Candace Owens exposes Emmanuel Macron’s defamation lawsuit as a legally weak PR stunt after he pressured Trump to silence her Becoming Brigitte series, alleging his wife’s past as a man. She ties his legal tactics—backed by intimidating lawyers—to elite cover-ups of child abuse, citing Macron’s ties to convicted molesters and Freud’s role in psychological manipulation. Meanwhile, she dismisses Harvey Weinstein’s conviction as politically motivated, criticizing Me Too’s lack of due process while defending Epstein’s alleged Mossad links, accusing Israel of demonic actions in Gaza. Owens frames her survival of media smears and assassination attempts as proof of truth’s power, urging leaders like Trump to reject hypocrisy and prioritize moral courage over elite control. [Automatically generated summary]
And historically, I'm thinking, you know, all the times we were told that a war ended because of this or because of that.
If this was one element of negotiation of Emmanuel Macron to Trump and the topic of why he was, you know, ostensibly there was to discuss the end of the Ukrainian and Russian war, but you're taking Trump aside and you're asking him to shut up this podcaster in the U.S. I'm wondering if anything that we're told in our history books is real.
He said he was very confused when a leader of the leader of France took him.
He was a nuclear armed country during negotiations for Ukraine and Russia to inquire about whether or not he knew Cannis Owens.
And clearly it was an emergency because it wasn't like Trump called me two days after or a week after.
It wasn't like a side conversation that, oh, let's take care of that.
I was messaged by the intermediary hours after Macron left, maybe even an hour after Macron had left and said, like, we need to get on the phone with you.
Well, first, the person said, somebody very close to the president of the United States is asking me to ask you to stop talking about Brigitte's penis.
unidentified
And I. This is this is the true face of diplomacy.
Kind of didn't even, I kind of questioned whether or not it was even true.
But I liked the person who called me very much.
And I thought maybe I was being a bit short there because I'm nine months pregnant and I'm, or I was at the time, I think, five or six months pregnant.
And I tend to get short the more pregnant I become.
And so I called him back and I just said, can you explain to me what's really going on?
And that individual told me that it was presented to him as a condition of ending the Russian-Ukrainian war.
Like this was something that he brought up in the midst of these negotiations.
That's how it was presented to me from a third party person.
And then I was just completely floored.
And I just took a second, looked at my husband.
And the first thing we said to one another is, no one will ever believe us.
This is beyond the realm of things that could be plausible.
They're going to think I'm making myself and I'm lying.
And even when I did eventually tell the story months later, people were like, there's no way that this could have happened.
And until Trump didn't deny it.
And then, of course, Emmanuel Macron is now suing me.
And he included as a part of a lawsuit, he referred to that phone call and how he believes that presenting it as an element of the Ukraine-Russian war was wrong.
And what's really interesting is my series was based on a book.
I worked with Xavier Poussard, who is a journalist, a very credible journalist in France, who worked on the story for eight years and ended up having to move to Italy, move his family to Italy because of what Brigitte and her husband, you know, France is a whole different political system.
And so journalists that first got wise to the fact that Brigitte Macron kind of didn't exist for 30 years of her life were harassed by the government.
They filed charges against them for first and foremost invasion of privacy.
So there was never a dispute when she was bringing these charges about.
She never brought a charge against people for saying that she was born a man.
And that's what should be made clear to everybody.
Like that's not something that they ever say is not true when it comes down to the legality of it all when they get into courtrooms.
But they first sued for invasion of privacy.
Then they sued for defamation regarding a statement, an error that the woman had made investigating when she said, in my opinion, you know, this document is fake.
But that document actually was real.
It was a birth certificate relating to somebody in the story.
And so it was remarkably petty.
And this is what they do.
They get very legalistic.
We'll keep you in the courtroom.
We'll harass you.
And for Xavier, things were happening where it was, they made, they wanted him to know they were following him and that the Secret Service was keeping an eye on him.
They never actually brought a suit against him until recently, the same time as mine.
They're not suing him for defamation, even though he's the author of the book that I based my entire series on.
I think I should just say, because it's true that the French intelligence services, everyone makes fun of France as incompetent and weak, but their intel services are not incompetent or weak.
And after probably CIA, Massad, maybe the Russian Intel Services, like they are feared.
And so it was this tremendous act of bravery that he did this, you know, putting not just his life on the line, but the life of his wife and his children, because the story here was so demented and so twisted.
And just also the broader consideration that you could have an entire state colluding to protect a secret of that magnitude.
And what's so compelling about this story, and I get into this in the first episode of Becoming Brigitte, is that by the time it made its way to the English-speaking world, people thought that this was like a, as always, far-right conspiracy dug up from the trenches of Reddit.
And that's not what happened at all.
You know, the story begins with Emmanuel Macron and his wife is actually the journalists, the left-leaning journalists, the Condonas journalists who wanted to celebrate Brigitte, wanted to do documentaries on Brigitte.
This wonderful woman is now empowered.
And what is she going to do?
And they were kind of getting threatened.
They were told to come to the Lyse Palace and there was only one person that they could talk to.
They couldn't find or verify anything about Brigitte's history or Brigitte's past.
And they sort of fell down the hole and were like, I don't know why I suddenly feel like I've done something wrong for asking basic questions about the First Lady of France.
And so that's kind of where the series begins.
And it kind of takes you through what they went through and what many people have gone through since just trying to learn anything about the first lady.
So to be clear, it's an amazing story for so many reasons, but for the one that you just described, that this was actually well known in France.
It all took place in public.
But I don't think one in a million Americans had any idea at all until your series came out.
And the initial reaction to your series was, well, that now we know Candace is insane.
Really going off the deep end.
Wife's a man.
Come on now.
And then as the series progressed and became one of the biggest podcast series in the country and sort of sober people were saying, actually, you should listen to this.
This is pretty, this is pretty wild, pretty compelling.
But I just want to get to the lawsuit.
So like they're suing, they're not, they're suing you for defamation.
For things that I never said, which is they know that this lawsuit, this is why I called it a PR strategy.
This lawsuit was filed for the press, right?
Because she just lost her defamation case against two journalists in France.
And now everyone was reporting, wait, you said that this was the big case that proved or you presented it as if you were suing them on this claim of you being a man or a woman.
And now you've lost that in France.
This is your home territory.
What's going on?
And so I think she called the lawyers and were like, just file a lawsuit because it's very sloppy.
The points run into one another.
Like first, they argue that I'm doing it for money.
Then they make the argument that I was fired for talking, speaking about it.
So that doesn't make any sense.
It can't be both.
And it's a bunch of stuff that I didn't say.
They're behaving like mainstream journalists where they'll take a couple of words that I said, like gangster, criminal and gangster, but then they add their own sentence to it.
And they're like, she accused her of being a criminal and a gangster.
So it's very sloppy.
And what they're doing is they're just biding their time.
They don't want the world to look, which this was a very bad mistake, a very bad way to go about it, but they want the world to believe that she has a claim against me, that, well, we're suing, therefore, you know, because this podcaster lied.
And there is something also that the way that they're going about this, going after the journalists, thinking that America is the same sort of a beast as France is, and that, well, we have said that you can't ask us any questions.
We'll sue you for cyberbullying.
There is something cyberbullying, whatever the claims are here, but there is something about it where once you really arrive at a truth, what I find the reaction is for the people that are incensed by the fact that you're presenting that truth is I'll impoverish you.
And I've seen this over and over again.
It's like, okay, she told the truth, but our response to that is going to be demands that she get fired, right?
She should lose her livelihood for speaking the truth.
She should lose.
And that's why Jake Tapper, I don't know if you've seen it, you probably haven't because it's Jake Tapper, but he sits down with Tom Clare, who is a lawyer on this case.
And Jake Tapper is doing the absolute most to make this just the easiest interview for Tom Clare.
He's sitting across from him and he's like, she's deranged and she's crazy and she's a conspiracy theorist.
Jake Tapper, but so much so that people in the comments were like, now I want to watch a series.
His own viewers thought this was just so over the top.
But then he turns to Tom Claire and he asks him like a basic question.
He's like, you know, what evidence did you present to her that Brigitte's a man?
And Tom Clare can't answer the question.
He's like, we, you know, we, there was a ton, you can read the claims.
It's, we, it's extensive.
And, you know, we told her that she was a woman.
They never presented any evidence.
We went to them before we published the series.
We were in touch with Tom Clare of Clarenlocke.
We sent them a list of questions.
We said, look, we won't even do this series if you answer these basic circle yes or no questions.
Was Brigitte Macron the first lady born a woman?
