Richard Leonard details the 1994 Air Force's rejected $7.5 million Project Sunshine, which proposed non-lethal chemical weapons like a "gay bomb" to destroy enemy morale via aphrodisiacs or rat swarms. He critiques military strategy by contrasting lethal combat with disorienting technologies while abruptly pivoting to unsubstantiated claims linking vaccines to childhood asthma and autoimmune disorders. The segment concludes with Leonard's assertion that U.S. government is controlled by Jewish interests, demanding war against Israel, before promoting CBD products and his "Stew Crew" membership. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
The Gay Bomb Research00:15:06
Anybody who cares to think or even say that we don't talk about some off the wall stuff here on the Stew Peters Network is, well, first of all, you haven't watched anything on the network.
Second of all, it's a complete fabrication because today, folks, do I got a story for you?
Some people may remember or recall the topic of today's discussion, but I think a lot of people probably don't know and haven't heard about it.
So, Today, we're going to have a discussion about the time the Air Force was researching and requested a whole lot of funding to produce a gay bomb.
So, stick with us, folks.
Don't go away.
We start this one now.
Hey, folks, welcome here to another installment of The Richard Leonard Show.
I want to, as always, thank you for being here.
If you're new here, I want to thank you for stopping by, checking us out.
Hopefully, this will be a show that you enjoy and we'll come back.
If you are a returning viewer/slash listener, thank you.
Thanks for coming back.
Thanks for participating.
Thanks for being part of the audience.
It's a really great experience that we've had.
I want to say that this is 197, 196 episodes.
Let me see here.
Today's will be 195 weeks that the Richard Leonard Show has been coming to you at 7 p.m. Central Time on Sunday evenings.
And so today we have a real interesting topic, but before we get to it, we got to talk about how the lights are kept on.
And that is over at Cortez Wealth Management.
Go on over to America First Retirement Plan.com.
Check out what they got there on the website.
There's all kinds of things to read, there's some videos, information, and a whole lot of guidance.
Carlos Cortez and his staff want to help you with a tax free retirement plan.
This is a plan for you folks to be able to enjoy the fruits of your labor when your time working is over and to do so with as little tax liability as possible.
So get on over to America First Retirement Plan.com, gather all the information, digest whatever it is you can.
When and if you have questions, get a hold of Carlos.
Email, phone, social media, whatever it is, any way you can.
Carlos Cortez Jr. over at Cortez Wealth Management.
So, one last time, America First Retirement Plan.com.
Get on over there.
Okay, folks.
Well, we have potentially fallen off the rails here.
As I said in the intro, I found an article about the time in which the United States Air Force was doing some pretty extensive research in Ohio and was trying to produce a gay bomb.
And so this kind of brings up questions to me.
I mean, it's kind of comical, right?
That the United States military assumed that they could create some munitions that they could drop on our enemies and make them all want to drop their weapons and start humping each other, making all these dudes on the battlefield gay.
And so, like, instantly, being a veteran, I was an infantryman, so being on the battlefield was my job.
I had questions.
I had a lot of questions.
First of all, what happens if we drop these gay bombs too close to our own forces?
Are American soldiers then going to instantly become gay and want to hump the enemy, or vice versa?
That seems like it would pose one hell of a problem.
This thing, truth be told, never really got off the ground, if you could believe that.
But it was something that our government, our military, somebody that had a lot of brass on their uniform in the United States Air Force thought that this was a good idea.
This was a good use of time and money and resources to try to develop this thing and research this.
I found it very interesting.
And to be quite honest, there were some serious questions about this and how these types of things may change warfare altogether.
There's probably some things that we don't think about when we think about traditional combat, you know, with its bombs and bullets and missiles and explosions and death and dying and screaming and all the horrors of war.
Well, there's also an aspect that we probably don't think a whole lot about, which kind of plays into this whole gay bomb and why it might be something that was apparently feasible.
Apparently, it was a good use of resources.
But anyway, let's get through this article.
The article is very short.
I will say that inside the article was a newscast.
A news story, I assume from 1994 when this was actually in the news.
And it's about three minutes long, but they just talk about the same thing that we're going to read.
So I didn't think to put up the whole video.
Sometimes I think that's a waste of your time because I think that I can explain it from the article just as well as the video can.
Anyway, in 1994, the United States Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Ohio was pressing the bounds of the question hey, fellas.
Is it gay?
Is it gay to fight for your country?
That was the question that they set out to answer.
In the early 1990s, the Pentagon was working on developing a whole host of non lethal chemical weapons that could render an enemy force incapable of being anything other than amorous or annoyed.
So either they were going to be overthrown with this passion to ass rape their battle buddy, or they were just going to be pissed off and annoyed.
Within a three page now declassified document, there was this excerpt from this now declassified document, and it read like this.
