Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong exposes rising cancer rates in children and young adults as a "non-infectious pandemic," blaming chronic inflammation from toxins (PFAS, processed foods) and COVID-19’s spike proteins—whether from infection or mRNA vaccines—which suppress NK and T-cells via ACE2 receptors. His BioShield therapy, a T-cell-based approach, achieves long-term remissions in metastatic cancers but faces FDA delays and industry suppression, mirroring China’s biomedical progress. Criticizing conventional treatments as immune-destroying, he advocates low-dose chemo plus BioShield to activate natural killer cells, calling for a "cancer Red Cross" of cryopreserved immune cells. Warns mRNA vaccines may drive viral persistence, citing ignored universal T-cell vaccine research, and ties systemic failures to political interference, like his $200M Dunkirk lab left unused. Acquired the LA Times to counter echo chambers, firing staff for partisan bias, while Tucker Carlson notes YouTube’s censorship of their platform, framing it as a fight for truth in media. [Automatically generated summary]
So you spent your life, you know, 50 years working on treatments for cancer.
And when you started, it seemed like we were moving in the West toward the elimination of cancer.
Smoking was a huge emphasis.
Get rid of tobacco and cancer rates will drop.
Obviously, smoking does cause cancer.
And we got rid of it, basically.
But cancer rates...
Went up.
And that is a very rarely remarked upon mystery that really bothers me.
Tell us, since you made billions of dollars selling your companies, but you're still involved in medical research, which I admire, where are we now with cancer?
Well, what's really worrisome to me now is not just the rate, but the population in which it's increasing, i.e.
the younger people.
So, we're clearly seeing an increase in certain types of cancer, like pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, and we're seeing it, colon cancer, and we're seeing it in younger people.
Well, I got to tell you a really concerning story.
It's not only I'm seeing it now, I'm seeing it in younger people.
And for the first time in my career, you know, when I left UCLA, I was doing all the whipples, which is a surgery to actually remove most of the pancreas, a very big operation.
Yes. And I was also doing pancreas transplants for type 2 diabetes and islet cell transplants and stem cell transplants.
So I had this diverse activity as a UCLA assistant professor.
But I never saw pancreatic cancer in children.
And the greatest surprise to me was a 13-year-old with metastatic pancreatic cancer that the family called us to help.
And to me, that was not only devastating, it emphasized the idea that we're seeing people with Higher incidence of pancreatic cancer and younger.
Right now in our clinic, we have 45-year-old, 50-year-old.
And what was sad about this young boy, by the time he came to see us, he had exhausted all the standards of care.
And he came from Butler, Pennsylvania.
And all the major medical centers really had exhausted all their therapy.
By the time he came to see us, his body was ridden, and he passed away.
So, seeing cancers now in younger people, and almost a rise, almost like a, I don't want to call it a non-infectious pandemic, but this is what I think is going to worrisome in the world, not just in the United States, but largely in the United States, we're beginning to see this, and it's really worrisome.
I inquired around because it bothered me so much now of why this is happening.
So, Dr. Stephen Day was a good friend who trained with me at UCLA when I was at UCLA.
He's now at the Angeles Clinic and I called him and he said, listen, Patrick, I'm now seeing an 8-year-old, a 10-year-old, an 11-year-old with colon cancer.
Colon cancer?
Colon cancer.
We've never seen that.
We're seeing now 30-year-old, 40-year-old ladies, young ladies with ovarian cancer.
So this is a real phenomenon of a rise of cancer in early people, in young people, and really need to get to the bottom.
Right. I'm getting reports of that now, that people that have been in remission before even are now getting back the cancers and they're not getting back the cancer.
Very rapidly progressing.
So, if you really think about what the cause of cancer is, you know, and I did a piece with Sanjay Gupta many, many years ago on 60 Minutes, and I said, you know, the cause of cancer is its inability, it's not the rapidity of its growth, but its inability to die.
And its inability to die is because it either hides from the cells that matter, i.e.
your natural killer cells, your T cells, or, and this is what I'm really worried about, your body and the cancer has found a way to suppress your killer cells.
And once they do that, once they activate what are called the suppressor cells, and you call yourself immunosuppressed, Then I think you see this rapid progression because there's nothing stopping them.
Well, I think if you look back of causes, you know, ironically, when I was doing at UCLA, I was working on pancreas transplant where I want to immunosuppress the patients.
Whose job is to kill, quite right, anything that threatens the body, whether the body has infection.
If you have TB, you have HIV, if you have hepatitis, you have COVID, these cells are there to recognize these infected cells and kill it.
As you and I are sitting here today, our stem cells are growing in order to replenish parts of your body, your heart.
If you didn't have that, you wouldn't have a heart.
At the age of 14, you need those stem cells.
But mathematically, There are some cells that are transformed and your body recognizes that through these natural killer cells and kills it.
