Stew Peters Show - THE BASED REPORT: Why Was Richard Nixon REALLY Forced Out of Office?

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 23, 2025 - Stew Peters Show

54:52

THE BASED REPORT: Why Was Richard Nixon REALLY Forced Out of Office?

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to the base report Frankie Stocks here on the Stu Peters Network.
	I'm your host, Frankie Stocks.
	Thanks to everyone for joining me here again this evening.
	We are going to have a show tonight that is based in a lot of history, that's based in a lot of precedent that's been set throughout this country's history.
	You know, I love talking about historical precedent.
	I have a real affection for history.
	I know that I've shared that with you guys many times since this show has started airing one hour a night, Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Eastern Time.
	Just a little reminder, you know, be here 7 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday on the Stu Peters Network.
	But back to the point.
	I know that I've shared with you guys a number of times since this show started that I'm a huge history fan.
	I always have been.
	History is what got me into the news, got me into following politics, because it was like you were looking at it all in real time.
	You know, you spend your whole childhood looking back, reading up on history, fascinated, always digging deeper and deeper and deeper.
	And then you realize one day, oh my gosh, the history that's happening right now, we're in it.
	It's taking place right before our very own eyes.
	The news, it's living history.
	So history is what got me into this.
	It got me to really being here and talking about all this stuff with you guys every night.
	And history is going to form the basis for our show this evening, because I think that the times that we're in, there is a lot.
	There is a lot to look back on in American history and say, okay, we've seen this before.
	What do we do next?
	We've seen this before.
	How can we deal with it?
	How can we let people know that what we're seeing right now has already happened?
	That the infiltration of our country that we're seeing by foreign subversives, for instance, that it's happened before.
	It's been ongoing.
	Various levels of severity ebbing and flowing through history.
	And right now, we're in a really, really bad point in history when we talk about just how deeply this country has been subverted again by foreigners, by hostile, malign foreign interests.
	So we're going to jump into that this evening.
	But before we do, there's actually another story that I want to do some historical citation on.
	And I think that this story right now, this is the biggest distraction in the entire country.
	And you know what we're being distracted from?
	Exactly what we were just talking about, foreign subversion.
	It's no coincidence to me that this week, the week that JD Vance is in Israel getting his marching orders from Benjamin Netanyahu, he just flew back today, spent a couple of days there.
	The week in which the Israelis announced that Marco Rubio is next in line, that he's coming to get marching orders once again from Benjamin Netanyahu.
	That guy's been on a revolving door in and out of Israel.
	The very week that that was announced, these back-to-back trips already coming on the heels of Trump's Knesset visit, his report back to Miriam Adelson and Benjamin Netanyahu coming as Israel constantly violates this so-called ceasefire, this so-called peace deal.
	And I say so-called because can we even call it that anymore?
	At the rate that this has been violated, at the amount of death and destruction that we've seen, over 100 civilians killed, more than 200 wounded.
	And those numbers are a couple days old at this point.
	Can we even call this a ceasefire?
	Can we even call this a peace deal?
	Or is this just a moment for the U.S. to regroup, for Israel to regroup, and then go in and flatten the rest of Gaza, remove or kill the rest of the people there, and do it with U.S. help?
	Give the U.S. government a few weeks, get their ducks in a row, get people calmed down, make people think it's over.
	Get some guys in position, get some armaments in position, get some money to Israel, and then give the Israelis a few weeks to get all their ducks in a row, to get all their U.S. munitions, to get all their U.S. money, to get all of their U.S. allies, allies, right?
	Heavy air quotes around allies in the region so that they can then facilitate attacks against them or directly carry out attacks against them themselves to rope the United States into a full-fledged conflict that flattens, destroys the remainder of whatever's left in Gaza and kills and displaces the rest of the people there.
	That's what we're in the middle of right now.
	And I think that our news cycle is being twisted and steered to draw this false ire, this false outrage from the general public so that they won't, so that they won't be pissed off about their government selling out to Israel,
	so that they won't be pissed off about foreign subversives, operating Congress, running Congress, walking through the halls of Congress, chairing the House Foreign Affairs Committee in their IDF uniforms.
	That's what the people are being distracted from.
	Now, yesterday, we talked about the curated manufactured wedge issues that are used to drive that wedge between the American people, drive that wedge between our consciousness and what's really going on, and get us laser focused on fighting each other and on having endless arguments about social issues or cultural issues, and not to dismiss the concept of social or cultural issues, but to say, look at what we face.
	You can see how this stuff has been planted.
	You can see how transgenderism was foisted upon us to distract from other things.
	You can see how our education system was torpedoed to distract from other things, to steer kids in another direction, and get their parents pissed off about how horrible their perverted schools are and get their eyes off of what's happening at the federal level and increasingly at the state and local level when we talk about foreign subversion.
	This whole cultural Marxist campaign on the United States, and this is what cultural Marxism is for.
	As much as it's a humiliation and sacrifice and conquest ritual of the United States and of the American people, the cultural Marxism that we see playing out before our very own eyes every single day in this country, that's for softening the target.
	That's for distracting the American people.
	So as much as it is to embarrass and humiliate and subjugate the American people, these cultural Marxism issues, this cultural Marxism, just full frontal assault, whether it's homosexuality, transgenderism, race mixing, whatever the case may be, open borders, all of these things are meant to soften the target.