We are going to effectively use chemicals that affect human behavior so that morale and discipline in our enemies is adversely affected.
One distasteful but completely non lethal example that they gave in this document.
So, like this document that was declassified was basically the request for funding.
So, they were talking about what it is they hope to find like, what is the problem?
What do we hope to find in our research?
And then, apparently, outline.
What they plan to do to conduct this research.
Like, who are you conducting the research on?
What's the process?
What kind of drugs are being used?
What kind of chemicals are being used?
All these things.
I just, I don't understand where this came from.
Like, it was 1994, right?
So in 1994, Don't Ask, Don't Tell was going strong.
People were getting booted out of the military if they were caught being gay.
And so then we have this idea that we're going to create a bomb.
First of all, a bomb is sometimes a massive projectile that's dropped from thousands of feet in the air.
We all know that.
So is this going to be just some big, huge.
Container that hits the ground like a water balloon, and then through evaporation and osmosis, all the soldiers in the area are going to become queer.
Like, how did my question is, how did this idea get to the point of hey, we should write a proposal to Congress and ask for millions of dollars because we can 100% turn enemies gay?
I just I don't quite understand how that interaction probably went.
Like some researcher, some scientist goes, Well, you know, hey, George, did you know that we could probably figure out how to make a bomb that turns our enemies gay?
And George goes, Hmm, yeah, you're probably right.
Well, we should research this.
And we should ask for allegedly $7.5 million of taxpayer money to research how to turn our enemies gay.
And so, as far fetched as this sounds, it's not the first time that any of this kind of thing has been used or at least proposed.
Allegedly, there's been a lot of different methods that are considered non lethal used on enemies, whether they know it or not.
We saw it in Venezuela recently when President Trump sent the military to go scoop that sum bitch up.
And the soldiers that were there to defend the place, that was there to defend Maduro, all talked about how the United States soldiers had this impeccable technology and they moved fast, and there were so many of them, and the bullets were coming fast and violently, and it was just this.
They were overcome with this feeling of vomiting and nausea and all this other stuff.
So.
Okay, now we hear about gay bombs that they were researching in 94.
So, what else?
What else is there?
What else is there that's being used to manipulate our enemies?
More importantly, is any of this stuff being used by the United States government on American people?
It's a question probably worth asking.
Is it possible?
I think it's very possible.
I think that didn't we hear in the news that when ICE was here in Minneapolis trying to get all the illegals out, that there were some kinds of these devices used the high frequency sound waves, any of these other things.
So now this all becomes not so far fetched.
At least the idea of altering behavior of our enemies, maybe turning them gay, was a little out there.
It's a little.
It's a little unreasonable.
I just don't even know if that's possible.
Maybe I'm stuck on it for some reason.
So, anyway, in the article, one distasteful but completely non lethal example of how they were going to do this would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior.
So, let me, and this may be like a real ignorant question of me.
But you hear people talk about natural aphrodisiacs or like this cologne you can spray pheromones on you and it'll drive the ladies wild.
And, you know, like that old movie, it was probably made in the early 80s, Love Potion Number Nine, where the guy would put this drop of this love potion he got from some palm reader on his tongue.
And the second he said anything, every woman around him instantly was trying to kill him to get in his pants.
So we hear about these types of behavior altering things all day.
Now it's in just the regular everybody civilian market.
There's all these colognes and things they say that dudes can put on, and you become instantly irresistible to ladies.
I guess I don't know.
I don't know if it works.
In a word, a chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to one another, which they say would strike a real strong blow to morale.
Well, I don't know.
If it's true that we're turning them all gay, and now all of a sudden they find themselves in the forest with a bunch of dudes who are also gay and can't wait to hump one another.
Is that going to strike a blow to their morale?
Maybe it's advantageous for us because they're not going to give a shit about the American military trying to kill them.
They're going to want to screw each other, was the idea.
This Randy, they call it this Randy chemical, later dubbed the gay bomb, was just one of many Wright Laboratory explored.
And then in its proposal, they dubbed it Project Sunshine.
So, these gay bombs and all of this super sensitive, touchy feely, we're going to turn you into like fairies and queers and queens and all this other stuff.
They dubbed it Project Sunshine.
Makes sense, right?
Among others, Project Sunshine contained a litany of ideas ranging from the absurd to impractical, including, get a load of this, including making a chemical that made personnel very sensitive to sunlight, like a vampire.
Project Sunshine Madness00:12:38
Right, all of a sudden, you get this chemical on your skin, or you ingest it, or you breathe it in, and you step out in the sun and instant pain.
Is that even possible?
Well, maybe it is.
Um, uh, making a weapon that would attract swarms, man, and swarms of enraged wasps and rats to an enemy position, and the development of a chemical that caused severe and lasting halitosis.
