Tucker Carlson and Michael Shellenberger dissect California’s wildfires, exposing delayed National Guard mobilization, Mayor Karen Bass’s absence during crises, and $17.5M fire department budget cuts tied to DEI priorities, while blaming meth-induced psychosis among homeless individuals for half of LA County blazes. They dismiss climate change as a cause, citing stable rainfall records since 1877, and link the disasters to "nihilistic" left-wing ideology—from Marxist resentment to "Let Malibu Burn" fatalism—while praising authoritarian leaders like Bukele over Gavin Newsom’s incompetence. The conversation pivots to UAPs, where Shellenberger questions bipartisan suppression of MJ-12 documents and non-human intelligence theories, contrasting them with verified Hunter Biden laptop evidence, before returning to California’s collapse as a self-inflicted wound of ideological distraction over pragmatism. [Automatically generated summary]
And that doesn't mean that you're doomed to them, but it's not the same problem that we get in the Sierras.
So they're ignition-driven and they're obviously wind-driven, but there's nothing unusual.
You know, I just interviewed a climate scientist about this, or rather an environmental forest scientist about this.
There's nothing unusual about this.
I mean, it is somewhat unusual to get, you know, you have a dry period and then the Santa Ana winds in January, but it's not like that never happens.
I'm working my way there.
Of course.
The important thing to know is that the National Weather Service put out a fire warning on January 2nd, and a local weatherman actually forecasted on January 1st.
They said we're headed towards a super dangerous moment.
The next day, the National Weather Service Los Angeles held a briefing to underscore that point.
Yeah, and because there's so many ignitions, because of really these two factors, mostly the electrical wires brushing up against vegetation and triggering a fire, that's kind of one of the main ones.
The other one is homeless people.
Starting fires all over LA. Half of all fires put out by the LA Fire Department are started by homeless people.
I mean, look, meth makes you, you know, it makes you psychopathic.
It makes you psychotic.
It's meth-induced psychosis.
But, I mean, yeah, and all the crazy, I mean, people behave, I mean, things that people do on meth, I mean, it is like, it's like they behave with like superhuman crazy powers, the levels of violence, the...
I mean, when you interview people, particularly people in recovery, that describe being on meth, I mean, they're just awake for, like, weeks at a time.
Like, it's not even clear how they get any sleep at all.
So, but, you know, you kind of go, I mean, so first of all, that problem should have been dealt with, obviously, years ago.
It should never have been allowed.
So, but that, they knew on January 1st, January 2nd, that the fires were coming.
Like, it was inevitable that there would be fires.
Like, there was, like, zero doubt among anybody that knows anything about fire in Los Angeles that the fires were coming.
The fires were coming.
So, like, the governor should have been there.
The mayor should have been there.
Literally, it's all about prevention, in part because by the time the fire trucks are having to weave their way up those little hills of the Pacific Palisades, it's over.
So the other thing to keep in mind is that, okay, well, so that's the first thing, is that they just have to mobilize in advance.
I mean, anyway, there's so many places to go here.
But just on the most practical sense...
They knew the fires were coming and they didn't do anything.
The mayor leaves the country.
She flies to Ghana after having promised not to leave the country, by the way, as mayor.
She's traveled at least six times out of the country and she promised not to travel.
Why is it important the mayor be there?
Aren't there other people in charge?
Because it's an emergency command situation.
She has to be able to issue orders and to waive regulations and make things happen.
The governor has to be doing that.
They didn't do that.
They should have had, by the way, they should get the fire trucks up into the fiery areas right away.
They can also start, you know, they can start clearing brush.
They can start, you know, but literally they could just be in those neighborhoods just sitting there for days at a time waiting for the fires to happen, put them out as soon as they happen.
I'm not saying that they would have been able to prevent all the fires from happening, but you remember, like, the big fire in 1993, I think it was Laguna Beach.
Or maybe it was Malibu as well, but it was like 700 homes.
We're at 10,000, you know, structures at this point, homes and buildings gone.
You know, 200,000 people evacuated.
I mean, it's like, it's madness.
It never needed to get to that level.
Okay, so that's the first thing.
They just needed to have been there before the fire started, and they didn't do that because the politicians are just, they're focused on themselves, they're focused on the next political office they want to get.
So that was the first thing.
The second thing is, the water runs out, right?
And you hear people go, oh, well, there's nothing you can do, because once the homes are burned down, the water lines, you can see the pictures, the water will be spilling out of the homes, and so that lowered the water pressure.
That was a total lie.
There is something called the Santa Ines...
The water reservoir, which is the potable water, meaning the drinking water that also goes into the fire hydrant system, because the fire hydrant system is the drinking water system.
It's the same thing.
It's the exact same system.
That reservoir was empty, and it was the second largest of the 10 potable water reservoirs that serve L.A. County.
Let me make one distinction here, because there's actually two kinds of reservoirs.
There's the reservoir with the snowmelt water, these really big lakes, basically.
And that's the unpurified water.
And then they purify it, and then they feed into these reservoirs where they store the water for all sorts of reasons for emergencies.
So that is an absolute crime, that that Santa Inés reservoir.
Why?
Because, first of all, it's right next to the Pacific Palisades.
So for people that don't know, Pacific Palisades, of course, is like right near, it's on your way to Malibu.
It's like the last big neighborhood before you get to the...
You look at the Google Maps and you look at where the Santillanese Reservoir is.
It's right next to, like a few thousand feet.
From Pacific Palisades, and it's really high up, and so if you had had water coming from that, the firefighters would have had plenty of water.
They would have had the water pressure, even if you had lost some homes and had the water out.
So two major failures.
The first was the failure to aggressively respond days in advance, even though they had very clear warnings.
The second was the reservoir was empty.
One reporter has reported that the firefighters had not been warned by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power that that reservoir was empty.
If that's true, that's just additionally scandalous.
But one of the...
One of the things that we think probably happened is that they had been required to have a cover for the Santinés Reservoir, which is the potable water, the cover to prevent the water from being contaminated.
In the old days, like the 50s and 60s, birds would poop in those.
And then we decided, well, the water was still – had a lot of – it still was not particularly clean, so we wanted to be cleaner.
So you can just put a cover over it, which is a kind of plastic or rubber lining.
It appears that there was a tear in that.
They had to repair it.
They should not have removed that water ever during a fire season.
If you need to make that repair, you do need to drain right before you do the repair, but you would make that drain.
The people that I interviewed said, look, it would take days if not a couple of weeks to repair it.
It was empty for at least a year.
So it was sitting there for a year, and the person I interviewed who works as a senior executive at a...
Water utility in California said if we had any of our reservoirs empty, we would be like super nervous the entire time.
And you would also then have backup water systems.
So it's like any catastrophe.
You know, you just have multiple errors occurring in advance and at the moment.
And then the fires and then the actual ignitions.
You can't completely prevent ignitions, but you can significantly reduce them.
One would be to not allow people to camp outside all over Los Angeles, Los Angeles County with somewhere around, I think it's 40,000 to 60,000 homeless people in the whole county.
Madness.
And then the other is the electrical wires that brush up against the vegetation and create fire.
With that, you want to clear the vegetation from around the wires.
That's obvious.
And then you can also just stop.
I mean, this is a not great solution, but you could certainly do it in a pinch if you need to.
You just stop the electricity from going into those homes for some period.
I mean, it's a drag.
I live in the Berkeley Hills, which is also a dangerous fire zone.
And when the winds are really strong, they'll just cut off power as a precaution so that to prevent an ignition.
So I think the thing that the reason I wanted to come on your show, even though I'm in the midst of a huge book deadline, is because I'm really concerned about this nihilistic discourse that there's literally nothing that could be done.
I mean, that is exactly where the politicians want to go.
I worry that ordinary people have that idea.
The problem is, I mean, it's absurd.
I mean, this idea that you couldn't live in Los Angeles, right?
And it's like...
It's like, you can say it about anywhere.
You'd be like, oh, there's snowfalls in this place during winter, you know, or hurricanes.
I mean, we're in an area that's Hurricane Valley, right?
Like, huge amounts of hurricanes.
That's not how humans roll.
Like, we're capable of living in many different environments, including with extreme weather conditions, and we're really good at it.
And you trace it back, I mean, the best, the most articulate advocate of that view is a Marxist named Mike Davis who wrote this book called City of Quartz.
It's a crazy nihilistic book, but he had an essay and also it's a chapter in that book called Let Malibu Burn.
I mean, it's classic.
Kind of radical left politics is classic sort of envy or sour grapes.
I mean, sour grapes goes, I can't remember the parable, but basically it's like some animal wants to eat these grapes, but they're up too high.
And he says, oh, well, those grapes were sour anyway.
It's a consolation for your own personal weakness and failure.
That's just, you know, let Malibu burn.
I mean, you know, you have an ideology of Marxism that is based on resentment and envy.
And so then you go, well, yeah, all those rich houses should go up in flames.
It's a fantasy.
