Stew Peters Show - REPLAY: The Based Report: Israeli-Owned Politicians Plan Massive Attack on 1st Amendment

Nov. 25, 2025 - Stew Peters Show

01:05:33

REPLAY: The Based Report: Israeli-Owned Politicians Plan Massive Attack on 1st Amendment

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is a bomb service unknown space mothers coming straight at you.
	The base report, Frankie Stocks, Frankie Stocks, the base report, the base report of Frankie Stocks.
	Frankie Stocks on its mission, quizzing and exposing their eyes.
	Cause they run off scared of the fallout.
	Cause they know all the secrets of fallout.
	They support only the truth.
	Exposing their crimes.
	This is the base report with Frankie Stocks.
	Hello and welcome to Basin World of Frankie Stocks.
	I'm your host, Frankie Stocks.
	I thank you all for joining me this evening.
	This is our debut episode here on the Stew Peters Network.
	Stu, I thank you so much for giving me this platform.
	I'm so excited to get this started.
	Guys, we've come a really long way from the base report being a three-minute segment to now being an hour-long show, five nights a week.
	We'll be jam-packed, full of news, jam-packed, full of exclusive reporting, on-the-ground reporting, stuff that you guys aren't going to get anywhere else, but here on the Stew Peters Network.
	So I am really, really excited to get this off the ground.
	I thank you all for joining me.
	And again, Stu, I can't thank you enough for giving me this platform.
	Now, we're just going to get started just straight into it.
	And we really have the perfect story to pick up the bass report with to begin the first episode of the bass report with.
	Because what do we love to talk about?
	Not just on the base report, but on the Stew Peters Network, about these foreign influence operations, these Israeli influence operations that have taken over and occupied the United States government and occupied our government, not just at the federal level, but at all levels.
	That includes the state level.
	And in many cases, that even includes at the local level.
	And right now in Israel, the largest U.S. political delegation to Israel ever in all of American history, in all of the history of the U.S.-Israeli twisted relationship, the biggest American political delegation ever is in Israel right now.
	This is part of 50 States One Israel.
	That's what they're calling this.
	I'm getting ready to share the screen here with you guys.
	There are reports on it up on the Jerusalem Post.
	Israel themselves, their propaganda page that they have on social media is sharing photos about this.
	Let's go ahead and share the screen.
	This is over on X.
	This is, as you can see, from Israel, from the official State of Israel propaganda page.
	The 50 States One Israel delegation has landed in Israel.
	250 American legislators will spend the coming week in Israel and experience as it truly is.
	Experience it as Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu's propagandists want them to experience it.
	If they're going to experience it as it truly is, maybe they should take them to Gaza and see what Israel's truly doing.
	See how Israel truly, truly treats the Goyam, the cattle, the people who aren't Israeli citizens, the people who aren't expanding Israel's borders to gobble up more territory and forge greater Israel.
	Of course, with U.S. backing like they're doing here today.
	Today, they began their visit in Jerusalem.
	At the Western Wall, of course, they had to go hump the wall.
	They had to go kiss the wall.
	They went to the church, two of the holiest sites in Judaism and Christianity because they're merging this Judaism, Judeo-Christianity.
	They have to do these optics so that people say, oh my gosh, it clicks in people's heads.
	I've heard of Judeo-Christianity and now they're showing it to me.
	You know, hey, they only spit on me once.
	That's what Brandon Tatum told Benjamin Netanyahu, right?
	Hey, guys, they only spit on me once.
	It was a great trip.
	Christians are welcome in Israel.
	Again, I only got spit on once.
	It's pathetic.
	So let's share the screen again because we'll go over to the Jerusalem Post.
	Now, see, every time you go to one of these websites, it slows down the entire computer because they've got ads and videos popping up everywhere.
	It's a huge pain in the neck to go on a site like the Jerusalem Post.
	But here's the headline, bipartisan.
	And they probably, they're probably full of spyware.
	Bipartisan U.S. support reminds Israel that true friends stand by us, officials tell the Post.
	Seeing bipartisan support from those attending the 50 States One Israel Conference shows Israel's true friends stand by us.
	Foreign Ministry Deputy Director for North America, Lior Hayat, however you say that name said.
	At a time when Israel faces growing isolation around the world, the largest ever delegation, they're really proud of this.
	Largest ever delegation.
	They love throwing that out there.
	U.S. lawmakers representing all 50 states have arrived in Israel.
	Again, they're being greeted.
	They're being addressed by Benjamin Netanyahu.
	They're having a huge Israeli U.S. Love Fest Judeo-Christian convention for these people.
	Welcome to Jerusalem, the eternal capital of Israel.
	Speaking to the Jerusalem Post, they've emphasized that in a period like this, seeing bipartisan support from all 50 U.S. states in a historic event unprecedented in Israel's history reminds us that in difficult moments, our true friends stand by our side.
	They're really getting that true friends line out there.
	Here's a bunch of the Israelis, a bunch of the traitors all mixing together there.
	These people are disgusting.
	We'll get more to this in a little bit, fighting BDS.
	But look, this is a propaganda visit.
	These are U.S. politicians who are going over to Israel because Israel has lost control.
	They've lost the plot.
	They've lost control of the narrative here in the United States.
	The American people are rapidly turning against Israel, especially against America's military alliance with Israel.
	We are just a few weeks off of that massive congressional AIPAC delegation to Israel.
	You had people like Randy Fine posting action shots from their trip.
	You had Benjamin Netanyahu, not just meeting with members of Congress.
	And we covered this on the base report at the time on Stu's show.
	The most important part of that APAC delegation week, it wasn't just that the APAC sponsored members of Congress were in Israel.
	It was that U.S. media outlets were in Israel as well.
	They took trips to coincide with this.
	You had groups like Newsmax in Israel meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu.
	He was speaking to them, addressing them, thanking them for being such great friends in Israel's information war against the American people, against the world.
	You had these so-called influencers going over there, getting these tours, just like these, these state-level and local level politicians, these 50 states, one Israel people are.
	I thought this was 50 states, one America, by the way.
	But no, it's 50 states, one Israel.
	50 states all conspiring together to serve Israel and stab the American people in the back.
	That is exactly what these people are doing on this little trip, just like the federal politicians do on the AIPAC trip, just like the media talking heads and the so-called journalists, the propagandists in Israel's information war, just like they did on their media trip to Israel.
	This is just the latest chapter in all of that.
	It's very important for these people to get their marching orders and come back to the United States and advocate and work and strive in Israeli interests.
	These people are advancing Israeli interests in the United States, both in the media sphere and in politics.
	They are advancing Israeli interests, geopolitical interests, cultural interests, information war interests legislatively in the U.S., not just at the federal level.
	Again, this is at the state and local level as well.
	38 states in this country have legislation or executive orders that are currently being enforced that bar citizens from speaking out against Israel or boycotting Israel and in some cases criminalize you spreading the gospel.
	Christy Noam, she's now the DHS secretary.