Well, if you ask me some of this stuff, can you imagine being in the observation post, right?
Let's say you're in the woods, right?
And half a kilometer away off this ridge line, you can see an enemy camp, right?
We'll make it real Hollywood like.
You're sitting on the ridge, the edge of this mountain, and you're looking onto this enemy encampment.
But what you don't know is that to your left, Across the ridge line, there's another observation post, an enemy observation post.
And they have all of these mind altering weapons, gay bombs, wasps, and rats attracting weapons.
And now here we are sitting in our OP looking at the enemy encampment.
We don't know we're being watched from across the ridge line.
And all of a sudden, we're swarmed with rats.
Rats that are pissed off and they want to get you out of there.
I don't know what I'd rather have.
Would I rather have somebody taking pot shots at me from 400 or 500 meters away across the ridge line where I got a chance to evade and kind of break contact into the wood line, go 200 meters to the right, emerge back on the wood line, see where the shots are coming from?
If we could reach, take our shots, and take out the enemy, I probably would rather do that than get swarmed by a bunch of rats and wasps.
So, like, this is.
These are things that I think people, like I was saying, really don't think about.
It's really kind of fucked up.
I don't know anybody.
Really doesn't matter where you're from, what your heritage is, your ethnic background, your opinions, your political affiliation, none of that shit.
If you're a person that's out doing a job observing your target and you get swarmed by a bunch of rabid rats and wasps and And all these things, and all of a sudden the sun comes out and your skin feels like it's burning off your body.
Well, maybe that would be a pretty hard shot to morale.
That's going to break the will of soldiers who are there to die.
I think that these types of things could be a little more powerful than guns and bullets and missiles and bombs.
I mean, none of it's attractive, right?
No one wants to get shot at.
But if I have the opportunity to get shot at once and hope they miss, which usually the first shot does miss, unless you got a really, really experienced marksman or sniper, which could be the case.
We might be toast either way.
But if I have the ability to evade or relocate myself and find my target and take it out, well, I like my chances of doing that a whole lot better than fighting off a swarm of wasps or rats.
Because once those things get you, you're screwed anyway.
Your will to fight's over, you're dead.
Anyway, the lab requested $7.5 million over a five year period to make their harebrained ideas reality.
The funding was not forthcoming.
Congress did not approve this funding.
It did, however, eventually make its way to the mind of Tina Fey and Thirty Rock.
Apparently, they did some parody and some satire around this thing, which rightfully so.
Rightfully so.
A gay bomb is probably one of the dumbest things I've ever heard of.
And as the saying goes, there are no bad ideas.
There's only great ideas that go horribly wrong.
And maybe, maybe this time, the right laboratories in Ohio were the exception because it's some dumbass shit.
But it does raise interesting questions about other ways, other ways that we, as a fighting force, can break the will.
Of the enemy that we potentially find ourselves in front of.
And I think that there are things that it doesn't, like I said, it doesn't matter where you're from, it doesn't matter what you believe.
Sometimes it doesn't matter what training you've had, what your life experience tells you.
There are things that will break you, will break your will.
And things like that, like, can you imagine? Being stuck in a bunker with eight or nine other dudes.
Say there's ten of you in this bunker manning some cannon or some machine gun outpost, you know, to protect the perimeter.
And all ten of you in there got crazy severe halitosis.
Holy shit.
Now, I guess in a life or death situation.
Severe halitosis probably isn't going to cause me to run out of the bunker and risk getting gunned down by an enemy.
But holy shit, it's really going to make you think twice about coming back to work tomorrow.
Right?
I mean, and then we have these discussions about being strong minded and strong willed and having military bearing and discipline.
But I think that there are people that do put in a lot of thought about what are ways that we can break that discipline?
What are ways that we can break that ability to just kind of overlook it and embrace the suck?
Because I think that it's probably pretty accurate that most everybody has a breaking point.
And the range of breaking point could potentially be super wide.
Maybe some people just have no ability to keep it together, and their breaking point comes real early.
But I'm sure that there's a lot of folks out there, especially guys who have been trained in it, that their breaking point is on the extreme other end of the spectrum.
Where you're going to have to start pulling out fingernails and cutting the tips of fingers off, or whatever it is, whatever these torture, waterboarding, whatever these torture techniques are that people use to get information.
But I would say that the majority of the people are somewhere in the middle.
And although their breaking point may come a little bit later, they got one.
And I think it's true.
That most people, when they find themselves engaged in conversations and discussions about war, about military operations, combat, any of those things, not a whole lot of people really think about this type of thing.
And these types of things, I think there are examples of them that have been tried throughout the years.
Ask yourself.
Because it's a difficult spot to put yourself in that person's shoes, right?
It's difficult to mentally put yourself in the shoes of a person that may have to experience these long lasting halitosis weapons or rats and bees or gay bombs.
