VAX A NATION: Public Premiere “EVERY single vaccine has an excipient that is a human toxin.”💉💀
Our children are being physically and mentally mutilated right in front of our eyes…shot after shot.Show more But one doctor is breaking his silence and EXPOSING it all.
🎁 Stew Peters Locals January Bonus! Join with an annual subscription and receive the book “End Times Bible Prophecy: Identifying the Antichrist the Devil’s in the Details” by our friend A. Swedger for FREE. 👉 Join here https://stewpeters.tv
🚨 ANARCHAPULCO: GENESIS in Puerto Vallarta! I’m speaking and you don’t want to miss it! If you’re ready for real conversations, real solutions, and real people then be there. Feb 15–20, 2026 Register now: https://anarchapulco.com Promo code: STEW (10% OFF)
🛒 The Official SPN Store 🛒 for all things Stew Crew merchandise and more! Every purchase supports uncensored journalism and the mission to expose the truth.
🔗 Shop Now: https://spnstore.com/
At AmericanHempHub.com, you’ll find pure, lab-tested hemp and CBD products made right here in the USA. No globalist junk. No chemicals. ✅ Relief without toxins ✅ 100% American-owned and operated 👉 Shop now at https://AmericanHempHub.com 💥 Use promo code STEW at checkout: ✔ Free shipping on orders over $40
Welcome to JProof—The People's Coin. Created by Stew Peters, JProof is here to make a statement. There are no sellouts, just a real vision and a community. This is a Movement; it’s a decentralized army of innovators, creators, and freedom lovers who believe in rewriting the rules. Join us at http://x.com/jproofcoin and get plugged into exclusive chats and special offers. This isn’t a fan club, it’s a mission. Go to http://www.jproof.ai/ for more direction.
Western civilization has been infected by a parasitic invasion of foreign ideals and values that have been introduced into our culture by strange and morally degenerate people whose goal is world domination. We have been OCCUPIED. Watch the film NOW! https://stewpeters.com/occupied/
Shop with Purpose. Put your dollars in the right pockets, ditch the woke brands, and support patriotic shopping. 🛒 https://PatriotCheckout.com ✅ American-owned ✅ Trusted alternatives to big box stores
✅ Supports freedom-first businesses. Join the Movement. Make the switch. Shop smart.
These loyal and courageous sponsors chose to stand with us despite the backlash from cancel culture. Support their bravery below:
JOIN THE TZLA CLUB! If you have: Chronic pain, Low energy, Lingering injuries, Brain fog, Or want to repair damage done to your body (including vaccine injury)…this is something you need to look into. This isn’t about pills. This isn’t about trusting institutions. This is about mastering advanced technology at home. 👉 Learn more here: 🔗 https://TZLA.club Whether you’re dealing with health issues now, want next-level energy and vitality, or are serious about long-term resilience the TZLA Club may be exactly what you’re looking for.
Discover private wellness alternatives at Ezra Healing, where experienced professionals listen, value your feelings, and design personalized action plans recognizing the body's interconnectedness. Focus your attention where it matters most. Trust Ezra Healing for personalized wellness coaching and restoring mind-body balance. We value the "do no harm" model of care always. Book a FREE 15-minute Triage appointment today at https://ezrahealing.com
Cortez Wealth Management offers comprehensive financial planning services tailored to you and your family. Find out how you can rely on this America First financial advisory and get your retirement plan today by calling 813-448-3446 or by visiting https://cortezwm.com
Finally Painfree — If you’re ready to take control of your Health - stop accepting Pain and start to REGENERATE your Joints. ⭐️ Trusted by World Champions and professional Athletes around the Globe 🥇 this Method is focused on CLEANING the entire ANATOMY. This sets the base for Lifetime Health and Longevity. ✅ Unlock the biggest Secrets NOW ✅ Get Access to innovative Knowledge ✅ Join the FREE Live Coaching February 12th 2026 👉 Sign up here: https://finally-painfree.com/coaching
🇺🇸 Tax in 2026 like it is 1776. Where Is Your Money Going? Feeling buried by taxes and tired of the system? Get informed on your options and learn what Freedom Law School teaches about tax law, rights, and compliance. 👉 Learn more here: https://freedomlawschool.org/stew 📌 What you’ll find: Educational resources on federal income tax history & enforcement. Arguments and perspectives on filing, withholding, and legal classifications. Steps they claim can help you reduce tax burdens — and how to approach it carefully. Guidance to consult qualified legal/tax counsel before acting.
Energized Health: If you’re ready to stop restarting every January…If you want fat loss, not frustration…If you want to feel like yourself again in 2026 👉 https://My555Challenge.com Learn the science. Experience the difference. Build health that lasts.
Visit https://purgestore.com and unlock 20% OFF with code STEW! TOTAL BODY DEFENSE – CLEANSE. DIGEST. RESET. Flush toxins. Rebuild gut strength. Take back your health. 🔥 Start your purge today: ✅ All-natural formulas ✅ Made in the USA ✅ Trusted by patriots & truth seekers 🧠 Cleanse. Restore.
🔥 Red Light & PEMF Therapy – Advanced Healing at Home 🔥 Experience the most powerful wellness technologies available, designed for real results and backed by science. At https://myredlight.com/ our red light therapy devices feature 9 proven wavelengths (480–1060nm), dual light modes, and the highest irradiance on the market. Use code STEW for an exclusive limited-time discount.
At https://mypemfmat.com/ our PEMF mats deliver strong frequencies (1–30 Hz), up to 150+ millitesla intensity, and grounding support for deep cellular regeneration. Use code STEW25 for 25% off individual mats, or STEW30 for 30% off bundles. These are the highest-quality tools for pain relief, energy, inflammation, and whole-body healing, available now for a limited time.
IGF-1 wants to make men real men again!!! See the end of the year specials.
FOR WOMEN – IGF-1 AUTOSHIP DEAL. Subscribe to Women’s IGF-1 Autoship & receive: ✅ Sleep Miracle – FREE ✅ Platinum 300K – FREE 💥 $283.93 VALUE 🔥 ON SALE: $59.98 👉 Designed to support: Recovery & lean muscle - Sleep & overnight repair - Hormone-supportive performance 🔗 Claim Women’s Offer: 👉 https://www.getigf1.com Use promo code “STEW” at checkout.
FOR MEN – MAN’S EDGE AUTOSHIP DEAL. Subscribe to Man’s Edge Autoship & receive: ✅ Sleep Miracle – FREE ✅ Platinum 300K – FREE 💥 $294.93 VALUE 🔥 ON SALE: $70.98 👉 Built to support: Strength & performance- Testosterone support - Recovery & sleep optimization 🔗 Claim Men’s Offer: 👉 https://www.getigf1.com Use promo code “STEW” at checkout.
❤️ Boost Your Heart. Boost Your Life. 🇺🇸 Energy. Endurance. Heart Health. 🌿 Real science, natural ingredients, no big pharma. Circulation + nitric oxide support for total vitality.🔗 Take Charge visit: https://HighPowerHeart.com.
🛒 BLACK FRIDAY SURVIVAL SPECIAL! This Black Friday, don’t just shop, get prepared! 🔥 $150 in FREE gifts with your 4-Week Food Kit from My Patriot Supply. Real meals. Trusted quality. Peace of mind when disaster strikes. ⏰ Supplies are limited so don’t wait. 👉 Https://www.preparewithStewPeters.com Because when the world goes dark… your family shouldn’t go hungry.
Pet Club 247 is your trusted source for affordable, high-quality pet products delivered right to your door. Shop at https://stewpeters.petclub247.com and enjoy wholesale pricing, auto-ship convenience, and premium pet nutrition and wellness. Support your pets—and your wallet—by partnering with us. Join the Club today!
Unlock the Power of Youth with LifeWave's X39 Patch. Why X39? ✅ Rejuvenates Skin Appearance ✅ Boosts Daily Energy & Stamina ✅ Enhances Mental Clarity & Focus ✅ Improves Physical Performance ✅ Accelerates Recovery & Healing. Backed by cutting-edge science, the X39 Patch activates your body's natural renewal process, allowing you to feel better, look younger, and live more fully. 👉 Start Your Transformation Today: https://uncancelablehealth.com
Stay up to date with Stew by following him on all socials!
Locals: https://stewpeters.locals.com/
X: https://twitter.com/realstewpeters
X: https://x.com/StewPetersNet
Telegram: https://t.me/stewpeters
Gab: https://gab.com/RealStewPeters
GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/realstewpeters
Truth: https://truthsocial.com/@RealStewPeters
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@stewpeters722
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/clipstewpeters/
Apple podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/stew-peters-live/id1857136176
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4CYCjizFYHbjf4mnhADInZ Show less
Researchers found was that vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease, 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders.
A number of different diagnoses, including diabetes and ADHD, and a number of them, in the unvaccinated group, they were zero.
In other words, all these chronic diseases that we're accepting, the reality is maybe 99% of it don't have to exist in children.
That's not the way God made us.
They looked at over 47,000 Medicaid claims between 1999 and 2011.
Those who are vaccinated versus unvaccinated, I say an odds ratio would be like 2.81.
2.81 to 1.
So that would be 181% increase.
Epilepsy seizures, 252%.
Learning disorders, 581%.
If you look at all these different diagnoses, they're all higher.
For example, I'll just give you one example.
Learning disorders in the full term is 581%.
In the preterm, the ones who are vaccinated, 884% increase.
Every single vaccine has an excipient that is human toxin.
Human toxin.
Broadcasting live from the frozen tundra, sub-zero temperatures in the Minneapolis, St. Paul, Twin Cities metropolitan hellscape, which is on fire.
Family businesses being completely crushed.
Looting and robbing and stealing and assaulting and raping as one group of people gets psyoped into going out in the streets to face off against a federal government who hates them and wants them dead in order to take up for and defend another group of people that hates them and wants them dead.
So how am I staying warm?
Well, you won't catch me in the streets with the federal informant Jake Lang trying to provoke the federal government into initiating martial law and ushering in the complete and total lockdown that is the super surveillance state.
You'll catch me in and out of frozen hockey arenas.
I'm the arena announcer.
And of course, MLK Day, it's not a holiday that we would normally get really excited about around here at the Stew Peters Network.
It wouldn't keep us out of the studio.
We wouldn't give everybody the day off, but it is an observed holiday, I guess.
And so as such, the hockey coaches get really excited.
They schedule a tournament.
So there's me keeping the arena live, making the announcements, got the music locked in and on point.
You won't catch me in a Miami nightclub.
This is a season of life that I wouldn't change for anything in the world.
Being a father with real responsibilities, it's amazing.
Nursing my young daughter back to health.
She's had this fever that was like 102, 103.
Staying away from Western medicine, though, you won't catch us in the emergency department.
And I know people that work in the emergency departments, and they're telling me, look, this is going around.
I mean, influenza, COVID-19 with these PCR tests that are, you know, positive, have people freaking out.
But there's a couple things going around.
There's a stomach bug going around.
I've heard that there's a bunch of kids my son's age that are puking and it's just disgusting.
It's gross.
Nobody likes that.
Puking, vomiting is like the most violent thing that you could put your body through.
I don't know why we're talking about this, but people largely from my sources on the inside at Mayo Clinic in the emergency department are saying, yeah, largely people just aren't coming in.
They don't trust Western medicine anymore.
They don't want big pharma solutions, which is great because we're pushing other solutions here.
We're bringing our people to real remedy, to real solutions so that they can keep themselves healthy and stay strong, reverse the aging process and avoid all of the deadly toxic poisons that these psychopaths make billions of dollars injecting into our children.
And for the first time ever, actually, this would be a great time to talk about this.
For the first time ever, believe it or not, this is unprecedented.
There is a doctor who has scientifically analyzed and put together a comprehensive study and a report, I guess, of his findings, you could say, studying each and every one of the so-called vaccines that you will find on the CDC's recommended childhood schedule.
This has never been done before.
And so we had this doctor come into the studio.
We sat down.
We ended up making a docuseries out of it called Vaccination, which has premiered early for our supporters, you base chads at stupeters.tv.
And that's one of the perks, obviously, of being a supporter of the network is you get early access to document series, documentaries, the 24-7 live chat that I'm involved with all the time, the off-the-record segments, all kinds of different giveaways.
But you have seen vaccination if you are part of Stu Crew, if you're one of our supporters for $9 a month.
If you haven't yet done that and you would like to, if you want to support our network, stupeters.tv is a place that you can do that $9 a month, or it's just $90 if you want to pay the whole year.
You actually get two months free.
But we have decided that today we're going to release that to everybody in our audience, to everybody within our reach.
So on Rumble, on X, vaccination, that is premiering today, right now.
We want you to see that.
We want you to know what these doctors, whether knowingly or because of willful ignorance or because they really love money and they're bonused by big pharma, and they're bonused based on the percentage of their patients that are fully vaccinated per this CDC childhood recommended schedule.
It should not be allowed.
That's criminal.
It isn't about what the children need.
It isn't about what my kids need to keep them safe or healthy.
In fact, it's what keeps kids coming back as lifelong subscribers to the Western Medicine Big Pharma Industrial Poison Mill that has them taking pills and getting injected,
that keeps them sick so that they can then introduce other pills and other injections and other so-called treatments from big pharma, other prescriptions to either have them addicted to opiates and painkillers or that gives them a whole new set of adverse events and unwanted side effects.
Well, we got a pill for that.
Oh, you've developed that?
Weird.
It's a listed side effect on these other 10 medications that you're taking.
So let's give you another 13 of them.
So anyway, vaccination is airing right now.
Getting out of the cold, though, you will find me starting on February 15th, February 15th to the 20th.
You know where I'll be?
With you in Puerto Vallerta, because I know you're going to go.
You got to go to Anarcapulco this year.
This is where serious people get together.
Introducing The Tesla Machine00:04:51
This is where serious networking gets done.
We're talking about people who are bringing technology like, well, this is example here.
This is where I was introduced last year to the Tesla machine.
So there's this underground club that I'm a part of.
And man, since I became a member just a couple of weeks ago and I received the Tesla machine and I have access to it, first of all, my sister came to town with a debilitating migraine to the point where she couldn't even fall asleep.
20 minutes on a Tesla, no more headache.
She was able to go to bed, get really good rest.
She was able to fall asleep.
She works here at the network and she came in for another set of interviews that we did in some business meetings.
But then I was doing Bulgarian split squats.
I like to work out.
And I was doing Bulgarian split squats and I did something weird.
Didn't even really notice it right away, but I tweaked my hip flexor.
And over the last few days, it's just been really getting incessantly more and more painful and it's been really aggravating.
And it's stiff, especially with the cold weather.
This morning, I thought, well, what am I doing?
Why am I not putting the Tesla machine on this thing?
I did it for 15 minutes.
The pain is completely gone.
I'm not joking.
Like this is when they did my shoulder last year at Jeff Berwick's villa in Acapulco, Mexico.
This is this is a shoulder injury that I've been living with since I was in my early 20s.
And it is painful.
It's like excruciating at times, especially, I mean, it really restricts the mobility, but then especially like trying to lift.
I just enjoy lifting.
I like working out and wasn't able to do it, not effectively anyways.
Well, now, since this Tesla machine was originally put on me in Acapulco last year, about this time, completely gone.
It's never returned.
And we've told some other stories.
This one is really wild.
One of the members of this underground Tesla club had these things floating around in his eyes for 30 years, eye floaters, for 30 years.
And the doctors told him, well, it's just debris.
There's really nothing that we can do about it.
So he tried five sessions with the Tesla machine, Plasma Technology, which is all this is, by the way, based on Nikola Tesla's work that's been hidden by the establishment.
It was stolen by Trump's uncle and the CIA.
He can't even make it up.
He didn't even put this machine near his eyes, just on his chest.
And one morning he woke up and after 30 years of having these floaters, they were gone.
30 years of floaters vanished.
This is the type of result that you get from technology that big pharma does not want you knowing about.
And I found out about the Tesla Club through the dollar vigilante, Jeff Berwick, at his villa in Acapulco, Mexico.
But this is a private membership that you can, this is a club that you do want to be a part of.
And it's an association where you can actually get your own machine.
You can check it out at tzla.club.
Again, that's tesla.club, tzla.club.
All right.
So I think we got our housekeeping stuff taken care of.
I will see you at Anarchapulco and Puerto Vallerta February 15th at the 20th.
I'm speaking there.
And these are, by the way, not rah-rah, throw-out t-shirts, you know, and buy a few pieces of merch from my table and the country will be saved.
It's not one of those type of events.
It's not an event where we play loud music and we all stand on the wall like socially awkward retards and stare at each other.
No, no, no.
This is about high-level meetings.
This is about remedy and solutions.
There are very simple solutions.
Not just to big pharma, not just to Western medicine like the Tesla machine and the underground membership that you can be a part of at TZLA.club, but everything.
We're talking about political remedies and solutions.
We're talking about remedy and solution for the occupation that we live under and this compromised government where everybody's like, it just seems so blackpilling and so dark.
I just don't feel like that there's any way that we could ever get out of this.
Well, I have news for you.
If you are at Anarchipulco, you will hear remedy and solutions.
