Dr. Ben Carson warns Kamala Harris’s presidency would accelerate Marxist policies like open borders and government overreach, fueled by media manipulation and ignored voter preferences, while contrasting her with Trump’s economic leadership and divine mandate to "save America." He criticizes vaccine mandates for suppressing alternatives like hydroxychloroquine, accuses the FDA of ethical violations by downplaying risks, and demands election fraud investigations after comparing U.S. mail-in voting to France’s flawed system. Carson also ties cultural decline to radical academia’s anti-Christian agendas, defends his pro-life stance against professional backlash, and speculates on security lapses in Trump’s assassination attempt, framing the attack as a potential escalation by opponents. The episode ends with a call to bypass censored platforms like YouTube amid systemic distrust in Washington. [Automatically generated summary]
This is going to be a great test of the power of the media to take someone who formerly was universally disliked and transform them into a godlike figure.
And they will use everything that they have to try to do that.
The question is, are the American people smart enough to see through it?
The American people are smarter than anybody gives them credit for.
And I don't think that they are going to be willing to sacrifice what we have in this country, which is what everybody else wants, even though they try to denigrate our country, say we're systemically racist, we're unfair to people.
If we were all that bad, why are all these people trying to get in here?
And why aren't people trying to get out of here?
So we know that we have something that's very good.
And I think the American people realize that, and they're not willing to give that up and trade that for something inferior.
But there's no question that they have lost their original intent.
The media, the press, is the only business that's protected by the Constitution.
And there was a reason for that.
It's because they were supposed to disseminate unbiased information to the people so that the people could determine what their will was because the country was supposed to be run on the will of the people.
Now, you know, the Europeans thought we were crazy.
They said, you can't have a nation that's run on the will of the people.
You have to have a monarch.
You have to have a ruling body.
But we have demonstrated for a very long time That we can run on the will of the people, but that is being distorted significantly because the press has, instead of deciding to disseminate unbiased information, they have decided to put their thumb on the scale and to push a certain agenda, which, when you think about it, makes little sense, because the agenda that they're pushing...
It's more of a socialist, Marxist agenda.
Well, what do socialists and Marxists do when they get in power?
There's no question that they poisoned the atmosphere by saying, you know, he's like Hitler and he's going to destroy democracy and is sort of Satan incarnate.
You know, when you have people who perhaps are not fully capable of controlling themselves.
They can easily be influenced by that kind of activity.
And it's just wrong.
Now, I would quickly hasten that it's done on all sides in the political arena.
You know, spending time demonizing other people because somehow they think that that helps.
And it does help for some people.
Wouldn't it be amazing if we could actually discuss the issues?
Then we end up with somebody who, on their own merits, would never have been in that position.
That's a real problem.
And there are consequences for doing things like that.
You know, the reason that our country accelerated from a bunch of ragtag militiamen to the pinnacle of the world is because we had a process, and it worked well, and it reflected the will of the people.
When you throw that out, you can't anticipate that things will continue to go smoothly.
They won't.
And, you know, we've just thrown a big kink in the whole thing, and hopefully the American people will correct it.
You know, I think our founders were very, very smart people.
And they studied every single governmental system that had ever existed in the history of the world.
And they were eclectics.
They extracted the good things and they excluded the bad things.
But one of the things that they noticed when they studied all of these governments is that all governments move in the same direction.
Regardless of how they start, regardless of how lofty their ideals are.
They grow, they infiltrate, and they dominate.
And they wanted to give us a government that wouldn't do that, that would leave the people free and in charge.
And that's why they worked so hard.
And as you know, it was very raucous, and there were a lot of different opinions about how to do that.
And in the last convention in Philadelphia, Constitutional Convention, The whole thing was about to dissolve.
Everybody go their separate ways.
And the elder statesman Benjamin Franklin, 81 years old, said, Stop!
Gentlemen, let's get down on our knees and let's ask God for wisdom.
And they prayed and they got up and they resolved their differences and gave us the Constitution, which I believe is a God-inspired document.
But if we neglect it, if we don't adhere to it, Then we will suffer the consequences.
And that's what the battle is right now.
The battle that's going on in this election is not about Democrats and Republicans.
It's about people who want a country that is up for and by the people and people who want a government that is up for and by the government.