I mean, Maybe in the moment you find a way to tough it out, right?
Because mental fortitude, mental toughness, and perseverance is something that is offered to you through your training.
Whether you grasp onto it and you learn it and you practice it is another thing.
But those skills are there for you to grasp and put in your toolbox.
So, what is it?
What would be your breaking point?
Just if you've never served and it's hard for you to imagine to put yourself in the shoes of a soldier, just try and think to yourself what would be the point in which, all right, I'm out of here and I'm not coming back.
And maybe if imagining being a soldier is not something that's even in your realm, okay, any job, your job you work now, anywhere that you like to be.
I mean, anywhere.
What would your breaking point be?
Yeah, I'm telling you, rats and bees and wasps would probably be about at my level, too.
I mean, a couple here and there, yeah, you can deal with.
But imagine that they do.
They do make a weapon that they can spray chemicals like they did Agent Orange and fly an aircraft over you and drop all this, spray all this chemical, and all of a sudden it attracts all of.
I mean, it's not too far fetched.
We have heard stories of people infecting insects, mosquitoes with malaria, flies with botulism, who knows, whatever else, and then just releasing them into.
One specific geographical location, and all of a sudden you have this pandemic of malaria or whatever it is.
I mean, none of it seems too far fetched.
The gay bomb seems far fetched because I don't know that you can chemically alter somebody's brain or chemical makeup or whatever to manipulate them into being gay.
I don't think that that's even possible.
But I do think that there are many other ways to break a fighting force.
And non lethal ways.
The question is Is it possible?
Like, are some of these things possible?
Of course, infecting mosquitoes with malaria is possible.
We know that that's been done.
And that's not too far fetched at all.
But how do we propose?
How did they propose giving a whole battlefield full of people severe, everlasting halitosis?
I just, I guess I don't understand how that works.
But I guess that's why they conduct research.
Thankfully, for the gay bomb, Congress said, no, no, no, we're not spending Americans' money on this type of bullshit.
But anyway, folks, we got to take a break.
When we come back, we're going to dig into some of these other things that have been tried non lethal methods to subdue an enemy and gain the upper hand in any fight.
Sponsorship Loss Update00:05:20
So we'll be right back.
Don't go away.
Hey, folks, real quick before we get back to the show, it's no secret that we have been experiencing a loss of sponsorships.
Sponsors have been leaving the network or the network leaving sponsors due to our convictions.
And so we have recently begun to ask you, the viewer, for help.
We need your help.
You are the most important thing when it comes to this network, you are the lifeblood of the Stew Peters network.
And so we are asking for your help once again.
And in doing so, the way that you can help is to go down below on this video.
Right here, you'll see the red button that's titled Stew Crew.
You see it blinking there.
You can click on there and it'll take you to the Stew Peters Network locals page.
You can sign up for a membership.
It is $90 for one year or $9 a month.
If you do the $90, you'll get two months for free.
Also, when you go to checkout, if you use keyword StuCrew1, you'll get the first month for a dollar.
So these things are extremely important.
Keeping the network funded and bringing you content and information that you're not going to find on the mainstream media, the truth bombs that you're not going to get from the mainstream media.
This is where you get them.
The new age of information is not the mainstream media.
It is platforms like this one.
And we bend over backwards and break our backs to try to find you the content and the topics that are going to really affect you.
So, for $9 a month, you can join the Stew Crew, get exclusive access to behind the scenes footage, all kinds of extra content that'll be available to you, also monthly giveaways.
This month, Curable, which is a local CBD. Company has a huge basket of body creams and lotions and bath bombs and Epsom salts and booty scrub.
Not quite sure what that is, but it sounds interesting.
They are going to give this basket away to one Stew Crew member.
So if you join the Stew Crew or if you are a person that just wants to give a one time donation, that's great.
We will accept that too.
And you will also be entered into a drawing.
So get on over to the Stew Peters locals page.
You can also go to stewpeters.com and sign up there as well.
But it is easier to just go down and hit the red button there that says Stu Crew and sign up that way.
Again, it's $9 a month or $90 a year to get two months for free.
And when you check out, if you use Stu Crew 1 as a keyword, you should get one month for free.
We really do appreciate your support.
And as I said, you are the lifeblood of this network.
We can't do this work without you.
We can't continue to bring you all of this amazing content.
Without your support.
So, thank you once again for being here.
Thank you for joining us.
Thank you for supporting us.
We really do appreciate it.
We really do love you.
Thank you.
What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease, 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders.
A number of different diagnoses, including diabetes and ADHD, and a number of them.
In the unvaccinated group, they were zero.
In other words, all these chronic diseases that we're accepting, the reality is maybe 99% of them don't have to exist in children.
That's not the way God made us.