	Get your eyes on these big key headline-grabbing issues and take them off of the foreign subversion that's making all of that possible.
	We knock out the foreign subversion.
	We route these people the hell out of our government.
	We route their little Shabos goy minions the hell out of our government.
	And all of a sudden, the other problems that we face, they start drying up.
	The solution is seizing back control of the United States government at all levels, regardless of how we have to do it, regardless of what the American people are forced to do to take back control of our country.
	Regardless of that, these people are pushed out of power.
	And all of a sudden, these other plagues that we face on our country, they'll start drying up.
	They'll start going away real quick because the people who are making it all possible, they've got to be marched out of D.C. They've got to be marched out of your state capitol building.
	They've got to be marched out of your town council or your county board.
	They've all got to go.
	Now, look, I said there was a distraction this week, and there is.
	There's a big distraction.
	And it's not a social issue.
	It's not a wedge issue.
	It's actually something that it seems to have been able to be just pushed into the forefront of millions of people's minds because I just mentioned our education system.
	People don't learn about our own country.
	They don't learn about our own people, about our own history.
	They just learn about whatever propaganda is getting beaten over their heads.
	So the average American, and I don't blame them for thinking this because this is what they've been told, likely believes that the White House is a perfect historical relic that has sat there since the day it was constructed, untouched, unimpeded, no renovations, no nothing.
	This is the very same White House that Ulysses S. Grant was sitting in in the 1800s.
	I don't know why I picked Grant.
	He just popped into mind when I was thinking of an 1800s president.
	But regardless, that's what a lot of people tend to believe, that the White House is this totally untouched, unrenovated historical relic.
	But it's not.
	It's been renovated many, many times.
	So, I'm bringing up the renovations of the White House for the purpose of saying what is a story that's been thrown up in our faces all week, a manufactured outrage story.
	Oh my gosh, it's the end of the world.
	It's the end of America as we know it.
	Trump is building some tacky ballroom at the White House.
	They're knocking down parts of the East Wing.
	It's all over.
	Don't you understand?
	This is where Abraham Lincoln walked.
	And no, it's not.
	It's really not.
	It's not at all.
	Now, look, you can have whatever opinions you want on the ballroom, the construction of the ballroom.
	I've seen the plans.
	I mean, what can you say?
	It looks flashy.
	It looks eye-catching.
	It looks gigantic.
	From the little models, it looks like it might be like some kind of eyesore once it's built there because it might be like too big in proportion to the rest of the building.
	But again, I'm just saying this from what I've seen online as far as plans and little renderings that they're showing.
	So I guess the jury's still out on that.
	That's not the point here.
	We can think whatever we want about this ballroom.
	The point is, the White House is not sitting there in some kind of pristine condition as it was 150 years ago.
	The White House has been renovated.
	The White House has been altered.
	Nearly every president has made some kind of change, whether it's cosmetic or otherwise, to the White House since this country, since the president has been occupying the White House in this country.
	Which, you know what?
	I didn't have the year pulled up.
	What was the first year a president lived in the White House?
	Because you know, our Capitol was moved multiple times.
	It was not until 1800 when the White House was nearly completed that its first residents, President John Adams and his wife Abigail, moved in.
	Since that time, each president has made his own changes and additions.
	The White House, after all, is the president's private home.
	That's the quick result from the Google search there.
	But so, yeah, 1800.
	And since then, president after president after president has made changes to it, but we're having this manufactured outrage.
	And I mean, people are pissed about this.
	People are furious about this.
	This is manufactured.
	We have manufactured refugees.
	We have a manufactured border collapse.
	We have manufactured wars.
	Well, we have manufactured outrage as it comes to the architecture of the White House.
	And all of this is distracting us from the fact that the people behind all this, the people who made this renovation possible in the first place, the people who are running the government, they're not the bad guys because they knocked down part of the White House.
	They're the bad guys because they've sold our country out from underneath us.
	They're the bad guys because they are actively putting Americans and America in grave danger.
	They are actively selling this country down the river, selling this country's people down the river to foreign influence operatives, foreign influence operations, and subversives.
	And again, I've said this for the past few days, and I'll say it again.
	It's not just Israel.
	There's the Chinese, there's the Indians.
	Every country in the world wants a piece of the United States.
	But when you look at the influence operations, the malign foreign influence operations that are linked to these other countries, and you start peeling back the layers, you find Israeli interests.
	You find Jewish power brokers.
	You find people like Mark Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein's brother, financing something that appears to be a Chinese Communist Party influence operation in the Humpty Dumpty Institute, but in reality is an Israeli front.
	So that's what you find when you peel back the layers.
	So let's just go straight to it.
	This week, we are seeing our government sell this country out to Israel once again.
	Trump, Vance, Rubio, revolving door.
	Netanyahu's in D.C., they're in Israel.
	Netanyahu's in D.C., they're in Israel.
	They're standing in front of the flag.
	They're touching the wall.
	They're taking orders from BB.
	They're taking orders from the Knesset.
	It's a revolving door with these people, a revolving door of treason, a merry-go-round of treason.
	That is exactly what this is.
	That is what our government is up to every single day, every single day.
