states.
And the only thing that's keeping the American family alive, in my view, is the fact that we've got people in middle America that still believe in these conservative values.
And if we don't make those conservative values the norm again, I think that we're going down a slippery slope of Sodom and Gomorrah, if you will.
You know, times do change.
Now, that doesn't mean they always change for the better.
But, you know, one of the things that, you know, the left, they're the left.
They're never going to agree with us.
Okay.
And for the longest time, you know, for 50 years before conservatives really had a voice, you know, I'd say before the Reagan era, we really had to fight and we really had to explain ourselves because we didn't have a friend in the media.
Sure.
And we don't have one now either.
Radio.
Right.
Well, there was no talk.
I'm talking about the media as a whole.
There was no talk radio.
There was no Fox News.
There wasn't any of that where you could even get a word in edgewise.
So we really had to explain everything.
And I think we're coming to that point again.
We're coming to that point where, you know what, the conservative message has been lost.
We're not winning hearts and minds anymore.
Okay.
And we've got to tone down the rhetoric and show people and explain conservatism again and not try to shove it down their throats and yell at them and call them names.
You know what I'm saying?
So that's, you know, take it for what it's worth.
That's how I feel about it.
But well, I mean, all I'm simply trying to do is put some attention on the problem.
Now, I mean, I agree that, you know, if people disagree with me, that's fine.
This is America.
You know, we have that freedom.
But you see, what I get is not discourse.
Denying the Real Problem00:04:39
Okay.
I get nothing but vile hatred.
And you're saying I should explain myself.
I'm trying to explain myself on a consistent basis, particularly on this subject of feminism.
And what I mean by feminism, I acknowledge the feminists at the turn of the 20th century that aided the woman the right to vote, that aided the woman the right to work, and I commend those patriotic women.
I'm talking about the feminists of the 60s that have corrupted the woman mind.
You're talking about the Steinems and you're talking about them.
And, you know, and I agree with you.
I wholeheartedly agree with you.
You know, I was just in a bookstore on Sunday, and I walked past a book by Maureen Dowd called Are Men Really Necessary?
Oh, yeah.
And that's what you're talking about.
Absolutely.
I totally agree with you.
You know, it it's vile.
You know, it's it's acidic.
You know, they have this hatred.
And it seems like anything that we consider good, they think the opposite.
But again, it's not the way to reach people, like Steph.
In your opinion, she may be unreachable.
Absolutely.
And believe it or not, she's abiding by the conservative principle that I'm just sitting here trying to relay to the folks, and yet she still thinks that I want women beaten up or something.
I have stated over and over.
I've never advocated violence towards women.
I've never advocated this ridiculous notion that women belong in the kitchen barefoot and pregnant.
I've never stated that.
I believe that women have every right that a man has.
I'm just simply stating that there's a value system that comes along whenever you get married and you have a family.
And the only way that we're going to be able to perpetuate this mentality that, look, we need to raise our children properly.
And if we don't, let's not wonder why they're going into school and killing children.
And let's not wonder why they're going into shopping malls during the holidays and killing people.
Let's not wonder why our teenage children are becoming a bunch of sexual deviants when we have a majority of broken homes and broken families.
And this is the majority.
This is the social norm.
And I don't think that we should embrace this as just a change, and this is what we have to deal with.
I don't think so.
If we do that, I think we're going to lose our very country because it was the American family that kept this country together.
It's the American family that gives people the drive to go out, work 10 hours a day, put food on the table, have good times, that sort of thing.
I just don't understand.
You and I both know that that's what we would consider the ideal situation.
And God knows, we live in a Jerry Springer world.
And this is what I'm talking about.
And like I said, probably 85, 90% of what you say, but I could say, you know what, I may not say it the same way, but I agree with you.
But I think the delivery has a lot to do with the message being rejected.
And I could possibly agree with you to that because I do use a lot of extreme language.
I try to apply excessive linguistic pressure whenever I'm on this little forum here.
I try to utilize that in hopes of gaining attention to the problem.
Now, what I find is that you've got typically females that just do not want to acknowledge the fact that this is a problem.
And this goes back to Steph, who was just completely denying that there's a problem.
I mean, you heard that, right?
She was just completely denying that there's a problem.
From what I heard, it sounded like, because I've listened to a few of your shows, and from what I, you know, like I said, you know, I can decode what you're saying because, you know, I come from that background.
You know, where I'm at today is a little bit different, but I can decode what you're saying.
And I don't think she can.
You know what I'm saying?
I think there's a disconnect between you and a lady like Steph because I just don't think she's getting your message.
Drawing Lines on Liberty00:04:40
Because a lot of what she was saying really was kind of off the point of what you were talking about.
And that is my point.
And that is my point when it comes to providing any kind of civil discourse on this subject matter.
Now, and look, and I'll accept all the bad words and the logical fallacies, personal attacks.
I mean, that, hey, I'll accept that.
But what I want and what I'd like is for people to talk about this and not just deny it and not just deny it's happening.
And that's what most people in the world today are are doing.
They're just turning a blind eye.
Like Steph, she was saying, hey, hey, it doesn't happen in my backyard, so it's not happening.
Right.
And a lot of things, too, and I call it sensationalism, but when you say things like, you know, true conservative, you know, I consider myself a pretty conservative guy.
You know, but I don't agree with maybe three things, you know, in the ultra-hardline conservative belief system.
Now, I'm a combat veteran, you know, I'm pro-gun, and you go right down the line.
Thank you for your service, by the way, sir.
Go ahead.
Oh, no problem.
Thank you.
But, you know, you can go right down the line, but because of life experience and having some, you know, personal experience with some things, you know, I'm more understanding, I should say, of, say, and this, you know, we may get into it over this, but I'm more understanding over, say, like the gay lesbian situation.
So well, look, I don't, I'm not like the hardline conservative that wants to, and believe me, I've talked to them, I've seen them.
They just don't want to accept that whatsoever.
And to me, I think there is a line drawn.
I think that open homosexuality that's in front of children and in front of the public, I don't think that we should tolerate that.
And at the same time, sexual behavior in front of children would be bad.
Yeah, and I was just about to make that point.
Heterosexual open sexuality in front of children and in the public isn't good either.
But I am not trying to legislate what people do in their bedrooms.
I mean, this is America.
If you want to participate in deviant activity and you were over the age of, or over the legal age, I mean, this is your country.
This is your right, and you can do that.
I'm not one of these conservatives that want to go in your bedroom and find out what you're doing because I could care less.
All I care about is that we don't have it open in society and having that as the social norm.