I call that nature's first responder.
And that's your mechanism.
That's how we are all protected and we are in this state of equilibrium or balance.
On the other hand, the moment either the tumor finds a way to hide from these cells or your body's or the tumor.
It causes these cells to be suppressed.
And that's why I call the suppressor cells.
And there are certain cells in your body called T-reg cells or Milo-derived suppressor cells.
These are all technical.
And when they get upregulated, you've lost your protection.
And so the question then is, how do we understand this balance?
How do we increase the killers?
And how do we decrease the suppressors?
That's been 50 years of my challenge of, and how do we expose the tumor?
So on the one hand, you need to expose the tumor because it hides from the killers.
On the other hand, you activate the killers.
On the other hand, you have to suppress the suppressors.
So we're truly playing a good game of chess.
And I think like a...
Astrophysics, where you're looking for God's particle, where all these molecules are floating around, talking to each other, all the cells are floating around, talking to each other, and this dynamic interaction.
And how do you understand all of that?
You know, one of the best, most fun lectures I gave, I gave a lot of lectures on this and tried to be non-technical because it's what I call basic immunology.
And the problem with cancer is it's been treated by oncologists and not immunologists.
And immunologists don't see patients because they look at basic immunology.
And then when you have infection and you have virology, so this cross-disciplines of virology, immunology, oncology, all these ologies don't talk to each other.
But that, I think, is what's happening in our body.
We have these perturbations.
But we're in equilibrium, you know, and that's a good thing.
The moment you knock yourself out of equilibrium, now what could knock you out of equilibrium?
And that's why when, you know, Bobby Kennedy is talking about and standing up about the toxins in our food, the toxins in PFAS, the processed food, and viral infections, and really what knocks you out of balance basically is inflammation.
If you have inflammation in your body, there's this, now I'm going to get nerdy again, these cells called neutrophils that actually see an infection and tries to kill it, which it does.
But if there's persistent inflammation, these neutrophils actually flip into a suppressor cell.
So what people don't realize is that we have the yin-yang in our body that every cell has a counter cell.
And that's where I was about to go there.
I said the most fun conversation I had where I was asked by astrophysicists or physicists to give a lecture is I named this concept of cancer a quantum theory, like a physicist.
And that in our body we have cells that can be in two states.
It can be a killer or a suppressor.
And like the Schroder's cat, it could be alive or dead.
And it depends what you do with it.
And so I named this thing Quantum Oncotherapeutics, just to be controversial, so that doctors could understand what I'm talking about, is that we need to understand the fact that you have a killer T-cell and you have a killer suppressor cell.
We have an M1 macrophage that actually chomps things up, an M2 macrophage that blocks that.
You have an NK cell that kills, an NK cell that inhibits.
And we need to have that balance, otherwise you'll get into autoimmune disease.
But there's a thing called quantum entanglement, that is this cat alive or is this cat dead?
If somebody interacts with that, and the person that interacts with that is the doctor.
So you, as a doctor, could either be enlightened enough to activate just the activators and suppress the suppressors and change the dynamic towards the cure.
But it's very complex because it's now quantum because all those changes are happening in minutes in your body.
These molecules Like God's particle, where they're colliding with each other, and cells are colliding and interacting, happens within minutes.
So you need to have a theory of how you interact at that level.
And in so doing, the first thing you need to understand is, how does cancer happen?
And then, how does it grow?
How do you stop it?
This idea of a vaccine, a cancer vaccine, Do you radiate that cancer?
Do you remove that cancer?
Do you remove the lymph nodes?
Do you give chemotherapy?
And crazily enough, over the last 50 years, I figured out that everything we're doing is not the word wrong, because that's a bad statement, a pejorative statement.
It's not enlightened, a better way to say it.
Because everything we're doing is tipping the scales towards the suppressor cells.
We're activating the suppressor cells.
We're not activating the killing cells.
And we can go into this conversation where I can explain that.
So the key system, which you just said, is cancer is all about the immune system.
Something is suppressing people's immune systems, Poor 13-year-old boy who died of pancreatic cancer.
And the question is, what is that?
And maybe there are a lot of causes, but we're not the first people to notice there's been an increase in scary cancers in populations that didn't used to get them.
It's very obvious just from living here.
And a lot of people have pointed to both COVID, the virus, and to the mRNA COVID vaccines as potential causes.
Oncogenic viruses in medical terms, meaning viruses that are induced carcinogenic.
And the fundamental basis for that are threefold.
The hallmarks of an oncogenic virus is one, it must persist.
And why?
Because it continues to create inflammation.
And why?
With inflammation you get suppression, because your body is trying to suppress it.
It must inhibit the thing called P53 that's in your body to try and protect your body from...
And if it persists and causes inflammation and inhibits P53, it begins to have the hallmarks of an oncogenic virus.