I mean, that basic of questions.
Did she ever live as a person named Veronique before the transition temporarily?
Brigitte lived as a person named Veronique.
They refused to answer these yes or no questions.
Obviously, if you're going to prove actual malice, you have to, you have to present to the court, which is it's obviously a very high bar that's been set, which I don't necessarily even agree with that bar, by the way.
New York Times versus Sullivan said, but obviously you have to prove that I acted.
And the fact that they would hire those two lawyers, by the way, his wife, Libby Locke, is Bill Ackman's lawyer who Ackman uses to make people shut up.
I thought it was such a crazy, insane headline, but it was the Daily Mail had done this, had published an article saying that with a video of Emmanuel Macron denying claims his wife was a man.
And I just thought that's really funny.
Like, what could possibly be going on in France that the president has to deny a claim that his wife's a man?
But something that caught my eye was just as I was reading this article, they made no effort to debunk it.
Like it was sort of like, it was that typical CNN New York Times.
It's so crazy.
It's like, okay, but if it's so crazy, just, you know, post some photos of her.
Obviously, she's got three kids.
It's got to be tons of photos of her raising her children.
There's nothing.
They had one solitary photo.
And when you look at the photo, it was very obvious.
And this is before I got into the details that she looks a lot more like the little boy that's on the left than she does who they were trying to purport was the little girl that was sitting on the family member's lap.
And so I got into it kind of very organically.
I was like, this is weird.
Like, what's going on in France that the president has to make a comment on this situation?
And then I found a website where it explained it.
And I instantly realized there is something here.
Like you just, you don't have any photos of yourself for 30 years of your life.
And the two photos that you've given have been given to the public from a woman who has quite literally been charged with forging documents.
I mean, she's a thug.
I mean, Mimi Marchand, they had to eventually get rid of her, forging documents, thuggery, things of that nature, of a criminal nature.
She's the only one.
Everyone's going to go through her to get any information about your past.
This is so strange.
I mean, it's so kooky that you wouldn't just the defense to this is just, hey, could you show us any pictures of your living for these 30 years?
You know, you had allegedly three children.
Did you guys take any photos while you were raising them?
I don't, I am not clear because what was interesting is they, in that first letter, they included claims of what I said while I was working out with Daily Wire.
That was the previous March.
So you're responding to something that I said in March.
We're now in December.
So, what triggered you?
Like, clearly, it had to have been that I had just interviewed Xavier Poussard and they were aware of it.
So, then they said, okay, send her out a letter to intimidate her.
And obviously, getting a letter for most people, you get a letter from a sitting president of France.
You're going to go, okay, well, I'm just going to be quiet and not say anything more because I don't want to get involved in this.
But for me, it just made me even more curious.
And so, to be sure, I said, Well, I'm glad we have a lot of communication established because I'm certainly not interested in defaming you.
I'm not interested in lying.
Obviously, I would do myself a disservice if all of this was complete crap.
So, you presented the allegations then, which they, of course, were aware of, people had made others, not you, that she's not really who she says she is.
Yeah, and honestly, didn't require much of an explanation.
We also asked, Can you give us any photos of you living through this 30-year period?
I mean, pretty easy stuff.
If you're actually concerned and you're going to pretend you're so traumatized and defamed because of this story, I would have been like, Yeah, of course, here I am.
Here's me in middle school.
Here's me on a cheerleading team.
Here's me the first day I held my first son.
Here's me.
It's such an easy thing to debunk that it requires the suspension of common sense to believe that this is a conspiracy theory because it's just so easy to debunk and yet they refuse to do it.
And they're being extremely petty and going after every single person that speaks about it now.
They would have never had to sue anybody because everyone would have then laughed at them.
Like if someone was working on a story saying that I live as a man for 30 years, I don't need to lawyer up.
I want you to publish that story so that I can then come out and say, This person is a psychopath.
Clearly, here is the trove of me growing up with my sisters.
Here's my middle school yearbook.
To the contrary, even when Xavier Poussard, because he has been working on this for 10 years and therefore filing paperwork with the government to get pictures, Jean-Michel Tragneau has a military file.
He also filed to get Brigitte's school yearbook where she allegedly has a picture.
And he won that case and then took it to Sacor Coir, which is Sacred Heart.
And they said, We're not releasing it.
I don't care if you won the case.
We're refusing to release this to you.
So, in every regard, something that would be able to dispel this rumor, even her children, where are your kids in this?
If that's my mom and she's so attacked and it's so horrifying that she's got to put, you know, my dad stepdad on a plane to go speak to the president of the United States way before then, I would have released pictures of me and my mom.
Here's a revealing and unpleasant fact: Mexico is facing a dangerous outbreak of New World screw worm.
Screw worm is a flesh-eating parasite.
It's devastating to livestock and to humans.
Despite this, the Department of Agriculture has reopened foreign livestock imports, including from Mexico.
Does that sound wrong to you?
Does it sound revolting?
Well, yeah, our friends at Meriwether Farms agreed they sounded the alarm could clearly be a serious threat to your health.
And it worked.
After Meriwether's campaign, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins suspended Mexican livestock imports until we can certainly that our food supply and our citizens are safe, including from screw worm.
So the story tells a lesson and it asks an obvious question: why should you rely on untrustworthy foreign beef to feed your nation?
The answer is that you shouldn't rely on it.
If you agree, we hope you'll support Meriwether Farms.
In a time when so many are selling out, they have the courage to stand up for what is right.
And all of their meat comes from this country, the United States.
By the way, I engaged with Libby Locke and Tom Clare a long time ago about defamation, and they told me not to go after it because the bar was so high.
And I had a very clear case where someone told a blatant lie about me, which we would have, which we happily countered right away.
The motive here is money, which is fine if that's what you want your legacy to be.
Because at the core of this case, which most people should be speaking about, is their defense here is: I'm, I am admitting, which they've never done before.
They've now admitted that Emmanuel Macron was only 14 when they met, when he was in that play.
15, she says, whenever this affair happened.
And in my suit, they admit that Emmanuel Macron's parents took him away from the school because of this relationship.
Do you understand how the audacity of I'm a creep, I macked on a student at best, and I had the audacity to file this lawsuit?
I mean, what is going on in France that you would so willfully put that in a lawsuit, which, by the way, debunks their earlier claims when he was first running, the press said he was 17.
Then, when Xavier Poussard proved that it wasn't true, then suddenly we were saying he was 16.
Now we've got them writing that he was 15.
But the truth is, is that Emmanuel Macron was 14 and they can't go back on that truth because she has isn't that child molestation?
There we go.
That's another big thing happening here.
She's desperate now to keep it at 15.
Brigitte wants to keep it at 15.
No, he was 14 when he was in that play that she says that she watched him.
And as you know, 14-year-old boys, I guess, as a 40-year-old woman, you would just be so swept away by a 14-year-old child on stage.
He was in this play.
I'm forgetting the name of it.
It's a French name, Mila Cundera's play.
And that's when she alleges that she saw him and he just was ahead of his time, a savant, so brilliant in his demonstration, his ability to act.
And the more that you learn how much the press lied about that earlier story, I mean, even the press in the beginning, when he was running, even said that Brigitte Macron was this like irresistibly hot teacher.
Like they kept comparing her to Claudia Schiffer.
And then when Xavier and these journalists got documents and like, you know, pictorial evidence of what Brigitte looked like at that time, she looked like a man in the middle of a transition, you know?
And so even that, I mean, the way the press lied to sell this creepy relationship is something that should concern everyone.
Whether you believe she's a man or not, what you have is a couple that is willfully getting away with, at best, like molestation, a sexual perversion, deviance, and he runs the case.
And he sold this to the court, coined the phrase along with another person who, another lawyer who Emmanuel awarded the Medal of Freedom to.
And they said to the court in Amien, which is where Brigitte and Emmanuel are both born, that you should release this guy because he loves his daughter.
And now she's 21.
And so it doesn't really matter.
And honestly, it's the mom's fault.
They encouraged them to all sleep together.
And so they did.
They released him early.
And then his daughter tried to escape him and he killed her.
So this is, this is who everyone, this is the guy who's on the news channels right now saying, we're going to go after Candace Owens because this is a state affair.
And he's got this whole glorious story about how I'm being funded by Russia because it's always Russia, as we all know.
The more that I study and the more that I take a look at this picture, because at first, you know, you go through this period where you're going, am I crazy or are they all defending like children being raped?
Like this can't be, this can't be right.
Like somebody's going to stand up and say something.