Because what most homosexuals don't seem to understand is that because they're out here open and most open homosexuals, believe me, I live in Texas.
I go to Austin all the time.
I mean, it is blatantly open out there.
What these people don't understand is that they're relaying a message to young people that young people just don't really understand.
And you see, what's happening is you're developing a trend that is making this type of activity the social norm.
Now, do I believe that people are just homosexual or lesbian and that's all there is to it?
Sure.
But do I believe that it should be open in society as if a regular everyday American couple?
Absolutely not.
No, I'm not, you know, I'm definitely not for deviant behavior.
You know, whatever anybody's definition of that would be, especially in the public, what I was referring to was, you know, I think issues like, oh, gay or lesbian marriage, I think that should be left up to the states personally.
Well, I think that what George in that area, I think what George W. Bush was trying to do by Initiating that amendment towards gay marriage is just to facilitate a debate about the American family, in my view, because I think he knew he wasn't going to get it passed.
Everybody knew that.
But I think that he tried to set the debate.
I mean, he's got a debate going.
And that's an issue just like abortion, or any kind of inroads you're trying to make to ban it, you're definitely going to spark a debate or even the gun issue.
Insurance for Same-Sex Couples00:02:14
But like I said, I know gay and lesbian couples.
And it really hit home to me a little while ago, a few weeks ago, when one of my friends, she's in a lesbian relationship.
I'm from Pennsylvania.
We don't have, you know, there's not much.
In fact, if I were in a relationship like that, I wouldn't live in Pennsylvania.
Let's just put it that way.
Okay.
But, you know, she was looking for a job and I was trying to help her find a job.
And, you know, her partner has a job and they have a child together, which they adopted.
And, you know, I know these people.
They're good people.
You know what I mean?
They're friends of mine.
You know, it's just not the prototypical traditional family.
You know what I'm saying?
But, you know, I know how they're raising this girl.
You know, I know that they're instilling morals and values in her.
And actually, my friend is quite conservative.
But, you know, it really hit home when I said, you know, it was sort of a foot-and-mouth situation where I said, well, you know, if you don't need to have insurance for this job, you'll probably get paid more.
I said, if you can be on, you know, your partner's insurance.
And she said, well, I'll definitely need the insurance.
And, well, you know what?
That's not even a possibility for her in Pennsylvania.
You know, there's no, you know, what would you call any kind of union or, you know what I'm trying to say?
The words slip in my mind right now.
Sure, sure.
I mean, they're not on their partner's insurance.
You know, and I'm thinking to myself, you know what?
They have a child, you know, and what's more important?
You know what I'm saying?
What's that important?
You know, that that child is covered?
Or are, you know, morality being imposed on this family?
You know what I mean?
Well, that's when it kind of really hit home to me.
Justice System Trends00:16:13
Well, that's a touchy issue because, first of all, I know that we have a lot of unwanted kids and unwanted children due to the fact that these social ills have become the social norm.
Now, I know there's a lot of homosexuals and lesbians that adopt children.
And I'm not going to say that I accept it, but I can understand.
I think that any kind of a home and a legitimate home that a children can grow up in is something that is a little bit better than an orphanage or some kind of group home or something like that.
But I'm not.
It's a train wreck.
As a foster care, for instance, is a train wreck.
That's just terrible.
That's a failed system.
A lot of abuse going on in the foster system.
Yeah, and I believe it too.
And it's a major problem, but I think that we need to solve it at the end of the social ramifications of everything.
You see, and this comes back to my point about the feminist movement.
Now, the feminist movement has basically made the woman believe that it's just okay to just go ahead and be sexually irresponsible.
And if she gets pregnant, either she can have an abortion or she can dump it off.
And, you know, there's a big phenomenon of people having children, the younger generations having children and dumping them off on the parents that raised them.
I mean, this is a big phenomenon here.
Yeah, well, you know what?
It takes two to tango, my friend.
It does.
You know, there's just as many men responsible for these children being born as the woman.
Well, look, I'll agree.
I'll agree that, you know, men need to be responsible too.
Men need to step up and be a man.
That's the problem.
But at the same time, we do have a gender-biased justice system that can basically, a woman can just go in and demand child support from this man.
And if he doesn't pay child support, he can go to jail.
So I don't agree with the fact that somehow if a woman gets pregnant, she's on her own.
I mean, that's just a farce, and that's not accurate.
Because, I mean, I'm telling you, women have more right to child support.
As a matter of fact, a woman can literally cheat on her husband and still obtain custody of the children.
I mean, a woman can be a prostitute, literally, a legitimate prostitute, and the court of law will look highly on that because they'll say, oh, well, at least she's trying to feed her children.
I'll pull up some case.
Give me your email or send me your email.
I will send you these cases.
This is happening in our justice system.
I mean, this is a tender.
I don't, you know what?
It's, you know, it's so screwed up out there that, you know, I'm not.
That was a knee-jerk reaction.
It's probably true.
You know, you can send that to gorilla guys at Gmail, by the way.
Okay.
I'll put it in the chat room here at the end of the show here.
Okay, we'll do it.
But now that I had a second to think about it, I don't doubt it, you know, because there are some really screwed up judges out there.
But on the whole, not on the whole, I should say, but I would say, you know, when it comes to the courts and things like that, when those cases happen, okay, they get huge media attention.
And, you know, everybody thinks, well, that's screwed up.
How could you give the kids to a prostitute when they like the situation you said instead of the father, unless the father is the penth.
You know what I mean?
Yeah.
I mean, this is what I'm talking about.
This is why I believe that the feminists have won.
I mean, they have made a gender-biased justice system.
I mean, a perfect example, you remember Deborah LeFave?
I said this last night.
Do you remember that, Broad?
She was a blonde bimbo that utilized her teaching position to basically screw a little 13-year-old boy.
Yeah, yeah, there's been a couple of those.
Yeah, sure.
Yeah.
Okay.
And what happened was, is that she got probation for this statutory rape case.
And obviously, that wouldn't be the same with a man.
And right now, like you said, that's exactly right.
But, you know, I agree with you.
You know, whatever, you know, a man would have gotten for doing that to a 13-year-old girl in a teaching position, that's what she should have got.
But I couldn't help but think every time one of those cases come up was, you know, when I was 13, 14 years old, where were those teachers?
Well, I mean, you know what?
I mean, i i as funny as that sounds, I just there's just no way that I can accept a a female doing that, corrupting a young man's mind like that.
I mean, look, if i i if a 13-year-old uh it I mean, that's 13 years old.
It's not like she was, you know, messing around with like 16, 17-year-old.
I mean, this is this is a 13-year-old kid.