	DHS has been mobilized against the American people to stop so-called anti-Semitism, to stop noticing.
	Well, guess what?
	When she was governor of South Dakota, she was surrounded by a bunch of rabbis.
	You know, how many rabbis can they even have in a state like South Dakota?
	But nevertheless, they found Christy No.
	She found them and she had them at the governor's residence so that she could sign legislation that effectively criminalized the gospel and criminalized you questioning the validity of Israel and the validity of Israel killing people in its own interests and the U.S. supporting the entire thing.
	That's what this is all about, enforcing Israeli interests here in the United States.
	And speaking of people who enforce Israeli interests in the United States, let's talk about Brian Mast.
	This is the head of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
	This is the guy who shows up to work in the U.S. Capitol wearing his IDF uniform.
	He was an IDF volunteer.
	He volunteered to go serve the IDF.
	And now he shows up to work wearing the uniform of a foreign military.
	It shouldn't be really a surprise to anyone that somebody would take it that far because as the Stew Peters Network has shown you many times, there are foreign flags littering the halls of Congress in Washington, D.C., especially those satanic Israeli flags.
	They are all over the place, members of Congress professing their love, professing their allegiance, whether it's a flag, whether it's a sign, whether it's a mixture of both.
	You've got signs with the Israeli flag saying, I stand with Israel.
	We support Israel in this office.
	You have people actually flying the foreign flag of Israel in these U.S. taxpayer funds, supposedly the people's house.
	So of course, you're going to have some clown who's going to wear the Israeli military uniform to work in Congress because, of course, we have members of Congress who aren't just dual citizens.
	We have members of Congress who are Israeli veterans.
	That's how far out of control this has gone.
	And again, as this trip to Israel, this 50 states, one Israel trip is showing you, it's at every single level.
	But speaking of Brian Mass, the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, he's now pushing legislation that would allow Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, to strip your passport over criticism of Israel.
	Let's go ahead and share the screen again.
	This is being called the thought police legislation.
	U.S. lawmakers introduced thought police bill to strip citizens of passports over Israel criticism.
	This is really, this is 1984 dystopia type of stuff.
	Secretary of State Marco Rubio has already revoked visas and green cards, of course, of foreign nationals for opposing Israel's genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.
	We all know about that.
	People who are hunted down by masked federal agents.
	We have a country that's full of illegal invaders who are doing harm to American citizens, robbing, raping, murdering, maiming American citizens.
	But our government is going out hunting down students who are questioning Israel, hunting down these people in the Ivy League.
	Look, we shouldn't have any foreign students here in the United States.
	But before we start hunting down people who criticize Israel, maybe we should kick out these hundreds of thousands of Chinese spies who we have at our universities all over the country.
	Maybe we should kick out the foreigners who have come into this country with malign interests to then give our intelligence, give information on American students, on American projects, on American research back to their communist government in China, which, by the way,
	wouldn't exist without the very same type of Bolshevik Jews who overthrew Russia and crafted the Soviet Union and who now have circumvented everything about the United States being some kind of free constitutional republic to take over our government and exact control over the American people from their base of operations, from the command center, the nerve center of their octopus over in Israel.
	That is who is running the United States government.
	And you see that with Israeli military veterans like Brian Mass crafting legislation to stop you from leaving the country if you criticize Israel.
	And you see that with government agencies kicking in the doors of people who criticize and question Israel, throwing them in the back of vans and taking them to some kind of facility somewhere where they house them as they try to throw them out of the country.
	Meanwhile, they're letting people who are actually hurting Americans, who are actually attacking American interests, they allow them to operate with impunity all over the country.
	They won't stop them because they're too busy working on behalf of Israel.
	They're too busy now trying to lock American citizens in this country so that you can't escape the Noahide courts of justice.
	You couldn't escape even if you wanted to.
	I personally think you should dig your heels in, but even if you wanted to, you can't escape the Noahide courts of justice because your own country is going to strip you of your passport if you dare criticize a foreign nation, if you dare criticize our so-called greatest ally that wants to send the American people to war in the Middle East, that wants to flood our country, that wants to flood our cities, our towns, our rural communities.
	They're being flooded as well.
	They want to flood them with the Arabs and with the Muslims and with the terrorists that they don't want, that they created, the terrorists that they created, but that they don't want in their own backyard.
	They don't want them to be their problem.
	So they send them to the United States.
	They work with their NGOs.
	They worked with their compromised government officials and they send these people to the United States because they're clearing out territory so that they can start filling in the map of greater Israel.
	They radicalize these Palestinians and these other Arabs against the American people by dropping American bombs on their heads their entire lives.
	And then they get turned loose in the United States and weaponized against the American people and these freaks in our government, these compromised pedophile freak shows that we have in D.C.
	And as we talked about in the first story here, in state capitals and in county government centers all over the country, these people are signing off on all of it.
	These people are allowing it to happen every step of the way.
	They are working toward the destruction of the American people and they're lining their pockets and they're taking their luxury trips to Israel and to wherever else their handlers send them the entire way through.
	It's disgusting.
	And speaking of people in our government, again, we just talked about Brian Mass.
	We're talking about at the federal level.
	Lauren Bobert, that's somebody that we need to talk about because she is regularly cast as this America first superhero.
	You know, she's some big MAGA gal.
	She ran to Washington, D.C., and she started taking on the deep state.
	Well, no, guess what?
	Lauren Boeber, Lauren Bobert is the deep state.
	So she's introduced, actually, it's not just that she's introduced it.
	It's that it's been rammed through measures to bar so-called politically motivated boycotts of Israel.
	If you take part in whatever they're calling a politically motivated boycott, which is any boycott of Israel, they say that all of it is politically motivated or terror motivated or it's backed by Iran or whatever foreign boogeyman they want to throw out there at the moment that's not Israel.
	They say that it's politically motivated and that you can't do it.
	Now, so Lauren Bobert, under the cover really of Charlie Kirk's assassination, which we're going to get more into that, more into the story that's spinning out of that.
	And we're also going to get more into what Congress is doing under the cover of that to steal the civil liberties of the American people.
	And now Lauren Bobert, as everyone's eyes were focused on the Charlie Kirk assassination, she snuck on to defense spending bill, to an appropriations bill.
	She snuck on a measure to stop anyone who participates in one of these Israeli boycotts from getting a federal defense contract.
	So now you can only get a federal defense contract in this country, thanks to Lauren Boebert, if you swear your allegiance to Israel.
	If you vow not to take part in any boycott of Israel, this is just like they've done.
	We talked about 38 states across the country have implemented very similar measures, or they've gone even further.
	Now they're doing it at the federal level.
	And this is the foot in the door to be able to do that.
	So there's a report up over, this is on the intercept.
	The House just passed a bill punishing politically motivated boycotts of Israel, far right.
	They're calling her far right.
	She's obviously far Israel.
	Rep Lauren Bobert added an amendment to the Pentagon budget that targets the BDS movement against Israel.