They looked at over 47,000 Medicaid claims between 1999 and 2011.
Those who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated, I'd say an odds ratio of like 2.81.
2.81 to 1.
So that would be 181% increase.
Epilepsy seizures, 252%.
Learning disorders, 581%.
If you look at all these different diagnoses, they're all higher.
For example, I'll just give you one example.
Learning disorders in the full term is 581%.
In the preterm, the ones who are vaccinated, 884% increase.
Every single vaccine has an excipient that is a human toxin.
Human toxin.
Human toxin.
For the month of April, I have arrived at the number three.
The number three is what I have decided on.
$3 off your first month at stewpeters.tv.
When you make the decision, Hey, I am going to become a financial supporter of the stewpeters network.
Vaccine Toxin Claims00:14:01
I believe in the mission.
I believe in the cause.
I want to do my part.
$3 off your first month at stewpeters.tv.
When you decide, Hey, I'm going to cash in on all of those perks.
$3 off your first month at stewpeters.tv.
It's a smaller number, but with a powerful meaning.
Because, as you all know, on the third day, Jesus Christ rose from the dead, bringing hope and renewal and new life as he defeated death itself.
And that's what we're building at stewpeters.tv a place for truth, a place for freedom, and a community that stands together.
So join us, if you will, $3 off your first month at stewpeters.tv.
Again, stewpeters.tv.
Hey, folks, welcome back here.
Let's continue.
Let's continue on with the topic.
Here's my thoughts.
There are a lot of things on any battlefield that are extremely important.
It's extremely important that a number of things happen, not necessarily in succession of each other, but just in general.
We got to have command and control.
We got to know where people are.
We got to be able to communicate.
We have to know how we're moving and where we're moving the best we can, right?
I mean, of course, good recon of your operation area is the best policy, in my opinion.
You want a good recon if you can.
But these are all things that have to happen.
And when they don't, that's when we see.
Tragedies happen.
We see catastrophes happen in military operations.
You know, for example, maybe Black Hawk Down is a good example of this that everyone can at least have some frame of reference.
Like, was Black Hawk Down poorly planned?
I don't know that it was poorly planned.
I think that there were some things that were overlooked.
I think there might have been some complacency after a little while.
You know, that's day after day of the same thing.
But all of a sudden, when presented with adversity, this opposing force really kind of threw us for a loop and did some good damage to the United States military.
Of course, in the end, we were successful, but it didn't come without consequence.
And when we start adding different measures to control, I don't know that it always is outside of the scope or the realm of what, you know, an element on the ground can handle, right?
I mean, when trained properly, United States military forces in general, when trained properly and allowed to use their tools the way that they're intended, there isn't anybody that can win, that can beat us, in my opinion.
I'm sure that we are weaker in some places than others.
But then, when the military comes up with these harebrained schemes to try to turn soldiers gay, for example, I don't believe that it's a horrible idea.
I think some of them are a whole lot dumber than others.
I think a gay bomb, although comical, is ineffective.
I don't think it's possible.
But something that does similar things, I think, is possible.
And I think that these things could be.
A pretty good use on the battlefield.
Because with all of these things that have to happen and all the leaders on the ground that need to monitor these things and need to direct the battle, direct your men, direct your soldiers,
direct your close air support if you have it, if you have artillery support, like being able to manage all of that and maintain command and control in chaos is a pretty valuable skill to have in some leaders on the battlefield.
But if we can also break the will of the enemy to fight, it just makes the job of the United States soldier so much easier.
And so there are things that have been tried.
I compiled the small list here of a few different things.
Some I had heard of, some I haven't.
The first one that I put on here is MKUltra, right?
I mean, this isn't, MKUltra is not a theory.
It's not a story.
It's not a fairy tale.
We know that throughout the 50s and from the 50s through the 70s, the CIA was running this MKUltra program mind control.
They used LSD, drugs, hypnosis, and sensory deprivation to try to gain control of somebody's mind and be able to direct them on actions to take, things to say, all of this shit.
And as I said, this is not a theory.
The US government actually tested mind control techniques on people.
The interesting part is that it didn't come out till later that many of these people, that were, I don't know if you want to call them victims, but research subjects of MKUltra, often didn't even know that they were being manipulated somehow.
And so, like, that was an interesting way.
The theory was that we can try to gain the control of the minds of our enemies.
And direct them to open the gate or just leave, just walk away, or provide intel to get information from people.
There were a lot of different theories about how they were going to use these folks who were under mind control, this hypnosis or this sedation from illicit drugs, to get them to do what we wanted to help us gather information and win the war.
There's chemical crowd control weapons.
Like these are all examples.
Of ways to gain advantage on the battlefield or in some kind of chaotic situations that are non lethal.
And so these, of course, are things like CS gas and pepper spray, freeze plus pee, smoke canisters, whatever it is.