I mean, I don't even think he's probably hit puberty at that time.
And just to underscore my point, she revoked her, or excuse me, she violated her probation recently because she was talking some sort of sexual perverted conversation with another minor who was about 14, 15, something like that.
And there was a I mean, it was all over MSNBC about two or three weeks ago.
Yeah.
And the hearing was on there, and I was expecting the judge to throw this ditzy, blonde-headed, ridiculous excuse for an educator in jail, but did they throw her in jail?
Absolutely not.
I have seen cases where, you know, women in a teaching position have actually served some time.
And rightfully so.
But you see, isn't that the fundamental root of supposed feminism is equality?
I mean, I don't see equality here.
Absolutely.
Actually, no.
Maybe at first under, you know, with suffrage, yes.
But it's been perverted, you know, like you said, by certain people over time, and it's not equality anymore.
You know, it's special treatment.
And then that gets, I guess, to the root of what you're trying to say here.
But, you know, but girls, or I should say, you know, women like Steph, you know, they, you know, I don't know Steph, okay.
But believe it or not, she's she's pretty conservative.
I mean, she's pretty conservative from where I'm standing.
I mean, I've never even said anything bad towards this female.
I mean, she's been married, from what I understand, 10 years.
Her husband, who is serving in the military, I think in Iraq or one of those theaters of combat, which I appreciate, by the way.
Thank you very much.
And I just don't understand how she can deny the fact that this social phenomenon is happening.
And you see, I blame the feminist movement once again because it corrupts the woman mind into absolutely not having any type of debate about subject matters pertaining towards women.
Right.
Well, like I said, you know, it's.
Even if there's substance backing this up, go ahead.
And hold on just one second.
I want to, you know, Fred, you know, he's been sitting on the line here for a good hour.
Oh, good for it.
Good for it.
And I'm kind of mad at the man because he made me look like an obnoxious jerk on his show, which I don't appreciate.
But I'll go ahead and let him on the line because he was actually on the line for about an hour and a half last evening.
So I'm going to go ahead and let him on.
Hopefully he has some substance to go in.
His mother was a feminist, so go ahead, Fred.
What's going on, man?
How's it going, Gus?
How you doing?
I'm fine.
Good, good.
I won't apologize for that because I'd probably do the same thing again.
But you're a gentleman and a scholar for taking my call.
So go ahead.
You heard the conversation.
I did.
I did.
A couple things.
I mean, I'm still of the opinion that you don't really know what feminism is.
There's a lot of different societal ills, and you seem to want to blame them on the specter of feminism.
But I wanted to ask you a question That you touched on slightly, but um I just wanted to well tell you a quick story and ask you a question based on it.
I have a I have a close friend who's um Somali by birth.
Okay.
She grew up in Kenya.
Her family's uh Muslim, right?
Uh she upper class family.
She went to uh private schools, uh college.
Her she um she and all all her very large family, there's like eighteen siblings.
Her and all her uh sisters and brothers, they studied abroad.
They went to they're really smart.
They went to the best schools.
They grew up watching MTV Europe.
They're sophisticated, multilingual, college educated, lawyers, doctors.
They're spread all over the globe now.
Now here's here's the here's the punchline on that story.
The family back home is getting far more conservative.
And the father is basically intimating that the girls, the women, should come back home, go live in a hut and have like 20 kids each.
And this is a total new thing.
And the reason I brought it up is because you had said that the Western cultures, you know, that the Western cultures are being twisted by feminism or whatever you're saying.
But I would want to ask you as a conservative, we have cultures in the non-West part of the world that used to be highly secular and highly westernized, including the scourge of feminism or whatever you're ranting about.
And now those cultures are becoming more conservative and more in line with Islamic, fundamentalist Islamic cultures.
And I find that a really scary trend.
You can see it in what happened in Palestine.
And I was just wondering what your thoughts are on that.
Because I really respect my friend.
I'm pretty close to her.
And to see somebody that grew up watching the same music videos that I did, and basically having a very Western kind of attitude towards things, become afraid to go home because the social tide has gone the other direction to me is really scary.
What's your thought on that?
Well, first of all, fundamentalist Islam is something that is just completely theocratic.
And I've stated this on previous shows that you will never hear me say anything religious motivated on my show.
As a matter of fact, it's pretty much political, if not social.
I'm talking about social conservatism.
I'm not talk I mean the the religion sort of goes hand in hand with it in that particular culture, but these are people that probably are probably more secular than you give them credit for.
So it's basically a social trend.
It's basically like come back home, put on a burqa, go have a lot of kids and do the traditional thing.
But that's not based on secularism.
That is obviously based on theocratic ideology.
No, it's not obviously based on that.
It's based on a social conservatism.
Here, in this country, social conservatism is based on Christian principles, family principles that you're talking about.
I never stated anything about religion.
I just said that conservatives believe in a God.
I don't ever say what God you should believe in.
I think your actual words were no matter conservatives believe that there is one God regardless of your religious beliefs.
Yeah.
So it's like you're it's like Stephen Colbert made a statement like that as a parody of Conservatives where he said there's you know whether you're a Muslim, a Jew, a Christian or or anything else, there's many paths to salvation through Jesus Christ.
Well, I never even mentioned I never mentioned Jesus Christ.
It's a joke.
It's a joke.
Okay.
But the point I'm making is very simple.
If you know to adopt your to adopt your social ideology, there's a positive influence to this supposedly decadent Western culture.
And the positive influence on the world is to get people away from these dangerous ideologies.
Do you disagree with that?
Well, I mean, I'll agree in the sense of Islamic fundamentalism.
But as far as social conservatism as a social value system in America, I don't see where that's hurting society.
On the contrary, I think the complete opposite is happening.
When you're talking about decadence and indulgence and everything that I've stipulated that the feminists and liberals have asserted on our society has basically made the social ills a social norm.
And that's my point.
Well, let me ask you this.
Let me ask you this, okay?
If you take that point to something practical like crime, right?
Okay.
The crime rate's gone down dramatically in the past 15 years.
Right?
Okay.
But the social decadence level in terms of music, gangster rap, all that stuff, all the most decadent forms of that type of pop culture are much more in the forefront, much popular, much more popular than they were.
That would seem to be in direct contradiction to what you just said.
Well, there's a lot of variables, I think, that go into that, too.
It has nothing really to do with, I think that, and I'm pretty sure I'm right about this, but we've seen unprecedented prosperity for the last 20 years or so, and I think that has a lot to do with crime going down too.
Absolutely.
I mean, that's debatable, but there are multiple factors.
There's definitely multiple factors.
But here's the thing.