So then the question is, does COVID, whether it come from the vaccine, which is the spike protein vaccine, or from the infection, which is spike-driven, that gets into every cell of our body?
It goes wherever you have this thing called the ACE2 receptor, which is in the blood vessels.
So wherever you have a blood vessel in your body, it's where it's going to go.
And if it has an ACE2 receptor on that blood vessel, that's where it can go, because that's the purpose of the spike protein, to penetrate, to hijack that ACE2 receptor and get into their cells.
So that's why it gets in the pancreas.
That's why you have brain fog, because it disrupts the blood vessels of the brain and causes mitochondrial dysfunction.
That's why in the colon, which has a high, in the GI tract, there's a high H2 receptor.
That's why pancreas is a high H2 receptor, where that's why you people have, in the heart, you have dysfunction.
You've seen young people who have sudden heart attacks all of a sudden.
You see young people with pancreatic cancer all of a sudden.
You see young people with colon cancer all of a sudden.
So is it by coincidence that post-COVID infection, post-COVID vaccine, we're seeing all these events where we know the spike protein goes there?
I don't think so.
I think it's not a coincidence.
So the question is, can we prove is this what I call long COVID?
Virus persisting.
And the group at University of California, San Francisco, has now definitively proven that and published that in papers like Nature.
Can we also prove that once you have that persistence of that virus, does that COVID virus suppress the natural killer cell?
Does the natural killer cell actually not only go to sleep, becomes what we call energetic?
Privacy should be a right for all citizens in this country.
It's a prerequisite to freedom.
No privacy, no freedom.
Unfortunately, in America, privacy is a luxury.
So who gets the luxury of privacy?
You don't.
We don't.
Privacy is given to government agencies.
They've got millions of classified documents, actually over a billion in this country.
The average American citizen, meanwhile, is being watched every time he or she goes online.
Data brokers are tracking and recording everything you do, and they're selling what they learn about you and your private life to advertisers, even to the government, to the NSA.
What do you do about it?
Well, we use a product called ExpressVPN.
ExpressVPN is an app that sends 100% of your online traffic through secure encrypted servers.
And that means that everything you do online, your personal data, your personal information, is shielded from the creeps who want to sell it to other businesses or the government.
ExpressVPN also hides your IP address, and that means the brokers cannot exploit you.
They can't sell you as a product to the highest bidder.
Without saying it, it scares the pants off me because I think what we may be...
I don't think it's virus versus man now, you know, this is existential.
I think when I talk about the largest non-infectious pandemic that we're afraid of, this is it.
Because... While there was an increased rise in cancer in our country because of the idea of the toxins and everything else, this immunosuppression that has occurred now globally, and more importantly, immunosuppression tied to inflammation, chronic inflammation, which is asymptomatic in some times, and sometimes it's not.
There's 15 million Americans with long COVID.
And they're not psychiatric when they have memory loss.
They're not psychiatric when they have instantaneous heart attacks.
It's not psychiatric when you have an 8-year-old, 10-year-old colon cancer, a 13-year-old pancreatic cancer.
I think it's important for me to have this conversation with you.
That's why...
Okay, I'll share with you a conversation I had.
I got invited by the CEO of the Henry Jackson Foundation to come to D.C. I think October, November last year during the election phase.
And just to have a conversation about what I'm doing.
And there he brought the leader from Walter Reed, the barter, the DOD, the NIH, the NID, all into that room.
It was just me.
And I said, it is time.
It is time for me to reveal to this learned group of leaders about what I'm scared about.
And I spent, I think it was three hours, no slides.
Just me speaking alone on the stage and all of them in the audience.
When I first started the conversation, the first sentence was, I think COVID is oncogenic.
One of the members of the audience said, that's nonsense.
I said, okay, let me explain to you what we've been doing in our research.
At the end of three hours, four hours, he said, you've got to publish this.
This is so important.
And I said, yes, we are.
Processing the publication and what came out was this paper that they biopsied the colon of young people temporarily when no COVID to COVID and showed the persistence of replicating viruses in the colon tissue two years out.
And when you have this inflammation, these neutrophils, now getting geeky again, plasticize, flip from a protective neutrophil to a suppressive neutrophil.
And at the funeral, at his funeral, all the people in the room, and it was, I think, November, and I turned to Gavin Newsom and I said, listen, this is one virus I'm worried about because I was studying this virus.
You know, I understand HPV very well and I understand hepatitis.
I said, this is not a respiratory virus.
This is a dangerous virus.
So I went back and I shut down our organization.
So that we could actually do nothing else but COVID.
My entire team of hundreds of scientists on Zoom and everything else around the world has said, we must go after this virus with a vaccine that clears the virus.
And the only way to clear the virus is to have what we call a T cell, an NK cell, the cell that kills cancer cells.