And the only thing that you can do in those moments where you're questioning whether or not this could be the circumstance is to educate yourself further.
Yes.
And I find that whatever area they have sort of an inordinate response to, where they're like getting very angry about something that seems so simple is probably where you should press your thumb the hardest.
And I did this with like Sigmund Freud.
I kind of said something on my show about how like Sigmund Freud was like a pervert and getting into children and incest, his whole theory, blaming the children for their parents being incestuous and the reaction across the press, like, how dare she?
He did present a theory that these children who were being raped by their fathers were actually attracted to them.
Why are you defending this?
And then I got educated about it and started reading books and stunned.
Like, yes, this is actually something that he was doing.
And I learned this from the person who controlled the Sigmund Freud archives who wrote this amazing book called The Assault on Truth.
But there is this common thread that it brings you back to Paris every time, whether you're talking about Epstein, Glene Maxwell, talking about Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte, talking about Sigmund Freud.
He studied and then came up with this theory while he was studying under Charcot in Paris that actually, even though we see all this evidence that these kids are being raped, it is their fault because they're attracted to their fathers.
And for this guy who rang the alarm on this, like years later, he was working with Anna Freud and he was in control of the archives.
His name is Jeffrey Masson.
He got kicked out of the archives for telling the truth.
He publishes that book, The Assault on Truth, and Anna allowed him to because she could have stopped the book.
And Anna Freud chose not to stop the book.
I think she wanted the secret to be out.
But you go through these stories and over and over again, you get this theme of this very dark theme of children that are being raped, right?
And it's incestuous.
Like I said, whether you're talking about Jeffrey Epstein, like, why do we keep coming back to this theme?
And why does it seem that the media is colluding to cover that up?
Like, I thought no matter where we were on the spectrum, left or right, like when it came to children, whether it's murder, rape, like we all were on the same page that like we have to defend innocent lives.
And so then you have to press further and go, what is the theology here?
Because everything, as my husband has taught me, is a theology.
They are being guided by a theology.
And while the rest of the world is being driven towards either being agnostic or being outwardly atheistic, I think the people that are in control are being pulled by.
And that's why studying Sigmund Freud, and I realized why they were so triggered when I kind of, I'm always a person like accidentally lands on something and then there's just like this reaction.
They're like, you can't do that.
And then I go, okay, well, I better learn about that because there's something you don't want me to know.
And so now I'm curious.
If they would just leave me alone, I promise that I wouldn't even have come down this path.
But what you learn about Sigmund Freud is that what he actually mainstreamed, I mean, the psychoanalytic movement was quite literally a movement to mainstream gaslighting.
And this is no question.
Like I said, you can read Sigmund Freud's archives.
This guy was not a guy theorizing that this is what was going on.
He had access, learned German, read the archives, alerted Anna Freud and was like, hey, did you know your dad knew that these kids were being raped and yet he lied to the public?
And she's like, yeah, I think, you know, maybe don't publish that.
But then she let him publish it.
And I think that was a cry for help, but that's, that's my theory.
Anyways, the second book to read was once you get to that and you go, what is this guiding theology?
Why did Sigmund Freud at first acknowledge, as he did openly, that all these kids were being raped?
Because he was at the morgue.
Some of these kids were dying because of their injuries.
And he was at the morgue in Paris.
He saw this up front.
There was no dispute.
The literature has been published.
He's studying under Charcot.
And then he does this pivot suddenly when he turns 35.
And he says, never mind, these kids are not being abused.
David Bakan published a book and he relates it to, and he makes a very sound argument and then proves his theory that it's the, it's called Sigmund Freud and the Jewish Mystical Tradition.
And he relates to, he relates it to the Kabbalah, this sort of Gnostic idea that you have to descend into hell and then you'll be brought up.
And like the worst thing that you could possibly do, the worst sin, they believe in this idea of holy sin, is to harm a child.
Now, again, these people that I'm citing, just because I know that you start talking about Sigmund Freud and anti-Semitism, these people who wrote these books are both Jewish.
Jeffrey Massan is Jewish.
He's an Ashkenazi Jew.
David Bakan is an Ashkenazi Jew.
These people are professors and, you know, they have their credentials here to make these conclusions.
And what he theorizes in this book is that Sigmund Freud was mainstreaming the Kabbalah through psychoanalytics.
And the reason why he waited until he was 35, as he explains, is that in the Kabbalah tradition, they don't, they think it's so powerful, whatever the Kabbalah is.
And I'm not educated on the Kabbalah, I will admit that, but whatever it is, they don't tell their kids about it until they turn 35.
And when Sigmund Freud was 35, he received a Hebrew Bible from his father.
And it's like, I guess they believe in numerology, whatever it is.
And he was suddenly awakened to whatever aspect of the Kabbalah that it was.
After David Bakan published the book, a rabbi came to him.
He got in touch with the rabbi and spoke to this rabbi who told him that, yes, Sigmund Freud was a Kabbalist because he had, he knew him personally and he had his Ohar in his apartment or in his place.
And he then verified that his theory as reading through his papers was correct and that he was a Kabbalist.
And so I think it's important for people, as I started a book club, to read these books, like don't take it from me.
And I always say, yeah, we need to stop falling for this credentialism.
You shouldn't listen to me because I'm Canison and I have a podcast.
I want you to read these same books and to recognize that something very wrong is happening in this world.
And when we point to these facts, we're all being gaslit.
Like we're suddenly being told that having a response, that's just one example to right now to like kids dying in Gaza makes us monsters.
Well, Sigmund Freud is the person that introduced the idea of sort of this, that gaslighting could be an effective strategy.
And one of the things to recognize about Freud is that so the Freud family creates a psychoanalytic movement, Sigmund Freud does, and they're gaslighting people.
But then that turns into modern propaganda because it's the Freud-Bernays family.
It's the same family.
Edward Bernays is the person that created propaganda during World War II, the OSS.
Like they were using him to figure out how can we mainstream, like, how can we convince an entire population to want to go to war, you know, to hate Germans.
This is the guy that they brought in.
So it's the same, the psychoanalytic movement then turns into propaganda with Edward Bernays and then turns into PR.
Like the biggest PR person in the world right now is still the Freud family.
The Freud family are the PR for the Royals.
His name is Matthew Freud.
So you can draw a direct line in understanding that this is.
And it's important for people to recognize this, though.
These people have had a tremendous head start.
Okay.
They know how the mind works.
They have run these experiments on people.
They have had this relationship with the state forever.
In fact, I think they are the state, if I'm being honest.
They are the state.
I shouldn't even say it's a relationship with the state.
And what they are constantly trying to do is to infect your mind.
Okay.
So picture you being that, you know, child who lived through this horrific experience.
And now you have an adult sitting before you and saying that never happened and you're crazy.
And what's wrong with you is that you're like attracted to your dad.
That's what they're doing to all of us in a certain way.
Obviously, way more devastating when it happens to a child in that regard, in that sinister regard.
But when you see the mainstream media apparatus today and they're gaslighting us, like the case of Brigitte Macron is the most gaslighting I've ever seen in my life, where it's just like you could debunk us in one second, but you won't.
And you're calling us deranged and you're calling us crazy and you're calling us anti-Semitic for caring about a dead Palestinian kid.
And it's like, this is, yeah, they created this system.
And the only way that we're going to be able to defeat it is we have to first, we have to first understand it.
And that's why I really encourage people to get educated.
And I just made it my point because I constantly kept getting this claim, like anti-Semitic, talking about Sigmund Freud.
I was like, you know what?
I'm going to do I'm only going to read Israeli historians and I'm only going to read Jewish books, books that are written by Jewish authors so that we can just go ahead and dispel the ruler.
And then he was really knocked off the pedestal by feminists, as I recall, because he had like some non-fashionable views on women and calling them hysterical, et cetera, et cetera.
But I don't recall Sigmund Freud being like a protected figure.
I mean, I feel like I've been everywhere, know a ton of people.
I've never met anyone who's been accused of molesting his own child.
That is so far out.
I've known people who've done every bad thing, and I've never met anybody who's even been accused of that.
And yet you're describing two clusters of people, powerful people, famous people, where like tons of people in the orbit have been accused of or have in fact committed child molestation.
Well, let me just tell you, as you get into my series, like as I point to all these, this orbit around them of everyone who just keeps accidentally committing pedophilia, defending pedophilia, whatever it is, the best part is for me that they kind of laugh in your face that they want you to know that there's something, there's an element of it that's partially sadistic.
Presidential portrait, Emmanuel Macron leaning against a guest, everybody has to do this, leaning against a desk, obviously, the official presidential portrait.