I mean, it's a left-wing fantasy.
I should know.
I was on the radical left.
Like, the fantasy, you hate the rich people because you want their wealth and you admire them in some level, but you know you can't get it.
So, I mean, this is how envy works.
So you end up constructing this whole political ideology.
I mean, this is what Marx has done.
And it's infected, like, the citizenry.
I mean, it's infected the politicians.
And so there's this...
I think that even though it's not consciously, the politicians aren't consciously saying, oh, let's let Malibu burn.
That is the...
The behaviors they have taken have had that impact.
So I think that what you're seeing in real time in these fires in Los Angeles, these destructive fires, is the manifestation of a nihilistic ideology.
It's an emergent quality.
It happens through a million small steps.
But this heavy focus on left-wing ideology, whether it's DEI or ESG or climate apocalypse or just class resentment, Manifest itself in, like, the most spectacular, beautiful neighborhoods just being turned into ashes and cinders.
It's also on a more prosaic level a violation of, like, the most basic agreement there is between citizens and their government, which is I send you more than half of what I own, but you keep my house from burning down and meth heads from scaring my children or whatever.
Well, because, of course, they're all trapped by this ideology.
I mean, these are the neighborhoods that voted overwhelmingly for Kamala, that voted overwhelmingly for Gavin Newsom, that voted overwhelmingly for Karen Bass.
I mean, Tucker, I saw focus groups in 2022. Two Latinos, men and women separated, Latino group and a white group.
And the Latinos were great.
I mean, they were just like, when they started talking about the mayoral race, they were like, well, what are their positions?
First of all, every focus group, when the moderator would just be like, oh, hey, how's it going around here?
They don't even try to lead the conversation anywhere, and everybody just starts talking about the homeless situation and the crime, which is basically continuous with homelessness.
And then they would be like, oh, yeah, okay, well, about the remedies, oh, there's a mayoral race coming up.
I think it was in the summer that these focus groups were held.
And they hadn't really been thinking a ton about it, but there's a moment there where You see, it dawns on the white focus group participants.
And they were not, like, recruiting, like, leftists or Democrats or anything.
It was just supposed to be a mixed group of swing voters.
And they just, as soon as it dawned on them that there was a black woman running, they were like, oh, well, I mean, that's, I mean, gotta vote for the black woman.
Like it was the most racist, like you would think like in the most racist moments in American history, you know, the stereotypes that we would have, you know, about the South or whatever, you know, reconstruction or something.
Like people would not be as open and honest about it, but they were just like openly like, well, we have to vote for the black woman.
And then in the rest of the focus group, when they, a lot of them knew who Caruso was because, you know, he's famous for these really spectacular, you know, housing developments.
And also they're like kind of calling them malls is a kind of beautiful, like outdoor shopping centers with like lawns and you can get like a, you know, fantastic restaurants and you can like have the kids can play freely on these lawns.
I mean, it's sort of tragic because, of course, it's all private.
It's not public spaces.
But nonetheless, you feel safe.
You go in there.
It's an amazing place.
These white participants, I was watching them through basically over the next hour, hour and a half.
Explaining why Caruso was a bad guy for just running against this black woman.
Like, it was just outrageous.
And what is he trying to do?
He's trying to make money.
I mean, which is just crazy.
Because, of course, he's just, you know, like, I think he's like a billionaire.
I mean, he's a self-made and extraordinarily successful person.
And clearly, running for mayor is an altruistic act.
I mean, it seems like there's, like, multiple levels.
I mean, at one superficial level, or at least a kind of psychological, sociological level, they're all competing with each other to show who's a better person.
The more hatred I express towards white people, the better I am as a human being.
Obviously, this is a very old story about decadence and of, you know, comfort, and you start to kind of believe.
I mean, there's something really checked out from reality about the whole thing.
I mean, first of all, the stories that get told are just, you know, like, absurd.
Like, 1619 being the founding of America.
That's just obviously wrong.
The country was founded, you know, our Constitution in 1789, Declaration of Independence in 1776. And not only that, but, like, slavery was never at the heart of the United States.
It was always, it was a whole place committed to, it was English Americans, or the American English, as they were referred to, wanting to create a country the first time that was just founded on the Enlightenment ideals of freedom and of free expression.
I mean, it's so important they put it as the First Amendment, they insist on the Bill of Rights.
So you just get this completely twisted, you know, disinformation story about the United States that gets embraced.
So it is a, I mean, leaving it to the fact that it's false, but, you know, a lot of creation myths are false, but this one is false in a specific way, which is like, you suck and you should die, and all the way, it's like, yeah, you're right, I should.
In some ways, it's an old story of a civilization just at its end.
I mean, including all the transgenderism.
Of course.
I mean, that's the Camille Pauly's famous...
Writing about how that shows up at the end of civilizations.
And so, you know, if you read Toynbee, it's like one of the characteristics is when the elites stop, the creative class of elites, which is, I mean, Los Angeles, they stop identifying with their own working class and they start to identify with, you know, with outsiders, basically, with people from foreigners from outside the country.
I mean, it's a cliche, but like a lot of cliches, there's a lot of truth to it.
The good times make soft men, and soft men make bad times.
So, I mean, there's obviously been a huge correction in the United States, which is, you know, welcome, which is a sort of re-embrace of the ideals of the United States.
I mean, let's hope that this has been a wake-up call for the people of Los Angeles.
I mean, they are reaping what they sowed, and the people of California are reaping what we sowed.
And, you know, that is, you know, I mean, it's really quite...
Symbolic.
You know, it's like the neighborhoods of the elites in Los Angeles that really got the most effective, that are having to flee.
But again, I mean, part of the reason I wanted to come on, and I've been writing about it every day and trying to surface the stories of the water utility executives, and I've got a story coming out later today from a firefighter who basically just described, I mean...
The firefighters, of course, the men and women on the ground doing the hard work, they're blameless.
But, I mean, the destruction, there's 29 fire departments in Los Angeles, including LA County Fire Department.
You know, there's 88 cities.
People don't realize, like, Los Angeles is a city, but then there's a much larger county around it with 88 cities in it.
And not all of them have fire departments.
In fact, most of them don't, right?
So the ones that don't have their own fire departments, they depend on LA County Fire Department.
But, you know, and it's been this way for a long time, so it's not like it can't work, but it definitely introduces a level of complexity into it.
I mean, the priorities of these fire departments, it's not just like a social media meme.
I mean, it really has been DEI. Like, it really has been the priority of these fire departments.
The first priority of the fire departments should be to...
Put out fires and keep people safe and save lives.
But the first priority has been DEI. I mean, that is clearly...
You know, it's like, it's also sort of like, I mean, it's funny because the way that the defenders of it sort of talk about it is as though they're imposing equality.
Actually, they're demanding that it not be based on merit.
I mean, first of all, there was never any evidence that the fire departments were like systematically or structurally excluding qualified people.
They also rejected gay marriage, but they're not allowed to get what they want, actually, it turns out.
Because whenever you think of gay marriage or racial preferences or whatever, if you believe in democracy and you have a referendum system, you have to abide by the results.
And everyone living under the crushing burden of history.
Most of it misconstrued in a lie anyway, but still, the idea that the past is determining the present and the future, that's like the least Californian, least American idea ever.
Yeah, I mean, it's like we, in our next book, we're doing, we're working on this idea of these singularities, meaning like these just awful events in the past, the Holocaust, slavery, indigenous genocide.
And they become, like, gods for secular people.
They become, like, super present.
Like, you know, it's just everything that we do is affected by slavery and, you know, everything.
This is indigenous land.
I mean, I was just going through all of the various documents over the years of, like, water and fire and disaster in Los Angeles.
And they, like, all open with land acknowledgments.
You know, you're just like, well, yeah.
Like, literally, you think that white people don't belong here.
Like, that is literally what you're saying in those land acknowledgments.
You're saying, we don't belong here.
And you may have seen, there's a clip that went viral on social media with the deputy police, the deputy fire chief of Los Angeles, where she's sort of saying, oh, yeah, people ask me, you know, can you carry my husband out of a house, you know, in danger?
And she's like, well, you know, your husband got himself in a place that he shouldn't have been.
You're like, yeah, that's literally your job is to be able to carry someone...
Can you imagine someone being like, oh, yeah, your father, your elderly father, we couldn't carry him out of the house, and he shouldn't have been in that house when it was burning down.
She should have been fired as soon as that came out.
I mean, and Gavin Newsom should have called for her to be fired.
The mayor should have called for her to be fired.
She's still in that job.
I mean...
That's dangerous.
It's a violation of firefighter ethics.
That person is a danger.
In other words, she's going around suggesting to all of her people that work for her that they're not responsible for saving.
But I think it reflects the mentality, which is a nihilistic mentality, which is that we don't belong here.
We stole this land.
Let Malibu burn.
Definitely, definitely nihilism.
I mean, it's anti-civilization nihilism.
You know, there's sort of two forms of nihilism.
One of them is basically anti-civilization, anti-human, anti-modern life.