	So, this bill would effectively ban contractors from boycotting Israel from tapping most federal contract dollars since more than half of the $755 billion in the U.S. government spent on contracts last year flowed through the Defense Department.
	Now, that's an issue in and of itself.
	That half of the money that our federal government is contracting out there of your tax dollars, they are going on this gravy train to the military-industrial complex.
	And now, as you can see here with Lauren Bobert's little measure, they're going on this gravy train to the military-industrial complex that is loyal to Israel before it's loyal to you, the American people.
	Because if Israel continuously stabs the American people in the back year after year after year after year, and some contractor says, Hey, you know what?
	I'm tired of this.
	I'm no longer going to do business in Israel.
	Well, the U.S. Defense Department, they don't want you.
	The U.S. Congress, they don't want you.
	And by the way, this measure, this was rammed through without any sort of floor debate.
	There was no debate on this.
	This was just inserted, rammed through.
	Again, it was all done under the cover of Charlie Kirk's assassination.
	Members of Congress are seizing upon that so that they can attack the American people.
	And so, look, it's not just Lauren Bobert who's operating under that.
	It's not just Israel who's attacking you under that.
	It's Israeli-owned reps for sure.
	But it's also, they're coming for your free speech, and Republicans are doing this.
	So, in the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination, Republican politicians, they're attacking your First Amendment rights, and Clay Higgins is one of them.
	Now, it's interesting that we bring up Clay Higgins, that he coincides with this other discussion on Israel, because for the record, and this is footage that has been widely distributed by the Stew Peters Network.
	It's been viewed millions of times.
	Millions of American citizens now know exactly who this guy is.
	When we caught up with Clay Higgins in Washington, D.C., he compared his affection for Israel to his affection for his wife and his daughter.
	He couldn't decide who he loved more, America or Israel.
	He has Israeli flags hanging off the wall outside of his office, these Pledge of Allegiance to Israel signs hanging off the wall on the side of his office, and he can't decide who he loves more, the American people or Israel.
	Well, he definitely, he's not showing any love for the American people right now either.
	Okay, so in the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination, Clay Higgins has taken to the internet to call for massive censorship of Americans.
	Now, a guy like that, once you give him an inch on censorship or anything else, once you give him an inch, he'll take a mile.
	This guy's owned and operated by AIPAC, obviously.
	This guy's owned and operated by other Israeli interests in Washington, obviously.
	So, as these Jews want to clamp down on your free speech and stop you from criticizing Israel, do you think a guy who wouldn't try to stop you from criticizing an assassination, no matter how disgusting whatever you have to say is, do you think a guy who would try to stop you from doing that wouldn't try to stop you from criticizing his foreign paymasters?
	Of course he would.
	If we give someone like Clay Higgins or the entire U.S. Congress the ability to censor the American people and punish the American people without due process because of crimes of speech, then they will destroy our First Amendment.
	And that's exactly what Clay Higgins is looking to do.
	I'm going to share the screen with you here.
	So, as we all know, in the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination, these freak shows, they come out of the woodwork, they mock his death, they cheer it on.
	You know, it's, but whatever happened to the old American principle of, I don't agree with what you have to say, but I'll die for your right to say it.
	I mean, these members of Congress supposedly swore an oath to uphold your right to free speech.
	But Clay Higgins, if you criticize or if you mock Charlie Kirk's assassination, Clay Higgins wants to take away your driver's license.
	He wants to take away your business license.
	He wants to destroy your life and he wants to ally himself with big tech to do it.
	So, I'm going to skim through this tweet for us here.
	This was posted on September 11th, the morning after Charlie Kirk's assassination.
	I'm going, this is Clay Higgins.
	I'm going to use my congressional authority and every influence with big tech platforms to mandate immediate bans for life of every post or commenter that belittled the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
	If they ran their mouth with their smart ass hatred celebrating the heinous murder of that beautiful young man who dedicated his whole life to delivering meaningful, respectful, conservative truth into the hearts of liberal enclave universities armed with only a Bible and a microphone and a constitution, these profiles must come down.
	So, I'm going to lean forward in this fight.
	He's going to demand that big tech have a zero tolerance policy for violent political hate content.
	What is violent political hate content?
	Who gets to define what hate speech is in this situation?
	Is it Clay Higgins?
	Does that hate content?
	Does that hate speech?
	Does that violence stop with mocking the death of Charlie Kirk?
	Or does that continue on to questioning Israel?
	Does that continue?
	Is it violent?
	Is it violent to question Israel's ability to wage war on the entire Middle East?
	Would they consider that a violent form of hate speech?
	Because you know how they frame it?
	When you question Israel's right to exist or their right to wage war on their neighbors, well, then you're calling for another show up.
	You're calling for another Holocaust.
	That's how these people always like to frame this.
	So it's not much of a leap for a guy like Clay Higgins to want to censor you for saying mean things on the internet to then jump and say, hey, you know what?
	I want to censor you on behalf of my paymasters too.
	And this is where it gets really, really ugly.
	So he says he wants to align with big tech to ban you from all platforms ever.
	I'm also going after their business licenses and permitting.
	Their businesses will be blacklisted aggressively.
	They will be kicked from every school and their driver's licenses will be revoked.
	If the government doesn't like what you have to say, no matter how ugly it is, your right to transportation and free movement is going to be taken away from you.
	This is absolutely insane.
	This is a trampling of your constitutional rights.
	You can't operate a business in this country.
	You can't go to school in this country.
	You can't drive in this country.
	If Clay Higgins, this congressman from Louisiana who's paid by AIPAC, doesn't like what you have to say, does anyone out there think that he's going to stop at Charlie Kirk with this?
	Once you give this guy an inch, he will take a mile.
	They will keep on going.
	And this is a guy who, as you saw when I first pulled up the screen just a couple of years ago, let's share the screen again.
	Just a couple of years ago, Clay Higgins was railing against big tech censorship.
	Look at this.
	We, the people, must stand together against First Amendment oppression.
	Oh, you think, buddy?
	Social media big tech corporations have crossed a line with their radical biased behavior.
	Silencing American conservative voices is wrong.
	The left is organized against our constitutionalist message.
	Stand with me today for freedom of speech.
	Register your opinion.
	So he only, it's freedom of speech when it's what he wants to say.
	And you notice he says register your opinion because it's cut off in that screenshot.
	But beneath that, there was a little form you could click on.
	You could register your opinion by voting in his poll and, of course, giving him your email address, probably so they could then turn around and sell their email list full of your email addresses to AIPAC or to some other candidate that's going to run for office somewhere.
	You know, these political operatives, they make a pretty penny off of email lists.
	So when you see these guys putting out a poll, it's not because they're genuinely curious.
	It's because they want your email because it's worth money.
	And so Clay Higgins railing just a few years ago.
	That post was put up in 2021.
	So at this point, that was five years ago, four years ago, excuse me, which is almost hard to believe.
	It's getting toward being five years ago.
	But now he's done a complete and total 180 and he's doubled down on this.