Here's the thing.
Ghost is saying that there's a causal relationship between an ideology and an outcome.
And I just gave you an example that even by your debunking of it, where you say there's multiple factors, that works to make my point.
The point is that the ideology is not creating the outcome.
The ideology of decadent music, violent video games, hip-hop, violent movies is not creating an outcome that's negative.
I disagree.
In that arena, it's not.
I disagree.
I think that it's not.
But that crime would be going up, wouldn't it?
Well, crime is going down is because we had a humongous spike in crime whenever, remember when Tupac and Biggie Smalls and all them was around?
Ideology vs Outcomes00:07:52
I mean, there was a big traumatic trend in gang-related activity.
I mean, you had gang- Yeah, but it wasn't really, that's my point.
My point is it's not because of that music.
It's the other way around.
And to claim the other way around is that the gang activity, the music is a reflection of the gang activity and the crime.
Absolutely.
Absolutely not.
I mean, and let me explain.
You know, that there were gangs that were popping up all over suburban America during this influx of gangster rap.
Not only gangster rap, but you had gangster movies, you had uh movies that embraced as opposed to give an actual reflection of the lifestyle.
I mean, they actually made it chic to go out and create this uh h hood mentality in suburban America.
If that was if if you're if the example that you're saying is true, then the crime rate would be greatly increased over the over the time since then.
I think that we've learned.
I think society has learned from you know the mid-nineties.
I mean, there was a traumatic spike in in gang-related activity, murders, and all that.
You can look at statistics.
I just think it's fluctuating.
Okay.
So as a social conservative, you believe, and I'm not going to try to convince you otherwise.
As a social conservative, you believe that the ideologies come first, like feminism or decadence or something like that.
And then the negative outcomes come second.
That the that because somehow people have all read some book somewhere that tells them what feminism is, when you can't even articulate what feminism is.
But they've made a decision to go live a certain way.
They've made a decision to go live a certain way based on that.
Hold on, Fred, is that what you're saying?
Don's being quiet for a minute.
Go ahead.
Yeah, go ahead.
I'm just saying, in my point of view, and this is like I said before, guys, I think this is my, you know, you know, kind of viewing things from the middle here.
But I think I hear, I'm listening to both you guys, and I agree and disagree with both of you.
Okay.
Jeff is it?
Fred.
Fred, I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Fred.
My name's Dan, by the way.
Nice to meet you, too.
Now, I agree with you that media does not necessarily create social trends.
In other words, music doesn't create violence.
But in certain instances, it does.
Okay.
Just one.
Just one example of when that happened.
Fine.
That would be Columbine.
You know, those guys.
I'll do the it's so Maryland Manson albums.
Hey, Fed, listen to you asked me for one.
I gave you one.
And based on everything I've read, these guys were greatly influenced by the violence in the media and whether it be video games, music, the music they listen to, the video games they played, things like this.
And these guys came from pretty affluent homes.
Yeah.
Did you ever read that?
Did you ever read anything to do with that?
Did you ever read In Cold Blood?
No, I haven't.
Because Marilyn Manson wasn't around back then.
I think you had to listen to to get your evil music, you had to listen to like Elvis or like Lead Belly or something like that.
Yeah, but you didn't see the prevalence of school shootings.
You didn't see the prevalence of drive-bys.
That's right.
But see, there's, you know, back when Elvis was on TV back then, you know, and he started shaking his hips, that had a much more, you know, a much greater impact on people than it would today.
You know what I'm saying?
So to say, that's the same point.
I mean, because conservatives during Elvis's time were complaining about that.
And they were using basically the same the same ideas that because Elvis was shaking his hips, that uh women would be you know, people would come come back from the concert uh pregnant on drugs and uh doing crimes.
Well, look at look at what look at what's happened, Fred.
I mean, look at what's happened.
I mean, you know, you compare the rates of crime, the rates of teenage pregnancy, the rate of single-parent pregnancy.
You compare all those numbers.
It's just a straight arrow upwards.
Here's the thing.
You're making my point for me because to suggest to suggest that there's a connection between that and soft things like media and music, it doesn't if you look at the decli it again, I'll go back to the same thing I started with.
If you look at the decline of crime in the past 20 years, that breaks the trend, doesn't it?
If there was a rise, there was a rise of crime in the 60s and 70s, and then and then the eighties it sort of reached a peak, and then it fell off dramatically after that, then it would that to a scientific point of view, that would indicate that there's no connection between the what's happening in the music.
Again, you know, I agreed with you and then gave you one instance where I disagreed.
Here's where I'm going to be.
You used it as an example of a causal relation that was never proven or shown in any way.
It was just a speculation.
They wrote what?
They wrote, I picked up a Marilyn Manson album today, so now I'm going to go kill people?
I don't think so.
Okay?
Well, what made them do it then, Fred?
I mean, you explained.
You seem to be the expert.
Why did they do it?
You're kind of taking what I say out of context.
I would probably look at the families that they grew up in.
I would probably look at an early talking over me all day, Fred.
Now you're not letting me finish a thought.
Well, didn't you ask me?
You just asked me a question, no?
Well, look, you're not letting me finish a thought.
Now, you're telling me I'm wrong, but you're not letting me finish what I'm saying.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
I agree with you.
It's not just music.
You're saying it's not music at all.
I'm saying no.
That's one of many things.
Okay.
It's like a 9-11 conspiracy theory, right?
The 9-11 conspiracy theories, you can debunk it like a million ways.
And what they always say is, well, if you don't know what happened, it must be this.
But if there's a list of possibilities of what happened, the government doing it is like 1,005 on that list.
So if I was going to consider the reasons why a young man or woman would murder multiple people, the music thing would be like 500th on the list.
The first thing would be like sexual abuse, you know, or physical abuse in the home.
That would be not.
There was no sexual abuse or any kind of thing.
We know that.
It's been proven, Fred.
We know everything about it.
You know everything that happened behind classes.
Everything was exposed because believe me, this was a media circus when this unfortunate incident happened, and they delved into everybody's life that was involved in this.
Even the victims of the people.
Music and Mass Murders00:02:32
I'm not going to tell you that.
There are people that are still collecting money from priests that they were molested by in the 50s.
You see, you're all over the place, Fred.
No, I'm making a simple statement.
But you're all over the place.
First you went for music, then to Columbine.
Now you're talking about 9-11.
If you think you know that every single shooter in Columbine was not sexually or physically abused, you have been sold something.
That's what I'm saying.
There's no way to know that.
Unless they were caught by social services, if they lived in a wealthy, semi-gated community, then nobody's going to know anything, are they?