And it stems from this earlier nihilism, which is that life has no meaning.
We're just like animals in the famous Russian novel Fathers and Sons by Turgarev.
You know, the nihilistic character dissects a frog and says, we're just like this frog.
You know, we're just matter.
You know, we're just dead matter, just disassembled.
So, it's a very dark nihilistic story that then leads to this just...
Yeah, nihilistic anti-civilization ideology, which became very fashionable.
I mean, City of Courts, the Mike Davis book, I mean, it was a very fashionable book to read in places like Pacific Palisades and Hollywood and Santa Monica and Venice.
So, yeah, I think it's, you know, I hope it's a wake-up call.
I don't know if it will be, but it is a completely preventable disaster.
Fires are definitely not completely preventable, but that level of destruction absolutely is.
And anybody who says that it is not preventable should be as far away from power as possible.
Anybody who believes that it was inevitable to lose 10,000 homes and buildings in Los Angeles over a week, they should be very far away from political power.
They should not be in charge of any fire department because it ends up becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I mean, it's a stable climate with these amazing extremes.
So, like, you know, you'll just get these, I mean, the best, I mean, for my favorite weather is, like, after, like, you know, three days of just intense rains and you're just, like, trying to make sure that your house isn't flooded and, you know, the mud's everywhere.
It's just the dogs are bringing in mud.
And then the sun comes out and it's just heaven on earth.
I mean, that's why we're in California, right?
You're just like, ah.
So, we love those.
We love those extremes.
Yeah, I mean, I think that's part of the, I mean, it's so funny because it's like the reversion back to these, you know, people are cursing the weather.
Well, another one was literally just before I got here, the legislature got to its very important work of passing a bill just now that sets aside $50 million for California to sue Trump.
Literally, and they were in a special session that they kept going.
They were in a special session to figure out how to sue Trump while L.A. is burning.
And meanwhile, Gavin's going out there all the time being like, well, boy, it'd be really terrible if Trump withheld disaster aid or, heaven forbid, required that we get our shit together.
I'm not sure if I'm allowed to say that in your podcast.
Get our things together.
And then literally he's like, we're going to sue him for implementing the agenda he was elected on by a majority of the American people.
I mean, there was sort of an idea that Karen Bass, because she was black and because she came from the left, would be able to do things that a white guy wouldn't be able to do.
That was part of the reasoning for her.
She didn't do it.
I mean, she's just, I mean, look, she's very, people have to remember, she's very radical.
I mean, and I get it.
I mean, I was like, I was there, I left it, but, you know, she went to Cuba a bunch of times, and, you know, like, admired Castro, and...
You kind of thought, well, maybe that was behind her, but it's not.
You know, it really isn't.
I mean, the thing where, like, you're, like, literally get a warning that the whole city's going to go up in flames, and you're like, oh, I really got to be in Ghana for the inauguration of the new president.
I mean, look at where your head's at.
I mean, she talks about it.
She just loves going to Africa all the time.
I love going to Africa.
I do, too.
unidentified
You're, like, the mayor of, like— It's just silly and selfish, really.
I know, so she literally goes up at a press conference, and it was word salad.
I mean, it was quite impressive.
I mean, she was just sort of like, like, you were like, What did she just say?
I mean, she goes, well, that was...
You know, it would kind of be like, well, that was different because we just approved this other money.
And she would basically just, it was a non sequitur.
I mean, she's describing a totally different salary negotiation.
They cut $17.5 million from the budget.
And not only that, but then they had this internal memo that leaked that said that they were looking to cut another $48.8 million, another $49 million.
It's complicated, which is like, yeah, yeah, she did cut the budget.
But the media was not being honest with people about what was really going on until...
The fire chief, the lesbian LA County fire chief, to her credit, she was being grilled by a local Fox television reporter who was just doing a great job, actually.
I mean, just to be handed to the local TV, actually, some of the best reporting still.
So it was a little bit like, okay, you were on the record saying it was going to hurt your ability.
But then she was like, yes, yes, it did hurt our ability to deal with it.
Then she just was like, I think at that point, the fire chief, she was just like, all right, you know, like, the gloves are off.
So she goes on CBS and on CNN and reiterates it, and with very strong language.
I was able to get into this piece that will come out shortly.
I was able to get into the weeds a little bit on it.
But basically, there's 100 fire trucks that are currently in the maintenance shop that just need to be fixed.
There's 100 fire trucks missing.
The person I interviewed was like, we could have bought, for $100 million, we could have bought 100 or 200. You know, kind of used fire trucks or whatever, just get fire trucks from wherever, maintain them, and just put them in different points all around the city.
You wouldn't necessarily have the staff to deal with them, but...
You could then, as soon as you get that fire warning, again, on January 1st or January 2nd, you can just fly in firefighters from around the country, from around the world.
You'd just be like, look, we're just going to bring everybody in.
We don't know what's going to happen.
And then they can just go.
This person was like, you know, we could put like 30 of them at Dodger Stadium.
You know, you could just like put these fire trucks that are well-maintained, you know.
But so she was like, because I didn't quite understand it either, because she was like, we didn't have the money for the mechanics.
And you're like, well, what do you need the mechanics for?
Well, you need the mechanics to maintain the fire engines.
So, I mean, this is what, you know, it's like when civilization breaks down, it breaks down in like just a million small ways, you know?
So, you know, is there some DEI part of it?
Yeah, they were promoting people not based on merit.
Is there budget cuts?
Absolutely.
I mean, they didn't, you know, and what goes wrong when you don't have those budget cuts?
I mean, the other complaint I've heard, you know, is just that It's just the advanced thinking.
It's just getting people that can kind of be thinking in advance.
That's where their focus is.
That's where their priority is.
So the problem with the DEI is that when you're just orienting an entire organizational culture towards racial and sex quotas rather than towards, okay, you know, what about the Santa Ana winds and the fire risk and whatever?
It's just, we all know that, like...
It's not just time in the day, it's also mind time.
It's like, what do you think about when you take a shower?
What do you think about when you're putting on your shoes?
Like, where is your head at?
Their head has been in the clouds around, you know, DEI, the larger society, ESG, climate, homelessness.
I mean, the list goes on and on.
But, you know, it was on homelessness.
We now know, because the state audit came out, $24 billion on homelessness since Gavin took office.
Tucker, homelessness in California increased by 40% under Gavin.
Can you believe that?
Because everyone goes, it's such a curious mystery as to we spent all this money on homelessness, and yet it just increased.
It's like, well, yeah, because you spent money incentivizing and subsidizing homelessness.
You spent all this money to attract people from all over the United States.
I mean, I interview people in California that are on the streets, and it's like, nobody's from California.
The only reason I feel like I have any understanding of what homelessness is is because the interviews that you did several years ago, which are the most unbelievable.
I'd never heard of you before I saw these interviews.
And you did, and I would recommend to our listeners to go find them because they're on YouTube.
You did the thing that nobody, I've never seen anybody do it before.
Others have followed since.
You did it, but you just went and interviewed the homeless.
The secret to all great interviews, as you know, more than anybody, is you need to have a long time.
Yes!
Because people tell the—they lie at first, and then the truth comes out.
So, like, you'll interview people, and you'll be like, you're like, where are you from, brother?
And they'll be like, oh, I was raised here.
And you get, like, 30 minutes in the interview, they're like, oh, I'm from Arkansas.
You know?
I'm from Texas or whatever.
So, yeah, I mean— So yeah, they're from all over.
They come, you know, the most famous one I did was with James Church.
He had tattoos on his face, and he was just incredible.
I just love that interview so much.
I think it was like an hour, hour and a half with him, just holding my iPhone up to him while he's talking.
But he was the one who was like...
You know, if I'm being honest, you know, they pay people to be homeless here.
And I was like, what do you mean by that?
You know, he's like, well, he's like, I get $650 a month, you know, in cash welfare to be homeless here, plus a couple hundred bucks more in food stamps.
It's a great deal.
And he was like, I got Netflix on my phone.
I watch Amazon Prime TV on my phone.
You know, I still electricity from the light pole right here.
That video, I will say, is very satisfying.
I do think that played a pretty big role in the voters of San Francisco voting to get rid of cash welfare for homeless people.
Make 2025 the year you check life insurance off your list to protect your family's future with Policy Genius.
It is hard to find life insurance.
It's a hassle who wants to think about it.
Policy Genius makes it super easy.
And when you do that, you ensure that your loved ones have a safety net to cover...
All the debts or expenses should something happen to you.
And things do happen when you don't expect them to.
So with Policy Genius, it's really easy.
You find life insurance policies that start at just $292 per year for a million dollars of coverage.
Some options are 100% online, and you don't even need unnecessary medical exams, which is another hurdle to go through to get life insurance.
You don't want to sit through that stuff.
They've got licensed support teams to help you get what you need fast so you can get on with your life and check life insurance off the list.
They answer questions.
They handle paperwork.
They advocate for you throughout the process.