Again, that is February 15th to the 20th.
And if it stays cold like this, which it's supposed to, I guess next week, I'm going to be at my dad's house.
He lives in northern Wisconsin and it's supposed to be a high of negative 11 degrees, 27 degrees below zero overnight.
We're going to, what are we going to do?
We're Peter's boys.
We're going to do some ice fishing.
This is a season of life I just wouldn't trade for anything in the world.
Not to riot in the streets With the federal informant Jake Lang, not to be in nightclubs in Miami.
I am right where I want to be.
Responsibilities like a real human being, raising children, raising young boys.
So Eli is playing his hockey tournament today.
They have won their first sets of games and they will be in the championship later on.
I'll let you know in the live chat over on locals how they do.
Supporting the Family00:03:28
Join us there.
If you're not a part of this family, you got to be a part of the family.
We need the support, number one, to stay on the air, to continue putting together docuseries like vaccination, which you're all about to see.
Do not move.
If you want to know what's in these shots, the shots that the CDC says, in order for your child to participate and be a part of polite society, to be able to enroll in the club, to play in these sporting events, to go to school, public or private, you have to have these shots.
You want to know what's in them?
Do you want to know what's in them?
Vaccination.
Our people have seen this because they are Stu Cruz supporters.
Please, we need your help.
StuPeters.tv, $9 a month.
And if you're shopping around, if you're going on like Amazon or you're going to the big box stores to buy things, first, please check SPNStore.com.
We have a lot of loyal advertisers that, despite many of our advertisers saying we can't be with this guy anymore, because, you know, this guy is touching the third rail.
He's talking about things that polite society that we were just talking about says that you're not allowed to talk about without being completely canceled and defunded.
And they've tried that with me.
They've tried the hit pieces.
They brought in sponsors that had millions of dollars dangled out like carrots.
We were actually doing business with a lot of these sponsors.
And when they tried to, you know, kind of nudge me at first, it was a nudge.
Hey, you know, we noticed that you're talking about some of these things.
It was right after I sat down with the survivors of the USS Liberty, actually, that these conversations kind of started.
And it was, you know, yeah, I don't, I don't really think that that's something that you really want to be talking about too much.
And then it kind of graduated into, hey, listen, you know, we don't, we don't really necessarily want our brand or our product or our name attached to this thing that could be perceived as anti-Semitic.
So we're just going to ask that you kind of tone it back, tone it down, walk it back, just take it easy a little bit on that narrative.
And the more I kept asking questions and talking about this, the more research that I did, the more imminent I viewed the situation as being to our country detrimentally, of course.
And all of the ills in our society and all of the plights of the American people and all of the bureaucratic, kind of hovering, powerful, totalitarian, dystopian, you know, this feeling of imminent doom that a lot of people have.
I just don't have that.
I don't have that because of remedies and solutions.
So you can find the base advertisers that have nuts but said, yeah, we're going to stick around.
You can find them, a lot of them at spnstore.com.
So before you go buy it anywhere else, you could support this network by supporting our sponsors at spnstore.com and by going to stupeters.tv and signing up for $9 a month.
Honestly, collectively, if we could get everybody in the rumble, if we could get everybody on X, if we could just get everybody to agree, hey, you know what?
I think that the content, I think that the work that that network is doing is worth $9 a month.
Supporting My Sons00:03:56
StuPeters.tv, and we would really appreciate it.
God bless you for doing that.
We are just so tremendously thankful for the supporters that have been here.
We could not be here without you, quite literally.
We could not do it without you.
All glory to God Almighty.
We're still here.
And thanks in part, of course, to you at stupeters.tv, who have contributed $9 a month, $90 a year, however you decided to sign up.
So there's that.
Okay, Anarchipulco, February 15th through the 20th.
It's in Puerto Vallerta.
Tickets are relatively inexpensive and cheap.
There are details on the website for Anarchipulco about where you could stay.
I believe that there's some recommendations on there.
The speakers list is there.
I'm looking forward to seeing Max Egan again.
Good friend of mine.
Can't wait to see Jeff Berwick.
I know that the Ikes will be in town.
Always good hanging out with Gareth, especially though his wife, Gemma.
Gareth can stay home if he wants to.
Just send Gemma.
That's fine.
No, I'm just kidding, of course, but yeah, just great people.
Prayer to Vallerta, February 15th to the 20th.
Vaccination coming up right now for everybody.
We've decided that you all need to see this.
Sorry, I'm wearing the hat because, you know, I've been in these hockey arenas.
My hair is all effed up.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
You'll get what you deserve tomorrow.
I tell you what, I'll put on the three-piece suit for you.
I'll keep the tie.
I don't think that you guys actually really care, but I feel like you earned that, that you deserve that respect at least.
So I try to throw on a tie.
I try to look nice and put together here, but what are you going to do?
It's seven degrees below zero.
I'm in frozen hockey arenas.
I'm not doing my hair.
I'm not brushing my hair.
Supporting my team, supporting my sons.
My daughter even plays hockey.
So it's just great.
Sleepovers.
And, you know, I think right now they're watching film on the other team in the other room.
They're in and out of the studio.
They're in and out of the arena.
It's an all-day, you know, friendship, bond, lifelong kind of relationship establishing time period in their lives.
And it's just really, it's, it's just really, it's indescribable.
For you dads, you know that.
If you've raised sons, watching them develop these friendships and relationships and being present and being a father.
We need more of that.
We need more people being present in their sons' lives and daughters as well, equally important.
And I don't intentionally leave Reagan out.
I don't know why I do that sometimes.
I just kind of skip over that.
She is the apple of my eye.
Honestly, I mean, she's just a ray of sunshine.
I love you, Reagan.
So anyway, vaccination coming up right now.
Puerto Vallerta, Anarchipulco, February 15th to the 20th.
And make sure that you shop spnstore.com, support us at stupeters.tv and get yourself to be a part of the membership club, the underground club that you do want to be a part of.
Go to tzla.club.
Again, tzla.club.
All right, without further ado, tripping over my words here.
How can you be an arena announcer when you're tripping over your word?
Maybe it's just because I've said too many words today.
A lot of penalties in the one game.
So it kept me busy there.
Anyway, minor penalty assessed today.
I'm really good.
It really, it's a whole show when I do this.
All right, vaccination starts right now.
All right, guys.
So obviously, it's a big club and we're not in it.
I have no desire to be in that club.
I am a member of a club, though, an underground club, a private club, the Tesla Club.
And I'm going to tell you actually something that happened to a Tesla club member's sister.
Vaccines and Safety Studies00:15:37
She was diagnosed with Padgett disease, cancerous cells in her breast.
She had lumps, pain, the whole nightmare.
Well, her brother is a member of my underground plasma technology group and he convinced her to try this machine.
Two sessions, 20 minutes each over two days.
On the third day, she wakes up.
All the lumps are gone.
No BS.
Pain completely vanished.
She goes back into the doctor.
He looks at her.
He examines her and he says, you know, I've never seen anything like this before.
And the lab results came back.
They found nothing.
This is the type of technology that has been hidden since Tesla died.
It was stolen by Donald Trump's uncle.
It's been hidden by the CIA.
Jeff Berwick introduced me to the Tesla Club.
And if you're dealing with any health issues, you need to know that this exists.
So go to Tesla Club, check it out for yourself, tzla.club, again, tzla.club.
will be right back.
So I started my life in Massachusetts and suburban Massachusetts south of Boston where I grew up.
And I went to college at University of Massachusetts in Amherst and majored in nutritional biochemistry with a minor in chemistry.
And then I applied to medical school, going to the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
And I was there, obviously, for four years.
And then I went to, I did an internship in general surgery at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City.
And then I went to Tufts University for an internship in internal medicine.
And then I did a residency in emergency medicine at Boston University.
It was an academic emergency medicine program.
And since then, I've been practicing emergency medicine.
And I've had various positions in leadership along the way, as well as since residency, obtained a master's in public health from Johns Hopkins University.
I have a master's in healthcare administration from Rosalind Franklin University.
And I have a fellowship in occupational environmental medicine from University of Cincinnati.
In addition to emergency medicine, I've been doing a little occupational medicine on the side.
I did some geriatric medicine.
I did outpatient surgery.
I had an outpatient surgery practice at one point.
I did some medical legal work.
I love to learn and learn new things.
And all while practicing emergency medicine, I'm just getting, you know, just learning more and more and more.
Happens to be over the past few months, I've taken a deep dive into the vaccines.
The reality is, is that most doctors don't know the data on the vaccines.
I've taken all my skills that I've learned from my career and applied it to looking into PubMed, into the database, and looked at all the studies of vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
And really, the results are shocking.
For example, this is a study that was just brought out yesterday in the Senate hearings with Aaron Siri, who's an attorney who basically brought this paper out, explained that the Henry Ford Medical Center, and I think it was Detroit, Michigan, they had a study that they researched and they wrote up.
They never published it, though.
This research study showed it was really the largest in the history of the United States of vaccinated versus unvaccinated in their medical center using the electronic medical record of their institution.
And they found huge amounts of like anywhere from 300 to 600% increase of chronic, you know, neurobehavioral problems, neurodevelopmental problems, psychological issues, diabetes, ADHD, a lot of these chronic problems they saw much, universally all higher in the vaccinated group versus unvaccinated.
The studies designed to examine the long-term effects of a cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted.
That's the Institute of Medicine's finding after reviewing the entire body of scientific literature.
Meaning the IOM could not find studies comparing as you would do to study the safety of a product, an exposed group, meaning kids that got vaccines, the childhood schedule with unvaccinated children, kids who got no vaccines, which is what you would need to assess the safety of the schedule.
Lacking evidence to support safety, the best the IOM can conclude was, quote, there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe, end quote.
This, of course, also means the IOM cannot find evidence to conclude that the schedule is safe.
Instead, what these researchers found was that vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease, 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay and 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder.
All of these findings were statistically significant.
There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group, but zero in the unvaccinated group.
Hence, a rate cannot be calculated, including brain disease, intellectual disabilities, and ticks.
A number of different diagnoses, including diabetes and ADHD and a number of them, that in the unvaccinated group, there was zero.
In other words, all these chronic diseases that we're accepting to be normal, you know, part of life, the reality is probably greater than 90, maybe 99% of them don't have to exist in children.
And then, of course, they have chronic disease in children that follows them into adulthood.
But all these chronic diseases that exist, that's not the way God made us.
As a doctor, I've had patients who either refused or were hesitant to receive a vaccine, especially like say a tetanus shot.
My reaction to those people who were hesitant or refused the vaccines is I just simply offered it.
I personally did not, I didn't get upset at them.
Now, there were nurses I worked with and there were other residents or other attendings that would make very cynical comments, very, very dark negative comments about, and or pressured the patient.
And I was just not one of those people that did that.
I just felt like they have a right to refuse it.
There's like 20 cases of tetanus per year in the United States and nobody dies of tetanus anymore.
We have supportive care, we have intubation, we have antibiotics, and so nobody dies of tetanus.
So when people come to the ER and they don't want to take the tetanus shot, I've always been okay with not taking it.
But you have to understand it a little bit.
If you just believe in this popular narrative, like I hate to say it, although many of the doctors do, that it's deadly, it's going to cause them to die and these scare tactics.
They just believe it.
They don't actually look at the data.
They just being, it's what they're being told by these governing bodies, you know, or what they were taught verbally by their superior during training.
Then they have this belief, like a religion, that you have to take it.
But all you need to do is just open your eyes, become more open to looking at the data yourself.
I read not very long ago an article that said until wonderful people like us introduced vaccinations to Africa, the African children basically were autism-free.
They never heard of autism, never had a case of doubt.
Are you familiar with that?
Had you ever heard that before?
I wonder if the CDC has conducted or facilitated a study comparing vaccinated children with unvaccinated children yet.
Have you done that?
Most recently in 2011, and their conclusion, again, was not just looking at the work that was done at CDC, but with the total body of evidence, was suggesting that vaccines and their components did not increase the risk for autism.
My time is very limited here.
So clearly, definitely, unequivocally, you have studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
We have not studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
Never mind.
Stop there.
That was the meaning of my question.
You wasted two minutes of my time.
The doctors are working as commissioned salespeople, really for the pharmaceutical companies.
But again, it's the administrators that are also colluding and/or directing it, actually.
Same thing with a hospital system.
And many of the practices are owned by big hospital systems.
So they're being told, the doctors are being told that they need to do this.
They need to be giving up the vaccine.
Some of these pediatricians can make up to a million dollars a year from the incentives that are given for vaccinating.
In 1983, when I started medical school, I was taught vaccines were safe and they were effective and give them.
But I was not taught about any of the science around their safety or any of the studies around how safety were done.
And it wasn't until 1998 that a mother came up to me and said, Dr. Larry, did you know that there's mercury in vaccines?
And I said, no, I did not.
And as a medical student, I was trained to critically think.
If you see an observation, you go after it and try and figure out if there's a question to ask.
So instead of just ignoring it, I looked further into the vaccine ingredients.
And I found that there were a number of vaccine ingredients that in animal studies were proven to be very dangerous to animals.
And I didn't understand why these same ingredients were actually in vaccines.
I was starting to hear stories from parents, not dozens, not hundreds, but thousands of stories from parents who took a very healthy child into their doctor's office and then found that their child lost much of their health, whether it was their speech, whether it was seizures, whether it was death, whether it was asthma, allergies, eczema, whether it was autism, whether it was learning disabilities, whether it was inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune diseases.
And every one of those parents were told it had nothing to do with the vaccine.
Every single one.
And this continues today.
A lot of what I'm saying, if the doctors see it, they're going to get very angry because it's hyperbole right now.
And that's part of why we show the data, we look at the data, then anybody who's a scientist or a doctor, they can't argue with it anymore.
And that's what's missing.
The common theme really is about, is groupthink.
So there's this common narrative that becomes prevalent in the population of doctors, whatever specialty it is, that this is the way it's done.
And they all believe it.
Why should they go in and verify, validate what they're being taught in the literature?
You know, the vast majority of doctors won't do that.
Even when you're in medical school and you're being taught in the classroom, you're being taught by MDs or PhDs, you know, and you learn it and it's in the textbook and you memorize it and you learn it.
That's how it works.
You know, the only way you're going to go and look at the literature is if you're a researcher.
You know, doctors can be researchers or PhDs or MD PhDs.
This is thimerosol, which is labeled very toxic, has cumulative effects, can cause damage to the kidneys, to the respiratory system, skin, to the nervous system.
It specifically warns on here that it can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning that it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.
This is immensely toxic stuff.
And this is what's in the vaccine.
It's important to realize we're talking about a whole range of products.
Vaccines are a big one because, of course, you're directly injecting it.
For example, this is tetanus vaccine.
This one expires.
It's a little outdated now in 2007.
Here's the thimerosol.
1 to 10,000 is a preservative.
Perhaps the biggest one in the U.S., at least, that's for exposure to mercury is the influenza vaccine.
Influenza vaccine is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, all children on a yearly basis.
You're supposed to have a lot of people.
You have less influenza.
Understand that thimerosol is not added at the end.
It's not like, well, that factory next year can make thimerisol-free.
Thimerosol, you either have to have a thimerosol-free factory or you have to not have one.
They add thimerosol at each step because the factory is not clean and not sterile.
So you either have to have an expensive sterile factory, well, you don't need thimerosol, or you have to have one that produces thimerosol.
It's going to need thimerosol or something the whole time.
It needs to be stopped.
This is the influenza vaccine from Adventispester, their flu zone.
Thimerosol.
25 micrograms of mercury per dose.
But I'd like to point out that a lot of people didn't know, and I'm one of them.
I've given 2,000 Rogam shots.
I've been in vaccines for 35 years.
I didn't know that Rogam had thimerosol in it.
So I think a lot of the doctors were unaware.
They weren't aware that even the word thimerisol meant mercury.
In the 1990s, the mercury thimerosol ostensibly was taken out of the vaccines, but it really wasn't.
What they did is they took out the last step, the higher amounts.
In 1999, it was at that point in time, it was thought by everyone that they took out the thimerosol, but they didn't.
It was a grassroots effort by parents complaining to their congressmen that they know their kid got autism from the vaccine.
When I was at Hopkins, this was taught to me that it was the only legislation in healthcare that came from grassroots non-scientific information.
So it was, you know, from just from the parents complaining to their congressmen.
In a pregnant mother, the most rich, the organ that has the highest amount of lipid or fat is the fetal brain.
So it'll go right through the placenta.
It'll go into her blood, go right through the blood brain.
There's not much of a blood brain barrier in the fetus anyway.
It wants to go into fat, basically.
So we'll go into the fat of the developing brain of the fetus.
The fetus is much more susceptible to the effects of an organic mercury with fat-soluble mercury, which is, again, ethylmercury or methylmercury.
And it's a developing brain.
It goes right into the brain.
It has a half-life of like over 30 years.
As a doctor, there's only so much you can learn.
There's only so much they know.
And the problem is that they're like everyone else.
Vaccines and Autism Speech Impairment00:15:30
And they're susceptible to this mass psychosis, this brainwashing, this group think.
And that's how they're able to get all these pediatricians to give out these vaccines that are harming people.