	But we're being confronted with stories where we're supposed to be pissed about some renovations, where we're supposed to think that America is under attack because there's bulldozers knocking down part of the White House and rebuilding it.
	No, no, America's under attack because in that building, there are foreign subversives.
	In that building, there is a president who was purchased by AIPAC and Miriam Adelson and Benjamin Netanyahu for we say $200 million.
	That's just the APAC money.
	That's not looking at all the different conduits that APAC funnels money through.
	That's not looking at all of the different funding channels that went into making Trump president.
	So when we say he's the $200 million man, that's a minimum.
	So we're looking at the White House and we're seeing a place that's occupied by foreign agents, including the president at this point.
	And I don't take pleasure in saying that.
	Everybody knows.
	I voted for Trump all three times.
	I mean, the joke's on me, right?
	I voted for Trump all three times.
	And then now we see here the veil is pulled all the way down.
	And this guy's selling this country out every step of the way.
	This guy is the president, not of peace, but of war.
	This guy is the president, not of mass deportations, but of fake deportation numbers.
	I was a single issue voter, mass deportations.
	I don't want my son to be a minority in his own country.
	I don't want myself to be a minority in my own country, but I certainly don't want my son and my nieces and my nephew to be a minority in their own country.
	But guess what?
	That was just another Trump rug pull.
	Where's the mass deportations?
	And are people asking about the mass deportations or are more of these distractions just being thrown up in our faces?
	Hey, Goy, pay attention to this.
	Don't worry about the deportation numbers.
	Pay attention to this.
	Hey, don't worry about that.
	Don't you want to hear about the black guy we arrested in D.C. with the National Guard?
	No, I want to hear about the foreign subversives and the foreign invaders being thrown out of this country.
	That's what I want to hear about.
	Speaking of historical precedent, how about Operation Wetback?
	When are we going to get a modern day Operation Wetback?
	A real, legitimate military operation to remove invaders from this country.
	Why do we have a military if we're not protecting the U.S. homeland, if we're not protecting our own soil?
	Why does America even have a standing army?
	The founders, more historical precedent, the founders, they believed the standing armies were dangerous for liberty.
	They believed that they'd be weaponized against the American people, just like the British Army was weaponized against British subjects, including the Americans.
	And guess what?
	That's happening.
	That in more ways than one, both from the aspect of troops being turned inward toward the United States as this AI surveillance state is installed under the guise of coming riding in on the white horse to save the American people with the Trump administration calling the shots in command.
	And then we see that's not happening at all.
	400,000 illegals deported over the span of months, more than half a year.
	400,000?
	There's 50 million of these people in our country right now.
	400,000?
	And you're telling me that we need American forces sent overseas?
	You're telling me that we need an AI surveillance state installed in direct partnership with the U.S. military?
	They've got the Indian AI overlord partnering with the U.S. military.
	I can't think of the guy's name off the top of my head, that grotesque looking troll-like Indian who's now running AI for the U.S. military under Trump.
	And then, of course, you've got the guys from Palantir linked into all of it.
	This is dangerous to the American people.
	This is dangerous to our freedom.
	That's the point.
	By design, it's dangerous to our freedom.
	That's what an AI surveillance state is.
	It stalks you.
	It follows you.
	It predicts what you're going to do next.
	Like the minority report.
	I remember seeing, I can't remember what movie I was seeing, but I remember being a fairly decently young.
	I'm not sure when the movie came out.
	I was like kid age, you know, late elementary school, middle school, something like that.
	And I remember being in the movie theater and seeing a preview for the minority report.
	And that I don't think I've ever seen the movie, but the preview has always stuck with me where they come in and they're arresting the guy for a murder that they claim he's going to commit in the future.
	I mean, that's where we're going.
	Americans being arrested for an act of anti-Semitism that they're predicted to program to commit in the future.
	That the AI program says you're going to commit this act of anti-Semitism in the future because your palantir profile that we've been building on you since you were a child says that you're an anti-Semite, says that you're a fan of hate speech, says that your mouth can't be controlled, says that you might ask too many questions, do too much noticing.
	So we're going to have to arrest you because you're going to commit a crime eventually.
	The AI system tells us so.
	That's the direction that the U.S. military is being sent toward by the Trump administration.
	Instead of being sent toward our own borders, it's being sent toward implementing an AI surveillance state.
	And in the meantime, in the meantime, while they get all of that set up, while they get all of the guys in place, all of the unelected, and these guys that they're putting in to run the AI, they're not even military guys.
	These aren't military men.
	These are dorks.
	It's like revenge of the nerds.
	They're giving control over the U.S. military to a bunch of computer freaks.
	I mean, that's who's heading this up.
	That's who's running the technocracy, the surveillance state that we see being unrolled right now, right up in our faces.
	And our best guys, Americans who with pure intentions, people who want to protect this country, people who signed up and joined the military, especially in the combat roles.
	And by the way, you know, you look out at the demographics of the military and in combat roles, heritage Americans vastly outnumber others.
	We always hear about how all these illegals want to serve in the military, but heritage Americans vastly outweigh the number of combat arms, soldiers, Marines, sailors, airmen in the U.S. military, vastly outweigh foreigners or illegals or newcomers or whatever.
	But regardless, these guys, these American patriots who step up and say, I want to serve my country.
	I mean, you're mostly joining the military when you're 18 years old, 19 years old, 20 years old.