	So yesterday on Sunday, September 14th, I'm going to share the screen again.
	Clay Higgins put up another post over on X, again, doubling down on his calls for censorship.
	There are societal limits to freedom of speech.
	We, the people, are reminding our fellow citizens that some speech will not be tolerated and operating freely within the construct of our society requires some modicum of decent behavior as determined by our traditional values.
	The most egregious offenders, those who celebrated the evil assassination of Christian martyr Charlie Kirk, can live and speak freely in the wilderness.
	So, we, the people, are done quietly tolerating the nasty, filthy hatred of the left in our public spaces.
	They're to be shunned in every way.
	Enough is enough.
	We're scourging our temple.
	Is he scourging the third temple?
	Is that what he means?
	But regardless, this guy is doubling down on his calls to censor Americans and to push them out of society.
	He wants their jobs, he wants their business licenses, he wants their ability to go to school, he wants their driver's licenses because he doesn't like what they said.
	It's these critics, these mockers of Charlie Kirk today, and it's everyone else tomorrow.
	If you don't stand by people's constitutional right to say the most extreme things possible, then you can't stand by your right to say what others may consider extreme.
	In 2020, people were calling for people like all of us.
	I speak for myself.
	I speak for, I'm sure, a lot of you people out there in the audience calling for us to be fired from our jobs, kicked off of the internet, silenced because we mocked George Floyd, the criminal who died of a fentanyl overdose.
	We spoke out against these black animals who, of course, were handled by a bunch of Jews by the same people who are paying Clay Higgins.
	We spoke out against them from burning down the cities of this country.
	You know, people were calling for us to be kicked off of the internet.
	They were calling for us to lose their jobs.
	I don't actually remember anybody calling for us to lose our driver's licenses.
	So Clay Higgins may have taken this to an even further extent.
	If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong.
	But I don't remember anybody saying you shouldn't be allowed to drive a car if you made fun of the death of George Floyd, or you shouldn't be able to drive a car if you didn't put a little black box as your social media profile and get off of social media so that you could give black people the floor so that you could give them the mic.
	Isn't that what they said?
	We give them the mic.
	They're going to speak into the mic at day turn.
	You know, it was ridiculous, but that's what you were expected to do as a white.
	You were expected to cuck.
	And if you didn't cuck, then you were expected to grovel to your free speech rights being taken away.
	And now, Clay Higgins, this guy who claims to be a champion of free speech, as you saw in that post I just shared with you guys from four years ago at this point, this guy is now calling for American citizens to be silenced and to be punished because he doesn't like what they have to say.
	Okay, Lauren Boebert, his GOP colleague in the House, is calling for Americans to be excluded from half of federal contracts if she doesn't like their views on Israel.
	Brian Mast is calling for Americans to have their passports revoked if he doesn't like what they have to say about Israel.
	He wants the Secretary of State to take away your passport.
	And by the way, speaking of the Secretary of State taking away your passport, Marco Rubio has now come out and is talking much in the vein of Clay Higgins.
	He's combining these Clay Higgins and Brian Mast ideas, it looks like.
	Marco Rubio is coming out and saying we want to take away the passports of people who mock Charlie Kirk.
	So these guys, they will pretend they will wrap themselves in the cloth of being, and not just these guys, these ladies like Lauren Boeber.
	They'll wrap themselves in the cloth of being some kind of free speech warrior.
	And then when things get tough, when there's something that they don't like being said, then they start lashing out.
	Then they start calling for other people to have their free speech rights stripped away from them, which is what this Trump White House did as soon as Trump got back to D.C.
	We spent the last four years hearing so much about how Donald Trump was a martyr for free speech, about how this guy just laid himself out on the chopping block and he took all these arrows on behalf of the American people.
	When they were silencing him, they were really silencing us.
	And then he gets into office and the first thing he does is start calling for limits on free speech to curb and combat whatever this government and whatever the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of anti-Semitism declares hate speech, declares to be anti-Semitic or anti-Israel speech.
	They want to silence you for that and they want to use big government to do it.
	They want to use big tech to do it.
	They want to use this surveillance, AI palantir surveillance state they're building up to track what you say, to track what you think, to track what you do, and to put a target on your back, to have you followed around by your social credit score.
	And it says, did you tell an ill-advised joke about the Jews or about the minorities when you were in elementary school?
	We've covered that on the base report back when this was a segment on Stu's show, Glenn Young here in Virginia, installing speech police in public schools so they can track what kids say.
	If kids are accused of racism or kids are accused of anti-Semitism, it goes in their file.
	They share that information with big tech corporations and with law enforcement who they're in league with to enforce these policies in schools all across the country.
	So it's full spectrum coming from the Republicans, always coming from the Democrats.
	Your free speech is under attack.
	Do not let these people emotionally manipulate you into signing off on your free speech rights being attacked, just as you can't emotionally let them emotionally manipulate you into your Second Amendment rights being attacked.
	Because of course, this Tyler Robinson guy, is he a Patsy?
	I don't know, but this is the guy that they're blaming this shooting on.
	And they're saying that he lived with some tranny.
	This goes right into the playbook of these trannies, these tranny associates.
	We've got to red flag them.
	Hey, white man.
	Hey, conservative.
	Hey, noticer.
	Sign off on red flag laws for these people.
	And we promise we totally won't use them against you.
	It's a trap every single time.
	It's a trap with the Second Amendment.
	It's a trap with the First Amendment.
	We cannot allow these people to censor us.
	And that's exactly what they are looking to do.
	So look, guys, we are at the end of the first segment here of the Baste Report.
	Again, I thank you all for joining me here on our inaugural episode.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back with more news.
	Don't go anywhere.
	Welcome back to the Baste Report here on the Stew Peters Network.
	I am your host, Frankie Stocks.
	I thank you all for joining me here for our inaugural episode.
	We're a little more than halfway through.
	I think we had a great first segment.
	Thank you guys for sticking with me through the break.
	We're going to pick up here with the second segment.
	We're just going to get straight into it and we're going to talk more about the Charlie Kirk assassination.
	So we already talked about how our federal government is using that Charlie Kirk assassination to exact its agenda on the American people to come through and start chipping away at your civil liberties, whether it's free speech, whether it's the Second Amendment, whether it's something else that remains to be seen.
	They're also giving us a very interesting story that has changed a whole lot since the very start.
	Now, according to the official narrative, this shooter, a guy named Tyler Robinson, he's like a 90-pound weakling type guy.
	He apparently lives with a tranny.
	This is his roommate, his live-in boyfriend, who he pretends is his live-in girlfriend, something along those lines.
	We're being told that he's the shooter, that he confessed to his father, that a minister and a U.S. Marshal brought him in.
	He surrendered to authorities.
	He's taken to jail.
	Well, now he's recanting his story.
	He says that he didn't do it and he's pleading not guilty.
	And that guy was only arrested after an additional, actually, two additional people were arrested.
	There were two arrests that were made before Tyler Robinson was taken in.