They make it super easy.
Life insurance is a form of financial planning, obviously.
PolicyGenius is the country's leading online insurance marketplace.
Even if you already have life insurance through work, it may not protect your family in the way you want them to be protected if something were to happen to you.
PolicyGenius can fix that.
So head to PolicyGenius.com slash Tucker.
Or click the link in the description to get your life insurance quotes for free and see how much you could save.
But why did it, I know I've asked you this before, but why did it fall to you to do that?
Black Lives Matter flag in front, you know, abandoned school bus.
They were really, it was a really terrible environment.
But, and I was like, oh, I was like, so I was like, if you guys already, I was kind of like worried.
I was like, I got here late.
And I was like, so you guys already like knocked on all the doors of the neighbors.
And they were just like, looked at me and they were like, no, we're like not.
I can't remember what one of them said.
He was like, oh, we don't want to be like rude or something.
Or that would be like inappropriate.
I was like, I was like, and at that moment I was like, oh, God, this is going to be great.
And I just, like, went and knocked on all the doors, and, like, you had all the information.
Like, oh, yeah, they would run naked out there, and they would be on drugs all the time.
And, yeah, they were, like, all left-wing, and it was like, you know, I was like, oh, this is amazing.
Like, there's no competition.
Like, it's, you know, I got on the White House briefing just recently, the White House briefing on UAPs, which you and I are both interested in, on the drones.
And it was just like, you can kind of go into these stories, you just start talking to people, and you just realize journalists aren't really, they're not really journalists.
They're more like kind of the people that would run for, like, class president or something.
I mean, there's like, and you realize it's essential to the functioning of civilization to have a bunch of disagreeable people running around asking impertinent questions.
So with this one, it was like, yeah, so I mean, you basically get...
Like, when you just look at the coverage of the fires, I mean, it was like the reporters that are going out and doing it, it's like their whole thing is like, oh, we've got to make sure that the right wing doesn't take advantage of this situation to push their...
Like, literally, that's how they think about it.
So they're out there running cover for the...
I mean, it's amazing, you know?
Somebody did, like, a little meme on it, but it's like that thing where it's like...
Yeah, it used to be that the reporter would, like, be holding the microphone up to the politicians and being like, answer my questions.
And now they're, like, demanding that the people defend themselves for their terrible votes, you know?
But one of the things I learned from your interviews with the homeless, which I just cannot recommend strongly enough as a primary source of information, actual information, is the degree to which the...
Narcotics fuel homelessness.
You can't really disaggregate homelessness from drug addiction.
I remember just being, my aunt had schizophrenia, you know.
I've told this story a long time, so I don't want to bore you.
But basically, it was like, it was just kind of like, so wait, everyone just thinks that there's like a housing problem.
Like, that's just crazy.
So, you know, you sort of needed to, I needed to go do all those interviews.
But I mean, really, the first homelessness epidemic, the first time that we're at modern homelessness, was in the early 80s.
And it was just, it was basically all it was, was a combination of the emptying, the final closure of all the mental hospitals, where they literally, literally dumped people on the streets.
Like, I thought that that was, that sounded like an exaggeration when I first started.
They literally were putting, you know, schizophrenics and stuff on the streets.
And then the crack epidemic.
Like, that's all it was.
It was just those two things.
And then, of course, then, you know, left-wing mayor of San Francisco and others are like, oh, well, we can't, like, we can't, like, require that people not camp outside.
They're poor.
The left, in reaction to Reagan, then took up homelessness as something that they claimed was caused by Reagan.
Like, I mean, he'd been in office for, like, whatever, two or three years, and they would just make ridiculous claims, you know, the Reagan budget, you know, that's why he's on the street.
So it really gets used, so it becomes viewed by the left early on as a political propaganda tool.
I also blame the comics, by the way.
I mean, just I'll name them.
Robin Williams, Billy Crystal, Whoopi Goldberg.
They did this whole thing, you may remember, Comic Relief, where they framed the whole thing as a problem of poverty, which is just, you know, it's just such a disservice to the people on the street who need an intervention.
There's a natural...
For addicts, there's a natural progression where you, whether from trauma or just because you enjoyed getting high, your addiction gets in the way of your job and you stop going to work.
And you often live at home with your parents or with friends.
You lie, steal, and cheat from them repeatedly.
They give you multiple warnings.
They finally kick you out.
That's often the route to homelessness.
You end up on the street.
That's the moment where the family and friends were not able to impose an intervention.
The way it should work is that you go out camp on the street and the cop goes, hey, you can't camp here.
It's illegal to camp here.
And they go, what am I supposed to do?
And they're like, well, we're going to take you to jail or you can go to rehab.
Those are your two choices.
Two choices.
And natural intervention is imposed in that situation.
What progressives and Democrats did for 40 years is they just removed the intervention.
In the name of compassion, the most compassionate thing is to impose the intervention.
I mean, the thing that's most common.
I'll even find this with, like, harm reduction workers.
I was just with some harm reduction workers in Skid Row, and one of them was telling me the whole usual thing.
Oh, you can't make somebody get clean.
They have to hit their own bottom, like, whatever.
And I was like, and they were like, I used to run around here, you know, on meth.
It was an Asian-American woman who was doing this.
And I was like, oh, wow.
I was like, what did it finally take you for you to get clean?
I have a really close friend who's lived that same trajectory.
I have a couple friends, but I have a legit close friend who's totally out of control on drugs and lost kids and all the things that happen when you're addicted and got sober in prison and rebuilt a life, a wonderful life.
But to deprive people of that and to encourage them to continue to use drugs and alcohol is like, I mean, don't even, whatever, it's an interview of you, not me, but I just feel like sobriety has to be the goal, not just for the individual, but for the society.
I really believe that.
So sobriety is the greatest gift.
A. B. Use of drugs and alcohol causes mental illness, which nobody ever says out loud.
I've seen it, to some extent experienced it, I know.
You can cause severe mental illness by using drugs and alcohol.
But what's interesting is, so in traditional Christianity and other religions, you know, the guilty person repents, atones, dons ashes, sackcloth, and covers himself in ashes as a way of saying, you know, I am worthy of the degradation.
Yes.
We've kind of transferred that.
It's almost like the homeless are in sackcloth and ashes.
Did you know what I mean?
Like, I live in the Palisades.
I produce music videos.
I'm doing pretty well, but I still feel guilt.
But, like, seeing somebody, like, you know, writhing on the sidewalk, I'm, like, displacing my atonement on him.
Well, there's 88 cities and there's 29 fire departments and counting the county.
No, no, no, that's fine.
But yeah, so like literally, like once the fire starts, I didn't even understand this until I started investigating it.
The county fire chief has to call all these cities and be like, hey, can you send a couple of trucks?
We're putting together a strike team.
You know, can you send some engines or whatever?
And they have to call around and they're like, okay, we're all going to meet.
You know, the fire's like blazing away.
And they're like, okay, well, we're all going to meet, you know, wherever, you know, Sepulveda or whatever the streets are in LA. You know, we'll meet in this place and we'll get together and we'll sync the radios and we'll develop a plan.
I mean, this is all happening like while the city's burning.
I mean, it's madness, right?
The other thing is that it's, I mean, there's like...
I mean, there might have been something that we, but obviously, if there was, it wasn't enough.
I mean, it's a little bit like when they go, when the people that are like, when the nihilists are defending what happened, they're like, well, there was nothing else we could have done, or we did everything we could have.
It's like, well, no, obviously you didn't.
Like, it doesn't matter what it is.
It obviously wasn't.
There's only one right answer, which is that you didn't do enough.
You know, the...
The fatalism.
You know, it's a way to disavow responsibility on the one hand.
Again, I think it expresses that nihilism.
But I think it's like, people just have been out of practice, but you have to, this is part of the journalism too, you know, it has to be like, no, no, we're not accepting that as an answer.
Like, the right attitude for the journalist.
Is to basically be no excuses.
Of course.
Maybe the journalists are being too much of a hard ass and too much of a dick about it.
Maybe they need to be a little bit more whatever.
That's fine.
That's their role.
It's like...
Your role is to be the prosecutor on the case of the failure.
You know, I mean, and this is what they do when they go after Trump and stuff, is that, like, because Trump will often be, like, directionally correct.
You know, like, oh, but Trump was referring to the wrong kind of reservoir.
You know, the other reservoirs were full.
It's like, okay, fine, but the reservoir right next to the Pacific Palisades was empty, so...
You know, the basic intuition, which is, I think, I often talk about the importance of, you know, like, if you're defending civilization, it's a physical thing, right?
So, I'm always thinking to myself as, like, there's a physicalism in my worldview, which is like, okay, that's a person, that's a body, you need to, they need to, they're in somewhere they shouldn't be.
They need to be somewhere else.
So we can have a debate about how to move them somewhere else.
That's a totally reasonable debate to have.
But they can't be there.
They can't be there because they're creating fires, they're breaking the law, they're hurting themselves and others.