He chooses to put a book, and he has in multiple interviews said it's his favorite author by Andre Gied on the table.
Andre Gede is an author who admitted openly that he was a pedophile.
He's a pedarast.
He specifically only actually molests little boys.
And he would go down to Algeria, Morocco, and he would write books based on his experiences.
The president of France chose to put that book, okay, an Andre Guide book on his desk for his official presidential portrait.
Like there was no other book that you could have picked to put there.
There's an element of it where they, I think that they've amassed so much power.
And it's quite interesting because I think maybe Daryl Cooper told you about this, but getting into Bill Barr's father, Donald Barr, who wrote that weird book.
The space, it's called Space Something, Space Relations by Donald Barr, where he predicts a colony of COSARs, as he calls them, Khazars, K-O-S-S-A-R-S, he spells it, that are so bored with their power.
They're so bored with being elite, just getting away with everything, you know?
And he then predicts kind of in this fantasy book, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghelane Max Looks Very Strange, got it.
And he also was, you know, in the OSS, which was a precursor for the CIA.
But there's an element of that when I see Emmanuel Malcrone engaging in that, that it's like they want to get caught and they just have so much power.
They know there's never going to be any consequences for it.
Where you go, why would you do this?
You could have put any other book on your desk.
You could have put literally any other book on your desk, but you chose a self-admitted, never denied the fact that he would go down to Morocco and he just was into little, he was into little boys.
So this is all of everything that you've said for the past 20 minutes makes me think they'd be crazy to bring this to trial because that would allow you discovery.
I just want to blinger on this for a moment, having been around a lot of lawsuits.
I've never heard anybody sued, particularly this is, they're spending a lot of money on this because Tom Clare and his wife have big expenses and they, I think they charge a lot.
I've never heard anybody say, I don't want a well-funded case against me to be dismissed.
Well, that's very interesting because they did file in Delaware and it is a place where we know that the courts are corrupt, but this would be a kind of precedent that would be, I think, almost even too crazy for Delaware.
You're talking about a sitting president of another country coming in and saying, I'm going to sue you for telling the truth.
We have truth on our side, right?
We actually have truth.
So unless he's going to say, blah, blah, blah, I'm not looking at anything.
And you're going to get no discovery and we're just going to award this person.
I mean, you got to give the other side discovery, right?
We are pioneering this, obviously, because this has never happened in the history of the world that a sitting president of a foreign country has sued a journalist and a podcaster in another country.
It just, it's never happened.
So we don't know.
I didn't even know how we could sue, actually.
I thought that you could only sue in a country.
I just am learning with everybody else how this is going to work.
But again, speaking of Tom Clare and Dominion, as he was sitting up there giddy with Jake Tapper as these representatives of like the state, because that's who they represent.
You can't beat me in the arena of truth and facts.
So what do you do next?
Well, I'm going to punish you.
I'm going to destroy your livelihood.
You're going to have nothing to your name.
And that's why I say this, this case matters so much more to me because we can't have this sort of behavior coming from people that are governing us, right?
That say, even if you find the truth, even if I am a pervert, even if I got away with sleeping with my student, even though his parents try to take him away, there's nothing you can do about it.
And I'm going to impoverish you for even telling people.
Like that's what this lawsuit is.
I'm going to impoverish you for telling the truth.
And they're happy.
You got to see that they're like, he's like giddy discussing it.
And then he turns in the camera, Jake Tapper and goes, Fox News did this.
And how much money did you get?
Like it's, it's totally bizarre.
I'm like, that's your master.
And you're going to come up against, you're going to come up against a hard rock here because I don't care about money.
If I hope the story of Candace Owens over the last two years, people have come to understand that money is not my master.
On my podcast, I just said, I have to openly, as we went through this Manochet affair and this woman ending up dead because they fought to like get this pedophile and creature in Amian released.
I just asked him, like, is it really worth it?
Like, cause for me, you couldn't, I couldn't look at a case that involved the abuse of children or a network of people who are involved with the abuse of children, who have admitted to abusing children, who are defending people who have admitted abusing children and put my head on the pillow at night.
And that's what matters most.
And everything that I do, I have to be able to put my head on a pillow at night and say, I feel like I've done, I did what I thought was the right thing to do and it was a good thing to do.
Having said in a long deposition with Tom Clare, I can tell you the game is to make you mad.
And that's very easy with me because I'm a hothead.
It probably won't work with you.
You seem to have way more emotional control than I do.
But I do think I just want to, I don't want to be mean, but I just want to say when people have in mind, when Shakespeare wrote about lawyers and I'm like, ooh, that's a little harsh.
If I was legit, I mean, the godfathers of my children are lawyers, you know, and really good.
My college roommates, really good guys, great guys, men of integrity, true integrity with wives who respect them, kids who love them and just good men.
But if I was a lawyer, if I was one of them and Tom Clare is talking the earth, I'd be like, man, we got to disbar that guy because he discredits the entire profession.
When I know he doesn't, because like I said, I got advice from their law firm not to pursue a defamation claim.
So you're in this what to help bolster their idea to the world that they haven't done anything when you know, when you know that they're lying, when you know that your client is lying and you so represent them.
Again, I don't know how people put their head on the pillow at night.
And what's interesting about me, and he'll just come up against a rock is I have nothing to hide, right?
If I had anything to hide, you guys would have found out last year, right?
That where I went through and physically felt like an x-ray from the press as they tried to destroy everything that I had, everything that I held dear.
I mean, it was non-stop.
I mean, banned from Australia, demanding that my speaking events get canceled because I'm an anti-Semite, you know, fired in front of the world.
I mean, last year was really one for the books and anything that they could find on me, they wrote articles about and they smeared me and they libeled me.
And the idea was to kill me.
It was like, you know, lay it dead.
This girl should no longer have a career.
And I survived it.
And I survived it because I had the one thing that they couldn't quite kill, which is truth on my side.
I told the truth.
Okay.
So at the end of the day, it takes so much more energy and persistence to lie.
You have to lie repeatedly.
You have to keep telling the person that the shadows on the wall are real.
Like, you know, and we tell the truth, we only just have to say it once.
And so they were unsuccessful in trying to destroy me, to try to destroy everything I've ever worked for in my entire life with smears and libels and lies.
And so what, what's left?
What is he going to say to me?
Like, what are you saying to me during a deposition?
And I think that everyone around them is way too close to pedophilia.
And I think, Tom Claire, that you should be ashamed of yourself and any person that would ever launch a defense knowing that children were hurt in the process.
I think, you know, you, you better hope karma is not real.
You are a child and your drama teacher, whatever, is macking on you and you're 14 years old.
I don't know what Macron has lived through, but when you get into his backstory, it's very weird as well.
It's a very weird backstory.
A lot of holes in the backstory.
And he is to me like a Zelensky.
He's totally powerless.
There's somebody in the shadows telling him what to do.
One of the more fun things learning about Macron is the press sold him as this like savant, you know, like he's just so brilliant and he was ahead of his time.
He's needed to sell this like creepy relationship.
You know, the 14-year-old's ahead of his time.
And he came across like a 60-year-old.
I don't know what we're doing.
Right.
That's weird.
But what was really funny was that he then starts to work for Rothschild's Bank.
And before he went to Rothschild's Bank, he went to this school.
I don't know how to give you like a tit for tat with America.
Let's just call it like he kind of pursued his master's.
And nobody knew how he got into the school.
He actually didn't get into the school twice.
And then he gets into the school and they take this test and he is, he graduates.
I mean, he passes with flying colors at the top of the class.
And the class revolted because they all knew he was dumb and they knew that there was a fix in for Macrone.
And so they just canceled test scores that year for the first time in the school's history because the kids were suddenly going, there's no way this person got this grade.
Same thing happens when he goes to Rothschild Bank.
They said, and this is again, according to a Wall Street Journal book, I only use mainstream sources, that everyone who worked with him said he was an absolute idiot.
They had no idea why he was at this bank, except for the fact that David Rothschild's hand was on him.
Like they basically, like he was allowed to be in these rooms.
He didn't even know what IBIDA stood for, but he worked for Rothschild Bank.
And they said that it was just very clear that the hand of Rothschild was on him.
And so they would all just remark to themselves, like, how are we working with this guy who's an absolute idiot?
So even the idea of Macron being this like sophisticated, brilliant banker who was ahead of his time is just not real.
If the mainstream media sources are to be believed, again, this was a book that was done by the Wall Street Journal and they sourced people that worked with him and said that he was an absolute idiot, which mirrored exactly what the people who went to school with him said when they had to cancel test scores because of his fake.