	Kash Patel even announced one of them on social media that night, the night of September 10th, saying, We have a suspect in custody.
	We have a person of interest in custody.
	We're currently investigating further into the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
	But then, according to the official narrative, it wasn't even the feds that got the guy.
	They let that guy go.
	Of course, they had a press conference where Kash Patel showed up in his FBI Windbreaker and he took credit.
	He took credit for arresting this Tyler Robinson character with the tranny boyfriend.
	Then he says, I'll meet you in Valhalla.
	I'll see you in Valhalla.
	That was a real, I really had a problem with that statement.
	I know a lot of other people did too.
	I mean, that was a really disingenuous thing for this Hindu to say.
	This guy's a Hindu.
	Charlie Kirk was a Christian.
	Christians don't believe in Valhalla.
	Okay.
	And a Hindu, don't Hindus believe in like reincarnation?
	So Kash Patel should be telling people who die, I'll see you when you're reincarnated as the next animal that I go to worship.
	I mean, it just, the whole thing was disingenuous and ridiculous and like a made-for-TV deal, just like him standing there behind that podium wearing his FBI windbreaker, like he's out there kicking indoors and he's out there personally investigating whatever the hell went on.
	Meanwhile, the FBI, they're not even the ones that brought this guy in.
	His own father brought him in.
	So the story that we're getting from the very start, it hasn't been, you could say, easy to understand.
	And when you want to look down additional angles of this story, you get shut up.
	You get shut down.
	You can't even hear directly from eyewitnesses who saw this shooting.
	They can't even tell a cameraman what they saw.
	We're going to play the clip in just a second, but there was a young guy at the University of the Utah Valley University campus.
	He witnessed the Charlie Kirk assassination.
	He's actually wearing a red shirt.
	It looks like a Turning Point USA shirt.
	It has Turning Point USA branding on it.
	And he's talking to a cameraman who was going around the event, getting people's firsthand accounts.
	He started, he was there just documenting the event.
	And then the assassination strikes.
	And so then he starts going around, getting people's firsthand testimony about what happened.
	And as he goes up and talks to this young man from Turning Point USA, who appears to be from Turning Point USA, I should say, this guy is silenced.
	A bunch of other guys in red shirts that look just like him physically stop him from speaking.
	They physically stop him from telling his story to this cameraman.
	Take a look at this.
	Okay.
	I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom.
	I saw him.
	I heard the shot ring out.
	I looked to my left and then I looked over to my right.
	I saw him slump over in his chair forward.
	He slumped over.
	He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt and he slumped over and he was carried off.
	Get off me.
	Get off.
	running high right now.
	What were they so afraid that he was going to say?
	What?
	What details of the story were they so concerned this guy would let out that weren't supposed to be let out?
	That is bizarre, if you ask me.
	And that video clip, it's been viewed millions of times on X.
	It's been posted by numerous people.
	And the response over and over again is the same.
	Something is off about this.
	What the hell is going on?
	Why are these guys running over and physically stopping him from saying, from describing what he saw?
	It's just weird, especially when you throw in other things that happened that day.
	I mentioned Kash Patel's FBI announcing that they'd arrested this dude.
	Well, immediately after the shooting, there was another guy who was arrested.
	His name is George Zinn.
	This is an elderly, supposedly left-wing political activist.
	He's from Utah.
	They say that he's a well-known figure around local political circles.
	He's a well-known disruptor out at political events and things like that.
	But there is way more to this guy than just being some agitator.
	So on his way out, and we're going to get in to the background details that we've been able to uncover about George Zinn.
	But on his way out, when he was first detained, first taken into police custody, and it looked like there was a civilian who was helping them get him out of the venue.
	He's flailing himself around.
	He's saying, I did it.
	Shoot me.
	Shoot me.
	He's yelling at the crowd to shoot him.
	Take a look at this.
	So that's George Zinn getting arrested at the Charlie Kirk assassination and then begging the crowd to shoot him.
	Why the hell was he doing that?
	Is this guy part of some plot?
	I mean, is this guy some mind control subject doped up on SSRIs?
	A lot like this Tyler Robinson guy is probably doped up on SSRIs.
	And God knows what.
	Is this some guy that was sent out there so that he could be the Lee Harvey Oswald figure?
	Was Jack Ruby, the modern day Jack Rubinstein, supposed to jump out and put a bullet in him?
	Were they hoping, were they counting on somebody carrying a weapon with him?
	Utah, I believe, is a constitutional carry state.
	Were the people behind this counting on somebody carrying a weapon and jumping out trying to be a good Samaritan and saying, this guy just killed Charlie Kirk.
	I'm going to put a bullet in him when that didn't work.
	Is that when they went to their Tyler Robinson jumping on the roof and setting his 30 ott six neatly in the woods, leaving his fingerprints, leaving his shoe prints, and then traipsing through neighborhoods, limping around again after jumping off of a multi-story roof?
	Is that, did they default to that story, to that sequence of events after this George Zinn guy failed to get shot?
	I don't know.
	I'm genuinely asking.
	And it seems like if you ask questions about this and about what happened, and even if you're a person who was at this assassination and you try to say firsthand, this is what I heard, this is what I saw, this is what I witnessed, you'll be shut down.
	Hey, they may eventually start coming for conspiracy theorists on this.
	If you don't buy the official narrative, if you say, hey, there's holes all over this story, you know, what the heck really happened here, maybe they'll take your driver's license.
	Maybe they'll take your business license.
	I mean, who knows that what constitutes hate speech?
	What constitutes violent speech?
	Questioning the government's official narrative on a violent crime?
	Could that constitute violent speech?
	Who knows?
	That remains to be seen.
	Again, once you give them your rights, once you give them your speech or your guns or anything else, you give them an inch.
	They take a mile.
	They take 100 miles.
	So we're just asking questions here.
	We want to know what the hell really happened.
	And we want to know why George Zinn was running around getting dragged out of there by the police and saying, shoot me, shoot me, shoot me, because this is a guy who has a history of being involved in strange occurrences.
	So you know what?
	Let me pull up the screen and share the picture of George Zinn because I think this is an iconic picture.
	You know, you see this guy, his pants have fallen down.
	He's being brought out.
	We haven't forgotten about you, George Zinn, and we're not going to forget about the part that you played in this story until we find out what the hell happened.
	If this guy was some random agitator who got swept up in this thing, then so be it.
	But we want to know the truth.
	So George Zinn, pants pulled down, screaming, shoot me, shoot me, shoot me.
	We have not forgotten about you.
	In fact, we've pulled up more details about you.
	Grok has details about George Zinn.
	And so we're going to see what Grok has to say about this.
	I'm going to share the screen again.
	So, according to Grock, George Zinn is a 71-year-old Utah resident known locally as a politically active gadfly or perennial attendee at political events across the state.
	He's often described as conservative-leaning with libertarian tendencies.
	See, I've seen him widely described as some crazy old leftist.