It's designed to sedate or incapacitate entire groups of people.
So usually these are used as crowd control techniques and tools, like we saw here in Minneapolis for, I don't know, what was it, three weeks?
The chaos was ensuing.
Throughout saint Paul and Minneapolis, as ice was scooping up people.
Often, these chemical crowd control weapons are advertised or talked about as they're more humane than other forms.
And I don't know, some would probably agree with that.
Does humane or not really matter, I guess, is the question.
If you're at a point where you need to subdue or divert a large mob of people, I mean, this is a non lethal form of crowd control.
How is it inhumane?
Would be my question.
They have said that people who were victims of these chemical crowd control weapons, such as CS gas, people have died from them.
But what they don't tell you is that some of these people that have died due to using chemical weapons, crowd control weapons, such as CS gas, Didn't die from the actual gas.
They died from the crowd moving and being trampled or something like that.
So, was it actually from the CS gas?
No.
But was the action that killed them a cause of the CS gas?
Yeah, I suppose you could argue that.
Sure.
Yes.
But this is, I guess, we don't make the rules, right?
We're just telling you about what's been used.
Next is sound weapons.
Long range acoustics.
These things are meant to give its victims like severe bouts of just like joint pain, body pain, disorient them, confused, dizzy, equilibrium off, all these things.
And all of these things also will start to induce panic in whoever is in the way.
And apparently, in reading about it, it's as simple as.
This directed beam.
And if you're in the beam, these are the things you're going to feel.
But there's no bullets.
There's no blood.
But I don't know.
They say it can cause crowds to like break out in this chaos and insanity.
They say.
But here we go again.
We're not killing anybody.
Are we causing them pain?
Yeah, we are.
But the argument always is.
Well, we can't just kill all these people.
We can't go on killing.
We can't be in battles and kill people.
I mean, to a certain extent, I understand non lethal options, right?
Like, non lethal options are a really good thing for law enforcement and things of this nature.
I think if we're engaged in combat, disorienting enemies.
And maybe this is a conversation for at scale combat.
Like, if we have a whole operation and there's hundreds and hundreds of soldiers on either side fighting each other across, you know, let's just say for conversation's sake, the invasion of Iraq, right?
When the US invaded Iraq back in the early 2000s.
If we had gone over that berm and found ourselves engulfed in enemies that were just waiting for us to cross that berm and fuck around and find out.
Are we worried about non lethal options?
The question is if we use non lethal options in combat, in military conflict, it works in the moment.
Like they call it an active denial system, right?
This microwave, it's like a heat ray, right?
It looks like this big, huge dish on the back of some helmet or some trailer, and it's a directed microwave heat ray.
And it kind of just sweeps an area real slow.
And if again, if you find yourself within the beam of this heat ray, uh, what is it they say you feel?
Uh, it says it uses millimeter waves to heat the skin, so it just kind of heats up your body.
And almost instantly, you start to feel your skin is burning.
Um, they say it forces people to run away immediately, like nobody wants to with this thing.
Okay, so imagine we cross the berm into Iraq from Kuwait, we're invading the country.
We find ourselves in front of hundreds, maybe even thousands of enemy soldiers.
And we take this heat ray and we sweep it across the battlefield.
And all these people instantly feel like their skin's on fire.
It's melting off of their bones.
And they turn tail and run away.
Great.
So now we've won that confrontation.
But what happens to those enemies?
They go back, they get out of the heat ray.
After an hour or two.
They feel like a million bucks again.
So now we've advanced from the border.
Let's say we got 50 miles in country.
We get to the next, let's say we get to the Euphrates River.
We need to cross the Euphrates.
Well, on the other bank of the Euphrates, here's all these hundreds, maybe thousands of soldiers again.
Do we hit them with the heat ray again?
Or did this time we decide, well, they fucked around enough and now it's time to find out?
Because we have a mission to complete.
Less Lethal Combat Tactics00:15:55
And so, like, this also plays into how people really think about combat.
You know, there's folks that will say, you know, sometimes soldiers just lose touch on how valuable a human life really is.
And I think that the people that spout that narrative are completely.
Off base, right?
Like, there's.
I don't know that there's a whole ton of soldiers that are thinking, especially joining combat arms, that are saying, well, hey, I'd really like to be an infantryman.
I'd really like to be a foot soldier.
But not if we're going to be shooting at people, not if we're going to be taking human life.
And if that's you, cool, man.
In my opinion, there's no shame there.
When you are put into a position to have to take human life, it changes you.
Especially when you're put in that position, maybe at a younger age, but in a split second without having the time to really analyze what's going on around you and make a real solid decision.
And anybody that expects that, who chooses to work in that role, is not going to be successful.
Like, we know that the act of taking another human life has impacts on the human psyche.