It is tempting, but, you know, much more tempting to me is trying to make sure that we show the contrast between those two systems because they are very different.
You know, one of them will create a situation where the workers control their own lives, control their own budgets, and one of them is a situation where you turn everything over to the government, including your hard-earned wages, and they decide what to do with them.
It was before either of us got into the political arena.
And we were just enjoying each other's company.
And someone says, Rod Stewart just came in.
He said, I don't care.
This is Ben Carson.
I knew what kind of person he was at that point.
And, you know, my whole family was with me and my mother.
And, you know, it was an Easter program.
And he just made sure that we were comfortable and that we were taken care of, especially wanted to make sure my mother was comfortable.
And there were all kinds of celebrities and important people walking around.
He was just trying to make sure that we were comfortable.
And that's the kind of person he is.
I noticed, you know, the workers, the people who served the meals, the people who parked the cars.
He knows those people.
He knows their names.
He knows their families.
Same thing at Trump Towers when I went there.
And he seems to be a genuinely caring person.
It didn't take long before he knew my family, knew their names.
He's just that kind of person, as opposed to the very superficial politicians who are always playing to the cameras and couldn't care less about you once you got out of the camera range.
I don't remember his specific words, but he was kind of taken aback that I would say that.
And he reminds me of that very frequently.
And I think he's really thinking about it since the assassination attempt, recognizing that, He's there for a specific reason.
And, you know, I had a hard time when I dropped out convincing my followers to go with him.
I got a lot of calls, particularly from evangelical leaders, you know, and I just said, no, don't be swayed by all the noise.
look at the policies that this man is putting forth, because we have to save our country.
And think about all the people who preceded us and the sacrifices they made.
We can't throw it all away.
And we've got to be able to overlook some of the things that the media is going to try to focus you on.
Those aren't the important things when it comes to a leader.
And I explained to them that this was a man who Made his way in the real estate market in Manhattan, one of the toughest real estate markets anywhere in the world.
I said, you're not going to be successful in that market unless you're very tough.
And that means you may have some rough edges.
And we just have to recognize that and be able to move beyond that and see that this is a man whose policies, Do you agree with those policies or do you not?
And several of the leaders then came and started thinking in a different way, and we had a big evangelical rally.
You know, at first it was going to be like 50 pastors.
It ended up being 2,000.
And at that time, I think he realized that, An incredible block of people that we need to be working with.
And if you take almost all of it and trace it to its roots, you'll arrive at the same place, the higher education system in the United States.
This is coming out of our colleges and universities.
And it's not an accident.
Radical professors and administrators have transformed higher education into this country into indoctrination factories specializing in teaching anti-American, anti-human ideologies.
That's not an overstatement.
So instead of encouraging civil debate in the pursuit of truth, which was the point, universities teach students that they should become social activists, deranged social activists, and that's the highest level of achievement.
So instead of shaping American citizens who defend their rights and are proud of their heritage to keep the country going and our civilization intact, universities instead celebrate global citizenship and promote contempt for the achievements of the West, hatred of our own civilization.
Instead of teaching students to behold nature and its undeniable God-created beauty, they push anti-science nonsense like transgenderism and climate panic.
And the worship of public health bureaucrats, dumbest of all.
Most importantly, instead of providing an education that seeks transcendent truth, truth from God, universities teach students to reject the concept of the divine and think only about themselves, institutionalized narcissism.
The result of this, of course, is sad.
American universities, once the envy of the world, have become hostile, mediocre places.
But there's at least one college that stands apart and has for 180 years.
Hillsdale College has stayed true to its original mission, even in the midst of all this chaos.
Hillsdale was founded in 1844 by patriotic abolitionist Christians.
They were provided to providing information and education necessary to, quote, preserve civil and religious liberty and intelligent piety in America.
And they've done that from the beginning.
Hillsdale has always refused to discriminate based on race, religion, or sex.
And in effect, that means no racist quota systems, no DEI officers, no Marxist struggle sessions posing as education in the classroom.
No.
Hillsdale has stayed true and kept faith with the old idea that the purpose of a college is the shared pursuit of knowledge.
To remain independent in doing all this, and it hasn't been easy, Hillsdale is one of the only colleges in the United States that refuses all government funding.
Federal, state, local.
None.
And unlike so many universities that rely on a government subsidy and view most Americans with contempt, Hillsdale is committed completely to sharing the best things from its classrooms to every person in the United States, every American who wants to learn for free.