	He has a history of minor legal troubles, including, get this, a 2013 arrest for a bomb threat at the Salt Lake City Marathon shortly after the Boston Marathon bombing, which, hey, wasn't the Boston Marathon bombing, didn't that have CIA Massad fingerprints all over it?
	He's had more recent misdemeanor charges, such as in May 2025 in Ogden, Utah.
	He was arrested as a pedestrian in a roadway after refusing to move from traffic during a protest.
	Zinn has also been banned from contacting certain government officials and the LDS church, the Mormons, due to his disruptive behavior in political and religious circles.
	Now, here they're going to talk about how he gained notoriety, and they're going to mention here how there's some claims linking him to 9-11.
	So, yes, yes, indeed.
	There are claims linking George Zinn to 9-11.
	So, we see how he tried to insert himself in the Boston bombing.
	I mean, this guy called in a bomb threat to the Salt Lake City Marathon.
	Don't you go to jail for like decades or years when you call in a bomb threat?
	When I was in high school, I remember waking up one morning.
	It was way past, you know, time to get up to school.
	Actually, I think I was in middle school because my parents were still making sure I got up in the morning.
	So, I'm in middle school.
	I wake up.
	It's way past time for me to go to school.
	And I go downstairs, and my mom is like, Yeah, there was a bomb threat.
	Some guy called in a bomb threat and they've canceled school.
	Well, that guy, he was this fat tub of lard.
	He was living in a hotel in town.
	And weeks later, maybe a couple months later, he was eventually arrested.
	And I remember this guy going to prison for a really, really long time when he was convicted.
	It was a story that the local newspaper, you know, really followed.
	And this guy got put away for quite a while.
	So, we have George Zinn, who calls in a bomb threat to a mass event, obviously for the purpose of calling in, of causing mass hysteria in the wake of a terrorist attack or an operation that killed and maimed American citizens in Boston.
	So, he calls in a bomb threat to another marathon.
	And then, what does he just walk?
	Do they give him some kind of slap on the wrist?
	Like he carries on to yet again go out and wreak havoc at events like this, like the Charlie Kirk assassination.
	I mean, what's really going on here with this guy?
	And now, let's talk about 9-11.
	So, George Zinn has been linked to 9-11.
	Now, there's a lot of reports out there, a lot of talk out there about this guy being some kind of eyewitness to the World Trade Center's collapse.
	Now, I can tell you what I have found.
	I found this video of George Zinn, and I'm going to share it in just a moment.
	And he describes his experience on 9-11.
	He goes through what exactly he claims he saw.
	Now, he claims, full disclosure, before we play the video, that he was in a hotel lobby in Colorado when the attack struck, when the false flag commenced.
	Yet he was featured in a documentary about 9-11 talking about his experiences.
	Who the hell cares about the experiences of some guy out in the Rocky Mountains in a hotel lobby on 9-11?
	Why?
	Why do you care?
	Millions of Americans had a 9-11 experience that did not involve hundreds of millions had a 9-11 experience that did not involve being a witness or being in proximity to where these things occurred.
	Why was this guy even in the documentary in the first place?
	Is this some type of guy who goes out here and he's like one of these recurring characters?
	You can find him in tragedies.
	That's how it looks.
	You can find him in tragedies and major questionable events like sprinkled throughout the years, throughout the decades.
	He's at 9-11 bomb threat at the marathon.
	He's blocking traffic.
	He's getting arrested at the Charlie Kirk assassination.
	I mean, is this guy like a recurring crisis actor?
	What the hell is the deal here?
	Just take a look at this video.
	It's a couple minutes long.
	This is George Zinn describing his apparent 9-11 experiences.
	You know, it was an interesting time when I went to, I was in Denver just on September 10th, 2001.
	And I'm a huge Broncos fan.
	So I was good.
	It was the opening night of Denver Broncos Stadium.
	I went down there and we were playing the Giants that night.
	And so it was a huge event for us.
	I remember everything that happened.
	We opened the stadium on September 10th, 2001.
	And so, you know, I was the Giants, which was good.
	I remember that was when Ed McCaffrey actually got hurt that night on a season-ending injury.
	And so I'm ready to go leave the hotel on September 11th, early that morning, and go back to Salt Lake City.
	And they said, come down, look in the lobby.
	Something's happening here.
	They said there's a plane that's headed towards one of the towers in New York City.
	And we're just glued.
	Everybody in the lobby is just going, wow, it's Pilate Error.
	What's going on here?
	You know, it was very confusing.
	And we see that plane go in, and we just think, wow, you know, and then I think it was what, a 9-12 or something like that, that that second plane hit that tower.
	Immediately, chaos in that hotel lobby.
	There was, everybody was on cell phones.
	People had friends, family, everybody they, you know, knew in New York.
	And we just said, oh, you know, that's got to be something that's that's that's terrorist attack or something like that.
	We were quite sure.
	We thought because, you know, there'd been attacked like several years earlier in the basement of that tower.
	We thought that, well, this was the same guy that had come in and just kind of finished the job.
	And so, you know, Denver immediately turned now.
	Denver does have.
	So George Zinn in Colorado on 9-11, he's interview worthy.
	This guy, he just keeps on popping up.
	Again, this is like a recurring character in a TV show.
	And here he is once again at the Charlie Kirk assassination, being dragged out by the police and begging the crowd to shoot him.
	If that doesn't make you think of Jack Rubenstein and Lee Harvey Oswald, then I don't know what it makes you think of.
	But we need to get to the bottom of why this guy was there, what he was doing, who he exactly is, and why he got arrested and then started yelling, shoot me, shoot me, shoot me.
	Again, George Zinn, the first so-called suspect in this case, news broke almost right away that he was being arrested, being dragged out of the venue.
	They bring in another guy, Kash Patel personally announces this other arrest.
	And then next thing you know, that guy's set free and President Trump is on Fox News announcing the, I guess you could call it the arrest or the apprehension, I guess the surrender of this Robinson clown who turned himself into his dad and turned himself into a minister and turned himself into a U.S. Marshal before going to law enforcement and taking credit for this and then reneging on it.
	So there's a lot out there about this story.
	There's a lot.
	You can go in a lot of different directions.
	But if one thing is certain, it's that the story that we're getting on the Charlie Kirk assassination, it's being procured for us.
	It's being curated, I guess, would actually be the correct word here.
	It's being curated for us like we're watching a documentary in real time.
	Even Michael Savage actually spoke out against this in the wake of the Charlie Kirk assassination.
	You know, a lot of you guys probably remember Michael Savage.
	He used to be all over the radio.
	You don't hear about him as much anymore.
	I believe his name actually used to be Michael Wiener or something Wiener, but Michael Savage also thought this deal didn't add up.
	Take a look at this.
	Did anyone see that press conference by the so-called FBI?
	Something's wrong.
	I know I shouldn't do this.
	I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI, the MAGA FBI.
	Something's very wrong with what I just heard.
	I mean, I watched it.
	I was hoping that they had caught the bastard who shot Charlie.
	So we saw a video of a person jumping off the roof.
	It looked very legitimate to me.