	You're not well versed yet in everything that's going on.
	You're not deep into the bowels of looking into the political system and who's running it and the purpose that the wars this country has been involved with over the past several decades, the purpose that they've served and who those wars have served, what foreign powers they've served.
	You're young.
	You're in many respects still a kid.
	You're not well versed in all of that.
	Joining the military is seen as a very, very high expression of patriotism.
	It's seen as I am stepping up to serve this country, to protect this country from enemies foreign and domestic, right?
	And then these guys who join the military with pure intentions, before they can realize how bad things really are, they're sent off to Eastern Europe.
	They're sent off to Qatar so that they can be on standby to go blitzing into Israel, blitzing into Gaza.
	When BB gives the order, they're sent off to the coast of Venezuela, pretty soon to Colombia, to Taiwan.
	Our best guys, some of our most patriotic young Americans, they step up, they try to commit themselves to a noble cause, and then they're sent elsewhere.
	Why aren't they sent to the border?
	Because then they'd actually be protecting America.
	And that's not the purpose in this government.
	Again, standing armies, to bring it back to the historical point here, standing armies, our founders told us are dangerous to liberty.
	They're dangerous to this country.
	And we see why.
	We see why, because some of our best guys are pulled into the military.
	They join the military.
	They're sent overseas.
	They're sent to their deaths.
	They're sent to experience and witness terrible things that bother them for the rest of their lives.
	So that in the meantime, we can have a bunch of subversives here running our country into the ground and opening up our borders.
	And we don't have a military to send to protect it because they're all overseas.
	What are we left with?
	A bunch of like supply clerk lesbians?
	Those are the type of people who get on TikTok and are like, yeah, I'm in the army.
	And let me tell you.
	And I'm citing a specific video here.
	You'll probably get the reference.
	I'm in the army and I'm a lesbian.
	And let me tell you, when they give us the order to shoot Americans, we're going to do it.
	That's what this bulldyke in the army, I believe it was, said in that viral TikTok video.
	Those are the types of people who they keep on the home front, who they will gather and deploy against American citizens, while real hard-nosed American patriots who wanted to step up and fight for this country are deployed overseas and taken completely off of the chessboard as we're talking about domestic issues here.
	So it's really, it's just a weaponization of another branch of government.
	Every branch of government, every department of government has been weaponized against the American people.
	And we're, again, we are distracted, not just by the wedge issues we discussed yesterday.
	We're distracted by the rage bait stories that appear in the media every single day, like this one in D.C., the tearing down of the east wing of the White House.
	Now, look, just to drive this home and how the White House has been effectively torn down entirely previously, I've got the wiki page pulled up here.
	This was just the, you know, not to endorse Wikipedia.
	They're basically a propaganda arm, but this page has pictures.
	It's got some descriptions.
	And so, I'll just go ahead and share the screen because in 1948, President Harry Truman had the White House renovated and they basically knocked the entire thing down.
	So, the White House Reconstruction, also known as the Truman Reconstruction, was a comprehensive dismantling and rebuilding of the interior of the White House from 1949 to 1952.
	In 1948, after nearly a century and a half of wartime destruction, rebuilding, hurried renovations, additions of new services, technologies, the added third floor, and inadequate foundations, architectural and engineering investigations found that the executive residence portion of the White House complex was facing near imminent collapse and it was deemed unsafe for occupancy.
	President Harry S. Truman and his family and the entire resident staff were relocated across the street to the Blair House.
	And over the next three years, the White House was gutted, expanded, and rebuilt.
	See, they had the whole place, they had it ripped out.
	The White House had been worked on so much throughout the years.
	And let's not forget in the War of 1812, part of it was burnt down.
	It had been worked on.
	There had been so many changes made throughout the years that they had to basically knock it over and start again.
	Now, they didn't knock down the entire shell of the building.
	And that was because Truman believed, and I actually agree, I think rightfully so, that if they had just gone in and just demolished the entire White House, the shell and all, and said, We're just going to rebuild it, it would have been psychologically traumatizing or discouraging for the American people to see images, especially just after the win in World War II.
	And then you see what happens, they come in with a wreck-in ball and they knock down the White House.
	And really, I mean, that would have been symbolic in a lot of ways.
	World War II, the total ushering in of the new world order, everything that was put into place with the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913, if they had come in and completely knocked down the White House and rebuilt it after World War II, that would be like a changing of the guard.
	That would be like the new world order, the new internationalist, globo, homo-American government.
	Here we are knocking down the White House of your forefathers and building a new one.
	I mean, that would be quite the psychological image to present to the people.
	And it may, it honestly may have made more people realize the reshuffling and the realignment of this country that we were going through in the wake of World War II.
	But Truman, and I think correctly, from a perspective of what you see when you look at something, I think correctly, Truman said the American people would be negatively impacted if they saw their White House knocked over.
	And again, that very likely was advice that was given to Truman saying, Hey, look, we're remaking the entire country.
	We're about to open the borders.
	We're about to install Judeo-Bolshevik communism in this country.
	So if we knock over the White House, you know, all the way, if we don't leave the shell, it's going to be too symbolic.
	People say, oh my gosh, out with the old, in with the new America 2.0.
	People would track the establishment of this new bastardized version of America that we're living in today.