So what I have with me is the printout from the Centers for Disease Control.
And I know you can't see it from there, but every vaccine that is made with cell lines from aborted babies is highlighted in yellow.
So the adenovirus vaccine, the D-Tap IPV HIP called the pentacil vaccine, the hepatitis A, the Havrix, the hepatitis A, Bacta, the hepatitis A, hepatitis B called TwinRIX, the MMR2, the MMRV, which also includes the Varicella virus, the rabies virus, the Varicella-Varibax vaccine,
and the Zosters all are made with cell lines from aborted babies.
Your physicians don't know what is in the vaccine and what the vaccine-related injuries are.
I know about mercury and vaccines, aluminum vaccines, polyservate ADN vaccines, formaldehyde vaccines, pig and kidney cells in vaccines, okay?
And so, because I know that, that's part of the informed consent discussion.
What about allowing people to exercise their religious exemption or a medical exemption so that they can avoid being forced to receive vaccines that could potentially be devastating or fatal?
If I were in a social setting at the golf course or any social setting with a group of doctors and I asked them if injecting metals into a person, especially a child, is harmful, they would universally say, yeah, it's harmful, especially if it's a toxic metal.
Aluminum is toxic to all human, to all living organisms.
They may know that and they may agree to that, but then the question is, are they aware that aluminum is in the vaccines?
Many of them don't even know that.
After looking at the literature myself and understanding it and looking at the mechanisms and understanding how the effects of aluminum, how much aluminum is in the vaccines, and all the outcome studies, there's no question that the aluminum is harmful.
Any justification is not valid.
Do you believe that ADHD is caused by vaccine?
Yes.
I know for a fact that the vaccines increase the risk dramatically of ADHD.
Is it the only cause?
I can't say it's the only cause.
Is it likely it's the only cause?
It's very likely, actually.
It's very likely it could be the only cause.
But the question is, do the vaccines cause ADHD?
Absolutely.
The literature is unequivocal.
It's probably the ones that have the aluminum adjuvant.
The majority of the ones in the vaccine schedule have aluminum adjuvant in them.
Aluminum is a neurotoxin.
And ADHD is a neurologic problem.
And 30, 40, 50 years ago, we didn't have this diagnosis.
So there's definitely biologic plausibility that aluminum could be causing ADHD.
And what's more important and more, really, this really is the essence, the essence of the point here is that the outcome data shows it.
A lot of these studies look at odds ratios.
What that means is the odds of something, like say four to one.
So the odds ratio is four.
Like a number of studies show roughly about three or four.
Some higher actually.
So if it's a four, that means that the odds of getting ADHD in the vaccinated is four to one compared to the unvaccinated.
So you look at these odds ratios, some of them are greater than 10.
In other words, a 10 to 1 ratio of getting a neurodevelopmental problem.
The common theme that I've been learning in my studies over the past, say, five years, I've come to conclude, is that anything that God has given us is always the best.
There's nothing that man can intervene and supplant what God gave us that's better.
Nothing.
Look at medicines versus natural medicine.
Everybody knows the turn of the century.
The Rockefellers that started the whole pharmaceutical industry that took control of the AMA, the medical school curriculums, they just basically, through their media, made it quackery to practice naturopathic medicine, which was keeping people healthy.
That's still the case.
Yeah, right.
Still the case till today.
The science is clear.
These vaccines will protect you and those you love from this dangerous and deadly disease.
They could save your life.
It's really important to know that the vaccines have all been through and met the necessary safety and quality standards.
What was that, Elton?
That was me acting.
Did you say free fries when you get vaccinated?
Mom, if this is appealing to you, just think of this when you think of vaccination.
Vaccination.
I'm getting a very good feeling about vaccination right at this moment.
I want you to get the vaccine because I want you to be safe.
Love you too.
To break that cognitive dissonance, you can't just tell somebody right away, oh, everything you believed to be true is not true.
Well, the cognitive dissonance is actually even greater once you've been vaccinated, right?
Because then now there's like, it's even, it's an additional layer of not wanting to accept it.
There are a whole number of studies looking at outcomes of autism spectrum disorder, other neurobehavioral problems, neurodevelopmental problems.
And so the first thing I want to just sort of just go through all these studies.
And the end of it, you know, hopefully this doctor's looking at this and watching what's going on.
I would challenge them to go into the literature and find articles that counter it.
Like, are there articles that look at vaccinated versus unvaccinated showing that these outcomes are not there?
Or there's a lower likelihood.
But whatever, you know, that there's not this safety concern.
Anybody's welcome to go into the literature and to PubMed to the scientific database and try to debunk it because it doesn't exist.
So let's start with the audit.
The first one, an article by Hooker and Miller, 2021, in the Journal of Translational Science.
They took survey data from 1998 to 2016.
They looked at 831 kids from three different pediatric practices.
And these kids are looked at age 9 to 11 years old.
And what they did is they looked at those who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated, okay?
And they come up with odds ratios.
The patients who had allergies who were vaccinated, the odds ratio of having an allergy, just general any allergy, is 4.3.
What that means is that the vaccinated population, the odds of them getting allergies is 4.3 to 1 compared to the unvaccinated, right?
So, or you could say it's a 4.3 times increased risk.
You can also say it that way.
So that's allergies.
Autism, five.
The odds ratio is five.
They're five times more likely to have autism in this study.
ADD, 21.
An odds ratio of 21 is huge.
Chronic ear infections, 28.
2011, Gail DeLong published a study in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health.
She did a regression analysis.
And she looked at the patients for each state in the whole country, actually.
This information, she looked at the percentage vaccinated by the age of two years old, and then looked at that same cohort when they turned eight for the whole country.
And what she found is a dose response.
So in other words, there's a it for you for each 1% increase in those who are vaccinated, there's a corresponding 680 kids who were diagnosed with autism and speech and language impairment.
Okay?
Statistically significant across the country.
And in the article, she basically did some analysis looking at other diagnoses.
In other words, if you take your patient, if you take your child to the doctor more often, is it more likely you're going to get a diagnosis of autism and speech and language impairment?
And what they found is that there's no statistical significance in all these other diagnoses.
So in other words, by taking your child to the doctor more often doesn't lead to that diagnosis.
So that wasn't the reason.
The reason is it's the vaccines that were connected, were associated with the outcome of autism and speech and language impairment.
They also looked at in this study, they looked at the number of pediatricians per state, because a lot of people think, well, if there's more, you're just getting more of a diagnosis, if there's, again, more access to healthcare.
So they looked at state by state the percentages of pediatricians.
And she found that there's no correlation between the number of pediatricians in a state and the diagnosis of autism and speech and language impairment.
Instead, what's specifically what was linked to it statistically is vaccines up to the age of two and then autism, speech and language impairment at the age of eight.
Another study published this past year by Mawson and Jacob published in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law.
They looked at over 47,000 Medicaid claims between 1999 and 2011.
And they found three basic outcomes they looked at.
One is vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
By the age of nine, it was 170% increased risk of autism spectrum disorder.
For ADHD, it was 181% in this group.
Say an odds ratio like 2.81.
2.81 to 1.
So that would be 181% increase.
That's just a way of looking at the data differently.
That's all.
Epilepsy seizures, 252% in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group, right?
Learning disorders, 581%.
Tick disorders, like a neurologic tick, 525%.
Now, if you look at all these different diagnoses, you look at the, they were born preterm, they're all higher.
For example, I'll just give you one example.
Learning disorders in the full term is 581%.
In the preterm, the ones who are vaccinated, 884% increased likelihood of a learning disorder if you are preterm and vaccinated versus the unvaccinated.
So that was the vaccine.
They looked at full term, they looked at preterm.
The other thing they looked at is they looked at, because it's Medicaid data, they looked at number of visits for the purpose of a vaccine, because they can track that data.
So if a child, so this is compared to no vaccines, no visits for vaccines.
The comparison, they have one visit for a vaccine, there is 70% increased risk of getting autism spectrum disorder.
They have four visits, 90% increased risk of autism spectrum disorder compared to the unvaccinated.
Greater than 11 visits for the purpose of a vaccine, 340% more likely to have autism spectrum disorder.
And what really, as a scientist, really, what you need to look at also is when there's a dose response, when there's an increased effect, there's an increased exposure and the effect is greater each as it goes higher or higher, that lends itself to be more of a causation versus just an association, right?
So we see a clear, clear-cut dose response really in all these studies.
Anyone, any of them that look at the dose response, we're finding it which is which really lends itself to a legitimate causation.
Gallagher and Goodman, I found these articles recently actually.
They published an article in 2008 in Toxicological Environmental Chemistry.
And they looked at this data called NHANES, which stands for Nutrition Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
This is a well-known data bank to a lot of researchers.
They use a lot of this data for various types of research that's published.
It's government data.
They looked at specifically this data set from 1999 to 2000.
And they looked at over 1,800 children.
And they looked at them from one to nine years old.
And they looked at those who have had the triple series for hepatitis B.
So the triple series is they get it first day of life, one month, and six months.
The one month may be a two-month one, but they get three, basically, right?
So they looked at those who have had all of them versus none.
And they also, there was also some in-between.
So they had to do a regression analysis because it could be a sort of gradations.
And they found the odds, they looked at the odds of neurodevelopmental disability.
And the boys, they found an 8.63 times more likely to have a neurodevelopmental disability than those who are vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
Gallagher and Goodman also then published another study, a little bit better of a study, in 2010, a couple years later.
and published it in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health.
It was a cross-sectional study, which means kind of one point in time.
They used the data from the National Health Interview Survey.
And this is the largest and the oldest national health survey data in the United States.
They looked at over 79,000 children did a logistic regression.
And they just looked at the one dose of hepatitis B, the neonatal one, and they correlated it with the age of three to seven years old, whether or not they got autism, okay, versus the ones that didn't get that just that first day of life dose.
Okay.
And they found the odds ratio was three.
So those are the three, those who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated, just that one dose, had a three times more likely diagnosis of autism between the ages of three and seven years old.
Published, peer-reviewed.
Mold and colleagues in 2018 published an article in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology.
They published five patients who died who had had autism spectrum disorder.
And the normal amount of, say, baseline mean in the population, aluminum you'd find in brains, is less than one microgram per gram of dry weight of brain tissue.
That's sort of baseline.
They just looked at five people with autism spectrum disorder.
They found one brain had over four micrograms per gram of dry weight, and four of them had over five.
Now, out of those four, three of them had the highest levels in recorded history.
One had 17 micrograms per gram of dry weight, one had 19, one had 22 micrograms per gram of dry weight, which has never been reported before.
Unlocking Pain-Free Health00:03:02
Many of them have aluminum.
Some of them have mercury.
Some of them have polysorbate 80.
Some of them have DNA fragments, which can cause cancer.
So some of them have formaldehyde, which is a human toxin, right?
So every single vaccine has an excipient that is a human toxin.
If you're dealing with acute pain or chronic pain, nobody around you really understands what's going on.
It's miserable and downright debilitating at times.
You've got that kink in your neck.
You're sitting at your desk.
It's promoting bad posture, whether you're at home, on the couch, trying to avoid that spasm.
And then the worst part is, as people don't understand what it is that you're dealing with, doctors are telling you, well, just take this pill.
We've got a prescription, muscle relaxers, painkillers.
Yeah, because I trust big pharma.
Or how about some surgery?
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, Western medicine.
Yeah, please sign me up.
Bring me in, put me out, cut me open, solder me together, put metal parts in me.
Yeah, no.
Or your friends might tell you, well, you're getting older.
It's just something that you're going to have to deal with.
You had that injury, remember?
It's always going to be tight.
It's never going to be the same.
Yeah, all of that is BS.
So my good friends over at Finally Pain Free are offering free live coaching on Thursday, February 12th.
And it is here where Angie will teach you the biggest secret in medicine, and that's to address the pain at its root.
Instead of masking the symptoms with big pharma poisons, you will learn what it truly takes to regenerate your joints and how to apply this innovative cleaning method to refurbish the entire anatomy.
You can actually go in there and clean out the joints.
And if you have a spoon at home, just a regular kitchen spoon, you can do this.
It's not mainstream medicine.
This is about taking control of your health by resetting the dislocated bones and opening up the block joints.
So you can now finally unleash your body's ability to heal itself.
This has all been developed by a German health activist, Angie, who's trusted by world champions and professional athletes around the world.
And the best part is this coaching is free.
Just go sign up right now.
Go to finally-painfree.com slash coaching.
Finally-painfree.com slash coaching.
If you're ready to stop accepting acute and chronic pain, unlock the biggest secret.
Start cleaning out the joints now.
This is where you begin.
Finally-painfree.com slash coaching.
Finally-painfree.com slash coaching.
Is there one chronic disease that Western medicine has cured?
Medicine's Health Myth00:15:36
Um...
I can't think of one.
Chronic diseases, which may be caused by some pharmaceuticals, i.e. vaccines, right?
They create the problem and they have the solution.
The solution is the pharmaceuticals.
Now, is there any medicine that any allopathic medical doctor learns?
Is there any medicine that actually can make people healthier?
Is there any medicine we can give somebody to say, this will reduce the likelihood of getting cancer?
This will reduce the likelihood of you getting MS, multiple sclerosis, right?
No, there isn't.
There's no medication that you can prescribe to do any of those things.
Happens to be that there's a lot of data showing exercise can decrease many, many, in fact, every cancer they've looked at.
Exercise decreases the incidence of cancer.
It can decrease your risk of cancer.
Even if you've got PSA levels and men who, before they get prostate cancer, you know, their PSA levels start to rise.
That increases the concern.
They've even been able to show that exercise can bring those PSA levels back down, actually, right?
Not only that, I mean, look at coronary artery disease, right?
Think about this.
There's a guy named Dr. Ornish, who's a cardiologist.
And one of the studies he did was there were three groups of people with risk factors for heart disease, right?
And he gave one was a control group, which we call the non-compliant group.
They didn't do anything.
And one group was a statin group.
And one group was exercise and a healthy diet and stress reduction, okay?
With no statin.
The group that was non-compliant, that was the control group, okay, they looked at heart caths year zero and year five.
They actually looked at year one as well, but that data doesn't really matter.
After five years, they found that this group had a 46% increase of coronary plaque, the ones that did nothing.
The ones that did the statin group, 32 to 33%.
So it decreased the progression of the coronary plaque and the coronary arteries, which is good, right?
But the exercise group, negative 7%.
They actually decreased the coronary plaque in the coronary arteries by exercise, a whole flu diet, and stress reduction.
All the doctors, all the primary care doctors should be well aware of this study and all the cardiologists.
I think most of the cardiologists probably know this, but so in other words, all the primary care doctors should be saying, you need to exercise and eat a better diet, right?
And so, but they don't do that.
Almost none of them.
I mean, very, very few do.
The first thing they'll do is put you on a statin, right?
Which has its other problems.
Does it cause dementia?
I think it probably does, but we need to get some more.
There needs to be more data showing that, but that certainly is a lot of biological plausibility.
There's a lot of discussion regarding that topic.
But the point is that every single primary care doctor, every single cardiologist should be, if somebody has risk factors and/or has had coronary plaque, they should be exercising because that can unravel or reverse the disease process.
So when you're looking at exercise, exercise should be the 100% should be the strong advice by every primary care doctor to make people healthier.
But it's not really being done most of the time.
Most of the time, they go right to the pharmaceuticals, which may slow the progression in some cases, some cases not.
But it's not going to reverse it.
It's not going to cure it.
Whereas exercise can.
Are these drugs approved based on independent research or pharma-funded studies?
Well, I'll tell you what, it's fascinating because we're all taught when the statins first came out, I was in college, and I learned in one of my biochemistry classes how it works, and it makes sense.
It makes logical sense how it decreases cholesterol.
We're all taught that cholesterol is bad.
So then the statins, then they started marketing them later.
And we all believed, in fact, when I was in medical school, I'm in my mid-20s, I had high cholesterol.
I put myself on a statin.
I've been taking a statin from medical school up until about a year ago, maybe a year and a half ago, when I stopped it.
And I realized it's not a good thing.
All the drugs, all the medications that we prescribe that's approved by the FDA, nearly all of them are funded by the drug companies.
Nearly all of the studies.
So there's no question that there's a huge influence.
And occasionally you might have a drug that actually really helps people that are taken off the market that were pharmaceuticals, but they actually really do help people.
And because it helps people too much, they become controversial and are no longer being used.
Like, for example, Zopinex instead of albuterol.
It's more expensive, and most pharmacies don't carry it.
The reason why it was never really well accepted is because we're told that the drug companies funded the research, right?
But that goes for every single drug, just about what we use.
I don't know any drug that doesn't get funded by the research.
Why did ivermectin become so controversial during COVID?
Well, ivermectin worked really well.
In fact, there's over 200 studies now showing not only does it decrease the severity of disease, it actually saves lives.
People who are getting injecting drugs for animals and horse and people telling them to.
Oh my God.
What person?
You know, you talk about like, you know, cancel culture and who to shame?
Ivermectin, a dewormer?
Really?
They are shaming themselves.
No one has to shame them.
They're shaming themselves.
No, they need to shame.