And I wrote a paper with Carl Scudone who said, COVID's like cancer and cancer's like COVID.
Meaning, it's immune suppression that causes its spread.
And it's immune suppression by the COVID virus that allows it to persist.
So, the only vaccine that's important is a T-cell vaccine.
But, that's what I'm telling you, virologists think about antibodies versus cellular therapy.
It's foreign to them to have a vaccine that stimulates T-cells.
Internally. It's a little weird since in 20 minutes you explained it to me, not particularly high IQ, not a scientist.
I understand exactly what you're saying.
Why isn't it obvious to virologists?
Why isn't that like day one lesson in virology school that the T cells, the cells that protect you against all potential internal harm, they're the key?
But your position is they're panicked for the wrong reasons.
And actually, maybe they're not quite as panicked as they should be because this virus could pave the way for cancer because it will suppress the immune system of the human body.
For cancer, using the same vaccine that NCI had already tested for HPV and for colon cancer, a thing called CA.
So I'd create this vaccine in which we would educate your body, prior to COVID, for the treatment of cancer, to educate the T-cells to recognize a cancer cell to kill it.
That's called a cancer vaccine, which, by the way, is for...
The only vaccine in clinical trials today to prevent cancer that the NCI is running using our technology.
And the BioShield is to educate your body to have these T-cells called memory T-cells that go and hide in the bone marrow and come out when they need it and kill that cell so it can never do damage.
That's the concept.
And it's not a foreign concept.
We published it with the National Cancer Institute.
You know, as I said to you over breakfast, I had no idea about stocks.
So when the two companies were bought, and they were bought for the right reasons.
So one company was American Pharmaceutical Partners, and we were making literally close to a million vials a day in the United States, manufacturing of 150 different SKUs for every part of the hospital.
And we're safe for heparin.
So Fresenius said, we want to buy you.
And we said, great.
And then I developed this molecule.
That was feeding the tumor that could actually activate the immune system to activate the macrophages called Abraxane.
And Celgene said, we want to buy you.
I said, great.
And the purpose for my selling them was not for the money, clearly it was for the money, but the purpose of the use of the money to pursue this dream of this astrophysics to find God's particle in your human body to activate your immune system.
Then he called me and he said, we're going to create warp speed.
And he's a star trekking and I'm a star trekking and I love warp speed.
I said, okay, we're going to do this in warp speed.
Absolutely. But the only way, Peter, you're going to do this in warp speed, you need, we need, as a country, to have NIH and Bada fund a trial where we take macaque monkeys.
We give them the vaccine, and everybody should throw their vaccine in because I don't care if it's not mine or theirs, whoever's vaccine, to clear the virus.
The only way to do this experiment, you give the monkeys the vaccine, it's under your control, you have 100 monkeys, everybody gets a set of vaccines, and then you infect the monkeys in the BSL-3 facility with a high dose of COVID, and then you see...
In their lungs and their tissue, that there's no virus after seven days.
Absolutely. That was warp speed.
So I was one of eight of warp speed.
Then I get a call, Patrick, you dewarped.
I said, test my vaccine anyway.
They did a vaccine test at the NIH and Bada.
It cleared the virus.
As I predicted.
There was no virus in the lungs after a big infection.
So I said, okay.
I'm dewarped.
And this was a Francis Collins scheme and Anthony Fauci scheme and Monsi Slaoui scheme.
And one day we'll talk about the conversation I had with Monsi Slaoui and what I've learned about Francis Collins in that event.
And they were going to go after this antibody vaccine, which is this mRNA vaccine with spike.
And I said, this is too important.
I told my people, we're going to build our own vaccine with our own money.
I couldn't get enough material other than to do one batch.
And we're going to do a phase one trial.
And we're going to inject as many people that we can do in the phase one trial.
I drew my own blood and tested and I have T-cells to nucleocapsid and to spike.
Which means if I were to get COVID, touch wood, the T-cells, now our memory T-cells, would clear the virus.
We then tried, begged, begged, because not for funding even, but for the plastic bags that were now restricted as you grow these things to Pfizer and Moderna, all the materials that you need in a biologic facility.
The people that, interestingly enough, it doesn't say, just so you know, You have to differentiate.
Does it actually prevent the penetration of the virus versus the load of the virus versus the clearance of the virus?
These are three different things.
So, we think it prevents the penetration, but we don't know because as soon as it does penetrate, it would clear, so you wouldn't even know, or the T cell vaccine.
This is anecdotal.
But some of the people who got our T-cell vaccine, their family members got COVID.
They didn't get it, obviously, the vaccine.
And they didn't get COVID from a time while living with the family.
The issue of clearing the virus in transmission was the key.
So an antibody vaccine may reduce the viral load and therefore reduce death, which is a...
Good thing that President Trump did.
But the next generation of clearing the virus was what was needed.