Well, that's a pretty good excuse for just about everything, Fred.
But I mean, but no, but you're claiming to know something that's unknowable.
I'm saying I don't know one way or the other.
Well, you don't know what's public knowledge.
How is it public knowledge if it's private knowledge?
That makes no sense.
If it's private knowledge, it can't be public knowledge, can it?
Listen, buddy, listen.
What you're saying is that, you know, okay, let's get down to breast tax here.
You know, you called to talk about feminism and what ghost has said about that in the past.
But let me just ask you a couple questions because we're not getting anywhere with this.
Obviously.
You know, think that having a mother and a father stay together in the same house with their children until death do us apart.
Do you think that's a good thing?
Yeah, of course.
I mean, unless the and wait, wait, with caveats.
If the father's abusing the mother, in some cases.
I'm talking about the children.
Well, Ozzy Harriet never really existed.
But yeah, I mean, that's the ideal.
That's the ideal situation.
I grew up in Ozzy and Harriet Land, my friend.
I did too.
I did too.
And you know what happened?
My mom passed away when I was in high school.
That wasn't planned.
That wasn't planned or anything.
So even in a perfect situation, until death drew us apart or whatever, there's still problems sometimes.
You know what I mean?
It's not a magic bullet.
No, no, I'm sorry that that happened, but in my case, it didn't.
My parents are still together.
I'm 36 years old.
Okay.
Evolving Views on Feminism00:16:24
Here's the thing.
I think when you get down past, when you get to all the rhetoric, if you could cut through that, I think that's all Ghost is saying.
In an ideal world, in an ideal situation, without abuse, without neglect, without all the problems that come through that happen to people, It's a good thing to have a family stay together.
And I wanted to ask or basically confront Fred with this notion.
You're saying that ideology has nothing to do with the social ills of society.
No, I'm not saying that.
I'm not saying that.
I'm simply, it's not an either-or thing.
It's that you're putting way too much weight with ideology.
Well, that's the same thing.
That's the same thing.
You don't even know what feminism is, and you think that people have been brainwashed by something you can't even articulate.
I've articulated it very well.
You don't know what it is.
You don't know what it is.
What is feminism, Fred?
It's empowering women.
I will explain it.
If somebody is a subconscious prostitute, as you so wonderfully say all the time, that's the exact opposite of a feminist, okay?
If somebody's using their body and their sexuality and their whatever feminine ways or whatever to get money or to get security or whatever and is using it cynically, that's the opposite of a feminist.
But you see, what you're failing to acknowledge, Fred, is that that's what it's evolved into.
That's my point.
Your point is, if it's evolved into that, then it's not feminism anymore.
They're still utilizing feminism as the label.
I mean, the empowerment of women.
I'm a survivor.
I don't need a man.
Maureen Dowd, men are useless, or whatever the name is.
Maureen Dowd's book, that title is a joke.
It's a joke.
And you guys are so punch-drunk from Republican talking points that you can't even look at a book cover like that.
I think you're calling Dan, right?
I've read enough Maureen Dowd.
Dan, you said it was vile.
She writes humor.
It may not be your cup of tea.
It may be liberal, but it's not vile.
But it's influential.
It's your cup of tea.
It's not my cup of tea.
I don't read Maureen Dowd.
I find her tone too frivolous.
That's my point.
Her tone is too silly for me.
She's silly.
She writes humor, you know?
Yeah, but there's a lot of hate behind what she says, even though it's funny.
No, there isn't.
It sure does.
It's hate to you because it's not to go back and take an English composition and rhetoric course because it's not when I read Maureen Dowd.
Well, I missed the mind-reading course that you took.
So I take people.
All right, all right, all right.
Words on a page, words mean things.
I know they do, but they usually mean what's actually there.
No, that's not true, Fred, because you see, that's the same thing you could say about communism.
I mean, communism, man, it was only words.
It was only words, and look what happened.
Right?
I mean, can you deny that?
I mean, it was only a book.
It started as a book, and then it was.
And then what?
And then what?
It evolved into what?
It evolved into a political movement.
Well, that's my point about feminism, Fred.
Guns and Fortune connected to it.
I mean, but you're proving my point with all due respect, Fred.
That's what I'm talking about when it comes to feminism.
I understand feminism.
My point is very simple.
You don't know what feminism is.
So to label the negative trends in society now where women are doing things that are a throwback to an era where they were dominated by men, where men paid their bills.
When men paid their bills and stuff, is to completely not understand what feminism is.
What areas of feminism would you disagree with?
What area of feminism would I disagree with?
What particular parts of the feminist movement do you have a disagreement with?
None of it, really.
I mean, there's no pro-life?
I am pro-life.
I mean, I'm pro-choice.
Okay, well, then you're not really a conservative.
I never said I was a conservative.
I'm as far from a conservative as I could be.
Okay, sorry you got that.
But you see, Fred, go ahead, 717.
The only problem I have with feminism is the far-left fringe of feminism, which Rush Limbaugh has made to seem like is feminism.
Like Andrea Dworkin, who says that all heterosexual sex is rape.
That's just some insane academic stuff.
But the fact that the right wing has found that one blurb that says that and stuck it on feminism as if that's what it's all about is ridiculous.
And Fred, look, I understand.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
717, you've been patient.
I'm just saying.
Now I understand.
See, I made a an error in not judgment, but you know, I guess I I assumed that you were calling in as a as a as a fellow conservative and and we were disagreeing on you know uh ideas of conservatism.
But now now that I know you're a liberal, I know why I'm not afraid of the people.
I'm not a liberal.
I'm a progressive.
Say the last word.
Liberalism.
You can change the name, but it means the same thing.
No, it actually doesn't, but you know, feel free.
It really does, Fred, with all due respect.
With all due respect, you're ignoring what feminism means, so why wouldn't you ignore what progressive politics?
You see, you're still thinking that feminism is the same as the feminists in the turn of the 20th century, and they want equality.
I'm thinking feminism is the same as the feminism of the 60s and 70s.
Feminism is the same as the TV show as the TV show Maud, as Gloria Steinem, if you actually read her, as Ms. Magazine from the 70s, if you actually read it, you find out what feminism is.
It's not that anything.
I have a confession to make.
I never read Ms. Magazine.
That's a shocker.
I'm on broke for it, okay?
I actually think of it as a badge of honor.
I'm sure you do, you know, because it's like somebody that looks at ignorance as a badge of honor.
I mean, you're making my point.
Fred, no, here's the thing.
No, Fred, come on.
I read Bias by Brian Gold, what's his name, Goldberg, or whatever.