They need to be called out and shamed, brother.
I am taking a, what do they call it?
Like a regular dose?
You know, whatever.
They're trying to build up of ivermectin.
Ivermectin was a boogeyman early on in COVID.
You couldn't talk about it.
That was wrong.
We were given bad information about ivermectin.
The real question is why?
Everyone's going to say, Joe Rogan was right.
No, Joe Rogan was saying, yeah, he was right.
But that's not what matters.
What matters is the entire clinical community knew that ivermectin couldn't hurt you.
They knew it, Patrick.
I know they knew it.
How do I know?
Because now I'm doing nothing but talking to these clinicians who at the time were overwhelmed by COVID and they weren't saying anything.
Not that they were hiding anything, but it's cheap.
It's not owned by anybody and it's used as an antimicrobial, antiviral, and all of these different ways and has been for a long time.
So they were wrong to play scared on that.
Didn't know that at the time.
Know it now, admit it now, reporting on it now.
Just look in my eyes for a second.
All the science existed in ivermectin when you were shaming people, when you were shaming those doctors that were speaking out and you were helping the media and helping the establishment take their licenses away if they tried to push ivermectin, which you now suddenly recognize works.
I want to make this clear.
At least a half a million people in America are dead because ivermectin was taken out of the arsenal of things that they could use while you were waiting for your miracle vaccine.
Now, you know, you can decide where you're going to be at with that, Chris.
But when the reporters start not doing the work, not investigating science, not saying to the world that this had actually won the Nobel Prize in Medicine, not on horses, but on human beings, here it was.
Ivermectin, a multifaceted drug of Nobel Prize-honored distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19.
That's what we now see.
But it won the Nobel Prize when you were reporting.
Everyone should be shamed that even talks about it.
Half a million people at least are dead because there was a product that those doctors that you say were afraid to speak.
Why were they afraid to speak, Chris?
Because everyone like you on the television set was shaming them and celebrating when they were having their licenses taken away.
Many drugs that we prescribe don't actually have never been shown to reduce mortality.
For example, nitroglycerin for a heart attack, right?
That's one of the most well-studied drugs that's out there, right?
It doesn't reduce mortality or morbidity at all, but we use it, right?
So ivermectin not only does it improve morbidity, like the severity of disease, but actually saves lives, big time.
Okay, and there's a few, there's a couple, at least two meta-analysis that show that.
So it really, really helped people with really pulling them out of the clutches of death from COVID.
And it was demonized.
I remember I was a couple times I got in big trouble.
The pharmacist had threatened to call the Attorney General on me because the Attorney General of Ohio put out this memo that the doctors were not allowed to prescribe ivermectin unless there's certain conditions like they have a parasite for example.
If we're using it for COVID, we were going to be prosecuted.
And so I called one, I called it in and the pharmacist told me that, that he's considering reporting me to the Attorney General office, right?
Another one, I prescribed it to a patient a couple times in the ER and I got phone calls and emails basically threatening to fire me because I prescribed ivermectin to patients.
Doctors always can prescribe medications that's not FDA approved for whatever the problem is.
It's called off-label.
We've always been able to do that.
You can always prescribe a medication that's off-label.
Happens to be that this one drug that's off-label, it wasn't FDA approved for COVID, we were not allowed to do it and we were getting in trouble in various ways.
Have you looked into the treatment of cancer with ivermectin?
Yeah, there's a great article that's published that shows why it works, some outcomes, along with that one article I'm referring to, it goes into the, it's basically a review article and it looks at vitamin D, high-dose vitamin C, zinc.
I think it's either mebenazole or fenbendazole.
It could be both.
But there's an article that looks that reviews all of them, and they all together will decrease the mechanisms that cause cancer.
And there's many anecdotes of people who claim that they have been cured of cancer.
But, you know, there's a friend of a friend who had who had liver cancer.
I saw him, it was probably last about six months ago.
I was spending some time with a friend, and his brother, his brother, was yellow, I could tell.
I said, does he have, and he looked emaciated.
I said, does he have liver cancer?
He goes, how do you know?
I said, well, you know, he's got jaundice and he looks emaciated.
I said, he, you know, it wasn't really difficult to discern that.
And he was going, this was sort of a last-dish effort.
He had gone through some chemotherapy and then he was going for this other, it was a research drug, and we're trying it on him.
And I said to him, I said, you know, there are treatments out there that can actually cure that many people have claimed that it cured their cancer or their family's cancer.
And there's mechanisms that support that it works.
It's published.
So, you know what, do you want to try?
And he said, well, I don't know.
I think I'm just going to stick with, they were going to have some famous cancer center they were going to.
I said, well, has anybody, are there any claims at all that this drug has actually saved anybody?
Even one?
No, there isn't.
And that's the thing.
There aren't very many people that said, you know, chemotherapy saved my life.
It does happen.
People do rounce out of a malignant cancer.
It does happen.
But first of all, it's with a lot of pain and suffering.
And secondly, some of these other modalities that are now being exposed to be valid.
A lot of these scenarios are like, you know, they had metastatic cancer and there's nothing more anybody can do.
And they were just basically given a death sentence by the doctor and that was it.
And then they took what was ivermectin, fenbendazole, mebenazole.
And, you know, and then they got cured.
There's many people on social media talking about that.
I found something shocking.
Old anti-parasitic drugs like ivermectin and membendazole have powerful anti-cancer properties.
Here's what they do.
Ivermectin blocks tumor cells from generating energy through oxidative phosphorylation.
It inhibits cancerous stem cells.
It also disrupts glucose uptake, starving tumors at the source.
I have three friends.
All three of them had stage four cancer.
All three of them don't have cancer right now at all.
And they had some serious stuff going on.
What did they take?
Jesus.
They took some what you've heard they've taken.
Ivermectin, Fembendazole.
Yeah.
Yeah, I'm hearing that a lot.
Yeah.
This stuff works, man.
I am putting out the all-call alert.
All of the ivermectin people who've ever said take ivermectin for cancer.
My father just green lit the decision to do ivermectin for cancer.
Get ivermectin so we can nuke this stupid cancer.
I mean, if you look at the mechanisms of how cancer works, there is a biological possibility.
Most doctors will say, well, first of all, they're cynical about how it could even work against the virus.
Blue technique, it's an anti-parasitic.
Why would that work in the virus?
Well, there's a published paper showing it decreases the viral entry into the cell in seven different ways.
But when I point that out, they don't even want to look at the article.
Cognitive dissonance is so steep.
And it's the same thing with cancer also.
You know, the reality is that the cancer cells use a different energy.
They need to be rapidly growing, so they use glucose as a mechanism to derive energy, versus regular cells use the oxidative phosphorylation pathway in the mitochondria, which you can't use that if you're a cancer cell because it doesn't provide energy fast enough, right?
So if you have this malignant cancer cells depending on the other energy system, there are things that you can do to disrupt that.
By the way, including fasting.
There's a lot of people, anecdotes, there's a lot of people saying that fasting helps reduce cancer.
It makes sense.
But the oncologists don't seem to be using this mechanism, this different energy derived, this different way of deriving energy.
They're not looking at that as something to intervene to stop the cancer.
Instead, like you said, they're just given poisons.
There are also immune modulating therapies that are coming out that stimulate the immune system.
And so those are also being promoted.
Vitamin C's Impact on Cancer00:03:04
Big pharma is making a lot of money from them.
There's not a lot of success from them.
But there are other things we can do that promote, that enhance your immune system.
There was a big famous study, all the doctors knew about it way back when.
I think it was around somewhere before 2010.
I can't remember exactly when it was, but it was this big splash where everybody heard this study.
It was all over the news, where high-dose vitamin C in this ICU group cured cancer.
In this study, they took cancer cells, and those are actually cancer stem cells, and they exposed those stem cells to different drugs, some different cancer chemotherapeutic agents, experimental ones, those are some natural drugs.
And they found out that all of these had some impact on the growth and propagation of the cancer stem cells.
And vitamin C, believe it or not, had more of an impact than any of the others.
You know, and it's interesting to note that I read an article in one of the medical journals the other day that a lot of people are being excluded from cancer care because they can't afford the medications.
But when you talk about vitamin C, it's inexpensive, it's natural, it's widely available.
This could be a significant step.
A way to slow cancer, even stop its growth.
The news comes from the prestigious National Institutes of Health, and Denise is back to talk more about that.
This is fascinating.
Yeah, huge news on the cancer front, Tracy.
High-dose injections of vitamin C reduce tumor growth by half, according to the new research.
And what's more, the treatment does not harm healthy cells, meaning there are fewer difficult side effects often experienced with traditional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation.
The work was done on mice, but one local doctor says he successfully used vitamin C treatment on patients for quite some time.
Today, our Lindo is cancer-free.
And my pulmonary doctor told me, whatever you're doing, keep on going.
Our Lindo believes his cancer is gone because of vitamin C treatment.
First of all, I thought it was quackery, right?
First of all, you got to look into the mechanism of how vitamin C works, first of all.
And you can see there's some biological possibility there, but they were using very high doses IV, very high doses.
So because there was some cynicism in the establishment, she says, there were a number of studies after that that looked at it that debunked it.
Well, all the studies that looked at it afterwards were using a lower dose oral vitamin C. When you take something orally, the ability to be absorbed from your gut into your blood is a percentage that gets absorbed.
When you give it IV, 100% of it, 100% of it is going into your bloodstream.
So if you give 100 milligrams orally and you're given 1,000 milligrams of IV, well, first of all, the IV is going to be much higher anyway.
Pressure Medicine Debate00:15:15
Maybe one out of 100, for example, like aluminum is actually a great and great example.
You take aluminum orally versus IV, it's one to a thousand ratio.
So in other words, you take 1,000 milligrams of aluminum orally, 1 milligram is going to get absorbed into your bloodstream.
You take it IV, 1,000 milligrams is getting into your bloodstream because you're directly injecting it directly.
So they looked at lower milligram dosages of vitamin C orally compared to the high dose IV, and that's why they weren't able to validate the study later.
And to this day, to my knowledge, they haven't looked at the, they haven't, nobody's looked at this again.
Does high-dose vitamin C work?
You know, it appears as though it does have a significant effect because there's biologic plausibility, and they have that study, that famous study, that showed those outcomes.
What made you like interested in all of this aside from the COVID vaccine?
Well, the autism rates skyrocketing, right?
In 1970, it was like one in 10,000.
And then in 1988, it started to go up to 1 in 1,000.
And then from there, it increased to 2022, it was 1 in 31.
So something caused that to happen.
Now, do I see an acute change in the emergency department?
No, because I'm not watching people over time, but there's no question there's a lot of chronic disease.
There's a lot of acute infections.
There's a lot of neurobehavioral problems that I'm seeing now that we saw a lot less of, say, 20 years ago.
There's nothing actually you can see by seeing when you're taking care of patients.
And maybe that's why this corruption has been able to take place.
But also, what's his name?
Robert Malone.
He was actually pushing the vaccines initially.
I remember he got into an argument with somebody early early on when he first started becoming in the public view.
He got into a really pretty harsh argument with another person who was arguing against the vaccine, the COVID vaccine, and he was promoting it.
But he saw his opinion change over time.
Is he 100% on board?
Honestly, there's a lot of things that, again, a lot of the data that I would present is really much more, like these people haven't quite made it yet, a lot of them.
They haven't quite made it to really seeing the absolute truth.
And I don't know if it's intentional or not intentional.
Maybe they're just ignorant and maybe they're just, they'll eventually see the light.
But I think I actually have a very optimistic view that I think things are going in the right direction.
And I think where we're going to get to is where we all right now feel it needs to be.
And we want it to be there now.
I for sure want this to be.
I would like this truth to be out like that, you know, but it's just taken a while.
There's definitely a reason to be suspicious.
There's definitely a reason to not wholeheartedly, universally in every situation, every doctor, to trust them.
No.
Because look, we have seen that there are problems.
But I think that the question really is more like: you need to be, are you asking questions?
When it comes to pharmaceuticals, medications, I agree with you 100%.
There are other things as well.
Fractures, other injuries.
I mean, where there is a role for medicine, the allopathic doctor or osteopathic doctor, there is a role.
Occasionally people do need an antibiotic for a bacterial infection.
At this point in time, I'm not really thinking that cranberry juice is going to solve it.
They need antibiotics.
Would cranberry juice prevent it?
Maybe.
Maybe a mild UTI, maybe.
Here's the example.
Number one, if there's any kind of adverse outcome of the patient, either the chart's going to get, not either, it's going to get reviewed in the hospital by committee.
Wait, wait, wait.
What?
The standard of care automatically includes pharmaceuticals?
Yeah.
Absolutely.
So you'll be penalized for not giving a tetanus shot to somebody that doesn't need it.
Well, if they meet the CDC indication for it, then I would be expected that I would offer it.
Knowing what I know now about the tetanus shots, I'm not pushing them.
Now, say a year ago, I would offer it for sure, and I wouldn't pressure them because I just don't do that.
I would feel like I'm doing something possibly good, right?
So I inform them that this is the protocol.
And they have a choice.
I sort of phrase it differently now because I'm not going to push it on them.
Here's the problem.
The problem is this.
There are still cases of tetanus, right?
Now, in the real world, is that if they have tetanus, they'll come back to the ER, they'll get treated, whether they get treated with the antibiotics or even intubation or just supportive care, whatever the case is.
Then at that point in time, if it looks like standard of care wasn't delivered, that's when the penalizations come in, come into play.
The tetanus vaccine needs to be eliminated.
I agree with you.
But the outcomes of the standard practice has to also change.
That's the only way you're going to get all done.
It's not all that way.
We're talking about tetanus.
I see that all vaccines should be eliminated.
And you've just done months and months worth of studies.
Do you see where I'm wrong when I say that?
No.
And that's basically why I am changing my practice into integrated medicine.
That's why I'm doing that because in that practice, it won't be in the matrix that forces me to do things like that.
So there's definitely.
I'm making changes.
I have a friend.
I have a friend who is an ER doctor.
He got fired from his job as an ER doctor because he was doing some Ayurvedic medicine in the emergency department.
Because, you know, it's not harming anybody.
You know, it's not that he wasn't replacing it with the standard of care.
He was just, he was doing it as an adjunct.
So, hey, here's how you can be healthier.
You keep saying standard of care.
Define that by the book, like by the book, what you know as its official definition, and then tell me what standard of care really means.
Standard of care basically is really adhering to guidelines, really.
That's really what it comes down to.
And the guidelines are based on published data generally.
It may not even exist at all, published data.
But what happens is they get an expert panel and they have a consensus.
They meet and have a consensus of what they think the best practice is.
For example, giving blood pressure medicine and certain, and like intracranial bleeds, strokes, thoracic dissections, all these different high diagnoses with high mortality, acute problems, where they're all consensus because there's no data showing actually bringing the blood pressure down acutely helps anybody.
So they get an expert panel and they decide what they think the best thing to do is.
And that's why these recommendations are changing all the time.
Because you may get a different group of doctors and a couple years later, five years later, or 10 years later, that will decide something else.
In fact, when I took my oral boards, one of the scenarios I failed on is a thoracic dissection because I didn't give the blood pressure medicine.
Because I knew that blood pressure medicine didn't change any outcome.
I knew that.
They needed to go for surgery to get their thoracic aorta replaced.
That's what they needed to do.
And the person who was the examiner kept asking me, well, the blood pressure is going up.
What are you going to do?
I'm like, let's give the patient more morphine.
Call the thoracic surgeon.
And then it went on and on and on for like 10, 15 minutes about the blood pressure.
And I'm like, I'm not giving blood pressure medicine.
As it turns out, when I got my report later, that was the problem.
I was supposed to give IV blood pressure medicine.
That is standard of care.
You're going to want to have a place where you have a guarantee on your funds as we go into a lower interest rate environment.
Banks will be stressed out when the commercial real estate crisis happens.
Right now, you can get a guarantee, yes, a guarantee on your principal and get a 29% bonus.
If you're younger than 65 years of age, we can utilize an insurance-based contract that has been around for over 100 years.
And guess what?
You get a guarantee on your funds.
You get a guarantee on your principal.
We want to help you find a guarantee on your funds that are actually outside of banking laws, outside of securities laws.
Right now, as interest rates are getting lowered, we only have this special running to November 1st.
Go to GreenMoneySolutions.com, fill out your information, and let's just see if you qualify.
You have ER doctors and hospitalists giving IV blood pressure medicine to people, okay, for elevated blood pressure, related problems, right?
I can tell you, all the research shows when you give an IV blood pressure medicine, okay, you increase ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and death.
When you bring someone's blood pressure down acutely, you don't actually help them.
And what you have to look at, you have to look at the pressure, the pressure in the systemic body is different than the pressure in the brain.
The brain has something called autoregulation.
It autoregulates its own pressure up to a certain point.
So after that point, with the given blood pressure medicine, they disrupt the autoregulation.
It can cause strokes and death that way, right?
There is not a single study under the sun that exists that improves outcome by acutely lowering the blood pressure.
So what I'll do to make everybody happy, to make the patient happy, to make the inpatient doctor happy, to make the lawyers happy, I'll give a PO dose.