We know that it alters who you are because it alters your view.
On human life in general, because now you've had a life experience that not a whole lot of people have had.
It's not necessarily a good life experience.
So, how can we have this frame of reference, and how can we talk to communities that haven't had the same life experience that don't quite understand?
That, what I suppose you call it a conundrum.
Folks who haven't really had to understand what making that decision, not only the act of taking human life, but making the decision that this is the right thing to do.
Because what comes along with that in the end is a lot of second guessing, a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking of yourself and your actions or your team, if it was a team action.
And so, in conversation, it seems like having all of these options that are less lethal might be a little easier on the human psyche.
So, when we're talking about protecting our soldiers and taking care of them after combat, well, giving guys the option to use a less lethal force so they don't have to necessarily deal with that or think about that throughout the rest of their lives seems like a like a good idea.
And maybe it is a good idea.
But my question would be Is it more detrimental to put soldiers in a position to have to make that decision more than necessary?
Like if we come over the border and we use the heat ray and we disperse this huge crowd of soldiers that were there waiting for us to come over the berm so they could stop us from invading their country, so they could kill us, they could shoot us, they could blow up our tanks, they could shoot down our aircraft, and they could decimate our infantry.
Well, now we've dispersed them.
We've got them out of our way.
We can continue our mission.
But now we've also added one more instance, because God knows how many are coming, of having to make the decision to shoot or not shoot, to move before I shoot or move after I shoot.
Is my buddy okay?
Are we going to move yet?
Did our support by fire team, are they all okay?
Because it doesn't seem like all the saws are firing.
Like we've trained on, like we've talked about.
So, are they okay?
So, like all of these things that go into just one firefight, all the thoughts that run through a person's mind.
Well, we've added another one of those.
By giving soldiers these less lethal options, we've also increased the chance that they need to make this yet personality altering, some would argue, personality altering decision one more time.
And if we use the heat ray again, well, that's one more time.
And then if we use the sound weapons, well, that's one more time.
We got them to leave.
So are we going to spend all this time dispersing the enemy over and over and over again?
Or are we just going to take care of the problem and complete the mission?
And so that becomes a question of moral compass.
Some people aren't okay with it because their moral compass won't allow them to take a human life without prejudice if necessary.
And it's a tall order to place on somebody.
And of course, people who join the military are voluntary.
It's a voluntary thing, right?
No one's forced.
Shit, the legal system, the judicial system doesn't even do that anymore.
Back in the day, If you didn't know, they used to offer people who were facing jail time for, I don't know what offenses qualified or not, but it wasn't uncommon to hear somebody say, Well, you know, yeah, I served in the military for four years.
It was either go to the military or the judge said I had to go to jail.
So there I was in the Marines.
So, I mean, that was a story you heard back in the day.
I don't, they don't do that anymore.
They're not forcing anybody into the military or jail.
So it's all voluntary, military.
So we know, we know what the risks are when we sign up.
But in my opinion, in my experience as a combat infantry soldier, and even playing back to my time as a veteran advocate, or when I worked for a member of Congress helping veterans, or worked for the state of Minnesota helping veterans find jobs as a veteran employment counselor.
There were all these.
Places for veterans to go to give help and all these experiences that we had.
And sometimes, sometimes I don't know where I'm going with this shit.
I don't even know where I was going.
I completely lost my thought.
Holy crap.
Anyway, sorry, folks.
That's one of the struggles I've been having, just keeping my mind focused on the task.
Anyway, Let's go down the list here.
Other chemical weapons they've considered using, like the gay bomb, but pheromone and behavior altering chemicals.
So they had this theory that they could use chemicals that were airborne, aerosol type chemicals that will increase aggression amongst whoever it's affected.
The idea was that if we can get these guys overly pissed off and overly aggressive, they're going to make a lot of mistakes.
They're not going to sit back and wait for the right time to initiate an ambush.
They're going to see or hear us and they're going to jump out and we'll have the drop on them.
They're not going to have the element of surprise because they don't have the patience.
They're too aggressive.
Or they're going to fight amongst each other.
And other things they talked about in this instance was if we can get these guys to be more aggressive, either towards us, they're going to make a mistake.
If they can be more aggressive towards themselves, they're certainly going to make more mistakes.
If we can also spray them down with some shit and it causes fear and it causes doubt and it causes them to hesitate, well, that'll work into our advantage also.
All of these things will significantly diminish unit cohesion.
And I think we all can imagine that if our unit cohesion is suffering and we're not together, we're not working together, we're not fighting together.
There's no way that we can win.
So that was another way that they thought of.
Now, the only ones of these that we really know have been tried and used is, of course, the chemical weapons, the crowd disbursement chemical weapons such as CS gas, smoke grenades, pepper spray, those types of things.