You know, I read it's a really crappy book, but I read it because I wanted to know what the other side was talking about.
I think Mein Kampf's and Karl Marx's books, too.
That doesn't mean I have to agree with them.
But you see, that's my point, though.
That's my point.
If you haven't read something and say that you know what's in it, Fred is not being intellectually curious, is it?
Fred, I don't have to go to a porn movie to know what it's going to be about, Fred.
Hold on just a second.
You see, Fred, you're not, you see, I understand maybe you have a bias towards feminism because your mother was a feminist.
That's why I have it.
But you're not acknowledging the fact that you acknowledge with communism.
Remember, these are just words.
These were just concepts.
I understand that.
But look, if the feminist movement was running the show, then all the women in America would have hairy armpits right now.
They'd all be wearing earth tones.
And we'd all be no, and we'd all be in encounter groups and hitting each other with bats, you know, soft bats to get out our aggressions.
It would not be.
We would be in the 70s on speed, on acid.
We are not in the 70s on acid.
But you're not understanding, Fred, is that it's evolved into something completely warped, man.
Just say the word different, because if it's evolved into something, it's evolved backwards into something that's the opposite of what it was.
It's evolved into like 1950s style women, you know, shopping for a guy, as you point out, or whatever.
You know, irresponsible, you know, irresponsible sexual practices like the objectification of women's bodies in videos.
You know, 11-year-olds buying thong panties.
But you see, the feminist movement.
This is not feminism.
This is not feminism.
The feminist movement are claiming that woman liberation, Fred.
They are claiming that is woman liberation.
It's not that.
I'm sorry that you don't get it.
I really got to go.
It's been fun, you know?
It was good talking to you, buddy.
All right.
See you later, Fred.
I mean, you see, this is what I'm talking about, man.
I mean, he acknowledged the fact, he acknowledged the fact that communism were, you remember how he was saying that feminism was just words and all this other nonsense?
Trying to relay the same concept to communism, and he'll acknowledge that, well, communism wasn't intended to be this, but it and he tried to stop himself until I continued his rant that it evolved into something completely ridiculous.
Right.
Well, Chris, the fellow that produces our show, I'll use Fred's word.
He's a progressive guy.
Now, we understand each other.
I know where Chris comes from.
Fred and I had a disconnect there because I think he was not listening to my entire points.
But there were some of the things he said that I totally agree with.
I think Fred's a good guy.
I think he's an all right fellow, too, man, but I just think that he's a little hard-headed, and he just doesn't want to acknowledge.
I think he's still stuck in the equality movement of the feminists of 1960, and it's not that way anymore.
And just because it's not that way anymore, he just wants to deny that it's even there.
I mean, and you can look at pop culture, you can look at the mainstream supposed women in society, they're equating woman liberation with sexuality.
Go ahead.
I don't think Fred's hard-headed.
It's just you guys come from total opposite ends of the spectrum as far as ideology.
And you can argue until the cows come home, and you will never, ever be able to see each other's points of view.
And that's what I think.
It may make some interesting debate, but you're not going to solve anything.
Can you agree with me, since you're an outside observer?
Because me and Fred, we have this conversation on a consistent basis because his mother was a feminist, and I'm sure that he's real close to her, and rightfully so.
But when I let's give Fred some, let's give Fred some credit.
His mother may have been a feminist, okay, but he's a grown man.
And he, you know, he, you know, just like me, I differ from my parents.
And he may have some differing opinions from his mother.
So, you know, he agrees with feminism in his own right.
Okay.
No, I just think that he's trying to keep what feminism was alive and trying to deny the fact that feminism has evolved in this corrupt ideology.
And that's all I'm simply stating about Fred is that he just doesn't want to accept it.
He wants to believe that feminism is still something of equality, and there's nothing equal about it.
You guys are oil and water.
It's not that he doesn't want to accept it.
It's just that he can't.
He can't accept it.
Like I said, you guys are coming from complete opposite ends of the ideological spectrum.
So having him on and debating with him, like I said, may make for some interesting conversation, but it's never going to solve anything.
You're never going to get Fred to agree with you.
Never, ever.
Well, I'm not trying to make him agree with me, but I just want him to acknowledge the fact that, look, feminism, I mean, we may have needed it at the turn of the 20th century.
They may have utilized feminism.
Females utilize feminism to facilitate equality in society, but it's gone way overboard, and that's my point.
Every time I...
That's not called feminism.
It was called suffrage.
So, you know, feminism is, you know, I believe it has been, you know, polluted.
Absolutely.
It's just like communism.
I disagree with Fred when it comes to, you know, Maureen Dowd and Gloria Steinem and all that stuff.
I mean, I can't swallow that.
But like I said, that's a disconnect we're always going to have.
And, you know, he thinks he's right.
I think I'm right.
And, you know, that's just the way it is.
You know, it's okay to try to explain why we think we're right.
I mean, that's America.
Sure.
But, you know, I think that like I said, it's a disconnect, and it's just how it's that's just the way it is.
You know, so and I and that's the only reason why I bring this subject matter up because I believe, like I've stated, feminism has evolved into something that, and you can listen to it in the pop culture.
I know he's like an artistic fella, and he likes music, and he doesn't want anybody to label music as any kind of a problem.
He doesn't want anybody to label any kind of artistic expression as any type of a problem.
I grew up in the late 70s, early 80s, and when I was a teenager and all, and I listened to death metal, I listened to thrash metal.
And it didn't make me into a homicidal maniac.
It never even gave me those kind of thoughts.
And I just like the music.
So I don't totally disagree with Fred when it comes to that issue.
But I utilize pop culture as an example of the mentality of the modern-day female.
I mean, look at Beyonce Knowles, and I know that Fred's probably sighing right now because I've used her as an example many times, but she is a pop icon for women.
She's made a lot of money off of it, and at the same time, she utilizes her being empowered as an independent woman, this and that.
That's her whole music.
But then at the same breath, she'll make some songs like, well, you can pay my bills, you can pay my telephone bills, you can pay all my bills, and then maybe we can chill.
And you see, that is what I'm talking about, man.
I mean, the modern-day feminist movement, and maybe I'm taking extreme language with it, but I think that it has turned a modern-day female into a subliminal prostitute because you've got males nowadays.
And believe me, I'm an employer, and I employ a lot of 20-somethings in society, and I talk to them, I take them out to dinner, and that sort of thing.
You've got to keep your employees happy.
And when we have discussions, because a lot of these guys are single, they come to dinner or whenever I flip the bill for a big feast or something, these guys are coming in with great-looking clothes and great-looking.
One kid had a $10,000, $15,000 watch.