And as part of that commitment, Hillsdale offers free online courses based on its core curriculum that every student there takes on campus.
That would include American history, politics, the Bible, classic literature, Western philosophy, music, foreign policy.
It keeps going.
And they're great.
More than 4 million people have taken free online courses with Hillsdale.
No charge whatsoever.
Check it out.
Go to TuckerForHillsdale.com to start learning about everything Hillsdale offers.
Again, even if you're opposed to college, even if you're one of the many Americans like me who thinks, if I had to do it again, I would never send kids to college, Hillsdale is different.
Check them out.
And while you're there, you can sign up for their free course on the American left right now.
This course explains the origins and the fundamental ideas of the modern American left.
We talk about it a lot on this show.
The course explains where it came from.
It explains how transgenderism, identity politics, global government, these are concepts that were formulated at the fringes of academia.
True, crazy people, tinfoil hat people, all of a sudden they're at the very mainstream, the core, the center of American public life.
Why?
This course will explain.
It explains how neoliberalism arose in the 1970s and how that idea has changed the very core, the basis of America, the morality and the economy of the country we live in now.
So fixing all of this, recovering the American way of life, is going to be hard.
It's not going to be easy.
But part of the work is learning that there is truth.
And there's a history to all of this.
It happened for a reason.
They don't want you to know what the reason is.
Hillsdale will tell you.
Sign up for free.
Start learning about Hillsdale and from Hillsdale.
I had a very hard time in the beginning, obviously, because I didn't have a A deputy secretary for eight months.
And I didn't have any assistant secretaries for five months.
Because they were playing politics.
Didn't want to give me the people.
I hoped that maybe I would go away.
But of course, that just makes you more determined to stay.
And once we got the right people in place, it was wonderful.
You know, we were very much aligned with the idea of getting rid of the regulations.
When I was running for president, you know, I'd talk about how that was the major cause of sluggish economy.
We had so many regulations.
We got rid of over 2,000 regulations at HUD, regulations and sub-regulations, which made it much easier to get things done.
And, of course, we had a situation.
You always heard the stories about the malfeasance, the fiscal problems going on at HUD. You probably noticed a year and a half into the Trump administration, you never heard those stories anymore because we were able, with much cajoling and arm-twisting,
to get one of the former senior partners at Ernst& Young to come on and really to take on the whole HUD organization.
Which was difficult.
He said in the beginning, he said he looked at the books and he said, Ernst& Young would never have taken you guys as a client.
I am fully dedicated to helping to save our country.
And, you know, there are a variety of ways that that can be done, and I will be following the guidance from the good Lord in terms of which is the best way to do that.
And I've talked to people who told me, you know, in Baltimore, go into the voting station and just vote.
They didn't have to show any ID. They didn't have to do anything.
I remember one person who worked with me said, I went in there and she said, do you want to see my ID? And they said, no, we don't need to see your ID. So think about that.
Multiply that by hundreds of thousands or millions of people, it can have a profound effect on the election.
But also think about the fact that when people come in here illegally, they get legally counted in the census, which then is used to help determine how many representatives they have.
So it has an impact that way also.
So it definitely has an impact.
It's just a matter of how great that impact will be.
And as time goes on and you get more representatives lean left, then you get legislation passed that becomes very friendly to people who have entered this country illegally.
I think we're one or two elections away from that.
And that's why it's so vitally important that we have people who can explain this in a way that people who are not legal or political scholars understand what's going on.
And are not so easily manipulated.
We have to recognize that we're being manipulated.
And this goes back a long way.
There have always been people who have not been happy with the United States and with the way that we do things.
And you can go all the way back to 1963 and look at the congressional record, January the 10th.
1963, Congressman Herlong of Florida read into the record the 45 goals of communism in America and how they plan to fundamentally change our society.
It was derived from a book called The Naked Communists by W. Kleon Skousen, who was a CIA agent and had done a lot of study on Communism and its effect.
And you look at those 45 goals, it was things like gaining control of the public school system and the teacher unions so that you could indoctrinate the kids, gaining control of the news media and Hollywood so that you could manipulate the opinions of people, denigrating the role of the family.
Denigrating the role of the church, getting into the churches and changing the real gospel to the social gospel, making sexual perversion normal, natural, and healthy.