And both should have been developed simultaneously.
It wasn't.
I'll share with you to this day.
It's a mystery to me why.
But the opportunity to clear the virus...
It was actually known, I think, by Collins and by Fauci that it did not clear the virus.
If you don't clear the virus, and you have pieces of the virus in there, especially spike, Whether from the infection or from the vaccine.
And now you get another infection.
Now the virus brings along this nucleic capsid.
Now it reconjoins and replicates again in these what they call privileged sites two years later.
So what we're seeing, now we're back to persistence.
That's now published just months ago.
And this is what I shared with NIH secretly four months ago.
And persistence, asymptomatic persistence but with inflammation and reduction of P53 and immunosuppression are all the hallmarks and recipes for cancer.
And coming back to your first question is, why are we seeing an increase in young people?
I think all of the above.
The toxins, the history, the red dye, the PFAS, the COVID, all of the above.
The vaccine itself upregulates temporarily the antibodies.
But if the vaccine The spike protein breaks off, and the RNA or DNA goes into the cells, and whether from infection or the vaccine, that's where the controversy is, right?
You probably have no idea where your meat comes from.
You probably should know.
The likelihood is that the meat you're eating passed through a massive industrial processing plant probably owned by a foreign corporation.
Foreign meat.
Did you sign up for that?
We don't think you did.
So, you probably have no idea of knowing where the animal grew up, what that animal ate, or what chemicals big food pumped into that animal to increase profits.
That's all kept secret, meaning you can never really know what you're putting in your mouth and in your body.
That's disgusting if you think about it, and it's easy to fix.
Meriwether Farms, a farm owned by friends of ours, is a great option.
We use their meat, we eat their meat for every meal.
Corporate farmers, Merriweather Farms controls the entire thing, from the pasture the cattle graze on to the facility where the beef is packaged.
In Wyoming and across the Mountain West, the cattle are raised without hormones, without antibiotics, or any other additive.
Clean American beef you can trust every single time, and they will ship it straight to your door.
Go to meriweatherfarms.com slash Tucker.
Use the code Tucker2025 for 10% off your first order.
You can also save it a monthly subscription if you sign up today.
That's meriweatherfarms.com slash Tucker.
We eat it and vouch for it.
So, and you know that they knew?
You've established for a fact that the developers of this and our public health authorities knew that the COVID vax would neither prevent infection nor transmission.
Correct. But worse, I've since discovered Not by my inquiry, but it's been revealed to me, emails about Francis Collins and some politicians work hard to prevent me from even joining, becoming head of NIH.
And I think that was the motivation all the way downstream that we asked, okay, so what happened to this vaccine?
So I called the FDA.
And said, okay, I can't do a randomized placebo-controlled trial now because you've got Pfizer's Moderna vaccines all over the place, so let me be the booster.
And Peter Marks, to his credit, was the one who said, absolutely.
Peter Marks, to his credit, was the one who says, I'm worried about this COVID vaccine and this long COVID.
I want to study the effects of this vaccine.
Peter Walkswood then said to me, Patrick, fine, go ahead.
I injected the first three patients as a booster.
I get the call from the FDA to say, you have to stop.
So now we're in the Biden era that said, I must stop.
This is 2020 now.
It was during the Biden era.
And I think there was this...
Sadly, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but now I've come to realize it truly was a deep state inside there that had a motivation beyond...
It's sad to say, it's the most devastating to say, beyond public health.
And I just tweeted recently of how so few people could hurt so many.
And that's why...
When I tweeted about, finally we have the right person in HHS with Bobby Kennedy, we'll take this on.
And that we have doctors that will be like Marty McCary, I don't know, but I do know he's a surgeon who can understand and touch and feel what it means to be there on behalf of the patient.
And my support for that...
I think we have a chance now to completely turn this around.
And he controlled, I mean, I had shared with President Trump that Francis Collins should not be the NIH director.
He offered me a job.
Peter Thiel nominated me.
And I've since found emails of Francis Collins.
Sending an email to a politician that, alarm bells, alarm bells, Peter Thiel has nominated Patrick Soon-Shong, we have to find a way to stop it.
Why? To this day, power, greed, political need.
He did the same thing with Craig Venter.
I remember during Clinton's time with the Human Genome Project where Craig Venter invented the sequencing machine for Tens of millions of dollars and you're spending billions of dollars doing nothing but wanted the credit.
I think what happens to you when you get into Washington, the ego, greed, and power changes your mindset.
So I can give motivation to that.
All I can tell you is when I saw that email, I was devastated that somebody would actually go to that extent.
And then send that same email to the CEO of Bio, which is all big pharma.
And that CEO of Bio said, let's go to Google search to find some dirt on him.
But the funny thing is, you made a product, and by the way, a clarification of terms, my understanding was a vaccine was administered to a healthy person to prevent him from getting the disease.