	And it would be a watershed moment, a watershed point.
	So they went with the interior total renovation.
	They even took down all the original supports in the building and everything, and they replaced it with a steel frame.
	So the White House are still total steel guts.
	The White House has been renovated.
	It's been effectively demolished before.
	And the whole reason that I went into this story was really to bring about the point that this is yet another manufactured outrage, rage bait moment to distract us from what's really going on.
	That the people who ordered this ballroom construction, these people are foreign agents.
	It's not about knocking down part of the East Wing and rebuilding it.
	It's about, hey, guess what?
	These people are foreign subversives.
	They're owned by a foreign country, by a foreign people.
	And we're being distracted from it in every way imaginable.
	This week, it's the East Wing project.
	Next week, it'll be something else.
	Either way, the answer to all of this: if you don't want the White House renovated, if you don't want our kids going to school and being groomed, and then that being thrown up in our faces as some kind of political haymaking machine and any of the other just filth and depravity that goes along with this, if you don't want it, we have to change our government.
	These people who are in power now, they have to be driven out.
	They've got to be taken out of power by the American people.
	And just like our founders said, just like our founders did, we must have a government established by and for us, by and for the American people.
	This is our country.
	This country doesn't belong to the government or to people who work for the government.
	This country belongs to us.
	This country doesn't belong to the foreign invaders that our subverted government has brought into here.
	This country belongs to us, to Americans.
	And we need to take it back.
	So, look, we're going to talk more about this in the next segment.
	I'm going to kind of take us another stroll back through history here because I really want to get into, you know, we look, we all know.
	I'll just, I'll just tee it up right here before we go to break.
	We all know what happened to President John F. Kennedy.
	We all know that he was murdered.
	He was publicly assassinated, much like Charlie Kirk, because he was noticing, because he was asking questions and not just asking questions, he was pushing back.
	But President Kennedy, he is not the only president who asked too many questions, who noticed too much Jewish, Israeli, Zionist, whatever you want to call it, subversion of the United States government.
	He wasn't the first and he wasn't the last.
	He was infamously murdered by these people, but he wasn't the last to lose his presidency one way or the other because he started to notice.
	And somebody had to make the call.
	The Goyam No shut it down.
	So we're going to get into that in the next segment.
	We're going to cut to break right now for a word from our sponsors.
	I'm Frankie Stocks.
	This is the base report here on the Stew Peters Network.
	And by the way, we're brought to you by AmericanHempHub.com, promo code Frankie at checkout.
	Free shipping on orders over $40.
	I'll see you guys in a moment.
	Out here in the driftless region where the soil's rich and the water runs pure, we grow hemp that hits different.
	American Hemp Hub's Entourage Line, it's not just a product, it's a vibe.
	Crafted from the finest Midwest hemp, we harness the entourage effect.
	THC Plus and CBD Plus teaming up to amplify the good and ditch the bad.
	This ain't your average buzz.
	It's bold.
	It's balanced.
	It's built for those who live life unfiltered.
	From the heart of the Midwest, we are rewriting the rules.
	No compromises, just results.
	Feel the freedom.
	Own moment.
	Explore your vibe through our entourage line.
	visit AmericanHempHub.com.
	Yo, America, tired of the same old fizz?
	Say hello to SensiPop, the soda that slaps harder than a summer storm.
	Every can's loaded with 20 milligrams of naturally occurring THC, delivering a buzz that's smoother than a back road cruise and bolder than a dive bar jukebox.
	This ain't your grandpa's soda pop.
	This is Sensi Pop, the American classic remix for the modern vibe.
	From cornfields to concrete, Sensi Pop's got that spark to light up your night.
	Crack it, sip it, feel the pop.
	Sensi Pop, get ready to feel the fizz.
	Explore your vibes at AmericanHempHub.com.
	Welcome back to the BASE Report with Frankie Stocks here on the Stu Peters Network.
	I'm your host, Frankie Stocks.
	Thanks to everybody for sticking with me through that break.
	Thanks to everybody for tuning in this evening.
	Now, with this second half of the show, I've really been looking forward to covering this for the past couple of days as I've been kind of doing some research and trying to find a time in the news cycle where we can jump in and we can talk about this.
	I teed it up sort of at the end of the last segment there.
	So I want to just jump really straight into this so that we can make the most of the time that we have left.
	And what I want to discuss is President Richard Milhouse Nixon.
	Was Richard Nixon a noticer?
	Did Richard Nixon know what was really going on?
	And is that why he was taken out?
	Is that part of why he was taken out?
	I mentioned before the break, we know that President John F. Kennedy, he paid with his life.
	He wanted to keep Israel from getting nukes.
	He wanted APAC to register as a foreign agent.
	And he paid with his life, publicly murdered in front of his own citizens.
	Forever changed the way that this country functions, forever changed the relationship between the American people and their government.
	That was a watershed moment in American history.
	Nothing was the same.
	And with Watergate and with Richard Nixon, obviously I was alive for neither.
	But looking back as someone who enjoys history, as someone who enjoys political-oriented, news-oriented history, Watergate, I mean, that's a watershed moment.
	Watergate was a major, major marker in American history.
	And it was a major marker in the way that Americans viewed their government.
	It was a moment in which the trust that Americans had was eroded.