I mean, just right down the line, all the things.
And the things that are happening in our society right now.
And we, the American people, are the pawns who are being manipulated.
And it's one of the reasons that Khrushchev was so confident.
When he talked to Eisenhower and said that your grandchildren's children will live under our system.
We won't have to fight a war because we think we won the Cold War.
But they had a much better plan on how to actually change this.
And we're falling for it.
And we, the American people, have got to wake up before it's too late.
And we've got to understand that part of the goal...
To overcome us is to divide us on the basis of race, age, income, gender, political affiliation, religion.
Because a house divided against itself cannot stand.
Jesus said it.
Abraham Lincoln reiterated it.
And it's absolutely true.
And you look and you see what's happening to our society.
You know, we are neighbors and friends and co-workers and colleagues.
We are not enemies.
And look at the first letter of each of those words.
We are not enemies.
W-A-N-E, wane.
We've allowed hatred and division to wax for a long time.
Now it's time to let it wane and come together once again.
It's okay to disagree about things.
It doesn't make someone your enemy.
Just because they have a different yard sign or a different opinion, it doesn't change the fact that that's your neighbor.
And you think about the early days in our country when you had communities, sometimes of 50 or 100 families.
They came from different areas of the world.
In many cases, they could barely talk to each other because they spoke different languages.
But they understood a concept called the common good.
That's language that you see in much of the writings of our founders.
The common good.
What's good for everyone?
All of us.
Not what's good for the Polish section or the German section or the African section, but what's good for everybody.
And that was one of the things that made the difference.
You know, if it was harvest time and Mr. Johnson broke his leg, everybody else harvested his crops.
They didn't say, are you a Democrat or a Republican?
What's your religion?
No.
They said, you're my neighbor and you need help.
That was one of the real strengths of our nation.
And we're allowing that to be destroyed.
We're being manipulated.
And one of the reasons I believe that that's happening is because we are the major obstacle to one world government and one world domination.
But we cannot be overcome militarily.
So you have to overcome us by destroying us from within.
One of the reasons that People talked about the common good and believed that it was important is because they were Christians, and therefore they believed in the moral equality of mankind because every person is created by God.
That doesn't seem to be a common view in the way that it was even 20 years ago.
And at the same time, the U.S. government seems openly hostile to Christianity, particularly the Biden-Harris administration, replacing Easter with Transvisibility Day, etc., People in prison for praying in abortion clinics, etc., etc.
But recognize that that's part of the overall plan of Marxism.
Now, Marxism and communism is very anti-religion because they want you to be dependent on government.
They don't want you to be dependent on God.
And they want you to believe that they have the ultimate say in everything.
So naturally, they're going to be anti-religion and anti-God.
And it's sad to see, I mean, when you look at television, the way that they mock Christians and Christianity.
And you saw all of the protests that occurred recently when the governor of Louisiana He said, we're going to have the Ten Commandments in the schools.
And the governor of Oklahoma and the legislature said, we're going to teach Bible and the Ten Commandments.
Oh, no, no, you can't do that.
This is horrible.
Separation of church and state.
You know, the Constitution says nothing about separation of church and state, by the way.
That's been distorted tremendously.
But I like to ask these people, exactly why don't you want the Ten Commandments to be taught?
What is wrong with thou shalt not kill?
What's wrong with thou shalt not steal?
Thou shalt not commit adultery?
Thou shalt not lie?
Thou shalt not envy?
Honor your parents.
What's wrong with those things?
And of course they never have a good answer for what's wrong with them because there is nothing that's wrong with them.
And, you know, these are basic principles of civilization.
And you can go to the deepest, darkest jungle of Borneo, and if you find a thief, what does he do?
He waits until nighttime when nobody can see him, and he goes and says, why did he do that?
Because he knows it's wrong.
There is such a thing as right and wrong, and there's nothing wrong with us teaching that to our children.
And they go so far as to want to punish those who disagree with them.
And make life very difficult for them.
I think we're in a situation now where our society, to a large degree, actually thinks logically and understands the difference between right and wrong and good and evil.
But we have people who are afraid.
They're afraid to express their ideals because of the punishment.
Never mind the fact that he saved thousands of lives and came up with all kinds of new ways to do wonderful things.
He's a horrible person because whatever they believe is not what he believes.