Similarly, there wasn't water there.
There needed to be more water.
And if you go, okay, well, let's say that they had...
Oh, well, this is, yeah, this is exactly, it's like, first of all, it's like, I mean, it's just so symbolic.
It's the city of angels, you know?
So it's like, we're up here, and you want, like, the wealthier you get in L.A., I guess with some exceptions, like Venice Beach, but mostly you're getting up higher.
Like, I'm connected to nature up here, but also, you know, away from all the, you know, the plebs.
And so you actually, I think they do, it's that whole thing.
thing we talk about people being a bubble you know i mean it's like the most bubbly place in the world except for that it's not and you're in a massive fire zone that must be constantly managed there's consequences of living in these spectacular places but you've got people that are it's there it's the the whole industry is a fantasy industry i mean it's just exists to construct a fantasy reality and yeah you would hope that that people would be able to compartmentalize
yeah my day job is constructing fantasies that we charge...
You know, $20 to stream.
But I know that when I go home that all the brush has to be cleared around my house and I have to vote for candidates that are physicalists.
I mean, I don't want to use the word idealist because there's too many other connotations to it, but it's just a difference between being your heads up in the clouds as opposed to just being really...
You need the firefighter view of the world.
You need the cop view of the world.
Frankly, you need the homeless guys view.
The homeless people live in a...
I mean, they're high a lot, so they're switching in and out, but they have to get their physical needs met.
When we first had kids, I remember my wife being, and I had much lower standards, but insistent on the house being clean and orderly.
And I remember saying, the point of having kids is to instill values in them.
She goes, yeah, but one of the values is order and cleanliness.
They will feel like things are out of control if the house isn't clean and orderly.
And she's really insistent on that, and we've lived that way our whole lives.
It's a version of what you're saying.
It's like, you can tell your kids about honesty and decency and compassion and high achievement or whatever, but someone has to make the bed and vacuum the floor, and if there's dog shit in the kitchen, it has to be cleaned up.
Because it's like, people will say things like practical, which is good, and pragmatic, but some pragmatic got started to mean things like making shitty political compromises.
Do you know what I mean?
Or it's an American linguistic tradition or a philosophical tradition.
But yeah, a physicalist, it's like, yeah, somebody's got to clean up all the, you know, if you have all the homeless people, you're going to have to spend millions of dollars on cleaning up crap, right?
All the time.
And, you know, the homeless, one of the things you probably have observed is that I think it's a, like, probably a compensating mechanism, but they're just, they're obsessed with collecting.
L-I-A-H. L-I-A-H. Yeah, she's a Russian, I think she's a Russian Jew who went to Israel, lived in Israel for a long time, and then her mentor was Edward Schills, the sociologist.
So she's a sociologist, but the nationalism book is beautiful.
I mean, it's like...
The famous book on nationalism is called Imaginary Communities by Benedict Anderson, and he's a Marxist, and so it's all the whole thing is like him trying to explain how nationalism, why it's so powerful when Marx thought it should wither away.
But she describes – so, she defines nationalism – the picture that people have of nationalism is completely wrong.
She describes nationalism as a sovereign community of fundamentally equal individuals who have a shared identity.
And so, she's like nationalism is fundamentally democratic.
Now, you might have some systems that are nationalist, but they don't have proper democracy.
But really, the basic idea is that egalitarian idea that we're Americans, we live here, we have the same solidarity.
I've also become, I'll come back to the Greenfield, but I've also been obsessed with Hannah Arendt, who I had never read until recently.
One is the Ontotalitarianism book and the other one is Eichmann in Jerusalem.
Eichmann in Jerusalem, it's rough because she describes how the Jewish councils participated in the Nazis.
I mean, that was what was really controversial.
But what really blew me away from reading Hannah Arendt, because I was coming to the nationalism conversation.
I mean, self-confession, because I should have been reading nationalism starting in 2016. But I finally was reading on it, and it was like...
She was like, nationalism is a barrier to totalitarianism because totalitarianism is attempting to destroy all relationships between people other than the relationship with the state.
You know, all of that is a threat to totalitarianism.
Yeah.
And so, that really struck me.
And Leah Greenfield kind of, she has a...
I just interviewed her, so she has a difference of opinion with Arendt on this issue.
But nonetheless, I was just struck by how...
I don't know what the...
For me, nationalism...
Because I come from the left, from the radical left.
And we would code our socialist...
public interest yes you know ralph nader kind of took all of the chomskyan left-wing views of the early 60s and packaged them for moderate he kind of made it all seem very reasonable you know um and the environmentalists did the same thing so so the brilliance of the left in general but the radical left in particular was of just cross-dressing as mainstream issues exactly so um so so it became so really what is the socialist movement became a consumer rights
exactly public interest the women's rights movement And you get these really radical ideologies.
I mean, I'm just obsessed with this, the ways in which, like, so Marxism, look back on it, it's like, wow, I can't believe the things I believed in.
Marxism has this idea.
That the capitalists, like, what's distinct about them is that they're just super greedy and they're thieves and that they're stealing from their workers.
And there's really no difference between the entrepreneur, the capitalist entrepreneur, like Elon Musk or Thomas Edison or Henry Ford, and their workers.
They're just meaner and they steal from them.
And it's like, it's just an amazingly audacious lie because whenever you go and actually study an entrepreneur...
What's incredible is that it's not just that they are doing, it's not like they're the best at what they're doing.
They're the best at like 12 different things.
You may remember when Trump and Elon were beginning their bromance, Trump goes, he goes, you know, I asked Elon, I was like, what is it that you're really good at?
You know, you can see it was like probably a question that Trump is used to asking people that he interviews for a job or something.
And he goes, turned out it was a lot of different things, you know?
And it's like, well, yeah, like, I mean...
Because, of course, like with Thomas Edison, people go, oh, we invent the light bulb.
He didn't invent the light bulb.
He improved it.
He invented a viable economic model for electricity production.
I mean, he invented the electrical grid.
He found the customers.
I mean, one of the things that impresses me so much with Elon is, like, I'll see him, you'll see him out there and he'll be selling.
You know, which is kind of, I mean, selling is sort of the worst part of our jobs in some ways.
I mean, you can do it with pleasure and you can do it with Verve and stuff.
But, you know, you're kind of like, I do it.
I mean, I'm always like, subscribe now, you know?
And you're like, you have to do it.
Like, it's part of the work.
But I'm always like, wow, Elon, he's the richest man in the world.
He's probably, he may be the greatest innovator in American history, certainly top three.
And he's still out there having to hawk his products.
And he does it great.
He's an amazing job of it.
One of the innovations was, you know, he'd just become the biggest user of Twitter rather than buying paid ads.
But so this gigantic lie from Marx, which is that, first of all, the entrepreneur, the capitalist, is just a meaner version of the worker, as opposed to this Schumpeterian genius.
And Schumpeter comes along, and then his, the other thing, the big lie, and then Schumpeter points it out.
Is that the owner of the company and the workers have the same fundamental interest.
In other words, Elon Musk's employees and Elon have the same interest.
They want to expand their markets and expand their products.
So to put them opposed is just so dishonest and it's so reminiscent of what...
You can say feminism or radical feminism, but this idea that the interests of women are opposed by men, that women and men have different interests.
And of course, you trace it back, it all goes back to Simone de Beauvoir, who's a Marxist writing in the post-war period.
I guess it was like the 40s, her book came out, The Second Sex.
But she's just taking this totally idiotic Marxist framework.
Well, it's the biggest lie because, I mean, it ignores the very obvious symbiosis.
It's just it's not possible for them to exist apart and it's not possible to continue the species.
It's like so dumb that they need each other that actually power is exerted in very subtle but powerful ways within a relationship between a man and a woman that are not at all described or even acknowledged, right?
So it is like really you trace back like the emergence of nihilism.
It really is in Marxism.
It's in feminism.
And then they successfully cross-dress for decades and they get so good at it.
This is the famous long march through institutions or what they call cultural Marxism.
But they basically dress themselves up as, you know, basically civil rights.
I mean, because once you get equal rights, the work is done.
Same thing with gays and lesbians.
But then the radical left activists then go and grab all those trappings.
Because we started the conversation, this may seem like a digression, but it's important, I think, for normies and everybody to understand that.
I mean, it took a long time for me to get it, but it was like, oh, right.
Like the people that call themselves environmentalists are actually just radical leftists, slightly different from Marx because they're actually into Malthus, this totally dystopian anti-human view.
But the genius of the left is that they are so successful at masking their real agenda behind something else.
You know, we just want equality for people of color.
We just want to create equal opportunity for migrants.
No, their agenda is the destruction of civilization.
And you see, I... And it's working in LA. Well, it is working, and I always thought on the environmental movement, there was a woman called Julia Butterfly Hill who spent more than a year in a Redwood.
And, you know, I always thought, you know, if you were sincere about environmentalism, like, she would be, like, whatever happened to her, nobody knows.
And that was, to your point about physicalism, like...