	And it's not that we should trust our government, it's that it was such a rapid, immediate heel turn from, yeah, you know, I'm the average American, Joe Smo, and I trust the government and I think that they've been voted in to do what's right for me.
	And then it turns into, no, I don't trust the government at all.
	They're crooks.
	I voted for Nixon and he was a crook.
	You know, whatever.
	It was a moment in which the way that Americans viewed their government and the voting process and what these people do once they get into office, where it was really forever changed and not in a good way, not in a good way at all.
	And it's when we look back on this and we see Watergate used as an example all the time, as like a dark chapter in American history.
	It almost seems like this was, you know, kind of planned.
	Like, hey, what's something that we can do to get rid of a president that we don't like to erode what trust the Americans have left in their government and to just let everybody know to send a signal?
	It was bad enough after the 1965 Immigration Act.
	It was bad enough a couple years before that, after President John F. Kennedy was shot.
	It was bad enough when this happened and that happened, when we saw our forces be mismanaged into massive American death in Vietnam, thanks to the White House, thanks to Lyndon B. Johnson trying to run the Vietnam War from the White House, which America never should have been in the first place.
	But regardless, all of these bad, ugly parts of American history that the people saw and they were still clinging on to whatever, whatever hope, whatever faith they had in the country, in the ability to vote in a government to effectively run the country, Watergate put a real dagger in that.
	It put a real dagger in it.
	And it's been used and enforced as a psyop.
	I mean, turn on the TV anytime some appointee in the federal government gets fired and they're complaining it to Watergate.
	It's a massacre.
	They've fired the investigators.
	It's a massacre.
	This guy from the Department of Education being fired is just like Watergate.
	Don't you see?
	I mean, this is like a trope.
	It's like calling somebody Hitler.
	You compare them to Nixon.
	You compare whatever situation they're into Watergate.
	It's a historical event that's used to beat the American people over the head and to immediately paint anyone as a villain who gets tied to some kind of money.
	They use GATE on anything.
	I mean, remember Deflate Gate with the New England Patriots?
	Spygate?
	There's GATE on like anything.
	And once you add that gate to it, it's bad.
	Once you add gate to it, it's noteworthy.
	So it's a very interesting just event in American history at the surface level, anyways, because of how consequential it's been, not just on our relationship with our government, not just on the way that the people view the government, not just on the way that the people view the media, but on the way that people speak in general.
	You know, the Watergate is a hotel.
	It's where the DNC had their shop set up, had their headquarters set up for the election, for the 72 election.
	It's a hotel in DC.
	You can go in there and you can look and they have the room where this burglary supposedly happened.
	They have the room where that went down and they have it set up to look how it looked or close to how it looked at the time this happened.
	But regardless, the whole Watergate deal, and that's sort of just where we're jumping into this.
	But I want to get more into Richard Nixon himself, but I want to go through Watergate here because the entire Watergate deal was used to bring down Richard Nixon, a man who was a noticer.
	If the recordings that we have on him are to be believed, and these are publicly available recordings.
	I've posted a couple of them on X. I've seen them be posted before.
	This isn't like anything new.
	I'm not breaking an exclusive scoop here with these recordings.
	But this is the type of stuff that we need to go back on and look at and examine and be like, wow, given what we know happened to this man, given that we know that the Watergate burglary, which was run by a bunch of Intel assets, which Nixon didn't sign off on, but which was run by people who were actually linked to the Kennedy assassination, like E. Howard Hunt.
	You know, given that that's who was in the middle of Watergate, wouldn't it make sense that this was something that was that was done, maybe if it was even done, but we'll say it was done, that this burglary was done by these government operatives so that they could then use this as a catalyst to destroy Richard Nixon and his administration and drive him out of office and then give it to the Washington Post.
	You know, everybody talks about Bob Woodward.
	How about Carl Bernstein, the Jewish character in all this, the Jewish reporter who, alongside Bob Woodward, broke this story.
	But, you know, look, my thought on that, my hypothesis here is it would have been a little too suspicious if they had some Jewish journalist as the face of this whole thing.
	And so they had to get Bob Woodward.
	That's an American-sounding enough name, right?
	Woodward?
	What's that, Anglo-Saxon?
	Bob Woodward, old Bobby, the all-American boy.
	So they get somebody like Bob Woodward to run points on this story and to put all of this out through the Jewish press, which, by the way, Nixon knew it was a Jewish press and he's on tape saying as much.
	Run this story through the Jewish press and use it to bring down a president who's obviously becoming J-pilled in some way, shape, or form.
	Now, people have tried to throw arguments out there at me about this and say Nixon gave aid to Israel, Nixon did this or whatever.
	That's fine.
	I am sure that Richard Nixon did because Richard Nixon was president of the United States.
	And I don't know a president that hasn't done that.
	You can look at things and say, oh, John F. Kennedy was pro-Israel because he gave this speech or because he signed this.
	The deal here is these are guys who are on record turning against them, noticing something ain't right here.
	Whether it's the Israelis, whether it's the Jews themselves, something ain't right.
	Much like Charlie Kirk, he noticed something ain't right.
	And look what happened to him.
	So what?
	These people get killed.
	They get framed and forced out of public life.
	And with Richard Nixon, if Watergate was a hoax, if Watergate was a political screw job, a political stabbing of Richard Nixon to get him out of the way, to get him out of office, because this was an extremely, extremely popular president.