	However, there was no rifle in his hand.
	Now, the Mauser does not break down very easily, incidentally, for those of you who know weapons.
	Something's wrong with the whole thing.
	They're trying to claim he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fit the receiver and stock in his backpack and barrel in his pants, like all in two seconds.
	It is not easy to remove a Mauser barrel or index it after reinstalling and remain accurate.
	We are not hearing or seeing reality.
	And by the way, the photo of the rifle allegedly left in the woods has the barrel installed.
	So we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel and then he leaves it for us to find the FBI to find.
	I don't believe a word of it.
	I shouldn't do this.
	I know I'm putting myself at risk, but I can't take it anymore.
	I can't take the bullshit from this fucking government.
	It's lying to us.
	Something's wrong.
	Something's so wrong.
	It's sickening.
	Look at this idiot.
	They found the rifle and they're getting the prints.
	Are you stupid?
	Are you that stupid?
	Are you that dumb?
	The man jumps off the roof.
	There's no rifle there.
	Oh, it's in his backpack.
	I just told you, moron, that this rifle doesn't break down that easily.
	And then it's supposed to be reassembled while he's on the run.
	Wait, I'll stop now and reassemble it and leave it in the woods in a box wrapped in a towel.
	He left breadcrumbs.
	Oh, and the trans anti-the trans stuff on the cartridges.
	Bullshit.
	Something is wrong with this whole picture.
	So, bottom line here, guys, something doesn't smell right with this story.
	We're going to continue following it, continue looking into it.
	We'll bring you updates as they be released, as they become released.
	But now we're going to move in to another story all the way across the world.
	It's not in Israel.
	This time, we're going to Eastern Europe to the battlefields of New Khazaria, Ukraine.
	So, the Russo-Ukrainian war, it was supposed to end within 24 hours of President Donald J. Trump swearing back in.
	I was going to say putting his hand on that Bible and swearing his oath to office, but he didn't put his hand on that Bible.
	He went in and he swore his oath of office without putting his hand on the Bible.
	So, I guess President Trump going in and swearing or maybe affirming, maybe affirming his oath to office.
	We were told that within 24 hours of that happening, the war in Ukraine was going to be over.
	It was coming to an end.
	It was all done.
	But guess what?
	Here we are nearly nine months later.
	Today is September 15th.
	We are five days short of the nine-month anniversary of President Trump's inauguration as the 47th president of the United States.
	And not only is the war in Ukraine, the war that's extending into Russia and elsewhere, continuing to rage, but it's getting worse.
	It's spreading.
	So on the base report last week over on Stu's show, we covered the situation in Poland where Russian, I believe they're widely reported to be surveillance drones.
	These drones, they allegedly entered Polish airspace.
	They say it was an accident.
	NATO, of course, says that it was very intentional.
	And the Poles just, they couldn't react fast enough.
	They were so excited at the prospect of going to war with Russia.
	They scrambled their jets.
	It looks like other NATO nations were also scrambling their jets.
	They take to the skies.
	They shoot these drones down.
	They actually damaged civilian targets on their way down.
	They were so excited to shoot these Russian drones out of the sky that they blew the roof off of some poor guy's house.
	And then they call a Schedule 4 NATO meeting, the first step to orchestrating a massive NATO operation that would lead, of course, to not just to war with Russia, but to World War III, that would lead into white Christian men being fed into a meat grinder in Eastern Europe, even more so than they already are.
	That's exactly what NATO wants.
	That's exactly what the political handlers and the financial handlers and the military-industrial complex at the very top of the United States government, that's Israel's colonial authorities, so to speak.
	That is exactly what they want to feed Americans into a meat grinder in Eastern Europe, just like they've done in the Middle East.
	And this is one of the catalysts through which to do it.
	They are ramping this up because now it's not just Poland that says they're having Russian drone problems.
	It's also Romania.
	Romania scrambled jets.
	They have now summoned the Russian ambassador.
	We're going to share the screen here.
	This is on Axios.
	Romania becomes the second NATO nation.
	Why the hell is Romania in NATO anyways?
	Romania becomes the second NATO nation in a week to report Russian drone in its airspace.
	So we're moving right along here, guys.
	The violation of Romanian airspace by Russian drones is yet another unacceptable breach of an EU member state's sovereignty.
	This continued reckless escalation threatens regional security.
	We stand in solidarity with Romania.
	I am in close contact with the Romanian government.
	This is from a European official.
	So standing in solidarity with Romania in this case means standing up and saber rattling on behalf of Romania, telling Russia, hey guys, we can't wait to go to war with you.
	Whether these drones entered Romanian airspace or not, the fact of the matter is NATO countries, especially the United States, are flying drones over these other countries on a regular basis all the time.
	Do you think American drones or American satellites especially aren't sitting above Russian territory right now taking pictures?
	I mean, do you really think that's a possibility?
	Do you think the satellites from any NATO nation that you could think of that has satellites aren't spying on the Russians or spying on somebody else?
	Of course they are.
	Countries spy on each other all the time.
	But now Russian drones float into allegedly into Romanian airspace, into Polish airspace.
	And this is cause for NATO to get all excited, to get their panties all in a bunch.
	You know, literally, NATO, I mean, geez, look at the people running these NATO countries.
	They're run by a bunch of neoliberal women, okay, which are basically neoconservatives who put a smiley face and a rainbow on everything as they go in and start killing people, start wiping out entire countries and sending men to go die in their place.
	They're not going to fight in these wars.
	They're going to send some man to do it.
	They're going to send some working class white Christian man to go die in their place.
	An American, a German, a Brit, a Frenchy.
	It doesn't matter.
	If you're from NATO land, these people want to send you to die in Eastern Europe and elsewhere.
	And these drones are just the tip of the iceberg as this whole Ukrainian situation, this whole escalation for war in Ukraine, war in Eastern Europe continues playing out.
	We've, again, we've covered on the base report because this is an issue since the outset of the Russo-Ukrainian war.
	I've been following this closely because this is a situation like in Yugoslavia back in the 1990s, where the United States could very easily be dragged in to a kinetic conflict.
	And in Yugoslavia, we nearly had World War III.
	So I just mentioned something we covered on the base report.
	What that something was, because I stepped away from it for a second, was NATO peacekeepers going to Ukraine.
	Heavy air quotes around peacekeepers, okay?
	These so-called NATO peacekeepers, these are NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine.
	Russia straight up says these will be seen not as peacekeepers, but as legitimate combat targets, and we will target them.
	This is a red line.
	This is an act of war.
	That's the point.
	That's what NATO wants to happen.
	They want to serve these guys up on a silver platter to lose their lives for the sake of going to war with Russia, for the sake of starting World War III in New Khazaria.
	It's the same method that they used in Yugoslavia when the United States tried to order British forces, so-called peacekeepers, to attack Russian troops at an airport in what's now Serbia, and they denied the order.
	They refused to follow the order, and they quite literally stopped World War III from being triggered right then and there by engaging Russian troops.