When he got, when he became president, there was a, and I'm blanking on his name.
He came out and spoke and said, there's this guy is, you know, watch out for Macron.
He's got some issues.
Like they, you know, he said that he was a part of a sex party with him.
Macron never disputed it.
And since he likes to sue for defamation, that would have been a pretty good one to go after if a guy is saying he slept with you and that you have mental issues, like that he's like almost like a masochist in many ways.
But the entire, if you just kind of look at the world right now, a lot of theater boys are getting power.
You know, Zelensky was an actor and a performer and he actually played the role of being the president and then actually became the president.
Macron, he was a theater boy.
Okay.
And now all of a sudden he's like playing the part of the president of France.
I don't take any of these people seriously.
Like this is, you are as people.
This is your next act.
Yeah.
You are told to pretend that you're the president of France and somebody behind you is telling you what to do.
And we can definitely, as Americans and I think we can all agree, whether you're left or right, that that is a circumstance after having Biden in office, because we know, irrespective of whether you loved him or hated him, that he was not cognitively there.
And that should terrify you who was in control while he was on a steep cognitive decline.
It's the same for, I think, the entire Western world that these people are not in real, in real control and that there's, they're just made to kind of delude the public into believing that like, yeah, this is a republic and a democracy and you have a say and look, you elected this person, but somebody else is obviously pulling the strings.
So speaking of theater, I just hesitate even to ask this, but since because I mean, it just opens up all this stuff I want to deal with, but you just interviewed Nick Fuentes or had a conversation with him.
I mean, I can tell you my experience is, was entirely fraudulent with him.
I, I never interview people as a gotcha interview.
It's always just he, he was making the rounds.
He's been around for a while.
And kind of his story, when I learned it, because he was banned from everywhere, so I didn't actually know what the backstory was with Nick Fuentes, but then I learned it when he was allowed back on X and Jeremy Boring, who was then the CEO of Daily Wire, did this X live with him.
Everything was weird about what happened, but it happened.
And Nick told his story and I was listening in and said essentially that he was canceled because he started asking questions about Israel.
He was 18 years old and he alleged that it was very much the fault of the Daily Wire or whatever he said.
And I found it very interesting.
And I was like, oh, I actually didn't know this was the backstory.
Maybe this really is a person who had just ahead of everybody else was questioning Israel and had like a bad hand given to him.
So I had him on the show, welcomed him into my home and he was very nice.
We told him we're going to cut a controversial trailer.
We're going to show you these clips of you talking trash about me and you can talk about whatever you want for as long as you want, ask any questions you want to ask.
It went great.
He left.
He said, thanks.
We can now be friends.
And I am not kidding.
We published this 11 days later and he, it was, I don't even know how to, he just starts screaming, calling me and effing BITCH, who set him up.
We didn't edit a single thing.
Those 11 days, like two weeks before we even published the interview, we told him if there's anything that he wanted us to insert, like nobody does that if you go on the show.
And apparently then, and I don't know if it was driven by insecurity.
He didn't know how his followers would take the interview, but he just did a complete 180, lied to his audience, pretended that he was surprised it was behind a paywall.
We spoke about him and how we were going to release it.
You could have had the beginning of us discussing various topics.
I think in many ways, whatever happened to him was when he was 18 may have stunted his growth, meaning that he now is responding to the internet, which is filled with people that don't even use their real names.
Right?
So, really, truly, the irony of it all is you could just be like the IDF soldiers just pretending to be his supporters, just getting him to say whatever you want because he's going to do whatever you say.
And I just want to say, I haven't watched a lot of Nick Fuentes in my life at all.
But what I've seen, the guy's very talented.
Like, just as a, as a, well, let me just say this: as someone who's talked to cameras his whole life, it is very hard to sit and just like riff for 20 minutes.
And I just, I think it's an amazing skill.
And he has that skill.
But I also have noticed that his targets are all people who are sincere, non-crazy, non-hateful opponents of neocon politics.
I had, I probably shouldn't even say this, but I had the only reason I know who he is is because someone sent me a video a few years ago of him attacking me.
And I was like, hmm, so I'm looking at this.
And I'm like, well, first of all, this kid's really talented, like legit.
And I can assess that just having done the job for so long.
So I was like, wow, lots of talent, native talent.
And he's attacking my dad as a CIA, his dad's CIA or whatever.
And I'm like, well, that's no untrue.
Then my father dies and I learn actually, yeah, you know, was involved in that world.
I was completely shocked by it.
So no one has to believe me, but that's just a fact.
Yeah, like someone just sent me this video and it was like, you can't believe anything Carlson says because his father was in the CIA and he's a CIA working on behalf of the CIA well.
I mean, I think it's pretty obvious.
And I'm pretty, I mean, I actually feel emotional in my anger towards CIA.
And I think that that comes out on the air quite regularly.
But she would be a lot more likely to take Russian money than I would be to work for the CIA because you would never take Russian money and you're not Russian, but I mean, I really hate the CIA.
And I mean, I would, I mean, that's like very offensive to me.
So it's either A, it's being driven from like a little boy insecurity, and he just was so worried that he like just went on the attack because he doesn't know how to have normal relations after being banned everywhere.
I mean, there's no, so it's like you use that as your, like, I could not determine what his motives were.
And I said, you know what?
I don't have time for this.
I gave you a fair chance, gave you a fair shake, and you are a fundamentally dishonest human being.
You know, there was no, there was no reason to do it.
If he had not done that show and screamed and yelled, his followers would have been like, oh, that was an interesting conversation between two people who agreed some, disagreed some.
And like, that was it.
It was interesting that he got there.
He doesn't want to be, and I can tell you that he doesn't want to be anywhere but where he is.
He doesn't want to have normal relations.
And it did, it did sort of feel, and I said that to him, that he's like responding to orders somewhere because why are you attacking me?
And he's like, why do you hate Dave Smith over Joe Rogan?
And it's like, well, Dave Smith is this kind of a Jew.
And I'm like, okay, I don't either you really are this immature and you haven't gotten further in your ideas or you're just attacking people and making people think that these attacks are legitimate when they're really not.
And we were so kind to him that I was just like, okay.
There's no hate on Dave Smith and you would smell it if there was and there isn't.
And he has credibility and he has knowledge.
And he's a marvelous debater and once again, a really good person.
So you have to take out Dave Smith.
You have to take out Joe Kent.
Those are the good people.
You have to take out J.D. Vance.
He was against JD Vance.
So if you're against like more pointless wars on behalf of foreign powers, like you're probably not going to be attacking J.D. Vance.
And Vance was exactly the person he was attacking.
So this, and the sad thing is, and I know that no one who watches him will believe me because they're desperate because they are the victims of a system that hates him.
It's young white men who've been totally cut out of our economy, attacked mercilessly, given, you know, narcotics, just go die.
I mean, they really are the victims and they're desperate and no one speaks for them.
So they go to Fuentes because he's like incredibly articulate and they think he's our leader.
But in one of the saddest ironies of all, like he's acting against your interests, actually.
I think telling the truth, even if you're wrong, doing your best really, really matters.
So how do you, so you mentioned before that last year was a, was, was just a tsunami of attacks on you, not simply on your views and their accuracy, which I think is, you know, it's legitimate to critique anything any of us say on the basis of whether or not it's true, but on your character.
And they were very intense.
They attacked your family.
I won't go more, I won't go deeper than that, but you know what I'm talking about.
I mean, they really went after you, your opponents.
And these other people, how could we have ever thought that they were our friends?
Like even waiting to see who's going to speak out and say this is wrong.
Like the number one litmus test is, let's not forget before we even get down to the books that I've read and what I think now, all I said was Crisis King.
Okay, this was like it's anti-Semitic, it's layered, it's this, it's that.
And there were people who I would have been like, I've always been friendly with who were making videos legitimatizing that.
Like, she didn't say it directed to anybody, but it could have been kind of implied.
And this is why you shouldn't say Crisis King.
And we're looking around, going, What is going on right now?
What is happening?
unidentified
And I think at that moment, craziest controversies I've ever seen.
It doesn't matter if Nick Fuentes is saying Jesus is king.
He is.
And so he was sort of saying to me that I would have to make a layered statement about Crisis King.
And he said that to you?
Very much came across.
I said to him, I'll publish because when he denied it publicly, I said, let me publish the text messages.
And then he went radio silent because I don't lie.
Okay.
I don't lie.
And he wanted me to make a statement against Grapers.
So my whole world is coming down.