	And if this was to get him out of the way, because he was noticing a little too much, because he was acting too much in the interests of the American people, because he was putting America first and not Israel first, well, then that would make total sense that that would be at the center of Watergate.
	And I said, let's show this before we go any further.
	I said a minute ago, Nixon was such a popular president.
	This is the 1972 electoral map.
	Nixon swept virtually the entire country.
	McGovern won Massachusetts and DC, and then there was a faithless elector in Virginia.
	There's so many instances in modern history where Virginia just does like stupid cuck stuff.
	It really, it really gets under my skin.
	But this faithless elector like kind of ruins the sea of Nixonian support all across the country.
	But the point here is, I mean, look at this.
	I mean, this is an American president all over the country.
	The American people support this guy.
	They're united in their support, saying we want this guy as our president.
	You don't have to go down the list of every single thing Richard Nixon did and in retrospect say, I like this, I didn't like that.
	I like this.
	That speaks for itself.
	And George McGovern was a leftist, like a freaking pinko.
	So the American people were rejecting this pinko-Judeo communism that was being thrust upon them by the Democrats.
	And of course, we know by the Republicans, we talked last week about the neocons and their conquest of the Republican Party.
	So don't think I'm letting them off easy here.
	What I'm getting at here is Richard Nixon was an outward anti-communist.
	Richard Nixon was openly anti-pinko, anti-communist takeover of the United States.
	You often saw in 2016 Trump compared to Richard Nixon because Nixon was an anti-communist and Trump was being framed at that time as an anti-communist.
	I mean, Nixon was close with Joseph McCarthy.
	He was on the early in his career, he worked on the trial of Alger Hiss.
	So this is a guy who was demonstrably anti-communist throughout his life.
	And then he becomes president in the election where, again, he massive defeat nationwide over a pinko candidate.
	And then all of a sudden, you have this Watergate thing come up and bite him and force him out of office.
	I mean, that's crazy when you think back to what Watergate even supposedly was, where they were going in and they were looking for some files that could potentially be damaging.
	I mean, and then they, what, they threw a bunch of pills around in the hotel room to make it look like drug addicts had broken in, right?
	That's that's an aspect of this story.
	So, like, the whole thing reads like some kind of idiotic op that was poorly run from the beginning, which it was.
	And then they use it to come back and bite Richard Nixon and stab Richard Nixon in the back.
	But what's at the center of all of this?
	That Richard Nixon, and you can't ignore this.
	You can't ignore it.
	When you see what happens to people who are noticers, you see the way that they are routed out of positions of influence, the way that they're even killed.
	You see what happens to them.
	And then you see, you listen to Richard Nixon's own words, which we're going to do here in just a second.
	And you see, okay, yeah, Richard Nixon, he was noticing and they had to get rid of him.
	So let's listen to a couple of recordings here.
	The first one, this is a Nixon recording on the Jewish domination of media.
	The media, of course, that took him out.
	The media was at the center of Watergate.
	And guess what?
	Nixon knew they were run by Jews the entire time.
	Take a look at this.
	the media listening in agreement is the Reverend Billy Graham Today, Dr. Graham declined to discuss those remarks.
	They're Jews.
	They're Jews.
	I mean, he just rattles through the different publications.
	He outs them all for exactly what they are.
	And look, I know that was a recording.
	It caught my mind a second ago.
	I said, watch this before I cut to the clip.
	I know it was a recording.
	So my mistake.
	Please forgive me.
	But look, regardless here, Richard Nixon was noticing.
	Richard Nixon knew that the media had been subverted by these Jews.
	And Richard Nixon knew that our government had been subverted by these Jews.
	Here's another recording, Richard Nixon on the Jewish subversion of the US government.
	See, the Jews are all in the government.
	And we have got to get in those areas.
	We've got to get the man in charge who's not Jewish to control the Jewish Jews.
	I sure, you know, I mean, you have a guard and a Kissinger.
	And Randy is satire.
	Those are the words of President Richard Nixon.
	He didn't want Jews anywhere near sensitive positions.
	He didn't want them in seats of power in the U.S. government.
	And this is a guy who his administration was full of him.
	I mean, Henry Kissinger.
	I mean, so this is a guy who was being obviously surrounded by these people who had been in government for quite some time because there was a lot of bridging of personnel in the U.S. government, especially hovering around the executive branch.
	When you look back through these administrations in the late 50s into the 60s and 70s, like there's a line of people, like Kissinger was a guy who was floating around DC for, I mean, not just through the 70s, for decades until his death.
	I mean, this guy, he was caught on tape saying straight up, I thought that the Ukrainians blew up the Nord Stream pipeline themselves, which they did.
	But he thought he was saying this in a conversation with Vladimir Zelensky, because this is a guy who was so plugged in to the geopolitical, nefarious establishment all around the world from way back then until present time that he was in all of that.
	He was mixed up in all of that.
	And so Richard Nixon saying, that's who immediately popped into my mind when Richard Nixon is saying, I don't want these Jews in these positions of power.
	Because look at what they done.
	Look at what they had done to this country, for instance, through Vietnam.
	I mean, look at the damage that had been caused.