You're describing a product, the one that you made.
That you can inject into an infected person and it cures the infection.
That sounds more like a conventional medicine than a vaccine.
And the reason I knew Bobby Shriver, because Bobby called me seven years prior to that, saying, Patrick, I'm on the city council of Santa Monica, and the mayor of Santa Monica has this terrible tumor in his head and neck.
It's ulcerating under his chin, ulcerating through his jaw.
And UCLA and Cedars-Sinai, he said, he's got two weeks to live.
You know, when you talk about the user fees, so we thought that the user fees was going to accelerate the approval where the FDA gets user fees from pharma.
It turns out that the big pharma user fees are so large, it pays for the salary for all these Reviewers.
So now the biotech companies, the young biotech companies are throttled.
So the big pharma that does this is incremental, little dots that just follow the revenue, there's checkpoints, multi-billion dollar, Merck's, what, 20 billion, 30 billion on revenue?
Bristol-Myers follows it, AstraZeneca follows it, Roche follows it.
There's no, they're all the same, but it's all about incremental, Sameness and follow the dollar.
But the innovation is really at this young biotech companies that are throttled.
This is what needs to be changed by the FDA today.
They need a complete revamp where people with skill sets and the skill sets of the modern science, not the old drugs, have to be in place to understand what's at stake here.
I got a call from a friend of mine yesterday, honestly, true story, who said his girlfriend had just broken up with him over Alp.
He wouldn't stop.
And I thought to myself, that's kind of sad.
And he said, no, it's not sad.
Imagine if I'd married her.
Now I know.
I was saved.
Then the next day, this same friend is driving at twice the speed limit through a major American city, pulled over by a cop in a speed trap.
The cop takes his license and registration, goes back to the patrol car, runs him, comes back, looks in the window, and sees a tin of ALP on the dashboard.
Pauses, stunned, says to my friend, you use ALP?
Yeah, I do, says my friend.
So do I, says the cop.
We all do!
He looks at my friend thoughtfully and goes, drive safely, sir, and hands back his license and registration.
No ticket!
So in two days, he's saved from a tragic marriage to a girl who doesn't like Alp and a speeding ticket.
All true.
It's more than a nicotine marriage.
In an age of 350 million people, we're guessing there are about 350 million Alp stories.
In healthcare and biomedical innovation is the best in the world.
And if we could use biomedical innovation as foreign policy for Africa and to Asia and to India, to bring that to the rest of the world, that's how we lead.
I now read the papers and the Chinese science is now outstripping us.
Look what happened to AstraZeneca just last week.
They just spent $2 billion investing in China now.
So what I'm saying is the fundamental problem, I think, lies at the FDA and even the NIH.
So the change that Bobby's bringing in with Jay now being head of NIH and Marty being head of FTA and Bobby himself having the courage to stand up to talk both against the food industrial complex and the pharma complex, take on the mercs of the world and the visas of the world.
I think we have maybe an opportunity of what I call a period of enlightenment.
And really I'm all about enlightenment.
And if you look at the Sanjay piece, we are there now.
Your body functions, you live or you die by the immune system.
The senescent cells aging is the immune system.
The cells in your body that allow you to go to 100 years old, 120 years old, is based on the activity and the function of the immune system, because the immune system is what's regulating your healthy cells.
Can we just go through, I know this is not patentable, this is not your business, but what are some of the obvious things a person can do to strengthen his immune system?
So it's like, you know when you look at the leaf and you talk about apoptosis and the leaf actually sits and goes brown and it changes but then it goes back up.
So all of human nature, all of nature is filled with this biology of this balance.
So you're a product of nature.
I mean, literally you're a product of when you were A tadpole and a fish as we came out.
So this cell has evolved since the Cambrian age.
Think about that.
This cell, this natural killer cell in your body.
I published my first article in the natural killer cell in 1990.
This cell was only discovered in the 1970s.
Think about that.
And we've ignored that cell.
This is what I call the missing link.
I'm going to announce that.
At the American Urology Conference in Las Vegas in the end of this month, we have discovered, I've not discovered the missing link, we've discovered the awareness of this missing link and how to activate this missing link.
So the idea is to activate the natural killer cell.
It has 30,000 receptors on this cell.
What this natural killer cell does, it replenishes itself with sleep.
So sleep is important.
It replenishes itself with light, with sunlight.
And I believe there's a certain wavelength, the red wavelength, in the sunlight that it actually requires for it to be stimulated.
Unfortunately, I think most natural foods are fine.
It's the toxins in the food.
Exactly what I said, the excipients.
So when we talk about the red dye, the processed foods, all this unnatural processed stuff ultimately cause inflammation.
Now when it gets back to this plasticity of inflammation, inflammation causes immunosuppression because it causes all these cells to flip from the killer state to the suppressor state.