And the good thing is that I don't encounter a lot of people who feel that way.
You know, when I go to the airport, when I came in here yesterday and I went to the airport, I had a line of people waiting to take pictures with me and to shake my hand and to thank me.
And that's what I find just about every place I go.
So the mainstream media, they do their best to demonize anybody who doesn't agree with them.
I don't think they're as effective as I think they are.
And as I started reading books about people of great accomplishment, surgeons and explorers and inventors and entrepreneurs, I began to realize that the person who had the most to do with you and your success was you.
It wasn't somebody else.
It wasn't some circumstance.
I stopped listening to all the negative people who were saying, you can't do this, you can't do that.
Society is stacked against you.
I just threw all that stuff in the garbage.
And I got to the point where if I had five minutes, I was reading a book.
And in the space of a year and a half, I went from the bottom of the class to the top of the class.
And it had a profound effect on everything I did.
But the other thing about my mother is as difficult a life as she had, she never allowed herself to be a victim.
And she never made excuses.
And that was a good thing.
The problem was she never accepted excuses from us either.
When she was making us read books and submit to her written book reports, which she couldn't read, but we didn't know that, she would put little marks and things on them and checks and act like she was reading them.
The last time I saw him was at my wedding when I got married.
And I didn't have any hard feelings toward him.
I was, at that time, understanding why he left the picture.
And that it was probably a good thing rather than a bad thing.
But of course, I am very pro-family, very pro-traditional family, nuclear family.
That's why I wrote the book, The Perilous Fight, Overcoming Our Cultural War Against the American Family.
If you look at the think tanks, the liberal think tanks, and the conservative think tanks, and all the study groups, they all agree that children raised in a traditional nuclear family do much better on all parameters than those who are not.
And yet we find ourselves not really pushing the traditional nuclear family.
You turn on a television series, You know, within five minutes, you get introduced to a non-traditional family.
And not only as acceptable, but as the preferred thing.
And there is a real war on traditional families.
There's a real war in terms of children and the formation of families.
The average birth per woman now...
It's down to 1.6.
You need 2.1 just to maintain the population.
And then we have people getting married very late, if at all.
And that, of course, depresses the birth rate as well.
So we have a real cultural issue that's going on that needs to be dealt with.
We need to be encouraging marriage.
And family, and family formation, and birth of children, and not succumb to the other influences.
One of the popular things now is dink, double income, no kids.
And because you get to lavish all of it upon yourselves, you don't have to worry about anybody else.
But what about when you're 80 or 85 years old?
And you don't have another generation who's concerned about you.
People need to begin to think beyond their immediate gratification.
Because when you're young, that's when you're energetic.
That's when you're likely to accomplish a lot.
You look at Nobel Prize winners in physics and mathematics and things like that, they usually don't get the prize until they're in their 50s, 60s, or 70s.
But it's for work they did when they were in their 20s and 30s.
They're the main way we communicate with each other.
They're where politics happen in this country.
But one of the problems with social media is that the rules change.
The people in charge don't want you to say something.
They don't tell you that.
And the next thing you know, you're without a platform.
Well, now you have an option.
Parler.
It's back.
The original free speech app, taken off the internet by the censors, has come back in full force.
Parler was the first big app to be pulled off because it was the first big app to make free speech a top priority.
Now, other platforms may be relaxing their policies and they change a lot, but Parler will not change.
Its distinct approach is here to stay.
By paving the way for other apps to protect users' free speech, Parler has set the standard in the industry.
It is now launched on a hyperscale private cloud called Parler Cloud, and that means your data are secure.
Your words cannot be controlled by third-party companies.
It's uncancellable.
Parler has been canceled.
They don't plan to be canceled again.
And they've taken extensive and very expensive steps to make sure it's not going to happen.
Parler is not at the mercy of other companies that don't believe in free speech.
And here's the best part.
It's ad free.
You are not the product on Parler.
Parler is committed to providing a space where you can share and engage without interference of ads or invasive targeting.
So it's more than just a platform.
It is effectively a movement, and its goal is to keep the free flow of information open globally, where everybody can talk without fear of suppression.
So it's upholding the values this country was founded on, free expression, open dialogue.
Also, innovation, by the way.
We're on Parler, at Tucker Carlson, and you can go there and find us and stay informed about what's happening in the world.