And I know that he's spending next week's cash on that sort of thing.
I mean, they're getting $45,000 cars.
I'm going to come to Texas and work to you.
Well, I know for a fact that he is not paying that off of the salary I pay him because that is an expensive watch.
Liberal School Boards00:08:28
But then I ask him, well, why are you buying this stuff, man?
Do you have like a materialistic need that you're trying to fulfill?
And he goes, no, it attracts women.
It attracts women.
I mean, and this is my point.
You know, you know, some guys buy a $15,000 watch, other guys brush their teeth.
You know what I'm saying?
Well, and that's the only thing I want to bring up when it comes to the feminist movement is that, you know, it has evolved into something completely unbelievable.
And they're using the disguise of equality to basically take complete and total domination of not only the American male, but America in general.
And the justice system is a good reflection of that.
I mean, it's a great reflection of that.
I mean, like I've stated, you you will never find a more gender biased justice system that is so imbalanced and so unequal than the American justice system.
And I think it has a lot to do with the feminist movement.
Well, I think it has a lot to do with universities too, because I I work for a well, one of the biggest state universities in the East.
And now they're they're actually my employer.
They write my they write my paycheck.
Now, thank God I'm in medical research, but um so I kind of stay out of the whole uh liberal arts you know atmosphere of the university.
But you know, science is science, let's face it.
But yeah but uh you know at the same time, you know, I see you know you know what is being taught and I see what's being turned out.
And you know, this has been going on for a long time and and that's why you have judges in the justice system.
You know, like I said, broad brushstrokes, right?
It's it's not the justice system, it's judges.
And, you know, you know but but but it's influenced through ideology though.
I mean that's my point.
Ideology begins with in the education system.
It does.
Well actually it begins at home and then you know you either accept what your parents tell you or you don't or you go to school and it it's exactly what your parents taught you or it's completely different and you either you know go with one or go with the other.
But you know it's but you know I think that you know the problem you know as as you as you see it you know and I would agree to a certain extent is you know what's being taught in our major universities.
And not only the major universities, it's in public school too.
I mean I think that feminists and liberals have infiltrated the public education system to the point where they're the the people that write the textbooks.
That's why they're so politically supposedly politically correct.
They've infiltrated the school boards, the teachers union.
I mean it's just unbelievably liberal and feminist.
I mean it's just unbelievable.
And I think that that government-funded bureaucracy is what's perpetuating the things that you see today.
At least in the public school system, it's on the local level.
And the people of a community can have some sway, at least over a school board.
Well, not really.
I mean, you know, I know in my own community, you know, there was some outrage over a certain, you know, over the content of a certain textbook.
We won't get into it because that's an entirely different discussion, but that we actually had shot down.
Because I live in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, which is a very Republican and conservative community and home of the Pennsylvania Dutch country.
Absolutely.
You know, yeah, great part of the country, people, if you've never been to Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
But like I said, when my father, I actually grew up in New Jersey, when my father moved us out here to PA, he was talking to a neighbor, and he was going to register to vote.
And the neighbor knew that.
And he said, if you have any aspirations of getting anything done or getting involved with anything as far as publicly, you better put an R in that box.
So it's been that way for a long time, and it'll probably be that way forever.
But yeah, so I know on the local level as far as the schools are concerned, you can have you can make a difference.
You can have some influence.
But In some areas, it's not.
But you may live in a liberal area where the school board doesn't care what you say.
Absolutely.
As a matter of fact, I live in Texas, and one of the local school boards out here, and this is why I think that private, and this is going to be another show, but we should privatize education.
So, I mean, if you want to be taught this feminist liberal garbage, you can go to the school that does that.
But you've got a school out here that's basically making it okay for same-sex couples at a pre-teenage level to go into middle schools and go to dances and things of that nature.
And they're actually embracing that.
And they're making it such a hot issue on the television that you've got teenagers nowadays basically just making a statement because they think it's the rebellious thing to do to take a same-sex partner to these dances and that sort of thing.
Now, the parents are completely outraged.
I mean, as you can imagine.
This is happening in Texas.
Oh, let me tell you something.
Texas is not as conservative as everybody likes to believe.
I mean, it is.
That's the open carry state.
No, I'm telling you right now.
I mean, Texas is just unbombarded.
You should go to Austin, Texas.
I love Austin, Texas, by the way.
But, I mean, it is so great city, but it is so openly liberal, it's almost pukable.
It's just horrible.
And this is what I'm talking about out here.
I mean, you know, the parents are just, the majority of them are in complete opposition to what's going on just in this scenario with the same-sex couples in middle school.
These are middle school kids.
These are 13, at the most, 13-year-old children taking same-sex couples to dances.
I mean, they don't know what homosexuality really is.
And you see, you've got these liberal and feminist teachers embracing this.
They're embracing it.
And this is what I'm talking about.
And I don't want to get too much on the gay thing.
I actually have a trip to Texas planned for next year, or actually later this year.
Yeah, and be pretty aware of the open liberalism that's out here.
If I'm planning on getting anywhere near the city, I'll be hunting.
Oh, there you go.
Yeah, I was going to say, if you go out there in West Texas, they don't take to that very much.
They'll put you in your place out there if you're liberal, believe me.
But check it out.
I'm going to go ahead and close the show, my man.
It's been great talking to you.
You've had some great points.
You have a show here on Blog Talk Radio, right?
You can go ahead and promote that.
Sure.
Yeah.
It's called Guerrilla News Radio.
We're on Sunday nights at 7 p.m. Eastern.
All right.
And we don't talk about a lot of serious stuff like this, though.
It's a lot of more lighthearted.
Sure.
As a matter of fact, I heard your last episode, and y'all were making fun of the Scientology movement and idiot Tom Cruise, you know, thinking he's some it was great.
I mean, it was absolutely great.
So, yeah, everybody, you know, check out Guerrilla News Radio.
Those are some great guys, and I appreciate your call, man.
Hey, thanks a lot now.
Not a problem.
Take care.
You too.
Well, it's about that time, folks.
I've got about 10 minutes left in the program here.
Conservative Infiltration00:10:56
And I just wanted to stipulate a couple of points.
First of all, regardless of who wants to admit it and who doesn't want to admit it, the feminist movement has evolved into this corruptive tool.
And it's because of the feminist movement disguising equality and liberation that has perpetuated an ideology that perpetuated an ideology that, you know, it's okay for females to go out and have multiple children from multiple different fathers.
It's okay to have multiple different divorces.
And all I'm simply trying to do, folks, is just trying to highlight some attention on this social ill.