That's why we said we have this dichotomy of is the cat alive?
Your body has a thing where you can induce what you call DAMPs, which is damage associated molecular patterns, but forget that.
It's a way of actually smoking it out, so now your T cells can recognize it.
Okay, so now you've done step one.
That's just step one.
That's one molecule.
So this is why I think the FDA needs to understand we're fighting a war where you need battlefield awareness all simultaneously, where you have to orchestrate your Marines, your Army, your Navy, your Air Force, all in the right place, so that you can use the tumor in your body to act as a weapon, as a vaccine.
Because a tumor has molecules that are foreign to the rest of your body, and if you educate your T cells to recognize those molecules that are foreign to the rest of your body, that T cell can remember.
Now you have a memory T cell.
So for the first time in 2024, in our package insert, we have a molecule called the BioShield now, I'll call it the BioShield, that can activate the natural killer cell, activate the killer T cell, and drive memory T cells.
We now have bladder cancer patients who would have lost their bladder in complete remission for nine years and still alive.
Yeah. But we're now seeing patients now in complete remission.
More importantly, I want to treat patients before they need surgery.
So I can use the tumor itself in the body.
As the vaccine.
To educate the body, the T-cells, all about that tumor.
What's even more exciting now, we can take blood from you, one pint, and extract the natural killer cell in the T-cell, and grow billions, and store it in cryopreservation, just like you do, I don't know, from cord blood.
We now have the ability to grow these natural killer cells and give it to anybody.
So I always said for the first time we could become the American Red Cross of cancer, our country, and use these innovations as foreign policy.
Well, as someone who's clearly, you've made reference to it a couple times, interested in evolution, to change the DNA of a species is to change the species over time.
I don't know, but to consider the possibility you have something, or the certainty that you have something within your body that is acting against your body's interests on purpose.
It's so self-evidently evil to even play with something like that, with the potential consequences which we're now seeing, 13-year-olds getting pancreatic cancer.
I mean, because you've done affinity maturation that would have taken tens of...
Maybe millions of years.
In that fusion protein, they created this fusion protein and then they created this vaccine.
I think Barney Graham was the part with Collins and everything else.
They were so proud to create this RBD and make it stable.
Think about it.
The spearhead, the tip of the spear that goes into your cell, we're going to make it stable.
That's how this vaccine was produced.
This was the mRNA vaccine was produced.
So, you've taken a virus that has now gone from bats to man only because I think this can function work.
You then create a vaccine by taking the spearhead of this virus that is now being created to get into you and make the spearhead even more stable and put it on the vaccine and says, here we go.
So, just from the perspective of a layman again, if I've never had COVID, And I get the MRA, you know, if I get the Pfizer vaccine, mRNA vaccine, if I got it three years ago, can you detect COVID in my body now?
unidentified
Possibly. See, that's like, that's just crazy town.
I've been begging them to go after the nucleocapsid protein because the nucleocapsid protein, which is in the core of the virus, is not the tip of the spear.
And the only chance we have now, because I had no idea that the political deep state was so powerful and so vicious and so egotistical that they would stop good science.
So now I'm out there speaking because the drug got approved.
But that's not enough just for bladder cancer.
It has the same treatment effect for pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, triple negative breast cancer.
It is the only molecule for 50 years that upregulates these killer cells, period, the missing link.
So if you did get COVID, there's three antigens in the virus.
There's a spike, there's a nucleic capsid, and there's a thing called the M protein, M. And if you have, when you do your blood test, you can see if you have the M protein.
If you have the M protein in your...
Antibody to the M protein.
That means it came from the virus.
If you have no M protein, it came from somewhere else.
So now you need to differentiate and not conflate.
The ability of the virus to infect, it could still infect me, but my body has the protection, the BioShield, to clear it immediately, within seven days.
Now what we're working on is a universal COVID vaccine for all coronaviruses because it's in.
So what we did...
Oh, that's a good segue to that.
So during my genomic sequencing, I was building the whole machine learning supercomputing network, and I ran the national Lambda rail for the God's particle, and I built supercomputers and AI, way before AI was.
And I presented the AI model to President Obama, believe it or not, in the one-pager for healthcare.
So our supercomputer, we combined ourselves with Microsoft, so with it we had the largest GPU cloud during COVID.
And we're able then to actually look at the infectivity of every species, every variant of COVID with every human type.
There's a thing called HLA.
So that we could actually look at how the virus would change and avoid the T cells.
The only thing that it could never do was change the nucleocapsid and never could avoid the T cells.
We made that software public.
It is still public and published it so that anybody could test.
Based on your HLA, your HLA and my HLA type would be slightly different.
There's hundreds and thousands of HLA types.
And know whether this sequence, if you had that sequence in your body, would be protective.
Through that, we are developing what we call a universal COVID vaccine.