So join a place that embraces your right to say what you actually think and that fosters connections between people.
Without free speech, you can't connect with other people.
We're all just lying to each other.
But Parler offers you that, a seamless social media experience tailored to your needs.
You can get Parler from the App Store, Google Play, or visit Parler.com.
At Parler, you are valued, you can say what you think, and you're awarded for doing so.
So what, I mean...
Maybe more impressive than having three successful sons, so that's pretty impressive, is being with the same woman happily for over 50 years, which you have pulled off.
So what specific advice would you give to married men for keeping your marriage intact and happy?
But one of my mother's sisters in Boston and her husband took us in.
It was a...
Typical tenement, large multifamily dwellings, boarded up windows and doors, sirens and gangs, rats and roaches, murders.
Both of my older cousins, who we adored, were killed.
I mean, that was the kind of place that it was, but at least it was a roof over our heads for a couple of years until we were able to get back to Detroit, still in a multifamily setting.
We had plenty of wildlife, but nevertheless, she was independent at that point.
And the goal was always to get back to that first neighborhood.
And after a couple of years, my mother worked very hard and we were able to get back to that neighborhood.
Some of the neighbors were still there who were there when I was growing up.
It was very nice to see them.
But, you know, it has the wear and tear, obviously, of a few decades.
But people still try to take care of their property.
And, you know, it...
It helps me to realize how blessed I've been just in terms of being able to navigate around the world, to own properties, to do all kinds of things that I never would have thought was possible.
You know, people say the American dream is dead.
It's not dead by any stretch of the imagination.
But it required a lot of work.
Extremely dedicated, hard work for many, many years.
People don't just give you stuff, nor should they.
But as I tell people all the time, if you work hard and you make yourself valuable and people need you, guess what?
I mean, he became mayor by walking from door to door, going into people's living rooms, talking to them, finding out what their needs were, developing relationships between people.
You know, he not only got elected, but he got re-elected.
Has been working with several business entities and trying to bring real revival to Detroit.
Well, I mean, there was some people, a few people who, you know, not well-known or anything like that, but I think two of my classmates at Southwestern High School became physicians.
But, you know, at that time, there was much more of a push for people to do better than their parents.
And now you don't see it as much.
You see more people saying, that system is against you.
And you're a victim.
We've got to march for your rights, and you need to do what you need to do in order to get your own, and if that's taking stuff from somebody else, that's okay.
Those are not good messages for people.
We need to remind people that people are people, and that you make your own bed, and you lie in it.
If you want to get ahead, there's mechanisms for doing that, but it requires hard work.
And one of the reasons that people who come here as immigrants do so well is because they look around and they say, wow, you mean all I've got to do is work hard?
All I've got to do is go to school and do well?
That's all?
And I can have whatever I want to do?
It's amazing.
I was talking to a young woman from Cambodia.
Well, she's not so young now, but she was young when she came here, when the Khmer Rouge came in.
And completely destroyed their lives, and she ended up in one of the work camps.
But at age 19, she was somehow able to get to this country.
And now she owns her own business.
She became an engineer.
And she just talked about all the amazing opportunities that she found in this country that she was not exposed to before.
But she also told a cautionary tale about the kinds of things that are occurring in our country now that are very reminiscent of what happened when communism came to their country.
And if you go to our website, AmericanCornerstone.org, we have a segment called My American Story.
There are many people, like the young woman that I just talked about, who came from communist or socialist environments, and they talk about the differences between our country and their country.
How they see some of the very worrisome things starting to happen in our country.
But, I mean, a drop has been so dramatic that there's got to be, you know, abrupt, that it feels like there's got to be some specific cause that we haven't identified that's important to know about.
I think it's just that we used to be much more physical.
And, you know, if you go to countries where, you know, the men and the women still engage in heavy physical labor, carrying around heavy buckets and things like that, I mean, you can go there and you can see like a 70-year-old woman, she can be a lot stronger than you are.
Well, I mean, I think some of the people who were pushing it were sincere, and they really thought that they were saving the population.
I think others perhaps had other motives.
Some of them linked to profits and monetary issues.
What is very troubling to me is the mandates that require people to get the vaccines if they want to keep their job.
And so many people in the airline industry, in the medical industry, first-line responders, military, lost their jobs, lost their pensions.