I'll give you an oral dose of blood pressure medicine.
It's kind of a game I play because I'm addressing the problem because everybody's brainwashed into thinking that actually you have to do it, but the oral medicine has not been shown to cause harm.
Say 15 years ago when I wasn't doing it, I would get a lot of pushback.
In fact, I got called in the office.
I was basically fired from a job related to not doing this.
That was one of the things that I actually left.
I didn't really get fired.
I was being threatened basically because I didn't treat the blood pressure.
And I said, there's no evidence.
The evidence-based medicine tells us that there's no benefit.
There's only harm.
So back then, there was a lot of pushback.
Nowadays, at least it's known well enough where it's accepted.
And what I do actually now is I actually put some research articles in my note and some references showing that if I treat the blood pressure, again, the mean archive has to be under, say, 140 for a non-hyperintensive or under 160 for a hypertensive person, as long as they meet that criteria, which 95, 98% of the patients are below those numbers when they're elevated blood pressure.
Then I put the references in my note showing that this is why I'm not treating the blood pressure because I'm not going to cause harm.
So since I started doing that and now that information is starting to come a little bit more, I don't get any pushback.
Again, the primary care doctors, they send out or the hospitalists or whatever doctors are seeing what I'm doing, because in ER, you're in a fishbowl.
Everybody's looking to see what we're doing.
And so I don't have any problems anymore.
I can still practice medicine in a safe manner and not cause harm and not get pushback.
But that's a big one.
This is one that all the doctors need to be, just like the vaccines.
This is basically a scam of treating blood pressures in the ER, in the hospital, acutely.
How many times do I get a patient being sent to me by an ENT doctor, an ophthalmologist, a primary care doctor, a dentist?
I can go on and on for the blood pressure so high, they send it to the ER.
No symptoms, right?
Why is the pressure high?
Because their adrenaline is released because whether they're in pain, they're anxious, they're nervous, whatever the case is.
This is the way God made our bodies.
Everybody's blood pressure goes up and down.
I said, now that I'm talking about this, because I've talked hundreds and hundreds of times to patients, my blood pressure is probably higher than yours right now.
Okay, so we're not going to treat it acutely because we're going to cause harm.
And sometimes I pull up in the screen, I show them the research because they're sent in by the primary care doctor because they think it's an emergency for their blood pressure, right?
And so, and I'm not going to, I'm not going to, because what the only difference thing I can do compared to what they can do is I can give an IV medicine and they can't in the office.
So I can bring, I said I can bring in something like that if I wanted to, but I'm not going to do that because that can cause a stroke.
Are other doctors like you secretly coming up with workarounds to avoid being sanctioned or penalized or fired for going outside of the quote-unquote standard of care to actually treat or save patients?
It seems like to me, I don't know anybody who's come up with this workaround.
In fact, I've even presented this when I was in faculty in a medical school teaching residence.
I've actually talked about this in an amphitheater of over 100 people and trying to give people tips of how to deal with this problem because we've talked about this.
ER doctors, most ER doctors know this.
Most, most well-trained ER doctors know what I'm saying, and they won't treat the blood pressure with IV medicine.
Most internists in the hospital don't know it and they'll treat, they'll give us a hard time.
Why aren't we treating it?
I don't know anybody who has a workaround.
I've developed this myself and I've shared it with people.
I think it's a great way to do it because that way I can accomplish not harming the patient.
You mentioned earlier something about not being able to get a code when you were entering a diagnosis.
Yeah.
What was that code called again?
The ICD-10 code.
That is the diagnostic code that's the database of all diagnoses around the world actually.
That is there so that they can track diagnoses and also for billing.
It used to be we could make our own diagnosis of.
And I think the problem there is that the billing companies didn't have that on their list.
So now they have implemented this system where you can only pick from a list of diagnoses.
And those lists ultimately end up making some pretty big bank, don't they?
Right.
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, you know, healthcare is a business is a big business, a big business, yeah, for sure.
No question about that.
Vaccines and Incentives00:15:36
And that's how they were able to implement the vaccines, right?
They're incentivizing the doctors.
It's all about money.
And again, most of the doctors are just brainwashed.
Okay, they're incentivized by money, too.
Are there doctors out there knowing what I know and just still giving it and getting to pay for it?
I don't know.
I don't know any like that.
Most doctors don't even haven't looked at the research anyway, but I think that the doctors that I know that, like, for example, with a COVID or awake for COVID, they wouldn't play in the sandbox.
They wouldn't, like, I have a friend who's an ER doctor.
Very, very high moral guy.
He's a partner in the group.
He basically, he never wore a mask.
He never didn't get injected with that kill shot.
And he was prescribed.
He was getting in trouble all the time, but he didn't care.
And he made it through.
It's surprising he made it through without getting fired, actually.
I mean, part is because he was a partner in the group.
But why didn't the hospital demand to get fired?
I don't know.
He was probably very close to that.
I think we should start getting into the data.
Okay.
Tom Lanovic and Shaw in 2011, they published a study in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.
And what they did is they looked at the vaccine schedule and correlated in the aluminum content in the United States, and they correlated that with outcome, the outcomes of autism spectrum disorder.
They also looked at six Western countries that also vaccinate, right?
So the U.S. data is from, they got this prior to the age of six, in other words, those who were vaccinated, they got that from the CEC data.
So six to 21 years old, to look at the outcome of autism, they took that data from the U.S. Department of Education annual reports to Congress in 1991 and 2008.
So they were able to get this data, right?
And then they also looked at the six countries they looked at, UK, Australia, Canada, Sweden, Finland, and Iceland.
The beginning of the paper, before they show you the data that they got, they go into this description of something called Asia.
What Asia is, it's well-known, not controversial, chronic diseases caused by the aluminum in the adjuvants, the adjuvant aluminum in the vaccines, right?
So it's called autoimmune inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
The adjuvant is aluminum.
That's what we talked about before.
Aluminum is put in there to make it last long.
It's called the Depot effect.
If the vaccine lasts longer, theoretically, it'll be more immunogenic and it'll work better theoretically.
But so they say, well, and they comment in the article, if this Asia is accepted in adults, why is it not accepted in kids?
Because as we talked about before, babies have, you know, we talked about broadband-brain barrier and the development of the brain.
And then also the doses are higher.
So it's certainly plausible that this could be causing autism.
They sort of just spell it out, and then they go into the research and show you the data.
What they showed is there's a dose response between the micrograms of aluminum, cumulative exposure in these kids in the U.S. data compared to autism at six to 12 years old.
So they definitely have a correlation of, you know, the more mercury, I'm sorry, the more aluminum in micrograms, the more likely they have autism spectrum disorder.
They also looked at number of vaccines.
They just looked at how many vaccines they get.
They also showed the more vaccines, the more likelihood they have autism spectrum disorder.
Again, this article is showing the same outcome as many other articles.
This is not conspiracy.
All these researchers are showing the same thing.
And then they looked at the six Western countries.
And what they looked at there is they looked at which ones introduced the vaccine earlier in life.
In other words, how many countries introduced it first day of life or up to three months?
And how many of them start at like, say, four months or six months, whatever.
And they found the correlation, the countries that introduced the vaccine earlier have a higher likelihood of autism spectrum disorder in that country and the prevalence of the country.
So it's clear-cut, you know, by country, you know, each country, you know, they introduced it earlier on were of an effect.
Albert Beretti, 2021, published an article in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology.
And he looked at, he kind of looked at a lot of different information that's out there in the literature.
This is more of a review article rather than an experiment.
And what he looked at, he looked at the published data that's out there showing more aluminum in vaccines correlates with more autism spectrum disorder.
Some of the articles we've already shown you, I've already mentioned.
He looked at all the mechanisms of how aluminum works in the body, all the published data on that.
And it is able to prove in the article that aluminum is a neurotoxin, right?
And he also looked at, he reported on this, the study I talked about with other countries that are vaccinating more and some other data.
And he showed that the countries that vaccinate higher vaccine have higher vaccination rates, have higher cases of autism-specum disorder.
And they also looked at the safe amounts, which I'll talk about a little bit later, but he says the safe amounts are based on diets in mice, okay, which he says basically it's inadequate, inadequate safety amounts.
So, you know, if you think about it, you know, if somebody's exposed to aluminum, very often you're going to have some damage to the brain, but you're not going to have an acute change in behavior, like, right?
Unless you have a really, really high dose.
So they're looking at mice, first of all.
Is mice a human?
No.
And the other thing is they're looking at how well do they eat their diets.
You know, they are able to consume the same amount of food.
So they give them so much aluminum, you know, micrograms per kilogram of body weight, and they stop, when they change, they alter their diet, that's considered the concentration that would be safe for a human being.
And by the way, I also want to point out there's two concepts in toxicology.
One is called stochastic, one's non-stochastic.
In other words, one is probability and one is not probability.
There's an effect.
Like, for example, probability of like radiation causing cancer, right?
So there's an increased probability if you're exposed to more radiation, more likely you get cancer.
That's just a probability.
A person may be exposed for a long time and not get cancer, for example, right?
Vice versa, but it's a statistic.
There's other things that are, there are toxins that are not considered statistics.
They're not probability, like mercury and aluminum.
In other words, they are not compatible with human life.
So even a little bit is not healthy.
But we are given these guidelines of what is acceptable to be safe.
But it's not up to probability.
There's no safe amount.
In fact, aluminum is a toxin to every living organism on Earth.
So there's really no safe amount.
So why is it allowed to exist?
It's a good question.
And this is an article I'm going to show you regarding.
It's fascinating that it's put in feeding for neonates and neonatal ICU.
It's put in the, it's called TPN, which is, well, we'll talk about that in a minute.
So it's actually very interesting because why do they put aluminum in TPN?
Interestingly, they pointed out in the article is that when mercury that was in the vaccines in the 1990s that supposedly was taken out, but it really wasn't taken out, it was just reduced as they were increasing the vaccine schedule.
By the way, just as an aside, when the parents were complaining to their congressmen that the kid got autism from the vaccine way back when, which caused them to alter the amount of mercury, they were noticing a sudden change because there was a lot of mercury in the vaccines, right?
So what they did instead is they increased the number of vaccines and put a smaller amount of the mercury.
So guess what?
You're not going to notice it.
You get the same effect, right?
You're going to have a neural, it's a neurotoxin, but it's much more of a gradual change because they have increased number of vaccines, smaller amount.
So the total amount of mercury, I don't know how it compares exactly, but it's probably very similar.
When you have more vaccines and smaller amount, you just don't notice a sudden change.
So think about that.
When they introduce these vaccines just so that they can introduce this mercury.
If you look at the history of smallpox, which really did not eradicate smallpox, it wasn't the vaccine that did it.
It was not the vaccine that did it.
It was not the vaccine, the smallpox vaccine.
When you look at the corruption that occurred in the 1700s and 1800s of the vaccine industry then, it's quite clear that the vaccines are really intended to harm the population.
Yeah.
Yeah, because when you're telling me that parents were quote unquote complaining about their kids developing autism, and then as a result, what they do is they reduce the amount of harmful toxins, neurotoxins, and then just give more for different vaccines that they're just arbitrarily introducing.
That tells me that they're insistent that every child gets a certain amount of these neurotoxins in their bodies.
So what this article points out, okay, is that when they decrease the mercury amount per vaccine, you know what they did?
They increased the aluminum concentration in the vaccines, too.
So think about that.
They're given for two different reasons.
The mercury is put in as a preservative.
The aluminum is put in there as an adjuvant.
Completely different reasons.
Why would they need to increase, this is what the article is saying.
Why would they need to increase the aluminum because they're decreasing the mercury?
Think about that.
And that's why we're seeing the autism rates go skyrocket, basically, over the past couple of few decades.
Is there a scientific justification?
No.
No.
Is there a medical justification?
No.
There's no medical justification.
Again, the adjuvant theory, which we can talk about, it's just a theory.
It's not really been proven.
I've reviewed the literature, and I guarantee you that the vast majority of doctors who are giving out vaccines have not reviewed the literature on aluminum as an adjuvant.
They've just really been given that reason and accepted it.
There is no data showing improved outcomes.
That antigen is more and more immunogenic, and the vaccine is going to work better because you put aluminum in it.
But that's the theory.
That's the theory.
And then the mercury, all they have to do is make single-dose vials and make it sterile, which they do to many, many drugs.
You don't have to put mercury.
Mercury is a preservative.
If you have a multi-dose vial, fine, you need a preservative of some sort, right?
Because they're going to be introducing potentially bacteria when they put the needle back in there, if it's not done correctly.
But if there's single-dose vials, you don't need any preservative anyway.
So there was no reason to put mercury in the vaccines to begin with.
So if you were to ask a pharmaceutical rep or CEO, somebody that works or has an interest in big pharma, what would be their justification?
What would be their reason if you said, why is there mercury in these shots?
Well, they'll tell you because it's a preservative.
That's why.
That's why they say it.
That's why they'll say it.
But you know that it's harmful.
Well, they may convince themselves into thinking that, oh, it's just small amounts.
It doesn't really matter.
That'll be the only explanation for it.
But the explanation doesn't match the data.
Right.
And that's the point.
The point is that there's a lot of data already out.
There's going to be more coming out, I think, very soon.
But there's already a lot of data out showing harm.
For real.
There's no data showing safety.
Any of the safety, there's a guy from Stanford who published a, well, he started an Excel spreadsheet that he enabled other researchers to, this happened last April.
He put it out and he had other researchers to basically put in all these articles showing safety in vaccines, okay?
So actually, I have a copy of it.
I was able to get Sexcel spreadsheet.
I can't, you can no longer add to it.
There were 270 articles showing safety, right?
First of all, half of the articles aren't even on the vaccine schedule, right?
So it's like chlamydia, a vaccine for chlamydia, a vaccine for cholera, a vaccine for anthrax.
They're not even on the vaccine schedule.
So I didn't even look at the results.
The ones that are actually on the vaccine schedule, they're looking at acute reactions.
They're not looking at ADD, autism spectrum disorder.
They're not looking at any of these outcomes.
None of them.
And it's stunning.
It's amazing to me that they've all considered themselves these are the safety studies.
Well, the safety studies, you need to look at vaccinated versus unvaccinated, and you need to look at the outcome that matters, something that could be a permanent disability.
Any of the articles that show, look at that, they all show harm.
There's not a single one out there.
And we talked about the gardasil.
That's the only one that they point to that they say the safety.
And I looked into it and we discussed it already, right?
The gardasil vaccine, that's not a safety study.
It does not show safety.
That's the only one that really exists that looks at significant outcomes.
And in this case, the outcome would be major adverse reaction, which would result in hospitalization, something life-threatening or death.
And they say for this Gardasil that there was a safety study.
Yeah.
Was there, in fact, a safety study?
Well, it was done by the drug company with no external review.
And the funny thing is actually the reporting actually, that there isn't, it's not safe.
If you look at it, at least there's some level of honesty.
In other words, they didn't make up data.
They did report their findings, but the way they present the findings is deceptive.
And there's no published data in PubMed on the Gardasil and safety of Gardasil.
So Mawson and colleagues in 2017 published an article in the Journal of Translational Science.
And this was a cross-sectional study.
And what they did is they looked at surveys from homeschooled, parents of homeschooled kids from three different, from four different states, Florida, Louisiana, Missouri, and Oregon.
Vaccines and Childhood Diseases00:05:52
And they looked at these kids, six to 12 years old, asking the parents, have they had any of these diseases?
They looked at there were about 666 kids, and the parents didn't know why they were being asked.
And the survey was like, did they get a vaccine or no vaccine, right?
And so they just answered the questions.
And what they came up with, odds ratios again, okay?
You know, so allergic rhinitis, 30.
A 30 to 1 odds of getting allergic rhinitis was basically an allergic, you know, nasal congestion, cough, whatever, that kind of stuff.
30 times more likely, those who are vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
Just general allergies, 3.9.
ADHD, 4.2, vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
Against 4.2 to 1.
The odds are 4.2 to 1, you get an ADHD compared to the unvaccinated.
Learning disabilities, 5.2.
Any chronic condition, 2.4.
Optitis media, which is an immiddle ear infection you treat with antibiotics, 3.8.
Pneumonia, 5.9.
And neurodevelopmental disorders increased by 560% in preterm vaxed patients.
In this study, you find, you know, chronic disease, right?
Like allergies, that kind of stuff, right?
Eczema.
You find neurodevelopmental problems.
We find acute infections, increased acute infections also, and those who are vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
Now, what they also did is there's an internal control to study, which is nice, okay?
The likelihood of them getting chickenpox, whooping cough, which is pertussis, which is contributory with an antibiotic, and rubella.
Okay, they have a lower likelihood in those who are vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
Great.
That's what we're after.
We're after that lower likelihood of getting those, and we're willing to allow these other problems to happen.
If you get rubella or whooping cough or chickenpox, right?
It's a self-limited problem you get, and then you get over it, and then you go on with your life.
If you get allergic rhinitis or allergies, that may be a lifelong problem.
Or ADHD or autism.
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
Those are bigger problems.
Right, of course.
Yeah.
And don't, and you know, severe autism spectrum disorder can be quite devastating.