	And then you have this whole, which I've always wondered, was this some kind of 3D type of chess move, 6 million D type of chess move where they goad Nixon into opening up relations with China just to then weaponize China against the United States.
	I mean, obviously, I think that's what it was.
	I don't know who pushed Nixon over the edge of saying, let's open up relations with China.
	Let's bring China onto the world stage.
	But that happened under Nixon.
	And then when you learn about the subversives that have been penetrating our government for over a century now, and you learn that they were in place, well established, entrenched by the time Nixon got there.
	And you see, okay, this guy signed off on opening up relations with China, which then rapidly led to China's rise to then being a place where America was our manufacturing, our means of production were sold out from underneath us and sent to China.
	And Richard Nixon, that wasn't his intention at all.
	He thought he was weaponizing China against the Soviet Union, taking advantage of the Sino-Soviet split.
	And so you see that whole thing turned around and weaponized against America.
	And it's like, which Jew in the Nixon administration, which, whose 6 million D chess move was that?
	To weaponize opening up relations with China against the United States before anybody could realize that that's what was happening.
	And then you hear Nixon on tape in his own words saying, I don't want these people in positions of power within my administration.
	I mean, I think it says a lot.
	I think he saw how things were going.
	I think he saw the direction that things were heading.
	And I think that he might have seen it a little too much.
	He may have talked about it a little too much.
	And then some of those very same Jews that he was mentioning in the media, they got a hold from some inside deep state source in the government, deep throat, right?
	They get this story and they run with it.
	And pretty soon, Richard Nixon is destroyed.
	He's thrown out of office.
	And you have Gerald Ford, this clown.
	So I just looked it up because I wasn't sure of exactly who the guy was.
	Mark Felt.
	You look up who's deep throat.
	William Mark Felt Sr. was an American law enforcement officer who had worked at the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 1942 to 1973 and was known for his role in uncovering the Watergate scandal.
	And he shared it with Bob Woodward, who shared it with Carl Bernstein.
	That's what they say, right?
	That's the story that they tell us.
	Obviously, this guy was meant to give that information to the Washington Post.
	And this was meant to fall into the hands of some Jewish-run publication so that they could pick up the next leg of whatever operation they were running to get Nixon out of office.
	Because again, they brought in Gerald Ford, the president that nobody elected.
	Nobody voted.
	He was elected to Congress.
	He was the speaker of the House.
	They didn't, nobody voted for Gerald Ford.
	They got rid of the president.
	They got rid of the vice president.
	And then here comes Gerald Ford, right?
	So he was the perfect guy to put in as a placeholder because you knew that he wouldn't win re-election anyways.
	To then you run your little, speaking of pinkos, I mean, you run Jimmy Carter.
	Now, I got to give it to Jimmy Carter.
	He doesn't seem like he was too, you know, he got pushed back on a little bit in his later years for not being supportive enough of Israel.
	So he doesn't seem like he was too much of a shill.
	But of course, he's like related to Van Jones, who is a total Israel shill, related, of course, by marriage.
	Van Jones is black.
	But regardless, somebody in Jimmy Carter's family married into the guy.
	So this is obviously somebody who's involved in the machine very, very closely in the machine.
	And he was just another placeholder until you could get to Neocon Reagan, the brainchild of the Trotskyites, of the Israel First Crowd, which we're about out of time here, but I want to play one more clip.
	This is Richard Nixon talking about this Jewish lobby, this very same Israel first crowd, after his presidency.
	Play the clip.
	Let me explain something about what is called the Jewish lobby in this country.
	Their belief is that being for Israel first, that does not mean you're putting America second.
	An American president, however, has to approach it in a different way, in my opinion.
	He's got always to think first of what is best for America.
	An American president must make a decision that does not, in effect, give the Israelis a blank check.
	And one example of that is a decision that I made.
	I decided early on in our administration that we were going to seek good relations with Egypt and other others of Israel's neighbors.
	Many of my Israeli friends didn't like that because they wanted a special relationship with Israel and Israel only.
	Nixon had dealt with those people.
	He had brushed up against those people.
	They're the people who pushed him out of office.
	I think that we can be pretty confident in saying that.
	And they're the people who are still running our country to this day.
	They're the people who are still barking orders at our politicians to this day.
	And they're the people who are inflicting these wedge issues on the American people.
	This is a foreign influence lobby.
	And it's not just Jews.
	Of course, it's a Jewish lobby.
	But you have plenty of these mind-controlled Shabos-goy so-called Christians pushing them along the way in government, in churches, on TV, in local political circles, all over the place.
	This is an occupation of the United States and of our political system and of our government.
	And it's been going on for a very, very long time.
	And that we talk about the John F. Kennedy example a lot.
	There's more examples out there.
	I wish we had more time to dig further into the Richard Nixon example, but we'll talk about it again.
	We'll cite this again.
	But I'm out of time here tonight, guys.
	Here on the base report with Frankie Stocks.
	Stu is up next.
	Thank you so much for joining me and God bless.
	Here come the Low Space Mother coming straight at you.
	Based report, Frankie Stocks, Frankie Stocks.
	The base report.
	This is the base report of Frankie Stocks.
	Frankie Stocks runs missing.
	Question and exposing their lives.
	Cause they run off scared of the call out.
	Cause they know all the secrets will fall out.
	They support on the truth.

▲