We do know that they've used the high powered frequency sound waves to disorient people.
And cause them to vomit.
Or there's even apparently some of these sound weapons get such high frequency and affect you so it'll cause you to shit or pee your pants.
But just break your will.
And so, maybe there's something to all this.
And then the gay bomb was the way for people to kind of get a comedic introduction to this type of warfare and these types of tactics.
But I think it is really something that could be useful on the battlefield.
But also remember that if we're researching it and we're trying it out and we're using it in limited real world situations, our enemies can be doing the same thing.
So, is it possible that some huge planes from some foreign country decide they're going to send a few of them over America and drop some gay bombs, and before you know it, we're all gay, the whole country?
Well, wouldn't that be a conundrum?
So, if it's out there being built, if it's out there being tested, if it's out there being researched, It's not just for us.
Because eventually all this shit gets out there and gets reverse engineered.
And they come up with other ways to do the same thing.
So pay attention to some of this stuff.
I think it's a good idea.
Pay attention to some of this stuff because just because it's reported that America is building it or America is researching it doesn't mean that it's just staying here.
If anybody thinks.
If anybody thinks that any product that the American government produces, whether it's a tangible item, a software, an idea, medication, medical procedure, anything like that, it's not proprietary to just us.
Because if we do know one thing, the American government will sell anything to make a buck, but they'll also spend anything to get what they want.
So, if things like gay bombs are really being produced at some point and they're a real thing, don't assume that it's just America that has them.
You could walk out the front door to go to work in the morning and just so happen to see that bomb falling.
And before you know it, before noon, you're humping a dude.
Huh.
Yikes.
Anyway, folks, I think we've beat it up.
I think we've beat this story to the ground.
But in closing, as comedic as it is, as far fetched as it seems, the gay bomb I don't think is ever going to happen.
I don't think it's a thing.
I think it died in 1994.
It may have brought more ideas about how to produce other types of weapons or things to deter our enemies.
We can't always continue to think about war and combat as just bullets and bombs and missiles and blood and guts and death and dying and destruction.
I mean, it is all of that.
But there's also another aspect.
And take it into account.
Take into account these other aspects we maybe don't think about all too often when we're hearing stories of what our service members have been through or we're seeing what's happening around the world.
Like it's not just military forces that use these things, there's probably governments or people all over the world using the same exact manipulations and the same exact theories and whatever on people all over the place.
So, just be aware of it.
And, for God's sakes, folks, look out for the gay bombs.
Good night.
As Christians in a Christian country, we have a right to be at minimum agnostic about the leadership being all Jewishly occupied.
Political War Rhetoric00:03:15
We literally should be at war with fucking Israel a hundred times over, and instead we're just sending them money, and it's fucking craziness.
Look at the side of Israel, look at the side of Televaven, look at the side of Philadelphia.
You tell me where this money's going, you tell me who's benefiting from this.
I am prepared to die in the battle, fighting this monstrosity that would wish to enslave me and my.
Family and steal away any rights to my property and to take away my God.
Go, fuck yourself.
Will I submit to that?
And if you've got a foreign state, you got dual citizens in your government.
Who do you think they're supporting God right now?
Would you protect the nation of Israel and protect those of us, not just our church, but every church in the world and in this nation that's willing to put their neck on the line and say we stand with them?
You go to Trump's cabinet.
You go to Biden's cabinet.
It's full of Jews.
I have a black friend in school.
I have...
I have nothing against blacks.
She has nothing against me.
She understands where I'm coming from.
Excuse me, I'm a Jew, and I just like to say that, you know, in our Bible it says that you're like animals.
The Jews crucified our God.
There's nothing we wouldn't do for our pets.
They're like our children.
Our friends at Pet Club 24-7 have developed natural products that contain the most potent strain of a mushroom that's been used for thousands of years to help support the immune system.
So visit their website today to discover how they're changing the way that pets and their parents are being treated for the better.
Tired of the same old buzz killers?
Ditch the drama and dive into the real deal with American Hemp Hub Premium Hemp.
Straight from the heart of the Midwest.
We're talking pure potent power that hits different, introducing the Entourage line inspired by the entourage effect, that killer synergy where cannabinoids team up to amp up the good vibes and crush the crap ones.
Three exclusive blends to unleash your inner rebel.
First up, low rider.
Kick back, melt away stress, crush pain and keep your mind sharp as attack.
No fog, just flow.
Need to own the day.
Grab focus, THCA and CBB tag teaming for that uplifting edge.
Crush your morning grind or afternoon hustle without the crash.
And for the wild nights, Highflyer, your party's new MVP, dips the hangover with our canna mixers, seltzers, lemonades, and pops.
Refreshing, booze-free blasts for epic and unforgettable fun.
Maximize the highs, minimize the lows, explore your vibe at AmericanHempHub.com.