I like redwoods, and if there's a reason to cut them out, okay, but maybe don't, because they're just so beautiful.
That's my personal view.
I always have felt that way.
So here was someone who was, she saved a tree.
That's got to be the highest level of what they claim they're trying to do, but they totally ignored her.
They don't give a shit about her at all.
She died in a tree.
Probably better for them.
What they really wanted to do was disconnect people from nature.
So why is it that every single person I know who really spends a lot of time outdoors, who's into the sporting life or whatever, lives in a rural area?
I mean, their goals are the opposite of those of the Environmental Defense Fund and the Sierra Club.
Well, and also, I think the physicalist distinction works on that as well.
I mean, here you have...
I did an interview with a terrific scientist I mentioned, and he's just like, you know, when you're dealing with fires, the main event is what is happening on the ground.
And the climate extremists are out there basically saying, no, no, no, ignore this whole physical reality.
We just need to reorganize the entire global economy.
I mean, think of all the houses with all the plastic and electricity burning.
It's terrible.
No, for sure.
I mean...
Yeah, a chance to get regrounded, I think.
A chance to, I mean, you know, it is also an interesting moment, right?
Because Hollywood, it's just producing garbage.
It is just, it is incredible how bad the cultural production is.
Just at a straight, like, you know, if you're someone that just loves pop culture, like, you just love Steven Spielberg, we're not getting that level of quality.
I mean, we tried to watch...
It's just awful.
And it's because they're all trying to fit it in.
Artistry and creativity is transgressive.
It's supposed to be breaking.
I mean, that's actually where you want your...
I want my transgression in my art, not in my civilization.
I want a really boring civilization and really transgressive art.
But it's become the opposite.
The art has become boring and conformist and authoritarian, and the civilization has gotten completely transgressive.
So people are not where they need to be.
The laws are not being enforced.
So, I mean, part of you go, God, I do hope it is a wake-up call.
It was five years ago this month that people started to drop dead in the central Chinese city of Wuhan.
Five years since the beginning of COVID. Tens of millions dead.
Societies reordered completely.
Economies destroyed.
And yet, for some reason, we still don't know answers to the most basic questions.
Where did this virus come from?
How did it get here?
Why did the government tell us to do things they knew wouldn't work?
None of those questions have been adequately answered.
And one man knows those answers.
His name is Dr. Tony Fauci.
Until now, nobody has really pressed.
And now, a documentary filmmaker called Jenner First is out with a new film explaining exactly what happened.
The film was called Thank You, Dr. Fauci.
Jenner First spent years trying to get answers.
And in that time, as he awaited Dr. Fauci's response, he went through tens of thousands of pages of documents and pieced together the story, which is shocking.
We are proud to host that documentary here on TCN from December 20th to January 19th.
You will see it exclusively here on TCN.
Again, it's called Thank You, Dr. Fauci.
And it's worth it.
So what, speaking of the laws not being enforced, tell us what you know about looting.
How could they let, you're stealing from people in the middle of a profound disaster, the city's burning down, and you're stealing, people are dying, and you're stealing.
And then they let them go, and then that became widely publicized.
Well, guess what?
You know, this is the thing that people have to understand.
You know, criminals, you know, they read the news.
Like, criminals are very online.
It's not like criminals don't know what's going on.
I mean, we have these amazing, there's these amazing, like, I think it was like phone calls between people in the Oakland jails and their friends, and they're like, basically, Auntie Pam, the name of the DA, they're like, Auntie Pam's gonna make sure we, you know, get off.
You know, they all know where the laws are not being enforced.
And I thought at the time, I guess it was 20 years ago, incredibly, 2005, I thought, well, you know, it's obviously tragic, but Bush is sending over a billion dollars to rebuild it.
I'm sure the city will be better, and it's been much worse ever since.
Well, there's no vision for it at all, you know, and we don't have anybody visionary in there.
You know, and they did, I mean, I think we had this guy Rick Caruso, as you were mentioning, who ran for mayor.
I mean, someone found, you know, there is a video of him calling for increasing the fire department budget.
I mean, kind of like, what else do you need to know at this point?
Can that overcome the...
i do think that the woke trance was broken i mean trump broke you i do for sure and look at that i mean look at the catastrophe that the news media is in and the success that people like you and i are having and joe rogan being the most influential yeah he's like the new walter cronkite yeah he's where somebody's observing he's where mark zuckerberg goes to confess his sins so it's a different world i do have some hope for it
i mean the the thing about the united states that's so different from europe is just that literally they i'm becoming like an old man because i'm talking about how great the founding fathers were but But it's like literally they created this incredible system that if you have free speech, if you can protect your free speech, which we've, I think, succeeded in doing, you bake it in, you remind people of its importance, you then are,
I think, going to be able to self-correct in ways that places that allow higher levels of censorship are simply not going to be able to do.
I mean, just look at this impact that Elon is having right now.
It's incredible.
I was on some social media chat group and somebody was like, how come we're all talking about the British grooming gangs?
It's like, because Elon decided that that was an issue, the AFD in Germany may end up, you know, I mean, I think they're going to come in at least second in the elections next month because Elon has mainstreamed them.
You've got a platform now that is still just the...
I mean, we always knew that the media had that agenda-setting power, but it's amazing to sort of see it so dramatically.
You only can really see it when it shifts from the mainstream news media.
We were writing last summer about how the sovereign in the United States, meaning, like, the true power center in the United States, was the news media.
That is now, in my view, clearly shifted to X. I think you said something recently.
I think I saw a clip of you saying the same thing.
And Blue Sky gave it a shot, but nobody can go on there.
It's too mad.
It's too insane.
So I think it can be very, very positive.
I always compare X to...
It's like when the printing press...
First shows up in the end of the 15th century for about 100 years.
The Catholic Church was like, the printing press is great.
We can print Bibles and give them out to all the priests.
It's very cheap.
The Catholic Church loved the printing press.
And then Martin Luther got a hold of the printing press.
And it was just, for the next five centuries, it was game over.
I mean, the best history of the printing press, she goes back, I think it's Oxford.
She goes back and just looks at its impact, and she comes back and she's just like, you know, after years of study or whatever, and she's like, oh, we knew it was a big deal, but it was a much bigger deal than we thought.
It's not just the Protestant Reformation.
It is that.
It's also the scientific revolution.
It's the industrial revolution.
It's nationalism, and it's democracy.
I mean, so you get a huge epical change with this shift of communication technologies and social media.
I mean, you know, Martin Gurry famously wrote this book, Revolt to the Public.
About the game-changing aspects of social media just on the Arab Spring, you know, which is now 14 years ago.
But in some senses, it really didn't get its power until Elon came in, bought it, and held strong against people calling him a racist anti-Semite for two years.
And then Trump comes, the business starts to collapse, and he realizes, I'm speaking for him, but he realizes, oh shit, you know, I'm a middle-aged white guy.
I better go along.
And he becomes just this cheerleader for every stupid, woke idea ever.
He feels sorry for him.
He's a nice guy, actually, and not a stupid guy.
Someone just sent me a clip of John Carl, like, basically defending Trump.
Well, yeah, and I also kind of go, are they really going to disclose all the stuff that they have?
I mean, we were going down, we just did a, actually, I don't know if we published it yet, but we were just going down the list of all the files that we want.
Well, not only are there bio labs in Ukraine, there are a lot of bio labs in Ukraine, which are working on biological weapons.
That's what, they're not there for livestock vaccines, sorry.
You know, the thing that people don't in this country understand is that the Ukrainian military is selling about half of the arms they get from the United States into international black markets, and they're winding up, in some case, with the drug cartels in Latin America.
That's a fact.
Okay, that's a fact.
And you can buy them.
And I spoke to someone who did buy some, actually, so I know this is a fact.
And they're bragging about it.
So they're selling conventional weapons, including weapon systems that are very dangerous and very destabilizing that would make commercial air travel impossible, for example.
So that's like the scariest thing that's ever happened.
And so like, you know, I think the Ukraine war has...
The potential to destabilize the world more than anything that's happened in my lifetime, just because of the scale of the weapon systems and biological agents involved in the most corrupt country in the West, which is Ukraine.
That's why I'm saying this right now, because I hope this is widely disseminated, because I think it's like the scariest thing I've heard in a long, long time.
I mean, it seems like the dominant two theories are now that it's non-human intelligence or that we or our adversaries have mastered anti-gravity technology.
The other scenarios of, you know, some kind of new plasma or...
You know, it's just kind of, the phenomenon doesn't seem to be showing up in that way.
Well, the core idea seems to be that there is non-human intelligence, whether all these manifestations of it are that, or whether they're government programs or Chinese or whatever.
It's probably a pastiche of all of them, but the core idea seems to be that there is non-human intelligence, which is plausible, and that it's been in interaction with the U.S. government for quite some time, and that it plays a role in...
I mean, well, there are all these things that I don't know what is true or what's not true.
I mean, you know, I covered the New Jersey drone situation.