And Seth Dylan's like, here's what you can do for me if you'd like a life raft.
You know what I mean?
Yeah, it's just tweet against the grapers.
And I was just like, seriously, Seth, F you.
You know, when your family had something that you were going, and I stood up for you, and I had, there was nothing for me to gain, everything for me to lose.
And you're, you're upset about random frog accounts on the internet and you're adding to this chorus of things that are being said against me.
I mean, he accidentally sent a screenshot that they didn't realize, like James Lindsay, he sends screenshots to James Lindsay.
And James Lindsay.
I don't, I don't know who he is, but I know he's always on Twitter in the same puddle of people who are constantly just like, I don't know, like applauding Palestinian death.
And he acts, James Lindley didn't realize that it showed that it was from Seth Dylan's account.
So clearly, Seth Dylan had texted it to him.
And then James Lindsay then like said something about what it was.
And it was just amazing.
It was a masked down moment where it's like, yeah, you're all on a group chat and you're sharing information of people who to attack.
And you presented yourself as like the funny, nice guy.
And you're anything but like, you know, you're quite sinister.
And we all kind of fell for it for a little bit because I'm just the guy who does satire.
No, you are like a totally deranged, angry individual who would literally break bread with anyone and then stab them in the back.
And so for me, like I said, I fear nothing.
I was like, release the messages.
Daylight, I will survive daylight.
I have always treated people with kindness and I have always worked very hard.
I tell the truth.
So there's nothing that Seth Dylan can expose about me that's going to hurt my feelings, you know, or make me look like I'm a bad person.
He's genuinely a bad person.
So these were the sorts of individuals like last year when we were going through it where I was like, am I, did I misremember us being like me, like putting everything on the line to help him?
And could he just give us silence for a couple of weeks?
Like, just not just not, just don't add into the chorus.
I'm not asking you to defend me.
I'm asking you to not join in the chorus of people.
It's just a weird world when you wake up and realize like Taylor Lorenz is obviously kind of deranged.
Her views are like repugnant to me.
I've made fun of Taylor Lorenz like for a living.
I've literally been paid to make fun of Taylor Lorenz.
I'll admit it.
But when you realize that she is actually a much more sincere and decent person than the guy who runs the Babylon B, then you realize, wow, what's going on?
You know, the backstory of that actually is somebody in Harvey's orbit reached out to me while I was at the Daily Wire and said, I'd really like to get on the phone with Harvey.
I'd love for you to like think about sitting down and interviewing him and doing all this stuff.
And, you know, at that time, I thought he was guilty of sin, like everybody else did, because there were just so many women and was thinking, wow, he must be pretty desperate to want to like reach out to me.
I know he's left-leaning.
Like, I'll do it.
Sure, fine.
And I got on the phone with him in prison and was very surprised that he clearly this friend was kind of lying and he, Oprah, was being floated to do the interview.
And he's like, why on earth would I give you this interview?
He was very, very powerful.
And I always describe it as Harvey has like a growl about him.
You could, he's still very powerful.
And he kind of lashed me and said, you know, I support the ADL and talked about Kanye and talked about my support for Trump.
He was all over the place, still, still a leftist in his prison cell.
If I ever sit down and write one, like, that's definitely a highlight.
I'm like, I'm getting lectured by Harvey Weinstein.
He's in prison.
And then I was sort of like, I realized at that point that I was trying out for like one of his movies in a way.
And I had to kind of sell myself of like why I would, I wanted to do the interview.
And then I thought this was so strange.
And then I hung up and I looked into the case because that person then sent me the stuff and I was just shocked.
I've never seen a crazier conviction in my entire life.
He literally got convicted because people were crying, even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
I mean, one case, his argument is I wasn't even there.
I wasn't even there.
It's not even like, it's not even like he's like, I know this woman.
He's like, I was not, I don't even stay at that hotel.
And I don't know this woman.
And the judge would not allow him, talking about the corruption of courts, to subpoena herself from records to see if she was even there.
It was the, and that was the person that got him, whatever, 15 years in LA, who the cases are incredible.
You were raped by him over the course of 10 years.
Help me understand this.
And none of these women are young, by the way, because then I'm like, maybe there was an argument.
They were 17 and he manipulated.
They were so, these women were 30 years old.
We know what this is.
This is a sugar baby traditional relationship.
It's how it's always been in Hollywood.
Young girls want careers.
They sleep with directors.
They do that stuff consensually.
And I think in the case of Harvey Weinstein, because he actually cared very deeply about his movies, they assumed he was going to give them these roles and he didn't.
He was just sort of like, yeah, I'm Harvey Weinstein.
These girls threw themselves at him thinking there was going to be an exchange and there just wasn't one.
And then if you look back in your life and now you're 50 and you slept with Harvey Weinstein, like not the hottest Brad Pitt looking person, you're like, what did I get for this?
And you kind of then see this movement taking off and it's me too.
And suddenly it's, you know, he had the power.
And yeah, so what?
I sent him a couple of emails saying, I love you after he raped me, which they did.
Cause that's actually, yeah, no, love you, miss you.
But constantly the emails, when you read through them, because there's a trove of them, are always them trying to be like, hey, I hear there's an upcoming audition.
I'd love to attend the audition.
Or I'm going to Cannes.
Can you get me some tick?
I mean, it is what it is.
This was your traditional oldest trade in the book is what I would say.
And I thought I was just doing an interview where I was going to like, you know, push back and get to the truth.
And when I looked at these cases, I was just shocked.
You know, what, 90 women who came out and said he did something and it actually boiled down to three cases.
And in the two New York ones that he got 26 years for, I mean, just you read the emails.
It's crazy.
You just cannot come out of reading the emails from Jessica Mann and Evginya, I'm blanking on her last name and just go, what happened here?
Like, what do you mean you convicted him of rape on the basis of these emails alone?
Why would you then like, has anybody ever, and Jessica Mann clearly is the first person ever who's done this, hit up their rapist after and been like, hey, I'm with my mom in town.
I clearly know that women will flirt with guys to get what they want, even if it's a drink at a bar.
So you can only imagine Hollywood where you welcome that climate of exchange.
Women who are just want to be the next Angelina Jolie, they all think they're going to be the next Angelina Jolie, what they'd be willing to do for that part.
And Harvey benefited from that.
He was Harvey Weinstein.
He's making the best movies that have been made in Hollywood.
And honestly, I'd argue that movies haven't been great since Harvey went in, right?
His movies were like, I mean, every classic movie that you can think of, Harvey Weinstein, the Weinstein company produced, the Mira, what was it called?
Mirror.
I can't think of the company's name.
Mirror Max.
It was his company had produced.
So it's a lot.
It was a lot to unpack.
And yet they still moved.
You know, obviously the appellate judges said this case was completely ridiculous.
It was rigged.
Why did you guys even allow these people into the courtroom just to convict his character, not based on the facts?
And he got sent back down.
But he just lost again on two of the cases.
And so I just interviewed him.
And that interview is coming out today again to ask him, okay, here's a broader question.
Harvey, who hates you?
Because this is so clearly, somebody took you out.
And that's how I look at the case now.
Who are you involved with?
Who did you piss off that wanted you to no longer be who you were in Hollywood?
Because this is, this is power.
This is a structure.
The judges are allowing this to take place for a reason.
And his answers were quite interesting, you know?
And I think Harvey Weinstein did upset a lot of powerful people.
He said Gloria Alread told him if she paid him, and I view her as a gangster of sorts.
Everyone knows how she moves when she's on a case, she doesn't lose, that if he had paid her, and I want to say it was a million dollars, don't quote me, that it would go away.
So it's, it's, people are going to hear it from his own mouth.
But that tells me that we're looking at maybe something different and what was the Me Too movement.
And I've spoken to other people that were victims of it.
And they allege to me that a lot of it has to do with publishing rights, that if they want to take out a business, you can take out, force a person to essentially have to sell their business and their assets if you can create a scandal.
And I'm inclined to believe that after examining the Michael Jackson case, because he was in a war with Sony over publishing rights and suddenly he was being accused.
And I didn't remember much about that case.
But then when I went and I looked at it, it was a crazy story of like a kid who was drugged by his dad to say that he was raped by Michael Jackson.
Literally, he was drugged by his father.
And so you start to wonder if there's a lot of stuff that's happening in Hollywood that many people have tried to speak out about.
And those people have either been deemed crazy or in the case of Michael Jackson, this, no, he's into children.
And we sort of pay attention to the media circus of everything without realizing that like there could be other stuff happening in Hollywood.