BioShield T-cell vaccine.
And we have it.
But how do we do it?
You know, so one of my thoughts was just to give it away to somebody.
I actually offered to give it away to Regeneron and to Amgen way back, but they were too busy.
Everybody was too busy during the COVID time.
So one of the ideas now was for me to actually go to the Serum Institute in India and say, yeah, please go build this and make us available to the world.
You know, just so much we could do as an organization.
We're a tiny little biotech company relative to the Merck and the Pfizer's.
But that's what my goal is.
My personal goal is, when you say, I'm still doing it, I don't have a vineyard, the resources that was given to me, it was like God's gift, I believe, that allowed me to do this.
So, you know, we have hundreds of employees, I have 40 acres of land in Los Angeles.
The other tragedy was I took over this facility in Dunkirk that New York State had put $200 million in, completely empty, brand new, amazing facility for national preparedness.
And I called Chuck Schumer to help me make that available for the country.
Nothing. It's still sitting there, available for the country as a national preparedness manufacturing site in Dunkirk, New York.
For which we put $50 million in, but there's no employees in there right now.
Nothing. That's crazy.
It is really ridiculous, right?
Without leadership, without skill sets in leadership, and without informed leadership, how we as a country could go down the wrong path.
And I'm so hopeful that these next four years could change that.
Very famous in the medical research world and controversial, but I'm sold on what you said.
So everything that you've done is, you know, you'll have a great obit because of it.
Then you decide to buy the LA Times in 2018-ish.
And, you know, owning the main newspaper in the country's second biggest town makes you obviously a media mogul, but it makes you a political figure as well.
That was the only way I got educated, books and newspapers.
To the extent that I would go every day as a newspaper boy to the printing press in Port Elizabeth, sit at the printing press, get the first one off the press, read it, and then run with about two, three hundred papers throughout the city.
That would be what I did and grew up.
So I fell in love with the printing press, the clicky clack and the oil and the smell.
And when the opportunity came, remember as I said, I had this amazing gift of The resources of selling these two companies that I never anticipated in life.
With Michael Farrow saying, he took over this company called, named it Tronc, and he was going to shut down the Washington Bureau and move all the...
He says, you know, Patrick, I always thought you were such a smart guy until yesterday.
But, you know, I have no regrets.
I think what I did then was said, okay, I'm going to take everything I know in healthcare, that rocket ship that I showed you, and then create...
Because during that time, Bezos would have this arc.
He'd had the software and he had the Washington Post.
And his team came...
To see me and said, listen, we've got this ARC software that we want to run.
I said, no, I don't like this old software.
I'm going to go build a completely new software content management system that could take podcasts, video, live streaming, because I want this newspaper to be an educational moment for people.
And at the end of the day, a newspaper is not just a newspaper.
It's a basis of engagement.
I want to engage users as a tool to engage with people.
Because that's how I grew up.
So we took the risk and we built this content management system.
It took us five years and we launched it, which could talk to the printing press and it could talk to magazines, it could talk to podcasts, it could talk to video, it could talk to live streaming.
And now it's just gone live.
It's called LA Times Studio and LA Times Live.
And the next thing we're going to do is call LA Times Next.
In the LA Times next, a gentleman called Eric Beach and I are forming so that we could create a platform that would allow voices to be heard and free speech to be heard unencumbered by either opinion or news.
So now we have three platforms.
We have a platform of news, which supposedly is facts.
We have a platform of opinion, which I've now changed to voices, meaning everybody should have a voice, whether you're right voice, left voice, central voice, do you like Coca-Cola, Pepsi-Cola, whatever voice, and then a complete platform that allows free speech and video, podcast, and now I have that platform, and we've built the infrastructure to accommodate that platform.
And I'm excited by LA Times next because we're going to have a studio in D.C. We have a studio in L.A. We may have even a studio in Nashville.
And shows like this are important because I believe long forms like this is how you communicate for people who are interested.
So just for those who didn't follow it, and it was quite a story, for a couple days there, it was during the campaign, the editorial board, correct me if I'm wrong, wanted to endorse Kamala Harris, and you said no.
What did they say to you, and what did you say back to them?
So it turns out that YouTube is suppressing this show.
On one level, that's not surprising.
That's what they do.
But on another level, it's shocking.
With everything that's going on in the world right now, all the change taking place in our economy and our politics, with the wars on the cusp of fighting right now, Google has decided you should have less information rather than more.
And that is totally wrong.
It's immoral.
What can you do about it?
Well, we could whine about it.
That's a waste of time.
We're not in charge of Google.
Or we could find a way around it, a way that you could actually get information that is true, not intentionally deceptive.
The way to do that on YouTube, we think, is to subscribe to our channel.
Subscribe. Hit the little bell icon to be notified when we upload and share this video.
That way you'll have a much higher chance of hearing actual news and information.