I went to Jersey and interviewed a bunch of people.
I mean, for me, the weirdest moment is where you have...
John Kirby, the Defense Department spokesperson at Mayorkas, basically on the same day or the same 48 hours, just when they were asked about it, they just came out affirmatively and they were like, well, we're definitely not getting any drones over the military bases or other sensitive sites.
And you're like, I was like, why would you lie about that?
Especially because the Wall Street Journal had like, they did this huge piece about all of the drone, so-called, by the way, unidentified anomalous drone flyovers over the military bases and sensitive sites, which includes nuclear plants.
I mean, part of my interest in this was always, you know, I was trying to save Diablo Canyon in California.
They kept getting drone flyovers.
Also Palo Verde, which is our biggest nuclear plant.
Three beautiful reactors there in Arizona.
Like, a lot of...
Drone flyovers.
I'm also from Northeast Colorado, which is where the ICBMs are.
They had this exact same drone situation.
I believe it was December, I want to say December 2019. And they had this whole interagency task force and they were like, we're going to put a plane up.
And they kind of put a plane up and you're watching and you're like, well, why are they not scrambling jets?
I think the other issue is that they may not know.
I mean, okay, well, so to finish that story, so then drone immigrants do that.
I go out, and I'm just like, that's the weirdest lie, because it's been heavily reported.
I mean, the drones over sensitive military bases is really well reported, and some of the best reporting was by a...
Publication called The War Zone, which I highly recommend.
Very good, serious investigative reporting.
They don't believe it's aliens at all.
Like, they're just openly, like, anti-alien.
They're like, this is, and I think it's, well, anyway, for whatever reason, they're just like, this is Chinese or Russian or whatever, and they're not taking it seriously.
But they do some of the best reporting because they can't figure out why the military is being so weird about it.
So, then Trump comes out, and he goes, they know what it is.
I mean, first of all, I'm really happy that they're going to disclose, and I want to raise expectations about what the Trump administration is going to do.
We want the data, and I mean, someone was criticizing me because they were like, oh, because I came out, I said, oh, I'm confident the Trump administration is going to share the data, and they were like, that just shows that Schellenberger is...
You know, it's like pro-Trump and whatever.
And I was like, no, I'm just like pro-disclosure.
I want the expectations to be high because they should be high.
There is so much information they're not releasing.
There's this guy named, I can't remember his first name, Stringfield.
He wrote this incredible thick book of UAP crashes, crash retrievals.
And he started doing it, I want to say, 50s or 60s.
And I think he went for multiple decades.
And you just sit down with that book and it is impressive.
I mean, if it's a hoax, it's just one of the greatest hoaxes of all times.
You know, like other hoaxes.
You know, like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion or whatever, they're really bad.
Like, they're really, you're just like, this is like the dumbest hoax ever.
Like, most hoaxes are not that sophisticated with all these details and all these people interviewed.
Of course, Roswell is the big case, but it's only apparently one of them.
There's others.
So, there is this incredible, you know, gray literature, never published by any academic press, by really a little bit of commercial non-fiction.
Obviously, you have David Grush and Lou Elizondo.
I testified in front of Congress on this in, I guess I was in December or November, and two people, the two guys from the military, when we were asked, what are they?
I mean, look, let's just look at the possibility that they're human.
They didn't get a single one of them.
They didn't down a single one of them.
Not a single one of them crashed.
And there was a lot of them.
Look, there's a lot of mistaken sightings.
It is easy to mistake things.
It's totally natural.
But there was also, I mean, I interviewed mayors, two mayors.
We're like, one of them was like, I had an SUV-sized drone flying over my house.
Another one said he was going to a Fox News interview in New York.
The car came from me, walks out his door, and there's one hovering right over him.
And he felt like it was watching him, like it was there monitoring him.
I mean, that's weird stuff.
So we can't get a single drone down.
They're over military bases.
They can't seem to get any of them.
You know, do I think the Chinese could be behind or the Chinese?
When the Chinese decide to encroach in the South China Sea, when they decide, you know how they'll warn the United States occasionally?
They'll go, you're flying over our airspace.
It's all super calculated.
It's like a performance.
The Chinese are like, we're messing with you, like you all kind of know.
And they're doing it in ways where they don't want it to escalate, but they want to get a little bit more of that space.
It's all super calculated.
Now, there was the balloon.
Are there Chinese balloons?
Yeah.
But, I mean, to be buzzing our military bases, it's just so aggressive.
Now, when I've said it before, I've had other people point out, they go, well, they're aggressive with the cyber attacks.
I guess that's true.
As a physicalist, I guess I kind of go, flying your drones over U.S. military bases and nuclear plants, that is just a level of aggression that just doesn't seem characteristic of the Chinese.
The Chinese have not been seeking confrontations like that for the most part.
Now, Jesse Michaels, who is doing some of the best reporting on this issue of UAPs, he's doing YouTube videos.
He just did a documentary that was incredible.
I think it's like a couple of hours, highly recommended, that goes through the very long history of unidentified anomalous phenomena over U.S. military bases, including all these cases of, you know, several cases of them shutting down.
And there was this famous press conference with like missileers and others from military bases in Washington, D.C. I want to say in the 90s, maybe?
Maybe 80s?
So, you know, like that predates any of the Chinese stuff by far.
It predates all the drones.
So that was going on for a really long time.
I mean, if you just kind of...
If you step back and you look at it, it looks like a very, like, what is it communicating on a very basic level?
It's definitely communicating dominance.
You know, it's, you can read in a lot of different ways, and that's similar to what the Navy pilot said around the tic-tac interactions off both coasts, is that these were phenomena or, you know, or objects, whatever you're going to call them, or craft.
That we're just demonstrating dominance over our craft.
They were able to do things that our craft weren't doing.
So just to bottom line your view after reporting on the lights over New Jersey in Pennsylvania, New York, mid-Atlantic drone hysteria, do you think they were human-made drones?
I mean, I might be more shocked if they were human-made because of their behaviors and they never were able to get one.
I did have somebody tell me recently that they had heard...
I mean, again, it's always secondhand.
It's so untrustworthy.
But somebody told me that the military got one of the famous orbs and opened it up and it was Chinese.
I mean, if that's the case, then somebody has mastered anti-gravity.
And that's almost harder...
I mean, I literally go back and forth.
You can see me doing it in the same conversation.
But we have these huge black budgets in the military.
I mean, just gigantic.
And they've been there for decades.
So is it possible to cover up something like that?
I think it might be.
I mean, I'm much more, after having covered the Hunter Biden laptop and...
I mean, RussiGate 2, but really the Hunter Biden laptop, I was just impressed by how many people were involved in the conspiracy to cover it up.
I mean, you had the FBI getting it, covering it up, basically working with Aspen Institute to run a disinformation campaign.
By the way, this is Vivian Schiller and Garrett Graff run the disinformation campaign aimed at persuading journalists in advance of the release of the Hunter Biden laptop.
That it was a Russian information operation.
Garrett Graff is the guy that goes and does the big UFO book.
So these things all, I mean, this was very weird.
So he comes out with a big book on UFOs.
I think it was last year.
It was called UFO, Garrett Graff.
This is somebody that is famously close with the intelligence community.
The narrative is that they don't know what they are.
So he doesn't fully...
He's not like a debunker, like these guys who are like, oh, we can explain everything.
So he's much more sophisticated than that.
But it's basically a debunking.
It's basically that...
It's basically that it's just all the typical explanations, and then maybe some U.S. military programs, but he also just says that he just argues that the U.S. military doesn't know what it is.
I don't believe Garrett Graff, and the reason I don't believe Garrett Graff is because I saw him participate in a disinformation campaign on Hunter Biden Laptop, and I know for a fact there's something else going on.
At that Aspen Institute program, and Aspen Institute, of course, is a massive U.S. government-funded NGO that cosplays as a kind of bourgeois gab fest.
So, for me, that all came out in the Twitter files.
I discovered that in the Twitter files.
And for me, it was like pulling back the curtain.
And you actually have, as a journalist, we have the emails.
You have the documents.
You have the tabletop exercise where they're brainwashing journalists into believing a lie about the Hunter Biden laptop.
That was so sophisticated that...
Because they basically go and brainwash journalists before the story comes out, because they know they're listening to Giuliani, you know, their FBI tap on Giuliani.
They're listening to Giuliani.
They knew we had to go brainwash the journalists.
They go get all the journalists from all the major outlets, plus the social media platforms in these seminars where they program them.
I mean, that was like, for me, it was like, wow, there's like a secret government.
Like, it was like, there's some, there's like a whole...
There's like a whole – it's a very – and it was very just sophisticated.
I don't know what else to describe it.
Like it was very – everything seemed very careful.
Also, with all the censorship stuff, you see these limited hangouts, right, where limited hangouts are kind of like the public relations of a covert operation, of like a covert propaganda operation, where like after they get caught, they can be like, oh, no, we were totally honest about what we were doing.
We were talking about it.