	But the United States goons of Bill Clinton, who were commanding NATO, wanted a bunch of Englishmen to run in and kill a bunch of Russians and trigger the start of World War III.
	Well, now here we are nearly 30 years down the road, and we have the exact same situation taking place, forming right before our very own eyes.
	So-called NATO peacekeepers, they're about to go into Ukraine.
	They are going to be killed.
	And then NATO is going to use that as a catalyst, as a pretext for going to war with Russia.
	These so-called drones, whether they're flying over these countries or not, this is being used as a pretext for war, as a pretext to call Schedule IV NATO conventions and begin the process of going to war with Russia.
	This is what these people want.
	It's what they've wanted the entire time.
	And Donald Trump's handlers, Donald Trump's paymasters, they would have never allowed for him to end this war in 24 hours.
	That was never going to happen.
	That was red meat that was being thrown to the American people.
	That was red meat that was being thrown to conservatives who have become anti-war to the MAGA base who's anti-war.
	At least many of them were, but now you see many of them are just aligning with whatever they're told to do by Howard Lutnick and Donald Trump.
	And they're saying, oh, yeah, the strike on Iran was great.
	Oh, yeah, war in Ukraine is great.
	Oh, yeah, let's be owned and operated by Israel.
	But you know who wasn't doing that for the record was Charlie Kirk in the final days and the final weeks of his life.
	He was turning against all of that.
	So again, the plot thickens here.
	But regardless, guys, we are well on our way to a war in Eastern Europe.
	This is exactly what the people running our government want.
	In fact, they want us engaged in a two-front war, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, where Americans on both of these fronts are going and dying at the altar of none other than the international banking cabal, then international jewelry.
	BlackRock was about to be the catalyst for, and then I've really got to go.
	I've got to cut the show out, guys.
	But I want to get this last point out here.
	BlackRock was about to be the catalyst for America attacking Russia.
	I mean, a so-called American factory in Ukraine was allegedly hit by Russian, by a Russian attack.
	It was probably by a Ukrainian attack.
	This factory, this American factory was owned by BlackRock.
	Vanguard and State Street also owned huge chunks of it, but BlackRock is the number one holder in the company that runs this factory.
	And Vladimir Zelensky and all of the talking heads across the, not just across Ukraine and Europe, but across the United States, they came out and said Russia has struck an American factory.
	This is an act of war against the United States.
	How will Donald Trump respond?
	We must go to war with Russia.
	So every single week now, we have some new travesty, whether it's an American factory getting hit, an American factory.
	Again, heavy air quotes around that too.
	So whether it's a BlackRock factory being hit or some country that shouldn't even be a member of NATO scrambling jets because there's a drone or NATO so-called peacekeepers going into this war zone and Russia straight up telling us, don't do it.
	It's a red line.
	And NATO saying, hey, we're going to do it anyways.
	Whatever the case may be, every single week, sometimes every single day, we have a new event that is edging us closer to war, that's edging us closer to Americans being sent to die on behalf of other people,
	on behalf of people who are not Americans, on behalf of the creditors of the United States government in this usurious, disgusting, Jewish cabal of central banking that has seized control of our economy and every other country where they're able to get a foothold,
	every other country where they're able to topple the democratically elected government just like they did in Ukraine and gain a foothold and use it as a flea market for crime, for financial crime, for military crime, for human trafficking, for child sex trafficking, for organ trafficking, you name it.
	These people want to get their grubby, disgusting hands on any place that they can.
	And Ukraine is going to be the next domino to fall if they have anything to say about it.
	This war didn't end in 24 hours.
	It's still going on nearly nine months later.
	And it's about to get a whole lot worse if NATO and the U.S. government and their handlers and their creditors have anything to say about it.
	And in the process, by the way, along the way, guys, they're going to steal your right to free speech and they're going to attack your right to bear arms.
	That's all the time that we have.
	Oh, oh, how could I forget?
	And they're going to be taking trips back and forth to Israel while they do it, getting their instructions, going through the revolving door.
	Israel, U.S., Israel, U.S., whether they're Fed, state, or local, your government officials are owned and operated, and they are taking orders from their handlers.
	That is all the time that we have for this evening, guys.
	I am Frankie Stocks.
	This has been the inaugural episode of the Baste Report here on the Stew Peters Network.
	Thank you so much for tuning in.
	Stu, thank you so much for the platform.
	I love you, man.
	I love the Stew Peters Network.
	God bless every single one of you guys out there and I'll see you again tomorrow night.
	This is a bullet service unknown.
	Here come the most base mother coming straight at you.
	Base report.
	Frankie Stocks.
	Frankie Stocks.
	The base report.
	This is the base report.
	It's Frankie Sox.
	Frankie Stocks one is missing.
	Question and exposing their eyes.
	Cause they run off scared of the fallout.
	Cause they know all the secrets of fallout.
	They support only the truth.
	Exposing their crimes.
	This is the base report with Frankie Stocks.
	Out here in a country where the soil's rich and the water runs pure.
	We grow hemp that hits different American hemp hubs entourage line.
	It's not just a product.
	It's a vibe.
	Crafted from the finest Midwest hemp, we harness the Entourage effect, THC Plus and CBD Plus, teaming up to amplify the good and ditch the bad.
	This ain't your average buzz.
	It's bold.
	It's balanced.
	It's built for those who live life unfiltered.
	From the heart of the Midwest, we're rewriting the rules.
	No compromises, just results.
	Feel the freedom.
	Own.
	Moment.
	Explore your vibe through our Entourage line.
	Visit AmericanHemphub.com.
	Yo, America.
	Tired of the same old fizz?
	Say hello to SensiPop, the soda that slaps harder than a summer storm.
	Every can's loaded with 20 milligrams of naturally occurring THC, delivering a buzz that's smoother than a back road cruise and bolder than a dive-bar jukebox.
	This ain't your grandpa's soda pop.
	This is SensiPop, the American classic remixed for the modern vibe.
	From cornfields to concrete, Sensi Pop's got that spark to light up your night.
	Crack it, sip it, feel the pop.
	Sensi Pop, get ready to feel the fizz.
	Explore your vibes at AmericanHempHub.com.
	What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease, 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders.
	A number of different diagnoses, including diabetes and ADHD, and a number of them, in the unvaccinated group, they were zero.
	In other words, all these chronic diseases that we're accepting, the reality is maybe 99% of them don't have to exist in children.
	That's not the way God made us.
	They looked at over 47,000 Medicaid claims between 1999 and 2011.
	Those who are vaccinated versus unvaccinated, I say an odds ratio would be like 2.81.
	2.81 to 1.
	So that would be 181% increase.
	Epilepsy seizures, 252%.
	Learning disorders, 581%.
	If you look at all these different diagnoses, they're all higher.
	For example, I'll just give you one example.
	Learning disorders in the full term is 581%.
	In the preterm, the ones who are vaccinated, 884% increase.
	Every single vaccine has an excipient that is a human toxin.

▲