Michael Jackson was weird in the same way that Harvey Weinstein was obnoxious in the same way that Richard Jewell seemed like a fake cop, the guy who was blamed for the Atlanta Olympic bombing in 96 who didn't do it.
They kind of fit your preconceptions of what a bad guy like that would be.
You know, Michael Jackson living in Neverland is weird kind of personal Disney with all these little kids.
And both of those people said absolutely never, not once did Michael Jackson do anything to them.
They stood up for him.
And then when you get into the people that said that he did something and you figure out what their motives were, one's drugged, one was paid.
The Michael Jackson story gets completely crazy.
And so what you had was a man who was stunted in his growth because of his childhood, who wanted to make the world a special magical place for people.
And he became the, you know, the perfect, I mean, he won his case.
So we can say Michael Jackson was not guilty, right?
He actually won his case once the jury saw all the evidence.
But yeah, it's kind of scary to think that a media circus can be created about you and people can believe things, just like we were saying with Matt Lauer.
Absent very little fact because the media just keeps saying it.
And that gets into the importance of why I select and get, you know, I'm like a dog with a bone on certain cases, the Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni case is another one.
Again, Justin Baldoni is Jewish, obviously.
So is Steve Sorowitz.
I'm like the worst anti-Semite ever.
Here I am defending these people.
But it's the same thing.
She went to the press and tried to smear this man and ruin his existence by claiming in so many words that he had sexually harassed her.
And she made him sound with the help of the New York Times like he was an absolute creep, a pervert, a sex-addicted pervert.
If you read that article, you took away that Justin Baldoni was a sex-addicted pervert, right?
And poor Blake Lively had to survive doing a movie with him.
If Brian Friedman had not done what he had done and published the entire, he said, there's nothing to hide, every text message sent between Blake and Justin and Ryan Reynolds, the world would have believed what she and the New York Times had worked on.
It was, it's, it's a shocking case.
People are like, oh, it's just like celebrity drama.
No, this isn't celebrity drama.
This is so much deeper than that.
Okay.
We are talking about the corruption of the media who has the trust of the people.
Like you're an educated person.
You read the New York Times, right?
The New York Times essentially assisted in a hit on a man.
For what reason?
What did Blake actually want from Justin Baldoni?
Publishing rights.
And we got to read her messages and she wanted to be put on the film and she wanted to be put as a producer, executive producer, or else, right?
You do this or else threatening.
So I'm not going to come back.
Here are my demands.
I mean, a total witch.
Truly, that woman is possessed.
I cannot, I cannot, after reading those messages and Justin falling over himself because he was like, she's an A-lister.
He was almost like pathetic, like stand up for yourself at a certain point.
And what's happening right now, like in the court system in New York, they're allowing her to, I don't know, like it just seems like it's a very corrupt case.
But what happened to Justin Baldoni, it is everyone should be reading those messages and realizing what the New York Times took part in because we're seeing this happen over and over again where the media, like the journalists are acting like assassins, right?
Enough of noise from the media and we just, we don't even look for facts anymore.
And I want people who watch my show to be trained in recognizing those patterns when actually they're saying a lot, but they're not really saying much.
You are watching a team of trained assassins take someone out.
For what reason?
I don't know.
Then we can become, you know, we can come up with conspiracies.
But that's what this is, right?
That's what this is.
They're ignoring facts because if they had presented the facts, none of us would have thought those things about Harvey Weinstein.
We'd have just said he's a creep who abuses power and he should step down because nobody who's running a company should be sleeping with all of these women and cheating on his wife.
And then you've got Trump over here being like, does anybody still care about Jeffrey Epstein?
And then Pam Bondi is asked the question, you know, was he working for another country?
And she says, you don't know, right?
You don't know.
So in my series, I'm like, well, maybe we can help them.
Maybe we can help the deep state figure out who Jeffrey Epstein was working for.
Here is Ari Ben Minosh, who was a Mossad agent, who is on record, literally recorded.
Let's listen to him tell us about how Jeffrey Epstein was working for the Mossad.
Okay, Ari Ben Minosh worked for Mossad.
He's saying that Robert Maxwell brought him to Jeffrey Epstein and said, let this guy in.
He's going to be involved in weapons.
Hey, Pam Bondi, you might have missed this one.
Okay.
You might have missed this one.
Then you go to another person who is on record, who is Victor Otrowski, who defected from the Mossad notoriously.
The Mossad admits he worked for the Mossad.
He wrote a book by Deception or By Deception Only.
He says that's the Mossad motto, which they obviously do that.
That's why they, you know, execute all these false flags.
And he told everybody the truth.
He has said Jeffrey Epstein was working with us.
So for whatever reason, Candace Owens is able to determine whether or not Jeffrey Epstein might have been working for another state, but Pam Bondi, they're just going to have to keep surmising about whether or not Jeffrey Epstein, who is with Ghelaine Maxwell, her father being Robert Maxwell, one of the biggest lies, by the way, that's told.
And I debunked this in our first or our third Epstein episode, is the idea that, oh, well, yeah, Robert Maxwell, they admit he was a Mossad agent, but Epstein didn't know him.
The story they try to tell now in fashion to the public is like Ghelene and Jeffrey Epstein met after her dad was dead.
That's just false.
Again, Ari Ben Minosh tells a story of being brought into the office and being told that Epstein was going to be brought in.
This was the Iran-Contra scandal.
So since the 80s, Jeffrey Epstein has been working for Israel.
I don't know how I know that and Trump and Pam Bondi don't, but they got to bring me in.
Like seriously, that would feel better at this point if they just came out and said, F you, na, na, da, boo, boo, you can't touch us.
We rule over you.
Ha ha.
That would feel at least authentic.
Going back to the Taylor Laurence thing, you know, I'd be like, I really don't like that, but at least it's authentic and I know you mean it and it's true.
I will never support Israel into the future after what they've done to these children, the starvation campaign.
I don't care.
Like, please write your honor.
You've already written them all.
I don't know what you could add about me, but I do not support Israel.
And I don't think that Jewish Americans should support Israel.
And I hope that they're now having those conversations.
I see many of them recognizing that they have been propagandized into believing they have to support this demonic state.
And that's in large part thanks to their birthright trip.
Yeah, that mask down moment for Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL when he got caught on the hot mic.
It was released.
He didn't know that he was being recorded.
And he's like saying that they got to get TikTok under control.
He's like, we have a generational issue with TikTok.
We need to do something about this, like what we did with birthright.
What does that tell you?
That the entire purpose of that birthright trip, telling every Jewish American, you forget a free trip to Israel was to propagandize you into believing that you have some affinity with this made up country in the Middle East in 1948, that you have to, you know, react when something's happening to them or you have to look away when they're doing things that are so obviously wrong and demonic.
And so I'm hoping now that we're getting to that point where people can recognize that whether you're black, you don't have to agree with BLM, whether you're Jewish, allowing your identity to shape your morality is problematic.
Okay.
And Israel, in and of itself, is a demonic nation.
I will never support Israel.
Right.
So I went from working for PragerU to I will never support Israel.
And so that's how much the scales have fallen from my eyes about what they are involved in.
And if this isn't your wake-up call to just look at the footage of what they are doing, they're playing hunger games and like throwing food at them and then killing people and seeing who survives.
Your point that if you allow your identity to determine your morality is a very deep and I think important point that I've never heard any, I've never heard anybody put it that way, but it does feel like we're moving toward a world in which, you know, all ethics are situational and it all depends on who I am and who my tribe is and what my identity is.
And there isn't to the extent there used to be a sense of like universal standards that apply to everyone, otherwise known as principles.
You clearly operate by those principles.
Does that accelerate or do we return to a moment where we can say, oh, no, there are universal standards of behavior.
Truth is an unchanging thing.
Whether we have it or not is debatable, but there is something called truth.
And not just surviving, I should point out, since you're not a braggart, I mean, thriving in a way that like nobody would have predicted as, you know, measured by your numbers on your podcast, as measured by your family output.
Now you're the mother of four.
Like, I don't know.
I don't even know how you like have a baby in the middle of all that, but you did.
I hope that people take away from me living through it and surviving and coming out the other side is that it's, it's, it isn't worth your soul to tell a lie, you know, tell the truth.
And that seems harder.
That certainly in that moment of temptation feels harder when you're being promised the world.
If you just don't say this thing, you know, everything will stay the same.
If you just pretend like you don't see what's happening in Gaza, you know, you can have your life the way that you like it.
That is, in my viewpoint, that that is being tempted by Satan.
That really is.
And that is why they want you to be attached to money, right?