I mean, they're just taking all types.
They're the ones that, you know, these kids like 24-70, 24-7 care.
They can't talk.
They can't eat this.
Every single American knew this.
Hey, the trade-off is your kid may get chickenpox or rubella, but there's a really good chance that your child will have autism or ADHD.
Yeah.
If 100% of Americans knew that, how many of them do you think would subject their kids to one of these shots?
Zero.
And I think that I don't think, I'm very confident.
It's going to take some time, but I'm very confident we're going to get there.
That's what I'm, I'm very confident we're going to get there.
I think this is getting exposed.
And that's what we're doing right now.
So Hooker and Miller published a paper in 2020 in the journal SAGE.
And this was a retrospective cohort from 2005 to 2015.
They looked at data from three pediatric practices and they looked at over 1,500 records.
And they calculated odds ratios of vaccinated versus unvaccinated and these outcomes.
And they defined vaccination up to the age of one.
And the outcomes were over three years of age, three years, five years.
And they found the odds ratio of developmental delay greater than two.
In other words, a two-to-one ratio of vaccine versus unvaccinated, having a diagnosis of developmental delay.
Asthma, 4.5.
More likely in the vaccinated.
Ear infections, 2 to 2.5.
And I give the range because they looked at three years and five years.
And they did a control.
They did head injury control.
And they found no association of head injury with vaccines.
So in other words, it's not just coming to the doctor and getting the diagnosis necessarily.
There's no association with head injury and vaccines.
But there is an association of vaccines with these other outcomes.
And they also looked at up to a certain age of getting vaccinated.
So in other words, they looked at developmental delay and vaccinated up to the age of six months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months.
So if they've been vaccinated up to that point, then they look at these outcomes later at the age of over three years of age.
And if they were vaccinated up to six months, they get a 95% chance of, I'm sorry, increased developmental delay by 95%.
If they were vaccinated up to 12 months, they found 118% increased risk of developmental delay.
If they were vaccinated up to the age of 18 months, 192% increased risk of developmental delay.
And if they've been vaccinated for 24 months, 251% likelihood of developmental delay diagnosis in the vaccinated.
Is it safe to say that all of these conditions are actually vaccine injuries?
There's no question that the increased risk of these diseases is caused by the vaccines.
Is it the only thing?
You know, there's poisons in the foods.
Crude Oil and Childhood Eczema00:02:48
There may be other toxins out there that they may be exposed to, maybe contributing.
But if I were to, an educated guess based on my look at the literature, I think that the vaccines are probably the biggest contributor.
That's what I think.
What else could cause eczema or chronic allergies or peanut allergies or ADHD or autism in a six-year-old or an eight-year-old?
Well, all the poisons in the foods, you know, like you know what natural flavors is in the food?
You know, the FDA does not have any responsibility to check what natural flavors is.
So it's a blank check.
And if you look in the, if you go to the supermarket and you go to all these packaged foods, you'll find natural flavors in nearly everything.
I haven't found a single sports bar without natural flavors.
Okay.
Or actually, or seed oils.
So seed oils also is a problem.
Seed oils is derived from petroleum, from crude oil.
There's a website you can go to if you want to open up a company to make you, you know, whether that's soybean oil, palm oil, you know, canola oil, vegetable oil, you pick your oil and you pick your country where you want to open up the company, when you want to set it up.
You go to the website and you click what you want to do and you pay the money and you can have a whole process of these seed oils.
And every single one of them, if you look back with the processing, the entire process, it starts with crude oil.
We were not designed to be eating crude oil.
So, and they just refine it and refine it and refine it for human consumption.
But that's another problem.
So there's, I mean, there's a lot we can talk about regarding foods, but I think that if I were to, I think that the vaccines is the biggest problem.
As I said, you know, regarding the, you know, the aluminum, it's aluminum being, in fact, there's aluminum in food.
There's aluminum and baby formula.
I guess what I'm asking is, is it possible that a child is just born with eczema or a allergy?
This Henry Ford study, okay, in Michigan, that's really what it's telling us that many of these diseases don't exist.
I'm not saying that it never exists, but it's so unlikely for a child to develop these chronic problems if there's no toxins going into the child.
It's extremely, I never say never.
Increasing Abnormal Genes00:02:49
Is it never?
You know, probably not.
There's probably cases that are, you know, genetic, you know, but we assume that they're all, you know, a genetic related problem, you know, inevitable.
You know, there's nothing we can do.
We don't know what the reason is.
Stress, anxiety, feeling out of alignment.
You don't have to live this way.
At Ezra Healing, we guide you back into balance with our new health paradigm.
Personalized options and soul-centered practices.
It's not about quick fixes.
It's about true transformation.
Our philosophy is do no harm model of care, and we are really focusing on people with vaccine injuries.
Our mission is to help people understand what cancers are and bring solutions and relieve pain and suffering.
No waiting rooms, no gaslighting.
The ivermectin is a moment in time in your life to get rid of parasites.
And if you're struggling with cancer, we get rid of cancer.
If we have a vaccine injury, we're going to alleviate that.
But the goal is to, you know, eliminate anything foreign in your body.
But we use these supplements, these medications, for a point in time in our life, eliminating anything that lowers your vibe.
In genetics, there's this concept, the abnormal gene in a population, it's a formula.
The formula is the square root of mu over S. What does that mean?
The square root of mu is the mutation rate.
And the S is the selection out of the population.
So in other words, if the numerator, the top number is going up by the mutation rate from chemical toxins that can change your DNA, it can increase mutation rate.
And say 200 years ago, the person would have died without modern medicine or without whatever, would have potentially been selected out of the population and died from whatever the problem is.
But instead today, we're now keeping them into the population, right?
So the selection rate out is going down.
So now the numerator is going up, the denominator is going down, so the abnormal genes in the population is just increasing.
Aluminum's Impact on Premature Babies00:03:07
There's a couple of these infant studies that really are powerful in my mind.
This one is powerful.
I'll show you why.
This was published in 1997.
Bishop and colleagues published it in the New England Journal of Medicine, Creme de la Crum Journal.
What they did is they look at premature infants, born less than 34 weeks, in the neonatal ICU.
And these babies sick enough to be in the ICU, and also the babies, you couldn't give them oral feeding.
In fact, they had to get IV feeding called TPN, which stands for total parental nutrition.
They looked at 227 of these babies from 1988 to 1991.
And what they found is that the babies had TPN, total parental nutrition by IV, like protein, carbohydrate, and fat through the IV, who had the standard TPN versus a lower concentration of aluminum TPN.
So the standard TPN has 45 micrograms per kilogram per day of aluminum.
As I said, aluminum is a human toxin and in fact it's toxic for every living organism on earth.
There's nothing that's okay with aluminum basically.
Before I came here today, I tried to Google it, figure maybe there's some other reason that I don't know about.
And what I got was I just got literature describing some outcomes of aluminum and TPN, like some scientific journals.
There was no explanation, actually.
There's no reason to put aluminum in TPN for these premature neonates in the neonatal ICU.
So they looked at standard aluminum, which is 45 micrograms per kilogram per day, compared to a lower amount that they had to make special, which was 4 to 5 micrograms per kilogram per day.
So a 1 tenth amount of aluminum.
And they looked at, so the babies that had this TPN for 10 days or more had a significant correlation.
When these babies turned 18 months of age, they did this test called the Bailey Mental Development Index.
And what they found is the ones who had the TPN with the higher amount had a 10-point lower score.
And the ones had, and the average, the mean score in the population is about 100.
The ones that had a really low score, which is like the bottom 17 percentile, where they had 85 points or lower, really low scores, it was 35% in the ones with standard TPN versus 17% in those who had the lower TPN.
So they were able to show that aluminum in the TPM was associated with these bad, decreased neurologic outcomes.
And the authors also in the article point out that this mental development test at the age of 18 months has been, in other articles, has been associated with lower IQ when they grow up.
And we know that it's well known that neurodevelopmental delay increases the risk of educational problems in later years.
Vaccines, SIDS, and Apnea00:15:58
A researcher named Joy Garner in 2022, she published a study in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
And she looked at survey data from 2019 to 2020 in 1,800 vaccinated children in 46 states and compared to the CDC data for the population that's been vaccinated, which is about 99.74%.
So that's the vaccinated group.
The unvaccinated group is the 1,800 unvaccinated.
And she looked at children and she looked at when these children became adults.
And they looked at chronic diseases.
So the chronic diseases in children, diabetes, gastrointestinal problems, allergies, neurodevelopmental delays, birth defects, epilepsy, and cancer, kids.
And in the vaccinated, 27%, okay?
And the unvaccinated who got vitamin K and the maternal, and the mother got a vaccine during pregnancy, 13%.
So they're unvaccinated, but the mother got, mother got vaccinated and they got vitamin K, 13%.
Now, you take the same unvaccinated kids, no vitamin K shot, no maternal vaccine during pregnancy, 2.25%.
So that's your number that should exist, at least, in the population in terms of chronic having chronic diseases.
Instead, we got now this vaccinated group, 27%.
And they looked at an adults, chronic diseases.
Now, the chronic disease they looked at in adults, coronary artery disease, diabetes, gastrointestinal problems, allergies, arthritis, epilepsy, cancer.
60% in adults have one of these problems if they've been vaccinated when they were kids.
And then those who, if you look back, were they unvaccinated with vitamin K shot and the maternal vaccines during pregnancy, 12%.
And unvaccinated, no vitamin K shot, no maternal vaccine, 4.5%.
So clearly, just yet another article showing harm in all these pharmaceuticals we're injecting into people.
All of our information as doctors derives from PubMed.
Derives from all the information that's been published, right, that's how we treat diseases.
We take the scientific articles.
We talked about before that there can be consensus also.
Whether that's biased or not, it's a separate issue.
But generally, we try to get evidence-based treatments and we call it evidence-based medicine.
We try to practice evidence-based medicine.
This is the evidence.
This is the evidence.
This is evidence-based medicine.
There's no evidence showing the opposite.
It doesn't exist.
Six months ago, I didn't know this stuff either, right?
I had to take a deep dive into it.
And the only reason why I took a deep dive is because I learned with what happened with the COVID vaccine.
And I figured that one out very early on.
And I'm like, well, what else?
What other corruption is out there?
You know?
And let me look into all the other vaccines.
This is what I found.
Do you know of anybody else that's done this?
No.
And not only that, I've taken, not only, again, I've taken, I think this is a very exhaustive list because, you know, even RK Jr. has said there's no studies that vaccinated versus unvaccinated before they're licensed.
Virtually every American would agree with my stance on vaccines, which is that vaccines should be tested like other medicines.
They should be safety tested.
And unfortunately, vaccines are not safety tests.
They're not, there's, and of the 72 vaccine doses now mandated, essentially mandated, they're recommended, but they're really mandated.
For American children, none of them, not one, has ever been subject to a pre-licensing placebo-controlled trial.
Yes, they have.
No.
Yes, they have.
Okay, let me just say something.
Dr. Fauci and many other people for many years said this.
Bobby Kennedy, when he says that, is wrong.
So I met with Dr. Fauci in 2016, you know, and I agreed to go on Trump's Vaccine Safety Commission.
And I was with Aaron Ziri and Lynn Redwood and a number of other people.
And we said to him, can you show us one test from any vaccine?
Pre-licensing safety test.
And he said, I'll send it to you.
I can't find one now.
He never did.
So we sued him.
Aaron Ziri and I sued HHS.
And after a year of litigation and stonewalling, they said that they could not provide a single safety study for any vaccine that is on the childhood schedule, pre-licensing safety study.
There are no studies showing safety.
Okay, but there are studies showing that they're unsafe.
There's no safety studies.
You're right.
There are none, still till today.
But there are safety studies showing that there's a lack of safety.
They're unsafe.
They do exist.
Not that many.
There's like, you know, say, you know, 15, 20 studies that I have, but depending on what we're looking at.
But this is all that's out there.
And every single one of them shows harm.
Why until today has nobody done what you've done?
I have no idea.
You know, it's, you know, it takes a strong interest, I guess, to do this.
I mean, like, who, I'm not sure what.
I have no idea.
I can't answer that question.
I can't.
And again, I'm giving the author, the year it was published, and in the journal.
So anybody can go and look this up and verify it.
They can validate.
They can debunk.
I'm happy to get people to say what you're saying is not true because it is true.
I've looked at all the studies and I'm just reporting on the results.
And you find me a study that shows that the vaccines vaccinated versus unvaccinated does not cause autism spectrum disorder or ADD or any of these things.
Like I know about SIDS because I'm a year doctor, right?
So when they bring a patient who stops breathing at home, like a six-month-old child or one-month-old, whatever it is, they turn blue, they stop breathing, they bring them in.
As long as they're still alive, obviously they can die at home.
But the idea is that we believe SIDS is a general, it's multifactorial.
That's what the current thinking is.
Primarily neurologic.
You know, why the brain's not, because the center of the base of the brain regulates breathing.
And if the base of the brain's not working, then the child will stop breathing.
And there's a lot of people who have written about this and spoken out about this, saying that there's no way it could be the vaccines because that's an immunologic problem, right?
So how can something, an immune using the immune system, how's that going to cause them to stop breathing?
It doesn't make any biologic sense, right?
But it's the excipients.
It's the excipients.
And that's what they're missing.
It's not about the antigen of the polioantigen.
That's not the problem.
The problem is all the additives they put in it that are toxic.
In any case, so let's talk about this article published by Neil Miller, 2021 in Toxicology Reports.
He looks at the VERES data, okay?
Now, I know that people have a problem with the VERES data because it only represents 1% of all data.
And the other thing is that you can be a non-doctor, report to it.
So, by the way, before COVID, nobody questioned the VARES data.
Nobody questioned it.
But some people want to question it now.
But the way this study was done, I don't think you can even question this data at all.
And so I'll tell you how it was done.
They looked at data between 1990 and 2019.
And they looked at cases of these children who died under the age of one, okay, and the ones who died after getting a vaccine.
So they looked at, they got the vaccine within 60 days.
You know, if they died within those 60 days, they looked at those kids, right?
And the number of SIDS cases they looked at is 1,048.
Total number of kids, 2,605.
In other words, about 1,500 were non-SIDS deaths.
So there's the SIDS and the non-SID deaths.
So they got the vaccine within 60 days they died.
Now, if it had nothing to do with the vaccine, there should be an even distribution of the death throughout that 60 days.
But what they found was 75% died within seven days.
50% of them died within three days of the vaccine.
So if they get the vaccine seven days later, 75% have died.
That means 25, the remaining 25% die between day seven and 60.
That means there was something that happened at the time they were given the injection.
And what's fascinating, this article that was published, they actually list seven other articles looking at the same thing in the past, including 1980, the CDC itself presented some study showing similar results.
The overall average is about 71% died within seven days and all these other seven studies that have been published showing the same thing.
Two of those studies, they died within, the 90% died within seven days.
Now we've got to think about biologic plausibility, and that's where this article comes in.
You know, how do the vaccine cause SIDS?
We talked about the, you know, it's a neurologic problem, okay?
And we talked about the fact that there's aluminum in the vaccines, which is a neurotoxin, there's murrican, there's a neurotoxin.
So what they did in this, so this Greenberg and colleagues, 2025, this year, published in the JAMA Pediatrics, okay, JAMA's a creme de la creme journal, okay?
And it was a randomized trial.
From 2018 to 2021, they looked at 223 infants in three U.S. neonatal ICUs, okay?
And they looked at, they were premature infants, born less than 33 weeks.
And they were all about six to 12 weeks of age, randomized.
Some received the two-month vaccine, they caught up to the two-month vaccine, and some received no vaccines.
And what they were looking for, they admitted them to the hospital, and they were watching, they got the two-month vaccine in the hospital, and they watched them in the hospital.
And what they were looking for is apnea.
Apnea means they stop breathing.
So there were two different categories of the apnea.
One is a breathing pause for 20 seconds.
In other words, the child stopped breathing for 20 seconds, or a pause of 15 seconds and the heart rate going below 80.
Usually in babies, the heart rate's much faster, so below 80 is very low for a baby.
So any one of those is the outcome they're looking for, and they compared the vaccinated versus unvaccinated.
And what they found is the vaccinated had a 24%, like 24% of them had apnea, and the unvaccinated, 10%.
So they did show a statistically significant difference in apnea.
So there's a study showing us that the vaccines increase the risk of apnea.
Apnea is what we believe causes SIDS, and there you have it.
There's a good explanation there.
So are you saying that it's your opinion that SIDS is caused by vaccine?
It's my opinion that it has definitely caused many cases.
Is it all cases?
I don't know.
But I can tell you that if a child has SIDS, God forbid, it's highly likely it's caused by the vaccine.
That's what I think.
Yeah.
Highly likely.
And the data shows that.
The data shows that.
And what's really important and what a lot of doctors are missing, there's biologic plausibility because we keep going back to it's the excipients.
Aluminum, mercury.
Those are neurotoxins.
Daly and colleagues in 2023 published an article in the Journal of Academic Pediatrics.
They looked at data from the CDC Vaccine Safety Data Link.
They looked at over 326 records.
And what they looked at, they looked at the cumulative aluminum by vaccines.