That's all I'm doing, and yet you will have people that'll chastise me for it, that'll call me every name in the book.
And I'm not saying any political perspective because both political perspectives seem to hate me now.
I mean, I'm a true conservative.
I'm as conservative as conservative gets.
And here you've got conservatives trying to chastise me, or so-called conservatives chastise me because I just don't believe in their social liberalism.
And I've stated previous.
I'll stated previous.
These are the principles that conservative Republicans abide by.
Conservatives believe that there is a God regardless of your religious beliefs.
Conservatives believe that marriage is the most sacred of all traditions between a man and a woman, and such liberal concepts such as divorce, adultery, and open sexual perversion cannot and should not be tolerated as a social norm in any society.
Conservatives believe that family is the foundation of every society, and broken families are a social ill that should not be accepted as a social norm.
Conservatives believe that all men should pledge unconditional oath to their families and country.
Conservatives believe that females should be respected and loved based on their character and loyalty, not based on their sexuality or the social exploitation of their own gender.
Conservatives believe that abortion is the purest form of murder and should not be tolerated, period.
Conservatives believe that females and males who have multiple children from multiple different partners is a social ill and should not be tolerated as the social norm.
Conservatives believe that children should be raised in a two-parent home and should be shielded from predators and propaganda that will corrupt their developing minds.
The youth is our precious resource for perpetuating the conservative values and they should be commended and embraced when they faithfully follow this value system.
Conservatives believe that we must abide by the laws of the land unless the laws of the land infringe or suppress on our value system.
Conservatives believe in racial equality.
Conservatives believe that open homosexuality and lesbianism should not be tolerated as a social norm in any society.
And let me tell you something, folks.
If you hear people that are claiming to be conservative, that are claiming to be conservative and they're not obliging themselves to these principles, they're not conservative.
They are not conservative.
And if you're a conservative person and you abide by these principles and you hear somebody on BTR or anywhere, if you see politicians that call themselves conservative and don't abide by these principles, then you need to understand that this is an infiltration.
These people are Trojan horses that are labeling themselves conservatives and completely contradicting the social value system that the conservatives abide by.
And we need to take direct action against these people, folks.
You need to call these Trojan horses out for what they are, who they are, and what their agenda is.
And their agenda is social liberalism.
That's right.
Social liberalism.
And if you want to sit here and call yourself a conservative and be in contradiction to these principles, well, take the conservative out of your name.
Take it out of your name.
You are not a conservative.
If you don't believe in the American family, get out of the conservative movement.
If you think it's okay for women to go out and be Miss Liberation and shit out about five or six kids and five or six different fathers, that it's okay to go ahead and have multiple divorces, take the conservative out of your name.
It's ridiculous.
Absolutely disgusting.
And all you people that are claiming that you're conservative and that you don't abide by these principles, then you are not a conservative.
You're a social liberal.
Look at yourself in the mirror and admit it.
Admit it.
And you got some moron in the chat room named MD Conservative, you know, sitting over here tickling his ass crack saying, oh, yeah, you're not a social conservative.
Yeah, right.
You're not a social conservative, you piece of trash.
It's people like you that have corrupted the conservative movement.
It's people like you that have turned conservative against conservative.
It's people like you, MD Conservative, that embrace social liberalism.
And I'm not going to take it.
I am not going to take it.
I'm not.
I'm a social conservative, folks, and I know that I have a high contingent of social conservatives that listen to this show.
I get triple-digit numbers on the live spectrum.
I get triple-digit numbers on the download and the iPodcast and that sort of thing.
And I know a lot of you, I get a lot of good emails from social conservatives that understand where I'm coming from.
That understand that social liberalism is a true agenda that most of these Nimrods posing as conservatives are trying to infiltrate.
And that's all there is to it.
That is all there is to it.
So all you people that are out here calling yourselves conservatives, you know, flapping your little milly mouth gums about, oh, I'm a conservative.
I'm a conservative.
But, you know, I believe in abortion.
No, no, I'm a conservative.
I'm a conservative.
But, you know, it's okay for women to go ahead and shit out eight to ten kids.
It's okay.
It's okay.
It's not okay.
All right?
It is not okay.
It's not okay.
And that's why I had this show, because I'm calling all you so-called conservatives that are corrupting the conservative movement.
I'm calling all of you out.
I'm calling you all out.
Take the conservative out of your name, you piece of trash.
All right?
Take the Kentucky fried chicken grease thumb out of your anal passage and put it in your mouth because that's the only taste that you're going to get.
Piece of trash.
I'm just sick, folks.
I'm sick of this garbage.
I mean, the social liberalism has infiltrated the Republican Party.
And nobody wants to talk about this.
Nobody that claims to be conservative.
Nobody that claims to be Republican wants to talk about how the social liberal ideology has infiltrated the Republican Party.
And they're trying to correlate conservative values with this garbage.
I mean, nobody wants to talk about it.
I mean, the Republican Party will allow a prostate-infected, wrinkled-up piece of trash like Ron Paul to get up on a forum and spew his liberal propaganda, and yet the Republican Party can shut out a true conservative like Duncan Hunter.
Duncan Hunter.
And that's what's unfortunate.
It's absolutely, utterly unfortunate.
And let me tell you something, folks.
If you're a true conservative, we need to stand up.
We need to stick together.
And we need to fight against this infiltration by these Trojan horses that are utilizing the label of conservatism and corrupting it into some sort of social liberal ideology.
We need to stand up against these people.
You need to call into their shows.
You need to write your congressmen that are obliging themselves to this ideology.
You need to do what it takes to let these people know that the conservative movement is alive and well.
It's alive and well.
And long live the conservative movement, my friends.
Because let me tell you something, if we lose the American family, if we end up like Australia, poor Australia, where 75% of marriages end in divorce, we're in some bad shape, my friend.
We're in some really, really bad shape.
And you've got people like Steph Stebb, who is obliging herself to the conservative principles, but she is so blinded by feminism that she doesn't even want to acknowledge the social ills that are happening in our society.
And you see, that's most people, folks, that oblige themselves to this ridiculous feminist garbage.
Anyway, folks, it's been a great show.
Thank everybody for listening in.
Even if you hate me, I thank you for listening in.
I thank for all the callers for providing their insight.
I'm going to be on the air this Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, 9 p.m. Central Time.
So make sure to mark it on your calendars, folks, because that's when I broadcast.
Friday, we're going to be talking about the privatization of education.
And we need to rid the United States of the public education system.
We just need to scrap it.
Anyway, folks, I am out of here.
This is Ghost with True Conservative Republican Radio.
Thank you all for listening.
Get the feminism, and long live the conservative movement.