That is why they don't even know how to try to destroy me outside of saying, we're going to financially crush you, right?
We're going to keep you in lawsuits.
We're going to sue you.
I'm going to sue you for $8 billion because there's no truth in these people.
Like money is all is the only motor.
That's their only real power.
And so I hope that when people, you know, the millions of people that listen to my podcast every single day, that they get that there is, there is something way bigger than that, way higher authority to that.
And when you commit yourself to truth, right?
What is Jesus?
Jesus is the way and the truth and the life, right?
I think that once you get through that temptation, you are rewarded if you do the right thing.
You do the moral thing and you do the principled thing.
You're being tested.
We're all being tested right now.
That's what I truly believe.
We're all being tested.
And a lot of people are failing that test, but a lot of people aren't, right?
Strange bedfellows.
You had Anna Kasparian on this show.
And I've been saying for a while that I liked her because I perceived that she was being authentic, even when I disagreed with her.
I was like, I disagree with her and she's been terrible to me, but I perceive that she's being authentic.
And we're seeing that happen.
It's a good thing.
It's a good thing that the left and the right are coming together on this topic and that it doesn't matter if you're black or you're white.
And so in that way, yeah, Israel, what's happening, Israel has been a blessing because I think for the first time, the entire world is in lockstep, realizing something is very wrong, that this is allowed to happen in broad daylight and no one is stopping it.
What I mean by that is I can, and obviously I'm looking at my own metrics here, but we have people committed to watching my show all over the world, like using VPNs to watch this show all over the world.
And as I, I don't view myself as an authority.
I'm learning with them.
I think that's what they enjoy about my show is I'm not like Jake Tapper sitting up here telling you she's deranged.
I'm actually saying, we're not getting answers here.
That's why you say, you ask me the question, Candace, why do you have so much joy?
Because it is funny, right?
And I think that my joy makes them even angrier because I think it's so ridiculous.
You're trying to sell to me that this guy, Daryl Cooper, is the second coming of Adolph.
You're like, that's funny.
And then it makes people curious because you're going, he's so clearly not.
So what is it that he's hit upon that has you guys so triggered?
It's got to be a truth.
Let me keep digging.
And yeah, you, as soon as you start like asking any questions about the World War II narrative, which has been decided in our textbooks, which were printed by Robert Maxwell.
Okay.
We're getting it's out our Epstein series, you know, who who, he who prints the textbook is king, you start asking other questions, right?
How has my mind been shaped since I was a child?
Why do I feel this way?
Why do I have an emotional response to these things that I don't understand?
And that was set up for you.
We were set up to not ask questions about certain things.
And so now they're arriving at their final point.
And this is why I love it so much, is that we've now forced them into a corner where their legitimate argument, as if it couldn't get more absurd, is that we have to just stop asking questions, right?
You're not just asking questions.
This is their new thing.
You, you're not just asking questions.
Why are you asking questions?
Say what you really mean.
They're the ones that are so clearly undone that we can't even ask questions.
unidentified
So we're funny thing is I actually am asking questions.
And now, with the things and the discussions that I'm having with my viewers, there's no way I could have been at the Daily Wire, just wouldn't have worked.
You know, it worked for a little bit and then it suddenly was not working.
And now it definitively, we would not be a good match.
And at the end of the day, I just don't view myself as in competition with the Daily Wire.
Like, I am interested in totally different things.
And I was, I'm definitely somebody that I think I thrive when I get to just truly say and express myself entirely exactly how I feel every second of every day.
And I'm interested in so many different topics.
And it was getting increasingly difficult to kind of explore things that I was interested in without having to worry about whether it would upset this person or that person or how the legal person felt about this.
And at that point, you're not having fun.
Then it becomes a job, right?
It always was a job, but then it becomes a job, meaning that you're waking up every day and you're like, and now I wake up every day and I'm thrilled and I'm researching and I'm learning with my audience.
In case you missed it, a guy tried to kill me last year.
Constantly about the FBI.
So there's nothing to fear.
Just embrace that that people are deranged and people are crazy.
And of course, people want to harm me.
Do I fear it?
No, because I don't fear death.
And I think that that is the true challenge of being a Christian.
I ask myself this question when there are so many people who purport to be Christians and they won't say things that they know are true or they actually say things that they know to be false because they're fearful of losing their jobs.
Right.
And if you are responding or you're behaving in a certain way or not saying something because you're fearful of something like the moment right now, do you believe in the afterlife?
Do you believe in Christ?
Do you know that you're actually not just trying to get paid by a check, but also trying to get into heaven?
Right.
That's the bigger thing.
So I go for the bigger thing.
And yeah, I know that no matter what, I will be okay.
My husband makes sure that he says his number one goal is to make sure that all of us are getting into heaven.
My advice to him would be my advice to very many people who I've seen become very big and then get very small or have their supporters turn on them, which is don't ever get to the point where you think you're smarter than your audience.
And I think that for Trump right now, and I'm speaking specifically about the gaslighting of Are We So talking about Jeffrey Epstein and then saying, I don't want any supporters that are still into this.
That means that you see yourself as a king and you've stopped listening.
You're not responding to the movement anymore.
And what made us get behind you was that despite the fact that we knew you were this boisterous billionaire, was that you had a way of communicating with and understanding how people felt, right?
The blue collar worker, how that person felt, the person that's listening to you, the truck driver, the plumbers.
And when you respond with, well, I don't want your support or gaslighting, you know, you've lost touch a little bit with your audience.
Just don't never think that you're smarter than your audience.
I'm constantly getting feedback from my audience and trying to figure out what they're interested in and how I can be better, even if slight tweaks of things like, oh, I don't like the way the audio sounds or this.
And they like that.
They know, because then they know that you care and I do care.
And I think that Trump's message over the last few weeks with the Epstein fumble, as I'm going to refer to it as, makes people think that he doesn't care.
I, when George and I first got married, I was not Catholic.
I was Protestant.
To see just God's design and everything, and how me and George met, and how he then was so drawn back into his faith.
Like he was, I would definitely say he was not a practicing Catholic when we got married, or else he would have told me that I had to convert before we got married, actually, because he's that he's that deep into the faith now.
But our marriage has brought us closer to faith.
And I made the decision, not knowing how all this is going to play out, but to become baptized into the Catholic Church.
And it's just interesting how, you know, there's so there is a divine aspect to everything that's happening, the timing of everything.
I never question God's timing, even when things seem terrible, right?
And that's not going to be enough of a threat for me to give up speaking truth because, and this is the part that I really want to get to because it's super important for people to hear this.
I'm encouraged when people say that I give them the courage, right?
That's the greatest thing.
That's the greatest compliment that I can receive that they were quiet about something and now they are vocal about it because they realize it matters.
Our children are going to inherit the world that we allow them to inherit.
So if we decide to become creatures of, you know, pleasure and creatures of social media and creatures of a lack of focus and ultimately creatures of fear and cowardice, they will inherit the world, right?
That we've left behind for them.
It's so important to stand up for what's right because your children, if you don't stand up to the demons, those demons are only going to grow more powerful.
And your children are going to be the ones that suffer it, right?
So the question is: do you care enough about it to protect your children to moms and dads, right?
When you say, I didn't say the thing, so I just went along with the COVID thing, you would allow them to poison your kids, like because you were just scared to say something.
And again, because we live in the society of pleasure and we live in this side, everything's so momentary and social media and a distraction, we've actually become a very weakened species.
Like I am so driven by who my grandfather was.
I always say this.
People are like, what's up with this girl?
Why are you so happy?
I say, my grandfather blessed me.
He spoiled me.
And I just looked up, looked at him as such a man, like truly what it means, like to embody faith.
His family was all that he cared about, faith, family.
And he could look you in the eye and do a deal on a handshake, right?
If he said he was going to be there, he was going to be there.
If he said he wasn't going to be, he was going to do this, he was going to do that.
So it turns out that YouTube is suppressing this show.
On one level, that's not surprising.
That's what they do.
But on another level, it's shocking with everything that's going on in the world right now, all the change taking place in our economy and our politics with the wars on the cusp of fighting right now.
Google has decided you should have less information rather than more.
And that is totally wrong.
It's immoral.
What can you do about it?
Well, we could whine about it.
That's a waste of time.
We're not in charge of Google, or we could find a way around it, a way that you could actually get information that is true, not intentionally deceptive.
The way to do that on YouTube, we think, is to subscribe to our channel.
Subscribe.
Hit the little bell icon to be notified when we upload and share this video.
That way you'll have a much higher chance of hearing actual news and information.