In other words, they took the amount of vaccines, calculated the amount of aluminum by 24 months, and correlated that with asthma when they became two to five years of age.
So up to the age of 24 months, they calculated how much aluminum from the vaccines correlated that with how many kids are getting asthma between the age of two and five years of age.
And they found that there was a dose response.
And for each one milligram increase in aluminum, a corresponding 19 to 26 percent increased risk of asthma.
I gave that range because they looked at asthma with and without eczema.
So either way, 19 to 26 percent without asthma with and without eczema, because eczema is also a chronic inflammatory problem, like asthma.
Asthma is an inflammatory problem of the lung.
Eczema is an inflammatory inflammatory problem of the skin.
So they're very similar pathophysiologists, just different parts of the body.
Historically, if somebody comes to you and, I mean, you're an emergency department doc and somebody is coming into the ED because they can't breathe and ultimately they're diagnosed with asthma.
Historically, before you did these studies, before you knew this, what did you attribute this asthma diagnosis to?
Like every other doctor, you don't know, idiopathic.
And we say it's we're idiots and we don't know the reason.
There's a lot of that, isn't there?
There's, I mean, idiopathic.
A lot of things.
Yeah, right.
Right.
But there's an elephant in the room.
And we need to look at it.
It's not so idiopathic anymore, is it?
Not really, not in my mind.
So there's another, there's something that's published that I want to share that was very interesting.
It's basically an educational piece based on the evidence.
Published, it was updated in 2024.
It's the Physicians for Informed Consent is the one that produces it.
And it's an evidence-based review for physicians.
And what they reported on, just based on literature that's out there, okay, information, 22 doses of the nine different vaccines containing aluminum from birth to age of 18 years of age include hepatitis B, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, hemophilus influenza B, pneumococcal, hepatitis A, human papillomavirus vaccine, and meningococcal vaccine.
So all these vaccines have aluminum, okay?
And they also reported that the Health and Human Services officially recognizes aluminum as a neurotoxin.
Okay?
In the Federal Register published in June 2003, warns that aluminum is a risk in infants because the reasons they give is limited kidney function.
It's also a risk because it's a neurotoxin.
But in other words, they can't eliminate it so fast.
So That's one of the features that I guess people don't really think about is they have decreased kidney function compared to an adult.
So now we are basing the maximum amount of aluminum in the vaccines based on a 1968 federal register, volume 33, number 6, which limits the aluminum to 850 micrograms per dose from 1968.
Aluminum Limits and Vaccine Doses00:11:39
For whatever reason, they decided in 1968 the maximum aluminum you can give anyone, anyone, including a child, is 850 milligrams a dose, adult or child.
Happens to be that any vaccine that's given, single vaccine, the maximum amount is 850 micrograms.
That's the maximum, which some of them have that, some of them have less, anywhere from 125 to 850.
But don't forget, when sometimes when the children have, they have to catch up on the vaccines, they get multiple doses the same day.
So they're exceeding this 1968, which is kind of old and maybe it should have been, should be updated, although the real number should be zero.
But we're going based on 1968 standard and they're getting multiple doses.
So they're already exceeding this old limit by the children who are getting injected with multiple doses.
Now, what's interesting, this is fascinating, there's another government agency called the ATSDR, which stands for Agency for Toxic Substances in Disease Registry.
Well, you know what they say?
Another government agency?
They say that the maximum amount of aluminum for a newborn is 3.3 micrograms per day.
Meanwhile, some of these vaccines have 850 micrograms.
Think about that.
So they give a gradation based on the age from newborn to 12 months.
Even a 12-month-old, they see that the AT SDR, they say that the maximum safe dose of aluminum is 9.3 micrograms per day.
9.3.
But some of the vaccines have to have up to 850 micrograms based on what's in the Federal Register.
So you know, the government, our own government, is giving us two different safety limits.
One's way lower than the other one.
So think about that.
I mean, that's fascinating.
And so a visit of a less than six-month-old baby may get pneumococcal, haemophilus influenza, hepatitis B, and a DTAP, which means diphtheria tetanus pertussis.
And that could be 1,225 micrograms of aluminum.
That's a very plausible scenario that might happen.
That has happened, sure, many, many times, regularly.
Yeah, there's something called a depot effect.
It was coined by this researcher from, his name is Alexander Glennie.
And this is from an article in the literature published in 2009 by Marrick and colleagues in a journal called Nature Reviews Immunology.
They go through the whole history of all the data up until 2009 looking at aluminum as an adjuvant and this depot effect.
So it was first described by Alexander Glennie.
He first published the findings in guinea pigs in 1926.
Then he did in humans in 1932.
What he found was the antibodies last against whatever the antigen is.
If they put aluminum in it, it lasts a little bit longer.
You get antibodies longer, farther out.
That's the whole idea behind it.
Why?
Because we can't metabolize aluminum because it's a human toxin.
Our body doesn't know what to do with it.
So as a result, you either link it up or mix it with the vaccine.
Ostensibly, the vaccine will last longer because the aluminum lasts longer.
That's the idea behind it.
That's what an adjuvant is.
And therefore, you're going to get a better immune reaction.
So it happened to be in 1950, 1955, two papers showed actually that doesn't happen.
And I don't think anybody's even looked at it since.
At least in this article up to 2009.
In other words, they haven't looked at antibody levels.
other thing is that there's also cellular immunity as well.
But there's been a lot of papers looking at mechanisms, like inflammatory cytokines.
There have been a number of papers looking at that, but that doesn't tell us anything.
They're just looking at how these cells interact with each other.
Basically, it creates more inflammation is what happens.
All these different inflammatory things are happening when you add aluminum.
But then the question is, yeah, what does the aluminum do to the human itself, which is a toxin?
And the other thing is, does it really make this vaccine work better?
Never been proven.
There are no studies saying, you know, this vaccine with aluminum makes a more effective polio vaccine or measles vaccine.
In other words, it doesn't decrease polio or measles in the population more effectively with aluminum versus without aluminum.
Nobody's done that study.
It doesn't exist.
I have something on polio I want to share afterwards.
You ever had a polio case in the ER?
No, but there's a new diagnosis called transverse myelitis, which is really similar to polio.
And what's happening, though, is because of the COVID vaccine, is that it's destroying people's immune systems.
When you destroy people's immune systems, you get all these other problems coming up.
And so this transverse myelitis is happening because of the COVID vaccine.
And in some scenarios, like in the Texas outbreak, first of all, the reality is even if it was just, even if there's a difference between transverse myelitis and polio, it may not be a difference.
It may be the same thing.
In other words, there may be polio cases happening, but we haven't detected polio in the water.
So how's that happening?
But there's a whole concept of immunology called viral immune escape.
So you're basically depressing the immune system of the population, allowing the viruses to go rampant more likely.
And this concept, I've never heard of the concept before, I looked it up before COVID.
Any doctor I work with, okay, friends, colleagues, never heard of the whole concept at all.
Never heard of it, because it's a vaccinologist, immunologist concept.
So we are at a level of immunology and vaccinology and medicine.
It's very rudimentary.
So people, they just automatically assume, what we've been told in the news, that these measles cases are happening because they're not getting vaccinated against measles.
Lots of children are not vaccinated, and then when they go abroad, they're exposed to measles, bring it home, and then it spreads among like-minded people after they return to the United States.
As you say, the whole age spectrum can be affected, all the way from infants to some adults.
So this is a new problem, and the answer is we've got to vaccinate our children.
And if you go abroad, check with your doctor first to make sure that your measles protection is up to date.
Now, Doctor, the decision to vaccinate or not has been one of quite a bit of debate over the years for parents of young children.
And parents fall on both sides of this issue very squarely.
But from your perspective, when you look at kind of the public risk, not just for one child, but the public risk of measles, is there any valid medical reason to not be vaccinated?
There is no reason not to vaccinate your child.
It's important for that child's safety.
It's important for the whole community.
The vaccines are safe.
They are effective.
Talk to your family doctor, talk to your pediatrician, and get your child vaccinated so that measles will not be reintroduced into the United States and spread.
It's a serious disease.
15% of these people who've had measles have been hospitalized.
It's much more likely that it's the depressed immune system allowing these things happening to people in addition to causing the toxicities from the vaccines as well.
Another article published in 2025 by Goldman and Cheng in the journal called International Journal of Medical Sciences.
And what they did is they go through all the different articles in the literature looking at basically how aluminum affects babies, right?
So they show all these studies from the literature looking at this enzyme called the cytochrome P450.
That's the enzyme that metabolizes a lot of these excipients and all the toxins in our body.
What they showed in the article is that immature infants have a lower likely, a reduced cytochrome P450 enzymes in their liver compared to full-term infants.
In fact, they can have like one-third to two-thirds the amount in full-term infants or even compared to adults.
So in other words, you looked at the literature published on the liver enzymes in infants.
The liver metabolizes all the toxins in our body, right?
So what's metabolizing the excipients?
What's metabolizing the aluminum?
Well, the cytochrome P450 is involved in metabolizing, getting rid of it.
So again, it's a neurotoxin.
It's used as an adjuvant, but you eventually want to get rid of it because you don't want to hang around in the body too long, right?
So you need to metabolize it.
Now, the babies have a more difficult time metabolizing it compared to adults.
And premature infants have an even more difficult time.
And the other thing is that even if you have a normal full-term baby, there's different polymorphisms.
In other words, there may be a baby that's not premature that just happens to not have the cytochrome P450 enzymes that is normal.
Occasionally, you have that.
You have a lot of cases like that.
So there's certain subgroups that work, some subgroups don't work.
The ones that do a really good job at metabolizing, there's some infants that just don't have them.
Because everybody's different.
The question is this, do pediatricians decide which baby to give it to?
Let's just say it's safe, hypothetically.
Say hypothetically it works as an adjuvant, which it doesn't.
But let's just say hypothetically, why aren't they looking at, oh, let's check their cytochrome P50 enzymes, see which one's able to metabolize it.
We'll give that one a dose.
Maybe the other one, let's monitor it and make sure the cytochrome P450 can handle it.
Then we'll give them a dose, right?
No, they don't do that.
How about the premature ones?
Same doses for the premature ones.
Okay?
I mean, think about that.
It's crazy.
It's like, there's variability in these babies' ability to metabolize the excipients, right?
And the other thing is this, the excipients, including aluminum, also depress the cytochrome P450 itself.
They've been able to show that in the literature.
So it harm, it decreases.
So when they get one dose, say at the age of one day old, and they get their second dose, they're going to now have a compromised ability to metabolize it the next time around.
Don't let the IRS rob you.
Where is your money going?
Over 4 million government credit cards by federal employees were used to make 90 million transactions with no accountability.
Doge has found $4.7 trillion in federal spending that is untraceable or fraudulent.
You work hard to pay your bills.
And a significant portion of your money is funneled to thieves and fraudsters through the taxes you pay to the IRS.
The IRS wants you to feel powerless.
Interferon's Role in Newborn Immunity00:15:52
Be a slave that shuts up and give them your hard-earned money.
But there is a way out of this slavery.
Freedom Law School has been teaching Americans for over 30 years that no law requires 99% of Americans to file and pay income tax.
None of their students who have stopped paying have gone to prison or had their bank account or property stolen by the IRS.
Go to freedomlawschool.org today to take seven steps to freedom from IRS deception, robbery, and slavery for freedom.
Go to freedomlawschool.org today.
How can somebody spend a decade studying medicine and be convinced that a newborn baby is going to be born and go sleep with a hooker or shoot up heroin?
Why would they need a half B shot and why would this cognitive dissonance or the refusal to see this by doctors be so widespread?
How does this happen?
It's all about trusting the popular narrative.
And you know, when you go through medical school in college, you know, you're trusting your professors to give you information that's accurate.
You have such trust in the system.
The system in the practice of medicine is very much controlled by the big pharma.
So this narrative, I mean, we learn all these mechanisms, which are great.
We learn pathophysiology and physiology.
This is all important stuff to know.
And we are given this narrative that the only solution is the man-made engineered chemicals, i.e., pharmaceuticals, in a lab, is the solution.
And you can see the mechanisms and how that works, and that's how you convince people, it convinces people.
But the reality is there are natural things that actually can make people healthy that we're ignoring.
That's in the literature.
This is in the public, you know, for example, like raw garlic or ginger.
These things actually improve outcomes.
What we are trained to believe, in fact, I remember I used to get offended when people would say, oh, they don't learn enough at nutrition and medical school.
I've been hearing this for decades.
We don't learn enough nutrition and we just treat disease.
And I didn't understand really what that meant.
Now I understand because the reality is there's nothing we can give to improve somebody's immune system to say fight a viral infection.
Now, if we have an antiviral to treat, like say a herpes lesion, we have an antiviral for that.
But most of these respiratory viruses, nearly all of them, basically, we don't have any antivirals to treat it.
There's no pharmaceutical.
So what do we do?
We give them Tylenol, get some rest, go home, drink a lot of fluid, you'll be fine.
But what we could be doing, we could be actually telling them that if you eat raw garlic, you'll actually stimulate your immune system and you will cure that viral infection much faster.
And not only that, if you take garlic every other day, fresh garlic, and chew it, then you can actually strengthen your immune system so you won't get sick.
Like we're not telling patients that, and guess what?
It's evidence-based medicine in PubMed.
I actually brought this in into medical school and I gave a couple lectures on it.
I know a lot of the faculty were, I think, very interested at the same time as being a little cynical.
Nobody told me I couldn't do it and nobody criticized me for it.
It became kind of big news in the medical school.
And when I gave a science-based lecture on garlic, it really blew people away, actually, because there's actually real science showing it improves glutathione, interferon alpha, interferon beta, nitric oxide.
That all these things happen.
Interferon alpha is like, we give it as a drug.
We give it as a drug to treat people who fail chemotherapy.
You know, when they're taking chemotherapy and it's failing to give, we can show the interferon can't improve outcomes, right?
So an interferon alpha is $11,000 a treatment.
Intiferrant beta is $22,000 a treatment.
It's also used for multiple sclerosis.
It's used to cure hepatitis B and hepatitis C, actually.
Intoferron is a pretty powerful drug.
It's not an antiviral, though.
It's a part of your own immune system.
So we're giving something that improves their immune system, stimulating their immune system with this drug, the pharmaceutical, and we're getting better outcomes.
Now, they haven't looked at it to see if it would cure cancer.
Theoretically, it may have some curative ability.
But what's not being recognized, not being taught, and almost being to some degree, there's a cynicism that exists where like, oh, we can take raw garlic, and you can improve your own natural interferon.
In fact, in one week, you can increase your interferon alpha by five times by just taking two to three grams of garlic per day.
There is no one that I knew in medical school or in residency or even since then that have questioned the vaccines.
Any of them?
Nope.
Not that I knew.
I mean, I'm sure they are out there, but very, very few.
I haven't encountered any.
So nobody once said, why are we vaccinating this child?
Well, it really came up during, again, I can't remember where I was in my career, but it came up with the chicken pox.
But that was it.
That's the only time people really questioned, do we really need it?
But not hepatitis B. You know, it's funny that hepatitis B has seemed to be accepted.
I have asked pediatricians myself why we're giving a one-day-old hepatitis B when we know it's transmitted by sexual contact, IV drug abuse, and blood transfusions, right?
And so, and actually Peter McCullough also has said that the likelihood of a baby, a newborn being exposed to hepatitis B is one in seven million.
So even if it did work, which it doesn't work, but at that age, even if it did work, you'd have to treat seven million babies to get one good outcome, basically, to benefit one child.
And has aluminum in it.
It has a lot of aluminum in it.
So I've asked pediatricians why do we need to give hepatitis B?
You know what the answer is?
The only answer?
To get the parents used to vaccines.
That's it.
The babies don't have a competent immune system yet.
They can't amount to appropriate immune reaction.
And the other thing is this, even when you're vaccinating people, it takes weeks to get a response.
So if you're thinking maybe it's what we call vertical transmission, in other words, mother to baby, if that's the argument, okay, it's not going to work because you get a vaccine, it doesn't work immediately.
It takes a few weeks to get the IgG antibodies that you need.
For site, maybe a week for IgM and then IgG after that, and the other cellular immunity you need.
So it's not going to do anything for a vertical transmission for sure, even if they had a competent immune system, which they don't.
And the other thing is that the amount of aluminum that's in the hepatitis B vaccine for a newborn is about 73 micrograms per kilogram.
What does that mean?
If you look at the micrograms per kilogram in an adult hepatitis B vaccine, it's seven.
Seven micrograms per kilogram.
There's 10 times more aluminum for a newborn baby exposure than an adult.
And the thing is this, is that when you're a newborn baby, your blood-brain barrier is not fully developed yet.
So you have permeability of your blood-brain barrier.
So that aluminum that needs an opening to get to your brain is more likely in a newborn baby to get into the brain.
We know aluminum is a neurotoxin.
They have a developing brain, which means it's much more susceptible to the damage of the aluminum versus an adult, right?
So like there's so many reasons not to give it to a baby.
And there's so much, and we're giving higher doses.
And actually the two-month shot is even higher.
It's about 24 times the amount of aluminum in the two-month dose.