But they do these weird limited hangouts.
You'll see these people that clearly look like either directly intelligence community or their intermediaries having these conversations they put on YouTube, but it's like a couple hundred views.
They're not promoting them in any way.
And so you just kind of go, wow, there's a whole creepy world of disinformation.
And you only can understand it when you see the whole big picture because there's no smoking guns ever.
So there's never something you can – I mean, a hunter buying a laptop got about as close as a smoking gun as you can get.
And it helped because it was – what helped to expose it was that it was partisan.
And so it was a particular partisan weaponization.
I mean, I guess the strength and a weakness is that it's become bipartisan in terms of the desire.
I mean, Tucker, the weirdest experience I've had, I've testified now like 12 times or 13 times in front of Congress in the last few years.
The weirdest experience I've had was on UAPs, seeing the Democrats and Republicans basically being aligned in wanting to get to the bottom of the UAP thing.
I mean, part of me is, you know, maybe it's my defensive pessimism on it, because like everybody else, I want the information.
Part of me is like, there's just no way they're going to let that information out.
It's just something is too, there's something about the UAP thing, like the JFK thing, where there's some secret there that they are really, there is some group of people that really don't want us to know.
I mean, how about the clip where Pompeo is being interviewed about the JFK files, and then he literally mid-sentence goes, but I mean, I've also seen the UFO files.
And it was like, well, why did you just switch from what made you think of the UFO files on the JFK files?
I don't know.
I mean, so anyway, is there a secret...
Have we developed anti-gravity?
I mean, we know that in the 50s, there was a whole book on it.
It's very fascinating.
But there was an anti-gravity program in the U.S. military with our defense contractors.
It made the cover of one of the aerospace magazines.
It was like a cover of it.
And then it just disappeared.
And so you can kind of go, I mean, the official experience goes, yeah, we tried that and it didn't work.
Well, I wonder, though, about the possibility that there is or has been technology transfer from some other realm to this realm.
Because there are, you know, just in the study of history, there are...
It's like, there's really no understanding at a bunch of different points in human societal evolution.
Like, where did that technology come from?
And you see that on a bunch of different technologies.
So, but nuclear, anti-gravity, that kind of stuff, like, are you open to the possibility that there's been, like, a transfer of that technology from some other?
As my wife says, she's like, your aliens really don't like the nuclear.
You know, because I love nuclear.
So, and I'm kind of like, I'm like, well, yeah, I mean, like, and also the most ridiculous thing is when people are like, oh, yeah, they want us to give up our, you know, the people that believe in them, they go, the aliens are here and they want us to give up our nuclear weapons.
It's like, doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
The foreign space invaders would like you to give up your most powerful weapons.
But those documents, I spent a bunch of time on them and I couldn't figure out how to report anything on it because of course, of course, FBI was like, these are all debunked.
They're all frauds.
But there are, first of all, there's a lot more of them.
You go to MajesticDocuments.com and you can look at them.
They're amazing.
I mean, if they are, and I've also had the other, and they're, by the way, in the Garrett Graff book.
They're in that book.
They're also in another debunking book called, by Mark Pilkington.
I'm playing on the name right now.
But all the people that are the debunkers deal with these documents, and their story is not that they were all hoaxes.
Their story is that they were what's called counterintelligence passage material, documents that were created by the U.S. government, but leaked to people to ostensibly be able to smoke out double agents, or people like you would see them, I guess you would trace these documents.
So, I mean, but the thing is, I mean, it is like, there's like, one of them is a handbook of crash retrieval, like for like, that the soldiers would ostensibly read to retrieve these crash.
I mean, it's...
They, the, if they're hoaxes, they're incredible.
I mean, like, they have, like, they have, like, they have, like, the people, like, they have, I forgot what it's called, but, like, basically, like, a manifest where they show who's checked it out on Reddit, and they have all these different names, and they've checked those names, and those were, like, real people at those airbases that had these documents.
So, and then, you know, there was one document in particular where it was a memo from JFK to the CIA Director Dulles where he says, I want to see you on this particular day.
It was, like, July 60. I can't remember which.
And again, everyone's like, oh, that's a forgery.
It's part of the MJ-12 documents or whatever.
It's not real.
But then they released the JFK files, and then sure enough, we see the Dulles calendar, and he had met with JFK twice that day, and nobody had known that they had had those meetings until we had that JFK memo, until we had the confirmation of the memo.
So that would suggest that at least either that document is real, that JFK memo to Dulles, or whoever forged it.
Knew that he had met with Dulles that day and nobody else had known that.
So, you know, you'd be sort of like, I guess you could still put it in the...
This is the problem with this issue.
There's still plausible deniability for all these things.
You know, you can make up a reason for why these documents are all counterintelligent passage material.
I don't know.
That's why I just have to kind of go...
I don't know.
I mean, I talk to a lot of people and...
Yeah, it's just a lot of secondhand information and the documents are secondhand.
So you kind of go, there's like my world of like the Hunter Biden laptop, which still a bunch of my progressive and Democrat friends and family don't believe.
You know, they still think the Russians were somehow involved.
But like, I actually have the documents and we can prove what happened there.
On the UAP stuff, it's just still just surrounded in history.
But if Trump knew what it is, and if it's NHI and Trump knows that, he seemed very relaxed about that.
Because, of course, the main...
The conventional wisdom among people that follow this who think it's NHI is that it's bad news.
That it's not a great story.
That if it were good news and that they were just friendly space brothers offering us advanced tech, and they'd be like, and there's no strings attached or whatever, that would be a much easier story to sell.
But if there's some bad news in that story, then that might explain why they're so secretive.
My theory is that The reason that permanent Washington or deep state or whatever, people who administer the system hate Trump is not because of any of his policies, which they're probably agnostic on, but because they fear that he will disclose information.
I think everything's about disclosure.
If you look at the federal government, it's defining quality is secrecy, right?
And I'm pretty sure that everybody I've ever spoken to who I think knows a lot more than I do, I mean, what does it mean to know?
Like, do we really know anything?
I don't know.
I'm not sure anybody fully understands this or even partially understands it, but the people who I'm confident have a lot more information than I have to a person are very, very uncomfortable about it.
I mean, Yeah, no, I mean, it's very, yeah, I mean, I say my prayers.
I'm still Christian.
I mean, you know, it's interesting, Joe, when I was on Joe Rogan's podcast last time, I mean, here, you know, Joe was like, I think that they're extraterrestrials.
There have been so many sightings in this country and around the world that if they were from another galaxy far, far away, there would be some satellite evidence of that.
The Court of the Red Zar being, I think, the greatest of them.
About Stalin, for example.
And one thing you learn from reading the book is they kept records on everything, almost like the Nazis, like crazy level records.
And, you know, most of them have never been this close.
So I did have some questions for Putin about that, about Rudolf Hess specifically.
It's one of the great stories in history that doesn't make any sense at all.
The number two guy in Nazi Germany flying into Scotland in a plane by himself and bailing out, you know, right before the U.S. entry into the war and had all these things to say that were wild.
And one of the things he apparently said in his debriefs was he believed That Hitler was being influenced by demonic spirits that he had summoned through the occult?
Well, I thought also that, you know, you may have seen Marc Andreessen recently, so that when he met with White House officials who said that they wanted to take control over all AI, that they said to him something like, we've declassified whole areas of science since the 1950s.
And I was like, that just seemed like a reference to this stuff.
I think the modern Western mind, the post-1945 Western mind, is incapable of understanding some of the stuff because we lack the language of, you know, metaphysics.
And I think that's, you know, just been a feature of human thinking from the cave period until we dropped the atom bomb, in which case it just like turned off and we're like, oh, only the material world is real.
But no one else has ever thought that because that's not true.
In fact, if there's anything this conversation I think is like provoked in people, it's a desire to hear more Michael Schellenberger.
Oh, thank you.
Do you think it's possible that what we're seeing in LA, which does feel like the destruction of our second biggest city, from which maybe there's no recovery?
I don't know.
I hope.
But do you think it's an act of war in some sense?
No, I mean, I guess I look at it, I just think Nietzsche really nailed it, which is that when people, you know, when people stop believing in traditional religions, they become, they unconsciously, you know, develop, you know, they develop a new sense of guilt.
A new vision of the apocalypse.
They invent a new soul.
I mean, people think that there's this thing called gender, which is separate from your body.
It's kind of like a soul.
My friend Abigail Schreier pointed that out.
And so, we just end up recreating Christianity, but in a deformed and deranged way.
And the emergent quality of it is this destructive fire.
It's actually more powerful because nobody got out there and said, you know, let's let...
Somebody did say, let's let Malibu burn, but that was never like the explicit policy of the government of LA. It's just something that emerges after years of budget cuts, after years of self-hating ideologies like DEI, like climate apocalypse, like the homeless apocalypse.
It just emerges kind of deep from deep within us, from some self-destructive part of us.
So for me, if there's a foreign invasion, it came through the human psyche, not from outside of it.