Lost their livelihoods because they refused to do it.
Those people have not been made whole, even though it's been proven that they may have been right in refusing to take the vaccines.
And we also discovered that many of the alternative treatments that were Basically demonized, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, were actually very effective.
But, you know, we had an FDA rule that said we can't get an EUA, the emergency use authorization for the vaccine, if you had other effective treatments.
So they had to, you know, denigrate those.
When in fact...
The ruling should be just the opposite.
If we're having a pandemic, use every avenue possible to find a solution, not just try to channel everything into one direction.
So, the other thing that was done is we didn't make known the complication rate of the vaccines.
It was much higher than previous vaccines.
And, you know, transparency requires that if you're going to treat somebody with something, you need to tell them what the benefits and risks are.
We didn't do that.
We just said, you got to do this, and that's the declaration.
Was it weird for you, since you were a doctor and one of the most famous doctors in the United States, and we were told to trust the doctor, trust the experts, but...
You know, if you stood up as HUD Secretary and said any of these things, you would have been censored on YouTube.
France banned routine mail-in balloting in 1975 because they said there was just too much cheating, there are too many different ways to cheat, and you couldn't control it.
And they went back to paper balloting and an election day instead of an election season.
And they now know their results within a day or two.
So, you know, we're about the only country in the world that does it this way.
And why would we do that?
Why has everybody else discovered that it's a problem, but we haven't?
Obviously, because somebody's benefiting from the way that we do it.
I think we probably should have a congressional investigation.
And let's look at the way it's done in places where it's done effectively and in a way that people trust it.
Who did you, I'm sure you're, I haven't even asked you, but I'm sure, you know, you moved to Washington, you spent a lot of your life right nearby in Baltimore, but it's a totally different city from Washington.
I'm sure you were appalled in a lot of ways and frustrated.
You said the Congress wouldn't even give you your deputies for months.
Who were you impressed by?
Who did you think was a person of integrity, intelligent, hardworking?
Were there anyone in the government you thought was great?
It's pretty bad, and it's going to require a lot of work to get us back to a point of trustworthiness in the government.
And I think that's the reason that the swamp or the cesspool is so frightened of Donald Trump, because he's not a creature that was born there, that was raised there, that accepts and understands that was raised there, that accepts and understands their ways.
And you can't have a disruptor like that to come into your home and to disrupt it.
I guess that's why, as a young child, I wanted to be a doctor.
I listened to the stories about what doctors did.
I was particularly impressed by what missionary doctors did.
And I decided when I was eight years old that I would become a doctor.
But looking at innocent little babies, Being killed, just because they happen to be in the safest place where you can possibly be, which is in the mother's womb, therefore it gives you a right to kill them, some people feel.
And, you know, as a pediatric neurosurgeon, I operated on very premature babies, sometimes 27, 28, 29. Weeks gestation.
And we had to give those babies anesthesia.
They felt everything.
And yet, you have people who are willing to stick a force up into the uterus of a 27-week baby, grab whatever is there, twist and pull, and out comes an arm or a shoulder.
Or another part of the anatomy.
Knowing that that baby can feel that.
I mean, to me, it's barbaric.
And I don't understand how people can do it.
I truly do not understand how medical colleagues can do that.
But what gives you the right to kill another human being just because that human being is being protected by you?
And the thing that really changed my mind...
As I was thinking about slavery, and I said, what if the abolitionist had said, well, I don't believe in slavery, but I don't have any right to tell you what you need to do.
What if that had been their attitude?
Where would we be?
So, and the Bible says it too, in Book of Proverbs, 24th chapter, 11 and 12 verse.
What about those people who are being drawn unto death, innocence?
Did you say anything?
And doesn't he who sees everything know what you did and what you didn't do?
So I think we have a responsibility.
When we know something is right or wrong, we have a responsibility to speak up.
So it turns out that YouTube is suppressing our show.
I know.
Shocking that in an election year, with everything at stake, Google would be putting its thumb on the scale and preventing you from hearing anything that the people in charge don't want you to hear.
But it turns out it's happening.
So what can you do about it?
Well, we could whine about it, but that's a waste of time.
We're not in charge of Google.
Or we could find a way around it, a way that you could actually get information that's true.
It's not intentionally deceptive.
And the way to do that on YouTube, we think, is to subscribe to our channel.