Zero, three months, six months, I believe is the three hepatitis B vaccines.
The second one has about 172 micrograms per kilogram.
During your career as a doctor, did you have any patients that were vaccine hesitant or refused vaccines?
Yes or no?
Yes.
My reaction to those people who were hesitant or refused the vaccines is I just simply offered it.
I personally did not, I didn't get upset at them.
Now, there were nurses I worked with and there were other residents or other attendings that would make very cynical comments, very, very dark negative comments about, and or pressured the patient.
And I was just not one of those people that did that.
I just felt like they have a right to refuse it.
And the other thing is if, I mean, look, we're dealing with herd immunity.
So we're not necessarily for most vaccines, not the tetanus vaccine, but for most vaccines, we're dealing with herd immunity, which means that if they didn't want to take it, they're not harming anyone else.
The people who are taking the vaccine are protected.
If they don't want to protect themselves, theoretically speaking, I didn't see any reason why I needed to push it on them.
Now, as far as the tetanus, look, I mean, I know that there's like 20 cases of tetanus per year in the United States and nobody dies of tetanus anymore.
We have supportive care, we have intubation, we have antibiotics, and so nobody dies of tetanus.
So when people come to the ER and they don't want to take the tetanus shot, I've always been okay with not taking it.
But you have to understand it a little bit.
If you just believe in this popular narrative, like I hate to say it, although many of the doctors do, that it's deadly, it's going to cause them to die and these scare tactics.
They just believe it.
They don't actually look at the data.
They just being, it's what they're being told by these governing bodies, you know, or what they were taught verbally by their superior during training.
Then they have this belief, like a religion, that you have to take it.
Talk about how doctors are motivated by money.
Right.
Well, it's more than particularly straight from the big pharmaceutical corporations that are manufacturing these poisons.
Right.
Right.
There's no question that the pediatrician's offices and the pediatricians are being paid to have a certain percentage of vaccinated patients.
In fact, actually, during COVID in the ER, we were told we had to offer the COVID vaccine to emergency department patients.
And that's where I drew the line there.
I'm like, because a lot of these decrees come from the administrators, you know, from the bean counters.
I know people want to blame the doctors, and I'm not saying the doctors are totally innocent because they're basically like, you know, in a sense, being the pimp, basically, they're carrying out this mission based on money.
But it's the no, no, I'm not saying it is bad.
It is bad.
However, there's also the people above them who employ them, who pressure them because they want to make money.
And maybe they'll bonus the doctors to incentivize them as well.
They all work together, basically.
It's a whole consortium of various levels of the system.
And then, of course, the brainwash that the nurses, nurses aren't making any more money, but they brainwash them, so they push it as well.
It's a matter of brainwashing and it's driven by money, no question.
So doctors and pediatricians and all doctors are essentially working as commission-based salespeople for pharmaceutical companies.
Yes.
The doctors are working as commissioned salespeople, really for the pharmaceutical companies.
But again, it's the administrators that are also colluding and/or directing it, actually.
Right?
I mean, every medical practice has the individuals who are managing the practice, watching the money, and the same thing with a hospital system.
And many of the practices owned by big hospital systems.
So they're being told, the doctors are being told that they need to do this.
They need to be giving up the vaccine.
And a lot of the doctors, and there's many cases like this, I've heard even as recent as yesterday that people have come to me and told me that when they didn't want, they refused the vaccine, they were kicked out of the practice because they needed to meet their quota.
Some of these pediatricians can make up to a million dollars a year from the incentives that are given for vaccinating.
Pediatricians are earning a living based on these commissions that's greater than what their salary is from the healthcare system that they work at.
Right.
Is it true?
You said they can earn up to a million dollars.
Yeah, that Mayo is not paying a pediatrician.
No, that's exactly right.
They are.
They make the big part of their money.
The line's share of their salary these days is from the vaccines.
Yes.
And they don't question that.
It somehow becomes normal in their world.
And I don't understand it either, actually.
Look, I'm not paid that way.
So, you know, I don't know.
I can't explain the psychology of it, really.
But that's the world we're living in today.
A lot of these things are really your own personal philosophy.
So there are nurses who they themselves question.
Yeah, in other words, the independent thinkers who are more into naturopathic treatments and things like that, and a lot of people into their own health, actually.
These are the individuals that may question things, but I would say that's a small percentage.
The majority of nurses also, they just buy into this popular narrative and they believe it to be true.
They believe that A, vaccines are good, and B, it's the right thing to do.
It's morally the right thing to do in society.
And yeah, and they believe they should be, like, to be a good nurse and to be a good person, a good societal member, they push the vaccines.
This article published by Geer and colleagues, G-E-I-E-R, published in 2015 in Clinica Chemica Acta Journal.
They looked at basically all the literature that's published, looked at 81 references in the literature regarding thimerosol, which is ethylmercury.
And it's been used as a preservative in vaccine since 1927.
And it's a well-known human toxin.
They looked at human clinical data, epidemiologic data, biochemical data, and it all causes human harm.
There's toxicities in the literature, causing death, birth defects, neurodevelopmental defects, and disorders.
So they're telling you that mercury causes these problems.
And then we put it in the vaccines.
So now the authors quote the WHO.
This is what they say.
The WHO says, it's important to note that concerns about the toxicity of thimerosal are theoretical and that there is no compelling scientific evidence of a safety problem related to its use in vaccines.
Vaccines and Bacterial Pneumonia00:15:00
That's what the WHO says.
And so this article, they're giving you 81 references showing that that statement is false.
So what they conclude, this article, the authors conclude this article, this is what they say, quote unquote, the culmination of the research that examines the effect of thimerosol in humans indicates that it is a poison at minute levels with a plethora of deleterious consequences, and there's a clear cause for concern.
That's what they say.
That's in the peer-reviewed literature.
A couple of articles on influenza, okay?
One is this past season.
It was published in, I believe it was in April, published this year, April 2025.
The author is Shretsta and colleagues.
There's a paper on the Cleveland Clinic employees from the 2024 to 2025 influenza season, this past season.
They looked at over 53,000 Cleveland Clinic employees, and they found that those who were vaccinated against influenza were 27% more likely to contract influenza.
In other words, the vaccine didn't work.
It did the opposite.
That's published data.
I'm so confused about how this information can be out there.
It can be peer-reviewed.
It could be published data in a reputable journal.
And you're the only guy that knows or cares about this?
I don't know.
I just can't explain.
I'm not making this stuff up.
I got it from PubMed, and I'm just reporting on it now.
But as long as the vaccine skepticism has become this huge controversial talking point and this polarizing conspiracy theory, why hasn't this been just very simplified by saying, well, the evidence is right here.
There's nothing really to argue about.
Well, to be fair, I've been told there are many articles out there showing influenza vaccine has worked in the past.
I haven't looked at them, actually, just like every other doctor.
I don't look at the journals.
I just accept what, and maybe they exist.
But I think the point that I'm making is that this past season, there was an institution that was able to show it didn't work and actually caused more cases of influenza.
And so in other words, it's not 100%, even if there are articles showing it worked in the past, giving the people who taught me this, who told me this, what I accepted to be true all along, giving them the benefit of the doubt, well, this past year, it showed the opposite results.
So I think that it should at least wake up people saying, maybe, maybe it's not 100%, maybe it's not 100% every season.
Maybe this is not 100% true.
What are the common influenza outcomes for an unvaccinated person that contracts influenza?
What are the common outcomes for that person?
Well, most of the people don't have any problem with it.
In other words, they just get cough, congestion, and they get, I mean, look, I see influenza all the time in the ER, okay?
And when I get the influenza positive out the door, if they want Tamoflu, I'll give it to them.
I don't actually offer it anymore because that's also, actually that one drug was at least looked at by the faculty and the medical school I was at, by the entire department of emergency physicians, a lot of smart people.
In fact, the toxicologist of the group is the one that presented this data that he was pro-vax for COVID.
He buys into everything, but he was able to show from the literature that Tamiflu doesn't actually help anybody.
We were taught that Tamiflu decreases the severity of the illness and it decreases the duration of the symptoms by one day.
That's the common teaching for Tamaflu.
It doesn't save lives.
It doesn't decrease hospitalizations.
It doesn't decrease the likelihood of getting, you know, bacterial pneumonia, which is a problem.
It doesn't decrease the likelihood of getting intubated or whatever.
But it just decreases the severity and the duration a little bit.
But that is even false.
That's what we learned.
We went through that data.
That's even a false claim.
That was mainstream doctors who figured that out in the department I was at.
I was in.
Okay.
That's just Tamiflu.
So I don't, it caused harm.
So I don't prescribe Tamiflu unless people somebody really wants it.
And I tell them openly I wouldn't take it, but let me prescribe it.
Before we go on, the next thing.
So you treat influenza, you see it all the time, mostly not problematic.
People feel ill, they get better, life goes on.
These are the people who were not vaccinated for influenza.
Those that are vaccinated, that go get the flu shot.
What potential negative side effects could they experience from the flu shot?
Well, that's the question.
I haven't seen any specific, there's no published data showing safety for the influenza shot.
But is there published data showing that they're unsafe?
There isn't any.
There's no that I know of.
I haven't found any specifically influenza and looking at outcomes.
So yeah, we don't know either way.
But I can say that when people die of influenza, greater than 90% of them die of a bacterial pneumonia.
So what happens is you get it's called an opportunistic infection.
In other words, your body's overwhelmed fighting this virus, the influenza virus.
So it leaves itself open for an opportunity for something else to come in, which is a bacterial pneumonia.
The most commonly it's staph aureus, which is a rapidly growing bacterial pneumonia, but that can be true with antibiotics.
If it's, you know, so a lot of people, when they come to the ER and they get, they have positive, they're positive for influenza.
If the oxygen saturation is low or if they have significant morbidities or if they really, heart rates really fast or they have a significant fever, I'll get a chest X-ray.
Just to look, I'm looking for a bacterial pneumonia.
Because then if I have that, then I can treat with an antibiotic and everything's good.
Right?
So even the cause of death, people generally don't buy, they don't die of influenza itself.
It's the opportunistic infection, which is treatable.
But that's pretty rare.
I mean, very rare.
So why wouldn't you get the flu shot?
I guess is what I'm asking.
Why wouldn't I get it?
Well, looking at all these other vaccines, I can look up what the incipients are in influenza, but I can tell you that, well, first of all, there are smaller doses of thimerosol in it, for sure.
The ones that are, the ones that are in the multi-dose vial, they have thimerosol straight up.
Please rise, be sworn.
Do you swear to tell the whole truth and nothing but true self you got?
Has thimerosol ever been tested by our health agency?
It's been only in the, there were those early tests that you know of that were done by Lilly.
And when was that tested?
That was done in 1929.
Okay, well, let's follow up on that.
In 1929, they tested this on 27 people that were dying of meningitis.
All of those people died of meningitis.
And so they said there was no correlation between their death and the mercury and the vaccines.
That is the only test that's ever been done on thimerosol that I know of.
Can you think of any other?
No, in people, no, except for accidental exposures over here.
So we have mercury that's being put into people's bodies in the form of this preservative and has been since the 30s.
And it's never been tested by our health agencies.
And yet you folks come here and you testify that there's no conclusive evidence, conclusive evidence, and the IOM says they favor, get this.
They don't say they're sure.
They say they favor rejection of a causal relationship between mercury and autism and other neurological disorders.
Mr. Egan, can you say to me right now that that amount of mercury being injected into a baby will not hurt it?
It's impossible to make those categorical statements of 100%.
That's right.
That's what I want to say.
So it is possible that the amount of mercury that's being injected, even in trace amounts, could damage a child neurologically, right?
I don't think it has that catastrophe.
I mean, that's, you know, we can argue.
I know, but you don't think it is, but you can't say categorically, can you?
Do I have evidence for every single child for every possible dose?
The answer is no.
There you go.
Another article published in 2012 by Cowling and colleagues in the Clinical Infectious Disease Journal.
They looked at 115 children who were randomized to get influenza vaccine versus placebo, right?
After nine months, you know what they found?
They found that those who had the flu vaccine had a 4.4 increased risk of getting non-influenza viruses like rhinovirus, coxakivirus, and echovirus.
So you got other viruses going up.
So let's talk about polio, because that's an interesting one.
Because first of all, if you look at the, if you Google the polio, when the polio vaccine was introduced and what the cases were in like the 1950s, you'll see that it looks like it worked beautifully, right?
But then I found two graphs in the Bureau of Statistics that show that when the polio vaccine was given, okay, it was given at the end of the epidemic of polio.
Then what they did is they redefined what polio is.
So the two graphs in the Bureau of Statistics.
The second graph, what they do is they added additional viruses as the definition of polio.
So in other words, they added Coxakivirus, they added diphtheria, and when they were positive for those, they considered those polio.
So the second graph looks like they gave the vaccine and then the cases came down.
That's what happened.
So they extended out that graph to make it look like the polio vaccine was the cause.
But I do want to point out also that in 1952, okay, one year before the rollout of the polio vaccine, which is the worst year, there were 3,145 deaths from polio that year.
That's the worst we've ever had.
Okay?
3,000 cases.
Now, I looked at the U.S. Census.
I wanted to see what the population was at the time.
The closest I could find is 1950.
The U.S. Census in 1950, the population was 151 million.
So I did the math.
The mortality rate from polio is 200,000.
Okay?
But the entire population was scared they're going to get polio.
That's why they gave how they get them to take the vaccine.
200,000 is a very low likelihood, right?
Now, when a person gets polio, 70 to 75% are asymptomatic, zero symptoms at all, right?
In 1952, which is the worst year, they had 58,000 symptomatic cases.
37,000 of them were mild viral cases.
21,000 had mild to disabling paralysis.
So 21,000 mild to disabling paralysis.
Okay, autism in 2022, okay, where 1.1 million children had autism spectrum disorder, and 275,000 of those had profound autism.
That means lifelong 24-7 care.
That means they don't speak, they can't feed themselves.
275,000 cases of profound autism 2022 compared to 21,000 and the worst year ever of disabling paralysis.
I'm sorry, mild to disabling.
The ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is now one in 31.
Shocking.
There's an extreme risk for boys.
Overall, the risk for boys of getting an autism diagnosis in this country is now 1 in 20 and is high in California, which has the best data collection.
So it probably also reflects the national trend.
1 in 12.5 boys.
This is part of an unrelenting upward trend.
The prevalence two years ago was one in 36.
Since the first ADDM report in 1990, which was 1992 births, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8.
That's 480%, I believe.
The first ADDM survey was 22 years ago when prevalence was one in 150 children.
In all the core states, the trend is consistently upward.
Most cases now are severe.
25% of the kids who are diagnosed with autism are non-verbal, non-toilet trained, and have other stereotypical features.
If you're in a wheelchair, it's a lot different than the severe cases of autism.
A severe autism case is a much worse problem.
But you have 21,000 versus 275,000.
Think about that.
And if the vaccines are the primary cause, which I suspect they are, it's pretty crazy.
My professional conclusion, based on the scientific evidence, the harm of these vaccines outweigh any benefit.
No Masters, No Limits00:04:16
We need to stop all the vaccine mandates.
And we need to stop the groupthink of the vaccine religion.
That's what it is.
It's a religion.
Oceans hymn, no chains, no pleas.
No rulers, no kings, no scripts to recite.
Burn the old book, let the phoenix ignite.
Rebirth on the sand, where the rebels convene.
A genesis scene, mind sharp and keen.
Dollars to dust, trust in the soul.
And I capoca where we break the mold.
And I capoca where the spirit flies.
New dawn, breaking under open skies.
No masters, no limits, no change to choke.
This is freedom's fire, and acapulco spoke.
And I capoca where the spirit flies.
New dawn, breaking under open skies.
No masters, no limits, no change to choke.
This is freedom's fight, and a capulco spoke.
Beach bonfire sparks spark like flint.
Ideas ricochet, no permission, no stint.
Borders dissolve, minds expand.
Every soul sovereign, every mind grand.
No contract signed, just a handshake truth.
Ancient wisdom reborn in the fountain of youth.
Rules crumble like castles at high tide.
Revolution lives where the dreamers reside.
Golden horizon, the birth of the free.
Echoes of laughter, the waves decree.
Freedom is anthem, a beat in the chest.
And I could put it And I could New dawn, breaking under open skies.
No masters, no limits, no change to choke.
This is freedom's fire, and Acapulco spoke.
And I capulco where the spirit flies.
New dawn, breaking under open skies.
No masters, no limits, no change to choke.
with performing artist Aya May.
Anakapulco opening party on February 15th.
Anakapulco Genesis, February 16th to 20th.
The Dollar Vigilante TDV Summit, February 21st.
The Crypto Vigilante TCV Summit, February 22nd.
Agorafulco, retreats and other excursions, February 21st to 27th.
Bufo and other plant medicines with Bearheart throughout the event.
A special eboga ceremony with Christoph Melchizedek from February 23rd.
Two Tesla Plasma Healing Devices will be running throughout the event.
Thanks to the Tesla Club.
Bring the whole family.
The Ana Capulco Family Camp runs throughout the event with activities for non-lethally injected, free-range, unschooled pure souls.